Full Text
Transcription
Full Text
Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 MORPHOMETRIC DATA CONCERNING ANIMAL SPECIES IDENTIFIED IN SITES OF CUCUTENI CULTURE, PHASE A Romeo CAVALERIU, Simina STANC and Luminiţa BEJENARU “Al. I. Cuza” University Iaşi, Faculty of Biology, Bd. Carol I 20A, 700505 Iaşi, Romania, [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. Archaeological excavations carried out recently in the site of Cucuteni Culture, phase A, furnished numerous faunal remains. This paper presents the morphometric description of both domesticated and wild animal species identified that we studied. Keywords: Archaeozoology, Osteometry, Prehistory, Cucuteni A Culture. Rezumat. Date morfometrice privind specii de animale identificate în situri aparţinând Culturii Cucuteni, faza A. Săpăturile arheologice realizate în ultimii ani în straturile Culturii Cucuteni, faza A, au furnizat numeroase resturi faunistice. În prezentul studiu s-a realizat descrierea morfomerică a speciilor de animale identificate, atât domestice cât şi sălbatice. Cuvinte cheie: arheozoologie, osteometrie, preistorie, cultura Cucuteni A. Introduction The samples of faunal remains analysed in this study are taken from the Chalcolithic sites of Hoiseşti (Iaşi County, Romania) and Feteşti (Suceava County, Romania). The settlement of Cucuteni Culture, phase A, from Hoiseşti is situated at 47˚12′5″ northern latitude and 27˚19′55″ eastern longitude, in a meander on the left side of the Bahlui River, corresponding of the bridge that provides the entrance in the Hoiseşti village (Dumeşti Commune, Iaşi County) (Ursulescu et al., 2004; 2005). The settlement Feteşti-La Schit is situated in the East of Suceava County, 15 Km North-East from the Suceava City on the Dradomirna Plateau (sub-unit of the Suceava Plateau), at right of the Grigoreşti River, affluent of Siret (Boghian et al., 2005b). Geographical coordinates of the archaeological site are: 47˚42′41″ northern latitude and 26˚22′6″ eastern longitude. Material and Methods The material under study comes from the Cucuteni A cultural level, of two archaeological sites, namely Hoiseşti (Iaşi County) and Feteşti (Suceava County). In the first case (Hoiseşti), material was found during the 2003-2004 excavations (Ursulescu et al., 2004, 2005) and the Feteşti remains were excavated during 2000-2004 (Boghian et al. 2005a). The Hoiseşti faunal remains belong to phase A3 of Cucuteni Culture (Ursulescu et al., 2004; 2005) and were dated of between the years 3500-3300 B.C./4350-4150 CAL. B.C. (Mantu, 1998), and those from Feteşti have been considered to belong to phase A3A4 (Boghian et al. 2005a), and were dated of between 3500-3200 B.C./ 4350-4050 CAL. B.C. (Mantu, 1998). The methodology used is the specific to archaeozoology (Udrescu et al., 1999), the measurements of anatomic elements being performed according to the van den Driesh guide (1976). - 279 - Romeo Cavaleriu et al. Results and Discussion From the Hoiseşti sample of 1557 mammal remains specifically determined (Cavaleriu et al., 2006), 318 remains could be measured, at a percent of 20.42%. From the Feteşti sample of 103 remains specifically determined (Cavaleriu & Bejenaru, 2007), only 15 remains were measured and the percentage was a reduced one, 14.56%. The excessive fragmentation of the remains was the impediment in assessing the withers height of the species identified in the Feteşti samples. Table 1. Quantification of mammals remains (NISP=number of identified specimens; MNI=minimal numbers of individuals) and of measurable remains in the sample of Hoiseşti. Species MNI NISP NR* % Bos taurus 5 222 31 13.96 Sus domesticus 16 451 38 8.42 Ovis aries/Capra hircus 7 204 26 12.74 Ovis aries 2 12 9 75 Capra hircus 2 6 1 16.67 Measurable remains Canis familiaris 4 26 8 30.76 Total domestic mammals 36 921 114 12.37 Equus caballus 1 1 - - Cervus elaphus 3 158 22 13.92 Capreolus capreolus 6 118 31 26.27 Sus scrofa 12 328 133 40.54 Bos primigenius 2 8 7 87.50 Lepus europaeus 2 13 6 46.15 Ursus arctos 1 1 - - Castor fiber 1 1 1 100 Felis sylvestris 1 1 1 100 Vulpes vulpes 1 4 1 25.00 Sciurus vulgaris 1 3 2 66.67 Total wild mammals 30 635 204 32.12 67 1557 318 20.42 Total mammals *NR=number of rests In booth samples, there were identified