Intel - Aviation Maintenance Magazine
Transcription
Intel - Aviation Maintenance Magazine
www.avmain-mag.com MRO, UPGRADES AND REFURBISHMENT ON COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS/GA AND MILITARY AIRCRAFT GLOBALLY December 2010 / January 2011 HOW TECHNICIANS KEEP UAVS IN THE AIR INSIDE BUSINESS AVIATION’S RECOVERY EUROCOPTER’S CAMPAIGN TO IMPROVE CUSTOMER SERVICE TWO GREAT WAYS TO KEEP YOUR ENGINE UP TO SPEED. Do you have a new engine core that’s never been rebuilt or overhauled? Do you have an original Lycoming factory engine that last left the factory as a new, rebuilt or overhauled engine? SAVE UP TO SAVE UP TO 5,000 1,900 5000 $ $ ON A REBUILT ENGINE. ENGINE*. *A new engine core is defined as a Lycoming factory new engine that has never been overhauled or rebuilt (otherwise known in the industry as a “first-run core”). ON A NEW, REBUILT OR OVERHAULED ENGINE**. **An original factory engine is defined as an engine that last left the Lycoming factory as a New, Rebuilt or Overhauled Engine. For complete details, visit Lycoming.com or call 800-258-3279 to find an authorized Lycoming Distributor near you. Certain restrictions apply. These offers require the return of a new engine core or an “Original Factory Engine.” Offer subject to end or change at any time. See your distributor or visit Lycoming.com for more details. Discount program cannot be combined with the Fleet Rebate Program. © 2010 Avco Corporation. All rights reserved. Contents www.avmain-mag.com December 2010/January 2011 : vol 29 issue 6 Cover Story EDITORIAL Editor-in-Chief and Online Publisher John Persinos 301-385-7211, [email protected] European Contributing Editor Thierry Dubois, [email protected] Contributing Editors James Careless Kathryn Creedy Ramon Lopez Douglas Nelms Tom Scarlett ADVERTISING/BUSINESS Publisher/Owner Adrian Broadbent, +34 91 804 2577, [email protected] Sales Director (USA) Daniel Brindley, + 1 414 967 4997, [email protected] Sales Director (International) Jina Lawrence, +44 (0) 20 8669 0838, [email protected] DESIGN/PRODUCTION Production Manager Henry Lindesay-Bethune, [email protected] Production Splash Graphic Design [email protected] SUBSCRIPTIONS [email protected] CLIENT SERVICES Administration Maria Hernanz Reyes, [email protected] LIST RENTAL Statistics Jen Felling, (203) 778 8700, [email protected] REPRINTS The YGS Group 1800 290 5460, [email protected] 18 I The Giants of MRO 18 by James Careless A look at the major MRO providers, and how they intend to stay that way. This feature encompasses the globe, examining trends in all regions: Europe, North America, Asia, and more. 39 I Eurocopter: an MRO Case Study by Thierry Dubois Our European editor examines how global helicopter manufacturer Eurocopter is raising its game, in terms of maintaining, repairing and overhauling rotorcraft. 44 I MRO for Avionics by Doug Nelms Contributing editor Nelms, a high-time helicopter pilot, speaks with the major providers of avionics MRO in both the fixed- and rotary wing sectors, to convey the latest methods, tactics and challenges in this growing field. 47 I Special Report: MRO Webinar by John Persinos A review, with discussion excerpts, of our magazine’s most recent webinar: “The Convergence of Avionics, UAVs and MRO”. 39 52 I NBAA 2010: The Business Aviation Barometer by John Persinos Our editor-in-chief visited NBAA in Atlanta and covered the show from top to bottom. Here’s a wrap-up of what he discovered and what it means in the future for MRO in the business aviation/GA sectors. 44 56 I ADMA Visits the Sunshine State by Doug Nelms An on-site review of the Aviation Distributors and Manufacturers Association (ADMA) meeting in Florida. US Publisher Daniel Brindley ASI Publications Ltd US Publishing Office Address: 5590 N Diversey Blvd #209 Milwaukee WI 53217 60 I The Trent 900 Incident by Ramon Lopez Contributing editor Lopez, a renowned expert on air safety, interprets the causes and the fallout of the recent failure of Rolls-Royce’s engine on a Qantas flight. 62 I Point/Counterpoint www.aerospace-media.com Aerospace & Security Media is a trading arm of ASI Publications Ltd Calle Mar Mediterraneo 64, Tres Cantos 28760, Madrid, SPAIN. +34 91 804 2577 (T) +44 (0) 20 8090 6211 (F) www.avmain-mag.com or www.aerospace-media.com UK Company registration no 5999781 UK VAT no GB919525796 The rapid spread of Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) aviation parts is the basis of this issue’s debate. Contrasting views are offered by aviation consultant Daniel Doll and former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) member John Goglia. Cover photo: a hangar operated by MRO giant, Lufthansa Technik Departments 04 | Editor’s Notebook 06 | Intelligence: News 07 | Intelligence: About People 59 | Guest Opinion 64 | Guest Opinion 65 | Marketplace: Classified 66 | Marketplace: Tool Crib Aviation Maintenance (ISSN 1090-221X) is published bi-monthly and monthly by Aerospace & Security Media Ltd; 5590 N Diversey Blvd #209, Milwaukee, WI 53217. Application to mail at periodicals postage prices is pending at Milwaukee, WI and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Aviation Maintenance 5590 N Diversey Blvd #209, Milwaukee, WI 53217. The editors welcome articles, engineering and technical reports, new product information and other industry news. All editorial inquiries should be directed to Aviation Maintenance; Email: [email protected]. Subscriptions: Free to qualified individuals directly involved in the aircraft maintenance industry. All other prepaid subscriptions, see www.avmain-mag.com. Contents may not be reproduced in any form without written permission. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 3 Editor’s Notebook A Culture, Not a Department By John Persinos, Editor-in-Chief A side from being a subtropical melting pot of many ethnic cultures, Tampa also serves as an incubator for another type of culture — that of customer service. In December, I visited Chromalloy at its ever-expanding facilities in Tampa, Florida. Chromalloy provides repairs, coatings and cast parts for aerospace turbine engines and other applications. This well-managed company, owned by the private equity firm Carlyle Group, exemplifies the “customer service culture”. A customer service culture is a set of values and methodologies that are communicated to all members of the organization, to guide their interactions and decisionmaking with customers. To be effective, this culture must by holistic and shared by everyone in the company, from the shop floor to the executive suite. The business imperative for fostering a customer service culture is easy to grasp: attracting new customers costs more than retaining existing ones. The importance of customer service is explored by this issue’s cover story, “The Giants of MRO” (see page 18). I examined the theme on my own, during my tour of Chromalloy’s spotless foundry in Tampa. The facility is a hightech symphony of engineering, tooling and machining. As my hosts explained, customer service must be a pervasive culture, not simply an isolated department. “We put ourselves in the shoes of our customers, who wake up every morning thinking about life cycle costs,” said Andrew Farrant, v.p., marketing/corporate communications, Chromalloy. “Everyone at all levels of the company is encouraged to think along the same lines. How can we make it the most cost-effective to coat, repair or build a part or component for an operator? We have engineers on site at major MRO facilities, as a way to stay close to customer needs. Our constant goal is to provide speed, innovation and turnaround times that are better than the OEMs.” Tom Trotter, Chromalloy’s vice president and general manager, said that instilling respect for the customer is not a hierarchical, top-down process. “A customer service culture is important here,” he said. “We make customer service expectations very clear and specific and we communicate those expectations to everyone on the shop floor.” (For more on Chromalloy’s new state-of-the-art casting center in Tampa, turn to page 11.) Another company that’s grappling with customer service is the helicopter manufacturer, Eurocopter. Our European editor, Thierry Dubois, reports on Eurocopter’s new and 4 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 Attracting new customers costs more than retaining existing ones. innovative attempts to improve MRO turnaround times and responsiveness (see page 39). Similarly, contributing editor Douglas Nelms addresses MRO and customer support for fixed-wing and rotorcraft avionics (see page 44). Starting on page 62, read our “Point/Counterpoint” columns for different perspectives on the controversial topic of Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA). In a separate Guest Opinion column, influential aviation lawyer Jason Dickstein opines on PMA (page 59). Jason serves as president of the Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA), which represents the PMA parts industry. The importance of PMA has prompted our magazine to create a new conference, “The International PMA Summit”, scheduled for November 2011 in London. For details, go here: http://www.avmain-mag. com/pma-summit In addition to conferences, we also produce web-based events. Our recent webinar, “The Convergence of MRO, UAVs and Avionics”, looked at how major avionics OEMs are funneling greater resources into the upkeep of the ultrasophisticated electronics within unmanned aircraft. To read highlights of the webinar’s panel discussion, turn to page 47. This 60-minute webinar was recorded and archived; it remains available for registration on demand, at this URL: http://www. avmain-mag.com/webinars And finally, I’m proud to announce that the seasoned and widely respected aviation journalist Ramon Lopez has joined our editorial staff. He has written an article for this issue, on the incident when a Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engine blew apart on a Qantas Airbus A380 (see page 60). He also wrote the lead analysis story for our Intelligence news section, concerning a December court ruling on the Air France Concorde crash of 2000 (see page 6). Ramon is the former editor-in-chief of the newsletter, Air Safety Week. As such, his insights into the Qantas mishap are of particular relevance. How engine maker Rolls-Royce rectifies the problem is bound to serve as a customer service “case study” of historic proportions. AM John Persinos can be reached at [email protected]; 301-385-7211 Our work... flies with you. Put your engines in our hands. Because at Iberia Maintenance we take exquisite care for the engines that power your fleet while we subject them to stringent tests. We proudly have the most complete and most powerful test cell, with up to 120,000 pounds thrust. Because at Iberia Maintenance, our work is to ensure your engines carry you further, because our work... flies with you. IBERIA MAINTENANCE Commercial & Development Direction. Madrid - Barajas Airport, La Muñoza. 28042 Madrid, Spain. Phone: +34 91 587 49 71 / Fax: +34 91 587 49 91. E-mail: [email protected] www.iberiamaintenance.com IntellIgence Shadin Avionics Announces Fuel Management STC for the Bell 212/412 The Bell 212 Shadin Avionics, a major provider of Fuel Management Systems (FMS) and Engine Trend Monitoring (ETM), announced the approval of a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for the installation of a Shadin Fuel Management Kit into Bell 212 and 412 model helicopters. The Bell 212/412 STC is the latest addition to Shadin’s portfolio of FMS STCs that includes installations for other Bell, Eurocopter, and McDonnell Douglas Helicopters. The new STC enables the installation of the Shadin fuel flow transducer that supports Shadin’s ETM, Digiflo, Miniflo, Microflo, Digidata, and Air Data Computers (ADC), as well as glass displays from other manufacturers. Concorde Verdict Stirs Fiery Debate By Ramon Lopez A French court’s December ruling that Continental Airlines was guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the crash of an Air France Concorde supersonic transport at Charles de Gaulle Airport outside Paris in July 2000 has elevated concerns that criminalization of aircraft accidents will harm future aviation safety investigations. The court ordered Continental, now part of United Airlines, to pay $1.6 million in fines and damages to Air France, finding that the U.S. air carrier and one of its mechanics were “criminally responsible” for improperly maintaining a company DC-10, debris from which crippled the Concorde during takeoff and killed 113 people. The mechanic also received a 15-month suspended prison sentence. The U.S. airline said it would appeal the “absurd” ruling. The defendants included the person who oversaw the development of the supersonic jetliner. He and three other defendants involved in the Concorde’s design and certification were all acquitted. The crash of New York-bound Flight 4590 was the only fatal accident involving the small Concorde fleet that was retired in 2003. The trial was a high-profile example of a growing trend among public prosecutors to seek criminal accountability for mistakes that lead to air disasters. 6 “Its terrifying to think that someone can be prosecuted ten years after the fact,” said Bill Voss, head of the Flight Safety Foundation. He added: “Like other recent and failed attempts to criminalize aviation accidents in France, these manslaughter charges appear rather dubious and shortsighted. Absent willful intent or highly egregious conduct, we seriously question the basis for putting companies and aviation professionals through the ordeal of criminal prosecutions. In addition, we’re very concerned criminal prosecutions will discourage the free flow of information from operators to management to regulators, to the detriment of aviation safety.” Prosecutors worldwide continue to meddle in ongoing aviation accident investigations, hampering efforts to improve air safety and prevent similar accidents in the future. With the trend toward criminalization already having a chilling effect, according to Kenneth P. Quinn, general counsel of the Flight Safety Foundation, “the situation may get worse before it gets better and we are seeing it get worse.” In addition to the obvious impact on the accident investigation itself, such trends threaten some of the greatest contributions to aviation safety such as the Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP), which calls for self-reporting to catch trends that could lead to an accident. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 Air France Concorde fight 4590 crashed shortly after take-off in France on July 25, 2000, killing all 109 people on board and four people on the ground. Quinn believes “there is a need for safety professionals to openly discuss errors without fear of reprisal.” He sees a growing tendency of verdict-hungry prosecutors and judges to seek criminal sanctions in the wake of aviation accidents, even when the facts do not support findings of criminal negligence, willful misconduct or particularly egregious reckless conduct. “In recent years, prosecutors and willing judges around the world have turned the powerful weapons of criminal prosecution against what are simply tragic accidents, the result of mistakes, not willful actions,” Quinn remarked. “…Prosecutions have turned into persecutions and chilled the free admission of mistakes.” Ramon Lopez is former editor-in-chief of the newsletter, Air Safety Week. He now serves as a contributing editor to our magazine, focusing on safety issues. If you have a safety-related tip or story idea to share with Ramon, you can reach him at: [email protected] I news 06 I people 07 I Aircelle to Provide Tailored Nacelle Services on Singapore Airlines’ A340-500 Fleet Aircelle is to provide comprehensive maintenance services for engine nacelle components on Singapore Airlines’ A340500 jetliners under terms of a new umbrella contract reached by the international carrier with Airbus for its “Flight Hour Services-Tailored Support Package.” As a result of this six-year agreement, Aircelle joins a supplier team that will furnish adapted services for Singapore Airlines’ five A340-500s, which are about people operated in an all-business configuration on long-haul flights. class Air New Zealand Adopts Pratt & Whitney’s EcoPower Engine Wash to Reduce Fuel Burn Air New Zealand has signed a one-year agreement, extendable up to five years, for Pratt & Whitney’s EcoPower engine wash service, which will help the airline reduce fuel burn. Under the agreement, the Christchurch Engine Center, a joint venture between Pratt & Whitney and Air New Zealand, will use portable equipment to perform the washes in either Auckland or Christchurch, New Zealand. The service will be performed on all turbofan engine types within Air New Zealand’s existing fleet, including CFM56-3, V2500, CF680C2, RB211-524G and Trent 800 engines, and will also cover the GE90-115B and Trent 1000 engines on order by the airline. As Pratt & Whitney’s New Zealand EcoPower franchise, the Christchurch Engine Center is able to wash other engine types and also can provide the service for third-party customers. Air New Zealand is an international and domestic airline group that provides air passenger and cargo transport services within New Zealand, as well as to and from Australia, the Pacific, Asia, North America and the United Kingdom. Pratt & Whitney’s patented EcoPower engine wash system reduces fuel burn by as much as 1.2 percent, eliminating approximately three pounds of carbon dioxide emissions for every pound of fuel saved, while also decreasing engine gas temperature, consequently increasing the amount of time an engine can stay on wing. Jet Fuel Strategies to Merge with Johnston Aviation Jet Fuel Strategies announced today that it will join with Johnston Aviation’s fuel procurement operation, forming a single operating unit. The new company, which will be led by President Doug McConnell of Johnston Aviation, will retain the Jet Fuel Strategies, LLC name and operate from Johnston’s current headquarters in Elyria, Ohio. The company will offer its fully integrated, web-based suite of software, which includes its popular “Fast Fuel” and “Smart Fuel” search and order utilities, “Optimizer” tankering calculator, and a host of administrative and reporting tools. Operators with their own fuel contracts can utilize the programs for free. Those approved to do so may choose to purchase fuel directly from Jet Fuel Strategies, gaining streamlined billing, invoice auditing, and other value added benefits. CIRCOR Aerospace Promotes Michael Dill to VP Business Development CIRCOR Aerospace Products Group has promoted industry veteran Michael Dill to Vice President of Business Development and Strategy covering the North American, Asian, European and North African aerospace businesses. Michael will be responsible for driving the overall business development strategy for CIRCOR Aerospace. He will lead the group’s sales and marketing activities, longer term business and technology development strategies, and play a key role in supporting acquisition opportunities. He will be focused on new business capture by leveraging CIRCOR’s technical capabilities to solve complex, systemsrelated applications for its global customer base. Dill came on board in 2009 as the Group Continuous Improvement Director. In his career, he has spent over 20 years with Parker Hannifin, Shaw Aero Devices and Milliken & Company. He brings extensive experience in lean manufacturing, operational management and business leadership, resulting from past career assignments in Industrial Engineering, Operations Management, Materials Management, Program Management and Business General Management. Previously, he was the Business Unit Director of Lubrication and Heat Management at Parker Hannifin and prior to that Vice President and General Manager of Shaw Aero Devices, a $70 million designer and manufacturer of fuel, oil and water/waste systems and components. Dill earned a Bachelor of Science in Industrial and Systems Management degree with Highest Honors from the Georgia Institute of Technology and has been an active leader in South Florida Community and Economic organizations. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 7 Intel I news I about people New ASA Board Builds Five-Year Strategic Plan Vision and hands on leadership are part of the common thread that runs among the four aviation executives who have recently joined the Washington D.C.-based Aviation Seal Dynamics CEO Suppliers Association (ASA) Board of Directors. The new Board will include: Richard Levin, Managing Director with A.J. Levin Company; David J. Susser, President and CEO for Seal Dynamics LLC; Brent Webb, President of Aircraft Inventory Management & Services, Ltd.; and Mitchell Weinberg, President of International Aircraft Associates, Inc. Michele Dickstein currently serves as President of ASA. These individuals will join current directors, with leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), to build and begin implementation of a five-year strategic plan that will improve aviation safety as well as global representation for ASA’s worldwide membership. “ASA has experienced 16 percent growth in membership that crosses 19 countries, releases ‘The Update Report’ to more than 5,000 industry constituents, and is on track for more expansion in 2011,” noted David Susser (pictured), President and CEO of Seal Dynamics LLC. “This is an area that I am excited to be a part of and will include work with ASA’s strategic workshops, world-wide conference, and industry panels that shape the aviation industry.” Since the company’s founding in 1976, Seal Dynamics has grown from a value-added distributor and manufacturer of mechanical seals to an integrated provider of engineering and logistics solutions serving the industrial and airline industries. 8 GE and Nexcelle Enlisted by Bombardier for its Global 7000 and 8000 Jets Bombardier has selected GE Aviation to provide the integrated powerplant system for the new Global 7000 and Global 8000 business jets, launching the development of a new business jet engine for GE, currently called the TechX engine. The TechX engine will further strengthen GE’s presence in the ultra long-range, large cabin business aviation segment, which includes aircraft that can travel up to 7,900 nautical miles with 8 passengers. The engine will incorporate advanced technologies from both GE’s commercial and military engines developed with the company’s annual $1 billion investment in new technology research and development. The TechX engine will deliver several benefits, including an 8 percent lower specific fuel consumption than current business jet engines in the 10-20K thrust class, as well as more than 50 percent margin to CAEP/6 regulations on all emissions (NOx, smoke, hydrocarbons and CO). In related news, Nexcelle will provide the nacelle and thrust reverser for GE’s TechX integrated powerplant on the Bombardier Global 7000 and 8000 jets. Nexcelle’s win for this new GE engine program follows the company’s 2009 selection to provide the nacelle and thrust reverser for CFM International’s LEAP-X1C engine, which is to power the COMAC C919 jetliner. Features of the nacelle for the new GE TechX engine include a one-piece extended aluminum inlet lip-outer barrel for reduced aerodynamic drag; an innovative anti-ice system that uses a directed flow nozzle concept; a 360-degree, singlepiece extended composite inner barrel incorporating advanced acoustic protection for lower engine noise levels; a simplified composite fan cowl that allows for improved maintenance and reduces system weight; and a target style thrust reverser with fixed nozzle to provide lower weight and reverse thrust efficiency. Bombardier’s Global 7000 and 8000 business jets Midcoast Aviation Selects Avtrak to Enhance MRO Services Midcoast Aviation and Avtrak have partnered to develop maintenance tracking tools designed to enhance Midcoast’s customer service. Midcoast Aviation has teamed with Avtrak to enhance its internal MRO processes by incorporating Avtrak’s sophisticated maintenance tracking technology. The result will be faster, more accurate quotes and, ultimately, improved MRO service delivery. Avtrak has a long legacy in the maintenance tracking business and is a leader in easy-to-use Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 Internet-based aircraft maintenance tracking systems. In the recently launched Phase 1 of the project, Avtrak will help Midcoast Aviation capture the company’s extensive “tribal knowledge” and experience to develop a database to support quote development and assist customers with maintenance planning and forecasting. In Phase 2, slated to begin next year, efforts will be focused on using the information gathered during Phase 1 to enhance maintenance performance. EXPERIENCE MATTERS • Up to $20,000 in signing bonuses available (For specific part-time jobs) • Educational assistance programs • Low cost TRICARE health & dental insurance • No cost retirement plans AFReserve.com/mech • 800-257-1212 Intel I news I about people PAS Technologies Names Rey as General Manager PAS Technologies Inc. has named Carlos (Charlie) Rey to the position of General Manager of the Miramar, Florida facility reporting to Phil Milazzo, PAS Technologies’ President and CEO. Rey replaces incumbent Michael Clifton who has accepted a new sales leadership role reporting to Mark Greene, Vice President Commercial Aero Sales. Rey will be responsible for leading all aspects of the operation, which provides service and repairs for engine and landing gear components with an emphasis on customer-facing activities to grow sales and revenue. He also will work to improve turnaround times and waste reduction. Before joining PAS Technologies, Rey was Executive Director of Production Control for AeroThrust Corporation Jet Engine Overhaul and Repair in Miami, Florida. Rey worked for AeroThrust for over 23 years in production control. He also worked for FJ Turbine Power where he was director of production control and outside services. A privately held corporation headquartered in North Kansas City, Missouri, PAS Technologies specializes in providing repair and overhaul solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets. Embraer Names Krull as Managing Director Embraer has named Phil Krull Managing Director of the Company’s first U.S. aircraft assembly plant and customer center, at Melbourne International Airport (MLB), in Melbourne, Florida. Krull will head up the newly established facility dedicated to the Phenom executive jet family in the company’s largest market. Krull’s responsibilities for the facility’s industrial and plant operations include developing strategies to maximize profitability and customer satisfaction. He will also be the local contact person for 10 TRAX Joins Forces With Turkish Technic TRAX USA Corp and Turkish Technic have announced a strategic partnership. Under the agreement, Turkish Technic will utilize the TRAX Maintenance and Engineering solution to manage its MRO IT operations. The companies will work together to integrate TRAX’s Maintenance and Engineering solution with the MRO’s line of work, thereby allowing them to offer a more complete range of customizable services. TRAX will allow Turkish