Report - India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd.

Transcription

Environmental and Social Due Diligence Report
for
Kakinada Deep Water Port
March 2015
Submitted by:
HaskoningDHV Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
Green Boulevard, Plot B 9A, Tower B, 4th Floor, Sector 62, Noida - 201301, India
T +91 120 4016100, F +91 120 4260165, Email: [email protected]
Page 1 of 108
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
2
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... - 4 1.1
SUB PROJECT LOCATION & REGIONAL SETTINGS ................................................................................ - 4 -
1.2
SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... - 6 -
1.3
SCOPE OF SERVICES UNDER THE CURRENT ASSIGNMENT................................................................ - 8 -
1.4
STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .................................................................................................................. - 9 -
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE STATUS...................................................................................... - 10 2.1
APPRAISAL OF CONCESSION AGREEMENT ......................................................................................... - 10 -
2.2
APPRAISAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE – 4TH BERTH & OSV TERMINAL............................... - 11 -
2.3
APPRAISAL OF THE EIA DOCUMENT (5TH, 6TH & 7TH BERTH) ................................................................ - 14 -
2.4
WATER SUPPLY AND WASTE WATER GENERATION ........................................................................... - 15 -
2.5
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE PLAN ............................................................................ - 16 -
2.5.1 FIRE FIGHTING ....................................................................................................................................... - 16 2.5.2 ONSITE AND OFF SITE DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................... - 16 -
3
2.6
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS........................................................... - 17 -
2.7
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME .................................................................................... - 17 -
2.8
DREDGING & LAND RECLAIMATION ACTIVITIES....................................................................................... 17
2.9
GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................................... 17
2.10
STATUS OF STATUTORY COMPLIANCE– ENVIRONMENTAL ................................................................... 18
2.11
PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FOR 5TH, 6TH & 7TH BERTH ............................. 21
2.12
SITE OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 22
2.13
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................... 24
2.14
CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 28
SOCIAL COMPLIANCE & ISSUES ......................................................................................................... 29
3.1
FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIAL DUE DILIGENCE ............................................................................................. 29
3.2
PROJECT STRUCTURE AND DELINEATION OF PROJECT AREA............................................................. 31
3.3
LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS UNDER THE PROJECT ........................................ 33
3.4
COMMUNITIES IN THE PROJECT AREA - THE IMPACT............................................................................. 36
3.5
PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND HEARING IN THE PROJECT.................................................................... 39
-2-
3.6
EMPLOYMENT GENERATION AND SAFEGUARDS FOR EMPLOYEES ..................................................... 39
3.7
CSR INITATIVES BY KSPL ............................................................................................................................ 40
3.8
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................... 41
3.9
CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 42
3.10
DISCLOSURES .............................................................................................................................................. 44
3.11
MONITORING BY IIFCL ................................................................................................................................. 44
ANNEXURE 2-1: EC FOR 4TH BERTH & OSV................................................................................................ 45
ANNEXURE 2-2: EC FOR 5TH, 6TH, & 7TH BERTH .......................................................................................... 49
ANNEXURE 2-3: WATER CESS FORM 1 ...................................................................................................... 55
ANNEXURE 2-4: ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT YEARLY SUBMITTED ON SEPT 2014 ........................ 58
ANNEXURE 2-5: STATUS OF ROAD NETWORK – PORT AREA ............................................................ - 84 ANNEXURE 2-6: CFO CERTIFICATE ........................................................................................................ - 87 ANNEXURE-3.1: PUBLIC HEARING UNDER EIA ..................................................................................... - 92 ANNEXURE-3.2: CASE STUDY OF KAKINADA DEEP WATER PORT .................................................... - 94 ANNEXURE-3.3: CSR DETAILS FROM APR 2010 TO MAR 2014 ............................................................ - 96 ANNEXURE-3.4: MINUTES OF MEETINGS UNDER CSR INITIATIVES ................................................... - 99 ANNEXURE-3.5: DETAILED ACTION PLAN AND TENTATIVE BUDGET PROPOSED ......................... - 101 ANNEXURE-3.6: ACTION PLAN DISCLOSURE ...................................................................................... - 104 -
ATTACHMENT A: GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FUND, DISTRICT
COLLECTOR EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 1 JUNE 2013
ATTACHMENT – B: COMPANIES (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY) RULES, 2014, GOI,
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
-3-
1 INTRODUCTION
1. The India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd (IIFCL) was constituted in 2006 with a mandate to
increase the availability of long term financing for public private partnership (PPP) infrastructure
projects in India. The IIFCL further revised its objectives in 2013, for strengthening its capacity for
infrastructure PPP financing through piloting instruments and implementation approaches.
2. Primarily, IIFCL focuses on two types of financing, direct financing (funding undertaken directly by
IIFCL to the developers during the construction stage) and post construction refinancing, also called the
“Takeout” financing. The two sectors pre-identified and agreed by IIFCL for “Takeout” financing entail
roads & port terminal.
3. The current assignment for preparation of Environmental and Social Due Diligence reports by
HaskoningDHV Consulting Private Limited (HDC) for a maximum of six sub-projects (Kakinada Deep
Water Port being one of them) acts as a groundwork (under the takeout financing component) ensuring
that there are no pending legacy issues or other reputational risks with regard to environmental and
social aspects.
4. The current draft environmental and social due diligence report presents the findings of the
appraisal for the first sub project i.e. Kakinada deep water port terminal1. The project details are
provided in the subsequent sections.
1.1 SUB PROJECT LOCATION & REGIONAL SETTINGS
5. Owing to its strategic location in the East Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh, Kakinada Deep
Water Port (KDWP) constitutes a part of Kakinada port (the second largest port in the state after
Vishakhapatnam). The Latitudinal and Longitudinal extent of the port entail 16°58’05.69’’N
to16°57.36.86”N and 82°16’56.82’’E to 82°16’50.97’’E respectively.
6. The port is well connected and accessible from all major Indian cities and enjoys multi-modal
connectivity by road, rail, air and pipelines (for liquid cargo). The nearest major settlement to the port is
Kakinada town at a distance of 10 km. The port is situated between Vishakhapatnam (170 km in north)
and Chennai (650 km in south) and forms the gateway for the rich agricultural belt of East Godavari,
West Godavari and Krishna Districts of Andhra Pradesh (Refer Figure 1-1).
7. From the regional perspective, the port development over the years coupled with good transport
network comprising connectivity through important roads (NH-214/ NH5 – part of the Golden
Quadrilateral Network), railways (railway station within port area) and air routes (nearest airports at
1 Terminal at the port shall mean an unit consisting of berth or berths with or without the associated land (leased, acquired, reclaimed etc) and
water area and the facilities provided therein by the promoter including but not limited to cargo handling equipments/system, storage, inter modal
transfer systems and utilities.
-4-
Rajahmundry – 65 Kms and Vishakhapatnam - 170 Km) has given impetus to industrial activities in the
region and further consolidated its position as one of the most important intermediate (non- major) ports
in the eastern region of the country.
Figure 1-1: Regional Linkages for the Kakinada Port
8. The bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Andhra Pradesh and a proposal to develop a new capital
town between Vijayawada and Guntur towns has provided additional focus to the region.
9. In addition to the Kakinada Deep Water Port, there is one additional minor port in vicinity i.e.
Kakinada Anchorage Port operated by
Department of Ports, Government of
Andhra Pradesh. An additional port i.e.
Kakinada SEZ port is also proposed in
vicinity to be developed by GMR on 2,100
acres out of the 10,500 acres available
with KSEZ, at an investment of around
INR 500 million. The location of the Port
is about 15 km North of Kakinada Deep
Water Port and is an all together separate
entity with no links to the existing
Kakinada Deep Water Port. The location of Figure 1-2: Location of Port
these three ports in Kakinada is depicted
figure 1-2.
-5-
10. GMR has also established barge-mounted gas-power plant at Kakinada after the Reliance
Industries began natural gas production in KG-D6 block but is currently not operational as observed
during the site visit.
1.2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION
11. Kakinada Sea Ports Limited (KSPL) is the appointed concessionaire by the Government of Andhra
Pradesh (GoAP) for operation, maintenance and management of the terminal in accordance with the
terms of the concession2 agreement and its subsequent amendments. The port was originally
developed as an all-weather port by GoAP with financial assistance from Asian Development Bank and
was commissioned during 1997. GoAP operated the facilities for two years prior to privatizing and
concessionising to KSPL in March, 1999.
12. KSPL began its commercial operations upon signing of the concession agreement for “four berth
terminal”. Four Berth Terminal as defined in the concessionaire agreement implies a terminal with the
existing three shore connected berths (610 m long) and a future berth (300m long) to be constructed
contiguous to the above three berths for handling all containerized cargo of any type, liquid cargo, LPG,
heavy machinery and equipment, over dimensional cargo and steel material with arrangement of any
type developed and operated by concessionaire on the
premises for receiving, shipping and transshipping of
cargo to and from vessels including ships and barges
The Takeout Agreement for subproject between
in
the Novator, Takeout Lender and Borrower has
domestic
and
international
service,
onshore
transportation arrangements, storage and onshore
transfer
from
or
to
railways,
road
and
inland
waterways. The activities to be undertaken under the
3
project were divided into two phases (Phase 1 and
4
been designed under the Phase I and Phase II.
Phase I as per the takeout agreement shall mean
and include the expansion of existing port and
development of OSV jetties and fourth berth of
Phase 2 ) as per the concession agreement.
Kakinada Port.
13. The components of Four Berth Terminal shall
Phase II shall mean and include the construction
include but not be limited to berths, open stockyards,
of fifth and sixth berths, north berths, north
storage sheds, railway yards, handling systems,
retention wall berth, laying of railway sidings,
utilities such as water supply, power supply, fire
capital dredging (balance) fourth berth and for
fighting and safety facilities, communication facilities
deepening of channel to 13.5 meters from the
and all other engineering structures/facilities on the
existing level if around 12 meters at Kakinada
premises.
Port.
14. IIFCL has sanctioned financial assistance for
2
The Concession grants exclusive right and authority to KSPL for Operation, Maintenance and Management of Terminal with Four Shore
connected Berths at Kakinada Port through Concessionaire’s own investment together with a right to levy, collect and retain appropriate charges for
Services by Concessionaire during the concession period.
3
Phase 1 Development shall mean development of that part of the Package which makes the existing three berths fully developed for cargo
handling, storage etc
4
Phase 2 development shall mean construction of the fourth berth (300 meters long) contiguous to South of the three berths and providing of
cargo handling and storage arrangements and other associated facilities
-6-
Phase I and Phase II developments post (at least one year) start of commercial operations date (COD)
as per the guidelines under “takeout” financing. The Phase I and II defined under the Take out
Agreement and concession agreement have different scope of coverage. The phase I and II as
considered under the takeout agreement are explained in the box above.
15. The Port operation was initiated by the KSPL-SPV in April 1999 and fourth berth was commissioned
in March 2008 and two additional berths (fifth and sixth berths) were commissioned in 2012. It may be
observed that Kakinada Deep Water Port (KDWP) since its inception¸ has witnessed series of
development and, expansion activities are still ongoing in line with the proposed port master plan.
16. The ongoing expansion activities includes construction of 7th Berth contiguous to the 6th Berth,
dredging the berth pockets at 7th Berth, reclamation and development of back up area behind 7th Berth,
construction of drainages, roads, installation of lighting system and development of other infrastructural
activities, laying of railway sidings, doubling of existing main line to the port main station, widening and
deepening of Channel from 13.5m to 16m from break water to 5th and 6th and 7th Berths. These above
mentioned tasks are expected to be completed by December 2017.
17. The port operations started with an initial land parcel of 65 acres owned by the Government of
Andhra Pradesh. During the process of expansion, KSPL has reclaimed an area of about 360 acres
and further plans to reclaim additional 153 acres for future developments. Figure 1-3 below shows the
expansion activities in the port terminal area over the years starting 2005 till 2014 based on the Google
Earth data.
Figure 1-3: Development and expansion of the port area
-7-
1.3 SCOPE OF SERVICES UNDER THE CURRENT ASSIGNMENT
18. By emphasizing on achieving a balance between developmental imperatives and environmental
sustainability and social well-being, IIFCL endeavors to avoid, minimize, mitigate environmental and
social adverse impacts/risks in their operations and is committed to comply with all relevant
Government of India (GoI) and state level statutory requirements and also remains responsive to E & S
safeguard policy requirements of DFIs (Development Finance Institutions) wherever DFI’s Line of credit
is involved.
19. The scope of work of the study will mainly encompass the following:
•
To review whether the sub-project is in compliance with applicable national & state statutory
requirements and regulations related to social and environmental aspects only.
•
To review that there is no significant outstanding legal or legacy issues pending based on the
information in public domain and no significant outstanding risks for either IIFCL or the World
Bank.
•
To review whether the social and environmental plans have been implemented during the post
COD phase of sub-projects as per national policies on safeguards and
•
To confirm and report in ESDD, if any safeguard covenants or issues identified as part of
appraisal process are implemented.
20. Under Takeout financing, the financing is akin to post-COD refinancing of a lender as it does not
finance any construction stage activities, and differs considerably from typical project financing. It
contributes to improving (through reduced debt service burden and reduced interest rate) funding for
the operation and maintenance activities (including debt servicing) without financing any new capital
assets, any construction, or any purchase of land, etc.
21. The safeguard implementation during the construction stage as per the applicable policy
provisions has been reviewed based on the available information in public domain to identify
residual issues, if any. However, the current environmental and social due diligence study
focuses on the phase-I and phase-II post COD activities wherein IIFCL has sanctioned financial
assistance. Certain facilities / activities / services provided by the developer for the complete port area
are also appraised as part of the current study as these activities cannot be considered in isolation e.g.
the disaster mitigation plan, etc
22. Being a post COD due diligence study, the focus of the assignment mainly entail review of
environment and social management/action plans under the applicable clauses of the Concessionaire
Agreement, environmental and social safeguard compliance post COD and highlight the compliances
and gaps.
23. This report is based on the reconnaissance field visit observations, data collated and analyzed for
the activities having related environmental and social measures, review of the available compliance
reports/ document, EIA/EMP documents for expansion activities undertaken in the past as per the
availability.
-8-
1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
24. Chapter 1 provides a brief background about the project, description of the sub-project and scope of
the assignment. Chapter 2 provides the details of the due diligence carried out for the environmental
compliance of the sub-project and concludes with any non-compliance and pending statutory
requirements or legacy issues if any identified during the appraisal. Chapter 3 provides the due
diligence of the social safeguards including status of the land and public consultations conducted.
-9-
2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE STATUS
25. The Environmental due diligence task focuses on the status of the applicable environmental
regulatory clearance obtained as on date; the compliance and /or compliance reporting with the
regulatory clearance conditions; review of the EIA documents including compliance of clearance
conditions and address residual environmental impacts of significance especially related to
community/common property resources, natural habitats, and cultural properties etc. The ESDD study
for takeout shall also focus on impacts during operation phase of the sub-project.
26. As part of the environmental due diligence under TFS5 (Take-out Financing), the compliance to the
project was reviewed w.r.t the following:
•
Environmental plans implementation during operation phase
•
Outstanding or pending legal or legacy issues
•
Compliance to applicable national social and environmental laws
•
Institutional arrangements in place for implementation and monitoring of environmental
mitigation measures
•
EHS related clauses in O & M agreement
•
Emergency preparedness and Response plan during operation phase
•
Status of plantation and compensatory plantation; and current arrangements for
maintenance and replacement of casualties
•
Accident / incident reporting
•
Health and work safety measures
•
Outcome of implementation status of public hearing proceedings
27. Reconnaissance site visit was conducted by the consultant’s team along with the IIFCL’s safeguard
