the bikeable city masterclass - embarq

Transcription

4 -10 May 2014, Copenhagen
THE BIKEABLE CITY
MASTERCLASS - EMBARQ
Evaluation // APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Annex 1: Participants
Annex 2: Trainers and Facilitators
Annex 3: The Week’s Program
Annex 4: The Day’s Program
Annex 5: Evaluation by Participants - rating
Annex 6: Evaluation by Participants - statements, suggestions, comments
Annex 7: Documentation of training sessions by Aalborg University AAU
The Danish Cyclists’ Federation
Lotte Bech, Urban Cycle Planning
August 2014
ANNEX 1
PARTICIPANTS
ANNEX 1
Annex 1: Participants The Bikeable City Masterclass – EMBARQ 4.‐10. May Arzu Tekir Çiğdem Çörek Öztaş Merve Akı Tolga İmamoğlu Kiarash Ghasemlou Ben Welle Nicolae Duduta Marta Obelheiro Brenda Medeiros Marco Priego 4.‐7. May Erkan Atmaca Serkan Korkmaz Remzi Öztoklu Aişe İçli Ahmet Savaş Bülent Köstem Cüneyt Çetintaş Salih Erdemci Mehves Evin EMBARQ Turkey [email protected] +90 533 337 37 26 EMBARQ Turkey [email protected] +90 535 570 92 14 EMBARQ Turkey [email protected] +90 537 922 16 26 EMBARQ Turkey [email protected] +90 539 882 64 81 EMBARQ Turkey [email protected] +90 531 697 84 56 EMBARQ USA
[email protected] EMBARQ USA
[email protected] EMBARQ Brazil
[email protected] EMBARQ Brazil
[email protected] EMBARQ Mexico
Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality, Turkey İstanbul Development Agency, Turkey Konya Metropolitan Municipality, Turkey Konya Metropolitan Municipality [email protected] [email protected] İspark, Turkey Seferihisar Municipality, Turkey Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality Ministry of Transportation Milliyet Newspaper +90 531 873 72 62 [email protected] +90 212 468 34 00 [email protected] +90 530 435 89 90 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] +90 530 568 5020 <[email protected]> +90 530 236 25 77 [email protected] 0 312 203 10 48 [email protected] +90 532 623 18 53 1
ANNEX 2
TRAINERS AND FACILITATORS
ANNEX 2
Lotte Bech, Course Leader
Phone: +45 2125 7105
Mail: [email protected]
Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
Phone: +45 3366 3332
Klaus Bondam, Danish Cyclists’ Federation
Phone: +45 4070 8365
Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen
Phone: +45 3366 3414
Trine Juncher Jørgensen, Danish Cyclists’ Federation
Phone: +45 4070 8357
Morten Kabell, City of Copenhagen
Mayor of Technique and Environment
Phone: +45 3366 2626
Andrés Valderrama, AAU
Phone: +45 2396 7843
Anne Katrine Braagaard Harders, AAU
Phone: +45 2961 9229
Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen, Cycling Embassy of Denmark
Phone: +45 2526 9314
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen
Phone: +45 3366 3569
Lars Gemzøe, Gehl Architects
Phone: +45 2672 6102
David Sim, Gehl Architects
Phone: +45 2672 6103
Mathias Sdun, COWI
Phone: +45 4176 2779
Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
Phone: +45 7218 3818
Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen
Phone: +45 3366 3362
1
ANNEX 3
THE WEEK’S PROGRAM
City tour on bicycle – study
of cycle infrastructure.
(Lotte Bech, Niels Jensen
City of Copenhagen)
Providing bicycles for the
participants.
Cycle planning in Copenhagen – The political process.
(Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen)
Cycling as an integrated part
of Cities for People. (Lars
Gemzøe, Gehl Architects)
Welcome.
Introduction to the program
(Lotte Bech).
Introduction to Cycling Embassy of Denmark. (CED)
Introduction to Aalborg University Centre Cph (Andrés
Valderrama, AAU-Cph).
Sunday 4 May
Welcome dinner, 19.30
(Danish Cyclists’ Federation)
Site visit on bicycle:
-to the sites of the data-cases and
to discuss cycle infrastructure
solutions.
Hands-on workshop designing
safe biking facilities with case
from EMBARQ projects in:
Turkey (Carsten Wass, Consia
and Andrés AAU Cph)
-Nørrebrogade, The Red Square
(Anne Eriksson and Klaus
Grimar,City of Copenhagen)
Visit to the Traffic Police - presentation of their work with e.g.
preventing heavy vehicles accidents. (Traffic police)
Hands-on workshop with practising analysis and use of traffic
safety data – data-cases from accidents sites in Copenhagen.
(Anne Eriksson, Cph)
Creating safe infrastructure for
cyclists - traffic safety measures -traffic safety data collection. (Carsten Wass, Consia
Consultants)
Design of cycle infrastructure –
different practices in Embarq
collaborating countries and
other countries. (Anne Katrine
Braagaard Harders and Andrés
Valderrama, AAU-Cph)
Visit to Gehl Architect, 17.0019.00 (David Sim)
Drop of bicycles (4 days participants)
Meeting with the Morten Kabell, Mayor of the Technicaland Environmental Administration in the City Hall
Community engagement
- experiences from transformation of arterial shopping
street with public participation. (Klaus Grimar, City of
Copenhagen)
Discussion on potentials for
developing the political process in EMBARQ projects
(Gehl Architects
Hands-on workshop designing safe biking facilities with
cases from EMBARQ projects
in: Brazil and Mexico. (Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés, AAU)
Hands-on workshop with design of safe infrastructure
including intersection solutions. (Mathias Sdun, COWI
and Carsten Wass, Consia
Consultants)
Design of cycle facilities in
intersections. (Mathias Sdun,
COWI)
The film, The Human Scale
(David Sim, Gehl Architects)
Traffic safety Plan for Cyclists.
Traffic safety, accidents and accident prevention – syste matic
accident reduction.
(Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen)
Bicycle strategy, cycle infrastructure and Bicycle Account
in Copenhagen. (Niels Jensen,
City of Copenhagen)
Consultancy on liveable and
bikeable cities and political
willingness. Gehl experiences
from around the world
(David Sim, Gehl Architects)
Thursday 8 May
Wednesday 7 May
Tuesday 6 May
Monday 5 May
Agenda for BC-Masterclass – EMBARQ – Lotte Bech 3.05.2014,
Evening
15.30 17:00
(18.30)
15.00 –
15.30
(13.00)
13:30 –
15.00
Lunch break
11:0012:30
(12.00)
10:30 11:00
9:00 10:30
Schedule
Time
Annex 3: The Week’s Program - The Bikeable City Masterclass - EMBARQ 2014
ANNEX 3
1
Meeting active members of
the Cyclists’ Federation.
Discussions on building a
cycling culture in the cities
where EMBARQ is working.
Introduction to the work of
the Danish Cyclists’ Federation. (Trine Juncher Jørgensen, Erik Hjulmand,
DCF)
Hands-on workshop with
practicing planning a Bicycle
Account in cities where
EMBARQ is working.
(Ulrik Djupdræt, Cph and
Andrés Valderrama, AAU)
Bicycle Account. Detailed
presentation of method, indicators and questionnaire.
(Ulrik Djupdræt, City of copenhagen)
Friday 9 May
Farewell reception
Diploma Hand-out, evaluation
and closing of the Masterclass.
Feed back, discussions and
networking.
Presentation of highlights from
the masterclass (AAU-Cph)
Presentation of the participants
studies and experiences from
Copenhagen. (Participants)
Participants working on common projects report and presentation of experiences. (Andrés
Valderrama, AAU, Lotte Bech)
Drop off bicycles
Saturday 10 May
Agenda for BC-Masterclass – EMBARQ - Lotte Bech 3.05.2014
Evening
15.30 17:00
(18.30)
15.00 –
15.30
(13:00)
13:30 –
15.00
Lunch break
11:0012:30
(12:00)
10:30 11:00
9:00 10:30
Time
Schedule
The Week’s Program - The Bikeable City Masterclass for EMBARQ 2014
2
ANNEX 3
2
ANNEX 4
ANNEX 4
THE DAY’S PROGRAM
ANNEX 4
Annex 4: The Day’s Program
The Bikeable City Masterclass – EMBARQ
Sunday 4 May
Location
Hotel Astoria
Trainers
8.00
Meeting with Lotte in the lobby of the hotel
S-train to Sydhavn Station. Walk to Aalborg University, AAU
Lotte Bech
Lotte Bech
Location
AAU, room nr. 2.1.043
9.00-10.30
Introduction to the program. Presentation of participants
Introduction to Cycling Embassy of Denmark, CED
Introduction to Aalborg University Copenhagen, AAU
Lotte Bech
Niels Tørsløv
Andrés Valderrama
10.30-11.00
11.00-12.30
Coffee break
Cities for People - Soft CitiesCycling as an integrated part of Cities for
People.
Lars Gemzøe, Gehl
Architects
Cycling is mobility – but there is much more to cycling than mobility.
Mobility involves also much more than cycling.
The presentation covers the combination of people on foot, people
pedalling and people in transit….also with cycles. The main focus is on
active mobility - mobility where you have to use your own body to do the
work.
Data about what people actually do in public spaces of the cities has
changed the understanding of what matters for urban quality in daily life.
More and more cities are recording urban activity on foot and on cycles and
not only relying on the data about car traffic for planning purposes.
The changing role of urban life and the importance of data will be
illustrated by examples from Copenhagen and Melbourne, Australia.
12.30-13.30
Lunch break
13.30-15.00
Cycle planning in Copenhagen – The political process
The presentation will be based on 10 years of experience in the political
processing of cycling proposals at the Copenhagen City Hall - combined
with knowledge from colleagues in other cities - mostly in Europe. The key
to success in decision-making is to cover both the technical issues of
cycling proposals - and to understand and predict the political pattern that
will adopt the cycling agenda. What are the elements that make political
value and benefits?
Niels Tørsløv,
Deputy Director,
Technical and
Environmental
Administration,
City of
Copenhagen.
The presentation will leave room for reflection and discussion.
15.00
Location
15.30
S-train from Sydhavn Station to Dybølsbro station
Baisikeli, Bike Rental, Ingerslevsgade 80
Providing bicycles
Lotte Bech
16.00-18.30
Site visit on bicycle.
Study of cycle infrastructure in the inner part of the City.
18.30
At Hotel Astoria
Evaluation. Filling out evaluation form
Niels Jensen, City
of Copenhagen
Lotte Bech
Lotte Bech
Lotte Bech
1
ANNEX 4
Day program 4-10 May
Monday 5 May
Location
Hotel Astoria
Trainers
8.00
Meeting with Lotte in the lobby of the hotel
On bike to Aalborg University, AAU
Lotte Bech,
Anne Katrine
Braagaard Harders,
Lasse Hauschildt
Location
9.00-10.30
Bicycle strategy, cycle infrastructure and Bicycle Account in Copenhagen
Copenhagen has a long tradition for cycling – and cycling is socially
accpted by the society. On this background, the first goals for Copenhagen
cycling was agreed upon in a Cycle Policy by the politicians some 12 yeas
ago. Goals at that time included a modal share of 40 % cycling in
commuting to workplaces and education situated within the municipality, a
10% increase in cycling travelling speed to make the bicycle more
competetive and that 80 % of the cyclists eventually should feel safe in
traffic.
10.30-11.00
11.00-12.30
Coffee break
Design of cycle infrastructure –different practices in Embarq
collaborating countries and other countries.
Presentation of slides of good and problematic infrastructure from Turkey,
Brazil and Mexico.
Niels Jensen, City
of Copenhagen
Anne Katrine
Braagaard Harders,
Andrés Valderrama
AAU
