Summit and Medina Workforce - Ohio Labor Market Information

Transcription

Workforce Analysis
Summit and Medina Workforce
Development System
Williams
Ottawa
Wood
Henry
Sandusky
Erie
Putnam
Trumbull
Lorain
Huron
Seneca
Paulding
Van Wert
Geauga
Cuyahoga
Medina
Summit
Portage
Mahoning
Hancock
Wyandot
Allen
Crawford
Richland
Ashland
Wayne
Stark
Hardin
Shelby
Logan
Union
Darke
Preble
Montgomery
Madison
Noble
Perry
Morgan
Hocking
Warren
Clinton
Ross
Highland
Hamilton
Pike
Clermont
Brown
Adams
Harrison
Muskingum
Pickaway
Washington
Athens
Vinton
Meigs
Jackson
Gallia
Scioto
Lawrence
WORKFORCE 411
Jefferson
Tuscarawas
Guernsey
Franklin
Fairfield
Greene
Fayette
Butler
Coshocton
Licking
Miami
Clark
Knox
Delaware
Champaign
Carroll
Holmes
Morrow
Belmont
Monroe
Workforce Analysis
Marion
Auglaize
Mercer
Columbiana
Summit and Medina Workforce Development System
Defiance
Fulton
Ashtabula
Lake
Lucas
2007
Workforce Analysis
Summit and Medina Workforce Development
System
Table of Contents
Preface ......................................................................................................................................... ii
Highlights .....................................................................................................................................iii
I. Understanding the Local Labor Market ................................................................................ 1
Figure 1: Regional Commuting Patterns ................................................................................. 1
Figure 2: Net Flow of Ohio Commuters................................................................................... 2
II. Key Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3: Population Trends .................................................................................................. 3
4: Demographic Characteristics ................................................................................... 3
5: Employment Trends ............................................................................................... 4
6: Employment in the Workforce Development System by Major Industry ....................... 4
7: Unemployment Trends............................................................................................ 5
8: Per Capita Income.................................................................................................. 6
9: Number of New Residential Building Permits............................................................. 7
10: Valuation of New Residential Building Permits ......................................................... 7
III. Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................. 8
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
11:
12:
13:
14:
Employment by Major Sector, 2005........................................................................ 8
Employment by Industry Sector, 2005.................................................................... 9
Employment Prospects by Industry Sector ............................................................ 10
Sectors Ranked by 2005 Average Weekly Earnings ................................................ 11
IV. Educational Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 12
Figure 15: Educational Attainment ....................................................................................... 12
Technical Notes ......................................................................................................................... 13
References ................................................................................................................................. 14
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
A: Ohio Workforce Investment Areas ................................................................... 15
B: Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas................................................................ 16
C: Major County-to-County Commuting Patterns ................................................ 19
D: Major Employers by County .............................................................................. 20
Summit & Medina Workforce Development System
Preface
Over the last few years, the Bureau of Labor Market Information (BLMI) has prepared several
sets of customized regional publications to help workforce professionals and others gain a better
understanding of their local economy and how it has fared compared to other areas. In June
2002, “Demographic, Labor Force and Industry Trends” were published for Ohio’s 12 Economic
Development Regions; “Market Analysis of Key Workforce Trends” was published for all of
Ohio’s Workforce Investment Areas in 2000. This current set of “Workforce Analysis”
publications is an update of these efforts to produce reports for all nineteen WIAs in the state,
including all One-Stops in WIA 7.
This workforce analysis report provides a summary snapshot of the Summit and Medina
Workforce Development System (referred to as the ‘Workforce Development System’ in this
document), the Workforce Investment Area for Medina and Summit Counties. This presentation
also examines some of the key trends compared to state and national trends. The first section
begins with a review of the area’s basic demographic and economic characteristics. The second
section shows trends in important statistics for the area, including population, employment,
unemployment rates, income and housing. Employment characteristics by industry receive a
detailed examination in the third section. The fourth and final section looks briefly at the area’s
educational characteristics.
A careful review of this information can yield important insights about the local economy. One
may assess the health of the local economy by examining key economic trends and comparing
them to the state or the nation. Or an examination of industry composition will yield insights
into the strengths and weaknesses that local economic development policy might address. Please
refer to the Technical Notes and References sections at the end of this publication for reference
and documentation of the wide variety of statistical data presented in this report.
Keith Ewald, Ph.D., Chief
Bureau of Labor Market Information
Office of Workforce Development
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
ii
Highlights
Summit County is the economically and demographically dominant county in the
Workforce Development System area. This is due in part to its larger population and
employment base.
The two counties in this workforce investment area differ significantly in their
commuting patterns, primarily because they belong to two different metropolitan
statistical areas.
