Key note lecture: The importance of synergy between surgery
Transcription
Key note lecture: The importance of synergy between surgery
London 28 nov 2014 Key note lecture: Factors for successful surgery: The importance of synergy between surgery & anesthesiology in bariatric surgery. Should there be a subspecialty? Prof. Jan Paul Mulier Departement of Anesthesiology AZ Sint – Jan AV Brugge Belgium London Mulier 2014 Should there be a subspecialty? • A:Sub-speciality or B:Sub-society? • A:Anesthesia of the obese patient or B:Anesthesia for bariatric and metabolic surgery? • A:Achieving credits by extra training in a certified center and/or examinations before qualification or B:Scientific meetings and/or live training? • A:Part of the basic anaesthesia training or B:Post specialisation training? London Mulier 2014 1. We need a sub society for Anaesthesia of the obese patient Anaesthesia of an obese patient requires special anaesthetic knowledge, skils and equipment. To improve this we need to: • Stimulate Research, by bringing interested researchers in this area together, by giving a forum to exchange ideas and by stimulation of publications together. • Improve the Skills of anaesthesiologists and the supporting team by training, by congresses and by providing clinical visits and clinical training. • Adapt our equipment by the stimulation of inventions (in the industry) • Discuss with surgeons what we need and what they need to improve together the patient outcome. • By understanding each other problems we London Mulier 2014 Mission of ISPCOP ESPCOP SOBA The Mission of both Societies for the Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient is to promote Excellence in Clinical management, Education and Research regarding the care of the morbidly obese patient during the perioperative period. London Mulier 2014 Function of Society ESPCOP ISPCOP SOBA • The societies deal with a disease, a medical problem being obesity with its different components like • Metabolic syndrome • Diabetes • Hypertension • Central obesity • OSAS • Hypoventilation syndrome and pulmonary hypertension • The society is not fixed to one work environment but combines anaesthesiologists, intensivists and emergency care physicians who all deals with these problems peri operative. • The anaesthesia is including all surgery types from bariatric surgery to orthopaedics, including also sedation for diagnostic procedures. London Mulier 2014 01:50:55 ESPCOP [[email protected]] namens ESPCOP [[email protected]] Verzonden:zaterdag 24 mei 2014 18:54 To: dr. Jan Mulier 26 Anesthetic Aspects of Bariatric Surgery Newsletters Bariatric Times • May 2013 ESPCOP Newsletter Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. ANESTHETIC ASPECTS of Bariatric Surgery Column Editor: Stephanie B. Jones, MD Dr. Jones is Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School and Vice Chair for Education, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. THIS MONTH: Intraoperative Fluid Assessment in Patients with Obesity by KONSTANTIN BALONOV, MD Bariatric Times. 2013;10(5):26–27. This ongoing column is authored by members of the International Society for the Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient (ISPCOP), an organization dedicated to the bariatric patient. ABSTRACT Intraoperative fluid management in morbidly obese patients remains a controversial and under-researched topic. Minimizing the risk of the intraoperative complications requires precise assessment of the patient’s volume status. This article reviews current scientific views and concepts regarding fluid management in morbid obesity. Goal-directed therapy appears to be the most accurate approach in guiding fluid management. Dynamic parameters such as pulse pressure variation are considered to be the most reliable in assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness of the patient. KEYWORDS bariatric surgery, fluids, intravascular volume INTRODUCTION Estimation of intravascular volume is one of the most important clinical skills of the anesthesiologist. Management of the fluid balance in patients with morbid obesity remains controversial, which, to great extent, can be attributed to the lack of randomized controlled studies. Current paradigms for fluid management in this patient population are based on studies that mostly compared liberal to restrictive approaches in a nonobese population. FLUID MANAGEMENT APPROCHES: BENEFITS AND RISKS Liberal fluid management can produce a positive fluid balance, weight gain, and congestive heart failure while a more restrictive approach may increase the risk of acute tubular necrosis and rhabdomyolysis. The benefits of the liberal approach as demonstrated in studies by Ettinger et al,1 Schuster et al,2 and Oggunnaike et al3 include the prevention of rhabdomyolysis and a decrease in postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients with more liberal fluid management (40mL/kg vs. 15mL/kg totak body weight [TBW]) also produced significantly higher urine output in the operating room, in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and on Postoperative Days 0 and 1 as demonstrated by Wool et al.4 However, the same study failed to prove any changes in the incidence of rhabdomyolysis.4 On the other hand, a restrictive approach to intra- and