Michelle Branch

Transcription

Michelle Branch

Page 1 01'2
Michelle Branch
From:
SCOTT SIMPSON [[email protected]
Sent:
Thursday, March 19,20098:24 PM
To:
Joe Yarbrough; Drago. Patricia
Cc:
Smith. Margaret A. (SUPERINTENDENT)
Subject: Re: South Halifax elementary school zone changes
Pat:
I have reviewed Joe's email and the Interlocal Agreement that was negotiated and executed in 2007.
When the School District considers an amendment to a school's attendance boundary, there should also
be consideration given as to whether there needs to be an amendment to the school's Concurrency
Service Area. Section E of the Interlocal Agreement deals with the Concurrency Service Areas. The
Agreement provides that initially the Concurrency Service Area for an elementary school shall be the
same as the attendance boundary for the school. However the Agreement recognizes that they do not
always have to be (he same and that the School District retained the exclusive right to amend school
allendance boundaries. Section E provides a process for amending the Concurrency Service Area and a
change to a Concurrency Service Area is not effective until approved by all Affected
Local Governments. In summary, the School District can amend a school's attendance boundary
without the local government's approval, but the Concurrency Service Area can only be changed
with approval of the local government.
It is not clear whether the School District is proposing a change only to school's attendance boundary in
South Daytona or also the school's Concurrency Service Area. However it appears that the School
District will not receive the City of South Daytona's approval to change the concurrency service area
of its elementary school. Therefore, the School District is left only with amending the attendance
boundary while leaving the concurrency service the same. My question is how will we determine the
available capacity of a school when the concun'ency service area covers an area that is not the same as
the school's attendance boundary. This will result in areas heing included in the Concurrency Service
Area that do not actually attend the zone and children altending the school who do not live within the
Concurrency Service Area. If we are going to have school attendance boundaries and school
Concurrency Service Areas that are not the same we need to make sure we know
how proposed residential development will be evaluated in the future.
Scott E. Simpson
595 West Granada Blvd.
Suite A
Ormond Beach. FL 32174
Telephone 386-677-3431
Facsimile 386-673-0748
3/20/2009
Page 2 of 2
From: Joe Yarbrough <[email protected]>
To: "Drago, Patricia" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Smith, Margaret A. (SUPERINTENDENT)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 20094:25:51 PM
Subject: South Halifax elementary school zone changes
Pat,
I have circulated your interoffice memorandum of February 18 with the City Council and staff for
comments. The majority of City Council members are in opposition to the Scenario 3 that is
recommended by the Superintendent for changes in the school zoning affecting South Daytona
Elementary .
As you may recall during the hearing at South Daytona Elementary on February 2, Mayor O'Neal,
Councilwoman Long and I expressed the City's desire to include South Daytona residents in the zoning
changes. At the time, you stated you felt Reed Canal Road was unsafe for children to cross, but at
least two subdivisions presently zoned for South Daytona Elementary cross Reed Canal Road. Bryan
Cave and Orchards are not zoned for South Daytona, however.
The maps provided in the scenarios I received in the most recent communication are not legible. It is
difficult to determine exactly which zoning changes are recommended for South Daytona and the other
school zones that would impact South Daytona Elementary. More detail is needed to better understand
the scenarios. My records indicate at the February 2 meeting, the only school zones to be affected
would be South Daytona, Sugar Mill, Spruce Creek, Palm Terrace, Sweetwater and Horizon. I cannot
find any reference to Turie T. Small.
Finally, it is perceived that South Daytona Elementary is being utilized to strike socia-economic
balances in the student attendance that other schools in the area are not subject. The City Council
would like to know the existing socio-economic makeup of South Daytona Elementary as well as the
socio-economic makeup with the proposed changes in scenario 3. The socio-economic makeup of the
other school zones affected with these proposed changes is also of interest.
Joseph W. Yarbrough
City :o.lan<lgt'r
City ()f Sfltlt h Lla\·tOl1d
167:! S. Ridge\\'o;lt! c\wnue
South Daytona, Florida :~2119
386-:322-3 0 1<\
.I\\"\/mb
pu·~·\!'F. ':-:OTE; Flnrida has n.'ry hroad puhlic records law. :\1(lSl wriu"n communication 10 or from City of South Paytoml oflicials and