Technic the benefits of having aircraft information, inventory and maintenance activities integrated into a single system, thereby streamlining aircraft maintenance and inventory planning and processes. TRAX Maintenance’s MRO software has been implemented by almost 100 airlines and MRO organizations worldwide. A Turkish Technic hangar West Star Appointed Hawker Beechcraft Service Center West Star Aviation’s Grand Junction, CO (GJT) facility has been appointed by Hawker Beechcraft (HBC) as an authorized service center. The agreement includes services on all Beechcraft King Air models, as well as on Beechcraft Baron and Bonanza models. West Star services numerous King Air customers at GJT; this agreement allows the company to provide complete The Hawker Beechcraft King Air 200 airframe and engine services, as well as the convenience of processing warranty claims. West Star Aviation specializes in airframe repair and maintenance, engine repair and maintenance, major modifications, avionics installation and repair, interior refurbishment, paint, parts, surplus avionics sales, and accessory services. Sky Tractor Named Authorized Service Center for GE’s M601 and H80 Engines Sky Tractor Supply Co. has signed an agreement with GE Aviation to become an Authorized Service Center for the M601 and H80 turboprop engines. As part of the agreement, Sky Tractor will offer comprehensive line maintenance, removals and re-installations of engines and LRUs and engine spares for the M601 and H80 engine families. GE Aviation will provide Sky Tractor with comprehensive material support and training. Sky Tractor provides a variety of aircraft equipment parts, supplies and services, including a full service fixed base operation Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 (FBO), agricultural aircraft parts, sales and maintenance, and professional aerial application equipment. GE Aviation’s Business & General Aviation Turboprops has more than 1,600 M601 engines in service that have accumulated more than 17 million flight hours on 30 applications. GE’s H80 engine is undergoing certification testing and will power business and general aviation, utility and agriculture aircraft. The H80 will update the legacy M601 in several aspects, including power and efficiency. I news I Chromalloy Announces $5 Million Core Production Facility In Tampa, Florida Chromalloy’s Casting Facility in Tampa. Chromalloy announced in December that the company will build a $5 million ceramic core production facility in Tampa, Fla., adjacent to its newly operational investment casting center. Pre-engineering for the core facility is complete and construction will commence in 2011. The core facility is scheduled to be operational in early 2012. The new facility will allow the company to manufacture the cores that are an integral part of investment casting. Ceramic cores are utilized in the investment casting process to form complex cooling passages within the components, which are necessary to operate effectively in the hot and highly stressed sections of gas turbine engines. Chromalloy currently provides design, engineering, tooling, machining, repairs, coatings and cast parts for turbine engines in aerospace, aero-derivative and industrial gas turbine (IGT) applications. Customers include commercial airlines, the U.S. Air Force, power generation and offshore platform operators, and marine operators including the U.S. Navy and cruise lines. Chromalloy unveiled its new 150,000 square foot, state-of-the-art casting center in Tampa during a grand opening in December. The casting center triples the company’s previous engine component production capability of superalloy turbine components and parts in Tampa. FAA Awards Type Certificate To Hartzell The FAA has awarded a type certificate to Hartzell’s new 4-bladed, 93-inch diameter, ASC-II advanced composite propellers. These propellers with lightweight aluminum hubs will save over 30 lbs compared to an equivalent metal-bladed propeller. For strength and durability, the composite section of the propeller is composed of high strength carbon fiber. To achieve propeller TC approval, the new blades underwent more than a year-long test program that included endurance, fatigue, lightning strike, bird strike, and propeller vibration testing, ultimately achieving certification for an unlimited fatigue life. Hartzell’s ASC-11Turboprop Composite Propeller about people suppliers, government authorities and the surrounding Melbourne community. The central Florida native brings many qualifications in manufacturing operations and engineering, as well as experience in continuous improvement implementation based on the lean six sigma methodology. He joins Embraer directly from Siemens Energy, a top player in the global power plant development field, where he was responsible for steam turbine and generator programs process improvements from proposal through program execution. Krull previously worked at DRS Technologies, where he led a 350-person 24/7 manufacturing, depot and material ordering organization responsible for the production of aerospace and aircraft assemblies for domestic and foreign military sales. Before that, he held several positions for Lockheed Martin over a 20-year period leading project management, continuous improvement programs, operations engineering and manufacturing operations for producing various military aerospace systems. The opening of the new Melbourne facility is part of Embraer’s broader strategy of bringing operations closer to customers and to its largest market, as the company’s first industrial site in the U.S. The plant will start operations with the production of the Phenom 100 executive Wencor Announces New Executive Officers Wencor Group, LLC announced three new executive officers. Gregory Beason will join the executive team as Chief Executive Officer of the Wencor Group. John Chalaris and Keith Hicks also will join the Wencor Group as CFO and CIO, respectively. Mr. Beason has 28 years in the aerospace industry in both aftermarket and OEM sales. He has led a number of businesses at Honeywell and most recently at Danaher. In his role as Group Executive at Pacific Scientific Aerospace, he was responsible for growth strategies of Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 11 Intel I news I about people six operating companies to deliver year over year top line growth & operating income. Greg will lead the Wencor Group in growing company sales and expanding offerings for its customers. Mr. Chalaris has held several executive financial positions, both in the private and public sectors, most recently with DeCrane Aerospace, but also including Wesco Aircraft, Landmark Aviation, Comprehension Polymers Holdings and General Electric Aircraft Engines. Over the past 25 years, John has led companies through acquisitions, divestitures and new product development and has also managed companies through relationships with private equity investors, banks and external auditors. Mr. Hicks has managed international teams of technical professionals for over 20 years. Before coming to the Wencor Group, he was the Chief Operating Officer at Global Accessories. He also served as Chief Information Officer at Spillman Technologies and Omniglow Corporation. Keith’s strengths include a solid track record of aligning technical initiatives with business strategies, deploying efficient and scalable business support systems, international data center management, and implementing IT enterprise management systems for rapidly growing businesses. Rockwell Collins Names Buesing as VP Steve Buesing has been appointed vice president, Investor Relations for Rockwell Collins. He succeeds Dan Swenson, who will transition into a strategy role within the company’s Commercial Systems business as part of a leadership rotation. Buesing will be responsible for developing and maintaining relationships with sell and buy side financial analysts, as well as communications between the Rockwell Collins and the investing public and shareowners. He has held various leadership positions within the company’s Finance organization since joining Rockwell Collins in 1995. He most recently served as Controller, Operations since May 2009. 12 DART Helicopter Teams with Hawker Pacific Eurocopter’s EC135 DART Helicopter Services (DHS), which produces and globally distributes more than 3,000 certified helicopter accessories, completed an exclusive agreement with Hawker Pacific that will establish a stronger DHS presence in the Middle East, Asia, Australia and New Zealand. Hawker Pacific operates facilities in several Asian and Australian locations, Auckland, New Zealand and Dubai, UAE. The company offers comprehensive aviation services including sales, charter, MRO and aircraft support, spare parts, logistics and training for both fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft. With this agreement, DHS will have the capability to offer its complete inventory of helicopter components to operators in Hawker Pacific’s markets, supplementing its operations in North and South America, Europe, Japan, China and Singapore. By utilizing Hawker Pacific warehouses and service facilities, DHS will provide readily available accessories to customers worldwide, ensuring quick delivery of high quality parts and systems that improve helicopter efficiency, safety and reliability. In related news, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has given approval to DART Helicopter Services to offer several new products now approved and certified for operational use by rotorcraft operators throughout Europe. So far in 2010, DART has received eight STCs from EASA , and now holds 125 EASA STCs. DART’s extensive list of newly certified accessories and components are applicable to the most popular models of commercial helicopters currently flying throughout the European continent. DART’s products are available for the Agusta 119; Agusta/ Westland AW 139; Bell 206A, B, L/212/407/412 and OH-58; Eurocopter AS350, AS355, AS332/ 332L, EC120, and the highly popular EC135 (pictured), EC145 and EC225; MBB 117 and BO105; MD Helicopters MD 500 and MD 900 Explorer; Robinson R44 and Sikorsky S76, S61 and S92. BizJet Delivers Second BBJ to Boeing BizJet International, Lufthansa Technik’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, has delivered on time the second Boeing Business Jet (BBJ) to its possessor, Boeing’s Corporate Flight Department. Before delivery, the aircraft ran through a complex program at BizJet, including major maintenance checks and refurbishments. A first BBJ owned by Boeing had already been completed and delivered in the second quarter of 2010. BizJet’s work package included periodic inspections and the clearance of findings, the removal and re-installation of the complete Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 cabin, several interior modifications, the installation and update of electronic equipment and the performance of over 50 service bulletins and service letters. The Boeing Business Jet (BBJ) I news I Embraer “Powers On” The Legacy 450/500 Iron Bird Test Facility Embraer “powered on” the Legacy 450/500 flight controls integrated test facility, known as the Iron Bird. The facility integrates the equipment and components of the fly-bywire flight controls, avionics, hydraulics and several other system interfaces of the new midlight Legacy 450 and midsize Legacy 500 executive jets. The Legacy 450/500 Iron Bird has been developed by Embraer in a partnership with Parker, which supplies the flight control system. It features a fully equipped cockpit with the actual hardware of an airplane installation. In a very automated environment, not only flight controls and systems integration are tested, but the platform can also be connected to the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) and aircraft electrical system, which have their own dedicated test facilities. The Iron Bird allows pilots to be a part of the tests through an integrated aerodynamic model and visual system. The first flight of the Legacy 500 is on schedule for the about people second half of 2011. In related news, StandardAero has signed a long-term agreement to support Embraer’s global Pool programs for the Hamilton Sundstrand APS 2300 Auxiliary Power Units (APUs). These APUs are operated on the Embraer 170,175, 190, and 195 aircraft. The partnership provides worldwide support for four of Embraer’s sites, including Fort Lauderdale, Paris, and Singapore, as well as Brazil. This new APU support agreement is a major milestone for StandardAero’s operation in Maryville, TN where all of the work will be performed. C M Y CM Buesing earned a bachelor’s degree in Accounting and Business Administration from Coe College, and a Master of Business Administration from The University of Iowa. MY Reheat Appoints Vince as Maintenance Manager Paul Vince has been appointed as Maintenance Manager at Reheat International. He joins Reheat after a 23-year career at Thomson Airways, culminating as Workshops Manager. His appointment strengthens Reheat’s technical management structure ahead of expected growth associated with the recently announced support deal with Adams Rite Aerospace and further expansion into cabin interior parts refurbishment and sales. Reheat International is a specialist provider of CY CMY K aftermarket support services for aircraft interior equipment The Embraer Legacy 500 interturbine Aviation Logistics GmbH www.interturbine.com THE ONE STOP SOURCE Worldwide Material Support for all Maintenance Materials Appointed for total fleet support by AIRBUS • ATR • DORNIER EMBRAER • EUROCOPTER • PILATUS Consolidating > 500,000 part numbers / specifications from more than 2,700 sources Innovative supply solutions from regional warehouses Raw Materials interturbine Aviation Logistics GmbH THE ONE STOP SOURCE Bulbs & Lamps Consumable Materials (Chemicals) Semi-finished Materials Hot Bonding Equipment INTERTURBINE AVIATION LOGISTICS GMBH · WORLDWIDE MATERIAL SUPPORT · WWW.INTERTURBINE.COM USA / Texas USA / Washington +1 817 633 8377 · USA / Florida +1 425 644 5544 · Canada +1 786 337 8144 +1 450 632 0647 GERMANY · FRANCE · UK · CZECH REP. · HUNGARY · RUSSIA · MEXICO · BRAZIL · UAE · P.R. CHINA · JAPAN · SINGAPORE · INDIA · AUSTRALIA · SOUTH AFRICA Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 13 Aviation Maintenance Magazin Intel I news I about people West Star Aviation Promotes McKillips West Star Aviation promoted Dan McKillips to Manager of Paint and Interiors at the company’s East Alton, IL facility. McKillips is now responsible for the Paint and Interior (Wood, Upholstery & Trim) operations at the (ALN) facility and continuing the growth, productivity and quality opportunities in Cessna, Dassault Falcon, Challenger, Gulfstream and Piaggio aircraft. McKillips previously held the positions of Regional Sales Manager and Technical Sales Manager at West Star Aviation. His experience as an A&P mechanic, licensed private pilot, corporate D.O.M., and his Sales & Marketing activities within West Star over the past years will add a significant level of experience and knowledge to Paint and Interior operations at ALN. West Star Aviation, Inc. specializes in airframe repair and maintenance, engine repair and maintenance, major modifications, avionics installation and repair, interior refurbishment, paint, parts, surplus avionics sales, and accessory services. GE Aviation Appoints Bill Fitzgerald and Colleen Athans to New Roles GE Aviation has appointed Bill Fitzgerald as vice president and general manager of the GEnx Product Line and Colleen Athans as vice president and general manager of Assembly, Test and Overhaul. Fitzgerald joined GE in 1983 and has held several technical and leadership roles at GE’s Lynn, Massachusetts; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Cardiff, Wales (UK) facilities. Most recently, he served as vice president and general manager of Assembly, Test and Overhaul. 14 Premier Turbines Offers Full Test Cell Capability for GE’s M601 Engines Premier Turbines now has full test cell capabilities for GE’s M601E-11 engines. This means Premier Turbines can test M601 engines at its Neosho, Missouri facility after heavy repair services and no longer has to send the data to GE’s facility in Prague, Czech Republic for validation. Late last year, Premier Turbines was selected as a Designated Repair Center in North and South Americas for GE’s M601 and, once in service, the H80 turboprop engines. As a Designated Repair Center, Premier Turbines offers heavy repair services, exchange engines and rentals, line replacement unit rotable pools and field service support to all existing and future M601 and H80 engines in the Americas region. GE Aviation provides the necessary OEM parts to meet Premier Turbines’ needs. GE’s M601 operators now can have aroundthe-clock customer support through its Business Jet Operations Center. The Business Jet Operations Center is staffed with customer product technicians who can provide a rapid response to needs, such as parts availability, trouble-shooting and field issues. M601 engines continue to be overhauled at GE Aviation Czech’s facility in Prague. Located in Neosho, Missouri, Premier Turbines is a provider of repair and overhaul services for commercial, government and military turbine engines, components and accessories. Gulfstream Celebrates Rollout of 300th G550 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. recently rolled out the 300th Gulfstream G550 aircraft at its manufacturing facility in Savannah. The large-cabin, ultralong-range business jet received its certificate of airworthiness from the FAA, thereby completing its initial The Gulfstream 550 phase of manufacturing. The 300th G550 is also nearly the 500th aircraft in the GV family, which includes the GV, G550 and G500. Gulfstream suppliers Fokker and Vought recently celebrated milestones for delivery of the 500th tail and wing, respectively, for the GV series of aircraft. Powered by enhanced Rolls-Royce BR710 turbofan engines, the G550 has a range of 6,750 nm (12,501 km) at Mach 0.80 and a high-speed cruise capability of Mach 0.87. The G550 fleet recently surpassed 404,000 flight hours. From now until late February, the aircraft will be painted in Savannah and outfitted at Gulfstream’s Brunswick, Ga., facility in preparation for its scheduled delivery to an undisclosed international customer in February. Lufthansa Technik Takes On Engine Work for Austrian Airlines Austrian Airlines has contracted Lufthansa Technik to overhaul the engines of its Airbus A320 family aircraft. The agreement further expands the long-standing cooperation of Austrian, a member of the Lufthansa Group since 2009, and Lufthansa Technik. The contract, which extends over a period of eight years, covers all CFM56-5Bengines powering the 21 A320 family aircraft of Austrian. Lufthansa Technik has been providing support for Austrian Airlines’ CFM56-7B and PW4000 engines powering the carrier’s Boeing 737 and 767 fleets. These aircraft, as well as the airline’s Boeing 777 and Airbus A320 family, jets are also supported with component and landing gear services. Austrian itself is an exclusive provider of component services to Lufthansa Technik for selected component groups. Austrian Airlines’ A320 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 I news I Stevens Aviation Named Installer for GE M601 Engine Smyrna Air Center has authorized Stevens Aviation to be a part of the Power 90 Upgrade Program and install the GE M601 engine on King Air 90 aircraft. Smyrna Air Center in Smyrna, Tennessee, holds the rights to the Power 90 conversion Supplemental Type Certificate (STC). The Power 90 Upgrade Program is a conversion program for owners of King Air 90, A90, B90, C90 and E90 aircraft, in which the installed engines are replaced with the powerful 705 shaft-horsepower (shp) GE M601E-11A engines. Owners of King Air C90 aircraft who take advantage of the Power 90 Upgrade Program and upgrade engines to the GE M601E-11A engine will gain significantly increased operating efficiency, reduced variable costs, and net savings, according to a July 2010 study by Conklin & de Decker performed for GE Aviation. The comparative analysis of the GE engine against its competition was acknowledged by Vref, which recently recognized 100 percent of the conversion cost in the value added to a C90 when the GE engine upgrade was selected. GE’s M601E-11A Turboprop Engine about people In his new role, Fitzgerald will be responsible for overseeing all aspects of the GEnx engine line, which is the fastest selling jet engine in GE’s history. The GEnx engine will power the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and 747-8 aircraft. The engine is currently undergoing flight testing on both aircraft. Athans also joined GE in 1983 and has held numerous technical, quality and leadership roles at GE’s Lynn, Mass.; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Durham, North Carolina facilities. She most recently served as general manager of the CF6 commercial engines and services. The CF6 family of engines has accumulated more flight hours than any other widebody engine at GE. In her new role, Athans will lead all GE Aviation’s development and production engine assembly and test operations, and overhaul facilities around the world. Reheat Appointed ARA Repair Center Reheat’s UK-based facility Adams Rite Aerospace (ARA) and Reheat International have signed an agreement to establish Reheat International as the authorized Adams Rite repair center for all Europe, Middle East and Africa customers. Repair capability has been established at Reheat’s United Kingdom MRO facility in Alton, Hampshire, with full factory support from Adams Rite. This capability became operational in the fall of 2010. Now, all customers from the region can send any Adams Rite product to Reheat for repair. Reheat International provides aftermarket support for an extensive range of aircraft galley equipment products. The company’s work includes aircraft ovens, coffee makers, water boilers, and faucets. Reheat also supplies and supports associated cabin interior parts. Navigate Economic Headwinds Position for Blue Skies Take your business beyond survival. As economic headwinds make the fight for survival a reality, you are challenged to do more with less, to maximize efficiency while lowering costs -- all without compromising customer service or safety. Software automation is a key to the solution, but not all software applications are alike. Choosing the best package for your business is critical. CORRIDOR® Aviation Service Software is proven to positively impact aviation service providers throughout the industry. The increased organization and efficiency, improved safety, and lower costs CORRIDOR® provides will not only help you survive now, but will strengthen and position your business to take advantage of opportunities once headwinds subside. Request a demo today. C RRIDOR Aviation Service Software WWW.CORRIDOR.AERO 512.918.8900 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 15 Intel I news I Lufthansa Technik, Air Memphis Expand V2500 Engine Activity Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen has established a new Engine Parts & Accessories Repair (EPAR) product to expand its nacelle services. The new business starts with the repair of common nozzle assemblies and tail cones for the V2500 engine and comprises the complete repair portfolio. If needed, design engineering capabilities will be delivered by Lufthansa Technik’s Engine Parts & Accessories Repair (EPAR) design organization in Hamburg, Germany. Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen mechanics and engineers attended the corresponding training course at EPAR’s repair and overhaul shop for exhaust nozzle components in Hamburg to be prepared for their new job. During the introductory phase the new team in Shenzhen will also be supported by experienced technicians from EPAR in Hamburg. The V2500 engine is designed and manufactured by International Aero Engines, a global partnership that includes Pratt & Whitney, Rolls-Royce, Japanese Aero Engine Corporation, and MTU Aero Engines. In related news, Air Memphis signed an exclusive five-year Engine Management Program agreement with Pratt & Whitney Global Service Partners (GSP) for the airline’s fleet of V2500 engines. Pratt & Whitney’s Engine Management Programs provide expert analysis of engine operational data to monitor and forecast engine health and maintenance. Through the agreement, Pratt & Whitney’s team of engine performance analysts will leverage its The V2500 engine web-based Advanced Diagnostics & Engine Management (ADEMTM) tools to help Air Memphis enhance reliability and lower maintenance costs throughout the lives of its engines. Air Memphis is a charter airline based in Cairo, Egypt. Regional Aircraft Manufacturers Face Changing Competitive Landscape The Embraer E-175 In a new study, “The Market for Regional Transport Aircraft”, the consultancy Forecast International projects that 4,016 regional aircraft, valued at $123 billion, will be produced from 2010 through 2019. The forecast includes both regional jets and regional turboprops, with jets accounting for about 64 percent of the total. The forecast is good news for the MRO market, which is expected to reap benefits from the renewed activity, after a brutal two-year recession that only now is showing signs of easing. Forecast International, based in Newtown, Conn., is a provider of market intelligence and analysis in the areas of aerospace, defense, power systems and military electronics. The company’s projections indicate that Bombardier, Embraer, and ATR will be the leaders among regional aircraft manufacturers during the 10-year forecast period. Bombardier’s product line includes both jet-powered and turboproppowered aircraft, while Embraer currently specializes in jets and ATR builds turboprops exclusively. The top end of the regional aircraft market is seeing an influx of new models. Bombardier is developing the CSeries, a new family of 100-145 seat aircraft that transcends the boundary between the regional jet market and the large airliner market. The CSeries competes against large regional jets from Embraer and others, and also against narrowbody airliners such as the Airbus A319 and the Boeing 737-700. “The challenge from the CSeries has become a prime consideration for Airbus and Boeing as they make development decisions regarding their narrowbody families.,” said Forecast International senior aerospace analyst, Raymond Jaworowski (pictured). Embraer is well positioned in the 70-125 seat market with its E-Jets series regional jets, and has been pondering future development strategies. Among the options being considered by the Brazilian company are a re-engining of the E-Jets family and/or a larger, all-new aircraft family. The latter would compete in the market above 125 seats, taking on Bombardier’s CSeries. Several companies are looking to break into the regional aircraft market, and are developing new aircraft that compete for sales in the top segment of the market. These include the Chinese firm Comac, with its ARJ21 regional jet; the Japanese company Mitsubishi, with the Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ); and the Russian firm Sukhoi Civil Aircraft, with the Superjet 100. All of this activity is taking place against a backdrop of a changing regional airline industry. Regional airlines were hit hard in the 20082009 airline market slump. A recovery is now under way, but could easily stall should the general economy remain sluggish or drop back into recession. Meanwhile, many mainline network airlines are looking to significantly redefine their relationship to the regional airlines that operate feeder services into their networks. Feeder operations are the core business for many regional carriers. The majors want to alter, or even scrap altogether, the fixed-fee-per-departure arrangements that have traditionally defined the major/regional partnership. Increasingly, regionals are being asked to assume much of the risk, and much of the cost, of feeder operations. Forecast International’s Raymond Jaworowski Intelligence is compiled and written by our editorial staff. If you have any story ideas, press releases or hot tips for this section, please go to our magazine’s web site and post them here: http://www.avmain-mag.com/cat/press-releases. Our staff will review all submissions. 