10-Fudge Point CAMP DNS SEPA

Transcription

A. Background
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fudge Point Classification and Management Plan
2. Name of applicant: Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Michael Hankinson
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
1111 Israel Road SW
Olympia, WA 98504
Phone: (360) 902-8671
TDD: (360) 664-3133
E-mail: [email protected].
4. Date checklist prepared:
April 28, 2015
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
This checklist contains non-project SEPA analysis, which includes preliminary recommendations for
land classifications and long-term boundaries for Fudge Point.
Washington State Parks held three public workshops throughout the planning process for this
property.
§
Public workshop was held, October 27, 2013, Mason County Public Utility District 3, 2621
East Johns Prairie Road, Shelton WA. The purpose of the workshop was to identify issues
important to the public.
§
Public workshop was held Wednesday, January 28, 2015, at the Harstine Island Community
Club, 2271 E Harstine Island Road North, Harstine Island. The workshop presented
alternatives to resolve issues identified at the previous workshop and receive public
comment.
§
The final public workshop was held on April 1, 2015, at the Harstine Island Community Club,
2271 East Harstine Island Rd North, Harstine Island. The workshop presented preliminary
recommendations and discussed public comment.
Fudge Point Property Land Classification and Long-Term Boundary Environmental Checklist
Page 1 of 67
Advance notice was provided to a contact list of people that expressed an interest in the
process. To develop the contact list, staff:
§ Sent 944 E-mails to former park visitors.
§ Mailed letters to neighbors and other stakeholders.
§ Distributed news releases to local newspapers and radio stations.
§ Wrote letters to elected officials, tribes, and other government staff.
The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (Commission) will take action on a
staff recommendation for long-term boundaries and land classifications at its regularly
scheduled meeting July 23rd in Poulsbo, WA. Individuals interested in commenting on this
action may do so through this SEPA review, or may provide comments directly to the
Commission at the meeting. If the final recommendation is significantly different than the
preliminary recommendation, an addendum to this SEPA checklist and determination will be
filed. The July Commission meeting will be held in Poulsbo City Hall in Poulsbo, Washington.
The exact location is 200 Moe Street, Poulsbo WA, 98370. Commission meetings are scheduled
to begin at 9:00 am, however this proposed item is not yet scheduled.
7.
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Yes. This SEPA checklist analyzes the foreseeable impacts associated with the Commission’s
adoption of proposed staff recommendations for the land classification plan and long-term
boundary for Fudge Point. The Commission’s decision will provide policy direction to staff, and
begin the agency’s focus on completing tasks identified through that direction.
A draft management plan for Fudge Point has been developed to implement the Commission's
proposed land classifications and long-term boundary. The management plan is an
administrative document that will be approved by the Director when finalized. The plan will be
reviewed under SEPA as a non-project action. The draft plan will be available to any interested
parties on the Commission’s website: http://www.parks.wa.gov.896/Fudge-Point-Planning
Any future project actions are dependent upon securing adequate funding and regulatory
approvals. Additional SEPA documentation will be prepared for any specific project actions at
such time developments are proposed.
8. List any environmental information you know that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal:
§
National Costal Wetland Conservation Grant Application FY 2013, July 29 2012
§
Federal Emergency Management Agency flood maps. March, 2015.
§
National Wetland Inventory GIS data. March, 2015.
§
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). March, 2015. Web Soil Survey Data
Page 2 of 67
system research for the Fudge Point State Park area.
§
Washington Department of Natural Resources. Fudge Point State Park area.
§
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007 Priority Habitats and
Species Program data system search for Fudge Point State Park area.
§
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2006 Priority Habitats and
Species Program. http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htm.
§
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 1998. Cultural Resources
Management Policy.
§
Literature reviews for historic and archaeological surveys and significant sites for each
park included in the Fudge Point State Park CAMP were conducted. Consultation
with Native American Tribal officials and the Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation also occurred as part of the CAMP planning process.
§
Luttrell, Charles T., 2015 Fudge Point State Park Property – Cultural Resources Study
for a Classification and Management Plan (CAMP) Process and Potential Development
Areas, Mason County, Washington. Washington State Parks and Recreation
Commission, Olympia.
§
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Trust for Public Lands, 901 5th Ave 1520
Seattle WA, 98162. Kane Environmental 3815 Woodland Park Ave North Suit 102.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known:
Approval by the Commission is required for the project and non-project actions.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe
certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead
agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)
Fudge Point is located on the east side of Harstine Island in South Puget Sound, Mason County
near the town of Shelton. Currently, State Parks owns and manages 136 acres with over 3,000 feet
of saltwater shoreline. The property slopes north and east, towards Case Inlet. Elevation of the
site ranges from approximately 160 feet above mean sea level to sea level. Portions of the
property are tidelands. Steep bluffs are present on the eastern side of the property. The uplands
were heavily logged in the mid-1980s. There is no infrastructure at the park with the exception of
Page 3 of 67
a 1.5 mile two-track entry road that historically served as a logging road. This alignment provides
access from East Ballow Road to the low-bank shoreline.
Washington State Parks is in the final stages of completing a land-use planning project for this
property. The planning project, also known as Classification and Management Planning (CAMP),
addresses overall visitor experiences, natural and cultural resource management, long-term
property boundary decisions (acquiring and/or surplus land, as well as other land management
agreements, etc.), defining use and upgrading existing park facilities, and other topics of interest to
the community and park visitors.
The CAMP process sought input from the public including members of the local community,
organizations, governmental agencies (Mason County, Washington Department of Natural
Resources, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Squaxin Island Tribe, Nisqually Indian
Tribe, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, other entities and organizations, Audubon Society, Bureau of
Reclamation, Army Corps of Engineers) and State Parks staff. Through public meetings
different land classification and long-term boundary alternatives were evaluated and a
preliminary recommendation was developed.
The review for this proposal will be phased. “Phased review” means the coverage of general
matters in broader analysis (WAC197-11-776). Phased review will allow State Parks to focus on
decisions regarding the proposed land classification designations and long-term boundary. This is
the first phase of environmental analysis for the Fudge Point State Park. Subsequent Phases will
include environmental analysis for specific project actions at such time developments or other
actions are proposed. Further phases may include capital projects, implementation of the
management plan objectives, and other facility improvements.
This proposal seeks Commission approval of:
1) A long-term park boundary for Fudge Point: The long-term boundary of the park
represents areas which the agency deems desirable for management consistent with
the park’s mission.
2) Specific land classifications, or zoning, for Fudge Point: The purpose of Land
Classification is to provide general policy guidance for staff on appropriate management
and use of land holdings in the parks for recreational activities and developments. The
land classification system was revised in October 1995, and is codified under WAC 35216.
Land ClassificationWithin the long-term boundary, staff developed recommendation for classification of the parks
and park areas. Land classification is like internal zoning for the parks and provides internal
guidance on appropriate uses and developments within each classification. Land classification
is regulated by WAC 352-16-020. Although all land classifications were considered for Fudge
Page 4 of 67
Point, the State Parks’ classifications proposed for the property includes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Recreational areas are suited and/or developed for high-intensity outdoor
recreational use, conference, cultural and/or educational centers, or other
uses serving large numbers of people.
Resource Recreation areas are suited and/or developed for natural and/or
cultural resource-based medium-intensity and low-intensity outdoor
recreation use.
Natural Areas are areas designated for preservation, restoration, and
interpretation of natural process and/or features of significant ecological,
geological or paleontological value while providing for low-intensity outdoor
recreation activities as subordinate uses (See Appendix B and C).
Appropriate land classifications were identified by State Park staff through a public planning
process. The preliminary recommendations for the parks were chosen to provide a high level of
protection to the parks’ natural and cultural resources while considering current and future
recreational uses and opportunities.
The proposal classifies State Parks’ land, and certain adjacent public and private holdings
within each park and/or park areas as potential additions to the State Parks’ system. Also, the
proposal identifies State Parks’ land that may be appropriate for surplus. Use limitations
imposed by specific classifications are discussed further in this document. Within the proposed
long-term boundary, there are properties that State Parks may be interested in co-managing or
acquiring. All options will be subject to future decisions by the Commission and further SEPA
analysis.
Maps of the vicinity and preliminary recommendations for the land classification and long-term
boundary for Fudge Point State Park are provided in Appendix A. Please note that the color coding
of the classification types is as follows: Recreation (reddish color), Resource Recreation (bluish
color), and Natural (orange color). The half tones of those colors describe the land classification for
lands that are not owned by State Parks, but will be included in the final staff recommendation to
the Commission (See Appendix C).
Preliminary staff recommendations:
· The long-term boundary would include an approximate additional 60 acres located
adjacent to existing park lands, west. All existing land will be retained. Two parcels
west of the property are in the long term boundary. The property will primarily be
classified as a Resource Recreation area punctuated with smaller proportions of land
reserved for Recreation and Natural Areas. Specifically, Resource Recreation includes
160 acres and is characterized by the east beach, feeder bluffs, and a portion of
uplands, wetlands, and ravines. Recreation includes 20 acres of uplands that are
centrally located, relatively flat, and previously disturbed. Additionally, one acre of
Page 5 of 67
upland is reserved for recreational beach access. The Natural Area includes ten acres
associated with the lagoon system and north beach at Fudge Point which provide
critical habitat for sand lance and surf smelt, a food source for sensitive salmonid
species. Resource Recreation classification was chosen to protect critical natural
features and systems associated with the lagoon and feeder bluffs while providing for
appropriate passive recreational opportunities. The Recreational Area classification was
chosen to allow for high intensity uses for large gatherings of people. The Natural Area
classification was chosen to maximize protection of the north shoreline lagoon and
mouth of the unnamed stream. It limits development while allowing for some low
intensity recreation use that is subordinate natural systems.
Concepts for several new construction projects at Fudge Point State Park are included in the
preliminary recommendations and management plan. Development, however, will depend upon
future funding and permitting while subsequent environmental analysis will reveal if a specific
project may proceed. The following discussion explains more about potential projects.
Circulation System
Vehicular Circulation: The existing entrance road serves as the central spine of development with
all of the proposed facilities physically connected to it. Beginning at Buffington’s Corner on East
Ballow Road, the one and a half mile long entrance road to Fudge Point is aligned to take
advantage of the path of least resistance, a relatively flat route that avoids the ravines and
wetlands that cross the property diagonally. Today, the entrance road is a two-track dirt/gravel
road in fair condition.
The entrance road will be widened to allow for two-way traffic, surfaced with asphalt, and include
bike lanes. This two-way traffic segment will be about one mile in length and terminate in the dayuse parking lot, centrally located within the property.
The parking lot will serve as a central node of activity for park visitors. It will be large enough to
accommodate summer peak visitation and provide additional parking for school buses. The parking
lot will be surfaced with an appropriate material. It will be designed to convey storm water to
allow for the recharge back into the water table to ensure good water quality from the parking lot
into Puget Sound.
From here the road continues down slope, leading to a small two-stall American with Disabilities
Act (ADA) compliant parking lot located near the beach. The entrance road also serves as a
pedestrian walk way, ADA car access and as a drop off area for all park visitors. The road then
continues uphill to the central parking lot.
Apart from bicycle lanes integrated with the entrance road, bicycle and pedestrian trail
development will promote wellness, provide access, and protect habitat. In some cases, trails may
be aligned into ecologically sensitive locations in effort to prevent unintended development of
social trails in potentially hazardous or environmentally sensitive areas. Through intentional
Page 6 of 67
design, trail systems can be aligned that are safe, provide protection to sensitive natural areas, and
also provide an opportunity for interpretive education. Trails will be integrated into the landscape
with some segments appearing more refined or developed than others depending on their
purpose, location, and popularity. Some trails will be wider to allow for people or bicycles to pass
each other, or by contrast, more narrow for single purpose use in remote areas. Future trails will
be surfaced with a variety of appropriate and compatible materials such as native soil, gravel,
concrete or asphalt depending upon design requirements.
In addition, bicycle lanes may be needed many years from now to link the northwest corner of the
Scott property with Fudge Point. This concept will only be realized as a partnership between State
Parks and Mason County. A demonstrable need for this kind of amenity is required.
In the future a trail plan will be required to more fully understand potential alignments, purpose,
and materials.
Day-use Development
Comfort Stations: Future planning will reveal where to best locate comfort stations. The design
will consider key criteria such as location, where people gather, where drain fields can be
constructed, and size based on projected capacity. Larger scale comfort stations will be
constructed in the vicinity of the camp ground and day use parking lot. A small-scale comfort
station will be located closer to the beach in close proximity to the ADA parking stalls. The purpose
of a comfort station near the water is to provide a convenient location for visitors, while also
protecting water quality.
Beach Access: The access point is located along the existing entrance road. Favorable topography
coupled with an existing access road provides an opportunity to install a small scale, ADA
compliant ramp to link the uplands with the beach.
Interpretive Installations: In the future, interpretive signs and information kiosks will be integrated
into a trail plan to provide more information to visitors about Fudge Point.
Picnic Shelters: Picnic shelters are constructed for a variety of reasons. They serve as central
nodes of activity for school groups to gather, weddings, and for public and family events.
Sometimes larger scale shelters include electricity, water, and tables as amenities. On the other
hand, shelters can be smaller in scale and provide protection for a single picnic table. Both scales
could be appropriate at Fudge Point.
Other: Over time, other facilities not described in this document may be required to operate the
park. This is why a master plan is the key next step in the development of Fudge Point. All future
proposals will be thoroughly designed and vetted through applicable environmental regulations.
Over Night Facilities:
1. Camp Host Site: A camp host site allows volunteers to spend extended lengths of time at
Page 7 of 67
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Fudge Point. The benefit of a volunteer is immeasurable. They make visitor contact, aide
park rangers, and monitor the park. Volunteers sometimes engage in various operation
tasks with park rangers.
Campground: A small-scale campground is proposed for about 25 campsites. A small
campground is appropriate for the overall size of the park and allows for a wider range of
state residence to enjoy the park. The campsites will include electrical hookups to
accommodate recreation vehicle (RV) access. Camping will be limited to the uplands, away
from the water and ravines, to ensure protection of the property wilds character and views
of the park as seen from the water.
Cabins: A small number of cabins would allow visitors who do not have camping equipment
the ability to experience the park. Cabins also provide the potential for revenue
generation.
Administrative Facilities: Administrative facilities will be scaled to meet the level of
intensity of day use and overnight development. For example, a day use facility may not
require a visitor contact station or other administrative buildings such as a shop/garage or
vehicle yard. On the other hand, if an overnight facility is built, there will be justification for
a greater staff presence and as a result administrative building in support of these uses is
appropriate.
Visitor Contact Station: A facility such as this serves the dual purpose of housing park
office space and as a single point to provide information.
Interpretive Plan: Fudge Point provides low bank access to the water while offering
outstanding views of Mount Rainier and the Kitsap Peninsula. Today, the beach appears
wild and undeveloped with driftwood embedded into the beach, encircling a brackish
lagoon system that abuts the steep hillside behind it. This beautiful location, however, is
also home to successful aquaculture activities occurring on adjacent, privately owned
tidelands. Northwest of the property, private land owners in Harstine Island’s Ballow
community also have commercial shellfish growing operations that farm geoduck and
oysters. The development of an interpretive plan that educates visitors about the many
resources and recreation opportunities at Fudge Point is proposed to ensure no harm to
this commercial operation and to promote respect for natural systems and resources.
12.
Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to
this checklist.
Please see vicinity maps included in Appendix C.
·
Fudge Point State Park is located on the east side of Harstine Island in South Puget
Sound, Mason County near the town of Shelton: Section 7; Township 20N; Range
2W. Coordinates for this site are Latitude 47ᵒ 14’5.48” and Longitude -122ᵒ
Page 8 of 67
51’25.758”.
B.
Environmental Elements
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other:
Currently, State Parks owns and manages 136 acres with over 3,000 feet of saltwater shoreline.
