PDF MAKE - Pismo Beach

Transcription

AMENDED AGENDA
City
of Pismo Beach
REGULAR
City
Council
Meeting
r16 2003
30 p
6
T
s
daY septem
m
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
Beach California
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Crescione
Councilmembers
Gee Rabenaldt
Gonzales
Reiss
Natoli
INVOCATION Dr Paul Jones
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Next Resolution No 63
03
R
1
Next Ordinance No 03
03
O
PRESENTATIONS
Item 1
A
Proclamation
Line of
Item 1
B
in the
Duty
Introduction of New
and
2
Recognizing William Billy Larson for his Heroism
George
City Employees Nathania Boutet Office Assistant I
Interim
Administrative Services Director
Edes
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
may
At this time members
the pobl
COmment on any item NOT appearing on the agenda It is recommended to keep
ic
to 3
Under State
your
matters presented under this item cannot be discussed or acted
utee
mln
upon by
the
Councd at this time For items appuanng on the agenda the public will be invited to make comments at the time
the item comes up for Council consideration At all times
use the
co
ree
ty
of
Law
please
t3
microphone
Ci UNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS
All items
on
the
Conse Calendar are
to be acted upon
by
a
single action
of the
City Council
unless otherwise
requested
indw Councdmember for special consideration Otherwise the recommendation of staff will be accepted and
duid
acted upon by roll call vo
Per Resolution 14
03 any items Dulled from the Consent Aaenda will be heard under
R
by
an
Section 10
Item 4
A
s Report of
Clerk
Posting The agenda of the regular September 16 2003
City Council agenda was posted on the City Council Chamber bulletin
board on September 11 2003 Grigsby
Recommendation
Item 4
B
Waive
title
readings
are
waived
Approval by
All
Readings of ordinances and resolutions except by
Grigsby
Recommendation
Item 4
C
Minutes of the
Approval by roll call vote
PBRC August 7
joint Council
Recommendation
Item 4 D
Approval
of
E
4
2
3
meeting Grigsby
vote to Consent
Calendar
Approval by roll call vote
to
Consent Calendar
2003
Clerk
Administration
File
City
Grigsby
1
101
Conference and Visitors Bureau Brasile File 806
Administrative Services
4
Department Edes File 201
Community Development Department Bloom File 450
5
Public Works and
6
Fire
7
Police
Engineering
File
400
Turner File 600
Department Cortez File 621
A Resolution of the
Receive
City
A Resolution of the
reports
as
information only
Council of the
of the California
Recommendation
City of Pismo Beach Rejecting the
Specialized Training Institute CSTI
Approve
Resolution
by
roll call vote
City Council of the City
of Pismo Beach Transferring
Funds
from
the Ocean Boulevard Drainage
City
975 to the Drainage Outfall and Access Repairs Project 989
000
10
Project
Delzeit
Department
Proposed Closure
in
General
Recommendation
Item 4
H
Consent Calendar
Register of Demands Edes file 202
Recommendation
Item 4
G
to
Monthly Activity Reports for February
1
Item 4 F
2003
Approval by roll call
Recommendation
Item
roll call vote to Consent Calendar
Approve Resolution by roll
cell vote
A Resolution of the
the
City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Approving
Transfer of 444
131 for the Water and Wastewater Telemetry
Upgrade
Recommendation
Approve Resolution by roll cell vote
1
Item 4
A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Endorsing
County Healthcare Alliance
the Activities of the South
Recommendation
J
Item 4
Approve Resolution by roll cell
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Approving
the Applicant to Apply for Grant Funds for the Percapita Grant
Program
under the California Clean Water Clean Air Safe Neighborhood Parks
and Coastal Protection Act of 2002
Recommendation
K
Item 4
Adopt Resolution approving
Authorization to enter into Wastewater Treatment
Carollo Engineers for Additional Services
Recommendation
Item
L
4
vote
Authorization to
reject
the
applicetion
Plant Contract with
Approve contract
all
bids for the Ocean Boulevard Storm
Drain
Improvements and Price Street Sidewalk Project
RECOMMENDATION
Reject
all bids
PUBLIC H
RING
5
CiTY COUNCIL PROCEDURES FOR PUBUC HEARINGS
will be conducted as follows
1
2
3
4
The Mayor will announce each item and thereafter the hearing
City staff will present the staff report and recommendation on the proposal being heard and respond to
questions from Council
The Mayor will open the public hearing by first asking the project
her representative
appullant or his
applicunt
to present any points necessary for
Council as wall as the public to fully understand the proposal
The Mayor will then ask other interested persons to come to the podium to
present testimony either in support of
or in opposition to the propmml
The Mayor will invite the applicant
appellant or his
her representative beck to the podium to respond to the
public testimony if appropHata
The Mayor will then close the public hearing and lime further discussion to the Council and stall
prior to the
Council taking a vote
A1
Item 5
A Resolution of the
Amendments
to
City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Adopting
the General Plan Map and Text for 100 and 110 Oak Park
Road APNS 005
008 and Portion of 005
391
013
391
Recommendation
Item 5
2
A
Open public hearing
Adopt Resolution
take
comments
and
An
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Amending
Zoning Map for a portion of Property at 110 Oak Park Bivd from
to General Commercial CG
Open Space
OS
the
3
Recommendation
Open Public Hearing
Waive First
Item
B
5
101 Indio Bruce
comments
by title only
McFarlan Appellant Project
A Resolution of the
City
Planning Commission
Project
Reading
take
and Introduce
Council of the
Action
City
Approving
a
and
O125
03
of Pismo Beach
Upholding a
Coastal Development Permit
No 03
0125 101 Indio
Recommendation
Resolution
Adopt
Commission
Issued
Upholding
Coastal
Planning
Development
Permit
Item 5
A Resolution of the
1
C
City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Adopting
Minor Amendments to the General Plan Text to Correct Errors Cladfy
Working and Modify Certain Standards
Recommendation
Open public hearing take
Adopt Resolution
comments
and
Item 5
2 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach Amending
C
the Zoning Text to Correct Errors Clarify Wording and Modify Standards
Citywide
Recommendation
Open Public Hearing
First Reading and Introduce by title only
16
comments
Waive
BUSINESS ITEMS
Item 6
A
Request from Council regarding Phone Service Options
Recommendation
Item 6
B
Discussion
regarding
Discussion and
or Selection of
Pier Parcel
Item 6
C
Discussion of Initial Overview of
Recommendation
Item 6
D
Use of the
City Logo
s
Improvements
Recommendation
options
Map Exhibit
For Information
Recommendation
t
and take
Only
Key Financial Issues
Discussion and direction
or
Flag
as
it relates to the Downtown
Streetscape
Discussion and Direction
CI MANAGER REPORT
4
18
CITY ATTORNEY
S REPORT
I
COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
9
Area Agency on Aging
Gee
Gonzales
Natoli
Dinosaur Caves Preservation Society Gonzales
Reiss
Gee
2
3
Economic
4
5
Pismo Beach Conference
Visitors Bureau
Gee
Gonzales
Friends of Price House Reiss
Gee
Gonzales
6
Integrated
7
Mobile Home Rent Stabilization
Natoli
Gee
Gonzales
SLO Council of Governments
Natoli
Crescione
8
9
Vitality Corporation
Waste
Crescione
Rabenaldt
Management Authority
JPA
Crescione
SLO Regional Transit Authority
Natoli
Zone 3 Advisory Committee Rabenaldt
10
11
SLO County Water Resources
Advisory Committee
SLO South County Area Transit
Reiss
SLO Air Pollution Control District
Reiss
12
13
14
Natoli
Scenic Highway Committee Crescione
South County Youth Coalition
Rabenaldt
Natoli
EOC
Rabenaldt
15
16
17
18
Community Improvement Group
Rabenaldt
Gee
Gonzales
Crescione
Gee
Gonzales
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
Reiss
Ventana Fire Station
19
PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
The Council
he
Il
past
I
meeting
that time
next
will
00 p
adjourn by 11
fifths vote of the Council wishes to continue
m unless a four
30 p
adjourned at 11
m any remaining agenda items will be continued to
If the meeting is
regular meeting
Affidavit Date
Time of
Posting
Date
Time
General Information
The
Council Agendas
The City Council agenda is now available for
public review at the City
s
website at www
and
the
s Office 760 Mattie
orR
pismobeach
City Clerk
Road Pismo Beach California on the Thursday prior to the scheduled
City of Pismo Beach meets on the First and Third
month at 6
30 p
m unless otherwise noticed
Tuesdays
of each
meeting
Council
Meeting Broadcasting
is
on
Notice
Channel 20 three times a
Regarding
day
Americans with Disabilities Act
In
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting please contact the City Clerk
s Office at 773
7003 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to
ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to
provide accessibility to the meeting 28CFR
104ADA Title II
102
35
5
I
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PISMO BEACH RECOGNIZING LEAD LIFEGUARD
WILLIAM BILLY LARSEN
FOR HIS HEROISM IN THE LINE OF DUTY
WHEREAS
waters off of Avila
August
Beach and
on
19th
2003 there was a fa
a shark
WHEREAS Billy Larsen is employed by the City of
position of Lead Lifeguard and was representing the
competition in Avila Beach at the time of the attack and
WHEREAS
due to the nature of the
Pismo Beach in the
lty
in
one of
t
competition
attack in the
lifeguard
a
the
lifeguards
had the benefit of their normal rescue tools which d
wou d
n
e radios flotation
devices paddle boards and wetsuits and
WHEREAS
four
lifeguards including Billy
Larsen
deo
respo
to a call
for
the beach with unknown circumstances three guards entered the water
while Billy interviewed the witness who reported the possibility of a shark attack
and
help
on
Billy
Larsen entered the water and
WHEREAS
even
after
discovering
rescue
of the victim and
stayed
rescue
at
risk
great personal
NOW BE IT RESOLVED
by
the
swam to
with the other
the
City
strong possibility of a shark attack
uards to assist in the
life
guards until the completion of the
his fellow
Council of the
City
of Pismo Beach
follows
WILLIAM
BILLY
LARSEN
IS HEREBY AWARDED THE
CITY
OF
SMO BEACP
P
MEDAL OF VALOR
FOR HIS HEROISM AND COURAGEOUS ACTIONS ON AUGUST
Dated this 16t
Mayor
day of September
Benito J Crescione
2003
19
2003
as
PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT
TITLE
SREPORT OF POSTING
CLERK
RECOMMENDATION
Council to approve
by roll
call vote to Consent Calendar the Clerk
sdate and time of posting
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
s
Clerk
Report of Posting
Council
meeting Was posted
and time
on
the
The
agenda for the regular meeting of September 16 2003 City
City Council Chamber bulletin board on the verified date
Council
City
agenda
Council approves this item for
on
the
requirements of the
Brown
Act Government Code
2
54954
FISCAL IMPACT
Not
Applicable
OPTIONS
Not
Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
None
Prepared by
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
City Manager Approval
Meeting Date September 16
2003
PISMO BEA CH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TITLE
SUBJECT
WAIVE READINGS
RECOMMENDATION
All
readings of ordinances and resolutions except by title
are
waived
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is
approved
as a
Consent Calendar item and is done in this way so that the Mayor reads
by title only and not the whole content of each item that come
all Resolutions and Ordinance
up for consideration
City of Pismo
Beach
Municipal
Code reads
as
follows
04
2
340
At the
Reading of Ordinances
time of adoption of an ordinance
Councilmembers
consent may be
this ordinance
present
can
expressed by
can
the City Council by unanimous consent of those
determine that the ordinance shall be read in title only
Such
a statement
be read in title
by the presiding officer that
if there is
no
objection
only
04Reading of Resolutions
2
350
At the time of adoption of any resolution the City Council by unanimous consent of those
Councilmembers present can determine that the resolution shall be read in title only
Such
consent may be expressed by a statement that if there is no objection this resolution can be
read in title only
If any Councilmember so requests the resolution shall be read in full
However when a resolution is placed on the consent agenda the title need not be read unless
requested by any Councilmember Such resolutions may be adopted with the remainder of the
consent
agenda
FISCAL IMPACT
Not
Applicable
OPTIONS
Not
Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
None
Prepared by Lori Grigsby City
Clerk
2003
ApeqdP
Item
B
4
SUBJECT
TITLE
MINUTES OF THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL
PRBC SPECIAL MEETING AUGUST 7 2003
RECOMMENDATION
vote to Consent
Calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Minutes
are
attached for your review
FISCAL IMPACT
Not
Applicable
OPTIONS
1
Approve minutes
2
Make corrections to minutes with
approval
ATTACHMENTS
1
August 7
Prepared by
2003
Lori
PRBC meeting
City Council
Grigsby City Clerk
Meeting
Date
September 16
2003
DRAFT
MINUTES
PRBC
City CoUnCil
Special Meeting
Joint
Thursday August 7
2003
00
6
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present
Boardmembers Present
Arlene
Gonzales Rudy Natoli Bill Rabenaldt
Gee
Mayor Joe Crescione
Mary
Ann Reiss and
Tom
Abshere Chris Bingaman
Bill
Couch
and
Shelly Higginbotham
Boardmembers Absent
ITEM A
Alfred Lemos
PARK RENTAL FEES
Vice Char H q nbotham spoke regarding the park rental fees She reviewed the
fee basis for Dinosaur Caves Park and remarked that a discount is
being offered
to residents of the City
Mayor Crescione spoke
Public Comment
in further detail the start of the fees
opened
Marilee
Hyman spoke regarding wedding information in respect to Dino Caves
suggested allowing up to 100 people on the site raising the price requiring
a security guard and urged preliminary fees She further stated that the site
needed to be kept in pristine condition which can incur an extra cost She further
expressed concerns regarding allowing barbeques She suggested allowing beer
and wine at the special events and expressed concerns with safety and
She
maintenance with the overlook
Marc Lebed
agreed with Ms Hyman He stated that it was critical that they set a
high but yet will allows for the park not being complete The
be
would
society
happy to help the City with the grouting of the overlook area
the
area
extending
beyond the amphitheatre to allow for a small reception and
adding more grassy areas He reminded the Council that the City has an MOU
that states that things of import be discussed with the Society
fee that is not too
Public comments closed
Vice Chair
Hi asked
qpinbotham
about the
Special
Event Permit process
J
Carolyn Johnson Planning Manager spoke regarding
the
Special
Events Permit
process
Kristen
Lyons Recreation Coordinator explained
in further
detail the process
and the functions of the SEC
Vice Chair
people
which would
cause more
increasing the number of
more groups needing permits
concern with
qinbotham expressed
q
Hi
and
landscape architects said the area should hold
people They could be contacted again to see about
hold more people
Ms Johnson stated that the
larger
a
number of
modification to
Vice Chair
Hi
q
q
inbotham remarked
that
a
deposit
is
required
for
up and
clean
would be groat She spoke with Atascadero and
thought a designated BBQ
San Luis Obispo and they do allow alcohol in some of their parks and they have
aroa
a
process set up for insurance
Boardmember Couch
expressed
concerns
regarding safety precautions
in
fencing at Dinosaur Caves Park He did not feel
and that could prove to be a safety hazard as well
the chain and bollard
particular
people look at the signs
as a litigation hazard
that
Marc Lebed
responded
to the
potential litigation hazards
and the
municipal
liability
Boardmember Couch
agreed
with the
security guard suggestion by
Ms
Boardmember Bin
qaman asked if anyone knew how many weddings
at
Margo
Ms
Hyman
were
held
Dodd
Lyons responded
Discussion held
that there
regarding
Boardmember Abshere
were
about 45
the purpose of the
spoke regarding
the
50
meeting
mandatory
insurance
Gonzales expressed concern regarding the enforceability of
Councilmember Gee
the 2
hour limit She asked about the deposits the litigation issues
Day reminded Council that
protected in the case of a fall
Don
Hiser Parks Supervisor
fencing cliff areas
Jeff
the
City Attorney
said that there
had stated that the
were no
standards set
City is
by
the
City for
Discussion held
regarding
the chain and bollards
as
well
as
the
potential
litigation
Vice Chair
help
Hi
q
q
inbotham stated that the citizen patrol
was
going
to be used to
enforce the time limits
Madlee
Hyman asked if Council could approve the preliminary fees and have the
PRBC present the maximum number of people to Council at a later date
Don
Day
cautioned Council and the PRBC to not create
The SEC has
spent years
Councilmember Reiss
Christine Couch
on
the
special
cases in
the
City
Special Event Ordinance
spoke regarding
the SEC
spoke regarding other uses for the parks including birthday
parties
Boardmember Couch shudders at the
with
thought
of the
City competing
for business
private business
Vice Chair
separate
qinbotham added
q
Hi
accounts for each
that the recommendation was to establish
park in order to track the use of the parks
Randy Bloom Acting City Manager
Community Development Director stated that
this
it
will
a
set
up
by doing
tracking account for each park He added that the
City was not going to recoup 100 of the cost of running the parks The parks
are a service The CVP will play a key role with the park rentals
Ms Johnson
provided clarification of the resolution including the already added
park could be rented to more than 50 people
in caveat that the
Natoli to adopt the resolution
By motion of Councilmembers Reiss
establishing park rental fees and direct the establishment of individual revenue
and expenses accounts for each park Passed 5
0
ACTION
Under discussion
Councilmember Rabenaldt asked about the cost of the smaller areas of
park and expressed concern about the cost to the City to maintain the
the
park
Councilmember Reiss stated that the purpose is to improve the quality of
life The downtown improvements are not going recoup the cost
Discussion held
the
regarding the smaller areas and the
cost of
maintaining
parks
Boardmember
Bingaman stated that a couple of the smaller outlooks
appropriate to rent those out
are
memorial outlooks and may not be
Mr Bloom clarified the
park rentals
CHUMASH PARK AND DINOSAUR CAVES PARK STATUS
ITEM B
Vice Chair q
Hi
q
inbotham stated the commission would like to recommend that
Park
be completed
Chumash
Mr Bloom gave a status report of Chumash Park He clarified that Phase I did
not include landscaping of critical areas He added that the basketball court
would be discussed at the next Council meeting The Planning Department will
be installing two benches In regards to Dinosaur Caves the next phase applies
to the restrooms and the
of the
amphitheatre The benches
at Dinosaur Caves are
part
bench program
a
adopt
Ms Johnson clarified the memorial bench program Further phases were
06 She asked Council if this could be moved up
approved in the CIP for 2004
Councilmember Natoli stated that the timelines
are
unrealistic and that staff had
assured him that it would be moved forward
Mayor
Crescione asked the commission to
come
up with
a
realistic timeline for
the Council to review
Boardmember Couch asked for the total monies
put
into Dinosaur Caves
vs
Chumash Park
Councilmember Rabenaldt asked about
Christine Couch
been
spoke regarding
park
tours
Chumash Park
She felt that Phase I has not
completed
Discussion held
regarding
the
phases
of the
park development
this be added to the commission
in
Ms Johnson
suggested
ITEM C
LIONS CLUB AVAILABILITY FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS
agenda
September
DURING CLOSURE OF THE PISMO BEACH VETS HALL
Vice Chair
qinbotham updated
q
Hi
the Council
regarding utilizing
the Lion
s Club
Boardmember Couch said that the Lions Club is
Ms
Lyons
said that there
was no
agreement
moving along
at this
point
but that the
representative would be going to the board
Discussion
was
held
regarding
the timeline of the Vets Hall
improvements
Boardmember Abshere thanked Council for the
r time
Councilmember Rabenaldt hoped to hear
s Club in the future
Women
about the Vets Halls and
more
Discussion held
David
qarten introduced himself
Baum
the PRBC that
they
are
trying
to
get
as
the Executive Director of PLOT and told
back to Pismo
ADJOURNMENT
38 p
7
m
Respectfully Submitted
03
11
09
Mandy Dawson
Executive Assistant
Deputy City Clerk
Benito J Crescione
Mayor
TITLE
SUBJECT
APPROVAL OF REGISTER OF DEMANDS
RECOMMENDATION
vote to Consent Calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attached are the Summary of
for checks dated
Payroll Register of August 24 2003 and Final Disbursement List
August 29 September 3 5 2003 computer checks for Bank of America
FISCAL IMPACT
As
designated
OPTIONS
Approve register of demands and summary of Payroll
ATTACHMENTS
1
Register of Demands
Prepared by George Edes
Interim Finance Director
2003
Agenda
Item
4D t
SUMMARY PAYROLL REGISTER
FOR PERIOD ENDING 0812412003
CHECKS DATED 2003
29
8
PAYROLL WARRANTS
034142
034122
A005550
A005445
EARNINGS
REGULAR
72
310
171
HOLIDAY
327
2
46
OVERTIME
05
579
14
D
P
947
6
50
Fire
Public
00
274
Services
64
76
Pub Works
262
2
81
Water
50
989
Sewer
112
2
63
Motor Veh
74
201
Special
Events
Special
Events St
PD
St
s
Anthony
s
Anthony
Admin
Finance
174
1
27
71
498
25
41
SALARY ADJ
WC 4850
TRAINING
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
OTHER EARNINGS
00
0
00
79
00
0
23
296
188
LESS AUTHORIZED PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING TAX
FICA
STATE INCOME TAX
STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE
ADJUSTMENTS
19
97
956
33
255
14
870
5
46
306
1
10
184
1
90
HEALTH
00
0
PEBT HEALTH INSURANCE
00
0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISABILITY
00
0
SECTION 125
00
0
PERS
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
CREDIT UNION
UNION DUES
64
797
00
0
00
0
95
571
PISMO ATHLETIC CLUB
00
15
OTHER
91
11
NET PAYROLL
97
325
144
DIRECT DEPOSIT DEDUCTION
39
100
125
NET PAYROLL AFTER ACH DEPOSIT
58
225
19
City
of
Pismo
Beach
Disbursement List
Final
Bank BA
MICR
Check
BANK
Vendor
Number
03
29
08
Check
204
1916
263
2290
157
46
3380
MATT
2719
WESTERN
ARAMARK UNIFORM
LEE
SERVICES
IRC
ADE
KIN
WILSON ELECTRIC
OLYMPIC UNIFORMS
ORCHARD SUPPLY
PISMO HARDWARE
SLO COUNTY
FIRE
PROPANE
J
MARCEL
ENTERPRISES
HARDWARE
NURSERY
ROBERT C PRING
DEPARTMENT
SERVICE
Tote
AP Accounts
ECS
Aug 29 2003
03 Computer Checks
30
08 Discount Date 08
03
29
Payee
034239
034241
034242
034243
034244
034245
Date
Due Date
03am
lO
Page
1
OF AMERICA
034238
024240
Check
2FDI
1
APZCKRFG
R
Payable Release 7
Check
Date
Amount
Description
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
78
305
260502D03 JUNE 03
ACCT
00
140
REIMB EMT
539
1
37
223
88
24
36
34
46
11
437
08
75
REFRESHER
FOR
LEAD
LIFEGUARD
ELECTRICAL REPAIR
08 BIKE UNIFORMS
41 7
6
5 0 JUNE 03
ACCT
CONCRETE
PALLET
REIHB CO FOR
TANK
AIR
CHARGE
FARE
CHIEF
TURNER
INSPE
RENTAL
803
2
80
By BECKY ROBERTSON
BROBER1SON
City of
ch
Bea
mo
p
A 29 2003
Bank
BA
MICR
k
Ch
vendor
r
N
Payee
970
034144
69
127
2217
034146
034147
347
R WELDING SUPPLY
ACHIEVEMENT HOUSE INC
EQUIPMENT
ADAMSON INDUSTRIES UNIFORM
RKSHOP SYLVIA DIAZ
N
AFSS
HERMOSA BEACH
A
AMERICAN FLAG
GIFT
034148
2083
AMERICAN HEATING
034149
3755
AMERICAN
034150
034151
O34152
2923
204
106
106
808
034183
034154
034155
034156
034157
034158
034159
034160
034161
034162
034163
034164
80
3853
1184
1226
58
3803
2546
3417
2280
1680
COOLING
TEMPS EMPLOYMENT SPECIALISTS
INC
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES INC
ARCH
ARCH
WINDOW COVERINGS
BLUEPRINT EXPRESS BARRY KEY
BRIGHT BUSINESS MEDIA LLC
BAHNICK
OVERNIGHT
CALIFORNIA
COMPUTERS
CALTEC
57318
AUTO PARTS fite
CASCIARI
CARQUEST
CATHERINE
CELLULAR ONE
COAST CONTAINERS
CENTRAL COAST POWOER COATING BARI
CENTRAL
CLEAN
URBAN
PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL LAGORATORIES
CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER COMPANY
CREEK
034170
1152
3862
2084
3855
3742
MANDY
JANE DENNIE
ESGIL
0341B0
3856
LINDA
034181
809
034182
034183
034184
034185
3706
2242
3849
3787
034186
3857
034187
3664
034188
95
96
457
3548
034191
034192
034193
034194
034195
034196
034197
30
1013
31
3316
2576
DAWSON
ENTERPRISES INC
CORPORATION
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
FRED
FINK
FOREMAN
CURTIS
MICHAEL
GOOD GREEN
SEASONS LANDSCAP
EARTH
GRAND AWARDS
LIFT INC
GEOFFREY GREEN
GRAY
DAVID
HELETE
HANNAH HEWES
CLARK
ARO
PACK
HEWLETT
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
457 C
O FIRST NA
INTEGRATED TELESERVICES INC
dOHN D JOHNSON dba JOHNSON ENGINEERING
KATHERMAN
KEYLOCK SECURITY SPECIALISTS
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
LAHR ELECTRIC MOTORS INC
STEPHEN LOCKETT
DAVIDE MASCIA
MIER
URGENT CARE
METRON FARNIER
034201
2284
MD
034202
034203
034204
3863
BROS
MIER
JOSE R
S COFFEE
TEA
KNIGHT MIKE
3NDOGGIES
CLUB IND MC
ADRIANNA O
CAMPO
TOMMIE J O
S VOLUNTEER
DONOGHUE CITIZEN
OFFICE DEPOT
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
MICHAEL
BEACH
109
3779
PACIFIC GAS
1102
PERRY
PAPICH
ELECTRIC
FORD
42
PESTMASlER SERVICES
034210
111
PISMO BEACH CHAMBER
034211
46
PISMO
COMPANY
CONSTRUCTION JASDN PAPICH
0342O9
HARDWARE
OF
COMMERCE
NURSERY
ROBEH1
Check
Check
Date
unt
08
03
29
03
29
08
1
Page
C
PRING
Description
45
25
SHOP SUPPLIES
STREETS
236
1
00
AND
PARKS
03
29
08
297
62
00
25
03
29
08
70
328
QUARTERLY MEETING MICHELLE
REPLACEMENT FLAGS
03
29
08
39
253
HVAC REPAIR
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
0B
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
0G
03
29
0B
03
29
08
80
449
PAYROLL
03
29
08
08
03
29
03
29
0B
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
0B
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
LISA
36
198
2282
034208
FGUR
GARDNER
034199
034200
034205
034206
O342O7
PISCHKE
J
CRLLIS INC
MEDSTOP
3834
143
157
INSTRUCTOR
EMBLEM
1779
034198
RECREATION
ERIN DURAN
153
245
20
3848
3861
3
26
552
034189
034190
INC
JANE DALLY
034171
034172
034173
034174
034175
034176
034177
034178
034179
986
D SPE
STREET
ASSOCIATES
BRIDGES
COTTON
034167
034168
034169
23am
09
03 Due Date 08
29
08
03 C
30
03 Disoount Date 08
29
ter Checks
BANK OF AMERIOA
034143
034145
Date
Check
Final Dis
nt List
rse
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
00
03
29
08
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
NEW EQUIP FOR OFFICER
OB
AFSS
00
9
4
10
367
1
23
SITE
OF TELEMETRY
SYS
260502000 JULY 03
PAGERS
AUGUST 03
PAGER
221
2
09
68
70
CLERK D
NCCALEB 16
E8
W
03
SURVEY
ACCT
276
08
18
44
SERVICE
NEW
ST
03
BLDG DEPT
AUGUST
COVERINGS
WINDOW
PRICE
485
00
70
320
107
81
741
PEARSON
o
SIDEWALK BOND
MARKET PRINTIHG
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISPATCH PRINTER REPAIR
02
ACCT 480054 JULY 03
72
13
ACCT
455
81
00
225
02025146 JULY 03
LIFEGUARD
00
65
FLAGPOLE
BIN MOVED
FOR
DIE ST
4A
FRC
N
PARK
FIRE STATION
030
3
00
MONTHLY
015
3
00
PROFESSIONAL PLANNING
SERVlCES
60 O0
00
192
WATER
SYSTEM
MILEAGE
60
33
TINY
59
12
FOR
TESTING AND
SAMPLING
THE
U
ANALY
FOR
69
12
72
93
689
03
09WATER
DRINKING
REFUND
145
9
08
SWEEPING SERVICE JULY
REFUND
SNARK ATTACK CANCELL
SURfCAMP
REIMB CHANNEL CO DINNER
SURF
TOES
CAMP
SHARK
G
R
ORDON ATTACK C
03
DANCE AUGUST
PATCHES
08
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RETURN TO OUARTERMASTER
O0
OISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM PIPELINE
21
399
MATERIALS
FINK
4480 F
REFUND FOR SURFCAMP
SHARK ATTACK CANCELL
SILVER SHOALS
JST O
AUC
MED SUPPLIES
01
00
109
REFUND
061
2
58
59
39
00
109
00
520
083
2
48
70
17
REFUND
NAME
M REISS
BADGE
00
109
REFUND
02
444
LCD
45
77
00
9
SURF CAMP
SHARK ATTACK
PIER
dR
92
147
FOR
D1PROdECT
224
70
18
62
31
809
205
4
08
WATER ACCT
GUARD
REFUND
BIN
RENTAL TAX
WATER
ACCT 4 G GREEN
SCHDOL BEAUTIFICATION
NS MZDDLE
JUDK
FOR
SURF
DISPLAY
SHARK ATTACK CANCEL
CAMP
MONITOR
COMP PO 03
18
8
1002528 dULY 03
DEFERRED
ACCT
T
5 ALTERNATOR REPAIR
FOR SURFCAMP
SHARK ATTACK CANDELL
REFUND
00
115
LOCK
95
135
03 COMPUTER SOFTHARE
969
2
63
TO BC
OKING AREA
REPAIR
SHELL BEACH
15
00
00
350
CAR
00
190
PRE EMP
16
114
18
CANCEL
PLAZA
FAILURE
BOOSTER
PUMP
1
VAC A
WASH
5
TENNIS
WATER
CLASS
UST
A
03
PHYSICAL B
ROBERTSON
SYSTEM METERS
61
112
CONCRETE
00
32
142
92
SURF
32
145
RBFUND
17 COFFEE
SERVICE
CAMP
03
1
8
9
SURFCAMP
00
10
PATCHES SEWN ON
08
ACCT 89322974 JULY 03
4
9
49
06
ACCT 6641
77
42
795 0 JULY 03
BEACHCOMBER DR JULY 03
135
1
31
00
6B8
61
DRAINAGE OJTFALL
989
38
26
LG
00
85
PEST
227
6
00
1
SERVICE SB VETS
VISITOR
ACCT
1
VT
O
ACCESS
PARTS
80
518
5
740
FOR
INFORMATION
JULY 03
CENTER
7734655 JULY 03
POS1AG
JULY 03
mo Beach
City of P
Final Disbursement List Check
RANK OF AMERICA
Bank BA
MICA
Vendor
Check
Number
034214
1312
2732
673
3860
279
3854
2607
830
3723
327
3859
034215
034216
034217
034218
034219
034220
034221
034222
034223
034224
034225
034226
034227
034228
034229
56
689
614
034233
167
2486
3526
1532
3858
1065
034234
3583
034230
034231
034232
034235
24
034236
034237
2493
380
Date
08 Due
03
29
Date
Payee
PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY
PRUDENTIAL HUNTER REALTY
INC
R
T EMBROIDERY
CAROLYN RIVALDI
ROBERTRON SUPPLY
BECKY ROBERTSON FINANCE DEPT
SAN LUIS DISTANCE CLUB
SAN LUIS PAPER CO
SBC LONG DISTANCE
S FOOD COMPANY
SDOLARI
ELIZABETH SCOOLIS
SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIBUTOR
SHELL FLEET
PLUS
TOOLS TIMOTHY M SMITH
STATESIDE SAFETY AND SIGNS INC
STREET DECOR INC
SUPPORT CLEARING HOUSE CASE DO 82000 01
ON
SNAP
TECN
TIME
JENNIFER TRAUTMAN
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST
VALLEY INSTRUMENTS
VERIZON WIRELESS
WELLS FARGO
REMITTANCE
NC
CENTER
S POLYGRAPH SERVICE
LILFING
Total
AP Accounts
CCS
08 Oiscount
03
29
2FDL
1
APZCKREG
R
Payable Release 7
Date
Check
Check
Date
Amount
03
29
08
00
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
Descripti
23am Page
09
2003
Aug 29
03 Computer Checks
30
08
on
12
60
JANITORIAL SUPpLy
951 1
2 BELLO
150
2
00
SEPT
03
08
70
EMBROIDERY
00
218
REFUND FOR
28
367
FIRST
AID
REIM
POTLUCK gELCONE NE EMPLOYEES
OF P
11 TIMER FOR STRIDE WITH TN
08
03
29
03
29
08
51
46
00
25
72
93
00
359
38
566
00
109
03
29
08
043
3
52
08
03
29
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
03
29
08
42
44
69
65
43
256
03
29
00
03
29
08
03
29
08
988
4
57
RENTAL
SHARK
SURFCAMP
ATTACK CANCELL
GIFT
BAGS
PROMOTIONAL
E JULY 03
DISTAN
ACCT 94 JULY 03
REFUND FOR SURFCAMP
BBC LONG
ACCT
SHOP
3 JULY
0
021
079
03
TOOLS
SIGN SUPPLY
DONNTONN
HOLIDAY
DECORATIONS
03
29
08
174
12
00
525
00
109
89
145
03 BUILD CCTV MAINT GTRLY SERV
REFUND FOR SURFCANP
SNARK ATTACK CANCELL
FUEL FOR LIGHT TO
4TH OF JULY
ER
03
29
08
52
675
ELECTRICAL
03
29
08
06
295
ACCT
03
29
08
03
29
08
97
0
9
13
00
766
SUPPLIES
FOR
TELEMETRY
SYSTEM
808097939 JULY 03
00001
ACCT 2342 JULY 03
CREDIT CHECK
RECRUITMENT
22
908
163
SON
K ROBER
SON BROBERI
By BE
City of pismo Beach
Finat Disbursement List Check
Bank
BA
MICR
ck
Ch
034249
Date
03
09
Due Date
03 Discount
09
Date
Sap 03 2003
03 Computer Checks
04
09
39am
08
BANK OF AHERICA
Vendor
Number
3865
Check
Date
Payee
S
GROSSINI
AUTO BOOY
Payable
244
1
78
78
4
1
Total
A Accounts
ECS
03
09
Check
Amount
ReLease
7KRFO
1
AP2
R
rP
Description
VEHICLE
REPAIRS DUE
TO
FIRE
ENGINE
Page
City of pismo Beach
Final Disbursement
Bank
BA
MICA
Check
034250
034251
034252
034253
034254
O34255
BANK
List Check Date
03 Due
05
09
Date
03 Discount
05
09
3731
3755
2089
393
Check
Date
Payee
100 WAYS
TO PLAY
AMERICAN TEMPS
APPLIED
BADGER
EMPLOYMENT
SPECIALISTS
INC
GEOOETICS
METER INC
FALL AD
CAMPAIGN
97
342
PAYROLL
CLERK
03
05
09
WATER ATLAS MAP
00
2
3
00
3 FIRE HYDRANT
282
1
53
03
05
09
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
CYNTHIA BALDWIN
034265
034266
034267
034268
034269
1075
1152
384O
3372
608
CRYSTAL
SPRINGS
DOLPHIN
SHIRT
EVANS COMMUNICATION
03
05
09
034270
3137
EXECUTIVE
03
05
09
034262
034271
20
272
03
A60
3
03427
2615
412
2242
3786
5664
034274
034275
034276
0342
034278
93
BASIC
CHEMICAL
LYNDA
SIRDSALL
BLUEPRINT
DEBBIE
EXPRESS BARRY
BOWERS
03
05
09
CAROLLO ENGINEERS
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
ANITA CHANNEL
BRYAN COX POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
CREEK
LABORATORIES
WATER
INC
COMPANY
IRC
CO
FERGUSON
AL
JANITOR
INC
ENTERPRISES
TOOD
FREDERICK
GARING TAYLOR
GRAY
INC
ASSOCIATES
INC
LIFT
DEBSY HARSEN
PACKARD
HEWLETT
ASSOCIATES
HINDERLITER de LLAMAS
JAMES CRC
KS TRUCKING INC
3366
VALERIE KLINE
359
2977
SHERRY LANGE
LEAGUE
OF
2404
3868
DANIEL
MARTIN
034285
2491
MOBILE
034286
034287
0342
034289
034290
034291
034292
034293
034294
034295
034296
034297
034298
594
CALIFORNIA CITIES CHANNEL COUN
CATHY MCNEILL
THE
MINI LLC
GROUP INC ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
MORRO
3806
MUNICIPAL
1507
NC
96
3
OMNI
3690
KAREN
CHILD
MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT
NC
EQUIPMENT
CHILD
SUPPORT CENTRA
OSTROVITZ
PACIFIC
LEISURE
5876
DARLENE
PAULSON
MARKETING
PERS
PETTY
CASH
9
38
MICHAEL
2445
1312
274
3869
HOLLY
275
1059
RRM DESIGN
SAN SERNARDINO COUNTY CHILO
SUPPORT PAYM
3143
SAN
BERNARDINO
SUPPORT PYMN
161
1337
282
3875
115
5880
59
3870
962
SAN
dOAQUIN COMPOSTING
60
PFAU
DOVE
PC
PROCARE
JANITORIAL SUPPLY
QUINN COMPANY
BRIAN
1225
RICHARDS
GROUP
COUNTY CHILD
IRC
GRISWOLD dba SAN LUIS MAILING
RICK
SAN
DEPT
LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY PUBLIC
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
INC
CONTROLS
228
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
FIRMA
034280
034281
034282
034283
034284
0342
034300
034301
034302
034303
034304
034305
034306
034307
034308
034309
034310
034311
034312
034313
034314
03
05
09
EASYL1NK SERVICES
183
375
KEY
DUNHAM DBA BUROINE PRINTIN
DELLA BURDINE
0342
41
C
L
SOLUTIONS
ORKS DEPA
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
JANELLE SANCHEZ
03
05
09
SEIU
03
05
09
LOCAL
620 AFL
CIO
RONNIE SOARES
THE
GAS COMPANY
MAIL
PROCESSING
CENTER
ARTHUR STANDIFER
S SECURITY
SYLVESTER
ALARMS
TELEGRAM
LUIS OBISPO
TRIBUNE SAN
3871
3872
TKZ
L
R
LC
TROPHIES 2 GO
034315
034316
3873
24
VERIZON
034317
3877
BONNIE
034318
034319
3078
TIM
3881
ANNA MARIE WHITE
JUANA
VALDEZ
WIRELESS
VOGEL
WAAG
COUNTY
Description
455
4
00
034263
034264
034257
034258
034259
034260
034261
Page
Check
Amount
09
03
05
03
05
09
3866
5O
2472
8O
3147
2955
1208
3245
223
64
3867
034256
13am
11
03 Computer Checks
06
09
OF AMERICA
Vendor
Number
Sep 04 2003
Date
09
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
03
05
09
00
50
REFUNO
33
695
11
MD
SODIUM
00
91
99
00
94
84
BLUE
22
8
03
FOR GIS
METER ASSEMBLY C
F REGI
PARK DEPr
BALDWIN
C
DANCE
CLASS
BIRDSALL
L
PRINTS
MUSICAL
REFUND FOR
COLOR
00
56o070
TEMPLATE
HYPOCHLORITE
VARIETY
276
1
16
MCCALEB W
D
E
WWTP
COPIES
DESIGN AND
86
112
635
55
46
666
00
70
TACTICAL
747
3
50
ANALYSIS
THEATER
BO
J
ERS
SPECIAL MTG
RELATED
DISPATCH
DOWNTOWN
SVCS
TRAINING 7
18
4
3 BRAKE REPAIR
M
GARNISHMENT
REIMB FOR
00
192
166
45
36
1
18
233
29
8
PD 03
LIVE
FINGERPRINTING B
COX
AN
S
54667 JULY
03
WITH THE
TIDE
ACCT
STRIDE
08 TEAC
T
SHIRTS
SYSTEM
ON
MONTHLY MAINT
PHONE SYSTEM
8
0
2
3 BSA
1
5
83
64
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PiPELiNE MATERIALS
388
6
61
NSIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
NT
DO
00
160
PER DIUM WASTEWATER TRAINING CLASS
50
346
DRAINAGE OUTFALL ACCESS REPAIR PROdECT
522
3
00
JANITORIAL FEE
319
1
50
EXTRA
00
140
46
0
3
57
137
1
90
219
3
44
318
50
00
202
00
96
00
231
91
841
23
117
00
130
CLEARS
BREAKFAST
MEETING
CLASSES
163
85
24
57
251
4
26
51
938
78
054
236
245
00
95
586
00
140
65
426
500
4
00
292
00
26
754
50
353
68
17
00
500
107
1
47
03
8
9
PARK
DEP
03
MCREILL
C
ESTATES
CUTTER
03
29
mlm
III
GARNISHMENT
AMETEK
LEVEL
TRANSDUCER
FLAMENCO DANCE
OSTROVITZ
K
INTERNET
AUGUST 03
REFUND FOR
BEACH VOLLEYBALL
PERS
RETIREMENT
YOGA
00
550
03
1D
2
9
3
9
1
8
BUILDING
l
9
03
O
4
ROOT
00
147
507
1
35
AUGUST
TRAINING
D
M
ARTIN AUGUST
SUNSET BEACH
PETTY
07
71
OF BIOSOLIBS
MEALS FOR
ENZ
CAMP
COMPUTER AND DESKTOP
SERVICES
KLINE
V
206
10
00
140
445
2
50
VOLLEYBALL
PILATES
MODULAR
390
1
00
51
249
22
CONTRACT
TRANSPORTATION
REFUND MD
75
4
1
12
538
1
60
500
1
00
BEACH
REPLACEMENT LAPTOP
ART
00
50
50
185
PERMIT CARDS
REFUND FOR
CASH REIMB AUGUST
REFUND FOR
03
BEACH VOLLEYBALL
PODOVE
H
AUGUST
JANITORIAL SERVICES
ANTI
CAMP
FROM CCS
CAMP
03
SPORTS
COMPLEX
SEIZE
REFUND
SB
DESIGN
VETS
PLAN
RICHARDS
B
PROMENADE
IV
GARNISHMENT
03
2
8
9
29
8
05
GARNISHMENT
BIOSOLIDS
MAILING
SERVICE
CCWA REVENUE
REFUND
SEIU
960
FOR MUSICAL
DUES PD
REFUND
AUGUST
BOND DEBT
03
SERVICE
THEATER
29
8
03
FOR BEACH
VOLLEYBALL CAMP
8ELLO AUGUST 03
REFUND LANDSCAPE
JULY
SECURITY
DEP
215 RIDGE
03
REFUND
PB
JULY 03
2 PLANNING FEES APPLICATION
1
MEDALS
FOR
CITY OF
REFUND
ACCT
PB
STRIDE
VETS
WITH
DEP
THE
WIT
TIDE
VALDEZ
J
00001 AUGUST 03
509471827
00
130
REFUND
FOR
BEACH
VOLLEYBALL
00
140
REFUND FOR
BEACH
VOLLEYBALL
CAMP
00
140
REFUND FOR
BEACH
VOLLEYBALL
CAMP
CAMP
BECKY ROBERTSON
BROBERTSON
1
City of Pisrm Beach
Final Disbursement
Bank
BA
MICR
Check
BANK
Sep 04 2003
List Check Date 09
03 Due Date 09
05
03 Discount Date 06
05
09 Computer Checks
03
OF ABERICA
Vendor
Der
Nug
Check
Payee
Total
Date
Check
Amount
70
437
391
Description
13am
11
Page
City
of
Pismo Beach
Disbursement List Check
Final
Bank
BA
MICR
Check
034320
034321
034322
034323
034324
BANK
Cate
03
05
09
Due Cate
03 Discount
05
09
Sap 04 2003
03 Co
06
09
ter Checks
46pm Page
12
OF AMERICA
Check
vendor
r
N
Payee
3864
184
111
Date
CALIFORNIA
JOHN
SAN
CODE CHECK MAiN
OFFICE
WALLACE
L
ASSOCIATES
PISMO BEACH
3874
947
CHAMBER
OF
ENGINEER
COMMERCE
LUIS OBISPO CO OFFICE OF
USA BLUE
AN
EDUCATION
BOOK
Total
AP Accounts
CCS
Cate
2FDi
1
APZCKREG
R
Payable Release 7
Check
Amount
03
05
09
463
8
05
03
05
09
832
20
00
350
00
12
69
21
09
03
05
03
05
09
03
05
09
Description
BUILDING DEPT
PLAN
PISMO OAKS LIFT
VIC GOLF
LIVE SCAN
CHECK
STATION
SERVICES
UPGRADE
TOORNEY
COX
C
FINGERPRINTING
CHEMICAL PUMP
HOSE
AND
FITTINGS
678
9
94
6S
BECK
kOBER1SON
BROBERISON
1
TITLE
SUBJECT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORTS FOR AUGUST 2003
RECOMMENDATION
Approval by
Roll Call vote to Consent Calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The attached
monthly department reports
are
for your information
FISCAL IMPACT
Not
Applicable
OPTIONS
ATTACHMENTS
1
Information
2
3
4
5
6
7
Only
Administration Grigsby
City Clerk
Conference and Visitors Bureau Brasile
Administrative Services Department Edes
Community Development Department Bloom
Public Works and Engineering Delzeit
Fire Department Turner
Police Department Cortez
Prepared by
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
2003
Monthly Activity Reports
Administration
City Clerk
2
Conference and Visitors Bureau
3
4
Community Development Department
5
Public Works and
6
Fire
7
Police
Department
Department
Department
Engineering
for
August 2003
CITY CLERK
CITYMANAGER ACTIVITY REPORT
AUGUST 2003
City Clerk
Office Activities
City
Council support
Made reservations for
City
Council League of California Cities Annual Conference
Began preparations for the League
of California
Cities Annual
Conference Division
Breakfast
Clerk attended Channel Counties Division
Deputy City
Meeting
and activities
Special projects
Received Bid
approval
Requests
at the
Completed
for Personnel Rules and
September
the draft of
Regulations
Next
Step
Council
16 City Council Meeting
Request
of Proposals
regarding
the
City Attorney
recruitment
Ongoing administrative
management activities
records
Handled
and minute
agenda
preparation follow
review
up filing indexing and scanning
city council meetings and 5 Workstudy and Special City
of agenda materials for 2 regular
Council
meetings
Updated
the
s web
City
Updated
the
s Cable
City
page
Government Channel 20
Scanned documents into Laserfiche Document
Imaging Program
prepared contracts
Processed
agreements Proclamations
including indexing copying distribution and filing
Processed and
Processed
ordinances and resolutions
up public records requests
followed
special
event
permits
Office Assistant I Building Official WWTP Operator Engineering Technician
Maintenance Worker II and Lab Analyst
Treatment Inspector These positions
Pre
being
recruited for and
Processed 1 Bid
in various stages of
Comp
representative for the
following up with
Attended Outlook
training
CJPIA for orientation and evaluation of
a
report regarding compliance
session
City Manager Office Activities
activities
Administration
Y
Addressed
completion
claims
CJPIA will be
Major project
are
Openings
Processed 2 Workers
Met with
are
multiple personnel
issues
city facilities
The
issues from this evaluation
AUGUST 2003 CONFERENCE
VISITORS BUREAU
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
The Los Angeles KCCP Public Radio Live Broadcast
was
very successful in
showing
sand dunes for recreation
the two views of preserving yet using and enjoying
The CVB Staff worked with the show Producer by lining up Pacific Adventure Tours
our
and the local State Park
Ranger both affected by
Association of Conference
Western
our
beautiful dunes
