Modelling - Universität Stuttgart
Transcription
Modelling - Universität Stuttgart
Invited Lecture Papers Modelling Proceedings of the XVI ECSMGE Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development ISBN 978-0-7277-6067-8 © The authors and ICE Publishing: All rights reserved, 2015 doi:10.1680/ecsmge.60678 Numerical investigation of track bed stability on soft soils Etude numérique de la piste stabilité de lit sur sols mous J. Aschrafi*1 , F. Hamad1 , C. Moormann1 , S. Rapp2 and U. Martin2 1 2 University of Stuttgart, Institute for Geotechnical Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany University of Stuttgart, City, Institute for Railway and Transportation Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany * Corresponding Author ABSTRACT Track bed stability is of major importance for the safety and comfort of rail traffic. Quasi-static and dynamic loads from train-traffic are applied to the entire track system: superstructure, substructure and subsoil. Owing to the dynamic loads on the track system and lack of maintenance of the track bed, an accumulation of excess pore water pressure can develop within the substructure. Furthermore, a pumping effect exerted on the track system, which depends on the axle load and velocity of the vehicle, may cause in mud hole formation, rising of the underlying soil, ballast contamination and the clogging of gravel bed pores. Consequently, the subgrade resistance is reduced and hence the system loading capacity. The main objective is to detect mud holes, as early as possible, by non-invasive, nondestructive measurements. The plastic deformation induced by the development of the mud holes is investigated by simulating the complex track-subsoil interaction with the finite element method (FEM). In this analysis, the advanced hypoplastic model has been used. More focus will be paid on the effect of the boundary condition on the dynamic wave propagation. For this purpose, a one-dimensional problem is investigated. The time-dependent problem is studied next by considering the real load history of the rail traffic. RÉSUMÉ Suivre la stabilité du lit est d'une importance majeure pour la sécurité et le confort du trafic ferroviaire. Les charges quasi - statiques et dynamiques de la gare de la circulation sont appliquées au système de piste entière: superstructure , infrastructure et le sous-sol. En raison des charges dynamiques sur le système de voie et de l'absence d'entretien de l' assiette de la voie, une accumulation de pression d'eau des pores en excès peut se développer à l'intérieur de la sous-structure. En outre, un effet de pompage exercée sur le système de rails, qui dépend de la charge à l'essieu et la vitesse du véhicule, peut entraîner la formation de trous de boue, l'augmentation du sol sous-jacent, la contamination du ballast et le colmatage des pores du lit de gravier. Par conséquent, la résistance à la plate-forme est réduite et par conséquent la capacité de charge du système. L'objectif principal est de détecter les trous de boue, le plus tôt possible, par des mesures non destructives et non - invasives. La déformation plastique induite par le développement des trous de boue est étudiée par simulation de l' interaction complexe de piste du sous-sol par la méthode des éléments finis ( FEM). Dans cette analyse, le modèle hypoplasie avancée a été utilisé. Plus d'attention sera portée sur l'effet de la condition limite de la propagation des ondes dynamique. A cette fin, un problème unidimensionnel est étudié. A cette fin, un problème unidimensionnel est étudié. Le problème de dépendance du temps est ensuite examiné en considérant l'historique de la charge réelle du trafic ferroviaire. 1 INTRODUCTION Loads from train-traffic are applied to the entire track system: ballast, sub-ballast and subgrade (Adam & Kopf 2003, Adolfsson et al. 1999, Lieberenz et al. 2005). Climate factors affect the condition of existing track structures. Rainfall and temperature have different influences on the ballast track system components for conventional construction methods (Knothe 2001, Göbel & Lieberenz 2013). For fine-grained soil subgrades, rainfall can influence the consistency of the soil. On the other hand temperature might affect both, the soil, i.e. due to frost heaving, and the rail, i.e. due to tensile and compressive forces. If the ballast track is overstressed by traffic loads and/or climate factors, plastic deformations accumulate in the interface ballast-subgrade (Cantrell Rail Services, Inc. 2001). The process of in