Total population has increased about 6.3 percent in the last ten years. Demographically,
the two counties differ noticeably in their age distributions.
Employment rolls have grown 10.7 percent between 1995 and 2005. Medina County was
affected less by the 2001 recession than was Summit County with its large industrial
base. Area unemployment rates have tracked very closely with state and national rates.
Nominal per capita income has risen steadily over the past ten years at a 3.7 percent
annual compound rate of growth, reaching nearly $33,300 in 2004.
Construction activity has fallen from a peak in 1996, with about three thousand permits
granted in 2005. Average valuation has increased steadily during the last decade.
The dominant employment sectors for this region in 2005 were trade, transportation and
utilities; professional and business services; manufacturing; and education and health
services.
Management of companies and enterprises is more concentrated here than elsewhere in
the state and experienced the most job growth from 2000 to 2005, followed by health care
and social assistance.
Management of companies and enterprises also had the area’s highest average weekly
earnings: $1,532, followed by mining, wholesale trade and federal government. Over
half of all local industry sectors paid more than the statewide average.
The area has a higher level of overall educational attainment than the rest of the state.
iii
Workforce Analysis
Summit and Medina Workforce Development
System
I. Understanding Local Labor Markets
Labor economists define a labor market as a geographic area in which both the demand and
supply for labor are met primarily within that region. 1 In other words, it is an area where there
are jobs and the majority of workers needed for those jobs. An important first step in identifying
local labor markets is to examine the commuting patterns of individuals who live or work in the
area. These patterns are one of the primary inputs used to define metropolitan and micropolitan
areas. 2
These two counties differ significantly in their commuting patterns, with Summit County
showing a large influx of workers from outside the county. The commuting differences between
the two counties may be explained in part by the fact that they are included in two separate
metropolitan areas: Medina County is a part of the Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor metropolitan area,
while Summit County contains the central city for the Akron Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Figure 1: Regional Commuting Patterns
Workforce Development System
Total Working in the County
In Commuters
Percent of In Commuters
Total Employed Living in the County
Out Commuters
Percent of Out Commuters
Commuting Balance: Net Flow
Percent of Total Commuters
Medina
Summit
In Commuters
55,311
270,431
19,627
76,719
35.5%
28.4%
Out Commuters
76,548
258,414
40,864
64,702
53.4%
25.0%
Net Comparison Statistics
-21,237
12,017
-35.1%
8.5%
Figure 2 on the next page shows a visual summary of the net flow of commuters from the 2000
decennial census. Most workers commuting into a county to work usually do so from adjacent
counties. Detailed county-to-county commuting is shown in Appendix C.
1
Goldstein 2005, p. 10.
Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Area definitions are excerpted from the Office of Management and
Budget’s Federal Register Notice (65 FR 82228 – 82238). See Appendix B for detailed definitions.
2
Understanding Local Labor Markets, continued
Figure 2: Net Flow of Ohio Commuters
*Net flow equals in commuters minus out commuters. A negative number
means more people are commuting to work outside the county than are in
commuting. For more detailed information, please visit
http://lmi.state.oh.us/Census/CommutingPatterns2000.pdf on the web.
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information
2
II. Key Trends
Population: Total population in the Workforce Development System area has grown about 6.3
percent in the last ten years, compared to only 2.3 percent statewide. While Medina County is
clearly the smaller of the two, it has also shown the most growth, adding about 30 thousand
residents during this period (22.0%). Summit County’s population increased by only 2.3
percent.
Figure 3: Population Trends
800,000
Workforce Dev. Sys.
Medina
Summit
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Workforce Dev. Sys.
671,148
678,024
682,501
686,225
690,874
695,456
700,113
704,520
708,271
711,300
713,614
Medina
136,897
140,052
142,999
145,578
149,137
151,877
154,789
158,381
161,651
164,692
167,010
Summit
534,251
537,972
539,502
540,647
541,737
543,579
545,324
546,139
546,620
546,608
546,604
Demographic Traits: Data from the 2000 Census, shown in Figure 4 below, reveal some
interesting differences between the counties. Medina County is the younger of the two, with a
lower median age and higher proportion of minors under 18 (27.2%). Medina County also has a
slightly higher proportion of working age adults 18 to 64: about 62.2 percent compared to 61.9
percent in Summit County. Summit County has a substantially larger share of elderly residents.
Figure 4: Demographic Characteristics
Age Demographics
Total Population
Under 5 years
5 to 17 years
18 to 24 years
25 to 44 years
45 to 64 years
65 years or older
Median Age
Workforce. Dev. Sys.