and Visitors Bureaus
WACVB CEO Conference
s 15th Annual WACVB Conference Many of the
Executive Director Brasile
s
Bureau
s Visitors
five Western State
s or Executive Directors attended a 3 day
CEO
workshop regarding hot topics of changing travel trends print advertising
roundtable
This
was our
our
changes with the internet less written leads and more consumers directly going to
s
websites yet the need for good Visitors Guides and rising printing costs and employee
We have the least staffed Visitors Bureau including those cities
who are not tourism dependant and have had more than twice as many Board Meetings
benefits and flex time
this year
Plans
Many Boards have established their Annual Advertising
then cut back their number of Board meetings Our CVB
the other bureaus
as
did this year and
agreed to do the same at their
as we
Board
Chambers is
Center
always
a
and who caters to
VIC
following meeting
who
discussion
regarding
membership
Visitors Bureaus
the
operates
just supporting
rather than
versus
City Visitor Information
s
the
s own
city
to do what works best for each city Raising TOT was
businesses
tsupport raising TOT
also a subject that arose many said their city
s infrastructure didn
and has not been successful Pismo Beach is still way ahead of many other cities in
The conclusion
getting
The
our
piece
following
was
of the Tourism Pie
are
generated
advertising
information
Periodicals
Sunset
150
Magazine
Coastal
Living Magazine
42
Annuals
California State Visitor
sGuide
267
Correspondence
Website
65
Phone
15
1
Mail
TOTAl
4O
5
request
leads for this month
Travel Aqents requestinq packets
VVriters
Groups
com requesting maps
MapQuest
of area
streets
Certified USA Vacations
Hampshire 500 brochures
swedding June 2004 considering Shore Cliff Lodge
Jorgen
no Caves Park
swedding Sept 2004 D
Kampier
sbeach wedding
DePino
Club Resort Internals New
Promotional Materials
100
Ways To Play
provided
to
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
AUGUST 2003
Finance and
The
new
Accounting
Accounting
week She
preparing
Technician started work
actually jumped right
the benefit
in
doing
August 11th
entry for her
She started
on
data
first
payroll
during
an
actual
payroll
She was also trained on
payments
The Interim Finance Director started work on August 18th
of the projects that have been assigned to him He was
The Interim Finance Director was informed
initially given background information on each
projects to get him started After receiving the background information he actually began
contacting the project managers to get an update on the status of each project He made significant
headway in this process He will be giving the Interim City Manager updates as to the progress that
he makes on each of the projects
of the
Interviews
were
interviewed and
begin
work
on
conducted for the Office Assistant
a
selection
September
Finance staff was
was
on
13t
August
Fourteen candidates were
made from the top three candidates The
new
Office Assistant will
2
busy training
new
staff and
continuing
work
on
the audit for fiscal year
ending
June
30 2003
Utility Billing
Utility billing
was
business
as
usual The water usage seemed to be higher during the
inquiries regarding their utility bills
summer
months which resulted in several citizen
Payroll
Accounting Technician attended a Public Employees Retirement System PERS seminar
San Luis Obispo in August This is an introductory seminar that goes over procedures on how to
are
complete the retirement report that is submitted to PERS on a biweekly basis The seminars
offered at teast once a year on the Central Coast The timing was perfect for the new Accounting
The
new
in
Technician to attend
August A memo was sent to all employees
Enrollment
will be held from October 1 through
that
with the last paycheck informing employees
Open
new rates go into effect in December 2003
informed
that
31
The
memo
also
October
employees
Health Insurance information
was
sent out from PERS in
Information Services
The
busy setting up the new scanners that were purchased last month
and
orders
for
the
Council
palm
IS technician was also busy providing specs and placing
City
laptops
sservers There was a problem with
pilots The IS technician was also busy trouble shooting the City
the email server during the last week in August
The
A
s IS
City
new
technician
IS technician
learning
the
s
City
was
was hired
network
by Computerland
going through training
September
through
training
this month
He will continue to receive
He has been
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 2003 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
Accounts
Payable
Invoices entered
569
Checks issued
398
21
orders issued
purchase
New contract purchase orders issued
sIssued
Amendment PO
Change Orders
New
4
3
378
543
573
864
sissued
O
Total dollar amount of all P
paid
processed
Total Invoices
Total Voids
2
135
Total Voids
Business License
TOT
17
Business License certificates issue
Bus Lic
Adjustments Change
Orders
1
Bus Lic DELINQUENT Notices
966
489
Total TOT Charges for April
Payroll
New employees entered
Terminations processed
4
1
64
Checks issued
Automatic
311
Deposit Transactions
569
682
127
415
Total gross salary
Total net salary
Employee
file maintenance
24
Changes
1
pay calculations
Retro
Utility Billing
Utility bills Shell Beach Area
Utility bills Downtown Area
Delinquent
notices
Delinquent notices
Cash receipts
372
2
146
Shell Beach Area
Downtown Area
244
333
788
1
Customer accounts
Lock outs due to
paid
non
payment
0
9
Meters set
2
Meter
change outs
Change orders
Closing bills
Billing adjustments
Tenant deposits
Delinquent Closed invoices
Special Proiects
Accounting Technician
started
153
60
25
25
4
on
Aug 11
2003
Interim Administrative Services Director started
on
Aug 18
2003
Attend PERS Seminar in SLO
Project additional financing options
on Development Impact Fee Project
into financing sources for New Fire Dept and City
WWTP
Follow up
Look
Begin year end audit preparation
onand Rate fc
t
lorr
Receive Health Insuranc ir
Wide Street
Program
City ofPismo Beach
August Activity Report
Finance
The
Projects
new
Sep
5 Draft
Page
1 of2
Interim Administrative Services Director
or
Services
as
assigned by
In
August
started
which presently
the lAS Director is
the Interim
City Manager
the lAS Director focused
Plant and related
on
December 2003 with
Administrative Services Department
Information
lAS Director
Monday
month
through
potential to
until a regular permanent Director is hired While overseeing the
18 under contract
August
extensions
Department
on
includes
Accounting
and
focusing primarily on key Financial projects
rather than on day
to operations
financing
the
for the
new
Wastewater Treatment
facilities
getting
Impact
Study updated and completed and
Year
develop a comprehensive financing program for the City
s Five
beginning to
Capital Improvement
on
Regarding the
on
Fee
Plan
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
WWTF Project the LAS Director
documents including the Wastewater Facilities Project Report
the Draft Revenue Program and the State Water Resources Control Board
SWRCB s February 20 2003 Conditional Facilities Plan Approval for the State
Revolving Fund SRF Loan for the Project He also has had substantive discussions
with John Johnson ofCarollo Engineers Craig Hill of Northcross Hill Achs the
s Financial Advisor on the WWTF Project and Zachary Rounds at SWRCB
City
reviewed
numerous
One notable clarification from these discussions is that the rather widely circulated report
of a 10 million cap on loan amounts refers to the California Infrastructure
Economic
s SRF loan which is authorized
Development Bank CIEDB loans not to the SWRCB
at
4 million for the WWTF
12
1
0
4 million to be funded
Project
by the City
more
than 90 ofthe estimated cost
leaving
Another clarification is that cost reimbursements from the SRF loan may not be available
until at least five or six months after the Approval to Award ATA has been issued by
the SWRCB
or some five months after construction
will
actually begins Thus the
City
need other funds for this interim
Work has
period
perhaps
at least
4 Million
S Department ofAgriculture
begun anew on applications for CIEDB or U
and
on
sector
bond
USDA funding
possible private
funding to cover the needs
indicated above and to help assure an overall Financing Plan which best serves the City
s
overall financial situation outlook and needs
August Activity Report
Finance
Department
Sep
Page
Proiects
5
Draft
2 of2
Impact Fee Update Study to provide professional
s Development Impact Fees most
guidance and recommendations for updating the City
Work also has
begun
of which
established in
These
were
anew on
the
1992
and based
Impact Fees are an important part
on
ofthe
infrastructure needs
s program
City
to
as
seen at
that time
fairly apportion the
businesses and new ones
The new IAS Director has reviewed pertinent files and documents and discussed with
City staff and the City
s consultant Joe Colgan of Maximus an accelerated plan for
costs of new infrastructure among current residents and
consider
completing this project in the next few months Council will be asked to
holding a workshop on Impact Fees in about a month if an updated draft can be
completed in that time frame This accelerated plan is based on a tentative schedule that
includes Council action on new Impact Fees by the end of October which would allow
60 days later
any such new fees to become effective on January 1 2004 minimum
Year Capital
s Five
comprehensive financing program for the City
with
the
above
noted
Fee
Impact
Update being one ofthe
Improvement
begun
of
key components of this financing program Development this comprehensive
financing plan will be an interactive process over the coming months It is anticipated
that periodic progress reports on the plan will be presented to the City Council for
Council review and guidance
Work on
developing
a
Plan has
comprehensive financing plan also will include consideration of potential new
sources of revenue for the City In October 2002 the City contracted with William
Statler for him to provide a Revenue Enhancement Study and Fiscal Forecast for the
City The 1AS Director has reviewed the file and talked with Mr Statler about presenting
his report in the next few weeks as part ofthis financial planning process
The
information the City
s contracts with three of its consultants noted above Craig
Financial
Advisor
for the WWTF Project Joe Colgan at Maximus on the Impact
Hill the
As
Study and Bill Statler on the Revenue Enhancement Study each apparently
have used to date nearly all the contacted dollar amounts In order to continue financing
work on the WWTP and complete the impact Fee and Revenue Enhancement studies it
000 each Given the
may be necessary to amend these contracts for up to perhaps 5
apparent current need for accelerated progress the expeditiousness of using
000 may be appropriate Please advise
administrative authority for amendments up to 5
Fee Update
City
of Pismo Beach
Building
Safety Division
Monthly Report AUgust
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
This Month
Valuation
2003
Plan Check
Building
Permit Fee
Same
This Year
Last Year
Fee
Fees
Total
Month
to
to Date
Date
Last Year
28
4
29
0
5
4
4
2
0
1
9
86
7
0
0
4
t
6
11
117
97
3
37
29
Family Units
Single
1
2
Family Units
Multi
0
Commemial
Units
New Buildings
Public
Alterations
Residential Additions
Alterations
16
Commercial Additions
Alterations
1
Total Building Pennits Units
Motel Rooms
1
19
00
508
200
00
670
268
000
5
00
00
178
474
507
1
45
722
1
10
511
5
95
372
2
00
981
3
38
595
8
76
42
104
25
111
12
338
983
3
87
814
5
73
83
445
14
1
170 120
33
214
t
15
85
OTHER PERMITS ISSUED
This Month
Permit Fee
Same
This Year
Last Year
Total
Month
to
to
Date
Date
LaYear
Grading
1
I
Demolition Units
3
0
Plumbing Mechanica
Electrical
34
346
1
29
33
3
8
11 5
3
9
342
5
380
Sign
0
0
3
13
Renewals
0
0
0
0
Totals
Total Inspections
Year to
Date
00
178
474
983
3
87
814
5
73
17
792
14
488
3728
Address 760 Matlie Road
Pismo Beach
03
02
09
25
26
08
C 93a49
Page No
City of Pismo Beach
Building Safe Division
Monthly Report August 2003
permit Units Motel Census
Received
Permit
Address
Code
Rooms
Type
Valuation
Plan Review
76
509
00
000
60
BEMP
Total Fees
Building
75
713
306
1
61
03
01
08
B020644
99
03
05
08
B030353
941 OAK PARK
30
0
00
0
00
0
42
48
03
06
08
B030385
149 LIMERICK
30
0
00
0
00
0
88
36
00
0
00
0
33
76
tNDIO
00
0
MP
03
07
08
B030361
323 PALISADE
03
12
08
B030367
215 HOUSTON
00
0
79
258
03
262
03
13
08
B030372
17 LA GAVIOTA
500
1
00
23
37
61
55
34
93
03
19
08
B030357
921 QAK PARK
950
5
00
37
86
01
129
67
216
O3
19
08
B030377
154 LEEWARD
03
20
08
B030381
2251 SHELL BEACH
B
03
21
08
B030393
2031 COSTA DEL SOL
E
03
26
08
B030401
03
27
08
B030404
03
28
08
B030394
03
28
08
B030397
03
29
08
B030383
03
05
08
03
19
08
00
000
15
30
0
730
6
00
00
0
00
0
00
0
43
143
63
55
89
144
00
0
00
0
OO
O
57
36
721 HANFORD
00
0
00
0
30
0
63
55
216 WINDWARD
00
0
00
0
00
0
340 FIVE CITIES
000
3
00
41
57
4d FWE CITIES
3
911 OAK PARK
BE
88
36
75
85
81
143
00
0
34
40
05
36
36
333
00
000
25
35
339
99
402
09
919
124 INDIO
B
000
00
0
14
24
05
36
69
60
B030338
1809 BARCELONA
BX
000
00
0
05
36
05
36
60
72
VE CITIES
F
BX
000
00
0
05
36
05
36
60
72
101
A
00
236
12
06
192
95
229
87
546
B030342
B030371
340
03
08
49
B0303
372
WAWONA
BG
03
29
08
B030194
332
SANTA FE
BMEP
101
A
00
272
188
315
1
39
492
1
15
965
4
08
03
06
08
B030297
680 SHAMROCK
BE
434
E
00
000
25
59
269
25
391
58
707
351
B
434
E
00
555
10
11
201
57
212
B
434
E
03
22
08
03
11
08
03
12
08
B030363
R
WILMA
1
B030369
218 PIER
03
19
08
B030379
423
O
IND
B
434
E
03
20
08
B030382
430
DELL
B
434
E
434
E
03
21
08
03
22
08
03
25
08
99
402
29
426
000
4
00
00
0
17
100
83
105
000
5
00
00
0
59
114
01
121
99
120
B030387
760 HANFORD
B
B030395
2565 SOLANO
B
434
E
400
4
00
00
0
59
114
B030400
540
B
434
E
500
2
00
00
0
75
85
BMEP
434
E
45
982
75
993
171
3
41
93
42
91
39
55
107
HARLOE
00
330
99
B030252
342 PALOMAR
B030335
880
DELANO
BE
435
E
000
1
00
B030370
114
MONTECITO
B
435
E
270
1
00
03
22
08
B030344
MONTECITO
235
BEP
435
E
000
3
00
03
22
08
B030358
2549 SPYGLASS
B
435
E
2174 COSTA BRAVA
BE
435
E
PARK
BEP
435
E
CAPISTRANO
BE
435
E
BDE
437
F
645
I
03
25
08
03
29
08
03
19
08
03
13
08
67
90
75
85
00
0
00
800
24
03
26
08
03
22
08
00
0
500
2
00
03
06
08
03
13
08
00
0
B030374
B030216
121
B030341
202
B030234
6030354
Total items listed
250 POMEROY
339 SANTA FE
38
DB
1
67
90
33
49
83
49
00
133
75
85
52
413
24
374
99
558
352
1
44
21
130
85
157
27
351
69
317
75
441
44
969
215
7
00
89
121
85
157
69
304
000
5
00
42
104
25
111
12
338
200
3
00
06
67
17
100
73
167
00
000
40
000
8
00
00
000
30
00
0
217
5
848
7
43
00 63
558
594
59
585
18
Address 760 Mattie Road
Pismo Beach CA 93449
Phone
03
02
09
7040
773
805
1
Page No
City of Pismo Beach
Building
Safety Division
Monthly Report August 2003
Plan Check
Applications Submitted
Permit Units Motel Census
Received
Permit
03
07
08
R
Address
Type
Rooms
Plan Review
359 PLACENTIA
X
16
74
03
13
08
B030372
17 LA GAVIOTA
BD
9
37
03
06
08
B030357
921
OAK PARK
B
03
22
08
B030394
340
FIVE CITIES
B
03
22
08
B030397
340 FIVE CITIES
BE
03
20
08
B030383
41
57
911 OAK PAR K
BE
03
07
08
A
2500 BARCELONA
B
000
03
19
08
A
127 CUYAMA
BG
000
03
20
08
R
307 INDIO
BEPX
000
05
36
03
22
08
A
1331 PRICE
BX
000
05
36
03
28
08
A
921 OAK PARK
BX
000
05
36
03
29
08
A
226
PALOMAR
BX
000
36t05
340
FIVE CITIES
BX
000
03
13
08
B030371
03
08
A
324 SELMA
03
11
08
A
1331
03
11
08
A
1333 COSTA
03
11
08
A
35
339
72
76
05
36
BMEP
1
101
043
2
35
BEMP
I
101
86
709
BMEP
1
101
707
3998 SHELL BEACH
8MEP
1
101
692
1
64
COSTA BRAVA
BRAVA
03
18
08
A
368
CAPISTRANO
BMEP
1
101
394
1
33
03
19
08
A
194
SEARIDGE
BMEP
1
101
857
1
24
03
22
08
A
4000 SHELL BEACH
BMEP
1
101
816
1
85
03
27
08
A
374 CAPISTRANO
BMEP
1
101
03
04
08
A
550
FRADY
BMEP
320
03
06
08
A
680
WADSWORTH
B
320
41
57
03
04
08
A
159
NAOMI
BMEP
434
47
606
03
12
08
A
1303 COSTA DEL SOL
B
434
37
86
03
20
08
A
251 MORRO
BEP
434
52
210
03
21
08
A
214
INDIO
BMEP
434
89
854
03
21
08
A
231
ENCANTO
BMEP
434
20
346
03
21
08
A
321 WAWONA
BMEP
434
59
707
03
26
08
A
101 INDIO
BMEP
434
91
650
03
19
08
A
150 CORAL
B
435
68
105
435
24
374
03
07
08
B030358
2549 SPYGLASS
B
03
14
08
B030374
331
1
07
Exempt
Exempt
2174 COSTA BRAVA
BE
435
21
130
03
13
08
A
853 SHELL BEACH
BMEP
437
06
308
03
20
08
A
333 FIVE CITIES
BMEP
437
36
637
03
21
08
A
2251 SHELL BEACH
B
437
02
416
03
21
08
A
99
BMEP
437
90
733
03
28
08
A
1401 DOLLIVER
BEM
437
82
189
332 SANTA FE
DB
645
06
67
03
06
08
B030354
Total items listed
DOLLIVER
39
1
79
965
18
Address 760 Matiie Road
Prlone
03
02
09
PismoBeach CA 93449
7040
773
805
2
Page No
rlTLE
SUBJECT
AUGUST ACTIVITY REPORT
ENGINEERING
AND PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENTS
RECOMMENDATION
No action is necessary
Comments and
questions
are
welcomed
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to provide a narrative summary of the highlights of activities of the
Engineering and Public Works Departments during the month of August 2003
MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS
City staff is providing construction management
on the
following projects
1
Consultants have been hired to
2
Bids have been received for the construction of the basketball court at Chumash Park
The Pismo
Grover Promenade is out to bid
lights and street tree project
also to prepare bid documents for the satellite restrooms The goal is to have the
improvements completed before Spring Break 2004
3
design
the
sidewalk
street
and
OTHER PUBLIC WORKS ACTIVITIES
Beach raking will now be done on an as needed basis now that summer season is slowed
Removal of accumulated sand at the end of Park Street is being done on a weekly basis
The Streets Division continues to utilize the new
striping machine They are rebuilding the Pier
Tree
it
Christmas
getting ready for the fast approaching season Striping and stop bars are
being painted in Toucan Terrace areas and Shell Beach End Street Barricades throughout
City are being repainted The Parks Division is mowing weekly on two parks Spyglass
and Sunset as these two parks tend to grow at a faster rate The Parks Division will be taking
over Dinosaur Caves maintenance in Mid September They are currently
interviewing for the
new Parks Maintenance Workers position Water Division is working on
raising all of the air
relief valves that are below ground level and plan on re
the
Price
Franklin
Street water
locating
onto
Franklin The Wastewater Division hired a new employee to fill one of the
sample station
operator vacancies and is currently seeking applicants to fill the Lab Analyst position
the
ENGINEERING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES
Water Master Plan
Will be
Main Street
presented to Council for final approval in October
Design and environmental is underway
Promenade
Grover Promenade Construction will start in October
Pismo
Drainage Master Plan received final draft for review
South Palisades Stairway
Preliminary design has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission
Police Station
Emergency Generator
Pismo Oaks Lift Station
received final
design documents preparing
approved conceptual design
finat
design
in process
nd Iterr
A
to bid
Park Interceptor Sewer design in process
Cypress
DBE Program is currently in public review process
Lighted Crosswalks and Signal Override Project is 75 complete
Price Street at Dinosaur Caves
Project on hold until State Budget is approved and status
of grant funding is known
Vista Del Mar Stairway
Under construction
Ocean Outfalls at Baker and Paddock
Design is complete project to bid in
late
September
Ocean Outfalls at Florin and 107 Indio and Wadsworth Stairs Repair Under Construction
GIS DEVELOPMENT
GIS
now
has the
street functional
water tracts assessments districts
classification pavement management system zoning coastal zone aerial
following layers Parcels streets
photo assessors parcel information
and updating the water layer
We
are
sewer
developing
the Water Master Plan atlas sheets
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ACTIVITIES
During the month of August the Engineering Development Section performed plan checks for
20 single
family homes and 3 commercial developments Construction inspections kept the
Engineering Staff very busy with 87 field inspections on construction projects Staff issued 6
encroachment permits during the month In addition staff responded to 294 requests for
information and conducted 3 research projects Construction throughout the City remains very
active with both subdivision and building activities In addition City Staff made the final
corrections to the Engineer
sReport for the Water Tax Table
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The TSAC
reporting
will be done
by the Police Department
in their
monthly activity report
TREATMENT PLANT STATUS REPORT
Funding
The Finance
of
reports
Department
is
taking
the lead
and information to the State
on
this task and
Revolving
coordinating
the
required
submittal
Loan agency in Sacramento
Design
The
design is almost
100
complete
Schedule
Submit the Final
Plans Specifications
and Cost Est to the State
Advertise for Bids
Open Bids
Submit Approval to Award Package to the
Receive Approval to Award from the State
Sept 1 2003
Sept 15 2003
23 2003
Nov 15 2003
Dec 31 2003
Jan 13 2004
Sept 30 2005
Oct
State
Start Construction
Complete Construction
Agenda
Item
Fines
We had
no
violations
on our
As of Auqust
Overtime
31
monthly discharge requirements
2003
2
Engineering
t
Gov
Buildings
5
Park Maintenance
37
Streets
2o
15
Water
Department
Department
Wastewater
MY
Department
Operations
Public Works and
Prepared by
14
28
Engineering
Dennis
Total Dollar
Overtime Amount
Budget
Amount Expended
Amount Remaining
Delzeit City Engineer
Dir of Public Works Meeting
200
100
Date
769
15
431
84
September 16
2003
City of Pismo Beach
Fire
Dan
August
2003
Submitted
Labor
Department
Turner Fire Chief
Activity Report
by Division Chief Greg Pisano
DayWeekend
The Labor
Day weekend was a very busy day for our lifeguards and fire
this time the Fire Department responded to 6 emergency incidents
staff
During
Beach Restrictions
Due to the death of swimmer Denise Franzman
by shark bite in Avila Beach on
19m
as well as several subsequent shark
August
sightings in the Avila and Pismo
Beach areas Fire department staff working diligently with both the Port San Luis
Harbor District and the State Parks to restrict access to the beach areas and to
educate and warn swimmers of the potential threat It was
important that all three
in
worked
concert
as
much
in
as possible
order to avoid confusion and
agencies
misunderstanding
on
the
part of the public
and
inadvertently
lead to
an
accident
Chief
Tumer made a short presentation at the request of Mayor Crescione at the
September 2 City Council meeting That presentation resulted in a request from the
council for staff to investigate city authority and
city boundaries for enforcement of an
ordinance if one were adopted to close the beaches or waters
Recoqnition
of
Lifequard Billy
Larson
On the
day of the shark attack in Avila Beach lifeguards from several agencies were
participating in a lifeguard competition in Avila Beach Several lifeguards who
witnessed the attack immediately took direct action to rescue the victim One of
these was Pismo City Lifeguard William Billy Larson He joined three other
lifeguards in a heroic attempt to save a life all the while fully aware of the nature of
the rescue For his actions Mr Larson will be awarded with the City Medal of Valor
at the September 16th City Council meeting
Status of
Item 3
Department Work ProRrams
Fire
Facility Planning
Shell Beach Fire Station
Meetings
have
were
held with
completed
the
BFGC
the architect firm
arsite
prelimir
ar
alysis
doing the
structural
and will prepare
analysis They
r
c
mmendafior for
City Council for action regarding the suitability of the fire station
structure and site for upgrade
staff to
present
to
Ventana Fire Station
City staff including Public Works Community Development Acting City Manager and
Fire Department has met with RRM the architect firm doing the preliminary design of
the Ventana Fire Station
In addition
one
meeting
has been held with
city
staff and
Crescione Councilmember
Commission
members and a Park and Beach Advisory
Planning
member Mayor Crescione was not able to be present at that meeting
the citizen review committee that consists of Mayor
Gonzales two
Gee
Group
layouts and building schematics have been proposed and the committee is
working on narrowing the choices and preparing fro a neighborhood meeting to seek
community input on the design style and layout
Site
Automatic Aid
Item 16
has been
Updating
completed
on
the
Operational
Plan of the Five Cities Automatic
for mutual fire and rescue services involves the
Grover
Beach Oceano Arroyo Grande and now
Beach
County Fire and has been in existence for about ten years By utilizing the
CDF
closest resource concept all citizens of the Five Cities area will receive prompt and
Aid
Agreement
This
Agreement
communities of Pismo
by the nearest appropriate fire department resource regardless of
Plan represents a huge leap forward in the
agency jurisdiction This Operational
efficient use of emergency resources Target date for implementation is October 1st
efficient response
2003
Item 33
Emergency Operating
Plan
City updated Emergency Operating Plan is done Revisions
s
were made by Fire Department staff and sent back to the contractor The next draft
should be completed early next month In the interim City Department heads have
on the
been invited to attend a short training session on Thursday September 11m
the
SEMS
is
s Standardized Emergency Management System SEMS
State
organizational control structure used in the conduct of Emergency Operations Center
business during an emergency This training will also be offered to your Council in
the near future so that you may have a clear understanding how City staff will
The first draft of the
respond
to a local emergency
For August 2003
Incident
Summary Report
Number of Calls
Type
3
of Incident
90 Debris
3
4
48
34
62
10
99 Fire Alarms
12
Emercjency
Medical
0
00 Fire Menace
0
0
00
0
Standby
Floodin
I
30 Gas Leak
1
Odor
0
00 Other
0
6
79 Public Service Assistance
7
1
30 Smoke Check
1
0
0
0
0 Structure Fire
7
09ITraffic Collision
9
1
30 Vehicle Fire
1
0
00 Wildfire
0
77
00
100
Incidents
by City
Number of Calls
District
Descriptive
Ii
7
District
49 Palisades
6
A
09
9
B
Spyglass
12
58 Shell Beach
15
C
Village
1
30 Mattie Rd
1
D
8
39 Shorecliff
10
E
20
97 Downtown
25
F
2
60
2
G
I
30 Ventana
1
H
4
19 Trailer Parks
5
lhts
Hei
11
29 Five Cities Dr
14
J
6
7
7
9 James
00 NIB
0
Way
Hwy 101
K
0
NIB
0
00 S
0
B
101
Hw
B
S
77
00
100
AUTOMATIC AID
MUTUAL
AYG
Response
to Pismo
Response
to Other
by
Other
Agency
0
Pismo
0
Agency by
Average Response
Shell Beach
A32
GRO
CDF
OCE4716
I 00 I 00
Times To
Pismo Beach
Station 62
Avila
Valley
PismoBeach
64
35
4
10
7
El
For
Shell Beach
August 2003
21
7
I
48
6
Pismo Police
Police
Dept
Department
MONTHLY REPORT
August
2003
MONTHLY OVERVIEW
Chief Cortez accepted
a
500 donation
from the Wal
Mart Corporation
This is the
second year in a row that Wal
Mart has made this donation to the Police Department
used
Last year
to help pay for our Pizza on the Pier event for kids
s funds were
A
new
Pismo Beach Police Citizen
s
Academy class
ve sponsored with the first class
academy class we
this
class to have about 10 students
anticipating
This semester the Police
Department
is
sponsoring
begun This is the second
graduating in 2002 We are
has
a
Teen
Academy in conjunction
with
Judkins School This is an elective class for middle school students that meets on
campus once a week Reserve Officer Jim English is teaching it The curriculum is
mini police academy of sorts in that the students will be learning about criminal law
patrol procedures
4
civil and criminal
rightsl
evidence
collection
and
a
law
case
s lifeguards in helping
mid the Police Department has assisted the City
August
goers of the recent Shark encounter in Avila Beach
spread the word to beach
Since
Cpl Mike Hunter will be teaching DARE at Shell Beach School this
DARE education
year Both officers recently completed a training program on the new
Sgt
Tom Portz and
curriculum
Department recently purchased bright green plastic molded cutouts of a
child holding a flag warning motorist to drive carefully in school zones These attention
school and Happy
getting devices were donated to Shell Beach School New Life pre
Times pre
school in time for the opening day of school
The Police
The Detectives set up a sting operation in the City Pier Lot by
pickup truck in the lot that had an unattended surfboard in the
parking
bed
an
and
a
unmarked
wallet
vehicle doors were locked but the windows were
front seat in the cab The s
about 2
inches The vehicle was surveilled for approximately 4 hours and no
were
made to steal the
property
We will continue with
time to time in various locations in the
Resident of Wilmar St
reported
damage
and in general
feels that the
contacted Public Works and
repair
1 of 4
of
problems
city
attempts
property sting operations
CPOP
from
PROJECTS
that the Wilmar St dead
end has
to stairs at beach access
the
city
COMMUNITY PROBLEM ORIENTED POLICING
1
on
down
pot holes trash
age drinking overnight camping problems
under
is not
giving
attention to this
a crew went out to
to the heath access slairs
A
pick
area
asl epair
up t
new
In response Police
pot hole and begin
hl camping
ic
vprr
sign
was
Pismo POlice
Dept
arranged for the area Several patrol checks have been made
in the area since this problem was reported Resident was contacted and advised that
these problems would be solved and to contact the Police Dept if there were any further
problems
erected Extra
Resident
patrol
was
reported that
a
vehicle
was
s house Officer monitored
resident
continuously being parked
in
a
for violation Once violation
area
red
zone
was
in front of
observed
her of
officer tried several times to make contact with vehicle owner to advise him
parking Vehicle was cited because registered owner was unable to be contacted
illegal
INVESTIGA TIONS DIVISION SUMMARY
1
investigated a stolen ATM card that was used at two banks in Pismo Beach and
Santa Ynez Valley The victim reported to her bank in Clovis that her ATM card was
missing She then discovered that 900 in cash was withdrawn from her account Photos
Detectives
from
ATM machines in
the
both
Pismo
investigations From the photos the victim
her friend from Orcutt
photos
to
a
vehicle
Detectives
parked
were
in front of the
Beach
was
and
able to
Santa Ynez
forwarded to the District Attorney
sOffice for
a
photo
of
a
on
the
as
vehicle in the ATM
residence in Orcutt The
warrant
forwarded to
identify the suspect in the photos
able to match the
s
suspect
were
case
has been
suspect
investigated a residential burglary in Shell Beach where jewelry and guns were
stolen After the burglary a San Luis Obispo Shedffs Deputy served a warrant on an
individual in Oceano During the search of the residence the stolen guns were located The
up Detectives were able
suspect was arrested for possession of stolen property On follow
locate
another
in
Oceano
He
was
interviewed
and subsequently arrested for
to
suspect
burglary and conspiracy
Detectives
investigated a male subject who was using phone calls to make lewd statements
to a juvenile in the Shell Beach area The investigation led to obtaining a search warrant on
the records from a phone card which the suspect had been using The suspect was located
via the investigation as residing in New York The suspect was interviewed and the case
was documented on the request of the juvenile
sparents who did not wish to prosecute
Detectives
up investigation into the assault and battery with serious
follow
on July 26t
At the time the victim and witness only
injury to a
had a description of the suspect The follow
up investigation led to the identification of a
who
resides
out
of
San
Luis
suspect
Obispo County The case is progressing with
additional follow
up being conducted
Detectives continued the
female tourist that occurred
5
30 worth of merchandise
currently investigating an embezzlement of 000
local business The investigation is still on going
Detectives
a
are
at
equipment rental store in the
950
suspect
equipment and failed to
return the items Detectives from the Bakersfield Police Department assisted in the follow
up The Pismo Beach Police Department investigators created a photo line
up where the
suspect was positively identified An arrest warrant was requested through the District
sOffice
Attorney
Detectives
downtown
2 o1
4
investigated
area
The
an
embezzlement at
had rented
a
local beach
worth of beach
Police Dept
Pisrno
Detectives
be
were
brandishing
of San
a
bow and
registered
owner
lethal bow and
non
and the item
subjects
weapon
involving juveniles
a case
at other vehicles
arrow
of the vehicle
mailed to
was
our
Highway
101 who
vehicle
suspect
reported to
registered out
were
was
Department
Police
Diego
contact
was
The item that was brandished turned out to
The San
set
arrow
on
The
the assistance of the San
Diego Through
made with the
be
forwarded
a
Diego
department
Police
Department counseled the
of a dangerous
brandishing
The
unfounded
was
During the course of the investigation of
male subject driving in front of them who
burglary case detectives observed a
matched the description of a suspect investigators
believed to be involved in the case Detectives followed the vehicle observing a vehicle
code violation A traffic stop was initiated on the vehicle in Arroyo Grande The driver failed
to stop and attempted to evade in the vehicle The driver stopped and fled on foot Officers
from the Arroyo Grande Police Department and the Pismo Beach Police Department
and
responded
residential
a
attempted to locate the suspect After an intensive search
suspect The suspect was ultimately located hiding
to locate the
attempting
dog alerted
homeowner who alerted the
a
AGPD and turned
child
over to
detectives
endangerment driving
on a
police The suspect
The
arrested
suspect
suspended license and resisting
was
was
on an
we
in
terminated
garage A
apprehended by the
a
outstanding warrant
arrest
began in January of a sexual assault on a teenager in Shell Beach
sOffice in July An arrest warrant was issued on the
Attorney
suspect He was subsequently arrested after investigators contacted LAPD detectives and
provided them with a known address of the suspect The information provided by
investigations assisted LAPD in locating the suspect The suspect is currently in custody at
the San Luis Obispo County Jail
An
investigation
was
10 Detectives
to
responded
attended the
autopsy
in
a
death of
conjunction
individual in the Shell Beach
an
with the Sheriff
s
Department
Detectives
area
Detectives
A
case was
for documentation purposes
completed
11 Detectives
lot
that
forwarded to the District
were
assigned follow
up
The victim sustained minor
investigation
investigation
12 Detectives
battery
injuries
led to the identification of
is
going pending
on
investigated
a
Child Welfare Services
on a
a
a
an
an
adult tourist that occurred in the
was
suspect
assaulted
from
identification
report of suspected
misuse of
of
when he
positive
An additional
Santa Barbara Child Welfare
investigation
on a
by
the
by
the
Paso Robles
suspected
area
The
report
to the
the victim
child abuse and forwarded the
child abuse
Services when detectives
case was
were
forwarded to the
conducting
an
unrelated
ATM card
13 Detectives
they
14
were
registered 4 subjects as sex registrants These subjects are not new to the
all currently living in Pismo Beach and came in for their annual registration
Investigations
all of the 17
on
cases
handled
a
cases were
that
were
pier
The
suspect
total of 17 Juvenile Diversion
handled
cases
for the month of August
area
Not
through diversion Detective English conducted follow
up
diversion
cases
to the
and
forwarded
these
through
not handled
probation department The juvenile cases included thefts possession of alcohol under the
influence of drucs possession of a false identification possession of marijuana burglary
vandalism
an ii rowan9
Objects at
a
n9
pass
ve c
e
Pismo Police
TRAINING SUMMARY
1 Twenty members of the department
Dept
certification on CPR and
update re
of
the
effort to keep all members
First Aid on three different dates This training is part
s The rest of
current on these techniques All employees were also certified on AED
the department will be certified during September
attended
an
sAll Terrain Vehicles for Ofc A
department
Martin Ofc Trimble Ofc Ellis and Ofc Fabrocini on August 14 and August 28 This
s on the beach while on duty
training includes all aspects of operating the ATV
Officer Weir conducted
training
on
the
Commander Norton attended a course on SWAT Leadership Aug 11 through 15 in Palo
Alto This course covered the duties involved and expected of an officer in charge of
the
s
department
Critical Incident
Response Team
Leadership Aug 18 through 22 in Palo Alto This
course covered the duties involved and expected of an officer in charge of the
department Critical Incident Response Team
s
Sgt Miller attended
Sgt
Portz and
Cpi
School curriculum
officers
on
the
new
a course on
SWAT
Hunter attended
update training
a
on
Drug Abuse Resistance Education Elementary
Aug 25 and 26 in Concord This course updated
ten week curriculum for DARE
STATISTICAL INFORMATION
see attached report
OVERTIME
Total OT
Budgeted FY 04
Spent YTD
Percentage OT Spent YTD
Total OT
000
155
992
29
19
INA CAREER IN
INTERESTED
LAW POLITICS OR
LAW
Or
ENFORCEMENT
maybe you wouldjust like to have a better
understanding of ourjustice system
If so consider joining
our
Pismo PD
JudMns Teen A cademl
HEN Wednesdays at 2
W
15
IERE Judkins
WI
Campus
starting September
10t
Room 9
WltAT WILL IT INCLUDE
Exposure
justice system through activities movies
trips community service activities and
to our
games field
HOW YOU SIGN UP Sign up with me on campus or in the
DO
school office The program is limited to the first 25 who sign up
QUESTIONS
1075
will
or
catch
me on
help shape
Detective Jim English PBPD at 542
but your input
campus I have a lot of fun ideas
Page
me
this program
TITLE
SUBJECT
A RESOLUITON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH REJECTING
THE PROPOSED CLOSURE OF THE CALIFORNIA SPECIALIZED TRAINING INSTITUTE
CSTI
RECOMMENDATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This
was
placed
on
the
agenda
per the
request
of
Mayor Crescione
FISCAL IMPACT
None
OPTIONS
1
Approve
resolution
2
Pull from consent and
deny approval
ATTACHMENTS
1
Resolution
Prepared by
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
2003
Agenda
Item
F
4
Resolution
03
R
A RESOLUlTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH
REJECTING THE PROPOSED CLOSURE OF THE CALIFORNIA SPECIALIZED
TRAINING
WHEREAS the Director
the closure of the California
saving measure
INSTiTuTE CSTI
of the Governor
s Office of
Emergency Services has proposed
own
Specialized Training Institute
Training Branch as a cost
its
and
WHEREAS the Director of OES in recent media releases has indicated that CSTI is
s
thus
minimizing the importance of ensuring that California
saving lives
are
and
trained
emergency responders
adequately
not in the business of
WHEREAS for the past 32 years CSTI has provided training to Law Enforcement Fire
Services Public Works Municipal Department Staff the Emergency Management Community
Special Districts School Districts Hospitals Universities Utility Organizations the private
sector and many other organizations and
2003 fiscal year alone CSTI trained over 7200 emergency
WHEREAS in the 2002
from
California
Cities Counties State Agencies Special Districts and other
responders
to
their
vital mission in times of crises to include earthquakes floods
organizations
perform
hazardous materials and TERRORISM emergencies and
WHEREAS CSTI provides
General Fund
support recovering
revenue sources
this invaluable
its costs
training to California with a minimal level of
through grants reasonable tuitions and other
and
CSTI has and is capable of generating in excess of 2
3 million dollars in
the
while
its
to
state
proposed elimination would save only one million dollars and
WHEREAS
revenue
WHEREAS the true benefit of CSTI cannot and should not be measured only is fiscal
terms in that the professional staff at CSTI through their patience dedication and knowledge
have
provided
an
invaluable and
and emergency response
WHEREAS
training provided to
the
irreplaceable
community and
City
service to s
California emergency
of Pismo Beach has benefited
greatly
management
from the education and
its executives managers and staff the manifestations of such training has
been an increased level of competence in performing the cdtical mission of SAVING LIVES
AND PROTECTING PROPERTY both during and after an emergency or disaster
NOW THEREFORE
hereby REJECT
Beach does
BE IT PROCLAIMED that the
City
the PROPOSED CLOSURE OF
Council of the
City
and further find
of Pismo
DIRECT
CSTI
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TRAINING PROVIDED BY CSTI AND THE SAFETY OF OUR
CITIZENS WE STRONGLY URGE THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE and the GOVERNOR TO
REJECT THIS PROPOSAL