team. The site visit focussed on understanding the port terminal activities; applicable environmental and
social aspects in the KSPL Deep Water Port operations; informal interactions with the fishing
community in immediate vicinity; Port officials including the environment and safety department team
members; understanding efforts undertaken by KSPL as part of their mandatory CSR commitments;
and gather requisite information available in public domain & discussions with the developer for
preparation of the environmental and social due diligence report.
2.1 APPRAISAL OF CONCESSION AGREEMENT
28. The concession agreement was signed between the Government of Andhra Pradesh (Transport,
Roads & Buildings Department) and International Seaports Pte Limited, Singapore (currently
5 TFS will deal with sub projects which are at post construction/ operational phase. As assistance under TFS is sanctioned only after minimum of
one year after the start of commercial operations date (COD), it is expected that the safeguard issues as per applicable state, national
guidelines/regulations would have been addressed by then.
- 10 -
represented by SPV in the name of KSPL) on March 19, 1999 at Hyderabad. The Government of
Andhra Pradesh (GoAP) granted permission to the concessionaire to take over the existing
three berths with all the existing infrastructure facilities, construct an additional berth
contiguous to the existing three berths, operate and maintain the facilities and provide services
at its sole cost and expenses. The land reclaimed and waterfront shall always be owned by GoAP
however the concessionaire shall be the owner of the assets only for duration of concession period.
The concession agreement was originally signed for a period of 20 years and has been extended
based on the revised agreements between the GoAP and concessionaire. The key aspects stated in
the concession agreement pertinent to environmental due diligence includes:
•
Obtaining of all statutory and non-statutory clearances required for the package
development of all government and other agencies and authorities and the cost for
obtaining such clearances shall be the responsibility of concessionaire.
•
All plans and designs of the package development shall be reviewed by GoAP prior to
implementation to ensure conformity with the total development plan and accepted
engineering design codes and practices.
•
Concessionaire shall take all necessary measures to ensure compliance with all
environmental laws, laws relating to pollution and shall be entirely liable to any violations or
breaches thereof attributable to concessionaire.
29. Supplementary agreements to the concession agreement were signed between GoAP and KSPL
on 25-Aug-2003 and 28-Jan-2009 modifying some of the clauses under the original agreement taking
into account, the overall circumstances and long term viability of the package. The key points being :
•
The concessionaire shall have the freedom to develop new berths / facilities within the
Deep Water Port. However, GoAP can construct and operate their berth(s). In all other
cases concessionaire has first right of refusal.
•
Additionally the supplementary agreements states that the land if any available and also in
future as and when any lease agreements entered with GoAP by the port users expire, first
right of refusal may be offered to KSPL, in deep water port except the areas earmarked for
ship-building units, fishing harbour and land being used for government purpose.
•
KSPL has been granted permission to establish the ship building activity in the earmarked
land as per the approved master plan of Kakinada port for land use and water front.
Currently KSPL is also undertaking the construction of the 5th, 6th and 7th Berth (berth 5th
and 6th completed). Other future expansion activities include setting up of a floating LNG
terminal.
2.2 APPRAISAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE – 4 T H BERTH & OSV
TERMINAL
30. The documents related to the Environmental Clearance granted by MoEF for the 4th berth & OSV
facility (Refer Annexure 2-1) was reviewed. The status of the compliance to the specific conditions
subject to which the clearances has been granted is reported below. It may be noted that specific
- 11 -
conditions under which the environmental clearance was granted relate to “during construction stage”
activities. The below mentioned compliance reporting is based on the information provided by the
developer during the site visit and documents shared.
SR
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
COMPLIANCE STATUS
1
The dredged material from the maintenance dredging
activity should be dumped at the same location where the
dumping is ongoing. The height of the dumping should
not exceed 30 mts.
Complied - The dredged material from maintenance
dredging disposed into the ongoing dumping site only. The
dumping site did not exceed more than 25 mts height.
2
The reclamation should be carried out using the sand
from sand trap.
Complied - For reclamation sand was used from the sand
trap.
3
Geo textile base should be provided to prevent
percolation at the stacking and storage site.
Complied– Already provided at stacking yard.
4.
Drill oil, metal cuttings during construction should be
properly collected and disposed at approved disposal
areas identified by APPCB.
Minute quantities of drill oil, metal cuttings which aroused
from the construction activity collected with care and
disposed to recyclers
5
Adequate precautions should be taken to contain spillage
and pollution of the coastal water as per the standard
practices observed in the port.
Complied as reported by KSPL
6
The impact of the project on Coringa should be studied
by NIO and the recommendations should be
implemented. Steps should be taken to promote
additional mangrove plantation in the Coringa mangroves
including opening up of the freshwater sources to be
provided.
As per NIO (National Institute of Oceanography) report
(report not available with the consultants) there was no
impact on the Coringa and mangrove plantation.
7
Measures to prevent spontaneous combustion of the coal
in the yard.
Complied with - All coal yards are arranged in such a way
that water sprinkler should meet the corner position also.
Further temperature recording for minimizing the risk of
spontaneous combustion in the coal yards.
8
Measure to prevent the dispersion of dust should be
implemented.
Implementing dust suppressions measures like continuous
sprinkling of coal stacks / wetting of roads / usage of max
sweeper (dust sweeping machines) etc
9
The NIOT report on erosion, littoral drift study along with
the recommendations of the study should be provided
and the recommendations should be implemented.
Implemented the recommendations of NIO during the
construction stage as reported by KSPL
10
All the recommendations listed in the Environmental
Management Plan, Environmental Impact Assessment
report prepared by NIO should be strictly implemented.
Implemented the recommendations of EMP document.
(Water sprinklers arranged, Road sweeper for control of
fugitive emissions, Restriction of vehicular movement, Oil
spill control, Proper disposal of dredge material, Using of
sand in the sand trap for reclamation works as reported by
KSPL)
11
The dredged material obtained should be utilized for
filling up of back up area.
Complied with - The capital dredged material was used for
filling the backup area wherever feasible.
- 12 -
SR
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
COMPLIANCE STATUS
12
The recommendations of CWPRS (Central Water &
Power Research Station) mathematical model studies
with respect to hydrodynamics should be implemented.
Implemented the recommendations of CWPRS.
13
Appropriate shore erosion measures should be taken up
as indicated in the report of NIO.
As per NIO report there is no specific shore erosion impact
due to our project.
14
All the conditions stipulated by the Andhra Pradesh
Pollution Control Board in their consent order No.
APPCB/VSP/RJY/451/CFE/HO/2006, dated: 6-7-2006
should be effectively implemented.
Complied as reported by KSPL
15
Sewage arising in the port area should be disposed off
through septic tank – soak pit system or shall be treated
along with the industrial effluents to conform to the
standards stipulated by APPCB and shall be utilized/recycled for gardening, plantation and irrigation.
Septic tank followed by soak pit for the disposal of sewage
wastewater, and further STP provided and treated water
used for on land irrigation for small part of the green belt.
16
Adequate plantation should be carried out along the
roads of the port premises and a green belt should be
developed.
Ongoing Activity - Avenue plantation all along the road
and blocked plantation in vacant premises.
There should be no withdrawal of ground water in CRZ
area, for this project. The proponent should ensure that
as a result of the proposed constructions, ingress of
saline water into ground water does not take place.
piezometers should be installed for regular monitoring for
this purpose at appropriate locations on the project site.
The fresh water for construction activity was supplied
through tankers by an external party. No withdrawal of
ground water from CRZ area for this project was
undertaken and it is only through third party suppliers.
17
(Proposed 10-meter green belt along the periphery of the
Backup area of the 4th berth and OSV complex)
Piezo wells were installed for monitoring of ground water/
leachate collection.
18
The project should not be commissioned till the requisite
water supply and electricity to the project are provided by
the PWD/Electricity Department.
All necessary approvals from the concerned departments
and all applicable clearances were obtained.
19
Specific arrangements for rain water harvesting should
be made in the project design and the rain water so
harvested should be optimally utilized. Details in this
regard should be furnished this Ministry’s Regional Office
at Bangalore within 3 months.
Rain water structures were already provided at all water
flowing / collecting areas as reported by KSPL during the
interactions.
The copies of reports submitted to the MoEF’s office were
not available.
20
All development activities and the facilities to be
constructed in CRZ area as part of this project should be
strictly in conformity with the provisions of the CRZ
Notification, 1991 as amended subsequently.
All the construction activities were carried out according to
the CRZ rules only.
21
Green buffer zone should be provided all around the
project area in consultation with local forest department
and the report submitted to this Ministry’s Regional Office
The development of the green belt is ongoing currently
and additional green areas are being developed by the
concessionaire.
- 13 -
SR
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
COMPLIANCE STATUS
at Bangalore.
22
No product other than those permissible in the Coastal
Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 should be stored in
the Coastal Regulation Zone area.
Being Complied with as reported by KSPL
23
The project proponent should undertake up activities to
improve the quality of life of the local people living along
the project site. The activities should include supply of
drinking water, providing rainwater harvesting structure.
KSPL has been arranging drinking water in the nearby
wards / fishing community and residents of Hope Island for
the consumption of the general public, and also RO plants
installed under the mandatory CSR initiatives.
24
The relocation of the fishermen community should be
done strictly in accordance with the norms prescribed by
the State Government. The relocated fishermen
community if any will be provided with all facilities
including health care, education, sanitation and
livelihood.
No relocation was required for this project during the project
construction stage as no habitation was covered within the
project area.
The general conditions under the EC granted were also adequately complied by the concessionaire /
KSPL as informed during interactions with the officials of KSPL.
31. There are no pending non - compliances against the general & specific conditions under
which the EC has been granted. However the tasks for development of the proposed green belt
(10-meter green belt along the periphery of the Backup area of the 4th berth and OSV complex)
are yet to be completed. The KSPL officials did highlight the low survival rate of saplings and not so
favourable soil conditions as reasons for slow progress on the development of green belt but confirmed
its commitment to develop the same as per the statutory requirements.
2.3 APPRAISAL OF THE EIA DOCUMENT (5 T H , 6 T H & 7 T H BERTH)
32. The review of the EIA document reveals that the area is predominantly agriculture oriented with
crops like sugarcane and paddy as predominant crops. The area has predominantly agricultural
labourers and industrial workers. The proposed project area is devoid of any major natural vegetation.
33. There is no anticipated rehabilitation of the village / community due to the proposed expansion of
the port. The following activities are being carried out by KSPL towards environmental management
during the port operations:
•
Green belt development in the port area
•
Dust suppression
•
Ambient environmental quality monitoring
34. The port terminal area is not in vicinity of any ecologically sensitive zones like an estuary or
mangrove forest areas. No significant irreversible impacts are identified in the EIA study. The impacts
identified are short term, localized impacts mainly during the construction stage both for marine-side
and land-side. The construction stage impacts include:
- 14 -
1. Changes in the current pattern
2. Increased turbidity levels and DO levels
3. Suspended sediment
35. No impacts are envisioned for the fishing activity being carried out from the fishing harbour located
north of the existing facility and also near the anchorage port. The dredging activity is confined
within the immediate vicinity of the port hence no significant impacts are envisioned. The monitoring
reports shared by KSPL also confirm that the impacts due to increased sediment and turbidity
levels are restricted to construction site / berth only.
2.4 WATER SUPPLY AND WASTE WATER GENERATION
36. As per the information shared by KSPL, the waste water generation is domestic in nature and for
treatment of domestic waste water, a STP is installed and treated water is used for gardening or
irrigation within the STP area. However, the STP is part functioning with less than adequate operation
and maintenance systems. The treated water from STP is being used for gardening, plantation
purposes. In order to further strengthen the STP operations, KSPL plans to undertake complete
revamping of STP by painting, pumps replacement, welding/patch works where necessary, Over Shed
Construction, Cleaning of all the tanks and re-commissioning of STP by August 2015.
37. The estimated waste water generation (KLD) after implementation of expansion shall not exceed
the following:
Sl.No
a)
Source
Domestic
Quantity (KLD)
Existing
25 KLD
Expansion
20 KLD
Total after expansion
45 KLD
38. The port operation generates fugitive liquid emissions due to runoff as well as port operations at
different terminals. Except settling tank arrangement, currently there is no prudent/well established
mechanism of effluent treatment. An ETP is under construction and KSPL confirmed that the ETP will
be established by Oct 2015.
39. There is no extraction of ground water, and water supply is through third party supplier as
mentioned in the table below:
Sr No
a)
B)
Purpose
Dust suppression
Domestic & Gardening
Total
Quantity (KLD)
Existing
Expansion
500 KLD
90 KLD
590 KLD
100 KLD
55 KLD
155 KLD
Total after
expansion
600 KLD
145 KLD
745 KLD
40. KSPL is complying with the statutory requirements by ensuring that no ground water
extraction is being undertaken; the water requirements for domestic purposes, offices, dust
suppression etc are met through an external third party supplier, ensuring that the domestic
waste water generated is treated and reused after treatment in gardening & plantation related
activities.
- 15 -
2.5 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE PLAN
41. The port complex is equipped with adequate water storage and other fire fighting facilities in all fire
prone areas. The details of the facilities and manpower to handle emergencies round the clock are
mentioned in the subsequent subsections:
2.5.1 FIRE FIGHTING
42. KSPL is having a 20 member Fire Emergency Team for Fire Fighting which operates on shift basis
round the clock. In addition to this a separate Safety Team comprising of 7 members, also work on shift
basis round the clock to tackle any emergencies. Apart from this 24X7 Emergency Ambulance Service,
Dock Inspectors, Mechanical Staff, Marine Operational Staff and in-house Security are all trained to coordinate Emergency Situations in Port. The list of firefighting equipment with KSPL is as follows:
•
Main Fire pumps
: 3 No’s
•
Jockey Pump
: 1 No. (30HP)
•
Cooling Water pump
: 1 No (7.5 HP)
•
International shore coupling: 02 Nos
•
Tower Monitors
: 2 Nos
•
Foam Making Branch
: 01 No
•
Foam Tanks
: 2 Nos (Each tank
•
Siren
: 01 No
•
10 kg DCP Extinguishers : 61 Nos
•
Nozzles
: 11 Nos Fixed Jet type
& 4 Nos Universal type
capacity 3000 Ltrs.)
•
Water curtains
: 2 Nos
•
75kg DCP Extinguishers : 04 Nos
•
Motor Operated Valves
: 3 Nos
•
05kg DCP Extinguishers : 03 Nos
•
Ground Monitors
: 4 Nos
•
3.2kg DCP Extinguishers : 02 Nos
•
Double Hydrants
: 5 Nos
•
4.5kg CO2 Extinguishers : 31 Nos
•
Single Hydrants
: 12 Nos
•
09 lts Mechanical Foam
: 21 Nos
•
Hose Boxes
: 17 Nos
•
Fire Entry Suits
: 02 Nos
•
Hoses
: 34 Nos Canvas hoses
•
Breathing Apparatus
: 04 Nos
& 10 Nos Synthetic Rubber Hoses
43. Apart from above, a dedicated & sophisticated multipurpose Fire Tender is available to combat fire
emergencies in & around the port with 9 member dedicated team which operates round the clock on
shift basis.
44. No major fire incidents have been reported in the past within the Port terminal area except one
instance of fire in the conveyor belts for coal transfer due to excessive heating. KSPL upon request by
the DM has also responded to fire emergencies outside the port area as part of their Corporate
Social Responsibility.
2.5.2 ONSITE AND OFF SITE DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
45. The risk assessment & emergency response manual provides guidelines for dealing with natural
(storms / earthquake) and man-made disasters (fire, explosions, terrorist attacks, and discharge of
effluents to water, collision and escape of inflammable or toxic gases). The manual provides guidelines
for minimizing losses to life, environment and property; systematic response to the crisis situations.
46. The manual lays down the institutional setup, roles and responsibilities of the KSPL staff on duty to
handle emergency scenarios. It was observed during the site visits that adequate signs depicting
- 16 -
assembly areas, hardhat areas etc and emergency numbers are displayed adequately within the port
premises. KSPL also conducts regular training and mock drills (at least twice a year) to train staff and
workers in handling emergency situations.
KSPL is adequately complying with the emergency response management in case of natural
and man-made disasters and have a trained manpower to undertake such tasks with a sound
institutional mechanism for implementation.
2.6 ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
47. KSPL has established HSE (health, safety and environment) Management Systems with relevant
staffing and management protocols. KSPL Deep water port operations are also certified for ISO 14001,
OSHAS 18001 and 18000 for overall port management and common infrastructure facilities within the
port area. KSPL also enforces stringent HSE standards for all operators working within the port. While
some of the terminal/cargo operators (fertilizer, etc.) have such systems in place, many of them are yet
to comply with such international practices fully. In order to ensure a common minimum and unified
HSE policy across all the activities within the port area, KSPL plans to prepare an
implementation strategy and conduct training programs in future for further strengthening the
existing management systems.
2.7 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME
48. The monitoring is being carried out on monthly basis through a third party consultant. KSPL
operates 8 ambient air quality monitoring stations within the port area and 2 of these stations have been
