Final Report - Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness

Transcription

Busan Civil Society Forum
Haeundae Grand Hotel
Busan, South Korea
26-28 November 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
I. INTRODUCTION: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF BCSF……………………………………………………………………4
II. OPENING CEREMONY……………………………………………………………………………………………………….6
Messages from the Forum
Chang-shik LEE, President of Korea Council of CSO……………………………………………………6
Dr. Hyun Back CHUNG, Co-representative of KOFID……………………………………………………6
Antonio Tujan, Better Aid Co-Chair…………………………………………………………………………….6
Emele Duituturaga, Open Forum Co-Chair………………………………………………………………….7
Younghoon KIM, President of Korean Confederation of Trade Unions………………………7
Dongman KIM, Vice-President of Federation of Korean Trade Union………………………….7
Tae-yul CHO, Ambassador Development Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and
Trade of the Republic of Korea……………………………………………………………………………………7
III. Opening PLENARY – FEATURES OF THE HLF4……………………………………………………………………..8
CSO Road from Accra to Busan……………………………………………………………………………………8
Presentation of the final draft Busan Outcome Document (BOD)……………………………….9
Updating on Political Negotiation Process on the BOD……………………………………………..10
Presentation of the HLF-4 Program…………………………………………………………………………12
Special Address - Maina Kiai, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of
Peaceful Assembly and of Association………………………………………………………………………12
IV. SELF-ORGANIZED WORKSHOPS……………………………………………………………………………………….13
V. PREPARING FOR HLF4………………………………………………………………………………………………………13
Thematic Workshops and Building Blocks…………………………………………………………………14
Regional Caucuses…………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
Report-back on the BOD Negotiations………………………………………………………………………14
Finalization and Endorsement of the CSO Statement to the HLF-4…………………………….15
ANNEX 1:
ANNEX 2:
ANNEX 3:
ANNEX 4:
ANNEX 5:
CIVIL SOCIETY STATEMENT TO THE FOURTH HIGH LEVEL FORUM………………………16
SELF-ORGANIZED WORKSHOPS SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS………………………………18
THEMATIC WORKSHOPS AND BUILDING BLOCKS SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS……27
BCSF PROGRAM SNAPSHOT………………………………………………………………………………..33
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS…………………………………………………………………………………………35
2
ACRONYMS
AAA
AE
AIDS
BA
BB
BOD
CEDAW
CD
CF
CSO
DAC/OECD
DE
EU
GNI
HIV
HLF
IADG
IATI
IFI
ILO
IMF
INGO
KE
KOFID
MDGs
NGO
NT
ODA
OF
PD
PPPs
PS
RBA
ROA
ROA AP
SSC
TS
UNDP
VAW
WB
WP- Eff
Accra Agenda for Action
Aid Effectiveness
Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome
BetterAid
Building Blocks
Busan Outcome Document
Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
Capacity Development
Climate Finance
Civil Society Organization
Developmental Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development
Development Effectiveness
European Union
Gross National Income
Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus
High Level Forum
Internationally Agreed Development Goals
International Aid Transparency Initiative
International financial Institutions
International Labor Union
International Monetary Fund
International Non- Governmental Organization
Knowledge Exchange
Korea Civil Society Forum on International Development Cooperation
Millennium Development Goals
Non- Governmental Organization
Negotiating Team
Official Developmental Assistance
Open Forum
Paris Declaration
Public Private Partnerships
Private Sector
Rights-Based Approach
Reality of Aid Network
Reality of Aid Network Asia Pacific
South- South Cooperation
Task Team
United Nations Development Program
Violence Against Women
World Bank
Working Party on Aid Effectiveness
3
BUSAN CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM
FINAL REPORT
I. INTRODUCTION - Brief Description of Busan Civil Society Forum
1. The Accra Agenda for Action (AAA) recognizes that the involvement of CSOs as
independent development actors in their own right is fundamental to both
development and aid effectiveness. It commits donors and developing country
governments to deepen their engagement with CSOs to help ensure their contributions
to development reach their full potential. This recognition was reflected in the decision
of governments and multilateral organizations to grant CSOs membership, through the
BetterAid platform, to the OECD/DAC WP-EFF, which has undertaken to implement,
monitor and evaluate the PD and AAA, and prepare the High Level Forum (HLF4) in
Busan, South Korea 29 November to 1 December 2011.
2. The HLF-4 in Busan aims to draw conclusions on the Paris/Accra process, and to assess
whether the commitments and targets set for 2010 have been met or not, and why.
HLF-4 produced the Global Partnership for Effective Development which shapes the
global-light/country-heavy architecture on development cooperation. CSO participation
in the HLF-4 marked the culmination of the BetterAid’s engagement on the aid and
development effectiveness agenda. This includes the presentation of the Istanbul
Principles and the International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness by the
Open Forum process. HLF-4 was also an opportunity to actualize AAA’s recognition of
CSOs as independent development actors in their own right.
3. As a contribution to a meaningful implementation of the PD and AAA and move the aid
effectiveness agenda to address development effectiveness, the Busan Global Civil
Society Forum provides an opportunity for CSOs worldwide to consolidate their key
demands and to strategize on how best to put forward urgent reforms in international
aid architecture and practices. The BCSF was organized by Better Aid, Open Forum for
CSO Development Effectiveness and KOFID as a preparatory forum for civil society
organizations to develop a common message and strategize for the High Level Forum in
Busan. The BCSF covered self-organized workshops, thematic sessions, sectoral and
regional workshops and caucuses. One of the key outcomes of the Forum is a CSO
Statement for the HLF-4 (See Annex 1).
4. BetterAid is an open platform of civil society working on development cooperation and
challenging the aid effectiveness agenda since January 2007. BetterAid leads many of
the civil society activities including various consultations from country to global levels,
as well as studies and monitoring of developments and updates in the lead-up to the
Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. The platform’s overarching goal is to
monitor international aid effectiveness agreements, influence policy discourses to
emphasize the need for democratic ownership, broaden the AAA agenda to
4
development effectiveness and contribute to substantial reforms in the international aid
architecture. BetterAid produced the document, ‘CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key
Messages and Proposals’ better known as the ‘CSO Key Asks’ to rally CSOs towards a
common agenda for the HLF. (www.betteraid.org)
5. The Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness, or Open Forum, is an initiative
conceived of and led by a diverse coalition of CSOs from around the world. Its main
goal is to define and promote the roles and effectiveness of the CSO sector in
development, based on a shared framework of principles. The Open Forum Process was
able to develop and consolidate results of their country, regions and global level
consultations to come up with two important documents – the Istanbul Principles and
the International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness (http://www.csoeffectiveness.org).
6. Korea Civil Society Forum on International Development Cooperation, or KOFID, is a
Korean network of civil society organizations to promote effective aid and development
cooperation. KOFID works to strengthen capability of Korean civil society by monitoring
Korean government’s ODA policy and advice aid and development policies based on
universal values. KOFID works as a member of the steering group of BetterAid and
Open Forum for CSO development Effectiveness. It was the local organizing committee
of BCSF.
7. The Forum agenda offered four spaces where participants can exchange issues, analysis
and share recommendations:
a. Plenary Sessions provided the participants with overview of the issues and set
the tone of the discussions for the day. Introductions and keynote speeches
highlighted the plenary sessions. The plenary sessions also synthesized the
discussions of the regional caucuses, sectoral and thematic discussions and selforganized workshops.
b. Self-Organized Workshops provided CSOs with the opportunity to organize their
own workshops focusing on various issues related to aid and development
effectiveness.
c. Thematic Sessions and Building Blocks sessions were mirrored around the
planned sessions of the HLF. The main objective of these sessions was to
coordinate and strategize CSO participation and positioning during the Thematic
and Building Block Sessions during HLF4.
d. Regional and Sub-regional caucuses were conducted to prepare CSOs based in
different regions of the world to convene and develop regional strategies for
HLF. These caucuses were facilitated by the Regional Focal Persons.
8. Discussion points and major agreements during the three-day forum were consolidated
to develop the Civil Society Statement to the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid
Effectiveness – a document emphasizing the important role of CSOs in the aid and
5
development effectiveness agenda and the unified CSO positions on important elements
on the negotiations on the new aid architecture.
9. Around 600 civil society representatives from around the world participated in the 3-day
forum held at the Grand Hotel, Busan, South Korea, from 26 November to 29 November
2011.
Participants came from Civil Society Organizations from Sub-Saharan Africa,
North Africa and Middle East, Latin America, North America, Europe, Pacific, South Asia,
Central Asia and Eurasia, East and SouthEast Asia. Sectors and themes from trade
unions, women, agriculture and rural development were also substantially represented.
II. Opening Ceremony
10. The Opening Ceremony was facilitated by Anselmo Lee of KOFID and Carolyn Long of
InterAction. Guest speakers included representatives from KOFID, BetterAid, Open
Forum, Korean Trade Union and Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
11. Chang-shik LEE, President of Korea Council of CSO, opened the BCSF by emphasizing
the move from aid effectiveness to development effectiveness. Development must be
achieved not through aid but through cooperation among CSOs and HLF4 is the time to
raise the CSO voice. BCSF is a fruit of CSO efforts and will be another starting point for
deepened and more meaningful cooperation. He acknowledged CSO efforts in
developing the Istanbul Principles and Seam Reap Consensus and called on governments
to join CSO on development effectiveness. He confirmed that the results of the BCSF
will be presented and discussed in the HLF.
12. Dr. Hyun Back CHUNG, Co-representative of KOFID argued that the Korean CSOs do
not have time to think about aid because of their heavy workload. She called for new
ideas and proposals from CSOs hoping that the forum will build brotherhood and
promote human rights and gender equality.
13. Antonio Tujan, Better Aid Co-Chair, stressed that BCSF is about CSOs. Busan is a result
of 3 years of hard work since Accra. The journey from Accra led to the formulation of
the ‘CSO Key Asks’ that united CSO demands towards Busan and enabled a strong
lobbying position on the BOD. These demands grew to a level that it cannot be ignored
at the global stage. CSOs have been pushing and threatening governments to listen to
the CSO voice. He mentioned that some African governments are pressured to work
because CSOs in their countries are ahead of them. Three years after Accra, some issues
remained such as the global crises, focus on value for money, business and growth. New
issues also emerged such as development that is faced with the challenge of climate
change. Other forms of development assistance emerged to address the current
situation such as South-South Cooperation and horizontal partnership. Given these
issues, he emphasized on the need to involve CSOs in development processes that are
inclusive and democratic and towards holistic development effectiveness. He ended his
6
speech by calling for genuine development built on human rights, solidarity, equity and
justice.
14. Emele Duituturaga, Open Forum Co-Chair, accentuated that BCSF makes CSOs as equal
partners of donors and government in development. She recognized the contribution of
the Arab Springs to the global CSO movement and presented the Istanbul Principles and
Seam Reap Consensus as gifts of the Open Forum Process to the HLF. She ended her
opening speech by calling for governments to provide an enabling environment for CSOs
to exercise their role in promoting development effectiveness.
15. Younghoon KIM, President of Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, underlined that
the global and regional crises led to unemployment. He challenged the Korean
Government in its claim that it is changing towards a more progressive approach to
development. The reality shows many Koreans out of work, and those who are
employed suffer from harsh work conditions. He challenged the Korean government to
not contribute to the spread of bad labor practices in other countries. He emphasized
that labor unions are important development actors, and with their rich experience,
need to step up and raise their voice in development cooperation.
16. Dongman KIM, Vice-President of Federation of Korean Trade Union, reiterated that
trade union made efforts for their voice to be heard. Mr. Kim considers it ironic that
Korea hosts HLF when it is known for not recognizing CSOs in the country. More often,
donor countries use aid as instrument to advance their political interests. He also
recommends that social dialogue is essential to achieve democratic ownership.
17. Tae-yul CHO, Ambassador Development Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and
Trade of the Republic of Korea, opened his speech by saying that the Busan HLF would
seek new global context for effective development cooperation, review implementation
of commitments and draw conclusions based on evidence, as well as broaden the
existing aid paradigm.
HLF would also address real issues that have impact on
development such as SSC, effective institutions, gender equality, climate finance and
private sector. Korean Government agreed to broaden development effectiveness and
operationalize its concept. As Busan HLF would embrace on a new global development
partnership, it would embrace new actors and approaches. Currently there is an
absence of mechanism where development partners can play a constructive role. He
recommends that more work must be done to fully utilize SSC in enhancing capacities of
partner countries to achieve development outcomes. More partners must be engaged,
including CSOs and private sector, with the goal of enhancing transparency. Broadening
development effectiveness should not dilute the commitments on aid. Ambassador Cho
reiterated that development effectiveness supplements AE and it must catalyze and
amplify the role of aid. It must support endogenous efforts, locally-owned and locallyled initiatives. It should give more weight on the need to develop human resources and
capacities of institutions.
7
18. Ambassador Cho recognized the critical role of CSOs. It goes beyond monitoring and
oversight role as they are actively participating in international dialogue. CSO efforts
towards transparency and accountability of their activities and strengthen their
contribution on development effectiveness must be recognized. He also gladly shared
the news of the endorsement of the Republic of Korea of the Istanbul Principles and the
International Framework of CSO Development Effectiveness.
19. In addition, private sector must be maximized as engine for growth and broker of local
and international partnership. Private Sector contribution must not be limited to
funding only but also in market-driven technical input and capacity building. A model
must be developed to merge profit objectives with development objectives.
20. Ambassador Cho also added that the post-Busan process should serve as an important
political event and provide a fresh momentum towards achieving MDG 2015. Aid
architecture should develop in a way that will maximize benefits and achieve efficient
coordination. As more development actors join in the aid discourse, coordination
becomes more difficult. Global Monitoring System Post-Busan should be cost-effective,
global light and country heavy, making full use of respective strengths and advantages
of existing structures such as OECD and UNDP. It should strengthen domestic
accountability by calling on parliamentarians and CSOS to be involved. The differing
roles played by the OECD, UN and G20 should not hinder cooperation, rather each
should move in a mutually reinforcing way to support global endeavors in achieving
MGDs. Strategic links must be encouraged and increase synergy.
III. Opening Plenary – Features of the HLF4
21. CSO Road from Accra to Busan – Brian Tomlinson, BA and OF. The purpose of Mr.
Tomlinson’s presentation is a review of the creative work CSOs had undertaken since
Accra and emphasize milestones of the journey, as well as identify the challenges and
opportunities for CSOs. He started by saying that there has been no remarkable
achievements in the areas of human rights approach, gender equality, decent work,
social justice and environmental sustainability. Strengthening CSOs through democratic
ownership by addressing the imbalance of power in donor-partner country relationship
still remain in the CSO agenda.
22. He mentioned some progress since Accra: (1) a more inclusive but not yet democratic
understanding of democratic ownership of country processes, (2) acknowledgement of
human rights and gender equality as indicators of development; (3) more attention to
improve transparency; (3) and the recognition of CSOs as development actors in their
own right, as its most significant achievement.
23. Nonetheless, much of Accra commitments are unfinished business. Because of this,
CSOs organized themselves globally, regionally and nationally through various platforms
8
as well as conducted numerous dialogues, conferences and workshops to consolidate
and sharpen their positions. CSOs also took advantage of its membership to WP-Eff to
shape the discussion on aid in Busan.
24. Three dimensions of CSO work in the past 3 years: (1) Engagement inside in multistakeholder policy processes, (2) address issues on CSO effectiveness; (3) work at the
country and regional level to deepen engagements.
25. 1st dimension of work: Engagement inside through multi-stakeholder policy processes –
CSO membership to the WP-Eff gave it a unique opportunity to have access on full
documents and participate with donors and partner governments on policy oriented
processes.
26. 2nd dimension of work: Address issues of CSO effectiveness – the work of CSOs, through
OF, strengthened CSO capacities to contribute to development. This included initiating
dialogues with donors and government on issues on enabling environment of CSOs, as
well as challenging existing structures or mechanisms of development cooperation.
Consultations held in 70 countries led to Istanbul Principles and Seam Reap Consensus
27. He emphasized that enabling environment is crucial, and better language is needed that
must be based on HR standards. He also recommends that CSOs need to treat Istanbul