situ soil softening at the interface starts, such as the rising of soil materials in track bed under traffic load (mud pump3797 Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development ing). The volume of voids in the ballast bed will be closed stepwise. The stability of track bed is affected by the degree of contamination, causing a reduction of the friction force in the ballast. In addition, the water accumulation in the track bed reduces the stability of the entire track system (Figure 1). If a certain degree of contamination of the ballast is recognized not sufficiently early, the track after local maintenance will return to its pre-maintenance condition (Lichtberger 2007; Tzanakakis 2013). The latter causes a reduction in the ballast elasticity, which imposes higher stresses in the subgrade. This results in the settlement of the railway track causing larger plastic and elastic deformations along the track bed. Furthermore an increase of vertical acceleration due to traffic loads occurs and eventually a loss of serviceability and load bearing capacity. Track bed damages, associated to conventional ballasted track construction methods, are in need of extensive redevelopment. This is of particular importance if higher costs related to train operation disruption, elaborate construction methods and intensive maintenance works are to be mitigated. 2 Different approaches for detection of irregularities on railway tracks are available in literature. Long-wave track irregularities are currently not evaluated under the regular track geometry inspection done by the Deutsche Bahn AG (German Railways). In a study, Kipper explores the detection and valuation of long-wave track-deformations by using actual data measured through a measuring vehicle. By establishing reference values for long-wave longitudinal irregularities, this method could be applied to the regular German Railways’ track geometry inspection (Kipper 2014). The determination of dynamic wheel-rail forces at track level during the passage of a train is developed by Liu et al. (2014). A multi-flexible, parameterized finite element track model in combination with multi body simulation and field measurements, allows for the determination of the wheel-track forces and their load distribution. A guide by Deutsche Bahn AG is given for the qualitative proof of dynamic stability of railway tracks built on soft soils in ballast tracks conventional construction methods. For simplification the modelling is split in two sub-models: Track dynamic (see section 2.1) and soil dynamic model (Vogel et al. 2013). 2.1 Figure 1. a) Mudregion (Göbel & Lieberenz 2013); b) initial state (top): genesis of plastic deformations and leaching of small soil particles; final state (bottom): water accumulation in track bed. 3798 INTERACTION VEHICLE-TRACK-SUBSOIL Vehicle - track interaction The operating program provides information on the speed on the routes and the traffic volume of the railway line. The result is the number of trains (timedependent stress) and the different train classes occurring (force diagram) with their corresponding axle load (Göbel & Lieberenz 2013). With increasing speed, the dynamic impact rises. The overlapping frequencies propagate vibrations within the structure of the track. The individual frequencies can be divided into low, medium and high frequencies. Lowfrequencies are caused for example by wagon length and axle spacing. Middle and high frequencies result from wheel flat, sleeper distance and local unevenness along the railway (Müller-Boruttau & Breitsamter 2000). The stress caused by the vehicle-track interaction is the sum of the quasi-static (lower frequency) and dynamic (higher frequency) forces. The quasi-static Aschrafi et al. loads are simplified by Fryba (Fryba 1999), as determined by the continuously elastic embedded beam model. The higher frequency effects could be determined according to Knothe through the simplified frequency domain method (Knothe 2001). 2.2 Track - subsoil interaction According to Vogel et al. (2010) deformations in sub-ballast / subgrade should not exceed the admissible value in order to ensure high track quality (Vogel et al. 2010). The overlay, the soft soil depth, ground water level and the impact of traffic load influence the dynamic stability. Due to large vibration paths, vibration speeds and vibration acceleration, on the existing track system, elastic and plastic deformations might develop in the vicinity of water accumulations (Vogel et al. 2013; Weisemann & Wegener 2005; Vogel et al. 2011; Wegener 2009). By increasing water content under dynamic impacts, the consistency of the existing soil changes from solid to plastic solid down to the liquid state. For soils in the subgrade frequencies up to 120 Hz are relevant (Göbel & Lieberenz 2013). 