J Boyd and J Turtura T2 for ESC
Transcription
J Boyd and J Turtura T2 for ESC
2/28/2010 Tertiary interventions Secondary interventions w/function-based modifications Secondary Interventions •CICO •First Steps to Success •Skills groups Primary Prevention •Tier 1 SWPBS •Second Steps •Strong Kids Justin Boyd & Jessica Turtura University of Oregon School Psychology Program March 8, 2010 Secondary interventions should require low effort on the part of teachers and staff Be consistent with school-wide expectations Should be able to be implemented quickly and efficiently Provide increased opportunities for feedback about student behavior and provide multiple opportunities to practice skills Data-based decision-making is key • Selecting students for the intervention • Progress monitoring Behavioral Functions An example of an evidence-based secondary intervention is Check-InCheck-Out function is not always a consideration when placing students into tier two interventions suggests that interventions may be more effective when they address the specific function of the student’s problem behavior function-based components at tier 2 is feasible Student is “set up for success” First contact each morning is positive. “Blow-out” days are pre-empted. First contact each class period (or activity period) is positive. Evidence Incorporating Improved structure Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior. System for linking student with at least one positive adult. Student chooses to participate. Behavioral Increase in contingent feedback Feedback occurs more often. Feedback is tied to student behavior. Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded. 1 2/28/2010 Evidence Supporting its Effectiveness Most effective for attention-maintained problem behavior • Increase academic engagement, reduce problem behavior (e.g., Fairbanks et al., 2005; Filter et al., 2007; Hawken & Horner, 2003) Less effective for escape-maintained problem behavior • Highly acceptable to teachers, parents, students (e.g., Hawken et al., 2007) Modifications required • Can be modified for different behavioral functions May be less effective in middle schools Aversive properties resulting from academic skill deficits Importance of organizational and study skills (March & Horner, 2002; Fairbanks et al., 2005) but is often done so on an individual basis Mild problem behaviors Student’s Who’s • • • • who are sensitive to adult attention Student’s whose problem behaviors are maintained primarily by adult attention • Considerations for Practice • Systematic modifications versus individualized interventions • Mechanisms to address function directly • Appropriateness & “fit” Elementary Secondary left? work avoiders off-task escape-maintained students who lack academic or organizational skills Student for whom adult attention is not highly reinforcing Tier two interventions for students whose problem behaviors are, in part, maintained by escape or avoidance Special considerations for elementary and upper levels Building off an existing secondary intervention 2 2/28/2010 An Evidence Based Practice • e.g., Bird, Dores, Moniz, & Robinson, 1989; Brown et al., 2000; Carr & Durand, 1985; Durand & Carr, 1987, 1991; Hagopian, Fisher, Sullivan, Acquisto, & LeBlanc, 1998; Mildon, Moore, & Dixon, 2004; Wacker et al., 1990 Logic & Examples Children with communication deficits Typically developing children (e.g., Stahr et al., 2006; Filter & Horner, 2009) Typically considered as part of a Tier 3 intervention Escape-maintained problem behavior Justin Boyd, M.S. CICO Explicitly teach an alternative/replacement behavior (i.e., break requests) teaches students to recruit adult attention BrB with CICO teaches students to recruit briefbreaks as a functionally equivalent alternative to problem behavior. Breaks Promote self-management by teaching students to “keep track” of their breaks Establish & Teach teachers (and students) how this will look in the classroom are Better (BrB) • Implemented in the same way as CICO Make it feasible and sustainable for classroom teachers to implement • Includes the use of Replacement Behavior • Directly addresses escape /avoidance functions Elementary school • Utilizing SWPBS Exhibiting problem behaviors in academic settings Nominated by instructional staff as needing additional behavior support for mild disruptive behaviors in the classroom Brief FBA or informal teacher interview suggests their problem behaviors are maintained primarily by escape (e.g., work avoidance). • Have implemented SWPBS with fidelity for at least 2- years • CICO for at least one year • At least 90% of CICO features on the CICO self- assessment (fidelity) FACTS Guess & Check 3 2/28/2010 BRB point card (with team defined goals) Timer (e.g., digital, “hour-glass”) Team-generated list of acceptable break options Breaks are Better Card Training of Staff and Teachers • When After obtaining buy-in Prior to attempting to implement the program Day-to-Day Implementation of BrB Orientation time (additional 12 minutes) • Must explicitly teach the break request & provide opportunities for the student to practice with feedback. • Teaching Script Student Training/Orientation (once identified) Teacher orientation/support Data review using CICO-SWIS 4 2/28/2010 Must teach teachers how to allow or disallow student breaks Student problem behavior • Individually defined for each student Academic • “thumbs up” and “thumbs down” • Preferably this is done school-wide, rather than individually engagement • Decreases in off-task behaviors and increases in on-task behavior, work completion, etc. Frequency of Breaks • Appropriate requests to be “off-task” or to engage in • Teacher Reminders Page behaviors other than what the classroom expectation is at the time. • Brief (i.e., 2-minutes) • Limited number of opportunities to request these breaks Link between academic and behavioral concerns Jessica Turtura, M.S. Modified version of CICO to… Designed • Decrease problem behaviors that are maintained by escape and/or avoidance of academic tasks • Increase desired behaviors including work completion and class participation • Provide scaffolding to help students develop effective organizational habits and study skills • Improve communication between home and school around homework completion Increasingly important role of organizational and study skills Students who engage in problem behaviors in order to escape or avoid academic tasks Students that are often off-task during class Students that have difficulty keeping track of assignments and turning in work Students that lack organizational and study skills 5 2/28/2010 Students with severe academic skills deficits • Will likely need specific instruction in academic areas of concern • May benefit from the ABC program plus additional support Students that engage in problem behaviors but for whom work completion and/or organization is not a concern Components • Students receive daily point card and review goals • Coordinator checks: Are students prepared for the day? Have students completed all homework due today? • Opportunity to complete unfinished homework • Points earned for being prepared and/or completing homework Key modifications from CICO • Explicit focus around academic-related behaviors • Points are linked to being prepared for the school day and having homework assignments due that day Components • Daily point card/homework tracker • Goals defined in terms of academic behavior • Points for recording assignments on homework tracker Key modifications from CICO • Feedback is specifically related to academic behaviors hand raising, work completion, class participation, etc. • Teacher checks to make sure students have accurately recorded any homework assignments Components • Rewards and/or feedback • Review homework tracker Key modifications from CICO • Rewards linked to the function of behavior examples may include break coupons, homework passes, etc. • Explicit focus on reviewing homework and ensuring that students are prepared to complete that evening’s assignments 6 2/28/2010 Components • Home-school communication • Parent meeting Key modifications from CICO • Communication between home and school about homework completion • Parents gain information about how to best help their children with homework • Parents are better able to track assignments that their children need to complete Student buy-in Communication between staff Fidelity of implementation Parent involvement For more information feel free to contact us Justin Boyd [email protected] Jessica Turtura [email protected] 7
Similar documents
Tier II Getting Started Workbook
supplement primary prevention efforts, and are appropriate for students who exhibit problem behaviors across multiple settings. Crone, Hawken, and Horner (2010) indicate that Tier II interventions ...
More information