The U.S. geological Survey (USGS), Longbranch, Washington 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Map indicates the property elevation ranges from approximately 160 feet above mean sea level to
sea level. Portions of the property are tidelands. The property slopes north and east, towards Case
Inlet. Steep bluffs are present on the eastern side of the property (See appendix). Groundwater
beneath the upland, forested portion of the property is 160 to 200 feet below ground surface.
Shallow groundwater flow is likely similar to surface topography and flows north and east.
b. What is the steepest slope in the site (approximate percent slope)?
Slopes vary throughout the property from flats to ravines and feeder bluffs. The Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS), web soil survey indicates Fudge Point State Park consists primarily of
Sinclair shotty loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)?
If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of
long term commercial significance and weather the proposal result in removing any of these
soils.
Harstine Island is located in an area of solid deposits and land features deposited during the
Pleistocene Epoch which began approximately 1.5 million years ago. Soil characteristics in the
Puget Sound Basin and, therefore, in vicinity of the site generally consist of glacial till deposited by
the Vashon Glacier. Glacial till is a mixture of sand and gravel with silt and clay. Sinclair soils are
moderately well drained, with very low to moderately low permeability. Observations of the bluffs
at the eastern edge of the property indicate that the property is underlain by sand and gravelly
soils. No agricultural lands will be impacted by this proposal.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
Yes. The NRCS Soil Surveys for the Mason County Area (March 11, 2015) indicate that Harstine
gravelly ashy sandy loam, (15 to 30 percent slopes) and Kitsap silt loam, (5 to 15 percent slopes)
are present near in the feeder bluff area of the property. Both have a slope erodibility with a
numerical rating of .50. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings
are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the
point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the specified aspect of forestland
management (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). These soils
are located within ravines and feeder bluffs and away from any anticipated future development.
Page 9 of 67
Future project proposals will include appropriate location, sustainable design, and implementation
of Washington Department of Ecology’s Best Management Practices to prevent and reduce erosion
and landslide activity.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No fill or grading activities are proposed for the non-project action elements of this proposal.
Other future project actions associated with the preliminary recommendations and management
plan for Fudge Point Property State Park may result in filling or grading. Future project actions will
be analyzed to ensure minimization of environmental impacts and implementation of Best
Management Practices.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
This proposal will not result in erosive activities. Land classification designations will consider
potential sensitive geological hazard areas, existing areas where disturbance has already occurred,
and where erosion is unlikely. Future project actions will include appropriate location, sustainable
design, and implementation of Washington Department of Ecology’s Best Management Practices
to prevent and reduce erosion and landslide activities.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
None for this action. Other future activities may result in the development of impervious surfaces.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
As stated above, staff considered sensitive geological hazard areas and existing developed areas
when developing land classifications. Areas with known erosion hazards were classified
appropriately to limit development and protect geologic resources while providing lower intensity
recreational opportunities.
Development will be limited within shorelines of the state to provide ADA compliant car parking
and beach access, interpretive and directional signage, and a toilet facility to insure protection of
water quality. In addition, State Parks has classified the park in a manner that concentrates
development of new facilities to the most appropriate upland areas of the park and away from
sensitive natural resources. As previously stated situations could occur wherein pedestrian trails
may be aligned into ecologically sensitive locations in effort to prevent unintended development of
social trails in potentially hazardous or environmentally sensitive areas. This will be done though
intentional design so that these systems can be aligned in a manner that is safe, provides
protection to sensitive Natural Areas, and also an opportunity for interpretive education.
No further measures to reduce or control erosion are included in this non-project proposal. Future
project actions will be in appropriate locations to avoid geologic hazards, incorporate sustainable
design, and implement the Washington Department of Ecology’s Best Management Practices to
Page 10 of 67
prevent and reduce erosion and landslide activity.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantiles, if known.
None for this action. Minor exhaust and brief dust emissions (particulate matter) could be
expected in the event of future developments at State Parks property. Future expansions of park
facilities including campgrounds may result in the addition of fire rings (grills) within the campsites
and picnic areas. These amenities could increase emissions and impact air quality. However, State
Parks will continue to operate its parks in a manner consistent with local fire departments’ fire
windows/restrictions and comply with air quality standards.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor, which may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emission, or other impacts to the earth, if any.
No measures to reduce or control emissions are included within this action.
3. Water
a. Surface
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including yearround and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Yes. Fudge Point Property State Park is adjacent to Case Inlet on Puget Sound. There is also an
unnamed stream that is a least partially fed by springs, flowing through the property that feeds the
lagoon system and empties into Puget Sound’s Case Inlet on the northern portion of the park.
In addition, the National Wetland Inventory’s GIS Database indicates (insert wetland type(s))
wetland(s) occur within Fudge Point Property State Park.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No work over, in, or adjacent to the described waters is required for this action. Land classification
designations for the parks incorporate the consideration of sensitive shoreline environments. The
proposed classifications for areas adjacent to the water bodies described above provide a high
level of protection to the parks’ sensitive shoreline environments while considering recreation use
and opportunities. Future project actions may occur within 200 feet of the above-noted water
bodies. Any future project actions shall be consistent with the designated land classifications and
Page 11 of 67
permitted uses for such areas outlined in the Washington State Parks Land Classification and Use
Matrix, Appendix A.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
No fill or dredge material is required for this action. Staff classified the park lands to emphasize
appropriate management and to limit future uses of sensitive areas such as surface water, and
wetlands. Future project actions shall be consistent with the designated land classifications and
allowed uses.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose and approximate quantities if known.
No surface water withdrawal or diversions are required for this non-project action,
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe
the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will result from this action. Staff classified the
parks to emphasize appropriate management and future uses of sensitive areas such as surface
waters or wetlands. Future project action within the designated areas will be consistent with the
respective land classification and allowed uses policies. In addition, future project actions will
ensure compliance and implementation of Ecology’s Best Management Practices.
b. Ground Water
1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give
a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the
well. Will was water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and
approximate quantities if known.
No groundwater will be withdrawn or discharged as a result of this action. Future development
activities could involve investigation to determine the potential for domestic wells for park
purposes. Future development of potential wells would be toughly designed and vetted through
local, state, and federal regulations and standards.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals...
agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of such systems, the number of houses to be served
(if applicable) or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
This is a non-project action. Future project actions may result in discharges into the ground (e.g.
new septic/sewer systems). Potential sources of new discharge will be associated with the drain
fields from septic systems included in the installation of flush comfort stations (restrooms), within
Page 12 of 67
the park.
c. Water Runoff (including stormwater)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe.
No surface water runoff will be generated by this action. In the event of future development of
State Parks property, stormwater would be collected, treated and disposed of, in a manner that
emphasizes the agency’s commitment to stewardship and sustainability and in accordance with
state and local government stormwater regulations and Best Management Practices.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No waste material will enter ground or surface waters as a result of this action. Future project
actions will incorporate appropriate stormwater management techniques to treat surface water
runoff prior to entering ground or surface waters.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so,
describe.
This is a non-project action. Future development may alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in
the immediate vicinity. Proposed development would only occur in Recreational or Resource
Recreation areas.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drain pattern
impacts, if any.
This is a non-project action. Future project actions will include measures that follow local, state,
and federal government storm water regulations and other best management practices.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ______
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _______
shrubs:
grass:
pasture
crop or grain
orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _____
water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other _______
other types of vegetation: Fudge Point uplands consist of mixed conifer and
deciduous forest that support highly functioning wetlands and small
streams. The uplands were last logged in the mid-1980s and as a result
Page 13 of 67
many disturbance regime plants have established in the logged areas which
are today dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra) and big leaf maple (Acer
macrophyllum) trees. Closer to the bluffs a wider array of vegetation
includes Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii), and Western redcedar (Thuja plicata) which typically overhang
the upper beach and in many places extend laterally eastward over the
beach for 20 feet or more.
Riparian understory shrubs common along the shore include sword fern
(Polystichum munitum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), evergreen huckleberry
(Vaccinium ovatum), and low Oregon-grape (Mahonia nervosa). This
overhanging vegetation has long been known to contribute important
organic material (leaves, sticks, and twigs) to the marine environment.
The lagoon receives freshwater inputs from two streams. A sand spit
surrounds the lagoon with characteristic backshore vegetation dominated
by dunegrass (Leymus mollis) along the waterward edge of the spit.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None for this action. Future development activities or management actions may result in the
removal or alteration of native and non-native vegetation and will require consistency with the
Washington State Parks land classification and use matrix.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
A review of the Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
Database on March 11, 2015, indicates that giant chain fern (Woodwardia fimbriata), a State
sensitive plant species occurs within or nearby the Fudge Point State Park property.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any.
This is non-project action. Future project actions may include measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation and/or such measures could be included in development plans. Native plants would be
required for future landscaping.
Land Classification designation for the park(s) takes into consideration the condition and extent of
existing vegetation. The highly sensitive lagoon area will be classified as Natural Area. This
designation provides a high level of protection for the vegetation communities and natural
resources by restricting high intensity recreational use. All other areas are designated as either
Resource Recreation or Recreation.
Additional surveys could be conducted for rare plants, as needed, for any significant land
disturbing activities associated with future development or restoration activities. Management
planning will implement techniques to minimize resource impacts or enhance areas currently
Page 14 of 67
degraded. Parks staff will review management plans to assure recreational uses will not unduly
impact sensitive species. Park staff will also seek help from resource agencies and others to
enhance these existing native vegetation communities and limit activities which might degrade
rare plant communities. In addition, park staff will update the park plans for controlling noxious
species within the park, focusing in particular on areas where sensitive species are present.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive plants known to be on or near the site.
Much of the property was logged during the mid-80s and today is predominately a disturbance
regime characterized by alder (Alnus rubra) big leaf maple (Acer macrophylla), and madrone
(arbutus menziesii). Some invasive species are present throughout the park including English holly
(ilex aquifolium), Himalayan blackberry (rubus armeniacus), and scots broom (cytisus scoparius).
Others may exist.
5. Animals
a. List and birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site. Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: cougar, deer, bear, coyote, muskrat, otter,
rabbit, chipmunk, squirrel, skunk, raccoon, weasel, opossum and porcupine.
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Fudge Point is highly productive habitat
for many creatures. According to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat
Program’s Priority Habitat Species (PHS) database indicates that seabird colonies (Pigeon
guillemot); seal/sea lion haulout where pupping occurs seasonally; Bald eagle nests; hardshell
intertidal clam, Pacific oyster, and subtidal Geoduck habitat; Rock sole and Sand Lance spawning
area; herring holding area, all occur within proximity of the property with the lagoon serving as the
central core habitat in support of these animals.
The tidelands are rich with shellfish, seabirds, and marine animals. The abundant shellfish
species include mussels (Mytilus sp.); geoduck (Panope abrupta); and horse clams (Resus
nuttalli, T. capax), manila (Venerupis philippinarum), butter (Saxidonus gigantean), and native
littleneck (Photothaca staminea) clams. The riparian zone along the marine shoreline of the
property reflects the underlying shoreline geology.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Analysis of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitats and
Species Program (PHS) lists found identified coastal salt marshes, a priority habitat, within the
park. Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and sea lion (Zalophus californianus) haulouts, which are
priority habitats, were identified within one mile. Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) a
Federal Species of Concern, was also identified within one mile.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) indicates that the following threatened or endangered
species may occur within Mason County: Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Chinook salmon
Page 15 of 67
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), and steelhead (Oncorhynchus
mykiss) (USFWS 2007).
No other threatened or endangered species are known to exist within the project area.
FE= Federal Endangered
FT= Federal Threatened
SE= State Endangered
ST= State Threatened
SC= State Species of Concern/ Candidate
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, Fudge Point State Park lies within the Pacific Flyway. It is also associated with the annual
migration route for the salmonid species listed above.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
Proposed land classifications consider existing PHS data on known fish and wildlife resources. Using
information such as this, State Parks will balance the needs of the recreating public with wildlife
habitat conservation by locating potential intensive recreational developments and uses out of
sensitive areas where possible within the parks. The Recreation Area classifications allows for
facility development in existing disturbed areas and/or in a manner to avoid compromising the
wildlife management of the parks. Other proposed measures include consultations with
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) habitat biologists and implementing
recommended management guidelines for priority species. In addition, State Parks will participate
in site specific restoration/enhancement projects/proposals. Any future development actions will
be reviewed in consultation with WDFW, and other regulatory agencies as appropriate. Biological
assessments will be conducted as required and potential mitigation measures will be identified for
any listed species which could be affected by project actions. Additional baseline resource surveys,
inventories, and monitoring will help guide park management activities through the further
identification of sensitive species and priority habitats.
e. List any invasive animals species known to be on or near the site.
No animal surveys have yet been conducted for this property.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
etc.
None for this non-project action. Future project actions may result in electricity or solar power to
meet energy needs for recreation facilities.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
None for this action. Should future development occur, it is unlikely that the potential use of solar
Page 16 of 67
energy by adjacent properties would be impacted.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List
other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any.
None for this action. Future projects will include energy conservation measures consistent with
Washington State Parks Sustainability Policy, the agency’s Sustainability Plan, and park specific
Integrated Sustainability Plan.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
None for this action. Future projects will follow Washington State Department of Ecology’s Best
Management Practices to limit the potential for environmental health hazards.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
There are no known possible areas of contamination on the property. Historically the property’s
only use was for timber extraction.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemical/conditions that might affect project development and
design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located
within the project area and in the vicinity.
There are no existing hazardous chemical/conditions on this property.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the
project’s development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project.
This is a non-project action. Currently no plans exist for future proposals that will include the use
of toxic or hazardous chemicals at any time during the construction or operating life of the project.
4) Describe special emergency service that might be required.
No additional or special emergency services are needed for this action. Future project actions
may require additional police, fire, and medical services. Park staff has limited training in
emergency services and are qualified to provide a certain amount of those services.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
This is a non-project action. Future developments would be subject to appropriate regulatory
controls to abate health hazards.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Page 17 of 67
None for this action.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a shortterm or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what
hours noise would come from the site.
No changes in type or level of noise are anticipated as a result of this action. Future developments
could cause a temporary increase in noise associated with traffic, recreational uses, and heavy
equipment operation. Land classifications consider potential noise impacts when designating areas
for higher intensity uses and development. Those designations typically occur within existing
developed areas or are buffered by vegetated corridors to reduce noise impacts on neighboring
land uses.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any.
None for this action. Noise impacts caused by future project actions will be controlled by using
best management practices during construction, and enforcing quiet hours in the state parks.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Fudge Point is a state park property currently held for future development. There is a potential for
a mixture of recreational activities including hiking, biking, fishing, camping and more. Adjacent
properties are used for forestry, residences, recreation, open space, private and commercial
aquatic aquaculture, and fish & wildlife habitat.
Future development proposals will not affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties.
State parks underwent a rigorous public planning process which resulted in a management plan to
mitigate the development of the park. A number of management strategies were developed with
adjacent land owners who farm shellfish (Appendix A).
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how
many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will e converted to nonfarm or non-forest use?
Historically the Fudge Point property was used for timber extraction, however, the land is currently
zoned RR5 which, as a park, is consistent with this management proposal for future development.
Please note that establishment of an RV compatible campground will require a zoning change to
“Rural Tourist Campground.”
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and
harvesting? If so, how?
Shellfish aquaculture adjacent to the property is compatible with the future development
Page 18 of 67
proposals outlined in this document. Park visitors will be educated to avoid private lands and bed
lands which are used for shellfish farming.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
There are no structures on the property.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No. There are no structures at Fudge Point.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The zoning classification for this property is RR5
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current comprehensive plan designation for the Fudge Point area is Rural Lands.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Mason County is currently updating their Shoreline Master Plan. The current proposed shoreline
master program designation for this site is Conservancy.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "critical” area? If so, please specify.
Mason county GIS data indicates the presence of unnamed streams and wetlands on the
property.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
N/A. There is currently no one residing on the property. State Parks may someday develop future
plans to develop residences, but nothing is planned in association with this action.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/A. This completed project will not displace anyone. There are no residences on the property.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
None for this action.
