Solceller i bebyggelsen
Transcription
Solceller i bebyggelsen
Internationellt seminarium: Solceller i bebyggelsen Malmö den 13 september 2006 Plats: Augustenborgs solenergicentrum i Malmö Tid: 9:00 – 16:00 Malmö Stad i samarbete med SolEl-programmet och det internationella solcellssamarbetet IEA PVPS bjuder in till ett heldagsseminarium om den internationella och nationella utvecklingen inom solceller i bebyggelsen. Solcellsbranschen växer mycket snabbt och seminariet kommer att fokusera på vad som driver marknaden och exempel på internationella intressanta projekt kommer att redovisas. Seminariet hålls på engelska. 09:00 – 09:30 Registrering 09:30 – 09:50 Peter Lindhqvist (Serviceförvaltningen Malmö Stad) hälsar välkomna och berättar om satsningarna på solel i Malmö. 09:50 – 10:10 Christy Herig (projektledare för solceller i bebyggelsen inom IEA PVPS, USA) presenterar det internationella samarbetsprojektet och stödformer i olika stater i USA. 10:10 – 10:40 Maria Hall (Energimyndigheten) presenterar det svenska investeringsstödet och visar exempel på projekt runt om i Sverige samt redovisar SolEl-programmets verksamhet 10:40 – 11:00 Fika 11:00 – 11:20 Bruno Gaiddon (Hespul, Frankrike) presenterar ”Solar Cities” – exempel på urban-scale BIPV i Europa. Bruno presenterar också olika bidragssystem i olika länder och vilken effekt det fått på tillbyggnaden. 11:20 – 11:50 Tjerk Reijenga (Bear Architecten, Nederländerna) ger arkitektens syn på byggnadsintegrerade solceller och visar upp bra exempel. 11:50 – 12:15 Keiichi Komoto (Mizuho Institute, Japan) presenterar storskaliga japanska byggnadsintegrerade solcellsprojekt i bebyggelse. 12:15 – 13:00 Lunch 13:00 – 13:30 Torsten Persson (arkitekt Malmö Stad Stadsfastigheter) redogör för Malmös satsningar ur ett arkitektoniskt perspektiv. 13:30 – 16:00 Guidad busstur till solel-projekt i Malmö samt till Västra Hamnen. Anmälan Tid: Onsdagen 13 september Plats: Augustenborgs solenergi och grönatakcenter, Ystadvägen 56 i Malmö Kostnad: 300 kr exkl. moms, kaffe och lunch ingår. Faktureras i efterskott. Anmälning: Senast 5 september till [email protected] eller fax till 040 – 12 36 94 Mer information: Kontakta Martin Nilsson 040 – 34 18 42 [email protected] Målgrupp: Seminariet utgör en möjlighet att träffa internationella experter inom området solceller i bebyggelsen och riktar sig mot dem som redan har grundläggande kunskaper om solceller. Den svenska insatsen i IEA PVPS finansieras av Energimyndigheten, mer info om programmet finns på www.iea-pvps.org. SolEl-programmet är finansierat av Energimyndigheten, elföretag, bygg/fastighetsintressenter samt tillverkande industri, mer info finns på www.elforsk.se/solel. Deltagarlista 060913 Dennis Aaro Hans Peter Thoegersen Karin Kappel Henrik Åström Monika Adsten Kennet Lindqvist Peder Vejsig Pedersen Keiko Kjellsson-Sampei Josephine Granell Johnny Kronwall Annick Stenman Göran Fajerson Håkan Skarrie Emil Persson Pontus Lundgren Kalle Demeter Leif Selhagen Christer Olsson Elisabeth Kjellsson Jan Lindell Tommy Nilsson Per Paulsson Peter Krohn Henrik Davidsson Lars Hansson Stig Larsson Dariusz Zlotnicki Cecilia Wedberg Johan Larsson Maria Hall Torsten Persson Gaia Solar A/S Schüco International Solar City Copenhagen Akademiskhus Elforsk Energirådgivare i Storfo Cenergia Energy Cons JETRO Stockholm Sharp Electronics Nord Malmö Högskola boReal development Project Consultant Ringsjö Energi AB Malmö Stad Exoheat Exoheat Naps Ericsson LTH Regionfastigheter Gmki Elkonsult Uppsala universitet Vattenfall AB LTH Energi bygg Bauer Nilssons Elektriska Blue Seven Malmö Stad Malmö Stad Energimyndgheten Malmö Stad Linus Palmblad Mats Andersson David Elzinga Reinhard Haas Tomoki Ehara Keiichi Komoto Shogo Nishikawa Tommy Kleiven Marcel Elswijk Henk Kaan Donna Munro Emil ter Horst Bruno Gaiddon Christy Herig Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 Task 10 IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Task 10 - Urban-Scale PV Applications & US Subsidy for BIPV Swedish Stakeholders Workshop Augustenborgs Solar Energy Centre Malmo, Sweden Sept. 13, 2006 Christy Herig Segue Energy Consulting, LLC [email protected] IEA Work Leading to Task 10 BIPV in IEA Perspective • IEA SHC Task 16 What is BIPV ? • IEA PVPS Task 7 How can we do BIPV ? • IEA PVPS Task 10 Let‘s do BIPV ! Stefan Nowak, IEA-PVPS Chairman, Feb 3, 2004, Vienna, AUT IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Task 10 - Urban Scale PV Applications Task 10 Countries Participating Australia Austria Canada Denmark France Italy Japan Korea Malaysia Netherlands PV-UPSCALE Norway Portugal Sweden Switzerland USA Overall objective The objective of IEA PVPS Task 10 is to enhance the opportunities for wide-scale, solutionoriented application of photovoltaic power electricity production in the urban environment as part of an integrated approach that maximizes building energy efficiency