postoperative fluid management has been advocated by Brandstrup et al.5 Surgical patients whose fluid balance was managed in the more restrictive fashion demonstrated faster recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function, better wound healing, and improvement in pulmonary function and tissue oxygenation. In the bariatric setting, as proposed by McGlinch et al,6 limiting intravenous fluids reduced the incidence of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction and hypoxia, and shortened hospital stay. Recently, urine output as a guide for perioperative fluid management has been challenged. A study by Matot et al7 demonstrated low urine output in bariatric patients regardless of relatively high-volume fluid therapy. The authors concluded that their results potentially invalidate urine output as a reliable indicator of the fluid status in the patients with obesity and further investigation is required. Steep head-up (reverse Trendelenburg) position in the presence of pneumoperitoneum represents another challenge for the intraoperative assessment of fluid balance. Under general anesthesia, this position is associated with a gravity- induced shift of blood volume to the lower part of the body, which frequently results in a significant decrease of cardiac output and blood pressure.8,9 GUIDING PARAMETERS FOR ADMINISTERING FLUIDS TO PATIENTS WITH OBESITY While administering fluids in patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric procedures or any other type of surgeries, a promising technique is to assess fluid responsiveness, and include this parameter in the concept of goaldirected therapy (GDT), as proposed by many authors.10,11 GDT encompasses a technique involving intensive monitoring and aggressive management of intraoperative hemodynamics. It is based on the achievement of certain values rather than estimating fluid status and calculating interventions. Fluid responsiveness is defined as an ability of the heart to increase stroke volume in response to volume expansion. Dynamic parameters such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), derived from arterial waveform analysis, have been suggested as the most reliable indicators of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients as long as sinus rhythm is maintained. A recent study by Jain and Dutta12 demonstrated the value of SVV in the bariatric population. PPV or SVV values greater than 13 percent indicate fluid responsiveness, while patients with PPV below nine percent should be considered nonresponders.12 Twentyfive percent of the patients with PPV value between 9 and 13 percent represent the so called “gray zone,” when fluid responsiveness cannot be reliably predicted.13 Plethysmographic waveform variation (PWV) obtained from the pulse oximetry waveform is a completely noninvasive dynamic parameter that can also be used to assess fluid responsiveness as described by Pizov et al.14 Its noninvasive nature, minimal additional cost, and practically universal availability represents a major benefit for its use. However, compared to arterial waveform analysis, the authors found some delay in detecting hypovolemia. In other words, PWV may be useful at levels of more profound hypovolemia. There are other new technologies for noninvasive assessment of the cardiac output, PPV, and SVV, such as the ccNexfin (Edwards Lifesciences, Amsterdam,May ESPCOP Newsletter Netherlands) that uses a finger cuff for assessment of blood pressure and interested in his work. Anaesthesia derived variables. Based on a recent Ed. Leafing through your research work, I was inspired from an publication by Fischer et al,16 this was working with monitoring that technology was not sufficiently useful in iterative topic “the ten golden rules atofthat obesity a postoperative cardiac surgical required time aanaesthesia…” lot of population. On the other hand, early Paraphrasing I shall continue with” the ten short questions” for the results from intraoperative use in a technical expertise besides clinical bariatric population suggest that expertise. The ability to measure ccNexfin may be comparable to ESPCOP President. invasive PPV determination.17 the effect of your drugs and actions The FloTrac (Edwards Lifesciences) is a minimally invasive system that directly, opened the world of calculates vascular tone and cardiac Professor Mulier , may we start with you giving us some brief output by analyzing the waveform physiology to me. Surgery at that derived from the arterial line. Along biographical information? How did you come into the profession? with the SVV, it provides continuous CO time seemed more manual work and central venous oxygen saturation And how long have you been in obesity (ScvO2) if connected to a central andinterested internal medicine was topics? venous line. The additional parameters provided by the FloTrac can be used in descriptive. At that time monitoring bariatric patients with significant cardiac comorbidities. was airway pressure, manual blood pressure and an ECG if Pulse-contour analysis-based available, butage an explosion in monitoring technology was aabout to techniques, such as PiCCO (Pulsion JM. At the of 18 when I decided to become physician and not Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany) take place. are a comprehensive