3 NUMERICAL SIMULATION Complex three-dimensional numerical modelling of dynamic loads on the track including the subsurface is a very complex and computationally expensive task. For engineering practice the overall modelling can therefore be composed of two substructures of a track dynamic model for the determination of the stationary excitation and a FE model for the subsurface (Vogel et al. 2013). 3.1 General requirements In the numerical modelling of wave propagation problems the mesh fineness and the time step size play an essential role. Extensive studies on the general one-dimensional and two-dimensional wave propagation in soils are among others shown by e.g. Wegener (2013); Wegener & Herle (2010, 2013); Shan (2013) and Henke & Grabe (2009). In the following, basic investigations on the influence of boundary conditions on the wave propagation are shown for the one-dimensional case. The investi- gations were carried out using the FE software package PLAXIS (Vermeer & Brinkgreve 2012). 3.2 Boundary value problem (1d) Loads from a four-axle locomotive with attached four-axle cars have been applied on top of a column. At the bottom of the column (Figure 2, left) dashpots were placed, whereas rollers were applied to the left and the right of the column. Figure 2. Geometry of a single column for numerical simulation of 1d wave propagation with different boundary conditions at the bottom; left: fully fixed (reflecting) boundary / absorbing boundaries (dashpots); middle: extra soil layer without Rayleigh-damping; right: extra soil layer with Rayleigh-damping. As material description for the gravel and the sand the hypoplastic model (von Wolffersdorff 1997) with a modification by Niemunis and Herle to account for the intergranular strain in soils (Niemunis & Herle 1997) was applied. High initial strength at small strains, the decrease of stiffness due to an increase of shear strain and an accumulation of plastic deformations and pore water pressure under cyclic dynamic loads are essential for the numerical simulation (Wegener 2013). The material parameters for a Hochstetten sand were taken for the gravel and sand (Niemunis & Herle 1997). For the clay layer below the gravel (superstructure) the hypoplastic constitutive law is applied after Masin (2005) to take account of the relevant strain areas. For this study the material parameters of London clay were applied to the clay layer (Masin 2005). In general mud pumping is a problem for fine soils; however silt is more sensitive than clay to dynamic loads. Nevertheless, clay was chosen for the determi- 3799 Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development nation of the limiting behaviour of local instabilities development. Figure 3 shows a graph with the input load and the resulting stresses at the bottom. The bottom stress is shifted up (~208 kPa initial stress) and 0.03s left. This 0.03s is apparently the time the wave needs to travel to the bottom. After these shifts, the load/stress at b nearly coincide. The displacements increase when the stress is higher than the initial value. When the wave has passed (~initial stress), the displacements ´stop´. It is obvious that this type of boundary condition (dashpot at the bottom of the column) is unsuitable due to the continuous creep. Therefore, three further boundary conditions are examined in more details next. 3.2.4 Results The oscillating vertical stresses in the time domain of the simulated train crossing are shown in Figure 4 for the above mentioned variants. The calculated stresses at point b of the column (without initial stress) are generally higher and with a small phase shift in accordance to the applied load at point a. Figure 4. Oscillating vertical stresses at point b of the column in the time domain. Figure 3. Stresses and displacements with dashpot at bottom of the column. Dynamic loads from a four-axle locomotive with attached four-axle cars train from calculations with a track dynamic model. 3.2.1 Fully fixed boundary In the first variant, in contrast to the variant with dampers (shown in Figure 2, left) a non-absorbing fixed boundary was applied to the bottom. 3.2.2 Extra soil layer without Rayleigh-damping For the case with an extra layer of soil (Figure 2, middle), a 7 m thick soil layer was added. 