RMS Audioworks RMS12
Transcription
RMS Audioworks RMS12
on test RMS Audioworks RMS12 Valve Microphone Paul White D escribed by US-based company RMS Audioworks as their flagship microphone, the RMS12 is a detailed recreation of the much-loved vintage AKG C12, which was discontinued in 1963. The RMS12 is powered by a ‘New Old Stock’ GE 6072 valve and, just like the original, it uses the AMI Tab Funkenwerk T14/1 transformer. The all-important CK12 capsule is hand built, with great attention to detail. Only the power supply has been brought up to date, to conform to modern regulations and to offer maximum flexibility in pattern selection, but even that has a solid retro look to it. Such a microphone is understandably costly, but then it is still cheaper than the modern AKG C12VR — which, although a good mic in its own right, doesn’t really sound like an original C12. As Audioworks undertake a lot of restoration work on vintage mics, including C12s, they should know a thing or two about how they’re put together and what they should sound like! Inside Story Employing the same simple tubular structure as the original, the RMS12 has a copper chassis and uses point-to-point wiring, modelled on RMS Audioworks RMS12 £3399 pros How close have this boutique company come to recreating the sound of a vintage AKG C12? the layout of the original C12 and incorporating premium-grade capacitors and resistors. It comes with a Gotham eight-pin cable fitted with custom connectors, all packaged in an aluminium case, along with the power supply. One end of the cable from the review model came hard-wired into a combined connector and swivel stand-mount, so if you use a conventional shockmount, I presume this will be left dangling beneath it. This seems an odd design choice, as, when the mic is mounted, the connector pins determine the orientation of the mic relative to the swivel mount — and, in the case of the review example, the two were misaligned so that when the swivel was pointing directly towards the performer, the mic capsule was pointing almost directly to one side. Polar-pattern selection is via a detented rotary control on the PSU, offering variable pattern control covering everything from omni, via multiple widths of cardioid to figure-of-eight, so it can replicate all nine patterns of the original C12. There’s a voltage-selection switch for US or European voltages, and a balanced three-pin XLR carries the output for connection to a mixer or recording interface. There’s no level control or filtering. • Comes very close to the sound of a new C12. • Beautifully engineered. • Hand built in the US. cons • Understandably expensive. • I still haven’t figured out that cable/mount alignment issue! summary Although there are several C12 clones vying for your cash, this one will take some beating for sound and attention to detail. 136 May 2013 / w w w . s o u n d o n s o u n d . c o m I set up the RMS12 alongside my own C12VR, and went through the usual range of spoken word and instrument tests, which all revealed the RMS12’s noticeably more open high end and a few dB more sensitivity. It also sounded adequately quiet, although the original C12 was nothing special in the noise department, with a self-noise of around 20dB. Other than on female voice, I’ve always felt that my C12VR sounds rather too soft at the top end (despite the official graph showing it to have a hint more presence lift than the RMS12), and the RMS12 came over as better balanced, to my ears, delivering a viable result on every sound source I tried it with. There’s a subtle airiness to the highs, but the mic manages to combine that with a rich low-end and mid-range. Hear For Yourself! We tested the RMS12 against AKG’s C12VR, their modern recreation of the original C12. To listen to the audio files, visit www.soundonsound.com/sos/may13/ articles/rms12-media.htm. According to the frequency-response plot, the RMS12 has two ‘presence’ bumps — one at around 5kHz and the other at around 12kHz — but these are fairly wide, and only three or four dB up at their highest points, which is about right for a C12. The lows, which look exceptionally flat below the start of the first presence hump, seem better controlled than on my C12VR, which I always end up using with a high-pass filter. The overall impression was of a classy-sounding mic capable of stealthy flattery, and with a subjective character very close to that of an original C12. Twelfth Might It’s clear that this mic has had a lot of dedication poured into its design, in a genuine quest to get as close to an original C12 as possible, and other than the rather puzzling stand-mount alignment issue on the review model, the RMS12 is beautifully engineered, using the best of everything and put together in a reassuringly old-school way. The C12 has many fans, which has resulted in a number of boutique emulations, but Audioworks Alternatives There are other boutique companies such as Pape, Telefunken, Peluso and Wunder Audio building very detailed clones of the C12, but they are all expensive. seem to have pulled out all the stops in trying to recreate it down to the finest detail. That said, however, all the original C12s have either aged or had their capsules re-skinned by now, so there will always be arguments as to exactly what the C12 sound should be! Whether you can justify this kind of money on a single microphone is another question, of course, with many very capable microphones on offer for around a tenth of the price. But if you have your heart set on a C12 and don’t want the uncertainty of nursing an original, you’d be missing out if you didn’t add the RMS12 to the list of clones to audition. ££ £3399 including VAT, plus shipping. EE [email protected] WW http://rmsaudioworks.co.uk w w w . s o u n d o n s o u n d . c o m / May 2013 137 Mix with the best! “Besides the excellent interviews and fascinating, in‑depth recording and mixing articles, I can always depend on Sound On Sound for complete, unbiased reviews of the latest pro‑audio gear. “ Bob Clearmountain, engineer, producer and mixer, Grammy Award winner (Bruce Springsteen, The Rolling Stones, Paul McCartney, INXS) “As a professional I admire Sound On Sound as one of the most trusted and credible sources of inspiration and information.” Jack Joseph Puig, mixer, producer, Grammy Award winner (Rolling Stones, U2, Mary J Blige, Black Eyed Peas) The World’s Best Recording Technology Magazine This article was originally published in Sound On Sound magazine, May 2013 edition follow us on Twitter find us on Facebook go to the SOS YouTube channel visit the SOS forum Subscribe and Save Money! Visit our subscriptions page at www.soundonsound.com/subscribe for more information on the Sound On Sound App go to: www.soundonsound.com/app Sound On Sound, Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0) 1954 789888 Fax: +44 (0) 1954 789895 All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved. The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.