2010 Boston Logan International Airport Air Passenger

Transcription

Boston Logan International Airport
2010 Boston Logan International Airport
Air Passenger Ground Access Survey
PREPARED FOR:
Massachusetts Port Authority
Economic Planning and Development Department
PREPARED BY:
RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
IN ASSOCIATION WITH:
Resource Systems Group, Inc.
Granite State Marketing Research, Inc.
December 2010
Boston-Logan International Airport
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Background ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 Facilities and Service Changes since the 2007 Survey..................................... 1
1.1.2 New England Regional Aviation System Plan Update in 2004 ....................... 2
1.1.3 Scheduling of the 2010 Survey and Events Affecting the Sampling
Process .............................................................................................................. 2
1.2
Survey Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2
1.3
Organization of This Report ......................................................................................... 3
2.
Survey Methodology ................................................................................................................. 3
2.1
Questionnaire Design .................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1 Questionnaire Content ...................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Paper-based Questionnaire Format................................................................... 6
2.1.3 Online Questionnaire Format ........................................................................... 7
2.2
Sampling Plan ............................................................................................................... 8
2.2.1 Sample Flight Selection .................................................................................... 8
2.2.2 Sample Adjustments ......................................................................................... 9
2.2.3 Characteristics of the Sampled Flights ........................................................... 11
2.3
Survey Administration ................................................................................................ 15
2.3.1 Survey Fielding Preparation ........................................................................... 15
2.3.2 Survey Fielding .............................................................................................. 16
2.4
Dataset Development .................................................................................................. 17
2.4.1 Sample Weighting .......................................................................................... 17
2.4.2 Data Cleaning ................................................................................................. 18
2.4.3 Final Dataset ................................................................................................... 19
3.
Results—Summary Comparison with Prior Years .................................................................. 20
3.1
Profile of Logan Airport Air Passengers..................................................................... 20
3.2
Ground Access Mode Comparison ............................................................................. 22
4.
Detailed Results—2010 Air Passenger Ground Access Survey .............................................. 24
4.1
Profile of Logan Airport Air Passengers..................................................................... 24
4.2
Ground Access Modes ................................................................................................ 30
4.2.1 HOV Access ................................................................................................... 32
4.2.2 Logan Express Service Stated Preference Question ....................................... 33
4.3
Private Vehicle Access and Parking ........................................................................... 34
4.4
Terminal Waiting Times ............................................................................................. 35
4.5
Terminal Concessions Spending ................................................................................. 36
4.6
Expected Ground Egress Modes ................................................................................. 37
4.7
Use of Other Airports in the Region ........................................................................... 38
5.
Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 39
5.1
Summary of Findings .................................................................................................. 39
5.2
Experience Gained during the 2010 Survey ............................................................... 39
5.2.1 Questionnaire Design ..................................................................................... 39
5.2.2 Future Questionnaire Recommendations ....................................................... 39
2010 Air Passenger Ground Access Survey
i
December 2010
List of Appendices
Appendix A—Paper-based Survey Questionnaire
Appendix B—Screenshots of the Online Questionnaire
Appendix C—List of Sampled Flights
Appendix D—Survey Count Sheet
Appendix E—Tabulations and Cross Tabulations of Survey Results
List of Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
Table 19
Table 20
Table 21
Table 22
Table 23
Table 24
Table 25
Calculation of Sampling Interval ............................................................................... 9
Airlines by Terminals (April-May, 2010) ............................................................... 13
Final Dataset – Determination of Usable Responses............................................... 19
Share of Ground Access Trips by Market Segment, Weekday Trips (1996–
2010) ........................................................................................................................ 20
Distribution of Air Passengers’ Gender, All Trips (2004-2007) ............................. 21
Distribution of Air Passengers’ Age, All Trips (2004-2007) .................................. 21
Share of Ground Access Trips by Mode, All Trips (2007–2010) ........................... 22
Distribution of Ground Access Trips by Area of Origin, All Trips (1996–
2010) ........................................................................................................................ 23
Distribution of Logan Airport Ground Access Trips by Market Segment
(2010) ...................................................................................................................... 24
Market Segment by Trip Origin Area, All Trips (2010) ......................................... 27
Gender Distribution by Market Segment, All Trips (2010) .................................... 27
Income Distribution of Air Passengers (2010) ........................................................ 28
Household Income by Market Segment (2010) ....................................................... 29
Flight Distance by Market Segment (2010) ............................................................ 29
Distribution of Ground Access Trips by Access Mode (2010) ............................... 30
Average Occupancy by Access Mode, Weekday Trips Only (2010) ...................... 31
Travel Party Size by Trip Purpose, All Trips (2010) .............................................. 32
High Occupancy Vehicle Mode Share by Market Segment (2010) ........................ 32
Percent of Air Passengers that May Change Access Mode to Logan Express
(2010) ...................................................................................................................... 33
Distribution of Private Vehicle Parking Locations (2010) ...................................... 34
Distribution of Parking Duration (2010) ................................................................. 34
Distribution of Terminal Waiting Times (2010) ..................................................... 35
Distribution of Terminal Concessions Spending by Dollar Amount and
Concession Type (2010) .......................................................................................... 36
Distribution of Expected Ground Egress Mode Shares (2010) ............................... 37
Use of Regional Airports, Weekday Trips (2010) ................................................... 38
ii
December 2010
List of Exhibits
New Question on the 2010 Survey Questionnaire: Logan Express Parking
Exhibit 1
and Fare Stated Preference ........................................................................................ 5
Exhibit 2
New Question on the 2010 Survey Questionnaire: Concessions Preferences
and Spending ............................................................................................................. 5
Exhibit 3
Cover Page of Paper-based Survey ........................................................................... 6
Screen Shot of the Logan Airport WiFi Landing Page with Live Link to
Exhibit 4
2010 Survey Questionnaire ....................................................................................... 7
Exhibit 5
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Aircraft Type................................................... 11
Exhibit 6
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Terminal .......................................................... 12
Exhibit 7
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Scheduled Flight Departure Time ................... 14
Exhibit 8
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Survey Period Day .......................................... 15
Exhibit 9
Distribution of Average Daily Ground Access Trips to Logan Airport by
Massachusetts Municipality .................................................................................... 25
Exhibit 10
Distribution of Average Daily Ground Access Trips to Logan Airport by
Regional Municipality ............................................................................................. 26
iii
December 2010
1.
Introduction
This report presents the results of the 2010 Air Passenger Ground Access Survey (the 2010 Survey)
conducted by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) at Boston-Logan International Airport
(Logan Airport or the Airport) in April and May 2010. The report presents a description of the
methodology used in designing, conducting, and administering the survey; a comparison with some
key results of previous surveys; and detailed results of the 2010 Survey.
1.1
Background
Since 1979, Massport has conducted periodic surveys of departing air passengers at Logan Airport to
gather information on air passenger ground access patterns. The survey is designed to help Massport
monitor air passenger ground access patterns and other important characteristics of departing air
passengers at Logan Airport to measure the effects of changes in ground access facilities or service
and to plan future ground access improvements.
The first ground access survey was conducted in April 1979 and, since then, Massport has conducted
the survey approximately every 3 years. Specifically, previous surveys were conducted in:
•
•
•
•
•
April 1979
April 1984
August 1984
April–May 1987
April–May 1990
•
•
•
•
•
April–May 1993
April–May 1996
April–May 1999
October 2003
April–May 2007
A separate large-scale ground access survey was also conducted at Logan Airport as part of the New
England Regional Aviation System Plan Update in 2004, as discussed in Section 1.1.2
To maintain consistency among survey-to-survey results, Massport typically conducts the survey in
April and May; however, circumstances occasionally influence a change in the survey period. For
example, in 2003, the survey was scheduled for the first 2 weeks of April, but the initiation of
military operations in Iraq in March, combined with the outbreak and subsequent spread of severe
acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) resulted in significant reductions in airline travel during spring
2003. The 2003 Survey was postponed twice to later in the spring. On May 20, 2003, the
Department of Homeland Security raised the Advisory System threat level to Orange, representing a
“high risk of terrorist attack” following al Qaeda-linked suicide bombings in Saudi Arabia and
Morocco, and Massport security officials decided that the air passenger ground access survey could
not be conducted while the Orange threat level condition persisted. The survey was postponed until
October because Massport officials decided that a fall survey period would provide more compatible
results with prior year surveys than would a summer survey period.
1.1.1
Facilities and Service Changes since the 2007 Survey
Since the 2007 Survey was conducted, Logan Airport has experienced growth in low-cost carrier
service. Low-cost carriers’ share of the domestic jet passenger market was 32 percent in May 2007
and increased to just over 37 percent in May 2010. AirTran Airways, JetBlue Airways, and Spirit
Airlines operated at the Airport during the 2007 Survey period, and several other low-cost carriers
have initiated service since the 2007 Survey period: Porter Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Sun Country
Airlines, and Virgin America.
1
December 2010
Since 2007, no significant changes have been implemented to the ground access network serving
Logan Airport that would influence air passenger ground access behavior.
1.1.2
New England Regional Aviation System Plan Update in 2004
As part of the New England Regional Aviation System Plan Update (a project cosponsored by
Massport, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission), a
survey of approximately 5,500 air passengers was conducted at Logan Airport in 2004. Surveys
were concurrently conducted at nine other New England airports. Similar sampling methods and
survey instruments were used for consistency with prior air passenger surveys at Logan Airport,
although several questions were added to the questionnaire to address the specific needs of the
System Plan update. Databases containing the survey results were provided to the managers at each
participating airport upon completion of the update.
1.1.3
Scheduling of the 2010 Survey and Events Affecting the Sampling Process
The 2010 Survey was scheduled to maintain the historical spring survey timeframe and was
administered from April 29 through May 12, 2010.
Two events affected air travel at Logan Airport during the survey period:
•
The volcano Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland erupted on April 14, 2010, about 1.5 weeks before the
survey was to be conducted. The plume of volcanic ash spewed from Iceland south and east
over most of continental Europe and the United Kingdom, causing the cancellation of many
flights destined for Europe for a week. Many, but not all, European airports had reopened by
the time the survey was initiated.
•
A water main in Weston, Massachusetts, broke on Saturday, May 1, 2010, and the entire
water supply within the Route 128 beltway was considered contaminated. Although this
event did not affect air traffic at Logan Airport directly, JetBlue was required to cancel most
of its morning flights on Sunday, May 2, because the JetBlue maintenance crew had cleaned
and filled its aircraft with untreated water.
1.2
Survey Objectives
The objectives of the 2010 Survey were as follows:
•
Assess ground access mode share—The survey is the principal tool used to gauge the mode
shares of air passengers traveling to Logan Airport. Mode share is reported in the annual
environmental documentation for the Airport.
•
Develop a profile of air passenger characteristics—Results of the survey are used to develop
a profile of air passengers, which is then used to understand the influences on air passenger
ground access mode choices.
•
Update existing data on ground access travel behavior—The survey was designed to capture
data describing air passenger ground access travel behavior as of spring 2010, which can be
compared to data collected in prior surveys to understand long-term trends in such behavior.
•
Capture other air passenger characteristics to support various planning efforts—The survey
was designed to capture other data relevant to efforts such as terminal or concessions
planning.
The primary objective of the survey was to compare the results of the 2010 Survey with the results
from prior year surveys so that the trends in ground access could be clearly identified, and a
consistent history of results and trends could be maintained so that future surveys could further
2
December 2010
extend the analysis of such trends. Survey results are used in long-range operational and capital
project planning.
1.3
Organization of This Report
This report is organized as follows:
•
Section 2 describes the methodology used to conduct the survey, including the questionnaire
design, the sampling plan, survey administration, and production of the final dataset.
•
Section 3 provides an overview of the survey results and a summary comparison with
previous survey results.
•
Section 4 describes the results of the 2010 Survey in greater detail.
•
Section 5 provides a summary and conclusions regarding the outcome of the project,
including lessons learned that can be applied to the next air passenger ground access survey.
The report also contains several appendices:
•
Appendix A—Paper-based Survey Questionnaire
•
Appendix B—Screenshots of the Online Questionnaire
•
Appendix C—List of Sampled Flights
•
Appendix D—Survey Count Sheet
•
Appendix E—Tabulations and Cross Tabulations of Survey Results
2.
Survey Methodology
The general survey methodology followed in the 2010 Survey largely reflects that used in the 2007
Survey, as follows:
•
Only departing air passengers were surveyed in the waiting areas at the Airport departure
gates.
•
Sampling was conducted based on the expected number of air passengers per flight, and each
flight was categorized by aircraft type and total flight distance from Logan Airport.
•
A self-completion paper-based questionnaire was handed out to departing air passengers and
options for return of completed surveys included a hand-back option in the departure gate
waiting area, a prepaid postage mail-back option, and an online completion option, which
was offered for the first time during the 2010 Survey.
•
Counts of actual boarded air passengers were obtained from the airline gate personnel for use
in sample weighting and response rate calculations.
Benefits of this survey methodology include:
•
Sampling flights provides a statistically valid method to capture a representative sample of all
departing air passengers. This sampling methodology allows for expansion of the dataset to
the total air passenger activity for the 2-week survey administration period. Furthermore, this
sampling methodology allows for the collection of a sufficient sample size within the various
passenger population segments (e.g., business versus non-business passengers, short-haul
versus medium-haul versus long-haul passengers, international versus domestic passengers)
to make comparisons between segments that are statistically significant.
3
December 2010
•
Intercepting air passengers in the departure gate waiting areas allows air passengers to
respond to the survey during their stay at Logan Airport at a time that typically involves the
fewest hassles and distractions; that is, they have already passed through security screening,
have located the correct departure gate, and are relaxing for some period prior to boarding
their scheduled flights.
•
Providing three survey completion return options was anticipated to improve response rates
compared with those for the 2007 Survey. Furthermore, Massport staff expressed an interest
in conducting future surveys online to allow for customization of survey questions and to
save costs related to fielding the survey and data entry; therefore, introducing this option
allowed for it to be tested.
How the survey methodology was implemented in questionnaire and sample design, administration
of the survey, and production of the final dataset are described below.
2.1
Questionnaire Design
The 2010 Survey questionnaire content and format (both paper-based on online formats) are
discussed in this section.
2.1.1
Questionnaire Content
The 2010 Survey questionnaire (see Appendix A for a copy of the paper-based questionnaire) was
based on the 2007 Survey questionnaire with a few minor changes. Several questions from the 2007
questionnaire were not included or were reworded in the 2010 questionnaire; the subjects of these
excluded or reworded questions, followed by the specific questions, are as follows:
•
Questions about accessing Logan Airport using the Massachusetts Bay Transportation
Authority (MBTA) Silver Line (a new ground access service added in the period between the
2003 and 2007 surveys) were removed:
- “For what proportion of your trips to fly from Logan have you used the Silver Line since
it first opened in June of 2005?”
- “What mode did you most often use before June of 2005?”
•
A question and follow-up question about airline service to other cities were removed:
- “Are there any other cities outside the US not presently served non-stop from Logan to
which you would like to see new service added?” and
- “How many times per year would you use this service?”
•
A demographic question regarding age was changed from:
- “Which of the following categories best describes your age?” to simply “In what year
were you born?”
Two new sets of questions were added to the 2010 Survey questionnaire and one question was
modified. Also, some questions were arranged in a slightly different order, such as swapping the
questions related to mode of access and ground trip origin.
The first new question in the 2010 Survey, shown on Exhibit 1, is a stated preference question about
the use of Logan Express, the bus service operated by Massport between Logan Airport and
endpoints in Braintree, Framingham, Woburn, and Peabody. A stated preference question can be
thought of as market testing, or capturing preferences in response to changing conditions (as opposed
to a revealed preferences question, which is used to collect data capturing actual choices made).
4
December 2010
Booston-Logan In
International A
Airport
Exhibit 1
New Ques
stion on the 2010
2
Survey Questionnaire
Q
e: Logan Exp ress Parking and Fare Sta
ated Preference
Source:
Reesource Systems Group,
G
Inc., April 2010.
2
The secon
nd new question on the 2010
2
Survey, shown on E
Exhibit 2, is a revealed prreference queestion
designed to capture business
b
marrket opportun
nities relatedd to air passeenger concesssions preferrences
and spend
ding.
Exhibit 2
New Ques
stion on the 2010
2
Survey Questionnaire
Q
e: Concession
ns Preference
es and Spend
ding
Source:
G
Inc., April 2010.
2
A final change
c
on the
t 2010 Su
urvey questionnaire con sisted of repplacing Hannscom Field with
Worcesteer Regional Airport
A
in a question
q
inteended to colllect data on the frequenccy of using L
Logan
Airport and
a
other regional airp
ports. The other airpoorts listed inn this questtion in the 2010
questionn
naire includeed Manchestter-Boston Regional
R
(Neew Hampshirre), T.F. Greeen State (R
Rhode
Island), Bradley
B
Intern
national (Con
nnecticut), an
nd Worcesterr Regional (M
Massachusettts) Airports.
2010 Air Passenger Grou
und Access Survey
5
December 2010
Booston-Logan In
International A
Airport
2.1.2
Paper-ba
ased Questtionnaire Format
mat of the paaper-based qu
uestionnaire was redesiggned from prrevious quesstionnaires foor the
The form
2010 Surrvey. The new
n
design consists
c
of a tetra-fold, 8.5-inch by 17-inch forrmat that inccludes
colorful graphics
g
to in
ncrease the viisual interestt and attractivveness of thee questionnairre.
Instructio
ons were prov
vided on the cover of thee questionnaiire, detailingg the three coompletion options:
hand-back in departu
ure gate waitting area, maail-back (posstage-free ussing Businesss Reply Maiil), or
complete online. Thee survey cov
ver is shown on Exhibit 3. A uniquee password w
was printed iin the
middle of
o the coverr of each questionnaire
q
e to facilitat
ate later identification oof the comppleted
questionn
naire and to ensure
e
that survey
s
respon
ndents comppleted the surrvey only onne time (neceessary
given the online comp
pletion option
n, discussed in
i Section 2.1.3).
Exhibit 3
Cover Pag
ge of Paper-b
based Survey
y
Source:
G
Inc., April 2010.
2
und Access Survey
6
December 2010
Booston-Logan In
International A
Airport
2.1.3
Online Questionna
Q
ire Format
ompletion off the 2010 Su
urvey was a new
n option ooffered to suurvey responddents. The oonline
Online co
questionn
naire format provides seeveral beneffits in compparison to thhe paper-bassed questionnnaire
format:
•
The
T ability to customize qu
uestions baseed on a respoondent’s prevvious answerrs and to direect the
reespondents along
a
a path
hway custom
mized to theiir responses, which is nnot possible using
paaper-based questionnaire
q
s.
•
The
T collection
n of clean and
d validated data
d with autoomatically geeocoded locaations.
•
The
T potential to increase survey respo
onse rates byy providing a convenientt means of suurvey
paarticipation (both
(
for thosse using lapto
ops at the tim
me they weree requested too participate in the
su
urvey and tho
ose willing to
o complete th
he survey at a later, more convenient, time).
During su
urvey admin
nistration, freee WiFi was offered throoughout Logaan Airport. A live link tto the
survey qu
uestionnaire was
w provided
d on the top left
l corner off the WiFi laanding page ((the web pagge that
directs th
hose using thee free Airporrt WiFi to thee Internet), ass shown on E
Exhibit 4.
Exhibit 4
Screen Sh
hot of the Log
gan Airport WiFi
W Landing Page
P
with Live
e Link to 2010
0 Survey Que
estionnaire
Live
L
Link to the
t 2010 Air Passenger G
Ground Acce
ess Survey
Source:
Lo
ogan Airport free WiFi
W landing pagee, as available during the 2010 Air P
Passenger Ground A
Access Survey perriod (accessed Aprril 29,
20
010).
und Access Survey
7
December 2010
The online questionnaire contained the same questions as the paper-based questionnaire, with one
exception: the stated preference question, as discussed in Section 2.1.1, differed from the paper-based
format of this question shown on Exhibit 1. In the online version of the 2010 Survey questionnaire,
two questions preceding the stated preference survey question about the use of Logan Express
service were used to identify those online respondents to whom the stated preference survey question
applied: those whose local origins were outside the Route 128 beltway and those who did not use
Logan Express to access the Airport. The ability to instantaneously geocode respondents’ local
origins in the online survey allowed for the identification of origins inside and outside the Route 128
beltway. Eligible respondent were presented with a set of four stated preference questions about
Logan Express service. Hypothetical parking costs and fares were varied among the questions, and
respondents indicated whether they would switch to Logan Express service or whether they would
continue to use the same ground access mode as used for their current trip to the Airport.
Screen shots of the online questionnaire are provided in Appendix B.
2.2
Sampling Plan
The sample for the 2010 Survey was designed to be consistent with that of the 2007 Survey. An
interval sampling approach was used, such that each flight scheduled to leave Logan Airport in the 2week survey period had a selection probability proportional to the seating capacity of the aircraft, a
proxy for the expected number of air passengers boarding the aircraft. The sample was also stratified
by departure times and flight distances. The departure times were categorized for sampling and
scheduling purposes into three categories: 5 a.m. to 10 a.m., 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., and 4 p.m. to 10 p.m.
The flight distance categories were defined as: less than 500 miles, 500 to 1,500 miles, and greater
than 1,500 miles. Flight distance was used as a representative indicator of trip distance that may be
associated with amount of time spent away by the passenger and amount of baggage carried per
passenger.
The sampling method described in this section allows for selection of a subset of flights (the sample
flights) from the total list of scheduled departing flights during the survey period, as surveying all
flights is not practical. The method also includes identification of alternate flights with similar
characteristics to the sample flights in the event of a delay or cancellation of a sample flight to
provide flexibility to respond to changing conditions during the survey period.