Number
Percent
685,133
100.0%
43,897
6.4%
125,810
18.4%
60,298
8.8%
209,761
30.6%
154,518
22.6%
90,849
13.3%
Medina
Number
Percent
147,277
100.0%
9,541
6.5%
30,578
20.8%
11,278
7.7%
46,334
31.5%
34,045
23.1%
15,501
10.5%
36.6
3
Summit
Number
Percent
537,856
100.0%
34,356
6.4%
95,232
17.7%
49,020
9.1%
163,427
30.4%
120,473
22.4%
75,348
14.0%
37.2
Key Trends, continued
Employment: Figure 5 below shows major differences in employment between Medina and
Summit Counties. Summit County accounts for more than four fifths of employment in the area
and is more susceptible to economic downturns. Medina County’s employment levels, however,
showed almost no reaction to the recession of 2001. Overall, employment has grown 10.7
percent between 1995 and 2005.
Figure 5: Employment Trends
350,000
Workforce Dev. Sys.
Medina
Summit
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Workforce Dev. Sys.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
297,659
303,720
307,451
311,157
317,443
319,832
314,313
315,443
316,735
322,366
329,619
Medina
45,268
47,025
48,899
51,128
52,146
53,196
53,215
53,710
56,125
57,389
59,280
Summit
252,391
256,695
258,552
260,029
265,297
266,636
261,098
261,733
260,610
264,977
270,339
Several major sectors have added jobs in the last economic cycle, including professional and
business services, education and health services and leisure and hospitality. Manufacturing
industries lost the most jobs in this area between 2000 and 2005.
Figure 6: Employment in the Workforce Development System by Major Industry
Major Sector
Total All Sectors
Natural Resources and Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation and Utilities
Information
Financial Activities
Professional and Business Services
Education and Health Services
Leisure and Hospitality
Other Services, except Public Administration
4
2000
2005
319,832
699
14,645
58,888
68,153
4,959
13,984
42,467
39,029
29,428
10,466
329,619
542
14,952
46,871
71,264
4,520
14,680
50,575
46,298
31,793
9,971
Net
Percent
Growth
Growth
2000-2005 2000-2005
9,787
3.1%
-157
-22.5%
307
2.1%
-12,017
-20.4%
3,111
4.6%
-439
-8.9%
696
5.0%
8,108
19.1%
7,269
18.6%
2,365
8.0%
-495
-4.7%
Unemployment: The Workforce Development System has largely followed the same pattern of
fluctuations in unemployment as Ohio and the U.S. The region showed a slight upward trend in
1999 before major increases in 2001, indicating the region felt the effects of the recession earlier
than the rest of the country. Medina County had lower unemployment rates in the last decade,
only 4.7 percent in 2005. Summit County has tracked more closely with nationwide rates, 5.8
percent in 2005 compared with 5.9 percent in Ohio and 5.1 percent for the U.S.
Figure 7: Unemployment Trends
7.0%
U.S.
Ohio
Workforce Dev. Sys,
Medina
Summit
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
U.S.
5.6%
5.4%
4.9%
4.5%
4.2%
4.0%
4.7%
5.8%
6.0%
5.5%
5.1%
Ohio
4.9%
5.0%
4.6%
4.3%
4.3%
4.0%
4.4%
5.7%
6.2%
6.2%
5.9%
Workforce Dev. Sys,
4.6%
4.6%
4.3%
3.9%
4.1%
3.9%
4.4%
5.6%
5.9%
5.8%
5.5%
Medina
4.6%
4.1%
3.7%
3.2%
3.4%
3.2%
3.7%
4.5%
5.0%
4.9%
4.7%
Summit
4.6%
4.8%
4.5%
4.1%
4.3%
4.2%
4.6%
6.0%
6.2%
6.1%
5.8%
5
Income: As Figure 8 below shows, per capita incomes in the area have been nearly identical
over the past few years, varying by only by a few hundred dollars. Area wide, income has risen
to nearly $33,300 per capita in 2004. Incomes have been rising steadily over the past ten years at
an annual compound rate of growth of 3.7 percent, the same as Ohio’s growth rate but somewhat
lower than the country’s 4.1 percent annual growth. Local incomes have generally held just
above state and national incomes throughout this period. This may be because the area is largely
urbanized; incomes in urban areas tend to be higher than those in rural counties.
Figure 8: Per Capita Income
$40,000
U.S.
Ohio
Workforce Dev. Sys.
Medina
Summit
$35,000
$30,000
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
U.S.
$23,076
$24,175
$25,334
$26,883
$27,939
$29,845
$30,574
$30,810
$31,484
$33,050
Ohio
$22,495
$23,322
$24,656
$26,017
$26,859
$28,207
$28,601
$29,212
$29,954
$31,161
Workforce Dev. Sys.