recently converted in to continuous monitoring stations. The air quality monitoring efforts by KSPL are
commendable. The monitoring locations and plans which have been deduced in consultation with
Regional Office of Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) Kakinada are as follows:
I.
Stack Monitoring for SO2, NOx & SPM
a.
II.
III.
IV.
Ambient air Quality Monitoring for SO2, NOx,
PM10 & PM2.5
a.
Top of Fire Pump House
b.
Top of Control Room Building
c.
Near Cairn Office Building
d.
Near Customs Office Building
e.
VIth Berth area
f.
VIth Berth Back Up area
VI.
Domestic Waste Water Quality Monitoring
a.
At inner Canteen Area (STP Inlet)
b.
STP Outlet
OSV-Berth I
b.
OSV Berth II
c.
Near OSV Sub Station
d.
Outside OSV DG Set room
e.
OSV Gate
f.
Vth Berth area
g.
Vth Berth Back Up area
h.
VIth Berth area
i.
VIth Berth Back Up area
j.
Gate 4 entrance
Sediment Quality
a.
Marine Water Monitoring
a.
V.
5 DG sets: 125 KVA & 250 KVA &
03x500 KVA capacities.
a.
VIth Berth Area during Low Tide
Noise Monitoring
- 17 -
VIth Berth area
KSPL is adhering to the guidelines for regular monitoring and reporting on the ambient
air quality monitoring (stack emissions), waste water monitoring, noise monitoring and
marine water quality by hiring the services of an approved testing laboratory services.
The monitoring results for May 2014, June 2014, July 2014, Aug 2014 and Oct 2014
declared by the laboratory were shared with the consultants and found to be within
permissible limits for all parameters. The KSPL officials also shared the yearly
compliance reports submitted on Sept 2013 and Sept 2014 and the reports were found to
be satisfactory.
In addition to the statutory compliances it is felt that the haulage roads require
strengthening which could include black topping of these road stretches in the short term
and building concrete roads subsequent to the achievement of the desired soil
compaction levels as part of the measures to enhance the ambient air quality. The
inventory of current haulage roads and their status is enclosed as Annexure 2.
2.8 DREDGING & LAND RECLAIMATION ACTIVITIES
49. The dredge material disposal and dredging tasks were carried out as per the EMP
guidelines. As per the EIA document and information shared by KSPL, the dredged material
from the sand trap is being used for reclamation of the backup areas for the multipurpose berth.
50. About 80% of the maintenance dredge material from the channel and berths area is being
used for beach nourishment and transferred to the northern side to maintain the continuity of the
littoral drift. The remaining dredged material is being disposed at the designated site 15 kms
north of the Deep Water Sea Port. As regards the 5th, 6th & 7th berth EC, the proponent is
complying with the following as informed during the site visits:
S No
Solid Waste
Quantity
Treatment & disposal
1
Capital dredging material
3.2 million cum.
2
Maintenance dredge
material
0.66 m3/year
Back filling at disposal site as
approved by the competent
authorities.
3
Waste Oil
300 Lts/year
To disposed to recyclers authorized
by APPCB.
2.9 GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT
51. A total of 12 acres of green belt has been developed by KSPL as per the following details:
•
5 m wide along the periphery of the back-up area of the multipurpose berth at SBund internal Road.
•
Along the length of the main approach road.
17
•
Along the OSV Internal Road.
•
Along ADB road about 2.5 km stretch (recently undertaken)
•
Opposite all port offices viz., Operations, HSE, Projects, Security etc.
52. As per the information shared by the concessionaire, an area of approximately 12 acres has
been converted to green areas within port complex. Additionally 5 acres at Port Administrative
Building and 2 acre at existing vacant pockets in the port are planted. The concessionaire plans
to develop 45 acres of green plantation areas within the port area as per the conditions under
which NOC has been granted. The details of the 12 acres of green belt is mentioned below:
53. Owing to the saline conditions and black soil the development of the green belt is slow and
difficult. As per the information shared by KSPL, 27,667 saplings have been planted and more
plantations are proposed to be planted. The development of green belt is currently under way to
meet the requirements.
KSPL would need to put in additional efforts to ensure early completion of the targeted
green cover based on which the two EC’s has been granted for 4th Berth and 5th, 6th & 7th
Berth separately.
2.10 STATUS OF STATUTORY COMPLIANCE– ENVIRONMENTAL
54. The table below provides an outline of the applicable regulatory requirements and overall
representation of the statutory compliance followed by the concessionaire. The status is based
on the information shared by KSPL, review of the documents shared by IIFCL/KSPL and
interactions held with the KSPL officials during the site visit.
Statutory
Requirements
Environmental
Clearance (EC) and
CRZ clearances for
construction of 4th
Berth
(Refer Annexure 2-1)
Remarks / Status
EC from CRZ & EIA notifications for 4th Berth and OSV facility
granted on 31 Jan 2007 to handle iron and coal.
• NOC from AP Pollution Control Board granted on 06 July 2006
• Copy of EIA / EMP documents was not made available to the
consultants – hence could not be reviewed.
• 10-meter green belt along the periphery of the backup area of
the 4th Berth and OSV complex. (Ongoing activity at present)
• Year wise expenditure statements on environmental safeguards.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS FOR GRANT OF NOC
• Adequate plantation along the roads of the port premises and
green belt to be developed. (Ongoing activity at present)
•
18
Statutory
Requirements
Environmental
•
Clearance (EC) and
CRZ clearances for 5th, •
6th and 7th Berths
(Refer Annexure 2-2)
Consent to Establish
•
Under Water & Air Act
Remarks / Status
EIA Report pertaining to 5th, 6th and 7th Berth at existing facility
(April 2010) - Reviewed.
EC from CRZ & EIA notifications granted for 5th, 6th and 7th Berths
Based on the review of the documents shared, consent granted
under section 25/26 of Water Act; Section 21 of Air Act was valid till
30th Sept 2014. Renewal application filed by developer within 60
days of expiry (on 26.08.2014), renewal granted (Annexure-2.6)
• STP is operational and ETP is expected to be operational by Oct
2015 as per the information shared by the developer.
• Based on the information provided by the developer, water supply is
through an external third party supplier and no ground water
extraction is undertaken by KSPL.
6 Monthly report
• Reports submitted for the half year ending Sept 2013 were reviewed
submissions
and found satisfactory.
Water Cess (Form – 1) • Form 1 for Nov 2014 shared by the developer and found
returns
satisfactory.
Labour Licence
• Registered under the Contract Labour (regulation & abolition) Act
1970 till 31-12-2014
Accident Risk and
• Certificate issued by Bharti AXA valid till 31-03-2015
Group Health
Insurance
Minimum Wages Act
KSPL is complying with the Minimum Wages Act as informed during
the site visit.
Child Labour
KSPL is complying with the requirements under the Act as informed
(Prohibition and
during the visit.
Regulation) Act, 1986
No child labour was seen during the site visits.
The building and Other As the construction activities are being carried out by the contractor
Construction Workers
and not directly by the developer, the liability to pay cess rests with the
(Regulation of
contractor.
Employment and
Conditions of Service)
However KSPL ensures that the contractor has paid the cess as per
Act 1996 and the Cess the regulatory requirements before payments are released to the
Act of 1996
contractor by developer.
Factories Act 1948,
Factories Act is not applicable to KSPL operations as informed by
with AP State Rules
KSPL
Environment, Health
Occupational Health, Safety and Environment Management Plan in
and Safety Provisions
place including accident reporting,
Forest Diversion /
No Forest land diversion was undertaken for the port terminal area.
Clearance
19
Statutory
Requirements
Handling and Storage
of Hazardous
Substances
Public Liability
Insurance
Consent for handling
hazardous materials
and hazardous waste
Consent for diesel
storage and operation
of DG sets up to a
capacity of 800KW
Provision of cargo
storage and wind
barrier
Remarks / Status
Authorization granted under HW (MH & TM) Rules 2008
Annual Hazardous Waste Filing (Form-4), submitted on 28-06-2014
for year ending March 2014
• The insurance policy documents received from the developer are
valid till April 2015.
• Individual parties handling Hazardous Cargo obtain these licenses
separately. KSPL is not directly handling such cargo.
• The Pollution Control Board license granted to KSPL is inclusive of
Hazardous License for Port.
• In order to control the noise levels in vicinity of the operational DG
sets, the State Pollution Control Board has suggested certain
mitigation measures which are being compiled by KSPL.
•
•
•
•
Mechanized fully
closed conveyor belt
with water sprinkling
arrangements for dust
suppression
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Onsite and Offsite
disaster management
plan
•
The review of the document states that the consent has been
granted for maximum height up to 8 meters & wind barrier of 12
meters around cargo storage areas.
It was observed during the site visit that additional mitigation
measures are required around the coal terminal area to control
dust suppression like installation of high dust screens.
The review of the documents reveals that the mechanized systems
are in place for coal and fertilizers at 5th and 6th Berth operations.
For the 4th Berth, handling is being done in a semi-mechanized
manner.
During site visit period the mechanized conveyor belts were under
maintenance.
Dust suppression by sprinkling water on Roads, Berth and yard
areas is practiced.
All the vehicle involved in transportation of cargo shall be covered
with tarpaulin –
It was observed during site visits that provisions were
undertaken to control dust suppressions. However additional
measures are required to fully control dust suppressions
including adopting fog generating mechanisms.
All the transfer point, loading / unloading points and conveyer
systems are housed completely with leak proof arrangements.
Adequate dust suppression and containment measures need to be
implemented for effective control of fugitive emissions.
The onsite emergency and disaster management plan is adopted by
KSPL
20
Statutory
Requirements
Fire Emergency Team
Remarks / Status
•
•
Development of green •
belt within one year
giving due
consideration to
sources of dust
generation and
•
metrological conditions
Submission of
environmental
statement on a yearly
basis
•
•
•
Disposal of the Dredge •
Materials
•
Reclamation of land
parcels for expansion
of port terminal
Dust Suppression
along Haul roads
•
Dedicated and trained 20 member fire emergency team working in
shifts round the clock to tackle any crisis
Safety audit and training conducted at regular basis as informed by
KSPL.
As per the CFE (Consent For Establishment) conditions, the port
shall develop within one year properly designed green belt giving
due consideration to dust generation and meteorological conditions
with minimum width as committed in letter dated 30.04.2014 and
report compliance every three months to RO-Kakinada.
The development of the green belt is currently ongoing. New
plantations have been undertaken along the ADB road giving
due consideration to dust generating areas near the dry cargo
handling facilities.
Environmental Monitoring being carried out by a third party.
Results of the marine and ambient environmental quality monitoring
(ambient air quality, marine water sample, sediment sample for 6th
berth area) for month of year 2014 was shared by the developer.
Environmental statement submitted in Sept 2013 & Sept 2014
shared by KSPL
Undertaken at a designated site (at Uppada) in sea approximately
15 km north of the port area.
A visit to the site could not be conducted due to the turbulent sea
conditions and absence of permission from the coast guards.
A part of the dredge spoil is used for backfilling and remaining is
being dumped at the disposal ground.
•
2.11 PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FOR
5 T H , 6 T H & 7 T H BERTH
55. As per the information shared by KSPL and minutes of the public hearing meetings (as part
of the EIA requirements for 5th, 6th and 7th Berth) no special demands were raised by the Public.
The issues raised during the public hearing for EIA were predominantly focused on the
measures to improve the environment and employment opportunities for the local people. The
other environmental issues highlighted by the participants during the hearing was with regard to
safety and health problems of workers; allowing fishermen fishing in the ocean and adequate
measures in disposing the dredged waste materials.
56. The issues raised by the local community are addressed by the KSPL by way of providing
employment to the local fishing community, conducting regular health checkup camps for the
21
workers, and ensuring the fishermen community that there are no restrictions on fishing by them
from KSPL. The avenue street lighting for beach road emerged as one of the key expectations in
the hearing which has already been implemented by KSPL.
2.12 SITE OBSERVATIONS
57. The following key observations are concluded based on the site visit and available
documents including interactions with the KSPL officials:
i.
The environmental clearance for 4th Berth & OSV facility and 5th, 6th and 7th berth were
obtained under EIA and CRZ notifications.
ii.
The port terminal does not require any clearances under the Forest Conservation Act as
no forest land parcel was ever acquired. Most of the land has been reclaimed.
iii.
The details about the borrow areas / quarry sites (site locations, closure plans and its
implementation etc) were not made available to the consultant.
iv.
The port terminal has obtained necessary clearances from MoEF / State Pollution
Control Board under Air & Water Acts and other regulatory organizations and has been
complying with the reporting requirements based on the information shared by KSPL.
v.
It was observed during
the site visit that the basic
facilities provided by the
contractor
to
the
construction labourers at
labour
camps
(for
ongoing port expansion
activities) are inadequate
and
needs
further
strengthening as depicted
in the snaps below. KSPL
has the overall responsibility to ensure compliance to the regulatory requirements for
themselves as well as the sub lease partners/ sub contractors/ any third party operating
within the Port terminal area.
vi.
The health and safety compliance are kept as contractor’s responsibility in sub
contracting by KSPL.
vii.
The development of green belt and additional plantations are being undertaken by KSPL.
22
viii.
During the field visit it was observed that the workers were seen wearing safety gears at
work site, adequate safety related signs were displayed at various locations in the port
terminal area.
ix.
Water sprinkling was being done on a regular basis as observed during site visit in areas
handling dry cargo and on the main access roads.
x.
Fire extinguishers are installed and adequate training programs and mock drills are
conducted by KSPL on a regular basis for the staff and workers as observed during site
visit.
xi.
The sub project did not impact any eco sensitive zones / critical natural habitats. None of
such impacts are
expected in the port
expansion activities.
The land
requirements are met
through land
reclamation only.
xii.
Periodic
environmental quality
monitoring
marine
including
environment
23
is carried out regularly by third party agency appointed by KSPL.
58.
Project developer has confirmed that hazardous materials wastes are being
handled by a third party and disposed in an environmentally safe manner. Majority of
these activities are applicable for the complete port terminal area and cannot be looked in
isolation for the due diligence tasks. Overall the development of the port during phase I
and phase II did not have any noticeable adverse impacts.
2.13 PROPOSED ACTION PLAN
59.
KSPL in line with its commitment for continual improvement in port operations and
continuing compliance to various statutory requirements has proposed the following action plan
for implementation:
S Description
Environmental Aspects
1 CFO for Berths 5th& 6th
2 Common minimum unified HSE
policy across all the activities
within the port
Comments & action plan
along with Sub Activities
Tentative
Timeline for
implementation
Monitoring &
Supervision
By
Tentative
Cost
Implication
As on date
Remarks
CFO Meeting is expected to
be completed before 31st
march 2015
31.03.2015
--
--
COMPLETED
-Kick Start meeting between
KSPL HSE related team on
way forward to achieve
unified HSE policy.
15.04.2015
-Circular with reference to
unified HSE policy to be
circulated to all concerned.
03.05.2015
-Call for meeting to
understand the concept and
gap analysis
15.05.2015
-Concrete Plans for filling
the gaps by different parties
under KSPL
15.07.2015
-Way forward & Training,
30.09.2015
-implementation aspect.
30.01.2016
-Assessment of the
implementation
31.07.2016
KSPL HSE
Team
Individual
Parties will
bear the cost
and hence
not included.
(Refer Annexure
– 2.7)
Target Date
31.07.2016
24
S Description
3 Adopting fog generating systems
in all dusty areas instead of water
sprinkling such that working
conditions will significantly
improve.
Fog Generating System will
be installed. However, the
sprinkling system by
sprinklers & road tankers
usage for haulage dust
suppression in other areas
will continue as before.
Tentative
Timeline for
implementation
-Meeting with coal handling
agents who are responsible
to install Fog Generating
System
20.04.2015
-Collecting of location plan
& other description details
of the plan.
25.04.2015
-Installing new AAQ Station
for monitoring the
particulate levels before
installation of system and
after installation of system &
one sample per month will
be collected.
25th-30th Apr 2015
-Meeting on the way
forward on the
implementation aspect of
Fog Generating System.
20.10.2015
-Erection of the System
20.01.2015
-Commissioning of the
System
31.03.2016
Monitoring &
Supervision
By
KSPL HSE
Team
Tentative
Cost
Implication
15Lakhs
As on date
Remarks
Target Date
31.03.2016
25
S Description
4 High dust screens around coal
handling facilities such that the
emissions will be minimized;
Dust Screen/Wind Breaker
will be installed towards
ADB Road side, all along
the stretch of 5th Berth Back
Up area , where major
portion of the coal is
handled
5 Immediate black topping of all the
haulage roads in the short term
and subsequent concretizing once
the soil settlement/compaction is
achieved;
Tentative
Timeline for
implementation
-Meeting on the Dust
Screen aspect with the Coal
Handling Agent erecting the
screen which is presently
ongoing.
20.04.2015
--Installing new AAQ Station
for monitoring the
particulate levels before
installation of system and
after installation of system &
one sample per month will
be collected.
25th-30th Apr 2015
-Review Meeting on the
implementation aspect.
20.06.2015
-Erection Completion
31.08.2015
Black Topping of necessary
Haulage Roads is under
progress.
Black Topping of few
Haulage Roads is planned
Concreting will be done
based on need basis.
30.06.2015
Monitoring &
Supervision
By
KSPL HSE
Team
Tentative
Cost
Implication
30Lakhs
As on date
Remarks
KSPL HSE
Team
2.5Crores
New Target Date
30.06.2015
Target Date
31.08.2015
- Inventory of the Roads
Existing & Proposed
(Annexure 2.5)
26
S Description
6 The proposed ETP is one of the
critical aspects which need to be
implemented on urgent basis
given the lack of comprehensive
treatment facility. KSPL confirmed
that the ETP will be established by
May 31, 2015
ETP Designs finalized, and
expected to establish it by
Oct 2015.
-Wetting of Design
Drawings by GM Ops of
KSPL
7 It is essential to upgrade the STP
and fully utilize the treated
sewage for expanding the ongoing
green belt program within the port
boundaries.
8 Currently KSPL operates 8
ambient air quality monitoring
stations within the port area and 2
of these stations have been
recently converted in to
continuous monitoring stations.
The air quality monitoring efforts
by KSPL are commendable. The
data generated by KSPL need to
be further processed to present a
meaning analysis to record the
improvements as well as the
future actions to minimize the air
pollution.
Tentative
Timeline for
implementation
Monitoring &