remains of both domestic and wild mammals, with the preponderating of the domestic ones (Tables 1; 2). The domestic remains represent 59% of the total mammal remains identified at Hoiseşti, the percentage being even greater (77%) for the Feteşti remains. The pig remains are the most numerous, fallowed by the cattle and the sheep/goat, the last ones being equal in number (Tables 1; 2). Among the wild mammals, the most numerous are those of wild boar, red deer and roe deer in the Hoiseşti sample (table 1), and in the Feteşti sample the wild boar and the roe deer (Table 2). A distribution of the remains on skeletal segments has been observed for all the mammals species identified, the predominant being those of appendicular skeleton (Tables 3; 4): 61% of the total Hoiseşti remains of Bos taurus are of appendicular skeleton; for Sus domesticus the proportion of the two categories of remains is almost similar, only 56% being of appendicular skeleton; for sheep/goat the proportion is also greater for appendicular skeleton (65%) and for wild boar 69%. In the case of red deer, due to the great number of antler fragments identified, the remains of axial skeleton are - 280 - Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 greater than those of appendicular skeleton; we must take into account the fact that they are only fragments and we don’t know how many of then come from hunted wild animals. Twenty one of these fragments seem to have been worked upon, and four of them belong to sloughed off antlers and gathered from woods, so if we deduct the antler fragments from the total of axial skeletal remains, the axial skeletal remains prove to be dominant (Table 3). Table 2. Quantification of mammals remains (NISP=number of identified specimens; MNI=minimal numbers of individuals) and of measurable remains in the Cucuteni A sample of Feteşti. Species MNI NISP NR* % Bos taurus 2 24 5 20.83 Sus domesticus 2 26 2 7.69 Ovis aries/Capra hircus 2 25 3 12 Canis familiaris 1 4 - - Total domestic mammals 7 79 10 12.65 Sus scrofa 2 10 4 40.00 Capreolus capreolus 1 9 - - Cervus elaphus 1 2 1 50.00 Lepus europaeus 2 2 - - Vulpes vulpes 1 1 - - Total wild mammals 7 24 5 20.83 14 103 15 14.56 Total mammals *NR=number of rests Measurable remains Domestic mammals Bos taurus (cattle). In the sample from Hoiseşti 31 bone remains were measured of which 25 were long and short bones (Table 5), four plate bones (Table 6) and two molars M3 (Table 7). There were measured, of the autopod bones, one calcaneus (127 mm greatest length) and six middling phalanx (their variable greatest length being between 35-53 mm, and the medium value of 44 mm). A fragment of distal metatarsus of 70 mm distal width comes from a great animal, probably a great male. This value approximates the minimum value for this parameter of Bos primigenius and ranges among the limits obtained for this parameter at Drăguşeni, where the limits are of 49-75 mm, and the medium is 56.7 mm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). The values for the distal width of the tibia are 63.5 mm, 65 mm, and 70 mm, similar to the values found in other phase A settlements, of 60 mm at Dumeşti (Haimovici, 1989) and 63 mm at Preuteşti-Haltă (Haimovici, 2003). Other pieces measured were astragals, radius, ulnas and metacarpus (Table 5). As concerning the flat bones, we have measured four proximal fragments of scapular, having the maximum length of articular process ranged between 60 mm and 80 mm (Table 6), with an average of 69.5 mm. These values correspond to those obtained on Preuteşti and Dumeşti samples. Although few bones were measured, a large variety of body parameters can be observed; for instance, for the distal end of the metatarsus the values are between 54.5 mm and 70 mm, and for the articular end of scapula the values are between 60 and 80 mm. For the Feteşti sample five measurements have been made, all for long and short bones (Table 8). The greatest length of the calcaneus identified in this sample is of 127.5 - 281 - Romeo Cavaleriu et al. mm, similar to the one found at Hoiseşti. A great value for the width of distal epiphysis of metatarsus (68.5 mm) has been registered in the case of this sample, similar to that from Hoiseşti. For a proximal fragment of metatarsus the width is of 75 mm, this piece being one coming from a large animal. No whole long bones have been identified among these samples and that is why no estimation could be made of the height of cattle withers. Sus domesticus (pig). 