Principles seriously.
28. 3rd dimension of work: work at country and regional level. Many networks at country
and regional level conducted parallel CSO processes. RoA, for instance, came up with a
Shadow Report on the implementation of the PD and AAA based on the perspective of
the CSOs at the country-level. It draws on the experiences of CSOs in 32 countries on
barriers on democratic consultations.
29. Presentation of the final draft Busan Outcome Document (BOD) - Anne Schoenstein,
Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID). Ms. Schoentstein started her
presentation by stating that the role of CSOs has changed since Accra because CSOs are
sitting on the same table of the WP-EFF and has been influencing the BOD. How did the
current draft come about? BOD1 came out June 2011 which was built from the Menu of
Options – Menu of Options are themes that will be taken on at HLF. BOD2 came out
September 2011. A group of Sherpas was established to negotiate the Third and Fourth
Draft of the BOD.
30. The current draft has 34 paragraphs with 3 main parts: (1) Preamble; (2) Main Body
titled Complimentary Actions to Reach Common Goals; (3) and Final Part titled Looking
at the Road Ahead. One of the important questions is how the BOD addresses
development cooperation, human rights and social justice agenda.
9
31. Ms. Schoenstein elaborated on the coverage of the BOD by pointing out specific
paragraphs that are of concern to CSOs. Other areas of the BOD were not touched to
allow the next speaker to elaborate on the negotiations concerning the current draft of
the BOD.
32. Updating on Political Negotiation Process on the BOD - Antonio Tujan Jr., Co-Chair
BetterAid. The purpose of this session is to brief all BCSF participants on the current
status of the BOD and the crucial negotiation points. Mr. Tujan underscored some risks
for CSOs joining in the negotiation process. First, CSOs represent people whose
aspirations are difficult to compromise yet it is a party to a document premised on
compromise. Second, negotiations are being done by sherpas who are answerable to
their governments. On the other hand, the CSO Sherpa is answerable to CSOs coming
from different regions and represents various sectors. To handle that, BA tried to be
responsive to the reactions, comments and contributions of CSOs and oftentimes it has
become a difficult task to consolidate to come up with a unified message.
33. The BOD is a product of a year of lobbying. A year ago, CSOs came up with a policy
paper on development cooperation not aid. The current document does not talk about
aid except when it is about aid effectiveness (now the politically correct term is
development cooperation). Mr. Tujan acknowledged that while the BOD seeks to
deepen Paris and Accra, it is still not sufficient to satisfy CSO standards. He then
outlined the important negotiations for the final BOD:
a. On human rights, CSOs want IADGs to be explicitly referred to, but this still has
not been done. Instead, the document only refers to the MDGs and as the
negotiation stands, the CSOs, through the CSO Sherpa, think that this is sufficient
reference to IADGs.
b. CSOs wanted to focus on outcomes not results. The principles in the BOD are
principles which all CSOs abide by consistent with the internationally agreed
commitments on human rights, gender equality, decent work, environmental
sustainability and disability which will form the foundation of effective
development cooperation. The document defines principles according to what
the CSOs have proposed and defines results as lasting impact on eradicating
poverty, reducing inequality, and promoting sustainable development. Thus,
results should not be merely based on outputs but on impacts on poverty. This
means that the fundamental principles now are transparency and accountability
to citizens.
c. Deepen, extend and operationalize democratic ownership. CSOs demanded aid
should be untied by 2013 but we have not achieved this. No commitment was
made, but by 2012 a plan will come out on how to untie aid. The problem is
there are certain countries which have legislations that tie aid. This means, CSOs
have to lobby to their respective parliaments and demand that those laws are
repealed.
d. We supported partner countries in their demand to use country systems. The
document puts back country system as first option.
10
e. On architecture, we agreed on the establishment of global partnership by June
2012 and the WP-Eff will convene representatives of the Busan HLF to do this.
f. On November 28, a meeting of sherpas will happen to discuss key issues. This
will be a make or break meeting. In this meeting the CSO Sherpa will bring 5
important negotiation points on the table:
 The title should focus on development. Proposal: Busan Partnership for
Development Effectiveness or Busan Partnership on Cooperation for
Effective Development.
 Rights-based approach (RBA) is not reflected in the current draft of the
BOD.
Therefore, the BOD does not have the commitment to
comprehensive approaches that include anti-discrimination, affirmation,
inclusiveness, participation and empowerment. CSO Sherpa proposes to
rewrite paragraph 11b. as “This involves using RBA approaches, better
managing for results ...”
 On Paragraph 26. This paragraph states that aid is only part of the
solution and calls for a new vision for development that is driven by
strong, sustainable and inclusive growth. This violates CSO notion on
development and the right relationship between development and
growth. CSOs proposed to rewrite this paragraph as “Challenges to
effective development (remove reference to “vision”). In this effort,
development is founded on fulfilling the needs and rights of citizens; and
development is supported by strong and inclusive growth…. To realize
this vision, we need to rethink what aid is spent on so that aid catalyzes
sustainable development.”
 On Enabling Environment. There is a need to specify what kind of
enabling environment is being referred to in the BOD. The proposal is to
add “…the focus on enabling environment based on fundamental rights
as minimum standards to maximize CSO contribution to development”.
g. Other issues that are important to CSOs but are not ‘make-or-break’ negotiation
points are: (1) Private Sector. The proposal is to revise the paragraph as “Ensure
the participation of social partners in the design. Further develop innovative and
regulated financial systems and how businesses contribute effectively to
development.” (2) In Paragraph 1, the proposal is to rewrite, “Representatives of
public, civic, private and inter-parliamentary”, so there is a clear reference to
CSOs.
34. Mr. Tujan mentioned that the above negotiation points will be taken on the November
28 Sherpa Meeting. He also threatened that if 3 of the crucial CSO points are not
accepted, the CSO Sherpa will walk out. If this happens, the sherpa negotiations would
have failed and the negotiations would now go to the ministers. In this scenario, 500
ministers will negotiate on the document and this will be an enormous task to
consolidate and facilitate.
11
35. Presentation of the HLF-4 Program - Emele Duituturaga, Co-Chair Open Forum. Ms.
Duituturaga outlined the activities of the HLF in BEXCO. She provided an overview of
the major points to be discussed in important sessions. She discussed the logistical
preparations for CSOs who will be attending the HLF. She also pointed out that key
people inside HLF will do the subtle diplomacy in behalf of the CSOs.
36. Special Address - Maina Kiai, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of
Peaceful Assembly and of Association. CSOs are key actors and important partners in
the development of any country, especially as service providers, and in building an
active citizenry towards democratic ownership. Development as a concept must be
reworked in holistic terms to put emphasis on democratic rights and freedom to ensure
equity and accountability. Mr. Kiai stressed that the commitment for CSOs have been
repeatedly broken through intimidation, political freedoms, arrests, legal policy
restrictions which prevents CSOs from participating in disbursements, utilization and
monitoring of aid. If there is vast corruption, political freedom is also restricted.
37. The task team on CSO development effectiveness and enabling environment (co-chaired
by Mali and Sweden and CCIC) developed key messages for HLF. At the minimum, the
task team is calling for the states to commit and promote enabling environment for
CSOs as independent development actors in law and in practice, in keeping with existing
international agreements in guaranteeing fundamental human rights. Since these
fundamental rights are already agreed upon, it would be easy for CSOs to include these
in the document. These rights are on freedom of association, right to communicate and
cooperate, seek and secure funding and the state’s responsibility to protect CSO space.
Enabling environment can be enhanced by a dialogue between CSOs and governments.
He urged CSOs to use the HLF as effectively as possible for a fruitful discussion because
the alternative is more costly, as the Arab Spring had shown the world.
38. Beneficiaries of the policies must be keenly involved in the drafting process.
Governments need to ensure protection of international principles (e.g. rights). CSOs
must also adhere to its call on the use of RBA and on transparency and inclusiveness,
such as being transparent in CSO work and finances. More importantly, CSOs and
stakeholders must be accountable to the people they work with. Nonetheless, the call
for transparency must not be an excuse for governments to restrict CSOs. CSOs need to
be organic as possible and allow communities to set the agenda.
39. Towards the end of his speech, Mr. Kiai addressed the donors. It seems that donors
prefer funding governments or institutions such as UNDP at the expense of CSOs. This is
not an ‘either/or’. Donors must support CSOs. But they must be strategic and flexible
when engaging with CSOs, especially those in fragile countries, where governments and
democracy do not work. He ended his speech by offering himself as a tool to enhance
CSO work and to support CSO demand for bigger space.
12
IV. Self-Organized Workshops
40. Self-organized workshops were conducted during Day 1 and Day 2 of BCSF. The main
aim of these workshops was to give space to CSOs to discuss and exchange opinions and
recommendations on topics related to aid and development effectiveness. A summary
of the discussion for each self-organized workshop can be found on Annex 2.
V. Preparing for the High Level Forum
41. Emele Duituturaga, Open Forum Co-Chair, presented the preparations organized by
BetterAid for the HLF4. She reminded all CSO participants that they will go to HLF
under one platform – BetterAid. She also reiterated that it is crucial that
negotiations do not break down. She presented the CSO governance while in Busan:
a. The policy governance body will be led by the BACG.
b. The Steering Group will steer the day to day and hour by hour mechanisms of CSOs
towards the success of the negotiations.
c. The Key people in the Steering Group are:
Co-Chair: Anne, Emele and Jan (all members of Negotiating Team)
Negotiating Team: Tony and Bodo
Point Person on Building Blocks (and NT): Meja
Point Person on Task Teams: Richard
Briefing Coordinator: Fraser
Regional Focal Persons: Carolyn (N. America) Lonne (EU); Richard/Meja (Africa);
Lyn (Asia); Jorge (LatAm); Annas/Samer (MENA)
Communications: Henri
Host: Anselmo
Secretariat: Matt, Reileen and Robert
42. The Steering Group will have the following Terms of Reference:
a. Political reflection, identify issues for CG decision
b. Prepare agenda and action plan for daily briefings for CG and 300 meetings
c. Steer the mechanics (pragmatic arrangements)
d. Ensure policy issue should go to the BACG as governing body
e. Troubleshoot and avoid breakdowns
43. The mechanics of the Negotiation Team are as follows:
a. Negotiating Team will exist until adoption of the BOD. It will convene as necessary.
b. There will be a press conference immediately following the November 28th sherpas’
meeting.
c. Press release post-negotiations developed by the Communications Team will be
signed-off by BACG. Press release on final BOD will be on December 1. It will be
circulated on the eve of November 30 to CG and GFG.
d. If final BOD is very different, there will be emergency meetings of CG to compile
messages for December 1.
13
44. There will be CG briefings to finalize CSO-HLF draft statement, take stock of political
developments, and feed into final statements on BOD, policy issues relating to the HLF
and negotiations. Those who were part of the government delegation should
communicate internally.
45. There will also be briefings for CSOs to provide administrative updates, CG discussion
key points, and NT updates. Debriefings will be done by Task Teams for Building Blocks
and by Regional Focal Persons for debriefing to regions.
46. Ms. Duituturaga also mentioned CSO plans during the HLF4 as well as other CSO
engagements.
47. Thematic Workshops and Building Block Sessions. After the presentation of how the
HLF would be organized, thematic sessions and the building blocks sessions were
conducted. Thissessions mirrored the structure of the HLF4. Summary of the
discussions of the thematic sessions and building blocks can be found in Annex 3.
48. Regional Caucuses. Regional Caucuses were conducted after the Building Block Sessions
to prepare CSOs to develop regional strategies during HLF and also to review the CSO
Statement for HLF, provide inputs, additions or revisions when necessary. Discussions
on the regional caucuses facilitated the finalization of the CSO Statement for HLF which
was endorsed during the Plenary Session in the afternoon of Day 3.
49. Report-back on the BOD Negotiations, Antonio Tujan, Co-Chair of BA. Mr Tujan
updated the participants on the current negotiations on the Busan Outcome Document.
Major updates on the negotiations were the following:
a. China, France, Brazil and Timor Leste were absent from the most recent
negotiations. China, India and Brazil had position papers even though they were not
present. In their absence, Mexico was speaking for their issues. BA supported some
of their positions. The main issues of these three countries are: (1) distinguish SSC
form North-South; (2) Differentiated commitments should be recognized in the
document.
b. Timor Leste did not agree with the language on fragility. They were encouraged to
sit with BA and open opportunity for further discussions on the issue of fragility.
c. There was no progress on tied aid and country systems. The use of country system
as standard was accepted by some but quite damaging to donors.
d. Proposal on paragraph 1 was accepted. There is now a reference on “civil society.”
e. Proposal on enabling environment is subject to debate and lacked acceptance.
Because being a voluntary agreement, it is difficult for Busan to ask governments to
enact laws. HR was also debated. Regional and international agreements are still
being debated.
f. Negotiations for RBA were not yet through. Sherpas are still debating on where to
put it in the document. There is a proposal to put it on the paragraph on the CSOs.
g. Paragraph 26 is not yet negotiated.
14
50. Questions from Mr. Tujan’s update on the negotiations were the following:
 What is happening to the use of national systems when it comes to CSO
mechanisms. What has been done to address this?
 What is the implication of the absence of China, France and Timor Leste on the
negotiation?
 Private sector is viewed as not an important actor in development aid. Where do we
stand on this?
 We would like advice on how we can move forward collectively as CSOs?
 Do you think there will be a possibility to integrate RBA with a stronger language in
the document?
51. According to the assessment of Mr. Tujan, China would probably negotiate down the
line. The CSOs had no intention of weakening the statement for China. The sherpas
have stood together that Paragraph 10 and 11 should stand. The sherpas had adjusted
the language to accommodate China’s request on SSC. On Country Systems, Rwanda
raised its point on using it as the default system. CSOs are interested on country
systems because they want country systems to be used. The reason why these were not
used before is because there were issues of capacity. Northern CSOs must support CSOs
on the use of country systems. On Private Sector: CSOs have already lost half of the
battle on the current negotiations. Re-opening paragraph 26 would be controversial.
What the sherpas were doing is simply on language improvement. Re-opening means
putting new issues. RBA is still being negotiated and CSOs are accused of re-opening it.
52. Mr. Tujan assessed that there was 50-50 chance of having a good result and of having
the negotiations become a ministerial negotiation. He encouraged CSOs to be prepared
to go on an “offensive” plan on effectively lobbying to the ministers.
53. Finalization and Endorsement of the CSO Statement to the HLF-4, Ms. Emele
Duituturaga, Open Forum Co-Chair. Ms. Duituturaga chaired the discussion on the
finalization and endorsement of the CSO Statement for HLF4. Various inputs from CSOs
enriched the discussion to make the Statement capture the demands of the CSOs. After
the session, the Statement was read and endorsed by the floor. This symbolically ended
the 3-day Busan Civil Society Forum.
15
ANNEX 1.
“Better Aid and Development Effectiveness for the World We Want”
CIVIL SOCIETY STATEMENT
TO THE FOURTH HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS
28 NOVEMBER, 2011
BUSAN, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Since the last High Level Forum in Accra, more than 20,000 civil society organisations (CSOs) - including trade
unions, women’s groups, youth groups, faith-based organisations and other social movements – in more than 90
countries, have been consulted on the process, agenda and expected outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on
Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) that is meeting here in Busan. We, the 500 participants at the Busan Global Civil Society
Forum convened on 26-28 November, represent thousands of civil society actors and speak with one voice.
1. We value our inclusion as equals at the HLF-4 negotiating table alongside governments and donors; expect to
replicate this practice at national levels, welcome the opportunity to join world leaders, governments, donors,
parliamentarians, private sector and international institutions to forge a new consensus on effective aid and
development effectiveness at the upcoming HLF-4; and note that there are outstanding issues of utmost importance
that must be resolved in order to strengthen democratic ownership and true commitment to the final Busan Outcome
Document;
2. We reaffirm our role as development actors in our own right, playing a vital role in advancing development
effectiveness in order to achieve human rights, gender equality, social justice, decent work, environmental
sustainability, peace and an end to corruption and impunity within a solid framework of democratic governance,
rights-based approaches, and inclusive policy engagement;
Paris and Accra
3. We note with concern that donors and partner governments have failed to deliver on the majority of their pledges
made in the Paris Declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action. This has left unfinished business that must now be
completed through bold decisions that outline time-bound and ambitious targets;
We call on donor and partner governments to:

Implement fully and quickly their commitments from Paris and Accra
16




Advance on and boldly deepen commitments on untied aid, transparency through the International Aid
Transparency Initiative (IATI) standard, accountability and conditionality
Utilise and strengthen the capacity of country systems, parliaments and local governments.
Advance the Paris and Accra agendas through strong mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation of deliverables,
results and outcomes that are based on human rights norms and standards
Ensure their own accountability to people.
Development and Rights Based Approaches
4. We underscore our conviction that development is not only about economic growth, which on its own has failed to
deliver on development outcomes and has too often failed to address poverty, inequalities and environmental
degradation. Development is about fulfilling the rights and needs of people and addressing the causes and the
symptoms of poverty, inequality and marginalization.
We call upon all development actors to:

Implement development cooperation in ways that are consistent with international agreements on human rights,
norms, and standards;

Adopt rights-based policies and approaches that:
o are non-discriminatory;
o empower the poor, rural people, indigenous people and other marginalized groups to claim all their rights;
o guarantee sustainable and equitable development outcomes;
o promote democratic ownership, decent work, gender equality, women’s rights and empowerment;
Private Sector
5. While taking note of the potential contribution of the private sector to development, their engagement should be
premised on advancing the implementation of development effectiveness and so:
We call on all governments to:

Recognise social partners as development actors and the need for regulation and adherence to international
human rights, norms and standards such as the International Labour Standards

Recognize the role of CSOs in shaping private sector engagement in development.

Ensure that the private sector, when participating in development cooperation and programs, is accountable for
its contribution to development outcomes

Guarantee that public funds to the private sector adhere to standards of development effectiveness as well as an
evaluation of the risks and potentials of the private sector’s engagement
We call on the private sector to:

Ensure development effectiveness while adhering to but not being limited to the implementation of existing
international labour standards and international conventions.

Enabling Environment
6. As civil society, since Accra, we have developed for our guidance the Istanbul Principles and the Siem Reap
Consensus on the International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness. Through this framework we commit
to improve our own practices and will strengthen our transparency and accountability as well as our contribution to
development effectiveness. However, we are confronted with the reality that civil society space has been shrinking
despite Accra, and thus:
We call upon governments to:

Ensure minimum standards that guarantee an enabling environment for civil society organisations to fulfil their
development roles, at a minimum, in keeping with binding commitments, both in law and in practice, outlined in
international and regional instruments that guarantee fundamental rights.
Global Partnership (Aid Architecture)
7. We call for a development cooperation architecture that more effectively promotes equity, justice and a rights
based approach to development; considers the present reality of medium and low income countries as providers and
recipients of cooperation; guarantees full and genuine multi-stakeholder participation; and deepens the accountability
of all actors for meeting their development commitments. We fully support a Global Partnership for Development
Effectiveness that pursues these goals, and affirm that the full details of this partnership must be negotiated by June
2012.
We urge all developments actors to support a Global Partnership that:

Rationalises the governance framework in order to eliminate duplication and fragmentation while enhancing
harmonisation and coordination;

Creates a forum for inclusive, legitimate, democratic and transparent discussions and decision making on aid
and development effectiveness of cooperation;
17




Guarantees mechanisms for inclusive participation of CSOs in South-South Cooperation, realizing the vital
contributions we bring to the process;
Ensures the full participation of civil society as equals in national and global negotiations and processes, promote
leadership of local actors, making aid and development more transparent, reliable and effective;
Establishes a strong monitoring mechanism, with indicators and targets to assess progress building on and
improving existing aid effectiveness and development indicators and accountability mechanisms, especially
Human Rights conventions such as but not limited to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).
Commits to implement the New Deal in Fragile States with special attention to peoples participation.
With the aforementioned, we hereby reaffirm our resolve to work in new partnership with all development
actors for a better just and fair world.
Busan, Republic of Korea
28 November, 2011
18
ANNEX 2.
Grand Hotel, Busan, South Korea
26-28 November 2011
Self-Organized Workshops
Summary of Discussions
Sessions
Promoting an Enabling Environment for
Civil Society – Challenges and Responses
Organizers: ICNL, CIVICUS, Oxfam, Open
Forum
Contacts: [email protected],
[email protected]




Global Women’s Forum
Organizers: Asia Pacific Forum on Women,
Law and Development (APWLD), coorganized with Association for Women’s
Rights in Development (AWID),
Coordinadora de la Mujer, the African
Women's Development and
Communication Network (FEMNET) and
WIDE Network
Contact: [email protected]
Effective Aid for Better Health
Organizers: Busan Health Working Group




Main Message(s)
Seek Reference(s) in BOD to specific basic human
rights (e.g. freedom of association, expression,
etc.) particularly in paragraph 21(a)
Establish a monitoring mechanism for a minimum
standard of enabling environment and seek
language defining minimum standard of enabling
environment linked to basic human rights.
Governments recognize civil society as peer
partners (in BOD text).
Definition of country ownership (in BOD) needs
to specify “government and society”
We all agreed that economic growth cannot be
seen as key for development
Busan is not the end of Paris/Accra but is shaping
a new paradigm
Plan for action from US/Korea needs further
clarification and discussion
Health has been chosen as a tracer sector in the
OECD working group. Huge amount of work has
Action Points and Recommendations
OBJECTIVES:
 At the global level, put monitoring mechanisms
into existing mechanisms like Universal Periodic
Review by UNHCHR.
 Set up regional monitoring systems at local levels
 Push for precise standards of enabling environment
in BOD.
ACTIONS:
 Map-out activities related to enabling environment
at the regional level.
 Information-sharing on various efforts as
preparations for negotiations on indicators.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Gender mainstreaming
 Procurement balance
 Mutual accountability
 Democratic ownership
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Take lessons learned forward from health sector as
been done and governments remain accountable
for the health commitments and outcomes.





Exploring the ‘value for money’ and
‘results’ agendas in aid effectiveness –
implications and opportunities for CSOs
Organizers: BOND, Oxfam

Agenda on results and value for money are
very donor driven and there is a danger that
these will be defined in a way that does not
capture the challenges and complexities of
development. Therefore, CSOs need to be
more pro-active in framing these concepts in
ways that reflect our work and are grounded
in the experiences and aspirations of people
a tracer sector for putting aid effectiveness
principles into practice and align all aid modalities
to a country’s health priorities, according to three
core principles: one health plan, one budget, and
one M&E framework.
Ensure to have a stronger focus on Human Rights,
including right to health, in the Outcome
Document.
Ensure an enabling environment for civil society,
including those working on health issues, to
participate meaningfully. Civil society is
fundamental for effective health. We need to
ensure and come up with mechanisms on how to
account CSO health outcomes to be part of
government reports.
Transparency, access to information and an
enabling environment for all stakeholders in
specific civil society must be strengthened to foster
accountability over the use of aid and government
funds, which contributes to better health
outcomes.
Strong monitoring framework needs to be
developed and implemented at the national and
global level. It should include a sector focus,
integrated approaches and qualitative indicators
that capture health for all.
The participation and diversity of civil society and
other actors from all sectors in society is crucial in
the elaboration of the framework.