In this workshop we will analyze different design solutions in different
cities. In line with the fact that Copenhagen cannot be copied, we will
challenge the participants to find ways of translating the designs they see in
Copenhagen to the context of the cities they are working in.
12.30-13.30
13.30-
Lunch break
Creating safe infrastructure for cyclists - traffic safety measures -traffic
safety data collection.
Carsten Wass,
Consia Consultants
Cyclists are vulnerable. It is ten times as likely to sustain an injury per
kilometre driven for cyclists as for cars. If other risk measures are used the
result will be different, but if we want to substitute car travels with bike
trips the risk per trip should be used. If public transport is used on part of
the trip the risk will be reduced considerably. But very few are involved in
accidents compared to the total population of cyclists and therefore the
health benefit from cycling by far outweighs the negative consequences
from accidents.
-17.00
Coffee break
Hands-on workshop designing safe biking facilities with case from
EMBARQ projects in Turkey.
Presentation on cases: Historical Peninsula and Bike Paht and Besiktas –
Saviyer. Workshop on design of biking facilities.
17.00
Evaluation
Filling out evaluation form
Location
Restaurant Madklubben, Store Kongensgade 66
19.30
Welcome dinner
Carsten Wass,
Consia Consultant,
Andrés Valderrama
AAU
Lotte Bech
Danish Cyclists
Federation
2
ANNEX 4
Tuesday 6 May
Location
Trainer
9.00-
Traffic safety Plan for Cyclists. Traffic safety, accidents and accident
prevention – systematic accident reduction.
Anne Eriksson,
City of
Copenhagen
In this module the participants will learn and practice accident analysis on
real cases from Copenhagen Municipality. The participants will analyze
police information about the accidents from a number of black spots, draw
collision diagrams and construct a hypothesis for the accidents, based on the
information and the analysis. The participants will also try to come up with
solutions for the accident problem at the black spot.
- 12.00
Coffee break
Hands-on workshop with practising analysis and use of traffic safety data –
data-cases from accidents sites in Copenhagen.
12.00-13.00
13.00
Lunch break
On bicycle from University to the Copenhagen Police, Valby
Location
Copenhagen Police, Gammel Køge Landevej 1, Valby
13.30-15.00
Visit to the Traffic Police - presentation of their work especially with focus
on vulnerable road users.
Anne Eriksson
Traffic Police
Anne Eriksson
We will see their work in preventing accidents by traffic control.
15.00-18.00
Site visit on bicycle:
- a site visit to the black spots. On the site we discuss different cycle
infrastructure solutions.
Anne Eriksson,
Klaus Grimar,
City of
Copenhagen
- a site visit to Nørrebrogade, one of the main arterial shopping street, which
has been closed to through traffic and equipped with wide cycle tracks.
18.00
At Hotel Astoria
Lotte Bech
3
ANNEX 4
Wednesday 7 May
Location
AAU, room nr. 4.058
Trainer
9.00-
The film: The Human Scale
David Sim, Gehl
Architects
Consultancy on liveable and bikeable cities and political willingness. Gehl
experiences from around the world
Learning to do things differently – the journey to change.
The lecture starts with the experience of what works in Copenhagen and the
approach of integrating walking, cycling and public transportation into high
quality public space and then takes this experience to other places.
The Copenhagen experience comes from a holistic approach, recognising the
need for an enjoyable human experience. Cycling is always placed in a wider
context of living in the city. There is no way of “Copenhagenising” other
places – but elements of the Copenhagen approach can be reinterpreted to the
social, economic and environmental context of other places. A vital part of
the story is about changing mind-sets: the changing of culture starts with
people and their understanding of their environments. Examples of planning
processes, inter-disciplinary methods and citizen participation tools will be
presented, in particular Gehl Architects’ work in New York and Christchurch.
-12.00
12.00-13.00
13.00-14.00
Coffee break
Discussion on potentials for developing the political
projects.
process in EMBARQ
Lunch break
Community engagement - Experiences from transformation of arterial
shopping street with public participation.
Since 2008, the City of Copenhagen has been working with a new design of
the two main shopping streets, Noerrebrogade and Amagerbrogade. With the
projects the City of Copenhagen wants to improve streets functioning as a
commercial street, creating better conditions for pedestrians and cyclists and
public transport. To achieve this objective, it has been necessary to reduce
car traffic.
David Sim, Gehl
Architects
Klaus Grimar,
City of
Copenhagen
The politicians in Copenhagen have been very interested in the projects.
Bicycles, pedestrians and buses are given priority over car traffic. In both
districts, citizens and shop owners had strong opinions on the future design of
the streets. Copenhagen has therefore implemented long processes where
citizens' views have been clarified and incorporated into the projects.
14.00-14.45
On bicycle to the Cityhall
Location
City Hall, Rådhuspladsen
15.00-16.00
Meeting with Morten Kabell, Mayor of the Technical and Environmental
Administration
Short presentation. Questions from the participants.
16.00
On bicycle to Baisikeli, Bike Rental (for 4 days participants)
Location
Drop of bicycles (4 days participants)
Bus to Gehl Architects
Location
Gehl Architects, Gammel Kongevej 1
17.00-19.00
Visit to Gehl Architects office
Presentation of Gehl Architects work and discussion.
Diploma hands-out (for 4 days participants)
Lotte Bech
Morten Kabell,
Mayor
Lotte Bech
Lotte Bech
David Sim
4
ANNEX 4
Thursday 8 May
Location
Trainer
9.00-10.30
Design of cycle facilities in intersections.
Mathias Sdun, COWI
The session aims at highlighting the possibilities and challenges with
implementing bicycle facilities i a existing infrastructure. With base in
examples from the City of Copenhagen a variety of safe bicycle solutions
will be presented. The solutions will emphasis give way intersections,
signalized intersection and bicycle facilities in one way streets.
Due the introduction presentation a variety of examples and their
consequences are presented as inspiration for the workshop part. The
examples are of more general approach and therefore suitable for use in
other city, countries and more.
Furthermore some examples of safe bicycle solutions for both “give
way” and “signalized” intersection will be presented. Beside bicycle
equipment, the design of bicycle infrastructure has a major impact on
cyclist safety. In Denmark bicycle equipment and design have to meet
stringent requirements.
10.30-11.00
11.00-12.30
Coffee break
Hands-on workshop with design of safe infrastructure including
intersection solutions.
Due examples the challenges are presented and will be the base for the
following workshop in which examples from Copenhagen and from the
EMBARQ countries will be discussed in mean of possible conflicts,
mean of provided solution and what to be aware of and the possible
achievements with focus on safety, ridership improvement and secondary
effects.
12.30-13.30
13.30-
Lunch break
Hands-on workshop designing safe biking facilities with cases from
EMBARQ projects in Brazil and Mexico.
Presentation on cases:
- EMBARQ Brasil_Auditoria de Seguranca Viaria – Ciclovias e
ciclofaixas
- 2. Cap 2 - Ciclovias e Ciclofaixas
- Mexico City Bike Case Study
Mathias Sdun, COWI
Carsten Wass,
Consia Consultants
Carsten Wass, Consia
Consultants Andrés
Valderrama, AAU
Coffee break
-17.00
Workshop on design of biking facilities.
17.00
Evaluation.
Filling out evaluation form
Carsten Wass, Consia
Consultants Andrés
Valderrama, AAU
Lotte Bech
5
ANNEX 4
Friday 9 May
Location
Trainer
9.00-
Bicycle Account. Detailed presentation of method, indicators and
questionnaire.
Ulrik Djupdræt, City
of Copenhagen
The Bicycle Account will be presented thoroughly, and the individual
elements of it will be reviewed. Objectives and targets are discussed.
The questions that we use to collect citizens' views on cycling in
Copenhagen, are reviewed and discussed in relation to what is important
in participants' cities.
In the Copenhagen Bicycle Account it is also documented number of
accidents involving cyclists, miles of new bike lanes, modalsplit and
some other things. These items will be reviewed and discussed.
-12.00
Coffee break
Hands-on workshop with practicing planning a Bicycle Account in
cities where EMBARQ is working.
Based on the presentation, we will make a sketch of a bicycle account
for the participants cities / countries.
12.00-13.00
Ulrik Djupdræt, City
of Copenhagen
Andrés Valderrama
AAU
Lunch break
13.00
On bike to Danish Cyclists Federation
Location
Danish Cyclists’ Federation, Rømersgade 5-7
13.30-
Introduction to the work of the Danish Cyclists’ Federation, DCF
Pleasure, safety and mobility. For more than a century, Danish Cyclists’
Federation has been the voice of people using the bicycle in their
everyday lives. At present, we function as the interface between all
relevant players in the field of cycling.
Lotte Bech
Trine Juncher
Jørgensen, Erik
Hjulmand, DCF
The Danish Cyclists’ Federation is successfully working for better safety
and infrastructure for cyclists – both on local and national levels. This
effort is based on direct lobbying as well as consultancy, innovation, and
campaigns.
Nowadays our work is not against cars, but for the happy coexistence
between different ways of transportation – with the wish for a healthy
and sustainable development of the Danish transport sector as guideline.
Cycling should be a safe, fun, easy and obvious choice everywhere in
Denmark.
Discussions on building a cycling culture in the cities where EMBARQ
is working.
-17.00
Meeting active members of the Cyclists’ Federation.
Trine Juncher
Jørgensen, Erik
Hjulmand, DCF
Erik Hjulmand, DCF
6
ANNEX 4
Saturday 10 May
Location
10.00
Drop off bicycles
Bus to Danish Architecture Centre
Location
Danish Architecture Centre, Strandgade 27 B, 4th floor
Trainer
11.00-12.30
Participants working on projects report and presentation of
experiences.
Andrés Valderrama
AAU, Lotte Bech
Evaluation. General feedback and evaluation of the masterclass
12.30-13.30
14.00-17.00
Lunch in the restaurant
Presentation of the participants studies and experiences from
Copenhagen.
Participants
Andrés Valderrama
AAU, Lotte Bech
Presentation of highlights from the masterclass (AAU).
Feed back, discussions and networking.
Farewell reception
Diploma Hand-out, evaluation and closing of the Masterclass
7
ANNEX 5
EVALUATION
BY PARTICIPANTS
- RATING
ANNEX 5
The Bikeable City Masterclass - EMBARQ
Annex 5: Evalua-on by Par-cipants ‐ ra-ng General feedback and evalua-on of the masterclass
1
very good
LoFe Bech, DCF and Andrés Valderrama, AAU
The course management was:
in %