Supervision
By
KSPL HSE
Team
05.04.2015
-Civil Bill of Quantities
preparation
30.04.2015
-Initiation of Civil Work
15.06.2015
-Completion of Civil Work
15.08.2015
-Initiation of ETP System
Erection Work
01.09.2015
-Completion of ETP System
Erection Work
01.12.2015
-Commissioning of the
System
Complete Revamping of
STP by Painting, Pumps
Replacement,
Welding/Patch works where
necessary, Over Shed
Construction, and Cleaning
of all the tanks and Recommissioning of STP.
01.02.2016
-Finalising of Contractor/s
for Revamping work
05.05.2015
-Initiation of Revamping
Work
05.08.2015
-Completion of Revamping
Work
Statistical Analysis of Data
will be done every quarter
henceforth for all the eight
stations from the financial
year 2015-16, and
comments or remarks for
future actions to minimize
the air pollution will be
considered.
05.11.2015
KSPL HSE
Team
30.06.2015
Tentative
Cost
Implication
ETP System
Cost
Rs.20Lakhs
Civil Work
Cost for
erecting the
ETP
Rs.20Lakhs
As on date
Remarks
New Target Date
01.02.2016
New Target Date
05.11.2015
KSPL HSE
Team
27
2.14 CONCLUSIONS
60.
Based on the review of the available information, reconnaissance site visits,
interactions with the KSPL officials and local fishermen community in vicinity of the port
area, it can be established that the concessionaire i.e. KSPL is adhering to the statutory
requirements as per the national and state regulations and is committed to protection of
the environment while performing its activities.
61.
A random internet search also did not reveal any pending legacy issues related to the
Kakinada Deep Water Port or its operations. As part of the CSR initiatives, KSPL has also
responded to the fire emergences beyond the port area in the past.
62.
KSPL however need to strength their efforts in establishing green cover in the port area
as per the conditions stipulated under the EC granted.
63.
KSPL has reiterated its commitment to continue its efforts for compliance to the
requirements set forth under the environmental regulatory framework as per the proposed action
plan.
28
3 SOCIAL COMPLIANCE & ISSUES
3.1 FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIAL DUE DILIGENCE
64. The Terms of Reference for the ESDD envisage review of the following aspects as part of
Social Due Diligence
•
Magnitude of land acquisition and resettlement impacts in the project;
•
Outcomes of Resettlement and Tribal Development Plan implementation, if
applicable;
•
Outstanding grievances and complaints, if any;
•
Any court reference cases on land acquisition matters and pending compensation
payments; and
•
Summary of consultations held in affected villages and with other stakeholders
during construction phase, if available and based on this, assessment of
implementation status of outcomes of public hearings/ consultations.
65. The ToR also anticipate ESDD to cover any proposal for the preparation and implementation
of a “Community Development Plan” to meet the pressing and priority needs of the villagers in
the Project Area under their CSR initiatives during the construction and operation phase.
66. In light of the anticipated due diligence requirements of the study, there are four critical
elements:
•
Delineating the project area for the purpose of study and understanding the project
structure
•
Assessment of development activities, the land requirements and its procurement
under the project
•
Social impact of the project in the project area including achievement of recorded
community expectations as part of the public hearing/ consultation process
•
Initiatives by the project developer to address the community needs as part of the
CSR Initiatives as well as integration of communities in the project development
process
67. Social Due Diligence for the Kakinada Deep Water Port (KDWP) Project has been carried
out on the basis of review of project documents and documents available in the public domain
including:
29
•
Concession Agreement for Four Shore Connected Berths at Kakinada Port signed
between GoAP and ISPL, Singapore dated March 19, 1999
•
Supplementary Agreement to the Concession Agreement for Four Shore Connected
Berths at Kakinada Port signed between GoAP and KSPL (SPV constituted by ISPL
in the name of Cocanada Port Company Limited and Assignment Deed signed in
favour of CCPL on April 2, 1999, CCPL was renamed as Kakinada Seaports Limited
on September 18, 2001) dated August 25, 2003
•
Second Supplementary Agreement to the Concession Agreement for Four Shore
Connected Berths at Kakinada Port signed between GoAP and KSPL dated January
28, 2009
•
Project Agreement dated August 10, 1990 between Asian Development Bank and
the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The loan agreement was applicable for
financing the initial development of Births 1-3 by the GoAP.
•
Government Orders issued by GoAP with regard to KDWP and other Port Projects
in the State
•
Report No. 3 of 2013 Government of Andhra Pradesh - Report of the Comptroller
and Auditor General of India on Economic Sector
•
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (for proposed multi-purpose berths
V, VI and VII at existing facility), April 2010 including Compliance of Public Hearing
Points
•
Take-out Agreement signed between KSPL, IIFCL, State Bank of Patiala and Union
Bank of India dated July 27, 2012
•
Guidelines of Corporate Social Responsibility Funds, District Collector East
Godavari District dated June 1, 2013
•
PPP TOOLKIT for Improving PPP Decision-Making Processes, Ministry of Finance,
GoI, Case Study of Kakinada Port
68. The following information has been provided by the Developer with regard to the
implementation of social safeguards and the corporate social responsibility.
•
Implementation Status of Compliance of Public Hearing Points as reported by the
KSPL
•
Information regarding CSR activities undertaken by KSPL
69. In addition to the documents reviewed and the information provided by the Developer, the
community in the project area was contacted to understand the project impact and also the
selected CSR initiatives taken up by the Developer were visited and the beneficiary community
consulted regarding the benefits.
30
3.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE AND DELINEATION OF PROJECT AREA
70. Kakinada Port comprises of Kakinada Anchorage Port and Kakinada Fishing Harbour
(managed departmentally by the Director of Ports), and Kakinada Deep Water Port (developed
by GoAP and handed over to a private developer KSPL). The present study is limited to the
Kakinada Deep Water Port being managed by KSPL. However, from the perspective of impact
area, parts of Kakinada municipal area (mainly the fisherman colonies), Village Suryapet and
fishing harbor community falls within the immediate surroundings of the Project area (KDWP) on
the land side and Hope Island fisherman community on the water side. The major interventions
made as part of the community development activities under the CSR concentrate on these
areas.
The GOAP recognized the importance of port development due to major developments in power
sector, industrial development, agricultural activities, fisheries development and mineral
exploitation etc in light of the initiation of liberalization process in the Indian economy in early
1990’s. Kakinada Deep Water Port (KDWP), located in East Godavari District and comprising
three berths and other related infrastructure, was developed by GoAP between 1993 and 1996.
GOAP decided to operate the three existing shore connected berths, develop and operate one
more berth contiguous to the existing three berths and perform certain aspects of operation
maintenance and management of common facilities of the entire port through private
participation.
71. The Government of Andhra Pradesh had initiated the process for privatization of Kakinada in
1994 and finally the process could be successfully culminated in March 1999 with the award of 3
+ 1 berths at KDWP to the International Seaports Pte Limited, Singapore (ISPL) consortium, led
by Larsen & Toubro (India) Ltd., on Operate, Maintain, Share and Transfer (OMST –for three
berths)/Build Operate, Share and Transfer (BOST- for fourth berth) basis. Posts signing of
Concession Agreement in March 1999, the project facilities at existing three births for operations
were handed over to the SPV and the operations were commenced by the SPV with effect from
April 1, 1999.
72. As per the Concession Agreement, the development was envisaged to be completed in two
phases. The Phase 1 Development included making the existing three berths fully developed for
cargo handling, storage etc and Phase 2 development involved construction of the fourth berth
(300 meters long) contiguous to South of the three berths and providing of cargo handling and
storage arrangements and other associated facilities. The developer was required to prepare
plan for execution of Phase 2 Development (addition of fourth berth) on achievement of berth
occupancy of 65% for a year and complete the execution within 24 months of its
commencement. The Fourth Birth was commissioned in March 2008.
31
73. KDWP project was amongst the first private sector port projects in the country and was
launched at a time when such experience was not available in the country related to Concession
Agreements for the Port Projects and also in terms of defining the risk sharing mechanisms.
Based on the experiences gained during the execution of Agreement, several issues were
identified in the Concession Agreement including the ones emerging due to policy changes and
signing of concession agreement for other ports. In view of factors affecting the viability of the
project (primarily due to the non-realization of estimated traffic and the high component of MGA
that the developer had to pay to GoAP and the advantageous position for the other Competitor
Port Operators who entered agreements at later dates with different terms and conditions of the
Concession Agreement), several discussions and negotiations took place between the GoAP
and KSPL based on which two supplementary agreements to the original concession agreement
have been signed during 2003 and 2009 respectively.
74. The major changes as mutually agreed between GoAP and KSPL include revision in
concession period, freedom for future development, revisions in revenue sharing and removal of
minimum guarantee provisions, revision in provisions related to requirement of additional lands.
Following the amendments in the Concession Agreement in 2009, KSPL initiated the process for
3 additional births, out of which two additional berths (fifth and sixth berths) were commissioned
in 2011-12 and the seventh is under commissioning.
Figure-3.1: Master Plan for Kakinada Port for Land use and Water Front (2020)
Berth-1 to 4
Phase-1 and Phase-2
75. Figure-3.1 shows the Master Plan for Kakinada Port for Land use and Water Front (2020)
prepared by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, which clearly shows that majority of the Port
related activities are concentrated on the eastern side of the Samalkota-Kakinada Bypass
32
except for a narrow strip of proposed activities on the western side of the road. The Outline of
the Master Plan area (red outline) has been superimposed on the google earth image along with
demarcation of existing KDWP boundary of development (blue outline) in Figure-3.2. The
chronological development of KDWP over a period of 2005 to 2014 is already explained in
Section 1.1 also clearly shows that majority of the development has started coming up post
2009.
Figure-3.2: Master Plan and KDWP Boundaries on Google Earth
76. The safeguard implementation during the construction stage as per applicable policy
provisions has been reviewed to identify any residual issues based on the information available
in public domain. The extent and scope is limited to post COD Phase-I and Phase-II activities
included as part of takeout financing by IIFCL. Being a post COD due diligence study, the focus
of the social due diligence is more on the compliance of provisions under the Concessionaire
Agreement and the prevailing national laws related to social safeguards.
3.3 LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS UNDER
THE PROJECT
77. The Project involved transfer of land under the existing Port developed by the GoAP during
the period 1993-96 which became operational in 1997 and was being operated by GoAP till it
was transferred to KSPL in 1999. The Port was built primarily in the submerged and partially
reclaimed land in the coast area falling in the jurisdictions of the Government as is clearly evident
33
from Clause 3.2 of the Concession Agreement regarding the land area leased which reads as
follows:
78. “Clause 3.2: The land areas (including the submerged areas) to be leased by the GOAP to
CONCESSIONAIRE upon execution of this Agreement are indicated in Annexure C (Figure 3.3
below). The partially reclaimed area behind the three berths will be treated as land area for the
purposes of lease charges.”
Figure 3.3: Project Area as per Concession Agreement (Four Berth Terminal)
79. The Clause 3.2 of the Concession Agreement has been amended as per the Second
Supplementary Agreement signed in 2009 and now reads:
80. “The land area (including the submerged areas) to be released by the GoAP to
Concessionaire upon execution of this Agreement, area indicated in Annexure-C of the
Concession Agreement dated 19.3.1999. The partially reclaimed areas behind the three berths
will be treated as land area for the purpose of lease charges.
81. GoAP shall offer land if any available and also in future as and when any lease agreements
entered with GoAP by the port users expire (both annual and long term), first right of refusal may
be offered In KSPL, in deep water port, except the areas earmarked for ship- building units,
34
fishing harbour and land being used for Government purpose." The area excluded from the
purview of the Concession Agreement is marked with green circle in Figure 3.1.
82. The issue related to land status and ownership was also confirmed during the site visit from
the Developer and the residents of surrounding fishing harbour settlement (settlement has come
up on government land) and it has been confirmed that the land under the KDWP belonged to
the government and no private land was acquired for the KDWP.
83. The Concession Agreement does not provide the exact extent of land (except the map) area
including the submerged area that was transferred to KSPL as part of initial Three Berth Port
handed over in 1999. As informed by KSPL, the GoAP had transferred about 65 Acres of land
(including submerged land) at the time of initial transfer.
84. During the process of expansion, KSPL reclaimed an area of about 360 acres and further
plans to reclaim an additional 153 acres for future developments, which can be seen in Figure
3.4 below.
Figure-3.4: Layout of KDWP including Future Berths
85. Clause 2.25 of the Concession Agreement defines the term Premises as:
“The Premises means and includes (1) land (including submerged land) given on lease by the
GOAP to the CONCESSIONAIRE (2) all structures and facilities constructed or provided by the
GOAP on Premises sub component (1) above; (3) land reclaimed by the CONCESSIONAIRE
during the pendency of this Agreement; (4) all structures and facilities including modifications
constructed or provided by the CONCESSIONAIRE or its sub-contractors or any other
35
assignees on the Premises sub components (1) to (3) above during the pendency of this
Agreement and (5) Tugs, pilot launches and other flotilla for providing services to the ships, all
above within limits of Kakinada Port.”
86. It clearly establishes that except for the initial government land leased by the GoAP
(including submerged land), the remaining land has to be reclaimed by the Developer. Under this
project, the acquisition of land was not anticipated and hence there is no clause in the
Concession Agreement which refers to any land to be acquired and the associated
responsibilities of the Developer with regard to the social safeguards. The second important
factor is that the Concession Agreement was signed back in 1999, where the policies and
process for private port agreements were in the evolving stages. Since there was no land
acquisition involved in the project, there were no issues associated with the resettlement
impacts. Even the future expansion of births Container Zone and Cargo Zone is proposed only
through reclaimed land. Hence, no resettlement impacts are anticipated. The review of
documents available in public domain and discussions with the stakeholders clearly
reveals that there are no residual issues with regard to social safeguards implementation.
87. The subsequent Agreements for other Private Ports signed by the GoAP involving land
acquisition had provisions for the R&R package. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has comeup with privatization guidelines to encourage the private sector in Port development. The specific
provisions related to land for private ports in the policy are:
•
Government will assist in acquisition of land on payment by the investor. Wherever port
land is available, it will be provided to the parties at the rates prescribed by the
Government.
•
Land required for those industries which need to be located close to a port to take
advantage of bulk handling of their materials/products, can be acquired on the basis of
feasibility report made by the investor. If the investor wants to own the land and lease out
to industries, such land can be acquired on market price under Land Acquisition Act.
3.4 COMMUNITIES IN THE PROJECT AREA - THE IMPACT
88. As can be observed from Figure-3.4, there is an existing Fishing Harbour (green boundary in
Figure-3.5) in the north of KDWP boundary which was constructed back in 1984. In addition to
the Fishing Harbour, several huts have come-up on the harbor area (yellow boundary in Map3.5). The fishing harbor community resides outside the land allotted to KSPL for the purpose of
Kakinada Deep Water Port (blue boundary in Figure-3.5). As per the Master Plan for the
Kakinada Port, the fishing harbor is proposed to be relocated to further north of the existing
harbor (refer Figure-3.1) beyond the proposed break water structure and the current fishing
36
harbor area is proposed for future ship building activity as per the Master Plan Proposal. The
issue was discussed with the representatives of KSPL and they mentioned that decision
regarding relocation of fishing harbor is not within their purview as it falls under the Department
of Port of the state government. The operations of fishing harbor do not affect the functioning of
KDWP and they don’t intend to disturb the harbor. If the state government decides to relocate
the fishing harbor, KSPL has no controls over the decision. As per the provisions of the Second
Supplementary Agreement, “GoAP shall offer land if any available and also in future as and
when any lease agreements entered with GoAP by the port users expire (both annual and long
term), first right of refusal may be offered In KSPL, in deep water port, except the areas
earmarked for ship- building units, fishing harbour and land being used for Government
purpose". The Fishing Harbor does not fall under the purview of KSPL and hence has no
direct impact on the KSPL operations.
Figure-3.5: Fishing Harbour and Fishing Harbour Colony
89. In the initial stages of the privatization process, the stakeholder consultations were not
carried out and as a result, the two major stakeholders, i.e. the fisherman and the port workers at
Anchorage Port had lot of apprehensions with regard to loss of livelihood due to expansion of
KDWP.
90. The Fishermen working on the Fishing Harbour also had apprehensions in the initial stages
of the project regarding the likely impact on their business and livelihood. The KSPL adopted
37
an approach of inclusive and participative development. It worked with the people and also
explained them about the project and assured the community of not affecting their shipping
operations for fishing. The fishing harbour operations and the port navigation channel do not
conflict each other. KSPL has not put any restrictions on fishing ships crossing the navigation
channel. The KSPL has also made a provision to get the navigation channel before any ship is
brought into the channel by using the pilot boats to avoid any risks of accidents.
91. The tender documents issued by the GoAP had made certain projections with regard to the
cargo mix that included agri centric cargo like fertilizers, oil extractions, sugar, rice and wheat
that constituted 70% of the projected volumes at the time of bid. However, there were instances