a
UPON MOTION OF
seconded
the
by
Resolution is
foregoing
passed approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach
day of September 2003 on the following roll call vote to wit
Councilmember
AYES
Councilmember
NOES
Councilmember
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
Councilmember
Councilmember
Mayor
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
Benito J Crescione
Yth
hereb
this 16
TITLE
SUBJECT
RESOLUTION
A
TRANSFERRING
DRAINAGE
OF
THE
000
10
PROJECT
IN
975
CITY
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
PISMO
BEACH
CITY GENERAL FUNDS FROM THE OCEAN BOULEVARD
TO THE DRAINAGE OUTFALL AND ACCESS REPAIRS
PROJECT 989
RECOMMENDATION
By motion adopt a resolution to transfer funds from the Ocean Boulevard Storm Drain
Improvements to the Drainage Outfall and Access Repairs
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
Drainage Outfall and Access Repair Project was awarded to Papich Construction on June
17
During the construction of the outfall repairs the pipe outfall at Topaz Street broke
loose due to corrosion and fell onto the bluff Papich Construction has submitted a contract
change order for the repair of the Topaz Street outfall in the amount of 12
753 Currently the
remaining funds on this project are not sufficient to include the Topaz repair however funds
remain in the Ocean Boulevard Storm Drainage Improvement
It is recommended that
be
transferred
from one project to the other in order to expedite this critically needed
000
10
repair
2003
FISCAL IMPACT
Including
the
repair as a change order under the Drainage Outfall and Access Repair will result
in a cost savings for the City since an existing contract is in place and no additional overhead
costs would be required The repair will also guard against additional damage occurring to the
bluff and the City street at the end of Topaz
OPTIONS
1
2
Approve
Deny
the fund transfer
the fund transfer
ATTACHMENTS
1
Resolution for the fund transfer
Prepared by
Brian K
Recommended
by
Duncan E
P Assoc Civil Engineer Meeting Date September 16
Delzeit P
E Public Works Director
City Engineer
2003
R Dennis
Agenda
Item
6I
4
RESOLUTION NO R
2003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH
TRANSFERRING 10
000 IN CITY GENERAL FUNDS FROM THE OCEAN BOULEVARD
DRAINAGE PROJECT 975 TO THE DRAINAGE OUTFALL AND ACCESS REPAIRS
PROJECT 989
City Council of the City of Pismo Beach that from General
Funds allocated to Ocean Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Project 975 are hereby
transferred to the Drainage Outfall and Access Repairs Project 989
BE IT RESOLVED
by
the
UPON MOTION OF
was
AYES
Council members
NOES
Council members
ABSENT
Council members
ABSTAIN
Council members
Benito
ATTEST
Lori
by
the
passed approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
16th day of September 2003 on the following roll call to wit
foregoing resolution
Pismo Beach this
seconded
Grigsby City Clerk
Crescione Mayor
PISMO BEACH COUNCIl AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH APPROVING THE
TRANSFER OF 131
444 FOR THE WATER AND WASTEWATER TELEMETRY UPGRADE
RECOMMENDATION
the resolution to amend the
By motion adopt
project
budget
for the water
wastewater telemetry
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
C Systems Inc of Oxnard California to prepare the contract
City contracted with E
documents
and
Wastewater telemetry
specifications
engineers estimate for the Water
Under
the
contract
in
2001
and bid in February 2001
project
original
prepared
January
Electric
was
the
Iow
bidder
The
contract
was
originally divided into two phases
Madruga
water system phase and wastewater system phase and 250
aside for the first
000 was set
It
decided
was
after
bids
were
received
that
both
should
be performed at the
phase
phases
same time and therefore the project was held until the new budget year in
July 2001 was
passed
original
and cost
were
then re
evaluated and
cost of
A
again Madruga Electric was the Iow bidder at an
000 was added at that time giving a total
30
of
310
303
contingency
310 Work began for the modification of the WaterNVastewater telemetry
project cost of 333
system in January 2002
The scope of the
project involved replacement of all the 12
old programmable logic
year
controllers power supplies wiring and old
year radios The new radio system specified
8
was a breeze net 2
4 GHz band radio Initially upon testing the radios prior to preparing the
contract documents in the fall and winter of 2000 we had acceptable to good communications
for
our
and
case sites
worst
signal
Since then commercial and residential
interference from what is
communications
near
suspected
impossible without installing
have
as we
development tree growth
phone sites has made data
numerous 60 to 80
foot towers
This
now found
frequency
over long distances due to its narrow
wooden poles that tend to twist with hot to cold
range
to be cellular
out has very little tolerance for trees and buildings
radio path projection and expansion
contraction of the
weather
causing
antenna
misalignment
City has since had two radio surveys performed by Applied Technologies from
Bakersfield to determine the most cost effective means of dealing with the problems that have
The
adsen The
existing older radios could be utilized requiring a reprogramming and rewiring of
This could be accomplished after determining compatibility with the new
programmable logic controllers The overall cost to do this would be a not to exceed cost of
400 The second and preferred option would be to utilize a 900 Mhz band radio that
88
tested very well in the field and is much more forgiving when it comes to obstructions and
interference
This radio system installation would require less rewiring and give us the
of
the Breeze Net radios The 900 Mhz radios were not available with the
capabilities
capabilities of the original contract specifications when the project was first bid The 900 Mhz
all the sites
band radios would have to be purchased for each site
Th6 ot
dd be
vvo
s
not to
exceed cost of
444
131
The Water
Wastewater
telemetry system
information to
valuable
resource
our booster
request
The scope of work outlined in the
is
a
vital
means
of
controlling
stations and wet wells and is the
original
contract did not
and
providing
reason
for this
contemplate problems of
this nature with the radios
FISCAL IMPACT
Allocation of additional water and wastewater funds
400
88
or a
amounting
to either
a
minimum amount of
maximum of 131
444
StafFs recommendation is to approve the budget amendment for the larger amount
s
insuring a longer service life and manufacturer
support of the radios
OPTIONS
proceed
Approve additional
1
money in the amount not to exceed
00 to
444
131
with the
900Mhz radio
2
systems
Approve additional money in the amount not to exceed
programming and wiring for the older existing radios
400 to provide
88
ATTACHMENTS
1
2
Quotes from
Resolution
Madruga Electric
2003
Prepared by Rocky Rogers PublicWorks Supervisor Meeting Date September 16
R
Recommended by
Dennis Delzeit City Engineer
Director of Public Works
en
e
3216 State
93308
Road Bakersfield California
Office
3750
399
805
LicNo 363627
Industrial
commercial
Maintenance
Installation
AUtomatic Controls
Instnunentation
Manufacturer
2003
July 18
City of Pism0 Beach California
attn Rocky Rogers
760 Mattie Road
2056
SUBJECT ADDITIONAL WORK FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR
WASTEWATER TELEMETRY SYSTEM
WATER
UPGRADE PROJECT
quote for modifications required to existing system for
installation of a 900MHz radio SCADA system See attached sheet for the
The
following is
a
additional work needed
at
each site
labor equipment material freight and sales
Contingency of 10
Total price
Total
Bucket truck rental in addition if not supplied
00
City of Pismo Beach Two weeks at 2032
Total
tax
please give
Sincerely
druga
M
Me
Presid
me a
11
00
580
00
380
127
by
064
4
00
00
444
131
price including bucket truck rental
If you have any questions
cell at 661
2330
747
00
800
115
call
at
3750 or
399
661
on
my
ADDITIONAL WORK AT SITES
SUES
750 LIPS
PW5115
1
Host PC
2 EMT raceways
plus additional 1
Install 21x21 back pan in existing PLC enclosure with radio
mounting brackets and outlet for repeater 120volt source
A242412 fiber box
Install
Need
new
to
4 raceway from vault
3
install
a
to
PLC enclosure
on
temporary 242412 enclosure secured
backboard
at
site for
radio test sequence
Install 21 x21
backpan
in
existing PLC
brackets and outlet for repeater
Install third power cell and wire
enclosure with radio
120 volt
same
mounting
source
plus
one
750 UPS
PW5115
SITES 1 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20
At seventeen sites
to
source
we
supply 24
will
use
the 24 volt DC power
volt DC for
new
supply for analog
radios At these locations
install fusible switches with 3 amp fuses and terminal blocks
backpan including mounting brackets for radios
we
on
must
each
Temporary power supply
SITES 0 1 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20
duplex outlet needs to be available sixteen sites we will
exposed backpans in existing buildings by using either Wraps or
At host
secure
PC
screws
Rental
a
Will
with yellow caution tape
00 Bucket truck
days is 2032
064
4
required for a maximum of two weeks for a total of 00
cost
would be
secure area
for 40 bucket truck for
seven
00000
August 6
2003
Mr
Rocky Rogers
City of Pismo Beach
Pisme Beach CA
Dear Mr
Rogers
kyou for the
T
opportunity m propos the followin
solugon for
Warmwater Telemetry Co
Walar
municaitous System This solution would
modem cqullxnent presently in
stLr radio
ex
R
l
CO
l
O
tio
lCORi
Ot ali
gumti pro
mlng i
a
tallstions and for the base station proposed
Lr
Also required
require new
flew able
ogralIl Coatroller
P
a
e
pted under the
he current radios into lbe
is relocation of
Associated with this
ti
aHafloa eloeafion and
ra syamms varying by si
ant
e
re
sc note thc pricing is
Ple
due
oudg only
tary
employ the
service It will
ent eonu
cu
act
new controller
s
cabin
modification tasks to the
to
exisiing
tby he following
cr
ISSlleS
1
Research of the
syaem demnniued be FCC license has lapsed
RetnstaQng or securing a new liceme will need to be accomplished before the
work can begi The licensing prucea itKlf will cost app
00
oximattly 1000
2
Th
new
current radio
ssi
n
W
s a review oftbe existing radio sylee
lioen t
mFCC
complience with n
compliance may require
latlons
res
he
exiati symm and affect he pe
xo
This
work
lleeds
to
be
dol
fllt
with
exlllmlsJve l
edJO
system
by a
experience such u Applied Tedmology Oroup Al hhis lime tim extent of FCC
at This work
compliance issues ia unlmow therefo fltia os mnnol be esiim
them directly
would most economically be handled by oonlraciing
arc with the
radio system
Compatibility ofthe new hardware and sotb
tlom
modifi
3
assure
to
This
he
must be verified Cost t
o his
evaluation and verification would be on a time
material basis with a minimum eRtmated cost of 3500
00 It would not be
ox
expected to ex
10
Based upon a successfal resolution to the above
existing conlract for the followin work
we
propose
a
e order lo our
cha
Site 1
Pismo Oaks Boost Relocate existin radio and antenra system om its
location
ol cabinet Ioca
at the k to
new oo
lon at the boost
present
building Install new radio pcwe supply and comtmmicaticnl cabling between the
radio nd the new Programmable Conroller PLC Pro PL to
serial
communications via radin Install
Site 2
Install
the
a
24x24x 0 fiber enclosure
Pacific Estates Boost Mount existing radio on the new PLC back
panel
new radio power supply
communication cabling between the radio and
PLC
new
Site 3
PLC lo utilize serial communications via radio
h
Ill Existing telemetry enclosure h
Hvii
using the radio to
Program
mo
Pi
remain Ins
l
new radio porter supply ancl cammunic
on
radio arid the
Site 4
ew
Pismo
cahltng between th
PLC Pm
ram PLC io utilize serial communications via radio
Heip h I1
Mounl existing radio
on the new
PLC
panel
back
radio powtr supply and oommunioation cabling between the radio and
Cto utiliz s
C Pro
PI
ial communications via radio
ram PI
new
the nwv
Site 5
Install
the
Bello Bcosl
in
Existing telemetry enclosure housing the radio to rem
radio power supply
tion cabli 8 between the radio and
commtmi
PLC Prolp
m PLC to uglize serial communications via radio
new
new
SiR 6 Huber Well Pro
ide and install
a comple new radio systrm radio
Install new radio power supply and
arr
tor
lc
ini
light
abli
unlcation cabling betweea the radio and the new PLC Program PLC io
co
utiliz serial oommunl
tionsvia radio
antezza
Eighth
Site 7
new
new
St Well Mount
existing
radio
on
the
new
PLC back
ponel Install
radio power supply and communicaton cablin
beixveen the radio and the
PLC Program PLC to uiilize serial commttnicsiions via radio
Slte
Churl St Reservoir Mouut xisting radio on the new PLC back
pand
Install mw radio pow sllpply
tmtoation oabltn
corm
o between the radio and
tl
PLC Program PLC o utilize serial communications via radio
Site 9
Bay
Street Boost
Exi l
lemetry emlosuro housi the radio
to
ll
Inm
new radio power supply and oommunication cablia between the
radio and the ew PLC Program PLC to utilize serial communications via radio
Site 10 Shall B
ch Tal
sRelooate existing radio and amenua system from iiz
to
locaiion
tl
new coa
cA cabir
t
location a the boost building Install
present
Ma communication bliai ketw
new radio power
nth radio and the
supply
new Programmable Co
iroller PLC Program PLC to u
ilize serial
uicalions via r
u
cou
tio
Site 11
lnsufll
the
oO
Pi
k Lift Mou
w PLC back
II
radio on
pardi
and
on
comrnunicai
nthe radio and
power mpply
cabling betw
PLC Pro
s
via radio
ram PLC to utilize serial oommullicatio
w radio
new
Site 12 Five Cities Lift Movat existing radio on the new PLC back
panel
l
Ins
w radio pow
n
ion eabllng between the radio and
r
supply and communtc
the
new
PLC Program PLC Io ufiliz serial cor
ications via radio
m
6
Site
A
l
r
m
siallaoompletenewradiosysl
Providenndin
Lilt
adio
ddi
pply and
anemia li
iart
tot caNi e 11 new radio power s
dio and the new PLC Install additional
unicalion cablin between lhe r
co
unicafions port li
r
e
serial communications module in the PLC to provide a eo
1
for
h
local
interfnce
communications
lined
panel
operator
existing
pon
C lo utilize serial communicatior via radio
ogran PI
P
Site 14 PG Lift Exisiin telemeuy enclosure housit iiradio lo remain
Install new radio power supply a
l
l
io
communic
o and
cabling between th rad
urticafions via radio Install
the new PLC Program PLC to utilize serial co
s raceway from vault to PLC enclosure on b
kboard
n
radio
Siie 15 Saint
ews Life Mount exis
on the new PLC back
tin
panel
new radio power supply and communication cabling between the radio and
liz serial oon
the new PLC Program PLC to ui
anunicatlons via
new
s
Site 16 Spyglass Lift Existini ielemeto enclosure housin the radio to rerunS
Inmll new radio power supply and communication cabling betw
n lhe ra
io and
via
the new PLC Prosram PLC o t
tilt s
lnl communications
radio
Site 17
Vista Del Mar Lift
Existing Iclemetry eizclosure housing the radio
to
remain Install new radio l
WCr suppl and communicalion cabli between
PLC
radio and ihe new
Proram PLC to utilize serial communication via radio
e 1
Si
Inslall
the
e new PLC back
1ms4 palisades Lift Mount cx
sldng radto on ll
panel
radio power supply and comnlRillca
imcablin betweell Rte rndlo and
new
new
PLC
Pro PLC
am
tlltlize serial commtmicatiol via radio
radio to
Site 19 Freeway Foothills Lift Existh telemetry enclosure housin
between
he
onication cablln
remain Install new radio power supply and c
radio and the new PLC Pro
ram PLC to utilize serial ccmmmgcadons via radio
Rmen Plmi Bxisting telemelry enolosure housing the
Site 20 Wnstcwa
cT
l
o
radio to m
r
ain L new radio power slipply alld commBllic
between the radio and he new PLC Profpam PLC to utilize serial
mications via radio Inslall third power cell and wire s
comrn
me plus one
Master TclemeU
ram communications confiscation and
yComputer Prof
k via existin
nls
to
ulilizc
all n
ssecialed
scrial con
ions li
ca
min functions
ollcrs and ncw
modems kcorporale lo
radio
ic to allow existin telemetry con
ilitate Iransition to thc
controllers Io commtmicate on the ame rndio system to ti
Siie 0
colllrollef system Modify
create ral
iC screens as
750 UPS
seriel ations
commm Install one PWS115
new
Pricin to accomplish
required to implement
the above chnn
00
400
es 78
Sincerely
0
SO
August 6 2003
City ofpismo Beach California
attn Rocky Rogers
760 MaRie Road
Pismo Beaoh CA 93449
6
20
SUBJECT ADDITIONAL WORK FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR
WASTEWATER TELEMETRY SYSTEM
WATER
UPGRADE PROJECT
The
g is a breakdown of the proposed change order
oIlo
submivted this
mormn
Total
labor equipment material freight and sales tax
Contingency of 10
Total price
Bucket truck rental in addition if not suppliod
00
Cit of Pismo Beach One week at 2032
Total
I
uck mn
al
price including bucket u
50
425
69
00
368
76
by
00
400
78
for any inconvenience If you have any q estions
Mol a call at 661
3750 or on my cell at 661
399
2330
747
apologize
Sincerely
dmtn
Assl
please give
RESOLUTION NO R
2003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH
APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF
444 FOR THE WATER
131
AND WASTEWATER
TELEMETRY UPGRADE
WHEREAS
the
original radios specified for the telemetry upgrade
difficulties that would
jeopardize
the
the
experiencing
severe
system
WHEREAS insufficient funds remain
complete
are
in the
project budget
to correct the
problem and
upgrades
WHEREAS 131
444 is necessary
to
replace the failed radios
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach that
444 is hereby Transferred from the Water Enterprise Capital Improvement Account
131
601
56051
442
512
to the
Telemetry System Upgrade project
account
56012
442
512
948
UPON
MOTION
OF
seconded
the
adopted by the City Council of the City
the following roll call vote to wit
AYES
Councilmember
NOES
Councilmember
ABSENT
Councilmember
foregoing
Lori
Gdgsby City Clerk
Councilmember
of Pismo Beach this
hereby passed approved and
2nd day of September 2003 on
Benito J
ATTEST
by
Resolution is
Crescione Mayor
DateSeptember162003CityManagerApproval
TITLE
SUBJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH ENDORSING
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SOUTH COUNTY HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE
RECOMMENDATION
By motion adopt
resolution
endorsing
the activities of the South
County
Healthcare Alliance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This
placed on Council agenda at the request
September 2 City Council meeting
was
at your
of Council Mike
FISCAL IMPACT
None
OPTIONS
1
eTnesoldAoCrHseMumEtiNeoTnSt
the
RADeny
1
2
Approve
Meeting
Clerk
City
Grigsby
Lori
Prepared
Lady
Mr
by
supplied
Attachments
resolution and forward to Mr
Lady
Lady and Dr Ernest Jones
RESOLUITON
03
R
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH ENDORSING
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SOUTH COUNTY HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE
Whereas Arroyo Grande Community Hospital is
of Pismo Beach and
a
Whereas the local economy depends heavily
responsive community hospital and
upon the existence of
key
element in the well
a
being
of the citizens
high quality locally
Whereas the City of Pismo Beach desires ownership of Arroyo Grande Community Hospital
to be
responsive
to local
needs
and
City of Pismo Beach believes the couth County Healthcare Alliance is uniquely
represent their interests regarding Hospital ownership and other conceFns
Whereas
the
positioned
to
Now Therefore be it resolved the City of Pismo Beach formally endorses the South County
s
Healthcare Alliance
activities
directions
and conclusions
regarding
and
of
services
in
the
South
area
County
delivery
hospital ownership
UPON
MOTION
foregoing resolution
OF
seconded
AYES
Council members
NOES
Council members
ABSENT
Council members
ABSTAIN
Council members
Benito
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
aining
per
the
Crescione Mayor
to
the
by
City
adopted by
on the following roll call
and
passed approved
Pismo Beach this 16th day of September 2003
was
matters
Council of the
to wit
City
of
Gri Lori
lsb
From
Lionel Chadwick
Sent
53 PM
Tuesday August 26 2003 4
Grigsby Lori
SOuth County Healthcare Alliance
To
Subject
SCHA Pismo Beach
SCHA Fact
Endorsement
doc
Sheet
Ikchadwick@hotmaiLcom
SCHA Draft
For immedia
doc
Endorsement
doc
release
Laurie
Please
find attached
Recent
Press
SCHA Fact
Draft
Ny
letter
and
the
supporting documents
Release
Sheet
Endorsement Resolution
I will
attend the
September 2nd meeting
former Mayor of Arroyo
Grande
and Dr
and be
Ernest
accompanied by Mike Lady
jones
Medical Staff of A
royo Grande Community Hospital
resolution and request that they consider it at the
Thank you
for
Grover
for
Beach
Lionel Chad
1029
If you
get that
letter
Chief of the
will
present our
subsequent meeting
which
was
intended
please discard it
Chadwick
Trevor
Way
Obispo
San Luis
Cell
Get
your time
former
We
805
MSN
8
CA
4987
471
and
93401
Voice Mail
help protect
your
children with advanced parental
controls
parental
features
page
com
msn
join
http
SCHA
South County Healthcare Alliance
1029 Trevor
San Luis
Way
Obispo
CA 93401
4987
805 471
2003
August22
Mayor and Members
City of Pismo Beach
of the
City
Council
760 Mettle Road
Dear
Mayor
and Council Members
formal request that your council consider making a
County Healthcare Alliance The Alliance has formed
to create a vehicle for community input regarding the future ownership of Arroyo Grande
Community Hospital and to pursue other matters pertaining to South County healthcare
Please allow this letter to
serve as a
formal endorsement of the South
concerns
We
recently
held
of your Council
of an
a
Municipal
Ms Reiss
upcoming meeting
Leader Forum that
suggested
we
was
attended
formally request
to
by Ms Mary Ann Reiss
be placed on the agenda
and also ask that your Council endorse our activities and
deliberations
For your information I have enclosed the
Recent Press Release
following
materials
SCHA Fact Sheet
Draft Endorsement Resolution
t
00 PM and
7
It is my understanding that you will have a meeting on September 2nd
that this matter may be placed on the agenda for that meeting We will plan to have
representatives
of our
organization
available at that
meeting
to
respond
to any
questions
you may have
Thank you for your consideration
this request further
Sincerely
Please feel free to call
yours
Lionel Chad
Chadwick
Consultant to the Board of Directors
me
if you would like to discuss
SCHA
South County Healthcare Alliance
iew
Issue Over
Arroyo
Response
A
Grande
Community Hospital is in the midst of bankruptcy and
resultant ownership change Historic owners of the hospital have
used earnings from the hospital to finance endeavors in other areas
and or satisfy corporate earnings expectations leaving the hospital
under capitalized and over burdened with debt
large group of South County doctors along with community leaders
have formed an alliance to address local healthcare problems and
improve the working environment at Arroyo Grande Community
Hospital AGCH The South County Healthcare Alliance SCHA
composed of physicians elected officials emergency service
professionals and concerned citizens intends to provide a strong local
voice for the hospital
sfuture
Action
Endorse the South
s efforts to secure a
of
locally responsive owner
Arroyo Grande Community Hospital
Secure government and private organizational endorsements of their
work and their subsequent recommendations
Expertise
South
County Healthcare Alliance participants are experts in their field
uniquely qualified to make recommendations regarding hospital
ownership and operation
and
South
o
County Healthcare Alliance Board of Directors
Dr Ernest Jones President Physician
Immediate Past President of the AGCH Medical Staff
Member of AGCH Medical Staff for 23 years
o
Mr Nathan
Alvarado
Vice President
Branch Manager National
Brokerage
Firm
5 Cities Youth Basketball Little
El Canlino 4H AG High School Band Boosters
Active in
AYSO
League
AG HIGH SCHOOL Facilities Advisory Committee
o
Dr James
Hawthorne Secretary Treasurer Physician
Current President of the AGCH Medical Staff
o
Mr Mike
Lady Arroyo Grande
Past
Mayor of Arroyo Grande
Founding member and Board
Business Owner
AG
City
Council member
of Directors of local bank
Past President of Kiwanis Club
Two term President of Chamber of Commerce
O
Mr
Terry Fibich
Fire
Chief City
Board of Directors of
Boy
of
Arroyo
Grande
Scouts of America
Board of Directors and Past President of County
Emergency Medical Service Agenc
Board of Directors
Califorr
re
Chief Association
South
o
County Healthcare Alliance Participants and Advisors
Mr Katcho Achadjian
Member SLO Board of Supervisors
o
Dr William Ashley
Physician
Member of the AGCH Medicat Staff for 23
term
Long
o
member of Board of Directors
Society
Ferro Physician
years
of
County
Medical
Dr Tom
AGCH Medical Staff
o
Dr
o
Mr Sam Helton
o
Ms
Larry Foreman Physician
Member of the AGCH Medical Staff for 17 years
President AGCH Volunteers
Trudy Jarratt
Grande Community Hospital Foundation
Chairperson Clark Center Development Committee
2nd Vice President SLO County League of Women Voters
Chairperson Arroyo
o
President San Luis Obispo County
Co
MS Carol Keith Registered Nurse
Hospice Nurse
o
Dr Peter
Active
community
Public Access
TV
Inc
member
Thom Physician
Electof the AGCH Medical Staff
President
Consultant
Dr Chad Chadwick
o
Former CEO
Arroyo
Grande
Community Hospital
Former Administrator French
Hospital
Medical Center and
Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center
Local
Impact
For the
being of the local economy it is
Arroyo Grande Community Hospital be operated in a
ensures essential community services are maintained and
safety
of the residents and well
essential that
manner
that
expanded
in accordance with
community growth
The
new owner
investment of
long ownership and re
term
Healthcare services
capital
hospital operations
are central to a high living standard and a preferred quality of life
Local businesses depend upon quality healthcare to recruit employees
must be committed to
earned
back into
For more information contact
Or Chad
Phone
mail
E
Chadwick Chadwick and Associates
4987 Fax 805 786
4575
805 471
com
LKCHADWICK@hotmail
SCHA
South
County
Healthcare Alliance
ON
DRAFTENDORSEMENTRESOLU
endorsing the activities of the South County
Healthcare Alliance the following suggested resolution language is provided
Feel free to amend it to suit your particular needs
If you would like to consider
Whereas
Arroyo Grande Community Hospital
of the citizens of
is
a
depends heavily upon
locally responsive community hospital and
desires
Whereas the
City o
Community Hospital to be responsive
City
to local
Hospital ownership
the existence of
uniquely positioned
to
a
high quality
ownership of Arroyo Grande
needs and
believes the South
of
Healthcare Alliance is
Therefore the
element in the well being
and
Whereas the local economy
Whereas the
key
represent
County
regarding
their interests
and other concerns
City of
formally
endorses the
sactivities directions and conclusions
regarding matters pertaining to hospital ownership and delivery of services
South County area
South
in the
For immediate release
August 14 2003
Contact
Chad Chadwick
Phone
4714987
SOUTH COUNTY PHYSICIANS FORM ALLIANCE TO SAFEGUARD LOCAL
HEALTHCARE
Community Group
The
physician leadership
Ownership of AG Hospital
of Arroyo Grande
community leaders have formed an
with
and
Wants New
improve
the
working environment
Healthcare Alliance
service
professionals
Locally Responsive
Community Hospital AGCH along
alliance to address local healthcare
at the south
SCHA composed
to Be
county
hospital
of physicians elected
The South County
officials
and concerned citizens intends to provide
a
problems
emergency
local voice for the
sfuture
hospital
The
organization was
formed to influence any
new
hospital owner to
responsive to community needs
Adequately capitalize operations to improve and enhance local
Provide services that
are
healthcare
delivery
long term basis to the five cities area
Assure earnings generated in San Luis Obispo County be reinvested in
operations and equipment
Commit
on a
Current owner Vista Associates is immersed in
have affected
operations
hospitals including
large
at AGCH
Vista has
bankruptcy proceedings
to
sell the
AGHS and French
Center located in Riverside
headquartered
in
County
Systems UHS
Pennsylvania
Hospital while retaining
which
sthree
company
AGCH and French Hospital to Universal Health
owned hospital company
investor
promptly sell
agreed
AGCH
Corona
a
UHS intends to
Regional Medical
SCHA
was
profit public
for
that have
formed
benefit
expressed
consideration
to
explore the pumhase of AG Hospital
corporation
interest in
other
ownership
ofSCHA
states
the South
County that
responsive
to
our
Arroyo
While local
ownership possibilities that
Lady former Mayor
it is
ofArroyo
Jones
next owner
s
community
ofArroyo
is
worthy of
community
and member ofthe Board ofDirectors
the economy and well
Grande
being of the
Community Hospital
s of
citizen
be
needs
community
service role played
Hospital cannot
be overstated
Police and Fire
Departments depend heavily
Terry Fibich observed that
by Arroyo
the first line emergency
Grande
Community
responders such as
upon their presence
to
the
deliver emergency
when it is needed
The South
and
a not
SCHA President
Grande Fire Chief and SCHA Board member
The continued strong
care
ownership
would serve and protect the
Grande
vitally important to
the
operate itas
The alliance is also in discussion with other groups
interest also may exist stated Dr Ernest
Mike
to
consultant
continue
County Healthcare
Dr Chad
through August
recommendation
Chadwick
Alliance has retained former
to assist them with their deliberations that will
Once their review is
regarding
future
hospital administrator
complete they will
ownership ofthe hospital
make
a
TITLE
SUBJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PISM
BEACH CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
APPLICANT
THE
TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PERCAPITA
GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER CLEAN AIR
SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD
PARKS
AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2002
RECOMMENDATION
By motion Adopt
resolution
approving
the
application
for
grant
funds
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In
2002 California voters approved Proposition 40 the California Clean Water
Clean Air Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Act providing funds for
the Per
Capita grant program for 220
000 for each smaller cities to develop any
type of park acquisition development project The attached resolution approves the
filing of an application for funds The submission of the signed resolution will trigger
the State Resources Agency preparation of a contract between the City and the
state to encumber the
000 grant
220
The
Parks Recreation and Beautification Commission PRBC recommends Council
000 grant for Ira Lease Park construction With the 88
designation of the 220
140
committed to the park construction to date 2000 bond funds and funding from tract
2295 subdivider total available funds will be 308
150 consistent with estimates
received for plan preparation construction and project management The Council
s
authorization will enable the
2004
2003
park construction
s
Capital Improvement program
The PRBC notes
improvements
in FY 2003
04 consistent with the
to this downtown Park will facilitate its use
families consistent with the Council
s downtown
Local Coastal Plan
Plan
shall
be
a
city
focal
point
serves
inviting
improvement goals
17 which notes that Downtown Pismo Beach
P
with a blend of cultural commercial professional
catering to both visitors and residents of all ages
residents year
round and in this context the downtown
uses
and
pleasant
to
the
citizens
of
the
development
and revitalization of downtown should enhance the
residents
well
as
more
principle
residential and recreational
The downtown
must remain
by
and General
as better serve
the needs of visitors
community
quality
New
oflife for the
Last the PRBC
reminds
the Council that
Development
improvements to Ira Lease Park cannot be funded from the Park
fund as Ira Lease is not a new park Should the Council decline to
earmark these funds for Ira Lease
park
monies from the General fund would be
required for park construction
Agenc
ite n
J
4
FISCAL IMPACT
The
adoption
of this resolution will have
a positive fiscal effect on the City Approval
step in the ultimate improvements to Ira Lease Park Even with
the parks maintenance costs it is anticipated that park improvements will lead to
of the resolution is
expanded
use
a
of the
park and generate downtown
revenues
OPTIONS
1
2
Approve resolution
Deny resolution
ATTACHMENTS
1
Resolution
Prepared by Carolyn Johnson Planning Manager
Meeting
date
September 16
2003
Agenda
Item
JZ
4
Resolution No
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING THE
APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
PERCAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER
CLEAN
AIR SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD
AND COASTAL
PARKS
PROTECTION
ACT OF 2002
WHEREAS the people of the State of California have enacted the
Program which provides funds for the acquisition and development
community and regional parks and recreation lands and facilities and
WHEREAS
the California
responsibility for
procedures and
the
of
Capita Grant
neighborhood
of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the
of the grant program setting up necessary
Department
administration
WHEREAS said procedures established by
Recreation
Per
the California
Department
the
of
parks and
the approval
require
sGoverning Body to certify by resolution
Applicant
Applicant to apply for the Per Capital Allocation and
WHEREAS the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California
of the
NOW THEREFORE
Approves
Grant
the
filing
Program
BE IT RESOLVED that the Pismo Beach
of
an
Application
City Council
for local assistance funds from the Per
under the California Clean
Clean
Water
Capita
Air Safe neighborhood Parks
and Coastal Protection Act of 2002 and
Certifies that the
has
Applicant
or
will have sufficient funds to
operate
and maintain the
s and
project
Certifies that the
Applicant
has
reviewed
understands
and
Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural
the
Appoints
submit all
requests
documents
and
so on which
UPON MOTION OF
the forgoing resolution
City of Pismo Beach
all
Guide and
negotiations
this 16
General
execute
and
applications agreements payment
completion
of
s
project
seconded
was
by
passed approved
adopted by the City Council of the
day of September 2003 on the following vote
Councilmembers
Noes
Councilmembers
Absent
Councilmembers
Benito J Crescione
to
may be necessary for the
Ayes
Mayor
to conduct
Planning Manager
agent
including but not limited
as
agrees to the
and
Lori
Grigsby City
Clerk
SUBJECT
TITLE
AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CONTRACT
WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
By motion
approve the contract with Carollo Engineers for additional services associated with
a fee not to exceed 36
000
the Wastewater Treatment Plant for
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The treatment plant upgrade and expansion construction documents ara expected to be out to
bid in mid
September and a bid opening date has been scheduled for October 23rd
There ara
additional services that ara not covered in Carollo
s design contract that are needed at this
time The list of the additional services is furnished below
1
2
3
4
5
Organize distribute documents to plan rooms and maintain the bidders list
Provide plans specifications and contract documents to
prospective construction
management proposers
Interface with prospective construction management proposers
Coordination with SWRCB
SRF RWQCB
City staff
Work with sub
consultants APS architects Earth Systems Pacific and the biological
monitor
6
Prepare and conduct the pre
bid meeting
to
bidders
Respond
questions
8 Prepare bid addendums
9 Prepare and conduct the bid opening
10 Investigate the qualifications and background of the Iow bidder
11 Prepare a bid recommendation letter and attend the City Council
meeting for the award
7
of the construction contract
12 Coordinate the SRF loan Authority to Construct
documents
13
Contingency
11
stotal contract fees to date
Carollo
be pointed out that Carollo waived
with
pravious project scoping
fees
on
this
project
will be
on
a
the traatment
plant design
are 535
550 It should also
120 due to the City
000
s dissatisaction
estimates With approval of this contract Carollo
stotal
fee incraase of
and cost
550
571
FISCAL IMPACT
The final cost is to be based
on
the actual time and expenses incurred not to exceed 36
000
Agenda
Ilem
I
K
4
OPTIONS
The
only realistic option is for the design engineering firm to provide these services Non
approval of this contract will delay the bid opening since these services are an essential part
of the bidding process
ATTACHMENTS
Scope
of services
Prepared by
description and
R Dennis
fee estimate
spread
sheet
Delzeit P
E
City Engineer
Director
Meeting
Date
Sept 16
2003
Public Works
Agenda
Item K 2
4
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
AND
CAROLLO
s
ENGINEER
Scope of
ENGINEERS
Services
are as
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
follows
BIDDING PHASE ENGINEERING SERVICES
Task
Sell and distribute
1
approximately 100 sets of Plans and Specifications to potential
bidders subcontractor and suppliers throughout the bidding period Maintain a plan
holders list and fax to City and general contractors as required
2
1
Talk
with prospective Construction Management CM firms confirm contact names
percent and 100 percent complete Plans and
and addresses and mail CM firms 90
Specifications
3
1
Respond
4
1
Coordinate
State Water Resources Control
Control
Staff
to
questions
of
bidding with
Board and City
prospective
CM firms
5
1
Work with subconsultants to respond to their
process and obtain their responses to bidder
6
1
Prepare
7
1
Take bidders
for and conduct
a
Board Regional Water Quality
questions so they
questions
are aware
of the bid
Bid job walk
Pre
phone calls and respond to questions by potential bidders
suppliers throughout the bid phase period
sub
contractors and
8
1
Prepare and distribute Addendum
approximately 100 addendums
9
1
Prepare for and conduct Bid Opening for the Project at the City
Hall Prepare the Bid Opening Checklist and Summary Table
10
1
Investigate
11
1
No 1 This will involve the distribution of
Iow bidders references for
of Pismo Beach
City
and for
past work experience Contact
State to determine if any issues have been noted for their Class A Contractors License
Prepare
Council
September 9
letter
recommending award
meeting for the award
bonding
to lowest
2003
D
C
b
I
1
LOCALS
harnpson
OCUME Temp
AMEN D01 DOC
responsible
bidder and attend
Page
City
1 oi 2
12
1
Authority to Award process requirements by the State Water Resoumes
Control Board and State Revolving Fund policies This includes providing the
necessary forms to the City of Pismo Beach and sample letters for the legal opinion of
Coordinate the
Title
13
1
No 2 if needed This will involve the distribution
Prepare and distribute the Addendum
approximately 100 addendums
of
SERVICES BY OWNER
1
Provide outside services necessary to
services shall be defined as
a
Leqal
b
Permit
Staff
Quality
Provide the
Required permit
Control
permit
complete
legal opinion
cost
the
inspection
effort Such outside
for the Land Title
by Air Pollution Board
and the
Regional
Water
costs
SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES BY ENGINEER
Architect Review
for the Operations
a
Provide Subconsultant for
and
Laboratory Building
Bidding
Phase Service needed
The Subconsultant shall be APS
SERVICES NOT IN SCOPE
Reproduction costs for Plans and Specifications The
recover the reproduction costs Permit fee costs shall
Letter of
Legal Opinion
of Land Title
packages are established
be the responsibility of the City
costs of bid
SRF Requirement
shall be the
responsibility
of the
to
City
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The Work described herein shall be completed through the 30
for bid recommendations and Authority to Award
day bidding period plus
the time
PAYMENT
Payment
s
for services rendered will be in accordance with ENGINEER
applicable
Fee
The current schedule dated March 2003 is
Schedule at the time services are provided
attached hereto Attachment C A budget estimate of thirty
six thousand dollars 36
000 is
s Services unless amended by scope of services or
hereby established for ENGINEER
schedule
changes
Attachment B is
phase
spreadsheet
which presents the hours and estimated cost for the
bidding
services
September
9 2003
Page
2 of 2
CAROLLO ENGINEERS PC
FEE SCHEDULE
As of March 1 2003
Northern California
Hourly
Rate
Scientists
Engineers
00
97
Assistant Professional
00
131
Professional
Project
Lead
00
159
Professional
Project
00
174