38 bone remains have been measured at Hoiseşti of which 26 were long and short bones (Table 5), 7 plate bones (Table 6) and 5 molars M3 (Table 7). The variable limits for the distal width of tibia are 25-31 mm and the mean for the four values is 28.3 mm. These values come inside the variability limits met for another settlement of phase A, Drăguşeni, where the variability limits for distal width of tibia are between 26-32.4 mm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). For plate bones, measurements have been made for three coxals and four proximal fragments of scapula with the limits of the length variable of the glenoid cavity of 27-38 mm and the average of 30.8 mm. In other phase A settlements, values of 27 mm have been found at Bălţaţi (Haimovici, 1997), and 29 mm at Dumeşti (Haimovici, 1989) for the length of scapula glenoid cavity. For the three coxals we obtained values of 29-32 mm of the antero-posterior diameter and a medium of 31 mm which are similar to the values found at Drăguşeni, of 28-35 mm and an average of 31.6 mm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000), and to those from Dumeşti, of 30-34 mm and a medium of 32.75 mm (Haimovici, 1989). For Feteşti samples, only two measurements have been made, for a proximal phalanx (greatest length of 41.5 mm) and for a coxal (the antero-posterior diameter of 30.5 mm and the cross diameter of 30.5 mm). For this species no withers height has been estimated there being no remains in any of the samples on which such estimates could be made. Ovis aries/Capra hircus (sheep/goat). Few of the bone remains have been specifically identified as belonging to Ovis aries or Capra hircus species, the greatest part being of the sheep/goat zootehnical group (Ovis aries/Capra hircus). At Hoiseşti 37 remains have been measured: nine for Ovis aries, most at the level at long and short bones (two astragals, two calcaneus, one radius, two distal fragments of tibia with distal width of 22 mm and 25 mm, and two distal fragments of humerus with distal width of 30 and 31 mm), 27 remains for Ovis aries/Capra hircus (15 for long and short bones, 3 for plate bones and 9 for cephalic fragments) and one distal of humerus fragment of Capra hircus (36 mm distal width). Of the bones belonging to Ovis aries/Capra hircus group, there have been measured: astragal, calcaneus, phalanx I, humerus, metacarp, radius and tibia (Tables 5; 6). The Ovis aries withers heights have been estimated on some pieces using Teichert coefficients (1975, taken from Udrescu et al., 1999), the values being: 59 cm and 51 cm (astragal), 76.3 cm and 78.6 cm (calcaneus) and 53 cm (radius). The value obtained for the withers height on the basis of the radius is close to that obtained for the some element at Drăguşeni where the values are of 56.3 cm; 60.7 cm according to Teichert and of 55.4 cm; 59.8 cm according to Haak (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). At Feteşti measurements have been done for an astragal (29 mm length) and two humerus distal fragments (28 mm and 35.5 mm distal width) (Table 8). Canis familiaris (dog). A number of 8 remains have been measured from the sample at Hoiseşti (Tables 5 - 7): two long bones (humerus and tibia), one scapula and five skull elements (four mandibles and one M1 inferior). - 282 - Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 Wild mammals Cervus elaphus (red deer). Out of all the remains identified from the samples at Hoiseşti 22 have been measured: 19 long and short bones (Table 5), two scapula fragments (the glenoid cavity length of 50 and 56 mm) (Table 6) and one inferior molar M3 (41 mm in length and 18 mm width). Most of the bones that could be measured belong to zeugopod and autopod. Phalanxes are the bones which were best preserved whole and so, for the six median phalanxes which have been measured, their length variable limits are between 47 mm and 53 mm, and the medium value of this parameter is 50 mm. Three proximal phalanxes have also been measured their length being 53 mm, 63 mm and 70 mm (Table 5), which indicates a great variability within the population, which can be accounted for by the sexual dimorphism, similar to the case we found in other settlements where values vary from 50 mm at Preuteşti-Haltă (Haimovici, 2003) to 68 mm met at Bălţaţi (Haimovici, 1997). The proximal width for two radius fragments is of 62.5 mm and 68 mm. Other measured pieces have been centrotars, metatarsus and humerus (Table 5). Only one astragal has been measured at Feteşti and its greatest length is 58.5 mm (Table 8). Sus scrofa (wild boar). In the Hoiseşti sample measurements have been made on 133 fragments: 108 long and short bones, 15 plate bones and 10 skull remains (Table 5 7). Measurements have been made on seven astragal (the variable limits for the proximal length being 50.5 mm for the minimum and 56.5 mm for the maximum, the medium value 53.85 mm), nine calcaneus (the variable limits for greatest length being between 100 mm and 119 mm, the medium of 108 mm). 22 pieces were measured for proximal phalanx, the limits of variability for greatest length being between 43.5 mm and 55mm, and the average of 48.15 mm. 12 fragments have been measured for humerus and the distal width varies between 50 mm-58 mm and the average value of this parameter is of 53.8 mm. These values correspond to those found at Drăguşeni, where values of 49-64 mm were obtained and the average is of 59.3 mm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). One of the parameters assessed for radius is the width of proximal epiphysis with the variable limits between 37.5 and 45.5 mm and the medium value of 40.9 mm. The variable limits for the width of the distal epiphysis of tibia are between 38 mm and 42.5 mm, the medium value of 40.5 mm, while at Drăguşeni the values obtained are between 36.5 mm and 42 mm with an average of 39.2 mm. The measurements of remains from domestic pig and from wild boar are presented in the figures 1, 2 and 3, for humerus, radius and proximal phalanx. Measurements have also been made for femur, metacarpus, metatarsus III and metatarsus IV (Table 5). The values we obtained for astragals and calcaneus correspond to the variable limits obtained at Drăguşeni where the values for astragals are of 51-57.6 mm and the average is 545 mm, and for calcaneus 105-115 mm, with average of 107.9 mm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). 6 measurements have been made for plate bones of coxal and 8 for greatest length of the processus articularis of scapula with variable limits between 46-53 mm and medium of 49.7 mm (Table 6). The withers height has been estimated on the basis of astragals and calcaneus, by Teichert coefficients (1975, taken from Udrescu et al., 1999). According to astragal, the medium size is of 98.7 cm, the smallest value being of 92.6 cm and the highest of 103.4 cm. The medium value calculated on the basis of calcaneus is higher than that calculated - 283 - Romeo Cavaleriu et al. on the basis of astragalus, namely 103.5 cm, and the limits of variability have higher values (93 cm-113.7 cm). At Drăguşeni, the medium size estimated on the astragal is of 97.7 cm, the smaller size of 91.2 cm and the tallest size of 105.3 cm. The medium value calculated on the basis of calcaneum is of 100.7 cm and the limits of variability are between 93.4 cm and 107.4 cm (Bolomey & El Susi, 2000). Other two whole bones allowed the estimation of the withers height, the values obtained being of 106 cm (on the basis of a metatarsus III) and of 105.7 cm (on the basis of a metatarsus IV). 4 bones have been measured at Feteşti for this species (Table 8): a medium phalanx, a distal phalanx and two fragments of radius (a proximal one - 36.5 mm proximal width, and a distal one - 44.5 mm distal width). The value of proximal width of radius being lower to those found for the Hoiseşti sample. 60 50 B Fd (mm) 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Bd (mm) Bp (mm) Figure 1. Dimensional separation of humeral distal ends: Sus domesticus (o) and Sus scrofa (♦). 