of the anchorage port workers going on strike in protest of the deep water port handling agri
commodities such as wheat. The final negotiated Concession Agreement signed with the
Developer introduced a Clause which was not in line with the original tender conditions. Clause
2.19.1 (part) clause restricted the Developer to handle cargo handled by Anchorage Port, which
reads as follows:
92. “The concessionaire would also be permitted to handle any bulk cargo of the kind not
previously or presently handled by the Anchorage Port. Further, all cargo generated exclusively
by the Concessionaire through their own efforts may be handled by the Deep Water Port.”
93. The restrictive clause affected the viability of the project and KSPL was unable to meet the
obligations of Minimum Guaranteed Amount (MGA), which resulted in financial closure for
38
Phase-1 Development. After several rounds of discussions and negotiations, the government
agreed for rescheduling of payment of MGA ensuring that NPV of the amount to be paid during
the concession period remained the same in 2003 and accordingly the supplementary
concession agreement included these changes. However, even these changes did not make the
project viable and accordingly the second supplementary agreement deleted the clause related
to MGA. Annexure-3.2 provides further details of the Case Study of KDWP available as part of
PPP Toolkit on the web-site of Ministry of Finance, GoI.
3.5 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND HEARING IN THE PROJECT
94. The project does not involve any land acquisition so there were no hearings related to the
land acquisition or resettlement impacts. However, as part of the EIA exercise for V, VI and VII
birth, public hearings were conducted in 2009-2010 where the community representatives had
flagged certain issues and expressed the expectations from the project for the area. The list of
issues and the response from the management along with the status of existing implementation
is enclosed as Annexure-3.1.
The issues raised during the public hearing for EIA were
predominantly focused on the measures to improve the environment and employment
opportunities for the local people (discussed in next section). The other social issues raised
during the hearing was with regard to rehabilitation of
fishermen who will lose their livelihood,
and it was clarified that the reclamation of land is towards the southern side of the existing port
which does not affect the fishermen livelihood in any way. The avenue street lighting for beach
road emerged as one of the key expectations in the hearing which has already been
implemented as reported.
95. Apart from the above referred Public Hearing minutes, there is no formal documentation
available regarding the specific demands from the community. The community needs for the
surrounding communities are identified more on the basis of word of mouth and then in
consultation with the local community representatives, the developer has executed various
activities under the CSR for social development. However, no formal documentation of the
consultations was being maintained.
3.6 EMPLOYMENT GENERATION AND SAFEGUARDS FOR
EMPLOYEES
96. As per the data provided by the Developer, about 400 members were employed through
construction contractor and his sub contractors during construction phase. During operation
stage, about 100 members are employed. The expansion of port activities with the creation of
additional births would result in further expansion of employment during construction and
39
operation phase. As per the EIA document prepared for Births 5, 6 and 7, the total direct
employment is estimated at 600, whereas during construction phase an employment of about
1000 workers and indirect employment is estimated at 1500. KSPL is adhering to the insurance
for employees as per the provisions of the Concession Agreement and the Port requirements for
the employees. In addition, other safeguards for employees with regard to health and safety of
the employees are also being adhered to which are already discussed in Section on
Environmental Due Diligence.
3.7 CSR INITATIVES BY KSPL
97. The year-wise detail of the amount spent by KSPL towards CSR activities is given below.
98. The activities undertaken by KSPL as part of the CSR initiatives ranges from small scale
donations to trusts/ societies working for social causes to large capital intensive contribution of
equipments and vehicles for hospital as per the requirements finalised by the district
administration. The list of activities taken up by KSPL during the past 4 years along with the
amount spent on each activity under CSR is enclosed as Annexure-3.3. The District Collector,
East Godavari District issued the guidelines for implementation of CSR activities in order to
coordinate the development activities in the district. The guidelines are enclosed as Attachment A. The guidelines were made effective from April 1, 2013 and subsequent implementation of
CSR activities has been made as per the provisions of these guidelines. The CSR provisions
have been notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) on February 27, 2014 giving
effect to Section 135 the new Companies Act, 2013 (“Companies Act”) dealing with CSR read
with Schedule VII (“Schedule”) of the Companies Act covering the revised list of activities and
the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014 (“CSR Rules”), enclosed as
Attachment - B. The said Section, Schedule and CSR Rules will come into effect from the first
day of April, 2014.The CSR provision will be applicable to companies with an annual turnover of
INR 10 billion and more, or a net worth of INR 5 billion and more, or a net profit of INR 0.05
billion or more during any financial year. Companies that trigger any of the aforesaid conditions
40
must spend at least two per cent (2%) of their average net profits made during the three
immediately preceding financial years on CSR activities and/or report the reason for spending or
non-expenditure. The provisions related to the monitoring are well laid out in CSR Rules
regarding the implementation of the activities planned and compliance of the reporting
requirements. Based on the information provided by the Developer and visit to some of the CSR
initiatives implemented it can be concluded that the CSR activities are being implemented as per
the statutory requirements.
99. KSPL as part of its CSR initiatives had volunteered to organize meetings with the villagers of
Fishing Harbor, Vakalpudi, and Surya Rao Peta and identify immediate interventions that require
support in meeting the pressing needs of the community with regard to the infrastructure
development in these villages. In this context KSPL has organized meeting at Gram Panchayat
office of Surya Rao Peta on Feb 17, 2015 and at fishing harbor village on Feb 18, 2015 to
identify the priorities of the local communities. The minutes of the above referred meetings are
enclosed as Annexure 3.4.
3.8 PROPOSED ACTION PLAN
100.
KSPL in line with its commitment for improving the living conditions of the communities in
the surrounding villages as part of CSR initiatives plans to undertake the following activities
41
based on the priorities of the village communities as discussed during the above referred
meetings:
Sl.
No.
Activities identified
Tentative Timeline
for implementation
1
The activities identified for implementation
based on discussion with the community in
SuryaRao village include
For School in Suryarao pet
(a) Improving toilet facility.
(b) Sintex Tank (1000 liters capacity)
including pipeline connections.
(c) Steel Plates & Glasses for afternoon
lunch
(d) Improve sanitation by providing dust
bins and spraying of germicide powders.
(e) Improve the standards of Anganwadi
Centers like repairs for the building.
31.08.2015
The activities identified for implementation
based on discussion with the community in
Fishing harbor village include
.
31.08.2015
2
Monitoring &
Supervision
By
KSPL
CSR
Team
Remarks
Action Plan Separately
Given for Social Aspects
(Village
Wise)
Annexure 3.5
KSPL
Team
CSR
Action Plan Separately
Given for Social Aspects
(Village
Wise)
Annexure 3.5
a) Water distribution lines
b) Improvements to toilets.
c) refurbishment to the ceilings of the
school to protect from heat in summers,
The detailed action plan including tentative budget proposed for implementation of these
activities along with the timeline are enclosed in Annexure 3.5.
3.9 CONCLUSIONS
101.
The Social due-diligence study for the KDWP project clearly shows that there is no land
acquisition involved in the project and hence no issues related to resettlement and rehabilitation.
The consultants also visited the project site along with the social and environmental experts of
IIFCL during November 2014. The objective of the visit was to get a first hand information and
understanding of the project and the safeguard and social/ community development measures
being undertaken by the developer. The site visit included interactions with the developer, review
the updated documents available with the developer regarding the project activities, understand
the project operations and also interact with the communities in the project area to understand
the social impact of the project.
•
The initial parcel of three births (including submerged land) was part of the existing port
managed by GoAP admeasuring about 65 Acres handed over to KSPL in April 1999 and the
remaining entire land is only through reclamation. Based on the review of the Concession
42
Agreement, documents and the available information provided by Developer, information
available in public domain and the interaction with the community, the project does not
appear to have any legacy or residual issues related to the social safeguards.
•
The project did not have any negative impact on the livelihood of the communities in the
surrounding areas and in fact it has generated employment opportunities for the local people,
both directly and indirectly as confirmed through the interactions with the community in the
surrounding area. The project has helped in generating employment opportunities during
construction and operation stages of project.
•
The interactions with the users of Fishing Harbour facility for catching the fishes also
confirmed that there are no conflicts in the port operation and the shipping operation. The
Developer has never stopped movement of fishing ships crossing the navigation channel and
the safety measures are adopted by the KSPL at the time of movement of any ship in the
Channel. The operations at the fishing harbour are managed by the Department of Ports.
The fishing harbour activities were also observed and it was found that both the fishing and
port activities do not conflict each other and hence no impact on the livelihood.
•
The fishing harbour community in the fishing harbour area as reported are squatting on the
fishing harbour land which does not fall under the direct purview of KSPL. In addition as per
the provisions of the second supplementary agreement, “the GoAP shall offer land if any
available and also in future as and when any lease agreements entered with GoAP by the
port users expire (both annual and long term), first right of refusal may be offered In KSPL, in
deep water port, except the areas earmarked for ship- building units, fishing harbour and
land being used for Government purpose.".It clearly establishes that the state government
has exempted the Fishing Harbour area from the purview of First right of refusal for KSPL. It
does not conflict the operations of KDWP and any issue of relocation or rehabilitation of this
community does not fall in the purview and action plan of the Developer.
•
The community also confirmed the positive impact the project has for the area. The
developer has helped the community living in the fishing harbour area in addressing two
major day to day needs by extending support for improvement in the school building and
daily supply of drinking water through tankers for the community living in the fishing harbour
area huts.
•
The Port, being a gated complex with restricted entry due to security and safety reasons,
does not affect the only community in the surrounding areas.
•
The Developer has established systems for health and safety of the staff and workers. The
Developer has taken necessary insurance for the workers.
43
•
The Corporate Social Responsibility activities are being undertaken as per the provisions of
the Company Act, CSR Rules and the guidelines issued by the District Administration with
regard to community development activities. The monitoring mechanisms are already in
place as per the provisions of the CSR Rules, 2014 as well as the guidelines issued by the
district administration and the implementation of CSR activities is being taken up by the
developer as per the directions of the district administration.
102.
Based on the site visits observations and findings based on review of information
available in Public domain, it can be concluded that the project have no residual social safeguard
issues which could have reputational risks for the IIFCL or the World Bank.
3.10 DISCLOSURES
103.
The final ESDDR report will be accepted and approved by the project developer and
endorsed by IIFCL after getting the No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the World Bank. After
approval, the report will also be uploaded for public disclosure in IIFCL’s official website as well
as Project developer’s website.
104.
The action plan translated in local language for sharing with the village communities is
enclosed as Annexure 3.6 and shall be shared with the local villagers after it is approved and
ESDDR is uploaded on the developer’s website.
3.11 MONITORING BY IIFCL
105.
The Developer shall submit the report on the implementation of the action plan every six
months to IIFCL, which shall be shared with the World Bank by IIFCL. IIFCL shall make annual
site visits for the purpose of monitoring the implementation of the action plans for social and
environmental aspects.
44
Annexure 2-1: EC for 4 th Berth & OSV
45
46
47
48
Annexure 2-2: EC for 5 th , 6 th , & 7 th Berth
49
50
51
52
53
54
Annexure 2-3: Water Cess Form 1
55
56
57
Annexure 2-4: Environmental Statement
Yearly submitted on Sept 2014
58
59
PURPOSE AND ADVANATGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT STUDIES
60
The Environmental statement studies serve the following three basic purposes:
i) Compilation of the complete information on the operation of the industrial facility and its potential sources of
pollution through technical inspection. This inspection, which is conducted at a facility, allows the activities that are
programmed and entrusted to the operational branches to be carried out in order to correct the different problems
detected at their source or to force conservation and maintenance measures need to prevent major pollution
problems.
ii) Evaluation of the conditions surrounding the industrial facility in order to estimate possible impacts, which may be
caused, and the suggested recovery measures for such situations.
iii) Preparation and implementation of action plans for better control of the environment, and the environmentally
related industrial activities, including further developmental activities of the areas.
The primary and obvious advantage of preparation of environmental statement is to help and safeguard the
environment and to substantiate compliance with local, regional and national laws and regulations, and with
the company policy and standards. There can be several other benefits, the importance of which may vary
from situation to situation. These benefits include
i)Reduced exposure to litigation and regulatory risk (e.g. prosecutions, penalties etc.) – facilitating comparison and
interchange of information between operations or plants.
ii)Increasing employer awareness of environmental policies and responsibilities.
iii)Identifying potential cost – savings including those resulting from waste minimization.
iv)Evaluating training programmes and providing data to assist in training personnel.
v)Providing an information base for use in emergencies and evaluating the effectiveness of emergency response
arrangements.
vi)Assuring an adequate, up-to-date environmental data base for internal management awareness and decision
making in relation to plant modification, new plants etc.
vii)Enabling management to give credit for good environmental performance.
viii)Helping to assist relations to authorities by convincing them that complete and effective statement are being
undertaken.
ix)Facilitating and obtaining of insurance coverage for environmental impairment liability.
Summary
INTRODUCTION:
The Kakinada Seaports Limited site is on the southern part of East coast of India, 10 Km from Kakinada Town in East
Godavari District. The port is commissioned and started operating from April 1999. The Plant is occupied an area of
145 acres.
Environmental Audit Report is a commitment by M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited to minimize the impact of its
operations on the environment and is also committed to the principles of cleaner production and waste minimization.
Environmental Audit Report is being developed in conjunction with regulatory authorities, APPCB, and is in full
compliance with relevant Industry codes of practice.
M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited assigned M/s. SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS, Visakhapatnam to provide
consulting services to conduct “Environmental Statement” studies. SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS has carried
out an analysis of the activities of port affecting environment.
The subject-matter of the study/analysis are:
•
Process audit
•
Energy audit
•
Stack emissions
•
Water and waste water audit
•
Compliance audit
•
Health and safety audit
METHODOLOGY
Audit programme was carried out at M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited in 3 phases:
61
1.
2.
3.
Pre-audit activities
On-site activities
Post-audit activities
SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
The scope of Environmental Statement envisages Facilitating Management Control of Environmental Practices on port’s performance, economical benefit and
environmental situation,
Assessing compliance with M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited’s policy and standards, which would include
meeting regulatory requirements.
Develop and draw recommendations based on material, water and energy balance scenarios.
Site assessment proceeding specific questionnaires, plant surveys, interviews with the plant staff and the
specific documentation provided by the company on request have been used as work tools to carry out an
environmental analysis.
The Environmental Statement here reported has considered the activities concerning techno legal
standpoints.
The subject matter of the analysis and the environmental effects connected with:
• Process Audit
• Energy Audit
• Water and Wastewater Audit
• Environmental Quality Audit
• Health and Safety Audit
The work is organized according to chapters concerning the single environmental sections mentioned above, after a
general description of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited. Based on the above scenarios, conclusion and
recommendations are included.
Environmental Issues
The following environmental issues are addressed in the M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited Environmental Statement
Report:
• Air Emissions – Vents
• Air – “Fugitive Emissions”
• Water & Waste water – Domestic
• Solid waste
• Noise
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION:
The wind speed at Kakinada ranges between 5 to 15 km/hr indicating good dispersion. Wind dispersion
characteristics are with 5.5% and 2.2% calm period. The predominant wind direction is from Northwest and South
direction.
The maximum temperature recorded is 480C, and minimum temperature recorded was 200C. Humidity ranges from 61
to 90 %. The area is prone to cyclones during rainy season, being situated near to the eastern Sea coast of Bay of
Bengal.
SITE PARTICULARS
Climate conditions
Land acquired for the Plant
Land use and major crops
Predominant wind direction
Annual Max Temp.
460C
Annual Min Temp.
220C
Annual Rainfall
1050 - 1100 mm
Total Land 205.93Acres
Present Reclaimed land – 122.00 acres
Green belt area – 12.25 Acres + 6acres by Sep2014
Dry land scattered with shrubs.
NW
62
Nearest town
Major Settlement
Nearest Water Bodies
Hills and Mountains
Ecological sensitive zones
Historical Places
Wind speed
Kakinada
Kakinada
Nil
Nil