modality for an engineer, I assisted in the operating room for my father who is a perioperative cardiovascular assessment as they provide not only surgeon and gynaecologist. At the operating table in 1977 I met my real-time measurement of PPV, SVV, After several years of limited clinical experience I finally began my and cardiac output, but also useful uncle Michel Mulier, who worked as anaesthesiologist and I got newer parameters, such as Global Endtraining in anaesthesia and became more focused on research. In Diastolic Index, intrathoracic blood Friend on Facebook Talking with…in this issue ESPCOP President, Jan Paul Mulier London Mulier 2014 my second year the first endoscope-mounted echo probe became Forward to a Friend 14/06/14 09:35 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. b. Globesity Challenge - Rome News from Elsewhere "Anaesthesia Excellence" - Neil Hutcher , Surgical Review Corporation Special article “Obesity Epidemic: The Medical Profession Fights Back” - Euan Shearer Editor’s notes - Is sugar 1. Talking with… Jan Mulier the most dangerous the ESPCOP President drug? STAMPEDE2.study Brit Cop - The SOBA Upcoming events way-Michael Margarson Tell your Story! 3. News from around Europe a. 5th ESPCOP meeting - Gent BritCOP -b. Globesity interested in his work. Anaesthesia available. My orthopaedic surgeon uncle was performing many total Follow on Twitter Fibre-Optic Intubation in the Morbidly Obese: A Pilot Survey of International Opinions and Practices. Research John Cousins, Mike Margarson Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia Depts. of Anaesthesia, Charing Cross Hospital London & St Richards Hospital, Chichester UK Background The management of the airway in the morbidly obese patient is a source of great concern to many anaesthetists, and there is considerable variation in practice between different countries. Awake fibreoptic intubation (FOI) is held the goldstandard in safe airway management, but its precise role is much debated. Objectives Bariatric Anaesthetists have the most extensive experience of managing morbidly obese patients. We therefore performed an international survey of anaesthesia colleagues from major bariatric surgical centres to better understand the incidences and drivers around decision making for FOI in the obese. www.ISPCOP.ORG Methods Thirty-nine members of the two major societies for obesity anaesthesia (ISPCOP & SOBA) with a known major bariatric practice were personally contacted by email. Five questions were initially asked, pertaining to experience in any morbidly obese patient (BMI >40 kg.m-2) over the last five years (see table 1 below). To date, 28 bariatric specialists from 11 countries have responded (72% of those approached). These reported a combined experience of 21,145 general anaesthetic procedures in Morbidly Obese (BMI >40) patients over the past five years A total of 278 FOIs were reported, an overall incidence of 1:80. 155 of these were performed for “classical indications” i.e a past history of airway problems. acute airway swelling, scarring etc. and these are discounted in the subsequent results. Rate Northern Europe (14) 13930 31 0.22% Southern Europe (4) 2640 77 2.9% North America (7) 3225 15 0.47% South America (3) 1350 0 0% Table 2: International comparison of FOI incidence Discussion In 14 of the 27 centres, representing 53% of the total number of MO patients, no FOI was ever done for obesity alone. This is a pilot survey and the numbers of respondents are small, so extrapolation of this data must be done with great caution. There were three episodes of transient CICV described amongst the entire cohort of cases, in none did the patient come to harm. Sixteen (41%) of respondents felt that their incidence of FOI was reducing, fifteen attributing this to the presence of videolaryngoscopes, and one feeling Intubating LMAs were responsible. Three considered that cyclodextrans had contributed. Nineteen respondents provided free-text comments, five of these mentioned the role of training. 1. Please estimate how many Morbidly Obese patients (BMI >40) you have personally anaesthetised in the past five years. (include those where you were present in the operating theatre at induction, even if supervising a trainee) 2. Please estimate - or if you are sure of the number tell us - in how many of those morbidly obese patients you performed an awake fibre-optic intubation (past 5 years) 3. Please estimate in what percentage of those fibre-optic intubations numbered above, you chose the technique primarily because of predicted difficulties due to obesity alone (and not because of a known and clear anatomical indication; e.g. Mandibular fracture, head and neck scarring/radiotherapy, or other acute swelling) 4. Have you ever had a "can't intubate, can't ventilate" scenario patient (BMI >40) that you have personally anaesthetised? in a morbidly obese 5. Do you believe that because of the availability of Sugammadex and/or video laryngoscopes, that you have performed significantly fewer awake Fibre-optic intubations in recent years? Any other comments or thoughts??? Please add below, I may refer to these, but they will of course be anonymous. Western Sussex Hospitals FOI for Obesity 123 (1:170) were performed primarily for predicted difficult airway due to