Pamela Bailey-Campbell

Transcription

Pamela Bailey-Campbell
May 22, 2013
Pamela Bailey-Campbell
Vice President - North America Infrastructure Consultancy
Jacobs Engineering, Inc.
Public Partners
◦ Arizona Department of Transportation Office of P3 Initiatives
◦ City of Flagstaff
Project Description
◦ Relocation of ADOT’s Flagstaff
District offices , labs, leased facilities,
Motor Vehicle Division offices
Driving Force Behind P3
◦ The City of Flagstaff’s desire to improve local roadways requiring the
relocation of current ADOT facilities
◦ ADOT had no funding to relocate
◦ ADOT LOCATION IN DOWNTOWN FLAGSTAFF IS A PRIME RETAIL LOCATION
 Established
By H.B. 2396
 Allows DOT To Pursue Enhanced, Upgraded
or New Facilities
Including Facilities, Roads, Rail, Transit , Rest
Areas
 Allows
For Solicited & Unsolicited Projects
 Exempt From State Procurement Code
 Closely Follows “Model” Legislation
 Gives ADOT Significant Flexibility, Authority
to Enter into Negotiations and Agreements
Selections on Best Value Basis
 Outlines Process for both Solicited and
Unsolicited proposals

If unsolicited, requires ADOT to solicit for competing
proposals if they wish to move forward
Allows for single or multi-phase procurement
process
 Allows for Pre-Development Agreements
 Administered by the Office of P3 Initiatives,
ADOT who will negotiate and award contract
 Guidelines can be found on www.azdot.gov

How it Started…
◦ Discussions with City of Flagstaff and
potential P3 participants to gauge
interest
 The Big Question? Could a P3 deliver
ADOT new facilities in exchange for
valuable property?
City of Flagstaff Involvement
◦ City decided to include an adjacent
piece of property to enhance the value
◦ Also included option to construct the
City’s roadways (to maximize value
and potentially accelerate their delivery
as well)
◦ City of Flagstaff included on selection
team
Develop and Issue
RFQ/CP, Q&A
Issued March 2012
Negotiate & Enter
Implementation
Agreement, Deliver
Project
Receive SOQ/CPs,
Evaluate, Interview, ShortList
Draft RFCP & PDA
Released, Q&A, Final RFCP
& PDA
May 2012
August 2012
Complete PDA Scope, Sign
PDA, Complete PDA Work
Receive & Review Proposals ,
Interview, Select Preferred
Proposer
Underway Now
Proposals December 2012
Selection February 2013
Both Proposers Submitted Multiple Options –
Selected Preferred Proposer & Preferred Option
Vintage Partners Selected as Preferred Proponent
with Redevelopment of Harkins Theater
ADOT to Receive New Facilities Without Any Out
of Pocket Costs
Key Component is Successful Relocation of
Harkins Within City of Flagstaff
DEVELOPMENT FIRM CHOSEN TO LEAD PROJECT, PROVIDE NEW
LOCATION FOR ADOT FACILITIES
Selected Vintage Partners, an Arizona-based development firm to move
ADOT into new office space in Flagstaff, at no cost to the department, in
exchange for ADOT’s existing property at 1801 S. Milton Road.
First-ever P3 - acquire new facilities for the agency, free up prime land
for local redevelopment.
Upon successful delivery of the new facilities, Vintage Partners will take
ownership of the existing ADOT and city parcels and redevelop the land
for commercial, retail, and possibly residential uses. Vintage will follow
the regular city zoning and approval processes.
Expected to take 3-5 years to complete all components: Harkins’
relocation, extensive renovation of the existing Harkins building, and
the construction of the roadway improvements.
“This project is a
great example of the
value that a publicprivate partnership
can bring to ADOT
and the Flagstaff
community, while
creating a situation
that benefits
everyone,” said
ADOT Director John
Halikowski. “It shows
how we worked
through the
challenges. Due to a
lack of …funding,
ADOT would not
have been able to
accommodate the
city’s need for
relocation or obtain
new facilities to
replace its 55-yearold workplace. Now,
not only is the city
able to proceed with
its roadway
improvements, but
the project also
opens up prime
commercial property
for redevelopment.”
Public Partner
◦ Connecticut Department of
Transportation
Project Description
◦ P3 TOD for innovative delivery of
replacement parking garage and
associated improvements as part of
TOD at the Stamford Transportation
Center
Driving Force Behind P3
◦ Legislative mandate to maintain all
parking spaces in service
◦ Developed under TOD statute not P3
statute