No reserved forests
No wild life sanctuaries
Nil
Avg., 6.16 Kmph
IMPLEMENTATION OF AUDIT
The audit was performed at port site during September 2014, according to SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS
programme. Mr. KHASIM, Manager HSE of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited, representing port’s process development
and environmental issues, functioned as contact persons for the auditors and gave valuable contributions to the audit
results.
The implementation of on-site audit was conducted as follows:
1.
Presentation of the port by the Managers of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited:
i)
Organization
ii)
Functions of each and every unit operations
iii)
Layout descriptions and flow sheets, etc.,
2.
Analysis of the environmental issues:
Presence of authorization to water discharge, temporary dumping of waste and emissions in atmosphere, noise
emissions along with the accomplishments connected with the safety and health aspects and prevention of accidents,
3.
Description of emissions & Air quality
Presence of hazardous wastes;
Presence of bore wells, storage facilities;
Evaluation of noise levels;
Evaluation of work atmosphere for health aspects;
Prevention, internal environment, safety;
Documentation concerning the audit purpose
- Plant survey.
63
TOPO MAP OF 10 KM RADIUS
PROCESS AUDIT
M/s. Kakinada Seaports is engaged in handling /facilitating export and import of sea cargoes and contributes to the
exchequer. The cargo presently being handled consists of:
Import
: Liquid Ammonia, Phosphoric acid, Sulphuric acid, POL, Edible Oils,
General/Project Cargoes, Wood Pulp
Export
: Iron Ore & General Cargo
On the jetty, GSPC, Transocean, ONGC & Reliance have dedicated installations / storage areas where they keep
their off-shore drilling platform materials like tools, tackles, drilling bits, rigs, store items such as pipes, valves, fittings,
hoses etc and civil construction material prior to transportation to off shore platforms on the sea.
PORT FACILITIES:
Kakinada Deepwater Port (KDWP) currently has four multi purpose berths in operation. The berths are oriented
approximately in N-S direction. The present water depth in front of berth after completion of maintenance dredging is 12.0 m chart datum. This can accommodate vessel of about 50000 DWT.
64
At present the port has 2 no. mobile cranes and 12 no. forklift trucks to handle small capacity break bulk cargoes. POL
and liquid cargoes are handled at the north berth and edible oil is handled at the South berth. Various Port users have
installed their pipelines from KDWP berths to their shore facilities as below.
Organization
Product
Size
HPCL
Naphtha
400/16’’
BPCL
HSD
500/20’’
BPCL
Furnace Oil
500/20’’
BPCL
Naphtha
600/24’’
IMC
POL
450/18’’
Gowthami
POL
350/14’’
GFCL
Ammonia (Main Line)
400/16’’
GFCL
Ammonia (Pre cool line)
100/4’’
GFCL
Phos / Sulfuric Acid
400/16’’
GFCL
Phos / Sulfuric Acid Extension from 400/16’’
NB to MB
IMC
Veg. Oil
350/14’’
SSS
Veg. Oil
350/14’’
NCS
Veg. Oil
350/14’’
RUCHI
Veg. Oil
250/10’’
CARGO HANDLING:
The licensed cargos as per APPCB consent order:1. Cargo handling 45,75,000 TPA North(1)
2. Iron and coal cargo handling –
9,60,000 TPA Middle(2)
3. Handling of Alumina 8,00,000 TPA &South(3)
4. Handling of Bauxite –
10,00,000 TPA
Berths
Fourth berth - multipurpose berth to handle Iron ore – 20, 00,000 TPA
& coal
- 15, 00,000 TPA
IV
Berth
OSV facility: To serve offshore exploration activities in KG basin.
……………………………
TOTAL:
10835000 TPA i.e 10.835 Million Tons
Consent For Operation License Valid Upto 31st Aug 2016 for
1,2,3 Berths, OSV Berths & 04th Berth & NRW Extension Berth
5 & 6 Berths – existing licence Valid till 30th Sep 2014 and renewal under process for:
1.
Coal Cargo Handling
1.25 TPA
2.
Fertilizer Handling
2.5 TPA
3.
Iron Ore Handling
1.667 TPA
……………………………
TOTAL:
5.417 Million Tons
GRAND TOTAL LICENSED CARGO QUANTITIES: 16.252 MTPA
65
PRODUCTION DETAILS FROM APRIL’ 2013 – MARCH’ 2014
Month
Coal & Iron Ore
437783
458987
569293
454792
336393
260759
300057
280619
532076
380548
247413
353512
April’ 2013
May’13
June’13
July’13
August’13
September’13
October’13
November’13
December’13
January’14
February’14
March’14
Cargo Handling
Granite Blocks
275116
214997
240905
274229
140175
196324
74689
215343
227555
216236
138755
257911
Other Cargo Handling
280101
532341
595007
574358
616709
536760
631263
570603
448918
566097
487200
481166
Details of pipe line Connections from KDWP Jetty to Storage Terminals
Berth
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
SB
MB
SB
MB
SB
SB
NB
NB
NB
MB
Organization
HPCL
BPCL
BPCL
BPCL
IMC
Gowthami
IMC
IMC
Product
Size
mm / inch
400/16”
500/20”
600/24”
500/20”
450/18”
350/14”
350/14”
350/14”
Naphtha
HSD
FO
Naphtha
POL
POL
Veg.Oil
Veg.Oil Extension
from SB to MB
SSS
Veg. Oil
350/14”
SSS
Veg.Oil Extension
200/8”
from SB to MB
NCS
Veg. Oil
350/14”
RUCHI
Veg. Oil
250/10”
GFCL
Ammonia
400/16”
(Main Line)
GFCL
Ammonia
100/4”
(Pre cool Line)
GFCL
Phos/Sulphuric Acid 400/16”
GFCL
Phos/Sulphuric Acid 400/16”
Extension from NB
to MB
NB: North Berth / MB: Middle Berth / SB: South Berth
Length (in KM)
To Exchange pit
To Terminal
0.95
4.3
1.2
4.5
1.2
4.5
1.2
4.5
1.2
4.1
1.2
5.5
0.9
3.9
XXXX
0.2
0.9
XXXX
3.7
0.2
0.9
0.9
XXXX
2.6
2.5
2.7
XXXX
2.7
XXXX
2.7
0.19
COMPLIANCE ADUIT
This investigates the status of the Environmental Management systems and equipment. The complex embodies a
number of measures to control oil spillage and the 125 KVA & 250 KVA & 500KVA x3 generator’s stack emissions,
etc.
Show cause notice received on 15th May, 2014 and respective compliance is submitted on 23rd May’ 2014.
66
OIL SPILLAGE AVOIDANCE AND CONTROL PLAN
M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited handles products & Edible oils. Following precautions are taken towards prevention &
management of Oil spillage if any during the discharge of oils
The cargo receivers / pipe line- terminal operators are advised to use wire reinforced rubber hoses for discharge of
oils. This ensures that the hoses are adequately protected normal wear and tear & abrasion during handling.
The flange joints are inspected for leaks. Drip trays, sawdust, cotton rags are kept standby for attending to any
accidental leaks.
Discharge pressure and flow rates are continuously monitored by the vessel and the receivers to ensure that the lines
are never pressurized.
Continuous walkie-talkie communication is maintained by the pipeline-terminal operators to check and control oil
spillage if any during discharge. Communication is also maintained between the receiving terminal and the vessel to
effect emergency stop of cargo pumping in the event of a leak.
The vessels are advised to comply with all international regulations and effect the mandatory precautions on cargo
discharge.
KSPL maintains about 400 Ltrs of OSD (Oil Spill Dispersant) and dedicated dispersing spray system on board one of
its tug for quick combat of oil if any on the water surface.
WATER AND WASTE WATER ADUIT:
The total water requirement is 590 KLD + 155KLD
Water balance scenario is developed taking into consideration of the total water drawn from raw water source which is
a third party and its usage in different units, as per the water cess details submitted monthly to APPCB.
ENERGY ADUIT:
Adoption of cleaner and more efficient technological process geared towards greater energy efficiency and production
efficiency help in preventing the loss of energy.
ENERGY SUPPLY
A total of 1000 KVA of power is received from AP TRANSCO, and a suitable substation also installed for this purpose.
In addition a power diesel generators of 125 KVA & 250 KVA & 3x500 KVA capacities and the DO’s and DON’T’s are
exhibited. Operational procedures are to be exhibited at terminal powerhouse.
An Electrical / Energy audit is to be taken up by M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited as a separate module for better
clarity. However the Diesel Consumption with respect to the Electrical aspects during the year was 108595lts.
Month
April ‘13
May’13
June’13
July’13
August’13
September’13
October’13
November’13
December’13
January’14
February’14
March’14
APEPDCL POWER UTILIZATION OF 2013-2014
Jetty Supply (RJY -352) Contracted Demand
OSV Supply (RJY -727) – Contracted
(600 KVA)
demand (1000 KVA)
Running Demand
Running Demand
Units Utilized
Units Utilized (KWH)
(KVA)
(KVA)
(KWH)
254.11
64069
448.50
95955
225.05
65490
540.00
107055
256.52
72034
568.50
105735
243.83
72431
628.50
118230
264.39
93664
559.50
157080
281.34
100181
598.50
159615
324.67
104910
531.00
125445
225.00
91823
628.50
159615
286.72
89700
628.50
202805
272.71
90968
513.00
138385
223.60
90210
474.90
139680
255.62
89603
443.36
139485
67
68
GENERATOR UTILIZATION DETAILS OF 2013-2014
500 KVA Generator at Jetty Substation
Month
No. of
Units
Fuel
Running
Generated
Consumption
Hrs
April ‘13
243
19120
8379
May’13
219
18544
7827
June’13
147
11264
5103
July’13
144
13520
5427
August’13
21
1472
785
September’13
71
5600
2460
October’13
93
6944
3137
November’13
63
3728
1864
December’13
56
5408
2107
January’14
8
368
264
February’14
59
1792
1418
March’14
31
1120
794
250 KVA Generator at Shore Substation
No. of
Units
Fuel
Running
Generated
Consumption
Hrs
224
12352
5795
230
13053
6481
146
7481
3992
139
6690
3548
26
1021
616
65
2729
1568
98
4181
2277
51
1855
1066
16
541
309
17
490
324
74
2228
1302
42
1710
933
500 KVA Generator at OSV
No. of
Units
Running
Generated
Hrs
97.1
11472
145.3
18336
119.8
16592
82.8
10464
19.2
2304
80.1
10544
153.7
19968
48.4
4624
32.5
4416
2.5
336
61.5
8608
39.9
5120
Fuel
Consumption
4240
6597
5879
3548
940
3845
7106
1994
1643
142
3130
1885
69
Date
22.07.2013
22.07.2013
22.07.2013
30.10.2013
Capacity of
Battery
180 AH
180 AH
180 AH
180 AH
30.10.2013
180 AH
19.03.2014
28.03.2014
180 AH
180 AH
BATTERIES DISPOSED DURING 2013-14
Qty Generated &
Location
disposed to recycler
2
Star board Main Engine - Pilot Launch Bhima
2
Port Auxiliary Engine - Tug Jala Kanya.
2
Star board Auxiliary Engine - Tug Jala Kanya.
4
Emergency communication equipment &
lighting - Pilot Launch Bhima.
2
For Emergency communication equipment &
lighting - Tug Jala Tarangini.
2
500 KVA DG-1 - OSV
2
Port Generator - Tug Jala Hamsa.
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT RUNNING HOURS IN 2013-14
S.No
Month
Mobile Silos
Mobile Compressors
Maxsweepers
Crane & Forklift
Rhrs
Consumption
Rhrs
Consumption
Rhrs
Consumption
Rhrs
Consumption
1
April'13
223.2
114
148.9
1978
384.85
1048
63
182
2
May'13
154.4
78
108.3
1449
444.61
1145
52
163
3
June'13
274.5
139
183.9
2443
360.07
1052
91
281
4
July'13
416.9
209
192.9
2570
320.87
973
116
405
5
August'13
359.1
181
190.8
2547
423.1
1318
146
463
6
September'13
285.7
142
206.7
2766
403.38
1146
100
340
7
October'13
244.1
124
159.9
2154
112.05
396
95
324
8
November'13
254.9
119
126.2
1688
304.93
984
179
859
9
December'13
440.9
221
191.8
2591
533.74
1641
125
486
10
January'14
338.9
169
186.1
2450
528.49
1661
95
245
11
February'14
456.3
228
207.6
2755
981.51
1341
135
466
12
March'14
517.8
259
247.6
3357
859.43
1893
155
555
3966.7
1983
2150.7
28748
5657.03
14598
1352
4769
TOTAL
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
INTRODUCTION
“Compliance Audit” aims at investigating the status of the Environmental Management Systems and equipments vis-à-vis the
regulatory requirements. Proper operation and maintenance practices helps in reducing emissions from the M/s. Kakinada
Seaports Limited to arrest Environmental Quality deterioration.
AIR QUALITY AND COMPLIANCE
STACK EMISSIONS
M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited has generators of 125 KVA, 250 KVA, 500 KVA and two Fire Engines. Flue gas analysis was
carried out for generators and fire engines.
AIR QUALITY MONITORING
Ambient Air quality is monitoring at M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited in four locations within the port area i.e., first location is at
top of Customs Office Building, the second location is at top of the Control Office Building, the third location is at Top of Fire
pump house and the fourth location is at Near Cairn Office for determining the parameters viz., Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX), Particulate Matter10 (size less than 10 um), Particulate Matter2.5 (size less than 2.5 um). In addition to
the above, micrometeorological data like wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, barometric pressure are measured
at one location. The table shows the Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) levels for SO2, NOX, PM10, PM2.5 at 4 locations
within the M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited.
NOISE LEVELS
The Noise level measurements were made within the port premises of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited to determine the
compliance with respect to ambient noise standards and results are depicted in Table. On Perusal of the results depicts the
fact that the plants have been designed and built so that noise levels are well below the OSHA standards of 90 dB(A)
Past record review indicated that the noise levels recorded at various locations within M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited
range from 50 to 75 dB(A).
- 70 -
BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS AT
M/S. KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED
RESULT
Sl. No.
Location
Day dB(A)
Night dB(A)
1.
OSV – Berth I
70.0
66.5
2.
OSV – Berth II
69.2
63.9
3.
Near Sub Station
72.3
66.6
4.
Outside of DG Set Room
71.9
69.0
5.
OSV Gate
69.9
63.2
STANDARD
75.0
70.0
WATER AND WASTEWATER ADUIT
INTRODUTION
Water and wastewater audit conducted at M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited aimed at evaluation of raw water intake facilities,
performance evaluation of existing facilities for Domestic & Drinking purposes.
Development of Water Balance Scenario
The total water requirement is 590 KLD + 155KLD
Water balance scenario is developed taking into consideration of the total water drawn from raw water source and its usage in
different units of the M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited.
M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited does not have any product-related industry. The main function is to receive or export products
such as Liquid Ammonia, Phosphoric Acid, Sulphuric Acid, edible oils and Generals.
In M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited potable water is stored in tanks.
WATER & WASTE WATER MONITORING
Water and wastewater monitoring, samples will be collected regularly by the M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited for the following:
1. Raw water quality
2. Liquid effluent - Domestic
Characteristics of water, wastewater and soil samples are analyzed and results are formulated in tables, results reveals that all
the concentrations are within the stipulations of CPCB and APPCB Specifications.
SAMPLE PARTICULARS
SOURCE OF COLLECTION
Soil 1. Opp. to Canteen
DATE OF SAMPLING COLLECTION
Analysis Soil Samples
S.No.
Parameter
1.
pH
2.
Conductivity
3.
Sodium as Na
4.
Potassium as K
5.
Calcium as Ca
6.
Magnesium as Mg
7.
Total Kjedahl Nitrogen as N
8.
Phosphates as P
9.
Sulphates as SO4-10.
Nitrate as N
Available Metals
11.
Zinc as Zn
12.
Copper as Cu
13.
Iron as Fe
14.
Manganese as Mn
Note: BDL denotes below detectable level
:
SOIL ANALYSIS
:
:
Sep 2014
Unit
-µ mhos
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
Concentration
7.26
40
0.28
0.21
1.10
1.23
BDL
0.072
0.002
BDL
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
0.003
1.31
10.44
8.22
- 71 -
SAMPLE PARTICULARS
SOURCE OF COLLECTION
DATE OF SAMPLING COLLECTION
:
SOIL ANALYSIS
:
Soil 2. Near Technical Office
:
Sep 2014
Analysis Soil Samples
S.No.
Parameter
1.
pH
2.
Conductivity
3.
Sodium as Na
4.
Potassium as K
5.
Calcium as Ca
6.
Magnesium as Mg
7.
Total Kjedahl Nitrogen as N
8.
Phosphates as P
9.
Sulphates as SO4-10.
Nitrate as N
Available Metals
11.
Zinc as Zn
12.
Copper as Cu
13.
Iron as Fe
14.
Manganese as Mn
Note: BDL denotes below detectable level
Unit
-µ mhos
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
Meq/100gm
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
Concentration
7.30
43
0.34
0.30
1.13
0.72
BDL
0.072
0.003
BDL
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
0.005
1.13
11.14
9.02
HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDIT
Kakinada Seaports Ltd has been undertaking inspection and evaluation of health and safety parameters as would be generally
be relevant and appropriate for Port operations.
Essentially it covers the following:
1. Systems to identify hazards.
2. Corrective actions with respect to prevention, control & containment.
3. Compliance with standard safety norms and practices.
With regards to Health and Safety, We carried out an audit of the systems, procedures and activities and the details are as
under:
HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDIT DETAILS:
• Covering of pits, openings in the floors & open yards have been found satisfactory,
• The general safety was found good. Safety equipment have been positioned at various level in the utility areas,
• The electrical equipment, cables have been designed properly with enough safety margin and there is no possibility of
overloading or overheating,
• The statutory requirements of earth resistance monitoring & other electrical checks are being done scrupulously and
records maintained properly,
• Properly tested gloves are made available for working personal,
• Fire fighting pumps, power supply are independent of
shore electric supply & have back up genset power,
• Accident report form for reporting electrical accidents is available and to be reported within 24 hours,(till date accidents
are Nil)
• On perusal of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited documents, it was observed that the statutory and legal aspects are being
fulfilled.
Reporting and Review
The Management of M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited routinely report to the A.P. Pollution Control Board on the progress of
improvement of Environmental aspects.
The follow-up action to the Environmental Statement will be reviewed annually by M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited, to assess
progress and provide input to future improvement goals actions.
ACCIDENT REPORTING
Any accident small or high will be simultaneously reported to following in that order;
• KSPL Jetty Office : Tel 2354170, 2368246, 2349619
• Security Gate
:9866556710
• Fire –Pump house : 9000552515
• Ambulance
: 7702544401
• GM Operations (Designated Officer) : 9866556688
- 72 -
Whosoever among the above receives first information of accident, will inform others over phone. They will immediately rush
to the spot, as quickly as possible. The person noticing the accident will identify:
i.
Spot of the accident
ii.
Cause of accident
iii.
Seriousness of accident.
According to Hazardous Chemicals (management & handling) rules of 1989 promulgated by Govt. India, it is mandatory for
KSP management to:
• Identity major accidents / hazards and outline steps to be taken to avoid such accidents.
• Notify State Pollution Control Board authorities & Inspectorate of Factories, in the event of any accident.
• Submit a safety report to State Pollution Control Board.
Protocol for accident reporting will be adopted to ensure compliance with above said rules. Each and every accident, however
small it may will be reported and investigated. Accident report will contain a detailed description of the incident and identify
immediate cause. Accident report will also incorporate information on steps taken to prevent such accidents in future, impact
on accident, if any on the environment and cost estimate of loss.
In order to evaluate overall safety performance and to draw action plans to improve safety.
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH/INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Spillage of Oil content at Work Place
Spillages of Oil content at work Place are virtually nil, as M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited is well maintained and leaks are
minimum.
Personal Protective Equipments
During our on –site studies it was observed that all types of personal protective equipments, fire proximity suits, all type of
hand gloves safety helmets/safety shoes etc are maintained.
FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION SYSTEM
LIST OF FIRE FIGHTING FACILITIES AT KAKINADA SEAPORTS PVT. LIMITED
Fire Pumps:
Description
4 stage vertical
turbine
Qty
Make
Make of Drive
2+1
WPIL
2 nos Engine
Drive
HP
230
(Cummins)
Jockey Pump
Cooling Pump
1 no
1 no
WPIL
Kirloskar
Hydrants, Monitors & Water Curtains
Description
Qty
Size
Single head
12
63 mm
Hydrants
Double head
5
63 mm