Aid Effectiveness in Conflict Affected and
Fragile States: a New Deal for whom?
Organizers: Conciliation Resources, CARE,
CDA Collaborative Learning Projects,
Development Initiatives, GPPAC,
Interpeace, Saferworld, Tiri - Making
Integrity Work


Aid transparency: A ranking of 58 donors

living in poverty.
Stable, vibrant democracy is key to leaving
conflict and fragility behind - country
ownership should be about state and society
ownership.
Need to do much better in terms of Do No
Harm and conflict sensitive approaches uphold these principles even in crisis
situations.
Aid needs to be neutral - donors and
CSOs should carefully consider who gains and
losses from aid in order to avoid worsening
conflict dynamics.
Transparency is a pre-condition for developing
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Development aid strategies should be based on
people's priorities - country ownership should be
state-society ownership
 Need for better context analysis - ensure Do No
Harm principles are applied and a conflict sensitive
approach is taken at policy and practice levels
 Development should be focused on tackling
exclusion and divisions - with a focus on peacebuilding and engaging across conflict divides
ACTION PLAN FOR HLF4:
 Raise the issue of conflict sensitivity in ALL
development contexts not just in CAFs, including
the possibility of pushing for the integration of
conflict sensitivity in the Busan Outcome
Document.
 Make sure all approaches are context specific.
 Ensure that country ownership is explicitly
understood as state and society
POST-BUSAN ACTION PLAN:
 Explore how to work better on CSO's own conflict
sensitivity.
 Need to increase solidarity between civil society in
fragile and conflict affected contexts and global
CSO advocacy on effective development and
peace-building
 Need to address the regional and international
dynamics of conflict - for example the example of
nomadic armed groups such as the Lord's
Resistance Army.
 Move towards how military, diplomatic, financial
and commercial relations can avoid contributing to
conflict and work in support of peace.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
and the Swiss experience
Organizers: Publish What You Fund,
AidRating and CSEND Switzerland.
Contact:
[email protected]
The role of Faith Based Organizations
(FBOs) in Governance Assessments and
Social Accountability
Organizers: Act Alliance




better performance.
There is currently not enough transparency from
donors.
Ranking and rating is important because it
encourages response and action.
CSO space is shrinking, including those of FBOs.
Methods to limit CSO/FBO spaces include
repressive legislation, using the war on terror as
an excuse, denying visas, negative campaigning,
burdensome registration processes, new taxation
etc.
There is an opportunity for FBOs to play a
stronger role as a watchdog of government
because of their role as reflection of the
communities they serve.



Donors must publish more information.
Donors need to sign IATI.
The BOD must contain both IATI (in reference to
the common standard) and a 2015 deadline for
implementation.
 Extend these rankings to include more data and
more donors.
 Increase cooperation among CSOs working on
donor transparency.
 Use, and make more accessible, the information
that is generated.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Ensuring the legitimacy of the church with respect
to its own accountability. The Church (FBOs) to
uphold and use the Istanbul Principles as a tool for
strengthening their own internal accountability
systems.
 Utilizing governance assessment tools as a strategic
entry point for FBOs/CSOs to engage with
multilateral processes as well as a way to challenge
governments on social accountability (i.e., Oslo
Principles on Democratic Governance Assessment).
 Address the opportunity of FBOs/CSOs role to
monitor government aid flows while also
addressing appropriate capacity needs that must
be in place for FBOs/CSOs to fill this role.
 Fully explore how to link FBO/CSO service
delivery/care-giving with advocacy.
 Follow-up on the connection between churches
engagement with the private sector.
 Embrace the diversity of the church while
simultaneously thinking creatively on how to bridge
different faiths together to work in solidarity on
issues of human rights and justice
Protecting Church and other CSO human rights
defenders from personal prosecution by
considering providing financial support for legal
services.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Strengthen the role of the State and civil society
institutions in order to address the following
priorities:
o An effective way to achieve democratic
ownership is through social dialogue.
o Transparency and accountability is both a
condition and a result of development
processes.
o The approach to the development
paradigm
should
be
rights-based,
particularly the right to a decent work for
all with social protection.
o The link between the private sector and
development according to the following
alternative text to paragraph 27 of the
BOD in order to subsidy the work of the
sherpas. “We recognize the central role of
the private sector in advancing innovation,
creating wealth for poverty reduction,
income and jobs and mobilizing domestic
resources, contributing to public revenue
with the aim to reduce aid dependency
over time. To this end we will: Engage
with
representative
business
associations, trade unions and others to
discuss how to improve the legal,
regulatory
and
administrative
environment for the development of
private investment and decent work; and
also to ensure a sound policy and
regulatory environment for private sector
development, increased foreign direct

Development for a Decent World. Trade
Union preparatory meeting for the HLF-4
Organizer: International Trade Union
Confederation (ITUC)

Development paradigm should be based on
public policies (not market driven), as well as
comprehensive, transparent and well governed.
Reality of Aid Global Meeting and
Workshop on Aid and the Private Sector
Organizer: Reality of Aid (RoA)


Post-Busan Agenda - Rio+20 and MDGs
Beyond 2015
Organizers: KoFID, GCAP, CIVICUS and
Social Watch


There's a need to differentiate between social
economies from big businesses. Any government
assistance must give priority to domestic private
sector instead of foreign private investment;
The entry of private sector in social services
should not undermine the state obligation to
deliver and provide access to basic social
services to the public.
The involvement of the private sector needs to be
looked at much more closely and carefully.
The inclusion of CSO is a start but requires more
work to create more spaces for civil society. A
rights-based approach could be a good way of
approaching CSOs’ contribution. Above all, it is
investment, partnerships between the
public and the private sector, the
strengthening of value chains in an
equitable manner and the scaling up of
efforts in support of development goals.
Ensure the participation of the social
partners in a dialogue on the design and
implementation of development policies
and strategies to foster sustainable
growth and poverty reduction. Further
develop and scale up innovative and
regulated financial and fiscal mechanisms
to mobilize private finance and make full
use of the skills, expertise and resources
of all parties for development goals and
poverty reduction.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 The space of CSOs and communities in developing
public policies should be ensured, where private
sector is also involved.
 Full transparency and accountability should apply
to the private sector
 Ensure that an enabling environment for private
sector contributes to development and poverty
eradication. So regulatory framework should be in
place and standards on human rights, gender
equality and sustainability are applied as indicators
to measure impacts of private sector involvement.
 Mechanisms for the right to seek redress should be
in place, especially for cases of negative impacts
such as in PPP projects.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
 Shift to a rights-based approach to include rights of
persons with disability and environmental rights.
 Our next approach should be universal. It should
include things which can be applied to all countries.
 New goals and approaches should take account of

Development effectiveness and roles of
civil society organizations in Arab region:
consultation results and next steps
Organizers: Arab NGO Network for
Development (ANND)







Politics of Aid, Development Effectiveness
and LDCs: The Context of Istanbul
Programme of Action (IPoA)
Organizers: LDC Watch with SAAPE,
JSAPMDD, KoFID & RRN
Whose Ownership Matters? Development
Results & Accountability for People: From
CSO’s Perspectives
Organizers: Reality of Aid, KoFID, ODA
Watch / ReDI , VOICE, AidRating, CSEND


CSO Accountability Workshop
Organizers: CIVICUS, The INGO
Accountability Charter, Open Forum, The






CSOs’ role to provide a voice for the poor and
marginalized.
There is a key distinction between focusing on
poverty and on inequality. Focusing on poverty
risks ignoring widening inequalities. Yet the
number of people living in poverty today is still
unacceptable.
Arab Springs are the response to the corrupt and
exploitative governments
OF and BA processes as useful tools for the Arab
CSOs
Aid effectiveness should be rooted from good
governance
Aid effectiveness cannot be seen with the
absence of peace and cooperation
Enabling environment for CSOs is closely linked to
the environment of good public administration
Capacity of the CSOs is keys to the process of
developing national agenda
How can development aid contribute to national
resources towards democratic ownership
LDCs are not poor countries
Use of country systems is vital in LDCs
Critical notion – aid development is for people
Ownership should be deepened to democratic
ownership
More effective aid development results in
practice
ODA Watch approach, CSOs as key players in the
HLF4
How can accountability and transparency are
enhanced.
Accountability and transparency are already
and carefully consider the political and economic
conditions we find ourselves in today. The MDGs
were written in a very different context: let’s be
aware and be realistic.
International Forum of national NGO
platforms (IFP), Iniciativa Regional Rendir
Cuentas, ALOP, Corporación Región and
Open Forum/AidWatch Canada
Contact: [email protected] : [email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
An International Framework for CSO
Development Effectiveness: CSO
effectiveness and impact at HLF4 and
beyond
Organizer: Open Forum
Contacts:
[email protected],
[email protected]
Transparency, accountability and
verification: priorities for HLF4 and
beyond
Organizers: Development Initiatives, ICSO
Advisory Group of the Open Forum, Tiri,
PWYF, ONE
Contact: [email protected], [email protected]
Working together to make the EU more
accountable
Organizers: AidWatch EU, CONCORD,
ActionAid
Contacts: [email protected];
[email protected]







reflected in our existing agenda. There are many
practices which need to be shared on national,
regional and global levels and there are efforts to
create standards.
th
We need to value the 5 principle of Istanbul
Principles.
We need better communications between INGOs
and CSOs. We need the necessary arena where
these two parties can dialogue. .
Global crises result to increase in fragile states.
We need national effort to improve transparency.
Framework, strategy – how do we use the
framework in HLF4
In Accra (2008), governments and donors gave
an enabling environment for CSOs
CSOs did their work, while governments and
donors have yet to deliver.




Post-Busan landscape: which way the EU
influences Post-Busan in terms of global light and
country heavy.
Strong call for aid relations on poverty reduction.
Reflected on the way forward.
EU are important partners
ANNEX 3.
26-28 November 2011
Thematic Sessions and Building Block Sessions
Summary of Discussions
Table 1. Summary of Thematic Session Discussions
Thematic Sessions
Ownership and Accountability
Country Systems
Addressing Aid Fragmentation
Aid Predictability and Transparency












Aid and Development Results






Main Message(s)
Reaffirm the commitment of Accra and PD
RBA must be strengthened
Indicators for implementation must be elaborated
The group supports the Africa position that country systems must be the default system.
Implies revisions on indicators on country systems
The definition of country system must be expanded beyond the procurement system
There is an increasing number of actors
Use country systems to reduce fragmentation
Governments sometimes do not recognize everybody as citizens and they do not recognize
agendas.
Transparency is a key pre-condition for aid effectiveness and development effectiveness.
Accountability and transparency is not only for traditional donors but for all development actors,
including CSOs and new donors.
There is a need to address how to communicate the issue of aid transparency to Southern
partners.
The shift the focus from input to development results is in the right direction.
Results identification must be people-pillared.
Process must be people and country-led such as the African Peer Review.
Additional country result also need demand-driven capacity building
Accountability should not only be on results but also on process
A performance framework should be developed from a local aid policy (or similar) which sets out
locally adapted aid and development effectiveness priorities and targets for each development co-
CSO Enabling Environment
Agriculture and Rural Development
Capacity development and Knowledge
exchange
operation provider.
 Strengthen the current language on Paragraph 21a
 We are seeking enabling environment for CSOs both in law and in practice
 Make commitments on enabling environment including setting-up of appropriate indicators
 Support the implementation of CSOs of their own effectiveness
Key Messages
 Land reform has been neglected in the aid discourse. No significant impact on improving farmers’
lives has been made since the Paris Declaration of Principles.
 Small-scale food producers’ ownership and access to land and seed lie at the core of genuine
empowerment of rural peoples.
 Political will on the part of government which has strong CSO participation is important in carrying
out reforms in the aid architecture for agriculture.
 Climate and ecological justice cannot be achieved without promoting sustainable agriculture and
food sovereignty.
Key Recommendations
 Busan must make clearer commitment to support the development strategies which includes land
and agrarian reform as an integral part. Development strategies which get any international aid
must have a clearer plan to uplift the status of rural women farmers and ensure their land rights as
human rights.
 There should be no donor conditionalities on aid given to farmers which deprive them of
ownership and access to land and seed.
 No aid money should be used to promote, support and facilitate commercialization of farms and
land grabbing which has resulted in the displacement and human rights violations of rural peoples.
Aid should instead be channeled for sustainable development.
 Food sovereignty which brings in the right of people to determine their own land and food
production systems must be supported. It is not enough to be food secure by having food on our
tables, including food aid. It is important to ensure that people at the grassroots level have
ownership and access to land and resources to enable them to produce food in a sustainable
manner.
 A post Busan environment in agriculture and rural development should ensure that aid serves the
genuine interest of rural stakeholders. Their voices must be heard in planning, implementing and
monitoring aid and development policies that impact on their lives.
Key Messages
 CD must be seen as a comprehensive change process that does not only involve training and
technology transfer but creating and fostering the conditions for self-reliant development. It
should be an integral part of national development strategies and the full range of development
cooperation.

