Living Documents
Transcription
Living Documents
EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 1 Living Documents DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Finding Defenders for a Tropical Fortress People and Conservation in Ecuador's Sangay National Park • ' E c u a d o r ' s b e s t - m a n ag e d n a t i o n a l p a r k ' • A w a t e rs h e d o f p a r a m o i m p o r t a n c e • Tu r n i n g ch a i n s aw s i n t o p l o u g h s h a r e s • Losing game • ' We h a d n o t h i n g bu t o u r a xe s a n d m a ch e t e s ' From heights more wuthering than you would expect so close to the Equator, down to steamy lowlands, Sangay National Park covers the eastern side of the Ecuadorian Andes and the western extreme of the Amazon basin. 'A wilderness in its truest sense', the Lonely Planet guidebook says.To keep it that way, Fundacion Natura,WWF’s associate organisation in Ecuador, is seeking alliances with highland peasants and lowlanders - settlers and Indians - just outside the park. But what will happen, some day soon, when a fine new road crosses the area? EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 2 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio A fair chance for conservation Few countries have a higher number of endemic species than Ecuador. 5,400 metres high; its eastern limit is tropical, at a height of around 800 metres above sea-level. Sangay is a special park. It is not just conservationists who say so - conservationists, after all, are tempted to call any area ‘special’ that they can lay their hands on. Here is what an unbiased source, the well-known Lonely Planet guidebook to Ecuador, says about Sangay: it is ‘one of the most remote and inaccessible areas in Ecuador’, which ‘provides an incredible variety of terrain’. Some of ‘its terrain is so steep, rugged and wet (over 400 cm of annual rainfall in some eastern areas) that it remains a wilderness in the truest sense’. These ‘thickly vegetated slopes east of the mountains are the haunt of very rarely seen mammals such as Andean spectacled bears, mountain tapirs, pumas, ocelots, jaguarunis and porcupines.’ (The guidebook is not up-to-date regarding the park’s size, which it puts at just a quarter of a million hectares.) Sangay is also special because, protected as it is by mountains, rivers and dense forests, it is a natural fortress of sorts. Therefore, it is under no immediate threat, or no immediate severe threat anyway. Limited numbers of people regularly enter it and even fewer live inside its boundaries. This means conservation has a fairer chance than in many other places. Fundación Natura, WWF’s Ecuadorian associate organisation, is trying to seize on that chance. The following stories report on their attempt. ▲ ts number of species not found anywhere else in the world is 26 in mammals, 37 in birds, 106 in reptiles and 138 in amphibians. For that reason, as well as for its general abundance of animal and plant species, this modest-sized republic - bigger than Britain, but smaller than Italy - ranks among the countries of socalled ‘megadiversity’. A disproportionate share of this is concentrated in two regions: the famous Galápagos islands, which will not be dealt with here, and the eastern rainforest region. The latter is under threat: at 200,000 hectares a year, deforestation is fast-paced. This is caused partly by agricultural development, which extends the cultivated area by 3 per cent a year - the second highest rate in South America. Logging and oildrilling do the rest. Part of Ecuador’s natural riches has been granted a certain degree of official protection. Again, Galápagos are the best known example, but also on the mainland, an increasing number of national parks and other forms of protection have been established. At the moment, they number twenty-four, covering some 20 percent of the national territory. One of these is Sangay National Park, an area of just over half a million hectares situated on the eastern flank of the Andes mountains. Its highest point is the volcano of the same name, which is over I Mountain tapir WWF-CANON/JUAN PRATGINESTOS FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 2 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK WWF-CANON/KEVIN SCHAFER EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 3 ‘This is Ecuador’s bestmanaged national park’ Atillo valley is cold and barren. People keep themselves warm by wearing several layers of clothes. Their small houses are thatched with bundles of long straw all the way down to the ground, a form of insulation which makes them look like heads with wigs. While biologists disagree whether this was a wooded area in the past, it is as good as treeless nowadays. And cropless, since the frequent frosts will not even let potatoes grow, not to mention cereals or fruits. Welcome to one of WWF’s tropical rainforest conservation projects. get the sort of budget it takes for proper park management. Therefore, local allies have to be found.’ He speaks while we are winding our way towards a group of people that Natura hopes will become such allies: the community of Atillo, in the easternmost part of the Andes mountains. When we enter the valley, the windscreen of our vehicle seems to turn into a television screen. An impressively wide, brownish green landscape unfolds, bounded on both sides by mountains that are higher than their gentle slopes suggest and overarched by a blue sky with some large very white clouds. The smooth emptiness of the hill-sides is only occasionally interrupted by herds of seemingly tiny cattle, accompanied by colourful speckles on horseback. The comfortable warmth and pleasant music in the car add to the sensation of being a mere spectator, admiring a recorded scene. When we reach the group of villagers that have been waiting for us, the spell is broken by car doors swinging open and letting in the cold. The company here is little political support in Ecuador for conservation’, says Jorge Rivas. He is in charge at the Riobamba office of Fundación Natura, a Quitobased foundation that is associated with WWF International. ‘Inefan, the government agency responsible for forestry and natural areas, does not ‘T FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 3 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 4 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio BUREAU M & O inside, into the narrow passage where two occasional vets, bending astride over the agitated animals, give them a jab in the neck. Some recalcitrant bulls have to be lassoed - vaguely unsettling to see Indians cast for that part - and tugged into the passage. The strongest of them manage to drag their owners into the opposite direction, which earns them roars of laughter. While the men do this rough job, a group of women shoos and waves back animals that try to escape through the gate. Only one or two women bring a small herd of their own for vaccination. When all the animals near the corral have had their injection and the owners have paid their dues to Olmedo (since an amazing number of Atilleños have Chacha as their family name, only first names will be used from here on), several villagers vie with each other to offer their horses to the vaccinators. That settled, the company sets off for the next herd. Debating the vaccination campaign that welcomes us with numerous hand-shakes looks worried. An untypically tall man with a deep voice called Olmedo Chacha, the treasurer of the local cattle-raisers’ association, explains why. ‘We know you asked us to collect all the cattle near the corral, so you could make a quick job of vaccinating them’, he says. ‘But we think some of them have caught foot-and-mouth disease already. So we thought, we had better keep the herds separate, to stop them infecting each other.’ Rivas and his colleague Óscar Yepes agree. The question now is how to vaccinate some eight hundred animals spread over a wide area, with only two vaccination sets available. (Earlier on, the community claimed they only had some two hundred. One of the aims of Natura’s vaccination campaign is to find out the real number.) They decide first to do the few dozen heads that have been brought down to the agreed venue and then let two of the Natura team move from one herd to the next, starting from the highest part of the valley. The cattle are driven into the corral and, once Fiercely guarding their independence What is all this to do with protected area management? Obviously, there must be some connection with Sangay, a national park and Unesco World Natural Heritage Site, a bit further east. But how does preventing foot-and-mouth disease in Atillo help Sangay’s main endangered species, the tapir and the spectacled bear, neither of which can get infected? The answer lies in the fine new road that passes through Atillo. While he drives up the valley, Rivas says, ‘When it’s ready, it will connect Guamote, west of here, to Macas, in the Oriente. There’s thirteen kilometres missing at the moment and construction has recently been suspended for lack of funds. But I think we should expect it to be finished within a few years. There have been plans to build it since early this century. Some pioneers then settled along the old colonial bridle trail, expecting the road to follow soon. But for a long time, nothing came of it. Still, when Sangay National Park was proclaimed in 1976, the planners took care not to touch the trail. Then, in 1990, the government started building the road after all. Unfortunately, it has been designed in such a way that it runs a bit north of the old trail in some places. As a result, some eight kilometres of it actually do cross a tip of the park after all. We are getting there in a little while.’ But first, we get to a barrier across the road. Upon Rivas’s hooting, a young soldier comes running out to open it. Then, we pass two small lakes, one of which has a bump-shaped island all covered in forest, like a camouflaged helmet. Soon after, we cross the pass, and at once Atillo’s grim beauty is left behind. It feels like getting off a long-distance flight: suddenly, the sun is shining, the air is pleasantly warm and the valley we look down on is as lush and deep-green as any tropical forest. BUREAU M & O Atillo valley FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 4 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 5 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Sangay National Park Seen from the air, Sangay National Park resembles nothing so much as a huge green slide. From the Andes mountain range in the west to the Amazon basin in the east, it plunges from over 5,000 metres above sea-level to just 800. The average temperature range traces the same curve, from refrigerator to greenhouse values. The wide variety of natural conditions makes for a stunning diversity of plant and animal species. In the whole of eastern Ecuador, 1,662 different orchids have been described at altitudes between 300 and 3,000 metres, a good number of which are thought to occur in Sangay. An estimated 500 bird species live in this area, as well as several endangered mammal species, including the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) and the Andean spectacled bear (Tremarctus ornatus). The Sangay National Park also plays a crucial role in watershed conservation. Theoretically, the park could provide most of Ecuador with clean drinking water, while the hydropower plant on the Río Paute is already one of the country’s main sources of electricity. Politically, the park extends across five provinces: Chimborazo, Tungurahua, Cañar and Azuay in the west and Morona Santiago in the east. Within the park, there are hardly any human settlements, with the exception of a small colonisation zone in the south. Just west of the park, population pressure has traditionally been high. This area is inhabited by Quechua (or Quichua) Indians, most of whom are peasants. Until the 1960s, population density in the Amazon basin was extremely low. Outside a small number of old colonial towns, the inhabitants belonged to several indigenous ethnic groups, such as the Shuar. In recent decades, colonisation from the west has brought in mestizos and Quechua Indians, resulting in a certain degree of modernisation which extends even to Shuar communities. BUREAU M & O The eight kilometres of road that cut through the park are not the main problem, Rivas continues. In 1992, the Ecuadorian government extended the park southwards. This may sound like good news for conservationists, but it was a dubious gain: while the park’s size nearly doubled, problems and controversies multiplied. All of a sudden, forty kilometres of the road were within its boundaries. Local communities had not previously been informed, much less had they had a say in the matter. They reacted furiously. The people of Playas, the persevering heirs to the pioneers that settled the area Landscape between Atillo and Sangay NP FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 5 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 6 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio BUREAU M & O Park guard and Playas resident Gonzalo Llerena an elderly, wiry man sporting a martial white moustache, who declares he will ‘defend Sangay like a lion, till the bitter end’ - has experienced just that in the flesh. ‘I’ve been treated with hostility there many times. And on two occasions, they were really out to get me. What I remember most was the time when I crossed Atillo on my motorcycle and I was stopped by a crowd on the road. They meant to keep me there, as a hostage I guess. But my bike saved me. I had put her into first, so she wouldn’t stop moving. They hadn’t a clue what to do about it. After a while they got sort of fed up with the situation and returned her to me. They just told me to go to hell.’ Admittedly, as a clash, it didn’t amount to much. In two other villages around Sangay, Alao and Nueve de Octubre, disgruntled peasants succeeded in kidnapping Inefan officials, high officials even. They were both beaten up and one of them was nearly killed by drowning. But Llerena’s adventures do show how tense the relationship between Atillo and Inefan is. Or was, rather. To Álvarez’s mind, everything in the park is lovely nowadays. ‘We really co-operate well now, Atillo and us.’ He and Llerena pass through the community waving and greeting. And the wooden lodge along the road inside the park, which is the operating base for Llerena and some other guards, has been built with Atillo’s consent; they wouldn’t have let them a few years ago. All of which has come about thanks to two changes. One: an agreement signed in 1995, in which Inefan guarantees that private property along the new road will be respected. The road and its southern fringe will be converted into a buffer zone, as will the densely populated patch in the south. ‘And of course, we’ll keep to our word’, Álvarez assures. ‘If not, I will have to move abroad!’ The agreement, incidentally, was signed after a meeting of all parties involved, attended by hundreds of exasperated villagers. ‘That put a lot of pressure on Inefan’, Rivas says. ‘Not a very good negotiating strategy.’ But he in anticipation of the road, suddenly found themselves back in the midst of a protected area, with all the constraints on exploitation that that entails. In the southernmost part, the park now comprised a densely settled patch of limited natural value - why the planners should have wished to include it was anybody’s guess. In two villages, whose communal areas had remained outside the new limits, people feared that some of their private land might have been swallowed up by the park. By the time the confusion was cleared - the state did not even properly inform its citizens after the deed - their fears proved well-founded. One of these villages was Atillo. People must have remembered the fate of those pioneers in Sangay’s Palora valley, years ago, who had been allotted plots by the state land reform and colonisation agency, Ierac, and who were waiting for their official titles. Then, from one day to the next, they were told their new land belonged to a protected natural area. They were forced to leave without compensation. As it happens, Atillo is unlike many other rural communities in the Ecuadorian Andes. Before the land reform of the 1970s, most of the mountain peasants led miserable lives as socalled huasipungueros (‘wasseepoongayros’), nearserfs bound to an hacienda. Not so the people of Atillo, who led difficult lives as independent herdsmen. They have a long tradition of jealously and fiercely guarding their independence. Predictably enough, being deprived of land that was legally theirs did not go down well with them. A clash with the national parks authority, Inefan, was a mere matter of time. ‘But it wasn’t just us they fought’, emphasises Inefan’s Vicente Álvarez, a middle-aged man of winning manners who is in charge of the western half of Sangay. ‘Atillo would not let anyone enter the community. No state agency, no scientists, not even the Catholic Church.’ FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS BUREAU M & O Road in construction through the Park Park guard and Playas resident Gonzalo Llerena • 6 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 7 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio WWF-CANON/KEVIN SCHAFER management and the local communities have a common interest there: keeping the settlers out. Atillo does not have the right to do that, but no-one can enter the park from the west without their noticing. Inefan, on the other hand, which is entitled to summon and even force people to leave, doesn’t have the numbers of personnel to keep a sufficiently close watch on the park. (Much to Álvarez’s frustration. ‘In Quito, the government employs advisers to advisers and pays them two or three thousand dollars a month’, he complains. ‘But in 1993, our guards, who earn just over a hundred dollars, were offered a premium to quit. We were left with only sixteen of them, out of over thirty. This was a year after the Ministry doubled the protected area’s size!’ If the local population is at the mercy of government whims, they may find comfort in not being the only ones.) So Atillo and Inefan could mean a lot to each other, if only Atillo could be persuaded that they may stand to gain, not lose, by co-operating. But for persuasion, a minimum of trust is required. And the 1995 agreement may have laid to rest the community’s most tormenting fears, it takes more for trust to be built. This is where today’s vaccination campaign comes in, as well as other support activities. With foot-andmouth disease raging in nearby provinces, anyone helping Atillo to save their cattle will be welcomed. ‘We are donating it to the cattle-raisers’ association’, Rivas explains. ‘They sell it to their members. The revenue goes into a fund from which they can finance in advance the cost of a new round of vaccination when some other epidemic looms.’ Still, Natura usually stresses the point that giving gifts is not the name of their game. Cattle grazing on cleared land that was once cloud forest, Cosanga Valley too thinks that the agreement should be observed. Two: the participatory approach to conservation that has been proclaimed official Inefan policy in Sangay. It must be the origin of Álvarez’s pet phrase, ‘the decisive role of the community’. But the participation thing does not seem to sit easily with him. However genial his way of dealing with people, he also perceives a ‘need for control measures’ in settled parts of the park. He has, after all, been working in Sangay right from the start in 1976, and until recently, this was a conventional gazette-andguard conservation effort. Not for Natura to mock it either - it has been supporting Inefan since 1989, most of the time through a debt-for-nature swap scheme. Only under the current project, local people’s rights and demands are being considered more seriously, the better to protect nature - remember Rivas’s words that the park ‘needs allies’. The Atilleños potentially make most useful allies. The new road is bound to attract settlers, who will grab land, cut trees and hunt for game. So the park FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS Making it illegal So let’s assume Inefan, Atillo and neighbouring local communities will succeed in keeping new-comers from settling, logging and hunting. Next problem: who will keep these communities from damaging the park themselves? Surely, one of the aims of the project’s support activities is to make Atillo’s economy both more productive and more sustainable, alleviating the community’s poverty without impoverishing their natural resources. But at the same time, thanks to the road, it will be more tempting than ever to enter the forest and take its products to market. In the bufferzone, it would not even be illegal. ‘Well, that depends’, Álvarez says. ‘We may make it illegal.’And he proceeds to explain the subtleties of Ecuadorian forestry legislation. It amounts to a general ban on felling trees unless two legal requirements have been met: a land management plan, approved by the National Agricultural • 7 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 8 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio A watershed of paramo importance Few of the communities on Sangay’s western side rely as exclusively on cattle-raising as Atillo does. Growing potatoes and cereals are at least as important in valleys such as Alao and Guargallá. Their major problem is low agricultural production. Therefore, Natura, together with other organisations, offers advice on how to boost productivity as an alternative to opening up ever more marginal fields, ever higher up the mountains. Keeping the best rather than the puniest potatoes for next season’s planting, planting bushes to protect fields from wind and frost and constructing so-called ‘slow-formation terraces’ are among the suggestions. Moreover, Natura has organised trips to peasant communities elsewhere in the Andes where certain productive innovations have been successful. ‘Seeing that something works in practice convinces them much more than any agronomist’s explanation’, Natura official Óscar Yepes says.‘At the same time, it helps to build trust between us and them.’ As in Atillo, the question is, what’s it to do with the forest? Nothing, this time. But part of Sangay National Park is made up of a different ecosystem, called paramo. Though high, cold and seemingly poor in biodiversity, this is a unique habitat, threatened in many parts of the Andes, but relatively safe in Sangay. Relatively, because the cattle of Alao en Guargallá might be, or become, a problem for the paramo. That, again, depends on the way the cattle-raisers manage the paramo. Experts have strong reason to think that with better management, their herds can increase without serious damage to the ecosystem. But to persuade the herdsmen to change their ways, especially to quit their counterproductive habit of burning patches of land to stimulate regrowth, will take a lot of patience and trust. Interestingly, the Riobamba power company has decided to finance some small projects in Alao quite similar to Natura’s activities. Healthy paramo has an extremely high water-absorbing capacity. If the Alao paramo were to fall victim to overgrazing and degradation, the important hydroelectric plant situated further downstream in the same valley, might grind to a halt in a few years’ time. But even if the worst comes to the worst, Sangay National Park need not be given up as a bad job. It has two important assets which have always come to its rescue: size and roughness of terrain. ‘Of its total surface area, which is over half a million hectares, three quarters to 80 per cent are perfectly safe’, says Álvarez. ‘In spite of the road, in spite of the settled bits in the South. I even think, as far as the original, northern half of the park is concerned, humans have never set foot on 90 per cent of it. In the sixties, an aeroplane crashed a bit further east. The approximate location was known, but the wreckage wasn’t found until fifteen years later.’ ‘This park is a model’, agrees Günther Reck, a teacher in natural resource management at one of Ecuador’s leading universities, who happens to pass with a group of students. ‘Even the road does not affect more than 20,000 hectares, I think. Unesco has classified Sangay as a World Natural Heritage Site at Risk. Rubbish, I call that. It will just lead journalists in their usual ignorance to write alarmist stories about ‘a park on the brink of disaster’. Or some journalists anyway. ‘Actually, this is the bestmanaged national park of all Ecuador.’ Development Institute (Inda) and a permit issued by Inefan. ‘In the corridor along the road, we will try to co-ordinate with Inda in such a way that rational, sustainable exploitation is ensured’, Álvarez announces. What he fails to mention is that the Inefan that issues logging permits is not the green-at-heart national parks branch, but the hard-nosed moneymaking forestry department, which has a solid tradition of laissez faire. Convincing his forestry counterparts to step up inspections will be as strenuous a job as talking Inda into requiring management plans based on a modicum of respect for nature. There is a hopeful sign, though: the current government, which has reasonable environmental credentials, has appointed a conservationist as Inefan’s executive director, rather than a forester as tradition would have it. Alvarez has also placed some hope in the military. Ecuador’s armed forces have been looking for new roles since the country’s 1998 peace treaty with its archenemy, Peru. Protecting national parks is one of the new tasks they have found themselves. In recent years, an increasing number of tourists have been robbed in these natural areas. More relevant to Sangay, which has attracted few tourists so far, is the generals’ intention of cracking down on illegal logging. The military post we passed before was built for a different reason, but may come in handy. What remains to be seen is whether the forces’ rank and file will decide to inspect and enforce or prefer to track down and cash in. FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS A sudden downpour Atillo valley looks less hospitable than ever when we get back. The sky has become overcast and the wind has risen. We have just passed the two lakes, when we are stopped by a small group of ill-tempered men, • 8 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 9 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Florencio, Atillo’s president among them. In bitter and barely polite words, they complain they have been waiting all day for the vaccinators. Rivas and Yepes promise we’ll go down, pick them up and bring them. It takes a while to find them in the vastness of the hill-sides. Most of the all-male company - the two vaccinators, treasurer Olmedo with his note-book in one hand and a bottle of liquor in the other, and several herdsmen, some on horseback, others on bright-coloured mountain bikes - are in high spirits, with the work being nearly done and the bottle nearly empty. Rivas tells them they have forgotten the herds at the top of the valley, which leads to some confused bickering as to who is to blame. When the company finally reaches the men they forgot earlier today, the bickering flares up again and turns into a more heated argument between Olmedo and Florencio. ‘Come on, there’s work to be done, let’s get it over with’, Yepes tries to make himself heard, but only when the vaccinators pick up their tools and set off for the pasture do the owners of the cattle grudgingly follow them. When they return, emotions seem to have settled into shape. The treasurer brings out another bottle from heaven knows what hidden pocket. Other men do likewise and in no time at all, cups of liquor are handed about at a good rate. The drink sets the men’s tongues wagging. All of a sudden, the Natura team, the visiting reporter included, find themselves bombarded with questions. ‘Excuse me, señor’ - the speaker, named Eulogio and more than a little drunk, spits the word out ‘allow me to ask you, is it true that this land across the hill that we have bought, this land that we have scrimped and saved for in our poverty, for you have seen for yourself that we have very, very little here, just a few cattle, no fields, nothing - no, don’t you interrupt me’, he snaps to a younger man, ‘ I want to tell this ingeniero something he may not know yet.’ Meanwhile, a sudden downpour forces us to stand close together so as to be all sheltered by the eaves of Florencio’s house. Turning to the supposed ingeniero again, Eulogio continues, ‘Is it true, and do you think it’s fair, that the park will deprive us of our hard-won pieces of land? Pardon me saying so, mister’ - he makes it sound even worse than señor - ‘I should think that the land that we’ve paid for, that is ours by rights, as we can demonstrate with official titles, that it is up to us what we shall do with such land. Not up to Inefan, not up to Natura, not up to the armed forces, but up to us!’And without waiting for an answer, he turns away. After the manner of oldfashioned literature, a roll of thunder underlines the last words of his tirade. The young man, Estuardo, seizes on the FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS opportunity to take the floor. While frequent flashes of lightning render the whole scene somewhat surreal, his worries are real enough. ‘Why are we no longer allowed to gather firewood from our own land across the hill?’ ‘As far as I know, you are’, the reporter answers truthfully. ‘If that’s so, then why do the soldiers at the checkpoint stop us from bringing the wood home?’ Of all the guys here, the reporter’s interviewer has to be sober. Time to call for reinforcement. Yepes turns up. ‘The soldiers shouldn’t do that’, he says. ‘They have no right to. As long as the wood or timber you bring is for your own use, that’s allowed. If you want to market it, that’s different. I will have a word with the commander at the check-point to sort this out.’ ‘But you see’, Estuardo resumes, ‘sometimes we have somebody ill, or there is some other family calamity. That means we need money. More money than the little we have. So we go out, cut a tree and take the timber to market. Not to destroy the forest, but to cure the ill person. Surely the park can’t forbid that.’ ‘You’re right’, Yepes says. ‘And the park doesn’t forbid that. That’s in the agreement we signed a couple of years ago, remember? All you have to do is make a management plan for your land, have it approved by Inefan and then ask a permit to cut some trees.’ Estuardo asks no more, but his thoughts are easy to read. Asking for favours ‘We’re leaving’, Rivas announces. Another round of drinks, some more chatting. ‘Let’s go’, Yepes says, and he starts moving towards the vehicle. The whole company moves along, offering cups, insisting they be emptied. After ten minutes or so, the Natura team are all seated, together with some villagers who will be taken back home. The windows are opened to discuss some last arrangements. Still, we can’t leave: several men, all drunk now, lean on the open window, their crossed arms inside the car, and start to ask for favours. They want to keep the vaccination sets. ‘The sets aren’t ours’, Rivas explains. They want a vet to come and see whether their cattle may have some other disease. ‘I’ll see what I can do’, Yepes promises. If necessary, they want another vaccination campaign. ‘Yeah, if necessary.’ Rivas makes the engine roar every now and again, but the small crowd around the car are not impressed. They hand in another cup of liquor, ask for yet other favours. Rivas inches the car forwards. Yepes inches the windows ▲ up. Finally, the crowd splits. We’re off. • 9 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK WWF-CANON/KEVIN SCHAFER EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 10 Turning chainsaws into ploughshares Colonisation has cut a wide swathe through the forest between Puyo and Macas. All along the metalled road between the two Ecuadorean Amazon cities, pasture dominates the landscape. Cattle chew their cud in the shade of low trees and bushes. On both sides, only in the distance is there a hint of closed forest. Dirt tracks fork off, apparently to nowhere at all, but wooden signposts in roughly painted lettering suggest otherwise: Juan Pablo, Séptima Cooperativa, Sinaí. FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS he forest east of the road stretches all the way to the Peruvian border and from there down to Brazil. Not without its threats and disturbances, for sure, but still part of the world’s largest surviving chunk of tropical rainforest. Not so the thin green line on the hazy western horizon. In the past thirty years, this area has become something of an ‘island ecosystem’. Bordered by the densely inhabited Andes mountains on one side, the Puyo-Macas strip on the other and main roads on the narrow far ends, it will in biological terms have to T • 10 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 11 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio manner of exploitation that was misguided: illinformed and self-defeating. Like most tropical rainforests, this was a rich ecosystem sustained by a poor soil. In the course of dozens or maybe hundreds of generations, the indigenous inhabitants, such as the Shuar, had found out how to cope with this paradox. The development planners however, unaware or heedless of it, brought in from the Andes large numbers of settlers and advised them to clear the forest. The national development bank - which had money to burn, thanks to Ecuador’s newly-won oil wealth - through much of the 1970s and 1980s easily gave credit for the purchase of cattle. But then, two things happened, one dramatically, the other creepingly. One: interest rates went up. Many borrowers defaulted, went bust, sold their land and left to try their fortune in Macas, the United States or Spain. Two: pastures gradually degraded, so that ever fewer cattle could be sustained by one hectare. More land had to be opened up to maintain the size of the herds, more yet to increase them. Farming too, while less important here than cattle-raising, continuously needed fresh soil. And after cattle-raising had lost much of its appeal, logging became an important cash-cow. As a result, the Puyo-Macas corridor became wider and wider, even though the stream of new settlers had dried up. On its western side, the deforested land has moved very close to the national park, touching it in some places. The Shuar, meanwhile, after discovering there was no way of keeping the settlers out, had to change their lifestyle, because of shrinking land and forest resources. Their traditional form of agriculture, in which a mixture of crops and trees was grown in small plots, has largely given way to standard modern practice. They have also adopted cattleraising. They have clung to hunting though, albeit to a lesser extent than in the old days - for lack of time. Not a very glitzy job To a conservationist’s mind, Sangay’s east side is a promising place to work. The people living here do not really want to enter the forest (except for the Shuar hunters). They find it too far from the road, too far from the market, especially for timber. They would prefer to make a living around their homes, growing some crops, tending their cattle. If only they knew how. Which is exactly what Fundación Natura, WWF’s associate organisation in Ecuador, is trying to find out. Development for the sake of conservation, some may conclude, with a frown or without. But they would only be half right. It is also conservation for the sake of development: if Sangay cannot be saved fend for itself. Another road, which is nearing its completion, cuts it in two bits of roughly equal size. The name of the area is Sangay National Park. The Puyo-Macas strip, which has been opened up since the mid-sixties, is the result of a classical misguided development effort. Not necessarily misguided because a natural area was sacrificed. Ecuador needed land for its growing population, so it made sense to turn to the eastern one third of its territory, whose population was very small - mainly a number of scattered indigenous tribes. It was the FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 11 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 12 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Losing game Hunting and fishing used to be part and parcel of the Shuar life-style. Though this must have affected the forest fauna somewhat when they started these practices upon their arrival, several thousand years ago, their numbers were too small to threaten the ecosystem seriously. Moreover, they developed certain patterns, such as not fishing with barbasco poison in certain seasons, which further reduced the impact of their exploitation. None of this could hold after the settlers arrived from the late 1960s on. Though they never really took to hunting, they did destroy much of the natural habitat. The wildlife population dwindled accordingly. At the same time, the Shuar became cattle-raisers and spent more time on agriculture, so that on balance hunting and fishing grew less important. It is significant that Pedro Tiwi, the síndico or chosen leader of the community of Saar-Entsa, says that his father knew how to hunt for deer, tapir, armadillos, pacas and all sorts of birds, but he himself - in his thirties now - has never learnt it from him, ‘neither with a blowpipe and poisoned arrows, not with a shotgun’. Others have, and continue the practice. Mostly for the family table, but in some cases the bush-meat will be taken to the market in Macas. Reducing the hunting and fishing pressure is among the Sangay project’s objectives.Tapir and maybe some other mammals could be bred in captivity or semi-captivity. Fish-ponds are an obvious option. But while the settlers may seize on these opportunities, the Shuar are less likely to.‘The urge to hunt is not just rooted in a need for protein, but in their very culture’, Natura’s Robert Samaniego says. On the other hand, Shuar culture is far from static - they are probably among the best of South America’s indigenous groups that have achieved a balance between tradition and adaptation. And of course, they are well aware that there is much less game than before.