Professional
Senior Professional
00
189
Technicians
00
69
Technicians
00
108
Senior Technicians
Support
Staff
Word
Processing
00
68
Clerical
Project Equipment Communication Expense
PECE Per DL Hour
Other Direct
00
6
Expenses
at cost
Travel and Subsistence
mile
36
Mileage
Subconsultant
cost
10
Other Direct Cost
cost
10
Expert
Rate
Witness
This fee schedule is
subject
to annual revisions due to labor
DOCUME LOCALS
C
Temp aoL
I
bhampsonNCAL03
l
x
0
2
adjustments
03
08
09
MON 16
30 FAX
08
19
2083
08
SEP
566
916
4880
CAROLL
916
565 4888
auiu
l
vv
P 82
TITLE
SUBJECT
OCEAN BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PRICE STREET SIDEWALK
REJECTION OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS
RECOMMENDATION
By motion reject all bids for the Ocean Boulevard
sidewalk
storm drain
improvements and Price Street
project
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bids for construction of the Ocean Boulevard storm drain
sidewalk
August 28 2003
Grande with a
Arroyo
Company
Staff
is
funding
recommending rejection
opened
were
Construction
the available
improvements and Price Street
The lowest responsive bidder was Papich
total bid of 112
432 Project costs exceed
on
of
of the
bids
because the
project
is
over
budget
The Ocean Boulevard
portion
and
on
larger
drain inlet
of the project consists of construction of an eight inch rolled curb
Ocean Boulevard to keep storm runoff from eroding the remaining
park and bluff edge The Price Street sidewalk portion of the project consists of constructing a
concrete sidewalk along Price Street between the Shore Cliff Lodge and Lighthouse Suites
This wilt provide the last piece of missing sidewalk along Price Street
FISCAL IMPACT
The
project
costs
are as
follows
Original Budget
Design and Construction Management
Construction Contract w
Contingency
Funding
In order to
Shortfall
309
96
96 dollars would need to be appropriated
309
There are currently insufficient funds available for this purpose The project costs are much
more than originally anticipated due to Caltrans requirements for the sidewalk in the State
complete
way and
of
right
the
60
000
3O9
27
000
129
project
an
additional
the need to construct
an
enlarged
drain inlet
on
Ocean Boulevard
The Price Street sidewalk
bid
000 if bid alone Staff will re
portion will cost approximately 38
this project separately Following bidding
re staff will return to Council with a recommendation
this
If
additional
to award
project
funding becomes available staff will present the Ocean
Boulevard project to Council for budget consideration at the next budget update
OPTIONS
Agenda
Item
L
4
1
2
projects and return to Council for completion of the
Price Street sidewalk project at an upcoming Council meeting
Award the Contract to Papich Construction This option is not feasible due to lack of
Reject all
bids
Staff will re
bid the
available funds
ATTACHMENTS
1
Bid
analysis
Prepared by
R Dennis
Delzeit City Engineer
Meeting
Date
September 16
2003
Agenda
Item
Z
L
4
110 OAK PARK BLVD
SUBJECT 100
1 RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE TO
COMMERCIAL FOR PORTION OF 110 OAK PARK BLVD AND AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN TEXT
2 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING CHANGE FROM OPEN
SPACE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 100 OAK PARK BLVD
RECOMMENDATION
1 Adopt Resolution 03
the
general plan
to Commercial and
amending
2 Introduce Ordinance 03
the
zoning
the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and amending
portion of 110 Oak Park Road from Open Space
adopting
map and text
changing
the
a
text and
adopting
map for 100 Oak Park Road from
the
Mitigated Negative
Open Space
Declaration and
amending
to General Commercial
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
changes to the zoning and general plan maps for these two lots on
May 6 2003 to eliminate an inconsistency between the general plan and the zoning maps
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the changes on July 22 2003
City
Council initiated
development of 100 Oak Park Blvd is access The recommended
environmental mitigation measures require changes to the general plan text to require
biological and traffic studies for any development of the site The recommended text change is
attached Attachment 2 The access issue is described in Attachment 1
The
primary
issue with
FISCAL IMPACT
may
see
increased
Any
future
revenue
development
from sales and
costs will be borne
property
by
the
property
owner the
City
taxes
OPTIONS
1
Deny the
amendments The maps will remain
2 Introduce an ordinance
inconsistent
the
property undevelopable
amending the zoning map from Commercial
to
Open Space The
property will be limited to open space uses The maps will be consistent
2 Continue discussion Direction should be given to staff
ATTACHMENTS
1
Description
of
2 Proposed text
amendments
change
changes
3 Proposed map
access
issue
Res
4
amending the general plan
amending the zoning
minutes
PC
6
July 22 2003
7 Environmental Initial study
Ordinance
5
Prepared by Judith Lautner Planning Specialist
Reviewed by Carolyn Johnson Planning Manager
Meeting
Date
Sept 2
map
2003
Attachment I
A The
The
proposed changes
A
change
A
change
Proposed Changes
are
to the General Plan map for 100 Oak Park Road and
Park Road from Open Space to Commercial
to the
Zoning
map for 110 Oak Park
Road
from
a
portion of
Open Space
110 Oak
to General
Commercial
A
change to the General Plan text to require a biological and traffic study for any
development application for the site and to limit uses on the site to those that will not
create traffic hazards
The map
changes
are
shown in Attachment 3 The text
changes
are
shown in Attachment 2
B Access
The
fronts
Oak Park Boulevard and is adjacent to the northbound
highway 101
onramp Oak Park Boulevard is identified as a major arterial in the Circulation Element There
are
on
property
on
three southbound lanes and three northbound
turn lanes in both directions
including left
Oak Park adjacent to the site The Circulation Element
says access should be limited on
these routes to
permit efficient high
volume traffic circulation
Access to
may be limited to a greater extent than
Characteristics of Streets
Section
3
504
of the
as
in
Secondary
Arterials
from
adjacent property
Table
3 Functional
C
h
State Highway Design Manual 5 edition says that any driveway
connection within 160 meters of a state highway ramp and local road intersection will
require
approval of an exception from the California Department of Transportation CalTrans The
property is immediately adjacent to the onramp and its frontage on Oak Park is only 150 wide
Therefore any proposed access to 100 Oak Park on Oak Park Boulevard would be allowed
only if an exception is granted by CaITrans For both efficient flow of traffic and for driver
safety it is preferable that access to this site be provided from a location other than Oak Park
Boulevard
If
is not taken from Oak Park the
only feasible access would be through the adjacent
at 110 Oak Park Boulevard A driveway could be created to
provide access to both
110 and 100 Oak Park from the
to the Pacific Coast
existing
Center
access
property
driveway
Shopping
OSH
center Permission would have to be obtained from these adjacent property owners Any
driveway through 110 Oak Park would also cut across a slice of Open Space zoning on 110
Oak Park The creation of a commercial driveway
through Open Space zoning is inconsistent
with the intent of Open Space
zoning For this reason a portion of the Open Space zoning that
lies between the two parcels should be changed to General Commercial The
change is
shown
on
the attached
excerpt
from the zoning map Attachmenl
Attachment 1
study be undertaken for any project
proposed for this site Because conditions cannot be imposed on general plan or zoning map
changes the mitigation proposed is a change to the general plan text This change would
modify the policies in the Toucan Terrace Planning Area to include a requirement for a traffic
study for any development proposal on this site It is likely that such a study would be required
in any case but amending the text to include this requirement assures that it will be
Additional wording has been included that restricts uses to those that will not create traffic
The environmental
study recommends
hazards The draft text
change
that
is attached
as
a
traffic
Attachment 2
Agenda
Item
Attachment 2
Proposed General Plan Text Changes
Additions indicated
by
underlined italics Deletions
indicated
by
Toucan Terrace
Subarea N
I
I2r Commercial S
N
EU
tes
n
Way and Oak Park
1
James
2
100 Oak Park Boulevard
Boulevard
Uses
permitted on this site shall be limited to those that do not
Any development permit application for this site shall include
A
create traffic
biological assessment by a qualified bioloqist to determine
impacts on bioloqical resources or the habitat value of the site
a
b A traffic
access
study
to state
that identifies
qhwa 101
h
impacts
from the
safety hazards
if there will be
qnificant
s
development on surrounding streets
mitiqation for impacts
and that recommends
and
on
Attachment
Proposed Map Changes
General Plan map
LOW DENSITY RESIDE NTIAL
Figure
18
LU
ME O IJM DENSITY
RESIDE NTIAL
1 Toucan Terrace
N
RESORT COMMERCIAL
OPEN SP
CE
Zoning
map
ange from Open Space
C
General Commerc
ar
3
Attachment 4
RESOLUTION NO 2003
A RESOLUTION OF THE PISMO BEACH CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO
THE GENERAL PLAN MAP AND TEXT FOR 100 AND 110 OAK PARK ROAD
APNS 005
008 AND
391
WHEREAS
and
Zoning
WHEREAS
PORTION OF 005
013
391
the Pismo Beach
maps for
an
and circulated
environmental initial
as
WHEREAS
the
WHEREAS
the
City Council City initiated amendments to the General
on May 6 2003 and
properly
Plan
at 100 and 110 Oak Park Road
study
and
Mitigated Negative Declaration were completed
uired by the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA and
re
Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on the amendments
and environmental documents on July 22 2003 at which all interested persons were given the
opportunity to be heard and
Planning Commission recommended approval
of the
proposed amendments
and
WHEREAS the City Council
September 2 2003 at which
held
a
noticed public hearing
duly
all interested persons were
given
on
the
the amendments
opportunity
on
to be
heard
and
the City Council reviewed the environmental initial
Declaration
WHEREAS
Negative
NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED
by the City Council
study
as
and
proposed Mitigated
follows
FINDINGS
1
The
2
The environmental
3
The map and text amendments
Plan
proposed changes consist of amendments to the General Plan map and text
development of the site at 100 Oak Park Road with a commercial project
study
is
a
full and
are
complete
to allow
informational document
consistent with the
goals
and
policies
of the General
ACTION
The
and
City Council does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration
adopt the general plan amendments attached as Exhibits C and D
attached
as
Exhibit A
Attachment
seconded by Councilmember
UPON MOTION of Councilmember
day of September 2003
the foregoing Resolution is hereby approved and adopted the 2nd
the
following
role call vote to wit
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
Mayor Benito Joseph
Crescione
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
Attached
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Exhibit B text change
Exhibit C map change
Exhibit A
Agende
by
4
INITIALSTUDYREVISEDXYESNODateadoptedBy
Attachment 4
Exhibit
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NUMBER
0269
02
APPLICANT
City
PROJECTION LOCATION
100 Oak Park
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Amendment of General Plan and 1998
of Pismo Beach
development
Road
Pismo
Beach
CA 93449
Zoning
Code
to
allow commercial
ofthe site
FINDING
The
City ofPismo Beach has reviewed the above project in accordance with
procedures for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
Environmental lmpact Report EIR need not be prepared because
The
Alnpeicgtvcloaeune
senvcoul
not
mithere
because
case
effect
pemeasur
a
made
hereby
and
study
initial
proj
added
been
prInihave
that
Study
dbasi
this
catfor
PiA
of
City
at
file
kept
Communi
DeptDeBeach
Judi
BY
PREPARED
4658
773
J805
3
Laumer
Associ
days
30
NOTI
REVI
PERI
HEARI
Tent
PlDATE
2003
22
July
Commi
ipubl
is
on
comment
to
duri
revi
aperi
The
Negat
DeclDraft
be
will
comment
the
light
rin
RECEI
COMMENTS
X
DRAFT
ON
ceiropy
ivinihsart
rnoposed
pnnimgviulanner
sough
ched
nrft6inmentmoaatemtpdeddcvsEonOVCeametiNantcLaledesnentvctrEDWwoesdgchtEDGenasytl
proposed project will not
NO
YES
have
a
significant effect
on
the City of Pismo Beach
srules and
and has determined that
the environment
an
A
Attachment
General Plan Text
Additions indicated
by
4 Exhibit
Change
underlined italics Deletions indicated
strikccuts
by
Toucan Terrace
1
Subarea N
2Commercial Sites
N
LU
James
2
Way
A
u
r
d
and Oak Park Boulevard
lO0 Oak Park Boulevard
permitted on this site shall be limited to those that do not
Any development permit application for this site shall include
Uses
biological assessment by a qualified bioloqist to determine
impacts on biological resources or the habitat value of the site
a
A
create traffic
b A traffic
access
study
to state
that identifies
qhway 101
h
impacts
from the
safety
if there will be
development on surrounding
miEqation for impacts
siqnificant
streets and
and that recommends
Agenda
hazards
Item
on
B
Attachment 4 Exhibit C
Map Change
General Plan map
LOW DENSITY RE 1DEN T
A
18
FNigure LU
1
MEDUM DE NSITY RESE
E N3
iAL
Toucan Terrace
COMMERICL
OPEN SP
CE
Attachment 5
ORDINANCE NO 0
03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR A
PORTION OF PROPERTY AT 110 OAK PARK BLVD FROM OPEN SPACE
OS TO
GENERAL COMMERCIAL CG
the
WHEREAS
100 Oak Park
City Council initiated an amendment to the Zoning Map
Open Space to General Commemial and
for
Blvd
WHEREAS the Planning Commission held a duly
2003
were given the opportunity to be heard and
at which all interested persons
accordance with the
a
of
on
July 22
Planning Commission reviewed the environmental initial study in
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA and found
complete informational
the
WHEREAS
the
WHEREAS
environmental
City Council
with the
portion
the
WHEREAS
that it is
a
from
were
held
given
City Council
a
document
duly
the
opportunity
to be
heard
on
Quality
Act
September 1 2003
and
reviewed the environmental initial
of the California Environmental
provisions
and
study
CEQA
in accordance
and finds that it is
a
complete informational environmental document
NOW THEREFORE
Section 1
THE CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
qs The City Council
Findin
1
The
2
An environmental initial
makes the
following findings
project consists of a zoning map amendment for 110 Oak
Space to General Commercial for a portion of the property
this document
is
study
was
completed
for the
project
and the
complete informational document prepared
California Environmental Quality Act
Section
Declaration
2
a
Action
The
attached as Exhibit
City Council
A
does
the foregoing Ordinance is
the
City
Council held this 2nd
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
day
hereby adopt
and approve the map
of
Park
amendment
Road
City
from
Open
Council finds that
in accordance with the
the
Mitigated Negative
attached
seconded
hereby introduced at a
September 2003 with the following roll
as
Exhibit B
by Councilmember
Regular Meeting of
call vote to wit
Attachment 5
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City
Benito J Crescione
Clerk
City Attorney
David R Hunt
Agenda
Item
Attachment
PASSED AND ADOPTED at
September
2003
on
Councilmember
motion
a
of
on
regular meeting
of the
City
Council held
the
following
roll call
this 16th
day
seconded
Councilmember
vote
5
of
by
to wit
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
MAYOR Benito J Crescione
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City
Clerk
Exhibit A
Negative
Exhibit B
Zoning
David R
Hunt City Attorney
Declaration
Map
Amendment
Attachment 5 Exhibit A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NUMBER
0269
02
APPLICANT
City
PROJECTION LOCATION
100 Oak Park
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Amendment of General Plan and 1998
ofPismo Beach
development
Road
Pismo
Beach
CA 93449
Zoning Code to
allow commercial
ofthe site
G
D
F
and
accordance with the City of Pismo Beach
s roles
City of Pismo Beach has reviewed the above project in
and
has
that an
detemfined
procedures for implementation ofthe California Environmental Quality Act
Environmental Impact Report EIR need not be prepared because
The
The
proposed project
will not have
a
significant
effect
on
the enviromnent
wilt not be a
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there
in
the
initial study and
measures
included
environmental
significant effect in this case because mitigation
added
to
this
project
hereby made a part of this Negative Declaration have been
The Initial
Study
of Pismo Beach
that provides the basis for this determination is attached A copy will be
4658
805 773
kept
on
file at the
City
Community Development Department
DATE
DRAFT PREPARED BY
REVIEW PERIOD
HEARING DATE
Judith Laumer
30
3 June 2003
Tentative
days
Plauning
Associate Planner
July 22
NOTICE
the review period The
public is invited to comment on the Draft Negative Declaration during
ofthe Draft Negative Declaration will be reconsidered in light of the comments received
appropriateness
The
COMMENTS RECEIVED ON DRAFT
Date
adopted
X YES
NO INITIAL STUDY REVISED X YES
By
Agenda
lien
2003
Commission
NO
Attachment 5 Exhibit B
Zoning Map Change
Change
to
from Open Spa
e
General Commercial
mmm
mm
Attachment 6
Planning Commission Draft Minutes
2003
July 22
Aqenda
Item lB
110 Oak Park
100
Road City
of Pismo
Beach Applicant Project
no
0269
02
General Plan Amendment of General Plan map from Open Space to Commercial for 100 Oak
Park and a portion of 110 Oak Park Blvd amendment to General Plan
text to insert
requirement for bioloqical and traffic studies for any development proposal at this site Zoninq
map Amendment of Zonin
q Map from Open Space OS to General Commercial CG for a
small
of the lot at 110 Oak Park to allow
008 and portion of 005
391
013
391
portion
a
driveway
to 100 Oak Park Blvd APNs 005
Planning Specialist Lautner presented the staff report recommending
recommend approval of the amendments to the City Council
Chair
Sorgenfrei asked
agree to the
if staff had
approached
the owners of 110 Oak Park to see if
they
access
Planning Specialist Lautner said no Acquiring the access is
an option that may be advisable for the owner to pursue
Chair
that the Commission
Sorgenfrei asked
Planning Specialist
submits a proposal
Commissioner
when
a
traffic
Lautner said
Ehring
study
traffic
a
asked about the
would be
study
Johnson said the
application
required
status of
110 Oak Park Road
Planning Manager
s
approval It
required
would be
application
not crucial to the
a
at the time the
applicant
proposed residential project
is in the review process
pending
at
additional
information from the applicant
Commissioner Waage asked staff to
provide
a
history
of the
proposal
Planning Specialist Lautner said in 1992 the City Council adopted a new General Plan
showing the property as Open Space research indicates it was a last minute change the
Zoning Map showed it zoned as Unclassified In 1998 the new zoning map was adopted with
the site zoned as General Commercial it was an oversight not
changing the General Plan at
that time
Commissioner
Commercial
Waage
asked if
Planning Specialist Lautner
Chair
Sorgenfrei
said the
City
Council initiated the
change
from
Open Space
to General
said yes
owner
of the lot
Commercial and when the General Plan
was
purchased the property thinking it was
adopted it was designated Open Space
zoned
Attachment 6
Commissioner
appears almost
the lot to uses that
on
only
Lautner said it is not the
Planning Specialist
limited
too close
Waage is concerned with the access being
any future project could not access the lot
are
not intense traffic
option
access
to the
It
ramp
off
Development
would be
generators
Ehring cannot support the change from Open Space to Commercial without
knowing what will be proposed for the site Access would better be addressed when you know
where the entrance and exits are and what will be going in
Commissioner
Commissioner
access
Waage
said there is
Cai Trans will allow
through
even
his
access
Chair
said the Commission
property
Space
He
the lot
He
asked
what kind of
should
thought they
might
give
owner
of 110 Oak Park
Road
not allow it in the future
Mr
opportunity
Dunn
to
had recommended the Council
the
deny
a
opportunity
initiate the
to sell
his
the site if it
s
project
change
on
from
Open
to Commercial
Planning Specialist
Lautner said yes
back and initiated the
change
Sorgenfrei
said the
owner
The General Plan
changed
that
Chair
he
The Commission would still have the
not viable
on
if staff contacted the
property
and he allowed the
Sorgenfrei
driveway
a
He believes traffic should be routed elsewhere
Lautner said
Planning Specialist
already
try
Halldin
said the
be allowed to at least
Commissioner
City
the
property
Council tabled the item and then
property believing
poses lots of
it
was
brought
it
zoned Commercial
challenges The applicant should
property
Planning Commission recommended the initiation of the
turned it down then the City Council thought about it and said it
City Council
changed A parking study will be required when the application comes in The lot
has two existing problems the General Plan designating it Open Space and the access He
hopes the owners of both lots will agree to put them together
change
The
purchased
The
to sell the
The
should be
Chair
Sorgenfrei opened the public hearing
Richard Dunn Owner of 100 Oak Park Road said he purchased the parcel from Cai Trans
They gave him the access when he purchased the property He presented the Commission
with a copy of a map showing the original access a copy of the map has been included in the
project He noted that CalTrans had built a curb and driveway to his lot
and used the lot during the bridge building When Cai Trans built the bridge they revised the
traffic markings on Oak Park making access to the site difficult He believes Cai Trans did not
He said a simple solution for Cai Trans to give him back his rights
have a right to do that
public record
would be to
NI
for this
move
back the traffic
Dunn said h6
applied
tot
s
restraining
zomng
re
line
on
permil
Oak Park Road to allow for better access
Jr
198C
Piannin9
Agenda
Commission turned
Item
Attachment
him
6
down stating he had to have a plan for the lot in order to grant the change His ideas for
cutting the side of the hill to create a work of art promoting the City of Pismo
the lot include
Beach for tourist
business and the rest of the property could be used for an emergency station
a Fire Department ambulance service or substation
He displayed a
Patrol
Highway
model of his proposal for the hillside and road markings to the Commission
for the
Commissioner
asked Mr Dunn if the taxes he pays
Ehring
Space designation
Mr Du
nn said he pays very little because it is
Chair
Sorgenfrei asked
on
the lot
are
based
on
the
Open
undeveloped
Mr Dunn if he has discussed
selling his property
to the landowner of
110 Oak Park Road
Mr Dunn said yes but the offer the realtor made
He said he would like to sell his property
was
very little
as
they
said it
was
not of
value
Chair
to do
Sorgenfrei closed the public hearing
something with the lot
Commissioner
adequate
Waage
to make
sure
He said he would like to
is concerned with the traffic issue
the
safety
issues
on
give
The text
Oak Park Road will be
Mr Dunn
changes
a
chance
seem
to be
respected
Commissioner Halldin moved to adopt Resolution no 02
0266 recommending City Council
of
Commissioner
the
amendments
seconded
the motion The motion
approval
Ehring
passed unanimously by voice
0
4
vote
City of Pismo
Beach
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
Beach CA 93449
4658
805 773
EnvironmentallnifialStudy
t00 Oak Park Road
0269
Project02
Modifled toreflectcommentsreceived
1
Project title Amendment
development of site
2
Lead agency name and address
City of Pismo Beach
of General Plan and 1998 Zoning Code
to
allow commercial
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
Beach CA
4684
93449
Contact person and
Judith
Lautner
phone
number
Associate Planner
4658
805 773
Project location
Address 100 Oak Park Road
plus portion of 110
s Parcel Number 005
Assessor
008 and
391
Oak Park Road
portion
of005
013
391
Project sponsor
sname and address
of
Pismo
Beach
City
Zoning General
Commercial CG and Open
Space OS
General
plan designation Open Space
Toucan Terrace Planning Area
Description of project
Change to the General
Plan Land Use Element map from
Open Space
to
Commercial
Change
CG
Zoning map from Open Space OS to General Commercial
portion of 110 Oak Park Road to allow a driveway
to the 1998
for
a
small
Surrounding land
uses
and
setting
The site is
adjacent
to the Oak Park
northbound onramp to Highway 0
which is just west ofthe site and to a vacant lot to
in
the
the east Development
surrounding area on the easterly side of Highway 101
includes two
shopping
Oak
Branch
Park
on
uphill on Oak Park Pacific Coast and one across
Mart center several office complexes restaurants churches
K
centers one
and other retail and service establishmems A
the
l0
weslerly
Other
side of the
highway rontm
public agencies
whose
an
and holel
are
thai is
lx
prnnar
residential
area
approval
immediately
restauranl
is
required
e
ls
rm
financin
on
Initial
Study iO0 Oak Park Road
approval or participation agreement
Page
2
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental
involving
factors
checked below would be
at least one
impact that
following pages
checklist on the
is
Aesthetics
X
a
potentially affected by this project
Potent Significant Impact as indicated by the
ally
Agriculture Resources
X
Air
Quality
Biological
Resources
Cultural Resources
Soils
Geology
Hazards
Hazardous
Hydrology
Quality
Land Use
Materials
Mineral Resources
Noise
Public Services
Recreation
Utilities
Service
Systems
Water
Population Housing
X
Mandatory Findings
DETERMINATION To be completed
by
Planning
Traffic
Transportation
of Significance
the Lead Agency
On the basis ofthis initial evaluation
I fred that the
proposed project
a NEGATIVE
X
COULD NOT have
DECLARATION will be
a
significant
effect
on
the environment and
prepared
1 find that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment
a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made
by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared
there will not be
I fred that the
proposed project
MAY have
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
1 find that the proposed
project
MAY have
significant
is required
a
effect
on
the environment and
an
potentially significant impact or potentially
environment but at least one effect 1 has been
significant
mitigated impact
in
document
in accordance with applicable legal standards and
adequately analyzed an earlier
2 has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
unless
on
a
the
attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required
but it must
analyze
only the effects that remain to be addressed
1 find that although the proposed
project could have a significant effect on the environment
potentially significant effects a have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and b have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier E1R or NEGATIVE DECLARATION including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project nothing further is required
because all
June 3 2005
20
06
5
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
Judith Lautner Associate Planner
Page
Date
3
Page
Study 100 Oak Park Road
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Initial
4
1
explanation is required for all answers except No lmpact answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources cited A No Impact answer is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one
involved e
g the project falls outside a fault rapture zone A No lmpact answer should be
g the project
specific factors as well as general standards e
explained when it is based on project
to
based
on
a
will not expose sensitive receptors
pollutants
specific screening analysis
project
2
All
A brief
answers
cumulative
must take account ofthe whole
as
well
level
project
as
action involved
indirect
as
well
as
including
direct
site as well
off
and construction
as
as
site
on
well
as
operational impacts
3
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant less than significant
appropriate if there is
or more Potentially
required
with mitigation or less than significant Potentially Significant impact is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant If there are one
Significant Impact
entries when the determination is
made
an
EIR is
4
Negative Decimation Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from Potentially Significant Impact
to a Less Than Significant Impact The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level mitigation measures
from Section XVIl Earlier Analyses may be cross
referenced
5
Earlier
6
Include references
analyses may be used where pursuant to the tiering program EIR or other CEQA process
Section
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration
discussion
the
should identify
following
D In this case a brief
3
c
15063
and state where they are available for review
Earlier
Used
Identify
Analysis
a
checklist were
b
Impacts Adequately Addressed Identify which effects from the above
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis
Mitigation Measures For effects that are Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
c
om
Incorporated describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refmed t
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site
specific conditions for the
project
prepared
or
information
outside document
sources
should
where
potential impacts Reference to a previously
appropriate include a reference to the page
for
Information Sources A source list should be attached and other
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion
7
Supporting
8
The
a
b
200
06
to
explanation of each
the significance
the mitigation
issue should
criteria
measure
sources
used
identify
if any used to evaluate each question and
identified if any to reduce the impact to less than significance
or
threshold
or
Initial
100 Oak Park Road
Study
P ge 5
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
L AESTHETICS
a
Have
a substantial
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Would the project
adverse effect
on a
scenic vista
scenic resources
b Substantially damage
including
X
X
but not limited to trees rock outcroppings and
historic buildings within view ofa state scenic
highway
c
Substantially degrade
quality
d Create
would
the existing visual character
ofthe site and its
a new source
or
X
light or glare that
nighttime views in the
X
surroundings
ofsubstantial
adversely affect day
or
area
change to lhe maps would enable some type of commercial development of the site
development is subject to architectural review which will assure that any proposal does
si0nificani impact on nearby scenic resources
Explanation
The
11 commercial
not have
a
Sources 1998 Zoning Code source
2
IIAGRICULTURE RESOURCES In
determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects lead agencies may refer to the California
Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model
1997 prepared by the California Dept ofConservation as an optional model to use in assessing
on
and
impacts
agriculture
farmland Would the project
a
Convert Prime Farmland
Unique Farmland
or
X
Farmland ofStatewide Importance Farmland as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping
and
Resources
Monitoring Program of the California
Agency to non
agricultural use
b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
a
use or
X
Williamson Act contract
c lnvolve other changes in the existing environment
which due to their location or nature could result in
conversion ofFarmland to non
agricultural use
X
Explanation
Sources Project description
Ill AIR
pollution
QUALITY Where available the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations Would the
projecl
a Conflict with
i
applicable
b
or obstruct implementation
quality
rplan
ai
Violate any air
bstantially IO
s
an
quality
standard
exist ng
or
o
ofthe
comribute
ecled
pr
a
it
qua
X
or
air
f
v
e
t
ac6
Ay
Initial
100 Oak Park Road
Study
P 9e 6
Potentially
Significant
lmpact
Sslles
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
violation
c Result
in
a
cumulatively
considerable
net
any criteria pollutant for which the project
attainment under an applicable federal
non
increase of
region
or
X
is
state
ambient air quality standard
emissions which exceed
ozone
including releasing
quantitative thresholds for
precursors
d Expose
sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant
X
concentrations
e
Create
objectionable
odors
affecting
a
substantial
X
number ofpeople
Explanation The project is the change of map designations The change would enable the property
owner to develop the property with a commercial project However no specific proposal has yet been
made The change to the map designation will not in itself have a significant impact on air quality
there is
potential for air contamination from naturally occurring asbestos Naturally occurring
asbestos has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant Serpentine
However
and ultramafic rocks
are common in the state and may contain this substance The State Air
Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure ATCM for Construction Grading Quarrying and
Sudace Mining Operations requires that a geologic evaluation be conducted prior to the start of any
grading activities to determine if any naturally occurring asbestos is present If the geological
required by the Building Code do not take this requirement into consideration asbestos may
exposed to the air thus creating air contamination
Conclusion
May
Recommended
to issuance of a
Sources
be
a
mitigation The developer
grading permit
Project description
of the site must be alerted to the ATCM
letter from Air Pollution Control Distdct
Would the
source 7
project
substantial adverse effect either
X
directly or
on any species identified
as a candidate sensitive or special status species in
local or regional plans policies or regulations or by
habitat modifications
the California Department ofFish and Game
or
S
U
I
Fish and Wildlife Service
b
Have
a
substantial adverse effect
on any riparian
community identified
in local or regional plans policies regulations or by the
Caiilbrnig Deparlmem of Fist anti Game o
habitat
or
be
significant
IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a Have
through
studies
X
other sensitive natural
i
requirement pdor
7
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
P ge 7
ues
I
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
No
Significant
Impact
Impact
and Wildlife Service
c Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act including but not limited to marsh
vernal pool coastal etc through direct removal
filling hydrological interruption or other means
d
X
Interfere
substantially with the movement of any
or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors or impede the use ofnative wildlife nursery
X
native resident
sites
e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance
f Conflict
with the
provisions of an adopted
X
Habitat
X
Conservation Plan Natural Community Conservation
Plan or other approved local regional or state habitat
conservation
plan
Explanation The project is the change to the map designations
application for development to be submitted
for the site The
changes
would
permit
an
The site contains
impact
on
a
hill and is
large
the wildlife that
heavily vegetated
near a
enjoy
now
these
area
Development
may have
a
significant
resources
Conclusion May be signhScant
Recommended
The
Mitigation
policies in the Toucan Terrace planning area shall include a policy saying
require environmental review with focus on biological impacts
any
development
site will
Sources
Project description
V CULTURAL RESOURCES
a Cause
a
substantial adverse
significance
ora historical
site visit
Would the
change
resource as
project
in the
X
defined in
57
15064
b Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
57
15064
c Directly or indirectly destroy
I paleontological resource or site
X
to
I
a
umqu
or
unique geoiog
of this
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
P ge 8
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
feature
Disturb any human remains
outside of formal cemeteries
d
including
those interred
X
There may be significant cultural resources on the site not visible at this time A phase 1
cultural resources assessment will be required to be conducted before any development can take
place here because the site is within an archaeologically sensitive area That assessment will result in
Explanation
a
recommendation for the
archaeological finds
The assessment and
development
which ensures that no
significant damage
up
follow
must follow state law on
will be done to
significant
cultural
resources
Sources 1998 Zoning
Code figure
2
3
source 2 CEQA
Code 5020
1source
221084
1 5024
1 21083
VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the
a Expose people
potential
or
structures to
iRupture of a known earthquake fault
the most
on
Zoning Map
or
based
on
recent
issued
as
Guidelines
source 5
Public Resources
3
project
substantial adverse effects
including
delineated
Alquist Earthquake
Priolo
by the State Geologist for
the risk of loss
injury
or
X
Fault
the area
other substantial evidence ofa known
fault Refer to Division ofMines and
Geology Special
Publication 42
X
ii Strong seismic ground shaking
X
related ground failure including
iii Seismic
liquefaction
X
iv Landslides
b Result in substantial soil erosion
or
X
the loss of
topsoil
c
Be located on a
geologic unit or
or
that would become unstable
as a
X
soil that is unstable
result ofthe
site
potentially result in on or off
landslide lateral spreading subsidence liquefaction or
collapse
roject
and
expansive soil as defined in Table
B ofthe Uniform Building Code 1994 creating
I
substantial risks to life or property
d
Be located on
X
18
X
e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use
of septic tanks
systems where
or
alternative waste water
sewers are not
disposal
l
available for the disposal
8
death
involving
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
Issues
Less Than
Potentially
Significant
Significant with
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
A soils and
Explanation
Page
I
t
9
No
Impact
geology report has not been completed for this site Therefore the specific
nature of the soils is unknown Such
reports will be required at the time of building permit application or
before Any development of the site will be required to include
mitigation to limit damage from any of the
above geological conditions that are present on the site State and local
building codes require
construction to address soils and geological hazards to limit
potential damage to a level below
significant
Sources Building Code City of Pismo Beach 4
VH HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the
a Create
a
significant hazard to the public or the
through the routine transport use or
project
X
environment
disposal
ofhazardous materials
Create
b
significant hazard to the public or the
through reasonably foreseeable upset and
conditions involving the release ofhazardous
a
X
environment
accident
materials into the environment
c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
acutely hazardous materials substances or waste
within quarter
onemile of an
school
Be located on
d
a
existing
or
site which is included
or
X
proposed
on a
X
list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962
5
and as a result
would it
create a
significant
hazard
to
the public
or the
environment
e For a project located within an airport land use plan
or where such a plan has not been adopted within two
X
miles of a
the
or
0
public airport or public use airport would
projecl result in a safety hazard for people residing
working in the project
For
area
X
project within the vicinity of a private airstrip
would the project result in a safety hazard for
people
residing or working in the project area
a
g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency
evacuation plan
h Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving wildland fires including
wher wildlands
ere residences
wi
are
adjacenl
are
1o urbanlze a
eas o
intermixed with wiidiandsv
X
X
Initial
100 Oak
Study
k
Pa
Road
P ge 10
Potentially
Significant
Impact
ISSUe
Explanation The Commercial designation permits a
every possible use for this site Any project proposed
hazards
review
or
that involves the
Mitigation will
Sources CEQA
use
required for those
Guidelines source 5
effects that