The sampling of flights to be surveyed, adjustments to the list of selected flights, and characteristics
of the sample flights are described below.
2.2.1
Sample Flight Selection
Massport established the targeted number of responses at 8,000 completed questionnaires, consistent
with completion targets for previous surveys, to achieve a statistically significant sample. This large
sample size was established to allow for comparisons between various passenger segments (such as
between business and non-business passengers, resident and non-resident passengers, domestic and
international passengers, and weekday and weekend passengers), as well as between various
combinations of these passenger segments (such as resident business passengers traveling during
weekdays versus weekends). A sample size of 200 to 400 passengers within each passenger segment
analyzed is required to produce statistically significance results.
Based on an anticipated number of usable responses per expected air passenger departing on a flight,
the average number of expected departing air passengers per flight, and the total expected number of
departing air passengers at Logan Airport during the 2-week survey period, the sampling interval was
calculated to be every 2,538th air passenger and the number of flights to be sampled during the survey
period was calculated to be 199, as shown in Table 1.
8
December 2010
Table 1
Calculation of Sampling Interval
Target Response Size
8,000
Divided by Expected Usable Questionnaires per Air Passenger
Equals Required Air Passengers in Sample
Divided by Average Expected Air Passengers per Flight
Equals Required Number of Flights for Sample
Divided into Total Expected Air Passengers for Survey Period
Equals Required Sampling Interval
Source:
0.5
16,000
80
199
505,194
2,538
Resource Systems Group, Inc., April 2010.
Official Airline Guides, Inc. (OAG) data for the 2-week survey period provided information on
scheduled seats per flight, load factors, and departure times. The process followed to develop the list
of flights to be sampled was the same as that used in the 2007 Survey and included the following
steps:
1. Sort the OAG list of flights scheduled for the survey period by flight distance and then by
departure time, and then generate the cumulative number of expected air passengers over the
survey period (based on aircraft seats).
2. Select a random integer between 1 and the sample interval of 2,538. Using the cumulative
expected air passenger numbers in the sorted OAG list of flights, identify the flight that
would accommodate the air passenger represented by the selected random integer. This
flight is selected as the first flight to be surveyed in the sample.
3. Continue selecting the flight that accommodates each subsequent 2,538th air passenger until
all 199 flights within the survey period are selected.
This systematic procedure results in the selection of flights among departure times generally
consistent with the distribution of actual flight departure times and ensures that the probability of a
flight being selected is proportional to the flight’s seating capacity.
Once the list of flights to be surveyed was defined during the sampling process, the field schedule for
the survey period was developed. To ensure that survey administration was efficient in terms of both
logistics and the budget, the field scheduling to survey passengers departing on the selected flights
identified in the sample allowed for the surveying of those flights on days other than the exact date
that was selected during sampling; however, all selected weekday flights were scheduled to be
surveyed on weekdays and all selected weekend flights were scheduled to be surveyed on weekends.
Because delays and cancellations routinely occur in airline travel, alternatives were selected for each
flight on the scheduled list to facilitate adapting to potentially changing circumstances. The
alternative flights had similar characteristics and nearby departure gates to the selected flights.
2.2.2
Sample Adjustments
Once survey administration was under way, it became clear that additional flights would need to be
surveyed to ensure that the required number of completed questionnaires was obtained. The actual
number of completed questionnaires per flight was lower than expected. One trend was the lower
than expected proportion of eligible survey respondents on flights served by small aircraft because a
high proportion of the air passengers on those flights were connecting passengers and thus not
9
December 2010
eligible to participate in the survey. Therefore, the scheduled flight list was adjusted by adding
flights from the alternatives list to the schedule, with attention to minimizing changes to the sampling
plan procedure to the extent possible.
Two specific effects on air travel from Logan Airport were identified in Section 1.1.3. These events
affected the sampling plan as follows:
•
•
The volcano Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland erupted 1.5 weeks before the survey was to be
initiated. Despite the fact that some airports in Europe had reopened by the time the survey
began, to be safe, the sampling was adjusted to reschedule many of the international flights to
be surveyed to the second week of the survey period and to substitute some international trips
to Spain and Italy that had not been identified in the initial sample. Destinations in southern
Europe were not affected as much as destinations in northern Europe. During the first week
of the survey period, the schedule of flights to Europe returned to normal, and some of the
international European flights were added back into the first week schedule.
The Weston water main break on Saturday, May 1, and the subsequent use of potentially
contaminated water by JetBlue maintenance staff to clean and fill the aircraft the following
morning resulted in cancellation of JetBlue departures Sunday morning. Once the survey
agents and supervisors understood the disruption to the JetBlue schedule, alternate flights
were surveyed during the morning of May 2. By the afternoon of May 2, JetBlue resumed its
flight schedule and the surveyors resumed the original sampling schedule.
A list of the final set of sampled flights is shown in Appendix C.
10
December 2010
2.2.3
Characteristics of the Sampled Flights
Exhibit 5 shows the distribution of the final set of sampled flights by aircraft type. As described
above, the sampling method results in larger aircraft having a higher probability of selection, and the
distribution shown in the exhibit reflects this result. While widebody aircraft accounted for 4 percent
of all scheduled departing flights at Logan Airport during the survey period, they accounted for just
over 6 percent of the sample. Conversely, while regional jets and turboprops accounted for nearly
48 percent of total scheduled departing flights at the Airport during the survey period, they accounted
for about 22 percent of the sample.
Exhibit 5
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Aircraft Type
Large Narrowbody
14%
Widebody and
Large Widebody
6%
Small Narrowbody
58%
Turboprop
3%
Regional Jet
19%
Notes:
1/
2/
Source:
Aircraft were categorized as follows: large widebody (A330 series and A340 series, B-747-400, and B-777);
widebody (B-767); large narrowbody (B-757 series); small narrowbody (A319, A320, and A321; B-717 and
B-737 series; DC-9-50; and MD 80, MD 83, and MD 88); regional jets (Canadair Regional Jet 900; Embraer
170, 175, 190, RJ135, RJ140, and RJ145); and turboprops (Cessna Light aircraft).
Widebody aircraft accounted for less than 0.4 percent of the sampled flights and were combined with large
widebody aircraft in this exhibit.
Resource Systems Group, Inc., September 2010.
11
December 2010
Exhibit 6 shows the distribution of sampled flights by terminal at the Airport, and Table 2 provides
a reference list of which airlines operated out of each terminal in April 2010. About 35 percent of
the sampled flights departed from Terminal B, 28 percent departed from Terminal C, and 27 percent
departed from Terminal A. This distribution generally reflects that of the Airport as a whole, but, as
noted above, it also factors in the higher probability of selecting larger (widebody) aircraft for the
survey. For example, the international flights that account for the majority of Terminal E operations
typically are operated with larger aircraft. Thus, while Terminal E represents about 3 percent of total
international departures, it accounts for 9 percent of the survey sample. Since the 2007 Survey, the
share of flights from Terminal A has continued to increase, from 16 percent in 2007 to 27 percent in
2010.
Exhibit 6
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Terminal
Terminal C
28%
Terminal E
Domestic
4%
Terminal E
International
9%
Terminal B
35%
Source:
Terminal A
27%
12
December 2010
Table 2
Airlines by Terminals (April-May, 2010)
Terminal E
•
•
•
•
Terminal A
Alaska Airlines
Continental Airlines
Delta Air Lines
Delta Shuttle
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Terminal B 2/
American Airlines
Frontier Airlines
Midwest Airlines
Spirit Airlines
Virgin America
Air Canada
US Airways
•
•
•
•
•
Terminal C
AirTran Airways
Cape Air
JetBlue Airways
Sun Country Airlines
United Airlines
Domestic
• Southwest
•
Airlines
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Notes:
1/
2/
Source:
International
Aer Lingus
Alitalia
British Airways
Iberia
Icelandair
Lufthansa
Porter Airlines
SATA
Internacional
Société Air France
Swiss
International Air
Lines
Virgin Atlantic
Airways
This table lists the primary airlines operating from Logan Airport by departure terminal in April-May 2010,
and is not considered a comprehensive list.
Airlines in Terminal B–American Airlines included American Airlines, Frontier Airlines, Midwest Airlines,
Spirit Airlines and Virgin America. Airlines in Terminal B–US Airways included Air Canada and US Airways.
Massachusetts Port Authority, April 2010.
13
December 2010
The distribution of sampled flights by departure time is shown on Exhibit 7. The exhibit indicates
that generally busier periods represent a higher proportion of flights in the survey sample. In
addition, the end of the day is predominantly characterized by commuter flights; because of their
lower seating capacity, these flights were less likely to be selected for the sample.
Exhibit 7
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Scheduled Flight Departure Time
30
Sampled Flights
25
20
15
10
5
0
Time Interval
Source:
14
December 2010
The number of flights sampled each day of the survey period is shown on Exhibit 8. The exhibit
illustrates the addition of flights to the sample toward the latter part of the survey period to ensure
that the target number of completed surveys was captured. The distribution of sampled flights per
day also illustrates the disruptions to the sampling plan during the first few days of the survey period
resulting from the volcanic eruption and the interruption of JetBlue service during the morning of
May 2, 2010.
Sampled Flights
Exhibit 8
Distribution of Sampled Flights by Survey Period Day
Source:
2.3
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Survey Administration
Resource Systems Group, Inc. (RSG) administered the 2010 Survey at Logan Airport from April 29
through May 12, 2010. The survey was conducted in the departure gate waiting areas of all selected
flights by survey agents from Granite State Marketing Research (GSMR), a subcontractor with prior
air passenger survey experience at Logan Airport.
2.3.1
Survey Fielding Preparation
Prior to actually conducting the survey in the field (i.e., “fielding” the survey), the Massport Director
of Aviation sent letters to the airline station managers notifying them of the scheduled survey dates
and requesting their cooperation with the survey. All survey field staff (field managers, field
supervisors, and survey agents) went through the full security badging process at Logan Airport:
training class, background check, and fingerprinting. Survey field staff also participated in a training
session prior to fieldwork, during which they were educated on the purposes of and how to conduct
the survey (e.g., the purpose of the survey, survey procedures, the introductory script to initiate
discussion with air passengers), as well as the logistics of conducting the survey (e.g., terminal
locations, how to move between terminals, and how to pass through security checkpoints).
15
December 2010
A total of 19,000 questionnaires were printed to ensure that survey agents had adequate supplies at
all times. The questionnaires were stored in a centrally located room, provided by Massport, that
served as survey headquarters. Along with two field managers from RSG, GSMR supplied three field
supervisors and all survey agents. All survey agents checked in at survey headquarters at least one
hour before their shifts began to collect their shift schedule of flights and the survey materials (e.g.,
paper-based questionnaires and count sheets, provided in Appendix D). Survey agents also reported
back to survey headquarters at the end of their shifts to submit completed surveys.
2.3.2
Survey Fielding
Survey agents were grouped into teams, and each team was assigned a series of flights. For each
flight to be surveyed, a team of survey agents was tasked with distributing questionnaires to all air
passengers in the flight’s departure gate waiting area.
Survey agents arrived at their assigned departure gate one hour before the scheduled departure time
for a flight. The survey agents notified the airline gate personnel that they would be conducting the
survey of air passengers booked on that flight and, once the gate for the flight was closed, the survey
agent asked the airline gate personnel for the final boarding count for the flight (i.e., total air
passengers onboard, number of children, number of connecting air passengers, and number of
employees traveling as air passengers).
To implement the survey, survey agents briefly introduced themselves to air passengers in the
departure gate waiting area, as follows: “Your flight has been selected by Logan Airport to be a part
of an important planning study, and we are asking you to complete this survey and hand it back, take
it online, or mail it back.” Before distributing a questionnaire to an air passenger, the survey agent
confirmed that the passenger was not connecting at Logan Airport (and, therefore, did not access the
Airport via ground access modes) and, if in doubt, confirmed that the passenger was at least 16 years
old, the age at which the passenger may be able to drive themselves to the Airport. The survey agent
handed out questionnaires and pens to all qualifying air passengers, and then circulated back among
the passengers to collect the completed surveys.
A field manager was stationed in survey headquarters at all times in case survey agents called in to
report the cancellation or delay of an assigned flight. In those instances, the field manager assigned
the survey team to an alternate flight. Additionally, the field manager provided additional survey
materials to the survey agents, if needed. If the field managers were not otherwise busy supporting
the field agents, they reviewed returned questionnaires for completeness and accuracy.
At the end of an assigned shift, survey agents returned to survey headquarters and turned in all
completed questionnaires, any extra questionnaires that had not been handed out, and their count
sheets for each surveyed flight. If time allowed, the survey agents were able to pick up their
materials for the next day.
In addition to the paper-based questionnaire, which allowed for handwritten or online responses
using a personal laptop, two field managers had iPads, which Apple had recently released (in April
2010). The field managers accompanied survey agents to the departure gates for their assigned
flights and asked air passengers if they were interested in taking the survey using the new iPads. The
intent was to entice air passengers to complete the survey with an opportunity to try out the new
technology, thereby potentially increasing the survey response rate. Many air passengers were
intrigued with the idea of taking the survey using the iPads, but the technology presented some
challenges. Air passengers who were not adept at the touch-screen keypads took longer to take the
survey than those taking the paper-based survey, so the iPads tended to frustrate them. Field
managers observed that people who were accustomed to touch-screen keypad technology seemed to
16
December 2010
be able to complete the survey quickly and easily using the iPad. Furthermore, during periods of
high WiFi traffic, some survey pages downloaded slowly. The survey team concluded that the use of
technology, such as iPads, as a future survey completion option may be a better tool in the future as
more people become familiar with and use this type of technology.
2.4
Dataset Development
The final dataset for the survey contains 9,362 usable responses. The sample was weighted and the
dataset was cleaned to derive the final dataset, as discussed below.
2.4.1
Sample Weighting
Consistent with previous air passenger ground access surveys at Logan Airport, the final dataset was
weighted, as described in this section.
Step 1: Correct for travel party size effects
The travel party size correction depends on whether the variable of interest was assumed to be
similar across the traveling party. For example, access mode and arrival time would be similar for
every member of a travel party. Gender and age are examples of variables that may not be similar
across the travel party. The first stage weight calculation is:
=
if the variable was assumed to be similar across the party
= 1
if the variable was assumed to be different across the party
Where Aij and Cij are the number of adults and children in the party, respectively, and Rij is the
number of respondents in that party for the jth respondent on the ith flight.
Step 2: Weight the response to reflect the total number of air passengers qualified to
participate in the survey for each sample flight
Information collected from the airline gate agent after the gate was closed (i.e., after boarding was
completed) allowed for the calculation of the second stage weighting:
=
∑
Where Bi is the number of originating, not connecting, passengers for the ith flight.
17
December 2010
Step 3: Weight Each Flight by the Inverse of the Flight’s Selection Probability
For a particular distance category, many flights of varying sizes were sampled. As mentioned
previously, because seating capacity was used as a proxy for the number of air passengers expected,
larger flights were oversampled compared to smaller flights. To correct for this oversampling, the
third stage weighting was calculated as follows:
=
∑
∈
Where K is the set of all flights in the sampling distance category for respondent i, S is the
number of seats attributed to a flight, NK is the number of flights sampled in that distance
category, and Si is the number of seats attributed to respondent i's flight.
Step 4: Final Weighting
The final database contains two weights for each respondent, calculated as follows:
Weight=W1ij∙W2ij∙W3i
Weight A is used for variables describing travel patterns that are the same for all members of the
same party: for example, ground access origin and mode, and other variables related to the flight
being boarded at the time of the survey such as destination airport. Weight A imputes to all
members of the travel party the responses from any members of that travel party, and uses the
first definition of W1ij under Step 1 above.
Weight B is used for variables that describe aspects that are not necessarily the same for all
members of a travel party: for example, personal characteristics such as gender, household
income, etc., or details of the corresponding inbound flight. Weight B uses the second definition of
W1ij under Step 1 above, where W1ij = 1.
2.4.2
Data Cleaning
Data cleaning was a multistep process. Initial onsite cleaning was performed by field managers and
field supervisors, as follows:
•
Immediately after the completed questionnaires were returned to the field managers and field
supervisors after each survey shift, the field managers and field supervisors checked each
returned questionnaire for completeness and ensured that the correct airline, flight number,
and date were recorded on the questionnaire.
•
Next, field managers and field supervisors checked returned questionnaires for completeness.
Some respondents noted on Question 4a that their local origin was their home, but did not
complete Question 4b with the address of their home. If a respondent noting a home origin
did not answer Question 4b, the field managers and field supervisors checked for a response
to Question 20, which asks respondents for their home city/town, state, and zip code, and
then completed the response to Question 4b using that information.
•
Finally, field managers and field supervisors checked to see that the destination indicated in
Question 15 made sense based on the flight the respondent was boarding.
Following compilation of the dataset, detailed cleaning was performed, during which the following
items were examined and cleaned if necessary:
•
“Other” origin locations (not home or other residence) were cleaned and recoded into
additional categories: place of business, hotel/motel, school/college/university, and other.
•
The destination city or airport code was compared and matched with the state indicated.
18
December 2010
•
Records from flights that were not to have been sampled were eliminated. This situation
arose when the departure gate waiting areas were combined for several flights, such as for
JetBlue Airways and US Airways Shuttle. Although survey agents asked air passengers if
they were headed to the destination of the flight to be surveyed (Orlando, for example), the
respondent noted a different destination on the questionnaire (Charlotte, for example).
•
Ground access travel times were reviewed to ensure that they made sense; if not, they were
categorized as outliers. For example, if a respondent indicated that he/she left home in
Brownsville, Vermont, at 5 p.m. and arrived at Logan Airport at 2 p.m. for a 4 p.m. flight, it
was decided that the likely scenario was that the respondent had arrived in Boston the
evening before his/her flight because a 21-hour travel time from Vermont to the Airport is
unlikely. Furthermore, it was assumed that “p.m.” was recorded correctly because a 5 a.m.
departure time would equate to a 9-hour travel time from Brownsville to the Airport, which is
similarly assumed to be unlikely.
•
Many spelling corrections were made for write-in answers, such as names of rental car
companies, originating MBTA stations, originating ground access locations, and the like.
2.4.3
Final Dataset
Table 3 provides a summary of the response rates for the final dataset. Of the 14,182 total
distributed questionnaires, 8,998 responses were returned at the Airport and 158 were completed
online, while approximately 206 responses were returned by mail (as in previous years, only a small
percentage of survey responses were returned by mail).
Table 3
Final Dataset – Determination of Usable Responses
Total Paper Questionnaires Distributed
Completed Questionnaires by Return Method
Returned at Airport
Online
Returned by Mail
14,182
8,998
158
206
Total
Numbers of Air Passengers on All Sampled Flights
Total Boarded Air Passengers 1/
2/
Total Qualified Boarded Air Passengers
Response Rates for
Total Distributed Surveys
Total Boarded Air Passengers
Total Qualified Boarded Air Passengers
Notes:
1/
2/
Source:
9,362
31,181
26,492
66%
30%
35%
Total boarded air passengers for the sampled flights were obtained from airline gate agents following gate
closure for each sampled flight.
Total qualified boarded air passengers were calculated by subtracting the number of connecting
passengers, children, and airline employees from the total boarded air passengers for the sampled flights
(obtained from airline gate agents following gate closure for each sampled flight). In addition, initial refusals
to participate in the survey, as well as language-barrier refusals, were subtracted from the total boarded air
passenger numbers (refusals were tracked for each sampled flight by the survey agents).
Tabulations and cross-tabulations of the usable responses are provided in Appendix E and
summarized in Sections 3 and 4 of this report.
19
December 2010
3.
Results—Summary Comparison with Prior Years
A summary comparison of the key results of the 2010 Survey compared with the prior Logan Airport
air passenger surveys is provided in this section. Most of the results were compared with the results
of the 1996, 1999, 2003, 2004, and 2007 surveys. However, the mode distribution comparison does
not include data prior to the 2007 Survey because of major infrastructure changes that occurred
between 2004 and 2007, such as the opening of the Silver Line bus rapid transit line, the opening of
the new Airport MBTA subway station, the completion of the Central Artery roadways, and
completion of Terminal A. Additional detailed tabulations and cross-tabulations of the 2010 Survey
results are provided in Section 4 and Appendix E.
3.1
Profile of Logan Airport Air Passengers
Table 4 presents a comparison of the share of weekday trips by market segment over the past six
surveys. In general, the resident non-business segment accounts for the largest share of air
passengers over five of the past six surveys, including the 2010 Survey, with about a one-third share
of air passengers departing on weekday trips (fewer in the 2003 Survey, which was conducted in
October). The non-resident non-business segment, a segment that experienced considerable growth
in 2010 compared to 2007, accounts for the second largest share of air passengers, which is notable
because this segment has accounted for the smallest share historically. Combined, the total nonbusiness market share accounted for almost 60 percent of the weekday air passenger trips, an
increase of almost 11 percent in 2010 compared with the 2007 results. The growth in the nonbusiness market segment may be attributable to the increase in low-cost carrier service at Logan
Airport over the past several years.
Table 4
Share of Ground Access Trips by Market Segment, Weekday Trips (1996–2010)
Survey Year 1/
2003 2/
2004 3/
2007
2010
27.5%
24.3%
20.8%
25.3%
21.0%
25.7%
24.8%
23.4%
26.1%
19.5%
53.9%
53.2%
49.1%
44.2%
51.4%
40.5%
32.3%
33.1%
26.6%
35.3%
34.0%
33.6%
Market Segment
1996
1999
Resident Business
26.6%
Non-resident Business
27.3%
Business Segment Subtotal
4/
Resident Non-business
Non-resident Non-business
13.8%
13.7%
24.3%
20.5%
14.6%
25.8%
4/
46.1%
46.8%
50.9%
55.8%
48.6%
59.5%
Total 4/
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Non-business Segment Subtotal
Notes:
1/
2/
3/
4/
Sources:
All surveys were conducted in the spring (April-May), except as noted.