obesity. The median incidence of FOI for this indication was 0.1% (IQR 0-0.9%). Table 1: Questions circulated to the members of ISPCOP and SOBA who were surveyed London Mulier 2014 Total Cases Results However, there appears to be a large variation in the practice of FOI. Bigger centres with greater experience use the technique rarely, and northern European centres use it least. Within the free text responses, it appears that many of the reported FOIs were performed predominantly with training purposes in mind. The presence of two centres with markedly higher incidences of fibre-optic intubation skew the figures because of the relatively small sample size, and thus the overall figures (and particularly the international figures) must be interpreted with caution . A larger and more detailed survey to explore the drivers behind FOI practice today is underway. Conclusions There is a huge variation in the practice of FOI in the morbidly obese. Larger centres with greater experience use the technique rarely, and northern European centres use it least. Many of the reported FOIs were performed predominantly with training purposes in mind. The impact of Videolaryngoscopy would appear to be reducing the number of awake fibre-optic intubations performed. THE SOCIETY FOR OBESITY AND BARIATRIC ANAESTHESIA GUIDELINES ANAESTHESIA FOR THE OBESE PATIENT: BMI>35KG/M2 Preoperative Evaluation Instruction cards Any of: Central Obesity (waist > half height) Difficult airway /Ventilation problems more likely Greater risk of CVS disease, thrombosis ↑Risk of Metabolic syndrome: Central Obesity plus Hypertension Dyslipidaemia, Insulin resistance Peripheral Obesity (Fat outside body cavity) Less co-morbidity Intra Operative Management Suggested Equipment Suitable bed/trolley & operating table Gel padding, wide strapping, table extensions/arm boards Forearm cuff or large BP cuff Ramping device, step for anaesthetist, difficult airway equipment, ventilator capable of PEEP and pressure modes. Hover mattress or equivalent. Long spinal, regional and vascular needles. Ultrasound machine. Depth of anaesthesia and neuromuscular monitoring. Enough staff to move patient. www.SOBAUK.COM Ramping Ear level with sternum. Reduces risk of difficult laryngoscopy, improves ventilation. Drug dosing- what weight to use? Induction agents: titrate to cardiac output- this equates to lean body weight in a fit patient. Competitive muscle relaxants: use lean body weight. Suxamethonium use adjusted body weight to a maximum of 200mg Neostigmine: Increase dose Opioids: Use Lean body weight. Care with obstructive apnoea! TCI propofol: IBW plus 40% excess weight If in doubt, titrate and monitor effect! Lean Body Weight this exceeds Ideal body weight in the obese and plateaus ≈90kg for a man, ≈70kg for a woman. Ideal Body Weight in Kg - Broca formula Men: height in cm minus 100 Women: height in cm minus 105 Anaesthetic Technique Consider premed antacid & analgesia, careful glucose control & DVT prophylaxis. Self-position on operating table. Preoxygenate & intubate in ramped position +/- CPAP. Minimize induction to ventilation interval to avoid desaturation. Commence maintenance anaesthesia promptly. Tracheal intubation is recommended. Avoid spontaneous ventilation. Use PEEP. Use short-acting agents e.g. desflurane or propofol infusion. short-acting opioids, multimodal analgesia. PONV prophylaxis. Ensure full NMB reversal. Extubate and recover in head up position. Suggested dosing regimes for anaesthetic drugs Lean Body Weight Adjusted Body Weight Males 90Kg Females 70Kg Ideal plus 40% excess Propofol induction Thiopentone Fentanyl Rocuronium Atracurium Vecuronium Morphine Paracetamol Bupivacaine Propofol Infusion Suxamethonium (Max 200mg) Alfentanil Lidocaine Neostigmine (5mg) Sugammadex (see package insert) Antibiotics Low Molecular weight Heparin Post Operative Management PACU discharge: Usual discharge criteria should be met. In addition, SpO2 should be maintained at pre-op levels with minimal O2 therapy, without evidence of hypoventilation. OSA or Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome: Sit up. Avoid sedatives and post-op opioids. Reinstate CPAP if using it pre-op. Additional time in recovery is recommended, only discharge to the ward if free of apnoeas without stimulation. Patients untreated or intolerant of CPAP who require postoperative opioids are at risk of hypoventilation and require continuous oxygen saturation monitoring. Level 2 care is recommended. Effective CPAP reduces this risk to near normal. Ward care: Escalation to Level 1, 2 or 3 care may be required based on patient co-morbidity, the type of surgery undertaken and issues with hypoventilation discussed above. General ward care includes: multimodal analgesia, caution with longacting opioids and sedatives, early mobilisation and extended thromboprophylaxis. London Mulier 2014 See www.SOBAuk.com for references Guidelines The European Society for Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient. 1. Key points in pre operative planning: • Record body mass index BMI and total body weight (TBW) on operating list. If central obesity (weight >half height), look for metabolic syndrome. • Metabolic syndrome = visceral obesity plus diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension. These are the high