(,lIli'l<.yee~ regarding pUblic busint'ss are puhlic recor<i-; .(\·ailable to Ill':' publk and media UpOI1 request. )','Ui" c-mail COllllllllllicaliol1s llIay be
subject to puhlic tlisdosure. The \ iew c:-prcsscd in this IllCSSal~l? Hla~ 110t necessarily reflect those of tht: City of South [);l)1oll;l. If:- ou hanR'cl'in-t\ this nwssagl' in error, pIcasI.' notify us immediately h:- I'l'plyitl~; tolhis mcs<;agl', alld please ddete it fron. your mmp\I\(>r. Thank you.
3120/2009
FACILITIES SERVICES
3750 Olson Drive, Daytona Beach, Florida 32124
PHONE: 386/947-8786 FAX: 386/947-5847
Dr. Margaret A. Smith
Superintendent of Schools
March 6, 2009
School Board of Volusla County
Ms. Judy Conte, Chairman
Mrs. Diane Smith, Vice-Chairman
Dr. AI WIlliams
Ms. Candace Lankford
Mr. Stan Schmidt
Mr. Joe Yarbrough, City Mgr.
City of South Daytona
1672 South Ridgewood Avenue
South Daytona, Fl 32119
RE:
School Attendance Boundary Changes
Dear Mr. Yarbrough:
Please find enclosed the information presented to the School Board on February 24,
2009 as it relates to attendance boundary adjustments in your area.
The Board accepted the staff recommendation to adjust the school boundaries for
Horizon, Palm Terrace, South Daytona, Sweetwater, Spruce Creek, Sugar Mill and TT
Small Elementary schools pursuant to Scenario 3. This boundary change will relieve
Horizon Elementary and maximize the utilization at the area schools.
The public hearing will be held on April 14, 2009 at 5:30 pm at the School District's
Administrative Center located at 200 North Clara Avenue in Deland.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 386-947-8786 extension
50772 or Helen laValley, Planning Specialist at extension 50805.
Sincerely,
J~4C.1L< ~/i,\ .~ d--~~
Saralee L. Morrissey, AICP
~
Site Acquisition & Intergovernmental Coordination Director
C:
John Dillard. Community Development Director (via emaiVno end)
Helen Wert. Asst. Director Community Services (via emaiVno encl)
File
End:
Board Presentation
Exhibit 15
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February 18,2009
TO:
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
Dr. Margaret Smith, Superintendent
FROM:
Patricia Drago, Executive Director of Facilities
Saralee L. Morrissey, AICP
Director of Site Acquisition and Intergovernmental Coordination
SUBJECT:
South Halifax Elementary School Attendance Area Changes
Horizon Elementary in Port Orange is significantly over its permanent capacity. The permanent
capacity is 543 and its enrollment is approximately 933 students (20 day count). The Public
School Facilities Element adopted by the local governments requires that Horizon Elementary be
in compliance with the adopted level of service standard by July 1,2012. Other South Halifax
elementary schools have available capacity and are not being fully utilized. Given the recent
trends in school enrollments and capital revenues, a new elementary school is not scheduled for
construction to relieve Horizon Elementary in the planning period.
In addition to meeting the terms of the interlocal agreement and the Public School Facility
Element, a goal of this attendance boundary change is to balance utilization of existing capacity
at the area schools. Table 1 indicates the affected schools' 20 day enrollments, permanent
capacity, level of service and associated available capacity or lack thereof. The three
elementary schools that have the ability to absorb additional students are South Daytona, Spruce
Creek and Sweetwater.
Exhibit 15
Page 2
TABLE 1
SY08-09
~O-Day
Classroom Level of
Service
!Enrollment Seats
~ of Seats Available
or Needed
Cypress Creek
729
739
99%
10
~orizon
933
543
172%
(390)
lPalm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
1P0rt Orange
382
344
111%
(38)
South Daytona
755
978
77%
~23
Spruce Creek
647
823
79%
176
Sugar Mill
699
623
112%
(76)
Sweetwater
541
725*
75%*
184
rr. T. Small
1484
1452
107%
(32)
* Based on completion and occupancy of 9 classroom addition
District staff initiated the process for adjusting elementary school attendance areas in the South
Halifax area in January. Two scenarios developed by district staff were presented for public
comment on January 6, 7 and 8, 2009. Meetings were held with the Horizon Elementary faculty
and local government representatives. The three community meetings were held at Horizon,
Spruce Creek and Sweetwater Elementary Schools. After the community meetings, district staff
reviewed the comments and proceeded to develop Scenario 3, a proposal intended to address the
district's objectives as well as expressed community concerns. Follow-up community meetings
were held on January 29, February 2,3 and 4, 2009 to present Scenario 3 and receive comments.
The comments received were mostly positive and modifications were made in response to prior
input.
Map depictions of each scenario are included in the attached Power Point. A summary of each
scenario is as follows:
Exhibit 15
Page 3
Scenario 1- Reassigns a portion of Horizon Elementary to Palm Terrace Elementary and