The 2003 Survey was conducted in October.
The 2004 Survey was conducted as part of the New England Regional Aviation System Plan Update.
Numbers may not add to totals shown because of rounding.
Logan Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey results, 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, and 2010; and Massachusetts Port Authority, the
Federal Aviation Administration, and the Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission, New England Regional Aviation System Plan
Update, 2004.
20
December 2010
Table 5 presents a comparison of the distribution of survey respondents by gender from the 2007
Survey and the 2010 Survey, and Table 6 presents a comparison of the distribution of survey
respondents by age between the two survey periods. Compared with 2007 Survey results, the 2010
Survey distribution of the gender of survey respondents has become more balanced at a 50–50 split.
Similarly, the age distribution remained relatively constant between the two surveys, with about half
of respondents aged 45 years and above.
Table 5
Distribution of Air Passengers’ Gender, All Trips (2004-2007)
Survey Year
Gender
2007
2010
Male
54%
50%
Female
46%
50%
100%
100%
Total
Source:
Logan Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey results, 2007 and 2010.
Table 6
Distribution of Air Passengers’ Age, All Trips (2004-2007)
Survey Year
Age
2007
2010
8%
10%
25 - 34
21%
22%
35 - 44
23%
17%
45 - 54
23%
22%
55 - 64
18%
19%
8%
10%
100%
100%
Under 25
65 and Over
Total
Note: Numbers may not add to totals shown because of rounding.
Source:
21
December 2010
3.2
Ground Access Mode Comparison
Table 7 shows the changes in access mode choices between the 2007 and 2010 surveys. Given
ground access network and service changes prior to the 2007 Survey, earlier surveys were not
included in this comparative analysis. While private vehicles account for the largest share of ground
access modes, with approximately 40 percent, the total automobile share decreased 2.2 percent
between 2007 and 2010, with a corresponding increase in the shares of high-occupancy vehicles
(HOVs) and other shared-ride modes. Of note in the distribution of private vehicle mode share, air
passengers that were dropped off at the Airport increased by 3.7 percent from 2007 to 2010, while
those that arrived in vehicles that were parked at on- or off-Airport facilities decreased by
3.6 percent.
Table 7
Share of Ground Access Trips by Mode, All Trips (2007–2010)
Survey Year 1/
Mode
2007
2010
Dropped Off
23.3%
27.0%
Parked On-Airport
14.6%
12.2%
Parked Off-Airport
2.3%
1.1%
12.4%
10.9%
19.7%
18.8%
72.2%
70.0%
Logan Express Bus
3.3%
4.0%
Other Scheduled Bus
2.8%
3.7%
MBTA Subway
3.5%
4.0%
MBTA Bus (Silver Line)
2.6%
3.1%
Water Shuttle/Water Taxi
0.4%
0.3%
Van or Limousine (by Reservation)
7.3%
7.7%
Van or Limousine (Fixed Schedule)
0.8%
0.5%
Courtesy Shuttle
3.5%
4.4%
Charter Bus
2.5%
1.3%
0.9%
1.1%
27.8%
30.0%
Automobile
Private Vehicle:
Rental Vehicle
Taxicab
Subtotal
2/
HOV/Shared Ride
Public Transit:
Other Shared-Ride Vehicles:
Other HOV
Subtotal
2/
2/
100.0%
Notes:
HOV = High-Occupancy Vehicle
1/
The 2007 and 2010 Surveys were conducted in the spring (April-May).
2/
Total
Source:
100.0%
22
December 2010
Table 8 presents a comparison of the general distribution of trips by local origin over the past six
surveys. While the distribution of ground access trips originating outside of I-495 has remained
relatively constant over the past six surveys, the share of trip origins inside Route 128 has decreased
by approximately 5 percent between the 2007 and the 2010 survey results, with a proportionate shift
to origins between Route 128 and I-495.
Table 8
Distribution of Ground Access Trips by Area of Origin, All Trips (1996–2010)
Survey Year 1/
1996 2/
1999 2/
2003 3/,4/
2004 3/,5/
2007 3/
2010 3/
Inside Route 128
49%
53%
55%
52%
53%
52%
Between Route 128 and I-495
29%
33%
20%
20%
26%
25%
Outside I-495
22%
14%
25%
28%
21%
23%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Trip Origin
Total
Notes:
1/
2/
3/
4/
5/
Sources:
All surveys were conducted in the spring (April-May), except as noted.
Trip origins based on weekday trip responses.
Trip origins based on all trip responses.
The 2003 Survey was conducted in October.
The 2004 Survey was conducted as part of the New England Regional Aviation System Plan Update.
Logan Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey results, 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, and 2010; and Massachusetts Port Authority, the
Federal Aviation Administration, and the Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission, New England Regional Aviation System Plan
Update, 2004.
23
December 2010
4.
Detailed Results—2010 Air Passenger Ground Access Survey
The detailed results of the 2010 Survey are presented below. Results are shown separately, in many
cases, for weekday only trips, weekend only trips, and all trips (weekday plus weekend). A profile of
the air passengers responding to the survey and a description of the characteristics of their mode
choices and other characteristics of their ground access trips are provided.
4.1
Profile of Logan Airport Air Passengers
In total, 37.6 percent of air passengers (excluding connecting passengers) using Logan Airport during
the survey period in 2010 were traveling for business purposes. On weekdays, the share is slightly
higher (40.5 percent). Overall, about 52.3 percent of the air passengers during the survey period
were residents of the Boston area, with the weekday share again being slightly higher (54.6 percent).
Table 9 shows the distribution of air passengers by market segment characteristics that tend to
correlate to ground access travel behavior: resident versus non-resident and business versus nonbusiness trip purpose. As might be expected, during the weekends, the highest share of air
passengers at the Airport are non-residents traveling for non-business purposes, reflecting the
significant amount of tourists that visit the Boston area.
Table 9
Distribution of Logan Airport Ground Access Trips by Market Segment (2010)
Market Segment
Weekday Only
Resident Business
21.0%
All Trips
14.2%
19.4%
33.6%
30.4%
32.9%
19.5%
13.7%
18.2%
25.8%
41.7%
29.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Source:
Weekend Only
Logan Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey results, 2010.
In 2010, approximately 49 percent of the ground access trips to Logan Airport originated from
locations inside Route 128, with the remaining share of trips split relatively evenly among trips
originating between Route 128 and I-495 and those originating outside I-495 (26 percent and 25
percent, respectively). Exhibits 9 and 10 present a spatial representation of air passenger origins in
Massachusetts and in the New England region, respectively. The highest concentration of trips
originates in Boston proper and other areas with high densities of population or industry (such as
Brookline, Waltham, and Framingham).
24
December 2010
north
Not to Scale
Exhibit 9
December 2010
Distribution of Average Daily Ground Access Trips to Logan Airport
by Massachusetts Municipality
Source: Massachusetts Port Authority, Logan Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey results, 2010.
Prepared by: Massachusetts Port Authority, November 2010.
Source: Massachusetts Port Authority, Logan Airport Air Passenger
Ground Access Survey results, 2010.
Prepared by: Massachusetts Port Authority, November 2010.
Exhibit 10
Distribution of Average Daily Ground Access Trips
to Logan Airport by Regional Municipality
December 2010
Table 10 combines the market segment and area of origin information presented above, and further
differentiates weekday air passengers from weekend air passengers to provide more detailed
segmentation of passenger characteristics. For instance, an increase in non-resident non-business air
passengers originating from locations inside the Route 128 beltway occurs on weekends. This
“visitor trend” favoring places inside Route 128 is not reflected for origin areas outside Route 128.
A further comparison between weekday and weekend travel shows resident business air passengers
also originating from within the Route 128 beltway, consistent with the concentration of businesses
closer to the central city. The highest shares of air passenger trips originating outside I-495 are for
non-business purposes.
Table 10
Market Segment by Trip Origin Area, All Trips (2010)
Market Segment
Weekday Only
Inside
Route
128
Between
Route
128 and
I-495
Weekend Only
Outside
I-495
Inside
Route
128
Between
Route
128 and
I-495
All Trips
Outside
I-495
Between
Route
128 and
I-495
Inside
Route
128
Outside
I-495
Resident Business
10.5%
7.4%
5.0%
6.3%
6.6%
3.5%
9.5%
7.2%
4.7%
Resident Nonbusiness
16.4%
10.8%
10.8%
14.4%
10.0%
9.9%
15.9%
10.6%
10.6%
9.2%
3.3%
2.2%
6.7%
2.1%
2.5%
8.6%
3.0%
2.3%
Non-resident Nonbusiness
11.7%
5.8%
7.0%
21.0%
8.2%
8.9%
13.8%
6.3%
7.4%
Total
47.8%
27.2%
25.0%
48.4%
26.8%
24.8%
47.9%
27.1%
25.0%
Non-resident
Business
Weekday Total:
Source:
100.0%
Weekend Total:
100.0%
All Trips Total:
100.0%
Table 11 presents the gender distribution of respondents by market segment. Gender distribution
correlates with the business/non-business segmentation of the market. Approximately two-thirds of
the business share of air passengers during the survey period were male for both residents and nonresidents, while approximately 60 percent of the non-business share of air passengers during the
survey period were female for both residents and non-residents.
Table 11
Gender Distribution by Market Segment, All Trips (2010)
Market Segment
Gender
Resident
Business
Resident
Nonbusiness
Non-resident
Business
Non-resident
Nonbusiness
Total
Female
35.8%
58.8%
35.8%
61.0%
49.7%
Male
64.2%
41.2%
64.2%
39.0%
50.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Source:
27
December 2010
The incomes of air passengers at Logan Airport are considerably higher than those of the region.
Table 12 shows that 68.1 percent of the respondents who answered the income question during the
survey period reported an annual household income of $90,000 or more, and more than 50 percent
have an annual household income of $120,000 or more, with resident and non-resident incomes
generally comparable to each other. By comparison, according to the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census, only 20 percent of households in the Boston-Cambridge-Quincy
Metropolitan Statistical Area have household incomes higher than $100,000.1
Table 12
Income Distribution of Air Passengers, All Trips (2010)
Income
Under $30,000
Resident Air
Passengers
Non-resident Air
Passengers
All Air Passengers
7.2%
6.4%
6.8%
$30,000 to under $60,000
10.7%
11.6%
11.1%
$60,000 to under $90,000
13.3%
14.5%
13.9%
$90,000 to under $120,000
16.4%
16.7%
16.5%
$120,000 to under $150,000
13.8%
13.1%
13.5%
$150,000 to under $180,000
10.1%
9.4%
9.7%
$180,000 and higher
28.5%
28.3%
28.4%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Note:
Source:
1
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2006-2008 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates
for Boston, Massachusetts.
28
December 2010
Table 13 presents the distribution of household income in 2010 by market segment. Notably,
resident business travelers represent the highest share of respondents in the upper income brackets;
for example, 40.7 percent of respondents reported incomes exceeding $180,000, compared with 17.6
percent of resident non-business travelers.
Table 13
Household Income by Market Segment, All Trips (2010)
Market Segment
Under $30,000
1.7%
12.3%
2.7%
9.2%
$30,000 to under $60,000
5.5%
15.2%
6.1%
15.7%
Annual Household Income
Non-resident
Business
Non-resident
Nonbusiness
Resident
Business
$60,000 to under $90,000
9.2%
17.5%
11.8%
16.8%
$90,000 to under $120,000
14.3%
17.7%
15.9%
17.6%
$120,000 to under $150,000
15.2%
12.2%
14.6%
11.7%
$150,000 to under $180,000
13.3%
7.6%
13.1%
6.4%
$180,000 and higher
40.7%
17.6%
35.8%
22.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Note:
Source:
Table 14 presents the distribution of flight distance (short-, medium-, or long-haul) by market
segment. Flight distance traveled is relatively consistent across the market segments, with a larger
share of resident business passengers traveling shorter distances than the other three market
segments. Overall, the majority of air passengers traveled distances between 250 and 1,500 nautical
miles.
Table 14
Flight Distance by Market Segment, All Trips (2010)
Market Segment
Resident
Business
Flight Distance 1/
Short-Haul Distance
16.1%
Medium-Haul Distance
Long-Haul Distance
Total
Note:
1/
Source:
Non-resident
Business
Non-resident
Non-business
7.3%
9.4%
4.2%
57.3%
59.2%
64.4%
60.9%
26.6%
33.5%
26.2%
34.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Short-haul flights are defined as those shorter than 250 nautical miles; medium-haul flights are those longer
than 250 nautical miles, but shorter than 1,500 nautical miles; and long-haul flights are those longer than
1,500 nautical miles.
29
December 2010
4.2
Ground Access Modes
Table 15 presents the distribution of ground access modes on weekdays and weekends, as well as for
all trips. Automobiles accounted for 70 percent of all ground access trips, and HOV/shared-ride
modes accounted for 30 percent. The mode shares generally exhibited slight variations between
weekdays and weekends, with courtesy shuttles accounting for a slightly higher share on weekends
(2.1 percent more than on weekdays), likely accommodating the non-resident non-business traveler
visiting the Boston area on weekends and using hotel courtesy shuttles, and the Logan Express bus
accommodating a slightly higher share on weekdays (3.1 percent more than on weekends).
Table 15
Distribution of Ground Access Trips by Access Mode (2010)
Mode
Weekday Only
Weekend Only
All Trips
Dropped Off
25.6%
31.9%
27.0%
Parked On-Airport
13.4%
8.5%
12.2%
Parked Off-Airport
1.2%
1.0%
1.1%
Rental Vehicle
10.9%
10.6%
10.9%
Taxicab
18.8%
19.1%
18.8%
69.7%
71.0%
70.0%
7.4%
8.5%
7.7%
Automobile
Private Vehicle:
Subtotal
HOV/Shared-Ride
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
Courtesy Shuttle
3.9%
6.0%
4.4%
Logan Express Bus
4.8%
1.7%
4.0%
Other Scheduled Bus Service
3.6%
3.7%
3.7%
Charter Bus
0.9%
2.7%
1.3%
Subway Only
3.9%
3.5%
3.8%
Subway to Silver Line Bus
2.5%
1.1%
2.2%
Commuter Rail to Subway
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
Commuter Rail to Silver Line Bus
0.6%
0.1%
0.4%
Silver Line Bus Only
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
Harbor Express Water Ferry
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
MBTA:
Water Taxi
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
1.1%
1.0%
1.1%
Subtotal
30.3%
29.0%
30.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Other HOV
Notes:
HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle (for the purposes of categorizing shared-ride modes serving Logan Airport)
Source:
30
December 2010
Table 16 presents the average occupancy of several ground access mode types during the survey
period in 2010. Average occupancy was lowest for the automobile modes, at 1.9 air passengers per
vehicle on average for weekday trips. Furthermore, the percentage of air passengers arriving at the
Airport as a single occupant ranges from 45 to 55 percent among the automobile modes.
Table 16
Average Occupancy by Access Mode, Weekday Trips Only (2010)
Average
Occupancy 1/
Ground Access Mode
Percent SOV
Passengers 2/
Automobile
Private Vehicle
1.9
55%
Rental Vehicle
2.1
45%
Taxicab
2.0
47%
Average
1.9
HOV/Shared-Ride
3.0
32%
4.3
20%
Courtesy Shuttle
5.2
7%
Average
Overall Average (for the six modes
listed above)
3.7
2.2
Notes:
HOV = High-Occupancy Vehicle (for the purposes of categorizing shared-ride modes serving Logan Airport)
SOV = Single-Occupant Vehicle
1/
The true average occupancy per vehicle arriving at the Airport cannot be computed from the responses to
the survey because it is not possible to identify multiple travel parties arriving in a single vehicle. Average
occupancy in this table was calculated as the average occupancy of arriving vehicles across survey
respondents.
2/
An SOV passenger is defined as an air passenger that arrives at the Airport with no other air passengers in
the vehicle. Air passengers can arrive as the only traveling air passenger in any of the above modes.
3/
Outlier vehicle occupancy responses were removed from these calculations. Outliers were defined as (1)
responses of 12 or more occupants for the private and rental vehicle modes, or (2) responses of 17 or more
occupants for the van and limousine modes.
Source:
31
December 2010
As shown in Table 17, a travel party size of one (the air passenger taking the survey traveled to the
Airport as the only air passenger on the ground access trip) was the predominate party size for
resident and non-resident business air passengers, accounting for 78.9 percent and 63.3 percent,
respectively. For air passengers traveling for non-business purposes, travel party sizes of 1 or 2 were
the most frequent, accounting for 74.0 percent for residents and 75.6 percent for non-residents.
Table 17
Travel Party Size by Trip Purpose, All Trips (2010)
Market Segment
Travel Party
Size
Resident
Business
Non-resident
Business
Non-resident
Non-business
1
78.9%
42.8%
63.3%
40.3%
2
10.5%
31.2%
18.9%
35.3%
3
4.0%
9.4%
6.0%
10.8%
4
1.1%
6.3%
4.1%
6.1%
5
0.7%
2.9%
2.0%
2.3%
6–10
3.3%
4.1%
4.3%
3.1%
11–15
0.2%
1.0%
0.6%
0.3%
More than 15
1.4%
2.4%
0.9%
1.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Note:
Source:
4.2.1
HOV Access
Table 18 shows the share of ground access trips accounted for by the HOV mode by market
segment. For both weekdays and weekends, non-business air passengers tend to use HOV modes to
access the Airport to a greater extent than business air passengers. Resident non-business air
passengers used HOV modes to a greater extent during weekdays, while non-resident non-business
air passengers accounted for a greater share of weekend HOV use.
Table 18
High Occupancy Vehicle Mode Share by Market Segment (2010)
Market Segment
Weekday Only
Resident Business
16.8%
Weekend Only
All Trips
11.1%
15.5%
42.0%
30.4%
39.3%
16.5%
14.1%
16.0%
24.6%
44.4%
29.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
Note:
Source:
As shown in Table 15, combined, public transit modes (including MBTA modes and Logan Express)
were used by 12.9 percent of weekday air passengers and 6.7 percent of weekend air passengers.
The public transit mode accounting for the greatest share of air passengers is the Logan Express bus
32
December 2010
(4.0 percent), followed by the Blue Line subway (3.8 percent). Logan Express accounted for 4.8
percent of weekday ground access trips.
4.2.2
Logan Express Service Stated Preference Question
The 2010 Survey included a stated-preference question designed to examine, in more detail, the use
of Logan Express service. The stated preference question was designed to test the potential interest
of air passengers currently using private vehicle, van, or limousine access modes in changing their
access mode to Logan Express under differing parking fee, bus fee, and bus frequency scenarios;
however, this question did not capture effects on other mode shares, such as from on-Airport parking
to Logan Express. Table 19 presents the experiment variables and the results. Alternative D, which
consisted of free parking and a more expensive round-trip bus fare, was the most favorable of the
four experiment scenarios, with 29.2 percent of respondents indicating that they would switch from a
private vehicle, van, or limousine access mode to Logan Express service under the conditions
represented by Alternative D.
Table 19
Percent of Air Passengers that May Change Access Mode to Logan Express, All Trips (2010)
Experiment Scenarios
Experiment Variables
Existing Conditions
Alternative A
Alternative B
Alternative C
Alternative D
Daily Parking Rate
$11
$11
$6
$5
Free
Weekly Parking Rate
$66
$22
$30
$30
Free
Round-Trip Bus Fare
(adult)
$22
$22
$22
$22
$32
30 minutes 1/
30 minutes 2/
30 minutes 2/
20 minutes 2/
30 minutes 2/
Alternative A
Alternative B
Alternative C
Alternative D
Bus Frequency
Stated Preference Responses
3/
Respondent indicated that he/she would
change access mode (from private vehicle, van,
or limousine) to Logan Express
12.7%
13.9%
19.9%
29.2%
87.3%
86.1%
80.1%
70.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
3/
Respondent indicated that he/she would not
change access mode to Logan Express
Total
Notes:
1/
2/
3/
Bus frequency for existing conditions was specified as every 30 minutes on weekdays.
Bus frequency for the experiment scenarios (Alternatives A through D) was not limited to a specific
timeframe, such as weekdays, as it was under existing conditions.
Results were limited to those passengers whose local origins were outside the Route 128 beltway.
Source:
33
December 2010
4.3
Private Vehicle Access and Parking
Air passengers using private vehicles to access the Airport were most frequently dropped off instead
of parking their vehicles at the Airport or in an off-Airport parking lot, particularly on the weekends,
as shown in Table 20. Overall, 67 percent of air passengers who arrived by private vehicle were
dropped off at Logan Airport during the survey period.
Table 20
Distribution of Private Vehicle Parking Locations (2010)
Parking Location
Weekday Only
Weekend Only
All Trips
Vehicle not Parked 1/
63.9%
77.2%
67.1%
Terminal Parking
29.3%
17.3%
26.5%
Economy Parking
3.9%
3.0%
3.7%
2.9%
2.4%
2.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Off-Airport Lot
Total
2/
Notes:
1/
2/
Air passenger was dropped off at the terminal in a private vehicle.
Source:
Table 21 presents the distribution of parking duration for the survey respondents. Almost 22 percent
of weekday parkers parked for a duration of 1 hour or less, while 36 percent of parkers on weekends
parked for 1 hour or less. Approximately 13 percent of weekday parkers park between 2 and 24
hours, and approximately 5 percent of all travelers park for durations that exceed one week.