risk patients. • Atrial fibrillation, long QT, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension or a cardiomyopathy? • 10% pre operative body weight reduction is important if visceral obesity. Improves respiratory function and laparoscopic surgical access. • “STOP BANG ”questionnaire ≥ 5 or Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) (paCO2 >45mmHg) -> regional or opioid free anaesthesia or postoperative CPAP. 2. Key points in anaesthesia induction. • HELP:30 degree head up position, add ramping device or bag under thorax. • Pre-oxygenation and 10 cmH2O CPAP until the intubation. • Know the correct dosing scalars for induction agents and muscular relaxants. www.ESPCOP.ORG • Mallampati and large neck circumference = difficult laryngoscopy /intubation. • Facemask ventilation is frequently problematic –needs two hands ventilation and airways. • Avoid laryngeal and supraglottic devices, endotracheal tubes should be the default airway. 3. Key points in anaesthesia maintenance. • Lung recruitment maneuvers after intubation followed by sufficient PEEP even when oxygen saturation is normal. • Lung protective ventilation and beach chair position when possible. • Prefer water-soluble short acting drugs that are easy to dose and to monitor. • Prefer loco regional anaesthesia. Avoid long working sedatives and opioids. • Monitor the neuromuscular blockade (TOF and PTC ) to provide sufficient depth if use neuromuscular blocking agents. • Monitoring anaesthesia depth limits the anaesthetic load and avoids awareness. 4. Key points in anaesthesia emergence. • Use Pressure Support Ventilation and evaluate breathing frequency. • Be sure to have full neuromuscular blockade reversal. • Empty stomach and avoid suctioning endotracheal tube (if needed follow with recruitment). • Extubation under CPAP in beach chair position when fully awake. • Avoid sedation and use the lowest level of opioids. 5. Key points in postoperative care. • Continue with CPAP mask if used before surgery. • Beach chair position or better sitting up to 60°. • Sufficient pain and PONV treatment. • Promote early mobilization and provide tromboprophylaxis. • Look for SpO2 desaturations and hypercarbia. • Be aware of rhabdomyolysis when prolonged surgery in the sitting position. Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient © www.Espcop.org London Mulier 2014 Michael Margarson, Paolo Pelosi, Thomas Gazynski, Luc de Baerdemaeker, Jan Mulier Claire Nightingale, The European Society for Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient. 1. Key points in pre operative planning: • Record body mass index BMI and total body weight (TBW) on operating list. If central obesity (weight >half height), look for metabolic syndrome. • Metabolic syndrome = visceral obesity plus diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension. These are the high risk patients. • Atrial fibrillation, long QT, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension or a cardiomyopathy? • 10% pre operative body weight reduction is important if visceral obesity. Improves respiratory function and laparoscopic surgical access. • “STOP BANG ”questionnaire ≥ 5 or Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) (paCO2 >45mmHg) -> regional or opioid free anaesthesia or postoperative CPAP. 2. Key points in anaesthesia induction. • HELP:30 degree head up position, add ramping device or • Mallampati and large neck circumference = difficult London Mulier 2014 bag under thorax. laryngoscopy /intubation. • Pre-oxygenation and 10 cmH2O CPAP until the • Facemask ventilation is frequently problematic –needs Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:304 –11 Liver size reduction occurs in the first 2 weeks. Reduction in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is faster than body weight, both occurs over 12 weeks. Massive hepatomegaly patients lose more liver volume. London Mulier 2014 Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient. The European Society for Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient 1. Key points in pre operative planning: • Record body mass index BMI and total body weight (TBW) on operating list. If central obesity (weight >half height), look for metabolic syndrome. • Metabolic syndrome = visceral obesity plus diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension. These are the high risk patients. • Atrial fibrillation, long QT, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension or a cardiomyopathy? • 10% pre operative body weight reduction is important if visceral obesity. Improves respiratory function and laparoscopic surgical access. • “STOP BANG ”questionnaire ≥ 5 or Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) (paCO2 >45mmHg) -> regional or opioid free anaesthesia or postoperative CPAP. Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient. 2. induction. 