$23,933
$24,930
$26,337
$28,001
$28,955
$30,578
$30,488
$30,865
$31,859
$33,287
Medina
$24,049
$24,939
$26,605
$28,316
$29,330
$30,761
$30,758
$30,809
$31,624
$32,777
Summit
$23,904
$24,928
$26,266
$27,917
$28,852
$30,527
$30,412
$30,882
$31,929
$33,441
6
Housing Permits: New permits for residential construction are shown in Figure 9 below.
Overall, new construction activity has been cooling off from its peak in 1996, with about three
thousand permits granted in 2005. Summit County has accounted for most of this decline.
Trends in Medina County have been essentially flat in the last decade. The average valuations
for these new permits have been steadily increasing during this period.
Figure 9: Number of New Residential Building Permits
6,000
Workforce Dev. Sys.
Medina
Summit
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Workforce Dev. Sys.
3,705
4,360
3,993
5,000
4,350
4,286
4,054
3,602
3,735
3,862
3,157
Medina
1,412
1,505
1,388
1,846
1,514
1,681
1,551
1,529
1,381
1,639
1,189
Summit
2,293
2,855
2,605
3,154
2,836
2,605
2,503
2,073
2,354
2,223
1,968
2004
2005
Figure 10: Valuation of New Residential Building Permits
$250,000
Workforce Dev. Sys.
Medina
Summit
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Workforce Dev. Sys.
$121,176 $122,123 $124,166 $122,498 $142,991 $134,587 $149,281 $158,688 $167,527 $168,394 $190,210
Medina
$123,585 $143,439 $133,157 $131,720 $159,980 $149,626 $158,144 $159,832 $191,847 $174,491 $210,480
Summit
$119,692 $110,887 $119,375 $117,100 $133,922 $124,882 $143,789 $157,845 $153,259 $163,898 $177,964
7
III. Industry Analysis
Employment by Sector: Figure 11 below shows the distribution of industry employment in
2005. These statistics do not include most farmers, other self-employed workers, and others not
covered by unemployment insurance. This pie chart shows a very diverse mix of employment in
the Workforce Development System region. The four dominant major sectors in this region,
together accounting for nearly two thirds of all local workers, are trade, transportation and
utilities, which includes retail, wholesale markets, trucking and warehousing; professional and
business services, including law and accounting firms, corporate offices and administrative
support; manufacturing; and education and health services, including hospitals, clinics, colleges
and private schools.
The other major sectors shown in this chart are government and public schools (11.5%); leisure
and hospitality, which includes hotels, restaurants and certain recreation facilities (9.7%);
construction (4.5%); financial activities like banking, insurance and real estate (4.5%); other
service industries like laundries, repair shops and certain non-profit organizations (3.0%);
information, including publishing and telecommunications (1.4%); and a small number of
workers in natural resources and mining (0.2%).
Figure 11: Employment by Major Sector, 2005
Natural Resources and
Mining
0.2%
Construction
4.5%
Government
11.5%
Manufacturing
14.2%
Other Services
3.0%
9.7%
Trade, Transportation and
Utilities
21.6%
Education and Health
Services
14.1%
Information
1.4%
Professional and Business
Services
15.4%
4.5%
Figure 12 on the next page shows more detailed information about sector employment in the
region and how it compares with the state. In addition to the area’s industry mix relative to the
state, the proportion of total state employment for each sector helps identify the importance of a
sector’s employment in Ohio. The clearest example of such an industry is management of
8
Industry Analysis, continued
companies and enterprises, which includes mostly holding companies and corporate offices. In
Ohio, this sector accounts for only 1.9 percent of workers, but in this area, its share is 4.8
percent. Two other concentrated industries in this region are wholesale and retail trade, with 5.2
and 12.4 percent shares, respectively.
Figure 12: Employment by Industry Sector, 2005
Industry Sector
Total All Sectors
Natural Resources and Mining
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation and Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation and Warehousing
Utilities
Information
Finance and Insurance
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Professional and Business Services
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
Management of Companies and Enterprises
Administrative and Waste Services
Education and Health Services
Education Services
Health Care and Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment and Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services
Government, including Public Schools
Federal Government
State Government
Local Government
NA-Data not available due to confidentiality restrictions.
Employment
329,619
542
385
157
14,952
46,871
71,264
17,142
40,861
NA
NA
4,520
14,680
10,986
3,695
50,575
13,329
15,750
21,496
46,298
3,886
42,411
31,793
5,022
26,771
9,971
37,963
2,716
4,874
30,373
9
Percent
Distrib.