and solar thermal and photovoltaic usage. Value analysis, policy incentives, analysis tools as well as system design and integration that have proven successful in the IEA PVPS participating countries will be developed to the extent possible into a uniform international set of tools for the global market. IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Task 10-Workplan SUBTASK 1: ECONOMICS AND INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS 1.1 Value analysis 1.2 Barriers Resolution 1.3 Market Drivers 1.4 Market Roadmap SUBTASK 2: PLANNING, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 2.1 Integrating PV development and design practices 2.2 Urban Planning SUBTASK 3: TECHNICAL FACTORS 3.1 Building Industry/BIPV Products and Projects 3.2 Codes and Standards 3.3 Electricity Networks 3.4 Market Driven Approach 3.5 Certification Practices SUBTASK 4: TARGETED INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT INTERESTED PARTICIPANTS 4.1 Educational tools 4.2 Marketing Competition 4.3 Marketing approaches and consumer aides 4.4 Stakeholder Perceptions 4.5 Continuous communication/results Analysis and Research Results will have Multiple Products Targeted at Stakeholders • Building Sector: builders and developers, urban planners, architects, engineers, permit and code authorities; • End-Users: residential and commercial building owners; • Government: supporting, regulatory and housing agencies; • Finance and Insurance Sector: Banks, insurance companies, loan for houses; • PV Industry: system manufacturers, PV system supply chain, retail sector; • Electricity Sector: network and retail utilities; and • Education Sector. IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Economic Values and Institutional Factors Some examples Material Saving – Facade Values Category 1. Avoided primary energy (MWh) -Æ CO2 Saving (g/kWh) -Æ -Æ NOX Saving (g/kWh) SO2 Saving (g/kWh) -Æ (Water Saving (m³/kWh) -Æ 2. External Cost Saving (€/kWh)-Æ 3. Peak shaving €/kWp -Æ 4. Market value €/kWp -Æ 5. Other values (materials) Supply Security Environment Environment Environment Environment) Government/Society Utility Utility/PV generator -Æ Various AT AT AT AT AT DE DE DE ES ES ES ES JP JP JP NL NL NL NL NL Costs Range of PV System and Facade Materials (Stand 2004-2005) PV Metal Glass Stone Polished Stone PV Metal Natural stone PC curtain wall PV Black granite (ventilated) Grey granite (ventilated facade) Aluminum sandwich PV Metal Glass PV Metal Glass Stone Polished Stone 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 €/m² Note: Price of PV system is excluding installation costs! 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Some examples Material Saving – Roof Web-address SE NL Commen used mat. Roof mat (high price) JP PV NL Concrete roof (low price) NL SE Cost Range of PV System and Roof Materials (Stand 2004-2005) PV JP JP PV Metal roof DE DE Ceramic tile, flat shape Ceramic tile, curved shape DE ES PV ES ES PV Metal roof Roof material (common used) http://194.71.254.36/solcell/ AT PV AT AT Tile roof Commen used mat. Roof mat (high price) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 €/m² Note: Price of PV system is excluding installation costs! IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Energy Payback Time Report – The product One overall presentation (2 A4 pages) IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Technology Market Transition with……. …..BIPV Sustained Global “Solar” Market …..Solar Communities Governments set policy to …. -improve economic development -diversify fuel -reduce environmental impacts -increase Security …..Solar Developments Industry meets market demand thus reducing manufacturing costs through volume and efficiency, resulting in lower required incentives Consumers, businesses, industry participate if policy is set at a level to promote market © Prof. Kurokawa and Mr. Ozeki , TUAT IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME US Subsidies • Federal • State • Local Federal Tax Credit • Commercial 30% of the "tax credit basis" that a company has invested in “eligible property” that is “put into service” during 2006 and 2007. It is 10% of tax credit basis for property put into service in other years. • Residential – 30% max $2,000, 2006 & 2007 Cannot use two years Advantages to condos and coops • A tax credit is a dollar for dollar reduction of an entity’s Federal tax burden. A tax deduction is deducted from taxable income and therefore has a value equal to the tax rate times the deduction. IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME StateCorporate Tax Credits & Deductions State Public Benefit Funds for Renewables • Range from 10% 35%; $1,000 - $10M • Most are for several technologies – usually solar, wind, biomass • A few states use production-based credits • Most states allowing carryover of any unused credits • 3 states have declining credits