1. Key Key points points in in anaesthesia pre operative planning: •• HELP:30 degree upBMI position, add ramping device or Record body masshead index and total body weight bag under (TBW) on thorax. operating list. If central obesity (weight >half • Pre-oxygenation and 10 cmH2O CPAP until the height), look for metabolic syndrome. intubation. • Metabolic syndrome = visceral obesity plus diabetes, • dyslipidaemia, Know the correct dosing scalars agents and hypertension. Thesefor areinduction the high risk patients. muscular relaxants. • Atrial fibrillation, long QT, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension or a cardiomyopathy? •• Mallampati and large neck circumference = difficult 10% pre operative body weight reduction is important laryngoscopy /intubation. if visceral obesity. Improves respiratory function and • Facemask ventilation is frequently problematic –needs laparoscopic surgical access. two hands ventilation and airways. • “STOP BANG ”questionnaire ≥ 5 or Obesity • Avoid laryngeal and supraglottic devices, Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) (paCO2endotracheal >45mmHg) tubes shouldorbeopioid the default airway. or postoperative -> regional free anaesthesia CPAP. 3. Key points in anaesthesia maintenance. • Lung recruitment maneuvers after intubation followed by • Prefer loco regional anaesthesia. Avoid long working sedatives and opioids. •• Lung protective and beach position •• Monitor the neuromuscular blockade (TOF and=PTC ) to HELP:30 degreeventilation head up position, addchair ramping device or Mallampati and large neck circumference difficult when possible. provide sufficient depth if use neuromuscular blocking agents. bag under thorax. laryngoscopy /intubation. •• Prefer water-soluble acting CPAP drugs that •• Monitoring anaesthesia limitsproblematic the anaesthetic load Pre-oxygenation andshort 10 cmH2O untilare theeasy to Facemask ventilation is depth frequently –needs London Mulier 2014 dose and to monitor. and awareness.and airways. intubation. two avoids hands ventilation • Know the correct dosing scalars for induction agents and • Avoid laryngeal and supraglottic devices, endotracheal 2. Key points anaesthesia induction. sufficient PEEPin even when oxygen saturation is normal. Sterno mental distance without safety bird Sterno mental distance Normal position Use of inflatable pillow • Mulier J.P., Dillemans B. Intubation time with and without inflatable intubation device London Mulier 2014 Eur J Anesthesia 2007 Suppl • Mulier J.P., Dillemans B. CT analysis of the safety bird in mobid obese patients sterno mandibular cm Inflatable pillow under thorax elongates sterno mandibular distance 24 22 20 18 SM on 16 14 SM off 12 10 8 25 35 45 55 65 75 bmi London Mulier 2014 2. Key points in anaesthesia induction. • HELP:30 degree head up position, add ramping device or bag under thorax. • Pre-oxygenation and 10 cmH2O CPAP until the intubation. The•European Society for Perioperative of the Know the correct dosing scalars for induction Care agents and muscular relaxants. • Mallampati and large neck circumference = difficult laryngoscopy /intubation. • Facemask ventilation is frequently problematic –needs two hands ventilation and airways. Obese Patientand supraglottic devices, endotracheal • Avoid laryngeal tubes should be the default airway. 3. Key points in anaesthesia maintenance. Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese patient. • Lung recruitment maneuvers after intubation followed by sufficient PEEP even when oxygen saturation is normal. • Lung protective ventilation and beach chair position when possible. • Prefer water-soluble short acting drugs that are easy to dose and to monitor. 1. Key points in pre operative planning: 4. Key points in anaesthesia emergence. • Record body mass index BMI and total body weight • Use Pressure Supportlist. Ventilation evaluate breathing (TBW) on operating If centraland obesity (weight >half frequency. height), look for metabolic syndrome. • Be sure to syndrome have full neuromuscular blockade reversal. Metabolic = visceral obesity plus diabetes, • Empty stomachhypertension. and avoid suctioning tube dyslipidaemia, These are endotracheal the high risk patients. • Atrial fibrillation, long QT, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension or a cardiomyopathy? 5. Key points in postoperative care. • Prefer loco regional anaesthesia. Avoid long working sedatives and opioids. • Monitor the neuromuscular blockade (TOF and PTC ) to provide sufficient depth if use neuromuscular blocking agents. • Monitoring anaesthesia depth limits the anaesthetic load and avoids awareness. • 10% pre operative body weight reduction is important (if needed obesity. follow with recruitment). if visceral Improves respiratory function and • Extubation under CPAP in beach chair position when laparoscopic surgical access. awake. • fully “STOP BANG ”questionnaire ≥ 5 or Obesity • Avoid sedation and use the lowest of opioids. Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS)level (paCO2 >45mmHg) -> regional or opioid free anaesthesia or postoperative CPAP. • Continue with CPAP mask if used before surgery. tromboprophylaxis. • Beach chair position or better sitting up to 60°. • Look for SpO2 desaturations and hypercarbia. 