100.0%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
4.5%
14.2%
21.6%
5.2%
12.4%
NA
NA
1.4%
4.5%
3.3%
1.1%
15.3%
4.0%
4.8%
6.5%
14.0%
1.2%
12.9%
9.6%
1.5%
8.1%
3.0%
11.5%
0.8%
1.5%
9.2%
State
Employment
5,308,808
24,925
14,136
10,790
232,472
811,894
1,035,829
235,497
613,800
166,144
20,389
89,876
299,322
229,744
69,578
643,266
231,601
98,622
313,043
750,229
85,739
664,489
499,494
67,979
431,515
165,617
753,515
76,892
132,144
544,479
State
Distrib.
100.0%
0.5%
0.3%
0.2%
4.4%
15.3%
19.5%
4.4%
11.6%
3.1%
0.4%
1.7%
5.6%
4.3%
1.3%
12.1%
4.4%
1.9%
5.9%
14.1%
1.6%
12.5%
9.4%
1.3%
8.1%
3.1%
14.2%
1.4%
2.5%
10.3%
Percent of
State Total
6.2%
2.2%
2.7%
1.5%
6.4%
5.8%
6.9%
7.3%
6.7%
NA
NA
5.0%
4.9%
4.8%
5.3%
7.9%
5.8%
16.0%
6.9%
6.2%
4.5%
6.4%
6.4%
7.4%
6.2%
6.0%
5.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.6%
Employment Prospects: The table below looks at industry classifications and is color coded to
more quickly identify those sectors most important to the region. The left column ranks twenty
sectors shown by their employment levels in 2005. The top ten sectors in this column are printed
in blue. The right column ranks sectors by the net number of new jobs created since 2005. The
top ten growth sectors in the second column (in terms of net jobs added) are printed in red.
Sectors that appear at the top of both lists are printed in purple. Sectors for which a growth rate
could not be established due to confidentiality restrictions are printed in italics. Sectors with
high employment levels are often a major source of job openings because seven of ten openings
are expected to be replacement needs. 3
There are several sectors that appear at the top of both lists: health care and social assistance;
retail trade; local government; accommodation and food services; wholesale trade; and
management of companies and enterprises. The largest employment sector in the region was
manufacturing, which employed nearly 47,000 workers but also lost the greatest number of jobs.
The three remaining large employment sectors were administrative and waste services;
construction; and professional, scientific and technical services. Management of companies and
enterprises added the most jobs during this period: about 9,400. 4 The four remaining growth
sectors were education services; finance and insurance; arts, entertainment and recreation; and
state government.
Figure 13: Employment Prospects by Industry Sector
2005 Employment
Manufacturing
Retail Trade
Local Government
Wholesale Trade
Construction
State Government
Information
Education Services
Federal Government
Mining
New Jobs: 2000-2005
Management of Companies and Enterprises4
Education Services
Local Government
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
State Government
Construction
Federal Government
Information
Manufacturing
Mining
3
Ohio Job Outlook to 2012, p. 3.
A large portion of this growth is due to industry reclassifications from other categories. Statewide, employment in
this industry sector grew approximately 19.6 percent from 2000 to 2005.
4
10
Average Weekly Earnings: Figure 14 below ranks the sectors in the area by their average
weekly earnings—total wage or salary regardless of hours worked—and shows how much the
sectors have grown or declined in 2005. Statewide average weekly earnings for all employers
were $718 in 2005, the same as for this region. This table also uses the same color-coding
system as Figure 13 on the previous page, with sectors printed in purple being large sectors with
growth.
More than half of the industry sectors shown here had average weekly earnings higher than the
state average. The highest-earning sector in this region was also the fastest growing:
management of companies and enterprises. Average weekly earnings in this sector were $1,532
per week in 2005. The remaining top five earning sectors were mining at $1,495 per week,
wholesale trade at $999 per week, federal government at $975 per week, and professional,
scientific and technical services at $973 per week.
Bear in mind that industry size and growth do not always coincide with earnings potential.
Accommodation and food services was one of the largest employment sectors for 2005 and
added nearly 1,800 jobs in the last five years, but was also the area’s lowest-paying sector, with
the average worker making only $211 per week. This industry tends to hire large numbers of
part time workers, for many of whom tip income—not included in these statistics—is a large
portion of earnings.
Figure 14: Sectors Ranked by 2005 Average Weekly Earnings
Industry Sector
2000
Employment
2005
Employment
6,383
NA
16,400
3,137
12,922
58,888
10,253
4,463
4,959
14,645
29,273
36,302
3,731
NA
2,727
40,422
23,162
10,466
4,433
24,997
15,750
157
17,142
2,716
13,329
46,871
10,986
4,874
4,520
14,952
30,373
42,411
3,695
385
3,886
40,861
21,496
9,971
5,022
26,771
Mining
Wholesale Trade
Federal Government
Manufacturing
State Government
Information
Construction
Local Government
Education Services
Retail Trade
NA-Data not available due to confidentiality restrictions.