over time Cumulative 1998 - 2012 $10 M $95 M $22 M $85 M $80 M MA: $383 M RI: $10 M CT: $338 M NJ: $279 M DE: $11 M $127 M $20 M $2,048 M $234 M 15 State Funds = $3.8B by 2012 Funded by Voluntary Contributions IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Net Metering Rules $111 M State Personal Tax Credits MT: $500 NY: 25% $3,750 RI: 5% MD: 15% $2,000 CA: 7.5% Net metering is available in 38 states + D.C. State-wide net metering for certain utility types Net metering offered by one or more individual utilities AZ: 25% $1,000 HI: 20 – 35% NC: 35% $10,500 Multi-Technology RE Fuel Vehicles IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME State PV Grants & Rebates Renewables Portfolio Standards ( $/W or % of costs) 25% $2 $4 MN: 1,125 MW wind by 2010 $4-5 $5-6 WI: 2.2% by 2011 $5 ME: 30% by 2000 MA: 4% by 2009 + 1% annual increase RI: 16% by 2020 $3.90/$2.25 SE-PA: $4/W+ $1/kWh for 1 yr. $3.20 CA: 20% by 2017 IA: 105 MW W *NV: 15% by 2013 PA: varies by utility *MD: 7.5% by 2019 W 50% $5.50 *AZ: 1.1% by 2007 *NM: 10% by 2011 W TX: 2,880 MW by 2009 HI: 20% by 2020 Utility PV Rebates CT: 10% by 2010 *NJ : 6.5% by 2008 W SWH eligible State RPS Non-punitive goals W *Minimum requirement and/or increased credit for solar RPS in utility settlements Source: North Carolina Solar Center, DSIRE IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Production Incentives for PV • Chelan PUD (WA) Up to $1.50/kWh • Mass Energy (MA): 6¢/kWh, 3 years • Bonneville Env’l Foundation • People’s Power & Light (RI): 6¢/kWh, 3 years 10¢/kWh, 5 years • Energy Cooperative (PA), 20¢/kWh, at least 2 years Aspen CORE 25¢/kWh, 4 years W • TVA Green Power Switch Generation Partners Program 15¢/kWh, 10-year minimum Mainstay Energy Rewards – National 2¢/kWh to 9.5¢/kWh, up to 10 yrs. Source: North Carolina Solar Center, DSIRE Solar Cities 1. San Diego 50 MW of solar/RE on public bldgs. by 2013 10% renewable energy use in public bldgs. Expedited permitting for new homes using 50% RE and commercial bldgs. using 15% RE 2. Austin Austin Energy RPS: 20% renewables by 2020 15 MW solar by 2007, 100 MW by 2020 $5/W residential/commercial PV rebate Source: North Carolina Solar Center, DSIRE program $0 Hawaii Ohio Indiana Location Nevada Wyoming Idaho Nebraska Virginia Alaska Arkansas $10,000 S. Dakota $8 Oklahoma $12,000 Washington Emissions Mitigation Value N. Dakota $14,000 Colorado Missouri West Virginia Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Florida Tennessee Alabama Utah Kansas District of Columbia Minnesota Texas Iowa Pennsylvania Wisconsin Kentucky Maryland PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME S. Carolina IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Georgia IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY New Hampshire PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Connecticut IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Vermont New Mexico Illinois Maine Delaware Rhode Island Oregon Arizona Montana $6 California BTC New Jersey $10 N. Carolina Residential Consumer Value Massachusetts $/kW PV Energy kWh/kW-yr New York Washington Idaho Montana Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Minnesota Nebraska Kentucky South Carolina Michigan Alaska Wyoming Alabama Mississippi Oklahoma Arkansas West Virginia Vermont Missouri Georgia Indiana Louisiana Texas Kansas Ohio Wisconsin Iowa Maine Delaware North Dakota Connecticut New Hampshire Nevada New Mexico Rhode Island Arizona Massachusetts Utah Florida Colorado Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland New Jersey California North Carolina Hawaii Illinois New York IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PV Demand/Capacity Effective Load Carrying Capacity 2 Break-Even Turnkey Cost ($/W) Breakeven Turnkey cost for commercial PV $12 $16,000 Environmental Value Emergency Value Replacement Value Solar Load Controller Demand Savings Energy Savings Federal Incentive $8,000 State/Other Incentive $4 $6,000 $2 $4,000 $2,000 $0 IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Solar Reliability Value Solar Reliability Value -the cause of the peak demand is also the resource -disaster mitigation/preparedness Power Outages L.I. Jul. 3-8 110,000 customers PV = 82% of ideal PV Availability as % of Ideal Output ? San Francisco June 14, 2000 100,000 customers PV = 99% of ideal NYC Jul. 6-7 68,000 customers PV = 93% of ideal N.J. Jul. 5-8 112,000 customers PV = 91% of ideal Entergy Serv. Jul. 23 550,000 customers PV = 90% of ideal Chicago Jul. 30 – Aug. 1 1,000,000 customers PV = 90% of ideal Delaware Jul. 6 138,000 customers PV = 91% of ideal IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Task 10 - Urban Scale PV Applications http://www.iea-pvps-task10.org US Policy - www.dsireusa.org How much revenue was lost on August 14th? $8 billion What amount of dispersed PV would have supported the grid? Initially 40-60 MW