standards
substantially
that there would be
a
with
net
planned
granted
uses
c Substantially
alter the existing
X
or
aquifer
volume or a
the
existing land
X
drainage pattern of
including through the alteration ofthe
of a stream
or
in
river
result in substantial erosion
a
manner that
siltation
or
would
on or
site
off
X
d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area including through the alteration ofthe
course of a stream or river or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoffin
would result in
e
Create
or
exceed the
drainage
sources
flooding
on or
capacity
or
of existing
provide
as
manner that
X
or
planned
stormwater
substantial additional
of polluted runoff
f Otherwise substantially degrade
g
a
site
off
contribute runoff
water which would
systems
environmental
for which permits have been
uses or
course
required to undergo
significant
considered
groundwater recharge such
deficit in
to a level which would not support
the site or area
are
X
g
lowering of the local groundwater table level e
existing nearby wells would
production rate of pre
drop
Impact
waste
or
b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies
interfere
No
Significant
Impact
Would the project
VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
a Violate any water quality
discharge requirements
Less Than
t
wide range of uses It isn
possible to evaluate
for the site that has the potential to create
of hazardous materials will be
be
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
water
housing within a 100
year flood hazard
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary
Place
Flood Insurance Rate Map
or
X
quality
X
area
or
other flood hazard
delineation map
X
Place within a year
lO0 flood hazard area structures
that would impede or redirect flood flows
h
iExpose people or structures to a significant risk
loss injury or death involving flooding including
I flooding
20
06
as a
X
of
I
resuh oflhe failure of a levee o dan
O
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
P
Isslle
Potentially
Significant
Impact
jInundation by seiche tsunami
or
9
11
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Significant
lmpact
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
X
mudflow
Explanation The map change will not create water quality effects Any project proposed for the site
will be required to undergo environmental review if it meets cdteria in the California
Environmental
Quality Act including if any negative effects are determined to be significant Mitigation is required for
any such effects to lessen the effect to a level below significant
Sources CEQA Guidelines source 5
IX LAND USE AND PLANNING
a Physically divide
an
Would the project
established community
X
b Conflict with any applicable land use plan policy or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project including but not limited to the general plan
specific plan local coastal program or zoning
ordinance adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect
X
c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
X
plan
or
natural
community
conservation
plan
The
use designation
Explanation
change in land
plan and zoning maps
X MINERAL RESOURCES
a Result in
Would the
is to correct
an
inconsistency
between the
general
project
X
the loss of availability of
a known mineral
would be ofvalue to the region and the
residents ofthe state
resource that
X
b Result in the loss ofavailability of a locally
mportant mineral resource recovery site delineated
a local general
plan specific plan or other land use
on
lan
Explanation No known mineral resource
change or development of the site
Sources General Plan technical
XL NOISE
a Exposure
in
excess
plan
or
exists in the
area
that would be affected
by
the land
appendix source 6
Would the project result in
of persons
to
or
generation ofnoise levels
t
X
of standards established in the local
noise ordinance
or
general
applicable standards of
other agencies
I
b Exposure of persons
I groundborne vibration
To o
or
generanon of excess
v
groundborne noise ievels
5
use
Initial
100 Oak Park Road
Study
P
g
e 12
Potentially
Significant
lmpact
Issues
c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the
project vicinity
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
mpact
Impact
X
above levels existing
without the project
d
A substantial temporary or
ambient noise levels
existing without
e
For
a
miles of a
the
airport land use plan
such a plan has not been adopted within two
public airport or public use airport would
project
or where
project
project
the
periodic increase in
in the project vicinity above levels
project
located within an
people residing or working
excessive noise levels7
expose
area to
X
in the
project within the vicinity of a private airstrip
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels
f
X
X
For a
Explanation Noise impacts will be considered in environmental review of any project
significant noise impacts will be required to be mitigated to a level below significant
Sources California Environmental Quality Act source 5
XII POPULATION AND HOUSING
or
other
the site
Any
Would the project
a Induce substantial population growth in an area
either directly for example by proposing new homes
and businesses or indirectly for example through
extension ofroads
on
X
infrastructure
X
b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere
X
c Displace substantial numbers of people
necessitating the construction replacement housing
elsewhere
Explanation The site is vacant and about two acres in area
Adequate infrastructure exists to serve development here
It is zoned for commercial
development
XIII PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities need for new or physically altered governmental facilities the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios response times or other performance
objectives
for any ofthe public services
Initial
100 Oak Park Road
Study
P
Potentially
Significant
Impact
i
SSUe
e
13
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Police
protection
X
Schools
X
Parks
Other
X
facilities
public
The site will accommodate
Explanation
mostly
commercial
have
significant impact on public
development
a commercial
This minor
expansion
development
in an area that
of commercial
development
already
is not
contains
expected
to
services However environmental review will be required of any
project on the site thai meets California Environmental Quality Act CEQA thresholds for such review
If any negative environmental effects are found to be
significant they will have to be mitigated to a level
a
below
significant
Sources CEQA
source 5
XIV RECREATION
X
a Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated
b
Does the
require
project
facilities that
might
X
include recreational facilities or
the construction or
have
expansion ofrecreational
adverse
an
physical
effect
on
the environment
specific development that may occur at the site is unknown at this time However
designated for commercial rather than residential use It is unlikely that any commercial
use will generate use of nearby parks or other recreational facilities If the site is developed with a
recreational facility then that facility
s effects on the environment will be evaluated If significant
will
be
mitigation
required
Sources CEQA source 5
Explanation
The
the site is to be
XV TRANSPORTATION
TRAFFIC
a
Cause
relation
an
to
Would the
project
increase in traffic that is substantial in
the
street system
existing
X
traffic load and
result in
i
e
a
capacity of the
substantial increase in
either the number ofvehicle
capacity
ratio
on
roads
or
trips the volume to
congestion at intersections
b Exceed either individually
cumulatively
ofservice standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
or highways
c
Resuil
m a
change
e an increase
eiJj
m
n air
lrafiSc
or
a
level
roads
afi pauerns mciudtnl
I
c
tevei5
p a chang
X
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
Pt
Potentially
Significant
Impact
S
158U
location that results in substantial
safety
f Result
in
g Conflict
supporting
turnouts
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
lncorpornted
Significant
Impact
Impact
risks
X
d Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature e
g sharp curves or dangerous intersections
or incompatible uses e
g farm equipment
e Result in inadequate
14
X
emergency access
X
inadequate parking capacity
X
with
adopted policies plans or programs
alternative transportation e
g bus
bicycle racks
Explanation
The site is
100 feet from
private
immediately adjacent
road
leading
to the northbound onramp for
Highway
101 It is about
from Oak Park Road to the Pacific Coast
Shopping Center OSH
dangerous situations Vehicles may try to
turn left into the site crossing three lanes including a turning lane of traffic Vehicles
heading west on
Oak Park heading for the onramp may not see vehicles slowing to enter the site Frequent trips into
and out of the site are likely to be hazardous and difficult to maneuver unless adequate design
changes can be made o the street
a
If the site has
access
from Oak Park Road it could lead to
It may be advisable to provide access from the private road that leads to the
alternative would eliminate any additional driveways on Oak Park Road
shopping
center This
The Califomia
Department of Transportation CalTrans notes that Section 504
3of the H
qhwa
160
meters
connection
within
of a State highway
qn
Des
h edition requires any driveway
ramp and local road intersection to obtain a Des
qn Exception from CalTrans CalTrans recommends
to
that this propertl gain access
Oak Park Road through another existing access rather than directly
from Oak Park Road added after comments received
Manual
Adequate traffic and circulation information is not available at this time to make a determination
the types of uses that may be accommodated at this site or the appropriate access
Conclusion
May
Recommended
be
about
significant
mitigation
The General Plan Land Use Element Toucan Terrace Planning Area shall be amended to say that
uses allowed and access locations may be restricted to protect the safety of drivers on Oak Park Road
A traffic and circulation
Sources Site
comments
study
description
must be
and
completed
before any
received
al Exceed wastewater treatment
of the site is
approved
location site visits letter from CalTrans source 8 added after
XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the vroiect
I
development
requiremenls
he I
ol
Initial
100 Oak Park Road
Study
P
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Than
Significant
lmpact
Less
15
No
Impact
Incorporated
applicable Regional
b Require
or
Water
Quality
Control Board
X
result in the construction ofnew water
wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of
existing facilities the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects
or
c Require
result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
or
facilities the construction of which could
significant
cause
environmental effects
d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources or are
new or
X
X
expanded entitlements needed
e Result in
a
termination by the
de
X
wastewater
provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
sprojected demand in addition to the
project
sexisting commitments
rovider
treatment
f Be served by
capacity
disposal
a landfill
with sufficient
to accommodate the
permitted
ssolid
project
X
waste
needs
g Comply with federal state and local
regulations related to solid waste
Explanation
The
s
City
statutes and
X
Wastewater Treatment
System is currently in the process of being upgraded
serve all development within the
improvements
complete
existing city limits The City
s
water supply is expected to
provide adequate water to development within the current city limits
according to the General Plan Contracts with local landfills assure that solid waste is handled
adequately and in accordance with state law
When
it will
are
Sources
XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGN
FICANCE
a Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality ofthe environment substantially reduce the
habitat ofa fish or wildlife species cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels
threaten to eliminate
reduce the number
a
plant
or
animal
community
restrict the range of a rare or
animal or eliminate important
or
endangered plant or
examples ofthe major periods ofCalifornia history or
prehistory
i b Does the
prqiecl have n
lpacIs lha are indMdual
3
limited bul cumulalivelx considerable Cumulalivelv
X
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
P
Potentially
Significant
tle
t
Impa
considerable
project
are
means
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
that the incremental effects ora
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past
projects
projects
current
c
projects
the effects ofother
and the effects of probable future
X
Does the project have environmental effects that will
cause
substantial adverse effects
either
directly
or
Explanation
proposed
2
06
O0
16
on
human
beings
indirectly
Effects of specific
development
will be evaluated at the time such
development
is
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
Page
17
SOURCES
1
General
3
Archaeological
Plan City of Pismo Beach adopted 1992
2 Zoning Ordinance City of Pismo Beach adopted 1998
codes State CEQA Guidelines Public Resources Code 5020
1 5024
1
1
221084
21083
4
Building
5
California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines
Resources Code Division 13
amended Jan 1 2003 and Guidelines for Implementation the California Environmental
Act sec 15000 et seq as amended Jan 1 2003
6
7
8
Code UBC
4
3309
Sect 1802
public
as
Quality
General Plan Technical
Appendix City of Pismo Beach 1992
Letter from Air Pollution Control district County of San Luis
Obispo dated May 20 2003
Available in project file
Letter from California Department of Transportation James
Kilmer dated June 5 2003 Available
in project file
MITIGATION MEASURES
Number
Measure
1
Measure The
issuance of a
Monitoring
The
developer of the
grading permit
site must be alerted to the ATCM
requirement prior to
Notice of this
requirement
requirement shall be given to the current owner of the property
shall also be noted in the Pismo Beach Land Use inventory database
program in the research section
Responsible Project Planner City
of Pismo Beach
Note This has been done
2
Measure The
development
3
policies
in the Toucan Terrace
of this site will
require
planning
area
environmental review
shall include
with focus on
policy saying any
biological impacts
a
Monitoring The map amendment description will be expanded to include an amendment to
the Land Use Element text Responsible Project Planner City of Pismo Beach
Measure The General Plan Land Use Element Toucan Terrace Planning Area shall be
amended to say that uses allowed and access locations may be restricted to protect the
safety of drivers on Oak Park Road A traffic and circulation study must be completed before
any
development
of the site is
approved
Monitoring The map amendment description will be expanded to include an amendment to
the Land Use Element text Responsible Project Planner City of Pismo Beach
061200 i
Initial
Study
100 Oak Park Road
Summary of
Page
comments received
Written comments
are
in
project
Date
Agency
21
5
03
SLO APCD
or
on
initial
18
study
file
person
Comments
Response
occurring
Naturally
asbestos may
at the site The geologist must
Comment rec
dprior to
occur
completion
look for it and if found must follow
of state law
requirements
inform
of IS
owner
of
mitigation is
requirement
to
include in database As of June
30 2003 both actions have been
taken
06
6
03
CaITrans
Section
3
504
of the
Highway
information was added to
explanation portion of the
This
preliminary
Design
Manual says any dw
connection within 160 m of a state
the
03
7
highway
ramp and local road
intersection requires exception from
transportation and circulation
impacts Mitigation remains the
CalTrans Development project should
same
on
initial
study
gain
access
through existing
in
suggested
above evaluation of
access as
project description
Department reserves the right to review
development plans possibly
requiring a traffic study to gauge
impacts on the state highway system
future
20
6
03
Richard Dunn
Telephone call said asbestos
property
occurrence
owner
highly unlikely
monitor wanted option to
driveway on Oak Park
no
Asbestos
need to
have
for
Mitigation proposed
asbestos
possible
occurrence
is
to inform
property owner of
potential and of requirement for
geological evaluation and to
place asbestos information into
portion of City land
inventory This has been
done Geologist will be required
to assess rocks for possible
asbestos when a specific project
is proposed Mitigation measure
not changed
Oak Park driveway Cai Trans
exception permit is required to
allow a driveway on Oak Park
research
use
Mr Dunn may request such
exception Mitigation
an
measure
not
changed
6123103
26
6
03
Army Corps of
Engineers Lisa
Corps unable to evaluate site at this
time Corps permit may be required
Mangione
depending
Engineering
Division City
Comments included
Pismo Beach
of
on
circumstances
A copy of possible permit
requirement will be forwarded to
property
owner as
information
anticipated
conditions
site
not
on any development of the
summarized here
Traffic and circulation Traffic study
Mitigation
measure
y reqL
3 addresses
Initial Stud
100 Oak Park Road
e 19
Pa
proposed projects
within the
city and
is proposed
affected
areas If access
from Oak Park Road an inter
governmental
traffic review will be
required
Drainage detention required for
development
03
07
SLOCOG
Worthley
James
runoff
No formal comments
been identified as
Ride lot location
a
Property has
possible
Park and
No response
required
PISMO BEACH COUNCIl AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT
101 INDIO BRUCE
MCFARLAN APPELLANTi
AUGUST 12 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT NO 03
0125 APPEAL OF THE
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH UPHOLDING A
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT
PROJECT NO
0125
03
101 INDIO
RECOMMENDATION
By motion adopt resolution upholding Planning Commission
issued Coastal
Permit with additional conditions
Development
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On
August 12 2003
the Pismo Beach
0125 for
Permit 03
blufftop
blufftop
lot
Planning Commission approved Coastal Development
family residence at 101 Indio a
single
an 841 square foot addition to a
All additions to the existing building were
setback of 27
the front of the
house
feet
as
recommended
not at the
rear
by
of the lot
does not include any work to the seawall
or to
a
required to meet the minimum 100
year
geologist The entire addition is proposed at
adjacent to the bluff top The approved project
adjacent to the existing seawall
the stairs
Bruce McFarlan
s
August 26 2003 appeal of the Planning Commission decision
states
that
This
841 square foot addition should not move forward till the
3
rebuilt private beach stairs be removed As to the City
Coastal
s LCP
attachment
illegal newly
Plan that states
Local
that
private beach stairs
be built and that the ones now on the beach not be re
built or
remodeled The stairs must go for this
to
move
forward
There
is
also
the
issue of
project
illegal gunnite on the bluff face of this property and on the beach and tide pools This also
must be removed These tide pools are
under the LCP and areas
no
Attachment A
protected
provides additional discussion and an analysis
of the
specific plan
appellant statements
s
FISCAL IMPACT
None
OPTIONS
Options for Council action include
1 Uphold the PC determination and deny the
appeal
2
Uphold the appeal and overturn the PC determination
ATTACHMENTS A
Background
and
analysis
of
appeal
Resolution
2
3
4
upholding Planning Commission determination
Planning Commission minutes of 03
12
8
letter
to
Appeal
City Council
101 Indio Planning Commission report
Draft
Agenda
Item
5B
J
Plans
6
7
8
101
0125
Indio Project 01
Photographs of bluff face and stairs
April 19 1999 letter from city staff to the
Frederick Glick letter of May 18 1999
Guilds
Planning Manager
Prepared by Carolyn Johnson
Michael Gruver
Assistant Planner
Meeting
date
September 16
2003
Attachment A
Backqround
property owner at 101 Indio from
attachment 7 The letter stated
Angelo in April 19 1999
A letter
was sent to
that
indicating
the
repairs
had been
performed
in
approximately
one
a
of the
citizen
s planners Mark
City
complaint
1998 to the
stairway
was
that
received
provides
beach access from the area of your lot on the bluff to the beach below The referenced letter
directed the property owners to remove the stairway based on General Plan
Local Coastal
Plan
11 which states No new public or private beach stairways shall be
A
Policy LU
stairways are damaged or destroyed they shall not be repaired or replaced
allowed
If existing
The
stairway in question is constructed of wood and traverses the bluff face to a landing
15 feet above
adjacent to a seawall The landing for the wood stairway ends approximately 10
the beach see photos of the stairway attachment 6 and does not extend to the beach rather
to a landing area part way down the bluff
Following the transmittal of the city letter to the
applicant the Interim Community Development Director directed that no action was to be taken
by the City at that time as the wooden stairway did not extend to the beach thus not qualifying
as a beach stairway The new directive was relayed by the attorney for the property owners
Mr Frederick Glick who memorialized the city
s position in a letter to the City dated May 18
would
not
take
action
on removal of the stairway adjacent to the
1999 verifying the City
seawall attachment 8
Appeal
Mr
Bruce McFarlan
s
August 26 2003 appeal alleges there had been an illegal and newly
stairs and gunnite added in the summer of 1999 Mr McFarlan asserts
rebuilt beach
access
the stairs and
gunnite should be
and Donna
Guild
removed from the bluff face before the
should be allowed to
move
ahead with
Project
homeowners
Thomas
0125 to add the 841 s
03
f
addition to the front of the house
Analysis of appeal
The
sassertions
appealant
raise two
questions
1 Was the 1999 determination to exclude the repair of the
15 feet above the beach correct
landing 10
wooden stairs
leading
to the
11 which states
A
Community Development director examined Policy LU
No new public or private beach stairways shall be allowed
If existing stairways are
or
shall
not
or
be
damaged
destroyed they
repaired
replaced bold added While a written
memo or letter has not been located explaining his logic in allowing the stairway repair to
s recollection he determined the stairs in question were not
remain to the best of staff
considered a beach stairway as they did not traverse to the beach rather they ended at a
15 feet above the beach This determination excluded
landing adjacent to the seawall and 10
from
the
of
11 as it was not considered a beach stairway
A
LU
the stairway
requirements
In
1999
the Interim
Agenda
Item
5B
Staff comment In and of itself the stairway to the
should not be considered a beach stairway
Was the
2
stainNay
on
the sand
leading
landing
from the
does not end
landing
on
the beach and
to the beach
repaired
and
should it be removed
sdetermination only referenced a
planner preceding the Interim Director
15 feet above the beach no gunnite was
stairway again the stairway leads to a landing 10
s
It
on
a
second
set of stairs to access the beach
mentioned below the wooden stairway
unknown if or when gunnite was applied to the stairs leading from the landing to the beach
The application of gunnite in and of itself for repair and maintenance purposes is not a project
which requires a Coastal Development Permit pursuant to Public Resources Code Division 20
the California Coastal Act Section 30610
11 prohibits repair of
A
d However Policy LU
private beach stairways thus the stairway from the landing to the beach canhot in the future
be repaired
The letter from
a
staff
Staff comment The project in question can be conditioned to specify that no future repair and
maintenance may occur on the gunnitted stairs to the beach from the landing in compliance
11 Requiring removal of these stairs with no substantiation of if or when they
A
with Policy LU
were
repaired
in the
past is
not advised
Staff recommendation
following is recommended
Council uphold the Planning Commission
The
decision to approve the Coastal
with the addition of Conditions B11 and B12 which would read as follows
Development
Permit
private beach stairway located
at the
Bll
No
repair
or maintenance shall be
and
base of the wooden stairs
adjacent
permitted
on
the
to the seawall
B12
These conditions shall be recorded
against
the
property prior
to issuance of a
Agenda
Item
5B
building permit
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO 03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH UPHOLDING A
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO
Thomas
WHEREAS
addition to
a
single family
the
WHEREAS
Zoning Code
the
Donna Guild
residence
opportunity to
Applicants submitted plans
blufftop lot at 101 Indio and
be
for
841
a
square foot
on a
held
Planning Commission
section 17
020 on
54
0125
03
PERMIT
101 INDIO
duly
a
August 12 2003
noticed
public hearing consistent with
were given
heard and
WHEREAS Planning Commission authorized the Coastal Development
the 1992 City of Pismo Beach General Plan and 1983 Zoning Code and
Permit consistent with
WHEREAS Bruce McFarlan Appellant appealed the Planning Commission
s decision
Coastal
development permit approval
WHEREAS
the
appeal
on
September 16 2003
The
August 12 2003
the
NOW THEREFORE
California
on
as
City Council held a duly notice public hearing
were given the opportunity to be heard
BE IT RESOLVED
by
the
City
on
the
and
Council of the
City
of Pismo
to hear
Beach
follows
hereby upholds the action by the Planning Commission authorizing
project
approving the Coastal Development Permit subject to all of the
conditions of the original Planning Commission Permit No 03
0125 which are attached hereto
as Exhibit lA as approved August 16 2003 with the addition of conditions B11 and B12 which
City
approval
are as
Council does
of the
and
follows
Bl1 No
repair
or maintenance shall be
and
located at the base of the wooden stairs
permitted
on
the
private
beach
stairway
to the seawall
adjacent
B12 These conditions shall be recorded
against the property prior
to issuance of a
building permit
Further the City Council does hereby deny the appeal and
Permit and Architectural Review Permit
the
subject
approve the Coastal Development
to the Conditions of Permit No 0125
03 and
following findings
1
The
request complies with
all
Zoning Code provisions applicable
to the
proposed
use
2
The
proposed
use
with all of the
complies
3 The proposed
use
4
of the
The
approval
the California
is
permitted
within the Low
applicable provisions
of the
Density Residential R
lzone and
Code
Zoning
is consistent with the General Plan
Local Coastal Plan
Zoning
Environmental
Clearance for the
Quality
Act
CEQA
proposed project
is in
compliance
with
the
Councilmember
the foregoing Resolution is hereby
2003 by the following role call vote to wit
MOTION
UPON
August
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
Mayor
operating characteristics of the proposed
in
existing and anticipated future land uses the vicinity
The location and
5
use are
by Councilmember
adopted the 16th day of
seconded
of
approved
and
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
Benito J Crescione
ATTEST
Lori
compatible with
Grigsby City Clerk
City of Pismo Beach
Commission Minutes
i M
Planning
2003
Tuesday August 12
Page 2
lA
801 DolliveG
Coastal
Donna
Guzman Applicant
0133 no oral
03
No
Proiect
Permit and Architectural Review for the addition of
Development
buildings
enclosure between two existing
Zone ofthe Downtown Core
Commercial C
l
breezeway
the
on
Planning
same
report
60 square foot
a
The site is in the
parcel
032
121
Area APN 005
Chair
Sorgenfrei presented Agenda item lA The staff report
no 03
0133 approving the project as submitted
adopt
recommends the Commission
Resolution
Commissioner
handicapped
Chair
said
Ehring
the
should
project description
also
include
Sorgenfrei opened the public hearing
standards He
provided
submitted
vote
lB
101
the Commission with
closed the public
Sorgenfrei
Commissioner
voice
moved
Waage
to
Indio
Thomas
Development
residence
adopt
Resolution
Donna
Commissioner
report there is
on a
move
The motion
Guild Applicants Proiect No
bluff lot
top
Planning Area
the
project as
passed unanimously by
Ehring
no
0125 no oral
03
report
recommended
HOA in that
Sorgenfrei opened
the
an
APN 010
007
205
Item lB
approving the
project
striking
The staff report recommends the Commission
conditioned
as
out Condition 5
on
10 of the staff
page lB
area
Commissioner Halldin asked the
Bruce
handicapped
public file
841 square foot addition to an
The site is located in the Low Density Residential R
l
Sorgenfrei presented Agenda
agreement
013 approving
03
no
Permit and Architectural Review for
Resolution 03
0125
Applicant
to
copy is included in the
heating
Zone of the Sunset Palisades
Chair
a
the shoe store
0
5
existing
adopt
a handout
Commissioner Carson seconded the motion
Coastal
Chair
a
bathroom
s expanding
Applicant Representative Gary Miamotto Architect said he
s putting a hallway between two buildings and bringing the bathroom up
He
Chair
remodel of
if they read the conditions and agree with them
applicants
public hearing
Donna Guild said she agrees with the conditions and noted she has the easement
9
required by Condition B3 on page lB
McFarlan
331 Park Ave Pismo
forward until the
stairway leading
Beach CA
to
said the
the beach is
project
tom out
should not be allowed to
He filed
a
complaint
several
City ofPismo
Beach
Commission Minutes
Planning
Tuesday August 12
2003
Page 3
years ago when the
replace
a
beach
owners
access
built the
re
stairway
stairway
He said his
law does not allow you to
was never acted on
City
complaint
repair
nor
s
by staff responding to Mr McFarland
Staff
complaint also attached was a letter from Mr Glick an Attorney for the applicants
s
it
an
because
it
does
not
to
the
go
beach
determined the stairway is not a beach access stairway
There are 10 feet from the landing to the beach Because the stairs did not
access to a landing
go to the beach staffchose not to pursue abatement
Planning Manager
Johnson
presented
a
letter
9 Condition B3 Offer of Dedication
page lB
and asked how this is established He asked if the seawall falls within this area He agrees that
Commissioner
referenced staff
Ehring
report
the stairs do not go down to the beach
Johnson said the seawall falls within the offer of dedication The offer is
The offer is recorded but that does not mean the city or the Coastal Commission
Planning Manager
specific
accepted it
very
Commissioner
asked if the stairs Mr McFarlan
Ehring
spoke
of would
belong
to
public
a
agency
Planning Manager
Chair
Johnson said yes
Sorgenfrei closed
Commissioner
conditioned
voice vote
Ehring
the
public heating
moved to
adopt
Resolution
no
0125 approving
03
Commissioner ttalldin seconded the motion
The motion
the
passed by
project
as
unanimous
0
5
127
150 BeachcombeG Alan Little Applicantl Proiect No 03
Review
for construction of a
Architectural
Coastal Development Permit
Review Landscape
new 3
family residence including garage The site is located in the
796 square foot single
047
141
Planned Residential PR Zone of the South Palisades Planning Area APN 010
Item lC
presented
ofthe
approval
project
Planning Manager
recommends
Chair
Johnson
the staff
There
are no
outstanding
issues
Staff
Sorgenfrei opened the public heating
Applicant Representative Allen Little
conforms to the city regulations
Commissioner
a
report
Ehring
fireplace or barbeque
of Allen Little Custom
wanted to know if the structure
on
the
Homes
patio upstairs
said his
over
project
the garage
was
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
Beach
CA 93449
APPEAL OF A PLANNING
COMMISSION
DECISION
An
appeal of the City of Pismo Beach Planning Commission decision may be filed by
paying a fee set by the Pismo Beach City Council Appeals must be filed in the Offi
of the City Clerk within 10 working days of the
Planning Commission decision Appeals
of all permits for projects within the Coastal Appeal Zone nbe made at no
charge
See Section 17A21
250 of the Municipal Code for general information on appeals See
Section 17
180 for Coastal Permit Appeal information
130
124
Person
Filing Appeal
Print Name
Address
What
permits
List all
are
applicable
Date heard
Zip
State
City
Project
Parcel Number
Address
Project
Name
being appealed
case
s
number
by Planning Commission
Fee Paid
Z
c
3
0
Date
Date
Appeal Filed
Receipt No
Attach copy
CAUSE FOR APPEAL
reference any
Plan and
receipt
Please be specific attach additional sheets if necessary
inconsistency
Zoning Ordinance
i
of
with
specific city statutes
is available for
uARE
the General Local
Plan Coastal
review
Fec
J
TI
ADLO
LD
c
Appeal
of
S
A
a
Planning
FH
T
Page 2
Commission Decision
E
5 THAT
fT T
qcH
S
HE
S TA i
t
m
S F
o
foR
FcRu Q
R
I LL C
AL
BLUFF
c
F
s
Signature
ATTEST
Date
City Clerk
Definitions of permit initials
SD
CUP
Subdivision Tentative Map
Conditional Use Permit
Coastal Permit
AR
Architectural Review Permit
ED
Environmental Determination
V
Variance
City ofPismo Beach California
Planning Commission Agenda Report
I01
lndio
Thomas
Coastal
Development
existing
residence
Donna
Guild Applicants Project
No 03
0125
Permit and Architectural Review for
on a
top
bluff
Zone ofthe Sunset Palisades
RECOMMENDATION
lot
Planning
Adopt
an 841
square foot addition to an
The site is located in the Low Density Residential R
I
Area APN 010
007
205
Resolution
no
0125 approving
03
the
project
as
conditioned
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
existing residence at 101 Indio Drive is a bluffiop lot and the proposed 841 square foot
required to meet the 100
year bluff retreat rate setback estimated at 2 per year plus
ten 10 additional feet
Per the Geologic Bluff Study prepared for this lot the minimum
bluff
is
setback
to
be
27 All new permanent structures and improvements must meet
required
addition is
the minimum bluff setback
The
project
as
requirement
conditioned
will
comply with the policies
Zoning Code
and standards of the 1992 General
Local Coastal Plan and the 1983
Plan
Michael
Gruver Assistant Planner
by Carolyn Johnson Planning Manager
Approved by Randy Bloom Community Development
Prepared by
Meeting
Date
August 12
Reviewed
Director
Exhibits
LCP Overlay Zoning Issues Development
GP
Standards Chart
Resolution No 03
0125
Plans
AGENDA ITEM
2003
Exhibit 1
LCP Overlay Zoning Issues Development Standards
GP
0125 Address 101 Indio
Project No 03
APN 010
007 Planning Area Sunset Palisades
205
Chart
General Plan and Zoning Code Consistency Issues Charts
A GENERAL PLAN
LOCAL COASTAL PLAN
6
A
LU
Sunset Palisades an area
scattered vacant
with
of existing
homes
None
lots shall be
Low
Residential
Density
designated for
The emphasis is on maintaining coastal
views open space and protecting thee
The 841 square foot addition to the
istent with the
existing residence is con
existing neighborhood
bluffs and intertidal habitat area
nfill development shall be compatible with
coastal
the
existing community
7
A
LU
E1 Portal Drive ndio Drive
a
No structure shall exceed 15 in
None
height
None the
design
appears to meet these
6
design guidelines Structure will be 14
from high point and 18
4from center of
when
measured from the highest point of the site
natural grade to the highest point of the
building footprint
Nor shall any structure exceed
in height when measured from the
structure
25feet
highest point of the roof above the center of
the building footprint to the elevation of the
natural grade directly below that point
2
D
0
Driveway widths 12 minimum 16
maximum driveway width to allowfor
narrow
pedestrian
street
22
PR
on ocean
ont
fi
3
B
3
Condition B
to
PR Coastal Access Dedication For all
22
development on parcels located along the
a
lateral public
at
property
line No
requires the property owner
offer of dedication for a public
easement for the portion of the
make
access
property
parcels
shoreline
Existing driveway 13
changes are proposed
scale
Lateral Beach access dedication
II
A
LU
LU1
I
A
shall be required as a condition ofapproval
of discretionary permits
None
a
access
easement
perpetuity extendingfrom the Oceanside
parcel boundary to the top of the bluff shall
in
be required for the purpose ofallowing
public use and enjoyment of dry sandy and
rocky beaches intertidal and subtidal
an
from the
top ofthe bluff
mean
high tide
to the
B OVERLAY ZONES
Zone
Overlay
Nunther
Related
Issue
Conditions
i 7
069
Architectural Review
o lots
Development
bluffs shall
072
17
AR
abusing
None
coastal
is
subject to
by the Planning
Commission
Appeal CA
Coastal
project
al
architcctm
review
architectural review
require
None
None
None
Project
is
being
by
Project approvals within this zone can
be appealed to the Coastal Comnnssion
in limited circumstances All projects
Planning Cornnmssion Th6 Planffmg
within the CA
the Council approve the project its
action can be appealed to the
Commissions action may be
appealed to the City Council Should
reviewed by the
zone are
Commission
Planning
California Coastal
063
17
reviewed
Archaeology and Historic Sites A
Requires archaeological surface survey
None
No further
for all sites in this zone additional
or
mitigation
study
required
be
may
A Phase 1
changes
would
depending on results of survey
Commission
study has been completed
study is required If
are
needed the project
the Planning
return to
Commission
C Devele ment Standards Consistency Chart 101 Indio
1 Zone Sunset Palisades
R
Code Section
Required
Permitted
Item
000
5
sq fi min
060
102
17
Max bldg
25 above the center of the
height
footprint
building
grade 99
7515
high point 103
oflot
55
at
above the
010
102
17
site
Proposed
fromhigh
6
14
point
55
080
102
17
Allowed 3
4
0
08 sq ft
Must
not exceed
Area
floor
955 sf
2
Max
86 ofthe 1
Building
60 of the remainder
Area Ratio
6342 sf
max
Minimum
20
lot
2na
floor
frontyard
or
t
2700 s
f
of lot
135
105
17
and
area
18A
955 sq fi
2
170 sq fi
8
5
125
3
sq fl
10
maximum 20
existing
garage
020
102
17
required
030 f
108
17
new addi6un
38
Minimum
setback
20 for garage enlxances
the property line
Minimum
10 lot width
side
max
5
55
118
allowed
fronting
in this
10
f
1
030
108
17
existing
garage
on
case
5
yes
135
105
17
2322 4020
setback
garage
max
4
31
80 of the first
depth or
yes
center
4
18
Proposed
Max lot
Complies
f
400 s
9
030
102
17
yes
No existing
conforming
No existing
uon
conforrrdng
yes
yard
setback
blufflop
findings of a Geologic Bluff
Study 100 year retreat rate 10 the
ard setback
minimum
Minimum
Per
required
setback
040
102
17
27
0
existing
residence
No existing
35 new
conforming
addition
non
New addition
meets
27
setback
d
req
Min
parking
spaces
2 spaces both wilhin
a
garage
020
108
17
17b
030
108
2 spaces
yes
EXHIBIT 2
RESOLUTION NO 03
0125
Planning Commission
Approving Project No
A Resolution of the
Addition of 841 square feet to
101
WHEREAS
Thomas
Pismo Beach for
a
WHEREAS
the
an
City
of Pismo Beach
0125
03
existing single family residence on a blufftop
lot
007
205
APN 010
Indio
Applicants have submitted an application to the City of
Development and Architectural Review Permit for the for the addition
Donna Guild
Coastal
of 841 square feet to
an
of the
existing single
family
Planning
were
given
the
on a
blufftop lot
and
duly public heating
noticed
opportunity to be heard and
Commission held
which all interested persons
residence
a
on
August 12 2003
at
the California
Planning Commission determines that under the provisions of
family
Environmental Quality Act CEQA the addition of 841 square feet to an existing single
15303
lot
is
section
on
a
residence
exempted per
blufftop
WHEREAS
the
NOW THEREFORE BE IT
Beach California as follows
A
FINDINGS
ACT
CEQA
1
The
residence
2
REQUIRED
project consists
on a bluffiop lot
There
are no
environmental
impacts
residence
bluffiop
lot
a
by
the
Planning
Commission of the
City
BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
of the addition
site constraints
as
on a
RESOLVED
or
of 841
square feet
to
result of the addition of 841 square feet to
QUALITY
existing single
family
an
other factors that would create the
of Pismo
potential
an
for
significant
existing single
family
The addition of 841 square feet to an existing single
family residence on a blufftop lot is
exempt from CEQA in accordance with section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines exempting
3
limited numbers of small structures where all infrastructure is present
B
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PERMIT
1
recreation policies
project improvements comply with the public access and public
commencing with Section 30220 of the California Coastal Act of 1976
The
Chapter
3
family residence
with
the
adjacent structures
appropriate in size so as to be compatible
2
3
on a
bluffiop
of
lot is
an existing
appearance of the addition of 841 square feet to