Table 21
Distribution of Parking Duration (2010)
Parking Duration
1 Hour or Less
1 to 2 Hours
Weekday Only
Weekend Only
All Trips
21.8%
36.0%
24.4%
2.7%
3.3%
2.8%
2 to 7 Hours
3.8%
1.3%
3.3%
7 to 24 Hours
9.5%
1.0%
7.9%
1 or 2 Days
18.2%
10.9%
16.9%
3 or 4 Days
25.3%
20.2%
24.4%
5 or 6 Days
13.6%
21.7%
15.1%
5.3%
5.6%
5.3%
100.0%
Note:
Total
100.0%
100.0%
Source:
7 Days or More
34
December 2010
4.4
Terminal Waiting Times
About 7.0 percent of weekday air passengers arrived at the terminal less than 1 hour before their
scheduled departure time, with the majority arriving between 1 and 2 hours before their scheduled
departure, as shown in Table 22. Terminal waiting time was relatively consistent between weekday
and weekend air passengers with a slight shift to earlier arrivals and longer terminal wait times for
weekend air passengers.
Table 22
Distribution of Terminal Waiting Times (2010)
Arrival Time Prior to Departure 1/
Shorter than 60 Minutes
Weekend Only
All Trips
7.0%
3.5%
6.2%
60–89 Minutes
20.7%
18.0%
20.1%
90–119 Minutes
24.1%
22.4%
23.7%
120–149 Minutes
16.4%
18.8%
16.9%
150–179 Minutes
7.2%
9.8%
7.8%
24.7%
27.5%
25.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
180 Minutes or Longer
Total
Notes:
1/
Weekday Only
2/
2/
Arrival time prior to departure was calculated by subtracting the stated arrival time at the terminal from the
scheduled flight departure time.
Source:
35
December 2010
4.5
Terminal Concessions Spending
Table 23 summarizes the distribution of the amounts spent by the respondents at Logan Airport
concessions, by concession type. Of the air passenger respondents that made a purchase at food
court concessions, 37.5 percent spent between $10 and $25. Of the air passenger respondents that
made a purchase at a full-service restaurant, 30.8 percent spent between $25 and $50. The greatest
share of newsstand purchases were in the less than $5 category, and the greatest share of retail shop
purchases were in the $10 to $25 category.
Table 23
Distribution of Terminal Concessions Spending by Dollar Amount and Concession Type, All Trips (2010)
Concession Type
Amount Spent
Food Courts
Full-Service
Restaurants
Newsstands
Retail Shops
Duty Free
Shops
Less than $5
21.7%
16.4%
32.4%
22.7%
44.3%
$5 to under $10
33.4%
7.7%
27.9%
16.4%
8.6%
$10 to under $25
37.5%
28.7%
31.2%
31.4%
11.3%
$25 to under $50
5.4%
30.8%
6.1%
17.2%
15.7%
$50 to under $75
1.0%
13.0%
1.7%
7.2%
11.5%
$75 to under $100
0.3%
2.0%
0.1%
2.4%
3.0%
$100 or more
0.8%
1.4%
0.6%
2.7%
5.5%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Note:
Source:
36
December 2010
4.6
Expected Ground Egress Modes
Table 24 presents the air passenger responses on the form of ground transportation modes they
planned to use when leaving the Airport on their return trips. The overall distribution of responses
between automobile modes and HOV/shared ride modes for egress (approximately 70 percent and 30
percent, respectively) reflects the distribution of air passenger ground access mode shares.
Table 24
Distribution of Expected Ground Egress Mode Shares (2010)
Mode
Weekday Only
Weekend Only
All Trips
Picked Up
25%
29%
26%
Parked at Airport
Automobile
Private Vehicle:
15%
8%
14%
Rental Vehicle
10%
9%
9%
Taxicab
20%
20%
20%
70%
66%
69%
7%
7%
7%
1%
1%
1%
Courtesy Shuttle
4%
6%
4%
Logan Express Bus
4%
3%
4%
Other Scheduled Bus Service
2%
2%
2%
Charter Bus
1%
3%
1%
5%
6%
5%
Subtotal
HOV/Shared Ride
MBTA:
Subway
Silver Line Bus
Water Taxi
Other HOV
Subtotal
5%
4%
5%
<1%
<1%
<1%
2%
1%
2%
30%
34%
31%
100%
100%
Note:
Total
100%
Source:
37
December 2010
4.7
Use of Other Airports in the Region
The survey included a question about frequency and trip purpose of air passenger use of other
airports in the region during the previous 12 months. Table 25 shows the results for business trips
and non-business trips. The 2007 Survey included Hanscom Field as one of the airport selections in
this question, but Hanscom Field was replaced with Worcester Regional Airport in the 2010 Survey.
Thirteen (13) percent of the respondents indicated that they had taken more than 10 business trips
from Logan Airport over the past year, while 17 percent of respondents indicated that they had taken
1 or more business trips from Manchester-Boston Regional Airport and 17 percent indicated that they
had taken 1 or more business trips from T.F. Green State Airport. Similarly, 19 percent of
respondents indicated that they had taken one or more non-business trips from Manchester-Boston
Regional Airport, and 19 percent had taken one or more non-business trips from T.F. Green State
Airport. Overall, 75 percent of respondents had taken one or more other trips from Logan Airport or
other regional airports over the past 12 months, and 16 percent of respondents used at least one
regional airport in addition to Logan Airport over the past 12 months.
Table 25
Use of Regional Airports, Weekday Trips (2010)
Number of
Flights in Past
12 Months
None 1/
1
2
3 to 5
6 to10
11 to 15
16 to 20
More than 20
Total 2/
Trip Purpose
Business Trips
BOS
MHT
PVD
BDL
Non-business Trips
ORH
BOS
MHT
PVD
BDL
ORH
All
Trips
24%
19%
14%
18%
11%
4%
3%
6%
82%
7%
5%
3%
2%
–
–
–
83%
6%
4%
4%
2%
1%
–
–
94%
3%
1%
1%
–
–
–
–
99%
–
–
–
1%
–
–
–
16%
27%
23%
25%
7%
1%
–
–
80%
11%
4%
3%
1%
–
–
–
82%
10%
5%
3%
1%
–
–
–
92%
5%
2%
1%
–
–
–
–
98%
1%
1%
–
1%
–
–
–
25%
17%
14%
21%
11%
4%
2%
5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Notes:
BOS—Boston-Logan International Airport
MHT—Manchester-Boston Regional Airport
PVD—T.F. Green State Airport
BDL—Bradley International Airport
ORH—Worcester Regional Airport
1/
Responses of “none” for trips from Logan Airport reflects the fact that respondents were asked to record
separately the number of business and non-business trips, including the trip that was the subject of the
survey. For many respondents, the subject trip was their only trip from Logan Airport over the past
12 months, and if the subject trip was a non-business trip, the respondent would have recorded “none” for
business trips, and vice versa.
2/
Source:
38
December 2010
5.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The 2010 Air Passenger Ground Access Survey provided some standalone results, as well as results
that should be analyzed comparatively with prior survey results. The summary of findings presented
below highlights the major results from the 2010 Survey, as well as the strongest air passenger
trends.
In addition, feedback and recommendations for future surveys are presented. This feedback helps
optimize the survey process and increase the overall efficacy of the survey teams.
5.1
Summary of Findings
Whereas some parameters and user characteristics appear to be relatively constant over the years,
other characteristics are evolving because of a variety of factors, such as the introduction of low-cost
carrier service at Logan Airport. The major trends include:
•
Logan Airport experienced growth in the share of air passengers traveling for non-business
purposes.
•
The private vehicle mode continues to be the predominant ground access mode share,
accounting for 40 percent of all ground access trips.
•
The HOV/shared ride mode share has increased to 30 percent of all ground access trips.
•
Combined public transit trips (MBTA and Logan Express services) account for 11.4 percent
of all ground access trips, 12.9 percent of weekday-only ground access trips, and 6.7 percent
of weekend-only trips.
•
The most commonly used public access mode to the Airport was the Logan Express bus
(4.0 percent overall, and 4.8 percent on weekday-only trips), while the mostly common use of
MBTA transit was accounted for by the Subway Only mode (3.8 percent of all ground access
trips); other MBTA transit use accounted for more than 3 percent share.
5.2
Experience Gained during the 2010 Survey
5.2.1
Questionnaire Design
The paper survey option provides a quick and convenient means for respondents to complete the
survey. If stated preference questions are desired, a computer-based survey instrument provides the
advantages of a convenient and easy-to-read format for a potentially complicated question and the
ability to customize the information presented to each respondent based on the reference trip and
particular travel situation. The computer-based survey format provides data that are complete and
clean, reducing data processing and cleaning efforts, and simplifying the analysis.
5.2.2
Future Questionnaire Recommendations
Based on experience implementing the 2010 Survey, the following recommendations are provided
for consideration during development of future surveys:
•
One focus area that was not included in the 2010 Survey questionnaire because of time
constraints consists of questions posed to understand what could induce air passengers to
drive and park at Logan Airport rather than being dropped off. Research should be
conducted to determine a parking scheme that Massport could implement at Logan Airport to
support its efforts to be more “green.” When air passengers are dropped off and picked up by
a friend or family member, four trips (two round trips) are made to the Airport versus only
two trips when air passengers drive themselves and park. Massport would like to encourage a
39
December 2010
reduction in the number of trips made by private vehicles to Logan Airport. Air passengers
driving and parking can also eliminate much of the congestion at the curbside areas, a
problem that is becoming more troublesome each year.
•
To improve the results of the calculation of average occupancy by access mode (see
Table 16), the questionnaire could be modified to clarify the distinction between vehicle
occupancy and travel party size. In paper-based surveys, respondents may choose to
complete some answers and not others, or they may provide inconsistent answers. In the
presentation of the results of average occupancy of private and rental vehicles, the
assumption was made that all members of a travel party were in the same vehicle and vehicle
occupancy was calculated using the response to Question 16, “How many people in your
personal party came to the airport in the same vehicle and are traveling on the same flight
with you?” However, comparison of respondents’ answers to Question 16 and Question 6
(“Were you or any passengers dropped off at a terminal? If yes, including yourself, how
many persons were dropped off?”) indicated the potential for inconsistencies. To address this
potential discrepancy, the following sequence of questions are recommended for inclusion
after Question 5 to facilitate Massport’s calculation of average occupancy, curbside drop-off
rates, parking, and travel party size:
- “How many people in total were in the vehicle when it arrived at the airport?”
- “If you came by a private or rental vehicle, were you or any passengers dropped off at a
terminal?”
- “If you came by a private vehicle, was this vehicle parked or driven away?”
- “How many people in total are there in your personal travel party with you today
traveling to the same destination on the same flight?”
•
To maintain consistency with the 2007 Survey results, the sampling plan and dataset
weighting used flight distance categories of (1) less than 500 miles, (2) 500 to 1,500 miles,
and (3) greater than 1,500 miles. To provide consistency between the sampling plan and
Massport’s working definitions of short-, medium-, and long-haul flights for use in planning
purposes, consideration to updating these categories to (1) less than 250 miles, (2) 250 to
1,500 miles, and (3) greater than 1,500 miles should be given.
•
In the future, the computer-based instrument could incorporate controls and features to make
the computer-based survey more usable and faster for respondents. It is also best to use a
technology that is both appealing and familiar to users. Laptops may be preferable to iPads
until iPads become more commonly used and familiar to a broader set of travelers.
40
December 2010
Appendix A
Paper-based Survey Questionnaire
December 2010
2
S
A
Appendix A
P
Paper-Based
d Survey Que
estionnaire
A-1
De
ecember 2010
Bostoon Logan Internattional Airport
2
A
Appendix A
A-2
De
ecember 2010
Bostoon Logan Internattional Airport
Appendix B
Screenshots of the Online Questionnaire
December 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
September 2010
Appendix C
List of Sampled Flights
December 2010
DALLAS\FT. WORTH(INTL) TEXAS USA
CHICAGO(O'HARE) ILLINOIS USA
RALEIGH\DURHAM NORTH CAROLINA USA
TORONTO(PEARSON) ONTARIO CANADA
ROCHESTER NEW YORK USA
NEW YORK(NEWARK NJ) NY USA
MILWAUKEE WISCONSIN USA
CHICAGO(MIDWAY) ILLINOIS USA
PHOENIX(INTL) ARIZONA
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA USA
PHILADELPHIA PA\WILM'TON DE USA
WASHINGTON(NAT'L) DC USA
ORLANDO(INTL) FLORIDA USA
NEW YORK(LAGUARDIA) NY USA
BUFFALO NEW YORK USA
LONDON(HEATHROW) ENGLAND UK
ROCKLAND MAINE USA
LEBANON NEW HAMPSHIRE USA
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/29/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
September 2010
LOS ANGELES(INTL) CALIFORNIA USA
DESTINATION
04/29/10
DATE
LEB
RKD
LHR
BUF
LGA
MCO
MKE
DCA
PHL
CLT
CLT
PHX
PHX
MDW
MKE
EWR
ROC
YYZ
RDU
ORD
DFW
LAX
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
CAPE AIR
CAPE AIR
BRITISH AIRWAYS
AWAC-US AIR EXPRESS
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AIRTRAN
AIRTRAN
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
MIDWEST EXPRESS AIRLINES
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
AWAC-US AIR EXPRESS
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
CARRIER
1875
1853
238
3691
4523
899
731
2033
1811
1775
1021
524
400
1309
1921
1121
4071
4610
4560
1619
1315
145
FLIGHT
NUMBER
FT. LAUDERDALE(INTL) FLORIDA USA
FORT MYERS FLORIDA USA
NEW YORK(KENNEDY) NY USA
BALTIMORE(INTL) MARYLAND USA
PARIS(C.DEGAULLE) FRANCE
SANTO DOMINGO DOMINICAN REP.
ST. LOUIS(INTL) MISSOURI USA
MARTHA'S VINEYARD MA USA
ATLANTA(INTL) GEORGIA USA
DETROIT(METRO WAYNE) MICHIGAN USA
MINNEAPOLIS\ST. PAUL MN USA
SAN FRANCISCO(INTL) CALIFORNIA USA
CANCUN MEXICO
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
04/30/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/01/10
05/02/10
September 2010
BAR HARBOR MAINE USA
04/30/10
DESTINATION
04/30/10
DATE
MCO
ORD
BWI
CUN
SFO
MSP
DTW
ATL
RDU
MVY
RDU
STL
SDQ
ORD
LHR
CDG
LGA
PHL
MDW
MKE
BWI
JFK
RSW
RSW
FLL
BHB
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
AIRTRAN
UNITED AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
CAPE AIR
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIR FRANCE
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
COLGAN AIR (US AIR EXPRESS)
CARRIER
899
535
1325
771
637
2699
2123
1501
6458
305
4560
4402
2087
1619
124
337
2129
1605
771
1825
1327
1017
469
463
407
4703
FLIGHT
NUMBER
INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA USA
AMSTERDAM NETHERLANDS
SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA USA
TAMPA(INTL) FLORIDA USA
DENVER(INTL) COLORADO USA
SEATTLE\TACOMA WASHINGTON USA
LEBANON NEW HAMPSHIRE USA
CINCINNATI(INTL) OHIO USA
LONG BEACH CALIFORNIA USA
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/02/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
September 2010
05/02/10
DESTINATION
05/02/10
DATE
CLT
DEN
LGB
RDU
MSP
CVG
LGA
LGA
EWR
EWR
DCA
DCA
LEB
LHR
ROC
SEA
DEN
ORD
LGA
ORD
TPA
SAN
MSP
AMS
IND
LHR
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
COMAIR
CAPE AIR
BRITISH AIRWAYS
AWAC-US AIR EXPRESS
ALASKA AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
SHUTTLE AMERICA
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
BRITISH AIRWAYS
CARRIER
1243
493
481
6287
2725
1540
1385
1375
1154
1121
6659
6649
1877
238
3819
15
785
541
5931
925
441
411
2725
230
6396
214
FLIGHT
NUMBER
DUBLIN, REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
REYKJAVIK\METROPOLITAN
HOUSTON(INTL) TEXAS USA
CLEVELAND(INTL) OHIO USA
MADRID SPAIN
FRANKFURT GERMANY
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/03/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
05/04/10
September 2010
WASHINGTON(DULLES) DC USA
05/03/10
DESTINATION
05/03/10
DATE
PHL
PHL
PHL
PHX
DEN
FRA
MCO
MAD
MSP
MSP
ATL
CLE
IAH
DTW
LHR
REK
RDU
DFW
LHR
YYZ
DUB
DCA
PHL
PHL
ORD
IAD
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES
JET BLUE
IBERIA AIRLINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMPASS AIRLINES
BRITISH AIRWAYS
ICELANDAIR
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIR CANADA
AER LINGUS
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
CARRIER
1811
1613
1469
400
779
423
439
6166
1389
2699
1801
1531
783
1823
214
630
4569
521
108
365
136
2035
1271
1183
535
317
FLIGHT
NUMBER
SALT LAKE CITY UTAH USA
COLUMBUS(INTL) OHIO USA
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/05/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
September 2010
05/05/10
DESTINATION
05/04/10
DATE
ATL
DTW
CVG
DCA
CMH
LHR
ORD
PHL
ORD
MDW
BWI
BWI
BUF
LGB
LAX
RSW
MCO
ATL
LGA
SLC
DFW
ORD
LHR
BWI
BWI
LGA
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES (DELTA CONN)
BRITISH AIRWAYS
AMERICAN AIRLINES
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIRTRAN
AIRTRAN
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
CARRIER
2101
1805
1540
6649
6092
238
1569
1605
541
2141
1025
116
1211
481
483
467
437
1901
1373
1209
1685
1619
156
816
599
2127
FLIGHT
NUMBER
FRANKFURT GERMANY
SHANNON REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
MUNICH (INTL) GERMANY
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/06/10
05/07/10
05/06/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
05/07/10
September 2010
05/06/10
DESTINATION
05/06/10
DATE
DCA
CLT
PHX
ORD
IAD
SFO
MUC
FLL
MSP
MSP
MSP
ATL
ATL
IND
DFW
ORD
LHR
CDG
SNN
PHL
DEN
BWI
MDW
FRA
BUF
ATL
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIR FRANCE
AER LINGUS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
CARRIER
2041
1525
400
881
205
179
425
455
2999
2699
2525
2301
1001
6675
2473
1569
124
337
132
1153
779
3329
1309
423
1211
2301
FLIGHT
NUMBER
BERMUDA ATLANTIC OCEAN
CANCUN MEXICO
WEST PALM BEACH(INTL) FLORIDA USA
MONTEGO BAY JAMAICA
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/08/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
September 2010
05/08/10
DESTINATION
05/07/10
DATE
ORD
DFW
DFW
DFW
LAX
LHR
BWI
BWI
YYZ
LHR
IAD
SFO
BWI
CVG
BUF
MBJ
SFO
MSP
MCO
PBI
DTW
CUN
BDA
EWR
JFK
LAX
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIRTRAN
AIRTRAN
AIR CANADA
VIRGIN ATLANTIC
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SHUTTLE AMERICA
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
COMAIR
VIRGIN AMERICA
CARRIER
2487
1315
1281
521
223
124
958
599
367
12
823
179
1112
6751
1219
893
637
2725
435
421
2023
567
561
9
6519
371
FLIGHT
NUMBER
PORTLAND OREGON USA
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/09/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
September 2010
05/09/10
DESTINATION
05/09/10
DATE
ATL
LGA
LGA
SLC
EWR
IAH
CMH
LHR
LAX
PDX
SEA
BWI
DCA
IAD
ORD
SFO
MKE
MKE
LHR
BDA
IAD
LGB
LAX
FLL
ATL
BUF
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES (DELTA CONN)
BRITISH AIRWAYS
AMERICAN AIRLINES
ALASKA AIRLINES
ALASKA AIRLINES
AIRTRAN
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
BRITISH AIRWAYS
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
AWAC-US AIR EXPRESS
CARRIER
1601
1391
1381
1215
1177
1083
6092
238
223
35
15
881
2031
897
533
179
1921
967
214
1703
1255
481
473
453
2401
3895
FLIGHT
NUMBER
MADRID SPAIN
PORTLAND OREGON USA
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/10/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
September 2010
05/10/10
DESTINATION
05/10/10
DATE
ORD
DFW
LAX
PDX
DCA
CLT
CLT
IAD
FLL
DEN
BWI
MDW
IAD
CLT
JFK
DEN
LGB
LAX
RSW
FLL
BDA
MAD
MSP
MSP
ATL
ATL
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
ALASKA AIRLINES
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
SPIRIT AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
IBERIA AIRLINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
CARRIER
1339
521
25
35
2049
1761
1025
897
473
1172
1052
1047
1255
1245
1003
493
481
473
465
457
1703
6166
2999
2725
2301
2101
FLIGHT
NUMBER
KANSAS CITY(INTL) MISSOURI USA
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
05/11/10
September 2010
05/11/10
DESTINATION
05/11/10
DATE
PHL
CLT
PHL
PHX
DEN
SFO
MDW
BWI
MCI
BWI
FLL
MCO
MCO
PBI
SAN
PBI
DTW
ATL
MCO
ATL
IAH
LHR
JFK
ORD
ORD
ORD
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UNITED AIRLINES
UNITED AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
DELTA AIR LINES
BRITISH AIRWAYS
AMERICAN EAGLE INC.