supporting cooling load, for the large outage, 500MW Global Outlook The Swedish PV programme – Market support and RTD • 5 GW installed PV capacity • Annual PV production of >1 GW • Annual market growth of 40 % Maria Hall • The 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition in Dresden had 2700 delegates and 400 exhibitors Programme Manager Photovoltaics • Japan and Germany are the largest module manufacturers Swedish Energy Agency • Germany, Japan and California are the largest PV markets [email protected] +46-(0)16-544 21 74 • While off-grid PV is cost-competitive in numerous applications, grid-connected PV still needs financial support www.energimyndigheten.se • National support programmes are the market drivers for PV • Feed-in tariffs causes a transition from stand-alone systems to grid-connected systems Swedish energy policy Swedish PV policy • The Swedish Energy Agency is the responsible governmental agency for energy issues (except nuclear) • Government support for PV has been devoted to research • Goals for the Swedish energy policy – Security of energy supply – An energy system with low environmental impact – Energy at reasonable prices for industry and households • No specific goal for the deployment of photovoltaics in Sweden • 17 TWh new renewable electricity during 2003–2016 • Economic incentives (taxes, RECs, investment subsidies, etc) and RTD to fulfill these goals • PV has been regarded as a business opportunity rather than a contributor to electricity production in Sweden • No specific market support for PV (until May 2005) • REC prices and fuel taxes are to low to have an impact on PV Research • PV RTD is part of the long-term energy research programme • Total budget of 90 million Euro per year for energy RTD • Approximately 2 million Euro for PV RTD (not fixed) PV in Sweden today Applications Industry • Four module manufactures (silicon modules) • A new spin-off company (Solibro AB) is developing a production process for thin film CIGS modules • No BOS manufacturers • Increasing number of PV consultants • A lot of new actors are entering the Swedish PV market due to the investment subsidy • Scandinavian Photovoltaic Industry Association (www.solcell.nu) • Installed PV capacity is 4–5 MW • <0.1 % of national electricity production (nuclear power and hydropower dominate) • Building-integrated PV is gaining market shares due to the new investment subsidy for PV on public buildings Photos: Energibanken • PV is mainly used in off-grid applications (lighthouses, telecom, recreational applications, etc) Market stimulation programme • Investment subsidy for PV on public buildings • Part of a broader support scheme for energy-efficiency and conversion to renewable energy in public buildings • 70% of the total cost for the PV installation (investment+labour) • 15 May 2005 – 31 Dec 2008 • 150 MSEK (approx. 16 MEUR) for PV installations • Also support (30%) for an energy assessment of the building • Expectations: – Double PV capacity in Sweden, from 4 MWp to 8 MWp – Create jobs in the building and PV sectors – Increase electricity production from renewables – Reduce CO2 emissions and dependency on fossil fuel Photo: Energibanken PV in Sweden today Results so far • The programme has run for 15 months • According to plan • Half of the budget (77 MSEK) has been used (August 2006) • The responsible authorities (the counties) have received 75 applications, of which 58 have been approved • Rather good spread across the country • Stockholm and Malmö hold the top positions with 26 and 12 approved projects, respectively • Malmö has fewer but larger projects • Stockholm has several rather small projects (PV on schools) Results so far – Approved amount per county Alléskolan, Hallsberg • High school renovation project • South, east and west façades • 289 glass/poly-Si/glass modules with aluminium frames from Schüco • >400 m2, 45 kWp • Cost: 3,5 MSEK • Architect: Staffan Nordlund, White • Installer: Flex Fasader (their first PV system) Photo: Energibanken Fjärås care centre Schools in Stockholm • Roof-mounted • Pre-study by Energibanken AB for PV on 13 kindergartens and schools in Älvsjö, Stockholm • 65 kWp – largest in Sweden when installed • Roof-mounted small standard systems of 2.5 kW modules, inverter, etc. • Annual production of about 45 000 kWh, which equals annual electricity consumption • 10 applications was approved • Net-metering (agreement with the utility company Fortum) • Owner: Skolfastigheter i Stockholm AB (owned by the municipality of Stockholm) • Owner: Eksta Bostads AB • Inaugurated by energy minister Mona Sahlin Photo: Energibanken Photo: Energibanken Ullevi soccer stadium, Göteborg Results so far – • Planned PV system on the VIP stand for high visibility • 84 kW, about 630 m2 • Pre-study by Switchpower, financed by the SolEl programme, Got Event, Higab and Göteborg & Co Impact on the PV innovation