Sweetwater Elementary; Reassigns portion of existing Sweetwater Elementary
zone to Spruce Creek Elementary.
TABLE 2
SCENARIO}
ESTIMATES
lO-Day
Classroom Level of
Enrollment Seats
Service
~ of Seats Available
~ypress
1N0 change to 739
99%
10
Creek
or Needed
!Zone
!Horizon
727
543
134%
(184)
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
~ortOrange
No change to 344
iZone
1N0 change to 978
1Z0ne
1l1%
(38)
77%
~23
South Daytona
Spruce Creek
819
823
100%
~
Sugar Mill
No change to 623
112%
,(76)
80%*
143
107%
(32)
~one
725*
Sweetwater
582
T. T. Small
IN0 change to 452
!Zone
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fails to increase student population at South Daytona Elementary.
Does not achieve compliance with level of service standard at Horizon Elementary.
Shows a possible increase in transportation costs.
Allows a large number of seats to remain available at Sweetwater Elementary for future
growth.
Does not significantly change racial and socioeconomic diversity at any affected school.
Moves many Sweetwater Elementary students in order to accommodate Horizon
students and future growth.
Concerns and objections expressed by Sweetwater families.
Scenario 1 does not achieve the district's objectives.
Exhibit 15
Page 4
Scenario 2 - Reassigns portions of the Horizon Elementary zone to Palm Terrace Elementary,
South Daytona Elementary and Sweetwater Elementary; Reassigns a portion of the
Sweetwater Elementary zone to Spruce Creek Elementary; Reassigns a portion of
Turie T. Small Elementary to South Daytona Elementary; and Reassigns a portion
of the Sugar Mill Elementary zone to Spruce Creek Elementary.
TABLE 3
"# of Seats Available
SCENARIO 2
IESTIMATES
20-Day
Classroom Level of
Service
iEnrollment lSeats
Cypress Creek
1N0 change to 739
1Z0ne
~9%
10
1H0rizon
520
543
96%
123
lPalm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
1P0rt Orange
1N0 change to 344
~one
111%
(38)
South Daytona
974
978
100%
~
Spruce Creek
874
823
106%
(51)
Sugar Mill
607
1623
97%
16
Sweetwater
598
725*
82%*
127
If. T. Small
1472
1452
104%
(20)
or Needed
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Increases student population at aU schools with available capacity.
Achieves compliance with level of service standard at Horizon Elementary.
Achieves a reduction in transportation costs.
Expands walk zones to Spruce Creek Elementary but creates an undesirable crossing for
students at Spruce Creek and Nova Roads.
Retains a large number of seats at Sweetwater Elementary for future growth.
Moves many Sweetwater Elementary students in order to accommodate Horizon
students and future growth.
Concerns and objections expressed by Sweetwater families.
Concerns expressed by Sugar Mill families regarding crossing at Spruce Creek and Nova
Roads.
Concerns and objections expressed by Horizon families being reassigned to South
Daytona Elementary.
Scenario 2 does achieve the district's objectives.
Exhibit 15
Page 5
Scenario 3 - Reassigns portions of the Horizon Elementary zone to Palm Terrace Elementary,
South Daytona Elementary, Spruce Creek Elementary and Sweetwater Elementary;
Reassigns a small portion of the Sweetwater Elementary zone to Spruce Creek
Elementary; Reassigns a portion of Turie T. Small Elementary to South Daytona
Elementary; and Reassigns a small portion of the South Daytona Elementary zone
to Sugar Mill Elementary.
TABLE 4
SCENARIO 3
ESTIMATES
~O-Day
Classroom Level of
Enrollment Seats
~ervice
# of Seats Available
or Needed
Cypress Creek
!No change to 739
!Zone
99%
10
Horizon
595
543
110%
52)
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
Port Orange
1N0 change to 344
!Zone
111%
(38)
South Daytona
879
978
90%
99
Spruce Creek
724
823
88%
99
Sugar Mill
704
623
113%
(81)
Sweetwater
667
725*
92%*
58
if. T. Small
f472
452
104%
(20)
'Ie
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Based on completion and occupancy of 9 classroom addition
Maximizes utilization at all schools with available capacity.
Achieves compliance with level of service standard at Horizon Elementary.
Makes no significant change to transportation costs.
Retains a large number of seats at Spruce Creek Elementary for future growth.
Addresses the concerns and objections expressed by Sweetwater families.
Addresses the concerns expressed by Sugar Mill families regarding crossing at Spruce
Creek and Nova Roads.
Addresses the concerns and objections expressed by Horizon families residing in Port
Orange.
Concerns and objections expressed by Horizon families being reassigned to South
Daytona and Spruce Creek Elementary.
Scenario 3 does achieve the district's objectives.
Exhibit 15
Page 6
OTHER COMMENTS: District staff conducted a total of seven community meetings on the
proposed rezoning and presented twice to the Horizon faculty. In addition to comments received
from the school communities, staff met twice with the affected local governments.
A clear feeder pattern is not apparent within the South Halifax area affected by these scenarios.