16 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 The future and us: a perfect match. Great challenges are part of our everyday routine. With over 50 years’ experience in maintenance and repair, not to mention acting as launching customer for a great number of new planes, you can rest assured that we are already making all the necessary arrangements and will be ready to go the moment your plane is. Just like all other types of aircraft, your 787 will benefit from our comprehensive Start-up-Support, including maintenance and component support. We look forward to working together to ensure a perfect launch. Lufthansa Technik AG, Marketing & Sales E-mail: [email protected] www.lufthansa-technik.com/787 Call us: +49-40-5070-5553 More mobility for the world Battle Titans of the Here’s a look at the genuine giants of our industry — and how they’re fighting to stay that way by James Careless T here are many MROs in the world, but only a handful qualify as the “Giants of MRO”. These are the companies such as Lufthansa Technik, Air France Industries/KLM Engineering & Maintenance, and ST Aerospace, whose reach spans the globe. And they’re also smaller MROs who, by dint of their service quality and financial success, command serious respect from their customers. Whatever the reason for their status, the Giants of MRO found within the pages of this special edition of Aviation Maintenance face similar challenges in today’s tough world market. What they are battling with, and the innovative solutions they’ve developed to prosper and grow during hard times, is what this story is all about. The Recession’s Affect on MROs Research by AeroStrategy Management Consulting proves that these are tough times for the MRO industry. Thanks to the world recession and its impact on the global aviation industry, “business is down everywhere,” says Hal Chrisman, a Principal in AeroStrategy’s North American practice. “For instance, global air transport MRO revenues were just $42.7 billion in 2009, down from $44 billion in 2008 and $45 billion the year before.” The MROs themselves back up AeroStrategy’s research. “Unlike previous downturns which impacted only specific regions, this downturn has been more global in nature,” 18 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 says Delta TechOps spokesperson Anthony Black. Worse for MROs, “Most of the airlines cut back significantly on operations, cutting flying and grounding aircraft, running down consumables and spares stocks and pressing their suppliers for lower costs through renegotiated agreements,” says Dr. Fuat Oktay, Executive Vice President of Commerce with Turkish Technic. “Business in general has suffered from the crisis initiated in 2008,” notes Katia Diebold-Widmer, Head of Marketing of the MTU Maintenance Group. However, some areas have been harder hit than others, she says. “North America and Europe clearly have suffered higher declines in terms of MRO demand as they also represent the most mature markets. In comparison, Asia — especially China, India and Indonesia — continues to be a fast growing market, as well as the Middle East and South America.” Much of the lost business is due to the grounding of older aircraft. According to AeroStrategy, there are currently 1,553 passenger aircraft grounded worldwide. “Many of these aircraft are now serving as parts sources, for airlines trying to avoid end-of-life maintenance to engines and other components by cannibalizing their fleet,” Chrisman says. Adds Diebold-Widmer: “A comparison of commercial engine MRO forecasts from AeroStrategy over the past three years [2009 vs. 2007 comparison] show that approximately 15 percent of the total market has been lost for the next Battle Tactics Here’s a list of the top tactics that the Giants of MROs are using to fight back against the troubled world economy: Get Efficient! Spanish Air Force Transport at Iberia Maintenance hangar 10 years. This relates mainly to older equipment which has been phased out or parked, and is unlikely to be put into service again.” The Fallout From Tight Money Tight money isn’t the only challenge facing the Giants of MRO. With fewer dollars floating around, competition for business is getting fierce. “We are seeing flag carriers increasingly compete for our business, as the governments who own them scramble for revenues,” says Peter Chapman, AAR’s Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer. “Then there are the aircraft OEMs. They are looking for ways to make money after the sale of their products, and the MRO space is a natural target for them. That makes life difficult for us, because we find ourselves both competing against and working with these OEMs at the same time.” It is also becoming harder for MROs to find and retain qualified help, given the hours the work demands and the fact that other technology sectors pay better. “We see manpower as one of the biggest challenges facing MROs today,” says AeroStrategy’s Chrisman. “It is difficult to convince young people that aviation maintenance is an attractive career option — and the Boomers just keep retiring.” True Giants of MRO don’t take hard times lying down. Instead, they look for opportunities in the marketplace, and ways in which they can become more competitive. And make no mistake: Even in the current economic situation, “the advent of low-cost airlines, everincreasing passenger traffic and continuing regional fleet growth in Turkey and the Middle/Far East has opened up a whole new business opportunity for global aircraft companies in MRO,” says Turkish Technic’s Dr. Oktay. To grab hold of new opportunities, MROs are trying all kinds of stratagems. One of these is to radically improve business efficiencies by coming together, as in the case of the Air France Industries and KLM Engineering & Maintenance (AFI KLM E&M) MRO merger. “By merging our operations and rationalizing our systems, AFI KLM E&I has manned to be profitable despite 2009 being a very poor year for the airlines,” says Fabrice Defrance, the company’s Senior Vice President of Commercial and Business Development. “Coming together has allowed us to decrease unit costs and focus on new technologies, such as the GE90, CF6-80E1, components for the 777,737NG and A330.” Greenwich AeroGroup is heeding AFI KLM E&M’s example. “Acquisitions or partnerships in international markets which show strong growth in aircraft and associated services” is part of the company’s two-pronged approach to “robust growth,” says Kasey J. Baker, Greenwich AeroGroup’s Director of Marketing. The second prong is “continued focus on organic Customer’s GE90 on-wing support by AFI KLM E&M Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 19 In order to expand its product range, Bombardier Customer Services developed repair capability for the Rolls-Royce RB211 535 Thrust Reverser in 2009. growth through investments in people, infrastructure and new service products,” she says. Diversify Lufthansa Technik has not merged with any other MROs, but the company has still managed to cut costs through “lean production and administration systems,” says Walter Heerdt, the company’s Head of Marketing & Sales. Lufthansa Technik also has increased revenues by diversifying into related markets where its existing resources give it an edge. “We now do VIP aircraft and cabin finishing,” Heerdt says. “This is a very demanding market niche where an MRO must have the depth in people and capabilities to give VIP clients precisely what they want, including the advanced entertainment, communication and navigation systems being installed in today’s VIP aircraft.” Iberia Maintenance also sees its future as driven by new market areas. “I can say that diversification and constant adaptation to the MRO environment is the basic attitude behind any response we make to the market,” says Jose Luis Quirós, the company’s Sales & Business Development Senior Vice President. “Unless an organization is in continuous motion to satisfy new customers’ needs and requirements, it will not be sustainable. Like the dinosaurs, it will end up extinct.” 20 Keep Customers happy Improved customer service is one area where the Giants of MRO see a chance to drive revenue growth. “The most important thing for us is to continue to provide our customers with improved solutions based upon industry-leading cost, quality and cycle times,” says Delta TechOps’ Anthony Black. “This is critical in making sure we are positioned to take advantage of the opportunity provided by the growth of the Delta network.” Lufthansa Technik endorses this approach, and anything else that SR Technics line maintenance technician at work. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 makes business better for its clients. “We want to reduce aircraft time on ground,” says Walter Heerdt, “because time spent on the ground is time that the aircraft is not making money for its operators.” Pratt & Whitney has made improved customer service a top priority through its Achieving Competitive Excellence (ACE) operating system. ACE employs standard processes and metrics throughout the Pratt & Whitney network that help the company maintain, reward and advertise the quality of its top service facilities (ACE Gold). “We can tell you that 80 percent of our engine overhaul centers are already rated ACE Silver or ACE Gold,” says Tom Hutton, Pratt & Whitney Global Service Partners Vice President. “These ratings don’t just come from our internal evaluations. We also include data regarding on-time delivery and customer feedback. We want our customers to know that when they see an ACE rating, it means something that they can count on.” Bombardier is maximizing customer services by moving its people from facility to facility, to keep them where the work is. “Being flexible allows Bombardier to provide faster, more timely service to our clients,” says Gary Martin, the company’s Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Service Programs. “Since we are also an OEM, we can keep the right people on staff to service our own products, which speeds things up.” Aveos is trying to create longterm relationships with its clients to keep them coming back. “If we shape our services to help our customers maintain and grow their businesses successfully, then they will be motivated to stick with us,” says Carl Burger, Aveos’ Director of Business Development. “So we do everything we can to help them out in the short-term, to make staying with Aveos worth their while, both financially and operationally.” Don’t forget Value Offering customers more for their money is another strategy being employed by the Giants of MRO. A case in point: “We have announced several interior programs to provide operators with more value,” says Steve Gade, Duncan Aviation’s Vice President of Marketing, Aircraft Sales and Component Solutions. “For example, we have developed a program for many Citation models that guarantees installation of new interior soft goods in just 14 days for operators of Citation Xs, Encores, Ultras, XLs, XLSs or Sovereigns.” Duncan Aviation is working on a similar offer for Learjet 45s. “We are developing a program where we will work with operators and provide personalized interior plans that coincide with their maintenance, allowing them to better budget for their interior expenditures and ensure that the interior looks fresher, longer,” Gade says. Robert Mionis, President and CEO of StandardAero. “We have put a lot of money into staying at the cutting edge, and in keeping our people’s skills current as well.” In terms of training and skills upgrading, ST Aerospace believes in investing for the future and despite the global economic slowdown, there has been no significant impact on the company’s training budget. “In fact, the slowdown enabled us to train more of our employees, preparing them for the eventual upturn,” says ST Aerospace’s Chang. “It usually takes about three years to train technicians and engineers, and we are continuing with our recruitment training so that we will have a competent workforce according to our plans. On average, ST Aerospace has about 500 employees under training at any given time.” Part of the investment in human capital involves encouraging and supporting young people in joining this industry. Turkish Technic pursues this goal by “working hand-in-hand with aeronautical engineering schools and universities,” Dr. Oktay says. The company does this by giving research funds and scholarships to universities, and aviation schools. Work With, not Against, OeMs It is intimidating to compete against Airbus and Boeing. But even though these OEMs do have considerable resources, especially when it comes to parts, they are not fundamentally structured to be MROs. This is why ST Aerospace President Cheow Teck Chang sees OEMs as better suited to serving as MRO partners rather than competitors. He believes that OEMs see this as well. “It may not make good business sense for OEMs to invest more into maintenance capabilities and skills training,” Chang observes. “Also, OEMs may not be able to achieve the price competitiveness that independent MROs can offer.” Get Creative In addition to servicing aircraft at its facility in Victorville, California, Pacific Aerospace Resources & Technologies invest in Your Company A Giant of MRO can’t keep customers satisfied if their MRO facilities and services don’t keep pace with the times. AFI KLM E&M knows this well. This is why the company recently opened a state-of-the-art workshop in Paris for very large engines such as the GE90. They’re not the only ones keeping up. “We are investing in new infrastructure and equipment,” says Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 21 A GE CF34 in StandardAero’s test cell. (PART) has started a sideline refurbishing off-lease older aircraft, and then providing them on contract to third world carriers. “This option is very attractive, in comparison to new aircraft purchases,” says Johan Claasen, PART’s CEO and Chairman. “It is very difficult for third world airlines to raise capital, given the current banking climate. Refurbished aircraft are easier to finance, and they meet their needs.” Hang Tough! The phrase “hang tough” is good advice for MROs. Eventually the market will get better, but it will take time and staying power to get there. “We know that many of those engines which are in use now will need servicing some day,” says Pratt & Whitney’s Tom Hutton. “You can only cannibalize your fleet for so long; you can only defer maintenance for so long. So sometimes, as an MRO, you just have to wait things out as best you can, until the business cycle takes its inevitable upswing.” In hanging tough, keeping a positive attitude is all-important. “We have confidence in the business aviation industry and continue to invest in our people, our facilities and our future,” says Duncan Aviation’s Steve Gade. “We are confident that business aviation will continue to be the best travel option for many businesses and individuals. We believe there will be a shift and that the percentage of aircraft based outside of the U.S. will continue to grow.” Will the Giants Stay Giants? A CF6-80 on the assembly/disassembly line at MTU Maintenance Hannover. 22 The many options above show how adaptable the Giants of MRO have become in the face of the global recession. Such flexibility is a must in the current economy, says Greenwich AeroGroup’s Baker. Rather than continuing to follow Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 the methodologies of the past, “One must adapt to the change in business landscape by changing the applicable business model to best serve customers,” she notes. “With each business that means something different and there is not a single answer that addresses all businesses.” It is this willingness to adapt that has made the Giants of MRO what they are today. And it is this same quality that will keep them on top for years to come — assuming that they stay in touch with their customers’ needs and fulfill these needs effectively. Doing this is no easy task, observes Iberia Maintenance’s Jose Luis Quirós. “There is no doubt that it is extremely difficult to equally satisfy different customers’ needs along the different regions from a unique organization, as they might be opposite,” he says. “It means that the business will develop easier in some of them, and it will take a little bit longer to grow in other markets.” This adaptability will include a willingness to move where the business is. “North America and Europe are mature markets, with room for limited growth,” says AeroStrategy’s Hal Chrisman. “The real engine of MRO growth is Asia, and that is where those MROs who wish to become or remain giants must make inroads. As well, the move to composites and newer engines is signaling real change for MROs in the future. Those who want to continue to succeed, will have to invest and change.” StandardAero’s Robert Mionis neatly summarizes all of these themes. “We got to where we are through hard work, providing real value to our customers, and being able to move with the times,” he says. “Our clients will ultimately determine who remains a Giant of MRO, but make no mistake: We and likely our competitors will do everything in their power to deserve this title, and then some.” AM James Careless is a contributing editor: [email protected] Repair beats replacement! Your advantage is our goal. Awarded “Best Engine MRO” at UBM Aviation’s Aircraft Technology Engineering & Maintenance Awards 2010 The MTU Maintenance group is renowned for excellentvalue engine maintenance. For a quarter of a century, the company has been a reliable partner of many airlines, offering a compelling choice of customized service packages. We aim to repair rather than replace, using the very latest inspection, maintenance and repair technologies. Forget about expensive replacement parts and keep costs down. Expect us to provide outstanding repairs and short off-wing times – worldwide and at affordable prices. www.mtu.de Industry Profile Air France Industries KLM Engineering & Maintenance: a world-leading multi-product MRO About AFI KLM E&M The AFI KLM E&M Network AFI KLM E&M is consolidating a strong network of subsidiaries and joint ventures, both for the development of new products and the extension of its geographical presence. These include the Floridabased Aero Maintenance Group (component support, repair and services), EPCOR in Amsterdam (APU and APU component maintenance), KLM UK Engineering in Norwich (full maintenance of Boeing 737 and regional fleets), CRMA in Paris (engine repairs), Turbine Support International in Blytheville (Engines teardown services), AMES in Dubai (Aerostructure services), Aerotechnic Industries in Casablanca (A320 Family 24 OSL HEL ARN LED CPH SVO NWI DUB HAM WAW AMS PRG LHR YYZ ORD SEA SFO TLS BOS JFK BYH LAX PAR YUL ALG ATL DFW IAH FCO TUN IST LOGO AIRFRANCE INDUSTRIES PTP DKRKLM BKO Nº dossier : 2009026E CAY CCS ABJ BOG Date : 20/04/10 UIO Network Facilities Logistic Centers Sales Offices AFKL Major Stations DXB JED LOS PHC ACC DLA DEL HKG BKK BLR MNL KUL ADD SIN CGK NBO Validation DA/DC : TPE BOM NDJ OUA NRT PVG KWI BAH HAV MEX ICN KIX BEY AMM CAI MIA PEK EVN ATH TIP CMN ALA VCE MXP BCN MAD IAD KBP LAD LIM Validation ClientGRU TNR GIG JNB MRU AFI KLM E&M - November 2010 AFI KLM E&M offers a comprehensive portfolio of Components & Logistics support for Airbus, Boeing and regional aircraft, GE and CFM engine overhaul, and airframe & modifications services. AFI KLM E&M provides expertise and scale effects based on its support for close to 1300 aircraft worldwide. Its 14,000 highly-skilled personnel working in world-class facilities leverage more than 75 years of handson experience. From one-off repairs to all-in fleet support, AFI KLM E&M meets and surpasses the requirements of today’s highly-competitive civil aviation market. Flexibility lies at the heart of AFI KLM E&M’s successful offer. The airlines that prefer to outsource all their maintenance activities can access a one-stop-shop approach. AFI KLM E&M can also customize services and maintenance contracts to their very specific requirements. RUN CPT SCL EZE A320 Family Airframe services Components services Aerostructure services Aerostructure services APU services Pneumatic component services Engines teardown services Engines parts repairs Components services Airframe services A380 components services www afikl e co Components services Airframe services) and Spairliners in Hamburg (A380 component services). A single point of contact and local support is provided by sales offices all over the world. Ultimately, the strength of AFI KLM E&M lies in the extent of its knowledge, flexibility and experience, combined with its worldwide network support. Approvals and certification > European approvals (EASA and DGAC) EASA Part 145, Part M subpart G, Part 21J, Part 21G, Part 147 > US approvals > Certification AFI is the world’s only MRO to have obtained Global and Unique Certification covering nine international standards for all of its facilities: ISO14 001 (Environment), ISO 9001 (Quality Management), EN 9100 (Aircraft Design), EN 9110 (Aircraft Maintenance), EN 9120 (Logistics and Storage), ISO 22 000 (Food Safety), OHSAS 18 001 (Occupational Health & Safety), ISO 15 489 (Records Management) and ISO 26000 (Sustainable Development). In the Netherlands, KLM E&M’s avionics unit is also ISO 14 001 certified. FAR 145: FAA approved Repair Station: CNFY912C > Other international approvals Over 30 approvals have been granted to AFI KLM E&M by a number of international authorities (and notably CAAC), enabling the Group to work on aircraft registered in the countries concerned. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 More information at www.afiklmem.com Now get direct, one-click access to your maintenance solutions. Air France Industries – KLM Engineering & Maintenance is launching aklmem.com, its new, specialized website for all your aircraft maintenance solutions. Get instant access to a range of customized eet management tools along with up-to-the-minute news. Wherever you are, tune in to the know-how of our global network of experts. Our work… flies with you Iberia Maintenance & Engineering is one of the greatest companies on MRO Ser vices with an extensive experience on Iberia fleet and third par ty. Our 4.000 experienced technicians and engineers, our competitive tur n times, our knowledge and our personalized solutions for each workscope provide a recommendable MRO source based in customized maintenance programs according to your specific needs. Iberia main facilities are located at Madrid-Barajas Airport. The extension of the maintenance complex is more than 220.000m 2, sited in two industrial areas on both sides of the airport. The facilities are made up of: • Seven hangars and general workshops with an automated wheel and brakes facility, sheet metal installations, composites, structural damages, galleys, interiors, painting, labelling and marking works, etc. • Engine, engine associated accessories, APUs and thrust reverses shops with one engine test cell (120.000 Lb. thrust). • Avionics and components shop • Training school. Our AOG services provides the most effective and flexible support on emergency services. 