Hydrants
Ground Monitors 4
75 NB
Tower Monitors
2
Water Curtains
2
38 nozzle
200 NB
135nozzl
e
100 ND
1 no. Motor
220
Motor driven
Motor driven
30
7.5
Disch.
Pressure
Disch. Rate
Total
Head
8.8 Kg/cm2
410 m3/Hr
96 m
8.8 Kg/cm2
30 m3/Hr
30 m3/Hr
88 m
35 m
Type
Rate
900 LPM
Range
Rotation
Operation
Manual
Female Oblique
1800 LPM
Stand post
fixed
installation
2580 LPM
60 meters at 7
kg/cm2
H - 3600
V-+85–650
Manual
Monitor Trigger
Teo
3000 LPM
51 meters at 7
kg/cm2
H - 3600
V-+85–650
Remote/
Electrical
Jumbo
3000 LPM
33mHorizontal
11 m vertical
Manual
Electrical
- 73 -
Branch pipes (Nozzles):
Description
Instaneous male end
Universal (Dual Type)
branch pipe
Qty
13
4
Type of Nozzle
Jet Type
Jet & Spray type
Reinforced Rubber Lined hoses Size: Dia 63mm X 15 M long
Fibre Reinforced Plastic Hose Boxes
Nozzle Bore
20 mm
108 mm
:
:
Nominal Bore
63 mm
63 mm
34 Nos.
17 Nos.
Portable Fire & Safety Equipment:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Dry Chemical Power Extinguishers 75 Kg
Dry Chemical Power Extinguishers 10 Kg
Carbon dioxide type Extinguishers 4.5 Kg
Mechanical Foam type Extinguishers 9 Lts
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) Foam tanks
Fire Entry suits
Fire Proximity suits
Breathing Apparatus
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
4 Nos.
4 Nos.
21 Nos.
21 Nos.
2 Nos. Each 3000 Liters
2 Nos.
10 Nos.
4 sets
Siren: Horizontal Double mounting type Range 5 Kilometers.
- 74 -
PETTY INCIDENT/NEAR MISS/ACCIDENT REPORT FOR THE YEAR OF 2013 - 2014
S. No:
Description
MONTH & YEAR
Apr - Jun
Jul - Sep
Oct - Dec
Jan - Mar
2013
2013
2013
2014
TOTAL
1
Petty incidents
9
6
8
4
27
2
Near Miss
4
3
7
5
19
3
Accidents:
6
8
4
9
27
19
17
19
18
73
a) Minor
b) Major
TOTAL
PETTY INCIDENT/NEAR MISS/ACCIDENT REPORT FOR THE YEAR OF 2014
S. No:
Description
MONTH & YEAR
Apr - Jun
Jul - Sep
2014
2014
TOTAL
1
Petty incidents
3
2
5
2
Near Miss
1
2
3
3
Accidents:
4
3
7
8
7
15
a) Minor
b) Major
TOTAL
- 75 -
Fire Watch & Ward 2013-2014
No. of diesel bunkerings
Hot works
Hazardous cargo Vessels
Apr-Jun
99
66
24
Jul-Sep
129
81
50
Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Total
126
144
498
89
86
322
50
30
154
Fire Watch & Ward 2014-2015
No. of diesel bunkerings
Hot works
Hazardous cargo Vessels
Apr-Jun
107
81
35
Jul-Sep
114
105
31
TOOL BOX TALK 2013 - 2014
MONTH & YEAR
S. No:
NAME
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRAINING/TOOL BOX April - June
July - Sep
2013
2013
CONDUCTED
No's Participants No's Participants
1 Granite hooking labour
126
1015
110
1042
2 Coal handling labour
15
147
9
77
3 Bentonite handling labour
10
108
1
9
4 CP Coke handling labour.
1
15
6
51
5 Wood pulp handling labour.
3
30
4
33
6 Wheat handling labour.
1
7
0
0
7 Ballclay handling labour.
1
7
0
0
8 Fertilizer handling labour.
3
26
4
27
9 Feldspar labour
1
12
5
58
10 Lime stone handling labour
0
0
1
6
11 Wood handling labour
0
0
4
38
12 cement clinker handling labour
0
0
0
0
13 Soda ash labour
0
0
0
0
14 Tool box conducted at other yards 0
0
0
0
TOTAL
161
1367
144
1341
Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Total
221
186
66
Oct - Dec
2014
No's Participants
90
598
12
140
6
49
3
30
2
16
3
31
2
16
13
128
1
9
0
0
1
7
7
65
0
0
0
0
140
1089
Jan- Mar
2014
No's Participants
64
593
46
232
17
164
0
0
0
0
9
94
0
0
9
75
0
0
0
0
6
49
9
74
2
23
6
49
168
1353
No's
390
314
34
10
9
13
3
29
7
1
11
16
2
6
845
TOTAL
Participants
3248
596
330
96
79
132
23
256
79
6
94
139
23
49
5150
- 76 -
TOOL BOX TALK 2014 - 2015
S. No:
NAME
MONTH & YEAR
April - June
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRAINING/TOOL BOX
CONDUCTED
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
July - Sep
Granite hooking labour
Coal handling labour
Bentonite handling labour
CP Coke handling labour.
Wood pulp handling labour.
Wheat handling labour.
Ballclay handling labour.
Fertilizer handling labour.
Feldspar labour
Lime stone handling labour
Wood handling labour
Cement clinker handling labour
Soda ash labour
Tool box conducted at other yards
No's
36
34
15
3
0
0
0
10
0
0
4
7
0
6
2014
Participants
259
189
114
32
0
0
0
82
0
0
36
64
0
55
TOTAL
115
831
TOTAL
No's
95
27
4
0
1
0
1
16
8
3
2
8
4
0
2014
Participants
1427
313
32
0
12
0
20
167
114
32
17
101
50
0
No's
131
61
19
3
1
0
1
26
8
3
6
15
4
6
Participants
1686
502
146
32
12
0
20
249
114
32
53
165
50
55
169
2285
284
3116
Mock Drills 2013-14
st
1 Quarter
April to June
nd
rd
th
4 Quarter
January to March
Total
S.No
Mock Drill
Description
No.’s
Participants
No.’s
Participants
3 Quarter
October to
December
No.’s Participants
No.’s
Participants
No.’s
Participants
1
Hose Drill
01
15
01
10
01
09
02
34
05
68
2
Portable Fire
Extinguishers
04
57
---
---
04
69
05
182
13
308
3
SCBA
---
---
01
07
---
---
01
29
02
36
4
Hydrants,
Monitors &
water
curtains
---
---
01
11
02
30
03
126
06
167
2 Quarter
July to September
5
Ammonia
Leak Rescue
---
---
---
---
---
---
01
11
01
11
6
fire drill with
fire Tender
---
---
---
---
---
---
01
28
01
28
05
72
03
28
07
108
13
410
28
618
Total
- 77 -
Mock Drills 1st & 2nd Quarter 2014
rd
S.No
Mock Drill
Description
No.’s
Participants
No.’s
Participants
3 Quarter
October to
December
No.’s Participants
No.’s
Participants
No.’s
Participants
1
Hose Drill
05
71
01
43
---
---
---
---
06
114
2
Portable Fire
Extinguishers
07
89
07
162
---
---
---
---
14
251
3
SCBA
---
---
01
13
---
---
---
---
01
13
02
24
02
43
---
---
---
---
04
67
---
---
01
31
---
---
---
---
01
31
st
1 Quarter
April to June
nd
2 Quarter
July to September
th
4 Quarter
January to March
Total
5
Hydrants,
Monitors &
Water
curtains
Ammonia
Leak Rescue
6
fire drill with
fire Tender
05
81
04
69
---
---
---
---
09
150
7
Oil spill
Boom laying
---
---
01
13
---
---
---
---
01
13
8
Smoke
Detection
---
---
02
28
---
---
---
---
02
28
19
265
19
402
---
---
---
---
38
667
4
Fires Attended for the period of 2013 - 2014
Inside Port
Fires Attended
Minor
Major
1st Quarter
Apr to Jun 01
03
2nd Quarter
Jul to Sep
04
-3rd Quarter
Oct to Dec -02
4th Quarter
Jan to Mar 02
01
Total
07
06
Fires Attended for the period of 2014 - 2015
Inside Port
Fires Attended
Minor
Major
1st Quarter
Apr to Jun 07
-2nd Quarter
Jul to Sep
04
01
rd
3 Quarter
Oct to Dec --4th Quarter
Jan to Mar --Total
11
01
---01
01
Outside Port
Minor
Major
01
-01
02
04
-01
--01
Outside Port
Minor
Major
-04
--04
Total
Minor
01
04
-03
08
Major
04
-03
03
10
Total
Minor
07
05
--12
Major
-05
--05
- 78 -
- 79 -
GREEN BELT
Green belt developed till 2012-2013 was about 12acres and for 2013-14 another 0.25acres added to the Green Belt and by Sep
2014 about 06 acres more Green Belt Developed.
Plants of native origin, first growing type with thick canopy and large leaf index shall be preferred. The philosophy behind the green
belt developed at M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited is to improve the ecology and environment of the surrounding of the plant by
extensive afforestation. Appropriate planning techniques have been adopted in selected areas. Greenbelt is a set of rows of trees
planted in such a fashion, to create effective barrier between the port and surroundings. The greenbelt helps to capture the fugitive
emissions, attenuate the noise levels in the port and simultaneously improving aesthetics of the port site.
The greenbelt around the factory compound wall in the reserve site will be developed in keeping view of the following objectives:
1. Planting of trees in each row are in staggered pattern.
2. The short trees are planted in the first two rows and the tall trees in the outer rows around the purview of the project site.
3. Since the trucks of the tall trees are generally devoid of foliage, it will be useful to have shrubs in front of the trees so as
to give coverage to this portion.
4. Sufficient spacing is maintained between the trees to facilitate effective height of the greenbelt.
The photographs of already completed Green Belt, Ongoing & Proposed areas are depicted in the subsequent pages.
- 80 -
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 22nd April, 1993
G.S.R. 386(E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 6 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
(29 of 1986), the Central Government herby makes the following rules further to amend the Environment (Protection) rules,
1986, namely:1. (a). These rules may be called the environment (Protection) Amendment rules, 1993.
(b). They shall come into force on the date of the their publication the Official Gazette.
2. In the Environment (Protection) rules, 1986:(a). in rule 14 –
i). For the words “audit report” wherever they occur, the word, “Statement” shall be substituted.
ii). For the figures letters and words “15th day of May” the words “30th day of September,” shall be substituted.
(b). In Appendix ‘A’ for FORM V. the following from shall be substituted, namely :“FORM V”
(See rule 14)
Environmental Statement for the financial year ending the 31st March 2014
PART A
i.
Name and Address of the Owner Occupier of the industry operation of process –
M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited,
Beach Road, Kakinada – 533 305.
E.G.Dt., A.P.
ii.
Industry category Primary (SIC Code) Secondary – (SIC Code)
iii.
Production capacity – Enclosed as annexure
iv.
Year of establishment - 1996
v.
Date of the last environmental statement submitted- September 2013
PART - B
Water and Raw Material Consumption
(i).
Water Consumption: Explained under water Requirement
Process
--Cooling
--Dust suppression 500 KLD +100KLD
Gardening/irrigation
70 KLD
Domestic:
20 KLD+55KLD
Name of Product
(1) Cargo Handling
(2) Iron & Coal Cargo Handling
(3) Alumina handling
(4) Bauxite handling
There is no process water consumption
Process water Consumption per unit of
Product Output
During the previous
financial year
During the Current
financial year
(1)
45, 75,000 TPA
4460000 TPA
800000 TPA
1000000 TPA
(2)
As per pg no.9
above
Raw Material Consumption: Explained under Raw material consumption
*Name of Raw
Name of
Consumption of Raw Material per
Materials
Products
unit of Output
During the Previous
Financial Year
During the Current
financial year
- 81 -
There is no Raw Material consumption. It is only Cargo Handling Seaport.
*Industry may use codes if disclosing details of raw materials would violate contractual
obligations; otherwise all industries have to name the raw materials used.
PART – C
Pollution discharged to environment/unit of output
(parameters as specified in the consent issued)
Explained under water management
pollutants
Quantity of pollutants
Concentrations
Percentage of
Discharged(mass/day)
of Pollutants
Variation from
In Discharges
prescribed
(mass/day)
Standards with
Reasons
a) Water Domestic effluents
Analysis Report s enclosed
b) Air
Air Quality
Analysis Report s enclosed
PART – D
HAZARDOUS WASTE
(as specified under Hazardous Wastes/Management and
Handling rules, 1989)
Hazardous Waste
Total Quantity (kg)
During the Previous
Financial year
(a) From Process
(b) From Pollution
Control facilities
During the current
financial year
No Hazardous
No Hazardous
waste generated
waste generated
Waste oil generated from generators are being using for
lubricating the machinery. As per Form-4, 300LPA during
current year
PART – E
SOLID WASTE
Total Quantity
During the Previous
During the Current
Financial year
financial year
No process Solid waste generated, however domestic solid waste generated
(a) From Process (b) From Pollution
Control facilities
130640kgs
(c) i) Quantity recycled
or reutilized within the unit
ii) Sold
iii) Disposed Domestic Waste used for filling Low Lying area within port, however KSPL is permitted for Municipal
Dumping of the Domestic waste Generated.
PART – F
Please specify the characterizations (in terms of composition and quantum) of hazardous as well as solid wastes and indicate
disposal practice adopted for both these categories of wastes.
There is no solid waste generated in the plant
Waste oil generated from generators is being used for lubricating the machinery parts.
PART – G
Impact of the pollution abatement measures taken on conservation of natural resources and on the cost of production.
It is not a production unit. There are no fugitive emissions from the plant. The pollution abatement measure is mainly
linked to dust suppression by water sprinkling, which will further improve the surrounding Air Environment, whereas
for development of natural resources, the green belt is continuous developed throughout the port premises.
PART – H
Additional measures/investment proposal for environmental protection including abatement of pollution, prevention of
pollution.
-
Using of Dust Sweeping Machine
Water sprinklers at all transfer and fugitive emission sources.
Controlling of Vehicular Speed
Tarpaulin arrangement for Vehicles.
- 82 -
PART –I
Any other particulars for improving the quality of the environment.
A Green belt area of 12.25 acres developed through out the port area, and further being enhanced as a continuous process.
APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
The following statutory requirements applied in the state of Andhra Pradesh have been taken into consideration:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the rules made thereunder.
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 and the Rules made there under.
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the rules made there under.
Environment (protection) Act, 1986 and the rules made there under.
Hazards Waste (Management & Handling) rules, 1989.
The public liability Insurance Act, 1991 and the rules made there under.
The factories Act 1948 with the Andhra Pradesh State rules.
The competent authorities in the application of the mentioned set of statutory requirements (1 to 6) are the “Andhra Pradesh
Pollution Control Board (APPCB) whose headquarters is in Hyderabad and its regional and sub-regional branches are all over
the State.
•
•
•
•
•
The APPCB Engineers/Scientists during their surveys collect samples of the industrial discharges/emissions after the
treatment to be analyzed in their own labs.
The results of the analytical reports are sent to the M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited. The M/s. Kakinada Seaports
Limited has been authorized to water discharging, noise and emissions in atmosphere.
The extensions of the mentioned authorizations have been requested when expired.
The M/s. Kakinada Seaports Limited has shown that compliance is important to it, displaying a willingness to accept
guidance from A.P. Pollution Control Board in this matter.
The industry has demonstrated in the past its ability and commitment to work closely with A.P. Pollution Control
Board staff to meet environmental requirements.
- 83 -
Annexure 2-5: Status of Road Network –
Port Area
KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED
KAKINADA
CATEGORY WISE LENGTH OF ROAD UNDER Minor Ports
As on 31st March, 2015
(In Kms)
Name of the state: ANDHRA PRADESH
Type of Road
WBM
BT/CC
2
3
4
Minor Ports Roads
Total
Surfaced
Total Length
(5+8)
1
4.55
14.295KM
Format No. 1-A
4.55
Un Surfaced
Total
(3+4)
5
B.T. 9.085KM
C.C.
0.66KM
9.745KM
Motorable
6
−
14.295KM
7
Total
(6+7)
8
−
−
Non Motorable
−
−
−
BT/CC = Black Top/Cement Concrete
WBM = Water Bound Macadam
B.T. ROADS
S. No
Name of Roads
Length
Conditions
1
OSV gate entrance road
530M
Good working condition
2
3
4
4th berth gate entrance
Direct access road(Main entrance road)
North road
770M
955M
900M
Some settlement ditches are there, they are to be rectified
5
Middle road
1000M
Some pot holes are there, to be frectified
6
Cross road
500M
Some pot holes are there, to be rectified
7
Middle yard road
450M
Some pot holes are there, to be rectified
8
Semi cross road
30M
Pot holes are there, to be rectified
9
South ramp road
200M
Pot holes are there, to be rectified
10
Jetty west side road
580M
Working condition
11
Jetty 4M road
610M
Working condition
12
Cresent road
200M
Working condition
13
North yard plots road
300M
Working condition
14
NFCL unused road
120M
Working condition side berms at bell mouth to be laid
15
R&D yard west side
180M
Working condition
16
17
18
R&D yard Road No-1
R&D yard Road No-2
R&D yard Road No-3
80M
120M
160M
Working condition
Ditches formed at bell mouth areas, to be rectified
Working condition
- 84 -
19
20
21
22
East side in Spur-V Road
OSV Pipe line corridor road
Approach to Ex. GSPC Yard
Opposite to Transocean yard
350M
370M
120M
150M
Working condition
Working condition
Working condition
Working condition
23
Opposite to SKL Godown
100M
Working condition
24
OSV - 2 Approach road
310M
Working condition
9085M
= 9.085 Km
W.B.M ROADS
S. No
Name of Roads
Length
Conditions
1
OSV-II approach road
310 M
Some ditches are there, to be rectified
2
North side in Spur-V
400 M
Working condition
3
East side in Spur-V (by the side of NS2 Bund
road)
350 M
Working condition
4
Middle yard road in 4th Berth Backup area
720 M
Working condition
5
Cresent road to 4th Berth approach road in 4th
Berth Backup area
120 M
Working condition
6
5th & 6th Berth East Road
600M
Working condition
7
5th Berth South Road
900M
Working condition
8
6th Berth South Road
1000M
Working condition
4400M
= 4.4 Km
- 85 -
C.C. ROADS
S. No
Name of Roads
Length
Conditions
1
In front of Ware House at Middle Jetty South
80 M
Working condition
2
Back side of Ware House No-1 (North)
80 M
In some places water is stagnating
3
B.J bulk plant side road
50 M
Working condition
4
Opposite warehouse No-2
50 M
Working condition
5
Semi cross road
170 M
Working condition
6
U-Bend road
120 M
Working condition
7
6 Road junction
30M
Working condition
8
U- Turn Near Control room
35M
Working condition
9
Rock Bund Road
15M
Working condition
10
4th Berth Gate
30M
Working condition
660M
= 0.660 Km
- 86 -
Annexure 2-6: CFO Certificate
- 87 -
- 88 -
- 89 -
- 90 -
- 91 -
Annexure-3.1: Public Hearing under EIA
Sl.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
Issues raised by the Public
Sri. G. Srinivas, Sarpanch, Vakalapudi,
Kakinada welcomed the project and he
expressed that there will not be much
pollution problems due to this project is
away from habitation and further
requested the management to address
the safety and occupational health
problems of workers working in the port
and to provide employment to the
fishermen community who have lost
their livelihood.
Sri. K. Satyanarayana, Sarpanch,
Suryaraopeta welcomed the project
and requested the Govt. to take
remedial action over the surrounding
industries causing air pollution and ash
nuisance. Further requested the port
authorities to allow fishermen to catch
fish in the ocean and also requested to
modify the park located adjacent to the
port.
Sri P.V.V. Satyanarayana, Sarpanch,
Indrapalem welcomed the project and
he requested the port management to
take precautions in disposing the
dredged material and to take care of
health needs of workers, people and
fishermen.
Sri. G. Srinivas, Sarpanch, Vakalapudi,
welcomed the project and suggested to
provide rehabilitation to the fishermen
living in fishing harbour.
Sri. K. Parameswar Rao, Kotha
Kakinada, welcomed the project and
requested the Govt. to take measures
to control pollution due to the
surrounding oil units.
Compliance from Industry (as
in EIA document)
Shri Y.S. Prasad, CEO, KSPL
stated that at present the port
management is conducting the
health checkups of the workers by
utilizing the services of specialists
in Apollo Hospital and same will
be continued
Implementation
Status
(as
reported by the Developer)
At present the port management is
conducting the health checkups of
the workers working in the port and
no fishermen have lost their
livelihood due to port development.
The management responded
positively and assured to
complete the task.
The surrounding industries causing
air pollution and ash nuisance is
beyond KSPL purview, and KSPL
has no control over fishermen to
catch fish in the ocean and there is
absolutely no objection from KSPL
over fishermen to catch fish in the
ocean. At present there is no park
located adjacent to the port to
modify.
The generated dredged material
partly used for back up area
development and part disposed at
designated dumping site near
Uppada in the sea.
The management stated that the
generated dredged material will
be used for back up area
development and part will be
disposed at designated dumping
site near Uppada in the sea.
The management clarified that the
construction of new births is
proposed to take place in the
southern side and as such no
rehabilitation is required
----
The construction of new berths
took place in the southern side and
no rehabilitation was required.
Positive
Response
Implementation
Status
Applicable in this regard.
–
Not
- 92 -
Sl.
No.
6
7
8
9
10
11
Issues raised by the Public
Sri. G. Gurraju, Sarpavaram Junction,
welcomed the project and he was