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses
and plans, if any.
Local governments will receive a copy of this checklist and have the opportunity to offer further
comment on consistency with existing and projected land use plans. At this time, the proposal
appears to be compatible with existing and projected land uses & plans. State Parks staff will
continue to work closely with local planning officials as the CAMP project is implemented.
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest
lands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
Future development proposals are compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of longerFudge Point Property Land Classification and Long-Term Boundary Environmental Checklist
Page 19 of 67
term commercial significance. State parks underwent a rigorous public planning process which
resulted in a management plan to mitigate the development of the park. A number of
management strategies were developed with the adjacent land owners who farm shellfish. Future
proposals will not impact adjacent forestry activities. (Appendix A).
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or
low income housing.
N/A. Future project actions may include additional housing units for park staff.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle
or low income housing.
N/A.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts if any.
N/A. No impacts to housing will occur from this action.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
N/A. Future project actions, developed with a master plan, will determine questions such as this.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/A. Future project actions may affect views in the immediate vicinity. However, the land
classification system was applied to preserve/protect view-sheds from within the park and from
adjacent properties towards the park.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any.
Future project actions will be guided by design standards developed to minimize potential visual
impacts through the use of appropriate building materials, colors, sizes, shapes, and other design
elements, such as landscaping. Future project actions will be consistent with adopted land
classifications. Preservation and enhancement of existing visual characteristics of the park could be
accomplished through a variety of means including: formal view shed analysis, undergrounding of
utilities, restoration of degraded sites, sensitive placement of more intrusive facilities (such as
service yards and buildings) to more shielded locations, and through the use of landscape
buffering.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Page 20 of 67
N/A. Future project actions may result in an increase in the number of exterior lights within the
developed areas of the parks should additional development activities occur. Also, there may be an
increase in light produced from motor vehicles, buildings, campfires, recreational vehicles, etc.,
during the evening hours.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
N/A. Future project actions may increase light produced from campfires, recreational vehicles,
cabins and other buildings when it is dark.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any.
N/A. Future project actions will be guided by design standards that include measures to reduce
and control light and glare impacts, such as down lighting (special light fixtures to limit light “wash”
and planned landscaping to limit light and glare intrusion on the landscape). In addition, the
designation of Fudge Point State Park will preserve existing forested vegetation, buffering any
light sources produced from park structures.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
State parks are classified using the Washington State Parks Land Classification System.
Recreational facilities and uses are permitted as described in the attached Land Classification
Matrix (See Appendix B and C). There are currently no formal recreation opportunities at Fudge
Point. Some trail hiking opportunities exist. There are four other State Parks within in five
miles that offer a multitude of recreational opportunities. Please visit Washington State Parks’
website www.parks.wa.gov for more information on recreational opportunities.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
N/A. Classification of Fudge Point State Park will guide development to allow for recreation. The
proposed land classifications support current uses and facilities.
Future project actions at Fudge Point State Park may displace recreational uses in the short-term.
In general, recreational opportunities will increase; especially hiking, biking, beach access and
other overnight accommodations.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any.
The purpose of classifying land within the parks is to allow for, and enhance, appropriate
recreational values and uses, in balance with natural and cultural stewardship responsibilities.
Specific considerations should include recreational potential such as developing day-use areas,
campgrounds, trails, etc.
Page 21 of 67
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are of 45 years old,
listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near
the site? If so, specifically describe.
Washington State Parks’ archaeologists have conducted a literature of records on file at State
Parks and the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Show no archaeological or
historic sites are recorded on the Fudge Point Property.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts or
areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted
at the site to identify such resources.
A review of records on file at State Parks and the Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation shows no archaeological or historic sites are recorded within Fudge Point. A
pedestrian survey was conducted on site during which no landmarks, features, or other evidence
of Indian historic use or occupation were identified other than a historic logging road which is not
considered significant (Luttrell 2015).
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of
Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
Assessment methods including a cultural resources pedestrian survey of development areas at the
Fudge Point property, background research to document past land-uses (including pre-contact,
historic, and modern), and review of databases compiled by the Washington State Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia.
d. Proposed measure to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to
resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
Washington State Parks’ archaeologists have conducted literature reviews for historic and
archaeological significant sites for previous projects to identify cultural and historical resources and
provide management recommendations. No historic or cultural resources were found. State Parks
has communicated with Native American tribal officials during the planning process to understand
any culturally significant sites in the planning area.
If and when capital developments are undertaken within Fudge Point, State Parks will undertake
cultural resource assessments consistent with agency policy, Governor’s Executive Orders, and all
applicable state and federal regulations. Additionally, future contract specifications for any new
construction activities will contain provisions regarding the protection of cultural resources in
compliance with Chapter 27.44 RCW and Chapter 27.53 RCW and the rules and regulations of the
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). None required as there are no
significant cultural resources present.
Page 22 of 67
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Fudge Point is accessed via Highway 101; State Route 3; Pickering Road; North Island Drive;
Harstine Island Road North; East Ballow Road. Future access will not change.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Fudge Point is not currently served by public transit. The closest public transportation facility is a
park and ride/Mason Transit bus station located approximately seven miles north west of the
property at the intersection of State Route 3 and Pickering Road.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
Future project actions will include the construction of additional parking spaces for recreational
purposes. This parking will be vetted through a master planning process and likely a traffic study
will be required to inform that process. Any proposal will be reviewed under all applicable local,
state, and federal regulations.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or improvements to existing roads, streets,
pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally
describe (indicate whether public or private).
A 1.5 mile long road logging road currently provides access into and through the park, terminating
on the water. In the event of future developments on State Parks property, road improvements
will be necessary and will be reviewed through a design process.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air
transportation? If so, generally describe
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what will the percentage of the volume
would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
The proposed land classification is not anticipated to generate new vehicle trips. Future project
actions will be vetted through a master planning process and a traffic study will be required to
inform that process.
g. will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so generally describe.
No.
Page 23 of 67
D.
SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Land classifications will serve to guide continuing development and use of the state parks.
Recreational uses will increase throughout the property. State Parks considered impacts to water
and air, and impacts caused by the production of noise when classifying the park. Natural
classifications were considered for environmentally sensitive or significant resource areas that
would be impacted by intensive recreation, or for the purpose of providing a high level of
stewardship and resource protection within the parks. State Parks staff realizes that if recreational
uses are not properly managed it is possible that environmental impacts would increase in areas
classified as Recreation. Increased use would probably require additional structures and
infrastructure to control impacts. The proposed land classifications direct staff to consider
sensitive natural resource areas when determining proposed project areas. Additional
development could result in a net increase in impervious surfaces associated with buildings, hard
trails and parking areas. Such development could cause a localized increase in stormwater
discharges. Likewise, it is likely that increased motorized uses would cause a minor localized
increase in emissions. Increased human use of the park could cause a net increase in human
waste, emissions, and noise levels above that which currently exists. Washington Department of
Ecology’s Best Management Practice’s will be implemented for all future projects to prevent and
reduce impacts to the environment resulting from proposed project construction.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Future development and use will follow the guidelines of the underlying land classification.
Management planning will be required to minimize impacts. Management planning will guide
development within the park based on policies adopted by the Commission through land
classification efforts. Future projects will include appropriate location, sustainable design, and
energy conservation measures consistent with Washington State Parks Sustainability Policy,
the agency’s Sustainability Plan, and a park specific Integrated Sustainability Plan. In general,
any future developments on State Parks property will be designed and sited out of sensitive
floodplains, and/or so that stormwater runoff is directed to grassy swales for biofiltration and
infiltration. All future development will be in compliance with local government stormwater
regulations and Best Management Practices. Additional sanitary facilities could be installed.
Such facilities would be routinely maintained and waste either treated on-site or taken to an
approved waste treatment plant for disposal. Future technological advances and increased
regulation of emissions will help offset the impact of increased use of these parks.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The immediate proposal will likely have no direct effect on plant, animals or fish life. Finding the
optimum balance between the protection of natural systems and public recreational access to
those natural systems is the basis for developing land classification and management planning.
The application of land classification and management planning reaffirms State Parks mission to
protect the natural systems of state park areas while accommodating increased demand for parks
Page 25 of 67
and open space.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish or marine life are:
The staff recommendation recognizes the importance of preserving the quality of the natural
resources within the park while allowing for appropriate levels of human use. Efforts will be made
to minimize habitat loss by locating future developments in areas previously disturbed or in areas
with low habitat value. Continuing consultation with WFDW Area Habitat Biologists and DNR’s
Natural Heritage Program staff will reduce site-specific impacts to wildlife and plant species
through implementation of management recommendations. Land classifications also support the
concept of greenways to connect to regional parks and open spaces. This could help support
regional protection efforts for important migratory corridors and linkages for wildlife.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The proposal is unlikely to have a direct effect on the depletion of energy or natural resources.
Existing activities and future proposed actions will include energy conservation measures
consistent with Washington State Parks Sustainability Policy, the agency’s Sustainability Plan, and a
park specific integrated sustainability plan.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Land classifications and long-term boundaries generally protect natural resources. Any future
proposed actions will be consistent with Washington State Parks sustainability policy, the agency’s
sustainability plan, and the park specific integrated sustainability plan.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
While land classifications do not authorize a particular development for a given area, they do
specify the types of developments and uses which could be allowed. Land classification could set
the stage for future developments and uses which may have the potential for causing negative
impacts to a sensitive species such as, habitat loss, disturbances, increased competition, loss of
forage or prey resources, etc. The proposal will designate certain areas of the parks as Resource
Recreation to protect quality natural systems, as well as priority habitat and species by restricting
high intensity recreational uses from those areas. It will restrict development activities from
wetlands and other sensitive areas. Development and use of the park will provide access to
certain lands and shoreline areas, but will only do so as approved and/or conditioned by local
shoreline and land use ordinances. Only permitted development will be constructed.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
This proposal seeks to achieve a balance between providing adequate recreational opportunities
and providing adequate protection of important natural and cultural resources. The staff
recommendation also restricts more intensive development in riparian areas, and other sensitive
areas by classifying them as Natural Area. Public ownership and the proposed land classifications
Page 26 of 67
accomplish many of the aims noted above. Any future developments will be subject to regulations
administered by federal, state and local governments. All required permits and approvals will be
obtained prior to any development. A management plan has been drafted to further identify
management issues and identify appropriate mitigation measures to minimize impacts and protect
sensitive resources.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
The land classification process, on State Parks property, strives to promote compatible uses and
resource protection.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
State Parks will work closely with federal, state and local government agencies to assure
compatible management objectives on all State Parks owned and/or managed lands. Land
classification designations for the parks respect sensitive shoreline environments while considering
existing recreation use and opportunities. Future project actions may occur within 200 feet of the
above-noted water bodies. Any future project actions will be consistent with the designated land
class for such areas and permitted uses outlined in the Washington State Parks Land Classification
and Use Matrix, (See Appendix B).
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services
and utilities?
No increase in services is directly contemplated by this proposal. Future project actions, however,
such as campground development will increase the number of parking of daily and overnight
visitors to the park causing an increase in demands for parking, public services, and utilities. All
elements will be examined and thoroughly analyzed prior to approval.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Any proposed use activity or development requiring additional transportation, utilities, and/or
public services must be consistent with Parks Integrated Sustainability Plan. Park rangers will
continue to patrol the park on a routine basis and provide emergency response and law
enforcement when in the area.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
The proposal does not appear to be in conflict with any known local, state or federal laws or
requirements for protection of the environment. Future developments will be compliant with
local, state, and federal requirements and regulations.
FUDGE POINT STATE PARKS- CAMP SEPA CHECKLIST
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Page 27 of 67
Appendix A
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Introduction
Park management plans describe the principal features of a park, set park-wide
management objectives, and outline specific approaches and prescriptions in response
to issues identified in stages one and two. These plans also document the planning
process and serve as an informational resource.
Principle Features
Fudge Point is characterized by steep ravines, feeder bluffs, sandy/gravelly beach, an
estuary system, and logged uplands. Low bank water access is one of the most
important aspects of the property allowing for visitors to enjoy Puget Sound’s Case Inlet
and view Mount Rainier over the Kitsap Peninsula. Fudge Point is very walkable because
it includes a smooth, sandy surface. The estuary and beach also provides habitat for
sand lance and smelt which are considered key sources of food for Puget Sound
salmon. The feeder bluffs, primarily located on the east side of the property, maintain
healthy habitat by providing sedimentation and overhanging vegetation.
The logged uplands provide opportunities for development. There is an ideal area of the
property that has seen much disturbance located east of the existing entrance road. It
is today characterized by alder, young conifers, and shrubs. It is an area of land that
includes high ground. It is level and considered buildable. Dramatic ravines, located
west of the entrance road, cross the property diagonally southwest to the northeast,
draining into Case Inlet.
Key Management Objectives
In collaboration with our neighbors and stakeholders, State Parks is addressing
management concerns including:
· Trespass and protection of resources
· Vehicular access
· Pedestrian/bicycle access
· Overnight/Day-use facilities
· Administrative facilities
· Park staffing numbers
· Fire response
· Master plan
Trespass and Protection of Resources: The beach and tidelands between Fudge
Point and McMicken Island State Park are the primary concern. Neighbors report
trespass by land and boat. The primary question is how to best educate and prevent
park visitors from wandering onto private lands?
Page 28 of 67
Strategy: Improve signage, install maps, and continued coordination with neighbors,
local and state police.
a. Directional Signs and Buffer Zones
1.
Clearly demarcate the State Parks boundary south of McMicken Island and
along the land bridge using a combination of signs and markers, placed in a
line, to prevent encroachment onto leased tidelands and private beach. Work
with interested parties to install signs.
2.
New signs and maps will communicate that visitors are leaving State Parks
lands and entering private property. The directional signs or boundary
makers, provided by State Parks, will be strategically placed on the beach to
maximize visibility at McMicken and Fudge Point. Department of Fish and
Wildlife will make the maps with metal backing showing private and public
lands, installed by State Parks.
3.
Place new bulletin boards where appropriate at McMicken Island, Scott
property, and Fudge Point. Include signs that encourage proper digging
etiquette such as backfilling holes.
4.
Work directly with Seattle Shellfish LLC at McMicken Island and Taylor
Shellfish Farms at Fudge Point.
5.
Install signage on Colonel Wright Road and Plantation Way that
communicates there is no State Park access from these roads.
6.
Contact Google Maps or other internet mapping services to correct their
directions to park access for the Fudge Point property, Scott Property,
McMicken Island, and Harstine Island parks.
b. Interpretive Signs
1.
Design interpretive signs with partners to communicate messages that
highlight protection of natural resources, highlight recreational opportunities,
and educate visitors how to best respect adjacent private lands.
c. Visitor Contact
1.
Develop volunteer program with area manager to provide direct visitor
contact at key times in the summer months. The purpose of the program is to
provide a presence on the beach, but not to provide surveillance as a security
guard. Rather, the goal is to educate visitors about the tidelands and to
explain where visitors can walk. A program such as this would be dependent
on volunteer availability.
d. Coordination with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Page 29 of 67
1.
Create maps printed on metal sheets showing land ownership and
property lines.
2.
Work with DFW law enforcement to emphasize contact with trespassers.
e. Dial 911
1.
Call 911 if you witness a crime on private or public lands. Mason County
will forward the call to Washington State Patrol. State Patrol will in turn
contact DFW if the crime occurs in their jurisdiction or State Parks if the crime
occurs on park property.
Vehicular Access: Limit day-use access from dawn until dusk.
a. Install gate at the entrance of the park to control entry.
b. Open gate from dawn until dusk.
c. State Parks will open the park in the evening, however, to accommodate special
events.
d. Access into and out of Fudge Point will be through the current location on East
Ballow Road. There will be no access via Plantation Way. It was determined
through the planning process that Plantation Way would be inappropriate for this
use. Plantation Way is a residential street with many homes located very near
the right-of-way.