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
CARRIER
1811
1025
710
524
339
179
2269
1052
1523
1325
455
439
435
425
415
2541
1805
1601
1171
1001
783
214
4617
2529
2487
1569
FLIGHT
NUMBER
MEMPHIS TENNESSEE USA
RICHMOND\WMBG VIRGINIA USA
ZURICH SWITZERLAND
LAS VEGAS(INTL) NEVADA USA
05/11/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
05/12/10
September 2010
05/11/10
DESTINATION
05/11/10
DATE
LAX
LGA
LGA
DCA
PHL
CLT
LAS
ORD
ZRH
DEN
BWI
RIC
ORD
LGB
LAX
FLL
ATL
MEM
DFW
LAX
BWI
ATL
LAX
LAX
SFO
FLIGHTS SURVEYED
AIRPORT
CODE
VIRGIN AMERICA
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS SHUTTLE
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
US AIRWAYS
UA EXPRESS-CHAUTAUQUA
SWISS/CROSSAIR A.G.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
JET BLUE
DELTA AIR LINES
COMPASS AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIRTRAN
AIRTRAN
VIRGIN AMERICA
VIRGIN AMERICA
VIRGIN AMERICA
CARRIER
371
2139
1297
2049
1826
1297
69
7691
53
1172
1325
1281
921
481
473
457
2301
3203
1685
223
811
279
371
367
355
FLIGHT
NUMBER
Appendix D
Survey Count Sheet
December 2010
September 2010
Appendix E
Tabulations and Cross Tabulations of Survey Results
December 2010
Table 1
Departure Airline
Valid
AER LINGUS
AIR CANADA
AIR FRANCE
AIR TRAN
ALASKA AIR
ALITALIA
AMERICAN
BRITISH AIRWAYS
CAPE AIR
COMAIR
CONTINENTAL
DELTA
IBERIA
ICELANDIC
JET BLUE
LUFTHANSA
MIDWEST
SOUTHWEST
SPIRIT
SWISS AIR
UNITED AIRLINES
US AIR
VIRGIN AMERICA
VIRGIN ATLANTIC
Total
2010 Logan Internation Airport Air Passenger Ground Access Survey
Variable Frequency Tables ‐ All Passengers
E-1
Frequency
55
93
46
370
149
15
1170
251
21
248
340
1461
53
12
1965
88
180
490
38
43
783
1356
156
15
9397
Percent
0.59
0.99
0.49
3.93
1.58
0.16
12.45
2.67
0.22
2.64
3.62
15.55
0.56
0.13
20.91
0.94
1.91
5.21
0.40
0.45
8.34
14.43
1.66
0.16
100
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.59
0.59
0.99
1.57
0.49
2.06
3.93
5.99
1.58
7.57
0.16
7.73
12.45
20.18
2.67
22.85
0.22
23.07
2.64
25.72
3.62
29.34
15.55
44.89
0.56
45.45
0.13
45.58
20.91
66.49
0.94
67.43
1.91
69.34
5.21
74.56
0.40
74.96
0.45
75.41
8.34
83.75
14.43
98.18
1.66
99.84
0.16
100.00
100
Table 2
Logan Scheduled Departure Time (by hour)
Valid
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
Total
Missing
Total
E-2
System
Frequency
16
632
346
742
693
572
992
483
414
836
350
560
743
927
438
357
255
9357
Percent
0.17
6.72
3.69
7.90
7.38
6.09
10.55
5.14
4.41
8.89
3.73
5.96
7.91
9.87
4.66
3.79
2.72
99.58
39.74
9397
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.17
0.17
6.75
6.92
3.70
10.63
7.93
18.56
7.41
25.97
6.11
32.08
10.60
42.68
5.17
47.84
4.43
52.27
8.93
61.20
3.74
64.94
5.99
70.93
7.94
78.87
9.91
88.78
4.68
93.46
3.81
97.27
2.73
100.00
100.00
0.42
100
Table 3
Ground Origin Location
Valid
Boston/Cambridge/Somerville
Other inside Route 128
Between Route 128 and Route I‐495
Outside Route I‐495, but within Massachusetts
Out‐of‐Massachusetts
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-3
Frequency
1718
1578
1872
809
913
6890
2507
9397
Percent
18.28
16.79
19.92
8.61
9.72
73.32
26.68
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
24.93
24.93
22.90
47.83
27.17
75.00
11.75
86.74
13.26
100.00
100.00
Table 4
Ground Origin Departure Time (by hour)
Valid
12 AM
1 AM
2 AM
3 AM
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-4
Frequency
23
25
31
126
510
722
810
664
675
629
453
487
595
465
647
701
513
306
273
104
15
14
18
26
8833
564
9397
Percent
0.25
0.27
0.33
1.34
5.43
7.68
8.62
7.07
7.18
6.69
4.82
5.18
6.33
4.95
6.89
7.46
5.46
3.25
2.90
1.10
0.16
0.15
0.19
0.27
93.99
6.01
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.26
0.26
0.28
0.55
0.35
0.90
1.43
2.33
5.78
8.10
8.17
16.27
9.17
25.45
7.52
32.97
7.64
40.61
7.12
47.73
5.13
52.85
5.51
58.37
6.74
65.11
5.26
70.37
7.33
77.70
7.94
85.64
5.81
91.44
3.46
94.91
3.09
97.99
1.18
99.17
0.17
99.34
0.16
99.51
0.20
99.71
0.29
100.00
100.00
Table 5
Logan Arrival Time (by hour)
Valid
12 AM
1 AM
2 AM
3 AM
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-5
Frequency
33
18
29
32
281
554
683
669
631
691
602
401
558
487
482
718
741
508
315
229
50
28
30
22
8793
604
9397
Percent
0.35
0.19
0.31
0.35
2.99
5.90
7.27
7.12
6.72
7.36
6.41
4.27
5.94
5.18
5.13
7.64
7.89
5.41
3.35
2.43
0.54
0.30
0.31
0.23
93.57
6.43
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.38
0.38
0.20
0.58
0.33
0.90
0.37
1.27
3.19
4.47
6.31
10.77
7.77
18.54
7.60
26.15
7.18
33.33
7.86
41.19
6.85
48.04
4.56
52.60
6.34
58.95
5.53
64.48
5.48
69.96
8.16
78.12
8.43
86.55
5.78
92.33
3.58
95.92
2.60
98.52
0.57
99.09
0.32
99.41
0.34
99.75
0.25
100.00
100.00
Table 6
Ground Travel Time
Valid
Less than 30 minutes
30 minutes to under 60 minutes
60 minutes to under 90 minutes
90 minutes to 120 minutes
More than 120 minutes
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-6
Frequency
2068
3127
1598
915
806
8513
884
9397
Percent
22.00
33.28
17.00
9.74
8.58
90.60
9.40
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
24.29
24.29
36.73
61.02
18.77
79.78
10.75
90.53
9.47
100.00
100.00
E-7
Table 7
Ground Arrival Mode
Frequency
Valid
Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, motorcycle, etc.)
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
Van or limo that picked me up by reservation
Van or limo running on a fixed route/schedule
Courtesy shuttle (hotel, school, hospital, etc.)
Logan Express Bus from Braintree
Logan Express Bus from Framingham
Logan Express Bus from Woburn
Logan Express Bus from Peabody
Other scheduled express bus service
Charter/group tour bus
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Line's Airport Statio
MBTA via subway to Silver Line bus
MBTA via commuter rail to subway
MBTA via commuter rail to Silver Line bus
MBTA via Silver Line bus only
Harbor Express (MBTA) water ferry
Water taxi
Other
Total
Missing
System
Total
3734
1005
1744
710
43
405
173
118
73
9
338
121
351
203
18
41
46
20
5
100
9258
139
9397
Percent
39.74
10.69
18.56
7.56
0.46
4.31
1.85
1.26
0.78
0.10
3.60
1.29
3.74
2.16
0.19
0.44
0.49
0.21
0.06
1.05
98.52
1.48
100
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
40.33
40.33
10.85
51.18
18.84
70.03
7.67
77.70
0.47
78.16
4.37
82.53
1.87
84.41
1.28
85.68
0.79
86.48
0.10
86.58
3.66
90.23
1.30
91.54
3.80
95.33
2.19
97.52
0.20
97.72
0.44
98.16
0.50
98.66
0.21
98.87
0.06
98.93
1.07
99.99
100.00
Table 8
Private Vehicle Parking Location
Valid
Driven away by someone else, not parked
Parked at airport in terminal garage or lot
Parked at airport in economy lot
Parked in lot off‐airport
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-8
Frequency
2869
1133
159
118
4279
5118
9397
Percent
30.53
12.05
1.69
1.26
45.53
54.47
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
67.05
67.05
26.47
93.52
3.71
97.24
2.76
100.00
100.00
Table 9
Number of Well‐wishers
Valid
None
1
2
3
4
Between 5 and 10
More than 10
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-9
Frequency
7078
670
281
84
33
67
12
8224
1173
9397
Percent
75.32
7.13
2.99
0.89
0.35
0.71
0.12
87.52
12.48
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
86.06
86.06
8.15
94.21
3.42
97.63
1.02
98.65
0.40
99.05
0.81
99.86
0.14
100.00
100.00
Table 10 Trip Type
Valid
Resident business
Resident leisure
Non‐resident business
Non‐resident leisure
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-10
Frequency
1578
2587
1537
2458
8161
1236
9397
Percent
16.80
27.53
16.36
26.16
86.85
13.15
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
19.34
19.34
31.70
51.04
18.84
69.88
30.12
100.00
100.00
Table 11 Destination Airport/City
Valid
AMSTERDAM NETHERLANDS
CANCUN MEXICO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
Cincinnati
CLEVELAND(INTL) OHIO USA
DALLAS
DALLAS/FT WORTH
DETROIT
DUBLIN, REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
dullas
FRANKFURT GERMANY
FT MEYERS
Heathrow, london
KANSAS CITY(INTL) MISSOURI USA
LAS VEGAS(INTL) NEVADA USA
E-11
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
26.59352653
0.283000176
0.283000176
0.28
435.8203957
4.637867359
4.637867359
4.92
671.3019381
7.143789912
7.143789912
12.06
42.49248858
0.452192068
0.452192068
12.52
21.76444537
0.231610571
0.231610571
12.75
209.6148888
2.230657538
2.230657538
14.98
79.40207217
0.844972568
0.844972568
15.82
268.0078006
2.852057046
2.852057046
18.68
25.20978228
0.268274793
0.268274793
19.32
75.32422846
0.801577402
0.801577402
20.12
154.1403593
1.640314561
1.640314561
21.76
122.5526642
1.304167971
1.304167971
23.07
355
3.72
3.44
26.47
33.6648237
0.358250758
0.358250758
26.83
53.94006519
0.574013677
0.574013677
27.41
13.1200592
0.139619657
0.139619657
27.55
57.52031991
0.612113652
0.612113652
28.16
36.28558587
0.386140107
0.386140107
28.54
36.28558587
0.386140107
0.386140107
28.93
201.0761698
2.139791101
2.139791101
31.07
305.3421767
3.249358058
3.249358058
34.32
25.70603784
0.273555793
0.273555793
34.59
101.6683901
1.081923913
1.081923913
35.67
30.37044656
0.323193004
0.323193004
36.00
50.85331623
0.541165438
0.541165438
36.54
107.7017209
1.146128775
1.146128775
37.69
67.51844637
0.718510656
0.718510656
38.40
45.46049978
0.483776735
0.483776735
38.89
241.2268153
2.567061992
2.567061992
41.45
14.62553067
0.155640424
0.155640424
41.61
117.7662671
1.253232597
1.253232597
42.86
65.29333612
0.694831714
0.694831714
43.56
25.91005402
0.27572687
0.27572687
43.83
42.1043555
0.448061674
0.448061674
44.28
299.1583461
3.183551624
3.183551624
47.47
191.9104319
2.042252122
2.042252122
49.51
434.7774606
4.626768762
4.626768762
54.13
Table 11 Destination Airport/City (continued)
madrid
MADRID SPAIN
MEMPHIS TENNESSEE USA
MIDWAY‐CHICAGO
MUNICH (INTL) GERMANY
new york lga
NULL
ny jfk
ny leguardia
Orlando
PORTLAND OREGON USA
RICHMOND\WMBG VIRGINIA USA
ROCKLAND MAINE USA
SANTO DOMINGO DOMINICAN REP.
SHANNON REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
ST. LOUIS(INTL) MISSOURI USA
TAMPA(INTL) FLORIDA USA
washington dc
Washington dulles
West Palm Beach
E-12
27.98742694
24.99506054
40.94817182
38.29770758
191.4798326
400.9416332
62.36685224
12.66528831
182.9657096
305.8536482
178.4326885
111.3968592
30.18123646
20.08976766
37.52779512
220.6570214
45.88265138
482.8991772
171.9900917
70.54316
153.0539358
47.75250426
55.81461537
20.67207977
58.26986714
75.05559023
243.5429811
27.70023388
78.12217719
24.63021586
24.73816422
24.103218
117.9698699
53.83827368
43.41136751
227.6200432
248.8382521
21.05217775
0.297833638
0.26598979
0.435757921
0.407552491
2.037669816
4.266698235
0.663688967
0.134780125
1.947065123
3.254800981
1.898826099
1.185451306
0.321179488
0.213789163
0.399359318
2.348164536
0.488269143
5.138865352
1.830265954
0.750698734
1.628753174
0.508167546
0.593962066
0.21998595
0.620090105
0.798718636
2.591709919
0.294777417
0.831352317
0.262107224
0.263255978
0.256499074
1.255399275
0.572930442
0.461970496
2.422262883
2.648060573
0.224030837
0.297833638
0.26598979
0.435757921
0.407552491
2.037669816
4.266698235
0.663688967
0.134780125
1.947065123
3.254800981
1.898826099
1.185451306
0.321179488
0.213789163
0.399359318
2.348164536
0.488269143
5.138865352
1.830265954
0.750698734
1.628753174
0.508167546
0.593962066
0.21998595
0.620090105
0.798718636
2.591709919
0.294777417
0.831352317
0.262107224
0.263255978
0.256499074
1.255399275
0.572930442
0.461970496
2.422262883
2.648060573
0.224030837
54.43
54.70
55.13
55.54
57.58
61.85
62.51
62.64
64.59
67.85
69.75
70.93
71.25
71.47
71.87
74.21
74.70
79.84
81.67
82.42
84.05
84.56
85.15
85.37
85.99
86.79
89.38
89.68
90.51
90.77
91.03
91.29
92.55
93.12
93.58
96.00
98.65
98.88
Travel/Trip Duration
Valid
Less than 1 day
1 day
2 to 3 days
4 to 6 days
1 to 2 weeks
3 to 4 weeks
1 to 3 months
4 to 6 months
7 to 12 months
1 year or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
Table 11 Destination Airport/City (continued)
ZURICH SWITZERLAND
Total
E-13
Frequency
767
1132
2159
1253
922
793
188
33
4
9
7260
2137
9397
63.10496637
42.55398248
9397
Percent
8.16
12.05
22.98
13.33
9.81
8.44
2.00
0.35
0.04
0.10
77.26
22.74
100.00
0.671543752
0.452846467
100
99.55
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
10.56
10.56
15.59
26.15
29.74
55.89
17.26
73.15
12.69
85.85
10.93
96.77
2.59
99.37
0.45
99.82
0.06
99.88
0.12
100.00
100.00
0.671543752
0.452846467
100
Table 12 Travel party size
Valid
1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
11 to 15
More than 15
Total
E-14
Frequency
5095
2367
754
440
208
332
52
148
9397
Percent
54.22
25.19
8.03
4.68
2.21
3.53
0.56
1.58
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
54.22
54.22
25.19
79.41
8.03
87.44
4.68
92.12
2.21
94.33
3.53
97.86
0.56
98.42
1.58
100.00
100.00
Table 13 Average Number of Checked Luggage Pieces
Number of Pieces of Checked Luggage
E-15
Count
9397
Mean
1.63
Table 14 Average Number of Carry‐On Luggage Pieces
Number of Pieces of Carry‐On Luggage
E-16
Count
9397
Mean
2.32
Table 15 Ground Egress Mode
Valid
Picked up by someone else
Private vehicle parked at airport
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
Van or limo by reservation
Van or limo on fixed route/schedule
Courtesy shuttle
MBTA Blue Line subway
MBTA Silver Line bus
Logan Express bus
Other scheduled express bus
Charter/tour bus
Water ferry/water taxi
Other
Not sure
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-17
Frequency
1980
1040
718
1536
525
60
313
409
356
294
183
101
21
117
54
7709
1688
9397
Percent
21.07
11.07
7.65
16.35
5.59
0.64
3.33
4.35
3.79
3.13
1.95
1.07
0.22
1.24
0.58
82.03
17.97
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
25.69
25.69
13.49
39.18
9.32
48.50
19.93
68.43
6.81
75.24
0.78
76.02
4.06
80.08
5.31
85.39
4.62
90.01
3.81
93.83
2.37
96.20
1.31
97.51
0.27
97.78
1.52
99.30
0.70
100.00
100.00
Table 16 Gender
Valid
Female
Male
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-18
Frequency
4172
4192
8364
1033
9397
Percent
44.39
44.61
89.00
11.00
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
49.88
49.88
50.12
100.00
100.00
Table 17 Total Combined 2009 Household Income
Valid
Under $30,000
$30,000 to under $60,000
$60,000 to under $90,000
$90,000 to under $120,000
$120,000 to under $150,000
$150,000 to under $180,000
$180,000 or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-19
Frequency
483
782
967
1122
883
648
1875
6760
2637
9397
Percent
5.14
8.32
10.29
11.94
9.39
6.90
19.95
71.93
28.07
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
7.15
7.15
11.57
18.72
14.31
33.03
16.60
49.63
13.06
62.68
9.59
72.27
27.73
100.00
100.00
Table 18 Alternate Access Mode
Valid
Private vehicle, dropped off at terminal
Private vehicle, parked on‐airport
Private vehicle, parked off‐airport
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
Van or limo on a fixed schedule
Courtesy shuttle
MBTA subway
Logan Express from Braintree
Logan Express from Framingham
Logan Express from Woburn
Logan Express from Peabody
Other scheduled bus
Other
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-20
Frequency
1915
581
212
328
2314
868
63
203
726
280
166
107
91
19
221
62
119
8275
1122
9397
Percent
20.38
6.19
2.25
3.49
24.62
9.23
0.67
2.16
7.73
2.98
1.76
1.14
0.97
0.20
2.36
0.66
1.26
88.06
11.94
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23.15
23.15
7.03
30.17
2.56
32.73
3.96
36.69
27.96
64.65
10.48
75.14
0.76
75.90
2.45
78.35
8.77
87.12
3.39
90.51
2.00
92.51
1.29
93.80
1.10
94.91
0.23
95.14
2.67
97.81
0.75
98.56
1.44
100.00
100.00
Table 19 Trip Origin Type
Valid
Respondent's home
Someone else's home
Place of business
Hotel/Motel
School/College/University
Other
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-21
Frequency
4637
3441
24
41
13
4
8159
1238
9397
Percent
49.35
36.61
0.25
0.43
0.14
0.04
86.82
13.18
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
56.84
56.84
42.17
99.01
0.29
99.30
0.50
99.80
0.16
99.96
0.04
100.00
100.00
Table 20 Parking Duration
Valid
1 hour or less
Between 1 and 2 hours
Between 1 and 2 days
Between 1 and 2 weeks
More than 2 weeks
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-22
Frequency
336
38
13
29
106
229
335
208
50
24
1369
8028
9397
Percent
3.58
0.41
0.14
0.31
1.13
2.43
3.57
2.21
0.54
0.26
14.57
85.43
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
24.55
24.55
2.79
27.34
0.97
28.32
2.14
30.45
7.73
38.18
16.69
54.87
24.48
79.35
15.19
94.54
3.68
98.22
1.78
100.00
100.00
Table 21 Ground Transportation Reimbursed
Valid
Yes
No
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-23
Frequency
2681
5110
7791
1606
9397
Percent
28.53
54.38
82.91
17.09
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
34.41
34.41
65.59
100.00
100.00
Table 22 Number of Children and Adults in Household (Including Self)
Valid
1
2
3
4
5
Between 6 and 10
More than 10
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-24
Frequency
1299
3090
1249
1424
621
296
19
7998
1399
9397
Percent
13.82
32.88
13.29
15.15
6.61
3.15
0.20
85.11
14.89
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
16.24
16.24
38.63
54.87
15.62
70.49
17.80
88.29
7.77
96.06
3.71
99.76
0.24
100.00
100.00
Table 23 Number of vehicles, owned or leased, in household
Valid
None
1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
More than 10
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-25
Frequency
447
1871
3577
1402
525
148
107
6
8085
1312
9397
Percent
4.76
19.91
38.06
14.92
5.59
1.58
1.14
0.06
86.03
13.97
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
5.53
5.53
23.14
28.68
44.24
72.92
17.34
90.27
6.50
96.77
1.83
98.60
1.33
99.93
0.07
100.00
100.00
Table 24 Age
Valid
Under 18
18 to 24 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 65 years
More than 65 years
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-26
Frequency
16
782
1675
1351
1677
1467
784
7753
1644
9397
Percent
0.17
8.33
17.83
14.38
17.85
15.62
8.34
82.50
17.50
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.21
0.21
10.09
10.30
21.61
31.90
17.43
49.33
21.63
70.97
18.93
89.89
10.11
100.00
100.00
Table 25 MBTA Station Used
Valid
72 BUS TO HARVARD SQUARE
ABINGTON
ALEWIFE
ANDREW
AQUARIUM
ARLINGTON
BABCOCK STREET
BACK BAY
BEACONSFIELD
BEVERLY DEPOT
BLANDFORD
BONANZA BUS LINES PROVIDENCE
Boston University Central
Boston University East
BOWDOIN
Boylston
BRAINTREE
BRIGHAM CIRCLE
BROADWAY
BROCKTON
Brookline Hills
BROOKLINE VILLAGE
Central
CENTRAL SQUARE
CHARLES MGH
CHESTNUT HILL
CLEVELAND CIRCLE
Cohasett
Community College
COMMUTER BOAT SILVER LINE
COMMUTER LINE TO 5 STATION THEN CAB
COOLIDGE CORNER
COPLEY
CUSHING SQUARE BELMONT
DAVIS SQUARE
DOWNTOWN CROSSING
ENGLEWOOD
E-27
Frequency
1
1
6
1
9
4
2
4
6
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
6
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
0
12
1
3
Percent
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.13
0.01
0.03
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.08
0.01
0.09
0.09
0.18
0.04
0.22
0.03
0.25
0.04
0.29
0.06
0.35
0.01
0.37
0.01
0.38
0.01
0.39
0.01
0.39
0.01
0.40
0.03
0.43
0.01
0.44
0.02
0.45
0.01
0.46
0.00
0.47
0.01
0.48
0.02
0.49
0.01
0.50
0.03
0.53
0.06
0.58
0.02
0.60
0.01
0.61
0.01
0.62
0.01
0.62
0.01
0.63
0.01
0.64
0.01
0.65
0.04
0.69
0.04
0.73
0.00
0.73
0.13
0.86
0.01
0.87
0.03
0.90
Table 25 MBTA Station Used (continued)
FOREST HILLS
FOURTH STATION
GOVERNMENT CENTER
GREEN B
GREEN BUSH
GREEN LINE
HALIFAX
HARVARD AVE
HARVARD SQUARE
HAYMARKET
HYNES CONVENTION CENTER
JFK/UMass
KENDALL SQUARE
KENMORE
KINGSTON
LECHMERE
LONGWOOD
LOWELL
MALDEN
MANSFIELD
MARBLEHEAD BUS
MASS AVE
MAVERICK
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
NAHANT BUS 439 TOLYNN BUSS 44 TOWOND LAND
NEWTON CENTRE
NEWTON HIGHLAND
NEWTON STREET
NEWTONVILLE
NORTH LEOMINSTER
NORTH STATION
NORTHEASTERN
NORWOOD CENT RR STA TO SO STA SILVER LINE
NULL
OAK GROVE
ORANGE LINE
ORIENT HEIGHTS
PACKARDS CORNER
E-28
1
2
11
1
5
1
1
3
15
3
10
1
10
5
1
2
5
1
2
2
1
6
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
9111
6
6
1
1
0.01
0.02
0.12
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.16
0.03
0.11
0.01
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
96.95
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.12
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.16
0.03
0.11
0.01
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
96.95
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.91
0.93
1.05
1.06
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.16
1.33
1.36
1.47
1.48
1.58
1.63
1.64
1.66
1.72
1.73
1.75
1.77
1.79
1.84
1.85
1.87
1.87
1.89
1.90
1.90
1.91
1.92
1.96
1.97
1.98
98.94
98.99
99.06
99.07
99.08
PARK STREET
PLYMOUTH
PORTER SQUARE
PROVIDENCE
PRUDENTIAL
QUINCY ADAMS
QUINCY CENTER
RED LINE PORTON
RESERVOIR
RHINELAND
RIVERSIDE
Rockport
ROSLINDALE VILLAGE
RUGGLES
SALEM
SAVIN HILL
SILVER WAY
SOUTH
SOUTH ATTLEBORO
SOUTH END
SOUTH STATION
ST MARYS
ST PAUL
STATE ST
STONY BROOK
SUTHERLAND STREET
SYMPHONY
THEN TAXI SIOM NORTH STATION
TOUR BUS
UNION STATION WORCESTER
VALLEY ROAD
Wallaston
WALPOLE
WASHINGTON SQUARE
WASHINGTON ST
WATERTOWN SQUARE
WAY STATION
WELLESLEY MA
E-29
1
1
6
2
5
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
2
4
1
1
2
0
3
0
19
2
3
7
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
2
1
1
1
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.21
0.02
0.03
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.21
0.02
0.03
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
99.09
99.10
99.17
99.19
99.24
99.25
99.25
99.25
99.26
99.27
99.28
99.30
99.32
99.36
99.37
99.38
99.40
99.40
99.44
99.44
99.65
99.67
99.70
99.77
99.78
99.79
99.80
99.81
99.82
99.82
99.83
99.83
99.84
99.85
99.88
99.89
99.90
99.91
WELLINGTON
WEST GLOUCESTER
WEST ROXBURY
WORLD TRADE CENTER
Total
E-30
4
0
2
3
9397
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.03
100
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.03
100
99.95
99.95
99.97
100.00
Table 26 Logan Express Options
If Logan Express costs were... would you use the bus?