Comments were received that requested changes to the middle school boundaries in order to
address a clear feeder pattern although it was made clear the exercise was focused on elementary
boundaries only. Additionally, comments were received relative to available participation in the
extended day program registration and kindergarten registration. These activities' registration is
scheduled after final action by the Board in April. Additionally, staff is working with school
staff and extended day facilitators to ensure parents are aware of new school assignments.
In response to comments received, district staff is recommending tha~ the current fourth graders
(next year's fifth graders) be allowed to remain at their assigned school if desired by the parent.
Additionally, it is recommended that siblings ofthese students be allowed a one year variance to
also remain at their current assigned school at which time the variance would expire. Student
transportation is not recommended to be provided to these students. All other variances would
be reviewed on a case by case basis.
No scenario presented addresses all concerns and objections received; however, Scenario 3 is the
preferred scenario in terms of meeting the district's objectives and responding to as many
concerns as feasible.
SUPERINTENDENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Superintendent recommends that the
School Board authorize the advertising of new boundaries for Palm Terrace, Port Orange,
Horizon, South Daytona, Spruce Creek, Sweetwater, Sugar Mill and Turie T. Small Elementary
Schools pursuant to Scenario 3.
School Attendance Area Change
Horizon, Palm Terrace, Port Orange,
Spruce Creek, Soutlt Daytona, Sugar Mill,
Sweetwater and Turie T. Small
Elementary Schools
Artifact 1 - Transportation Analysis
Artifact 2 - Demographic Data
Artifact 3 - New Residential Development Data
Artifact 4 - Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Artifact 1
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SCENARIO 1
Routes total
Bus Attendants
Mileage per school
year
Cost
Current data
44.5 buses
30 assigned
Proposed Data
46 buses
30 Bus Attendants
278,348 miles
287,730 miles
Difference
1.5 more buses
oless Bus
Attendants
9,382 more miles
$1,066,170.00
$1,066,170.00
Cost $40,444.50
Number of buses indicated above may be able to service multiple schools thus bringing
the cost of the service down a little more. We would try and not add any buses to get
these students to their newly assigned schools. Based on our projected data, we show a
possible increase in the cost for transportation for this plan as indicated above.
Routes total
Bus Attendants
Mileage per school
year
Cost
Current data
44.5 buses
30 assigned
Proposed Data
42 buses
26 Bus Attendants
278,348 miles
262,710 miles
Difference
2.5 less buses
4 less Bus
Attendants
15,638 less miles
$1,066,170.00
$1,051,974.00
Savings $77,645.00
Based on the geographical location of the students, student program and timing issues
within STS, we can see a cost savings due to fewer buses, less bus attendant requirements
and miles traveled. More students would be required to walk to their new school.
Routes total
Bus Attendants
Mileage per school
year
Cost
Current data
44.5 buses
30 assigned
Proposed Data
44.5 buses
30 Bus Attendants
278,348 miles
278,348 miles
Difference
oless buses
oless Bus
Attendants
oless miles
$1,066,170.00
$1,066,170.00
Savings $0.00
Based on the geographical location of the students, student program and timing issues
within STS, we do not see any change in the cost to STS operation. The same number of
buses and personnel are required to get these students to school.
•
•
•
•
Cost for bus run without Bus Attendant: $18,207.00
Cost for bus run with a Bus Attendant: $26,239.00
FY08 cost per student: $768.00
o FTE funds collected per student: $417.00
STS Average Ratio of bus routes with Bus Attendants: 59.8%
Artifact 2
Scenario 1
Estimated Level of Service as affected by Scenario 1 Scenario 1 -- Figures representative of the 2008-09 20-Day Count Student Data
Current Year - Actual
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
School
Scenario 1 - Total in Zone
08/09
LOS
Scenario Scenario
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
Scenario 1 - Enrolled in Zone
Reflecting Transfers
Scenario Scenario Scenario
08/09
08/09
08/09
LOS
Enrollment Capacity
Scenario
08/09
LOS
Not Applicable - No changes to Zone (Enrollment and LOS default to Current Year)
Cypress Creek
729
739
99%
Horizon
933
543
172%
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
794
382
810
344
98%
111%
South Daytona
755
978
77%
Spruce Creek
Sugar Mill
647
823
79%
699
623
112%
Sweetwater
Turie T Small
541 484 543 452 100%
107%
742
543
137%
960
810
119%
763
625 823
725
93%
86%
727 794 819 582 543 810 823
725 134% 98% 100% 80% Data represents percentage of students enrolled in the Free and Reduced Lunch Program
Scenario 1 -- Figures representative of the 2008-09 20-Day Count Student Data