residence on a blufftop lot is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood
with the visual quality and character of the
new
residence is
The architectural and
single
family
The proposed
surrounding area
general
compatible
and is
compatible
with the immediate
neighborhood
family residence on a blufftop lot is
consistent with the General Plan Local Coastal Plan and General Plan Land Use Plan category
4
of Low
Density Residential
The addition of 841 square feet to an existing singleZfamily residence on
compatible with the nearby existing uses and not detrimental to the health
5
comfort and
general
welfare of persons
residing
or
Working
in the
bluffiop lot is
safety morals
surrounding area of the
a
proposed project
family residence on a bluffiop lot
the
will not be detrimental to
orderly development of improvements in the surrounding area and
6
will not be detrimental to the
orderly
and harmonious
development
ofthe
City
family residence on
or
will not impair the desirability of investment
occupation in the neighborhood
7
The
Planning
Commission
does
Architectural Review Permit
hereby approve the Coastal Development
subject to the Conditions attached as Exhibit A
UPON MOTION of Commissioner
Resolution is
foregoing
following role
seconded
hereby approved
and
call vote to wit
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
Chairman
ATTEST
adopted
by
Commissioner
the 12th
day
of
a
blufftop
Permit
lot
and
the
August 2003 by the
EXHIBIT 2A
PERMIT NO
0125
03
CDP
ARP
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF August
007
205
101 Indio APN 010
The conditions
imposed
on
this
project
shall affect the title and
12
2003
possession
of the real
property
thereof All
any portion
made available to the
and
the terms covenants conditions
benefit of the owner applicant dbveloper his
applicant shall be binding upon and inure to the
successors and assigns Upon any sale division or lease
or her heirs administrators executors
to each portion of the real
of real property all the conditions of this permit shall apply separately
such
or possessor of any
and
portion shall succeed
property and the owner applicant developer
this permit
to and be bound by the obligations imposed on owner applicant developer by
that is the
subject
and shall
permit
of this
run
with the real
and restrictions herein
Subject
AUTHORIZATION
to the
conditions stated
property
or
imposed
below approval
of Permit
0125
03
family residence
permits for the addition of 841 square feet to an existing single
Beach stamp of August 12
as shown on the approved plans with City of Pismo
grants planning
on a blufftop lot
construction and
Approval is granted only for the
changes shall require approval of amendments
2003
to these
herein
permits by the City
to
conditions policies and selected code requirements applicable
are by this
adopted by the Planning Commission on August 12 2003
Standard
as
use as
stated
any
proposed
ofPismo Beach
a
family home
single
reference included
as
attached to this permit when signed
permit Such standard conditions will be
on Exhibit A ofthis permit The applicant
applicant Special project conditions are listed
conditions
and
conditions specific to the project
to comply with all City standard
conditions of this
by
the
agrees
shall become effective upon the passage of 20 days
Coastal Commission provided that
following the receipt of notice of this action by the California
within 10 working days or that an appeal has not
an
appeal has not been filed to the City Council
The filing of an appeal shall stay
been filed to the Coastal Commission within the above 20 days
EFFECTIVE
This
DATE
the effective date until
an
permit
action is taken
on
the
appeal
e building
applicant is granted two years for inauguration i
on August 12
will
this
The
expire
permits
permit
permits issued and construction begun of
are
extensions
date
Time
to
that
permitted
pursuant to Zoning
2005 unless inaugurated prior
EXPIRATION DATE
The
160 2
121
Code Section 17
ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT AND CONDITIONS The property owner and the applicant if
of receipt the permit is not
different shall sign these Conditions within ten 10 working days
valid until
signed by
the
property
owner
and
applicant
COMPLIANCE AGREEMenT I have read and
understood and I
comply with all
of
Pismo
Beach
and any other
State City
applicable requirements
governmental entity at the time of construction The duty of inquiry as to such requirements
shall be my responsibility I agree to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City its agents
officers and employees from any claim action or proceeding against the City as a result ofthe
action or inaction by the City or from any claim to attack set aside void or annul this approval
by the City of the project or my failure to comply with conditions of approval This agreement
of any law
shall be
binding
on all successors
I ItAVE READ AND
or
and
agency of the
assigns
UNDERSTOOD
AND I WILL COMPLY
WITH ALL ATTACHED STATED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT
Approved by
the
2003
Date
Applicant
Property
Planning Commission on August 12
Owner
Date
CONDITIONS
POLICIES AND SELECTED CODE
101
REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT
0125
03
Indio APN
007
205
010
FOR
basis of the
the
Conditions as indicated below have been deemed to be of a substantive nature
be
altered
without
conditions
cannot
Planning
decision These
s
Planning Commission
on
Commission
approval
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS
A
code requirements on file
Project shall comply with all standard conditions and selected
located
at 760 Mattie Road
Community Development Department Planning Division
at the
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
B
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
Building
Division
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TO
apply
for
building permits
submit five
5
COPIES OF THE CONDITIONS OF
the
APPROVAL NOTING HOW EACH CONDITION HAS BEEN SATISFIED to
Building Division
sets of construction
plans
ALONG WITH FIVE
5
Planning Division
COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL Prior to the issuance
building permit the Project Planner shall confirm that the construction plot plan
s approval and
building elevations are in compliance with the Planning Commission
these conditions Project shall comply with these standards
of a
APPROVED
ITEM
Lot Area
f
400 s
9
Building Height
4
18
6 from
center 14
Proposed
Building Floor
Lot
Area
Coverage
Front Setback
Garage
Setback
10
Side Yard Setback
Bluffiop Setback
Parking Spaces
35
Driveway
high point
1
118
f
3
1
25 s
f 31
955 s
2
4
35 new addition
7
Width
and
conforming
existing non
new addition
where 27
d
req
2 spaces
13 existing
OFFER OF DEDICATION The property owners shall offer to dedicate a public access
the top of the bluff
easement for the portion oflhe property from the mean high tide lo
Such
easement
Engineering
shall ll
escribed and illustrated in
and
a
format
table to the
acl
and shall be recorded
Planning Divisions
ENGINEERING DIVISION
4
All recorded
Provide
a
copy of the
Engineering
Drainage
drainage
easements shall be
shown
most
on
the
plans
as
stated in the current Title
s recorded
R
CC
recent
within
the
Report
County
to
the
Division
from the lot shall be collected and carried to the street or an approved public
system per the Soils Engineer recommendations No discharging un the bluff is
allowed
The
applicant
is
responsible
for
securing
Public
Utility signatures
for any
proposed utility
relocations
is
Applicant
required
location of the
to show the
lateral
existing
condition then applicant
lateral is in poor
for the installation ora
Applicant
is
required
new
lateral
to show the
location ofthe water lateral if
10
existing
proposed
water meter then
All
applicant
on
is
on
no
lateral exists
or
existing
for all costs materials and labor
the
the
plans The size of the existing lateral and
plans If existing lateral is inadequate for the
for all costs materials and labor for
responsible
water lateral Show size and
City Standard Engineering
If
location of the Water Main in the street and
existing
water meter shall be shown
new
is
the
plans
responsible
on
Show size and type o
all sewer lines
proposed
the installation ora
location of the Sewer Main in the street and
existing
if
sewer
Notes shall he placed
all water lines
type o
on
the
plans
ECBSlevhatioAncs
Z
0
Io
gA
pUl
l 0l
pP pl
l
uO
l
it
OlOlxll
ll
l
lO
I1
Attachment 6
Photos
of
stairway
at 101 Indio
City
of Pismo
Beach Planning Division
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
Beach CA 93449
Fax 805
4658
773
805
4684
773
COPY
19 1999
April
Thomas Guild
101 Indio Dr
Pismo
Beach
Subject
CA 93449
Citizen
complaint concerning repair
of beach
access
stairway
Dear Mr Guild
This letter is in response to a citizen complaint received by the City about repairs performed on the
stairway that provides b
3ch acces
s from the area of your lot on the bluff to the beach below Your
lot is located within the Sunset Palisades Planning Area of the City For blufftop lots within that
Local Coastal Plan policy LU A
s General Plan
11 states that No new
planning area the City
or
public
private beach stairways shall be allowed If existing stairways are damaged or destroyed
not be repaired or replaced It appears that your stairway was repaired
shall
they
approximately
year ago As this is in direct conflict with the above referenced policy the stairway must be
removed Please remove the stairway within 60 days of the date of this letter or the City will start
one
abatement
proceedings
If you have any
Your
in order to have it removed
questions regarding
cooperation
is
appreciated
Sincerely
Mark
9
Angel
Contract Planner
CJ
MA
cc
Larry Boyd Building Inspector
Carolyn Johnson City Planner
this matter
please
contact me at
7039
773
mcK K
o
F
May 18
GLICK
1999
MR MARK ANGELO
CONTRACT PLANNER
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
PLANNING DIVISION
760 MATTIE ROAD
PISMO BEACH CALIFORNIA 93449
Retaining
RE
Wall
101 Indio Drive Shell
Dear Mr
Beach
California
Angelo
message I received from your office wherein you
indicated that at this time the City ofPismo Beach has decided not to take any further action with
to the stairs to the retaining wall located at the property owned by Thomas Guild whose
This letter is to memorialize
a
telephone
regard
address is 101 Indio
Drive
Shell Beach Califomia In that
letter received from your office
wall are to be removed
April 19 1999
the
retaining
connection Mr
requesting
that certain
Please be advised that I have indicated to Mr Guild that he is to
and take
no
further action with respect
to
the
stairway
which is the
Very truly yours
pcs
FKG
cc
T Guild
stairways running
disregard the April
subject
Thank you for your time and attention in this matter
FRED K
Guild is to disregard the
GLICK ESQ
of said letter
down to
19th
letter
SUBJECT CITYWlDE
1 RESOLUTION APPROVING MINOR GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENTS AND
2 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE APPROVING MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE 1998
ZONING
CODE
TO
CORRECT
CLARIFY
ERRORS
WORDING
AND
MODIFY
STANDARDS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution
plan text and
1
adopting
03
2 Introduce Ordinance 03
text to correct errors
Planning Commission
the
Negative
Declaration and
amending
the
general
adopting the Negative Declaration and amending the zoning
clarify wording
and
modify
some
standards
as
recommended
by
the
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
Planning
Zoning Code
Commission initiated
a list of minor amendments to the General Plan and 1998
2003
Environmental review was completed and the Planning
27
May
Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the amendments on August 12 2003
The
address minor issues that have
changes
on
been in effect While these amendments
result
in
more
description
efficient
of the
are
up in the five years the 1998 code has
minor in nature the effect of their adoption will
come
project processing and better service
changes
is included in
Attachment
1
to the
public A complete
The actual text
changes
are
in
Attachment 2
FISCAL IMPACT
Many of the changes
and therefore result in better
projects
should
use
simplify review and processing
and Commission time
of small
of staff
OPTIONS
1
Deny
the amendments Staff and the Commission will continue to work with the limitations of
the code
2
Approve amendments
as
modified
by
the
City Council
The effects will
depend
on what is
modified
2 Continue discussion Direction should be
given
to staff
ATTACHMENTS
1 Description of amendments
4 Ordinance
2 Draft text
5 PC minutes
3 Res
6
changes
amending the general plan
amending the zoning map
May 27 and Aug 12 2003
Environmental Initial study
Prepared by Judith Lautner Planning Specialist
Reviewed by Carolyn Johnson Planning Manager
Meeting Date Sept 2
2003
Attachment 1
Description
The
following
list describes in
amendments
Attachment 2
of Amendments
greater detail the
attached Zoning and
020
08
Zoninq 17
General Plan
and Table 2
3
and
LCP Table LU
GP
3
Change
to allowable
density
The code
Table 3
2 says the Single
Family Low Density
to
four dwelling units per acre However the
RSL
permits from one
minimum lot size is 5
000 s
fwhich translates to over eight dwellings per acre The table says
the Medium
Density Residential RSM zone allows from 5 to 10 dwellings per acre which
translates to a maximum of one unit per 4356
of lot area The high
f
s
density zone RR
H
11
30
units
from
to
acre
permits
per
Residential
In the 1983
zone
code density is calculated
l
R
one unit per buildable lot
2 one unit per 2
R
f of lot
000 s
3R
R
4R
one
follows
as
area
unit per 1450 f
s of lot
area
These numbers translate to
8 units per acre if the lot is the minimum lot size of 5
l
R
000 s
f
21 units per acre
2
R
8
R
3
3
0units per
acre
The
density allowed for the Iow and medium
density zones should be changed to reflect
actual allowed net density based on allowable lot size and density levels reasonably consistent
with that allowed
by the 1983 code Parallel to the zoning code density change would be an
amendment to the General Plan
Local Coastal Program Table LU
3 which currently defines
Iow density as 1
4 units per acre medium density as 5
10 units to the acre and
high density
30 units to
as 11
the
acre
The recommendation is
Low
density 1
density
High density 16
Medium
8 units per acre
9 15 units per
acre
30 units per acre
030
08
17
Accessory buildings
RSM and RR
The allowed
uses
chad
zones but not in the RSI zone
permits accessory
Many homeowners
uses anti
structures
like to have
separate
n
the
Attachment 1
gardening sheds
Home
uses
occupation
density zone
accessory offices and other uses that are appropriate in a Iow
permits allow accessory uses in all residential zones Therefore accessory
and structures should be
permitted
in the RSL
zone
The chart has been modified to
reflect this recommendation
040
08
17
Clarification
conversion of
Clarification When there
serving
visitor
are
uses
conflicts between the
standards in the two tables
development
zoning the other on specific plans this section says the specific plan standard
proposed clarification says this includes any references to other sections of this
ordinance included in the zoning table Some standards are included by reference only in the
table the clarification will assure that these standards are also outweighed by specific plan
provisions should there be a conflict
one based
on
overrides The
Conversion Section 17
050 says that the conversion of visitor
08
serving lodging in the RR
zone to non
serving use requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit The
visitor
recommended change adds this
requirement
to the
zoning
chart
Tables 2
3 and 2
4
Clarification of
Changes
overlay
height measurement
in these tables
zones
apply
are
correction to notes
to the method of
References to setbacks
measuring height
required
and to correct where HL
for accessory structures
are
added
030
10
020 17
10
17
Correction Addition of single
family purpose clarification of applicability of standards
elimination
of 80 rule but retention of step
back requirement
Change to standards
10 includes
single The Residential Design Standards section Chapter 17
family
standards for both single
family and multi
family housing However as presently written the
section
addresses
only
multifamily development It appears that the chapter was
objectives
family standards were added
initially written only for multifamily development and single
section
was not changed
the
review
but
the
process
objectives
through
Addition of
changes include the addition of a paragraph and modifications to existing paragraphs in
family standards that follow
objectives section to provide justification for the single
The
the
single design standards apply to dwellings in the RSL RSM and RR
family
zoning districts and on all parcels with slopes greater than 15 percent except in the Pismo
Heights Planning Area emphasis added The wording is not clear and its intent is not
clear It seems clearer to state that the standards simply apply to dwellings in all residential
Clarification The
zone
end Item
A
f
Z
2
Attachment 1
The first standard is the 80 rule The Pismo Heights Planning Area was
originally exempted
from this standard and from all others in this section as well In the amendments the 80
has been
requirement
but the
eliminated
requirement
for upper level
backs has
step
been
retained
Tables
9
6 2
2
8 2
measurement clarification
Height
These tables have been modified
by wording
that clarifies the method for
measuring height
040
20
17
Exceptions
Change
to
height limits
to standards The current
regulations allow cupolas steeples and similar structures to
in
RR
and
nonresidential zones by up to 15 The regulations do not
height limits
such structures to exceed height limits in residential zones however The
change would
such structures limited to a diameter of six feet at their base to exceed residential
limits by up to five feet
exceed the
permit
permit
height
020 17
28
17
040
28
050
28
17
General Plan CO
10
Hillside Development
The
changes
would reduce the number of lots considered hillside lots
by
Changing the minimum hillside slope from 10 to 15
Exempting lots from hillside standards where the average lot slope is 15 or more but
where the portion of the lot that
s under the building footprint averages under 15 Staff has
consistently interpreted the regulations in this manner and would like to codify that
interpretation
The
requirement for a Conditional Use Permit
Development Permit or Coastal Development
review these permits
The
would be replaced by a requirement for a
Permit The Planning Commission would still
requirement for no greater than 40 reflectivity
Planning Commission approval of shades that
allow
The
that
prohibition against grading
are
fhese
already
changes
zoned for
are
inten of the hillside
is to
protect
on
slopes greater
development
intended to
reguiauons
simplify
for
building
may have
greater reflectivity values
than 30 would not
Hillside standards
and
colors would be modified to
clarify
the
would
review
apply
of course
to
existing
apply
process without
sacrificing
ne purpose of the standards a stated in section
views to and from hillsides to locate
development
lots
the
010
28
17
in the least sensitive areas
Attachment 1
family standards
to preserve significant natural features Single
of slope except that the 80
020 would continue to apply to all homes regardless
10
17
if retained would not apply to hillside lots
environmentally and
rule
Table 3
090
34
2 and section 17
Parking and driveways
2 amends the parking requirement for single
family dwellings The
change to table 3
for
f and larger The
property 2700 s
current regulation requires two spaces in a garage
f On lots 2700
lots larger than 2700 s
proposal would require two spaces both in a garage on
be in a garage This change is
f or smaller only one of the two spaces would be required to
s
Beach lots easier
expected to make development and redevelopment of many Shell
The
widths The
regulations specify minimum and maximum driveway
would allow the
Commission has frequently struggled with these maximums The change
for
or
accessibility reasons
safety
review authority to increase or decrease the width required
Driveway
width The current
three
not exceed
regulation requires that entrance and exit areas
street right
way except where the City Engineer
of
percent within the first 30 feet from the
density
It is impossible to meet this standard for much Iow
approves an alternate standard
alternatives
have
the
Rather
than
in
the
Engineer
approve
City
residential development
city
restrict
this
standard
to
commercial
the requirement to
every time the change would modify
and multifamily development
Driveway design
The current
030
42
17
Site
plan and architectural
review
This section needs clarification It is unclear
who can do this review The changes would
any new building or addition or
the modification to the exterior of
a
exactly when architectural review
require architectural review of
is
required
and
nonresidential structure
changes to the exterior of a nonresidential
at the staff level while new
structure that do not involve extra floor area could be approved
Commission review
buildings and additions in the remaining zones would require Planning
Development
in
density residential
Iow
zones
and
at the staff level
single family homes outside the Coastal Zone are approved
is
floor
area
no
new
added These
as are exterior changes to commercial structures when
1998 code
changes would codify these practices in the
At
present
most
Agenda
Item
Attachment I
62
17
Site coverage definition
The current definition defines site coverage as all area
vehicle use There are many lots in the city where the
limit
building development potential significantly
Occupied by
paving
structures and
coverage
While the intent to limit
paving for
requirement
area
would
devoted to
vehicle
use is admirable it appears that such a concern is better addressed more specifically
in another section of the ordinance or simply through architectural review The change would
eliminate the
paving as part of the calculation of site coverage The change would
the minimum landscaping requirements which would still be in effect
not affect
Attachment 2
1998
Zoning Code
Amendments
1992 General Plan
Minor Amendments
Contents
Excerpts from the
1998
and 1992 General Plan with draft
amendments as indicated below Each page is headed by an explanation of the purpose of the
changes shown on that page These pages are also to be included as exhibits to the resolution
Zoning Code
and ordinance
separated into two parts general plan amendments will
resolution zoning changes will be attached to the ordinance
Legend
Insertion
Deletion
light underlined italics
be attached to the
Attachment 2
Proposed Changes
to 1998
Zoning
Code
Purpose of change use density number that makes sense
translates to over eight residences per acre gross
020
08
17
Purposes
Minimum lot size of
f
5
0
00 s
of Residential Zoning Districts
The purposes of the individual residential
applied are as follows
zoning
districts and the
manner
in which
they
are
Density Residential District The RSL zoning district is
appropriate for neighborhoods of detached single family homes
Allowable densities range from 1
0 to 4 8
0 dwelling units per acre
This district is
intended for areas where site characteristics access and available public services and
utilities are suitable for single family development The RSL zoning district is consistent
Local Coastal
with the Low Density Residential land use classification of the General Plan
RSL
Family
Single
intended
for
Low
areas
Plan
Agend
Item
Attachment
Purpose of change To allow accessory
uses
and
buildings
030 Residential District Land Uses and Permit
08
17
in
2
family zones
single
Requirements
Table 2 identifies the uses of land allowed by this Zoning Code in each
sidential zoning
re
district and the land use permit required to establish each use in compliance with Section
040B Zoning District Regulations
06
17
Note
where the last column in the tables
number
the
See Standards
in the referenced section
regulations
Sections of this Zoning Code may also apply
apply
in
to the use
Section includes a Section
however provisions in other
TABLE 2
ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Excerpt
PERMIT REQUIREMENT BY DISTRICT
LAND USE
1
RSL
RSM
RR
See standards in
P
P
p
110
38
17
Section
RESIDENTIAL USES
Mobile homes
family dwellings
Multi
Residential accessory uses and structures
Rooming and boarding houses
p
P
P
120
38
17
P
150
38
17
CUP
KEY TO PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Symbol
P
MUP
CUP
Permit
Requirement
Zoning Clearance required 2 3
Minor Use Permit required 2 3
Conditional Use Permit required 2
Permitted
use
Use not allowed
Procedure is in Section
020
42
17
050
42
17
050
42
17
D
020
02
See 17
regarding
uses
not listed
Attachment 2
Purpose of changes
1 clarification of conflict
2 addition of
use
provision
permit requirement for
conversion of
serving
visitor
uses
to other
uses
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
PERMIT
LAND USE
1
REQUIREMENT BY
DISTRICT
See
standards
RSL
RSM
RR
in Section
P
P
P
150
38
17
CUP
050
08
17
RESIDENTIAL USES
Residential
Accessory
Uses and
Structures
SERVICE USES
COMMERCIAL
Con version of visitor
serving
serving use
visitor
q to non
qin
Iod
KEY TO PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Procedure
Symb
Permit
P
Permitted
use
Minor Use Permit required 2
CUP
Conditional Use Permit required 2
Residential District General
020
42
17
ZoninQ Clearance required 2 3
MUP
Use not allowed
040
08
17
is in
Requirement
050
42
17
3
050
42
17
See 17
020 D reaardina
02
uses
not
Development Standards
Subdivisions new land uses and structures and
or
alterations to existing
and structures shall be designed constructed and
established in compliance with the requirements in Table 2
3 in addition to the applicable
and
General
in
Article
I11
standards
Development Standards
Site Planning
General standards
Use of table
land
uses
Specific Plan areas Subdivisions new land uses and structures and
alterations to existing land uses and structures within an area subject to a Specific Plan
shall comply with the requirements in Table 2
4 in addition to the requirements of
3
Subsection A above In the event of any conflict between the requirements of Tables 2
and 2
feren c
sectlon of th
r
h
o
t
e
s pmcance th
ren
a
d I TaSte
o
4 ncludlng re
Standards within
the
requirements
of fable 2
4 shall control within the
apphcable Specific
Agenda
Item
Plan
ares
Attachment 2
Purpose of changes
further clarification of height measuremen correction to notes
change
to
density
allowed to be consistent with
existing densities
08
17
TABLE 2
3
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Continued
Requirement by Zoning District
RSL
Development
RSM
Feature
Maximum
1 to 4
density
8 units
9
to I
9
per acre
5 units per
acre
1
Setbacks
required
Minimum setbacks
setback
and
22 for
required See Chapter 17
allowed
measurement
projections into setbacks
exceptions
to
required setbacks
Parcels of 4
000 sq ft
Front
or
qer
lar
20 for all structures
Parcels of less than 4
000 sq
ft 20 of the
lot
with a minimum
Accessory
requirement
depth
of the
of 10 ft
structures 20 minimum
see
38 50
17
See Section 17
Afor second floor setback
040
10
requirements
See Section 17
4for
A
070
34
garage
setback
requirements
15 ft
Front blufftop lot
Accessory
10 ft
Rear
5 f
structures 20 minimum
on
parcels with
a
depth of
on
parcels with
a
depth
10 ft for accessory structures
Between
Floor
area
buildings
ratio
FAR
Height limit 3
see
17
150
38
70 ft or more
less than 70 ft
see 17
150
38
Accessory structures must be separated from any other
38 50
qs by at least six ft See Section 17
buildin
86 maximum for
0
72 maximum for
0
25 ft from site
parcels
of
700 sq
2
ft
or
less
700 sq
parcels larger than 2
ft
Trade
25 ff from site
grade
Pismo
and the
Heights
Motel Distnct
areas
ptannin9
fl
35
elsewhere
in the
Attachment 2
L
RR
Development
H
RR
Feature
Maximum
9 to 49
density
15 units per acre
44
1to 30 units
6
per acre
1
Floor
area
ratio
86 maximum for
0
700 sq
parcels of 2
ft or less
72 maximum for parcels larger than 2
0
700 sq
ft
FAR
Height limit 3
35 ft from site
qrade
Notes
1
Maximum number of
subdivision
or a
dwelling units
family project
multi
allowed per net buildable acre in a single
family
The actual number of units allowed is determined
See Section
through the subdivision or land use permit process as applicable
060 for maximum density requirements applicable to hotels and motels
38
17
2
3
Maximum percentage of site area that may be covered with structures
See the
definition of site coverage in Article VI Definitions
Maximum allowed height of structures except where a Height Limitation HL or View
overlay district applies Sections 17
040 and 17
18
060
18
respectively The HL overlay applies in the following planning areas established by
the General Plan
3 r Dinosaur Caves Freeway Foothills North
v
r
Motel
District Shell Beach Spyglass South Palisades and Ontario
Spyglass
20 Height Measurement and
See also Chapter 17
Sunset Palisades
Ridqe
Exceptions
4 See Section 17 IO 040
A
Considerations
V
Agenda
Item
Attachment
Purpose of change clarification of height measurement correction of note
TABLE 2
4
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Requirement by Specific Plan Area
Bay Cliff
Village
Development
Feature
Height
3
limit
Mattie
Pacific
Pismo
Road
Estates
Oaks
25 ft nd limited to 3 stories
above site
grade
25 ft from site
grade
Floors
above the first shall be
back up the hillside
reduce the appearance of
stepped
o
t
bulk
TABLE 2
4
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Requirement by Specific Plan
Continued
Area
Sunset
Development
Spyglass
Ridge
Feature
South
Palisades
Toucan
Palisades
Ontario
Terrace
Ridge
Height limit
25 ft from
15 ft from
3
site
grade
site
grade
and 3 stories
first
row of
Floors above
the first shall
structures
nearest bluff
be
top park
stepped
back up the
Below
hillside
nearest
25 ft from site
for
freeway lane
elevation for
structures
between Shell
Beach Road
and
freeway
25 ft
elsewhere
i
grade
2
Attachment 2
s
No
3
height of structures except where a Height Limitation HL or View
Considerations V overlay district applies Sections
040 and 17
18
17
060
18
HL
in
areas
The
the
established
overlay applies
following planning
by
respectively
Dinosaur Caves Freeway Foothills North
the General Plan
Spyglass Motel District Shell Beach Spyglass South Palisades and Ontado
20 Height Measurement and
See also Chapter 17
Sunset Palisades
Ridge
Exceptions
Maximum
allowed
Agenda
Item
Attachment 2
Purpose of changes
addition of single family to purpose sections
elimination of 80 rule but retention of step
back requirement
CHAPTER 17
10
020
10
17
The
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
Applicability
provisions
of this
Chapter apply
including condominiums requiring
to all
family
single
and
family residential projects
multi
Site Plan and Architectural
Review
in
compliance
With
Section 17
030
42
The review
projects
applicant
authority may exercise discretion in applying these standards to proposed
where the review authority determines that a design feature
proposed by the
as
alternative to these standards achieves
an
substantially
the same results
as
these standards
030
10
17
Objectives
family residential development can
Single
neighborhoods
specific means
to create
The
objectives
larqe boxy structures that do not fit into existin
followinq sinqle
qn standards are to provide
family deS
walls to prevent the appearance of top
heavy buildings and
to articulate visible
neiqhborhood residences
fdendl
Because
mean
of the
that do not overwhelm the street
of their
residential
higher densities family
multi residential projects differ from single
family
to
projects by tending
generate large parking areas a decrease in private open
space and
like
large box
structures
If not
propedy designed parking facilities
can
dominate the
site and open spaces may be relegated to left over areas not related to the dwelling units or the
people who live there Residential developments with unarticulated walls and roofs surrounded
by parking lots and rows of carports along public streets are
of
that should
examples
practices
be avoided
The
objectives of these foflowing multifamily design standards are to provide potential solutions
to the problems that are often inherent in higher density residential
developments through proper
site planning parking circulation building
design and landscaping
040
10
17
Family Dwelling Design
Single
Standards
The
or
design and development standards of this Section shall apply to the construction alteration
enlargement of single
family dwellings in the RSL RSM and RR zoning districts c
d c
q ali
Second floor massin9
planes extending
planes the
wall
in
heigh
1o avoid
tot two
or
boxy
more
structures
that have unrelieved exterior wall
stories nd to
promote
vertical articulation of
Attachment
ejress
from the
be set back
second floor living area shall
much as determined by
sides of the house as
floor building footprint on the street
the second floor
the Shell Beach Planning Area
authority to be feasible Within
3f 3rfloor
fio
ground
2
the review
setback shall
The
house
be located at the front of the
Agenda
Item
Attachment 2
TABLE 2
6
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Requirement by
Zoning District
CRS
CG
CS
25ft fromsite
35ft fromsite
25ft fromsite
grade
grade
Development
Feature
Height limit 1
grade
TABLE 2
8
SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
OS
Development
PF
Feature
Height
limit
Maximum allowed
height of structures except where a
HL or View Considerations V overlay
district applies Sections 17
18040 and 17
18 060
also
See
20
17
respectively
Chapter
Height
Height Limitation
Measurement and
Residences
15 ft from site
Other
Exceptions
grade
A
N
A
N
25 ft from site
grade
structures
TABLE 2
9
HEIGHT LIMITATION OVERLAY DISTRICT STANDARDS
Height
1
HL
Limitation District
Sunset Palisades
Pismo Heights St
Andrews
I
Height
Limit
25 ft from site
qrede e and
point of natural grade
15 ft from the
highest
Tract
4 Dinosaur
HL
Caves
25 ft from site
height of the
Highway
adjacent to the
buildable frontage along Shell Beach Road and up
qrade
or
up to
southbound lane of
101
to 98
0 ft above sea level for the North Dinosaur
Cave
planning
area
and 1180 fl above sea level
for the South Dinosaur Cay6
5 Freeway
HL
Foothills
25 ft
or 3
planning
ares
stories above site
i
grade
Attachment 2
whichever is less and structures shall not detract
from views of coastal landforms
6 Shell
HL
Beach
25 ff from site
grade and
not to appear to be
than 2 stories from the exterior
Agenda
Item
more
Attachment
Purpose
of
change
to
permit cupolas towers and similar structures to exceed
by up to five feet
residential
height
040
20
17
Exceptions to Height Limits
The
height
limits
limits of this
2
Zoning
Code may be exceeded
residential and RR districts
Non
as
follows
Uninhabited structures
including chimneys cupolas
domes elevator housings flag poles spires steeples towers water tanks and similar
structures may exceed the height limits of the applicable zoning district by a maximum of
15 percent subject to Site Plan and Architectural Review or where
applicable to the
pdmary structure Conditional Use Permit approval
Approval of increased height shall require that
height bulk and scale of the proposed structure
the review
is
authority determine that the
compatible with the adjacent area and
is consistent with view and other General Plan
LCP considerations
Residential districts other than RR
Chimneys television antennas cupolas towers
d solar collectors and similar structures not
3
exceeding a dimension of six feet at their
base may exceed the height limits of the applicable
zoning district by a maximum of five
feet
Attachment 2
Purpose of changes
change to hillside development applicability
15
or more
to
apply
to
development
on
sites of
rather than
under 15 in slope
exemption when the actual development area is
to 40
addition of wording allowing Planning Commission to permit exceptions
is
blue
that
light
reflectivity requirement and addition of light to clarify
prohibited but other blues may be allowed
lots with slope over 30
exemption to 30 prohibition for existing
addition of
28
CHAPTER 17
020
28
17
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
Applicability
on sites with a natural
requirements of this Chapter shall apply to development proposed
with a slope
5 percent or more or sites where proposed access will cross an area
1
slope of
to
family
existing single
of 1 5 percent or more except that these provisions shall not apply
the RSL
within
Pismo
within
the
Planning
Area
Heights
dwellings and accessory structures
to January 23 1981 nor shall these provisions apply
zoning district on parcels recorded prior
of the lot that would be
to lots where the average slope is 15 or more but where the portion
5
under the building footprint has an average slope of less than
The
030 Permit Requirements
28
17
41
Permit
t
Pcr
r
equired
i
r
l
n
f
l
i ID
1
li
I
Permit
Development Permit or a Coastal Development
to the issuance of Building or Grading
by the Planning Commission shall be required prior
that is subject to the provisions
Permits or Tentative Map approval for all development
Approval
of this
040
28
17
of
a
Chapter
Design Objectives
be visually
materials
Development on the hillsides shall
be dark natural
subordinated to the hills Colors used on buildings and structures shall
or as approved by the Planning
colors with a light reflective value of less than 40 percent
Building
colors
and
and light blue
not
allowed
Light colors including white cream
colored
glazed tile
lighter or more brilliant colors of red fired clay tile brightly
shall
Commission
shall the
reflective metal be used for roofs
possible
from
freeway
views
through
Development shall
the
use
be
nor
or
also be screened to the extent
of trees and other
landscaping materials
Agenda
Item
Attachment 2
050
28
17
Hillside Grading Standards
Development and
new
and
uses
proposed in hillside
areas
requirements
Grading
than 30
on
steep slopes prohibited
percent
ADOPTION1 with
This
No grading
comply with
shall be allowed on
the
following
slopes greater
apply to lots existinq as of DATE OF ORD
or qreater zoned for
development
shall not
provision
averaqe slopes of 30
shall
Attachment 2
Purpose
of
changes
in a garage
change parking requirement to require one parking space
f or smaller rather than on lots smaller than 2700 s
on lots 2700 s
to eliminate 3 requirement for residential driveways
to allow exceptions to driveway width requirement
to
one
out
TABLE 3
2
REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
Land Use Type
Residential Uses
Number of
Continued
Parking Spaces Required
2 spaces both within a garage on parcels ef
ft or Icrgcr one within a
qer than 2
lar
700 sq
family dwellings
Single
duplexes
garage
on
parcels
smaller Carports
ess th3n 2
700 sq
r
ff o
shall not be allowed for
family dwellings
single
090
34
17
Driveways
and Site Access
Driveways providing ingress and egress
constructed and maintained as follows
C
street
to off
parking spaces
shall
be
designed
Driveway width and length
1
requirements Driveways
4
specified by Table 3
width
Driveway
widths
shall be
designed
and constructed to the
TABLE 3
4
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH
Number of
Parking
Accessed
Spaces
by Driveway
Minimum Width
Maximum Width
8
2
12
0
16
0
14
9
16
0
18
0
15
18
0
24
1
0
Notes
1
The review
authority
may incrcccc
the maximum
modi
or
m
n
imum width
Agenda Item
Attachment 2
When
redevelopment
drivewavs
or
rehabilitation occurs existinp
shall be modified
or
eliminated to conform to these
standards
Driveway slope
commercial
Driveway and parking lot slopes shall
not exceed 20
ntrance and
development and mu
family development eE
ti
not exceed three
the
City
area
percent
exit
areas
For
shall
percent within the first 30 feet from the street right
way except Where
of
an
alternate
standard
that
Engineer may approve
provides an adequate landing
adjacent
to the sidewalk
Item
x
Attachment 2
Purpose of changes to change when architectural review is required and when it can
be at staff level required for all new floor area not required for internal remodels minor
changes to commercial buildings to be reviewed at staff level
030
42
17
Site Plan and Architectural Review
Purpose Site Plan and Architectural Review is required to review proposed site design
egress parking and loading
including the location of structures landscaping ingress
grading and architectural design for compliance with the standards in Article III Site
Planning and General Development Standards and the design guidelines established for
each land use category in Article II Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses
B
Applicability
Site Plan and Architectural Review
approval
is
required
for
1
permitted in Article
Zone Standards
Zoning Districts Allowable Land Uses and Specific
2
Thc
The construction of any
building
of
to site
Architectural
changes
planninq
Project review