Rights-based approaches
Fragility, Conflict and Vulnerability
South-South cooperation and Triangular
Cooperation
Strengthening and ensuring country ownership/ democratic ownership requires capacity
development. Without local capacity, there can be no real local ownership. Without capacity
development for and with civil society, there can be no democratic ownership.
 CD is not just from North to South but in fact South-South CD & KE is often more effective and
appropriate. Indeed, there is also a need for South-North Capacity Development because many
donor institutions and personnel and consultants are divorced from realities on the ground in
developing countries.
Key Recommendations
 CD should build on existing capacity and tap local expertise as a first option including indigenous
and traditional sources of knowledge and practice. Donors should also recognize and support the
role of CSOs as providers and recipients of CD.
 CD must be demand-driven and need-based. All stages of CD -- from needs analysis to
implementation to monitoring and evaluation to institutional and policy reforms -- should be
country-led and involve civil society, especially women, youth, trade unions and other marginalized
sectors and communities.
 CD should be part of national development strategies, with concrete action plans and schedules,
backed by adequate resources.
 We can no longer put human rights commitments in one end and the development assistance in
the other end and the economic policies in the other end
 Human Rights approach contributes to democratic ownership and sustainability of programs. It
increase value for money
 RBA should be implemented now.
 Make aid and development effectiveness consistent with the RBA.
 The private sector should be included as one of the duty-bearers and needs to be bound to adopt
and fulfill BRA. e.g. FTA or TNCs
 Equality should be added into one of the principles.
 Mechanisms should be developed to ensure that voices of the minorities are heard
 CSOs and community people should actively participate in monitoring of government’s
commitments to human rights
 The principle on the quality of life needs to be added
 Inclusivity of civil society and the people in the implementation of the New Deal is essential
 Development and aid need to address the roots of conflict and fragility and include a prevention
agenda
 Development and channels of aid need to be conflict-sensitive
 People-centered approaches and rights (including gender rights) must be respected. SSC should
lead to realizing human rights and poverty reduction.
 Establish a more equitable, transparent and inclusive aid governance system encompassing DAC
Public-Private Cooperation
Special Session on Gender
UN DCF Strategy Session
donors, emerging donor countries, developing country governments and CSOs. Since SSC is very
important Post-Busan, therefore the group recommends the creation of an institution that will
promote the objectives and aspirations of SSC.
 SSC best practices should be studied and promoted, not just among developing countries, but also
among developed countries, multilateral institutions and civil society.
 Adhere to and implement the highest standards of openness and transparency. This includes
access to information and appropriate data. And that SSC must be mutually beneficial.
 Need to address the existing barriers among the people of the south to facilitate SSC among
people and to promote self-reliance and sustainable development.
 Facilitate and promote exchanges and solidarity among movements of the south
 SSC should not be an excuse for donor countries to not implement their commitments.
 ODA should increase capacities of public sector to ensure private sector contribution to
development
 Civil society, trade unions, and informal sectors should be part of the dialogue
 Private Sector benefitting from aid money should demonstrate clear financial development
conditionalities and adhere to aid effectiveness principles, OECD and UN guidelines
 We welcome the initiative of the Gender Action Plans but we are not going to endorse it because
gender equality that has been put forward by CEDAW was not integrated
Key Messages (these will be presented during the Special Session on Gender in HLF4)
 Gender Action Plan should focus on countries in conflict. Women should be economically
independent but all efforts, including micro finance, increased burden among women and created
violence. Microfinance Programs should effectively support women and can help them to unleash
their capacities.
 Provide scholarship and opportunities for women as means for empowerment and pursing gender
equality
 Women should play an active role in policy decision
 Gender Action Plans should draw from the international and regional agreements particularly
Beijing Platform for Action
 Issues of HIV and AIDS must be included as a part of gender action plan and political commitment
 VAW should be emphasized because international agreement are far from local people especially
CEDAW and ILO should be included in Action Plan
Key Messages
 We encourage CSOs to participate in the UN DCF side event at the HLF
 Because the UN DCF operates in the UN framework, human rights are more seriously treated than
in the more technical OECD-DAC processes, including the HLF. This is an important moment for the
civil society to be heard.
 UN DCF is actively seeking increased civil society participation.
Key Recommendations
 Because the UN has higher status to the HLF it is important to influence it on the outcomes of
Busan. Human rights dimension is critical to this.
 The more we are committed to make UN DCF relevant, the more it will be successful.
 There can be a significant return for just a small investment of time in this process.
Table 2. Summary of Building Block Discussions
Building Blocks
Transparency
Results and Accountability
South-South and Triangular Cooperation
Fragile States
Climate Finance
Effective Institutions and Policies
Main Message(s)
(Please refer to Accountability and Transparency of the Thematic Session for main messages)
(Aid and Development Results and Results and Accountability were combined in one presentation.
Please see refer to Aid and Development Results on the Thematic Session for main messages.)
(Please see refer to SSC on the Thematic Session for main messages.)
(Please refer to Fragility, Conflict and Vulnerability of the Thematic Session for main messages)
Key Messages
 Climate finance is about equity and justice. This means recognizing the historical responsibility of
the industrialized North as mainly responsible for human-induced climate change. Correcting this
historical climate injustice necessarily entails large-scale funding from the global North to finance
climate action, especially adaptation, which the global South needs most urgently.
 Climate change finance should be people-centered. It should primarily benefit those who are most
vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and must involve them in decision-making.
 Climate finance must not replicate the negative lessons of the aid system such as the imposition of
policy conditionalities, fragmentation, tying, lack of transparency, policy incoherence, and so on.
Key Recommendations
 Climate finance must be gradually shifted from aid flows to compensatory, obligatory and rightsbased Climate Finance transfers with clear commitments based on the principle of common but
differentiated responsibilities and time-bound targets.
 CF must be adequate and predictable, additional to ODA, should primarily come from public
sourcing, distributed according to countries’ needs rather than donor interests or priorities. Private
sources of CF must be supplementary and should be regulated.
 The governance of climate finance must be legitimate, effective and democratic. Climate finance
transfers should primarily be under the authority of the UN System with accompanying reforms in
the governance of UN-managed funds to ensure civil society participation and facilitate access of
communities most vulnerable to climate change.
 Effective institutions should go beyond state institutions and must also include local institutions,
parliamentary and CSO institutions
 Technical assistance should be people-driven
Private Sector
A New Consensus on Aid and Development
a. Future development cooperation
b. Post-Busan governance
framework