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 fragment Figure 2. Dimensional separation of radial proximal ends: Sus domesticus (o) and Sus scrofa (♦). - 284 - Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 30 25 Bp (mm) 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 GL (mm) Figure 3. Dimensional separation of proximal phalanx: Sus domesticus (o) and Sus scrofa (♦). Capreolus capreolus (roe deer). A number of 31 fragments have been measured in the sample from Hoiseşti: 15 long and short bones, 5 plate bones (one coxal and four proximal scapula fragments) and 11 skull fragments. Four astragals have been measured, the variability limits for greatest length being 29 mm - 37 mm, and the medium value for this parameter is of 32.4 mm. Three proximal phalanxes have been measured (greatest length of 42, 42 and 43 mm) with a medium value of 42.3 mm. Other measured pieces were humerus, metacarpus and radius (Table 5). Numerous measurements have been taken for fragments of mandible (Table 7), the estimated parameter, being the length of cheektooth row (the variability limits for these parameters being 68-74 mm and the medium value 70 mm), the length of the molar row (with variability limit of between 40-43 mm and the medium value of 41.6 mm), the length and the width of the molar tooth M3 (Table 7). Nine remains from the Feteşti sample are of roe deer but they could not be measured (Table 2). Bos primigenius (aurochs). For the sample from Hoiseşti (Table 5) measures have been done for seven long and short bones, of which two astragals (of which one of 81 mm greatest length and 50 mm distal width), one calcaneus (190 greatest length) and a proximal radius fragment (breadth of the proximal end of 118 mm), a proximal phalanx (greatest length of 87 mm). The values for two medium phalanxes, of 57 mm greatest length, are different from those of the Bos taurus species, as can be seen in figure 4. In the Feteşti sample this species has not been identified. - 285 - Romeo Cavaleriu et al. 40 35 Bp (mm) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 GL (mm) Figure 4. Dimensional separation of middle phalanx: Bos taurus (o) and Bos primigenius (♦). Lepus europaeus (hare). In the samples from Hoiseşti, measurements have been made for five long and short bones (femur, radius, humerus, and two tibias) and one scapula (15 mm length of glenoide cavity). The value for the distal width of the femur is of 20 mm, 13 mm for humerus and 16 mm for tibia (Table 5). In the Feteşti sample there are only two remains belonging to this species (Table 2), but they couldn’t be measured because of their fragmentation. At Hoiseşti the diversity of identified wild species is relatively high (Table 1), but for some species few bones have been measured. So, for fox the only measured piece is a humerus, the distal width of it being 20 mm; a tibia of beaver has been measured, its distal width being 22 mm; of the squirrel bones a radius (4 mm proximal width) and a tibia (37 mm length) (Table 5). Conclusions The osteometric data are relatively few, because few of the remains could be measured, due to their high degree of fragmentation. Because of lack of the whole bones the withers height could not be estimated for some species highly represented within the samples such as Bos taurus, Sus domesticus, Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus. The only values for the withers height are of Ovis aries and Sus scrofa in both cases the variability limits being large for this parameter: between 51 cm and 78.6 cm for Ovis aries and 92.6 cm and 113 cm for Sus scrofa. A clear distinction could be noticed, in some pieces, between the domestic and wild forms, on the basis of metric date, as for instance between Bos taurus and Bos primigenius species, and Sus domesticus and Sus scrofa respectively. - 286 - - 287 - Element B. t. S. d. O. a. C. h. O/C Antler / Horn core 8 4 Neural cranium 9 62 4 Maxilla 17 40 1 16 Mandible 18 79 44 Vertebra 33 15 6 Ribs 4 2 Hyoid 1 Scapula 10 44 1 8 Humerus 11 56 2 2 14 Radius 11 14 2 17 Ulna 9 19 1 Metacarpus 6 3 5 Pelvis 13 31 7 Femur 15 5 18 Patella 1 1 Tibia 12 27 2 24 Fibula 9 Astragalus 1 1 2 3 Calcaneus 4 10 2 10 Metatarsus 12 4 8 Metapodium 8 7 12 Carpal/Tarsal 13 4 Phalanx I 4 5 3 Phalanx II 5 10 2 Phalanx III 1 1 Total 222 451 12 6 204 C.f. 2 11 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 26 E. c. C. e. C. c. S. s. B. p. L. e. C. f. U. a C. v. F. s. S. v. 78 18 3 41 4 5 13 7 30 18 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 2 