Cypress Creek
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
South Daytona
Spruce Creek
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
Turie T Small
Current
Year
19% 40% 91% 54% 62% 42% 51% 18% 89% Scenario 1
Total in Zone
Enrolled in Zone Reflecting
Transfers
Not Applicable - No Change to Zone (Percentage defaults to Current Year)
46% 85% 45% 91% Not Applicable - No Change to Zone (Percentage defaults to Current Year)
37% 35% Not Applicable - No Change to Zone (Percentage defaults to Current Year)
23% 22% Not Applicable - No Change to Zone (Percentage defaults to Current Year)
Current Year (yellow column): Represents current year (2008-09 20-Day) student data with all boundaries intact and unchanged.
Total in Zone (green column): Represents the boundaries as affected by the scenario, uses 08-09 student data, and counts represent total number of students in
newly drawn zones only (no transfers in or out).
Enrolled in Zone Reflecting Transfers (orange column): Represents the boundaries as affected by the scenario, uses 08-09 student data, and counts represent students in the zone enrolled at the school and the transfers coming into the school.
Created by Facilities Services
February 18, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 1
Estimated Student Grade and Race Distribution as affected by Scenario
Total in Zone
Horizon Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
8
45
KG
AI, AN
141
1
1
Black
124
123
2
Hispanic 47
120
3
Mixed
120
41
4
White
145
485
5
84
Total Student Count 742
Palm Terrace Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
34
13
KG
AI, AN
150
2
1
Black
165
535
2
Hispanic 45
142
3
Mixed
166
83
4
White
157
282
5
146
Spruce Creek Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
10
13
KG
AI, AN
124
3
1
Black
105
31
2
Hispanic
147
30
3
Mixed
119
24
4
White
133
662
5
125
Sweetwater Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
6
19
KG
AI, AN
99
3
1
Black
108
39
2
Hispanic 21
98
3
Mixed
103
17
4
White
83
526
5
128
February 13, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 1
Enrolled in Zone Reflecting Transfers
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
6
43
KG
AI,
AN
132
1
1
Black
122
109
2
Hispanic 42
114
3
Mixed
119
36
4
White
139
496
5
95
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
16
11
KG
AI,
AN
128
2
1
Black
118
512
2
Hispanic 34
133
3
Mixed
135
72
4
White
140
163
5
124
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race
Count
PK
Asian
17
12
KG
AI,
AN
132
4
1
Black
115
33
2
Hispanic
149
36
3
Mixed
128
23
4
White
135
711
5
143
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
0
15
KG
AI,
AN
90
2
1
Black
95
32
2
Hispanic 21
102
3
Mixed
97
15
4
White
76
497
5
122
February 13, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 2
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
School
Scenario 2- Total in Zone
08/09
LOS
Scenario Scenario
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
08/09
08/09
08/09
LOS
Enrollment Capacity
Cypress Creek
729
739
99%
Horizon
933
543
172%
508
543
94%
520
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
960
810
119%
794
Port Orange
382
344
111%
South Daytona
755
978
77%
1103
978
850
581
823
623
644 319 Spruce Creek
647
823
79%
Sugar Mill
699
623
112%
Sweetwater
541 484 543 452 100%
Turie T Small
107%
Scenario
08/09
LOS
543 810 96% 98% Not Applicable - No changes to Zone (Enrollment and LOS default to Current Year)
974
978 103%
874
93%
607
823
623
725
89%
598
452 71%
472
113%
725 452 100% 106% 97% 82% 104% Data represents percentage of students enrolled in the Free and Reduced Lunch Program
Cypress Creek
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
South Daytona
Spruce Creek
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
Turie T Small
Current
Year
19% 40% 91% 54% 62% 42% 51% 18% 89% Scenario 2
Total in Zone
Transfers
61% 38% 50% 22% 85% 59% 37% 52% 21% 87% Current Year (yellow column): Represents current year (2008-09 20-Day) student data with all boundaries intact and unchanged.
February 18, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 2
Total in Zone
South Daytona Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
3
34
KG
AI, AN
102
1
1
Black
72
88
2
Hispanic 33
86
3
Mixed
86
18
4
White
99
334
5
60
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
34
13
KG
AI,
AN
150
2
1
Black
165
535
2
Hispanic 45
142
3
Mixed
166
83
4
White
157
282
5
146
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
17
20
KG
AI,
AN
196
3
1
Black
191
283
2
Hispanic 65
179
3
Mixed
193
81
4
White
175
651
5
152
Sugar Mill Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
14
7
KG
AI, AN
89
2
1
Black
91
38
2
Hispanic 41
99
3
Mixed
86
29
4
White
99
464
5
103
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
5
20
KG
AI, AN
94
3
1
Black
111
37
2
Hispanic 18
101
3
Mixed
109
15
4
White
90
551
5
134
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
11
13
KG
AI, AN
153
3
1
Black
115
41
2
Hispanic 35