2. Key points in anaesthesia induction. • Sufficient pain and PONV treatment. • Be aware of rhabdomyolysis when prolonged surgery in HELP:30early degree head up position, add ramping device or • Mallampati and large neck circumference = difficult • Promote mobilization and provide the sitting position. bag under thorax. laryngoscopy /intubation. • Pre-oxygenation and 10 cmH2O CPAP until the • Facemask ventilation is frequently problematic –needs Key points to remember in anaesthesia for the morbidly obese Mulier patient 2014 © www.Espcop.org London intubation. two hands ventilation and airways. Claire Nightingale, Michael Margarson, Paolo Pelosi, Thomas Gazynski, Luc de Baerdemaeker, Jan Mulier • Know the correct dosing scalars for induction agents and • Avoid laryngeal and supraglottic devices, endotracheal 60° 90° 30° 45° 30° -> 0° London Mulier 2014 London Mulier 2014 2. We need a subspeciality in Anaesthesia for the surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders • A sub speciality focus on giving better patient care • By having a dedicated group of anaesthesiologists • Who work frequent in an area. • Who develop local guidelines for those less involved • The work area is not patients who are obese as these patients are not grouped but are bound to the different surgeries. • The work area for an anaesthesiologist in the OR can be a certain surgical discipline like cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, orthopaedic surgery or obesity and metabolic surgery. • In most centres this is combined with upper abdominal or thoracic surgery when the bariatric volume is limited or when the surgical team performs also other abdominal procedures. London Mulier 2014 The Anesthesia for the surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders Giving anesthesia for Gastric banding Gastric bypass Sleeve gastrectomy Biliopancreatic diversion Giving anesthesia for revision procedures in patients with acute post operative Bleeding with acute or chronic Leak with insufficient weight loss or weight regain with excessive weight loss till cachexia in acute or chronic obstruction Ex of a common surgical anaesthesia interaction where we need to understand each other and2014 need to help each other. London Mulier Can we do something to improve the situation? Intraabdominal pressure ? Intraabdominal volume? Workspace? 20 • Surgeon: The abdomen is flat, I have no space to operate, I think the patient is pressing! • Anesthesiologist: I don’t measure any change, your problem? The patient is asleep and stable, everything fine at my side. • Surgeon: Look at the video screen. How do you want me to operate in so little space? And the pressure is already 18 mmHg. • Anesthesiologist: The patient will not tolerate higher pneumoperitoneum pressures. An experienced surgeon can handle this. • Surgeon: Do you want me to change to a laparotomy? When was the last time you gave a musclerelaxant, and by the way why do I always have to ask that? • Anesthesiologist: The patient has only one TOF response in the AP. Last time this was enough. What’s happening today with you? • Surgeon: I don’t know what “one TOF response” means. What I said is I can´t work with you. Call your supervisor! London Mulier 2014 From the most sensitive to the most resistant muscle for NMB Tongue, throat muscles Peripheral mucles, adductor pollicis Orbicularis oculi Corrugator supercilii Abdominal mucles, Vocal cords Clinical definition of deep block: TOF = 0 and PTC < 5 London Mulier 2014 Diaphragm Laparoscopic view at 12 mmHg IAP More space between stomach and anterior wall at deep NMB Is ideal IAP for surgeon in this patient if deep NMB is applied Moderate NMB TOF = 2 PTC = / IAP = 12 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 8 ? Calculated vol at 12 = 2 liter London Mulier 2014 Deep NMB TOF = 0 PTC = 6 IAP = 12 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 6 Calculated vol at 12 = 3 liter 23 Can we change the OR scenario into... • • • • • • • Surgeon: Now I can work and I have enough space. Anesthesiologist: the patient is OK. Surgeon: Look at the screen. The patient is relaxed and the IAP is low. Anesthesiologist: the patient is now on a deep neuromuscular block. Surgeon: how many PTCs has the patient in the adductor pollicis? Anesthesiologist: only 3 PTCs, I will keep him on a deep NMB until the end and give Bridion to reverse after the last stitch. Surgeon: thanks, then we will end in time and we can have a drink together. London Mulier 2014 Laparoscopic space (IAV) predicted or measured at insufflation IAV > 4 L Large Abdomen IAV 2 – 4 L Medium Abd Moderate or no NMB IAP 15 mmHg, high opioids, or low BIS Deep NMB IAP 12 mmHg, less opioids, and BIS 40- 60 Deep NMB IAP 15 mmHg, less opioids, and BIS 40- 60 Laparotomy or cancel case IAV < 2 L Small Abdomen Deep NMB IAP 18 mmHg, and surgical problems London Mulier 2014 Weight reduction pre operative? Abdominal recruitment at high IAP Should there be a subspecialty? Hope is not enough to turn to change • YES: Sub-speciality for Anaesthesia for bariatric and metabolic surgery • YES: Sub-society for Anaesthesia of the obese patient • YES: extra training in a certified centre • YES: Scientific meetings and live training? • YES: Part of the basic anaesthesia training and Post specialisation training? • We deserve a dedicated surgeon who understand our questions… • YOU deserve a dedicated anaesthesiologist who shares your spirit: make him/her part of your team… London Mulier 2014 London Mulier 2014 But what needs the surgeon? Surgeon needs high IAP and space/distance to put trocar at the start Surgeon needs space to work during laparoscopy Low pressure vs high London Mulier 2014 Low volume vs high Difference between active contraction and relaxation 1. No muscle relaxation 2. Active contraction against ventilator 3. Full muscle relaxation 30 1 25 2 3 2 40 1,5 30 1 20 15 0,5 10 IAP mmHg 35 IAP mmhg PV loops with fit 2,5 IAP IAV 40 IAV liter 45 IAP 2 20 1 3 10 0 5 no relaxation 0 0 500 valsalva contract relaxation 1000 2000 1500 0 2500 -0,5 3000 -0,5 London Mulier 2014 0 0,5 1 IAV liter 1,5 2 2,5 Why surgeons are frequently the first once to notice NMB recovery? • The diaphragm is more resistant than the adductor pollicis to rocuronium. Only deep NMB at the adductor pollicis ensures abdominal muscle relaxation. • Cantineau JP Anesthesiology. 