Park $11/day, RT fare $22/adult, 30 min. freq.
Park free, RT fare $32/adult, 30 min. freq.
E-31
Column %
26.49
27.36
42.56
61.13
522
450
504
98
27
1
10
1612
7785
9397
E-32
Frequency
Amount spent at newsstands
Valid
Less than $5
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
1064
1641
1839
263
49
14
39
4909
4488
9397
Frequency
Count
Amount spent at food/beverage courts
Valid
Less than $5
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
Table 27 Concessions Spending
Amount spent at food/beverage courts
Amount spent at full service restaurants
Amount spent at newsstands
Amount spent at retail shops
Amount spent at duty‐free shops
Percent
Percent
5.55
4.79
5.36
1.04
0.29
0.01
0.10
17.15
82.85
100.00
11.32
17.46
19.57
2.80
0.52
0.15
0.41
52.24
47.76
100.00
Mean
$ 15.07
$ 84.25
$ 12.81
$ 42.74
$ 23.87
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
32.35
32.35
27.94
60.29
31.25
91.53
6.09
97.62
1.70
99.32
0.08
99.40
0.60
100.00
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
21.68
21.68
33.43
55.10
37.47
92.58
5.36
97.94
0.99
98.93
0.28
99.21
0.79
100.00
100.00
Amount spent at duty free shops
Valid
Less than $5
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
Table 27 Concessions Spending (continued)
Amount spent at retail shops
Valid
Less than $5
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Missing
System
Total
E-33
Frequency
Frequency
76
15
19
27
20
5
9
172
9225
9397
105
75
145
79
33
11
13
461
8936
9397
Percent
Percent
0.81
0.16
0.21
0.29
0.21
0.06
0.10
1.83
98.17
100.00
1.11
0.80
1.54
0.84
0.35
0.12
0.13
4.91
95.09
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
44.34
44.34
8.65
52.99
11.33
64.32
15.67
79.99
11.50
91.49
3.02
94.51
5.49
100.00
100.00
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
22.71
22.71
16.36
39.07
31.44
70.50
17.17
87.68
7.18
94.86
2.42
97.28
2.72
100.00
100.00
E-34
Table 28 Air Frequency Overall by Airport by Trip Type, All Respondents
Count
Mean
Numbers of Business Flights from Logan in Past 12 m
Number of Leisure Flights from Logan in Past 12 mo
Numbers of Business Flights from Manchester in Pa
Number of Leisure Flights from Manchester in Past Numbers of Business Flights from TF Green in Past 1
Number of Leisure Flights from TF Green in Past 12 Numbers of Business Flights from Bradley in Past 12
Number of Leisure Flights from Bradley in Past 12 m
Numbers of Business Flights from Worcester in Past
Number of Leisure fFights from Worcester in pPst 1
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
9397
6.32
2.92
3.38
0.43
0.65
0.38
0.21
0.17
0.05
0.10
Variable X‐Tabulation Tables ‐ All Passengers
X Tab 2
Logan Arrival Time by Trip Type
Logan Arriva12 AM
1 AM
2 AM
3 AM
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
Total
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Non‐resident business Non‐resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
3
0.17
11
0.43
5
0.32
10
0.44
28
0.36
2
0.10
1
0.03
4
0.30
4
0.17
11
0.14
1
0.08
5
0.18
1
0.07
4
0.19
11
0.14
3
0.21
8
0.33
4
0.27
15
0.66
30
0.39
40
2.68
129
5.19
29
2.03
53
2.27
251
3.24
133
8.89
198
7.94
50
3.51
95
4.11
476
6.15
193
12.97
212
8.52
77
5.38
112
4.82
595
7.68
161
10.78
219
8.77
82
5.68
148
6.38
609
7.87
94
6.32
195
7.84
96
6.69
140
6.02
525
6.79
119
7.98
193
7.76
81
5.65
215
9.25
608
7.86
112
7.50
179
7.17
39
2.73
203
8.75
533
6.88
60
4.03
92
3.68
70
4.91
146
6.29
368
4.76
69
4.64
119
4.77
122
8.53
165
7.09
475
6.14
113
7.57
92
3.70
97
6.73
136
5.84
437
5.65
64
4.32
119
4.76
104
7.27
135
5.83
423
5.46
74
4.93
212
8.49
153
10.68
186
8.01
624
8.06
88
5.92
149
5.98
220
15.35
216
9.31
674
8.70
63
4.25
160
6.43
95
6.64
143
6.18
462
5.97
35
2.37
100
4.00
59
4.14
97
4.18
292
3.77
41
2.76
63
2.54
30
2.12
61
2.62
196
2.53
14
0.96
21
0.85
3
0.20
9
0.40
48
0.61
3
0.23
4
0.16
2
0.15
11
0.49
21
0.27
3
0.23
9
0.37
3
0.23
9
0.39
25
0.32
2
0.14
3
0.10
6
0.44
7
0.31
18
0.24
1492
100.00
2492
100.00
1435
100.00
2323
100.00
7742
100.00
E‐35
X Tab 3
Ground Access Mode by Alternate Access Mode
Alternate Access Mode
Private vehicle, dropped off at terminal
Count
Row %
799
23.91
Access Mod Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, motorcycle, e
Rental vehicle
174
20.10
Taxicab
266
18.07
169
25.50
6
15.62
32
8.77
70
46.62
59
55.73
33
52.11
3
44.30
113
37.97
28
26.15
47
14.25
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Line's Airport Sta
43
22.72
5
29.01
14
35.45
9
20.09
6
29.88
Water taxi
1
11.38
Other
13
22.51
21
Total
1890
23.10
Private vehicle, parked Private vehicle, parked on‐airport
off‐airport
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
190
5.68
56
1.66
91
2.72
916
27.40
9
1.05
2
0.24
89
10.24
351
40.50
91
6.18
16
1.07
72
4.90
158
10.72
128
19.37
36
5.49
15
2.30
209
31.58
4
9.19
4
10.29
18
46.09
36
10.04
26
7.15
15
4.23
149
41.10
14
9.63
10
6.98
1
0.75
19
12.47
10
9.08
8
7.14
2
1.73
8
7.93
9
13.76
1
1.62
2
2.36
10
14.94
1
11.61
2
26.72
53
17.73
45
15.09
12
4.08
16
5.40
8
7.86
0
0.26
9
8.63
14
13.22
6
1.94
1
0.44
5
1.62
230
69.77
6
3.32
5
2.78
111
58.05
3
16.93
2
8.88
4
21.13
3
6.53
1
1.70
0
1.17
5
12.62
1
3.09
1
1.99
29
66.29
2
10.53
2
42.60
2
3.61
1
1.36
5
8.06
23
39.55
1
100.00
574
7.01
210
2.57
324
3.97
2275
27.81
E‐36
Count
Row %
422
12.61
66
7.66
259
17.59
37
5.61
3
8.33
19
5.23
4
2.63
7
6.65
6
8.70
10
3.41
14
13.42
2
0.75
3
1.46
2
11.97
1
2.15
7
34.74
0
0.80
863
10.55
Van or limo on a fixed schedule
Courtesy shuttle
Count
Row %
Count Row %
21
0.62
38
1.12
6
0.64
56
6.46
19
1.30
83
5.60
5
0.81
2
0.34
2
0.55
10
2.67
2
1.60
2
1.55
2
0.73
2
0.66
5
1.55
2
0.73
2
1.07
1
3.17
0
1.09
1
30.44
2
3.83
62
0.76
202
2.46
X Tab 3
Ground Access Mode by Alternate Access Mode (continued)
MBTA subway
Count
Row %
242
7.24
Rental vehicle
52
6.00
Taxicab
342
23.18
12
1.83
Van or limo running on a fixed route/schedule Courtesy shuttle (hotel, school, hospital, etc.)
13
3.64
5
3.12
4
3.53
2
3.21
1
8.86
1
0.27
15
13.65
12
3.57
8
4.43
6
14.21
3
6.62
2
12.38
Water taxi
Other
4
6.06
21
Total
722
8.82
Logan Express from Logan Express from Logan Express from MBTA Silver Line bus
Braintree
Framingham
Woburn
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
98
2.94
110
3.28
76
2.26
73
2.17
18
2.07
8
0.92
5
0.54
3
0.32
100
6.76
7
0.46
4
0.29
1
0.10
5
0.68
7
1.06
13
2.02
7
1.03
2
5.21
34
9.35
3
0.71
1
0.28
5
1.40
2
1.44
20
13.45
0
0.34
4
3.59
2
3.30
2
0.79
5
1.66
3
1.04
3
2.99
10
3.18
0
0.14
1
0.18
2
0.94
3
7.04
2
4.77
0
0.83
1
5.95
0
9.68
277
3.39
165
2.02
106
1.29
91
1.12
E‐37
Logan Express from Peabody
Count
Row %
14
0.41
1
0.13
1
0.20
0
0.10
1
8.52
2
12.08
19
0.23
Other scheduled Water ferry/water taxi
bus
Count
Row %
Count Row %
125
3.74
24
0.72
15
1.74
2
0.22
9
0.60
24
1.60
5
0.78
1
0.20
2
5.27
15
4.01
2
1.43
2
1.48
1
1.12
18
6.07
2
0.64
11
10.78
3
0.98
3
0.88
5
2.46
1
0.66
2
5.67
2
4.72
1
6.52
0
5.90
5
8.62
219
2.68
62
0.76
X Tab 3
Ground Access Mode by Alternate Access Mode (continued)
Other
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
Count
Row %
50
1.51
3342
100.00
Rental vehicle
10
1.17
867
100.00
Taxicab
23
1.59
1473
100.00
8
1.19
661
100.00
Van or limo running on a fixed route/schedule 38
100.00
3
0.77
363
100.00
149
100.00
107
100.00
64
100.00
7
100.00
13
4.48
298
100.00
3
3.04
106
100.00
330
100.00
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Line's Airport Sta MBTA via subway to Silver Line bus
4
2.10
191
100.00
17
100.00
0
0.79
39
100.00
44
100.00
20
100.00
Water taxi
5
100.00
Other
3
5.62
59
100.00
21
1
100.00
Total
119
1.45
8179
100.00
E‐38
X Tab 4
Ground Access Mode by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
914
58.57
1220
47.88
172
11.24
878
36.22
3184
39.49
Access Mod Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV,
Rental vehicle
10
0.66
47
1.86
411
26.89
429
17.70
898
11.14
Taxicab
264
16.89
336
13.19
564
36.86
417
17.21
1581
19.61
Van or limo that picked me up by 160
10.24
206
8.07
155
10.12
89
3.65
609
7.55
5
0.34
5
0.20
16
1.03
4
0.15
30
0.37
Van or limo running on a fixed rou
30
1.91
113
4.45
64
4.20
149
6.15
357
4.42
Courtesy shuttle (hotel, school, ho
18
1.13
76
3.00
5
0.35
31
1.29
131
1.62
Logan Express Bus from Framingh
16
0.99
57
2.24
2
0.14
27
1.12
102
1.26
21
1.33
18
0.71
5
0.31
15
0.62
59
0.73
3
0.19
3
0.12
1
0.08
2
0.08
9
0.11
Other scheduled express bus serv
32
2.03
134
5.25
17
1.13
104
4.28
287
3.56
19
1.23
41
1.62
21
1.37
26
1.08
108
1.34
35
2.22
132
5.18
33
2.14
132
5.44
331
4.11
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Lin
17
1.06
109
4.29
23
1.51
41
1.69
190
2.36
MBTA via subway to Silver Line bu
3
0.19
5
0.18
2
0.15
7
0.31
17
0.22
MBTA via commuter rail to subwa
MBTA via commuter rail to Silver 6
0.40
19
0.76
3
0.19
10
0.41
38
0.48
4
0.26
9
0.36
10
0.66
21
0.86
44
0.55
4
0.25
1
0.06
2
0.15
8
0.34
16
0.20
Harbor Express (MBTA) water ferr
Water taxi
1
0.03 3
0.18
1
0.06
5
0.06
Other
1
0.08
14
0.56
20
1.30
32
1.33
67
0.84
Total
1561
100.00
2547
100.00
1530
100.00
2424
100.00
8062
100.00
E‐39
X Tab 5
Ground Access Mode by Travel Party Size
Travel party size
1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
2063
41.32
933
39.76
326
43.71
185
42.18
79
38.82
Rental vehicle
451
9.03
307
13.11
94
12.67
76
17.26
24
11.52
Taxicab
1045
20.92
433
18.46
150
20.12
52
11.88
16
7.69
345
6.90
161
6.88
51
6.86
31
7.03
47
22.96
24
0.47
17
0.71
3
0.65
142
2.84
158
6.74
45
6.01
39
8.98
18
8.66 Logan Express Bus from Braintree
114
2.28
36
1.53
1
0.19
10
2.24
4
1.89
65
1.30
45
1.92
8
1.09
38
0.77
20
0.87
4
0.81
7
0.14 2
0.29
182
3.64
108
4.61
21
2.88
5
1.03
4
2.18 Other scheduled express bus service
8
0.16
4
0.19
2
0.25
1
0.25
208
4.16
54
2.30
28
3.82
25
5.65
3
1.67
130
2.61
33
1.42
8
1.14
5
1.22
10
0.20
8
0.34
39
0.79
2
0.07
41
0.83
3
0.13
1
0.25
14
0.28
4
0.17
1
0.20
Water taxi
3
0.06
1
0.06
1
0.15
Other
64
1.29
17
0.74
6
0.78
2
0.41
9
4.61 Total
4994
100.00
2345
100.00
745
100.00
438
100.00
204
100.00
E‐40
Col %
134
47
40
59
40.48
14.15
12.17
17.96
6
1.68
11
3.42
33
9.99
0
0.14
330
100.00
11 to 15
Count
Col %
5
9.90
9
17.32
3
4.85
3
5.39
0
0.52
4
7.50
3
5.90
26
48.62
52
100.00
X Tab 5
Ground Access Mode by Travel Party Size (continued)
Travel party size
Total
More than 15
Count
Col %
Col %
Count
Col %
Access Mod Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, motorcycle, eCount
Rental vehicle
9
6.28
3734
40.33
Taxicab
6
4.10
1005
10.85
Van or limo that picked me up by reservation 1744
18.84
13
8.99
710
7.67
Courtesy shuttle (hotel, school, hospital, etc.) 43
0.47
405
4.37
3
1.92
173
1.87
118
1.28
73
0.79
9
0.10
14
9.68
338
3.66
102
69.03
121
1.30
351
3.80
203
2.19
18
0.20
41
0.44
46
0.50
Water taxi
20
0.21
Other
5
0.06
Total
99
1.07
148
100.00
9258
100.00
E‐41
X Tab 6
Ground Origin Location by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
243
18.55
396
18.09
423
47.67
524
30.64
1586
26.01
Ground OrigBoston/Cambridge/Somerville
Other inside Route 128
353
26.99
567
25.86
130
14.62
340
19.89
1390
22.80
433
33.04
623
28.43
188
21.24
379
22.17
1623
26.62
Between Route 128 and Route I‐4
150
11.49
285
12.99
64
7.22
201
11.73
699
11.47
Outside Route I‐495, but within M
Out‐of‐Massachusetts
130
9.93
321
14.63
82
9.25
266
15.58
799
13.10
Total
1309
100.00
2192
100.00
886
100.00
1710
100.00
6097
100.00
E‐42
X Tab 7
Ground Egress Mode by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
233
16.12
788
33.42
95
7.23
625
32.13
1740
24.67
Ground EgrePicked up by someone else
589
40.69
298
12.62
22
1.71
48
2.46
956
13.55
Rental vehicle
9
0.62
28
1.19
325
24.83
307
15.77
668
9.47
Taxicab
267
18.46
315
13.34
559
42.77
320
16.48
1461
20.71
145
10.02
172
7.30
106
8.14
45
2.33
469
6.64
10
0.69
23
0.96
15
1.13
9
0.48
57
0.80
Van or limo on fixed route/schedu
Courtesy shuttle
24
1.68
107
4.53
53
4.03
111
5.71
295
4.18
38
2.62
145
6.16
31
2.34
175
9.01
389
5.51
31
2.13
167
7.10
36
2.72
106
5.44
340
4.81
Logan Express bus
60
4.14
144
6.09
12
0.92
45
2.30
260
3.69
19
1.34
90
3.82
9
0.70
39
2.02
158
2.24
Charter/tour bus
10
0.68
39
1.66
21
1.58
19
0.98
89
1.26
3
0.22
1
0.03
8
0.58
7
0.37
19
0.27
Other
5
0.33
28
1.20
7
0.57
67
3.45
107
1.52
Not sure
4
0.27
14
0.58
10
0.74
21
1.06
48
0.68
Total
1446
100.00
2358
100.00
1308
100.00
1944
100.00
7055
100.00
E‐43
X Tab 8A
Number of Business Flights, All Airports, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
268
17.04
1817
70.37
392
25.59
2140
87.60
4616
56.80
Number of bNone
1
116
7.40
149
5.77
433
28.27
116
4.73
814
10.01
2
122
7.77
156
6.05
251
16.39
64
2.62
593
7.30
3
96
6.10
122
4.72
124
8.08
36
1.49
378
4.65
4
89
5.67
78
3.03
78
5.11
25
1.03
271
3.33
5
81
5.16
42
1.63
46
2.99
13
0.54
182
2.24
6
99
6.30
56
2.15
39
2.53
15
0.61
208
2.57
7
29
1.87
4
0.15
16
1.01
3
0.12
52
0.63
8
52
3.34
18
0.70
25
1.66
20
0.81
115
1.42
9
11
0.69
6
0.23
2
0.14
19
0.23
10
84
5.32
31
1.21
43
2.79
1
0.03
158
1.95
11 to 15
152
9.68
41
1.57
35
2.29
3
0.11
231
2.84
16 to 20
119
7.54
26
0.99
20
1.32
0
0.02
165
2.03
21 to 40
168
10.67
26
1.01
17
1.11
7
0.29
218
2.68
41 to 60
61
3.87
6
0.25
7
0.47
74
0.91
More than 60
25
1.60
4
0.17
4
0.26
34
0.41
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐44
X Tab 8B
Number of Leisure Flights, All Airports, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Number of l None
676
43.02
794
30.77
1368
89.43
864
35.38
3703
45.57
1
225
14.33
321
12.42
75
4.92
671
27.47
1292
15.90
2
278
17.67
465
18.00
39
2.54
374
15.29
1155
14.21
3
144
9.15
335
12.98
14
0.94
193
7.90
686
8.44
4
110
6.97
224
8.66
10
0.66
109
4.46
452
5.56
5
59
3.74
125
4.85
7
0.47