11
Net
Change
9,367
NA
742
-421
407
-12,017
733
411
-439
307
1,100
6,109
-36
NA
1,159
439
-1,666
-495
589
1,774
Percent
Change
146.7%
NA
4.5%
-13.4%
3.1%
-20.4%
7.1%
9.2%
-8.9%
2.1%
3.8%
16.8%
-1.0%
NA
42.5%
1.1%
-7.2%
-4.7%
13.3%
7.1%
Average
Weekly
Earnings
$1,532
$1,495
$999
$975
$973
$900
$896
$893
$887
$758
$744
$701
$538
$487
$458
$456
$434
$408
$290
$211
IV. Educational Infrastructure
Figure 15 below shows educational attainment for persons 25 and older in the area, according to
data from the 2000 decennial census. Overall, the Workforce Development System region has a
slightly higher level of educational attainment than the rest of the state, especially in terms of
bachelor degree holders. Medina and Summit Counties are both similar in their educational
profiles.
Figure 15: Educational Attainment
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Ohio
Workforce Development
System
Medina
Summit
30,421
547,276
37,296
6,875
Bachelor's Degree
1,016,258
78,309
17,634
60,675
Associate Degree
436,608
25,368
6,208
19,160
Master's Degree or Higher
Some College
1,471,964
100,011
21,203
78,808
High School Graduate
2,674,551
157,703
35,998
121,705
No High School Diploma
1,262,085
62,963
11,087
51,876
There are 20 postsecondary schools in the region: Hamrick Truck Driving School in Medina,
Medina County Career Center, the Academy of Court Reporting in Akron, Akron Adult
Vocational Services, Akron Machining Institute, Akron Medical-Dental Institute, Akron School
of Practical Nursing, Akron Testing Lab and Welding School in Barberton, the Berlitz Language
Center in Akron, Brown Mackie College in Akron, the Carnegie Institute of Integrative Medicine
& Massotherapy in Suffield, Edutek College in Fairlawn, the National Institute of Massotherapy
in Akron, National Institute of Technology in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio College of Massotherapy in
Akron, Portage Lakes Career Center in Green, Riggs Lemar Beauty College in Cuyahoga Falls,
the University of Akron, and the W. Howard Nicol School of Practical Nursing in Green. In
addition, the area is host to 1,925 apprentices in 45 programs, covering such fields like electrical
work, carpentry, masonry, sheet metal working, millwright work and several other trades.
12
Technical Notes
Commuting data are from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing, “County-to-County
Worker Flow Files.” Data is available at http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/P0005.htm.
Population and demographic estimates were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. The figures
are available online at http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php.
Employment data were obtained from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
(QCEW), Bureau of Labor Market Information, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
The data are based on reports filed by employers subject to the Ohio Unemployment
Compensation Law, as well as those covered under Unemployment Compensation for Federal
Employees, by place of work. See the NAICS-based Economic Development Profiles at
http://lmi.state.oh.us/CEP/CEP.htm or the data query menu for Employment and Wages by
Industry at http://www.ohioworkforceinformer.org. Because data for some industry sectors in
some counties have not been released due to confidentiality requirements, we were not able to
report data for these sectors in the region. Total employment may include employment and wage
data for non-classifiable establishments.
Unemployment statistics are produced by the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
section, Bureau of Labor Market Information, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
Data for One-Stop areas are available for query at http://www.ohioworkforceinformer.org or for
other geographies at http://lmi.state.oh.us/ASP/LAUS/vbLaus.htm.
Per capita income figures are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and are downloadable from
http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis.
Information on residential construction permits and their valuation are from the U.S. Census
Bureau, “Construction Reports: Housing Authorized by Building Permits and Public Contracts.”
Data are available online at http://www.census.gov/const/www/permitsindex.html.
Data on education were obtained from the Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic
Research, based on information from the 2000 decennial census. Detailed information on each
of Ohio’s counties is available at http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm. The Bureau
of Labor Market Information also collects data on programs for the Integrated Postsecondary
Educational Data System (IPEDS). These data are posted on the internet by the National Center
for Education Statistics at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cool.
The list of major employers in each county is available in the Ohio County Profiles produced by
the Ohio Department of Development’s Office of Strategic Research at
http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm.
For more information on Ohio workforce statistics, visit the Ohio Workforce Informer online at
http://ohioworkforceinformer.org or the Ohio Labor Market Information Classic website at
http://lmi.state.oh.us.