Review propose
hearings are not
in all
modifications
in exterior
for any
use
Additions to
c
changes
3
new
zoning districts
to
materials
the
exterior
the addition
of
v
existing bufldinqs and
of nonresidential
or
changes
u
v
u
to
II
structures
awnings
or
including
etc
hearing When applications for Site Plan and Architectural
development in the RSL or RSM zoning districts public noticing or
required unless the project is within the CA Coastal Appeal zoning
notice and
district Modifications to the exterior of nonresidential
structures
if
no new
floor
area
is
may be reviewed by staff Public noticinq may be required for such changes at
the discretion of the Director The Director will review and determine if the application is
in compliance with site planning standards and land uses allowed Applications proposed
included
zoning districts are
subject to approval by the Planning Commission and a public hearing shall be set
58 Public
noticed and held by the Planning Commission in compliance with Chapter 17
Hearings
for
new
construction
or
d
c
se
tcnsificct additions in all other
i
c
Agenda
Item
Attachment
Purpose
building
of
changes
area not
CHAPTER 17
62
to
modify definition
of site
coverage
so
that
2
it includes only
paving
DEFINITIONS
Site coverage The percentage of total site area occupied
vehicqe
e
building coverage includes the
Structure
by structures
primary structure all accessory
structures e
g carports garages patio covers storage sheds trash dumpster
enclosures etc and architectural features e
g chimneys balconies decks above the
first floor porches stairs etc
building coverage is measured from exterior
Structure
wall to exterior wall
o
o
k
to
Site Coverage
Landscaped
area
Bmlding
l
In
i
coverage
I
ng
FIGURE 6
5
SITE COVERAGE
y
c
See
Figure
6 5
Attachment 2
General Plan
Purpose
of
change
to
on
clarify language
Permanent
10 Slopes Over 30
CO
changes
hillside
development prohibition
Open Space
over 30 except in the
buildings or grading shall be permitted on existing natural slopes
Pismo Heiqhts Planninq Area The areas over 30 shall be retained as permanent public or
private open space
No
width table reference to zoning ordinance for
Purpose of changes deletion of driveway
like this are not general and should
implementation of policies Specific requirements
be included in implementing ordinances not in the general plan
2
D
Building and
Site
Design
Criteria
Driveway Widths
scale Minimum
Driveway widths shall be kept narrow in order to retain a pedestrian street
r
n
Ordinance
the Zoning
maximum driveway widths shall be as set forth n
f
I
r
1
1
I
See also
14 Parking
Circulation Element C
Drivcw3y
28
9 4
16 0
15
8 O
Purpose of change
requirement
6 Hillside
D
to allow
some
exceptions
18 0
to the
building
coiot
reflectivity
Development
Agenda
Item
and
Attachment 2
Development
buildings and
40
Light
on
the hillsides should be
structures
visually subordinated to the hills Colors used
be dark natural colors with
on
shall
light reflective value of less than
where
colors
are
determined
except
liqhter
to be appropriate by the review authority
colors such as white cream and liqht blue
shall not normally be allowed nor shall the
lighter
or more
brilliant colors of red fired
be used for roofs
views
through
the
a
clay tile brightly colored glazed tile or reflective metal
Development shall also be screened to the extent possible from freeway
use of trees and
landscaping
Attachment 2
Purpose
of change to correct
density in
chart
2 Residential Uses
LU
d Densities
Permissible housing densities
are
established within three broad
categories
shown on Table
3
LU
Table LU
3
Housing Categories
Category
Low
Density
Medium
Density
High Density
and
Density
Density
8 units per ac
1 to 4
9 to 4015 units per ac
1416 to 30 units per
ac
Agenda
Item
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO 2003
A
OF
RESOLUTION
WORDING
Zoning
the Pismo Beach
code
WHEREAS
circulated
as
WHEREAS
on
CITY
TEXT
TO
COUNCIL
CORRECT
ADOPTING
ERRORS
MINOR
CLARIFY
Planning Commission
initiated amendments to the General Plan
environmental initial study and Negative Declaration were completed and
required by the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA and
an
the
opportunity
WHEREAS
BEACH
PLAN
May 27 2003 and
Planning
Commission held
and environmental documents
the
PISMO
GENERAL
AND MODIFY CERTAIN STANDARDS
WHEREAS
and
THE
THE
AMENDMENTS TO
to be
the
on
a
noticed public hearing on
duly
August 12 2003
the amendments
at which all interested persons were given
heard and
Planning
Commission recommended
of the
approval
proposed amendments
and
September 2 2003 at which
held
a
noticed
duly
public hearing
all interested persons
were
given
on
the
the amendments
opportunity
to be
on
heard
and
WHEREAS
the
City Council
study
and
proposed Negative
Declaration
NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED
by
the
City Council
as
follows
FINDINGS
1
The
2
The environmental
3
The text amendments
proposed changes consist of amendments
clarify wording and modify certain standards
study
is
are
a
full and
to the General Plan
complete informational
consistent with the
text
to correct errors
document
goals and policies of the General Plan
ACTION
The
City Council does hereby adopt the Negative Declaration attached as Exhibit A and
adopt the general plan amendments attached as Exhibit B Genera
an Changes
P
portion of
Attachment 2 above to be renamed Exhibit B
the
the
foregoing Resolution is hereby approved
following role call vote to wit
seconded
and
adopted
by Councilmember
the nd day of September
2003
by
Attachment 3
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
Mayor
Benito
Joseph Crescione
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
Attached
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Negative Declaration
text changes General Plan portion
of Attachment 2 to staff
report
Agenda
Item
Attachment 3
Exhibit
A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NUMBER
0117
03
APPLICANT
City Of Pismo
PROJECTION LOCATION
Citywide Pismo Beach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Amendments to the 1998
Beach
clarify provisions
CA 93449
Zoning Code and to the
changes to several
make minor
General Plan to correct errors
sections of the code and
General Plan
G
D
F
The
City
ofPismo Beach has reviewed the above
procedures
for
Environmental
X
The
project
in accordance with the City ofPismo Beach
srules and
ofthe California Environmental
implementation
lmpact Report EIR need
proposed project will not
Quality Act
and has determined that
an
not be prepared because
have
a
significant effect
on
the environment
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a
significant effect in this case because mitigation measures included in the environmental initial study and
hereby made a part of this Negative Declaration have been added to this project
The lnifial
Study that provides the basis for this determination is attached
4658
Community Development Department 805 773
A copy will be kept
on
file
at the
City
of Pismo Beach
DRAFT PREPARED BY
DATE
REVIEW
PERIOD
HEARING
DATE
Judith Laumer
June 6 2003
30
days
Associate Planner
tentative
August 12
Planning
Commission
2003
NOTICE
public is invited to comment on the Draft Negative Declaration during the review period The
appropriateness of the Draft Negative Declaration will be reconsidered in light of the comments received
The
Date adopted
YES X
By
NO INIT1AL STUDY REVISED
YES
X
NO
Attachment 4
ORDINANCE NO 0
03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING TEXT TO
CORRECT ERRORS CLARIFY WORDING AND MODIFY STANDARDS
CITYVVlDE
WHEREAS the Pismo Beach Planning Commission initiated amendments
Zoning code on May 27 2003 and
to the
General Plan and
WHEREAS an environmental initial study and Negative Declaration were completed
as required by the California Environmental
Quality Act CEQA and
and circulated
WHEREAS the Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on the
amendments and environmental documents on August 12 2003 at which all interested
persons
were
given
the
the
WHEREAS
amendments and
opportunity
to be
heard
Planning Commission
and
recommended
approval
of the
proposed
WHEREAS the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing on the amendments on
September 2 2003 at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard
and
Negative
NOW THEREFORE
Section 1
1
The
study
and
proposed
Declaration
project
THE CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
qs The City Council makes
Findin
consists of
a
zoning
the
text amendments
following findings
as
shown
on
the attached Exhibit B
An environmental initial study was
completed for the project and the City Council finds that
this document is a complete informational document
prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act
Section
2
Action
The
City Council does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration attached as Exhibit A and approve the
zoning regulations amendment portion of Attachment
the
the
City
Council held this 2nd
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
map amendment attached as Exhibit B
2 to be renamed Exhibit B
seconded
by Councilmember
foregoing Ordinance is hereby introduced at a Regular Meeting of
day of September 2003 with the following roll call vote to wit
Attachment 4
MAYOR
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
Benito J Crescione
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney David
R Hunt
Agenda
Item
Attachment
PASSED AND ADOPTED at
September
2003
on
Councilmember
motion
a
of
on
regular meeting
of the
City
Council held this 16th
Councilmember
the
following
roll call vote to wit
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
MAYOR Benito J Crescione
ATTEST
Lori
Grigsby City Clerk
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
David R
day
seconded
Hunt City Attorney
Negative Declaration
Zoning Map Amendment portion of Attachment 2
Item
4
of
by
Attachment 4 Exhibit A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NUMBER
0117
03
APPLICANT
City
PROJECTION LOCATION
Citywide
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Of Pismo Beach
Pismo
Beach
clarify provisions
CA 93449
Zoning
make minor
to the General Plan to correct errors
several sections of the code and
Code and
changes
to
General Plan
FINDING
The
City
ofPismo Beach has reviewed the above
project
in accordance with thc
for implementation of the California Environmental Quality
Environmental Impact Report EIR need not be prepared because
procedures
X
The
proposed project will not have
a
significant
effect
on
City ofPismo
srules and
Beach
Act and has determined that
an
the environment
will not be a
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there
in
the
environmental initial study and
significant effect in this case because mitigation measures included
this
project
hereby made a part of this Negative Declaration have been added to
provides the basis for this determination is attached
4658
Beach Community Development Department 805 773
The Initial
of Pismo
Study
that
DRAFT PREPARED BY
A copy will be kept
on
file
at
the
DATE
REVIEW
PERIOD
HEARING
DATE
Judith Lautuer
June
6
2003
30
days
tentative
planmng
Associate Planner
August 12 2003
Commission
NOTICE
The
public is invited to comment on the Draft Negative Declaration during the review period
Declaration will be reconsidered in light of the comments received
ofthe
Draft
appropriateness
Negative
The
Date
adopted
YES
X
City
NO INITIAL STUDY REVISED
YES
By
Agenda
Ilem
X
NO
Attachment 5
Planning Commission Minutes
Citywide City Of
1D
qram primarily
Pro
0046
Beach Applicant Project no 03
and 1998 Zonin
Local Coastal
q Codes and to the General Plan
Pismo
to correct
errors
and fix
that have surfaced since the code
problems
The affected sections affect several zones and
adopted
Associate Planner Lautner
The staff
packet
presented
the staff
report
Sorgenfrei
asked
why
Lautner
said the
as an exhibit
Chair
the
City
is
working
She said there is
report
should have included the
Code
planning
proposed
out of two
was
areas
mistake in the
a
amendments to the 1998
Zoning Codes the
Zoning
1983 and the
1998
Judith
1998
Zoning Code
was
not
adopted by
the California
Coastal
Commission because that commission wanted changes to certain provisions for bluff top lots
The City Council was unwilling to make the recommended changes in 1998 Therefore the
1983 code still
applies
Planning Manager
the 1983
within the Coastal Zone
Johnson said that the Coastal Commission is
willing
to make
Associate Planner Lautner recommended the Commission make comments and
and ask
changes
to
Zoning Code
questions
then
adopt
the resolution
initiating
the amendments
suggestions
By initiating
the
staff
the
to
environmental
documents
and
directing
process
discover the environmental consequences of making the general plan and zoning changes
amendments the Commission is
initiated
Staff would then return to the Commission with the
completed environmental review
amendments
s
separate packages The Commission
job
later dates would be to review the information and make recommendations to the City
She outlined the main points of each of the four separate packages of amendments
and recommendations
at these
Council
Hillside
on
the
in four
Development
Lautner said the
with
an
suggested changes were to change the definition of hillside lot to those lots
average slope over 15 rather than 10 for consistency with other regulations and to
reduce the number of lots considered hillside
The changes would also incorporate an
that
if
the
natural
of
the
under
the house footprint is under 15 then
area
interpretation
slope
the lot would not be considered
a
Commissioner
said
they
to build
are
Ehring
allowing people
hillside lot for purposes of development
by Ontario Ridge they
on a 30 slope
over
Commissioner Halldin said the ordinance
and
over
30
developed
slope
He
was
was
adopted
to
are
under
prohibiting development
the hillside
county
ordinance and
above the 200 elevation
north of Shell Beach from
prevent
prohibition against grading
concerned that the
area
a
of
Ge
slopes
over
nc Item
30
being
applies
Attachment 5
suggested that widening Price Canyon Road will
He said we should be allowing
be necessary and would require grading of steep slopes
construction of roads and driveways through portions of property with slopes of 30 or
to the
of roads
building
as
well
as
homes He
greater
Planning Manager Johnson said
hillside development policy CO
10
After
brief
there
discussion
recommendation
Commissioner
changing
on
there is also
a
General Plan
Commission
was
policy
consensus
that does not allow
to
with
agree
staff
the definition of hillside lot
Ehring asked about
the process for
hillside lots
developing
removing the CUP requirement There was
Commission consensus on eliminating the CUP requirement but still requiring projects
on hillside lots to be reviewed by the Planning Commission
Planner Lautner
Associate
recommended
Lautner discussed the recommendation to altow
Commissioner
can
reflect
sun
Ehring
flexibility
in color
said there should be there should be
a
reflectivity requirements
reflectivity
code for
roofs
which
into homes above them
retaining the reflectivity reference for the roofs
grant exceptions
reflectivity requirements on a case
by
Commission consensus on this approach
Associate Planner Lautner recommended
allowing
basis There
Chair
Don
to the
the Commission to
was
Sorgenfrei opened
Day
101 Park
PI
the
public hearing
Pismo
Beach
natural condition is crucial to the
said studies show that
s character One
city
of the
maintaining the hillsides in a
s left
things people enjoy is what
of the hillside
Tony Spinelli said that although a 30 slope
heights was recently built that comes straight
contradictory
Densit
to
our
General Plan
accessory
He felt
mistakes
created to
protect hillsides
a
down and cut out the side of the
should do away with 30
qsspecific plans
buildin
Planner Lautner said the recommended
and
we
was
slope
house on the
hill
which is
limitation
roof extensions
changes
would
simply
reflect actual usage correct
clarify other regulations
Commissioner Halldin made the
020
28
17
Plan should
020
28
17
following comments
what density is allowed in certain areas Our Zoning Code and General
be consistent so that the developers know what is allowed
t we allow them in all the zones we have
accessory buildings
why can
Agenda
Item
Attachment
5
040 we need clarification in all cases where there is a
08
17
specific plan adopted
specific plan overrides the Zoning Code That
s why specific plans are
created
that the
80 rule
A 90 rule would be more
commercial
as
well
as
acceptable
and this rule
should apply
to
residential
Height limits measurement techniques
Steeples should be allowed to exceed
should be the same for all districts
the height in residential areas to provide
a
different appearance
There
was
Commission
buildings specific plans
to agree with staff
consensus
and roof adornments There
was
proposals for density accessory
general agreement that the 80
rule needs to be reviewed
ParkinR
Driveways
Planner Lautner discussed the recommendation to
and to allow greater
flexibility
in
Commissioner Halldin said
wide
driveway
and it will be
Commissioner
Ehring
some
just
asked
driveway
as
change
the
driveway slope requirement
widths
people
do not need
a
16
driveway They
can use a
why driveway
widths range from 12
16
Planning Manager Johnson said the General Plan restricts driveway
more
friendly She said the problem with the policy is that
pedestrian
widths to make streets
it does not
differentiate between residential and commercial needs
There
was
Commission
10
safe
consensus to agree with
staff recommendations
on
adequately
parking and
driveways
Site
plan and architectural review
There
was
Commission Consensus to agree with staff recommendation
Site covera
qe definition
Commissioner Halldin asked if site coverage is
Chair
Sorgenfrei
Commissioner
believes the
Waage
designed
to allow open space
on
the lot
changes provide greater flexibility
asked if
people
would be able to pave the whole lot
Commissioner Lautner said there is still architectural review at staff level and that this
change
d not reduce the
wou
Commissioner
Ehring
landscape requirement
said their
needs to be
some
ground
for the water to go to when it
drains off the hard surfaces
Ageno
Item
Attachment 5
in Shell
Planning Manager Johnson said this definition is only in the 1998 Code If approved
Beach they would only be able to build very small houses Currently Shell Beach is under the
1983 Code
Commissioner Halldin
the
definition of site
the back yard
into
Commissioner
There
was
in
suggested eliminating the inclusion of the driveway area
their
house
coverage A lot of people would like the driveway to go by
Waage said
Commission
he does not want to
consensus
see
to eliminate
people arbitrarily cementing their yards
the
the
paving part of
site
coverage
definition
Non
qstructures
conformin
Planner Lautner raised the
an owner to
bring
Commissioner
such
a
primary
issue with
structure into
compliance
city of
about the
Waage asked
structures when will
nonconforming
with the
we
require
regulations
Del Mar
He asked if their process worked
well
Associate Planner Lautner said it did from what that
generally supported
Commissioner
Ehring asked
valuation
Commissioner
if you would need
Currently
Ehring said
no
that it
s not
Sorgenfrei recommended using
conformity
Planning Manager Johnson said
to the 50 rule
50
electrical
She
a
the ordinance
unless
by using
the
requires
that
method of
Building Code method
real value
the 50 rule for
conforming
bringing non
structures
interpretations in the past related
specifically define what is included in the
maintenance
and that these
Commissioner Carson asked how
Ehring
value before and after
there have been different
noted that
heating changes
Commissioner
appraised
The Commission would have to
Commissioner Halldin
and
not
an
the value is determined
Chair
into
had told her
it
Associate Planner Lautner said
determining
s representative
city
they
types
should
of
be
defined to include
roofing
changes should be allowed
would determine 49
asked what constitutes 50 if the
or
51
footprint
of the house remains the
same
Agenda
Item
Attachment 5
Commissioner Carson asked what if
Chair
Sorgenfrei
There
was
they modify
25 at
a
recommended staff look at other cities to
Commission
consensus
time
see
changes
to initiate
how
to the
they
modified their code
nonconforming structures
regulations
Staff asked how value should be addressed There
Sorgenfrei suggested using the
meet certain conditions to be approved
Chair
same
was no
method
action taken
Used for
Variance where
a
they
have to
a requirement that says if you remodel 50 of the
to
Code The City has to decide if its intent is to
building you have to bring everything up
if our intent is to get
encourage the improvement We are going to have to change our intent
Commissioner Halldin said the UBC has
no additional
rid of the older structure
s He suggested that when one bedroom is added
parking should be required if two or three bedrooms are added then additional spaces should
required He suggested staff pay closed attention to the town of Cayucos and the changes
the
they are making related to vacation rentals He asked if it is 50 of the value or 50 of
be
area
Mr Tim
Tiessen
to the bottom
or
distinction just
enough room to
reduce street
Don
a
resident and
to the
parking
vehicle
on
is to allow wider
a
small lots
He said
distinction between
Planner
should go up to 18
should be different for each
A way to
and residential
Most of the downtown is
up to current code
There may be
HeiRhts
Lautner
noted
that
the
request to allow further
previous meetings This request would allow
Commission had
subdivision in the Pismo Heights Planning Area in
staff to develop the environmental study and return with
Commissioner
Ehring wanted
permit
size lots
standard
There
was
IV
they
conforming Commercial
non
non Anything you remodel has to be brought
conforming
reasons financially you would not want to go up to 50
Pismo
apply
driveways
conforming Parking requirements
non
III
It should
be any
Whether it
s cantilever or decks there shouldn
t
said
that
a
16
wide
curbcut
t
doesn
between floors
He
give
top
asked if there is
Day
said the 80 ratio is hard to meet
ratio
difference
maneuver a
architect
to be
sure
discussed
a
a
recommendation
that subdivisions in the Pismo
Commission Consensus to initiate this amendment
Vacation Rentals
Heights
area
only
Attachment 5
Commissioner
Sorgenfrei
He said at least
neighbors
Commissioner
Ehring
rentals
said he
s concerned with what tenants of vacation
will have
opportunity
an
said the draft
to
complain
if rentals
are
regulations define vacation rentals
as
not
will do
managed well
those lasting fewer
than 30 days
Commissioner
housing
is
a
Halldin
said
He said
he
sentence
on
He referred
to
14
1D
page
should
say
Cayucos new regulations on
has an issue with cai poly students We are going to
ordinance and recognize it
s going to be inconvenient but will
written comments on several of the proposed regulation
throughout
said the City of SLO
have to live with the second unit
provide housing
second
the world
concern
vacation rentals and
the
amendments that he would like to forward to staff
business owner said we should let the economy dictate what
s coming in If a
vacation rental isn
t working out then the applicant should be able to switch to a permanent
Tony Spinelli
rental
Cayucos
house
There is
is
the
City revenue is TOT
s
preferable and lucrative
Chair
of too many people in one
limit vacation rentals in certain areas Sixty percent of
going through this
law proposed to
There
a new
Sorgenfrei
complaint
was a
it should be considered
said he
s divided
this
Renting
short term
He doesn
t think it
ll
over
long
term
is
any more homes for
people to live in He supports restrictions to make them granny units instead of vacation
rentals He doesn
t
believe the city can control it but there should be some criteria
Associate Planner Lautner said
and everyone was kicked out
we could do about it
Commissioner
in
property
causing the
are
downtown
was
purchased
it could be converted to vacation rentals
there is
it
apartment complex
an
supply
a
lot of affordable
Forcing
a
developer
housing
to pay
but
people
There
a
year ago
was
nothing
who want to invest
10 for affordable
housing
is
value of the other houses to go up
Commissioner
grandfather
Ehring said
purchasing
so
on
in those
Commissioner
is
Waage
on
opposed
to vacation rentals in residential
areas
Sorgenfrei
asked what the
penalty
is for not
suggested
we
paying TOT
Planning Manager Johnson said the Finance Department has a system
management companies submit payments each month for all their clients
Commissioner Carson would like to
She said s
it not fair to the
Chair
Sorgenfrei closed
Chair
Sorgenfrei
when
they
are
but
record
see a
on
the number of families allowed in
a
The
house
neighbors
the
public hearing
said he would like the
developed
limit
worked out
to make sure
City Attorney treview
iorceabl6
they are en
the vacation rental
Agenda
Item
regulations
Attachment
Commissioner
the
1998
Waage
and
moved to
adopt Resolution
1983
to
Zoning Code and
Commissioner Carson seconded the motion
to
number
05
Amend
various
sections
The motion
initiating
of the
5
amendments
General
Plan
0
5
voice
passed unanimously
by
vote
Item 1D
City
Citywide Minor amendments to 1998 Zonin
q Code and
0117
Beach Applicant Project no 03
the General
Plan
Of Pismo
Modifications to various sections of the 1998
q Code
Zonin
clarify wordinq simplify processinq eliminate or
proposed amendments are available at the Planninq
www pismobeach
http
q click on plannin
or
q
errors
and to the General Plan to correct
modify certain standards Copies of the
counter
or
be downloaded from
can
Planning Specialist Lautner presented the staff report recommending the Commission adopt
Resolution 03
0117 recommending Council approval of the amendments
Commissioner
Ehring
Planning Specialist
Chair
asked how the 80 rule would work
Lautner said she recommends
Sorgenfrei said removing
the 80 rule and
on a
removing
requiring
downhill
slope
the rule
a
step back
fits in with what the
Commission had discussed
Commissioner
Waage
had
no
questions
He said
Judy
did
a
good job incorporating
their
changes
Commissioner Halldin concurred
Chair
Sorgenfrei closed
the
public hearing
Commissioner
Ehring
approval of the
passed
amendments
by
moved
to
adopt
Resolution
Commissioner
unanimous
no
Waage
0117 recommending Council
03
seconded the motion
voice
vote
The motion
0
5
Attachment 6
City
of Pismo Beach
760 Mattie Road
805
Environmental Initial
4658
773
Study
Citywide
0117
03
Minor Amendments to General Plan and 1998
Project title
Minor
Zoning
Zoning
Code
Code and General Plan Amendments
Lead agency name and address
City of Pismo Beach
760 Mattie Road
Pismo
CA 93449
4684
Beach
Contact person and phone number
Judith
Lautner Associate
Planner
805 7734658
Project
location
Address
citywide
s Parcel Number various
Assessor
Project sponsor
s
ofPismo
Beach
City
General
name
and address
plan designation
Description
Amendments
of
Various
project
Zoning
to the 1998
7
Code and to the General
provisions
make minor
sections A
complete description ofthe changes
amendments
are
Surrounding
the city
changes
attached
land
as
uses
Zoning
Plan to
Various
correct errors
clarify
to several sections ofthe code and related General Plan
is attached
as
Exhibit A The ordinance
Exhibit B
and
setting
Varies The
changes will
affect most parts of
Other
public agencies whose approval is required e
g permits financing
approval or participation agreement The Coastal Commission changes to the General
Local Coastal Program
Plan
dm
Attachment 6
Program and Zoning Code Amendments
FACTORS
POTENTIALLY
AFFECTED
ENVIRONMENTAL
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
Initial
least
Study
one
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal
impact
that is
a
Potentially Significant Impact
as
indicated
by
project involving
the checklist
on
the
following
S
Aesthetics
Agriculture
Air
Resources
Quality
Biological
Resources
Cultural Resources
Hazards
Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology
Quality
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Traffic
Transportation
Utilities
Service
Systems
DETERMINATION To be
Soils
Geology
Water
Land Use
Mandatory Findings
completed by
the Lead
Planning
of Significance
Agency
On the basis of this initial evaluation
X
I find that the
a
proposed project
COULD NOT have
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
a
significant
effect
on
the environment and
prepared
although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment
a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
1 find that
there will not be
l fmd that the
proposed project
MAY have
a
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
significant
required
effect
on
the
environment
and
an
proposed project MAY have a potentially significant impact or potentially
mitigated impacl on the environment but at least one effect 1 has been
significant
adequately analyzed in an earlier document in accordance with applicable legal standards and
2 has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required but it must analyze
only the effects that remain to be addressed
I find that the
unless
although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment
potentially significant effects a have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and b have been avoided
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION including revisions
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project nothing further is required
I fred that
because all
or
or
or
June
Judith Lautner Associate Plammr
S
Signature Judith Lautuer Associate Planner
200
06
Date
44
5
2003
at
Initial
Study
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal
Program
and
Zoning
Code Amendments
Attachment 6
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1
A brief explanation is
by
the information
information
sources
except No Impact answers that are adequately supported
Impact answer is adequately supported if the referenced
the impact simply does not apply to projects llke the one involved e
g the
for all
required
sources
answers
cited A No
show that
project falls outside a fault rapture zone A No Impact answer should be explained when it is based on
specific factors as well as general standards e
project
g the project will not expose sensitive receptors to
based
on
a
pollutants
specific screening analysis
project
2
All
answers
cumulative
must
as
well
take
as
of the whole action
account
level
project
indirect
as
well
site as well as on
involved including off
site
direct and construction as well as operational
as
impacts
3
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular
answers must indicate whether the
impact is potentially
physical impact may occur then the checklist
significant less than significant with mitigation
or less than significant Potentially
is
Significant Impact appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
effect
be
Ifthere
an
are one or more Potentially
may
significant
Significant Impact entries when the
determination is
made
an
EIR is
required
4
Negative Declaration Less Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from Potentially Significant Impact to a
Less Than Significant lmpact The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly
om Sect
on
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level mitigation measures fi
Earlier
be
XVII
Analyses may
referenced
cross
5
Earlier
analyses may be used where pursuant to the tiehng program EIR or other CEQA process an
adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration Section 15063
D In
3
c
this case a brief discussion should identify the following
Earlier Analysis Used Identify and state where they are available for review
a
b
Impacts Adequately Addressed ldenfify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis
c
Mitigation Measures For effects that are Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
om the earlier
Incorporated describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined fi
document and the extent to which they address site
conditions
for
the
specific
project
effect has been
6
Include references to information
outside document
7
Supporting
should
where
sources
for
appropriate
Information Sources A
source
potential impacts
include
a
Reference to
a
prepared
previously
list should be
attached
and other
sources
used
or
contacted should be cited in the discussion
8
The
a
b
explanation of each issue should identify
the sigaificance criteria or threshold if any used
the
mitigation
measure
or
reference to the page
to evaluate each
identified if any to reduce the
impact
question and
significance
to less than
individuals
Initial
Study
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal
Program
Issues
and Zoning Code Amendments
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
Impact
IAESTHETICS
a
Would thc
Attachment 6
project
Have a substantial adverse effect
X
on a
scenic vista
b Substantially damage
scenic resources
X
including but not limited to trees rock
outcroppings and historic buildings within
view of a state
scenic highway
c Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality ofthe site and its
surroundings
d
Create
glare
a new source
that would
nighttime
ofsubstantial
adversely
affect
day
light
X
X
or
or
views in the area
Explanation
Elimination of the 80 rule
requiring
upper levels to have
no more
than 80 of the
area
of lower levels
may result in larger upper levels than are currently being built It may also
result in smaller lower levels The ordinance would retain the requirement to step back
levels as viewed from the street This
boxy buildings
requirement
upper
intent to eliminate
should not have a significant
should meet the
with little adiculation Conclusion this
original
change
buildings
Accessory buildings allowing accessory buildings in Iow
density neighborhoods would permit
residents to have storage and garden buildings Many such residences already have these
structures either because they were constructed before the 1998 code was adopted because
the property owner did not obtain permits for them or because Planning Staff made an
interpretation of the ordinance and allowed them Most such structures occupy rear yards or
larger side yards and are not visible from the street Many perhaps most cities permit
accessory structures in Iow
density zones and do not appear to suffer from the allowance
Conclusion this change should not have a significant effect on the appearance of
neighborhoods
Cupolas and similar structures the changes would permit cupolas towers and similar
structures to exceed the residential height limit by up to five feet when
they are no larger than
six feet at the base Such small structures are similar to chimneys and do not typically block
views from public vistas The Commission has often interpreted the regulations to permit this
type of structure to exceed the height limit This change would codify that interpretation
Conclusion No significant effect
The change to permit one
car garages on lots 2700 s
f in area may result in homes of
floor
area
need
not
be
greater
one parking space
covered and can be in a yard More lots
in
the
front
This
may havp o
yard
ne parking space
change would affect primarily the man
y 0t
effect
on
the appearance of
40
Initial
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal
Study
Program and Zoning
Issues
Code Amendments
Attachment 6
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Impact
Significant with
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
in the Shell Beach
parking
area
that
are
2700 square feet in
area
There may result
a
greater number
of
spaces in front yards which can be unattractive to some On the other hand the
would give these lot owners more flexibility in the development of these small
lots
change
putting them on
f and smaller The potential to build larger homes
s
par with lots 2699
2122 s
f of floor area maximum based on the code
s maximum allowable floor
allows these lots to accommodate more people or to provide more comfortable living
approximately
ratio
area
areas for fewer
slimitations The additional vehicles that
people making better use of the site
not
be
in
front
will
may
parked
significantly change the appearance of the Shell Beach area
which contains many smaller lots with parking in front Conclusion Not a significant impact
Color reflectivity The change would permit the Planning Commission to allow exceptions to
the 40
reflectivity
maximum
required
homes where appropriate The required
that homes blend into their surroundings and do not
reflection onto homes above or below them Conclusion Not a
Commission review will
of hillside
Planning
significant light
significant impact
Site coverage change The change to eliminate paving for vehicle use from the site coverage
calculations will permit larger homes to be constructed on the same
size lots The homes can
be the same size as are currently permitted under the 1983 code which do not appear to be out
cause
of character with the
that
Sources
neighborhoods
require long driveways
area
assure
The
because of
of these homes Conclusion Not
change
permit development of homes on lots
special topographical conditions without penalizing the
a
would
significant impact
Proposed regulations
H AGRICULTURE RESOURCES In
determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant
effects
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model 1997 prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an
optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland Would the project
environmental
a
Convert Prime
i
Farmland
or
lead
Farmland Unique
X
Farmland ofStatewide
Importance Farmland as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program ofthe
California Resources Agency to non
agricultural use
b Conflict
agricultural
with
existing zoning
use or a
for
X
Williamson Act
contract
c
Involve other
environment
nature
2
0
changes
which
in the
existing
due to their location
could resuh in
X
or
conversion o
4
Initial
Stud
Code Amendments
Local Coastal Pro ram and Zonin
Minor General Plan
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
Farmland
to
Attachment 6
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
impact
Impact
non use
agricultural
Explanation
city
The
proposed changes
would have
no
effect
on
any farmland that may be annexed to the
Sources
QUALITY Where available the significance criteria established by the appl
cable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations
HI AIR
Would the
project
a Conflict
with
of the
X
obstruct
implementation
applicable air quality plan
or
quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing
projected air quality violation
X
any air
b Violate
or
X
cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
attainment under an
the project region is non
federal
or state ambient air quality
applicable
standard including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors
c
Result in
a
sensitive receptors
d Expose
to
X
substantial
pollutant concentrations
objectionable odors affecting
substantial number of people
e
Create
Explanation
The
changes
affect the
X
a
design
of
buildings
and
driveways
and do not affect air
quality
Sources
IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a
Have
a
Would the
substantial adverse effect either
project
X
through habitat modifications on
any species identified as a candidate
sensitive or special status species in local or
regional plans policies or regulations or by
directly
or
the California Department offish and Game
or
S Fish and Wildlife Service
U
b
Have
riparian
a
habitat
or
other sensitive
on
any
natural
X
Initial
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal Pro
Study
Issues
ram
and Zonin
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Code Amendments
Attachment 6
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
communtty identified in local
plans policies regulations
California
or
regional
by the
or
Department offish and
Game
or
US Fish and Wildlife Service
c
Have
a
wetlands
federally protected
as
on
defined
X
by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
but not limited to marsh vernal
coastal etc through direct removal
including
pool
filling hydrological interruption
or
other
means
d Interfere substantially
of any native resident
wildlife
species
resident
or
impede
or
with the movement
migratory
fish
X
or
with established native
or
migratory wildlife corridors or
the
use
of native wildlife nursery
sites
e
Conflict with any local
ordinances
such
policies
X
or
I
protecting biological resources
preservation policy or
as a tree
ordinance
f
Conflict with the
provisions
Habitat Conservation
Community
of an
X
adopted
Plan Natural
Plan or other
Conservation
approved local regional
conservation
or state
habitat
plan
Explanation
The
proposed changes
would not
change
Sources
V CULTURAL RESOURCES
a
Cause
biological
resources
project
in the
X
b Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
X
a
substantial adverse
Would the
any regulations related to
significance
of a historical
change
resource as
5