83
3.41
275
3.38
6
22
1.40
102
3.94
8
0.51
52
2.11
183
2.25
7
12
0.74
43
1.68
1
0.05
15
0.60
70
0.86
8
12
0.78
51
1.96
2
0.15
28
1.16
93
1.15
9
1
0.09
12
0.45
0
0.03
8
0.33
22
0.27
10
18
1.13
40
1.57
0
0.03
13
0.55
72
0.89
11 to 15
11
0.69
45
1.73
2
0.14
22
0.90
80
0.98
2
0.12
5
0.20
3
0.13
10
0.12
16 to 20
21 to 40
2
0.15
13
0.49
1
0.05
7
0.29
23
0.28
41 to 60
0
0.02
5
0.21
1
0.08
1
0.03
8
0.09
More than 60
3
0.11
3
0.04
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐45
X Tab 8C
Number of Total Flights, All Airports, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
200
12.71
538
20.83
356
23.26
713
29.20
1807
22.23
Number of t None
1
66
4.20
262
10.17
419
27.41
696
28.50
1444
17.77
2
104
6.63
417
16.15
254
16.62
391
16.02
1167
14.36
3
100
6.39
350
13.56
124
8.12
218
8.91
792
9.75
4
97
6.15
278
10.77
93
6.10
124
5.06
592
7.28
5
72
4.60
159
6.17
49
3.18
85
3.50
365
4.50
6
79
5.00
120
4.64
45
2.95
77
3.17
321
3.95
7
68
4.30
59
2.27
20
1.28
18
0.75
164
2.02
8
80
5.07
78
3.01
25
1.60
33
1.37
215
2.65
9
22
1.40
34
1.30
4
0.28
12
0.51
72
0.89
10
52
3.32
70
2.72
42
2.75
14
0.56
178
2.19
11 to 15
186
11.80
110
4.26
45
2.94
31
1.26
371
4.57
16 to 20
111
7.08
33
1.26
20
1.33
15
0.59
179
2.20
21 to 40
230
14.64
55
2.13
20
1.33
13
0.51
318
3.91
41 to 60
75
4.80
7
0.28
9
0.57
2
0.08
94
1.15
More than 60
30
1.92
13
0.48
4
0.26
47
0.58
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐46
X Tab 9A
Number of Logan Business Flights, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
302
19.18
1873
72.53
397
25.98
2159
88.38
4730
58.21
Number of LNone
1
141
8.95
150
5.81
460
30.04
124
5.09
875
10.77
2
139
8.81
150
5.82
255
16.64
64
2.63
608
7.48
3
114
7.25
107
4.13
122
7.94
31
1.28
373
4.59
4
81
5.15
64
2.46
82
5.39
25
1.04
252
3.10
5
90
5.75
50
1.94
36
2.33
9
0.37
185
2.28
6
85
5.39
50
1.94
43
2.80
16
0.64
193
2.38
7
16
1.05
2
0.06
13
0.84
1
0.04
32
0.39
8
50
3.17
15
0.57
15
1.00
4
0.17
84
1.03
9
4
0.27
1
0.03
3
0.22
9
0.11
10
101
6.41
40
1.54
47
3.10
1
0.06
189
2.33
11 to 15
135
8.59
26
1.00
22
1.43
2
0.07
185
2.27
16 to 20
123
7.80
23
0.88
14
0.90
1
0.03
160
1.96
21 to 40
124
7.88
23
0.88
12
0.77
5
0.21
164
2.01
41 to 60
54
3.46
6
0.24
6
0.36
66
0.81
More than 60
14
0.91
4
0.17
4
0.25
23
0.28
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐47
X Tab 9B
Number of Logan Leisure Flights, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
764
48.62
876
33.95
1394
91.11
898
36.76
3933
48.40
Number of LNone
1
222
14.12
372
14.41
69
4.49
715
29.25
1377
16.95
2
270
17.15
473
18.32
37
2.44
379
15.50
1159
14.26
3
128
8.13
286
11.09
8
0.53
180
7.36
602
7.41
4
77
4.90
208
8.04
9
0.61
95
3.91
389
4.79
5
55
3.47
110
4.26
4
0.28
72
2.94
241
2.96
6
16
1.01
96
3.72
3
0.20
43
1.76
158
1.95
7
4
0.23
25
0.98
5
0.19
33
0.41
8
10
0.64
43
1.68
2
0.11
16
0.65
71
0.87
9
3
0.12
6
0.26
9
0.12
10
18
1.15
38
1.48
0
0.03
12
0.49
69
0.85
11 to 15
6
0.37
33
1.27
1
0.08
16
0.65
56
0.69
16 to 20
1
0.06
5
0.21
0
0.02
7
0.08
21 to 40
2
0.14
6
0.23
1
0.05
6
0.23
14
0.18
41 to 60
0
0.02
3
0.12
1
0.08
1
0.03
5
0.06
More than 60
3
0.11
3
0.04
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐48
X Tab 9C
Number of Total Logan Flights, in Previous 12 Months by Trip Type
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
223
14.17
618
23.95
362
23.67
748
30.62
1951
24.01
Number of LNone
1
112
7.15
333
12.89
452
29.57
746
30.53
1643
20.22
2
119
7.55
452
17.51
260
16.97
398
16.29
1228
15.11
3
114
7.25
304
11.77
124
8.14
197
8.09
740
9.10
4
97
6.16
243
9.41
95
6.18
118
4.84
553
6.80
5
91
5.77
131
5.09
40
2.63
77
3.14
339
4.17
6
68
4.35
117
4.53
45
2.91
64
2.61
294
3.61
7
48
3.07
43
1.68
16
1.03
9
0.35
116
1.43
8
69
4.37
68
2.65
18
1.21
31
1.25
186
2.29
9
22
1.41
22
0.85
5
0.31
9
0.36
57
0.71
10
62
3.96
76
2.93
46
3.04
11
0.46
196
2.41
11 to 15
160
10.16
88
3.41
28
1.80
21
0.87
297
3.65
16 to 20
108
6.86
22
0.86
12
0.80
3
0.12
145
1.79
21 to 40
190
12.09
47
1.83
16
1.03
11
0.46
264
3.25
41 to 60
70
4.44
6
0.23
7
0.47
1
0.03
84
1.03
More than 60
20
1.24
10
0.40
4
0.25
34
0.42
Total
1572
100.00
2582
100.00
1530
100.00
2443
100.00
8127
100.00
E‐49
X Tab 10
Vehicle Occupancy by Ground Access Mode
Number of p1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 to 15
16 to 20
More than 20
Total
Access Mode
Total
Taxicab
Van or limo that picked mVan or limo running on a Courtesy shuttle (hotel, sCount
Col %
Private vehicle (car, minivaRental vehicle
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
32
17.38
27
18.43
748
46.83
197
31.09
7
19.43
21
6.57
1033
35.31
56
30.18
26
18.02
519
32.47
165
25.92
9
25.36
84
25.74
859
29.35
36
19.42
20
13.51
194
12.11
71
11.10
2
5.46
38
11.58
360
12.28
26
13.75
18
12.58
90
5.62
49
7.71
3
8.80
43
13.12
229
7.81
16
8.85
16
11.02
12
0.76
57
9.01
2
5.62
26
8.02
130
4.44
3
1.35
6
4.29
11
0.69
20
3.22
4
10.45
26
7.90
70
2.38
9
4.91
6
4.09
5
0.33
17
2.64
1
1.82
16
4.89
54
1.83
3
1.39
2
1.65
29
4.58
20
6.11
54
1.84
0
0.22 8
0.52
11
1.78
2
4.30
7
2.25
29
0.99
2
0.82
12
8.31
0
0.02
6
0.89
1
4.02
21
6.42
42
1.43
2
0.98
6
4.25
9
0.58
12
1.94
4
11.21
15
4.64
49
1.66
1
0.42
2
1.19
1
0.12
5
1.51
8
0.28
1
0.32
4
2.65
1
0.09
1
3.50
4
1.25
11
0.38
186
100.00
145
100.00
1598
100.00
635
100.00
36
100.00
326
100.00
2927 100.00
E‐50
X Tab 11
Household Income by Terminal
Total Combi Under $30,000
$30,000 to under $60,000
$60,000 to under $90,000
$90,000 to under $120,000
$120,000 to under $150,000
$150,000 to under $180,000
$180,000 or more
Total
Logan Terminal
Total
Col %
Terminal A
Terminal B
Terminal C
Terminal E ‐ Domestic Terminal E ‐ InternationaCount
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
109
6.58
149
6.74
163
7.61
34
8.77
27
8.24
483
7.17
184
11.12
259
11.70
246
11.48
45
11.42
41
12.63
775
11.51
249
15.05
304
13.75
295
13.78
65
16.55
51
15.48
964
14.33
322
19.44
300
13.54
362
16.89
81
20.85
55
16.94
1121
16.65
212
12.77
289
13.07
281
13.13
54
13.93
42
12.95
879
13.06
137
8.25
248
11.22
201
9.38
33
8.41
26
7.83
645
9.58
444
26.79
664
29.99
595
27.73
78
20.07
85
25.93
1866
27.71
1658
100.00
2213
100.00
2144
100.00
390
100.00
327
100.00
6732
100.00
E‐51
X Tab 11
Household Income by Terminal (continued)
Concessions Spending by Market Segment
Amount spe Less than $5
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
239
29.40
303
21.28
156
19.17
255
19.00
954
21.69
307
37.79
445
31.29
290
35.55
403
30.00
1446
32.89
235
28.85
546
38.37
322
39.42
574
42.68
1675
38.12
24
2.89
90
6.36
43
5.22
83
6.15
239
5.44
2
0.23
18
1.28
2
0.25
20
1.52
42
0.97
1
0.08
8
0.58
1
0.12
3
0.23
13
0.30
6
0.76
12
0.84
2
0.28
6
0.41
26
0.59
813
100.00
1422
100.00
816
100.00
1344
100.00
4395
100.00
16
23.32
23
18.06
12
11.11
21
13.93
71
15.82
5
7.38
8
6.20
2
1.67
18
11.93
33
7.23
31
46.97
29
22.69
30
27.87
34
22.58
124
27.48
13
19.35
35
27.61
46
43.11
50
32.90
143
31.81
2
2.28
24
18.80
14
13.48
23
15.11
62
13.85
0
0.70
3
2.34
1
1.33
5
3.54
10
2.26
5
4.30
2
1.42
7
1.54
67
100.00
126
100.00
106
100.00
151
100.00
450
100.00
132
44.72
156
30.41
67
30.82
127
28.97
482
32.93
83
28.24
146
28.51
56
25.82
124
28.26
409
27.98
69
23.21
173
33.80
67
30.87
140
31.91
448
30.66
9
3.13
31
6.10
17
7.75
32
7.31
89
6.11
0
0.14
4
0.77
8
3.65
13
2.98
25
1.73
1
0.39
0
0.09
1
0.08
2
0.57
2
0.40
2
0.70
2
0.48
7
0.50
296
100.00
513
100.00
216
100.00
438
100.00
1462
100.00
27
48.20
29
32.01
20
20.18
23
12.72
100
23.25
5
9.22
8
9.35
18
18.12
42
23.23
74
17.25
10
18.11
27
30.28
30
30.23
67
36.67
134
31.36
5
8.19
19
21.18
15
15.53
34
18.58
73
17.04
7
12.72
3
3.81
4
3.55
12
6.56
26
6.10
1
1.39
2
1.85
4
4.36
2
1.15
9
2.08
1
2.16
1
1.51
8
8.03
2
1.08
13
2.93
57
100.00
90
100.00
100
100.00
181
100.00
428
100.00
10
68.70
27
57.54
10
39.89
24
33.38
71
44.81
1
1.94
10
37.94
0
0.53
11
6.92
10
20.15
1
3.79
9
12.02
19
12.04
3
21.82
4
8.90
3
10.57
16
22.04
26
16.26
1
8.11
2
4.02
1
5.27
14
19.57
18
11.61
0
1.37
2
4.76
3
3.83
5
3.27
1
2.70
1
2.55
6
8.62
8
5.10
14
100.00
47
100.00
25
100.00
71
100.00
158
100.00
E‐52
X Tab 11
Household Income by Terminal (continued)
Concessions Spending by Terminal
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
$5 to under $10
$10 to under $25
$25 to under $50
$50 to under $75
$75 to under $100
100 or more
Total
Logan Terminal
Total
Col %
Terminal A
Terminal B
Terminal C
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
280
25.02
333
21.83
357
20.29
46
20.27
44
17.37
1059
21.70
398
35.55
542
35.53
549
31.27
70
31.04
67
26.73
1627
33.34
386
34.43
559
36.68
695
39.54
90
40.00
100
39.52
1830
37.49
43
3.81
70
4.58
99
5.63
18
8.12
33
13.18
263
5.39
4
0.39
7
0.44
32
1.82
6
2.25
49
1.00
2
0.14
2
0.13
9
0.54
1
0.38
14
0.28
7
0.67
13
0.82
16
0.90
0
0.21
2
0.95
39
0.79
1121
100.00
1525
100.00
1757
100.00
226
100.00
252
100.00
4880
100.00
25
30.69
24
14.01
21
12.47
7
28.68
4
10.68
82
16.68
7
8.37
11
6.48
9
5.25
2
9.02
3
6.40
32
6.48
29
34.57
47
26.94
52
30.66
4
16.88
12
29.78
144
29.28
21
25.64
61
34.75
50
29.58
9
39.05
10
24.76
151
30.79
1
0.73
20
11.58
32
18.99
1
6.38
10
25.15
65
13.22
6
3.33
3
1.97
1
2.43
10
2.07
5
2.92
2
1.08
0
0.80
7
1.48
83
100.00
175
100.00
170
100.00
23
100.00
41
100.00
492
100.00
139
37.51
161
30.99
163
31.89
27
29.23
31
26.95
521
32.39
99
26.56
162
31.21
125
24.47
30
32.65
35
30.02
450
27.99
108
29.13
151
29.04
175
34.32
25
27.34
42
35.81
501
31.13
17
4.62
28
5.36
40
7.76
8
9.15
5
4.50
98
6.10
5
1.27
14
2.66
5
0.99
1
1.64
2
2.03
27
1.70
1
0.24
1
0.08
3
0.91
4
0.74
2
0.33
1
0.68
10
0.60
372
100.00
519
100.00
511
100.00
91
100.00
116
100.00
1609
100.00
32
26.99
29
19.53
31
21.51
6
42.59
8
20.84
105
22.85
7
6.03
52
35.28
13
8.88
1
10.51
3
7.17
75
16.46
36
30.12
37
25.40
54
37.89
3
21.80
13
32.71
142
31.01
26
22.42
17
11.55
25
17.21
2
14.76
9
24.38
79
17.28
9
7.37
7
4.67
15
10.20
1
4.92
2
6.26
33
7.23
4
3.10
4
2.73
2
1.28
2
4.47
11
2.44
5
3.97
1
0.84
4
3.03
1
5.43
2
4.16
13
2.74
118
100.00
146
100.00
143
100.00
13
100.00
38
100.00
458
100.00
16
68.19
24
35.32
26
87.95
4
100.00
6
13.60
76
44.34
1
3.00
10
14.11
4
9.63
15
8.65
0
2.06
7
10.91
12
24.63
19
11.33
0
2.06
13
18.38
4
12.05
10
21.95
27
15.67
6
24.70
5
6.97
9
19.86
20
11.50
3
4.00
2
5.22
5
3.02
7
10.31
2
5.09
9
5.49
23
100.00
68
100.00
30
100.00
4
100.00
47
100.00
172
100.00
E‐53
X Tab 12
Trip Type by Destination Type
Trip Type
Resident business
Resident leisure
Total
Destination Type by Trip Type
Final DestinaDomestic
Canada
Carib/Bermuda/Mexico
Europe
Total
Final Destination Type
Total
Domestic
Canada
Carib/Bermuda/Mexico Europe
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1426
19.73
23
21.38
6
4.14
107
18.67
1561
19.40
2147
29.69
15
14.63
101
70.80
273
47.65
2535
31.50
1442
19.95
29
27.56
6
4.56
52
9.04
1529
19.00
2214
30.63
38
36.43
29
20.49
141
24.64
2423
30.10
7229
100.00
105
100.00
142
100.00
573
100.00
8049
100.00
Trip Type
Total
Count
Col %
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1426
91.33
2147
84.66
1442
94.29
2214
91.39
7229
89.81
23
1.44
15
0.61
29
1.90
38
1.58
105
1.31
6
0.38
101
3.96
6
0.42
29
1.20
142
1.76
107
6.85
273
10.77
52
3.39
141
5.83
573
7.12
1561
100.00
2535
100.00
1529
100.00
2423
100.00
8049
100.00
E‐54
X Tab 13
Travel Party Size by Trip Type
Travel party 1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
11 to 15
More than 15
Total
Trip Type
Total
Resident business
Resident leisure
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1254
79.45
1083
41.88
972
63.19
980
39.87
4289
52.56
163
10.30
834
32.23
289
18.79
878
35.73
2164
26.51
61
3.85
232
8.97
95
6.18
269
10.92
656
8.04
18
1.16
162
6.26
64
4.17
143
5.83
388
4.75
1
0.05
83
3.20
31
2.03
61
2.48
176
2.16
55
3.49
110
4.25
64
4.13
79
3.20
307
3.76
4
0.23
29
1.12
9
0.57
9
0.35
50
0.61
23
1.47
54
2.10
14
0.93
39
1.61
131
1.61
1578
100.00
2587
100.00
1537
100.00
2458
100.00
8161
100.00
E‐55
X Tab 14
Average Number of Checked Bags by Trip Type
Number of Pieces of Checked Luggage
Count
Mean
Trip Type Resident business
1578
1.19
Resident leisure
2587
2.06
1537
1.27
2458
1.57
E‐56
X Tab 15
Average Number of Carry‐on Bags by Trip Type
Number of Pieces of Carry‐On Luggage
Count
Mean
Trip Type Resident business
1578
1.99
Resident leisure
2587
2.47
1537
2.38
2458
2.42
E‐57
X Tab 16
Rental Vehicle Company (open ended) * Trip Type Crosstabulation
Count Trip Type
Total
Resident businResident leisNon‐residenNon‐residenResident business
1
0
0
0
1
Rental Vehic 5 MI
2
0
0
0
2
Alamo
0
0
1
0
1
ALAMO
0
10
13
41
64
AMS
0
0
1
0
1
AMTRAK
0
2
0
0
2
ANOTHER SHELL
0
0
0
2
2
ANY
0
0
0
0
0
ARTS
0
0
0
1
1
avis
0
0
0
1
1
Avis
0
0
4
0
4
AVIS
2
0
74
46
122
BUDGET
1
6
46
68
121
CENTRAL NATIONAL
0
0
1
0
1
CORPORATE
2
0
0
0
2
DELTA
0
0
0
0
0
DOLLAR
0
0
12
19
31
don''t know ‐ relative drove me
0
0
0
0
0
DOUCIO
0
0
0
1
1
Enterprise
0
1
1
0
2
ENTERPRISE
1
4
48
63
116
ERAC
0
0
0
1
1
EXCEPTIONAL
0
3
0
0
3
FNTYORN
0
0
0
0
0
FROPCOR
0
0
0
0
0
HAMS
0
0
0
0
0
HANISON A1
1
0
0
0
1
Hertz
0
0
1
2
3
HERTZ
1
18
106
98
223
JOHNS
0
0
0
0
0
JW CAR SERV
0
4
0
0
4
KNIGHTS LIMO
0
1
0
0
1
LIMO
0
0
0
0
0
MART
0
0
1
0
1
MERTE
0
0
1
0
1
MICHAELS
0
0
0
0
0
national
0
0
1
0
1
National
0
0
2
0
2
NATIONAL
2
0
61
22
85
NULL
1565
2538
1142
2062
7307
PLANETTRAN
0
0
1
1
2
SCHOOL BUS
0
0
0
0
0
Thrifty
0
0
3
0
3
THRIFTY
0
0
16
28
44
ZIPCAR
0
0
0
2
2
Total
1578
2587
1536
2458
8159
E‐58
X Tab 17
Household Vehcile Ownership by Ground Access Mode
Access Mode
Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, Van or limo that picked Van or limo running on Courtesy shuttle (hotel, Logan Express Bus Logan Express Bus motorcycle, etc.)