The course venue was:
in %
The course logis?cs and informa?on was: in %
The overall quality of your learning in the course was:
in %
Please rate your own par?cipa?on in the course ‐
how ac?ve were you?:
in %
9
38,46%
4
30,77%
3
23,08%
4
30,77%
7
53,85%
23,08%
4
30,77%
69,23%
9
69,23%
8
61,54%
5
3
To short
The dura?on of the course was:
0,00%
1
very useful
1
How useful will the content of the course be for your job:
6
46,15%
How informa?ve and useful are the materials used in the course?
2
good
6
46,15%
3
okay
4
poor
5
Number of
very poor respondants
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
7,69%
0,00%
0,00%
7,69%
0,00%
0,00%
7,69%
0,00%
0,00%
13
100,00%
13
100,00%
13
100,00%
13
100,00%
6
46,15%
0,00%
0,00%
13
100,00%
1
1
1
OK
Too long
11
2
84,62%
15,38%
2
useful
2
6
46,15%
7
53,85%
3
okey
13
100,00%
4
5
Number of
les useful not useful respondants
3
4
5
7,69%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
1
13
100,00%
13
100,00%
Individual Session Evalua-on: Session 1
Cycling as an integreted part of Ci-es for Cyclists
Lars Gemzøe, Gehl Architects
The presenta?on and the discussion was:
The quality of your learning was:
The training materials are:
The relevance to your work is:
Total
1
very good
2
good
3
okay
4
poor
1
2
3
4
10
8
10
11
39
51,32%
To short
The dura?on of the ac?vity was:
0,00%
9
8
8
6
31
40,79%
OK
16
84,21%
3
1
2
6
7,89%
0,00%
Too long
3
15,79%
5
Number of
very poor respondants
5
0,00%
19
19
19
19
76
100,00%
19
100,00%
Side 1 af 8
1
ANNEX 5
Side 2 af 8
Anne Katrine Braagaard Hardes and Andrés Valdeerrama, AAU
Design of cycle infrastructure‐ different prac-ces
Session 4
1
2
3
4
5
0,00%
Session 2
Cycle Planning in Copenhagen
Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen
To short
1
42,65%
9
29
7
8
9
10
9
6
34
5
45,33%
Total
Total
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen
1
To short
Bicycle Strategy, cycle infrastrukture and Bicycle Account in Copenhagen
Session 3
0,00%
Site‐visit 1
City tour on bicycle ‐ study of infrastructure
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen 1
The on site presenta?on was:
The observa?on and the ideas you got to take home was:
Total
The relevance for your job was:
Total
10
12
34
12
12
34
12
10
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen The dura?on of the ac?vity was:
Site‐visit 1
1
0,00%
To short
62,96%
62,96%
To short
42,65%
8
29
8
7
3
5
4
8
23
9
30,67%
14,71%
2
10
4
2
6
2
4
3
16
3
21,33%
2
OK
3
Too long
14
5
73,68%
26,32%
88,89%
11,11%
16
2
2
3
OK
Too long
6
22,22%
4
12
2
2
12
4
22,22%
6
0,00%
0,00%
Session 3
To short
1
73,68%
26,32%
14
5
OK
Too long
2
3
45,33%
5
34
69
109
87
299
42,65%
Session 2
1
To short
0,00%
30,67%
9
23
84
53
78
298
42,65%
21,33%
3
16
34
26
24
102
14,71%
2
OK
3
Too long
13
4
76,47%
23,53%
4
5
0,00%
0,00%
1
1
1,33%
1
1
1,33%
4
5
100,00%
19
68
19
17
18
17
19
17
75
17
100,00%
19
100,00%
4
2
14,81%
2
8
4
4
8
2
14,81%
2
OK
Too long
2
3
16
2
88,89%
11,11%
Total
Total
100,00%
17
76,47%
23,53%
13
4
OK
Too long
2
3
5
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
4
5
100,00%
18
18
100,00%
18
54
18
18
54
18
100,00%
18
18
100,00%
100,00%
19
4
5
1,33%
1
1
1,33%
1
1
0,00%
0,00%
4
5
100,00%
17
75
17
19
17
18
17
19
68
19
100,00%
17
100,00%
Session 4
1
2
3
4
5
Side 2 af 8
2
Session 3
5
6
1
10
8
Total
29
5
42,65%6
10
To short 8
Total
29
0,00%
42,65%
To short
0,00%
Session 4
Session 2
9
3
8
3
2 5
3 2
7
2
29
10
9
3
42,65%8
14,71%3
5
2
OK 7 Too long2
13
4
29
10
76,47%
23,53%
42,65%
14,71%
0,00%
OKThe Bikeable
Too long City Masterclass - EMBARQ
13
4
17
76,47%
23,53%
100,00%
1
2
8
9
6
7
11
1
9
10
9
35
34
51,47%
45,33%
7
8
8
8
2 3
3
4
4
22
23
32,35%
30,67%
To short
To short
Total
Total
0,00%
5
Session 4
Total
Total
Site‐visit 1
Session 5
Crea-ng safe infrastructure for cyclists‐ traffic safety data collec-on
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
4
17
17
ANNEX
5
17
17
68
17
0,00%
100,00%
17
17
17
17
68
0,00%
100,00%
1
5,88%
0,00%
1
10
12
12
34
Session 3
16
14
94,12%
73,68%
2
1
OK
OK
To short
0,00%
2
11,76%
1
To short
0,00%
To short
0,00%
5
Side 2 af 8
4
5
1
Side 2 af 8
1
0,00%
1,33%
1
1
0,00%
1,33%
3
9
3
8
3
2
3
5
2
7
2
5
4
29
10
4
4
42,65%
14,71%
6
3
OK 7 Too long1
22
12
13
4
37,93%
20,69%
76,47%
23,53%
17
19
17
19
17
18
17
19
68
75
100,00%
100,00%
17
19
100,00%
100,00%
4
3
5
5
4
1
0,00%
1
1,47%
0,00%
0,00%
18
17
18
17
18
17
54
17
100,00%
68
100,00%
18
100,00%
17
100,00%
4
4
3
4
0,00%
3
1
11
18,97%
5
5
0,00%
0,00%
17
17
17
17
14
68
15
100,00%
14
15
58
17
100,00%
100,00%
OK
Too long
10
5
15
The Bikeable
66,67%
33,33%City Masterclass - EMBARQ
100,00%
Session 4
Session 2
1
2
3
Session 7
Traffic Safety Plan for Cyclists.Traffic safety, accidentsand accident preven-n ‐ systema-c accident reduc-on
1
2
3
Workshop: Prac-cinganalysesand use of traffic safety data
Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen
1
2 8
3 2
9
7
8
4
9
3
6
9
4
4
Total
34
23
16
45,33%
30,67%
21,33%
4
Too long
Too long
5
0,00%
26,32%
6
2
1 2
2
4
2
1
2
4
5 8
2
12
3
2
22,22%
14,81%
11
7
16,18%
10,29%
OK
Too long
16
2
OK
Too long
88,89%
11,11%
12
3
70,59%
17,65%
2
Session 6
5
workshop: Designing safe biking facili-es with case from EMBARQ projects in Turkey
6
Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés Valderrama, AAU
1
10
8
2
Total
29
3
42,65%
2
To short 6
Total
13
22,41%
0,00%
2
2
3
4
3 3
6
3
4
11
16
16,18%
21,33%
3
2
14
13
10
12
62,96%
49
72,06%
To short
3
OK
14
73,68%
Too long
5
26,32%
4
4
Side 2 af 8
4
Side 3 af 8
1
1
1,33%
5
5
5
1
1
1,33%
19
19
18
19
75
100,00%
19
100,00%
3
Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés Valderrama, AAU
1
Session 3
Total
2
3
2
1
6
13
5
22,41%6
Total
2
5
4
2 6
7
22
9
37,93%8
10
8
29
0,00%
42,65%
3
4
4
4
3 3
1
12
3
20,69%3
3
4
4 3
1
11
18,97%
5
2
7 Too long2
10
5
29
10
66,67%
33,33%
42,65%
14,71%
The Bikeable City
To short
OK
Too long
13
4
Session 7
Session 2
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
Traffic Safety Plan for Cyclists.Traffic safety, accidentsand accident preven-n ‐ systema-c accident reduc-on
City
Workshop: Prac-cinganalysesand use of traffic safety data
1
2 The Bikeable
3
Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen
1
2
3
To short
Session 4
Total
Total
9
13
7
11
9
9
1
9
12
34
45
45,33%
66,18%
To short
To short
Site‐visit 1
Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen Site‐visit 2
Visit to the Traffic Police ‐ presenta-on of their work
Ane Eriksson, City of Copenhagen and the Traffic Police
Total
Total
0,00%2
11,76%
OK
8
3
8
5
3
2 6
4
2
23
16
30,67%
23,53%
2
1
4
0
6
3 2
4
3
16
21,33%6
8,82%
2
10
112
12
634
5
62,96%
5
16To short
34,04%
6
2
24
32
2
4
612
38
622,22% 414,81%
5
3
17OK
10
Too long
36,17%
16
221,28%
88,89%
11,11%
OK
Too long
9
7
56,25%
43,75%
Session 3
0,00%
1
3
2
To short
0,00%
To short
0,00%
0,00%
14
15
58
17
100,00%
17
17
100,00%
Masterclass
4
5 - EMBARQ
4
5
5
1
1
1,33%
0,00%
19
17
19
17
18
17
19
17
75
68
100,00%
100,00%
19
17
100,00%
100,00%
4
5
4
5
1
1 0,00%
1
3
6,38%
0
0 0,00%
1
1
2,13%
18
18
18
16
54
16
100,00%
15
47
100,00%
18
100,00%
16
100,00%
4
4
5
5
2 0,00%
1
0
3
6,67%
1 0,00%
1
1
3
6,67%
17
17
17
17
68
15
100,00%
15
15
4517
100,00%
100,00%
OK
Too long
9
6
15
The Bikeable
60,00%
100,00%
Session 4
Session 2
1
2
3
Session 8
Consultancy on liveable and bikeable ci-es and poli-cal willingness.Gehl experiences from around the world
1
2
3
David Sim, Gehl Architects
1
2
3
9
8
2
11
3
0
7
8
4
9
3
6
9
4
4
Total
34
23
16
45,33%
30,67%
21,33%
5
17
17
15
68
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
Masterclass - EMBARQ
0
Side 3 af 8
1
4 0
1
0
1
Side 2 af 8
1,33%1
1,47%
3
Site‐visit 3
5
9
3
Site‐visit on bicycle to the sight of the data‐ cases and to discuss cycle infrastructure solu-ons
6
8
3
visit Nørrebrogade to see the transforma-on of the main ar-rial shopping street
10
5
2
Anne Eriksson og Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
1
8 2
7 3
2
Total
29
29
10
2
42,65% 842,65% 214,71%
2
7
4
4 To short
6 OK
4
Too long
Total
8
21
13 10
4
17,78%
46,67%
22,22%
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
14
ANNEX
5
15
OK
Too long
OK 14 Too long5
13
2
73,68%
26,32%
76,47%
11,76%
1
0,00%
To short
5
OK
14
73,68%
Too long
5
26,32%
4
4
Side 2 af 8
4
Side 4 af 8
1
1
1,33%
5
5
5
1
1
1,33%
19
14
19
18
19
75
100,00%
19
100,00%
4
0,00%
visit Nørrebrogade to see the transforma-on of the main ar-rial shopping street
Anne Eriksson og Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
1
Session 3
2
2
1
4
Total
8
17,78%5
6
To short 10
8
0,00%
Total
29
42,65%
88,89%
2
11,11%
3
100,00%
4
5
ANNEX 5
8
2
2
1
15
7
4
1
1
15
6 2
4 3
0 4
1 5
15
21
10
3
3
45
46,67%9
22,22%3
6,67%
6,67%
100,00%
17
8
3
17
OK 5 Too long2
17
9
15
7 6
2
17
60,00%
40,00%
100,00%
29
10
68
The Bikeable
- EMBARQ
42,65%
14,71%City Masterclass
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
To short
OK
Too long
Session 8
Session 2
13
4
17
Consultancy on liveable and bikeable ci-es and poli-cal willingness.Gehl experiences from around the world
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
100,00%
David Sim, Gehl Architects
1
2
3
4
5
Session 4
Total
Total
11
9
9
7
9
9
10
9
39
1
34
69,64%
45,33%
3
8
3
8
2
3
2
4
2 10
23
17,86%
30,67%
To short
To short
0,00%
0,00%
OK
OK
13
14
92,86%
73,68%
0
2
2
4
3
6
2
4
7
3 16
12,50%
21,33%
12
12
34
3
4
3
62,96%
6
To short 16
30,77%
0,00%
To short
Session 3
0,00%
2
To short
1
10,00%
Session 4
Session 2
Site‐visit 5
Visit to the office of Gehl Architects. Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen
Host: David Sim, Gehl Architects
Total
2
1
7
5
3
2
2
9
7
9
9
34
45,33%
To short
0,00%
5
4
5
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
18
18
13
18
13
54
13
100,00%
13
52
100,00%
18
100,00%
13
100,00%
4
4
5
5
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
17
17
17
17
68
10
100,00%
10
10
30
17
100,00%
100,00%
OK
Too long
9
10
The Bikeable
90,00%
100,00%
1
1
4
3
5
9
3
Site‐visit 4
6
8
3
Mee-ng in the City Hall. Host: MortenKabell, Mayor of the Technical and Environmental Administra-on
10
5
2
1
8 2
7 3
2
Total
29
29
10
6
42,65% 442,65% 014,71%
6
4
0
5 To short
4 OK
1
Too long
Total
17
12
1
13
4
56,67%
40,00%
3,33%
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
14
19
100,00%
100,00%
4
2
8 4
2
2
9 8
0
12
8
2
22,22%
14,81%
5
2
OK 30 Too long6
57,69% 211,54%
16
88,89%
11,11%
OK
Too long
10
3
76,92%
23,08%
1
1
5 1
0,00%
1,33%
Too long
Too long
1
5
7,14%
26,32%
Site‐visit 1
Session 9
2
3
Community engagement ‐ experiences from trnsforma-on of ar-rial shopping street with public par-cipa-on
Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
10 1
6 2
2 3
Total
Total
Side 4 af 8
1
4 1
0,00%
1,33%
Side 2 af 8
14
19
14
19
14
18
14
19
56
75
100,00%
100,00%
3
3
8
8
3
4
23
30,67%
3
4
OK
14
73,68%
2
4
6
4
16
21,33%
4
4
Side 2 af 8
4
5
5
5
1
2
Too long
5
26,32%
1
Side 5 af 8
1
1,33%
1
1
1,33%
19
11
19
11
18
19
75
100,00%
19
100,00%
5
Mee-ng in the City Hall. Host: MortenKabell, Mayor of the Technical and Environmental Administra-on
1
2
3
Total
Session 4
6
6
5
17
1
56,67%
To short
Total
1
10,00%
0,00%
7
19
To short
57,58%
Session 2
Site‐visit 5
Visit to the office of Gehl Architects. Total