Donors should refrain from weakening institutions
The real focus should be on the local private sector development and not multi-national
development; ODA should be used to create an enabling environment for business to contribute to
development
 Private sector is composed of many different actors with different drives, ambitions and incentives.
This should be addressed by a document as well and it should not be covered by one statement on
the private sector
 Incorporate the informal sector and the growth paradigm in the statement
 Government should regulate the PS so that they can be an engine for development
 PS should fulfill human rights obligations and follow international and national commitments to
human rights process.
 Enhance transparency among social partners and trade unions, ILO requests should be better
reflected on the future.
Key messages
 UNDCF seen as complementary of OECD and WP-Eff
 Problem of leadership exists because WP have been selected based on more personal suggestions
that has been agreed
Key Recommendations
 Redefine accountability in terms of WP
 Working parties should be elected rather than selected
ANNEX 4.
BCSF PROGRAM SNAPSHOT
26-28 November 2011
BUSAN GLOBAL
CSO FORUM
26 November 2011 - Day 1
27 November 2011 - Day 2
28 November 2011 – Day 3
Preparing for the High Level Forum
Opening Plenary Session
Sectoral/Thematic Workshop (up to 8 parallel
sessions)
“From Aid Effectiveness to Development
Effectiveness
Parallels thematic and “special” sessions of the HLF-4
Welcoming Remarks
Morning Session
Sessions to run concurrently.
Plenary session – Features of the
HLF-4
Sectoral/Thematic Workshop (up to 7 parallel
sessions)
Plenary sessions and post HLF-4 work on Building
Blocks and Future Framework
Parallels “profile” building blocks and future
framework discussion of the HLF-4
Sessions to run concurrently
Reporting of sectoral and thematic workshops
Regional/subregional Lobby Planning Caucus
Sectoral/Thematic Workshop (up
to 8 parallel sessions)
BCSF Press Conference
Lessons Learned from Paris and Accra: Actions
to Move Forward
Afternoon
Session
Parallels thematic and “special” sessions of the
HLF-4
Sectoral/Thematic Workshop (up
to 8 parallel sessions)
Reporting, synthesis and action plan
Plenary Session preparation followed by
Adoption of CSO Statement to HLF-4
Closing ceremony
Evening Session
Free Evening
Dinner Reception
Free Evening
ANNEX 5.
LIST OF BCSF REGISTERED PARTICIPANTS
Prefix
Last Name
First Name
Email
Organization
Mr.
Abbasi
Shakeel Ahmed
[email protected]
International Human Rights Observer(IHRO)
Mr.
Abbasi
Mujtaba
[email protected]
Mr.
Abdus Salam
Shah
[email protected]
Development Wheel (DEW)
Mr.
Abidi
Javed
[email protected]
Disabled People's International
Mr.
Acemah
Christian
[email protected]
ASADI/The National Academies
Miss
Aché
Mahamat Abdoulaye
[email protected]
reseau des associations et groupements des femmes
handicapées du tchad(RAGFHT)
Mr.
Adams
Gregory
[email protected]
Oxfam America
Ms.
Adams
Barbara
[email protected]
Social Watch
Mrs.
Adekambi
Bayi Makandjouwola
[email protected]
Réseau des Organisations Féminines d'Afrique
Francophone (ROFAF)
Mrs.
Adekambi
Bayi Makandjouwola
[email protected]
Francophone (ROFAF)
Mr.
Adhikari
Praman
[email protected]
Rural Reconstruction Nepal
Mrs.
ADJAMAGBO
Kafui
[email protected]
WILDAF
Mr.
ADJEI
GUY
[email protected]
ACTIONS SOCIALES INTERNATIONALES
Miss
Ahiadorme
Esenam
[email protected]
Women in Law and Development in Africa
Miss
AHIADORME
ESENAM
[email protected]
WOMEN IN LAW AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA (WiLDAF GHANA)
Mr.
Ahmad
Tariq
[email protected]
Oxfam America
Dr.
Ahmed
Tammam
[email protected]
Al-Jawf Women Organization For Development
Mr.
Ahmed
Raad
[email protected]
Future Leaders Forum
Mr.
Ahmed
Uzair
[email protected]
Mr.
AKOLOGO
Samuel Zan
[email protected]
National Catholic Secretariat
Mr.
AKOUETE
yaovi beleki
[email protected]
ituc-africa
Ms.
AKTER
MOST FARJANA
[email protected]
VOICE
Ms.
AKTER
MOST FARJANA
[email protected]
Aid Accountability Group
Dr.
Akwetey
Akwetey
[email protected]
Institute for Democratic Governance
Mr.
alarou
souley
[email protected]
rodaddhd
Mr.
alarou
souley
[email protected]
rodaddhd
Mr.
alarou
souley
[email protected]
rodaddhd
Mr.
Al-bathigi
Tawfik
[email protected]
Human Rights Information & Training Center
Mr.
Alhashidi
Faisal
[email protected]
The Civil Society Organizaitons Network for
Development
Alpizar
Lydia
[email protected]
AWID
Mr.
Als
Henrik
[email protected]
The LO/FTF Council
Mrs.
Andeka
Madeleine
[email protected]
SERACOB/Comité de suivi du symposium de la société
civile
Mrs.
Anim-Ayisi
Gladys
[email protected]
GROOTS Internaional Ghana
Mr.
Ardiansyah
Syamsul
[email protected]
Yayasan Kristen untuk Kesehatan Umum
Mr.
Arthur
Charles Addo
[email protected]
Seeds 4 African Relief Agency
Mr.
aşar
ibrahim
[email protected]
MINISTRY OF INTERIOR AFFAIRS
Mr.
AŞCI
MESUT
[email protected]
Prime Ministry of Republic of Turkey, Presidency for
Turks Abroad and Related Co
Mr.
Atakpu
Leo
[email protected]
Africa Network for Environement and Economic
Justice (ANEEJ)
Mr.
ATIDEGLA
Aurélien Comlan
[email protected]
REPAOC
Attah
Mohammed
[email protected]
World Association of NGOs
Mr.
Attree
Larry
[email protected]
Saferworld
Mr.
Auberry
Greg
[email protected]
CRS
Mr.
Awal
Abdul
[email protected]
Noakhali Rural Development Society - NRDS
Mrs.
Ayala Monreale
Maria Martha
[email protected]
Confederación Sindical de Trabajadores/as de las
Américas - CSA
Ms.
Azu
Helena
[email protected]
Farmers Organisation Network in Ghana
Mrs.
Ba
Oumoul Khayri
[email protected]
Organisation Internationale de la Coopération en
Evaluation (OICE)
Miss
Bah
Djenabou
[email protected]
association des jeunes filles pour la promotion de
l'espace francophone
Mr.
Bakar
Bakar
[email protected]
KEPA
Mr.
Balbis
Jorge
[email protected]
ALOP
Mrs.
Bangura
Adama
[email protected]
CHILDHELP SIERRA LEONE / CHAMPION GIRLS UNIT
Mr.
Barder
Owen
[email protected]
Center for Global Development
Miss
Barry
Amy
[email protected]
Publish What You Fund
Ms.
Bartlett
Amy
[email protected]
Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness
Mr.
Bartlett
Suresh
[email protected]
World Vision Lanka
Miss
Bassoli
Sergio
[email protected]
CGIL
Prof.
Becerra Pozos
Laura
[email protected]
DECA, Equipo Pueblo, AC
Mr.
Belay
Netsanet
[email protected]
CIVICUS, World Alliance for Citizens Participation
Mr.
BELAY
NETSANET
[email protected]
CIVICUS
Mrs.
benavente
miyaray
[email protected]
Asociacion Nacional de Centros
Dr.
Beneva
Rayna
[email protected]
Gender Education Research and Technologies
Mr.
Bengtsson
Lars
[email protected]
TCO-Sweden
Prof.
beralus
gerard
[email protected]
Reseau des citoyens haitiens pour la promotion des
droits de l'hommew
Ms.
Berge
Gweneth
[email protected]
Norwegian Church Aid - ACT Alliance
Ms.
Berkhout
Esme
[email protected]
Oxfam Novib
Dr.
Besharati
Neissan
[email protected]
SAIIA and WITS University
Mr.
Bhandari
Ratan
[email protected]
Water & Energy Users' Federation, Nepal (WAFED)
Ms.
Bisping
Jennifer
[email protected]
OECD
Mr.
Bissio
Roberto
[email protected]
Social Watch
Dr.
Bokosi
Fanwell
[email protected]
AFRODAD
Mr.
Bond
Glenn
[email protected]
Plan International
Mr.
BOUBOU
Mamoudou
[email protected]
Réseau Nigerien des Personnes Vivant Avec le
VIH/sida
Miss
Bova
Lola
[email protected]
Public Fund "GLOBAL"
Ms.
Brown
Dayna
[email protected]
CDA Collaborative Learning Projects
buadromo
virisila
[email protected]
Fiji Women's Rights Movement
Miss
Bucknall
Isabel
[email protected]
Development Initiatives Poverty Research
Mr.
BULEMBI DILUKA
Papy
[email protected]
GROUPE DE RECHERCHE-ACTION POUR LE
DEVELOPPEMENT INTEGRAL
Mr.
BULEMBI NDONGALA
Pitshou
[email protected]
CONSEIL NATIONAL DE LA JEUNESSE
Ms.
Bullain
Nilda
[email protected]
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
Mr.
Bultron
Ramon Mari
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM)
Mrs.
Busch
Dorte
[email protected]
Danish Red Cross
Ms.
bustinduy
ana
[email protected]
WIDE/ plataforma2015ymas
Mr.
C.S
Saravanan
[email protected]
SAHANIVASA
Calimutan
Joram
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants
Mr.
Carlos
Cabo
[email protected]
Spanish Development NGO Platform
Ms.
Caroline
Mugala
[email protected]
East African Trade Union Confederation
Mrs.
Carrion Pereira
Sancha Maria Cayetana
[email protected]
CIDSE
Mr.
Chakma
Ashok
[email protected]
Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP)
Mrs.
CHALBI-DRISSI
Hassania
[email protected]
GENTA ( Gender and Trade Network in Africa)
Mr.
Chapman
Nigel
[email protected]
Plan International
Ms.
Chiarella
Elena
[email protected]
World Vision International
Ms.
Chidaushe
Moreblessings
[email protected]
Norwegian Church Aid
Ms.
Chowdhury
Uma
[email protected]
Campaign for good Governance (SUPRO)
Mr.
Chowdhury
M Rezaul Karim
[email protected]
Equity and Justice Working Group Bangladesh
(EquityBD)
Ms.
Christiansen
Karin
[email protected]
Mr.
ÇİÇEK
GAZALİ
[email protected]
Prime Ministry of Republic of Turkey, Presidency for
Turks Abroad and Related Co
Mr.
Clarke
Andrew
[email protected]
Mr.
Clarken
Jim
[email protected]
Oxfam Ireland
Concepcion
Niza
[email protected]
Diakonia-Asia
Mr.
Cote
alexandre
[email protected]
international disability alliance
Ms.
Cottingham
Sara
[email protected]
VSO
Prof.
Croce
Alberto
[email protected]
Latindadd - Fundación SES
Mrs.
Cumbi
Marta
[email protected]
Foundation for Community Development
Mr.
Dacara
Jodel Effin
[email protected]
BetterAid
Ms.
d'ALMEIDA
Massan
[email protected]
Francophone (ROFAF)
Rev.
Damon
Malcolm
[email protected]
Economic Justice Network
Miss
DANG
THAO
[email protected]
VUSTA
Miss
Danlog
Ava
[email protected]
Reality of Aid Asia Pacific
Ms.
Davies
Penny
[email protected]
Diakonia
Mr.
De Fraia
Luca
[email protected]
ActionAid Italy
Dr.
de Renzio
Paolo
[email protected]
International Budget Partnership
Ms.
Dederichs-Bain
Birgit
[email protected]
Welthungerhilfe / Alliance2015
Dr.
Deegbe
Fred
[email protected]
Christian council of Ghana
Ms.
Degadjor
Regina
[email protected]
GROOTS International Ghana
Ms.
del Rosario-Malonzo
Jennifer Narcisa
[email protected]
Reality of Aid Network
Mr.
DEMBELE
DEMBA MOUSSA
[email protected]
ARCADE
Miss
DEMBELE
DEMBA MOUSSA
[email protected]
Corean International Forum
Mrs.
Dennis
Suzanna
[email protected]
Population Action International
DENNIS
FLORENCE
[email protected]
GHANA ANTI-CORRUPTION COALITION
Mr.
DEREYMAEKER
JAN
[email protected]
ITUC
Mr.
Devkota
Prabhash
[email protected]
Alliance for Aid Monitor Nepal
Mr.
DIALLO
MAMADOU
[email protected]
ITUC
Mrs.
DIOP
Mbeinda
[email protected]
Collectif Sénégalais des Africaines pour la Promotion
de l'Education Relative à
Mrs.
DIOP
Mbeinda
[email protected]
DIOP
Mbeinda
[email protected]
Dr.
Djanaeva
Nurgu
[email protected]
Forum of women's NGOs of Kyrgyzstan
Mrs.
Djanaeva
Olga
[email protected]
Rural Women's Association "Alga"
Ms.
Dlamini
Khangezile
[email protected]
Council of Swaziland Churches
Ms.
DLAMINI
KHANGEZILE
[email protected]
CHRISTIAN COUNCIL OF SWAZILAND
Ms.
Dlamini
Khangezile
[email protected]
Council of Swaziland Churches
Mr.
Doherty
Francis
[email protected]
ITGLWF
Mr.
Doumbia
Bakary
[email protected]
FECONG
Mrs.
DOUMBIA
Safiatou
[email protected]
Association malienne de Suivi et d'Appui à la Femme
et à l'Enfant
Ms.
Duituturaga
Emele
[email protected]
PIANGO
Ms.
Dulay
Reileen
[email protected]
BetterAid
Mrs.
Dzhuraeva
Shakhlo
[email protected]
NGO "Jahon"
Effah
Stella
[email protected]
Development Action Association
Dr.
EKRA
ELIANE
[email protected]
OSCAF
Mr.
El Hasnaoui
Anas
[email protected]
Espace Associatif / ANND
Mr.
Ellmers
Bodo
[email protected]
Eurodad
Dr.
Endo
Mamoru
[email protected]
JANIC (Japan NGO Center for International
Cooperation)
Ms.
Enge
Elin
[email protected]
Forum for Environment and Develoment
Mrs.
ENJOH NDENECHO
HONORINE
[email protected]
PCFS // LIGHT AFRICA
Mr.
EOM
TAEJIN
[email protected]
Kyunghee University
Mrs.
Erostegui Revilla
Patricia Susana
[email protected]
Unión Nacional de Instituciones para el Trabajo de
Acción Social-UNITAS
Mrs.
ESCRIBANO
MADELAINE
[email protected]
CONFEDERACION DE TRABAJADORES DE LA
REPUBLICA DE PANAMA
Mr.
ESELEM
DUME
[email protected]
Miss
Espey
Jessica
[email protected]
Save the Children
Mrs.
ESSO
Ama
[email protected]
GARED/OSCAF
Mrs.
ESSO
Ama
[email protected]
GARED
Mr.
ETIENNE
MAC
[email protected]
Peoples Coalition on Food Sovereignty
Mr.
EUGENE
RWIBASIRA
[email protected]
Rwanda Development Organization-RDO
Mr.
EUGENE
RWIBASIRA
[email protected]
Rwanda Development Organisation-RDO
Mr.
Fagan
Craig
[email protected]
Transparency International
Mr.
FALADE
Hippolyte
[email protected]
GRAPAD
Mr.
Fatoma
Abdul M