165
3
Mixed
132
32
4
White
137
726
5
137
Turie T Small Elementary School
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
11
5
KG
AI, AN
60
1
1
Black
54
196
2
Hispanic
50
14
3
Mixed
55
28
4
White
52
75
5
37
February 13, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 2
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
7
33
KG
AI, AN
98
1
1
Black
73
76
2
Hispanic
84
30
3
Mixed
90
16
4
White
98
364
5
70
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
16
11
KG
AI, AN
128
2
1
Black
118
512
2
Hispanic
133
34
3
Mixed
135
72
4
White
140
163
5
124
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
3
20
KG
AI, AN
189
4
1
Black
163
223
2
Hispanic
164
62
3
Mixed
162
74
4
White
158
591
5
135
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
34
8
KG
AI, AN
103
2
1
Black
98
35
2
Hispanic 45
100
3
Mixed
89
37
4
White
93
480
5
90
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
0
16
KG
AI, AN
85
3
1
Black
98
30
2
Hispanic 18
102
3
Mixed
104
14
4
White
82
517
5
127
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
17
10
KG
AI, AN
154
3
1
Black
119
41
2
Hispanic 39
163
3
Mixed
135
28
4
White
139
753
5
147
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
0
2
KG
AI, AN
90
0
1
Black
94
379
2
Hispanic 17
76
3
Mixed
80
22
4
White
72
52
5
60
February 13, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 3
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
School
08/09
LOS
Scenario 3 - Total in Zone
Scenario Scenario
08/09
08/09
Enrollment Capacity
08/09
08/09
08/09
LOS
Enrollment Capacity
Cypress Creek
729
739
99%
Horizon
933
543
172%
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
Port Orange
382
344
111%
South Daytona
755
978
77%
998
978
102%
879
978 Spruce Creek
647
823
79%
724
699
623
112%
113%
704
823
623
Sweetwater
541 484 543 452 100%
823
623
725
80%
Sugar Mill
661
701
100%
667
452 71%
472
Turie T Small
107%
Scenario
08/09
LOS
599
543
110%
595
960
810
119%
794
543 810 110% 98% Not Applicable - No changes to Zone (Enrollment and LOS default to Current Year)
727 319 725 452 90% 88% 113% 92% 104% Data represents percentage of students enrolled in the Free and Reduced Lunch Program
Cypress Creek
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
South Daytona
Spruce Creek
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
Turie T Small
Current
Year
19% 40% 91% 54% 62% 42% 51% 18% 89% Scenario 3
Total in Zone
Transfers
62% 43% 50% 21% 85% 60% 40% 51% 20% 89% Current Year (yellow column): Represents current year (2008-09 20-Day) student data with all boundaries intact and unchanged.
February 18, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 3
Total in Zone
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
6
38
KG
AI, AN
117
1
1
Black
91
107
2
Hispanic 38
98
3
Mixed
101
27
4
White
120
388
5
66
Total Student Count
599
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
9
6
KG
AI, AN
112
2
1
Black
100
36
2
Hispanic 31
124
3
Mixed
101
23
4
White
108
563
5
107
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
34
13
KG
AI, AN
150
2
1
Black
165
535
2
Hispanic 45
142
3
Mixed
166
83
4
White
157
282
5
146
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
14
16
KG
AI, AN
179
3
1
Black
168
264
2
Hispanic 60
163
3
Mixed
175
71
4
White
153
584
5
146
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
14
8
KG
AI, AN
115
2
1
Black
108
46
2
Hispanic 43
124
3
Mixed
108
36
4
White
111
566
5
121
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
7
26
KG
AI, AN
111
4
1
Black
113
34
2
Hispanic 20
121
3
Mixed
121
18
4
White
108
625
5
146
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
11
5
KG
AI,
AN
60
1
1
Black
54
196
2
Hispanic 14
50
3
Mixed
55
28
4
White
52
75
5
37
February 13, 2009
Artifact 2
Scenario 3
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
8
37
KG
AI, AN
110
1
1
Black
91
91
2
Hispanic
93
34
3
Mixed
102
23
4
White
116
409
5
75
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
16
11
KG
AI, AN
128
2
1
Black
118
512
2
Hispanic
133
34
3
Mixed
135
72
4
White
140
163
5
124
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
2
16
KG
AI,
AN
172
4
1
Black
139
199
2
Hispanic 58
152
3
Mixed
145
64
4
White
138
538
5
131
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
17
6
KG
AI, AN
122
2
1
Black
105
38
2
Hispanic
129
37
3
Mixed
107
21
4
White
116
620
5
128
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
34
8
KG
AI, AN
126
2
1
Black
113
41
2
Hispanic
118
46
3
Mixed
108
42
4
White
103
565
5
102
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
0
21
KG
AI, AN
100
4
1
Black
102
27
2
Hispanic
121
20
3
Mixed
115
17
4
White
95
578
5
134
Total
Total
Grade Count
Race Count
PK
Asian
0
2
KG
AI, AN
90
0
1
Black
94
379
2
Hispanic 17
76
3
Mixed
80
22
4
White
72
52
5
60
February 13, 2009
Artifact 3
CURRENT SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
New Residential Development
Elementary
Boundary
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
South Daytona
Potential
Elementary
Total
Students