Host: David Sim, Gehl Architects
42,65%
To short
29
1
8
10
9
7
6
7
5
5
9
1
4
4
4 2
12
40,00%
OK
9 The
90,00%
The
476,47%
11 13
OK
33,33%
4
2
1
0
0
1 3
1
3,33%
Too long
3
5
11,11%
26,32%1
2
1
Too long1
1
314,81%4
812,50%
4
2
2
Too long
2
2
2
4
825,00%
314,81%
Too long
2
26,32%
11,11%
3 5
Too long
1
21,33%
1
1
3 16
24
56
3
15,63%4
3
2
2
Too long 2
1
3 10
12,50%
14,71%
ANNEX
5
10
Side 2 af 8
4
5
0,00%
0,00%
10
10
30
100,00%
0,00%
4 4
0,00%
5
100,00%
68
11
17
100,00%
17
19
11
17
19
11
17
18
1
Side 5 af 8
4 1
1,33%
1
5 1
1,33%
19
75
100,00%
4
5
4 0,00%
0,00%
0,00%
5
0,00%
4 0,00%
5
0,00%
19
100,00%
8
18
8
8
8
100,00%
32
54
100,00%
18
18
18
18
18
8
18
100,00%
54
100,00%
4
5
18
100,00%
19
1,33%
4 1
1
1,33%
5 1
1
0,00%
0,00%
4
0,00%
5
0,00%
8
100,00%
8
75
8
19
8
18
32
17
19
100,00%
17
19
17
17
8
68
100,00%
100,00%
Too long
4
17
100,00%
Bikeable
3
2
4
2
5
Too long
Bikeable City Masterclass - EMBARQ
10
0,00%
100,00%
Bikeable
100,00%
11
4
17
3
33
Too long
9,09%
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
42,65%
14,71%
OK
Too long
2 2 29 3 3 10
11
7
2
100,00%
5
2
8 1
2
3
8
3
8 2
4
4
9
3
3
6
4
4
2 23
3 16
30,67%
21,33%
9
1
Total
34
Session 10
45,33%
Design of cycle infrastructure in intersec-ons
Session 3
To short
OK
Mathias Sdun, COWI
1
2
14
0,00%3
88,89%
73,68%4
4 16
3
Site‐visit 1
To short 2
OK 5
3
4
62,96%
Total
12 222,22%
16
Total
34
37,50% 12
50,00%
12
2
10
6
12
4
12To short
4 OK
10
6
6
12
2
0,00% 12
75,00%
Total
34
62,96% 222,22%
To short
OK
Site‐visit 1
Session 11
16
Workshop with design of safe infrastructure including intersec-on solu-ons
0,00%
73,68%
88,89%
Mathias Sdun, COWI and Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
1
2 14
To short
OK
Session 3
4
3
45,33%
30,67%
4
3
Total
34
4
3
1
2 23
59
14
9
3
Total
17
10
5
9
7
53,13%6
31,25%8
8
9
8
10
5
To short
8 OK
7
7
1
2 29
Total
29
0,00%
87,50%
42,65%
42,65%
Session 2
To short
OK
13
Session 12
0,00%
76,47%
The
Designing safe biking facili-es with case studies fromEMBARQ projectsinBazil and Mexico
Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés Valderrama
1
2
Session 4
4
4
0
0
3
5
1
1
Side 6 af 8
4
7
7
5
Side 2 af 8
6
Mathias Sdun, COWI and Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
1
0,00%
162
88,89%
2 3
11,11%
4
Session 3
Total
Total
4
3
1
4
3
1
4
3
1
5
1
2
1
2 10
3 5
17
53,13%
31,25%
15,63%
5
9
3
To short
6 OK
8 Too long 3
7
1
10
5
2
0,00%8
87,50%7
12,50%2
29
29 Bikeable
10City
The
42,65%
42,65%
14,71%
Session 12
To short
OK
Too long
Session 2
Designing safe biking facili-es with case studies fromEMBARQ projectsinBazil and Mexico
13
4
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés Valderrama
1
2
3
1
2
3
Session 4
Total
Total
4
9
2
7
2
9
4
9
12
34
1 42,86%
45,33%
0,00%
0,00%
Site‐visit 1
Session 13
Bicycle Account.Detailed presenta-on of method, indicators and ques-onnaire
Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen
1
10
12
012
034
Total
1
62,96%
1
Total
2 To short
8,33%
0,00%
To short
0,00%
Session 3
3
50,00%
Session 4
7
14
100,00%
73,68%
2
Too long
Too long
5
0,00%
26,32%
3
8
ANNEX
5
8
8
8
4
5
32
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
17
17
8
17
100,00%
17
68
Masterclass - EMBARQ
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
4
4
5
5
17
100,00%
Side 2 af 8
7
19
100,00%
100,00%
4
2
3
6
2
4
2
32
14
312
28
122,22% 314,81%
4
1
11OK
7
Too long
45,83%
29,17%
16
2
88,89%
11,11%
OK
Too long
4
2
66,67%
33,33%
2
To short
OK
OK
1
Session 14
5
Workshop on planning a Bicycle Account in ci-es where EMBARQis working
6
Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen and Andrés Valderrama
10
1
8
Total
29
0
42,65%
0
1 To short
0
Total
1
0,00%
4,17%
18
100,00%
The
Bikeable0City Masterclass
- EMBARQ
2
1
7
8
2
19
4
0
1
7
8
4
19
3
1
1
7
3
6
18
3
7
4
4 Side 6 af 8
1
1
19
12
1
3
28
23
16
1
1
75
42,86%
3,57%
10,71%
0,00%
100,00%
2
3
4
5
30,67%
21,33%
1,33%
1,33%
100,00%
To short
To short
5
4
5
1
1
1 0,00%
0
3
12,50%
1
0,00%
1
4,17%
4
5
4
5
2 0,00%
0
0
1
3
12,50%
1 0,00%
2
1
0
4
16,67%
OK
Too long
1
2
16,67%
33,33%
1
2
18
18
6
18
6
54
6
100,00%
6
24
100,00%
18
100,00%
6
100,00%
3
9
3
8
3
5
2
2
3
7
2
29
10
242,65% 114,71%
2
2
3 OK
1
Too long
4
1
13
4
11
5
76,47%
23,53%
45,83%
20,83%
5
17
17
17
17
68
6
100,00%
6
6
6
17
24
100,00%
100,00%
6
100,00%
3
4
5
Session 15
Side 2 af 8
Session 2
Introduc-on to the work of the Danish Cyclists' Federa-on ‐ Discussionns on building a cycle culture in the ci-es where EMBARQ is working
Trine Juncher Jørgensen, DCF and Erik Hjulmand, DCF‐CPH
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Total
1
1
9
7
9
9
34
45,33%
2
3
8
8
3
4
23
30,67%
3
1
2
4
6
4
16
21,33%
1
2
Side 7 af 8
1
1
1,33%
1
1
1,33%
7
19
7
19
18
19
75
100,00%
7
1
0,00%
0
0
Session 3
1
0
Total
1
1
4,17%
Total
5
6
10
50,00%8
29
42,65%
To short
3
2
16
88,89%
2
2
3
4
112
45,83%
3
2
11,11%
1
2
1
1
5 3
20,83%
4
5
2
0
0
1
3 4
12,50%
18
100,00%
1
6
ANNEX
2
6
1
6
0
6
4 5
24
16,67%
100,00%
5
9
3
17
8 Too long3
17
1
6
5 2
2
17
16,67%7
33,33%2
100,00%
17
The
29 Bikeable
10City Masterclass - EMBARQ
68
42,65%
14,71%
0,00%
0,00%
100,00%
OK
Session 15
To short
OK
Too long
Session 2
Introduc-on to the work of the Danish Cyclists' Federa-on ‐ Discussionns on building a cycle culture in the ci-es where EMBARQ is working
13
4
17
Trine Juncher Jørgensen, DCF and Erik Hjulmand, DCF‐CPH
1
2
3
4
5
0,00%
76,47%
23,53%
100,00%
1
2
3
4
5
Session 4
Total
Total
1
1
0
1
3
9
7
9
9
34
10,71%
1 45,33%
To short
To short
0,00%
0,00%
Site‐visit 1
Session 16
Par-cipants working on presenta-on of experiences and final presenta-on
Andrés Valderrama, AAU 1
10
The presenta?on feedback and discussion was…
What was seen, ideas to take home?
Total
The relevance to your work was:
Total
62,96%
20,00%
To short
To short
0,00%
0,00%
Session 3
1
Total
5
6
10
8
29
42,65%
To short
0,00%
1
3
9
8
5
7
29
42,65%
OK
13
76,47%
2
Side 2 af 8
7
19
100,00%
100,00%
4
2
3
6
2
4
2
1
2
2
4
2
2
12
8
122,22% 114,81%
4
5
26,67%
33,33%
OK
Too long
16
2
OK
Too long
88,89%
11,11%
3
2
60,00%
40,00%
2
Session 4
OK
Too long
OK
Too long
2
14 5
5
28,57%
71,43%
73,68%
26,32%
2
12
1
12
0
34
2
3
Bikeable City1 Masterclass - EMBARQ
2 The
7
8 3
2
19
3
1
2
7
8
4
19
2
7
3 3
6 2
18
3
2
1
7
Side 7 af 8
4
4
1
1
19
10 23 9
6
28
16
1
1
75
35,71%
32,14%
21,43%
0,00%
100,00%
2
3
4
5
30,67%
21,33%
1,33%
1,33%
100,00%
3
3
3
2
2
10
14,71%
5
4
5
0
0
0 0,00%
0
0,00%
1
1
1 0,00%
3
20,00%
18
100,00%
5
100,00%
4
0,00%
5
0,00%
Too long
4
23,53%
3
18
18
5
18
5
54
5
100,00%
15
100,00%
17
17
17
17
68
100,00%
17
100,00%
4
5
Side 2 af 8
Side 8 af 8
8
ANNEX 6
1
ANNEX 6
EVALUATION
BY PARTICIPANTS
- STATEMENTS, SUGGESTIONS, COMMENTS
ANNEX 6
Annex 6: Evaluation by Participants - statements, suggestions, comments
General Feedback and Evaluation of the Masterclass
1
Very Good
Sunday 4 May –
Saturday 10 May
2
Good
3
Okay
The course management
was…
No. of respond. 13 out
of 19
Rates
1
9
2
3
4
5
4
No. of respond. 13 out
of 19
Rates
Too
Short
OK
1
Very useful
2
Useful
1
6
2
6
3
1
2
3
1
4
3
4
5
1
5
5
3
7
1
4
5
4
Les useful
6
2
1
3
4
2
4
3
4
5
1
Please rate your own
participation in the course
– how active were you?
1
3
2
3
4
6
4
5
4
5
5
Not useful
How informative and
useful are the materials
used in the course?
1
The course logistics and
information was…
8
2
3
Okay
How useful will the content
of the course be for your
job?
No. of respond.- 13 out
of 19
Rates
1
The overall quality of your
learning in the course
was…
Too
Long
2
11
5
Very Poor
The course venue was…
9
The duration of course
was…
4
Poor
Other issues…
5
1
2
3
7
Statements
By Nicolae Duduta, EMBARQ-Washington:
What I appreciated the most about the masterclass was the opportunity to meet and work with experts in cycle
infrastructure design. We were able to address very important issues with a lot of detail – such as how to handle
conflicts involving left turning cyclists at intersections, or how negotiate conflicts between buses, cyclists, and
passengers at bus stops.
One of the key takeaways for me was that it’s more than just about creating bike lanes; the key is all the support
infrastructure that accompanies the bike lanes and makes them successful – planning, legislation, insurance,
parking policies, etc.
By Cüneyt Cetintas, Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality, Turkey:
I’m working for Transportation Department of Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality in Turkey. We have constructed
about 32 km of bike lane with good quality but we have few users. I have always been curious about where did
we make he mistake? Why people do not use these bike lanes efficiently? The masterclass helped me out to
understand the nature of bike world. I understood that constructing very well bike network is not enough to
attract people for biking but also it must be placed to daily life as a culture. So as Gehl architects said: “It is not
just hardware or software. Biking culture is both of them”. We have to think what is going on down the city
beside doing master plans. How does the city move? How do people live their life and what actually do they
need to have a livable city? For these statements the masterclass helped me a lot. I hope I’ll meet such nice
people and have a chance to work with them again.
1
1
ANNEX 6
By Cigdem Cörek, EMBARQ-Turkey:
As we mentioned in Copenhagen, we are working on a 'safe cycling design manual' for Istanbul. We are
conducting semi-structured in-depth face to face interviews with central and local government representatives.
We have also prepared a survey sheet by getting opinions from some non governmental organizations and
academicians from transportation departments of universities. We are planning to apply them to bicyle users in
İstanbul and learn their needs, thougts and expectations.
I can say that the masterclass help to form not only the survey sheet but also the framework of the whole
process.
By Ben Welle, EMBARQ Senior Associate:
EMBARQ is preparing a guide for cities where it works on safer design through traffic calming, pedestrian space
and providing better bicycle infrastructure. The Masterclass occurred during the development of this guide and
helped inform how to provide guidance to cities on the design principles, benefits and application of bicycle
facilities from the Copenhagen experience. This included key elements on increasing safety at intersections,
proper segregation of bicycle traffic from motor vehicles and concerns over bi-directional bicycle lanes. The
guide as a result has improved and will help cities in countries where EMBARQ works to consider safety more in
their design of bicycle lanes. In addition, the masterclass was helpful to EMBARQ in how it considers bicycle
infrastructure in the construction of bus corridors in Mexico and Brazil, as well as a follow up work to a previous
EMBARQ report and project to improve bicycling facilities within Brazil’s favela communities.
Suggestions
By Marta Obelheiro, EMBARQ-Brazil:
Suggestions:
1. The program did not include the topic of integrating cycling + public transport (in more details). For