system “The sun is always shining on Ullevi” Source: ABAKO Arkitektkontor AB Breda, Holland The Linus Palmblad (M.Sc. thesis, Chalmers) has found that: • The investment subsidy has lead to a number of new PV projects • It has influenced the dynamics in the Swedish innovation system for PV in a number of positive ways • New actors have entered the Swedish PV market • Important changes are the creation of an industry association and that the regulatory framework (e.g. for grid-connection and metering) is questioned • Too early to make statements about the occurrence of self-reinforcing mechanisms • PV in Sweden needs continued market support The report is available on www.elforsk.se/solel Focus areas for SolEl programme An applied PV RTD programme SolEl aims at reducing the cost of PV systems in Sweden by • Increasing the knowledge in Sweden about PV • Develop, evaluate and demonstrate new PV applications • Increase the PV competence within academia and industry • Building-integrated PV • Demonstration of new and interesting PV applications • Grid-connection issues and standardisation • System aspects • Information and education • Technology and market assessments, conference reports • Evaluation and monitoring of PV systems Scholarships Photo: Carl Michael Johannesson • Attending EUPVSEC(2 scholars per year) • MSc thesis (2 scholars per year) Västra hamnen, Malmö, foto: Carl Michael Johannesson Annual call for proposal Financing institutions Exemples of SolEl BIPV projects Swedish Energy Agency Sharp NCC/Byggsektorns utvecklingsfond Stiftelsen för Arkitekturforskning Brostaden EkoSol AB Malmö Stad Stadsfastigheter Statens Fastighetsverk Utility companies: Vattenfall AB, E.ON AB, Göteborg Energi AB, Mälarenergi AB, Jämtkraft AB, Borlänge Energi AB, Falkenberg Energi • Web based BIPV tool, www.solcell.nu • Pre-studies for PV systems in Malmö • PV-thermal hybrid systems for building-integration • SolEl Roadshow • Assessment of the potential for PV on roofs in Sweden (10 TWh) More information about SolEl More information about Swedish PV RTD and market • www.elforsk.se/solel • Programme manager Monika Adsten ([email protected]) Breda, Holland. Foto:Carl Michael Johannesson • Annual seminars • IEA i Sverige, www.iea-sverige.org • Scandinavian Photovoltaic Industry Association, www.solcell.nu Breda, Holland. Foto:Carl Michael Johannesson • Maria Hall Programme Manager Photovoltaics Swedish Energy Agency [email protected] +46-(0)16-544 21 74 www.energimyndigheten.se • Newsletter twice per year Potential for photovoltaics in Sweden kWh/m2/yr Approximately the same annual solar irradiation as northern Germany and 50 % of the irradiation of the Sahara A 10 % efficient 1 kW PV system produces 1 MWh per year in Sweden and 2 MWh in the sun belt PV on 50 % of the island of Gotland can fulfill Swedens electricity demand PV on 5 % of the Sahara desert can fulfill global electricity demand Foreword Cumulated PV power end 2005 kWp 1 600 Vilken effekt det fått på tillbyggnaden 1 537 1 400 1 200 1 000 1 400 23 21 11 5 Sweden 33 United Kingdom 36 Austria 51 Luxembourg 58 France 0 Italy 200 Netherlands Bruno Gaiddon 600 Spain 13 September 2006 Malmö 800 Germany ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Exempel på urban-scale BIPV i Frankrike 2 Effect of the feed-in tariff Feed-in tariffs in Germany Annual market in Germany MWp Ê 45.7 c€/kWh for PV on free surfaces 700 3 500 400 300 Feed-in law 200 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 0 1994 100 000 roof program 100 1993 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE 600 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE New feedin law 4 Ê 54 c€/kWh for roof PV systems > 100 kW Ê 54.6 c€/kWh for roof PV systems between 30 and 100 kW Ê 57.4 c€/kWh for roof PV systems < 30 kW Ê 59 c€/kWh for PV façades > 100 kW Ê 59.6 c€/kWh for PV façades between 30 and 100 kW Ê 62.4 c€/kWh for PV façades < 30 kW French PV market New French feed-in tariff Annual market in France MWp Ê Officially published on the 26 July 2006 7 5 4 Net metering contract 3 2 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 0 1994 1 1993 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE 6 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Feed-in law 0,15 Euros/kWh 5 Ê and also 50% tax rebate plus reduced VAT rate for domestic owners PV systems in Lyon Ê Definition of eligible “BIPV systems”: – Roofs, tiles, slates industrially manufactured – Brise-soleil (shading elements) – Solar windows – Glazing structures (greenhouses) – Balconies – Façades ? Ê Tram service station – 80 kWp ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Ê Additional feed-in tariff of 0,25 Euros/kWh for “building integrated PV systems” Æ 0,55 Euros/kWh ! Ê 20 year purchase contract 6 New French feed-in tariff 7 Ê Base feed-in tariff : 0,3 Euros/kWh, an increase of 100% ! 