Park Staffing Number and Positions:
a. Future staff numbers at Fudge Point will be based on the intensity of
development. For example, if a small campground is constructed, in addition to
typical day-use facilities, a ranger or park aide position will be warranted.
Administrative Facilities: Need, type, and scale of facilities will also depend on the
level of intensity of use at Fudge Point. More development associated with day-use will
require smaller-scale developments, while overnight facilities will probably require more
administrative support. Typically, a small park with a campground can include a visitor
contact station/administrative office and garage. A garage can serve many purposes,
but will likely house equipment used to maintain the park.
Boating: Because of deed restrictions placed on the waterside parcel at Fudge Point no
boating facilities such as docks or marinas or boat launches will be installed. State Parks
will not install mooring buoys in this vicinity because of commercial shellfishing in the
bedlands. Mooring buoys are already available at McMicken Island State Park.
Fire Response: is dependent on size and location of the fire. For example, staff at
Page 30 of 67
Jarrell Cove is trained to dispatch a fire using tools and a fire pumper primarily for
small-scale incidents. Larger scale incidents that involve buildings will include the local
volunteer fire department. If a fire cannot be contained, the Department of Natural
Resources may respond to fight the fire. In the future, a hydrant system with a two inch
supply line could be constructed in association with development of a new water system
used for comfort stations and picnic shelters. Design of a water system will require an
adequately sized reservoir and pump system as a water source for State Parks staff as
well as the local volunteer fire department.
In addition, State Parks staff will establish an emergency response plan that considers
evacuation routes and ways to reduce the likelihood of a fire through fuel modification
and reduction in the forested areas of the property.
Master Plan: Although this report includes a facilities plan (see below), the
descriptions are considered conceptual to better illustrate their need, utility, and general
location. A master plan, however, will include a public process that builds on the ideas
first conceived in the master plan and will allow designers to better understand
opportunities and constraints of the property. The master plan will:
· Include surveys of the land to generate existing conditions by mapping
topography and locations of natural features such as wetlands, feeder bluffs, and
vegetation communities.
· Illustrate design concepts regarding all built features
· Outline phasing of the development
· Cost estimates
Page 31 of 67
Appendix B
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Washington Administrative Code Establishing Land Classification System
WAC 352-16-020 Land classification system. State park areas are of statewide natural, cultural, and/or
recreational significance and/or outstanding scenic beauty. They provide varied facilities serving lowintensity, medium intensity, and high intensity outdoor recreation activities, areas reserved for
preservation, scientific research, education, public assembly, and/or environmental interpretation, and
support facilities. They may be classified in whole or part as follows:
(1) Recreational areas are suited and/or developed for high-intensity outdoor recreational use,
conference, cultural and/or educational centers, or other uses serving large numbers of people.
(2) Resource recreation areas are suited and/or developed for natural and/or cultural resource-based
medium-intensity and low-intensity outdoor recreational use.
(3) Natural areas are designated for preservation, restoration, and interpretation of natural processes
and/or features of significant ecological, geological or paleontological value while providing for lowintensity outdoor recreation activities as subordinate uses.
(4) Heritage areas are designated for preservation, restoration, and interpretation of unique or unusual
archaeological, historical, scientific, and/or cultural features, and traditional cultural properties, which are
of statewide or national significance.
(5) Natural forest areas are designated for preservation, restoration, and interpretation of natural forest
processes while providing for low-intensity outdoor recreation activities as subordinate uses, and which
contain:
(a)
Old-growth forest communities that have developed for one hundred fifty years or longer and have
the following structural characteristics: Large old-growth trees, large snags, large logs on land, and large
logs in streams; or
(b)
Mature forest communities that have developed for ninety years or longer; or
(c)
Unusual forest communities and/or interrelated vegetative communities of significant ecological
value.
(6) Natural area preserves are designated for preservation of rare or vanishing flora, fauna, geological,
natural historical or similar features of scientific or educational value and which are registered and
committed as a natural area preserve through a cooperative agreement with an appropriate natural
resource agency pursuant to chapter 79.70 RCW and chapter 332-60 WAC.
WAC 352-16-030 Management within land classifications. (1) The director shall develop management
guidelines for each land classification listed in WAC 352-16-020. The guidelines shall provide specific
direction for each classification, outlining the philosophy of each classification, its appropriate physical
features, location, allowed and prohibited activities, and allowed and prohibited developments. (2) Nothing
in this section shall be construed to allow uses that are otherwise prohibited, nor prohibit uses that are
otherwise expressly allowed, by the commission, this code, or by statute.
Page 32 of 67
Land Classification Management Guidelines
Recreation Areas
TITLE
Washington
State Parks
Recreation
Areas
DEFINITION
State Parks
Recreation Areas are
suited and/or
developed for highintensity outdoor
recreational use,
conference, cultural
and/or educational
centers, or other uses
serving large numbers
of people.
PHILOSOPHY
State Parks
Recreation Areas
are to respond to
the human needs
for readily available
areas for outdoor
recreation and
facilities to
congregate for
education, artistic
expression and
other ennobling
pursuits. They are
to provide a variety
of outdoor
recreational,
educational, artistic,
and cultural
opportunities to
large numbers of
participants.
Primary emphasis is
on the provision of
quality recreational
services and
facilities with
secondary
recognition given to
protection of the
areas natural
qualities.
PHYSICAL
FEATURES
State Parks
Recreation Areas
physiographic
features such as
topography, soil
type, drainage,
etc., shall be
adaptable to
varied types of
intensive uses and
development. An
attractive natural
setting is
desirable,
however, humanmade settings are
acceptable. There
are no specific size
criteria.
LOCATION
State Parks
Recreation Areas
generally are made,
not found. They shall
be located
throughout the state
with primary
emphasis to service
major centers of
urban populations
and/or outstanding
recreational tourist
attractions. Scenic
and inspirational
values shall be
considered but are
secondary to the site
adaptability and
population criteria.
When part of a large
diverse park,
recreation areas
should be sited in
proximity to public
roads and utilities.
ACTIVITIES
State Parks Recreation Areas may allow
and provide for a wide variety of indoor
and outdoor day, weekend and vacation
activities. Provision may be made for high
intensity participation in camping,
picnicking, trail use, water sports, winter
sports, group field games, and other
activities for many people Off-trail
equestrian and/or bicycle use may be
appropriate in selected areas if approved
by the commission. Activities requiring
high levels of social interaction are
encouraged.
Page 33 of 67
DEVELOPMENTS
State Parks Recreation
Areas shall provide
appropriate facilities and
services for the
participation and
enjoyment of high
concentrations of outdoor
recreationists and/or
participants in indoor
educational, cultural and
artistic activities. A high
degree of development is
anticipated. Facilities
may include road and
parking networks,
swimming beaches, full
service marinas, trails,
bathhouses, artificial
lakes and pools, play
fields, large sanitary and
eating facilities; standard
and utility campgrounds,
stores, picnic grounds,
group shelters,
conference centers,
environmental learning
centers, hostels, and
administrative support
facilities.
Resource Recreation Areas
TITLE
Washington
State Parks
Resource
Recreation
Areas
DEFINITION
PHILOSOPHY
PHYSICAL
FEATURES
LOCATION
ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENTS
State Parks Resource
Recreation Areas are
suited and/or
developed for natural
and/or cultural
resource-based
medium- and lowintensity recreational
use.
State Parks
Resource
Recreation Areas
are sites where the
high quality of a
particular natural or
cultural resource or
set of such
resources is the lure
for human
recreation. Thus,
the rationale for
recreation is based
on the value of
attractive natural or
cultural resources.
Management of
these areas must
stress the centrality
of preserving the
quality of the natural
and cultural
resources while
allowing appropriate
and sustainable
levels of human use
and enjoyment.
State Parks
Resource
Recreation Areas
have a variety of
physiographic
features. While
they may contain
areas of
environmental
sensitivity, most
portions of each
area will be able to
withstand low- to
medium-intensity
recreation use
without significant
environmental
degradation.
State Parks
Resource Recreation
Areas may be located
anywhere in the state
where natural or
cultural factors
produce land and
water sites
particularly suited for
recreation in a
natural setting.
Access to these sites
should be reasonably
proximate to major
urban centers, but
some access
restriction may be
necessary to avoid
overuse of resources.
Within large diverse
parks, these areas
should be located at
least a moderate
distance from public
roads and high use
intensity areas, while
still maintaining
reasonable public
access for their
intended use.
State Parks Resource Recreation Areas
provide opportunities for low- and
medium-intensity recreational
experiences including, but not limited to,
picnicking, primitive camping, a variety of
recreational trail experiences, interpretive
facilities, historic/cultural exhibits, nature
observation, photography, orienteering,
kayaking, canoeing, floating, and fishing.
Off-trail equestrian and/or bicycle use may
be appropriate in selected areas if
approved by the commission. Basketball,
tennis, organized group sporting activities
requiring formal sports fields, commercialsized piers and docks, standard and utility
camping, indoor accommodations and
centers, developed swimming areas, and
other similarly intense uses are not
appropriate. Scientific research is
permitted.
State Parks Resource
Recreation Areas
development shall be
permitted to the extent
necessary to serve
allowed activities.
Parking, sanitary
facilities, and other
ancillary developments
and support facilities
should be constructed in
a manner that is
consistent with the site's
ability to manage
environmental change.
Page 34 of 67
Natural Areas
TITLE
Washington
State Parks
Natural Areas
DEFINITION
PHILOSOPHY
PHYSICAL
FEATURES
LOCATION
ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENTS
State Parks Natural
Areas are designated
for preservation,
restoration, and
interpretation of
natural processes
and/or features of
significant ecological,
geological or
paleontological value
while providing for lowintensity outdoor
recreation activities as
subordinate uses.
State Parks Natural
Areas are to
respond to the
human need for
readily available
"conservatories" of
nature and open
spaces. Emphasis
is directed toward
nature and the
conservation of
native flora and
fauna, special
geologic or
paleontological
resources, and the
natural amenities of
the area. Human
wants for other than
naturally existing
educational and
recreational
opportunities are
considered
secondary to
nature's
requirement for the
sustained
maintenance of its
natural balances, or
the preservation of
special geologic or
paleontological
features.
State Parks
Natural Areas
have a variety of
topography and
features to provide
a diversified
natural
environment with
interesting but not
necessarily unique
flora and fauna, or
geologic or
paleontological
features. Where
classification is
based on
biological
considerations,
sites should
consist of land
areas large
enough to
maintain natural
biological
processes in a
nearly
undeveloped state
and provide users
with a feeling of
solitude and
tranquility, and an
opportunity to view
nature in its
"uncontrolled"
form. They may be
partially or wholly
on land,
subterranean, or
part of the marine
environment.
State Parks Natural
Areas are not
"made", but rather
currently exist due to
historical
circumstances that
have resulted in little
or no human
interference in the
natural environment.
Those areas most
desirable in terms of
physical features and
size usually are
"found" and "held"
against creeping
encroachments and
raising land values.
They often become
over used and "lost"
as populations
spread around them.
As a part of the
overall system, these
areas should be
geographically
spread throughout
the state. When
classifying specific
park areas,
consideration must
be given to the ability
to adequately
manage the areas
against undesirable
human
encroachment.
State Parks Natural Areas provide
opportunities for outdoor recreation on
designated trails. Those trails may be
developed and used only to the extent
that they do not significantly degrade the
system of natural processes in a
classified area. Hiking, non-groomed
cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, or
other trail uses of similar impact to natural
systems and providing a compatible
recreational opportunity, may be
permitted, after consultation with
appropriate local, state, federal and tribal
resource management agencies, and
upon a finding by the agency that such
trails are not likely to significantly degrade
natural processes. Relocation of existing
equestrian, bicycle, Nordic track or other
similar trails into a natural area may be
permitted upon a finding by the director
that such relocation is for the purpose of
reducing overall resource impacts. All
trails may be moved, redesigned, closed
and/or removed upon a finding that their
use is causing significant degradation to
the system of natural processes.
Technical rock climbing requires
authorization by the commission. Off-trail
use for nature observation, photography,
cross-country skiing, harvesting of
mushrooms and berries and similar uses
are permitted to the degree that they do
not significantly degrade natural
processes. Scientific research is
permitted.
State Parks Natural Area
development shall be
limited to facilities
required for health, safety
and protection of users
and features consistent
with allowed activities.
Facilities to enhance
public enjoyment shall be
limited to primitive items
such as trails, trail
structures and minor
interpretive exhibits. All
improvements shall
harmonize with, and not
detract from, the natural
setting. Parking and
other trailhead facilities
should be located
outside of a classified
area.
Page 35 of 67
Heritage Areas
TITLE
DEFINITION
PHILOSOPHY
PHYSICAL
FEATURES
LOCATION
ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENTS
Washington
State Parks
Heritage Areas
State Parks Heritage
Areas are designated
for preservation,
restoration, and
interpretation of
outstanding, unique or
unusual
archaeological,
historical, scientific,
and/or cultural
features, and
traditional cultural
properties, which are
of statewide or
national significance.
State Parks
Heritage Areas are
designated to
preserve and/or
interpret selected
areas or features for
the education and
enjoyment of the
public, an area's
intrinsic cultural
value, and/or for
scientific research.
State Parks
Heritage Areas
vary in size and
physiographic
makeup according
to their location
and reason for
existence. Historic
landscapes may
require relatively
large acreage
while
archaeological
sites may be
measured in
square feet.
State Parks Heritage
Areas usually are
located where they
are found or the
feature exists.
However, in some
instances relocation
or re-creation of
artifacts, resources or
facilities is possible.
In these situations
they may be located
in appropriate
settings and
concentrated near
major population
centers and along
primary travel routes.
State Parks Heritage Area activities shall
generally be limited to those directly
associated with the interpretation of the
area or feature, and the education of the
patrons. Picnicking, recreational trails,
and other low- to medium-intensity
recreation uses may be allowed if they
do not detract from the principal purpose
of the area, its setting, structures, sites
and objects.
State Parks Heritage Area
development shall
generally be limited to that
necessary for the
protection and
interpretation of the area
or feature, and the
education and safety of
the patrons. Sanitary
facilities, recreation trails,
and picnicking facilities
may be provided in a
manner which does not
detract from the aesthetic,
educational or
environmental quality of
the area, its setting,
structures, sites or objects,
or, if applicable, its value
for scientific research.
Page 36 of 67
Natural Forest Areas
TITLE
Washington
State Parks
Natural Forest
Areas
DEFINITION
State Parks Natural
Forest Areas are
designated for
preservation,
restoration, and
interpretation of
natural forest
processes while
providing for lowintensity outdoor
recreation activities as
subordinate uses, and
which contain:
(a) Old-growth forest
communities that have
developed for 150
years or longer and
have the following
structural
characteristics: Large
old-growth trees, large
snags, large logs on
land, and large logs in
streams; or (b) Mature
forest communities
that have developed
for 90 years or longer;
or
 Un
communities and/or
interrelated vegetative
communities of
significant ecological
value.
PHILOSOPHY
PHYSICAL
FEATURES
LOCATION
ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENTS
State Parks Natural
Forest Areas are
places where
human access to
and interpretation
and enjoyment of
natural forest
processes are
limited to those
activities and
facilities that do not
significantly
degrade natural
forest processes.
Public access into
these areas
emphasizes
appreciation of
nature through
experiencing nature.
The principal
function of these
areas is to assist in
maintaining the
state's bio-diversity
while expanding
human
understanding and
appreciation of
natural values.
State Parks
Natural Forest
Areas have a
variety of
topographic and
vegetative
conditions. They
are generally large
enough (300 or
more acres) to
contain one or
more distinct and
relatively intact
vegetative
communities.
Smaller areas may
be appropriate if
representative of a
unique or unusual
forest community.
Desirably, they are
part of a large
system of open
space, wildlife
habitat, and
vegetative
communities that
provide a good
opportunity for
long-term
ecosystem
sustainability.
State Parks Natural
Forest Areas may be
located anywhere in
the state where
natural factors
produce forest
vegetative cover.