us at EMBARQ it was not necessary because we already know about the importance of integration,
but for other audiences of the masterclass it may be useful/interesting to include this topic.
2. We missed some time during the week to have the opportunity to know the city and visit touristic
sites.
3. It would be great to have more time to take pictures during the site visits, because we could abserve
many infrastructure solutions (not only for bicycles) and didn’t have time to document it.
4. At the discussion of case studies, a wrap up with the recommended solution was always needed
but not always happened. It would be good to receive more feed back and ideas from experts.
5. I would like to receive more info from Anne on the black spots work (how they are identified, what
counter measures are adapted, impact evaluation etc.)
By Brenda Medeiros, EMBARQ-Brazil:
Suggestions:
1. Explore the connection to public transport
2. Allow more time for people taking pictures during the bike tours. Some solutios are very interesting,
but we didn’t have time to document it.
3. Give more feed back on case studies. We want to hear more of your opinion. You are the experts!
Most of the time we only showed our cases and discussed possibilities. But it was hard to wrap up
with a solution.
General comments
-
The duration of the course was: Great! With less time it would be impossible to cover so many topics
and to have the great discussions we had.
-
Some case studies could have been better prepared or oriented.
It would be good to have a break in the middle of the week. 7 days is a bit tiring. Maybe one afternoon.
Some sections could be more explorated, more focus on how to do and not only presenting what was
done.
-
7 days were too long. If you complete the agenda in 5 days, it will be great.
I think we should watch the film-human scale in Gehl Architects own place. And again David Sim should
make his presentation in Gehl. Wednesday was complicated. Friday’s Bicycle Account presentation was
inadequate. He only showed what they did before. It was not “education”. Saturday was disappointment
for me. We did nothing but we spent all the time. I think the Saturday presentations will complete on
Friday.
-
Everything was on time. This was really important to have clear times.
It will be great if we had some cases about methodology. And urban planning aspects seems to be
missing.
Especially design was too long.
Some sessions were great about learning.
-
2
2
ANNEX 6
-
I think my participation generally was rate 1: Very good, but last day it was rate 3: Okay
-
Timing was great.
Great facilities.
The course logistics and information was very very good.
The whole experience was excellent but I will appreciate time for knowing the city.
-
Thank you Lotte and Andrés for everything.
Although to my half English it was really useful for me.
-
There should be a lesson/training about how to ride a bike (rules etc.) in the beginning. On site activities
are very useful but a group of 10 or less would be better. You cannot hear what the trainer tells in a
crowd of 20 people. And you cannot ride easily. You always wait for the rest at the lights. I think it would
be better to divide the group.
-
Actually more time should be allowed for workshops. Because workshops were really interesting.
Cycling in the city was awesome (fantastic) but it was a little bit exhausting
-
Overall, I can not descripe the importance of actually witnessing the integration of bicycles in urban
transport. Moreover, I would like to thank each and every person for sharing their time and experiences
with us.
Last but not least Lotte’s professional approach to our group needs congratulations. She dealt with
every problem of us without hesitation. Thanks a lot! I have a single recommendation for you: The
program was extremely busy. Maybe it is a good idea to start a little bit late and/or finish a little bit early.
Especially if there would be some people with health conditions.
-
3
3
ANNEX 6
Feedback and Evaluation of Training Sessions and Site-Visits
1
Very Good
2
Good
3
Okay
4
Poor
5
Very Poor
1. Session: Cycling as an integrated part of Cities for Cyclists
Trainer: Lars Gemzøe, Gehl Architects
Sunday
4 May
No. respond.
19 out of 19
Rates
The
presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
10 9
8
8
3
4
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
10 8
1
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity
was…
1
Too
Short
2
3
4
5
11 6 2
Ok
Too
Long
16
3
Comments:
-
-
Discussion should have been more interactive.
I think they should sent us the training material before the education.
The sessions are too long to keep concentrated.
The quality of the learning: Good intro.
It would be good to have more time for questions in the end.
It was very informative but there was too much info about too many topics.
It was a very illuminating presentation for me. It will be very beneficial for me when I go back to my
country and explain cycling as a “mode of transport” to my colleagues, superiors and people.
2. Session: Cycle Planning in Copenhagen – Political process
Trainer: Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen
Sunday
4 May
The presentation
and discussion
was…
No. respond.
19 out of 19
Rates
1
9
2
3
8
2
4
5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
7
8
4
4
5
The training
materials are…
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
No. respond. 18
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
Too
Short
9
9
4
4
1
1
3
6
Ok
Too
Long
14
5
Comments
-
-
It should have been included more about challenges and how does the City overcome of the
challenges.
The training material should be sent before.
1,5 hour is not suitable for human capacity of listening.
It will be great if he could complete the presentation.
Very interesting + insight
It is very important for us to understand the political process, and not only technical issues.
My business is to create opportunities and infrastructure for people. So political sessions are not my
concern but my manager’s!
The political process for integrating cycling in urban transport in Copenhagen seems different from a
potential process which could take place in Turkey. On the other hand, it is a valuable experience to
learn and benefit from.
Discussion part was more engaging.
4
4
ANNEX 6
S1. Site-visit: City tour on bicycle – study of infrastructure
Trainer: Niels Jensen, City of Copenhagen
Sunday
4 May
The on site
presentation was…
The observation
and the ideas you
got to take home
are?
No. of respond.
18 out of 19
Rates
1
2
3
1
2
3
10
6
2
12
4
2
4
5
4
The relevance for
your work is…
5
1
2
3
12
2
4
4
The duration of the
activity was…
5
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
16
2
Comments
-
Too many stops. Before the tour we should have been better to have a small presentation, routes,
landmarks, infrastructure etc.
The duration of the tour was OK. But I could not hear all the conversation. I think that was a problem.
After all the presentations it is really good to be in the City biking. Make me understand better.
I only wish I could bike better.
The comments from Niels were really valuable, but sometimes it was hard to hear him, the group was
too big.
It was good to be on the streets and see how the infrastructure is used by people.
Sometimes difficult to listen to him due to the number of people.
I’ve have never ride a bike for so long in a city. It is wonderful.
It might be better to divide group into 10’s. It might be easier to travel and listen to the trainer.
It was an invaluable experience to actually see and learn from a world class integration of cycling in
urban transport.
Too many people – hard to catch up
3. Session: Bicycle Strategy, cycle infrastructure and Bicycle Account in Copenhagen
Monday
5 May
No. of
respond. 17
out of 19
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The training
materials are…
2
3
5
6
10 5
2
9
3
8
3
1
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
Too
Short
8
7
2
4
5
Ok
13
Too
Long
4
Comments
- More interactivity.
- It was perfect to learn about the different bike infrastructure and the idea.
- It is quite long, that all sessions take about 1,5 hours. (not only this).
- Very interesting + applicable presentation
- It was a good opportunity to learn from Copenhagen’s experience in bicycle transport with a historical
-
perspective.
Would like to use the bicycle Account.
5
5
ANNEX 6
4. Session: Design of cycle infrastructure – different practices
Trainer: Anne Katrine Braagaard Harders and Andrés Valderrama, Aalborg Univercity Centre
Monday
5 May
The presentation
and discussion
was…
No. of
respond. 17
out of 19
Rates
1
8
2
3
7
2
4
5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
6
8
3
4
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
11 3
3
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
Too
Short
10
2
4
3
4
5
3
1
Ok
Too
Long
16
Comments
- That session was just great! Thanks Anne Katrine.
- Workshop idea was helpful.
- Very nice to think holistically about systems.
- It would be good to have more pictures with examples.
-
The workshop provided a general approach about how to implement bicycle friendly urban transport
projects in Turkey.
Very engaging
Would like to discuss different practices in detail.
5. Session: Creating safe infrastructure for cyclists – traffic safety data collection
Trainer: Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
Monday
5 May
The presentation
and discussion
was…
No. of
respond. 17
out of 19
Rates
1
2
3
14
1
2
4
5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
4
13 2 1
1
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
4
5
10 5 2
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
2
12
3
2
3
12 3
2
4
5
Comments
-
Familiar with this already but it was good for the participants!
Suggestion: Mix data with photos.
I have seen this presentation many times,
A very good presentation about Copenhagen’s bicycle strategy.
6. Session: Workshop: Designing safe biking facilities with case from EMBARQ project in
Turkey
Trainer: Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants and Andrés Valderrama, Aalborg Univercity Centre
Monday
5 May
The hand-on
workshop was…
No. of
respond. 15
out of 19
Rates
Respond. 14
1 2 3 4
2
5
4
3
5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
4
3
4
4
4
The training
materials are…
5
Respond. 14
1 2 3 4
2
6
3
3
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
4
Too
Short
6
7
1
1
5
Ok
Too
Long
10
5
Comments
-
It would be better to discuss in groups, and/or to have a list of pre-defined questions to be answered.
It would be better working in groups and discussing results.
The workshop was not prepared in advance. This created disorder.
6
6
ANNEX 6
7. Session: Traffic Safety Plan for Cyclists. Traffic safety, accidents and accident prevention –
systematic accident reduction – workshop: practicing analyses and use of traffic safety
data
Trainer: Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen
Tuesday
6 May
No. of
respond. 17
out of 19