8 PV systems in Lyon PV systems in Lyon ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Ê ZAC les Hauts de Feuilly – First French Solar PV Community – 19 x 1 kWp – 3 x 2 kWp ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Ê Solar car park – 150 kWp 9 10 PV systems in Lyon Energy Conservation in Buildings in Lyon ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Ê La Darnaise – Venissieux – Large Urban Renewal – 12 buildings with 4 to 12 kWp 11 12 Ê RESTART project (EU funded) – Design of construction of energy efficient social homes Ê Local innovative policy – Developers must design energy efficient residential building if local community involved in the project – Objectives : primary energy consumption for heating < 60 kWh/m²/year – 40% above the national thermal regulation The Lyon-Confluence project The Lyon-Confluence project Perrache Hôtel de Ville Confluent Rhône / Saône 150 ha 13 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE “A combination of the Grand-Lyon experience in Energy Conservation in Buildings and Renewable Energy Systems in a extraordinary site” 14 15 Ê 3 sections of Estate Ê 75 000 m² of useful floor Ê 15 European developers in competition Ê An integrated guideline : – 60 kWh/m²/year for the heating – 80% of RES on heating and DHW needs – 50% of RES on electricity for common spaces Awarded teams ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Lyon-Confluence First residential project 16 Ê Section of Estate “A” – Developer : Nexity Apolonia – Main architect : T. Conko Ê Section of Estate “B” – Developer : Marignan Bowfonds – Main architect : M. Fuksas ÊSection of Estate “C” – Developer : ING Real Estate – Main architect : W. Maas RES to be implemented ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Ê Wood chip boilers – 3 x 500 MW Ê Solar thermal systems – 1 250 m² Ê PV systems – 250 kWp 17 18 19 Regional Council Portzamparc ?? kWp Thank you for your attention Confluence Museum COOP HiMMELBLAU 200 kWp ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE Other buildings with PV 20 ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ET EFFICACITE ENERGETIQUE HESPUL 21 114, boulevard du 11 novembre F-69100 Villeurbanne Tel : +33 4 37 47 80 90 Fax : +33 4 37 47 80 99 [email protected] www.hespul.org Photovoltaics in an Architectural Context Henk Kaan 13 September 2006 Bringing PV to the client Use PV in a”neutral”way Bringing PV to the client PV can “Upgrade” the building Bringing PV to the client PV can strengthen the image of the occupier Architectural criteria for good PV integration: Architectural criteria for good PV integration: Natural integration of the PV system Architectural criteria for good PV integration: Architectural criteria for good PV integration: The PV system is architecturally pleasing The PV system is architecturally pleasing Architectural criteria for good PV integration: Architectural criteria for good PV integration: The PV system is architecturally pleasing Good composition of colours and materials Architectural criteria for good PV integration: Architectural criteria for good PV integration: The PV system matches the context of the building (Contextuality) The system, and its integration, are well-engineered Architectural criteria for good PV integration: The system, and its integration, are well-engineered Architectural criteria for good PV integration: The application of PV has lead to innovative designs Incorporation of PV in the building design: Incorporation of PV in the building design: Incorporation of PV in the building design: - PV is applied invisible - PV is added to the design Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system adds to the architectural image Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system determines the architectural image Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system determines the architectural image Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system leads to new architectural concepts Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system leads to new architectural concepts Architects who apply PV in well-thought-out way can make their clients happy and thereby contribute to a greater acceptance of PV!! Incorporation of PV in the building design: The PV system leads to new architectural concepts Residential PV system installation in Japan - Example of PV community - Trends in residential PV system installation in Japan Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10 13 September, 2006 Malmö, Sweden Keiichi KOMOTO (Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc., Japan) Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden Cumulative PV installation in Japan K. Komoto (MHIR) 2 Shipments of PV cells/modules 1,422 Cumulative installed PV power (MW) Grid-connected centralised 1,400 Grid-connected distributed Off-grid non-domestic 1,200 1,132 Off-grid domestic 1,000 860 800 637 600 452 19 24 31 43 