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
me up by reservation a fixed route/schedule school, hospital, etc.)
from Braintree
from Framingham
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
86
2.69
9
1.03
141
9.24
14
2.29
8
2.26
3
2.03
1
1.12
Number of vNone
1
603
18.92
180
20.44
384
25.22
118
18.75
7
19.51
66
18.00
37
28.56
39 36.48
2
1544
48.46
412
46.76
602
39.48
309
49.23
16
46.70
197
54.07
58
44.93
45 41.70
3
572
17.94
179
20.26
278
18.22
121
19.30
8
23.16
66
18.18
22
17.10
17 15.97
4
260
8.14
62
6.98
77
5.07
42
6.73
3
9.48
18
5.04
4
3.40
3
3.25
5
66
2.08
27
3.04
21
1.35
19
3.00
0
1.15
2
0.47
2
1.91
2
1.49
6 to 10
56
1.77
13
1.51
18
1.17
4
0.69
7
1.98
3
2.08
More than 10
0
0.01 4
0.24
Total
3187
100.00
881
100.00
1525
100.00
627
100.00
35
100.00
365
100.00
130 100.00
107 100.00
Number of vNone
1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
More than 10
Total
Count
Col %
7
10.87
30
48.96
9
14.87
4
6.59
11
18.71
60
100.00
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Line's Airport MBTA via subway to Logan Express Bus from Other scheduled Station)
Silver Line bus
Peabody
express bus service
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
10
3.32
1
0.85
64
19.63
33
20.78
5
57.44
68
23.34
30
27.27
96
29.38
65
40.73
2
25.93
148
50.91
73
65.70
101
30.75
37
23.34
1
11.98
34
11.68
6
5.76
55
16.90
18
11.13
0
4.66
24
8.45
0
0.42
8
2.45
6
3.47
2
0.82
2
0.62
4
1.48
1
0.26
1
0.55
9
100.00
290
100.00
111
100.00
327
100.00
161
100.00
Number of vNone
1
2
3
4
5
6 to 10
More than 10
Total
Count
Col %
5
11.53
10
23.71
15
35.23
7
16.71
2
4.34
3
7.63
0
0.85
42
100.00
Water taxi
Other
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
2
13.68
1
15.16
12
69.68
2
51.67
0
1.54
1
6.76
1
33.17
1
8.34
18
100.00
4
100.00
E‐59
21
Col %
Count
14
39
10
6
19.90
56.34
14.51
9.25
69
100.00
Count
Count
378.1106
1747.3444
3669.1002
100.00 1411.784
525.25144
147.68533
107.73951
15.680136
100.00 8002.6956
Col %
1
1
Col %
Col %
4.7247905
21.834448
45.848304
17.641355
6.5634315
1.8454448
1.3462903
0.1959357
100
MBTA via MBTA via commuter commuter rail to rail to subway
Silver Line bus
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
0
3.26
2
6.46
6
39.04
9 24.56
9
57.70
17 45.31
8 20.43
1
3.24
15 100.00
38 100.00
X Tab 18
Household Income by Ground Access Mode
$30,000 to under $60,000
$60,000 to under $90,000
$90,000 to under $120,000
$120,000 to under $150,000
$150,000 to under $180,000
$180,000 or more
Total
$30,000 to under $60,000
$60,000 to under $90,000
$90,000 to under $120,000
$120,000 to under $150,000
$150,000 to under $180,000
$180,000 or more
Total
Access Mode
Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, Van or limo that picked Van or limo running on Courtesy shuttle (hotel, Logan Express Bus Logan Express Bus motorcycle, etc.)
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
from Braintree
from Framingham
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
194
7.29
24
3.30
84
6.11
15
3.23
10
3.96
10
9.09
4
4.00
328
12.32
59
7.95
100
7.27
35
7.76
2
5.70
35
13.69
12
11.67
22 25.04
365
13.71
113
15.24
160
11.63
47
10.39
10
25.94
45
17.42
18
17.17
21 24.06
429
16.10
128
17.27
215
15.67
58
12.73
7
19.44
48
18.75
25
23.92
13 14.76
325
12.19
128
17.27
175
12.72
62
13.69
3
6.95
45
17.35
21
20.06
7
7.99
258
9.70
84
11.33
148
10.75
47
10.34
4
10.01
18
7.07
5
4.71
8
8.92
764
28.70
204
27.64
492
35.85
190
41.86
12
31.96
56
21.75
14
13.38
14 15.23
2663
100.00
739
100.00
1372
100.00
453
100.00
37
100.00
257
100.00
105 100.00
89 100.00
MBTA via subway only MBTA via Other scheduled (to Blue Line's Airport MBTA via subway to MBTA via commuter commuter rail to Logan Express Bus from Logan Express Bus from Woburn
Peabody
express bus service
Station)
Silver Line bus
Silver Line bus
rail to subway
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
2
4.52
1
8.79
29
11.86
0
3.31
49
16.26
26
16.67
2
13.37
7 16.18
5
14.15
1
11.44
54
22.57
2
15.39
56
18.56
29
18.04
1
3.32
4
9.25
6
15.18
2
23.00
48
19.83
3
19.75
51
17.04
29
18.29
0
1.43
3
6.58
7
18.53
2
27.50
48
19.86
4
31.17
49
16.40
26
16.36
5
29.43
14 31.09
9
23.24
1
8.19
27
11.11
3
19.31
40
13.33
17
10.81 6 12.94
0
1.02 18
7.57
1
4.28
18
6.00
14
8.92
2
8.88
8 19.29
9
23.36
1
21.08
17
7.21
1
6.79
37
12.41
17
10.91
8
43.56
2
4.68
37
100.00
7
100.00
240
100.00
14
100.00
300
100.00
159
100.00
18 100.00
43 100.00
$30,000 to under $60,000
$60,000 to under $90,000
$90,000 to under $120,000
$120,000 to under $150,000
$150,000 to under $180,000
$180,000 or more
Total
Total
MBTA via Silver Line bus Harbor Express (MBTA) only
water ferry
Water taxi
Count
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
5
9.52
1
5.02
10
20.45
2
8.25
2
55.83
3
6.32
6
31.41
13
26.07
3
15.94
0
10.83
5
10.16 1
17.76
2
3.07
7
33.88
12
24.41
1
5.51
1
15.58
50
100.00
19
100.00
3
100.00
E‐60
Other
Col %
Count
5
8.12
9
14.41
18
27.10
15
22.96
5
7.35
5
7.72
8
12.35
65
100.00
21
Count
Count
467.36043
768.31657
100.00 946.71813
1108.9815
876.13964
645.53862
1860.0301
100.00 6673.085
Col %
1
1
Col %
Col %
7.0036637
11.513664
14.187113
16.618722
13.129454
9.673766
27.873617
100
X Tab 19
Logan Arrival Time by Ground Access Mode
Logan Arriva12 AM
1 AM
2 AM
3 AM
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
Total
Access Mode
Private vehicle (car, minivan, SUV, Van or limo that picked Van or limo running on Courtesy shuttle (hotel, Logan Express Bus Logan Express Bus from Framingham
motorcycle, etc.)
Rental vehicle
Taxicab
from Braintree
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
12
0.34
8
0.86
3
0.19
0
0.10
1
0.60
1
0.68
6
0.16
4
0.48
1
0.08
2
0.25
1
0.33 7
0.21
2
0.17
1
0.06
1
0.19
1
0.30
14
8.62
9
0.27
10
1.08
6
0.38
4
0.52
1
2.18
1
0.21 109
3.08
15
1.66
66
4.05
24
3.59
1
1.25
27
7.08
16
9.80
4
3.72
253
7.17
38
4.11
126
7.68
54
8.06
0
1.09
53
13.85
11
6.56
1
0.55
318
9.03
54
5.85
112
6.86
66
9.83
5
12.63
43
11.35
16
10.01
11
9.79
268
7.61
62
6.65
120
7.35
67
10.05
4
8.53
37
9.69
9
5.61
11
9.93
266
7.54
52
5.58
101
6.13
41
6.18
3
6.49
53
13.80
13
7.83
6
5.49
282
7.99
51
5.51
105
6.39
57
8.49
6
15.06
23
5.89
10
5.87
19 16.86
268
7.59
58
6.24
76
4.61
36
5.36
3
6.76
32
8.43
16
9.82
9
7.83
134
3.81
53
5.77
82
5.01
27
4.03
2
4.76
6
1.66
5
3.26
9
7.55
205
5.83
70
7.57
128
7.78
35
5.27
1
1.86
18
4.64
16
10.19
3
2.67
231
6.56
45
4.82
82
5.03
21
3.13
5
12.60
12
3.22
7
4.47
3
2.60
193
5.47
90
9.70
84
5.10
26
3.91
3
6.75
7
1.94
4
2.28
3
2.93
260
7.37
102
10.98
125
7.66
75
11.28
3
7.61
17
4.42
7
4.12
6
5.49
240
6.80
118
12.75
155
9.44
59
8.88
2
4.86
10
2.73
8
4.76
3
2.59
167
4.73
45
4.89
128
7.83
23
3.38
3
5.89
11
2.94
4
2.58
23 20.16
127
3.59
19
2.10
76
4.67
14
2.03
0
0.94
18
4.77
2
0.94
1
0.56
115
3.26
8
0.85
37
2.27
25
3.80
0
0.72
8
2.09
2
1.37
1
0.60
33
0.93
2
0.25
6
0.38
4
0.65
6
0.16
9
0.97
5
0.32
3
0.42
2
0.56
1
0.43
14
0.40
4
0.41
7
0.41
2
0.23
1
0.49
4
0.11
7
0.75
5
0.31
3
0.46
1
0.37
3525
100.00
925
100.00
1639
100.00
668
100.00
42
100.00
383
100.00
162 100.00
113 100.00
E‐61
X Tab 19
Logan Arrival Time by Ground Access Mode (continued)
Access Mode
Logan Arriva12 AM
1 AM
2 AM
3 AM
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
Total
Count
Col %
1
0.91
3
4.41
0
0.52
3
4.44
16
23.90
3
3.71
15
21.95
7
10.37
2
2.85
2
3.14
2
2.37
4
6.03
4
6.61
1
2.20
1
1.82
0
0.43
2
3.05
1
1.30
67
100.00
MBTA via subway only (to Blue Line's Airport MBTA via subway to Logan Express Bus from Other scheduled Station)
Silver Line bus
Peabody
express bus service
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
2
0.48
3
0.86
1
0.30
2
0.60
0
5.14
1
0.21
1
6.10
1
0.18
10
3.23
1
0.27
0
0.18
2
21.39
12
3.56
1
0.27
20
6.33
12
3.46
8
4.29
17
5.35
38
11.45
8
4.06
3
33.35
23
7.00
19
5.56
13
6.89
0
5.48
29
9.05
20
16.38
34
10.19
11
5.93
1
7.14
41
12.71
3
2.29
21
6.40
7
3.45
23
7.24
5
4.25
20
5.86
12
6.43
21
6.43
13
10.63
17
4.98
7
3.79
18
5.51
7
5.68
23
7.01
12
6.07
0
5.11
19
5.90
1
1.18
28
8.26
8
4.33
1
7.13
34
10.49
14
12.03
33
9.93
15
7.67
1
9.16
28
8.66
37
31.34
31
9.32
18
9.54
12
3.56
18
15.43
20
5.92
38
19.70
5
1.58
21
6.31
21
11.08
5
1.41
9
2.75
10
5.43
0
0.14
1
0.44
1
0.46
1
0.44
1
0.26
1
0.30
0
0.13
1
0.79
1
0.42
8
100.00
324
100.00
119
100.00
333
100.00
193
100.00
E‐62
MBTA via MBTA via commuter commuter rail to rail to subway
Silver Line bus
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
0
0.58
3
6.51
4
28.60
2
4.14
2
16.11
5 13.14
3
7.23
0
3.43
6 15.52
6 14.85
3
6.70
2
4.78
1
10.12
2
5.98
4
27.53
3
7.29
2
14.20
3
6.54
2
3.91
1
2.82
15 100.00
39 100.00
X Tab 19
Logan Arrival Time by Ground Access Mode (continued)
Access Mode
Count
Col %
Logan Arriva12 AM
1 AM
1
1.49
2 AM
3 AM
0
0.99
4 AM
5 AM
6 AM
2
3.99
7 AM
1
3.18
8 AM
3
6.16
9 AM
7
15.44
10 AM
3
6.49
11 AM
12 PM
5
12.24
1 PM
5
11.41
2 PM
2
5.54
3 PM
3
7.24
4 PM
7
17.00
5 PM
6 PM
2
4.29
7 PM
1
3.34
8 PM
9 PM
1
1.20
10 PM
11 PM
Total
43
100.00
Total
Water taxi
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
1
10.08
1
4.89
4
27.53
3
19.98
1
22.06
1
11.40
1
12.64
1
5.24
2
16.10
1
22.80
4
24.16
0
7.53
0
2.09
1
13.48
15
100.00
5
100.00
E‐63
Other
Col %
Count
2
3.46
1
1.12
3
4
3
13
7
4
6
4
2
0
5
6
1
2
2
5.17
6.95
3.96
19.74
10.92
5.94
9.28
5.97
2.70
0.66
7.24
9.26
1.61
2.64
3.37
64
100.00
21
Count
Count
32.633807
17.608213
28.284255
32.463477
277.2216
553.07092
676.86705
664.23707
618.76261
682.0549
589.72629
394.26013
551.11621
478.13903
100.00 475.14626
711.80066
735.20404
498.78512
310.62619
225.69055
50.365777
28.312462
29.530277
21.74102
100.00 8683.6479
Col %
1
1
Col %
Col %
0.3758076
0.2027744
0.3257186
0.3738461
3.1924555
6.369108
7.7947317
7.649286
7.1256068
7.8544744
6.7912276
4.5402593
6.3465978
5.5062001
5.4717357
8.1970235
8.4665344
5.7439584
3.5771394
2.5990293
0.5800071
0.3260434
0.3400676
0.2503674
100
X Tab 20
X Tab 20
Ground Egress Mode by Scheduled Arrival Time
Scheduled arrival time
12 AM
Count
Col %
44
37.04
24
20.21
Rental vehicle
6
5.06
Taxicab
24
20.71
9
7.78
Van or limo on fixed route/schedu Courtesy shuttle
4
3.80
2
1.49
Logan Express bus
2
1.63
Charter/tour bus
1
0.72
Other
1
1.11
Not sure
1
0.45
Total
118
100.00
1 AM
Count
2 AM
Count
Col %
3
6
2
12
1
0
12.01
21.57
6.09
46.04
4.30
1.81
1
3 AM
Count
Col %
2
2
1
1
16.84
15.04
4.83
9.08
4
1
37.52
8.31
2.74
0
1.81
1
3.63
100.00
5.63
39.00
6.54
26.05
5
1
49.51
5.58
1
10.54
11
1
1
9.35
9.15
0
4.29
6
100.00
2
20.91
8.37
1
26
0
3
0
2
5 AM
Count
Col %
6 AM
Count
Col %
22
11
3
10
3
30.75
15.58
4.66
14.33
4.56
4 AM
Count
Col %
100.00
1
9
13.45
100.00
2
7
2
4
1
1
0
3
2
71
20
8
10
21
2
2.43
10.09
2.35
5.04
1.80
1.30
0.66
3.54
2.91
100.00
4
9
5
7
1
85
7 AM
Col %
Count
Col %
23.39
31 24.82
8.78
16 12.82
11.93
11
8.42
24.11
15 12.20
2.25
6
4.75
4.46
6
4.84
10.25
4
3.15
5.77
20 15.70
7.79
4
3.25
1.27
7
5.44
3
2.54
3
2.08
100.00
126 100.00
Ground Egress Mode by Scheduled Arrival Time (continued)
10 AM
11 AM
12 PM
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
8 AM
9 AM
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
32
15.23
45
20.71
97
23.66
49
21.64
75
28.10
97
23.34
93
23.12
114 26.26
21
9.87
13
6.13
33
8.11
12
5.30
17
6.44
47
11.37
37
9.11
62 14.17
Rental vehicle
37
17.47
20
9.20
51
12.35
42
18.40
28
10.46
43
10.34
40
9.79
40
9.22
Taxicab
63
30.17
45
21.13
73
17.77
35
15.24
60
22.52
103
24.73
69
17.07
92 21.05
11
5.18
11
5.24
16
3.91
10
4.28
9
3.41
23
5.46
33
8.08
27
6.22
2
1.11
0
0.23
4
0.92
2
0.93
4
1.44
5
1.31
4
1.03
5
1.03
Courtesy shuttle
6
2.81
4
2.01
35
8.49
4
1.80
10
3.81
15
3.53
22
5.38
8
1.81
20
9.69
20
9.26
25
6.18
19
8.39
11
4.17
37
8.82
20
4.91
19
4.37
7
3.29
16
7.37
35
8.58
6
2.71
18
6.81
19
4.60
48
11.93
14
3.19
Logan Express bus
4
1.86
22
10.39
15
3.76
7
3.11
15
5.68
7
1.68
19
4.65
17
3.85
4
2.13
3
1.49
9
2.24
10
4.35
10
3.58
10
2.33
10
2.41
13
3.07
Charter/tour bus
7
3.30
0
0.04
19
8.34
1
0.24
5
1.15
5
1.23
15
3.40
1
0.41
3
0.80
1
0.15
4
0.84
Other
2
1.17
4
1.83
7
1.80
10
4.27
6
2.07
4
0.91
4
0.93
5
1.19
Not sure
3
1.29
6
1.39
3
1.24
3
1.28
2
0.43
1
0.21
1
0.33
Total
210
100.00
215
100.00
411
100.00
227
100.00
267
100.00
416
100.00
404 100.00
436 100.00
E‐64
X Tab 20
Ground Egress Mode by Scheduled Arrival Time (continued)
4 PM
5 PM
Count
Col %
Count
107
22.44
59
12.44
Rental vehicle
54
11.46
Taxicab
97
20.36
39
8.27
10
2.00
Courtesy shuttle
21
4.41
30
6.26
16
3.45
Logan Express bus
26
5.39
11
2.35
Charter/tour bus
2
0.39
1
0.26
Other
2
0.51
Not sure
Total
475
100.00
Col %
146
106
77
120
35
2
20
44
17
22
24
2
1
10
1
628
23.21
16.88
12.20
19.14
5.59
0.38
3.23
7.02
2.74
3.48
3.86
0.36
0.23
1.54
0.15
100.00
6 PM
Count
7 PM
Count
Col %
143
82
41
109
50
1
32
21
25
32
15
11
2
10
1
574
24.97
14.33
7.14
18.97
8.62
0.18
5.53
3.63
4.28
5.62
2.63
1.85
0.30
1.71
0.24
100.00
E‐65
Col %
141
87
31
65
53
5
5
11
14
18
16
7
0
3
2
458
30.73
18.92
6.69
14.22
11.63
1.14
1.14
2.48
3.05
3.83
3.50
1.49
0.07
0.75
0.36
100.00
8 PM
Count
Col %
144
83
33
101
44
2
28
16
18
15
4
6
3
7
3
505
28.46
16.37
6.52
19.99
8.68
0.39
5.46
3.13
3.63
2.95
0.71
1.09
0.55
1.39
0.68
100.00
9 PM
Count
10 PM
Count
Col %
89
66
14
75
24
2
16
7
9
13
2
27.29
20.27
4.40
23.10
7.32
0.46
4.97
2.01
2.89
3.93
0.73
9
2.63
325
100.00
Col %
23.94
19.92
6.10
21.43
9.84
1.14
5.21
2.99
2.76
2.45
1.49
2.21
1
0.27
1
0.25
384 100.00
92
77
23
82
38
4
20
11
11
9
6
9
11 PM
Count
73
51
24
76
20
Col %
24.72
17.39
8.17
25.87
6.73
14
12
10
4
3
1
4.89
4.02
3.51
1.37
0.94
0.29
6
1.94
1
0.18
295 100.00
Total
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1664 24.89
922 13.79
630
9.42
1352 20.23
463
6.93
53
0.79
280
4.19
346
5.17
314
4.70
262
3.92
159
2.38
91
1.36
17
0.25
96
1.44
35
0.53
6684 100.00
X Tab 21
Number of Well Wishers by Terminal
Number of WNone
1
2
3
4
Between 5 and 10
More than 10
Total
Logan Terminal
Total
Col %
Terminal A
Terminal B
Terminal C
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1712
88.82
2293
87.26
2271
84.59
375
85.55
402
78.63
7053
86.12
136
7.07
176
6.69
233
8.69
43
9.83
72
14.17
661
8.07
57
2.97
85
3.22
101
3.75
12
2.71
26
5.12
280
3.42
11
0.57
27
1.03
39
1.44
3
0.67
4
0.86
84
1.02
1
0.07
10
0.38
17
0.62
1
0.18
4
0.82
33
0.40
8
0.43
37
1.41
18
0.68
1
0.28
2
0.35
67
0.81
1
0.08
1
0.02
6
0.22
3
0.79
0
0.05
12
0.14
1928
100.00
2628
100.00
2684
100.00
438
100.00
511
100.00
8189
100.00
E‐66
X Tab 22
Parking Choice by Carrier Type
Carrier Type
Total
Legacy
Low‐cost
International
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
Count
Col %
1548
62.76
1088
72.23
220
77.13
2857
67.07
Private Vehi Driven away by someone else, not
750
30.39
327
21.71
50
17.49
1127
26.45
Parked at airport in terminal garag
Parked at airport in economy lot
92
3.74
55
3.68
10
3.44
158
3.70
Parked in lot off‐airport
77
3.12
36
2.38
6
1.95
118
2.78
Total
2467
100.00
1507
100.00
286
100.00
4260
100.00
E‐67

2010 Boston Logan International Airport Air Passenger

Transcription

Similar documents

LUTHERDALE BIBLE CAMP JULY 21-26, 2013 Calling all 1st

London Airport`s Cloud Based Common Use System

airport shuttle

Untitled - TriaGnoSys

FLY2PIE NEWS - St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport

December 2008

Indian Oil Corporation Limite

Baska Voda Invo.sheet

dixie chopper pro bagger