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The training
materials are…
1
2
3
13
11 5 0
9
6
2
3
1
1
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was...
1
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
2
13
2
2
3
12 2
3
4
5
Comments
- We could not get feedback on our workshop sheets.
- She is great! Perfect presentation.
-
But we could have more time working on data.
A very illuminating presentation about safety issues for bicycle transport. And it also underlined the hard
work behind creating a safe and reliable bicycle network.
Learned a lot as a citizens about traffic safety. (journalist)
Practical workshop (journalist)
Detailed and necessary for road safety people and a citizen. (journalist)
S2. Site-visit: Visit to the Traffic Police – presentation of their work
Trainer: Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen and the Traffic Police
Tuesday
6 May
No. of respond.
16 out of 18
Rates
The on site
presentation of the
police work was…
1
2
3
6
6
3
4
1
The observation
and the ideas you
got to take home
are?
5
1
2
3
5
6
4
4
1
The relevance for
your work is…
The duration of the
activity was…
No. of respond. 15
5
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
3
1
1
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
9
7
Comments
- We needed to be sit and listen.
- Some of the projects are really interesting.
-
-
We were so tired. Maybe if it was comfortable it would be better.
Not our scale.
We just got tired. It will be great if we could sit.
It would be good to have materials with the data and projects explained during the visit.
It is good to know, but there is a lot different aspects on national legislation.
Speed ticketing prevention was irrelevant, every country has same technique. Police work about school
children was interesting; I hope we would spend much time on it.
There have to be some seats to sit.
A good opportunity to hear the experiences and work of traffic enforcement personnel in Copenhagen.
7
7
ANNEX 6
S3. Site-visit on bicycle to the sight of the data- cases and to discuss cycle infrastructure
solutions – visit Nørrebrogade to see the transformation of a main arterial shoppingstreet
Trainer: Anne Eriksson and Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
Tuesday
6 May
The on site
presentation was…
The observation
and the ideas you
got to take home
are?
No. of respond.
15 out of 17
Rates
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
2
8
2
2
1
2
7
4
1
1
4
6
4
0
1
The relevance for
your work is…
The duration of the
activity was…
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
9
6
Comments
-
We were so tired and could not focus on Klaus’s speek.
-
It was not a session of discussion or observation. It was not prepared.
4 hours cycling! You should create another program.
The duration of the activity was OK, but I would like to have stoped in some places for taking specific
photos like bus stops and intersections.
It was a fun ride first of all. Moreever, witnessing the well-designed network of bicycle transport was an
invaluable experience. The works like a bridge for only cyclists and pedestrians for enabling a free flow
of traffic were beneficed for us.
8. Session: Consultancy on liveable and bikeable cities and political willingness. Gehl
experiences from around the world - discussion
Trainer: David Sim, Gehl Architects
Wednesday
7 May
No. of
respond. 14
out of 18
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The training
materials are…
1
2
3
11
9
9
2
3
3
3
2
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was
1
Too
Short
10
2
2
3
4
5
2
Ok
Too
Long
13
1
Comments
- The slides were great, but we did not receive materials (yet).
-
Wonderful presentation, but too fast to process all the information.
Perfect. Thank you David
9. Session: Community engagement – experiences from transformation of arterial shopping
street with public participation
Trainer: Klaus Grimar, City of Copenhagen
Wednesday
7 May
No. of
respond. 13
out of 16
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The training
materials are…
1
2
3
3
4
3
8
2
8
2
9
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was...
1
2
3
Too
Short
6
5
2
4
5
Ok
Too
Long
10
3
Comments
- I could not participate this session.
- This is general. I think a session of 1,5 hour is too long.
8
8
ANNEX 6
S4. Site-visit: Meeting in the City Hall
Host: Morten Kabell, Mayor of Technique and Environment
Wednesday
7 May
The presentation
and the discussion
was…
No. of respond.
10 out of 15
Rates
1
2
6
4
3
4
The observation
and the ideas you
got to take home
are?
5
1
2
6
4
3
4
The relevance for
your work is…
5
1
2
3
5
4
1
4
The duration of the
activity was…
5
Too
Short
1
Ok
Too
Long
9
Comments
-
I could not participate in this session.
It is great to know what is in the political agenda of the City.
1 hour with the mayor was great!
S5. Site-visit: Visit to the office of Gehl Architect
Host: David Sim, Gehl Architects
Wednesday
7 May
The on site
presentation was…
The observation
and the ideas you
got to take home
are?
No. of respond.
11 out of 17
Rates
1
2
1
2
3
7
3
5
4
2
3
1
4
5
4
The relevance for
your work is…
5
1
2
7
4
3
4
The duration of the
activity was…
5
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
11
Comments
- Superb. Thank you for all.
- It was really a nice architecture office. And thanks to great Architect David Sim.
9
9
ANNEX 6
10. Session: Design of cycle infrastructure in intersections
Trainer: Mathias Sdun, COWI
Thursday
8 May
No. of
respond. 8
out of 10
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1 2 3 4 5
The training
materials are…
1
2
3
3
4
2
5
1
4
1
3
1
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
Too
Short
3
4
1
4
5
Ok
6
Too
Long
2
11. Session: Workshop with design of safe infrastructure including intersection solutions
Trainer: Mathias Sdun, COWI and Carsten Wass, Consia Consultant
Thursday
8 May
No. of
respond. 8
out of 10
Rates
The presentation
and discussion
was…
1
4
2
3
3
4
5
1
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
4
3
1
4
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
4
3 1
4
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
Too
Short
5
1
2
4
5
Ok
7
Too
Long
1
Comments
- It was great to work on a real case and also to discuss the adopted solution.
12. Session: Designing safe biking facilities with case studies from EMBARQ project in Brazil
and Mexico
Thursday
8 May
No. of
respond. 7
out of 9
Rates
The hand-on
workshop was…
1
4
2
3
4
2
0
1
The quality of
your learning
was…
5
1
2
3
4
2
4
0
1
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
1
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
Too
Short
4
3
3
4
5
Ok
Too
Long
7
Comments
-
It would be valuable to have the input of other experts (not only Carsten) since we already work with
him.
We have worked with Carsten along the last 3 years. I really like his job. But it could be helpful to have
the opinion of another safety expert, maybe Mathias Sdun.
10
10
ANNEX 6
13. Session: Bicycle Account. Detailed presentation of method, indicators and questionnaire
Trainer: Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen
Friday
9 May
The presentation
and discussion
was…
No. of
respond. 6
out of 9
Rates
1
0
The quality of
your learning
was…
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
3
1
1
1
0
3
2
1
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
4
1
1
3
1
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
Too
Short
1
4
1
4
5
Ok
Too
Long
4
2
Comments
- I think that I would learn about bicycle Account methodology or something like that.
- I would be good to receive the English version of the questionnaire used in the Account
- He could have explained more on the process of developing the Account survey.
14. Session: Workshop on planning a Bicycle Account in cities where EMBARQ is working
Trainer: Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen, Andrés Valderrama, Aalborg University Centre
Friday
9 May
The hand-on
workshop was…
No. of
respond. 6
out of 9
Rates
1
0
The quality of
your learning
was…
The training
materials are…
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
3
1
2
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
1
0
2
2
0
2
1
3
1
0
1
0
4
1
1
5
Comments
-
There is no time left for workshop
We should have discussed more about the process and questions
15. Session: Introduction to the work of the Danish Cyclists’ Federation – Discussions on
building a cycling culture in the cities where EMBARQ is working
Trainers: Trine Juncher Jørgensen and Erik Hjulmand, Danish Cyclists’ Federation
Friday
9 May
The presentation
and discussion
was…
No. of
respond. 7
out of 10
Rates
1
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
5
The quality of
your learning
was…
1
2
3
4
1
3
1
2
The training
materials are…
5
1
2
3
4
0
2
3
2
5
The relevance to
your work is…
The duration of
the activity was..
1
2
3
4
Too
Short
1
3
2
1
5
Ok
Too
Long
2
5
Comments
-
The beginning was OK, but the second part too long.
11
11
ANNEX 6
16. Participants working on presentation of experiences
Presentation of the participants projects and experiences to trainers, partners of Cycling
Embassy of Denmark and members of The Danish Cyclists’ Federation
Saturday
10 May
No. of
respond. 5 out
of 9
Rates
The presentation,
feedback and
discussion was…
1
1
What was seen,
ideas to take
home?
2
3
4
5
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
2
3
2
The relevance to
your work was…
The duration of the
activity was…
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
1
1
0
1
Too
Short
Ok
Too
Long
3
2
12
12
ANNEX 7
1
ANNEX 7
DOCUMENTATION
OF TRAINING SESSIONS
BY AALBORG UNIVERSITY AAU
ANNEX 7
Annex 7. Documentation of training sessions by AAU
Sunday 4 May
Session: Cycling as an integrated part of Cities for Cyclists
Trainer: Lars Gemzøe, Gehl Architects
-
Main impression of the professional presentation
- Exemplify with stories drawn on personal experiences
- Exemplify with pictures
- Clear overview of the presentation – Pedestrians, Cycling, transit and public space
- The main points were repeat many time
-
Activities and exercises used for the involvement of the participants
- Room for question half way through the session
- Room for question when the participants had questions to ask
Participants' involvement in discussions and workshops
- Clarifying questions
Main impression of the participants' academic achievement
- Motivation for cycling – it’s convenient, fast and easy
- The importance of data
- Similarities between pedestrians and cyclists
- It’s a matter of what you do (Political and planning decisions), not the physical structure)
- Difference between hardware and software – both are important
- Example from New York: To see whether a change of the street design is working, paint it and try it out
before changing it for good (Testing and tryouts)
- Knowledge of the historical development – Copenhagen has not always been a cycling city as it is today
1
1
ANNEX 7
Sunday 4 May
Session: Cycle Planning in Copenhagen – Political process
Trainer: Niels Tørsløv, City of Copenhagen