These areas are not
"made", but rather
currently exist due to
historical
circumstances that
have resulted in little
or no human
interference in
natural forest
progression. As a
part of an overall
system, these areas
should be
geographically
spread throughout
the state, recognizing
that maintenance of
bio-diversity is one of
the primary functions
of their classification.
When classifying
specific park areas,
consideration must
be given to the ability
to adequately
manage the areas
against undesirable
human
encroachment.
State Parks Natural Forest Areas
provide opportunities for outdoor
recreation on designated recreation
trails. Those trails may be developed
and used only to the extent that they do
not significantly degrade the system of
natural forest processes in a classified
area. Careful design of recreation trails
should match intended uses, to maintain
consistency with the purpose and
philosophy of the classification. Hiking,
non-groomed cross-country skiing,
snowshoeing, or other trail uses of
similar impact to natural systems and
providing a compatible recreational
opportunity, may be permitted, after
consultation with appropriate local, state,
federal and tribal resource management
agencies, and upon a finding by the
agency that such trails are not likely to
significantly degrade natural forest
processes. Relocation of existing
equestrian, bicycle, Nordic track or other
similar trails into a natural forest area
may be permitted upon a finding by the
director that such relocation is for the
purpose of reducing overall resource
impacts. All trails may be moved,
redesigned, closed and/or removed
upon a finding that they are causing
significant degradation to the system of
natural forest processes. Technical rock
climbing requires authorization by the
commission. Off-trail use for nature
observation, cross-country skiing,
photography, harvesting of mushrooms
and berries and similar uses are
permitted to the degree that they do not
significantly degrade natural forest
processes. Scientific research is
permitted.
State Parks Natural Forest
Areas development shall
be limited to facilities
required for health, safety
and protection of users
and features consistent
with allowed activities.
Facilities to enhance
public enjoyment shall be
limited to trails, trail
structures, and minor
interpretive exhibits. All
improvements shall
harmonize with, and not
detract from, the natural
setting. Parking and other
trailhead facilities should
be located outside of a
classified area.
Page 37 of 67
Appendix C
MAPS
Page 38 of 67
Page 39 of 67
Page 40 of 67
Page 41 of 67
Page 42 of 67
Appendix D
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Jim Schwartz Aag
Boston Harbor Marina
Bremerton Yacht Club
Sabrina Viebrock Brewster Harvest Foods
Bsa Pacific Harbors Council
Bureau Of Indian Affairs
Keith R Mcgowan Bureau Of Reclamation
Henry Guillen C/O Bernadene Dochnahl
Canyonwood Beach Homeowners
Carlyon Beach Association
Choice Construction And Consulting Inc.
Jeff Barney Citizen For A Healthy Bay
Citizen For A Healthy Bay
Jill Guernsey City Of Gig Harbor
Tim Payne City Of Gig Harbor Council, Position 1
Steve Ekberg City Of Gig Harbor Council,
Position 2
Casey Arbenz City Of Gig Harbor Council,
Position 3
Rahna Lovrovich City Of Gig Harbor Council,
Position 4
Ken Malich City Of Gig Harbor Council, Position
5
Michael Perrow City Of Gig Harbor Council,
Position 6
Paul Kadzik City Of Gig Harbor Council, Position
7
Cls Harstine Llc
Department Of Health
Gretchen Kaeler Dept Of Archaeology And
Historic Preservation
Robert G Whitlam Dept Of Archaeology And
Historic Preservation
Rochelle Knust Dept Of Natural Resources
Dept Of Natural Resources
Scott Berbells Division Of Environmental Health
Washington State Department Of Health
Liz Maier Division Of Environmental Health
Washington State Department Of Health
Doolittle Forest Preserve Inc.
Environmental Review Section
Glenn Glover Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance
Fair Harbor Marina
Federal National Mortgage Assn
Debbie Austin For Rep. Jim Angel
John Ohlson Fox Island Community &
Recreation Association (Ficra)
Fox Island Yacht Club
Fudge Point Property Llc
Gig Harbor Yacht Club
Patsy Glaser Gibson Glaser Oyster Company
Bob Zeigler Habitat Management
Fred Haley C/O Susan Haley Headley Ttee Haley
Beach Property Trust
Harbor Wild Watch
Joyce Murray Harbor Wildwatch
Hugo V & Geneva W Glaser Hugo V Glaser Life
Est
Jarrell’s Cove Marina
Jefferson County
Key Peninsula Civic Center Assoc.
Key Peninsula Historical Society
Key Peninsula Lions Club
Scott Gallacher Key Peninsula Metropolitan Park
District
Barbara Ann Smolko Kgi Watershed Council
Jerry Gibbs Kopachuck Ridge Estates
Homeowners Assn.
Lakeport Llc
Longbranch Improvement Club
Manke Timber Company Inc
The Honorable Ross Gallagher Mason County
Commission
The Honorable Terri Jeffreys Mason County
Commission
The Honorable Randy Neatherlin Mason County
Commission
The Honorable Tim Sheldon Mason County
Commission
Barbara Adkins Mason County Community
Development
Mason County Courthouse
Barbara Adkins Mason County Dept Of
Community Dev
Page 43 of 67
John Keates Mason County Parks & Trails
Department
Apolito Fabio Nisqually Tribe
The Honorable Cynthia Iyall
Nisqually
Tribe
David Troutt, Director Nisqually Tribe
Northwestern Boating Council
Richard Ries Okanogan County Historical Society
Olympia Outboard Club
Olympia Yacht Club
Onewest Bank Fsp
Oro Bay Marina
Blair Corson Outdoor Adventures
Pacific Global Development Llc
William Sehmel Peninsula Metropolitan Park
District
Pierce Co Parks & Recration
Kathy Smith Pierce County Parks & Recreation
Chuck Kleeberg Pierce County Planning & Land
Svcs
Pierce County Tax Title
Port Orchard Yacht Club
Joe Anderson, Director Puyallup Tribe
Larry Lapointe Puyallup Tribe
Brandon Reynon Puyallup Tribe
Bill Sterud Puyallup Tribe
Bill Sullivan, Director Puyallup Tribe
Judy Wright Puyallup Tribe
Cynthia Jackson Quincy High School
Seattle District Regulatory Branch
Second Growth Investors Llc
Sfi Holding Llc
Shelton Yacht Club
Shulich Family Lt
Sound Lake Limited Partnership
South Sound Area Kayakers
South Sound Sailing Society
Mark S. Welpman South Sound Sailing Society
Cruise Chair
Rhonda Foster Squaxin Island Tribe
The Honorable Dave Lopeman Squaxin Island
Tribe
Andy Whitener, Director Squaxin Island Tribe
Honorable Leonard Forsman Suquamish Tribe
Marilyn Jones Suquamish Tribe
Dennis Lewarch Suquamish Tribe
Alison Osullivan Suquamish Tribe
Dee Williams, Director Suquamish Tribe
Swantown Marina
Tacoma Yacht Club
Tahoma Audubon Society
Cathy Baker The Nature Conservancy
Len Barson The Nature Conservancy
Fayette Krause The Nature Conservancy
The Nature Conservancy
The Trust For Public Land Inc
Totem Yacht Club
Roger Hoesterey Trust For Public Land
Paul Kundtz Trust For Public Land
Ann Welz Trust For Public Land
Voyager Elementary School
Alex Callender Wa Department Of Ecology
Kathy Haigh Wa State House Of Representatives
Drew Macewen Wa State House Of
Representatives
Tim Sheldon Wa State Senate
Washington Department Of Fish And Wildlife
Becky Kelly Washington Environmental Council
Mo Mcbroom Washington Environmental
Council
Maryellen Haggard Washington State Parks And
Recreation Commission
Randy Kline Washington State Parks And
Jessica Logan Washington State Parks And
Tom Murley Washington State Parks And
Mark Schultz Washington State Parks And
Kira Swanson Washington State Parks And
Alexandra Wunsch Washington State Parks And
Senator Tim Sheldon Washington State Senate
Julie Anderson Washington Water Trails
Colleen Derting Webelos Pack 4066
West Bay Marina
Patricia Powell Whidbey Camano Land Trust
Ryan Karlson Wsprc Interpretive Services
Gerald Hodge Wwta
Ymca Camp Seymour
Page 44 of 67
Young Mens' Christian Assoc
Zittles Marina Inc
Wayne B & Karen M Aadnes
Patricia R. Abson
Edward J & Emily Aceto
Charles Adams
Mark D. Adams
Mary F Adams
Dennis Ader
Scott B. Ahrndt
Ling Albrecht
Lyle & Sharon Albright
Andrea J. Aldrich
Ericka Alexander
Linda & Amy Prestas Alexander
Jeffery Alfers
Angela Aliabadi
Cathryn Allen
Deborah Allen
Guy Allen
Krista Allen
Lynn Allen
Rebecca Allen
Sylvia Allen
Fredrick G & Carolyn Allinson
Doris E. Allmer
Linda N & Joel S Allwardt
Darrell J Alongi
Robert S & Betty Alston
Jeff & Debbie Altschul
Flordeliza C Alura
Loa Andersen
Mary Ann & Bill Andersen
Bruce Anderson
Candace Anderson
Earl J & Kathleen G Anderson
Elmer Anderson
Greg M & L Kay Anderson
Mark Alvin Anderson
Vicki Anderson
Anderson/Beckwith
Andrew J & Marcy R Spear
The Honorable Jan Angel
Greg & Becky Angelmyer
Ted & Geraldine M Apa
Cheryl And Larry Appel
Forencio C & Hermie M Arceo
Julia Ardon
Robert & Susan Arens
Laray Armstrong
Julie & Joel Arthur
Nicolas & Colleen Arthur
Robert K Arvine
Gordon Arwine
Aseem Pandey
Adella Ashbaugh
Terryl Asla
Valerie Aspee
David & Twila Asselstine
Atwood/Metzen
Gary L & Gloria P Aube
Kimbal Austin
Melissa Austin
Scott K & Jan Avery Avery
Michelle & Randy Mott Azzola
Jacqueline M Baber
George L Badger
Duane Badgley
Mary Baebler
Daniel & Pamala Baer
Greg And Alice Baer
Richard & Judith Baerg
Matthew Baerwalde
Barbara Baglio
Jerrold & Christina Bailet
Kathleen I Bailey
Kathy Bailey
Chris And Janine Baker
Pete Baker
Lloyd G Baker Jr
Mike Balasa
C.R. & Dorothy Baldwin
Cinda Baldwin
Gerry And Joan Baldwin
Joan Baldwin
Ralph H Iii& Cathleen Baldwin
Lola Ball
Howard Ballou
David & Sandy Bamford
Barbara Garcia Brooks Et Al
Gary Barber
Jane C. Barber
Page 45 of 67
Barbgig
Miranda Barden
Andrew Barkis
Harry & Susan Barmon
Michael & Susan Barnard
Robert M & Elinor J Barnes
Steven & Teresa Barnes
Karen Barnett
Anthony & Juanita Barngrover
Evalynn Barrett
Michael Barry
Scott & Coral Barry
Sherrill Bartol
Alan L & Lois E Bauer
Patti L Baugess
William J & Shirley Baumgart
Jennifer Baxter
The Beans
B.J. Beauchene
Holly Beckford
D. Beckwith
David B Beech
Diane Beelendorf
Steven & Lindy Belcher
Carol Belin
Joseph G & Michelle A Bell
Marlah Bell
Karen K Bellandi
Bonnie Belles
Alec Bellis
Birgit Bellis
Edward J & Gerda Benda
John & Colleeen Benn
Jim & Sue Bennett
Khalid Bennett
Lesli Bennett
Suzanne M Bennett
Rod & Toni Benoist
Eric Bensch
Boyd , Kasey & Sharon Benson
Lee Benson
Michael J & Linda S Benson
Mike & Linda Benson
Gary & Rose Benz
Gary And Rose Benz
Gary And Rose Benz
Albert W Berge
Rick Bergholz
Richard Bergholz
Lauren & Pam & Ken Bergman
David Berliner
Arne & Elizabeth M Berndt
David L Berntsen
Lisa Berntsen
Patrick D & Helene V Berry
Richard & Sandy Berry
Michael A Bettinzoli
Bgf117
James & Myrna Biasi
Darryl Bickel
Mary Bicknell
Mary Bicknell
Dana Bierman
John Biesiot
Melvin & Judy Bing
William Bingham
Mary Bird
Stefan & Corina Birgh
Birmington
Douglas Bishop
Gregory Black
Kelly Blackburn
Herbert J & Janice Blackinton
Herbert J & Janice Blackinton
Steve & Cindy Blair
Sara Blankenbaker & Dana Diemer
Matthew Bleich
Al Blum
Renee Blythe
Elisa Bob
Jenny Bocko
Ronald & Awaitha Boden
William L Jr & Sonja P Bogan
Todd S Bogardus
William & Elizabeth Bogle
Dennis J & Susanne Bonciolini
Kari & Edward Bond
Bob & Jann Bonnett
Daniel B & Pat Borchardt
Tom Borgen
Carol Borich
Arthur L & Martha J Boright
Page 46 of 67
Chandra Bornheimer
Richard & Dana Boscolo
Bossart/Christensen
Barb Bourgeois
Barbara A Bourscheidt
Paul Bourscheidt
Allison A F Bowen
Dale & Dawn Bowen
Raymond & Michele Bower
Bonnie & Doug Bowles
Lee Bowman
Larry Brackenbush
Bill Brackin
R & Karen Bradford
Kathleen Brammer
Ray E & Mary H Brammer
Christy Brand
Clamont W & Helen H Brandt
Richard & Heather Brandt
Heather & Dick Branott
David Bray
Dave Brengelmann
Brent M & Joan M Price
Marty & Terri Brewer
Thomas M & Joene A Brian
Susan Bridge Smith
Robert F & Virginia Briesmeister
Gregory G & Nancy Briggs
Annie Bringloe
Kristen Brinks
Leona Britt
Jacob D Brixey
Woodrow L & Marilyn Brock
Ashley Brooks
Christian J Brooks
David Brooks
John Brooks
John Brooks
Sandy Brooks
Steve Brooks
Jackie & Dorothy Browder
David Brown
Dorrene Brown
Joann Brown
Joyce Brown
Kenneth & Dorrene Brown
Russell E Brown
Stephanie Brown
Lisa Browning
Jon P. Brumbach
Sherry P Brunette
Gunter W & Sharon E Brunk
Victoria L Brunz
Brad Bryant
Sharon Bryant
Harold Jr & Florence Bucholz
Winnifred M Bukoskey
Shawn Buller
Burdick/Gimmi
Kimberly E Burg
Fredrick & Nataliya Burgdorf
James L & Alice Burnett
Susan Burnett
Diane K. Burns
Kathy Burns
Terrence E & Mary K Burns
Charles W & Suzan L Burr
Greg Burr
Jennifer Burroughs
Fremont O Burrows
William E & Karen C Burrows
Ruth Burwell
Andrea Buser
William E & Carol A Bush
James Busse
Peter A & Carole A Butkus
Aaron Butters
Kirk & Patricia L Byington
Norman W & Katherine Bykerk
James Bynum