7 days / 24 hours AOG SERVICES The engine repair center will assist you in the design of customized ser vices to suit your specific requirements. Shops with specialized personnel and components equipment are available to perform the inspections, repair and test for more than 70.000 instruments, accessories, electronics, radio and electric components repaired annually. Iberia Maintenance offers a wide range of aircraft, engine and component services on: Engine RB211-535E4 CFM56-5A1/-5B/-5C4 CFM56-7x CF34-3A1/-3B1 JT8D-217/-219 PEGASUS MK 150/-152/-157 APUs GTCP85-98DHF GTPC36-300 131-91 Airframe A340-300/-600 A319, A320, A321 A310 B757 B767 B707 MD80´s C-130 P3 ORION FALCON Originally aimed at the civil maintenance market, Iberia Maintenance services have since been extended into the military arena, partly because the Spanish Army Forces need widen maintenance and operational solutions. F ULL S UPPORT S ERVICES Iberia Maintenance can also provide additional services including engineering for all maintenance areas, computerized systems, metrology, maintenance personnel training, NDT services, inventory management and exchange. Iberia Maintenance position in Spain gives its customers a strategic situation in Europe as well as a low cost and timely alternative. Put your fleet in our hands… the perfect place where our technicians and professionals can apply cuttingedge technology so our work… flies with you. InDustry ProfIle Vector Aerospace Corporation Vector Aerospace Corporation (Vector) is a publicly traded Canadian company with its corporate offices located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. As a global leader in the aerospace maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) business, Vector services a diverse mix of defence and security, commercial and private operators from around the globe, as well as some of the industry’s most recognizable Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMS). Prior to 2008, Vector’s services were delivered through three main operating divisions: ACROHELIPRO Global Services, Atlantic Turbines International and Sigma Aerospace. In 2008, Vector united its operational divisions under the ‘Vector Aerospace’ brand to help ensure consistency of delivery of the Vector promise: “setting the standard of customer service.” Later in 2008, with the acquisition of the UK Ministry of Defence’s DARA (Defence Aviation Repair Agency), Fleetlands Rotary Wing and Almondbank Components businesses, Vector became one of the leading independent aviation MRO companies in the world, and is well-positioned to continue forward as an innovative, dynamic and growth-oriented company. Vector’s customers and Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) partners rely on an unwavering commitment to the highest levels of quality and expert technical support, competitive pricing, and industry-leading customer service. Vector represents some of the world’s most recognizable and respected OEMs, including: AgustaWestland - Boeing - Sikorsky - Rolls-Royce - Eurocopter Canada - Pratt & Whitney Canada - Bell Helicopter General Electric - Turbomeca - Sagem Avionics - Rockwell Collins Based on these approvals, Vector offers comprehensive repair and overhaul support for engines, dynamic components, avionics (including Supplemental Type Certificate development), structures and fabrication, and includes in-house engine & dynamic components test cell capability. Vector employs approximately 2,500 people at 13 locations in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and Africa For more information, visit www.vectoraerospace.com Dave McGrath, BPR Tel: 604.276.7685 Cell: 604.340.2434 Director- Marketing & Communications [email protected] Vector Aerospace Corporation SETTING THE STANDARD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE #101B 5947 206A Street Langley , BC Canada, V3A 8M1 SETTING THE STANDARD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE M a i n t e n a n c e • R e pa i R • Ov e R h au l 24/7 READY TO SERVE AROUND THE WORLD w w w . v e c t O R a e R O s pa c e . c O M Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 27 InDustry ProfIle Turkish Airlines Technic Inc. Having been separated from the parent company, Turkish Airlines as an 100% subsidiary on May 23rd, 2006, Turkish Technic (Turkish Airlines Technic Inc.) is looking to the future with its 70 years of experience as an Airline MRO now heading for new horizons on its new formation. Based in Istanbul Atatürk Airport, Turkish Technic is the leading Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Organization in the region that is certified through EASA 145, JAR 145, FAA for the performance of maintenance services. Turkish Technic offers at its 4 hangars, three located at Atatürk Airport (1st hangar 25,000 sqm serving 2 wide body 3 narrow body, 2nd hangar 60,000 sqm serving 3 wide body 4 narrow body and the 3rd hangar for the VIP aircrafts), and Esenboga Hangar in the capital city Ankara a variety of maintenance services through its diversified shops ranging from Airframe Heavy Maintenance, Engine-APU overhaul, LDG overhaul etc.its Business Partners, the Airlines, Lessors, Financial Institutions. TURKISH TECHNIC SABIHA GOKCEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MRO CENTER (HABOM PROJECT) HABOM (International Aircraft Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Center) Project that will be located at Istanbul Sabiha Gökcen International Airport. This new center is only 70 km. from its base in Istanbul Atatürk Airport and has the same strategic importance and location advantage. Upon completion of this project, with an area of 372,000 sqm, Turkish Technic will have the capacity to provide services for 3 wide body and 12 narrow body aircrafts at the same time. The narrow body aircraft hangar is planned to be activated by September 2011. TURKISH ENGINE CENTER (TEC) Our joint venture with Pratt & Whitney Company located at Istanbul Sabiha Gökcen International Airport which is activated as of January 2010 is focused on CFM56 series and V2500 engine types TURKISH TECHNIC – GOODRICH SEVICE CENTER Again located in the area near to Istanbul Sabiha Gökcen International Airport our second joint venture that is planned to be opened in the first quarter of year 2011 will have an area of approximately 6,000 sqm and will provide services for nacelles, thrust reversers and related parts. AOG Desk With its expert staff and wide range inventory, our AOG Desk provides a 7/24 service to its customers from all around the world for any of their component, spare part, consumable and tool sales, loan or exchange needs. Our aim is to fulfill all customer requests in the shortest time. Contact Information for Turkish Technic AOG Desk is: Tel: +90 212 465 22 52 (direct) / +90 212 463 63 63 Ext.7743 E-Mail: [email protected] You know who to trust when your aircaft is AOG. Turkish Technic, the powerful MRO of its region, is ready for 7/24 to help you. 28 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 Industry Profile Aeroconseil Aeroconseil is an aeronautical services provider founded in 1984 by a former Airbus Test Pilot: Max Fischl. Aeroconseil is managed by three complementary personalities: Eric-Jean Floureusse, chairman, Jack Barbieux, President, and Thierry Misson, CEO. Régis Trolliet, a reknown manager of Air Transport Services and COO for these activities in Aeroconseil, will retire by July 2011. Gathering 1200 high level engineers & technicians, Aeroconseil is organized around two areas of expertise: Aircraft & Systems Engineering and Air Transport Services. Aeroconseil is providing aircraft manufacturers & OEM with engineering in several domains such as Avionics, Cockpit, Electricity, Aerodynamics and Systems integration. Among a wide range of references, we can notice: Airbus, Thales and Goodrich. Focusing on the Air Transport market, Aeroconseil supports airlines, aircraft owners & lessors, operators & MROs with operational and technical services regarding: Aircraft modifications with more than 300 STC, EASA, FAA or GCAA approved, including cabin reconfiguration & refurbishment, avionics & systems such as GSM, SatCom, IFE, GPWS, TCAS, T2CAS, etc. Asset & Maintenance management, including continuing airworthiness technical services, regulatory advisory, engine advisory, engine storage, etc. Flight Ops optimization, including Fuel efficiency, safety management system, operational documentation, XML documentation management, etc 30 In 2010, the Group will achieve a turnover of 116 million Euros in France and through its subsidiaries in Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Netherlands, in Pacific and Canada. It can also rely on an offshore capacity through its partner in India and its subsidiary in Tunisia. References around the world: Emirates, Air Tahiti Nui, Nouvelair, Shangai Airlines, Aercap, CIT, Aviation Capital Group, Doric Asset Finance, etc. Aeroconseil is certified EASA Part 145 / EASA Part M, subparts G & I / EASA Part 21 subparts J & G / GCAA Design Organization /EN 9100 One of Aeroconseil recent success story covers the “continuing airworthiness management” of a 15 aircraft airline. As CAMO organization, Aeroconseil has to manage aircraft registered in France under F-OIVU in compliance with EASA’s regulation. In this case, Aeroconseil delivered Maintenance program (original and update): Monthly/weekly report, Data base updates, Engine Trend monitoring, Airworthiness tasks, Redelivery documentation. Aeroconseil succeeded especially in tackling the specific challenges of data gathering and exchanges despite distance as well as management of OSAC (authorities) relationship. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 Aeroconseil Netherlands is one of the latest subsidiary of Aeroconseil, dedicated to Maintenance & Asset Management. Managed by an experienced professional in the world of Lessors, Dennis Smink, it offers 5 kinds of services: Full Management of the Aircraft Technical Services Lease Management Regulatory & liability advisory Engine advisory, management & Storage As for the last item, Aeroconseil takes specifically in charge the prepurchase inspection and storage of engines. The team handled recently the inspection of an ATR72, on behalf of Plane Business Leasing, UK. Aeroconseil delivered a final report that was welcomed and gathered enough information to purchase in better conditions. Besides, Aeroconseil Netherlands has signed an agreement with SGI Aviation Services BV to store the engines of its customers in Aeroconseil facility in Amsterdam. Flexible solutions © istockphoto.com EASA PART 145 EASA PART 21, Subparts G & J EASA PART M, Subparts G & I GCAA Design Organization EN 9100 We bend over backwards for you! www.solutions-aeroconseil.com ADVERTORIAL Industry Profile AAR Wheel & Brake Services AAR WBS® offers commercial, military and regional aviation customers a complete program of aircraft wheel and brake services including repair, rebuilding and inspection for all major aircraft types. Our high-tech testing and certification process ensures that hairline fractures and other nonvisible stress defects are detected and repaired before they cause damage or affect safety. AAR provides fast turnaround from our modern 10,000 square foot facility, with an extensive inventory of long-lasting, original OEM parts. AAR’s volume-buying capability allows us to offer the highest quality products at competitive prices. Customer Benefits: AAR maintains a complete inventory of OEM parts on-hand for fast turnarounds. High-quality work delivered on time means improved safety and more landings for your aircraft. Exterior parts are cleaned and painted with durable coatings. Professional priming and painting extends part life by protecting metal parts from debris and wear. Backed by AAR’s global presence, our diverse product offering and professional services enable us to meet all your program needs. Stopping Competitive Differentiators: Experience — AAR is experienced in all aspects of wheel and brake overhaul, rebuild and repairs. Quality — AAR maintains a complete inventory of OEM parts on-hand for faster turnaround. Quality OEM parts last longer and are manufactured to meet the highest standards. Capabilities — AAR performs critical testing and certification on all models in accordance with FAA, EASA and CAAC. Value — AAR’s pricing is competitive because of our lean practices and extensive inventory. The highest quality parts and services result in longer lasting and more reliable wheel and brake systems. 32 When you need reliable wheel and brake services, nothing endorses that more than the support of the KC-10 fleet of refuelers. AAR WBS is critical to missions around the world as we support military air operations for Overhaul and Repair to the Strategic Air Command. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 AAR Wheel Brake Services 9270 N.W. 100th Street — Street Medley, FL 33178 USA——USA Tel: — 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com/wheel&brake AAR&Wheels & Brakes—Services — 9360 N.W. 100th — Miami, FL — 33178 Tel: 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com Stopping Across The Globe Stopping Stopping Our work is certified by the FAA, EASA and CAAC, which means that regardless of where our customers are located, they can experience our quick turn-times, personalized customer service and high quality work performed by technicians with over 60 years of combined experience. Miami, FL AAR Wheels & Brakes Services — 9360 N.W. 100th Street — Miami, FL 33178 — USA — Tel: 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com Oklahoma City, OK Indianapolis, IN Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Contact us today to learn more about lower costs and faster turnaround times from AAR. AAR Wheel Brake Services 9270 N.W. 100th Street — Street Medley, FL 33178 USA——USA Tel: — 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com/wheel&brake AAR&Wheels & Brakes—Services — 9360 N.W. 100th — Miami, FL — 33178 Tel: 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com AAR Wheels & Brakes Services — 9360 N.W. 100th Street — Miami, FL 33178 — USA — Tel: 305.883.1511 — www.aarcorp.com InDustry ProfIle TAP TAP Maintenance & Engineering is a MRO solution provider for Airbus, Boeing and Embraer fleets, offering a unique value proposition built around geographical flexibility, wide range of service offer and agility. The knowledge management resulting from the support experience of TAP Portugal airline fleet enables our Customers all the advantages of a complete set of integrated services ranging from airframe, engines and components, to the engineering and material support. With a total workforce of about 4500, comprising highly qualified technicians and engineering staff, TAP M&E operates one main centre in Portugal and two in Brazil, covering the Americas, Africa and Europe, bridging three continents and one entire ocean. TAP M&E Bases Lisbon Rio de Janeiro Porto Alegre In its Lisbon Base, TAP M&E offers, for the Airbus A300-600, A310, A330, A340, A320 family; for engine models CFM56-3,-5A,-5B,-5C, -7; JT8 standard; RB211-524 B4 and D4; a vast span of services ranging from line maintenance to heavy maintenance checks, engine overhaul, components maintenance, engineering and planning services, material support and integrated maintenance packages. In Rio de Janeiro TAP M&E provides aircraft maintenance services (A, B, C, IL and D checks, aircraft painting, engineering and planning support) for the Boeing B727, B737 CL, B737 NG (incl. BBJ), B747-100/-200/-300, B757, B767, B777, DC10, MD11; for the Airbus A300, B2, B4, A300-600, A310, A330 and A340. TAP M&E, at its Porto Alegre base, makes available to its Customers airframe maintenance for the Boeing B727, B737 CL, B737 NG (incl. BBJ), B767; for the Embraer 120, ERJ 135/145, E-JET 170/175/190/195 and Legacy; as well as complete overhaul for Landing Gears, APUs and PWC engines, plus avionics and accessories maintenance for over 17,000 part numbers. Hangars: 3 Hangar Capacity: 3 WB, 5 NB Hangar Area: 26,380 m² Total Building Area: 71,200m² Contacts Hangar: 1 Hangar Capacity: 4 WB Hangar Area: 14,500m² Total Building Area: 180,000m² Hangars: 5 Hangar Capacity: 1 WB, 5 NB Hangars Area: 12,500m² Total Building Area: 55,000m² Portugal: Lisbon Brazil: Rio de Janeiro Brazil: Porto Alegre P.O. Box 50194 P 1704-801 Lisbon Portugal Phone: (+351) 21 841 59 75 Fax: (+351) 21 841 59 13 E-mail: [email protected] Estrada das Canárias, 1862 21941-480 Rio de Janeiro / RJ Brazil Phone: (+55) 21 3383 2782 Fax: (+55) 21 3383 2300 E-Mail: [email protected] Rua Augusto Severo, 851 90240-480 Porto Alegre / RS Brazil Phone: (+55) 51 3375 7053 Fax: (+55) 51 3375 7006 E-Mail: [email protected] www.tapme.pt 34 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 InDustry ProfIle Discover high technology that lowers costs. Chromalloy is driven by innovation. Today, we are over 4,000 people strong, operating in 52 locations and 17 countries to meet the needs of customers around the globe. We are one of the world’s largest non-OEM providers of advanced coatings, repairs and replacement parts for gas turbine engines. And we are the only non-OEM company in the world that provides coatings, repairs, castings, manufacturing and overhauls—all from a single source. Chromalloy reduces the operating expense and extends the life of gas turbine engines. Coating Technologies Chromalloy was the first company to develop commercially viable aluminide coatings, and we continue to provide these coatings and their derivatives to all the major OEMs. We also provide Low Pressure Plasma Spray Overlay and Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (EBPVD) coatings, ceramic (thermal barrier) coatings, diffused precious metal/ aluminide coatings, vacuum plasma coatings, and other innovative processes that protect turbine components and increase their efficiency and reliability. Repairs Chromalloy offers a full suite of maintenance and repair capabilities for commercial and military turbine engines, including standard repairs, source demonstrated repairs and advanced source-demonstrated repairs such as airfoil replacement repairs. MRO – Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul In certain circumstances, Chromalloy provides airline and military customers with MRO services. By incorporating the latest technology in coatings, repairs and manufacturing into our MRO services, we add value to components, extend the time between overhauls and expedite turnaround. Replacement Parts Right now, over 300,000 FAA-approved Chromalloyengineered PMA and Airfoil Replacement parts are operating in commercial and military engines around the world. These components are engineered to meet or exceed the performance, reliability and durability specifications of OEM parts—while being offered at a lower cost. Casting Chromalloy’s casting capabilities are unsurpassed and include single crystal technology. We currently operate several state-of-the art centers for investment casting. Safety Record Chromalloy has never been issued a single FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD) over our entire 50-year history, spanning more than one million PMAs and AFRs. 36 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 Chromalloy is part of the Carlyle Group, one of the world’s largest private equity firms. Learn how Chromalloy can extend the life and reduce the operating expense of your gas turbine engine. Contact Name: Ben Story Job Title: Regional Sales Director Tel: +33 134 40 46 03 Website: www.chromalloy.com PILOTS KNOW: This is not the time to have trust issues with your engine. Which is why insisting on genuine Lycoming factory replacement parts is so important. After all, we designed, built and tested your engine as a total system – with components built to our exacting original equipment specs. With well-stocked inventories and support worldwide, we provide the parts you need, where and when you need them, and back them with an industry-leading warranty. Know your parts. Visit Lycoming.com or call 800-258-3279 to find an authorized Lycoming Distributor near you. © 2011 Avco Corporation. All rights reserved. The Power of Choice InDustry ProfIle Communications Software For over 35 years, Communications Software has supported aircraft maintenance organisations with highquality computer systems with easyto-use but functionally sophisticated systems that increase efficiency and reduce costs in many key areas. Proven worldwide in a variety of live maintenance environments under approvals from the CAA, FAA and JAA, the system modules are fully integrated, but can also be used individually. The system can be run on any PC or any network, offering several database options including Oracle. The company offers a full package of services: initial requirements studies; implementation support; user training; system tailoring; forward planning; day-to-day help desk; maintenance support; and update release services. The Open Aviation Strategic Engineering System (OASES) modules cover all key aspects of maintenance management for over 50 users worldwide, ranging from national carriers and large third party maintainers to regional, charter and small independent operators. Closed-loop maintenance OASES’s ‘closed-loop’ maintenance philosophy ensures full feedback between all aspects of the system. Starting with resource information relating to staffing, aircraft type and tooling, this feeds into planning modules producing a workpack, also generating work-in-progress reports and raising non-routine cards that are actionable immediately or fed into schedule changes – updating records continuously and informing the re-planning process. Simultaneously, a second closed loop is running for the provision of spares. Demands that come from the planning department and engineers on the line or in the hangar are electronically requisitioned with a ‘time required’. If the part is in stock the necessary electronic notification is routed to the appropriate store, or, if not in stock, notification is routed to the purchasing department. All such requirements will be automatically re-shortaged should the situation change and the part becomes unavailable. OASES covers all aspects of technical records, line maintenance, MSG-3, reliability, inventory control, purchasing, rotable tracking, workcard production, shop floor data collection, time and attendance, digital documentation, AD/SB/EO evaluation, advanced scheduling, line maintenance control, DR, graphical planning and defect control. OASES can be easily implemented either as standalone modules or as a fully integrated system. Communications Software 8 The Centre +44 1621 817425 Tiptree +44 1621 817262 Essex CO5 0HF [email protected] United Kingdom www.commsoft.aero ‘Growing Success’ Commsoft’s OASES MRO system offers comprehensive professional functionality together with a flexible, affordable approach that understands your business’ scaleable growth needs in today’s turbulent market Each OASES module can be offered individually or can be integrated at the engineering centre of your business systems Over 50 current aviation users, including airlines and MROs, spares suppliers, CAMO, corporate and bureau operators have grown their success with us The Professional, Flexible MRO System Whether you are a ‘start up’ or are looking for a more friendly approach to business, contact us at: Tel: +44 1621 817425 | [email protected] | www.commsoft.aero 38 Aviation Maintenance commsoft_ad.indd 1 | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 07/05/2009 08:56 Eurocopter’s Data Analysis Revolution As Eurocopter strives to raise customer satisfaction with its MRO work, this Franco-Germano-Spanish helicopter manufacturer is propelling huge changes in the analysis of maintenance data. By Thierry Dubois The EC135 is one of Eurocopter’s models that have benefited from customized maintenance programs. Credit: Turbomeca C onfronted with persistent customer dissatisfaction with the maintainability of its helicopters, Eurocopter is betting on usage data analysis to tailor MRO plans. The Marignane, France-based helicopter manufacturer is working relentlessly to improve its customer support. Although better than a decade ago, the perceived quality of the company’s customer service still leaves something to be desired. The company’s determination to rectify the situation has put it at the forefront of aircraft usage monitoring. How “friendly” are Eurocopter rotorcraft to maintenance technicians? Let’s ask the mechanics in the field. “They offer quite easy access,” answered José Luis López Gómez, Inaer’s Eurocopter fleet manager in Albacete, Spain. He takes care of the Dauphin family (also known as Dolphins, AS365s or EC155s); the Ecureuil family (Squirrels, AS350s/ AS355s, AStars); and EC135s, EC145s, BO105s and BK117s. He said one exception is the Dolphin, if a ferry tank is installed in the cargo compartment. “In that instance, accessibility is not so easy,” he explained. A spokesman for UK-based aerial work operator Bond Air Services noted that the EC135 has been designed “so that all major components can be accessed quickly and easily, by a series of quickrelease access panels and cowlings.” HeliPortugal maintenance director Rui Estrela agreed and added Eurocopters have few lubrication points. HeliPortugal maintains AS350s, AS365s and EC120s near Lisbon. Ludovic Derouin is the technical manager of THS, a France-based operator of helicopters — notably Dauphins and Ecureuils — and business jets and turboprops. He said that the AS350 Ecureuil has excellent accessibility. He said that its Bell equivalent, for example, “is just as reliable but not as easy to maintain.” A feature of the AS350 is that “you can leave for a remote destination with very few spare parts.” Jost Amstad, the Part 145 maintenance manager of Swiss Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 39 There is a trend to increase scheduled maintenance intervals but the manufacturer also has a vested interest not to make TBOs too long. rescue organization Rega, said that the EC145’s hydraulic system and main rotor head are very friendly to maintain. However, he pointed out difficulties due to the absence of a Fadec on Turbomeca Arriel 1E2 engines. “The torque matching system and the rotor rpm are very delicate to adjust. It calls for a lot of experience from technicians and is sometimes highly time-consuming,” he emphasized. Another shortcoming, according to Inaer’s López, is that most components are not repairable. When one fails, you are supposed to replace it. “For us, it would be better, economically, to be able to repair,” he said. On Bell helicopters, you can repair more components, López asserted. Learning to Listen It all begs the relevant question: Does Eurocopter sufficiently take customer feedback into account? For the most part, yes. But it’s a mixed bag. MRO professionals have plenty to say about it. “Normally, not too much,” López regretted. Under the EASA Part M regulation, Inaer runs a reliability program. If the maintenance department notices that the mean time between failure (MTBF) of a given component is below the time between overhaul (TBO), it asks Eurocopter to reduce the TBO. “In 40 that case, they do take the feedback into account,” López said. THS’ Derouin is not very happy either. “We submit incident reports, we send mails, but they are not responsive. It can take one year until we receive an answer,” he complained. Moreover, he added, the answers often are inconclusive. “Our requests for modifications are rarely successful. When they are, it is because an accident happened,” Derouin stated. Jacques Vian has a different experience. He gives the company high marks for responsiveness. He is the CEO of Helidax, a company in charge of French military pilot training. Helidax operates 36 EC120s, logging a total 22,000 flight hours per year. “Eurocopter does take our feedback into account,” he said, noting that the company is particularly responsive when it comes to updating documents such as the illustrated parts catalog. “They update it as soon as I report an error,” Vian stressed. Several operators expressed satisfaction with the way feedback is taken into account when it comes to customizing maintenance programs. “We are currently working with Eurocopter Deutschland and a small number of other key operators on a special maintenance evaluation program to extend the [EC135’s] Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 intermediate inspection (400 hours) and the periodic check (800 hours) to 500 hours and 1,000 hours, respectfully,” a Bond Air Services spokesman said. He emphasized this was not the first interval extension his company was working out with the manufacturer. Indeed, an incentive for operators to send feedback is they can be involved in a continuous maintenance evolution program, said Bernard Plissonneau, Eurocopter’s technical and publication services vice president. They can thus benefit from a customized maintenance plan before it becomes available to all operators. This can give a competitive edge. It also usually cuts costs. “We offer customized maintenance plans for some particular kinds of operation,” Plissonneau said. Offshore operator Bristow, for example, has seen one interval extended from 500 to 750 flight hours for its fleet of Super Pumas. “We know the company, they are very well organized and we have a lot of feedback,” Plissonneau explained. This does not work with the entire product range, however. “Some of our rotorcraft are highly optimized and therefore have little margin in their maintenance programs,” Plissonneau said. A Decade-Long Effort at Improvement And what about spare parts? According to Derouin, they are much more expensive than with other helicopter manufacturers. Lead times are said to be too long. It can take months to receive parts, which is intolerable at this price, Derouin said. Mathias Senes, the managing director of Aircraft Formula, a broker specializing in helicopters, confirmed that more than one operator complains about spares. “We have taken action,” Plissonneau answered. He insisted it is a painstaking effort. One outcome has been a reduction in the main gearbox’s part count. In addition, equipment manufacturers are responsible for 60 percent of an aircraft’s parts, Plissonneau pleaded. “Eurocopter has opted for