13
References
Goldstein, Harvey, University of North Carolina. Projecting State and Area Industry
Employment. Prepared through a grant from the Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. Projections Workgroup, August 2005.
Ohio Department of Development. Office of Strategic Research. Commuting Patterns by County.
March 2003. Internet. http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/P0005.htm. 29 August
2006.
Ohio Department of Development. Office of Strategic Research. Ohio County Profiles. October
2005. Internet. http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm. 29 August 2006.
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Bureau of Labor Market Information.
Demographic, Labor Force and Industry Trends. June 2002.
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Bureau of Labor Market Information. Market
Analysis of Key Workforce Trends. 2000.
United States. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Local Area Personal Income. Internet.
http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis/. 29 August 2006.
United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. June
2005.
United States. Census Bureau. Building Permits. Internet.
http://www.census.gov/const/www/permitsindex.html. 29 August 2006.
United States. Census Bureau. Population Estimates. Internet.
http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates/php. 29 August 2006.
United States. Census Bureau. Current Lists of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas
and Definitions. 23 August 2006. Internet.
http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html. 29 August 2006.
14
Appendix A
Ohio’s Workforce Investment Areas
15
Appendix B
Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas
16
Appendix B, continued
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) have at least one urbanized area with a population of
50,000 or more, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration
with the core as measured by commuting ties. Micropolitan Statistical Areas have at least one
urban cluster with a population of at least 10,000 but less than 50,000, plus adjacent territory that
has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core, measured by commuting ties.
For further information on the Office of Management and Budget’s 2000 Standards for Defining
Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, please visit
http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html.
Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Ohio and Adjacent States
A. Akron MSA: Portage and Summit Counties.
B. Canton-Massillon MSA: Carroll and Stark Counties.
C. Cincinnati-Middletown MSA*: Brown, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren Counties in Ohio;
Dearborn, Franklin and Ohio Counties in Indiana; and Boone, Bracken, Campbell, Gallatin, Grant, Kenton
and Pendleton Counties in Kentucky.
D. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor MSA: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain and Medina Counties.
E. Columbus MSA: Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking, Madison, Morrow, Pickaway and Union
Counties.
F. Dayton MSA: Greene, Miami, Montgomery and Preble Counties.
G. Huntington-Ashland MSA*: Cabell and Wayne Counties in West Virginia; Boyd and Greenup Counties
in Kentucky; and Lawrence County in Ohio.
H. Lima MSA: Allen County.
I.
Mansfield MSA: Richland County.
J.
Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna MSA*: Pleasants, Wirt and Wood Counties in West Virginia and
Washington County in Ohio.
K. Sandusky MSA: Erie County.
L. Springfield MSA: Clark County.
M. Toledo MSA: Fulton, Lucas, Ottawa and Wood Counties.
N. Weirton-Steubenville MSA*: Jefferson County in Ohio and Brooke and Hancock Counties in West
Virginia.
O. Wheeling MSA*: Marshall and Ohio Counties in West Virginia and Belmont County in Ohio.
P. Youngstown-Warren-Boardman MSA*: Mahoning and Trumbull Counties in Ohio and Mercer County
in Pennsylvania.
*Statistical areas in other states that include Ohio counties.
17
Appendix B, continued
Micropolitan Statistical Areas in Ohio
1.
Ashland
2.
Ashtabula
3.
Athens
4.
Bellefontaine: Logan County
5.
Bucyrus: Crawford County
6.
Cambridge: Guernsey County
7.
Celina: Mercer County
8.
Chillicothe: Ross County
9.
Coshocton
10. Defiance
11. East Liverpool-Salem: Columbiana County
12. Findlay: Hancock County
13. Fremont: Sandusky County
14. Greenville: Darke County
15. Marion
16. Mount Vernon: Knox County
17. New Philadelphia-Dover: Tuscarawas County
18. Norwalk: Huron County
19. Point Pleasant*: Mason County in West Virginia and Gallia County in Ohio
20. Portsmouth: Scioto County
21. Sidney: Shelby County
22. Tiffin-Fostoria: Seneca County
23. Urbana: Champaign County
24. Van Wert
25. Wapakoneta: Auglaize County
26. Washington Court House: Fayette County
27. Wilmington: Clinton County
28. Wooster: Wayne County
29. Zanesville: Muskingum County
The micropolitan area name is the same as the county name unless otherwise noted.
*Statistical areas in other states that include Ohio counties.