60 600 500 400 350 300 Others 200 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Calendar year i 2̀001 j ^ Fiscal year i 2002 ` Ref: JPEA (Japan Photovoltaic Energy Association) 133 91 Domestic shipments 700 1999 209 200 800 0 330 400 Export Import 900 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Calendar year Annual domestic shipments of PV cell/module (MW/year) PV cells/modules shipments in Japan (MW/year 1,000 1,600 300 Public & industry Residential 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Fiscal year Ref: IEA/PVPS, Trends in Photovoltaic Applications K. Komoto (MHIR) 3 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 4 Residential PV system installation by national subsidy program (1) Residential PV system installation by national subsidy program (2) Cumulative installation Annual installation 300,000 60,000 Cumulative installed PV power Installed PV power 250,000 Installed PV power (MW/year) 800 250 Cumulative number of residentials 700 200,000 600 150,000 500 400 100,000 300 200 Number of residentials Cumulative installed PV power (MW 900 50,000 200 Number of residentials 40,000 150 30,000 100 20,000 50 50,000 Number of residentials (/year) 1,000 10,000 100 0 0 0 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Fiscal year Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 5 Residential PV system installation by national subsidy program (3) Capacity of system Type of installation 4-5 kW 3-4 kW 40,000 -1 kW 20,000 10,000 0 Annual installed No. of residentials (/year) 60,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Others 50,000 Fiscal year Existing house: roof-mounted Existing house: roof-integrated 40,000 6 1,200 2-3 kW 1-2 kW 30,000 K. Komoto (MHIR) Averaged price of PV systems 5 kW50,000 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden Residential PV system installation by national subsidy program (4) 60,000 Annual installed No. of residential (/year) Annual installation Fiscal year Ref: NEF New house: roof-mounted New house: roof-integrated 30,000 Price of and payment for PV system (JPY/kW) Ref: NEF (New Energy Foundation) 1062 1074 User's payment 939 1,000 844 758 800 710 690 675 661 2002 2003 2004 2005 600 400 200 0 20,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 10,000 2001 Fiscal year 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Installation Ref: NEF Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden BOS PV module Ref: NEF Fiscal year K. Komoto (MHIR) 7 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 8 Residential PV system installation Annual installed PV power Annual installed PV power for residentials (MW/year) 300 Shipment for residential 250 Areal installation of residential PV systems Installation by subsidy program (Example of PV community in residential area) 200 150 100 50 0 1999 2000 2001 Ref: NEF & JPEA 2002 2003 2004 2005 Fiscal year Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 9 Definition of PV Community Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden Name Further deployment of conventional installation of residential PV systems Plus Areal installation of PV systems to residential area Definition of PV community Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden Copyright: MSK Corporation K. Komoto (MHIR) 10 Examples of PV Community in Japan Option for the future Area where a significant number of dwellings are equipped with PV systems K. Komoto (MHIR) 11 Location No. of houses Total PV Power 101 kW 108 kW + 15 kW Tiara Court Kasukabe Villa Garten Shin-Matsudo Kasukabe, Saitama Matsudo, Chiba Tamanodai Cosmo-Town Kiyomino Cherry-Town Izumi-Chuo Jo-Town Kanokodai Laperta Tahi Cherry-Town Izumi-Sunagawa Solche Katsuyama-Kita Sekisui Harmonate-town Shin-kamagaya Sekisui Harmonate-town Tsurunoura Panahome-city Seishin-Minami Jo-Town Rinkuu-Hawaiian-Village Hills-Garden Kiyota Pal-Town Jyosai-no-mori Kasugai, Aichi Yoshikawa, Saitama Izumi, Osaka Kobe, Hyogo Takamatsu, kagawa Sennan, Osaka Osaka Kamagaya, Chiba 35 36 +5 40 79 30 95 49 43 (planned) 16 29 Kurashiki, Okayama 32 (planned) Kobe, Hyogo Tajiri, Osaka Sapporo, Hokkaido Ota, Gunma 100 258 (planned) 500 (planned) 533 237 kW 90 kW 285 kW 100 kW 129 kW (planned) 48 kW Start of Operation Dec. 1998 Jan. 1999 + 2002 Sep. 1999 Aug. 2001 Jan. 2002 Sep. 2002 Sep. 2003 Apr. 2004 Aug. 2004 2004 - 2005 2006- 296 kW 516 kW (planned) 1 500 kW (planned) 2 160 kW Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden 2005 - 2006 (2003-) 2006 K. Komoto (MHIR) 12 Outline of some PV communities Outline of some PV communities Tiara Court Kasukabe Location: Kasukabe, Saitama No. of houses: 35 Total PV power: 101 kW (2,9 kW/house) Start of operation: Dec. 1998 Villa Garten Shin-Matsudo Location: Matsudo, Chiba No. of houses: 41 (=36+5) Total PV power: 123 kW (2,9-3,1 kW/house) Start of operation: 36: Jan, 1999 +5: 2002 Copyright: POLUS Group Copyright: POLUS