defined in 15064
suanl to
m
5064
Initial
Study
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal Pro
ram
and
Zoning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
Code Amendments
Less Than
with
Significant
Mitigation
Incorporated
Attachment 6
Less Than
No
Significant
lmpact
Impact
c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature
X
Disturb any human remains including
those interred outside of formal cemeteries
X
d
Explanation
Sources
VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS
a Expose people
of loss
injury
or
project
potential
effects including the risk
or
substantial adverse
Would the
structures to
death
involving
X
of a known
earthquake fault as
delineated on the most recent Alquist
Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
i Rupture
substantial evidence of a known fault Refer
to Division ofMines and
Geology Special
Publication 42
X
ii Strong seismic ground shaking
related ground failure including
iii Seismic
liquefaction
X
iv
Landslides
b Result in
substantial soil erosion
or
X
the
loss of topsoil
X
c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable or that would become unstable as a
potentially result in
spreading
subsidence liquefaction or collapse
result of the
on or
project
and
site landslide lateral
off
x
expansive soil as defined in
Table 18
B of the Uniform Building Code
1
1994 creating substantial risks to life or
property
d
Be located on
2001
06
5O
Initial
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal P gram and Zonin
Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
e
Have soils
incapable
supporting
the
alternative
waste water
use
Code Amendments
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
X
of adequately
ofseptic tanks
Attachment 6
Less Than
or
disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste
Explanation
water
Sources
VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the
a
Create
a
significant hazard
the environment
transport
public
X
or
the routine
through
use or
to the
project
disposal
of hazardous
materials
b
Create
a
significant
the environment
foreseeable
public
X
or
through reasonably
upset
involving the
hazard to the
and accident conditions
release ofhazardous materials
into the environment7
c Emit
hazardous emissions
hazardous
or
or
acutely hazardous materials
substances or waste within one
quarter
of an existing or proposed school
d
Be located
on a
mile
site which is included
list of hazardous materials sites
pursuant
X
handle
X
on a
compiled
to Government Code Section
5 and
65962
as a
significant hazard
result
would it create
to the
public
or
a
the
environment
e
For
a
project
located within
airport
land
plan has not been
adopted within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area
use
plan or
13 For
a
where such
an
prqiect
a
within the
vicinity
ora
ina
l
private mrslnp would lhe prQlecl resu
X
Initial
Study
Local Coastal Pro
Minor General Plan
ram
Significant
Impact
hazard for
safety
in the
Less Than
Potentially
Issues
project
people residing
or
with
Significant
Mitigation
Incorporated
Attachment 6
Less Than
No
Significant
lmpact
lrapact
working
area
X
g Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan
X
or structures to a
h Expose people
significant risk of loss injury or death
involving wildland fires including where
dlands are
wi
adjacent
where residences
are
to
urbanized
areas or
intermixed with
wildlands
Explanation
Sources
VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY
Would the
project
X
a
quality standards
discharge requirements
Violate any water
waste
or
X
b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level e
g the
of
existing nearby wells
pre
production rate
would
drop
to a level
which would not
support existing
which
planned uses for
granted
or
permits
land
uses
have been
x
c Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern ofthe site or area including through
the alteration ofthe
river
in
a
course
of a stream
or
manner which would result in
substantial erosion
or
siltation
on or
site
off
X
d Substantially
pattern
ofthe site
or
the alteration of the
river
oo
o6
or
existing drainage
area including through
alter the
course
of a stream
substantially increas
the rate
or
or
Initial
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal Pro ram and Zoning Code Amendments
Study
sstle
l
amount
of surface runoff in
would result in
e
Create
or
flooding
a manner
on or
contribute runoff
would exceed the
capacity
stormwatcr
water
hazard
within
a
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Impact
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
which
X
which
drainage systems
sources
f Otherwise substantially degrade
quality
g Placc housing
Potentially
site
off
of existing
planned
provide substantial additional
polluted runoff
Attachment
or
or
of
X
water
X
year flood
100
mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map
area as
h Place
within
a
year flood
100
structures that would
impede
or
hazard
X
area
redirect flood
flows
X
i Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss injury or death involving
flooding including flooding as a result ofthe
failure of a levee
or
dam
X
j Inundation by seiche tsunami
or
mudflow
Explanation
Sources
IX LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the
a Physically divide an established
community
b Conflict with any applicable land use plan
policy or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction
over
the
not limited to the
project including but
general plan specific plan
local coastal program or zoning ordinance
adovted for the vurvose of avoidine OT
ataB environmenla eflecl
t
m
ng
project
X
X
Initial
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal P Dgram and Zonin
Study
Potentially
Significant
lmpact
111
Code Amendments
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
lmpact
Impact
X
applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan
c
Attachment 6
Conflict with any
Explanation
Sources
X MINERAL RESOURCES
a
Would the
project
X
Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral
value to the
resource
region
that would be of
and the residents of the
state
b Result
X
in the loss of availability of a
important
locally
site delineated
mineral
on a
specific plan or
resource
recovery
local
other
general plan
land use plan
Explanation
Sources
XI NOISE Would the
project result
of persons to
a Exposure
noise levels in
excess
or
in
X
generation of
ofstandards
established in the local
ordinance
or
general plan or noise
applicable standards ofother
agencies
X
b Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundbome noise levels
c
A substantial
permanent increase
ambient noise levels in the
above levels
existing
X
in
project vicinity
project
without the
X
d A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity
above levels
existing
project
without the
project
e
For
nsc
a
nlan
J
20
06
project
or
located within
where such
a
an
airport
land
an has nol been
lq
X
i
Initial
Local Coastal
Minor General Plan
Study
9ram and Zonin
Potentially
Significant
lmpact
Issues
adopted within two
or
public
use
miles of a public
airport
would the
residing
project
excessive noise levels
area to
f For a project
within the
Attachment 6
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
airpor
project
working in
expose people
or
Code Amendments
vicinity
the
X
of a
private airstrip would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels
Explanation
Sources
XH POPULATION AND HOUSING
population growth in
either
area
directly for example by
homes and businesses or
new
proposing
indirectly for example through extension
a
Induce substantial
roads
or
other
b Displace
Would the
project
X
an
of
infrastructure
substantial numbers of existing
housing necessitating the construction
replacement housing elsewhere
X
of
c Displace substantial numbers of people
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere
x
Explanation Changes to the 80 rule and the garage requirement for small lots may result in
construction of incrementally larger homes although the 80 rule elimination could also have the effect
of creating smaller footprints for the same size home The increased development potential and
flexibility created by these changes may induce people to build here who otherwise might not have The
changes though would not create new lots or extend infrastructure Conclusion Less than significant
Sources
XIII PUBLIC SERVICES
physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities need for new or physically altered governmental facilities
the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios response times or other performance objectives for any ofthe public services
a
Would the
l
project
result in substantial adverse
Initial
Study
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal Pro
ram
and Zonin
Less Than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
Police
Significant
with
Mitigation
Attachment 6
Less Than
No
Significant
Impact
Impact
I
protection
X
Schools
X
Parks
Other
Code Amendments
X
facilities
public
Explanation
Sources
XlV RECREATION
x
a Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial
facility
physical
would
deterioration of the
occur or
be accelerated
X
b Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion ofrecreational facilities that might
have an adverse physical effect on the
environment
Explanation
Sources
Would the
XV TRANSPORTATION
TRAFFIC
a
Cause
an
X
increase in traffic that is
substantial in relation to the
existing
ect
pro
traffic
load and
e
capacity ofthe street system i
result in a substantial increase in either the
trips the volume to
capacity ratio on roads or congestion at
intersections
number ofvehicle
X
b Exceed either individually or
cumulatively a level ofservice standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
highways
or
X
c
Result in
1
20
06
a
change
in air traffic
patterns
Initial
Study
Local Coastal Pro
Minor General Plan
ram
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Issues
Attachment 6
Less Than
Less Than
No
Si with
nificant
Significant
lmpact
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
including either an increase in traffic levels
or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks
X
d Substantially increase hazards due
design feature e
g sharp curves or
dangerous intersections
g farm equipment
e
or
to a
incompatible
uses
X
e
Result in
inadequate
emergency access
x
f Result
in
inadequate parking capacity
X
g Conflict with adopted policies plans
or
supporting alternative
g bus turnouts bicycle
transportation e
racks
programs
xplanation
Sources
XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the
project
X
a
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements
ofthe
applicable Regional
Water
Quality
Control Board
X
b Require
new
or
or
result in the construction of
water or wastewater treatment facilities
expansion
of existing
facilities
construction of which could
cause
the
significant
c Require
or
result in the construction of
new storm water
expansion
drainage
of existing
facilities
facilities
construction of which could
X
or
the
cause
significant
X
supplies available to
serve the project from existing entitlements
and resources or are new or expanded
d
Have sufficient water
entitlements needed
or58
Initial
Study
Minor General Plan
Local Coastal
Program
Potentially
Significant
Impact
sue
l
Attachment 6
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
Impact
by thc
provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project
sprojected
demand in addition to thc provider
sexisting
c
Result in
and Zonir I Code Amendments
a
determination
wastcwater treatment
commitments
f Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
s solid waste disposal needs
project
g Comply with federal state and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
X
x
waste
Explanation
Sources
XVI1 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining
levels threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples ofthe major
periods ofCalifornia history or prehistory
b Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable Cumulatively
considerable
means
effects of a project
X
X
that the incremental
are
considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects
the effects ofother current
and the effects of probable future
c Does the project
effects that will
effects
on
have environmental
cause
human
projects
projects
substantial adverse
beings
either
vv
directl
X
Initial Stud
Plan Coastal Pro
Minor General Local
ram
and Zonir I Code Amendments
Potentially
Issues
Significant
lmpact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
indirectly
SOURCES
Plan City ofPismo Beach adopted 1992
Zoning Ordinances City of Pismo Beach adopted 1983 and
General
1998
Attachment 6
Less Than
No
Significant
Impact
Impact
SUBJECT
TITLE
REQUEST FROM COUNCIL REGARDING PHONE SERVICE OPTIONS
RECOMMENDATION
Each Councilmember may select which
40 per person per month
for 2003
04 is
option they prefer The budget
500
2
or
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council to consider from three
Options
include
1
Cell
options
phone 2
as
to what best fits their need
Land line
phone 3 stipend
for
regarding use of phones
phone usage
coil
own
Option 11 Cell phone
City to purchase and pay monthly usage For your consideration staff has compiled four 4
cell phone company
squotes for Council consideration If Council prefers to select this option
staff will make arrangements for the purchase and activation of coil phones Attached are
different phones and rate plans to choose The purchase of coil phones is not included in the
budget These phones come with a one
year contract
Company
Phonesye
Phone Cost
RatePlanS
Cost
Monthl
Nextel
160c
99
49
National
99
45
value 500
include 2
plan
way radio
Notes
500
100 direct
plan minutes
connect minutes 4
000 night
weekend minutes free nationwide
long distance no roaming fees
call
hold
call
waiting
way
3
forward unlimited
numeric messaging Offers
10
off usage 30 off equipment for
calling
Verizon
Varioussee
attached
America
s
Choice
99
59
includes 2
way radio
options
call
government agencies
400 anytime
minutes
weekends 9
nights
m
a
includes
unlimited
p to 7
m
unlimited 2
way
00 extra for long distance
radio 5
outside the area
Cingular
Motorola
Free after
Superhome
c331g
rebate of
600
99
39
99
49
minute
600
plan rollover unused
5
00 night
anytime minutes 0
weekend minutes nationwide long
distance
Mobile
T
Samsung
Free after
R225m
rebate of
99
Get More
99
39
600
plan minutes
weekend
unlimited
minutes
night
nationwide
no
long
distance
roaming
enhanced
voice
mail
charges
caller ID conference calling call
waiting
and hold
Agenda
Item
A
6
Option 2 Land Line phone
Council is currently participating in this option
The cost for
monthly
service ranges from
to 55 dollars
23
Option 3 Stipend to Council for cell phone usa
qe
This option would permit Council to use their own cell phone and the City to paya reasonable
stipend for that use to each member Staff is suggesting that the stipend be 40
00 per month
The Council
s budget for 2003
04 year is which
would
be
about
500
2
40 per month per
Councilmember
There
are
various rate
information
plans
and
Staff recommends
a
phones that can be purchased some free in the attached
rate plan for cell phones that would stay within budget
FISCAL IMPACT
This item is
already budgeted for this fiscal year
OPTIONS
1
schoice
City to purchase Cell phone of Council
City pays for Landline phone in Councilmembers home
Council to receive a Stipend for own cell phone usage
2
3
ATTACHMENTS
1
Cell Phone
Prepared by
Lori
purchase
and rate
Grigsby City Clerk
plan options
2003
Agenda
Item
AZ
6
Welcome te
our
Page
Wireless World
1 of 4
Offer
Your Free Offer for
4000
Pismo
Beach
Night
CA 3lick
here if this is not your
ocation
Weekend Minutes
Free Nationwide
Long Distance
Roaming
500 Cellular Minutes
100 Direct Connect Minutes
Limited bme offer We ve combined the hot new Motorola i60c
from
wireless phone now Free after rebates with the best rate plans
Nextel
See Details Below
Motorola i60c
99
in Rebate
50 Mail
00
00
50
50 Motorola i60c Rebate
00
00
50
Cost to you
Motorola i60c
FREE
Standard Features
Battery Type
Talk
Time
Lithium Ion
Up to 165
StandBy Time
Up
Memory Locations
Phonabook
1 Touch
Minutes
to 75 aoum
Emergency
250
Entry
Yes
Includes Holster
Car Charger
In
Yes
Speed Dialing
Timer Types
Individual
Cumulative Audible
set
Ringer Options Pre
Styles Plus
VibraCall
Vibrating Option VibraCall
Alert
or Custom
Alert
36 Ounces
W
i
ght 5
Tg
SMS Messaging
Predictive Text Input
2003
8
9
a
m
c
nic
inph
www
https
e
r
agent
93449
de
zipc
bi
qm
main
rringd
sp
Welcome to
our Wireless
Select
Page
World
EE
N
Wireless Planl
a
2 of 4
Terms
National Value 500 Plan
Conditions
month
99 per
45
Included Features
500 Plan Minutes
Weekend Minutes
000 Night
4
Free Nationwide Long Distance
No
Roaming Fees
yCalling
V
3
Call
varding
Fo
Unlimited Numeric Messagina
Choose
O
a
Data Plan
Total Connect 1
Meaabvte
99
9
O Total Connect 5 Meciabvte 19
99
O
Total Connect 10 Megabyte
99
29
O No Data Plan
This will be billed to your home address at
a
later date
a
later date
National Value 300 Plan
99
35
per month
Included Features
300 Plan Minutes
ekend Minutes
V
200 Night
3
Free Nationwide
No
Roaming
Call Hold
Long Distance
Fees
Call
Waiting
Way Calling
3
Call Fonvardina
Unlimited Numeric
Choose
a
Messaging
Data Plan
O
Total Connect 1 Meaabvte
O
Total Connect 5
O Total
O
Meoabvte
Connect 10
No Data
Meaabyte
99
9
99
19
99
29
Plan
This will be bi
led to your home address at
Orders
by
for
InPhonic
Offer
an
n
a
new
and
services
authorized
exclusively
lactivating
wwv co
5
Jllii
nphoni
products
agent
available to
line
of
are
for
fulfilled
Nextel
customers
service
on
a
one
1
2003
8
9
NEXTEI
i60c
OnLy 99
99
s 100 off the
That
price for
a
timJted
regutar
time
ontyP
i60c Premium Features
Speakerphone
VibraCalP aler
Standard
CapabiLity
Direct Connect long
range
Digital
digital
entPy Phonebook
250
talkie
walkie
SIM Card
Cellular Service
Smart
flip
Email Sen
ices
Buy
2
Key for
use
with
closed
Recent Calls
Messaging Services
Group
for trensfer of
contacts and services
Nextel Online Wireless Web
Connect
phones
and
an
get
additionat
25
off
OR
Buy
3
or more
phones
and
9et
an
additional
50
retait
off
NEXTEL
i90c
OnLy 19999
s 100 off the
That
price for
a
regular
Limited time
retail
yH
on
igOc Premium Features
Speakerphone
Entry Datebook
250
Java technology
enabled
Ring Tones
includes calculator and games
included ring tones
Voice Recorded
VibraCall alert
back
record and play
memos or
phone
choose from 20
calls
Internaland ExternaIDisplay
Voice Activated DialinE
Standard
CapabiLity
Direct Connects
entry Phonebook
250
ranEe
IonE
talkie
digital walkie
Menu Customization
Digital Cellular Service
SIM Card
fortransferof
Nextel Online Wireless Web
Email Services
Smart
Messaging Services
Group
buy
an
use
with
Recent Callss
Connects
Bonus Offer Get
you
Key for
flip closed
igOc
a
in rebate when
50 maiL
phone for
a
Limited time
only
NEXTEI
i95c
0nly 29999
s
That
10 off the ular
re retail
price
for
a
limited time
onlyP
i95cl Premium Features
Voice Recorder record and play
9 color LCD screen
1
back memos or
External LCD display
Voice Activated Dialing
Speakerphone
250 Datebook
Entry
Java techoology
enabled
run
advanced data applications
Standard
included ring tones
solutions
VibraCalP alert
Capability
entry Phenebook
250
Direct Connect long
range
choose from 20
Tones
Ring
games and enable wireless
enterprise
phone calJs
digital
talkie
walkie
Menu Customization
Digital Cellular Service
Nextel Online
for transfer of
SIM Card
Wireless
Web Access
Smart
Key for
use
with
closed
Email Services
flip
Messaging Services
Recent Calls
Group ConnecP
Buy
2
phones
and
9et
an
additional
25
off
OR
Buy
3
or more
phones
and
Dot
an
additional
50 off
Z
Page
Welcome To Verizon Wireless
1 of 3
Home I Search I Store Locab
You are shopping in
Chanoe Zio Code
Calling Plans
Plans for just about everyone We cover more towns cities and
places than anyone else and connect more people than any
other wireless service provider in the nation
Browse the plan descriptions
Select one of the plan types to continue
Existing customers who wish
to
upgrade their service should
visit their nearest Verizon Wireless Store Service
not yet available online
upgrades
are
National Plans
Monthly
Plan Type
s Choicesm
America
Description
Map
Access
Call anywhere from anywhere
s Choice
View on the America
Hap network with no roaming or
long
distance
39
99
99
199
Monthly
F
Airtime
Mil
Allowance
R
in
minutes
al
allo
400 3
200
0
charges
All the benefits of the
s Choice plans plus
America
Push to Talk Verizon
s Choicesm
America
with Push to Talk
View
Hap
talkie
Wireless new walkie
service Unlimited Push to
Talk one
to calls and only
99
59
400
99
219
200
3
0
SC
15 per minute per
0
participant for Push to Talk
Group calls
Buy
Promotional
s Choicesm
America
Family SharePlansm
America Choicesm
s
Family
one
lotorola V t20e
I
and get up to three
View
of thn same phone free
aP
iv
Share the value One account
phone
35
200
000
3
300
0
SC
One monthly bill
View Share the value One account
Hap One monthly bill
99
204
Pedect if you talk and travel
View around the country Domestic
Map roaming and domestic long
35
300
99
39
000
3
300
0
SharePlansm
National
SingleRatesm
150
000
3
0
distance included
s Choicesm
Compare America
with National SingleRatesm
Local Plans
Honthly
LOCAL
intro
customize
plsql
ics
com
verizonwireless
www
http
i
2003
8
9
Page
Home
You are
shopping
I Search I
1 of 4
Store Locab
in
Chanee Zio Code
Phones
Shop
or
browse our selection of digital phones
by price
manufacturer
network mode
Once you have selected your
or
phone you will be presented with calling
plan options
1 or 2 year agreement required on all phones Contract term and
phone availability varies by
View Phones
Compare
By
market
Price
O Mfg
O Mode
Phones
Check the compare boxes for 2 or 3
Phones link
phones
then click the
Compare
Under 100
Motorola
SPECIAL OFFER
Additional savings
or
other
promotions may apply to
phone pricing depending
on calling plan and
or
contract term
selected
V120e Silver
Audlovox
CDM9500
99
49
99
19
i
49
GET T NOW
Express Network
TXT
Messaging
Web Enabled
Compare
JJ
j
T
I
Enabled
Express Network
TXT Messaging
Web Enabled
Compare
Audlovox
Kyocera
CDM8300
KWC 2325
iiii
Exp
I
TX
Wel
Compare
Kyoc
KWC 2325
Office
Web Enabled
Web Enabled
TXT
Web
o
tT
rF
cs inu
cona
verizonwireless
www
http
stari u
i
pJsqi
sccuo E
L
2003
8
9
ed
by Carolyn Johnson
Planning Manager and Michael Gruver
Assistant Planner
Meeting
date
September 16
2003
TITLE
SUBJECT
PIER PARCELS MAP EXHIBIT
RECOMMENDATION
No recommendation
for information
only
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the request of the City
Council the Engineering Department in conjunction with GTA
the
attached map that depicts the ownership of the lands in and
prepared
around the Pismo Beach Pier As shown on the
map the majority of the lands from the Official
to
the
are
High Water Mark O
Limits
M
W
H
owned
the State of California and leased
City
Engineering
to the
City
has
of Pismo Beach
by
The
exceptions
extends to the H
O and the
M
W
M The pier itself is owned
W
H
O
operation agreement
with the State
the
the end of Wilmar Avenue that
from Ocean View Avenue to Park Avenue to the
the City and placed into the ocean under a lease and
are
area at
area
by
The
City
owns
the Pier
Parking
Lot
FISCAL IMPACT
None
OPTIONS
None
ATTACHMENTS
Pismo State Beach
LAND OWNERSHIP RECORD
Prepared by Brian K Duncan Associate Civil Engineer Meeting Date September 16
Recommended by R Dennis Delzeit City Engineer
Dir of Public Works
2003
Agenda Item
BI
6
Page
Welcome To Vefizon Wireless
Compare
Compare
Compare
L
Samsunq
VX3100
A310
i
rebate
Express Network
TXT Messaging
2 of 4
i
iiii
99
Express
Network
TXT Messaging
Web Enabled
Web Enabled
J Compare
r
100
Compare
and up
Audiovox
L
CDM8300 with Mobile
VX2000 with Mobile Office
t
Kl
Office Kit
98
109
i
98
119
i
Express Network
T Messaging
Web Enabled
Compare
Motorola
V120e Silver with Mobile
L
VX31
bef
rebat
Express NeLwork
Messaging
Web Enabled
Compare
Exp
Wel
Compare
Motorola
T730
Moto
V6
Office Kit
98
149
Express Network
PXT Messaging
Web Enabled
before 50
00
GET IT NOW
Enabled
Express Network
Exp
TXq
Wel
TXT Hessaging
Web Enabled
Compare
A310 with Mobile Office Kit
Compare
400
V
section
p
intro
start
pf
plsql
ics
com
verizonwireless
www
hltp
EQU1PMENT
Compare
PC 3
2003
8
9
Page
i
99
179
98
169
i
r
Express Network
TXT
Messaging
199
rebate
GET IT NOW
Web Enabled
3 of 4
Exp
Enabled
Web Enabled
Compare
Compare
Compare
G
L
Samsung
VX6000
30
A
SCH
99
199
99
199
before 50
00
iiiiii
F
Snap
Sierra W
Aircar
before 50
00
send
GET IT NOW
pictures
Enabled
Enabled
TXT Messaging
Web Enabled
Express Network
TXT IViessaging
Web Enabred
Compare
Compare
Compare
BlackBerry
6750tm
Audlovox
Thera Pocket PC
Kyoc
35 Sma
71
Phone
2002
i499
99
i
99
499
499
I
Exp
TX1
Express Network
i
i
L
ii T Hessaging
li
T Hessaging
Wel
Web Enabled
SPECZAL OFFER
Compare
Compare
Compare
Samsung
1700
SPH
Express Network
Web Enabled
ics
m
c
ess
nwire
veriz
www
http
s
s
s
p
nt
E
n
PMj
tart
ect
qb
QL
2003
8
9
Your Price Plan
Page
Map
1 of 2
Close Window
tan
Oa
2003
8
plan 9
p
popup
map
aps
id
category
m
coverage
plsql
ics
com
verizonwireless
www
http
Welcome to
our Wireless
Page
World
1 of 4
OUY
Mo
Offe
one
Your Free Offer for Pismo
Beach CA
Click here if this is not your
I
location
Free Motorola 331 Wireless
ju
nc
Phone
5000
NIght
nutes
Weekend M
Free Nationwide
Long Distance
Roll Unused Anytime
over
Minutes each Month
Limited time offer ve
We combined the hot new Motorola C331g
Free after rebates with the best rate plans from
now
wireless phone
Cingular
Wireless
See
Details Below
Motorola C331g
99
49
99 Instant Rebate
49
99
49
FREE
Cost to you
Motorola
C331g
Standard Features
Battery Type Lithium ion
Talk Time
Up to 240 Minutes
Stand By Time
Up to 242
Hours
500
Memory Locations
1 Touch
ll
J
Emergency
Yes
Speed Dialing Yes
Timer Types individual
Cumulative Audible
t
Ale
Ringer
Package
Entry
Pflonebook
Options
Includes
Includes
Hands
Car Charger Belt
Free Earbud In
Clip
99
Only 29
99
Add this to my order for 29
32
Up to 32
Customizable
Standard
Vibrating Option
Vib ra Call
Ned
3Ounces
iV
ght 4
SMS Messaging Two Way
Text
Messaging
Messaging flAPTM
Predictive Text Entry
SMS
2obilef
v
eferringdonqail
asF
p
z
agent
cnde
www 93449
s
htq
offe
com
inphonic
2003
8
9
Welcome to
our
Page
Wireless World
Select a wireless planl
Selection applies to each
2 of 4
cingular
phone
d Dealer
4z
Auth
Cingular SuperHome
600 w
Terms
Conditions
Rollover
per month
99
39
Included Features
600 Plan Minutes
Rollover Unused Anytime Minutes
m
000 Niaht
5
ekend Minutes
V
Nationwide Lon
3Distance
Basic Voice Mail
Caller ID
Call
Forwarding
Detailed Billing
way Calling
Three
s Important
Click For Additional Rate Plan Oetai
Cingular SuperHome
a
later date
1000 w
Rollover
99
49
per month
Included Features
1000 Plan Minutes
Rollover Unused Anytime Minutes
000 Night
5
Weekend Minutes
Nationwide Long Distance
Basic Voice Mail
t
Caller
ID
Call ng
Wa
Call Fonvarding
Detailed
Billing
Three Calling
way
Click For Additional Rate Plan Details
ortant
Im
Notices
Orders
by
for
InPhonic
Wireless
customers
er
O
later data
and
products
an
a
authorized
services
agent
exclusively
actJvatina
a
new
are
or
available
ne of
l
d
fulfil
Cingular
to
service
on
a
m
2003
8
er 9
m
c
nic
inph
www
https
agent
93449
de
zipc
ef
bi
qm
main
ngd
refer
asp
Cingular Template
Page
1 of 1
2002 Please note tha
The coverage depicted on this map reflects calling plan area for plans available after January 1
Please retain this calling plan map to
will
will
indicate
whether
incur
roaming
charges
on
not
you
your phone
display
Actual coverage area may differ st
the scope of your calling plan area Hap depicts rate area only not coverage area
be
affected
such
as
terrain
weather
foliage buildings and other cor
and
things
from map graphics
coverage may
by
not
guarantee coverage Roaming charges and
signal strength customer equipment and other factors Cingular does
and
the call not on the location of the st
of
the
site
transmitting
billed
based
on
the
location
receiving
charges witl be
2003
8
9
su
rnia
Calif
crn
Wes
laps
html
servlel
stores
wcs
webapp
com
cingular
onlinestore
http
Welcome to
our Wireless
1 of 2
Page
World
About Us
HelplFAQ
Site Security
Pghracy Policy
for Pismo Beach CA
or
call our
800
Bonus
Ref
Change Location
Offer Co
Shared Plans
More Local Plans
More National Plans
Local Coverage
Maps
l
Nat
Coverage Maps
Motorola
Bookmark Offer
IgSM 900
1900 MHz
18OO
iOet
V66g
More
Phone Details
See Other Phones
FREE
n
Package
Item
Motorola
i
99 per
39
Price
V66g
99
49
49
99
00
50
99
29
FREE
50 T
Mobile MaiMn
More National Plans
i
iii
i
i
ii See other Carriers
iB
i
Shared Plane
Rebate
Charger
Clip
Car
In
Belt
Free
Hands
Earbud
Total Value
Total cost
after rebate
99
9
99
29
FREE
FREE
96
119
00
0
Nationwide Lone Distance
No Roaminp Chames Nationwide
Enhanced VoiceMail
Caller ID
Conference Callina
Call Waitine and Call Hold
Click Here For Rate Plan Details
Optional
Features
Feature Unlimited
1 Buddv
I
rimeTM
LJ
I
Mobile To Mobile Callino
A
Text
T
obile Intemet Click I
Unlimited M
Details
T
g
enes 1MB tEntertainment
SMS Click For Details
2
10MB Entertainmen
v SMSl Click For Details
V
2
Zones Pro
riT
or
call
our
sales
department
at
7066
300
800
Bonus Code 188
51
Ref Code tmob
Offer Cede
specialofler
6B t7
93449 agent
zipcode
hotbar
erringdomain
re
specialoffer asp
com
inphonic
www
http
2003
8
9
Welcome to
our
Page
Wireless World
Beach
CA
Click here if this is not
1 of 4
y
u
r location
Motorola V66
600 Whenever Minutes
Weekend
Unlimited Night
Minutes
No
Roaming
Charges
ted t me offer We
m
L
wireless
now
or
Long
Distance
ve combined the hot new Motorola V66g
Free after rebates with the best rate plans from
phone
See Details Below
Mobile
T
Motorola
99
V66g
99
49
99 Instant Rebate
49
00
50
Motorola
00
50
V66g
Standard Features
Battery Type
Talk Time
in Rebate
Mobile Mail
T
FREE
Cost to you
Lithium ion
Up to 180 Minutes
Up to 125
StandBy Time
Hours
Memory Locations
500
Entry
Phonebook
1 Touch
Emergency
Speed Dialing
Yes
Package Includes Includes Hands
Car Charger Belt
Free Earbud In
Yes
Timer Types
Individual
Cumulative Audible
Ringer Options
Standard
Up to 32
Alert
Clip
99
Only 29
32
99
zable
Custom
Vibrating Option
VibraCall
AJert
3Ounces
Weight 4
Turn Way
SMS Messaging
Text Massaging
SMe
APTM
Messaging
Entry
Predictive Text
VVay Text Messaging
2
reless Internet
V
Ready
Yes
Yes
a
o
teferr lg
aSl
ofe
onccon
np
www
htips
rb
agent
9
t
k
zqx c
t
2003
8
9
Welcome to
our
Page
Wireless World
1 of 4
r
i
0
Mob
Q
le
Unlimited
Beach
CA
Click here if this is not
your
location
Weekend
Night
Minutes
No
Roaming
or
Long
Distance
Charges
600 Whenever Minutes
ve combined the hot new Nokia 3390 wireless
Free after rebates with the best rate plans from T
Details Below
tedbme offer We
Dm
phone
now
Mobile
See
ii
ii
Nokia 3390
99
99 Instant Rebate
99
Cost to you
FREE
Nokia 3390
Standard Features
Battery Type
Talk Time
StandBy
NiMH
Up to 200 Minutes
Time
Up to 180
Package Includes Includes Hands
Free Earbud In
Car Charger Belt
Hours
Memory
Locations
250
Alphanumeric Names
1 Touch Emergency
1
Yes
Speed Dialing Yes
Timer Types
Individual
Audible
Cumulative
AJert
Ringer Options
40
Clip
99
Only 29
99
Rings
Silent Mode
Vibrating Option
Included
2Ounces
iV
ght 4
SMS Messaging
SMS with
eg Predictive Text Input
T9
Way Text Massaging
2
Yes
https agent
93449
zipcode
qmobile
referringdomain
asp
offer
com
inphonic
www
2003
8
9
qlcfkzipcode93449apent982003pp
Welcome to
our
Wireless World
Page
YourFeOfPismBachCAkntyI
ted
m
L
Whenever
600
Charges
Distance
Long
or
Roaming
No
Weekend
Night
Unlimited
m
t
M
T
from
plans
rate
best
with
rebates
after
Free
now
phone
wireless
R229m
new
hot
the
combined
ve
We
offer
T
1
Phonebook
Entry
100
Locations
Memory
Hours
120
StandBy
Minutes
250
Up
Time
Talk
Ion
Lithium
Type
Battery
Features
Standard
FREE
you
to
Cost
Rebate
Instant
99
R225m
Samsung
Below
Details
See
Speed
Yes
Emergency
ouch
obile
e Text
Ounces
4
3
Weight
Alert
Internal
Option
Vibrating
Slots
Tone
loadable
Dow
Tones
Ring
25
Options
Ringer
AJert
Audible
Cumulative
Individual
Types
Timer
Dialing
W
2
Input
Predictive
reg
Tg
with
SMS
InCar
Earbud
Free
Hands
Includes
Package
Yes
Messaging
ay Charger
99Add
29
Only
Clip
Belt
eferr
l
offe
co
hon
in
xww
hn
99
29
for
order
my
to
this
a
kf2do
1 of 4
Welcome to
our
Page
Wireless World
Select
2 of 4
Wireless Planl
a
Terms
Get More
Conditions
99 per month
39
Included Features
600 Plan Minutes
Weekend Minutes
Unlimited Night
Nationwide Lone Distanc
NO Roamina Charges Nationwide Diaital Roaming
Enhanced VoiceMail
Caller
ID
Conference Calling
CallVVeitina and Call Hold
Choose
O
Zgnes 1MB
T
For Details
O
Data Plan
a
Entertainment
Way SMS Click
2
99
2
Zones Pro
T
1OMB Entertainment
Click For Details
O Unlimited
Way SMS
2
99
9
Mobile Internet Click For Details
T
99
19
O No Data Plan
a
later date
Get More Plus
99 per month
59
Included Features
1000 Plan Minutes
Unlimited Night
Weekend Minutes
Nationwide Lona Distance
Nationwide DiGital
No Roaming Charaes
lnstant
AOL
MessengerTM
Enhanced VoiceMail
Conference
Roaming
Service
Calling
Call Waiting and Call Hold
Choose
a
Data Plan
O T
Zones 1MB Entertainment
For Details
Way SMS
2
Click
99
2
Zones Pro lOMB
T
Click For Details
Entertainment
Way SMSt
2
99
9
O Unlimited T
Mobile internet Click For Details
99
19
No Data
Pia
93449agent
zipcode
qmobilef
referringdomain
asp
offer
com
inphonic
https www
2003
8
9
SUBJECT I TITLE
INITIAL OVERVIEW OF KEY FINANCIAL ISSUES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council
City
and
perhaps
set
an
begin updated discussions
workshops
of
initial schedule of
key financial issues facing
the
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The primary purpose of this item is to
begin a dialogue with the
City Council regarding key related
Finance issues that need to be addressed over the next few
months
It is proposed that this
dialogue begin with simply sharing a list of key Capital
type projects and
financing issues and brief descriptions of the key issues as perceived as this time
This interactive process would involve Council
providing its comments and directions regarding
related
priorities
and
requests
Eventually the
for further information
process will culminate with the Council
making decisions on
such matters as
Development Impact Fees
The
financing components for funding the Wastewater Treatment Facilities
s including possible increases in sewer user rates and other fees such
Project
as the above noted
The
Financing components on such General Fund projects
facilities Parks facilities Streets and other infrastructure
as
Public
Safety
And
perhaps developing a Comprehensive long
term Strategic Financial Plan
which could include all the projects listed in the
Capital Improvement Plan plus
other projects in the next five years or beyond as the Council
may choose
FISCAL IMPACT
Since the Council
will not be asked at this Council
Meeting to make decisions to commit fiscal
resources the immediate fiscal impact of this Agenda item is
essentially zero other than some
staff time and related
fees
the
expended under
on consulting
going
previously approved
great majority of which has been
contracts
However given the multi
millionS of anticipated Capital project costs the quality of the
decisions which get made
eventually on these issues may have multi
million dollar
on
the
s citizens businesses
City
and visitors who pay
taxes
user
fees and other
impacts
charges
Agenda
Item
6c
I
OPTIONS
To not discuss these
Capital Project and Financial Issues
at this
time but rather at some later
time
ATTACHMENTS
A one page
List of
Key Capital Projects and
Financial Issues
for
Initial Discussions
And
Prepared by
a one
page Financial
George Edes Interim
September 16
2003
Update Wastewater Treatment Facilities Project
Admin Services Director
Meeting Date Sep 16
2003
Agenda
Item
6C
City
List of
of Pismo Beach
Key Capital Projects
and Financial Issues
for
Initial Discussions
September 16
2003
Overview of Current Key Capital Projects
Ao
B
C
D
E
F
G
II
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Project VVWTF
Other Upgrades to Wastewater System
Project
Upgrades
to Water System
Ventana Fire Station and Shell Beach Station
Streets and other Infrastructure
Parks
Moderate Housing
Low
Overview of Key Finance
Issues Related to
A
Development Impact
B
Wastewater User Rates
C
Completing Financing
D
Arranging Financing
Fees
Capital Projects
plus Quimby Act Fees for Parks
perhaps
for VVVVTF
also Water Rates
Project
for other Wastewater and Water
Projects
E
Arranging Financing
F
Comprehensive Strategic
for General Fund
Financial
System
Projects
Planning
Agenda
Item
6c
3
City of Pismo Beach
Financial
Update Wastewater Treatment Facilities Project VVVVTF Project
Comprised of Major Upgrades
Pismo Oaks Lift
Station
and
to the
a new
Wastewater Treatment Plant plus Upgrades
18 Trunk Sewer Line the Park
to the
Cyprus Interceptor
This VVWTF
Project is well underway with award of construction contract scheduled for
or January 2004 construction is scheduled
to start in mid January 2004 and be completed in the Autumn of 2005
Overall project cost is currently estimated at about 14 million
December 2003
1
F nanc ncl
Components fairly
well in Place
Loan from State Water Resources Control Board SWRCB
for 12
4 Million Work continues on meeting the State
s Conditions of
Approval
b
Some
for this
Enterprise
Loan
Fund
Balances including Development Impact Fees
collected to date
2
Financ n
q
a
Components which
Interim cash flow
need additional
Financing
about 4
5 million for about 6 months
Probable increases in Wastewater
and other
c
Updating
2
user
fees to
support the SWRCB loan
Financing
the
Applications
1
work and Council Decisions
for additional
Financing
to
support Financing
for the WWTF
California Infrastructure and Economic
USDA Rural Development Financing
3
Revenue Bond
4
Possible
Final decisions
Bridge
Project
Development Bank
other Private Financing
Loan for above noted Interim
or
Financing
the
optimum mix of Financing Components
including possible combined financing with other Pismo Beach projects
with financing projects of other cities
on
Final submittal to the SWRCB of final
Program
to be
completed
update
or
to the Draft Revenue
after 90 of Construction
16
09
03
Agenda
Item
C
6
SUBJECT
TITLE
USE OF THE CITY
S LOGO OR
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
FLAG AS
IT
RELATES
TO THE
DOWNTOWN
RECOMMENDATION
Provide direction
downtown
as to
which emblem to
use on
the proposed street
core
light medallions
for the
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pismo Beach as many cities in California has a
City Logo and a City Flag Most City Logos
depict prominent features of a community and is used as a corporate identification not
only for
marketing purposes but also for identification of property City flags tend to be used more for
ceremonial functions and
In Pismo
Beach the
has
are a
little
of the
been used
use
Logo
historically
the City Flag has also been
used
more
elaborate in
design
logo and the flag has been mixed over the years The City
city letterhead vehicle identification and such However
on vehicles and city
property making it a bit confusing
on
The issue at hand is which one should be considered on
the new street light medallions that
are planned for downtown
The Community Improvement
Group reviewed both designs and
found that the City Logo because of its dramatic
simplistic design was the best choice The
majority found that in viewing the medallion from a distance the City Logo provided a clear
crisp image Staff concurs with this reasoning and is recommending Council provide direction
to incorporate the City Logo in the proposed
streetscape design for the downtown
FISCAL IMPACT
The
proposed medallions a currently unfunded
The cost of each medallion runs
approximately 400
00 City Staff the Community Improvement Group and the Chamber of
Commerce are looking into a donation
program to fund these improvements
There are no
fiscal impacts at this time with this decision
OPTIONS
Provide staff direction
on
design choice
ATTACHMENTS
City Logo
City Flag
Street light Design
Prepared by Randy Bloom
ty
i
A
n Manager
2003
Z
l
I
Agenda Item
D
6
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
11
5
LUMINAIRES
FOreIGN MAIERIAL THE C
LSTING HAS A UNJI
OIIM IHICKNEb
S OF 1
BRONZE LOGO
IBY OTHERS
REFLECTOR
8PUN ALUMINUM DOME DESIGNED ro PI
ODUC AN ANSI lES CLA
SlFICMION
V DIS1RIBUIION FOR J
VEN ILLUMINATION OF THE GLOW RINGS
DIFFUSERS
CELl NEC
REN GASKEL
OUIER RINGS
T
IS HLYTESIED I
PI10 SHIPMENL
M
1 6
0
LE
1 4
C
FINISH
I
LTA
LIOHTINO
ENGINEERING DESIGN DEPT
TITLE
GR SERIES Ay
WALkM LUMINAIRE
WITH UPPER ROADWAY LIGHTING
R WETZ
L
2894
DJ
30
3
01
8
3
1 0
R2
OPTIONS
Clr
B
DUPLEX RECEPTACLE

PDF MAKE - Pismo Beach

Transcription

Similar documents

Dinosaur Caves Park

You`re invited to the 3nd annual Weenie Roast

BROCHURE-ACQUALINA MIAMI

Mrs. House and Mrs. Huba`s STEM Challenge Day

Help Support Our Cause For Paws!

Weenie Roast - Cape Fear Sail and Power Squadron

Palm Beach - Blue Ocean Apartment

February 2015 - Pismo Beach Chamber of Commerce

Company Events Design Your Own Beach Party