C Harms Zum Spreckel Et Ux
Randall Cairy
Michael Caldwell
Joan Cali
Michael L & Judy A Callaghan
Jim Callea
Jeffrey H & Janie H Camm
Craig & Kathryn Campbell
Edwin H & Marilyn Campbell
Kevin E & Barbara L Campbell
Lee & Mary Campbell
Campbell Properties Llc
Page 47 of 67
Michele & Carmine Campione
John S & Janeal M Campos
Joseph & Carolyn Candito
Diane L Canfield
Sandie Carde
Michael Carey
Eric Carlson
Eric & Sheryl Carlson
Genevieve Carlson
Imogene A Carlson
Janice M Carlson
John & Linda Carlson
Marge Carlson
Sylvia Carlton
Robert C & Phyllis M Carpenter
Barb Carr
Vicki Carrell
Carrie L Hale
Bradford & Sherril Carson
Gayle Carson Riggs
Mary Carter
Henry E & Irene Cartwright
James R & Mary Cary
James Casby
Rod & Kathi Cassidy
Andrew Castle
Catharine C Riggs Et Al
Craig J Cavanaugh
Susan Chakravarti
Brooke Chambers
Jeff Chance
Oliver A & Dana Chapman
Walter D & Patricia A Chapman
Charles Chase
Dale V. Chester
Charlotte Chevrier
Childs
Titia Chilton
Dean Chilton
Dede Chinlund
Bill & Sherry Chisholm
Stephen J & Susan Chittenden
Jill & Ralph J. Christ
John Christensen
Linda/Frank Christensen/James
Kristen Chu
David Church
Scott Churchill
Steven J & Patricia Churchill
Cindy Farrell
John & Beverly J Clancy
Eleanor Clark
Tabitha Clark
Larry Clarke
Garry L. Cline
Ron & Denise M Cline
Don & Audrey Clinton
Kip Clinton
Monty & Wendy Cobb
Phillip A & Susan L Cohen
Ron J & Kelly L Colby
Robert & Sonia Cole
Hugh Coleman
Lori Collet
Michael S Colton
Fw Conard
James K & Janet L Conley
L Gail & Barbara L Conley
Louis & Beverly Conner
Bob Connolly
Allan L & Diane J Conrad
Edward J Conrad
Gary T & Patricia L Cook
Ken Cook
Patrick & Sharon Cook
Patrick M Cook
Bailey And Jimmy Cooper
Doris Cooper
Jonathan S & Karen S Cooper
Kelly Copp
Kelly,Mike & Julie Copp
Ronald Corcoran
Terri L Cordes
John Charles Cornwell
Matthew Corsi
William E Jr & Ruth M Cosbey
Judy And Al Cota
Pauline Cotton
Donna Coulter
Keith Cowan
Todd L Coward
Bill & Jennie Cox
Page 48 of 67
Bruce Cox
Janee Cox
Anne
Cox
Shannon Cozzolino
Nicole Craig
Ronald & Danette L Craig
Philip Craven
Carol R Creed
Donald T & Joy Crilly
W Crofoot
Keith Cronin
Jerry & Kathryn Crosby
Marilyn & Jim Croscetto
Gary
Crowell
Calvin & Patricia Crowley
Gabriel Crumpton
John L Sr & Donna M Cruse
Douglas Culver
Don Cummings
Thomas L Curcio
John Curry
Dick And Jo Curtis
Dick And Jo Curtis
Curtis B & Lucretia F Achziger
Jennifer Custer
Donald R & Beverly J Cutler
Rick & Priscilla Daci
Norman Daggett
Ann & Bill Dagle
Tammy Dahlstrom
Randy Dale
Stephanie & Christopher Daley/Watson
Michael D'almeida
Dana A & Michelle Brown
Richard Dare
Kirsten Darley
David & Tara Dassow
Folsom David
David L Berliner
David A & Laverna Davidson
Donald R & Ruth Ann Davis
Michael Davis
Rex & Judy Davis
Brad Davis
Dick Dawe
Diane & Thor Dawley
Jared Dawson
Robert E & Alice M Dawson
Gerald R Day
Bonnie Daybell
Jack Daybell
Greg De Bon
Juanito & Elizabeth De Los Santos
Michael & Barbara Deák
Karen Dean
Nicole Dean
Richard & Amy Debolt
Robert And Pamela Debuhr
Kenneth M & Donna M Decew
Phyllis M Defriese
Degennaro
Alexander M Dehaan
Pauline & Mark Dehart
Mark A & Nita K Dehn
Vincent Del Pizzo
Nancy Delacour
Robert Delaney
Linda Delong
Gary J & Shirley A Dempsey
Daniel
Denver
Michael & Susan S Depoe
Billy & Alison Deroche
David Desertspring
Daniel J & Toni D Devaux
Steve & Patti Devine
Douglas Devlin
Becky Devries
J Craig Dickens
Ron Dickinson
John E Diehl
Dana Diemer
John Divine
Djcrow46
Diane (Debby) Dodd
Linda Dodds
Mike Doherty
William & Marilyn Doke
Donnelly/Kirkpatrick
Timothy Dore
Jeffery L Dorsey
Jason Dougherty
Douglas L Gerlach Et Al
Page 49 of 67
Robin Dower
Steven
Drew
Jennifer Driscoll
William P. (Guy) And Joan Driver
Toni Droscher
Toni Droscher
Stephen Dubois
Laura Dunaler
Marcia & Ron Duncan
John E & Pat J Dunlap
Greg & Nora Dunn
Scott A Durand
David Dynes
Cynthia J Dyrnes
Richard A And Kathleen S Earl
Dan & Dana Early
Dalton Eash
John Eastman
Leo J & Marlene Echaniz
Eco6
Irene B And Donald L Eddins
Peter Edgers
Diane H Edgin
The Edmistons
Larry B & Linda Edralin
Edward & Dianne Van Der Bofert
Edward J Aceto
Daisy Edwards
Harry C Edwards
Jay Edwards
Karen L Edwards
Len & Lynette Edwards
Donna Edwardson
David E Ehrmantrout
Dale Eklund
Kathy Eliasen
Peter Elling
Don Elliott
Jolene Elliott
Mack & Linda Elliott
Ronald Elliott
David L Ellis
Nigel Ellis
Ronald M Ellis
Burton & Christine Ellison
Thomas D & Rosilynn R Ellison
Garby Elmore
Charlie Elms
Paul Embleton
Mary Emmich
Erica Engle
Helen Engle
Yaponcha English
Margaret Englund
Steven & Kristin Englund
Evelyn Susan Enslow
Gerald D & Judi L Enslow
Derek Epps
Karen And Derek Epps
David Erbeck
Nelsene Erickson
Steve Erickson
Trisha A Erickson
Trisha A Erickson
Paul C Erickstad
Clair Ervin
Daniel & Monika Ervin
Stephen W Ervin
Paul W & Angela R Esteve
Diane Evans
Jerilyn & Brian Evans
Hugh Ewart
Wally & Joanna Ewart
John Eyrich
Carolyn I Fabrick
Judith Fahy
Sara Fahy
Robb G & Beth T Faller
Colleen Fallon Menke
Doug Falooi
Coleman & Lila Fannin
Margaret Henning Farber
Sean Farr
Bruce Farran
James E & Christine Farrell
Joan Faye
Joan Faye
Jon Fayth
Melissa Feagen
Mary J Fehrenbach
Jack D & Donna Fellman
Jed Feltis
Page 50 of 67
Suzan Felton
Suzanne Felton
Roy A & Constance L Ferguson
Roger R & Helen A Ferleman
Flor Fernandez
Flor T Fernandez
Wendy Ferrell
Janet Fesq
Pam Fick
John J. Filson
Lynda Filson
James D & Diana D Findley
Thomas R Fischer
Lynne Fish
Michael Fisher
Christine M. Fitzgerald
Jon T Fitzgerald
Michael P Fitzgerald
Patrick Fitzgerald
Irene Helen Fjaerestad
Maggie Flanagan
Kevin Fleming
Phyllis Fleming
Paul Fletch
Wendy Flick
Levi Foraker
Ken & Sherry Ford
William G & Rita J Forster
Erika M Fortuno
M Leslie Foss, Et Al
Gordon And Wilma Foster
Leanne Foster
Vickie Foster
Brian And Julie Fox
Herbert F & Robin Fox
Sidney C & Marilyn Foyston
Jeri Frangello Anderson
Alfred J Frank
John Franzel
Bob Frasca
Barbara Fredrickson
George J & Donna K Freelund
Toni French
Janelle And Jim Frisbie
Daniel B & Sandra K Frishman
L. Fritz
Karyn Fritze
Pavel & Vera Fuchs
Mary Fuhrmeister
A Fulbright
Keith & Kathryn Fuller
Fuller/Suter
Elliott M & Kathy A Funkhouser
Lee Funkhouser
Claire Furlong
Peter J Sr & Linda D Gabel
Peggy Gablehouse
Rhoda Gage
Twila R Gagnon
Claudia Gahard
Stephanie Galindo
Jason/Julie Ganer
Dave/Jennifer Gans
Henry P & Connie S Garcia
Allen R & Vickie L Gard
Terry Garries
Patricia Garton
L Gaspar
Lawrence A & Elizabeth Gaspar
Damon Gaumer
Kenneth & Katharine Gaustad
Michael & Rita Gedney
Jeffrey F & Sally A Geibel
Geiersbach/Schuknecht
Amy Gerber
Cathy Gerhard
Bill & Mary Helen Gertz
Patunia Gherard
Gerald Gibbons
Robert Gibbs
Kari Gilje
Shelby A Gilje
David & Penny Gill
Thomas & Sherrie Gill
Robert J & Patricia Gillman
Pete Gimmi
Ron & Peggy Giza
Jeff Glander
Aaron L Glaser
Hugo & Patricia Glaser
Mike And Shelly Glaser
Glenn R Yates
Page 51 of 67
Bill & Deidra Godfrey
Lance & Candace Goehring
Kevin A & Debra M Goeppele
Justine A Goetsch
Lori Goff
Corina Going
Johanna Miller Goldschmid
Julie Gonsalves
Alexander & Frances Gonzales
Amanda Good
Robin L & Lauryn M Goodwin
Jon A & Theresa A Gorman
Lloyd Gorman
Lloyd Gorman
William & Mary Gortz
Floyd E & Julia Gossett
Jim & Linda Gough
Paul & Lisa Grabarek
Carol Graf
Judy & Gary Graff
G Alexander & Deborah Graham
Gary A Grant Sr
Ken Graves
Lorrie Graves
J W & Frederica L Grayson
Budd & Rachel Greco
Myrna M Green
Richard H Green
Ronald & Michele Green
Judith Greene
Liz Greenhagen
Douglas Greenwald
Garner R Greenwood
Micah Gregory
Theresa Gresley
Carlson Grete
Ethan Griffith
Nina Grobben
Rob Gronewold
Thomas Groover
Earl R & Linda L Gruer
Dylan J Guay
Eric Guenther
Robert F & Tina L Gurney
Pam Gurr
Garard M & Carol Gustafson
Arnold R Gutfeld
Steve & Ann M Haberl
Deborah Hacher Hanson
Emily Haddick
Aidan Haley
Anne Haley
Bruce Haley
Colin Haley
Graff Haley
Jeff Haley
Maggie Haley
Mark Haley
Mimi Haley
Misty Haley
Nancy Haley
Peter Haley
Sharman Haley
Todd Haley
Tom Haley
David Haley
Gary Hall
Elmer & Jean Haller
Lou & Jean Haller
Donna & John Hamilton
Wayne Hamilton
Cindy & Ned Hamlin
Dennis R Hamling
Barbara Hammerman
Rod & Ginnie Hammett
Jacque Hammond
Vesta Hampton
Wayne & Nancy Hanby
Wilson Hancock
Heather Hand
Irvin & Gail Handelman
Dr. Ulf Hanebutte
John Haney
Polly & Steve Hankin
Steve Hankin
Bob Hankinson
John Hanks
Joseph J & Daisy D Hanks
April & David Hansen
Mike Hanson
Ronald Hardy
Sheri Harkness
Page 52 of 67
Jerry Harmon
Janet M Harper
Ruth & James Harrah
Brenna Harrington
Lee R & Theresa Culver Harris
David T & Leona M Harrison
Kelli & Mike Harrison
Trish Harrison Wimpy
Craig & Kathy Hartley
Emily Hartley
David/Helen Hartley/Weagraff
Haskell/Rolle
Wendell R & Glenda R Hatcher
Lorne & Jeanette Hauser
Linda Haverstock
R&L Haverstock
Ida M Hawkins
Scott Hawthorn
Bob Haynes
Steve Headley
Daniel Healy
Heather
Karen & Wolf Hebenstreit
Jessica & Brian Hecker
Joseph Hedberg
Dave Hedges
Jean Hedges
Hedlund/Howard
Linda & Michael Hedt
Charles R Heidemann
Linda & Larry Hein
Jessica Heinrich
Patricia Helm
Robert E & Elizabeth A Helm
Joe Hendershot
Hugh R Henderson
Paul S & Connie M Henderson
Claire Hendrickson
Hengle
Bill Henry
Dave Henry
Henry & Gayle C Riggs
Alex Henshaw
Barbara Henshaw
Doug & Linda Henshaw
Rob And Kim Henson
Mike And Tania Hernandez
Herndon/Mackey
Margaret Herron
Marcie Hershman
Dwane Herzog
Linnea Freed Hess
John Hesselgesser
Earl E & Agnes A Heuman
Scott & Kris Hewitt
Brandon Hicks
Erin Hicks
Lee Ann Hicks
Fred Higaki
Lynette Higaki
Hilary D & Susan R Jones Trs
Amy
Hildebrand
Elmyra Hill
Jim & Becky Hill
Lee & Paula Hill
Robert T & Barbara L Hines
Gary & Lorna Hink
Gary R & Lorna L Hink
Howard A & Fay Hinkel
Richard L & Nora H Hinton
Paul Henry Hitchcock
Walter A & Kristi Hitchcock
Myron Hittinger
Linda D. Hixon
Gregory B & Mary E Hjelm
Jana, Murray Hocker
Gerry Hodge
Joan Hodgins
Tim Hoffman
Monte Hofstrand
Terry & Patty Hogan/Thoe
Hogan/Thoe
Hogden/Verduin
Ervin N & Frauna K Hoglund
Jeff & Patricia Hokenson
Paul H Holden
Ann Holder
Charlene Hollen
William G & Marlene A Holman
Lars & Dawn Holmberg
Kathleen A Holmes
Lois Holsinger
Page 53 of 67
Dan Holstrom
Karan Holt
Woody & Betty Holt
Kristen & Mike Holten
Doug Hoover
Nancy & Hoover Hopkins
Kathleen M Hoppenrath
Gerald L & Mary A Horstman
Eugene A & Sylvia T Horton
Andrew E & Jane C Hospador
Dayton S Hostetler
Lary & Carleen N Houghton
Shirley House
Christine Howard
Scott S Howard
Thomas F Howard
Susan Howell
Daniel & Barbara Hrehov
Madge Hubbard
Jerry Hubbell
Lawerence & Janet Hudak
J Hudson
Hugh Mcmillan
Gary B Hughes
Chris Hugo
John & Lorie Hulbert
Brett Hull
David A. Hull
John G & Michelle R Humphries
Prentis & Constance Hunsinger
Karin V Hunt
Jon Hunter
Kelsey & Rochelle Huntington
Stan Huntington
Vivian Hurd
Iris Hursh
Bob & Karla Huston
Kim M & Molly M Hutchinson
Linda Hutchison
Gene Hutz
Gretchen Hutz
Ken Hutz
Brian L & Greta S Ireland
Rose Elaine Ireland
Warren & Heather Ireland
James F & Ruth L Irish
Daniel Irish
Susie Irvine
James N & Janet L Irving
Jim And Jan Irving
Brenda K. Isaacs
Dave Isaacs
Paul E Isaacson
Cheryl & Robert Nay Iseberg
Teryl Isenberg
Calvin & Jenel Ison
Jenel & Cal Ison
Jesel Ison
Shirley M Jaccard
Tim & Eri Jackowski
Bev Jackson
Dan & Marilyn Jackson
Anthony Jacobs
Theodore L & Carole K Jacobs
Allan Jacobson
Donn S James
Judy James
James & Helen S Kai Cornwell
James/Willey
Ronald & Shirley Jamtgaard
Janice J Goldman/Wm B & Douglas B Mcturnal
Anthony W & D Joyce Jay
Maggie Jay
James M & Marjorie A Jazuk
Jeannette
Terri Jeffreys
Dorothy F Jeffries
Cartney Jelinek
Vicki & Austin Jenkins
Jenkins
Cory Jensen
Jo Jensen
Katherine J Jensen
Otto R & Amelia H Jensen
David I & Diane R Jepsky
George Jerry
James Keselburg & Jerry Keselburg
Robert Jewell
Warren C R Jewell
Jim Stephens/Rhonda Savage Dds
Joe Glaser Lf Est
Michel John
Page 54 of 67
John & Terry Parks
John A Zenew
John B Hitchcock
John T & Kathleen M Doherty
John.Mee
Budd Johnson
Craig
Johnson
Daniel &Elain Sonntag Johnson
David C Johnson
Don Johnson
Douglas G & Lynette H Johnson
Edyth Johnson
James M & Darlene G Johnson
Jerry Johnson
Joseph L Johnson
Kathy Johnson
Kenneth D Johnson
Lester Johnson
Payson & Katherine Johnson
Rick L & Margaret C Johnson
Steven & Kristin Johnson
Thomas M & Natalie L Johnson
Tom & Elaine Johnson
Tony Johnson
Wendy Johnson
William Johnson
Dewitt
Johnson
Douglas P Johnston
Jane Johnston
Jon & Kim Lan Peterson
Guy N & Gloria A Jonas
Edwin J Jonassen
Anton L Jones
Dianne Jones
Drew M Jones
Jackie Jones
Kevin C Jones
Mary Jones
Sally Jones
Steven H & John P Roddy Jones
Wilburn & Linda Jones
Scott And Lynn Jonge
Geir & Ellen Jonsson
Michael G. Jordan
Mary Ann Judd
Bill Jurasin
Chris K.