Group Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 13 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) Outline of some PV communities Outline of some PV communities Tamanodai Location: kasugai, Aichi No. of houses: 40 (all-electric houses) Total PV power: ?? Start of operation: Sep. 1999 Cosmo-Town Kiyomino Location: Yoshikawa, Saitama No. of houses: 79 Total PV power: 237 kW (3 kW/house) Start of operation: Aug. 2001 Source: NEDO website (http://www.nedo.go.jp) Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 14 Copyright: MSK Corporation 15 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 16 Outline of some PV communities Outline of some PV communities Jo-Town Kanokodai Location: Kobe, Hyogo No. of houses: 95 Total PV power: 285 kW (3 kW/house) Copyright: MSK Corporation Start of operation: Sep. 2002 Jo-Town Rinkuu-Hawaiian-Village Location: Tajiri, Osaka (under construction) No. of houses: 258 (planned) Total PV power: 512 kW (planned) Kansai Int’l Airport Osaka Rinkuu-Hawaiian-Village Copyright: MSK Corporation Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 17 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) Outline of some PV communities Outline of some PV communities Panahome-city Seishin-Minami Location: Kobe, Hyogo No. of houses: 100 Total PV power: 296 kW (3 kW/house) Copyright: MSK Corporation Start of operation: 2005 Pal-Town Jyosai-no-mori Location: Ota, Gunma No. of houses: 553 Total PV power: 2,16 MW NEDO’s R&D project (FY2002-2007) Copyright: Kyocera Corporation Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden 18 Copyright: Kyocera Corporation K. Komoto (MHIR) 19 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 20 Outline of some PV communities Nagoya-city public houses: Hazama-so (rental houses) Location: Nagoya, Aichi No. of buildings: 8 Total PV power: 200 kW (11-30 kW/building) Multi dwelling houses equipped with PV PV systems supply electricity for intercommunity. Start of operation: 2000 Copyright: Mitsubishi Electric Co. Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 21 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) Outline of some PV communities Outline of some PV communities Ikuji public-house (rental houses) Location: Kurobe, Toyama No. of houses supplied PV electricity: 12 Advance-21 Kifune Location: Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi No. of houses supplied PV electricity: 16 Total number of houses: 24 22 Total number of houses: 32 Total PV power: 32 kW Start of operation: 1998 Total PV power: 48 kW (3kW/house) plus 3 kW for intercommunity (Total 51 kW) Start of operation: 2001 Copyright: YKK Corporation Copyright: Harakosan Co. Ltd. Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 23 Copyright: Harakosan Co. Ltd. Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 24 Outline of some PV communities New-Gaia (all-electrified rental houses) Location: Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka No. of houses: 43 Concluding remarks All houses are supplied PV electricity Total PV power: 64,5 kW (1,5 kW/house) plus 1.6 kW for intercommunity (Total 66 kW) Start of operation: 2005 Copyright: Shibaura Tokki (Shibaura-Group) Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 25 Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 26 Concluding remarks National subsidy program for residential PV system by METI was terminated. Subsidy programs by METI will be moving to for public & industry buildings. Some local governments have their programs for residential PV system in the regions. Areal installation is a promising option for further deploying PV systems in urban-area. Programs for developing ‘environmentalfriendly urban-area’ are expected for deploying urban-scale PV installation. Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 27 Thank you for your attention ! Stakeholders Workshop - IEA PVPS Task10, Malmö, Sweden K. Komoto (MHIR) 28 Malmö, facade Malmö, window shades Malmö, demo Malmö, presentation of operation Malmö PV Power systems Facade: 3,5kWp DC & 3kWp AC Window shades: 6,5kWp DC & 5kWp AC Demo: 0,96kWp DC & 1,1kWp AC Solar center of Augustenborg 100 m2 PV 11 kW Student Union Building 180 m2 PV, 25 kW. Solar shading system Museum of Technology 515 m2 64 kW The biggest PV system in Sweden Sege Park Architect: Torsten Persson, Stadsfastigheter 2 systems of total 1 100 m2 Will be installed next year Mellanhed school 250 m2 PV as solar shading Will be installed later this year Augustenborg 400 m2, connected to the central heating system Solar thermal collectors Place Size Augustenborg 420 m2 Bunkeflostrand 27 m2 Stensjön 50 m2 Helenholm 1100 m2 Totalt 1600 m2 Ready June 2005 Oct 2005 Dec 2005 Sep 2006 PV Augustenborg Tekniska museet Kårhuset Mellanhedsskolan MINC Sege Park Totalt Mars 2005 Sept 2006 Sept 2006 Dec 2006 Dec 2006 May 2007 100 m2 515 m2 180 m2 250 m2 50 m2 1100 m2 2200 m2 Western Harbor in Malmö