-
-
First time the professional is giving a presentation about this topic.
Addressing the difference between mainstream cycling cities and other cities. But also addresses the
similarities.
Emphasizing the importance of the political process in promoting cycling
Outlining the political structure inside Copenhagen Municipality
How planners apply or propose for cycling schemes
Copenhagen created the cycling packages. Therefore every year in the budget that will be a cycling
package.
Mentioning different projects in Copenhagen and how they are funded,
Highlighting the health, safety and mobility benefits in Cycling but also the political benefits by doing.
Klaus Bondam is described as being very brave politicians. He actually took chances by promoting
cycling and thinks about being re-elected.
Copenhagen need to be innovative and are doing a lot to keep being the front runner in cycling
The police is a serious actor in the decision making. The municipality needs to agree with the police
before making decisions on street level. They are not governances by politicians but instead the police
department.
The elected politicians are changed but the civil servants are staying.
It is important to admit and understand the failures
The dynamics of the political process – first time presentation
Asking explicitly for feedback from the audience – made the presentation unstructured
Very Copenhagen focused
- The possibility of asking questions
Participants’ involvement in discussions and workshops
- Niels ask the class to ask questions
- Discussion about the citizens in copenhagen and how they sees cycling
- It is highlighted that removing parking lots are one huge political problem. Even people who normally
cycles and have car will be rather affected about this.
- Niels highlights for the participants the importance in doing test projects in Copenhagen, but also the
importance in choosing the right test projects to avoid bad media.
- One women asked about what was the main challenges for the politicians, because she couldn’t relate
this to politicians in her country.
- In general the particapants were very involved and asked a lot and good questions about cycling in
copenhagen and about the political power.
-
Asking clarifying questions
o About what the main challenges are
o About interest conflicts between different actors and the impacts they have
o About how to start building a comprehensive cycle network
o About issues of safety
Main impression of the participants’ academic achievement
- Information about the cycling embassy of Denmark - Website (Knowledge base) and a reward (for
promoters of cycling
- Two problems to solve: The technical part and the political part
- An idea of how the political system is working in Copenhagen – used as an example
- It’s about making proposals that are likely to be adopted by the politicians
- Awareness of what the wise Administration is able to
- Planners can help the politicians – “we” can help politicians framing their politics
- The importance of delivery and monitoring the output
- The dynamics of policy making – The press, the citizens and the elected politicians
General issue: Problem of translating the case of Copenhagen with a high biking share to cities with low biking
share
Take aways for London project:
- Understand the dynamics of policy making
- To formulate a clear vision and make a concrete and realistic strategy for implementation
2
2
ANNEX 7
-
The administrators under the mayors are also fighting eachother to show they are able to get visions
out in the real world and get them implemented.
To choose rhe most important value adding selection of projects
The administration (Civil servants/Planners) can become too clever – leaving no room for politicians.
A reason for why is cycling so strong in holland and denmark is because we don’t have a car industry in
denmark. Because we don’t have a industry trying to push cars.
3
3
ANNEX 7
Monday 5 May
Session: Bicycle Strategy, cycle infrastructure and Bicycle Account in Copenhagen
Bicycles infrastructure:
- Some small misunderstandings during the presentation due to differences in numbers
- Otherwise good presentation with clear points
Bicycle account:
- Bicycle accounts have been done since 1996
- A little pressured on time on this part of the presentation, but again Niels made the points
clear.
- Possible for participants to ask questions during the presentation
- Many questions about different percentages and modal shares
- Critical mass
- The standard of the cycle tracks
- Questions on Frederiksberg
- Should you put the infrastructure next to the main roads or through the side streets?
- An idea of the bicycle history in Copenhagen
- Introduction to the initiatives the City of Copenhagen have done to promote cycling.
- Fx. Green routes, green waves, separated cycle tracks, handling intersections
- Political support on cycling
- The idea of the critical mass
- The importance of cycle planning
- Introduction to the bicycle account
Main take aways for our London project
- Copenhagen cycle tracks: standard 2.5 m., Plus-net with 3.0 (sometimes 2.7) m.
- Difference between cycle lane (painting, no separation) and cycle tracks (separated)
- Concentration of accidents in intersections, intersection guidelines
- Critical mass – if you have a few cyclist then cardrivers won’t look out for cyclists.
Therefore the more cyclist an increase of safety.
- Debate on green cycle routes or not? Cycling on major roads make you feel integrate
with the city rhytms, but the green routes can be good for relaxing.
- Governmental support for super cycle highways
- It is good to have a cycle plan eventhough you don’t have the money. Because if you
get the money then you don’t have to start from scratch but you will have an actual
plan for cycling.
4
4
ANNEX 7
Monday 5 May
Session: Design of cycle infrastructure – different practices
Trainer: Anne Katrine Braagaard Harders and Andrés Valderrama, Aalborg Univercity Centre
-
Very fluent, very good in communicating the main ideas
Informed about different cases around the world, qualified to share that overview
Taking part in the developing process of the workshop, sharing her experience with one of the groups
Very committed with the participants during the process, explaining them as much as necessary to
make it work
-
What do you think it would be a challenge in your city? Involvement through their specific cases
WORKSHOP!
1. Map a system and identify challenges and potentials for your city
2. Thinking about threat/promoting scenarios
3. Share and discuss key findings including group presentations
-
3 different groups
All of them very involved in group discussions, offering their point of view
Interesting interactions and discussions within the different groups. Different cities in the same group,
fruitful sharing knowledge between participants
-
Showing different potentials for different cities. Some tips to develop their own ideas are provided.
Interesting perspectives from different places around the world, it might be very useful for Embarq
purposes.
They identify the main challenges concerning their cities (Police to enforce laws, bicycle signals,
bicycle traffic lights, lighting on cycle tracks, safety, bicycle parking, media awareness, maintenance of
infrastructure…)
5
5
ANNEX 7
Monday 5 May
Session: Creating safe infrastructure for cyclists – Traffic safety measures - traffic safety data
collection
Trainer: Carsten Wass, Consia Consultants
- Very loose and relaxed presentation with openness about contributions from the participants.
- Mixed presentation on road safety audit, bicycle accidents, safe infrastructure for cyclist, vulnerable road
users and accident data and analysis.
- Carsten tries to be aware of the differences in Copenhagen and the other countries, but also emphasize how
Copenhagen knowledge can be used.
- Giving advices and recommendation for the participants on what to think about in the future planning.
- Challenges for pedestrians and cyclist. One of them is the lack of education.
- Higher risk for accidents on cycle than cars pr. Km.
- Accidents happen for very people but health benefits are going to many more.
- Various crash types in a quantitative list
- Number of accidents between bicycle and different transport modes. Cars are by far the most common
transport mode in accidents with bicycles.
- Black numbers (Non-registered). Through UN-report it was shown that there were more injuries between
bicycles than between bicycles and cars. This is shown if non-registered injuries are taken into account.
- Very loose and relaxed presentation with openness about contribution from the participants.
- General initiatives in infrastructure that can promote cycling such as the importance of removing detours
create a coherent network etc.
- Invest were the biggest potentials even though it is most expensive. But it is here you get the best benefits
- A lot of statistic numbers about cycling was presented to the participants
- EMBARQ turkey showed a video on what they are doing and the importance of cycling as a transport mode.
- The participants from EMBARQ elaborated on how things work in their countries in relation to the
presentation.
- Questions were asked through the presentation
- Participants contributed with knowledge about the different topics
- Asking questions about what they should to in their countries when they don’t have the cycle network, trying
to relate to their own problems.
The participants seemed to be very interested in this class and how they could use this for themselves in their
countries.
- The participants used their knowledge to create a discussion on different initiatives highlighted by Carsten.
There was a really good discussion about bi-directional paths. Knowledge were shared and the advantages
and disadvantages was highlighted.
- Many questions were about how they could do it. Very practical relevant.
6
6
ANNEX 7
Monday 5 May
Session: Workshop: Designing safe biking facilities with case from EMBARQ project in Turkey
- Discussion about some of the challenges that the participants are meeting.
- Highlighting that Copenhagen also meet challenges if you look at cycling in the context of the greater
Copenhagen.
- Presentation on a site visit on a 22 kilometer cycling corridor in Turkey
- Andrés and Carsten contributed with possible solutions for some of the problems showed in the presentation.
- Highlights some of the problems and challenges they are aware of.
- Presentation on a intelligent cycling system in Turkey
- The presentation of EMBARQ wanted to have suggestion from the audience on their site visit.
- Participants discussed about the situation on this corridor. This concerned:
1. Speetlimits
2. Problems with many cars using this corridor.
- Discussion between Andrés and Carsten with the EMBARQ people on how to promoto cycling on this corridor
- Suggestion also came from participants that wasn’t playing a role for this city.