expensive reliability but this ensures superior regularity in operations,” Senes said. The manufacturer started tackling customer support in the late 1990s; it took over 10 years for this effort to bear fruit, Senes said. The first helicopter to benefit, right from design, from the input of maintenance experts has been the EC130 light single. Customers, such as sightseeing tour operators, were involved in the process. This was when the battery was moved to the tailboom, improving maintainability and opening up more cargo space, Senes explained. This is being carried on with in-development programs such as the EC175 medium twin. Field representatives are temporarily seconded to design offices. However, Plissonneau made it clear that not all maintenance experts’ needs and wishes can be taken into account. Some aircraft manufacturers, such as Dassault Aviation in business jets, have touted the use of a virtual technician in their digital mockup. It is part of the three-dimension virtual reality features of the Catia computeraided design tool. It helps confirm whether a mechanic can actually access a given connection behind a bundle of wires, for instance. For Eurocopter’s design engineers, “this is embryonic,” Plissonneau acknowledged. Although the firm uses Catia, the virtual technician rarely comes alive in the digital mockup. “Our maintenance is more difficult than that of fixed-wing aircraft,” Plissonneau said. He pointed out that some pieces of equipment are heavy, such as alternators. Virtual reality on a screen cannot evaluate whether the technician can hold the piece by himself. The endeavor for a better customer support can also be seen in global organization. Logistic hubs have been created in Texas, Hong Kong and Paris. Moreover, Eurocopter has created a network of fully owned subsidiaries. Over recent years, it has taken over its distributors in Japan and the UK. It also has strengthened its presence in Indonesia, Malaysia and Chile, for example. This is a way to structure feedback from the field. “All these subsidiaries report to the parent company,” Senes pointed out. This comes in addition to the tech reps that can also be found at customer bases. Bell Helicopter, for example, has a different approach, Senes commented, with dozens of service centers in North America and elsewhere in the world, none of them factory-owned. Another way to structure feedback is through customer conferences, hosted every year. However, it seems there is a difference in the way customer support is being organized for those models manufactured in Germany and those manufactured in France. “For those models that are built in Germany [the EC135, EC145, BO105 and Bk-117], we have regular meetings with Eurocopter Deutschland people and other operators; we wish we had similar meetings for all Eurocopter models,” López said. This echoed the aforementioned comment by Bond Air Services. Separately, THS’ Derouin was vocal about the fast-growing number of service bulletins (SBs) and airworthiness directives (ADs). “Authorities tend to issue ADs even for checking items that are already on a pre-flight check-list,” he complained. If mandated by an AD, checking the item implies to fill a form, hence a frustrating impression of a waste of time. “The AS350 Ecureuil holds a record number of ADs for its generation of helicopters,” Derouin said. He believes SBs and ADs are a way for Eurocopter to protect itself in liability issues. “Indeed, this person has good reasons to complain,” Plissonneau answered. He explained that the ADs are temporary. They are supposed to The EC175 Eurocopter Grapples with MSG-3 Eurocopter officials are keen on asserting that the in-development EC175 medium twin will be one of the first helicopters to feature the Maintenance Steering Group’s third (MSG-3) standard (the Bell 429 light twin was the inaugural one). However, the team dedicated to the task is struggling with proving that the helicopter complies. “The MSG-3 standard was devised for fixed-wing airplanes,” said Eurocopter’s technical and publication services v.p., Bernard Plissonneau. Véronique Cardin, EC175 service chief engineer, explained that some requirements call for actual flight demonstrations, whereas more straightforward computations would be enough for an airplane. “We are suffering,” she said. “The principle is very good but applying it to helicopters is tricky.” The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) also is discovering helicopter MSG-3. The EC175 is the first European-built helicopter to embrace this standard; EASA has made the MSG-3 mandatory for the EC175’s category. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 41 cover the two or three years needed to work out a permanent solution, he said. Senes has a different view. “Operators reproach Eurocopter with issuing too many SBs but this is necessary in the manufacturer’s strategy for continuous product improvement,” he said. In his experience, SBs are often aimed at increasing a life limit or watching a component more closely. “The more new models you launch, the more teething problems you have,” Senes pointed out. He alluded to Bell and Sikorsky. “They have lower costs in this regard because their products are more mature,” he said. Is there an overall trend towards longer maintenance intervals, independently from customized programs? Yes, according to operators. “For the Dolphin, T inspections now occur every 600 hours instead of 500 hours,” Inaer’s López said. Another example was given by Rega’s Amstad. On the EC145, “pendulum absorber oil change has been increased from 100 to 300 flight hours,” he said. HeliPortugal’s Estrela added that all inspection intervals have a 10-percent margin. THS’ Derouin challenges the relevance of increasing such intervals. About one year ago, he saw one Eurocopter TBO jumping from a 30-year-old interval of 3,000 flight hours to 3,500 flight hours. “This was because a competitor had just done the same,” he said, worrying that “safety comes second after sales.” Broker Senes agrees that increased intervals are a commercial argument. However, “in reality, implementation is more limited and difficult than customers wish,” he said. First of all, liability impedes the interval increase process because they encourage safesiding. “The manufacturer tends to wait until it has very strong and comforting statistics, which takes years,” Senes explained. Secondly, an OEM has a vested interest to keep intervals unchanged. “If a major overhaul occurs every 12 years, the manufacturer has a good sale opportunity every 12 years,” Senes noted. Finally, usages are diversified and consequently make it hard to find a one-size-fits-all TBO. Some components will not fatigue or wear in the same way, depending on whether they are on a fully loaded EC130 flying at 80 knots on sightseeing tours or an almost empty EC130 carrying urgent freight at 130 knots. There is even an opposite trend. “Regulations encourage manufacturers to set life limits on parts that used to have no life limit,” Senes said. Eurocopter rotor blades never had Most operators praise Eurocopter helicopters for good component accessibility. Credit: Eurocopter/Eric Raz 42 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 a life limit. But creating one made it easier for the authorities to keep an eye on these components. A life limit may be so high it may be never attained. “Trouble is, as soon as you have a life limit, you have to set money aside to cover a possible parts change — this impacts costs,” Senes said. On the Leading Edge of HUMS All of the trends and issues mentioned above are resulting in a seachange in MRO data analysis, propelled by Eurocopter’s commitment to improving not only the substance of its customer service but also the perception of it. Senes sees Eurocopter’s support strategy as occupying the leading edge of maintenance data processing. The health and usage monitoring system (HUMS) and its lighter counterpart, the vehicle engine monitoring display (vEMD), are key to future maintainability. “Eurocopter has been the first to widely spread the use of vEMD, from which maintenance technicians can download data,” he said. A vEMD is much simpler than a HUMS. nevertheless, it is an important step toward HUMS, and other complex monitoring systems, becoming standard equipment. Engine trends can be monitored, thus improving preventive maintenance. Should one of the curves suddenly vary, the tech rep can plan some maintenance before a problem happens. The tech rep can do this from his office; he does not even have to pay a visit to the operator’s base. “This is a revolution in the way helicopters are kept in operations,” Senes stressed. Before that, the approach was to send a replacement aircraft when one was out of order. These systems are beginning to be able to send automated reports practically in real time. Every time the engine is shut down, maintenance data is sent out — in a text message via satphone, for example — to Eurocopter, engine maker Turbomeca or the operator’s base. In Singapore, the military already has this feature, which automatically orders parts, even in flight. This can happen when a component reaches 900 flight hours and its TBO is 1,000 flight hours. The system factors in delivery lead times. In future, data analysis will be so readily available that a customer who has rented a helicopter may be charged depending on its actual usage. So far, helicopters are rented by the hour. “Usage pricing” may factor in extra takeoffs and landings, the engine power level in cruise, etc. Another future application could be seen right at purchase. “In 10 years from now, when you buy a helicopter, there will be several categories of usage to choose from,” Senes predicted. The ultimate maintenance program will be tailored to the customer’s way of operating the helicopter, even for a private owner-pilot. The trend is general but Eurocopter seems to drive it. AM Thierry Dubois is the magazine’s European correspondent: [email protected] Cute? Yes. Experienced? Not so much. Most operators praise Eurocopter helicopters with good component accessibility. Credit: Eurocopter/Eric Raz When it comes to repairs, experience counts. Especially avionic repairs. That’s why you need to go with a company you can trust: Aero. For more than 40 years, Aero has been committed to providing the most highly-trained technicians to take on the repair and overhaul of commercial aircraft instruments, avionics and electronic accessories. And with the most advanced technology to do the job right, you can count on unparalleled results that will keep your fleet flying high – long after junior’s grown up and gone. Aero. Experience is the difference. A E R O I N S T R U M E N T S & AV I O N I C S , I N C . 716.694.7060 www.aeroinst.com Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 43 MRO & Avionics: THE The increasing cost in repairing and testing highly integrated circuit boards (pictured here, conducted by a Honeywell technician) is causing operators to return the cards to avionics OEMs for the necessary maintenance. HIGH COST OF HIGH TECH Avionics are becoming increasingly sophisticated, but maintaining those systems is more than some MRO shops can handle. T he evolution in avionics from electro/mechanical “steam gauges” to the digital glass cockpit has heralded a significant increase in capabilities for pilots. However, the cost of maintaining those avionics is threatening the viability of smaller MRO shops, which often lack the necessary equipment and training. While maintenance on avionics hardware still largely constitutes exchange and repair, it’s the software that’s posing a challenge for technicians. The expectation of many MRO industry insiders is that the 44 By Douglas Nelms vulnerable outfits will either merge with larger entities or go under. At the G/A, corporate, and small regional airliner level, it’s business as usual, with most MRO work conducted through the Level One exchange process. A part goes bad, the operator pulls out the black box, sends it either to his own avionics shop, back to the OEM, or to an independent MRO. The part is then simply exchanged for a functioning part and the bad part gets repaired and put on the shelf for the next operator who needs it. Level Two maintenance also Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 is mostly routine: a bad card is identified, pulled from the box and sent off for exchange and repair. Get to Level Three, with larger air transport aircraft, and the situation gets more complicated. That’s where the card itself is repaired. Each new generation of electronics exerts its greatest implications on Level Three maintenance, said Adrian Paull, vice president, Customer and Product Support for Honeywell. He said that, as engineers are increasingly able to integrate functions, “they are developing single microchips that do the job of eight, 12 or even 50 microchips in an older chip, so it becomes a much more integrated environment.” Consequently, MRO shops will need extremely sophisticated equipment to isolate the problem down to the individual component, “because it is on a very large scale integration, condensed through the latest manufacturing technology to be a very tiny package with an enormous amount of functionality,” he said. While the integration of system capabilities is, in many cases, making the capital costs of the equipment cheaper, the maintenance, repair and overhaul of the upper level avionics systems, and the specialized equipment needed to repair and test them, are becoming more expensive than some MRO shops can afford. In some cases, the equipment required is simply not being made available to the independent shops. These trends are causing the shrinking of the avionics MRO industry, primarily from the merger of smaller MRO facilities with larger ones. That said, the avionics market itself is strong. According to Wayne Plucker, Industry Manager for Frost and Sullivan’s Aerospace & Defense Group, the global commercial avionics market in 2009 was $6.67 billion, with the services part of that market, which includes maintenance, software updates and certification/engineering services, at $577.6 million. On the military side, the U.S. market alone was worth $5.39 billion, with the services part at $426.3 million. The digital cockpit market is now growing at a rate of 16.3 percent, while lower-tech commercial electro/ mechanical systems were down by more than 63 percent in 2009. The Right Tools for the Job As these avionics become more advanced, two things are happening. Firstly, functionality is being combined, reducing the former array of black boxes into a single box, or even a single circuit card, simultaneously making the system more reliable. This also means there are fewer boxes, and those are being pulled much less frequently, thereby reducing the economies of scale that are required to pay back the investment necessary on the part of the MRO shops. Secondly, design and development of the new avionic systems is hugely expensive, a cost that has to be borne by the avionics OEM. “The OEMs are risk sharing partners with the airframe OEMs and the airframe OEMs do not pay engineering,” said Dave Tripp, manager, sales and marketing for Aero Instruments and Avionics, based in North Tonawanda, New York. “So, the avionics OEMs have to spend all the money developing the box and get no non-recurring engineering during development, no payment for what’s called the red-label box during the prototype stage. They don’t get paid until the box goes black label and it’s delivered to the customer.” For independent avionics MRO providers such as Aero Instruments, which counts airlines as its major clients, this is making one of the biggest issues today simply being availability of the tools to do the job. but when they retired their DC-8s and 747 classics, we saw a large dip in their volume. But there are still plenty of older airplanes flying around that are keeping us as a third-party MRO busy.” The inability to get the test equipment “could present a twilight scenario for our operations,” he said. However, he also mentioned that while his business had dipped down for a while during the recession, it has strongly bounced back in the past few months. “There is always something that is small and not complex that will be available, but the traditional systems in the cockpit, the computers, the FMS [Flight Management System], those are all off the table to us for all new airplanes. We will do radios and all kinds of little electrical things all over the airplane, such as lights and switches. What we call accessories is the biggest volume we have,” Tripp said. Aero Instruments had been forced to reduce its work force by about 10 percent, but is now busily rehiring. “We’ve brought five technicians on just in the past couple of months. As fast as we can find them, we can hire them. But avionics technical talent is thin. It’s hard to find,” Tripp said. The cost associated with performing Level Three maintenance on advanced avionic systems is even affecting the airlines, which traditionally have Gail Ramirez of Aero Instruments & Avionics tended to have their puts a Cabin Zone Temp Controller through final own avionics MRO testing. The company is a major independent FAA and EASA approved Part 145 center specializing in the repair and overhaul of commercial aircraft instruments, avionics and electrical accessories. “There is a contraction of the working relationship between all of the OEMs and the third-party market,” Tripp said. “All of the OEMs were hit by dropping revenues over the last couple of years, and we saw an acceleration of the trend to limit technical data or tooling going to third parties. They are making sure that they only sell the testers to themselves. They stock the testers in their own factory service centers. Some OEMs were doing that rather aggressively before, but we are seeing it more and more and more; OEMs restricting technical data or the testing tools so that the flow of repairs comes to them.” The non-availability of automatic test equipment “is stopping us,” Tripp said. “The test equipment is not available to a third-party MRO like Aero Instruments. We have purchased OEM testers in the past, but we are not allowed to purchase the tester for the 777 and above, so we won’t be able to test those complex boxes anytime in the future, never.” Tripp said that the top-tiered airline MRO shops would be able to get the necessary test equipment, but that “it is getting kind of rare.” He also noted that as airlines update their fleets, it affects the independent MROs who serviced them. “My top client was UPS, Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 45 cost effective anymore.” At one time, there was heavy competition among the OEMs, the airlines and even the independents. But that is changing. “There is much stronger cooperation and collaboration, as evidenced by some of our recent transactions where we’ve designated people as authorized to provide support where we are not doing it ourselves,” said Paull. “We are finding ourselves in different relationships where we are authorizing the MRO houses to represent us in the matter of support.” Situations such as the merger between Air France and KLM have transformed third-party avionics MRO Special Skills Required work. Air France has some of the Scott Gunnufson, vice president and general manager, Service Solutions for largest component repair shops in the world, while KLM has been saving Rockwell Collins, noted that on the money by shifting “It is becoming unrealistic that it would to third-party work. Following be economically viable for someone the merger, Air France has doing airline MRO to invest in the reportedly started to outsource its detailed cards testing capability.” MRO work based on the KLM - Adrian Paull, experience. Vice President, Honeywell Independent Customer and Product Support MRO shops on the international scene are also 787 avionics systems, as many as six being hit to some different boxes on prior generation extent by the lack aircraft have been integrated into one of availability of — “and the skills required to repair both technical that are huge.” data and test equipment. Adrian That pressing need also applies to Wolf, manager of the recently opened airlines. “It becomes more difficult Hawker Pacific Avionics in Dubai, to justify the purchase of the test said that the necessary technology equipment because you don’t see for glass cockpits “is increasingly the box that often,” Gunnufson said. locked down by the OEMs. If you “When you do see the box, you don’t can get access to the repair data, want a technician out there who only the test equipment requirements are sees the box once every four months expensive, and making a business trying to troubleshoot it. It’s not an case for the expenditure is difficult economic thing. So just from sheer considering the ‘thru-put’ of work.” economics, we don’t see a lot of However, Hawker Pacific Avionics is people requesting test equipment becoming a major player for avionics capability any more.” repair throughout the Middle East and Gunnfuson said that as airlines are recently acquired UAE GCAA Design transitioning into new fleets, “we’re Office Authority. This allows Hawker seeing more and more that they’re to provide its services to fixed- and not choosing to reengage in the rotary-wing customers in both the avionics side of support. It’s just not shops. The expense of specialized equipment to repair and test the new integrated cards, combined with the infrequency of needing those repairs, is making it economically unfeasible even for large operators. “It is becoming unrealistic that it would be economically viable for someone doing airline MRO to invest in the detailed cards testing capability. Airlines will simply return a bad card to Honeywell, which will replace it,” Paull said, adding that even Honeywell doesn’t necessarily test the cards sent in. “We then send it to the card manufacturer who has the test equipment for it,” he said. 46 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 military and civilian sectors, to include “equipment changes, upgrades and new hardware installations all approved to UAE GCAA and EASA standards.” Hawker’s geographic market covers the Middle East, and provides “on-site installation support for the customer who doesn’t have the in-house labor or skills to carry out an upgrade program,” Wolf said. From the European perspective, Hardy Truelsen, president of Billund, Denmark-based Scandinavian Avionics, said that several manufacturers typically like to keep MRO in-house, “and only strong dealers and service centers can fight this policy.” Still, more and more operators “are starting to realize that manufacturer MRO monopolies are not necessarily beneficial and will demand support from third-party maintenance and external service centers.” Truelsen said that preparing for increasingly sophisticated glass cockpits requires extensive capability and capacity, and that only a limited number of MROs will be able to survive in this future environment. Case in point: Scandinavian Avionics is considering setting up its own test equipment branch, although getting certification of test procedures from the authorities “is complicated and generally requires support from the equipment manufacturers,” he said. He also noted that increasing requirements from regulatory authorities “is making life unfairly difficult for smaller companies.” That, combined with high investment requirements and the retirement of owners who started their shops years ago, will cause a reduction in MRO shops in Europe. The upshot? As Truelsen put it: “While I do agree that many smaller avionics MROs will disappear in the next five to 10 years, most survivors will probably merge with either a larger avionics MRO or an aircraft MRO who wants to set up a total support arrangement.” AM Doug Nelms is a contributing editor: [email protected] When Technologies Collide As sensor technologies increase in sophistication, the need to maintain avionics becomes more imperative — especially in the booming unmanned aircraft sector. Our latest webinar explored this trend; here’s a report. By John Persinos, Editor-in-Chief A vionics suites and sensors are growing in complexity, which means more aspects of them can go wrong. Major avionics OEMs report that they’re funneling greater resources into the upkeep and repair of the delicate electronics that keep aircraft in the air and on target. The convergence of MRO and avionics is particularly apparent in the booming field of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Clashes between two unequally matched forces are known in military argot as “asymmetrical”. This category of conflict characterizes most warfare today. It pits, say, a furtive band of guerillas armed with rocket-propelled grenades and improvised explosive devices, against modern hightech armies deploying attack helicopters and armored personnel carriers. History has shown that oftentimes, the rag-tag guerillas are cunning enough to wreak disproportionate damage against their more professional foes — and win. Just ask the Russians, about their experience in Afghanistan. The bipolar geo-strategic paradigm that dominated the last half of the 20th century, in which opposing armies massed in fixed formations on battlefields, is an anachronism. As asymmetrical warfare increases in such battlefield hot spots as Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, unmanned aircraft are playing a vital role in tracking and engaging terrorists and other insurgents. However, new challenges are arising over the need to repair and test the electronic eyes and ears of these flying robots. As companies step in with solutions, the performance of lightweight, miniaturized avionics systems is soaring to new heights. To explore these exciting developments, Aviation Maintenance magazine conducted a webinar: “The Convergence of MRO, UAVs and Avionics”, which aired live on Wednesday, October 20. This webinar was sponsored by Aeroflex Test Solutions, a Wichita, Kansas-based global leader in test and measurement instrumentation. The webinar was recorded and archived; you can still access the event, on demand, at this web address: http://www.aerospacemedia.com/webinars The speaker panel comprised Peter van Blyenburgh, president, the Unmanned Vehicle Systems Association, a non-profit The U.S. military’s Predator drone, shooting a Hellfire missile. organization based in Paris, France; Raul Segredo, president, Avionica, a Miamibased provider of aircraft data collection and analysis products; and Chris Baur, president, Hughes Aerospace, a Houston, Texas-based provider of solutions in the fields of air traffic control, airline operations, general/corporate aviation, military and helicopter flight operations. I moderated the proceedings. Military strategists are embracing pilotless drones, viewing them as the perfect weapons with which to fight smaller wars. UAVs are flexible, tactical and precise, allowing high-altitude reconnaissance and shoot-to-kill capabilities that don’t put soldiers’ lives at risk. UAVs are the perfect soldiers: they feel no pain and they’re always willing to die for their country. The New Frontier of MRO Global investments in UAVs are taking off. These war-fighting wonders rely on highly sensitive and complex sensor systems that function as their guidance. UAV spending among the world’s militaries will more than double during the next decade, from current global UAV expenditures of Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 47 Unmanned aircraft rely on highly sensitive sensor systems that function as their eyes and ears. As these sensors become more complex, they’re more prone to require repair and testing. $4.9 billion a year to $11.5 billion a year, totaling more than $80 billion over the next ten years. Sensors account for about 50 percent of these figures. U.S. military forces alone plan to spend nearly $5.4 billion on UAVs in fiscal 2010, which began in October, an increase of nearly 19 percent from the previous year. American-based aerospace companies command a value share of more than 50 percent of the UAV market; analysts predict that they could grab up to another 10 percent over the next decade. The fast growth of the UAV market is accompanied by soaring demand for sensor technologies. Raytheon currently supplies the sensors on board Northrop Grumman’s RQ-4 Global Hawk high-altitude, longendurance unmanned aircraft, which can fly at altitudes of up to 65,000 feet for more than 31 hours. Because of Raytheon-built sensor suites, Global Hawk is capable of day-and-night surveillance. Within the Pentagon’s overall 2010 UAV budget, the U.S. Air Force plans to buy five Global Hawks for $609 million, and will put an additional $113 million into Global Hawk advanced procurement toward future buys of Global Hawk units and related equipment. The Air Force allocated money for five Global Hawks a year in 2008 and 2009. As our webinar speakers discussed, the spread of UAVs now puts new pressures on the MRO and avionics sectors. The 60-minute online event was interactive; 48 I fielded questions from attendees. Below are the highlights of our lively and informative discussion. Persinos: How is the growing use of UAVs affecting avionics development? Baur: UAVs are unique in that, as piloted vehicles, they are piloted remotely. As with any other aircraft, they encounter all the same challenges of manned flights, such as complex airspace, prohibited airspace, restricted airspace, terrain, weather, etc. If you have the ability to embed the navigation procedures in the UAV, if for some reason you would lose radio contact with the UAV, you could program the UAV to return and fly a precision approach to an airfield so you don’t lose the unmanned vehicle. We can develop a navigation solution for the UAV that would allow it to negotiate complex airspace. van Blyenburgh: Just one little thing that we should say at the beginning. Properly speaking, we should use the term Unmanned Aircraft Systems, or unmanned aircraft. UAS is now the term that has been adopted by ICAO and the majority of the aviation regulatory community. We’re not talking about vehicles, but aircraft. And they’re operated as part of a system. Consequently, everything in the regulatory arena that applies to aircraft applies to unmanned aircraft. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 Persinos: I’m glad that you mentioned this point at the beginning of the webinar. The rules and regulations that apply to aircraft MRO will apply to unmanned aircraft. It seems to me that one challenge today is how to integrate unmanned aircraft into the regulatory scheme that involves NTSB, FAA, EASA, etc. Baur: Well, that’s certainly true for an operator, especially if you’re operating in congested airspace. If you had a vertical UAS that you wanted to operate from a heliport and have it transition through complex airspace, assuming there’s more than one UAS that’s out there in operation and other aircraft, what’s probably very important to air traffic control or other operators is where your UAS is going to be and when it’s going to be there. So, providing this predictable, reliable, repeatable path, not only have you kept your UAS from harm’s way in terms of having a control flight in a terrain or flying over someplace that you didn’t want it to go, you can also know exactly where that UAS is going to be at any given time, which allows for better separation and more predictability. Persinos: What are the ramifications on the avionics testing field, the people who maintain, test and repair the increasingly sophisticated sensors that make up the brains of unmanned aircraft? Baur: You’ll have to maintain the same standards that you would for any aircraft. When you put navigation into these procedures, via a navigation database, the database has to be maintained by somebody so you can verify the accuracy of the procedure. Every 56 days you go through cycle changes. And every 56 days you want to make sure that the navigation that’s being loaded in this aircraft has met a certain standard. And that’s certainly another opportunity in the industry and there are people that provide that service, to maintain what’s called the Gold Standard. Persinos: There seems to be a lot of growth opportunities in that particular niche, correct? Baur: Absolutely. And what you’re seeing is a fundamental shift from terrestrial-based navigation that’s very cumbersome and expensive to maintain. They require flight checks. They’re subject to all kinds of catastrophic failures due to weather events, earthquakes, power outages. In some parts of the world the parts are even stolen. Persinos: So, the standards that need to be applied to maintain reliability and safety and standardization for component parts in the MRO field, they will increasingly apply to unmanned aircraft. Correct? Baur: Absolutely. All the testing, validating and precision that’s required for any aircraft would apply in this realm. That will be the case more and more as each country, including the United States, shifts aircraft navigation, especially in regards to Next Gen, into these sophisticated systems. Persinos: As unmanned aircraft have evolved, they’re getting extremely innovative and more and more capabilities are being added to them, especially in battlefield conditions. But they’re also being applied to civilian uses, such as for putting out fires or police surveillance. It’s a little bit of a wild west. And all of these standards for testing and repairing the avionics, for maintaining the navigation and communication systems, all of these different conflicting standards will have to be brought under one regimen. Will we see more standardization, instead of companies having their own standards and procedures? Baur: Yes, for sure. Arguably, I think one of the best companies out there today when you talk about voice and data communications, is Avionica. When you look at Avionica’s product line and how that is incorporated into any aerial vehicle, but certainly into a UAS, you can update and communicate this type of navigation data wirelessly. My fellow speaker Raul Segredo can discuss that. It’s a phenomenal technology, Raul, and the way you maintain it is different. Segredo: Chris Baur and I have worked on various communications equipment in support of precision navigation. We’re proud to have our avionics products on aircraft transiting across both oceans, working off the Iridium satellites. Persinos: The name of the game in avionics, as in so many other fields, is increasing miniaturization and losing the weight. Segredo: Yes, particularly when you’re talking about unmanned vehicles with limited lift capability. Our miniQAR product has been used by our customers, at this point, for over a decade in support of diagnosing and maintaining aircraft as The standards that need to be applied to the MRO field will increasingly apply to unmanned aircraft. the recorders capture the majority of the parameters that are being generated on the aircraft. When control surfaces are out of rig, flaps, slats become inoperative; the recorder has all the information necessary for the maintainers to pinpoint where the problem’s at. In that sense, the miniQAR reflects the theme of our webinar today, in terms of maintaining unmanned aircraft. Perhaps of more interest for our audience is, how do you get to that miniaturization? Because unmanned aircraft are constrained in their size, all of their systems need to shrink while still being either fully functional or even more functional than in their manned counterparts. The heart of the miniQAR design is what we call System-On-Chip, or SOC. We’ve integrated all the functionality of the device into one single chip. This type of chip is commonly called a gate array or field-programmable gate array, FPGA. One of the novel things that Avionica has done is incorporate not only all of the interfaces, but also the processors so that they can actually execute software. In our tiny little box, which is smaller than the fist of your hand, we actually have two processors running in tandem with all these aviation interfaces. There’s two solid-state ST memory card controllers that give the unit up to 64 gigabytes of storage and two Ethernet interfaces that provide interconnect with other onboard computers. So, there’s a tremendous amount of capability in a tiny little box and it’s all driven from the System-OnChip design. This is one chip design beyond allowing you to scale a complex system down to a very small size. It also takes care of increasing reliability. The fewer the parts, the less the heat, the longer it lasts. It also addresses a problem that I think will become increasingly problematic in aviation, which is obsolescence. As the functionality that’s necessary out of-the box is protected in a high level descriptive language Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 49 a maximum mass of inferior to say seven kilos, maybe even up to two kilos, that it might be possible to not have the system certified, per se, as we know it today, but that they could possibly be authorized to fly after having completed a safety analysis. Persinos: In considering all these Northrop Grumman’s RQ-4 Global Hawk (pictured) can fly at altitudes up to 65,000 feet for more than 31 hours. Its sensors, supplied by Raytheon, require sophisticated testing and maintenance. that can be tested and spawned into other architectures, the obsolescence of any individual component decreases. We as manufacturers can then envision supplying a functional box for a long time to our customers, without worry about the obsolescence to our components. For those designing unmanned aircraft, implementing data recording systems or establishing aircraft condition monitoring, this plethora of interfaces gives them the tools with which to get their job done. And again, all this scales down into a chip that’s about half-inch on edge. Persinos: Raul, what are the consequences of this incredibly miniaturized avionics on the people who have to test this technology, who have to maintain it, and who have to repair it, especially in the field? Segredo: Well, the recorder provides the clues, if you will. It’s capturing the data that provides the clues to the maintainers as to what specific areas of the avionics need maintenance. This webinar’s sponsor, Aeroflex, then provides the tools that will allow the aircraft, whether it’s manned or not, to return to service. The standard maintenance process is, you figure out what’s broke first through a fault diagnostic process, which is aided through the data capture the miniQAR provides. When you return to service, you confirm that the function is back in service. So, if you’ve got a radar that’s gone out, you would replace the radar and use the Aeroflex tools to confirm that it’s functioning again. That’s the challenge, and Aeroflex is providing one of the solutions for it. 50 Persinos: I’d like to pose a question from one of our registrants. And I do urge our registrants to submit emailed questions to us, because you are all experts in your own right and your participation enhances the proceedings today. I have a question here that’s very interesting: “Will UAS flying in European airspace need to comply with the Eurocontrol Link 2000+ Data Link Mandate, which begins January, 2011?” van Blyenburgh: It’s not possible to give a clear answer to this question. The unclear answer is that UAS are not flying in European airspace at the moment on a routine basis, only on an exception basis. So, once they get into the routine basis, we still have to look at them in the categories of below or above 150 kilograms. A small UAS is defined as fixed-wing aircraft with a maximum takeoff weight of less than 150 kilograms. And then for the small ones, below 150 kilograms, it will be left up to the national authority to do that. Above, it will be up to EASA to certify that. Persinos: Peter, you’re a worldrenowned expert in unmanned aircraft. So, let me ask you, the distinction between certified and non-certified unmanned aircraft, how does that affect the people on the ground who have to maintain these systems and test them and make sure they’re working properly? van Blyenburgh: There is no doubt in my mind that if UAS will be flying in non-segregated airspace or below nonsegregated airspace, they will have to be certified in one way or another. There might be a possibility for really small UAS, with Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 different UAS categories, military and civilian, which companies control the most market share? Who are the major players specifically in terms of OEMs? And to what degree do they handle their own MRO work for these aircraft, and to what degree do they outsource it? van Blyenburgh: At the moment, the majority of these aircraft are being used for military purposes, which means that the end customer is military. In some cases, these guys will dish out the work to nonmilitary entities. But the majority of the military take care of their own maintenance. Persinos: And in the growing and increasing and strategically important field of sensors, where the real action is in terms of technological innovation, which companies dominate the sensor field? Is it the likely suspects of Rockwell Collins, Honeywell, and Raytheon? Baur: Well, I it’s a mixed bag. You certainly have the heavy hitters that you mentioned, in the military sector. And I’d like to say that, if you look back at a lot of conflicts in history, each conflict has produced another type of technology that, after that conflict ended, went into civilian application. Persinos: That’s a classic example of how military technology, subsidized by taxpayers, produces technological innovation that spins off into the civilian sector. Baur: If I were to pull out my magic crystal ball, I would say that as current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan draw to an end, UAS technology that’s been incubated will be used in many, many different fields. There’ll be a lot of upstart companies that will come along and produce specialized Unmanned Aircraft Systems tailored to fit different civilian applications. Persinos: There’s a lot of talk and some concern among pilots and top brass in the U.S. Air Force that unmanned aircraft will take the place of piloted aircraft, that Pentagon strategists are overly emphasizing UAS. The Pentagon budget is increasingly devoted to UAS research and development and deployment, and the feeling is that the military is transitioning to a pilot-less force, making conventional fixed-wing piloted aircraft obsolete. Do you see us entering that futuristic world anytime soon, when almost all aircraft are pilot-less? themes. If you’re in the MRO, avionics or UAS fields, you must remain mindful of the fact that there’s a lot of work to be done in terms of standardizing regulations, and how those procedures will be brought to bear, and that these issues will continue to evolve in the coming months and years. And people on the ground, the engineers and the mechanics, need to keep an eye on them because they will profoundly affect what they do every day. van Blyenburgh: Not really. I very clearly see a complement between the two and there are missions that can be much better performed by unmanned aircraft. But there’s not only a technical issue at stake here, there’s also a mentality and moral issue at stake. I don’t think the public is ready for autonomous aircraft doing their own thing without any human control. As I see it for the foreseeable future, UAS will still have pilots in the loop up to a truly effective sense and avoid system, that is certified as such by the competent authorities, that will have an immediate impact, in the good direction, on unmanned aviation. It should dramatically increase safety in the air. All of the safety requirements relative to UAS, or to the maintenance of the system, will be implemented in various counties and the requirements must be the same, whether for manned or unmanned aircraft. Persinos: That’s a really important van Blyenburgh: That’s correct. Keep in mind, the entire UAS community is comprised of players that are not traditional aviation companies. But now they’ve been thrown into the aviation field. These companies have to understand that for many years the industrial standards applicable to aviation have been defined by industry through existing standards organizations. This work is done on a voluntary basis by industry. This is a long process. It cannot be shortened. However, if you do not participate in this process, you will be submitted to the decisions taken by others. Persinos: That’s a great takeaway. It appears that we’re witnessing the seeds of a totally new service niche within the MRO field. To experience the entire 60-minute webinar, register here: http://www. aerospace-media.com/webinars AM point that ties together all these various oUR WeBinAR PARTiciPAnTs John Persinos Raul segredo, Moderator President, Avionica [email protected] [email protected] chris Baur President, Hughes Aerospace Peter van Blyenburgh chris.baur@ President, Unmanned hughesaerospace.com Vehicle Systems Association [email protected] Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 51 NBAA 2010: BY John PERSinoS REPoRtinG FRoM atLanta upbeat But uncertain This year’s NBAA was bigger and more positive than the previous show, but an undercurrent of wariness lurked beneath the optimism. T At this year’s NBAA, the DeKalb Peachtree Airport static display (pictured) was full to capacity, with 93 aircraft. 52 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 he basis of optimism is sheer terror. I was reminded of that truism, while walking the floor of the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) annual convention in Atlanta in late October. To be sure, compared to the previous outing, this year’s crowd was bigger — roughly 24,200 attendees, up more than 5 percent from 2009 — and the mood considerably happier. The show’s slogan was plastered on posters throughout the convention center: “No Plane, No Gain.” The point being, companies that use timesaving and resource-efficient business aircraft outperform and return more to shareholders than companies that don’t use business aircraft. A strong return on investment (ROI) is an all-purpose justification that anyone can grasp. However, beneath the smiles and mutual backslapping, one couldn’t help but detect an undercurrent of fear. The industry still isn’t completely out of the woods, and the trauma of the recent decline was still fresh on attendees’ minds. I chatted about this contradiction with Michel Merluzeau, managing partner, G2 Solutions, an aerospace consultancy based in Kirkland, Washington. I caught up with Michel in the convention center’s pressroom. “Business aviation has suffered a very serious decline over the past four years,” Merluzeau said. “The low-end business aviation market has taken a massive hit. For all of business aviation, I expect a modest to marginal decline next year. A double-digit recession is still likely to take place. Growth will remain stagnant until around 2012 and then we might witness growth of about 10 percent a year. We’ll eventually see steady, reasonable growth, but it will be growth in which the exuberance is gone.” Merluzeau acknowledged that NBAA this year was a marked improvement from the previous show, but from his perspective, attendees and exhibitors were trying to generate an artificial sense of optimism in a market that’s still troubled. Oscar Garcia, chairman and CEO, InterFlight Global, an aerospace consulting and advisory firm based in Miami, offered his take on the show. I spoke with Oscar, at a Lufthansa Technik-sponsored cocktail reception in the sleek W hotel in midtown Atlanta. He took into account what the show meant for business aviation MRO, which has been knocked back on its heels lately but now seems to be recovering. “Quality and good business sense is the name of the game at NBAA this year,” he said. “Attendees here are decision makers ready to talk serious and responsible business. What I’ve been seeing and discussing are real orders, funded by real money and solid business plans, with reasonable investment horizons and returns. That’s a clear transition from the frantic pace and ‘smoke and mirrors’ announcements of the 2005-2008 cycle bubble.” Garcia noted that the MRO sector starts from a roughly 30 percent depression from the last cycle top, mostly due to the removal from service, or permanent deferral of heavy maintenance, of about 2,000 turbine aircraft that are more than 15 years old. He said these aircraft are becoming more and more “disposable” once their heavy maintenance checks come due. “MROs are reacting accordingly and shifting their ‘new normal’ business models to high technical content work in avionics, composite materials, and newer generation airframes and powerplants,” he said. Garcia said that the MRO and OEM buzz at NBAA was centered on “job outsourcing” to Mexico and other Latin American and even Near-Middle East countries such as Turkey and India. He said that Raytheon’s latest layoffs and radical cost trimming point inevitably in that direction. As if to underscore Garcia’s point, Bombardier announced the opening of its Lear 85 major aircraft component plant in Queretaro, Mexico, which gives Mexican aerospace a future composite technology and manufacturing edge. On the other hand, “job in-sourcing” is reflected by Embraer’s Melbourne, Florida-based Phenom plant, due to open in late 2011 and deliver aircraft in 2012. “Meanwhile, Gulfstream is still leading the world’s business aviation production, as an innovative and U.S.based vertically integrated company, not surprising given its General Dynamics DNA,” Garcia explained. Garcia said that FBOs were back to pre-2008 optimism, but kept in check with a serious dose of realism, because their overall activity is still about 20 percent below pre-2009 levels. He predicted single-digit, moderate, but consistent growth for FBOs during the 2011-2018 period. “Most FBOs are looking at other than Optimism Alloyed With Caution The consensus of most analysts at the show echoed the perspectives of noted aerospace analysts Michel Merluzeau and Oscar Garcia. Honeywell Aerospace’s forecast was no exception. According to longstanding tradition, Honeywell Aerospace released its widely followed Business Aviation Outlook on the eve of NBAA. The statistics conveyed optimism, alloyed with caution. Honeywell’s annual forecast is considered an important barometer of business aviation and related MRO activity. The company’s painstaking research is based on a survey of 1,200 corporate flight departments, aircraft manufacturers and other sources. According to the forecast, business aircraft deliveries in 2011 will fall below 700 units, marking the bottom of a three-year trough. Unit deliveries in 2009 dropped 25 percent from the peak year of 2008, and are expected to decline another 16 percent this year to 675-700 unit deliveries. Five-year buyer interest has softened from 2009, and new purchase plans are slightly below levels observed during the 2007-2008 period of industry expansion. International demand now accounts for up to 45 percent of new aircraft purchase plans over the next five years, down from 50 percent in the 2009 survey. Honeywell expects delivery of 11,000 new business jets from 2010 through 2020, generating industry sales of $225 billion. This represents a 10 percent increase in total expected industry sales value, compared to the company’s previous 10-year estimate. Honeywell predicts that a new period of growth won’t begin until 2012, and the industry will return to peak levels in 2017. That’s something to look forward to, but it’s cold comfort, if your company needs business now. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 53 fuel sources of revenue,” Garcia said. “Certainly, MRO for new generation aircraft is coming into play stronger than before. New engine and airframe support plans will rely heavily on support networks and supply chain facilitation partners. Keep in mind, supply chain-logistics still represent over 60 percent of MRO efficiencies. All FBOs are exploring new and creative warehousing and inventory support for OEMs.” “Growth will remain stagnant until around 2012 and then we might see growth of about 10 percent a year. We’ll see steady, reasonable growth, but it will be growth in which the exuberance is gone.” --michel merluzeau, managing partner, G2 solutions luxury Amid lean times If economic times were still tough, you wouldn’t know it from the lush interiors of the business aircraft on display at NBAA, which bore a closer resemblance to the living rooms of mansions than to private jets. Jumbo business jets vied with their smaller brethren for attention. Major MRO providers such as Lufthansa Technik showcased elaborate designs for “VIP” models of the Airbus A380, a favorite mode of transportation for billionaire investors and oil sheiks. Interior layouts included dining rooms, multiple bedrooms and large movie screens. Retail price for a fully outfitted A380: up to $400 million. Outsized business jets sparked fascination at NBAA, if not a frisson of envy among attendees of modest means. Lufthansa Technik is officially authorized by Boeing, Airbus and Bombardier for all maintenance, refurbishment and completion activities. At the show, Lufthansa Technik made it clear that it’s poised to scoop up about half of the completions necessary for 54 NBAA’s 63rd Annual Meeting and Convention, October 19-21, was home to 24,200 business aviation professionals and 1,083 exhibitors at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta. Boeing’s VVIP 747-8I customers. Boeing now boasts an order book of eight for its private, giant-sized VIP aircraft. Boeing plans to deliver all eight VVIP 747-8I aircraft within roughly 12 months, which makes Lufthansa Technik’s exceptional capacity and fast turnaround time of great importance to Boeing. Lufthansa Technik also crowed about a letter of intent that it inked at the show with Panasonic Avionics, to establish a joint venture for the development, manufacture and sale of In-flight Entertainment and Communications (IFEC) and Cabin Management Systems (CMS) for VIP aircraft. The joint venture will encompass both narrow and wide body VIP aircraft and make available to passengers the latest in in-flight entertainment options: high definition media playback; digital distribution; iPod and iPhone controls; high speed connectivity; ipTV; media and game libraries, and a whole host of hightech gadgetry for restless passengers seeking diversion at 30,000 feet. The partnership is significant, because in-flight entertainment is a huge growth opportunity in aviation. The joining of these two powerhouses will spawn technological innovations still unforeseen. splashy New products As new aircraft and sales were announced with great fanfare throughout the week of the show, it was perhaps too easy to forget that business aviation has been wallowing in a nasty recession for two years. Canada-based aircraft OEM Bombardier showcased the Global Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 7000 and Global 8000, two high-end jets with the eye-opening price of $65 million each. The ultra long-range planes are capable of flying non-stop along strategically important routes, such as Beijing to New York, making them attractive to multinational C-level executives and wealthy individuals. Bombardier will deliver 51 of its $40 million Global Express jets this year, roughly equivalent to last year’s levels and an increase from its 46 deliveries in 2008. Gulfstream in 2009 delivered 88 of its G300 through G550 models, with price tags ranging from $33 million to $50 million, up from 79 in 2008. Also on hand at NBAA was the $50 million-a-piece Lineage 1000 jet, produced by Brazil-based OEM Embraer. The company received a big boost at the show, when NetJets announced that it would order 50 firm and 75 optioned Phenom 300 light jets worth up to $1 billion. NetJets, a subsidiary of Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway, offers fractional ownership and rental of private business jets. NetJets’ (and by extension, Buffet’s) faith in Embraer can be interpreted as a leading indicator that bodes well for business aviation. Gulfstream unveiled the elaborately elegant interior of its top-of-the-line model, the $65 million Gulfstream G650. Gulfstream already holds about 100 firm orders for the premium jet. The company showcased five of the jets at the show’s static display at DeKalb Peachtree airport, making its G650 flagship available for private viewings for serious customers — no tire kickers, thank you. Also at the DeKalb static display, Dessault Falcon showed its Aviation Partners winglet-enhanced 4,750-nm. Falcon 900LX, which received FAA and EASA certification in July 2010. The 900LX burns up to 40 percent less fuel than other aircraft in its class. For its part, Cessna showed off its Citation Ten, a second-generation Model 750 with greater capabilities than its predecessor. Powered by RollsRoyce AE3007C2 engines, the Citation Ten can fly higher, faster and for longer distances than the current Citation X. It also burns less fuel, a capability that’s in line with the escalating pursuit of “green” aviation. With 3,242 nm. of range, the Citation Ten can fly between most major cities in North America and Europe with only one re-fueling stop, making it a perfect transportation choice for high-level executives in today’s global economy. Cessna officials at NBAA said that first flight of the engineering prototype is scheduled for December 2011. Hawker Beechcraft unveiled at NBAA the King Air 250, an enhanced version of the King Air B200GT. Powered by Pratt & Whitney Canada PT-6A-52 engines, the King Air 250 is an improved King Air with winglets, composite propellers and ram air induction modifications. The composite winglets are from BLR Aerospace. The King Air’s certification is scheduled for late 2010, with first deliveries on track for the second quarter of 2011. Wanted: trained mechanics A recurring theme at the show was the continuing need to enhance MRO training in all regions of the globe. MROs reported a shortage of adequately trained mechanics and a pressing need to train the personnel they already employ. Accordingly, CAE and Honeywell announced at NBAA that they are now jointly offering maintenance courses for MRO technicians in Europe, the Middle East and Asia, taught through the companies’ existing training alliance. European-based courses include maintenance training for TPE331 engines in Copenhagen; CFE738 and TFE731 line maintenance at Le Bourget, Paris; and training seminars for the FMZ/NZ2000 and Epic FMS in Burgess Hill, UK. Oscar Garcia asserted that the trade balance is still quite positive for the growth of U.S.-located MRO, but the writing is on the wall that highly technical work will form the competitive edge for business aviation MRO in the U.S. “This value-added MRO work, requiring considerable expertise, includes composites, glass, wireless IFEs, advanced powerplants, special mission outfitting, custom systems integration, and ‘total solution’ maintenance,” he said. Cockpit e l e c t ro n i c s and powerplant providers engaged in joint dialogues on how to save fuel with new powerplants, “green” non-fossil fuels, and more efficient navigation-guidance systems. Many attendees also expressed optimism about massive NextGen ATC federal budgets, which are injecting sorely needed cash into many of the exhibitor companies’ R&D budgets. Completion houses that exhibited at NBAA reported strong business, boosted by value-added work of the sort alluded to by Garcia. Notably, Duncan Aviation emphasized its new cost and time efficient corporate interiors program, which combines interior upgrades with scheduled maintenance inspections, making for a smoother and faster upgrade/ maintenance experience for business aircraft operators. “Quality and good business sense is the name of the game at NBAA this year. Attendees here are decision makers ready to talk serious and responsible business.” --Oscar Garcia, CeO, interFlight Global Corporation Duncan also announced a new chromefree paint process that it developed with paint supplier Sherwin Williams. Slated for implementation in January 2011, the process is designed to limit workers’ exposure to toxic chromium. Whether it was to announce new processes, new products, new partnerships, or new aircraft, the gathering in Atlanta was optimistic — but nervously so. Looking back at business aviation’s performance in 2010, it can be said that it was a year of extremes, of highs and lows, of exuberant expectations and dashed hopes. At NBAA this year, the business aviation community yearned for renewed growth, but also for long-term stability. If we’re lucky, we just might get both. AM John Persinos is the magazine’s editor-inchief: [email protected]; 301-385-7211. Gulfstream’s new G250 super mid-size jet after landing in Savannah, Georgia, en route to NBAA in Atlanta. The aircraft had just accomplished its first trans-Atlantic crossing. Pictured: Pres Henne, senior vice president, Programs, Engineering and Test, Gulfstream (center) greets Ronen Shapira, chief of flight test for Israel Aerospace Industries. Mark Kohler, director, G250 program, Gulfstream, looks on. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 55 No Company Company is is an an Island Island By Douglas Nelms, reporting from Marco Island, Florida At ADMA’s Fall Conference, distributors and manufacturers used “speed dating” to discuss their needs and issues. The overriding theme of the meeting seemed to be that in solidarity, there is strength. F or four days in the bright Florida sun, the Aviation Distributors and Manufacturers Association (ADMA) held its annual Fall Conference, marking 67 years of existence. And while it was held at the luxurious Marco Island Marriott in Florida to give attendees a chance to truly enjoy life during the meetings, nobody goes to an ADMA conference just to party amid the palm trees. First off, it isn’t merely an indulgent “cruise and schmooze” event. Yes, the ADMA does host a golf tournament half way through the conference. And yes, there is that cocktail “happy hour” where everyone can socialize and get reacquainted with all the folks they met at last year’s get-together. But make no mistake: ADMA is hardcore business. “ADMA’s purpose is to facilitate the meeting of manufacturers and distributors,” said Pat White, outgoing 56 ADMA president and president of Rapco, a manufacturer of FAA-PMA approved replacement aircraft parts. “Historically, it has become clear that private conferences are absolutely far and away the number one important thing for the members. There is massive economies of scale, being able to meet in one spot with 20 distributors or 20 manufacturers from every corner of the globe.” Held from October 31 to November 4, the conference was a relatively intense affair. The meetings started early in the day and ran until late afternoon, with distributors able to sign up to meet with the manufacturers, or vice versa, during pre-planned, well coordinated sessions. Think of it as “industrial speed dating”, with distributors and manufacturers conducting 30-minute to one-hour private sessions to pitch their services and products, find new outlets, discuss their segments of the industry, Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 and meet the influential people who are important to their businesses. The obvious goal is to increase business, although unlike the big air shows, it is not a place where orders are placed or announcements made. While the opportunity does exist for manufacturers to sign up new distributors, a major value is simply in having a chance to get multiple views of what is happening in the industry. “The ADMA is a great place for networking,” according to Mark Pearson, general manager for Lear Chemical Research Corp., manufacturer of ACF 50, an anticorrosion substance that acts like WD-40 on steroids. Like a fog creeping in on little cat’s feet, the fine ACF 50 mist enters an aircraft’s systems, covering the metal surfaces to prevent the formation of electrolytes that cause the corrosion. “It’s a chance to sit down with all the distributors and learn what is happening in the industry, what changes may need to be made,” he said. “We can talk to several companies to go over the past year’s results and determine why sales are up or down in specific areas. ADMA is very focused. Everybody knows what they are here for.” Pearson said that they stopped exhibiting at NBAA three years ago “because we saw less of the people we needed to talk to. We didn’t see the people who made buying decisions.” Thomas Jones, sales manager for Teledyne Battery Products, echoed Pearson by noting that meeting with other ADMA members “gives us a chance to find out what is being done wrong in the industry and what we can do better, to meet with top level decision makers who can go back and take action. The value of the association is that it is people who can get things done.” Inclusive and Collegial While not necessarily leading to concrete results such as signing contracts, the meetings are “a great place for contacting the key people in the industry,” Guido said. He also noted that there is a need to get more manufacturers into the ADMA. White said that manufacturers are attending, even though they may not be looking for new distributors. “The manufacturers are not so naïve or stupid to think that other distributors don’t touch their products,” he said. “Their products are on other shelves, so they would rather have other distributors educated on those products despite the fact that the distributors don’t purchase them directly.” The meeting also allows a look into the future, according to Tara Holder, marketing manager for Michelin Aircraft Tire Co. “We can discuss the achievements of last year and discuss the needs for the coming year: what needs to be done, what the market will be doing,” Holder said. “It allows us to do strategic planning in order to be proactive for the coming year.” The organization is global in nature, with 12 companies outside the United States attending the conference. And while Europe was the most represented of the international set, Latin America appears to be the hot new market, according to several of the attendees. Donnie Handley, head of outside sales for Airparts Company, a major distributor of airframe and engine parts, said that up to 75 percent of his company’s business is international, with 70 percent of that in Latin America. The company is currently building warehouse facilities in Lima, Peru and Sal Paula, Brazil, and has a warehouse running in Colombia. Handley noted that the owners of Airparts are from Argentina, and that marketing is done through “word of mouth.” Airparts also will take manufacturers, “such as Cleveland and Champion,” down to Latin America as well as hold seminars in Latin America to promote their company. Marketing is primarily done directly between the distributors and local Latin American companies, although there is interest in third-party marketing through companies such as Discover the World Marketing. These companies have marketing offices set up in virtually every country with entrenched marketing teams to handle companies ADMA is, in fact, what Fred Guido, operations director for Southern Cross Aviation, said is a “good old boys club for the manufacturers/distributors industry.” But in a good way. Instead of being exclusive, it’s an inclusive and collegial affair. Southern Cross is a distributor for turboprop and light jet general aviation parts, “plus some commuter parts.” Its main business is to put together complete packages of parts for MROs. It is also a major distributor for Cleveland Wheel and Brakes, a division of Parker Aerospace, that requested Southern Cross to join ADMA “in order to do business here,” he said. “We didn’t know what to expect, but we’ve Pat White, president of Rapco and out-going president of ADMA, uses the traditional conference found it to be very social hour to chat with three executives from Air Power, a new corporate member of ADMA. L to R: beneficial.” David Rogers, parts sales; Howard Van Bortel, president; White and George Van Bortel, vice president. Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 57 are not enough manufacturers that have airline products,” he said. Another major issue affecting the ADMA membership is the economy. Roughly 90 percent of the members We’re looking for ways to make people more passionate about our industry Frederick (Charlie) Elkins, senior managing director/marketing and supplier services for Aviall, was sworn in as ADMA president during the conference and will serve a two-year term, followed by two years as president emeritus on the ADMA board. that don’t want the expense of setting up their own facilities. “We are in about 13 different markets in Latin America,” said Bill Vinck, Discover the World’s vice president, Latin America. “Our value is that we have well established offices in all the key markets, and if you are in the parts business you might not want the expense of establishing your own office. That would be a huge fixed cost to you. Ultimately, it’s a question of relationships and contacts.” new People, new Ideas As with any association, a major function of a conference is to hold membership and board meetings to discuss issues affecting the organization. At ADMA, the biggest issue is the turnover of members and the change in demographics of the members, with the newer and younger members changing the shape of the future, White said. Frederick (Charlie) Elkins, incoming ADMA president and senior managing director, marketing and supplier services for Aviall, said that the organization is growing, “but the long term members who were very active are now retiring or leaving the industry. This has been happening for several years. Also, new companies are coming 58 into the industry and the industry is evolving. So how do we get the new people with their new ideas involved?” The best way is through getting them on the board, he said. However, only so many can be on the association’s board. “So we’re asking others to be on ad hoc committees, looking at issues and bringing those issues back to the board. We’re looking for ways to make people more passionate about our industry,” he said. Elkins noted that the general feeling a few years ago was that the association had run its course. However, he is finding now that a lot of new companies are coming in to revitalize the organization. “We will need to adapt to those new companies without losing the association’s unique capabilities and benefits to our members,” he said. The ADMA membership currently consists of 31 manufacturers and 29 distributors. Mark Morrow, an ADMA past president and distribution manager for Eaton Aerospace, noted that most of the distributors cater to general aviation and corporate operators. “The manufacturers still hold sway over the distributors in that the distributors have to have the products the manufacturers make, and there Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 are small business owners and operators. And these are people who can’t be told what to do. “They can be enticed, but they can’t be pushed,” White said. “Small businesses are sitting on trillions of dollars because of the level of uncertainty that they have felt exists in our economic and political climate. Business owners need to have some certainty about the future exposure to fixed costs. As much as you don’t like to think of taxes as fixed costs, they really are. If you don’t know what is going to happen with that, it makes it really easy to just sit on the bench.” Membership in ADMA is not a given. Lea Anne Leavens, parts manager for Leavens Aviation, Inc., an MRO and distributor of aircraft parts and services, primarily for flight schools, noted that distributors must meet certain criteria, including being financially sound, have agreements in place and have a certain amount of wholesale business. Manufacturers, she said, “must be financially sound with a solid list of distributors.” Companies within both groups must be sponsored to join. “It’s when the economy is struggling that companies can have the best understanding of what their customers and their peers are doing,” said Pat White. “When the economy is growing, all industry players need to be educated on the new products that are being developed or the product improvements that are changing, because when the economy is strong and the aviation industry is healthy, companies have resources to invest in product improvements.” AM Doug Nelms is a contributing editor: [email protected] PMA and China, Inc. An influential voice in the MRO sector discusses the opportunities in China for Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA). His conclusion: China is more open to business than you might think. By Jason Dickstein I ’ve heard two things about China. The first is that it’s the fastest growing geographic location for aerospace business. The second is that it’s impossible for foreigners to do business in China. I recently visited China and met with several air carriers, to test these competing theories. Upon arrival in Beijing, the number of familiar brand names advertised in the airport made it clear that someone had figured out how to do business in China. I was invited to speak at a conference introducing alternative solutions and sources (“nonOEM”) to Chinese air carriers. The conference speakers included American, European, and Chinese aviation experts discussing their experiences with FAA-PMA parts and FAA-DER repairs. The Conference began with an economic presentation that provided statistical background on the aviation industry. In 2009, the air transport MRO market reflected $42.7 billion worth of business. This was down from the peak, in 2007, which was $2.3 billion higher ($45 billion). But the exciting news was that they expect fundamental MRO demand to reach $58 billion by 2019. That is an average annual growth rate of about 3.1 percent for the next ten years. The same economic consulting firm predicts that China’s MRO demand will experience an average annual growth rate of about 9.1 percent for the next ten years, nearly three times the global average increase. The average OEM saw new parts sales contract 10-20 percent in 2009 (globally, not just in China). The Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) industry saw its sales contract by about 8 percent during the same period. No one likes to see sales contract, but if they have to contract, it sure is great to be able to minimize the rate of contraction. It appears that the proven safety record of PMA parts, combined with the cost savings, has made PMA parts very attractive to air carriers. It’s possible to recognize savings as high as 50 percent off of OEM pricing for competing parts. In many cases, PMA parts have improved reliability over their OEM corollaries. This can be due to tighter manufacturing tolerances, improved manufacturing technologies, or new designs featuring improvements in coatings, materials or other characteristics. With designs that improve the reliability of aircraft parts, the operators are reaping additional benefits — e.g., improved mean times between service. So what do these numbers mean in China? Can an MRO compete successfully in China using PMA parts? Are Chinese carriers willing to risk the wrath of the OEM by using PMA parts? The answer appears to be a resounding “yes.” I was prepared for an initial wave of rejection, but the Chinese air carriers and MROs with whom I met crowed about their own PMA success stories. They expressed eagerness to learn more about PMA. They also asked me to help them develop a database of MROs that would be “PMAfriendly” and that Guest could expedite their Opinion identification of Column more cost-saving and reliability-increasing solutions. I was joined on the speaking program by a representative from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC). I was pleasantly surprised by his support of the PMA paradigm. CAAC is actively encouraging Chinese operators to communicate with domestic and overseas companies to promote the use of PMA parts and DER repairs. CAAC is trying to establish trust and cooperation between the air carrier community and the PMA industry, and that smooth growth of the PMA industry — and the competition it represents — is in everybody’s best interest. What did I take away from my recent trip to China? China is a rapidly growing market for MRO, and China is encouraging MRO facilities to make their bids more attractive by using PMA parts. AM Jason Dickstein is president of the Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA). As a lawyer in the Washington, D.C. area, Jason has counseled aircraft parts distributors, aeronautical repair stations, air carriers, and aircraft parts manufacturers. You can reach him at: [email protected] Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 59 ROLLS-ROYCE SUFFERS Over Trent 900 When a Rolls-Royce Trent 900 powerplant blew apart on a Qantas Airbus A380, the mishap created more than engine debris. Serious consequences for Rolls-Royce, Qantas and Airbus continue to spread across the globe. By Ramon Lopez F allout from the uncontained failure of a Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engine on November 4 will not just include the turbine parts that blew off the Qantas Airbus A380 superjumbo and rained down on the Indonesian island of Batam. The investigation into the serious A380 incident quickly pinpointed a basic design fault with the advanced Rolls-Royce turbofan. In December, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) confirmed the problem as fatigue cracking within a stub pipe that feeds oil into a High Pressure (HP) / Intermediate Pressure (IP) bearing structure. The ATSB said “leakage of oil into the HP/IP bearing structure buffer space (and a subsequent oil fire within that area) was central to the engine failure and IP turbine disc liberation event.” 