6 17 1 3 4 26 1 1 6 7 20 1 1 2 2 25 1 1 8 4 2 16 8 3 13 2 4 3 3 23 1 3 1 1 1 3 5 9 2 1 19 1 7 7 9 2 12 7 23 2 1 3 3 5 5 29 1 1 10 6 3 1 3 1 2 1 158 118 328 8 13 1 1 4 1 3 Table 3. Skeletal element distribution in the sample of Hoiseşti (B. t. - Bos taurus; S. d. – Sus domesticus; O. a. – Ovis aries; C. h. – Capra hircus; O/C – Ovis aries/Capra hircus; C. f. – Canis familiaris; E. c. – Equus caballus; C. e. – Cervus elaphus; C. c . - Capreolus capreolus; S. s. – Sus scrofa; B. p. – Bos primigenius; L. e – Lepus europaeus; C. f. – Castor fiber; U. a. – Ursus arctos; C. v – Canis vulpes; F. s. – Felis sylvestris; S. v. – Sciurus vulgaris). Romeo Cavaleriu et al. Table 4. Skeletal element distribution in the Cucuteni A sample of Feteşti (B. t. - Bos taurus; S. d. – Sus domesticus; O/C – Ovis aries/Capra hircus; C. f. – Canis familiaris; C. e. – Cervus elaphus; C. c . - Capreolus capreolus; S. s. – Sus scrofa; L. e – Lepus europaeus; C. v – Canis vulpes). Element B. t. S. d. O/C C. f. C. e. C. c. S. s. L. e. C. v. Antler / Horn core - - - - - 4 - - - Neural cranium - 3 1 - - - 1 - - Maxilla 1 1 - - - - - - - Mandible 3 4 10 1 1 2 - - - Vertebra 1 - - - - - - - - Ribs - 1 - - - - - - - Scapula 1 4 - - - - - - - Humerus 6 5 5 - - - 1 - Radius 1 1 - - - - 3 - - Ulna 1 - - - - - - 2 1 Metacarpus 2 - - - - 1 - - - Pelvis - 4 3 - - - - - - Femur 3 1 - - - - - - - Tibia 1 - - 3 - - - - - Astragalus - - 1 - 1 - - - - Calcaneus 1 - 1 - - - - - - Metatarsus 1 1 3 - - 1 1 - - Metapodium - - 1 - - - 2 - - Phalanx I 1 1 - - - 1 - - - Phalanx II 1 - - - - - 1 - - Phalanx III Total - - - - - - 1 - - 24 26 25 4 2 9 10 2 1 Table 5. Metrical data (in mm) on long and short bones, in the sample of Hoiseşti (GL = greatest lenght; Bp = breadth of the proximal end; Bd = breadth of the distal end; SD = smallest breadth of the diaphysis; BFp = breadth of the facies articularis proximal; BFd = breath of the facies articularis distal; GB = greatest breadth). Species Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos primigenius Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Anatomic element Astragalus Astragalus Calcaneus Phalanx I Phalanx II Phalanx II Radius Astragalus Calcaneus Ulna Phalanx I Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx III Humerus Humerus - 288 - GL 81 190 87 57 57 Bp Bd 55 50 SD BFp BFd GB 74 46 42.5 36 32 37 33 118 38 30 30 61 127 41 45 41 53 48 46 46 35 65 25 26.5 22.5 22 37 35 31.5 35 30 28 35 29.5 27.5 33.5 28 27.5 25 26 20 23 23.5 82 92 76 88 Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 Species Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos/Cervus Canis familiaris Canis familiaris Canis vulpes Capra hircus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Castor fiber Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Cervus elaphus Lepus europaeus Lepus europaeus Lepus europaeus Lepus europaeus Lepus europaeus Ovis aries Ovis aries Anatomic element GL Bp Bd SD BFp Metacarpus 56 Metacarpus 55 Metacarpus 20.5 Metacarpus 57 Metatarsus 54.5 Metatarsus 70 Radius 83.5 77.5 Tibia 92 Tibia 70 Tibia 63.5 Tibia 90 Tibia 65 Centrotarsus Humerus 20 Tibia 20 Humerus 20 Humerus 36 Astragalus 29 18 Astragalus 37 23.5 Astragalus 33 21.5 Astragalus 30.5 29.5 Ulna 17 Phalanx I 42 13 11.5 9.5 Phalanx I 43 14 12.5 10.5 Phalanx I 42 11.5 10 8 Humerus 32.5 Humerus 31 Humerus 27 Metacarpus 22.5 Metacarpus 22 Radius 29 Radius 25.5 23.5 Tibia 22 Centrotarsus Centrotarsus Phalanx I 63 22 23 19 Phalanx I 70 30 27.5 25 Phalanx I 53 26.5 22.5 18.5 Phalanx II 19.5 Phalanx II 51 28.5 27.5 21 Phalanx II 50 27 22 18.5 Phalanx II 51.5 27 21.5 21 Phalanx II 51 24 20 17 Phalanx II 53 27 24.5 21 Phalanx II 47 25 23 17.5 Phalanx III 42 17 16 Phalanx III 18 20.5 Humerus 77 Metatarsus 47 Radius 62.5 58 Radius 68 63 Radius 58 Femur 20 Humerus 13 Radius 10 Tibia 16 Tibia 21 Astragalus 26 18 Humerus 30 - 289 - BFd GB 62.5 57 55 52.5 18.5 16 34.5 27.5 30 52 48 67 9.5 14 28 Romeo Cavaleriu et al. Species Ovis aries Ovis aries Ovis aries Ovis aries Ovis aries Ovis aries Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Sciurus vulgaris Sciurus vulgaris Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus. Sus domesticus Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Anatomic element Humerus Tibia Tibia Astragalus