- Sharing best practices for finding possible solutions for the corridor.
- Proposal on bi-directional paths on the right site of the parking lots for cars to benefit cycling.
- Very open and active discussion
- The discussion went on without the need for comments from Andrés and Carsten. The participants started to
discuss between eachother about how corridor can be improved. They started to take geographics,
demographics (Who will use it?), budget and then solutions.
- It seemed like the participants were a bit confused about this corridor and how it is structured and worked
through the whole corridor.
7
7
ANNEX 7
Tuesday 6 May
Session: Traffic Safety Plan for Cyclists. Traffic safety, accidents and accident prevention –
systematic accident reduction – workshop: practicing analyses and use of traffic safety data
Trainer: Anne Eriksson, City of Copenhagen
- A lot of great graphs and figures (good presentation & explanation)
- Many of the slides in Danish (even not focused on, it’s still a minus)
- Good visualization of different accidents (quite clarifying were the drawings on blackboard)
- Explanation of different type of accidents/ truck driving as an aspect of cyclists’ safety.
- Small technical problems
- Quite important was the distinction between accident and injury factors.
- Euler diagrams were rather interesting showing how factors and cause connect and overlap
each other.
- An illustrative example was made showing what the workshop assignment will be.
- Questions are very welcome, it shouldn’t be one way communication
-Workshop assignment: Drawing the accidents – Understanding patterns
-
Population numbers in Copenhagen (in order to relate them to accident numbers)
Why has the number decreased so drastically for car accidents?
Questions about legislation on cyclists and pedestrians on bus stops and the right
away
Discussion on what municipalities can do to improve safety for vulnerable road users
Question about the actual necessity of signs in intersection where the priority is
unclear and there are conflicts (e.g. cyclists vs pedestrians at bus stops)
There was a discussion of what is a black spot (there needs to be analysis and
identification of the patterns in order to define and afterwards come up with
suggestions). The term can have different content.
- To learn about traffic safety in Copenhagen
- Focus on the vulnerable road users
- Be aware of a high number of accidents in intersection
- Different initiatives that can increase road safety for cyclists
- Right turning trucks  create better visibility through mirrors, glass and the position of the
driver. Also creating campaigns for safer streets.
- Aware on accident factors; driver related 91,2%.
- Speed is one of the highest accident factors
- What can the municipality do to improve safety  1. campaigns, 2. best practise and
international knowhow, 3. improve coordination with police, schools, public transport etc., 4.
Ensure safe traffic
- How do the City of Copenhagen 1. identify, 2. analize and 3. improve “black spots”
- A lof of potential in collaborating with the police on accident reports
- There is a high need of information and data to help identify and define black spots.
The participants were interested and motivated on working with the assignment.
8
8
ANNEX 7
Wednesday 7 May
Session: Consultancy on liveable and bikeable cities and political willingness. Gehl
experiences from around the world
Trainer: David Sim, Gehl Architects
-
Very professional and fluent presentation, it is noticeable that he usually conducts this kind of lectures /
workshops
-
He was interested about the background of each participant
10 minutes in the end to start a conversation with the participants, which will continue in the afternoon
in a more informal environment (reception in Gehl Architects
-
Some participants interested about how dealing with warm weather (40ºC in Mexico City)
Question about pedestrians and pressing a button to cross the street
Question about how to experiment with painting on the pavement from night to day as part of an urban
experiment of urban space split (New York case)
Participants worried about how to convince technicians (specially car departments) and participatory
processes
-
Good overview of human scale and human perspective in planning
Culture and physical environment as key aspects for more liveable cities
Very visual understanding of the space each mode of transport takes in the city
Understanding of both hard and soft measures to implement cycling
Critique to urban planning from above (Brasilia as an example)
Importance of the nature in the city as a way of creating a microclimate
How to “recycle” urban space, changing the atmosphere of the street (Melbourne example)
New York as an example of implementing a project with bikes as one of the main issues
The need of social friction between different kinds of people in public urban space
9
9
ANNEX 7
Wednesday 7 May
Site-visit: Meeting in the City Hall
Host: Morten Kabell, Mayor of Technique and Environment
Professional presentation by the mayor but also honest and reflected replies to the questions from the
audiance
After a short presentation by the former technical and environmental mayor Klaus Bondam about the
institutional structure of Copenhagen Morten Kabell introduced his political party and the city of Copenhagen.
After that there was room for questions from the audience.
Questions about
The institutional structure of Copenhagen
How to balance the transport modes
How you can push cycling forward politically.
How to deal with “pro-car” politicians
The relationship municipalities and national government
How to work with the press
What the new things for cycling in Copenhagen is
- Continuation of the recent development. Width cycle tracks rather than building new ones
What the vision of the mayor is
- Give up the 50% target for 2015, however, get towards the goal for 2018
- Building of light rail, expansion of the metro system
Monitoring
Importance of transbalancing the modes
Importance of reclaiming space to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport
Main arguments to use to convince politicians:
- Efficient
- Cheaper
- Green
It’s about give people an alternative. Many car-drivers are not evil, they just don’t have an alternative.
Municipalities must take the lead. Hence need to push the government
It’s about providing knowledge to the press
Monitoring is essential to promote improvements projects
10
10
ANNEX 7
Friday 9 May
Session: Bicycle Account. Detailed presentation of method, indicators and questionnaire
Trainer: Ulrik Djupdræt, City of Copenhagen
- Ulrik is using bicycle account in Copenhagen to show the advantages and disadvantages about doing a
bicycle account.
- It is easy to hear he knows a lot about it and that he have been quite involved in the cycling account in
Copenhagen Municipality, but he seems a bit nervous.
- Ulrik took the time to answer the questions from the practitioners. If needed he even went in depth with some
of the more technical stuff to answer the questions.
- The presentation went a bit unstructured because of the questions from certain practitioners and the led the
discussion to something related to the slides.
- Copenhagen bicycle account 2006 was handed out to the practitioners and Ulrik went through it together with
them. Analyzing the different parts in it.
- The presentation went into a discussion between the different practitioners. Maybe Ulrik should have stopped
them. But again they also had time to reflect and have a really good discussion.
- The practitionmers was divded into groups and made a dummy account and then present this dummy
account.
- 2 groups: 1 turkey, 2 Brazilian, American and mexican.
- Questions time is also scheduled.
- Practitioner asked good questions about the mode share of Copenhagen and the greater Copenhagen.
- It seemed like some of the practitioners were a bit tired.
- Ulrik was also questioned about the methods by the practitioners.
- The practitioners who were awake wasn’t afraid of asking questions to Ulrik.
- One practitioner were very interested in knowing something about how the data was gathered and questioned
some of this. It became very technical.
- There was a really good discussion between the practitioners about a uncertainty in the bicycle account. The
practitioners said that after this week they need to allign their numbers. So they started to reflect how they
could use this.
- Discussion about promoting cycling without improving infrastructure because this will create accidents.
- Discussions about their different cases from their cities.
The turkey group tried to relate to a real case they are going to do. So they reflected on what the could do with
this new knowledge. The second group just in general discussed what could be interesting for them in their
country.
Turkey: First get and understanding of best practices around the world. Then secondly get a knowledge about
the situation in their country, demographics etc. Conduct surveys so they can compare data.
Brazilian: 3 parts: First understand what people thinks. Second part with numbers of modal share, kilometres,
cost etc. Third show people what we are doing, what are the goals, how will we achieve these.
11
11
ANNEX 7
Friday 10 May
Session: Introduction to the work of the Danish Cyclists’ Federation – Building a cycling
culture in the cities where EMBARQ is working
Trainer: Trine Juncher Jørgensen, Danish Cyclists’ Federation
- a good and clear presentation of the role and influence of the Danish Cyclist Federation
- Presentation of the varoius projects the Danish Cylist Federation are involved in.
-The next presentation from the two members of the Cyclist federation was a bit more confusing and maybe not
very usefull as the presentaion had a very narrow focus on two rather small projects in Copenhagen which was
explained in a lot of details.
- The participants were involve in the presentation and had two point out barriers in their home country.
- There were also a round of presentations and the participants asked a lot of questions along the way.
- Many of the participants seemed tired after many intensive days of learning, however, there were still quite
a lot of questions.
-
Highlighted the importance of having a national cyclist federation that promote and preserve the conditions
for the cyclists.
The Cycling Federation has a very good partnership with the planners from the City of Copenhagen and
are always asked for advice when they are planning or inplemting infrastructual changes.
12
12

the bikeable city masterclass - embarq

Transcription

Similar documents

Directions to the Port of Copenhagen

Bicycle Culture by Design

program 17.- 18. september 2015 general information architect tour

Frederikssund Kommune - Part of Greater Copenhagen

profile education interests contact languages

ku|tur natten - St Alban`s Church, Copenhagen

Model and Serial Numbers

COPENHAGEN NEWS BULLETIN

Work-‐shop kring sin vuxenutbildning

Copenhagen, Denmark