happy with the measures taking by the
port like dust suppression through
water sprinkling.
Sri. Venkateswara Rao, Kakinada,
welcomed the project and stated that
the project is providing employment to
many people and requested to provide
avenue lighting system in the Beach
road.
Sri. P. Adinarayana, Jagannaickpur,
welcomed the project and requested
the management to protect the
environment
besides
providing
employment.
Sri. G. Soma Raju, Ex. MPTC,
Suryaroapeta, welcomed the project
and expressed unhappiness over the
pollution caused by oil units and
requested the port to provide
employment to the locals.
Sri. Dasari Sattibabu, Komarigiri,
welcomed the project and dismay over
not providing of employment and
requested the management to provide
free power and to adopt the village.
Sri. Bhargav, Kakinada, welcomed the
project and requested the management
to provide employment to all the skilled
people in the area. While handling Iron
ore, port authorities shall take all
precautions such as coverage of ore,
dust suppression, etc., Further the port
shall also develop green belt as well as
avenue lighting.
Compliance from Industry (as
in EIA document)
The management stated that
presently port is having dust
sweeping unit, sprinklers for dust
suppression and tankers for road
wetting and further assured to use
sophisticated methods to control
pollution
The management assured to
provide employment to the local
people to the most extent.
Implementation
Status
(as
reported by the Developer)
Positive
Response
–
Implementation
Status
Not
Applicable in this regard. Anyways
Management has procured an
additional dust sweeping machine.
protect the environment by
takingup more avenue plantation
along both sides of the road
provide employment to the local
people to the most extent.
Positive
Response
–
Implementation
Status
Not
Applicable in this regard, Anyways
the management is committed to
protect the environment by
adopting all feasible environment
friendly aspects.
The
management
provides
employment to the local people to
the most extent.
The management assured that
the employment preference will
be given to the local people only.
The management provides
the most extent.
The Management has committed
to contribute Rs. 1 Crore and
CSR for augmenting drinking
water supply to Kakinada Town
besides providing green belt in
the Mc Laurin High School in
Kakinada
The
management
provides
the most extent & the management
is committed to protect the
environment by adopting all
feasible environment friendly
aspects.
Solar Lights provided on ADB
Road, and maintaining the same.
- 93 -
Annexure-3.2: Case Study of Kakinada Deep
Water Port
PPP TOOLKIT for Improving PPP Decision-Making Processes, Ministry of Finance, GoI
GoAP handed over the project facilities to KSPL in March 1999. All immovable assets were transferred
without any consideration. All movable assets like tugs, cranes and forklifts were transferred at a rate
calculated as per the norms agreed in the concession agreement. Soon after, it was realized that the
project was not likely to be viable on the existing terms of the concession. GoAP reportedly failed to
allow KSPL to handle the cargo mix as mentioned in the tender forms. This included agri-centric cargo
like fertilizers, oil extractions, sugar, rice and wheat that constituted 70 per cent of the projected
volumes at the time of the bid. In fact there was considerable social unrest with respect to handling of
commodities at the anchorage port and the deep water port. There were instances of the anchorage
port workers going on strike in protest of the deep water port handling agri commodities such as wheat.
KSPL thus was unable to meet the obligation of the MGA. This also impacted the financial closure for
the Phase 1 development. Accordingly, there were several rounds of negotiations and discussions
where KSPL requested the government to withdraw the MGA clause and retain only the revenue
sharing clause. In 2003, the Government agreed that the payment of MGA can be rescheduled
ensuring that the net present value of the amount to be paid during the concession period remained the
same. KSPL was thus able to achieve financial closure for the Phase 1 development in 2004 which
envisaged back-up area development, railway line connectivity and procurement of equipment. In 2004,
Salgaocar Mining Industries Pvt. Ltd. (SMIPL) was inducted as a shareholder in KSPL. Subsequently,
KSPL took up the development of the fourth berth and an OSV complex in 2007. The same was
completed in 2008.
Despite the changes in the concession agreement, KSPL continued to experience difficulty in attracting
traffic and paying the MGA to the Government. In addition, the development of the new ports of
Gangavaram and Krishnapatnam, in the vicinity of Kakinada, with modern facilities and a deeper draft,
added to the problems of the KSPL. Accordingly, KSPL once again appealed to the government for
flexibility and amendment in terms and conditions.
After a detailed evaluation and analysis, GoAP, in 2009, agreed to amend the concession agreement
by way of a supplementary agreement. The amendments included an extension in the concession
period from the original tenure of 20 years to 30 years, with a further option for extension by 20 years in
two blocks of 10 years each, elimination of the stipulation with respect to the MGA for revenue sharing
with the GoAP and allowing KSPL to undertake additional/ new developments at the port at the same
terms and conditions of the existing agreement.
In 2009, the principal shareholder L&T sold its stake in KSPL to Kakinada Infrastructure Holdings
Pvt. Ltd. (KIHPL). KIHPL also purchased the 2% stake held by SMIPL and now holds the single
- 94 -
largest stake in KSPL. The revised shareholding pattern of the company is as follows: KIHPL – 41%;
Everlink Asia Investments Ltd. (owned by the Salgaocar Group) - 30% and Konsortium Ports Pte Ltd.
(and its associate) - 29%. KSPL plans to expand its capacity by 3 million tonnes by constructing an
additional berth with facilities for handling edible oil, other liquid and general cargo at an investment of
Rs. 150 – 200 crore.
Key Learning and Observations
Level Playing Field: During the bid process/ tendering stage, the Government had indicated that the
private developer would get complete rights for development of Port. However, during the award of the
project, there were restrictions in terms of the anchorage port that will be operating in parallel. One of
the key reasons for the disputes between KSPL and GoAP was the restrictions on the cargo that KDWP
could handle. In order to protect the volume of cargo at the existing anchorage port, GoAP did not
provide a level playing field to KSPL thus affecting the traffic to an extent. While this issue was resolved
subsequently, ideally it should have been dealt with at the inception stage to prevent an adverse impact
on the project.
MGA to the Government: The revenue maximization approach of the Government by insisting on a
minimum guaranteed amount put substantial pressure on the project and could have derailed it. The
government had to eventually agree to an elimination of this stipulation.
Technical Due Diligence: There were a number of issues with respect to the port assets such as
cavities in the diaphragm wall, additional dredging requirement and requirement for removal of
boulders. Since this was a brownfield asset being privatised, the government should have undertaken a
detailed technical due diligence of the project site to accurately estimate the investment requirement.
Stakeholder Consultation: The project experienced social unrest with strikes by employees of the
anchorage port against the deep water port’s operations. A stakeholder consultation prior to the
appointment of the private operator where various affected parties would have been taken into
confidence could have prevented such disruptions.
Resolution of Issues through Mutual Discussions: The noteworthy learning from this project is the
amendments that were made in the terms of the concession agreement through mutual discussions
without abandoning the project. Despite the nature of the issues such as MGA and the term of the
concession agreement, both GoAP and KSPL mutually agreed to modify the agreement and ensured
continuity of the project.
Competing Facilities and Better Packages: Newer ports such as the Gangavaram Port and the
Krishnapatnam Port have given tough competition to KDWP. Both these ports had competitive
advantages in terms of being Greenfield ports, availability of huge land for future expansion, longer
concession period and better concession terms because of the evolution of concession agreements
and risk sharing mechanisms in the country. Thus while KDWP was at a disadvantage initially, its
concession terms were modified to bridge the gap.
- 95 -
Annexure-3.3: CSR Details from Apr 2010 to
Mar 2014
Particulars
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
Donation to Janhit Foundation for
empowerment of women & children
Donation for Development of cemetery at
Kakinada
Sensitization Workshop on Safety & health
to local people
Sensitization Workshop on Security
Aspects
5000 Saplings plantation drive on the
occasion of green day on 16.07.10 as part
of the 1 million plantation drive day set by
then Chief Minister A.P
KSPL Set up a techno stall at Kakinada in
the month of Jan 2011, to educate
Kakinada public on maritime activities
ADB Road Storm Drain Cleaning activity
undertaken as a proactive measure, to
combat flooding of Road outside KDWP in
monsoon season
A modest service oriented initiative of
providing Ambulance service on 24X7
basis
Provided Solar lamps on ADB Road to
facilitate the local commuters
Donated an unique Mobile Blood Donor
Van to Indian Red Cross Society Kakinada
Donation to Handicapped & Economically
poor arranged at tyagaraya gnanasabha at
chikkadpally, Hyd.
Sponsorship for international Coastal
Cleanup Day Conducted by Indian Coast
Guard along with South Asian cooperative
Environment programme (SACEP)
Donation for Durga Puja Celebrations at
keyes Girls High School, Secunderabad
Financial Assistance for Kakinada Police
Welfare through DSP Kakinada
Encouraged Fine Arts by Financial
Assistance to Sri KRKM Memorial
Academy of fine arts, Hyderabad
Donation to Indian Red Cross Society,
Kakinada.
1,800,000
1,000,000
200,000
2013-2014
500,000
58,365
22,260
581,270
199,403
1,512,990
1,383,740
900,000
428,000
2,984,000
10,000
15,000
12,250
20,000
100,000
408,164
25,000
30,000
20,000
- 96 -
Particulars
Financial assistance for building 1st Floor
of an Auditorium at JNTU Kakinada
through ECK Development trusts
Contribution to Cultural Activities by
Donation to Hyderabad Bangalee Samiti
Donation for Youth Development activities
through the young men’s Happy Club,
Kakinada
Donation for Development Activities for a
section of women to Sri Sarada niketanam
purva vidardhi (nee) sangham
Uniforms for poor Students (Through
APPCB Officials)
Financial Assistance for construction of
library Hall at District Police Office,
Kakinada.
Nilam Cyclone Relief Material Supply
Encouraging Sports by financial assistance
to Hyderabad Hockey Association
Encouraging Socio-Cultural Activities by
providing donation to Swarna Bharathi
Trust
Encouraging Socio-Cultural Activities by
providing Sponsorship for Kakinada Beach
Festival at Vakalapudi, through RDO/
District Collector Kakinada
Financial assistance for Police Welfare to
Kakinada Police Fund
Uniforms Distribution through Sri Sai Poor
People Society Associated with Bharatiya
Mazdoor Sangh Kakinada on 1st May,13 to
Orphan, Blind, Disabled Children
Good News service for the Blind Towards
Donations
Donation for distribution of cotton cloths for
old age & poor peoople through social
service worker Mr. L. Chinna Babu,
Kakinada ( cloths purchase from Sri
Dhanalaxmi cut pieces)
Donation under CSR to bring out 2nd
edition yatra special supplement on east
godavari heritage, traditions, tourism and
industries scenario.
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-2014
2,000,000
50,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
25,000
200,000
150,000
200,000
500,000
100,000
300,000
500000
25,500
200,000
20,000
50,000
- 97 -
Particulars
Supply of materials for repairs works to
Terrace, ceiling of slab, columns & beams
in Ground floor and first floor , Supply and
fixing of Reno Sintex Drinking Water Tank
(2KL) and Supply of Tent House Items for
inauguration of New Drinking Water Tank
Opening at Kumbabishekam temple in
beach road Kakinada.
Distribution of Rice bags for flood Victims
Area
Hrudaya cure little heart foundation
Free Eye Camp at KDWP on 25.09.2013
Chandra rajeswara rao foundation
Purchase of Maquet servo-s Upgradeable
Ventilator plat form medical equipment and
other medical equipment for Kakinada
hospital
Sambayya (Security) towards donation for
heart operation purpose
ISWMAW towards Sponsorship for
International Conference on Solid Waste
Management(ICO SWM-2014)
Fund Given to Indian Navy Welfare
Service Tax on Sponsorship
Sponsorship for Coast Guard Week
Celebrations 2014
Construction & Supply of material for New
toilets 2No's , 2KL water tank and supply &
Fixing of Iron Structure & Galivaliam Sheet
at M.P.U.P School, Fishing Harbor,
Kakinada
Supply and fixing of play equipment at
AMG School, Dairy Farm Center, Kakinada
Maintenance charges for KSPL donated
Blood donar Van
Total
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-2014
597,353
228,615
1,000,000
16,352
1,000,000
4,357,401
5,000
100,000
1,500,000
241,020
50,000
220,644
230,160
80,000
3,589,298
7,468,894
6,837,250
10,262,045
- 98 -
Annexure-3.4: Minutes of Meetings under
CSR Initiatives
- 99 -
- 100 -
Annexure-3.5: Detailed Action Plan and
Tentative Budget proposed
ACTION PLAN WITH TIME BOUND ACTIVITIES & PROPOSED BUDGET FOR ACTIVITIES FOR
SURYARAO PETA VILLAGE
S
DEVELOPMEN SUB ACTIVITY
T ACTIVITY
1.
Improving Toilet Day One: Free inspection & estimate the cost.
10:00 Hrs to 13:00 Hrs Rs 40,000/facilities
Day Two & Three: Ground work started with men 09:00 Hrs to 17:00
(i.e. 08 Toilets) material to clean and apply the acids and also put Hrs on both days
the repairs and distempers etc. Prepare paper
Expected to
work.
initiate by 15th
Apr & Complete Day Four: Final touch and re-inspection and
by 18th Apr 2015 handed over to the school.
Approx Four days
2.
Syntex Tank
(1000 liters
capacity)
including
pipelines
connections
Expected to
Day One: Free inspection & estimate the cost.
Day Two: Procuring the items from market like
syntax tank and pipelines etc, than select the
contractor give the task.
10:00 Hrs to 13:00 Hrs Rs 30,000/-
10:00 Hrs to 17:00 Hrs
Day Three: Fix the syntax tank and pipelines, tap
etc and test the same.
initiate by 20th
Day Four: Handed over to them after checking.
Apr & Complete
by 23rd Apr
2015
3.
TIME LINES FOR
TENTATIVE
ACTION PLAN & NO. BUDGET
OF DAYS
PROPOSED
ESTIMATED
Approx Four days
Steel plates and Day One: Ask which type of plates they want from 10:00 Hrs to 13:00 Hrs Rs 20,000/glasses for
school Head Master and obtain samples from
for 200 sets
afternoon lunch shop take approval from management.
(each set
having one
Expected to Day Two: Place the requisition to the material
plate &
th
department and prepare paper work accordingly. 10:00 Hrs to 13:00 Hrs
initiate by 27
glass).
Apr & Complete
Day Three: Purchase the items and put the name 10:00 Hrs to 16:00 Hrs
th
by 30 Apr 2015
of KSPL with date.
Day Four: Handed over to the school.
Approx Four days
- 101 -
S
DEVELOPMEN SUB ACTIVITY
T ACTIVITY
TENTATIVE
TIME LINES FOR
ACTION PLAN & NO. BUDGET
OF DAYS
PROPOSED
ESTIMATED
4.
Improve
sanitation by
providing dust
bins and
spraying of
germicide
powders.
All days morning 10:00 Rs
Hrs to evening 18:00 2,00,000/Hrs
Day One and Day Two: Inspect the entire village
and note the important places were condition of
sanitation too bad.
Day Three & Day Four: Plan the work how and
when it is started and how much of man power
required to clean the area of village and note how
many number of dust bins required and what
Expected to quantity of germicide powders required and plan
to use the same also print with paint on each dust
initiate by 4th
May & Complete bin etc.
th
by 13 May
Day Five & Day Six: Distribute the area sector
2015
wise on paper with the help of local body.
Day Seven & Day Eight: Start the work with
sufficient Housekeeping personnel (take some All days morning
personal from Gram Panchayat and also take 10:00 Hrs to evening
some personnel from volunteers of villages if 18:00 Hrs
agreed as a part of Swacha Bharat thereafter also
put some KSPL side on cash payment, as a part
of CSR to complete the task peacefully.
Day Nine & Day Ten: Same as above.
Approx ten days
the Day One: Free inspection of all the Angarwadi
5. Improve
All days works run
standards
of buildings in the presence of Executive Officers
between
Angarwadi
and President Gram Panchayat by the CSR team
10:00 Hrs to 18:00 Hrs
centers
like of KSPL and list out the buildings of Angarwadi
repairs for the centers.
building
Day Two: Procure the material like sand, cement,
Expected to water etc and also the detail the labor and mastry
th
initiate by 18 through a contractor.
Rs
May & Complete
2,00,000/Day Three& Day Four: Start the work with the
by 22nd May
help of contractor and put one. Supervisor from
2015
village panchayat and one person from our KSPL
side to see the work run smoothly without any
problem.
Day Five & Day Five: Same as above.
Approx. six days.
GRAND TOTAL
Rs
4,90,000/-
- 102 -
ACTION PLAN WITH TIME BOUND ACTIVITIES & PROPOSED BUDGET FOR ACTIVITIES FOR
FISHING HARBOR VILLAGE
S.No DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
SUB ACTIVITY
TIME LINES FOR
ACTION PLAN & NO OF
DAYS TAKEN
1.
Water distribution lines
Day One: Obtain sketch of plan to
layout the pipelines from village EO or
Expected to initiate by village Sarpanch were they want and
th
25 May & Complete by calculate the same that how much
rd
03 Jun 2015
length of pipeline required by them and
how many taps they want with the help
of EO/Sarpanch.
BUDGET
PROPOSED
All days started the job
from 10:00 Hrs and
closed at 18:00 Hrs
Day Two: Prepare the plan of work with
the help of contractor and ask to obtain
the connection from where etc.
Day Three: To procure the items like
pipelines, taps, cement & sands etc and
detail a suitable plumber with assistants
and also labor to dig the canal/pits.
Rs 2,00,000/-
Day Four & Day Five: Start the work
under the supervision of one person
from Gram panchayat and one person
from CSR team of KSPL
Day Six & Day Seven: Same as above.
Day Eight & Day Nine:
above.
2.
Improvements to toilets
Taken approx nine days.
Same as
Day One: Free inspection & estimate
the cost.
10:00 Hrs to 13:00 Hrs
Expected to initiate by
114th May & Complete by Day Two & Three: Ground work started 09:00 Hrs to 17:00 Hrs on
with men, material to clean and apply
14th May 2015
both days
the acids and also put the repairs and
Rs20,000/-
distempers etc. Prepare paper work.
Day Four: Final touch and re-inspection Taken approx Four days
and handed over to the school.
3.
Refurbishment to the ceiling Day One: Free inspection & estimate
of the school to protect from the cost for roof ceiling along with the
heat in summers.
contractor in the presence of School
th Head Master and CSR team.
All days started the job
from 10:00 Hrs and
closed at 18:00 Hrs
Expected to initiate by 8
h
June & Complete by 14 Day Two & Day Three: Procurement of
material &paper work.
June 2015
Rs40,000/-
Day Four& Day Five: Ground work
started under the supervision of one
person from our CSR team and also
Head master of the school.
Day Six & Day Seven: Applying the
white coat two times and handed over to
the school for their further use.
GRAND TOTAL
Taken
days.
approx
20 Days
seven
Rs 2,60,000/-
- 103 -
Annexure-3.6: Action Plan Disclosure
- 104 -
- 105 -
Attachment A: Guidelines on Corporate
Social Responsibility Fund, District Collector
East Godavari District, 1 June 2013
- 106 -
Attachment – B: Companies (Corporate
Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014,
GoI, Ministry of Corporate Affairs
- 107 -

Report - India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd.

Transcription

Similar documents

Presentation by : Kakinada Seaports Ltd, Andhra Pradesh, India

User manual

Kadey Krogen 48 North Sea Walk-Around - Kadey

Portuguese Minor Brochure - College of Arts and Sciences

Read the Diary of Micawber`s Millennium Voyage

Page 1 Page 2 LM-SCM 2014 XII. International Logistics and Supply

Bypass firewalls, application white lists, secure remote

Annual Report 2011-2012

Cycle 7 / Lecture 14

Port Forwarding for CCTV

Zeeland works - Impuls Zeeland