18
Appendix C
Major County-to-County Commuting Patterns
Percent of workers that work outside the county 53.4%
Average commute time in minutes 26.4
Number of workers 16+ years of age
living in Medina County
76,548
working in Medina County
55,311
Percent
Commute In From
Number
Percent
Commute Out To
Number
Cuyahoga Co. OH
26,572
34.7%
Summit Co. OH
5,248
9.5%
Summit Co. OH
8,647
11.3%
Cuyahoga Co. OH
4,795
8.7%
Wayne Co. OH
1,726
2.3%
Wayne Co. OH
4,667
8.4%
Lorain Co. OH
1,418
1.9%
Lorain Co. OH
1,874
3.4%
Stark Co. OH
445
0.6%
Stark Co. OH
770
1.4%
Portage Co. OH
322
0.4%
Ashland Co. OH
720
1.3%
Ashland Co. OH
307
0.4%
Portage Co. OH
314
0.6%
Lake Co. OH
307
0.4%
Huron Co. OH
102
0.2%
Richland Co. OH
148
0.2%
Richland Co. OH
89
0.2%
Franklin Co. OH
84
0.1%
Holmes Co. OH
72
0.1%
Medina
Percent of workers that work outside the county 25.0%
Average commute time in minutes 22.4
living in Summit County
258,414
working in Summit County
270,431
Percent
Commute In From
Number
Percent
Commute Out To
Number
Cuyahoga Co. OH
34,476
13.3%
Stark Co. OH
21,094
7.8%
Portage Co. OH
9,702
3.8%
Portage Co. OH
19,049
7.0%
Stark Co. OH
7,665
3.0%
Cuyahoga Co. OH
14,207
5.3%
Medina Co. OH
5,248
2.0%
Medina Co. OH
8,647
3.2%
Lake Co. OH
1,148
0.4%
Wayne Co. OH
3,948
1.5%
Wayne Co. OH
1,095
0.4%
Lake Co. OH
1,157
0.4%
Lorain Co. OH
588
0.2%
Geauga Co. OH
1,130
0.4%
Geauga Co. OH
563
0.2%
Mahoning Co. OH
1,096
0.4%
Mahoning Co. OH
460
0.2%
Trumbull Co. OH
1,038
0.4%
Trumbull Co. OH
447
0.2%
Lorain Co. OH
970
0.4%
Summit
Source: Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research, 2000 Census Data.
19
Appendix D
Major Employers by County
Medina
Brunswick City Board of Education
Medina City Board of Education
Medina County Government
Medina General Hospital
MTD Products, Inc.
Plastipak Packaging
Schneider National, Inc.
Wadsworth-Rittman Hospital
Westfield Group
Summit
Akron City Board of Education
Akron General Health System
Children's Hospital Medical Center
DaimlerChrysler AG
Diebold, Inc.
First Energy Corp.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
McDermott International/Babcock & Wilcox
Newell Rubbermaid/Little Tikes Co.
Signet Group plc/Sterling, Inc.
Summa Health System
University of Akron
Government
Government
Government
Health Care
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Transportation
Health Care
Insurance
Government
Health Care
Health Care
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Utility
Manufacturing
Retail
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Repair
Health Care
Education
Source: Ohio Department of Development. Ohio County Profiles.
Employers are listed in alphabetical order.
20
P.O. Box 1618
Columbus, OH 43216-1618
Business Principles for Workforce Development
Partner with the workforce and economic development community.
Develop and deploy new information solution tools and systems for the workforce
and economic development community.
Provide products and services that are customer and demand driven.
Be known as an important and reliable source for information solutions that
support workforce development goals and outcomes.
Acknowledgements: The Workforce Research Section, under the direction of Labor
Economist Larry Less, was responsible for the composition of this report. Labor
Market Analyst Jonathan Calig was primarily responsible for production. Thanks
are extended to the many other analysts who developed and reviewed the data
presented in this report. This publication was prepared under the supervision of
Labor Market Information Bureau Chief Keith Ewald and Assistant Bureau Chief
Rudy Wilkinson.
This report was prepared by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services,
Office of Workforce Development. For further information, visit our website at
http://lmi.state.oh.us or contact the Ohio Bureau of Labor Market Information at
1-888-2WORK-411 or 1-888-296-7541.
Ted Strickland, Governor
State of Ohio
Helen E. Jones-Kelley, Director
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
ODJFS is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Service Provider
(Rev. 7/2007)

Summit and Medina Workforce - Ohio Labor Market Information

Transcription

Similar documents

Buehler`s River Styx - Medina County Solid Waste District

Engaging Employees at GO

USA

Complete Streets - Health Policy Institute of Ohio

Medina Gazette - Bareketh Bellydance

session a3: the new workforce: attracting, retaining, developing

YOU GAVE ME A JOB

5145 BUEHLERS DRIVE ∙ MEDINA, OH THE SHOPPES AT RIVER