As defined in Section 13b-79kk of the
Connecticut General Statutes, Transit
Oriented Development means:
◦ “The development of residential, commercial and
employment centers within one-half mile or
walking distance of public transportation facilities,
including rail and bus rapid transit and services,
that meet transit supportive standards for land
uses, built environment densities and walkable
environments, in order to facilitate and encourage
the use of those services.”
Maximize the continuous long-term revenue stream to the State
Maximize revenue from State property – State Set Parking Rates/Retains Revenues
Minimize the State’s financial contribution
Delivery of Station Place and parking garage improvements – Total of 1,000 spaces
Provide a new Parking Access and Revenue Control System
Operations and maintenance for the Replacement Garage and 2004 Garage for 3 years
Provide connectivity to commuters between Replacement Garage and 2004 Garage
Inclusion of a TOD component as defined in Section 13b-79kk of the Connecticut Statutes
Issue
Project Requirements
Number of Spaces
Minimum of 1,000 spaces available
for commuter parking 24/7/365
days
Station Place Improvements
First level of any replacement
facility on Original Garage Site for
Kiss and Ride, Taxis
Improved traffic flow on Station
Place; minimization of traffic
disruption during the demolition of
Original Garage
Design and Construction
3-year maximum construction
period
Meet DOT Standards including
High Performance Building
Standards, Accommodate Electric
Cars and Charging Stations
Issue
Project Requirements
O&M
Include O&M during construction plus 3
years after completion
Temporary Parking
Minimize Disruption to Commuters.
Existing parking must be available at all
times.
Parking Revenues
ConnDOT set rates and retains all revenue
DOT Financial
Contribution
Up to $35 million (including DOT costs)
available for design, construction and
oversight. Priority on minimizing State
contribution
RFQ Released February 29, 2012
Four Development Teams Short-listed
RFP Released July 13, 2012
Questions, Clarifications, One-on-one Meetings, Final Procurement Documents
Proposals Received October 9, 2012
Technical Scoring then Financial Review
Interviews and Clarifications October 2012 – March 2013
Under Final Review
Public Partner
oColorado Department of
Transportation - High Performance
Transportation Enterprise
Project Description
New U.S. 36 Managed
Toll Lanes
oTwo Separate Projects: Phase I DB and
Phase II P3
Driving Force Behind P3
oPhase I – TIFIA Challenge Grant
oPhase II – Finding Options to Finish
the Project
16
PROJECT SCOPE
P1: 10 miles from Pecos to Interlocken
P2: 6 miles from Interlocken to Foothills Parkway
• Reconstruction of general purpose lanes
• Replace structurally deficient bridges
• Build one managed lane in each direction
• Start time of day tolls migrate to dynamic
PROJECT STATUS
P1: Design-Build began construction April 2012
• Original Goal: Open project for toll collection by July 2015
• Winning Proposer Ames Granite: Open for toll collection by January 2015
P2: Concession, preliminary selection April 2013
• Goal: Open project for toll collection by December 2015
• Winning Proposer Plenary – Begin construction late 2013, open by end of 2015
Existing Typical Section
Barrier
2’
Proposed Typical Section
18
Concession Model – 50 Years, Toll Revenue Risk
• Private Financing Possible Structure
• Roll in Phase 1 TIFIA loan
• New TIFIA Loan for Phase 2
• PABs
• Minimum Subsidy: RTD, DRCOG, CDOT
Scope
• Construction of 6 miles of Phase 2 Express Lane, Reconstruction of GP
lanes between 88th St and Table Mesa, Bridge & ITS Improvements
• Operations and maintenance of Managed Lanes on existing I-25 Express
Lanes, US36 Phase 1 upon completion of DB contract and Phase 2
• US36 Phase 1 and Phase 2 full lifecycle cost responsibility
19
2/3 of Phase II Project costs funded through private sector equity
and non-recourse debt.
P3 arrangement enables the project to be completed 20 years
sooner than originally planned
Operations and Maintenance for 50-year Term
•Entire US 36 corridor between I-25 and Table Mesa
•I-25 Express Lanes between downtown Denver and US 36
•Routine O&M of all lanes, reimbursed for US36 GP
•Snow Removal of all lanes, reimbursement for US36 GP
•Long-term replacement obligations for all aspects of the Managed Lanes
Selected Plenary Roads Denver as the Concessionaire for 50-year Phase
II agreement for the US 36 Express Lanes/Bus Rapid Transit project
Plenary Roads
•The Plenary Group- team lead and managing partner
•Ames Construction, Inc.- construction
•Granite Construction- construction
•HDR- engineering design
•Transfield Services- maintenance
•Goldman Sachs- financial advisor
Proposals submitted – March 2013
Contractor selected – April 2013
Commercial close of contract – May/June 2013
Financial close of contract – October 2013
Construction begins – Late 2013
Project open – By end of 2015

Maximize the Potential
“Entrepreneurial Agency Seeks the Optimal Partner”
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Commit to Success
Know your goals and stick to them throughout
Make the right investments in staffing the process
Pamela
Bailey-Campbell
Pick
the right
partner and projects
Vice President,
Jacobs Engineering,
Make
sure the procurement
process Inc.
North private
America
Infrastructure
Consultancy
aligns
sector
interest with
yours
Phone: 303.820.4833
Email: [email protected]
Jacobs Engineering
May 9, 2007