[email protected]
Campaign for Human Rights & Development Sierra
Leone
Mr.
FAYE
MAMADOU
[email protected]
CNTS/CSI
Mr.
FAYE
MAMADOU
[email protected]
CNTS/ CSI
Ms.
FAYE
Odile Ndoumbé
[email protected]
AAWORD/AFARD
Mr.
Fernandez
Ruben
[email protected]
Alop
Mr.
FIADE
OLUGBENGA
[email protected]
NIGERIAN YOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK
Foerde
Janice Goodson
[email protected]
KULU-Women and Development
Ms.
Fos
Anna Lee
[email protected]
Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP)
Mr.
Fox
Robert
[email protected]
Oxfam Canada
Ms.
Freitas Dos Reis
Alzira Sequeira
[email protected]
Alola Foundation
Mr.
FRITZ GERARD
NUMFOR
[email protected]
Ms.
Fry
Lucia
[email protected]
ActionAid UK
Ms.
Gajapathynaidu
Wathshlah
[email protected]
International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia
Pacific (IWRAW Asia Pacific)
GANSORE
Alimata
[email protected]
CNTB
Mr.
Garcia Lobo
Nelson
[email protected]
FOSDEH
Mr.
Garcia Marenco
Ivan
[email protected]
Coordinadora Civil
Mr.
Gaur
Rakesh Kumar
[email protected]
Udisha
Mr.
Gay
Charles
[email protected]
VSO
Mr.
GEORGE
OKORE
[email protected]
SAID
Mr.
German
Tony
[email protected]
Development Initiatives
Mr.
Gicira
Peter
[email protected]
Open Forum/All AFrica Conference of Churches
Ms.
GINDROZ
Anne-Sophie
[email protected]
Helvetas Laos
Mr.
Gloeckl
Nicolas
IBON
Mr.
GNÄRIG
Burkhard
Mrs.
Golichenko
Olga
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Ms.
Gombosuren
Urantsooj
[email protected]
Centre for Human Rights and Development
Miss
Gontarska
Marta
[email protected]
KARAT Colaition
Mrs.
Gonzalez
Estela Julieta
[email protected]
Prof.
Gonzalez
María del Carmen
[email protected]
Confederación General del Trabajo República
Argentina
Ms.
Gounder
Sushil
[email protected]
Fiji Trades Union Congress
Gounder
Sushil
[email protected]
FTUC
Dr.
Green
Wren
[email protected]
Council for International Development
Ms.
Guan
Mary Joan
[email protected]
Center for Women's Resources
Mr.
GUIRO
Mody
[email protected]
CNTS
Ms.
GWYNNE
Beris
[email protected]
Mr.
Habashi
Mamdouh
[email protected]
Ms.
Haglund Heelas
Mia
[email protected]
Plan Internationsl (Sweden)
Ms.
HARRISON
HAMIDA
[email protected]
NETRIGHT
Ms.
Harrison
Hamida
[email protected]
NETRIGHT/ABANTU
Mr.
Hasan
M M Mahbub
[email protected]
Coastal Development Partnership (CDP)
Ms.
Haspeslagh
Sophie
[email protected]
Conciliation Reosurces
Mr.
Hayashi
Akihito
[email protected]
JANIC
Ms.
Hayrapetyan
Anush
[email protected]
Youth Action for Change
Ms.
Hedman
Jenny
[email protected]
OECD DAC Network on Gender Equality
Berlin Civil Society Center
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mr.
Hodosi
Robert
[email protected]
Foundation for Development of Democratic Rights
Ms.
Hooper-Box
Caroline
[email protected]
Oxfam Internatoinal
Ms.
HU
YUAN QIONG
[email protected]
Save the Children China program
Dr.
Hudson
Alan
[email protected]
The ONE Campaign
Ms.
Hye Young
Shin
[email protected]
Caritas Koera
Dr.
Ibraeva
Gulnara
[email protected]
Innovative Solutions Inc.
Dr.
Iqbal
Md. Sohel
[email protected]
COAST/ Equity and Justice Worksing Group - EquityBD
Mrs.
Iro-Nsi
Bose
[email protected]
Women's Rights and Health Project
Mrs.
Ismail
Stella
[email protected]
VON
Ms.
Iwatsuki
Sumie
[email protected]
Space Allies
Mr.
Jahshan
Philippe
[email protected]
Coordination SUD
Mr.
Jaitli
Harshvrat
[email protected]
Voluntary Action Network India
Mr.
Jakobsen
Kjeld
[email protected]
Mr.
James Rwampigi
Aniyamuzaala
[email protected]
Mrs.
Jaramillo Guerra
Patricia Stella
[email protected]
ITUC - Brazil
African Youth with Disability Network-Uganda
Chapter
REPEM
Mr.
jarrar
allam
[email protected]
PNGO
Miss
Jaschek
María Daniela
[email protected]
INDES /Encuentro
Miss
JEONG
Saenal
[email protected]
Mr.
Jha
Ajay Kumar
[email protected]
Public Advocacy Initiatives for Rights and Values in
India (PAIRVI)
Ms.
Jimenez
Angelita
[email protected]
BetterAid
Mr.
Jocelerme
Privert
[email protected]
Parlement
JOEL
OLUWAMAYOWA
[email protected]
COMMUNICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT CENTRE
Dr.
Johnson
Tilewa
[email protected]
Anglican Church of Gambia and AACC, Gambia
Miss
Joro
Anna-Sofia
[email protected]
Service Centre for Development Cooperation KEPA
Mr.
joseph
jerald
[email protected]
Dignity International
Mr.
Joshi
Sharad
[email protected]
Centre for Community Economics and Development
Consultants Society (CECOEDECON)
Mr.
Joshi
Rajiv
[email protected]
GCAP
Mr.
Joshi
Jayesh
[email protected]
VAAGDHARA
Ms.
jult
wiske
[email protected]
11.11.11
Dr.
Jusayan
Macario
[email protected]
AidWatch
Mr.
Kaara
Kiama
[email protected]
Kenya Debt Relief Network - KENDREN
Mrs.
Kadunkova
Darina Ch
[email protected]
Center for Economic Development
Mr.
Kaliati
Maxwell
[email protected]
Centre for Alternative for Victimised Women and
Children
Mr.
KALUBI LUFUNGULA
GILBERT
[email protected]
FONDATION DES OEUVRES POUR LA SOLIDARITE ET
LE BIEN ETRE SOCIAL/FOSBES ONG
Mr.
Kampschoer
Colin
[email protected]
CONCORD
Mr.
KANE
MOMAR TALLA
[email protected]
CONGAD SENEGAL
Dr.
Karki
Arjun
[email protected]
LDC Watch
Ms.
Karybaeva
Mira
[email protected]
President's Office of the Kyrgyz Republic
Katambe
Mariama
[email protected]
CONGAFEN
Mr.
KAYA
ÖZER
[email protected]
Ministiry of Interior
Mr.
Kazuo
Tsurumi
[email protected]
Plan Japan
Dr.
Khadka
Sarba
[email protected]
LDC Watch
Mrs.
Khakimova
Zukhra
[email protected]
CSO Association
Mr.
Khan
Aqeel Ahmed
[email protected]
Mr.
Khan
Farooq Ahmed
[email protected]
Mrs.
Khus
Thida
[email protected]
SILAKA
Dr.
KIKUHE
NZANZU
[email protected]
MEDECINS UNIS EN MISSION
Mr.
Kilcullen
Justin
[email protected]
Concord / Trocaire
Dr.
Kim
Eun Kyung
[email protected]
Korean Women's Development Institute
Ms.
KIM
YOUNGHYE
[email protected]
Ms.
Kim
Jung-soo
[email protected]
Ms.
Kim
Giyoun
[email protected]
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development
(FORUM-ASIA)
Ms.
Kim
Hyunji
[email protected]
Korea Federation for Environmental Movements
Miss
KIM
Minji
[email protected]
Ms.
Kim
June
[email protected]
United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR)
KIMEMIAH
JULIET
[email protected]
AAWORD
Ms.
Kindornay
Shannon
[email protected]
The North-South Institute
Dr.
Kisselyova
Oksana
[email protected]
Liberal society Institute
Ms.
Kocaqi
Monika
[email protected]
"Refleksione" Association
Mr.
Koch
Lars
[email protected]
IBIS/Alliance2015
Ms.
Koenders
Rose
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive
Health and Rights
Ms.
Koenig
Helen Sibylle
[email protected]
German Foundation for World Population (DSW)
Ms.
KOH
JUNG HYUN
[email protected]
Caritas KOREA
Mr.
Kohnstamm
Alexander
[email protected]
Partos
Mrs.
KOITE DOUMBIA
MAMA
[email protected]
FEMNET/MALI
Ms.
Kolos
Larysa
[email protected]
NGO “ School of Equal Opportunities ”
Miss
Konaris
Thalia
[email protected]
HEDON Household Energy Network / Researcher
Tokyo University of Agriculture and
Ms.
Kooijman
Margaretha
[email protected]
PSO capacity Buiding in Developing Countries
Ms.
Kozhaeva
Olga
[email protected]
Dr.
Kroeker
Caroline
[email protected]
World Vision
Mr.
KUBALASA
Dalitso
[email protected]
Malawi Economic Justice Network (MEJN)
Mr.
Kumar
Narender
[email protected]
Indraprastha Public Affairs Centre (IPAC)
Kwakkenbos
Jeroen
[email protected]
Eurodad
Mr.
Lanzet
Peter
[email protected]
EED
Ms.
Lappin
Kate
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development
(APWLD)
Mrs.
Lara Ruiz-Granados
Pilar
[email protected]
Ayuda en Acción-España
Mr.
Larios Sanchez
Irving
[email protected]
Federacion de Organismos No Gubernamentales
Ms.
Layden
Claire
[email protected]
APWLD
Ms.
Lee
Connie
[email protected]
Oxfam America
Ms.
Lee
Jinjoo
[email protected]
Service for Peace Korea
Mr.
Lee
Gary
[email protected]
AID/WATCH
Mr.
Lega
Tamiru
[email protected]
Pact
Ms.
LELLOUCHE
Frédérique
[email protected]
INSTITUT BELLEVILLE-CFDT
Mr.
L'Heureux
Gervais
[email protected]
AQOCI
Mr.
LIFUKA
RUEBEN
[email protected]
Transparency International Zambia
Mr.
LIMACHE
Walter Luis
[email protected]
PROGRAMA NINA
Mr.
LIMACHE ORELLANA
WALTER LUIS
[email protected]
PROGRAMA NINA
Mrs.
Linaje Hervás
Cristina
[email protected]
Coordinadora de ONG para el Desarrollo-España
Mr.
Lofete Nkake
Martin
[email protected]
Confédération syndicale du Congo (csc)
Ms.
Long
Carolyn
[email protected]
InterAction
Ms.
Long
Carolyn
[email protected]
InterAction
Mr.
Lowrie
Sean
[email protected]
Consortium of British Humanitarian Agencies
Lun
Borithy
[email protected]
Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC)
Mrs.
Machava
Rafa Valente
[email protected]
Women, Law and Development (MULEIDE)
Mrs.
Magdiuk
Larysa
[email protected]
Center for Gender and Legal Education
Ms.
Maglahus
Myrna
[email protected]
IBON/Reality of Aid
Dr.
Mahmoud
Shaima
[email protected]
Assiut Human Rights and Women Development NGO\
Spiss Hope NGO Slovakia
Mr.
Mahmud
Ahmed Swapan
[email protected]
VOICE
Mr.
Mahmud
Ahmed Swapan
[email protected]
VOICE
Mr.
makram
ibrahim
[email protected]
coptic Evangelical organization for social services
Mrs.
MAMA DOUMBIA
KOITE
[email protected]
FEMNET/MALI
Mr.
Maningat
Carlos
[email protected]
EILER
Ms.
Mann
Josephine
[email protected]
APWLD
Ms.
Månsson
Åsa
[email protected]
INGO Accountability Charter
Mr.
Marelli
Sergio
[email protected]
Focsiv
Mr.
Marut
Donatus Klaudius
[email protected]
INFID
MARZOUGUI
Yassine
[email protected]
Club UNESCO ALECSO pour le Savoir et le
Développement Durable Tunis
Mrs.
Masagao Ribeiro
Vera Maria
[email protected]
ABONG - Associacao Brasileira de ONGs
Mr.
Maslych
Bogdan
[email protected]
GURT Resource Centre
Rev.
MATALE
SUZANNE
[email protected]
COUNCIL OF CHURCHES IN ZAMBIA
Mrs.
MATUNDU MBAMBI
Annie
[email protected]
Women's International League for Peace and
Freedom/DRC
Mr.
MAVUZI MINSENGI
FLORY
[email protected]
CONSEIL NATIONAL DE LA JEUNESSE
Mrs.
MAWETE KINSAYA
GINETTE
[email protected]
ONG GRADI
Mr.
Mawowa
Showers
[email protected]
ZIMCODD
Mr.
Mawudor
Bright
[email protected]
All Africa Aconference of Churches
Mrs.
Maxim
Irina
[email protected]
NGO Gender Center
Mr.
MBAKI MINSENGI
Bijou
[email protected]
ASSOCIATION POUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL
INTEGRE DE LA LUKAYA
Mr.
MBE
MEME
[email protected]
Mr.
MBELLE ABEGA
Jean Jacques
[email protected]
Fondation Conseil Jeune
Mrs.
MCKENNA
JEANETTE
[email protected]
TO DR WILLIAM ROWLAND
Mr.
Mehmood
Hafiz Aamir
[email protected]
Mr.
Mehmood
Tariq
[email protected]
Mrs.
Mejía Duque
Claudia María
[email protected]
Corporación Sisma Mujer
Ms.
Messer
Sara
[email protected]
ONE
Ms.
Milonova
Sasha
[email protected]
Oxfam America
Mrs.
Mizusawa
Megumi
[email protected]
Japan NGO Center for International
Cooperation（JANIC）
Rev.
Mokiwa
Valentine
[email protected]
Anglican Church of Tanzania
Mr.
MOKONG
FELEX
[email protected]
LIGHT AFRICA
Mr.
MONNYRATH
CHAN
[email protected]
Cooperation Committee for Cambodia(CCC) and
Foundation for International Develop
Mrs.
Morales
Maria Eugenia
[email protected]
Asociación Nochari
Mrs.
Morales Velásquez
Ruth Ileana
[email protected]
FOSDEH
Ms.
Moro Coco
Mayra
[email protected]
Association for Women's Rights in Development
(AWID)
Mrs.
MUIRU
MWAURA
[email protected]
GROOTSKENYA ASSOCIATION
Mujinga Nzambi
Astrid
[email protected]
Radio Okapi/ MONUSCO
Mujinga Nzambi
Astrid
[email protected]
Radio Okapi/ MONUSCO
Mrs.
Mujinga Nzambi
Astrid
[email protected]
Radio Okapi
Mr.
MUKENDI KAFUNDA
Edho
[email protected]
CATSR
Ms.
Muller
Joy
[email protected]
International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies
Mrs.
Munabi
Patricia
[email protected]
Forum for Women in Democracy
Mrs.
Muñoz Pavon
Josefa Georgina
[email protected]
Red Nicaraguense de Comercio Comunitario
Dr.
Murad
Nora
[email protected]
Dalia Association
Ms.
Muropa
Tafadzwa R
[email protected]
Gender Alternatives Trust(GAT)
Ms.
MUSA
ROSELYNN
[email protected]
African Women's Development and Communication
Network (FEMNET)(FEMNET)
Mr.
Mustafa
Ghulam
[email protected]
Mrs.
MUSUGANI
Jacqueline
[email protected]
Initiatives des Femmes en Situations Difficiles pour le
Développement Intégré
Mr.
MUTAZU
TIRIVANGANI
[email protected]
AFRODAD
MWAI
WANGARI
[email protected]
KENYATTA UNIVERSITY
Mr.
Mwansa
Sydney
[email protected]
Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection
Mr.
NAC
MI
[email protected]
Cooperation Commitee for Cambodia
Mrs.
Navara
Petra
[email protected]
global responsibility - austrian platform for
development and humanitarian aid
Mr.
NDAYIZEYE
Ernest
[email protected]
Echelle Vers le Développement(EVD)
Mrs.
NDEYE ASTOU
SYLLA
[email protected]
FEMNETSENEGAL
Mrs.
NDONGMO FOUEZET
Jacqueline Sylvie
[email protected]
FEMNET
Miss
NDOYE
BIRAME DJIGUENE
[email protected]