Calcaneus Calcaneus Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx II Femur Humerus Humerus Humerus Metacarpus Metacarpus Metatarsus Metatarsus Radius Radius Radius Tibia Tibia Radius Tibia Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx II Phalanx II Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Metatarsus IV Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Astragalus Calcaneus GL 22.5 69 67 35 35 27 132 37 33 40 33.5 36 56.5 55 51 55 50.5 56 53 107.5 - 290 - Bp Bd SD BFp BFd GB 31 30 25 21 22 20 13.5 26 21 11.5 11.5 9.5 12 11 9.5 13 10 9 35 36 26 25 32 22.5 21 16 19 27 27.5 25 16 28 25.5 21 18.5 23.5 21 4 7 6.5 3 21 21.5 20 22 20.5 22.5 16 15 12 15 15 13.5 21 17.5 17 22 18 19 38 30 39 32 36 26.5 20 34 24 26 27 29 28 29 25.5 25 21.5 29.5 22 31 28 22.5 24 32.5 33.5 30 35 32 34 32 31 Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 Species Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Anatomic element Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Calcaneus Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Ulna Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx I Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx II Phalanx III Femur Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus GL Bp 100 119 102 115 109.5 101 117 101.5 Bd 48.5 19 - 291 - 55 51 49 46 43.5 47 49 47 46 45 48 48.5 48 46 21 22 25 22.5 28.5 SD BFp BFd GB 26 37 32 35 30 27.5 32.5 31 30 29 29.5 28 39 31 30.5 32 30 29 29 29 27 29 15.5 22 18 21 18.5 21 18.5 23 18.5 16 18 15.5 20 20 26.5 22 19 21.5 20 22.5 20 22.5 20 24.5 22 21 19 26 24 25 20.5 23 22 48 21 20 48 24 22.5 54.5 22.5 49 22.5 19.5 47.5 21 49 22 20 46 23 20 35 23 19 32 22.5 20 33 22 20 34 21 17.5 40 15 62 55 50 54 52.5 52.5 17 16 17 16.5 19.5 16 19 16 16 18 18.5 17 16 17.5 18 17 17 16.5 15 45 40 39 44 Romeo Cavaleriu et al. Species Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Anatomic element Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Humerus Metacarpus Metatarsus Metatarsus III Metatarsus IV Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Radius Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia Tibia GL 113 120 Bp Bd SD BFp BFd GB 58 47 54 46 57.5 48 50 42 58 45 52 41 41 53 41.5 55 53.5 30 22.5 23.5 18 24 24 19.5 47 45 38.5 39.5 39 40 45.5 45 41 39 37.5 38 40 43 41 41 41 42.5 38 38 41.5 41 42 42 38.5 39 38.5 26 30 32 33.5 29 30 32 36 31 32 66 87 63 Table 6. Metrical data (in mm) on plate bones, in the sample of Hoiseşti (GLP = greatest length of the processus articularis; LG = length of the glenoid cavity; BG = breadth of the glenoid cavity; SLC = smallest length of the collum scapulae; LA = length of the acetabulum including the lip; TA = transversal diameter of the acetabulum). Species Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Canis familiaris Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Cervus elaphus Anatomic element GLP LG BG. SLC LA Scapula 60 46 44 37 Scapula 71 59 51 Scapula 80 62 59 Scapula 67 54 46.5 Scapula 23 20.5 15 Pelvis 29 Scapula 20 19 Scapula 29.1 25 22.5 20 Scapula 25 20 16.5 Scapula 29 23 22 18 Scapula 72 56 54 50 - 292 - TA Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 Cervus elaphus Lepus europaeus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Scapula Scapula Pelvis Pelvis Scapula Pelvis Pelvis Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Pelvis Pelvis Pelvis Pelvis Pelvis Pelvis Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula Scapula 66 15 28.5 32 33 50 15 26 28 29 37 29.5 49 12.5 24 25 23 32 24 9 25 25 23 22.5 32 29 29 18.5 24 20 21.5 32 45 44 41 42 42.5 48 48 51 49 51 53 46 52 38 33 40 38 41 41 42 38 40 30 42 41 42 34 32.5 30 27.5 37 35 37 35 34.5 33 34.5 35 32.5 33 36 36 27 Table 7. Metrical data (in mm) on dentition, in the sample of Hoiseşti (LC = length of the cheektooth row; LM = length of the molar row; LM3 = length of M3 tooth; BM3 = breadth of M3 tooth; LM1 tooth = length of M1 tooth; BM1 = breadth of M1 tooth; Lc = length of canine tooth; Bc = breadth of canine tooth). Species Bos taurus Bos taurus Canis familiaris Canis familiaris Canis familiaris Canis familiaris Canis familiaris Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus. Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Capreolus capreolus Cervus elaphus Felis sylvestris Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Anatomic element Mandible Maxilla Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible LC LM LM3 BM3 LM1 BM1 40 18.5 35 23 35 21 8.5 65 33 22 7.5 60 32.5 19.5 8 19.5 7.5 32.5 20 8 17.5 9 16.5 9 43 18 9 69 40 17.3 8 68 42.5 18 8 69 40 17 8 67 40 16 8 73 42 16 8 74 42 17 8.5 43 19 9.5 42 17 9 41 18 26 24 22.5 61 22 52 24 70 47.5 23.5 - 293 - 9 9 8 9 9 8.5 Lc Bc 6 7 Romeo Cavaleriu et al. Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus domesticus Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Mandible Maxilla Mandible Mandible Mandible Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla Maxilla 69 47 70 48.5 51 21 8 22 8 24 9.5 32.5 16 31 15 30 15 33 18 47 22 41 19 41.5 24 44 24.5 45 24 43.5 25.5 42.5 25 23.5 14 135 81 85 40 44 40 23 25 24 Table 8. Metrical data (in mm) on long and short bones, in the Cucuteni A sample of Feteşti (GL = greatest lenght; Bp = breadth of the proximal end; Bd = breadth of the distal end; SD = smallest breadth of the diaphysis; BFp = breadth of the facies articularis proximal; BFd = breath of the facies articularis distal; GB = greatest breadth). Species Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Bos taurus Cervus elaphus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Ovis aries/Capra hircus Sus domesticus Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Sus scrofa Anatomic element Calcaneus Phalanx I Humerus Metacarpus Metatarsus Astragalus Astragalus Humerus Humerus Phalanx I Phalanx II Phalanx III Radius Radius GL Bp 127,5 59,5 30 Bd 29 60 SD BFd GB 41 27 48 75 68,5 34 19 28 35,5 41,5 20,5 18,5 16 35 31 28,5 24,5 38,5 18,5 44,5 36,5 58,5 29 30 39 References Boghian, D., Ignătescu, S., Mareş, I., Niculică, B., 2005a. Feteşti, Jud. Suceava, “La Schit”. Cronica Cercetărilor Arheologice. Campania 2004, Institutul de Memorie Culturală, Bucureşti, 82-84. Boghian, D., Ignătescu, S., Mareş, I., Niculică, B., 2005b. Les Decouvertes de Feteşti-La Schit parmi les stations cucuteniennes du nord de la Moldavie. Cucuteni 120 des ans de recherches, Piatra-Neamţ, 332-352. Bolomey, Al., El Susi, G., 2000. Animals Remains. Drăguşeni a Cucutenian Community, Editura Enciclopedică, Bucureşti, 159-177. Cavaleriu, R., Bejenaru, L., Bodi, G., 2006. Archaezoological inventory of the faunal remains discovered in the Chalcolithic Cucuteni A Culture site from Hoiseşti (Iaşi County, Romania). Analele Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biol. anim., LII: 269-272. Cavaleriu, R., Bejenaru, L., 2007. Archaeozoological note concerning the archaeological complex from Feteşti, Suceava County. Analele Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biol. anim., LIII: 303-306. Driesch, A., von den, 1976. A Guide to the Measurements of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum Bulletin 1, Harvard University. Haimovici, S., 1989. Studiul materialului paleofaunistic găsit în groapa nr. 7 din aşezarea cucuteniană de la Dumeşti, judeţul Vaslui. Acta Moldavie Meridionalis, IX–XI: 83-89. Haimovici, S., 1997. Observaţiuni cu privire la resturile animaliere descoperite în staţiunea cucuteniană din faza A4 de la Bălţaţi (judeţul Iaşi). Cercetări istorice, Muzeul de Istorie al Moldovei, Iaşi, 16: 31-37. Haimovici, S., 2003. Analiza materialului arheozoologic. In Ursulescu N., Ignătescu S. (Eds.), Preuteşti-Haltă. O aşezare cucuteniană pe Valea Şomuzului Mare, Casa Editorială Demiurg, Iaşi, 95-105. Mantu, C. M., 1998. Cultura Cucuteni: evoluţie, cronologie, legǎturi. Bibliotheca Memoriae Antiquitatis, V. - 294 - Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, s. Biologie animală, Tom LIV, 2008 Udrescu, M., Bejenaru, L., Hrişcu, C., 1999. Introducere în arheozoologie, Editura Corson, Iaşi. Ursulescu, N., Cotiugǎ, V., Bodi, G., Chirilǎ, L., Boghian, D., Ţurcanu, S., Vǎleanu, M., Garvǎn, D., 2004. Hoiseşti, com. Dumeşti, jud. Iaşi. Cronica cercetărilor arheologice din România. Campania 2003, Institutul de Memorie Culturală, Bucureşti, 139 - 142. Ursulescu, N., Cotiugǎ, V., Tencariu, F., Bodi, G., Chirilǎ, L., Kogǎlniceanu, R., Garvǎn, D., 2005. Hoiseşti, com. Dumeşti, jud. Iaşi. Cronica cercetărilor arheologice din România. Campania 2004, Institutul de Memorie Culturală, Bucureşti, 177 - 178. - 295 - - 296 -