1994;81:585 • Monitoring of the peripheral muscles often overestimates the degree of diaphragmatic relaxation, but is a safe predictor of recovery. • Moerer O. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005;40:217 London Mulier 2014 Case of insufficient deep NMB at PTC = 4 • TOF = 0 PTC = 4 • Rocuronium bolus 0,6 mg/kg at induction • No continous infusion • Patient started to breath against ventilator: abdominal muscles active London Mulier 2014 deep NMB (PTC=2) does not paralyze diaphragm totally. London Mulier 2014 Patient1 breaths against respirator, disturbing the lap view very dangerous during trocar closure at end surgery Mulier 2014 32 Depth of NMB reveals TOF = 0 and PTC = 10 This is not deep enough to prevent patient from pressing and reduces the lap workspace Mulier 2014 33 Why surgeons are frequently the first once to notice NMB recovery? Time difference between abdomen – adductor pollicis after bolus NMB is given. Lateral abdominal muscles blockade have a faster onset and a faster recovery than adductor pollicis Continuous infusion avoids early abdominal recovery not seen at the adductor pollicis. Kirov K et al. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000;19:734–738. London Mulier 2014 Solution to Both Problems: Deep NMB and Magnesium (prolongs NMB) or Continuous NMB Infusion Deep NMB till end if no space Reduce earlier if sufficient space Help us to get reversal agents (Bridion) that allows to stay deep till the end London Mulier 2014 Should there be a subspecialty? Hope is not enough to turn to change • YES: Sub-speciality for Anaesthesia for bariatric and metabolic surgery • YES: Sub-society for Anaesthesia of the obese patient • YES: extra training in a certified centre • YES: Scientific meetings and live training? • YES: Part of the basic anaesthesia training and Post specialisation training? • We deserve a dedicated surgeon who understand our questions… • YOU deserve a dedicated anaesthesiologist who shares your spirit: make him/her part of your team… London Mulier 2014 Patient info Birth Date: 28 09 1971 35 years Gender: female Other: 25 Sept. 2014 lap RNBY after lap band in the past 172 kg 195 cm WHR 149/127 18 kg below max ever stop bang 5/8 high risk for OSAS WHR 147/129 Prediction score abd compliance:7/10 means medium abdomen Calculated abd compliance: E 2 mmHg/l and PVO 6: sufficient work space possible, thanks to weight reduction and previous laparoscopy. However central obesity with WHR > 1. use of deep NMB allows IAP to be 12 mmHg At end surgery spont recovery to TOF 4: Lap view at moderate NMB (TOF4) are recorded and compared with lap view at deep NMB (PTC 6) after Rocuronium 30 mg bolus with Pictures taken at different IAP 15 12 8 7 mmHg with approval of patient before. Easy reversal with 4 mg/kg Sugammadex at end surgery. TOF 100% Rapid awakening. London Mulier 2014 Predicted and calculated abd compliance pat SR at start laparoscopy large Prediction: Medium measurement: Large > 4L London Mulier 2014 Moderate versus deep NMB at end laparoscopy after leak test RNY Spontaneous recovery at end surgery Moderate NMB at 13:02 TOF = 3 (4 due to missing answer) E=2 PV0 = increased to 8 ? Calculated vol at 12 = 2 liter Patient is not pressing or breathing against ventilator, but is space reduced? Bolus of 30 mg Rocuronium to deep block Deep NMB at 13:10 TOF = 0 PTC = 6 E=2 PV0 = 6 as measured at start lap Calculated vol at 12 = 3 liter London Mulier 2014 Laparoscopic view at 7 mmHg IAP Insufficient space in both, stomach touches anterior wall at moderate NMB This IAP is always insufficient in this patient Deep NMB TOF = 0 PTC = 6 IAP = 7 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 6 Calculated vol at 7 = 0,5 liter Moderate NMB TOF = 4 PTC = / IAP = 7 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 8 ? Calculated vol at 7 = 0 London Mulier 2014 Laparoscopic view at 9 mmHg IAP Stomach is lifted up with no view on fat behind Air in stomach in both views blocks view more in moderate NMB This IAP can work for this patient if deep NMB but not ideal for surgeon Moderate NMB TOF = 4 PTC = / IAP = 9 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 8 ? Calculated vol at 8 = 0,5 liter London Mulier 2014 Deep NMB TOF = 0 PTC = 6 IAP = 9 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 6 Calculated vol at 8 = 1,5 liter Laparoscopic view at 15 mmHg IAP Limited difference in visibility. Moderate NMB gives sufficient space This IAP is required if no deep NMB is applied in this patient Moderate NMB TOF = 0 PTC = / IAP = 15 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 8 ? Calculated vol at 15 = 3,5 liter London Mulier 2014 Deep NMB TOF = 0 PTC = 6 IAP = 15 mmHg E=2 PV0 = 6 Calculated vol at 15 = 4,5 liter