Units Type Generated
Project Name
Andros Isles
Bella Oaks
Bethune Property
Coquina Cove 1-3
Coquina Cove 4
Nautica Lakes
Port Orange Landings, Ph II
Port Orange Plantation 2-5
Royal Palm PUD 2-3
Sunset Cove 2-3
The Park PUD
Villas of Key Largo
Villas of Port Orange Plantation, I-II
Villa Park PUD
Walkers Green
Walkers Green
Totals
360 MF
134 SF
12 SF
452 SF
136 MF
476 MF
104 SF
314 SF
214 SF
114 SF
37 SF
86 SF
346 SF
552 MF
399 SF
243 MF
3979
25
24
2
81
9
33
19
56
38
20
7
15
62
38
71
17
517
957 Beach Street Condo
Beach Street Condos
Beach Street Skyline
Daytona Live
Gateway Village
Madison Oaks PUD
Pine Haven
Shady Oaks
Totals
209 MF
510 MF
372 MF
450 MF
312 MF
32 MF
58 SF
16 SF
1959
14
35
25
31
21
2
10
3
141
Portofino Townhomes
Totals
8 SF
Casablanca
Diamond Reef PUD
Halifax Center
Mediterranean Villas
Seabreeze Towers
Totals
1
8
492
16
752
311
522
2093
MF
SF
MF
MF
MF
1
1
34
3
51
21
36
145
Artifact 3
CURRENT SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
Elementary
Boundary
Spruce Creek
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
TT Small
Potential
Elementary
Students
Total
Units Type Generated
Project Name
Parkside MHP replat
46 SF
8
Rojo Arabian
72 SF
13
118
Totals
21
Hammock Lake Estates
Lotus Club
Malaga
Newport
Northern Lights
Nova Bella Piazza
Nova Oaks
Oak Cove Villas
Riverwalk PO
Spruce Creek Commons
The Reserve at Port Orange
The Palms
The Palms
Totals
Central Park Reserve
Cracker Creek
Dalford Subdivision
Totals
The Courtyard
Gateway Daytona
Grand Isle
Joslyn Subdivision
Majestic Springs
Marina Pt PUD
Marina Point II
The Reserve @ Crystal Lk
The William Lofts
Totals
Grand Total
2
45 SF
369 MF
198 MF
240 MF
5 SF
20 MF
32 MF
16 SF
800 MF
109 SF
136 SF
288 MF
164 SF
2422
8
25
14
16
1
1
2
3
55
19
24
20
29
217
10 SF
5 SF
3 SF
2
1
1
18
4
12 MF
18 MF
18 SF
3 SF
102 MF
50 SF
72 MF
290 MF
38 MF
603
1 112001
1
1
3
1
7
9
5
20
3
50
1096
Proposed School Boundaries
Scenario 1
denotes change
Elementary
Boundary
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Port Orange
South Daytona
Spruce Creek
Total
Units Type
Project Name
Artifact 3
Potential
Elementary
Students
Generated
Bella Oaks 134
Nautica Lakes 476
Port Orange Landings, Ph2 104
Sunset Cove 2-3 114
The Park PUD
37
Villas of Key Largo
86
Villa Park PUD 552
Totals 1503
SF
MF
SF
SF
SF
SF
MF
24
33
19
20
7
15
38
156
957 Beach Street Condo 209
Andros Isles 360
Beach Street Condo 510
Beach Street Skyline Condo 372
Daytona Live 450
Gateway Village 312
Madison Oaks PUD
32
Pine Haven
58
Shady Oaks
16
Walker's Green 243
. Walker's Green 399
Totals 2961
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
SF
SF
MF
SF
14
25
35
25
31
21
2
10
3
17
71
254
Portofino Townhomes
Totals
SF
1
1
MF
SF
MF
MF
MF
34
3
51
21
36
145
SF
SF
SF
8
13
2
23
8
8
Casablanca 492
Diamond Reef PUD
16
Halifax Center 752
Mediterranean Villas 311
Seabreeze Towers 522
Totals 2093
Parkside MHP replat
Rojo Arabian
Totals
3
46
72
10
128
Artifact 3
Scenario 1
denotes change
Elementary
Boundary
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
TT Small
Total
Units Type
Project Name
Hammock Lakes Estates 45
Lotus Club 369
Malaga 198
Newport 240
5
Northern Lights
Nova Bella Piazza PUD 20
Nova Oaks
32
Oak Cove Villas
16
Riverwalk PO 800
Spruce Creek Commons 109
The Reserve @ PO 136
The Palms PUD 288
The Palms PUD 164
Totals 2422
SF
MF
MF
MF
SF
MF
MF
SF
MF
SF
SF
MF
SF
Cracker Creek
5
Bethune Property
12
Coquina Cove, Ph 1-3 452
. Coquina Cove, Ph4 136
Dalford Subdivision
3
Port Orange Plantation 2-5 314
Royal Palm PUD2-3 214
Villas of PO Plantation I-II 346
Totals 1482
SF
SF
SF
MF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Gateway Daytona
Grande Isle
Joslyn Subdivision
Majestic Springs
Marina Pt PUD
Marina Point II
The Courtyard
The Reserve @ Crystal Lake
The William Lofts
Totals
18
18
3
102
50
72
12
290
38
8
25
14
16
1
1
2
3
55
19
24
20
29
217
1
2
81
9
1
56
38
62
250
MF
SF
SF
MF
SF
MF
MF
MF
MF
603
Grand Totals 1 112001
4
Potential
Elementary
Students
Generated
1
3
1
7
9
5
1
20
3
50
1096
Scenario 2
denotes change
Elementary
Boundary
Horizon
Palm Terrace
Total
Units Type
Project Name
Bella Oaks
Nautica Lakes
Port Orange Landings, P II
Sunset Cove 2-3
The Park
Villas of Key Largo PUD
Totals
957 Beach Street Condo
Andros Isles
Beach Street Condos
Beach Street Skyline
Daytona Live
Gateway Village
Madison Oaks PUD
Pine Haven
Shady Oaks
..
Walker'S Green·
. Walker's Green
Totals
-
Port Orange
South Daytona
Portofino Townhomes
Totals
134
476
104
114
37
86
951
209
360
510
372
450
312
32
58
16
243
399
8
Potential
Elementary
Students
Generated
24
33
19
20
7
15
118
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
SF
SF
MF
SF
2961
14
25
35
25
31
21
2
10
3
17
71
254
SF
1
1
8
Casablanca 492
Diamond Reef 16
Halifax Center 752
Mediterranean Villas 311
The Reserve @ Crystal Lake 290
Seabreeze Towers 522
Villa Park PUD 552
Totals 2935
5
SF
MF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Artifact 3
MF
SF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