Groupe Agora de Recherche Pour lEducation Aux
droits de lEnfant et a la Paix
Miss
Ndoye
Birame
[email protected]
Graredep
Ms.
Nguyen
Linh Phuong
[email protected]
Research Center for Management and Sustainable
Development (MSD)
Mrs.
NGUYEN
HOA
[email protected]
Center for Sustainable Rural Development (SRD)
Mrs.
NGUYEN DAC
NHU MAI
[email protected]
Ms.
NICODEME
Gaele
[email protected]
Mrs.
Niyazova
Anara
[email protected]
Innovative Solutions
Mr.
NKESHIMANA
JEAN
[email protected]
TERRE DES JEUNES DU BURUNDI
Mr.
NKESHIMANA
Jean
[email protected]
TERRE DES JEUNES DU BURUNDI-TRANSNATIONAL
Mr.
Northover
Henry
[email protected]
WaterAid
Mr.
Northover
Henry
[email protected]
WaterAid
Mr.
Nowels
Larry
[email protected]
ONE
Ms.
Nowlan
Kirsty
[email protected]
Mr.
Nwosu
Ikechi
[email protected]
International Foundation for African Children
Mr.
Nwosu
Ikechi
[email protected]
Mr.
Nyemah
Sunny
[email protected]
University of Liberia, Graduate School of Buiness
Ms.
Ochojska
Janina
[email protected]
Polish Humanitarian Action
Mr.
Ogwu
Chukutem Ogwugwu
[email protected]
Mr.
Ohashi
Masaaki
[email protected]
Japan NGO Center for International Cooperation
Mr.
Okumu
Paul
[email protected]
Africa CSO Platform on Principled Partnership (ACP)
Ms.
Olazabal
Veronica
[email protected]
United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR)/
ACT Alliance
Mr.
OLETUKE
GABRIEL MARITE
[email protected]
SWEAT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
Ms.
Oliveira
Guacira
[email protected]
Articulacion Feminista Marco Sur
Mrs.
ONANA NGASSIMI épse
MANGA ENDEGUE
Marie Mathilde
[email protected]
AFRICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION
Ms.
O'Neill
Patricia (Patti)
[email protected]
DAC Network on Gender Equality
Ms.
ONEILL SANCHEZ
SALLY
[email protected]
TROCAIRE
Mrs.
Ormonova
Avazkan
[email protected]
Public foundation "DIA"
Ms.
OSARENREN
Linda
[email protected]
Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices (IAC)
Ms.
OSEI-BOATENG
CLARA
[email protected]
GHANA TRADES UNION CONGRESS
Ms.
Osman
Sophie
[email protected]
Wajir District Human Rights Watch
Ms.
OSPINA ROBLEDO
ROSA INES
[email protected]
Iniciativa Regional Rendir Cuentas
Mr.
OUATTARA
Diakalia
[email protected]
FNDP (Forum National sur la Dette et la Pauvrete)
Ms.
Ovsyannikova
Anastasia
[email protected]
KyungHee University
Ms.
Padilla
Amy
[email protected]
IBON International
Ms.
Palaniappan
Archana
[email protected]
Oxfam America
Ms.
Pano
Lyn Angelica
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Research Network
Mr.
Parayarikkal
Haridasan
[email protected]
ITUC-AP
Ms.
Park
Youn Sim
[email protected]
Service For Peace
Mrs.
park
youn sim park
[email protected]
service for peace
Mr.
Parrish
Simon
[email protected]
Mr.
Pedersen
Martin Rosenkilde
[email protected]
DanChurchAid
Mr.
PEDRO
Ernest Comlan
[email protected]
Plateforme des Acteurs de la Société Civile au Bénin
Ms.
Perakis
Rita
[email protected]
CGD
Mrs.
Petroccione
Maria Egizia
[email protected]
CINI - Italian Network of International NGOs
Mrs.
Phekani
Joyce
[email protected]
Centre for Alternative for Victimised Women and
Children
Dr.
Phillips
Charles
[email protected]
Service For Peace
Dr.
Phillips
Charles
[email protected]
Service For Peace
Mr.
Phillips
Benedict
[email protected]
Save the Children
Mr.
Phnuyal
Bimal Kumar
[email protected]
ActionAid International Nepal
Mr.
phongphichith
Thongdam
[email protected]
Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
Development Association (SAEDA)
Mr.
Pinauin
Roberto
[email protected]
IBON International
Mrs.
Pino Jiménez
Esther
[email protected]
Ms.
Pintera
Ewa
[email protected]
KARAT Coalition
Ms.
Poissonnier
Lonne
[email protected]
Concord Europe
Mrs.
Ponce Sosa
Norayda
[email protected]
Coordinación de ONG y Cooperativas
Mrs.
Pons
Emmanuelle
[email protected]
Coordination SUD
Ms.
Porteria
April
[email protected]
BetterAid
Ms.
Prasertcharoensuk
Ravadee
[email protected]
Sustainable Development Foundation
Puglisi
Daniel
[email protected]
CONCORD
Mr.
Purcell
Marc
[email protected]
Australian Council for International Development
Mr.
Qahoush
Nezam
[email protected]
International Trade Union Confederation ( ITUC)
Mr.
Quader
Abdul
[email protected]
SETU
Mr.
Quintos
Paul
[email protected]
IBON International
Mrs.
Rai
Kala
[email protected]
Goldenpeak high school
Ms.
Rana
Vishruta Singh
[email protected]
Rural Reconstruction Nepal (RRN)
Ms.
Randel
Judith
[email protected]
Mr.
Raza
Syed Saqib
[email protected]
Ms.
Rea
Joanna
[email protected]
Bond
Mr.
Reeves
Matthew
[email protected]
Pact
Mr.
Reilly-King
Fraser
[email protected]
Canadian Council for International Co-operation
Rivera Ocampo
Roberto
[email protected]
Iniciativa Social para la Democracia
Mr.
Robles
Luciano
[email protected]
Autonomous Trade Union Confederation Clasista
Dr.
ROWLAND
WILLIAM
[email protected]
INTERNATIONAL DISABILITY ALLIANCE
Mr.
Rukonge
Audax
[email protected]
Agricultural Non State Actors Forum
Ms.
Saares
Pauliina
[email protected]
Ms.
Sæbø
Anita
[email protected]
FOKUS - Forum for Women and Development
Miss
Sajda
Nathalie
[email protected]
The Graduate Institute of Peace Studies
Mr.
Salamadze
Vaja
[email protected]
Civil Society Institute
Ms.
Saleumsouk
Beykham
[email protected]
Huam jai asasamak Association
Mr.
Sam Ath
Sam Ath
[email protected]
The NGO Forum on Cambodia
Mrs.
SAMO
MARIA DA GRAÇA
NAMBURETE SAMO
[email protected]
FORUM MULHER
Mrs.
Samqui Chang
Eva de Rosario
[email protected]
Coordinadora Civil
Ms.
Sanchez
Julia
[email protected]
CCIC
Miss
Sánchez
Alicia
[email protected]
Asociación Chilena de ONG ACCIÓN
Dr.
Sánchez Gutiérrez
María Gabriela
[email protected]
Instituto Mora
Mr.
Sanchez Jacob
Eduardo Sanchez Jacob
[email protected]
Prof.
Saner-Yiu
Lichia
[email protected]
Centre for Socio-Eco-Nomic Development
Mr.
Santner
Maximilian
[email protected]
global responsibility - Austrian Platform for
Development and Humanitarian Aid
Dr.
Sayeeed
Azra
[email protected]
APWLD
Mrs.
Scarenzio Vera
Ana Laura
[email protected]
ANONG
Ms.
Schoenstein
Anne
[email protected]
Association for Women's Rights in Development
(AWID)
Ms.
Schouten
Claire
[email protected]
Tiri
Mr.
SECK
Ibrahima
[email protected]
CECIDE
Mrs.
Seurs
Griet Sofie
[email protected]
11.11.11
Mr.
Shah
Syed Faiz Ali
[email protected]
Ms.
Sharma
Dorodi
[email protected]
Disabled People's International
Ms.
shinawatra
punika
[email protected]
APWLD
Ms.
shori
rekha
[email protected]
Evaluation Society of Kenya
Mr.
Silaban
Rekson
[email protected]
KSBSI
Simonds
Matt
[email protected]
BetterAid
Miss
simonetti
paola
[email protected]
International Trade Union Confederation
Mrs.
SIMONNY ABEGUE
Blanche
[email protected]
Dynamique OSCAF
Mr.
Simpson
Graeme
[email protected]
Interpeace
Mr.
Singh
Anil
[email protected]
SANSAD
Ms.
SINGH
DEBBIE
[email protected]
Pacific Islands Association of Non Government
Organisations (PIANGO)
Dr.
Siwakoti
Gopal
[email protected]
Asia-Pacific Research Network
Ms.
Sladkova
Zuzana
[email protected]
CONCORD
Mr.
Smith
Henry
[email protected]
Saferworld
Mr.
Soeung
Saroeun
[email protected]
Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC)
Mr.
Son
Phan
[email protected]
Viet Nam Union of Science and Technology
Associations
Song
Jeongan
[email protected]
IAVE
Mr.
Sood
Varun
[email protected]
GP Connect!
Mr.
Sörbom
Peter
[email protected]
CONCORD Sweden
Mrs.
souad
belaazi
[email protected]
FEMNET
Mr.
Ssewakiryanga
Richard
[email protected]
Uganda National NGO Forum
Mrs.
Starck
Auli
[email protected]
Ms.
Staszewska
Katarzyna
[email protected]
WIDE Network
Mr.
Stiefel
Jan
[email protected]
AidRating
Rev.
SUAREZ
JAIRO
[email protected]
ACT ALLIANCE FORUM COLOMBIA
Mr.
Subedi
Rabin
[email protected]
Development Lawyers's Association
Ms.
Sugimoto
Kanako
[email protected]
Mr.
Sulehri
khalid Pervaiz
[email protected]
Mr.
Sutian
Lester
[email protected]
IBON/BetterAid
Ms.
Suzuki
Fumi
[email protected]
Space Allies
Mr.
Svoboda
Daniel
[email protected]
Czech national platform FoRS
Mrs.
SYLLA
NDEYE ASTOU
[email protected]
FEMNET/SENEGAL
Ms.
Szeniawska
Kasia
[email protected]
International Trade Union Confederation
Ms.
Tablang
Rosalinda
[email protected]
Council for People's Development and Governance
Mr.
Takahashi
Kiyotaka
[email protected]
ODA Reform Network
Mr.
Takayanagi
Akio
[email protected]
JANIC/Ferris University
Ms.
Tanglao
Goldie Liza
[email protected]
Reality of Aid - Country Outreach Programme
Ms.
tapia dominguez
emiliana
[email protected]
Red ACTIVAS
Ms.
TCHAITCHIAN BENA
FARIDA
[email protected]
Oxfam International
Mr.
Tembo
Russell
[email protected]
Economics Association of malawi
Mrs.
Terzi-Barbarosie
Daniela
[email protected]
National Women's studies and Information Center
"Partnership for Development"
Dr.
Tessema
Mesfin Teklu
[email protected]
Mr.
TETE BENISSAN
Aho
[email protected]
REPAOC
Mr.
TETE BENISSAN
AhO
[email protected]
REPAOC
Mrs.
Then Marte
Addys
[email protected]
Alianza ONG
Mrs.
Tholley
Yeabu
[email protected]
Statistics Sierra Leone
Dr.
Thoronka
Kaprie J G
[email protected]
CHILDHELP SIERRA LEONE
Tift
Randy
[email protected]
World Vision
Miss
Tixier
Flore
[email protected]
Coordination SUD
Mr.
Tomlinson
Brian
[email protected]
AidWatch Canada
Ms.
Towey
Olive
[email protected]
Concern Worldwide
Mr.
TSHIBANGU NTITE
Emmanuel
[email protected]
SOLIDARITE POUR UN MONDE MEILLEUR
Mr.
Tujan
Antonio
[email protected]
IBON Foundation, Inc. / BetterAid
Ms.
Turakhanova
Dilbar
[email protected]
NGO Human Rights Center
Mr.
Twalangete
Zaa
[email protected]
Tanzania Association of NGOs
Mr.
Twijukye
Gerald
[email protected]
Centre for Basic Research
Ms.
Uriona Gamarra
Katia Veronica
[email protected]
Coordinadora de la Mujer
Mr.
Valot
Henri
[email protected]
CIVICUS
Mr.
van Tuijl
Peter
[email protected]
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed
Conflict (GPPAC)
Mrs.
Vela Mantilla
Gloria Esperanza
[email protected]
La Alianza de organizaciones sociales y afines
Mrs.
Vela Mantilla
Gloria Esperanza
[email protected]
La Alianza de organizaciones sociales y afines
Mr.
Velásquez
Helmer
[email protected]
Coordinación de ONG y Cooperativas (CONGCOOP)
Mr.
VELAYUDAM
KARUPPIAH
[email protected]
NATIONAL TRADE UNION FEDERATION
Mr.
Verger
Daniel
[email protected]
Coordination SUD
viciani
iacopo
[email protected]
ActionAid
Mr.
Vithner
Erik
[email protected]
PATC Ass. of Danish CSO’s in development cooperation
Mrs.
VU
HOP
[email protected]
Center for Sustainable Rural Development (SRD)
Mrs.
wairagu
immaculate
[email protected]
mukaro orphans&vulnerable children
Mrs.
Waithaka
Consolata Waithaka
[email protected]
Womans Hope
Waithaka
Consolata
[email protected]
Woman Hope
Mr.
Walleem
Muhammad
[email protected]
Mr.
WA-MOKOBOSSABI
MOKAMANEDE
Godefroy
[email protected]
Association Centrafricaine pour la Démocratie et le
Développement
Ms.
Wanjiru
Rose
[email protected]
Center for Economic Governance
Dr.
Warnakula Arachchiralalage
Deshapriya Sam Wijetunge
[email protected]
Sri Lanka-United Nations Friendship Organisation
(SUNFO)
Ms.
Watanabe
Miko
[email protected]
The Against Malaria Foundation Japan
Ms.
Wilczynska
Izabela
[email protected]
Polish Humanitarian Action
Dr.
Winjobi
David Tola
[email protected]
Mr.
Wishart
Ian
[email protected]
Plan International Australia
Mr.
Wishart
Ian
[email protected]
Plan International Australia
Mr.
Wojtalik
Marcin
[email protected]
Institute of Global Responsibility
Ms.
WOO
MI SUN
[email protected]
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development
(APWLD)
Mr.
Worley
John
[email protected]
International Planned Parenthood Federation
Worthington
Samuel
[email protected]
InterAction
Ms.
Ximenes Granadeiro
Dinorah Suzette
[email protected]
Forum ONG Timor-Leste (FONGTIL)
Mr.
Yamada
Takumo
[email protected]
Japan NGO Network for Education
Mr.
Yamaguchi
Masashi
[email protected]
Mr.
yardımcı
mustafa
[email protected]
ministry of interior affairs
Mr.
Yogi
Gopal Nath
[email protected]
NGO Federation of Nepal
Ms.
Youn
Hyunjoo
[email protected]
Mr.
Yumnam
Jiten
[email protected]
Asian Indigenous Peoples Pact
Mr.
Zacharie
Arnaud
[email protected]
CNCD
Mrs.
Zaldivar Rolón
Elsa María
[email protected]
POJOAJU
Zaldivar Rolón
Elsa María
[email protected]
Base ECTA
ZÉ
Oumou
[email protected]
CNCD-11.11.11
Zhao
Daxing
[email protected]
China Association for NGO Cooperation
Mrs.
Ziela
Maimbo
[email protected]
International Justice Mission
Mr.
Zomer
Hans
[email protected]
Dóchas
Mrs.

Final Report - Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness

Transcription

Similar documents

View

Chief_Science_Officers_Winter16

How to Make A Korovai

Pottery Wheel Mania!

Yahoo Groups - CollectiveNet

MFHutton

Yahoo Groups account setup

RailOp – Software for Model Railroad Operations

File

Futsal fever - Yahoo News Malaysia