60 In simple layman’s terms, the Number 2 engine turbine on the Qantas superjumbo exploded because of an oil leak. According to the ATSB: “Misaligned stub pipe counter-boring is understood to be related to the manufacturing process. This condition could lead to an elevated risk of fatigue crack initiation and growth, oil leakage and potential catastrophic engine failure from a resulting oil fire.” The ATSB found that the Number 2 engine had ejected a number of components that struck the aircraft. Sections of the intermediate pressure (IP) turbine disc penetrated the leading edge of the left wing inboard of the Number 2 engine, resulting in damage to the leading-edge structure, the front wing spar and the upper surface of the wing. A small section of turbine disc penetrated the left wing-to-fuselage fairing, resulting in damage to several system components, the fuselage structure and electrical wiring. The damage to the wiring affected the operation of the hydraulic system, landing gear and flight controls. Rolls-Royce will be required to take action to ensure the continued safe operation of A380 aircraft. The action will Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 involve the close inspection of affected engines and the removal from service of any engine which displays the suspected problem. Rolls-Royce is implementing a modification program across the worldwide A380 superjumbo jetliner fleet each powered by four Trent 900 turbofans. There are currently 21 Trent 900-powered A380s in service worldwide, operated by Qantas (six), Lufthansa (four) and Singapore Airlines (11). Fully to Blame? The CEO of Qantas Airways, Alan Joyce, said Rolls-Royce was fully to blame for the catastrophic failure of the Trent 900 engine on one of his A380s. Joyce said it was “absolutely clear” that nothing Qantas did caused the engine to fail and he defended his airline’s handling of the incident. “When we found out we had a problem with an engine that had a design issue, we grounded the fleet until we knew how we could fix the issue,” said Joyce, adding that Qantas has “a strong positive safety culture.” While it is too early to estimate the overall cost of the service disruptions to Qantas, Lufthansa, Singapore and future Trent 900-powered A380 customers, RollsRoyce is preparing for the worst. Qantas laid the groundwork for legal action against the UK engine maker, filing a statement of claim in December in an Australian federal court, in case a commercial settlement doesn’t result between the two parties. The pre-emptive legal strike allows Qantas “to keep all options available to the company to recover losses, as a result of the grounding of the A380 fleet and the operational constraints currently imposed on A380 services,” the carrier said. Analysts believe that compensation owed Qantas could exceed $100 million. Rolls-Royce declined to comment on the legal maneuver of Qantas, although it is understood that the company is ready to complete a face saving settlement. However a senior Rolls-Royce official said the firm would inspect and fix all of its engines used on Airbus A380 superjumbo jets by the end of 2011. “In about a year’s time, all of the necessary components will be in place and this will all be behind us,” Chief Financial Officer Andrew Shilston told investors at a Credit Suisse Aerospace According to the ATSB, the Trent 900 exploded because of an oil leak. & Defense Conference in New York. Rolls-Royce’s initial findings in November corresponded with the December pronouncements of the ATSB. The engine maker concluded that the problem was confined to a particular component in the turbine area, which caused an oil fire that led to the release of the intermediate-pressure turbine disc. The disc, located at the back of an engine, holds the turbine blades and rotates at high speed. The engine maker noted that this incident was the first of its kind on one of its large civil engines since 1994. AM Ramon Lopez is a contributing editor to Aviation Maintenance magazine. Before joining our editorial team, he served as editor-in-chief of the newsletter, Air Safety Week. You can reach him at: [email protected] Subscription Card www.avmain-mag.com Every two months, Aviation Maintenance covers the latest in maintenance, training tips and expert perspectives on the state of the domestic and international markets. n Yes, I want to receive/continue to receive a FREE subscription to Aviation Maintenance (current editions ONLY) – complete below and return. n Print and/or n Digital Please PRINT Name Title Company Address City State/Province Zip/PC Country n I want to upgrade my subscription to a Priority Paid Version so I can access the online back catalogue as well as the print edition. n 1 Year Subscription ( U.S.: $99.00, Canada: $129.00, International: $195.00) n 2 Year Subscription ( U.S.: $188.00, Canada: $228.00, International: $295.00) Please charge to Visa n, Visa Electron n, Mastercard n, Maestro n, Amex n Card Number Expiry Date/ Start Date/ CVC (last 3 digits on reverse) Name on Card Card Holders Address Postcode Country Signature A. What is your primary business? (Check only ONE) Aftermarket n MRO n Repair Station n Distributor/Dealer n Inspection Authorization Services Operators n Commercial Airline n Business Aviation n Charter/Air Taxi n Cargo/Air Freight n General Aviation OEM n Airframe Manufacturer n Avionics Systems Integrator n Engine Supplier n Manufacturer/Service Provider Government n Federal Regulatory Agency n Government Maintenance Facility n Military Other n Training School/Educational Facility/Consultants n Others Allied to the Industry (please specify) B. What is your job title? (Check only ONE) n Owner/Partner/VP/Purchasing Agents Supervisors/Director/Managers of: n Maintenance n Avionics n Engineering n Corporate Flight Dept. n Customer Service n Training n Parts Department n IA or Inspector n A&P Mechanic n Engineer n n n n Chief Pilot/Pilot Sales/Marketing Director/Manager/Supervisor Instructor Others Allied to the Industry (please specify) C. Do you provide maintenance services or products for military customers? n Yes n No D. What types of aircraft are supported by this business? (Check ALL that apply) n Piston n Light Turboprop n Heavy Turboprop n Business Jets n Commercial Jets n Helicopters n Military Aircraft n None of the above E. Which of the following services does this business offer and/or utilize as an operator annually? (Check ALL that apply) General Services n Airframe n Avionics n Engines/Piston n Engines/Turbine n Interior Completion/Refurb n Painting n Technical Training Specialty Services n Wheels and Brakes n Window Repair n Corrosion Treatment n De-Icing n Instrument Repair n Non-Destructive Testing n Computer Maintenance Tracking/e-logbooks n Composite Repair n Landing Gear Inspection Services n Annual Inspections n Hot Section Inspections n Phase Inspections n Letter Checks (A, B, C, D) n Remote visual Inspections n None of the Above F. Which of the following products/services/ equipment does your company plan to buy in the next 18 months? (Check ALL that apply) n Aircraft Paint n Batteries/Battery Charges n Communication Equipment n Composite Materials n Connectors/Circuit Breakers/Relays n Corrosion Inhibitors n De-Ice/Anti-Ice Fluids n Fasteners/Hardware n Filters n Ignition Systems/Spark Plugs n NDT Supplies n Oils/Lubricants/Oil Filters n Paint/Coatings n Avionics Test Equipment & Supplies n Airframe Test Equipment & Supplies n Engine Test Equipment & Supplies n Testing/Inspection Equipment & Supplies n Tires/brakes n Tools n Avionics n RFID n Software/Maintenance n Software/Enterprise n Software/Other n Ground Support Equipment n Landing Gear n None of the Above Please complete and either scan/email to [email protected] or fax to +44 (0) 208 090 6211 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 61 EDITOR’S NOTE: POINT/COUNTERPOINT The rapid proliferation of Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) aviation parts is the catalyst for this issue’s Point/Counterpoint. Make no mistake: both authors embrace the use of PMA parts. However, former U.S. NTSB Board Member John Goglia raises several important caveats that are often given short shrift in the PMA debate. - John Persinos Welcome to the Profitable New World of PMA BY DANIEL DOLL T he arrival of PMA parts in large numbers in competition with OEM replacement parts is a relatively new phenomenon in our industry. Although PMA was established by the FAA in 1955 to enable pilots to repair obsolete WWII military aircraft, it didn’t take off commercially until the 1990s. PMA is a new way of doing business. Instead of acting as a passive customer and accepting replacement parts as a fixed (in the upward direction) cost of business, airlines can now proactively shop for the best value proposition. Airlines by their very nature combine huge fixed costs with fickle demand. This makes them extremely vulnerable to any kind of disturbance. I have been in this industry for 40 years and have seen a multitude of economic downturns, wars, acts of terrorism, diseases, aircraft crashes, and strikes suddenly shrink demand for air travel. Meanwhile, the costs of jet fuel and aircraft maintenance go up, up, and up. Survival demands that cost control must be a major ongoing effort for every airline in good times as well as bad. PMA parts can save a customer up to $130,000 on a single engine overhaul I have spent a fair portion of my life working in engine maintenance, and I have seen many airlines try to save money by short building engines. They remain legal and safe, but they do not build in longevity. I call this strategy, “saving yourself into bankruptcy” because an airline that short builds its engines ends up churning shop visits, operations are adversely affected, and maintenance costs race out of control. A far better way to control maintenance cost is to reduce the cost of maintenance materials. According to AeroStrategy, one of the leading consulting organizations in the aerospace industry, airlines spent more than $17 billion on spare parts in 2009. Savings on spare parts can definitely help an airline’s bottom line. Over the past few years a major tool has become available to maintenance organizations to help reduce these material costs: PMA parts. 62 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 PMA parts are new parts, fully approved by the FAA and just about every other airworthiness authority in the world. They are now available from PMA suppliers at savings ranging from 25-45 percent of what you are currently paying the aircraft or engine manufacturers. One leading PMA supplier estimates that they can save a customer up to $130,000 on a single engine overhaul, and there are many PMA suppliers. A single airline in the U.S. has documented $40 million in material cost savings per year due to an aggressive PMA approval program that covers airframes, engines, and components. The savings from PMA may go far beyond the PMA discount itself. Historically, the OEMs have held a strong monopoly on the sale of replacement parts. This has allowed them to push through spare part price increases on the order of 5 percent per year. This means that your parts costs double every 14 years. Competition from PMA has had a tendency to moderate this rate of growth. The OEM now has to consider the competition when he raises prices. PMA provides airlines with a useful tool, along with surplus parts, extensive part repairs, and joint procurement to counter the OEM pricing power and reduce the rate of price escalation. One of the major barriers to the use of PMA is airlines’ lack of knowledge on the benefits, safety and performance of PMA. That’s why it’s crucial for all parties concerned to learn the issues involved with PMA usage, as well as industry best practices for incorporating PMA. As an industry, our goal should be to get everyone making informed decisions of mutual benefit. Down with fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Up with performance, reliability, and profits! AM David Doll is an aviation consultant who has held key technical manager positions at United Airlines, including process engineering, fleet technical services, manufacturing engineering and component re-manufacturing. He holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Trinity College and an M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Santa Clara. He is the author of The Airline Guide to PMA. You can reach him at: [email protected] What’s It All About? BY JOHN GOGLIA A nyone who knows me knows I have strong opinions and nothing makes me happier than a forum to express them. I am grateful to John Persinos, editor-in-chief of Aviation Maintenance magazine, for providing me this column to talk about the hot issues regarding PMA parts and how they affect aviation maintenance. Over my four decades in aviation — as an airline mechanic, union safety official, NTSB Board Member and, now as a safety and compliance consultant — replacement parts have been an ongoing issue for maintenance providers. After all, these individuals and organizations are the ones responsible for ensuring the airworthiness of the repairs made. And that means having confidence in the parts they are installing. Install a bad part and the potential moral and legal liabilities are enormous. But pay too much for a part and your competitive advantage may be destroyed. OEM parts are a known quantity but they come at a price, typically higher than PMA-produced parts. These are the anxieties many people in the industry have about using PMA parts. Production of PMA parts is already in the hundreds of millions of dollars and expected to grow. Since 1997, growth in the use of these parts has climbed steadily. The airlines have been big beneficiaries, estimated to have saved millions of dollars on repairs and overhauls through use of these parts. Even as PMA parts have rapidly gained acceptance across the aviation industry, concerns still remain. Are the parts safe enough to be used in aircraft I’m responsible for repairing or overhauling? Can I afford not to use PMA parts since they tend to be cheaper than OEM parts? Even small cost-savings can add up and spell the difference between economic survival and bankruptcy. What about leased aircraft? So many lessors demand OEM parts when an aircraft is returned. Do maintenance providers have any leverage or are they totally dependent on the airlines to drive change in the use of PMA parts? I have some thoughts on this that I will share in future columns. And what about the safety of these parts? I have no doubt that PMA parts can be just as safe as OEM parts. However, I have concerns that I will discuss in the ensuing months. Chief among them: How do we reassure ourselves that PMA parts are in fact produced in accordance with a quality system at least equal to the OEMs? With so much lingering fear of unapproved parts, PMA part producers face a skeptical audience. PMA part producers face a skeptical audience What’s more, the FAA and the industry have not done as good a job as necessary to spell out the requirements that need to be met prior to obtaining a PMA and the oversight that’s done to establish continuing compliance. This could go a long way towards establishing the general acceptance of PMA parts. Stay tuned for more on this. Any maintenance providers who enjoy the cost-benefits of PMA parts, and want to continue to use them instead of OEM parts, also have responsibilities. Recordkeeping needs to be meticulous. Yes, I know how hard that can be. But if we are not willing to be extra-diligent in tagging parts and providing all required documentation regarding these parts, we won’t be successful in overcoming the reluctance that exists in many aircraft lessors’ minds about the quality and reliability of PMA parts. Sometimes the hardest thing to overcome is perception. Even if the facts show otherwise, perceptions often rule the day. Until these parts are perceived to be as safe as those from an OEM, people will hesitate to use them and lessors will continue to disallow them in their aircraft. AM John Goglia is an independent air safety consultant. Previously, he served as a member of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). With more than 30 years experience in the aviation industry, he was the first NTSB Board Member to hold an FAA aircraft mechanic’s certificate. As an NTSB Board Member, Goglia participated in numerous air accident investigations. Prior to becoming a Board Member, Goglia held numerous positions in the airline industry. You can reach him at: [email protected] Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010 / January 2011 63 How “Lean” Manufacturing Benefits MRO By J.P. Lambiase M anufacturing waste breeds risk, and risk is unsustainable for any business. For sensitive industries such as aviation, however, that risk is even less acceptable. The defects, overproduction and outmoded nature intrinsic in conventional manufacturing come from a reliance on a large number of people and processes to complete singular tasks. Manufacturers working under such conditions face more Guest expenses, greater overhead and numerous Opinion Column non-value-added processes that impede progress. In the aviation market, these problems also spur safety concerns that can be solved through leaner engineering and production practices. It’s easy to overlook the “fat” in traditional manufacturing environments. These telltale signs, however, should indicate to any manufacturer that it’s time to slim down: unnecessary shipments unused equipment and tools time-consuming assemblies product inconsistencies or defects Lean manufacturing solves these problems and also enhances fit, function, safety, and quality in the manufacturing process — which in turn enhances those qualities in the MRO sector. Engineered electronic lean molded assemblies, tailored for aviation applications, provide a path for continuous improvement. Guaranteed fit Fit describes the physical geometry in which the component can be identified and used in the space required. Molded assemblies have repeatable consistency to their geometry, holding tolerances up to ±.005. They can encompass several terminal outputs, inputs, mounting capabilities and legible marking techniques that pass several ASTM requirements. The fit of these units is extremely reliable and is based on the highprecision molds created in the design process. These units improve the fit guarantee. 64 IMPROVED FUNCTION The function of the unit describes its performance capabilities. Due to the earlier stages of design, these multiplecomponent molded assemblies have electrically engineered wire routing to specific components pre-tested to fall within the specifications required to function. This eliminates the need for a second operation on the customer side and prevents incorrect installation. These units provide the same function every time and are delivered as one package rather than in difficult-to-assemble pieces. Increased safety These lean aviation components also provide an element of safety in their design. Molded assemblies offer a variety of compounds used to encapsulate the assembly based on temperature and environmental requirements. The compounds serve multiple purposes, adding dielectric strength and heat dissipation, as well. One solid block molded from the various compounds offered provides physical protection to the unit from handling and environmental corrosion protection. Benefits of “Block” Components Condensing multiple assembly components into one larger component can save a company time and money from the beginning of the design process to the end product. The bus bar is an example of a lean component used for countless applications. Its benefits rely on its quality, reproducibility, consistency and a relatively simple design, reducing the risk of human error, lowering inductance and increasing electrical efficiencies. Bus bars convert a complex mess of cables into a single robust assembly. Nearly any power distribution requirement can be satisfied with the use of a bus bar. Bus bars and integrated electronic assemblies are both considered “block” products. Block design in bus bars condenses multiple components into one solid object. This simplification prevents missing components, eliminates guesswork and speeds up the design-verification Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 process. Following the design phase, the block approach benefits nearly every other aspect of production by cutting costs and saving time. Nearly any department that touches manufacturing benefits from the move toward leaner production. In procurement, for example, lean manufacturing relying on block components means manufacturers arrange vendors for one individual assembly rather than for a long list. Orders can be placed for single items, leading to simplified communication and the elimination of multiple-part files. Similarly, the work is reduced in receiving, where manufacturers find that lean processes require customer source inspection of only a single unit, eliminating the need to visit multiple vendors to inspect individual components. The elimination of multiple vendors to create a single block component also reduces demands on accounts payable and leads to tighter inventory control. Clearly, if a block design were broken down into its individual components and assembled in-house, an additional number of individual components would have to be inventoried to compensate for expected manufacturing loss. Because it’s a one-block design, this eliminates the need to stock more internal components than might be used. Manufacturers eager to cut the fat adopt block design and see the results in improved safety, time-to-market, cost savings, resource allocation and increased innovation. By replacing cables and multiple, unassembled components, manufacturers gain a competitive advantage in every aspect of the industry. In a market such as aviation, in which safety and quality are paramount, block design and alternative component choices such as bus bars enable manufacturers to dramatically reduce risk. AM J.P. Lambiase is a design engineer for Custom Electronics, Inc. (CEI), an Oneonta, New York-based manufacturer of electronic products for military, commercial/industrial, renewable energy, aerospace and oil exploration markets. You can reach him at: [email protected]. Sales Director (International) Jina Lawrence +44 (0) 20 8669 0838 [email protected] MARKETPLACE Classified Sales Director (USA) Daniel Brindley + 1 414 967 4997 [email protected] Is old “Benny” still doing on-the-job training for your MANUFACTURING and Interested in advertising? Contact US REPAIR TECHNICIANS? Perhaps it’s time to contact Abaris Training for practical & professional hands-on composite training. ABARIS We pay Top Dollar for all scrap aircraft parts Stators, Blades, Nozzles, Gears etc… Call 713 471 3554 www.worldwidesources.org TRAINING 775-827-6568 ◊ www.abaris.com regarding the new aircraft, including engine selection, but did say deliveries are scheduled to beg Pratt Closes Connecticut Maintenance Facilities ® Suffering from the airline industry’s economic downturn, Pratt & Whitney announced in late Septe to close its engine-overhaul plant inSince Cheshire, Conn., in 2011 and shift its Connecticut Airfoil Serving Aviation 1988 Ultrasonic Penetrant (CARO) from East Hartford, Conn., beginning in mid 2010. Eddy Current Visual Radiography Auditing The work at the Cheshire facility—overhauling PW2000, PW4000 and F117 engines—will be tran Level III Service Procedures Yourinpremier employment offering Whitney facilities Columbus, Ga.,resource and to Eagle Services Asia, aMagnetic joint venture with SIA Engineer Particle 1,000’s industryTurbine employers Technologies, a jointwww.ndtecinc.com The CARO work will go oftokeyJapan venture between Pratt & Whitney a for the 1,000’s of fresh, qualified applicants best dealsmillion on used equipment Pratt & Whitney claims that the work transfer will save close to $54 annually. Powerful resources at an affordable price Ph: (305) 246-4442 Aviation Employment The move drew aExcellence harshinresponse from the International Association Machinists and Aerospac Fx: (305)of 246-4644 do the legwork, you in getHartford results to block the closings. has filed action atWe U.S. District Court The work transfer will elimi Email: [email protected] Contact us today! Connecticut. Some 3,700 Pratt & Whitney workers belong to14359 the Miramar union.Parkway, Pratt’sMiramar, final decision follow www.avjobs.com 303•683•2322 Florida 33027 days of negotiation between Pratt and union officials in late July. Search issues quickly and easily Read the magazine while on the go Ease of forwarding and printing articles Absolutely free Links directly to resources and advertisers Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 Designed specifi A cannot be found boards will be e Employers will c Y managers Post anonymou A the opportunity confidentiall W organized. Save sea 65 MARKETPLACE Tool CRib PPG Quick-Application Windshield Coating Kit Available for General Aviation Operators of general aviation aircraft can now temporarily restore windshield rain repellency in the field with the easy-touse hydrophobic coating kit by PPG Industries’ aerospace transparencies group. The Surface Seal Quick Application Hydrophobic Coating kit by PPG Aerospace can be used by general aviation aircraft operators who are not in a maintenance service location and do not have immediate access to Surface Seal coating application by a trained service professional. They can treat one glass windshield in a few minutes to restore or maintain water shedding for improved visibility without the need for wipers. “We developed the fast coating process to meet the quick turnaround time needs of airlines, and are making it available for general aviation,” said Arthur Scott, PPG Aerospace global director for general aviation transparencies. “More airframe manufacturers are specifying cockpit windows with Surface Seal coating by PPG. We want to support general aviation operators flying aircraft with windows having this proprietary coating by providing a convenient solution when they don’t have the opportunity for a standard application.” The Surface Seal coating quick-application kit contains ampoules of the proprietary hydrophobic coating liquid, paper drying towels, applicator pads and gloves. Coating application is simple, Scott said. “The glass is cleaned, the coating is wiped on, and you are ready to fly.” Surface Seal coating application with the quick kit affords the same rain-shedding benefits on glass as with factory or standard coating application, Scott said, but it requires reapplication sooner. Operators are advised to continue to use the original hydrophobic coating when possible and to order replacement transparencies with factory-applied Surface Seal coating for longer service life. “Extreme Simple Green” Precision Equipment Cleaner Now Available Davis Instruments Releases New V76 Sourcebook Simple Green has unveiled its “next generation” precision parts and materials cleaning product, the Extreme Simple Green Precision Equipment Cleaner, which offers noncorrosive cleaning performance, ready biodegradability, low toxicity and easy disposal all in one product. Extreme Simple Green Precision Equipment Cleaner’s advanced, non-corrosive formula removes brake dust, graphite, petroleum greases, coolants, transmission and radiator fluids, greasy soils, stubborn black streaks, tar and asphalt, metal working fluids, mud and clay, plant and animal oils, tree sap, bugs, bird droppings, and more. Extreme Simple Green gets its superior cleaning ability from a unique trio of ingredients. Two high performance surfactants and a new generation grease cutter/lifter combine to pull soil away from surfaces quickly and then keep it suspended so that it can be cleanly rinsed away. Extreme Simple Green’s speed of grease cutting and its high capacity to hold grease, oil and soils in solution during cleaning and rinsing are the keys to its excellent cleaning ability. Reach for the Davis Instruments’ new V76 Sourcebook for a comprehensive selection of test, measurement, control, and calibration equipment, including the latest technologies. Find industryleading products from Fluke, Extech, Tektronix, GE Sensing, and other top brands, in a variety of configurations. Davis Instruments is one of the world’s leading sources of test, measurement, control, and calibration instruments in such sectors as power and utilities, petrochemicals, and aerospace. Call 800-358-5525 or go to www.davis. com/8109 for more information. PPG Surface Seal Available for the King Air PPG now supplies King Air windshields to Hawker Beechcraft Corp. for installation into new aircraft and spares and rebuilds them for aftermarket sales to operators. Pictured: PPG Aerospace finisher Jerri Hopkins applies Surface Seal rain-repellent coating to the glass outboard panel of a Beechcraft King Air windshield at PPG’s Huntsville, Ala., plant. The hydrophobic coating enables windshields to shed water during wet conditions to afford visibility for pilots without the need for windshield wipers. 66 Aviation Maintenance | avmain-mag.com | December 2010/January 2011 Power Power is something that Chromalloy puts back in the hands of our customers. As the world’s leading independent provider of regulatory approved, gas-path coatings, repairs and replacement parts, we are a trusted alternative for our customers and healthy competition for the OEMs. It’s the power of choice—the power to reduce your costs and extend the life of your gas turbine engines—and it’s only from Chromalloy. Learn more at chromalloy.com/icon Power = Choice Coatings / Repairs / Parts UP THE ANTE ON YOUR AVANTI GET AVANTI II PERFORMANCE FROM YOUR AVANTI I FOR HALF THE UPGRADE PRICE Bring your PT6A-66 engines home for overhaul and opt for an upgrade to PT6A-66B configuration standard. Pick up savings starting from $90,000 to $170,000 USD per engine, plus an additional 120 SHP. Climb to FL390 up to 14 minutes quicker, and cruise up to 18 KTAS faster. For a limited time only. This program allows the purchase of the parts required as per SB 14409 at the P&WC list price less a discount of 50%, as well as substantial discounts for rework or exchange parts as required by the SB’s referenced in SB 14409 (ref. para. 1.B). These discounts represent a savings of $90,000.00 to $170,000.00 per engine, depending on the current engine configuration. P&WC reserves the right to modify or terminate this program at any point in time, at its sole discretion. Please refer to Service Information Letter PT6A-164. UP THE PERFORMANCE, THE ECONOMY AND THE VALUE OF YOUR AVANTI I AIRCRAFT. CONTACT YOUR P&WC OR DESIGNATED OVERHAUL FACILITY OR VISIT: WWW.PWC.CA/REPAIR-OVERHAUL
Similar documents
MRO-ing Commercial Aircraft
information technology expertise with knowledge and experience in the aviation maintenance sector. The integrated, intelligent aviation maintenance management software brings innovation and thought...
More information