3.2.3 Extra soil layer with Rayleigh-damping As a third variant, the material of the aforementioned variant with an extra layer was then provided with a Rayleigh-damping (Figure 2, right). 3800 In the case of the hypoplastic constitutive law with stress- directional stiffness energy is dissipated even in more cyclic loading. In case of additional Rayleigh-damping (Figure 2, right), stress oscillation goes back to zero when load is off. Overall, the calculated stresses and deformations are significantly larger than in the case of two- or three-dimensional wave propagation, since due to the one-dimensionality of the problem the energy remains in the column (Wegner 2013). Extra soil layer with Rayleigh-damping is in our experience the best solution and applied to the following two-dimensional model of a railway track system. In Figure 5, it is clear that all cases overestimate the final settlement, which can be attributed to the version of the hypoplastic model and the material parameters. However, adding extra layer at the boundary with Rayleigh-damping improves the boundary condition as compared to the other two cases. Aschrafi et al. Strictly speaking, this means, that e.g. no geosynthetic reinforced layer or fleece was placed below the gravel of the track bed and consequently soft soil underlies directly the pending superstructure (Figure 6). For the soft cohesive clay layer an undrained material behaviour was assumed. An extra boundary layer of 7 m with Rayleigh-damping was applied to the bottom and the right boundary of the FE model (not shown in Figure 6). Figure 5. Oscillating vertical displacements at point a of the column for hypoplastic simulation in the time domain. 4 CASE STUDY: TRACK-SUBSOIL INTERACTION The overall modelling was carried out from 2 substructures consisting of a track dynamic model for the determination of the stationary excitation and a FE model, with the wave propagation in the track bed and upcoming ground. As the interface of both models, the threshold’s lower edge is selected. In the track dynamic model the vertical stress-time curve from Figure 3 is applied as input for the dynamic FE-calculation. After the calculation is checked whether the resulting deformation of both models at this interface (thresholds lower edge) is of proximately the same size and shear strains have not exceeded a critical value or whether a recalculation with appropriate adjustment of the load of the track-dynamic model is necessary. This article will discuss only the numerical modelling with a simplified soil dynamic 2d FE-model, since a three-dimensional numerical track bed model including the ground with changing of stiffness along the railway track takes significantly more computational time than a two-dimensional calculation (Holm et al. 2002). 4.1 Boundary conditions For the presented 2d calculations, a typical structure was chosen, that is highly susceptible to mud spots. Figure 6. Boundaries of FE-model (not true to scale); extra layer with Rayleigh-damping not shown. 4.2 Results Figure 7 shows the results of the two-dimensional calculation in the time domain of 0-2.4s. The vertical deformations of the roadbed due to the dynamic action of the train crossing at the time t = 2.4s are shown. Figure 7. Vertical displacements of the numerical simulation (loads from a four-axle locomotive with attached four-axle cars train). Due to two-dimensional wave propagation, displacements are less than for the one-dimensional column (Figure 5). 3801 Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development 5 CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK This paper presents the correlation between the analytical calculation of cyclic dynamic impacts, the detection of irregularities on railway tracks and the numerical simulation, which shows the influence and the characteristics of local instabilities. In the numerical modelling of wave propagation problems many factors play a role on the result of the numerical simulation. Basic simplified dynamic studies for track bed have been performed. In particular, it has been studied among other: Using a hypoplastic material model (clay and sand) for dynamic simulation. Studies and recommendations on three different boundary conditions have been made. Transport processes of cohesive soils in the superstructure ballast cannot be represented with the classical FE method. Following aspects have to be considered in the future when performing FE analyses for structures with selective instabilities in the