34
3
51
21
20
36
38
203
PROPOSED SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
Scenario 3
denotes change
Elementary
Boundary
Total
Units Type
Project Name
. Bethune Property
Coquina Cove 1-3
Coquina Cove 4
Parkside PUD replat
Spruce Creek
Port Orange Plantation 2-5
RojoArabian
Royal Palm PUD 2-3
Villas of Port Orange Plantation, I-II
Total Units
Sugar Mill
Sweetwater
TT Small
Hammock Lake Estates
Lotus Club
Malaga
Newport
Northern Lights Subdivision
Nova Bella Piazza
Nova Oaks
Oak Cove Villas
Riverwalk PO
The Palms
The Palms
The Reserve at Port Orange
Spruce Creek Commons
Total Units
Cracker Creek
Dalford Subdivision
Total Units
Joslyn Subdivision
Gateway Daytona
Grand Isle
Majestic Springs
Marina Pt PUD
Marina Point II
The Courtyard
The William Lofts
Total Units
12
452
136
46
314
72
214
346
SF
SF
MF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
1592
45 SF
369 MF
198 MF
240 MF
5 SF
20 MF
32 MF
16 SF
800 MF
288 MF
164 SF
136 SF
109 SF
2422
Potential
Elementary
Students
Generated
2
81
9
8
56
13
38
62
269
8
25
14
16
1
1
2
3
55
20
29
24
19
217
10 SF
5 SF
3 SF
2
18
4
1
1
3 SF
18 MF
18 SF
102 MF
50 SF
72 MF
12 MF
38 MF
1
1
3
7
9
5
1
3
313
30
GRAND TOTALSI 112001
8
Artifact 3
1096
.0
South Halifax Area
Elementary School Rezoning
Request to Advertise
School Board Meeting
. February 24,2009
I
,I
1
Goals
• To Balance Utilization at Area Schools
~Operate
schools more efficiently by using
existing permanent classroom spaces
rather than portable classrooms
• To Meet State Growth Management Rules
~ Elementary
schools cannot exceed 1150/0
of their permanent capacity
2
TABLEt
20-Day
Enrollment
Classroom
Seats
Level of
Service
Cypress Creek
729
739
99%
10
Horizon
933
543
172%
(390)
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
Port Orange
382
344
111 %
(38)
South Daytona
755
978
77%
223
Spruce Creek
647
823
79%
176
Sugar Mill
699
623
112%
(76)
Sweetwater
541
725*
75%*
184
T. T. Small
484
452
107%
(32)
SY 08-09
or Needed
4
Objectives
• To reduce student population at Horizon
Elementary
• To increase student population at
Sweetwater, South Daytona and Spruce
Creek Elementaries
• To redistribute the impact of new
residential development on area schools
• To maximize efficiencies with bus routing
and student occupancy where possible
5
TABLE 2
SCENARIO 1
ESTIMATES
20-Day
Enrollment
Classroom Level of
Seats
Service
Cypress Creek
No change
to Zone
739
99%
10
Horizon
727
543
134%
(184)
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
Port Orange
No change
to Zone
344
111%
(38)
South Daytona
No change
to Zone
978
77%
223
Spruce Creek
819
823
100%
4
Sugar Mill
No change
to Zone
623
112%
(76)
Sweetwater
582
725*
80%*
143
T. T. Small
No change
to Zone
452
107%
(32)
or Needed
7
TABLE 3
SCENARIO 2
ESTIMATES
20-Day
Enrollment
Classroom
Seats
Level of
Service
# of Seats
A vailable or
Needed
Cypress Creek
No change to
Zone
739
99%
10
Horizon
520
543
96%
23
Palm Terrace
794
810
98%
16
Port Orange
No change to
Zone
344
111%
(38)
South Daytona
974
978
100%
4
Spruce Creek
874
823
106%
(51)
Sugar Mill
607
623
97%
16
Sweetwater
598
725*
82%
127
T. T. Small
472
452
104%
(20)
9
Community Input
• Scenarios 1 & 2 presented January 6, 7, 8
• Input received and considered
• Scenario 3 seeks to address many of the
comments received as well the district's
objectives
10
TABLE 4
Level of
Service
99%
10
543
110%
(52)
810
98%
16
No change to 344
Zone
111%
(38)
South Daytona
879
978
90%
99
Spruce Creek
724
823
88%
99
Sugar Mill
704
623
113%
(81)
Sweetwater
667
725*
92%
58
T. T. Small
472
452
104%
(20)
SCENARIO 3
ESTIMATES
20-Day
Enrollment
Classroom
Seats
Cypress Creek
No change to 739
Zone
Horizon
595
Palm Terrace
794
Port Orange
or Needed
12
Other Issues
• Feeder Patterns
• Transportation
• Extended Day Registration
- April 27 - May 1 3:00 - 6:00 PM
• Kindergarten Registration
- April 20-24, 2009
• Grandfather (Student transportation not provided)
- District staff recommendation current
• Variances
4th
grade
(Student transportation not provided)
- Honor existing rollover variances
- Siblings of current 4th graders (one year/annual review)
- All others case by case basis
13
School Board Action
• Presentation and Request to Advertise
Tuesday, February 24
• Public Hearing & Final Board Action
Tuesday, April 14
14
Superintendent Recommendation
The superintendent recommends that the
School Board authorize the advertising of new
boundaries for Palm Terrace, Port Orange,
Horizon, South Daytona, Spruce Creek,
Sweetwater, Sugar Mill and Turie T. Small
Elementary Schools.
15

Michelle Branch

Transcription

Similar documents

Directions from NCTAMS to Helemano Elementary School

Castori Elementary School - Twin Rivers Unified School District

11-13-15 - Easton Valley CSD

August, 2012 Dear Group Leader, If you are looking

verde creek ranch kerr county, tx - 287 ac +

Adventures with Allatoona Ally

District Dateline - Lake Shore Public Schools

Presentation

Slotomania Big Win - Bingo Card Game For Ipad