Richard Kamrar
Bruce Diftoe & Kandi Horton
Robert W & Vannette M Kanna
Dennis &Gary Kanzler
Mike & Christa B Karimi
Edwin Karr
Kris Kassel
Merlin M & Wendy S Katolas
Katrina M Martin
Kristina Katsaros
Steven L Kaufman
Mike Keegan
Sharman Keely
William & Jody Keesecker
Janette Keiser
Keith
Carol J Kelley
Patrick N & Susan Kelley
Verne T & Carol Ann Kelling
Ann & Keith Kelly
D L & S A Backman Kelly
E. Edison Kennell Iii
John A Kennelly
Mary A Kenney
Carol A Kent
Larry & Joan Kent/Villa
Lori Kessler
Lori Kessler
Richard J & Meri S Kessler
Karen Lee Kiehlmeier
Kenneth S & Sharrell Kilborn
Larry & Gayle Kilmer
Richard L & Elizabeth A Kinerk
Alan King
Gerald E & P Sue Eastman King
Andrew And Jeanne Kinney
Mratin R & Janeth E Kinser
Bernard J & Susan M Kipp
Loueen Kirkendall
Duane & Laurie Kirschner
Doris Klarich
William Kleinhanz
Kenneth M & Karen A Klett
Jessica Klinkert
Dwane H & Lisa M Knapp
Page 55 of 67
Dick Knight
Bill & Rebecca Knowles
William E & Brenda J Knox
Amanda Knutson
Dick & Bev Knutzen
Paul Kohl
Robert & Claire Korman
Marylynn Kotansky
Kenneth & Donna Kraig
Kendall D & Sandra J Kramer
Richard Kramer
Fayette Krause
Kristie
Wendy K Krumroy
Michael W & Kaycee W Krysty
Peter Ku
John Kuamme
Raymond Kubista
Marianne Kuehnell
Sterling K Kuhlman
John Kuhlmann
George A & Beth Ann Kuhn
Milton G Kuolt Ii
Paul H & Michael N Kurose
Daniel R * Deborah L Kyler
Jelle Kylstra
Robert M & Janet B Lackman
Nils A & Lois N Ladderud
Lady Of The Lake
Brock & Maria Laffoon
Steven J & Sharon A Lagerberg
Barbara M Lajune
Carol & John Lake
Pete And Margie Laketa
Robert & Diane Lamb
Paul & Ruth Landers
Candance Landres
Susan Lane
Carl W Iii & Teresa M Lang
Jesse Langford
Jim Langhelm
James & Sara Langton
Jean Langton
Audrey M Lanphere
Jennifer Lantz
Cheryl Laplant
Larry D & Jacqueline Pearson
Larry William Hitchcock
Karen Lee Larsen
Linda & Stanley Larsen
Maureen Larsen
Lisa Larson
Mary K. Mcdaniel Larson
Nancy C Larson
Neil Larson
Jason Lauaz
John & Marilyn Laubach
John Lauber
Terri Lausten
Ray And Sandy Lavasseur
John Lavillette
Michael Lawson
Freddie A Laws Washatko
James M & Jane Lea
James O Lea
Leah
Kenneth & Carla Leander
Leclair/Christensen
Bobby D & Karen Ledbetter
Robert & Julie Ledford
Dale W & Sandra K Lee
Donald L & Carole M Lee
Lora Lee
Terry Lee
Lee A Desta
Dorothy Legacie
William "Jim" & Helen Leggett
Frank G & Waltraut B Lehmann
Allen O & Anne A Leland
Robert R & Kristi L Lemon
Don Lenning
Lenora
Leonard E Proctor
Fiona Leslie
Patricia J Leslie
David Lester
Gary Lester
Gerald R & Kathy Lester
John T & Wende L Lester
Matthew J & Carol L Lettich
Lori Letts
Frank & Cerri Lewis
Page 56 of 67
Gail & Michele Lewis
Paul Lewis
Leon O & Diane G Libby
Ray & Helen Liberg
P & J Libstaff
Debra C Light
Devon Liles
Dan Lind
Douglas Lindal
Lorna G Lindeman
Devere Lindh
Deonne C Lindley
Paula Lindsay
Robert A & Carol Lindsay
Robert A & Carol Lindsay
Loretta F Lindsey
Johnny & Rita Litchfield
Randy Litzenberger
Kay Lloyd
Richard Logan
Kristen Lord
Bruce P & Margaret F Loughlin
Edward J & Cynthia A Lowcock
John M Lowney
Jay Lucas
Clinton Luckman
Ludwig/Von Haartman
Eugene Luisi
Melvin G & Dorothy M Lund
Bryan Lundgaard
Lynch Creek Floral
Mary Lynn
Mary Lynn
Jason M.
Joan Mac Innes
Donald P & Carol Macbean
Bruce Macdonald
Alex Macdonald
Harold J R Macdonough
Elsie M Mace
Barb Mach
Wesley R & Joan Macinnes
Jim Mackay
Gregory D Mackenzie
Roland R & Charlotte Mackenzie
David Mackey
Scot Maclean Et Ux
Annie Madden
Lori A Madsen
Stephen A Magnuson
Noah Magram
Rebecca Maguire
Richard Jr & Emily Jean Mah
Sherette Main
James Malcolm Jr.
John T & Caren L Maldon
Richard J & Lorene Mandeville
Velma Mae Mangold
Baltazar & Nancy L Manibog
Reilly Mannery
Diane Manning
Kristine & Leon R Mansfield
Rosemary Manuel
Lori Mapes
Jon Marcinko
Robert S & Julia H Marconi
Mariano's
Marjorie Drynes Et Al
Mark & Geryl A Macconaghy
Daniel Marler
Rich Marquiss
Shirley G Marrs
Kevin & Jessie Marsh
Stephnie Marsh
Joan Martin
Linda D Martin
Noelle Martin
Troy W Martin
Martin R & Janeth E Kinser
Al Martineau
Coreen/Billy Joe Martineau/Adkins
Belen Martinez
Tony Marty
Mary Ann & Andrew Marzahl
Mark Mashtare
Patricia M. Mason
D. Wayne Mather
Shelleen & Mark Matthews
Eric & Christina Matthies
Douglas & Sherry Mattson
David Maxwell
Bridget Mayfield
Page 57 of 67
Teresa Mayfield
Dianna Mayon
James & Susan Mcalexander
Phyllis Mccarthy
Scott Mccauley
Dana Mcclain
Kevin Mcclain
Mcclung/Rockey
Jim Mcclure
Robert L & Susan M Mccorkle
Barbara Mccoy
Leo & Clara Mccullough
Carroll & Cynthea L Mccutcheon
Dale A & Susan O Mcdaniel
Cindy Mcdermot
Douglas H Mcdonald
James F Jr & Margaret Mcdonald
Lawrence E Mcdonald
William W & Carol A Mcdonald
Robert W & Gloria J Mcdonaold
Jeffrey Mcdonnell
Denise And Kirk Mcelney
Donald D & Virginia D Mcelroy
Thomas Mcevoy
Richard Mcgeovney
Jayni Mcghee
Thomas F Mcgrath
Mcgregor/Morris
Martin P Mcguirk
Pat Mchugh
Scott Mckay
Bob Mckibbin
Robert A & Margaret Mckibbin
Gregory & Stephanie Mckinney
S Mark Mclaughlin
Jean E Mclean
Bruce J & Lillian Mclendon
Will B & Sharon D Mcleod
Tammy &John Mcleod/Hamilton
Brian & Karen Mcmanus
Rose M Mcmanus
Janet Mcmullen
Lynn Mcmullen
Ronals And Janice Mcmullen
Roger S & Gayle Mcnulty
Rich Mcvey
Steven & Dee Ann Meacham
Steven And Dee Meacham
Cindy Mead
D Mead
Eva Meassick
Diane Meddaugh
John Mee
Trevor & Jenifer Meier
Susan Mendenhall
Mike & Masae Mermelstein
Tom & Candy Merrick
Courtenay Meyer
Geoff & Eileen Meyer
Suzy Meyer
Roger Michael
Michael J & Linda S Benson
Ray Michaelson
Doug Micklich
Henry M Milander
Martin & Vicki Milander
Amelia Millan
Deidra J Miller
Haley Miller
Isaac & Timarie Miller
Mike Miller
Scott Miller
Miller/Schasel
Patti Miller Crowley
Don Mills
Jack W Miner
Michael D & Barbara L Minner
Roderick Minogue
Ginger Minto
Roy L Mitchell
Theresa Mitchell
Charles Mitchell
William E Mobbs
Elaine G Modrow
Michael S & Evelyn J Moe
Bruce R & Lou Ann Moeller
Kristin Moerler
Toni Monzon
Glenn R & Judy L Moore
John P & Tina L Moore
Mary & John Moore
Tony Moore
Page 58 of 67
Warren G Moore
Joe Moran
Edie Morgan
Edith Morgan
Jess Moriarty
Bradley M & Eenas Morlock
Carol Ann Morris
Jud Morris
Kerry L & Diane H Morris
Barbara Morrison
Leroy G & Karen L Morrison
John Morrow
Delores & Joe Morton
Mark Mottet
Stephen & Judith Mounsey
Sherman & Jean Moyer
Mtacher
James I & Irene C Muirhead
Barbara & Tom Mulledy
Rebecca Mullen
James T & Ruth J Mulligan
Adam Munhalla
Ronald Murgo
Desmond L & Kerma Murphy
Douglas & Kari Murphy
Ed And Sandy Murphy
Edward J & Sandra L Murphy
James & Janice Murphy
Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
Paul J Murphy
Joyce Murray
Hugh A & Joyce E Muzzall
Diane E Myers
Jacob Myre
Jason Myre
K Myre
Bob Myrick
Frederick J Nachbar
Connie & David Nagel
Yong & Linda B Namkung
Jim Neal
Judy Nedrow
Buell Neidlinger
James G & Sue Neil
Hannah Nelsen
David H & Jacquelene Nelson
Eugene B & Doris M Nelson
Mark & Linda Nelson
Mark W & Kimberley S Nelson
Nancy Nelson
Richard & Jian Nelson
Rocco H & Linda J Nelson
William & Dora Nesmith
Nick Neuerburg
Nonie & Nick Neuerburg
Cheryl Nevins
Gaith F & Rodney W Newby
Nick Newerburg
Scott Newman
William & Linda Newman
Ruth Wingert Newton
Donld & Mary N Nichols
Harriett Nichols
Thomas L & Jacqueline Nichols
Thomas L & Jacqueline Nichols
Harold & Marilyn Nickel
Jim & Libby Nieland
Joyce Niemann
Vicki Niemann
Joyce Niemann
Nita's
John S & Marie M Niwa
No Name Listed
No Name Listed
John B Noble
Kurt And Tod Nogaki
Nola J Young
D. Nole
Allie None
Booth None
Colleen None
Laura Noreau
Ronald &Laurie Norman
Eric C & Alisa Northrop
Northwest Powersports
Craig Norton
Allison Novins
Deb Nroth
Gary Nutt
Stephen J Nutt
Richard Oberg
Page 59 of 67
John O'brien
Mark O'brien
Mikel & Paul O'brien
Edward O'conner
O'day/Mcallum
Jim O'donnell
Robert M & Michele Y Ogle
Rolfe And Pat Ogle
O'keefe/Johnstone
Curt Oland
Sydney Olausen
Darrick Oliver
Larry K Olli
Judy Olsen
Stan & Phyllis Olsen
David & Linda Olson
Janet G. Olson
Leonard A & Cindy Olson
Linda And David Olson
Mark & Mary Olson
Michael & Carole Olson
Nancy Olson
Russ Olson
Terry Olson
Craig Olson
David Olson
R.W. Olszewski
Mike Oneil
Eugene F. O'neill
James F & Jo Ann M O'neill
Karen Orff
Craig Orff
Phyllis & Sam Oshikawa
Clarence Jr & Myla L Oswalt
Doug & Connie Otjen
Ichiro & Lynne Otsu
Jill Ott
Rodger D & Joan Overson
Greg Packard
Debra Page
Trena Page
John Paine
Esperanza Pajo
Heather Palmer
Mary Palmer
Stet Palmer
Dudley & Anne Panchot
Pismorn S Panning
Tad & Nancy Papineau
William F & Grace A Parisio
Elizabeth Park
Donald Parker
Cheryl Parkinson Hummel
John J. Parks
Lilli Parks
Jose & Denise, Catherine And Andrew Parra
Dick Parrett
Jim Passage
Wayne C & Jacqueline R Pate
David Patkertz
Patra Rae & Steven E Boots
Patrick M Cook
David R Sr & Donna L Patterson
Kelli Paul
Roger A & Sheryl A Paul
Walter & Betty Paul
Paul E Novotne Sr
Paul L & Judith C Baker Tr
Gerald & Carol E Paulson
Janice Paulson
Susie Paxhia
Barbara Pearson
Conrad L & Patricia T Pearson
Gregory & Seran Pearson
Mary Lou Pearson
Victor & Yong S Pecora
Morris R. Pedersen
James Peele
Richard A Peet
Linda L Pelon
John F & Laurie A Peltier
Peninsula Credit Union
Aaron Penney
E. M. Pepper
Candace Perez
Carol & Bernard Perez
George K & Prudence A Perry
Joan Peter
Peter P Gimmi
Peter Riggs
Harriett L Petersen
Larry W & Judith E Petersen
Page 60 of 67
Mary Petersen
Brian & Elaine Peterson
Daniel & Larae Ada Peterson
Daniel And Larae Peterson
Martin L & Patricia Peterson
Van Peterson
Steven S & Melanie Petherick
John E & Marlene A Petit
Elina & Vadim Petrosova
B Craig & Hillary Pettyjohn
Karen And Steve Pfundtner
Robert A & Deneen M Phelan
Virginia Phillips Adams
James & Doris Philp
Jimmy C Phipps
Phyllis Anderson
Don And Donna Piblado
Ken Pickard
Rodney A & Carol L Pierce
Janet Pinneo
Charles R & Ida Joyce Pinney
Margie R Plebuch
Gary Plews
Plomski/Lortz
Bill G & Peggy A Plunkett
John & Beverly Pogany
Carol Pomeranz
Katie Pool
Skip Post
Virginia Potter
Christopher A & Laura Pottorff
David T Potwin
Bill Powell
Lois B Powell
Harmon Powers
Brent And Wendy Prante
William A & Joan Prastka
Prelsberry
Amy Presta
David J Price
David F & Marlene J Prim
Richard A Pringle
Cathy And John Prins
John & Cathy Prins
Jon Prins
Ken Proburt
Greg, Angela & Cali Pruett
Ps72638
Mary Pubols
Curt Puddicombe
Thomas & Constance Purchase
Richard J Purdy
Robert L & Janet K Purves
Mary Quistorff
Pizanti R
Kara Racutla
Jody & Katherine Radcliffe
Lynn Radcliffe
Steven A & Bonnie B Radelich
Karalee Rae
Carol Ragus
Vincent & Linda Raineer
Darryl & Diane Ramsey
Kenneth D Rasmussen
Ahmad David Rasti
Kathryn Ratkus
Jerome Rauen
Frank A & Denise A Raught
Virginia B Rawlings
Emily Ray
Roger & Joann Ray
Tim Ray
Rebecca Chadwick
David J Reda
Ernest W Reda
Judith Reddy
Richard W & Winnie M Redler