future: 3D modelling of the entire track system and advanced boundary conditions (e.g. infinite elements). Advanced modelling techniques as Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) and Material Point method (MPM) to take into account material transport etc. REFERENCES Adam, D. & Kopf, F. 2003. Dynamische Effekte durch bewegte Lasten auf Fahrwegen, Bauingenieur, 78(1), 1-12. Adolfsson, K. Andréasson, B. Bengtsson, P.E. & Zackrisson P. 1999. High speed train x2000 on soft organic clay – measurements in Sweden, Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Infrastructure, 1713-1718. A. A. Balkema Publishers. Cantrell Rail Services, Inc., 2001, Manual on what to do and what not to do when performing sub-grade maintenance, Australian Rail Track Corporporation LTD, Texas USA, 5-6. Fryba, L. 1999. Vibration of Solids and Structures Under Moving Loads, Thomas Telford. Göbel, C. & Lieberenz, K. 2013. Handbuch Erdbauwerke der Bahnen, DVV Media Group. Henke, S. & Grabe J. 2009. Elastische und anelastische Wellenausbreitungsphänomene in der Boden-Bauwerks-Interaktion, 3. VDI Fachtagung Baudynamik in Kassel, 521-54. VDI Verlag GmbH, VDI-Berichte 2063, Düsseldorf. Holm, G. Andréasson, B. Bengtsson, P.-E. Bodare, A. & Eriksson, H. 2002, Mitigation of Track and Ground Vibrations by High Speed Trains at Ledsgård, Sweden, Report 10, Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre. 3802 Kipper, R. 2014, Identifikation langwelliger Gleislagefehler bei der Gleisgeometrieprüfung, Eisenbahn Ingenieur Kalender, Ausgabe 2014. Knothe, K. 2001. Gleisdynamik, Ernst & Sohn Verlag, Berlin. Lichtberger, B. 2007. Das System Gleis und seine Instandhaltung, Der Eisenbahningenieur (EI), 2007(1), 10-19. Liu, J. Lechner, B. & Freudenstein, S. 2014. Messmethode zur Ermittlung der dynamischen Rad/Schiene-Kräfte, Der Eisenbahningenieur, 2014(2), 43-47. Lieberenz, K.. Wegener, D. & Müller-Boruttau, F. H. 2005. Dynamische Stabilität der Fahrbahn. Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau (ETR), (Special Edition, ABS Hamburg - Berlin), 64-74. Masin, D. 2005. A hypoplastic constitutive model for clays. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 29(4), 311-336. Müller-Boruttau, F. & Breitsamter, N. 2000, Elastische Elemente verringern die Fahrwegbeanspruchung, Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau (ETR), 2000(9), 587-596. Niemunis, A. & Herle I. 1997. Hypoplastic model for cohesionless soils with elastic strain range, Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 2(4), 279-299. Shan,Y. 2013. Numerical Investigation of dynamic Railway vehicle-track-subgrade interaction, Veröffentlichungen des Grundbauinstitutes der Technischen Universität Berlin, Heft 61. Tzanakakis, K. 2013. The Railway Track and its Long Term Behaviour, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. Vermeer, P.A. & Brinkgreve, R. 2012. PLAXIS Version 2012, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Vogel, W. Lieberenz, K. Neidhart, T. & Dirk Wegener, 2010. Erarbeitung von Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Notwendigkeit von Ertüchtigungen bei Eisenbahnstrecken auf Weichschichten, Abschlussbericht. Unveröffentlicht. Vogel, W. Lieberenz, K. Neidhart, T. & Wegener, D. 2011. Zur dynamischen Stabilität von Eisenbahnstrecken auf Weichschichten im Untergrund, Eisenbahntechn. Rundschau (ETR), 60(9), 46-54. Vogel, W. Lieberenz, K. Neidhart, T. & Wegener, D. 2013. Planungshilfe; Rechnerische Untersuchung- und Nachweisverfahren zur Beurteilung der dynamischen Stabilität, Stand 20.08.2013, DB Netz AG Technologiemanagement Fahrweg. von Wolffersdorff, P.-A. 1997. Verformungsprognosen für Stützkonstruktionen, Habilitation, Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik der Universität Fridericiana, Karlsruhe, No. 141. Wegener D. 2009. Bodendynamische Eigenschaften weicher organischer Böden. OHDE-Kolloquium, 47-66. Institut für Geotechnik der TU Dresden, Heft 16. Wegener, D. & Herle, I. 2010. Zur Ermittlung von Scherdehnungen unterhalb von dynamisch belasteten Flächen. Geotechnik, 33(1), 12-18. Wegner, D. & Herle, I. 2013. Akkumulation bleibender Verformungen infolge dynamischer Belastung mittels numerischer Verfahren. Hans Lorenz Symposium. 26.09.2013, Berlin, 153-172. Wegener, D. 2013, Ermittlung bleibender Bodenverformungen infolge dynamischer Belastung mittels numerischer Verfahren, Mitteilungen Heft 17, TU Dresden. Weisemann, U. & Wegener, D. 2005. Beurteilung der Standsicherheit von bestehenden Erdbauwerken, Der Eisenbahningenieur (EI), 2005(2), 52-57.