Gary J & Catherine M Redman
Kevin Reed
William G Reed Jr
Bill Rehfield
Ellen Reiche
Richard & Valerie Reineman
William & Shannon Reinhardt
Kenneth R & Patricia Remine
Nancy Renn
James & Alberta Resleff
Joel Rett
Joel Rett
Robert Reynolds
Craig Rhodes
Diana L Ribera
Page 61 of 67
Eric & Frances Larson Rice
Richard M Enlow
Robert R & Molly R Richards
Doris E Richardson
Don Richter
Margaret A Rickett
Rick Ridgeway
Floyd D & Agnes E Ridout
Lance & Tara Rigby
Jay Riggleman
Peter Riggs
Peter Riggs
Melvin D & Barbara A Riley
Mike & Mo Rinabarger
Mike And Maureen Rinabarger
Steve Riordan
Patricia P Ritchie
Patricia Ritts
Thomas E & Joyce River
Erin John Roach
Earl Roark
Maryjane & Rich Robbins
William J & Linda M Roberge
Robert M & Norene Stevens
Robert W & Sharon A Meadows
Gary Robertson
Robin
George E & Joye Robinson
Jeri Robinson
Magee Robinson
Mallow Robinson
Tyrone Robuck
Ronald & Wendy Rochon
Rodney J & Pauline M Garner
Stephanie Roeder
Steve & Susan Roettjer
Bob Rogers
Bob Rogers
Della Rogers
Dick Rogers
Donald & Mary Rogers
Jim Rogers
John Rogers
Samuel Rogers
Timothy O & Roseanne M Rogers
Dave Rolfs
Margie J & David L Rolfs
Craig Romano
Ronalee J Mizoguchi
Garrett J Ronning
Thomas H Roof
Leslie Rooney
Ronald & Ellen Rosbach
Jesse R & Mary Jean Rose
Tr Rosel
David L & Jeanne M Rosenkranz
Kathy Ross
Steven J & Sherry Rosselli
Mary T Rossi
Morgan Rothrock
Arleen C Rountree
Mark Roush
David C. Rowand
Mark & Monica Rowland
Chris & Becky Rowley
Var Chris & Rebecca M Rowley
Ruby A Bowers
William Rumbold
Runningasawolf
Dion Rurik
Jean Rushing
Victoria Ruth
Brett J & Ann M Rutherford
Tim Rutledge
Rwtucker56
Elizabeth A. Ryan
Terence F & Michelle E Ryan
Thomas J & Mary A Ryan
Marsha Ryder
S & H Franich Lt / S Franich Surv Trs
Kathleen Sacdalan
John Sack Md
Robert & Ingrid Sager
Sakuma/Likeda
Michael Salazar
William Salge
Katherine Salinas
Sara Salter
Richard A & Naomi Samson
June L Samuelson
Susan M Sandberg
Ronald K & Gail A Sanderson
Page 62 of 67
Mowry Sandra
Sandra L Rosenbladt
Paul Fallifan Sandra Jullson
Joe V & Abby L Santos
Gregory W & Kathleen M Saul
Daryl & Jackie Scanagatta
Vince Scartozzi
Judith Schaaf
Michael P & Marsha L Schaefer
Roy B And Eleanor D Schaefer
Pamela Schairbaum
Calvin K & Irma Scheinost
Susan Schell
Arthur Schick
Eric Schmidt
Herb Schmidt
Steven E & Nancy F Schmidt
Barbara A Schneider
Daniel J & Mary G Schneller
Tim R & Darlene Schnitzer
Rick Schoen
Jan And Sumner Schoenike
Victoria Scholzen
Susan Schopf
Dale Schroeder
Vernon & Jane Schuelein
Donna Schultz
James & Karen Schulz
Linda J Schwartz
Brian D & Louise M Scott
Thomas Seafert
The Honorable Larry Seaquist
Josh Seaton,
Glenn A & Molly Seaverns
James J Segaar
Bill Sehmel
Hilde T. Seidel
James Seidensticker
Jonathan F Seil
Gary & Viki Selke
Sellers/Pranger
Roger A & Luana M Senske
Tom Sexton
Hayward M Iii & Jane Seymore
Ari Shackell
Aurora Shackell
Sissy Shackell
Fred G & Susan L Shanafelt
Vikki Shanahan
Michael & Shirley Shanley
Shanster27
Sharyl Hitchcock Lamsma
Earlene G Shaw
Steven D Shefler
Beverley L Sheldahl
Suzanne O Sheldon
Robert E & Delores M Shepard
Ian & Yvonne Shepherd
Robert L & Theresa Shepherd Sr
Joan Sheppard
Stephen Sherlock
John Sherman
Ronald & Robin Sherman
Bill Sherrill
Wayne & Virginia Shew
Joseph Jr & Barbara Shickich
Bill Shoaf
Richard & Karen Shockley
Robert B & Debi K Shoemaker
Stuart S & Judith L Shorr
Cindy Shotts
Bernard L Shults
Roger & Margaret Shute
Cheryl Sicilia
Richard Sicilia
Aaron Siegrist
Claire M. Silver
Anthony M & Terry M Silvestrin
Danny J Simmons
Dean And Nancy Simmons
Odis & Jo Simmons
Simons/Smith
Glen A & Lisa K Simonsen
Robert L & Judith H Simpton
C Joseph Sinnitt
Nancy K Skaar
Bernard J & Particia A Skahill
Skiffington
Skip And Jackie Skinner
Douglas Skinner
Ed Skone
Frank & Colleen Slater
Page 63 of 67
Jerome K & Linda M Slatta
Bjorn & Hildur Sleveland
Melissa Slichter
George & Kris Sly
Clayton H Slyter
Donna Smeall
B Joel & Kimberly F Smith
Donald C & Beverly J Smith
Gary & Mary Lou Smith
Martin B Smith
Robert & Delores Smith
Willa A Smith
Michael Smyth
Angela/Kenneth Snider
Joyce Snodgrass
Frances Snyder
Lynn & Kathleen Sommers
Debbie M & Maxx M A Sonandre
Cheryl Sonneman
Rick Sorrels
Craig V & Vicki A Sosey
Patricia Souza
Linda H. Spadoni
Adrienne Spangler
Donald C & Lynette L Spangler
David Sparling
Barry J & Karen Spector
Michael Spence
Sue & Bill Spencer
Tony L & Mary M Spencer
Sally Spencer
Spencer Lake Bar & Grill
Michael & Janet E Sperling
James R Spice
Craig & Jeanne Spiegelberg
Spirit6724
Robert Sprague
Voski Sprague
Laura M St George
Jennifer S St Lorant
Kirk R St. Andrew
Daniel Stadler
Matthew Stahl
Dan R & Brenda J Stainbrook
Gene P & Lou Ann Stalder
Kareen Staley
Mark V Stalmaster
Lon D & Pamela J Stamper
Donald L & Hisayo W Stave
Sandra Stefan
Gary D & Terry L Steinhoff
O W & Barbara I Stellfox
Richard C & Margaret Stemwell
Nancy Stenk
Billie B Stenson
Deborah Stephens
Duane C Sr & Sharon Stephens
Ronald W. Stephens
James & Tammy Stevens
Richard Stevens
Lynn Stevenson
Alan & Helen Stewart
Donald W & Roberta M Stewart
Heather Stiegelmeyer
Mimi Stieler
Robert B & Carolyn M Stilwell
Kent Stock
James F. Stokes
Neal Stolberg
Rick Stolz
Christopher Stover
Eric Strachan
Charles M & Donna L Strandberg
John Strasburger
Mary K Strate
Anne Strathairn
Charles B Stratton
Celine Straub
John Street
Strohm/Paprocki
James & Shellie Strom/Boucher
John & Janet Stroup
Raymond & Susan Stultz
Brian M & Deborah Sullivan
Michael Sullivan
Don & Sue Sumsky
Henry D & Darlene N Sunday
Henry E & Irene Suprunowski
Susan Carrol Ayers
Jack Sutton
Wesley A Jr & Holly A Sutton
Christa Svoboda
Page 64 of 67
Mark Swartout
Rivkah Sweedler
Rivkah Sweedler Et Al
Mary Sweeney
Jeremy P. Swenson
Geoff & Colleen Swett
Brian Swimme
Clemens Szyperski
Pamela A Tacke
Takegami/Wennemark
Talakai/Gervais
Marneen Tallman
Milton & Margaret Tarp/Watchers
Cliford & Janet Tartalia
Carol Taylor
Roy Taylor
Fred A Mullan, Et Al Ted Lind
John & Bonnie Tegtmeyer
Joan Tenenbaum
Penny Tennison
Teresa Thompson
Terrence H Goulet
Beth Tesh
Dick Tesh
A J Fauconnier & Theresa A Schomin
Bob And Lisa Thiessen
James D. & Carol A Thomas
Linda Thomas
Susanna I Thomas
Thomas L& Jacqeline Nichols
Kagey Lance Et Ux & Thomas Llewellyn Et Ux
Charles W Thompson
Kim Thompson
Renee L Thompson
George & Vicki Thorhill
William L & Donnelle K Thornton
Ivan Iii & Nilsa Thorsos
Kris E & Deborah I Thorsos
Craig Tibke
Robert J & Diane K Tichy
James M Tiegen
Brenda Tingvall
Bruce Titus
Robert & Linda Tjossem
Theresa Tnken
Donna B Todd
Errol Todd
J&K Todrzak
Terese Toennies
Thomas & Deborah Tokarz
David C & Norma J Toland
Christto & Dorothea Tolias
William Kc & Martha E Tom
Judy Tooley
Diane & Andy Torrance
Irene Torres
Louis T Tountas
S Tower
Douglas Townsend
W Michael & Susan S Tracy
Bill Trandum
John & Carrie Trapp
Mary Jane Travis
Skip And Barbara Tripp
Spencer & Barbara Tripp
John R & Karen L Trueman
James J & Sin Yun Tsao
Dara T'sas
Brent & Jane Tucker
Daniel W & Patty E Tupper
Carole L Turcotte
Craig Turner
Mark & Jeanne Turner
Rune & Nancy Tvedt
Robert G & Patricia H Twigger
Yuji Uchiyama
Tova Uddenberg
Cliff & Melaney Uehlin
John Uehlin
Lindsey Updike
Susan & Colleen Usibelli
William J & Lynn Valley
Valley/Moreira
Nancy L Van Blaricom
Travis & Tricia Van Marter
Lola J Vance
Vance/Throckmorton
Russell/Cathy Vandver/Walcker
Linda Vanlandingham
Tom Vanslyke Et Al
Var/Rebecca/Michael/Kelly Rowley Trses
Christi Vasilescu
Page 65 of 67
Mary Vasser
Keri Veader
Gary Vierra
Marcello Vigo
Robert A & Carol J Virkelyst
Beverly Visse
Robert J & Erika A Visse
Carolyn Vivian
Vikki Voss
Edward L & Dorothy M Wack
Marla Waddell
Mary & Will Waddell
Mark Wahl
Cindy E Waite
George Waite
Reed Waite
Mike Wakeman
Jonette Waldbjorn
Bruce C Walden
Gary Waldherr
Ronald G & Patricia E Waldner
Jim Walke
James B & Shirley V Walker
Nadeen Walker
Walker Sandlin
Ken Wallace
Michael Wallace
Richard A & Susan C Wallace
Kathleen J Waltari
Walter & Kari Scott Jr
Walter A & Kristi Hitchcock
Eleanor Walters
Ted Walters
Ted Walters
Bernard R & Janice L Walton
Jan And Bernie Walton
Carol Holz Wamberg
Jeff Ward
Diana Ware
Jason Wargin
Richard D & Shirley L Waring
Bill H & Carol M Warren
Reed Wate
Jeffrey C Watkins
John & Tonya Watkins
Rebecca Watling
Conley Watson
Conley E Watson
Craig E Watson
Sean L. Watson
William Watson
Ann & Ted Watts
Bill & Mary Watts
Watts/Lamontagne
Thomas M. Wayno
Merl & Shirley Weatherhogge
Danna Webster
John & Terri Weeden
Jonathan & Terry Weeden
Bo Weeks
Kathryn Weeks
Robert W Wegener
William Weick
Marc H & Beth D Weinstein
Marie Weis
Orien W & Darlene M Weisz
Doris & Carl Welch
Tony & Betty Welfringer
James D & Donna Weller
Mark S. Welpman
Wendy Sharon L Rutkowski Et Al
Janet Werner
Linda Wescott
Dana West
Susan Westbrook
Karen E & Jan Orjan Westerlund
David Sr & Darleen Westermann
Westperson
Christopher Wheatley
Mary & Barney Wheeler
RobertWheeler
Joan Wheelis
Mark Wheelis
Mark & Kathy Wheels
Laird And Dianne Whipple
Laird D & Dianne E Whipple
Michael White
Schuyler M White
Timothy & Patricia Whitehead
Steve & Estella Whitford
Bruce & Joan Whitmore
Sue And Steve Whittier
Page 66 of 67
Paul R & Nadean L Wick
Ilene Wider
Marge Wieland
William S & Rebecca R Wiggins
Gil Wilde
Thomas & Barbara Wilderbuer
Myra V Wilgus
Karlee Fay Wilkinson
Sa Willer
William J & Lynne M Valley
Andrea B Williams
James H Williams
William R & Patricia Williams
Patricia L Willis
H.D. Willsie
Doug Wilma
Charles & Patricia Wilson
Gloria Wilson
Karol Wilson
Michael E & Tracy E Wilson
Steve Wilson
Steve & Donna Wilson
Steven E Wilson
Wilson/Jones Durnford
Donald H & Margery E Wilston
Steven Wilston
Anthony Winiewicz
Ronald S & Mildred Winkle
Pamela Winney
D Winterburn
Sandra Wires
Douglas & Nancy Wisdom
Trivick & Kathleen Wisher
Merle Witter
Ron Witter
Brendon R & Elisa J Wold
Martin H & Elizabeth J Wolk
James Wolland
Chak M Woo
Edwin & Pam Wood
Douglas J & Gloria I Wooding
Roberta Woods
Richard Wooster
David Worden
Courtney Workman
Dawn Wright
Edwin Wurden
Cynthia Wuts
Thomas W & Staci J Yarrington
Heather And Tracy Yost
Janet Young
Mary Ellen Young
Renee Youtsler
Tommie L A Zabrowski
Julian Zapp
Sandy Zapp
Virginia Zapp
Joe P & Sharon E Zeeben
Karl & Suzan Zeiger
Stanley J & Nancy S Zeitz
Kenneth K Zeman
Donna Zier
Ruthmarie Zimmerman
Laurie Zinke
Ken Zirinsky
John L & Renee J Zirkle
James L & Graciela L Zusy
David K & Sharon A Zylstra
Connie
Elizabeth
Page 67 of 67

10-Fudge Point CAMP DNS SEPA

Transcription

Similar documents

Baguio City - unescap.org

November 2015

bella`s bites - A Life Delectable

Community Prosperity Appendix 3 - Donner Summit Area Association

the original fudge kitchen

Adventure Parks in Malaysia | Lost World of Tambun

Meeting Presentation

City of Chelsea Presentation