‘I have heard several of them say, ‘We should make sure that wildlife can recover’’, Natura’s Martha Núñez says hopefully. how to introduce home-gardening, how to improve guinea pig breeding and how to get a better price for products. Development organisations have long known how hard it all is. So how does a conservation-minded group such as Natura go about it? There is a real enough risk of repeating the mistakes that development organisations have made in the past: speaking to and working for rather than with people, always knowing better, making too optimistic cost-benefit analyses, assuming everybody to have the same interests, regardless of age, sex and income, paying people for their participation - the list of potential errors is endless. In one respect, Natura is lucky. In areas where development organisations have repeatedly blundered, the intended ‘beneficiaries’ have grown suspicious and weary of interference. On the other hand, in much of the Oriente and certainly in this part, people are relatively keen on any assistance and advice they can get, especially from private groups. For as a man in Sexta Cooperativa put it, ‘We don’t matter to the government.’ from degradation and eventual deforestation, the whole surrounding region’s resource-base (water, soil fertility, game, even its mild climate) will go to waste. Therefore, this project, is financed by the Dutch government - not by its conservation department, but from development co-operation funds. Finding out how poor villagers in a remote area can make a more comfortable living is not an easy task. If it were easy, they would not be so poor. Nor is it a very glitzy job. It comes down to patiently discussing and considering all the crucial trivialities about questions such as whether and BUREAU M & O Woodworms ‘This is turnip, these are gherkins, that’s radish.’ Robert Samaniego’s forefinger points from one bed to the next. ‘I suppose you know cabbage, over there. Then we have soya beans and frijoles. And do you grow groundnuts in Europe?’ (No, we don’t.) A lot of work must have gone into this vegetable garden. It is fairly large at 200 square metres, protected against poultry by a good fence and Sexta Cooperativa FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 12 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK WWF-CANON/KEVIN SCHAFER EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 13 Squatters could settle along the new road through Sangay NP put everything else into the back seat. A number of families still grow some vegetables, but few of the youth do. When this garden was first suggested, five families participated. We’re at thirteen now. And you can see it’s well-kept.’ ‘Of course it is’, contributes Juan Tigre, one of the villagers. ‘We want a good harvest. It’s a nonsense to buy vegetables at the going price if you can grow them for yourself.’ What else has Natura done here? ‘The garden has been the main thing so far’, Tigre replies. ‘But they have also looked into this matter of how to fertilise the soil and the possibilities of planting trees on our private land. And they have given some advice related to cattle and pasture. The park? I don’t think it’s anything to do with the park. But they do say we had better exploit natural areas with some moderation. We should log with moderation. They give us suggestions on how to log better. No, we perfectly tidy. Quite something for a communal enterprise. Samaniego, an agronomist on the Natura team for the eastern half of Sangay, gives advice, pulls out a weed or two, demonstrates how to set seeds along with a handful of guinea pig manure and shows his guest around. In the meantime, the group of men and women working the garden grows from three to about a dozen. This is Sexta Cooperativa, a village - only formally a co-operative - of twenty families between Sangay National Park and the Puyo-Macas road. ‘They are mostly cattle-raisers’, says Samaniego. ‘They also grow some crops, but not in a big way some plantains, sugar cane, yucca, camote, a little bit of coffee, too. But unfortunately, they have sort of given up home-gardening. They used to do that back where they came from, in the sierra, but down here the development bank insisted on cattle so much it FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 13 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 14 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio settler folks don’t go fishing or hunting, that’s for the Shuar. We are real woodworms, we are!’ Research in the forest The Natura team are served lunch in the community centre, a one-room wooden building on the village square-cum-football pitch. ‘We don’t have an elaborate plan for this community, or for any other’, Samaniego says when we are alone. ‘We have a general idea, of course. We would like to introduce agroforestry systems. But what those systems should look like depends on what each community wants and what the natural conditions are like in different places. And we will consider entirely different things, too. We assume that the people we work with are capable of telling us what they need and want. We will then see if their ideas are likely to improve their incomes or their diet, and if it’s sustainable.’ After lunch, a group of about twenty gather in the community centre. Some of the women are busy keeping their children quiet; others are dozing. Most of the men listen attentively to the Natura people. Samaniego explains, as he has done during previous visits, what his organisation can offer them: agroforestry systems, improved pasture management and other things the village may come up with. ‘You know how desperate things are in [the nearby village of] Sinaí. The soil has impoverished so badly that people are leaving. As we have told you before, that’s what happens when all of the forest disappears and is replaced by pasture. On the coast and in the mountains, it’s not like that. But the soil in the Oriente is fragile. It needs better care. Let’s hope we can stop Sexta from going Sinaí’s way.’ Most of the company nod or mutter words of approval. Samaniego continues, ‘Another reason we are here is for the protected area, Sangay. Eighteen members of this co-operative are the owners of Selva Alegre, also known as Ambusha, which borders on Sangay. That’s your property, and it’s up to you what you do with it. But we would like to talk about the way it had best be exploited. Maybe we can make a deal about that.’ Samaniego’s colleague Ángel Chiundia, a forester, takes over. ‘With your help and permission, we would like to do some research in Ambusha forest. Not to stop you from doing what you see fit, but to see what valuable products it contains. Because there’s more to a forest than just timber. You can pick fruits, medicinal plants and a load of other things. Long-term resources. And if you harvest the timber in a well-planned, cautious way, it will benefit not just you, but also your children and grandchildren. As long as the forest is there, the rivers will not dry up, the cattle will stay healthier, the climate will not turn hotter. You’ll remember, when you first came FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS here, the temperature was usually some 22 tot 26 degrees centigrade. Now, 30 degrees is common. That’s because in those days, there was more forest left. Now, what do you think?’ ‘Well, let’s discuss it’, one villager says hesitantly. Upon which everyone remains silent for a while. ‘We would like to breed trout’, another man finally says. Samaniego is quick to respond. ‘Well, trout need water that’s cool and rich in oxygen. But we could try and find out for you whether other fish might be more suitable for this area.’ ‘Can we have both trees and pasture at the same time?’ another one asks. Chiundia explains how it all depends on the tree species whether they survive outside the forest, where the soil is drier, poorer and more compact. ‘Yeah, I’ve noticed’, somebody observes. ‘Some trees die right away when there’s no more forest around them. But the laurel survives for some nine years.’ The discussion gets going now. Some would like to master the technique of grafting, which is needed for fruits such as avocado and tomate de árbol [sweet ‘tree tomato’]. ‘That is quite difficult’, Samaniego warns. ‘I have done it before’, somebody remarks, ‘though I wouldn’t describe myself as an expert.’ • 14 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 15 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Landslides along the Guamote / Macas Road elbow-on-the-car discussion with him and some other men. When he hops back in, he says, ‘Yep, we’ll pay them a visit next week. See what we can do here. They seem quite eager.’ WWF-CANON/KEVIN SCHAFER Boycott the middlemen Next day. The rain is pouring down, but the Natura team stay dry on the veranda of Luz Suscal’s wooden house in Quinta Cooperativa. Time for a laid-back chat about how things are going. ‘I was kicked by a horse the other day’, Suscal says, and she shows an impressive black spot on her upper arm. ‘Ay, Dios mío’, says Martha Núñez, an anthropologist who is in charge of the eastern part of Natura’s Sangay project. ‘Were you hauling timber when it happened?’ ‘No, I wasn’t. My husband, Hugo, does that. But you’re right in that there’s always that risk. One day the horses will kick you, the next day, they will bolt. It’s a hard job, hauling timber is. And the most infuriating thing about it is the pittance we get for it from the gran señor who comes to buy it. While he doesn’t as much as dirty his shoes.’ ‘You sell too cheap.’ ‘I know. We know we get cheated all the time. But every week, the children need money for this or that at school. Where else do I find the cash?’ ‘In [the northern province of] Esmeraldas, they have set up a network of communities to take a stand against the middlemen’, Núñez says. ‘We know a lawyer there that we could ask to come to Macas. We could have a meeting of all the communities in this area and let him explain how they did it in Esmeraldas.’ ‘If you boycott the middlemen for a couple of months, they’ll get the message’, Chiundia adds in. ‘If we find an alternative source of income, you can afford not to sell for a while’, Núñez agrees. That’s how it went in Esmeraldas. The middlemen had to choose: either pay up or be forced out of business. We should calculate some time soon what would be a fair price here.’ ‘And when a plank is not quite perfectly sawed, they halve the price’, Suscal resumes her complaints. ‘It’s hardly worth all the trouble. We have to hire a chainsaw, buy fuel, hire horses. And when we cut trees on somebody else’s land, they get half the price. I’d rather just keep hens. That’s way less trouble.’ Not all that much less, though, it turns out. Some weeks ago, Suscal and eleven other women bought a hundred chicks, which are kept in a coop behind her house. They decided to do this after an extension ‘Come to think of it, I have seen people do it in a couple of places’, Samaniego says. ‘Both men and women. And fast, too.’ To which he adds, ‘You see, we would really like to know what you already know and do, and then improve on it. If it can be improved any further, that is. ‘There’s yet another thing you might be interested in’, Chiundia says. ‘It’s called agroforestry modules. Invented in Brazil, where it was very successful in the Amazon region. It’s a mixture of different crops on a small plot of about twenty by twenty. They grow on different levels, from short-cycle crops down on the ground up to trees. Costs are low and production is good. We have a German in Riobamba who knows all about it. We could bring him here.’ ‘That would be great’, the answer comes. Before we take our leave, Samaniego and Chiundia bring out a dozen or so little bags with vegetable seeds, some of them in quaint bright colours - pink, blue, purple. The tiny seeds are poured into large, callous hands, from where they go into makeshift packagings - pieces of torn-up plastic bags, matchboxes, curled-up leaves - which are handled with much care. On our way back to the main road, Samaniego calls on the president of a Shuar community along the track. He has a short FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 15 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 16 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio ‘At first, we had nothing but our axes and machetes’ Settlers in the Amazon usually get a bad press, especially in the industrialised world. Not without reason: colonisation is among the main causes of deforestation, hence of biodiversity loss. But that is only one side of the story. Here is their side. was the third man to settle down here in Sexta. No, I didn’t come straight from Azuay. I had been in other places for a bit, west from here. But I didn’t like any of them all that well, so I packed my things yet again - a ten-kilo bundle was all I carried with me - and walked for nine hours, until I hit on this spot. We were really wandering from one place to the next in those days. And wherever we liked it, we would settle down. Depending on what the soil looked like, but also depending a lot on mere chance: what the weather happened to be like that day, whether the river happened to be high or low, whatever. Since I settled down here in Sexta, I’ve seen many others come and go, looking for a good place to live, just like I once did. And some stayed, of course. Back in the sierra, there was simply no land for us. No irrigation water, either. New land had to be opened up. Which couldn’t be done there. There was none left. I remember that around 1970, you would hear this radio commercial all the time: ‘El Oriente es tu destino’ (the Oriente is your destination/destiny). It said you could move straight into a house in a street, all for free. That was a lie. But we only found that out when we got here. What they did give us, though, was food. During the first two years, CREA [the official colonisation agency] and the Peace Corps provided foodstuffs in exchange for us building roads, bridges and cableways. In those days, it was all pure jungle here, pura montaña. At first, we had nothing but our axes and machetes. With those, we built our first huts. In (the nearby community of) Sinaí we bought some sowing seed. That’s how we began farming. In 1973, just after establishing the co-operative, we were attacked by the Shuar. It was such a frightening experience that some settlers fled back to the sierra. Apparently, the Shuar believed we would grab their land and carry off their women. Maybe that was because we were only men at the time, all about 25 years old. We didn’t make our wives and children come over until two or three years later. At least we could offer them something by then: a little house, running water, even electric power. For suffering on your own is bad enough, but to see your family suffer, that’s different altogether. In the beginning, the Development Bank said, ‘You have to sow elephant grass, just clear the jungle’. We didn’t know better. We didn’t even sell the timber. The trees were just left to rot, the finest woods, everything. That’s how we created the pastures. But they went bad in no time at all. The trouble is, the soil here needs a whole different sort of management than we were used to. In many places, there is just ten centimetres of topsoil. When you remove the vegetation, it washes away instantly. In the sierra, people have grown their crops on the same fields for centuries and the soil is still fertile. Plants can root deeper there, which stops the soil from being washed or blown away. And the fields have more stones, which fertilise the soil. Didn’t you know that? I’ll tell you a story to prove it. There was this rich man in the sierra who hired a group of labourers to clear a field of all the stones they would find. ‘Just throw them into the river’, he said. But next year, instead of yielding a rich harvest as he had expected, the maize came up poorer than normally. And the year after that, it would only grow knee-high. So he regretted what he had done, and he hired the labourers again. ‘Get the stones back out of the river and spread them over the field’, he told them, and so they did. The following year, the harvest was better again. But it would never be like it used to. ▲ FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS BUREAU M & O ‘I The above statements were made during a group interview with three men in Sexta Cooperativa: Segundo Chinchilima, Juan Tigre and Segundo Yunga. • 16 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 17 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio BUREAU M & O ‘Anyway, most of the chickens have remained in good health’, Suscal says. ‘Only ten have died. But we have another problem now: we have run dead out of compound feed, and out of money to buy it. That’s because three señoras have pulled out of our group. They could no longer afford it, they claimed. I’ve told them, it’s an investment, you stand to make a profit. But they wouldn’t continue, so we’ve had to return their deposit. And now we can’t buy the three bags of feed for the chickens to reach their full weight.’ Núñez looks thoughtful. ‘We’ll see what we can do. Maybe we can help with you the feed when we return to Macas this afternoon. But are you sure this whole thing is profitable at all?’ Upon which the whole company tackles a complex sum, adding costs for purchase of the animals, feed, vaccinations, vitamins and fuel for lighting, estimating the amount of time needed for feeding, killing and plucking, multiplying this by a fictitious hourly wage, predicting the mortality rate, the weight of the survivors and their market price, and subtracting the full cost from the sales price. ‘Yes, you’ll make a good profit’, Núñez finally concludes. ‘Some 200,000 sucres (US$30) for each of you, not counting the payment for hours worked. And that’s on the basis of a moderate market price. If you can get seven thousand rather than six thousand sucres a pound, you’ll make a good deal more. So, what do you plan to do with the money?’ ‘First, pay back everybody’s deposit’, Suscal answers. ‘And then, the idea is to reinvest the profit, buying chicks again. It’s our capitalcito. ‘And what if your husbands want any of it?’ Núñez asks. ‘They can borrow some money if they like’, Suscal says, laughing. ‘With an interest!’ When we get back from Quinta, which is near the forest, to the main road, it turns out it hasn’t rained there at all. ‘That’s typical’, Samaniego says. Transport east of Sangay NP worker of the Ministry of Agriculture had given a talk on poultry keeping. A one-off affair: he never showed up again. No follow-up veterinary assistance, no commercial advice, nothing. Sloppy work, we all agree. (Ironically, Natura gave a similar talk on poultrykeeping in the Shuar community of Paantiin. Not a subject to be thought of lightly, given the number and complexity of specifications for the coops, the feed and animal health care. But since Paantiin, which had repeatedly asked for this information, was outside Natura’s priority area, they were told right from the start that there would be no further assistance. One couldn’t help feeling that whoever would invest in chickens on the basis of the lecture was at a severe risk of losing their money.) ‘We didn’t know that some vaccinations had to be repeated after a couple of weeks’, Suscal says. ‘And it’s hard to get a vet to come to Quinta in the first place. Some time ago, our guinea pigs were dying on us one after the other. When I cut one open, I found it was full of yellow foam. But there was no-one to ask what might be the matter.’ ‘We will talk to some vets in Macas’, Núñez says. ‘See if we can establish some sort of relationship with one of them for you.’ FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS Buffer zone ‘What worries me most is whether we will actually be able to identify and develop livelihoods that are viable alternatives to logging’, Martha Núñez says. ‘We really have to work even harder on that.’ We are seated in a shiny, cool Chinese restaurant in Macas. The hot and dusty co-operatives and Shuar villages seem far away - which is true in terms of travelling time, but not in kilometres. ‘It’s all very well to keep chickens or bees or build a pond and breed fish. But you have to consider very carefully if it’s really profitable, like we did in Quinta this morning. For one thing, you tend not to include the opportunity cost, that is the income people could • 17 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:08 Pagina 18 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio earn doing will have created an something else with informal buffer zone their time. for Sangay, because Especially with it borders the park. women, you’re ‘The major easily tempted to timber company pile more and more around here, burdens onto them, Arboriente, has assuming they’re sawmills in Puyo around the house and Ambato, but not anyway.’ yet in Macas. They Fortunately, are active in this some alternatives do area, though not seem to stand up to within in the park. such scrutiny; not We’ve already just poultry-keeping spoken with and fish-breeding, company people, so but also at least one they know we are product that comes watching them. straight from the ‘At the moment forest. ‘They have a we’re telling people medicine here, it’s better to save extracted from a Sangay as a falltree, which is called back for the future. sangre de drago’, If resources outside Núñez says. ‘It the park are used disinfects and helps more efficiently, Sangay NP healing. Here in more rationally, Macas, it’s sold at they will last much six thousand sucres a litre. In Quito, that’s the price longer, we explain to them. They say they didn’t for a two centilitre bottle!’ know it was unwise to cut down all the trees - it was Nonetheless, timber is likely to remain an what the bank told them to do. We hope that later on important source of income. The challenge will be to they’ll understand it’s best not to log it out.’ keep people out of Sangay nonetheless. ‘One But that’s for the long term - longer than the four important way of achieving that is by making sure years the current project is planned to run. ‘True’, they get a better price while at the same time drawing Núñez says. ‘And that is not just Sangay’s problem. up management plans’, Núñez says. ‘We hope we In a study by WWF International, one or two years will be able to organise forest owners into a network, ago, the conclusion was that Integrated Conservation Maybe they could get linked with the Forest and Development Projects cannot be expected to Stewardship Council. If we can get the Ambusha reach their objectives in four or five years. Double ▲ owners to work according to a management plan, we that, more likely.’ Why this project? WWF’s Sangay project has the twin objectives of conserving the National Park’s rich biodiversity and ensuring the local population’s participation in the management of the area. More specific objectives include the following: • To reduce the pressure on the park exerted by the human settlements in and around the park. • To minimise the adverse ecological and social impact of the Guamote-Macas road, which is approaching completion. • To make sure that the local communities in and around the protected area participate in its conservation and management and in the sustainable use of the buffer zones. • To upgrade the official park administration, which is a responsibility of the National Forestry and Conservation Institute’s Directorate for Natural Areas and Wildlife. FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 18 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:09 Pagina 19 LIVING DOCUMENTS DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio Looking forward hich are the crucial problems that have to be solved to make Fundación Natura’s Sangay project a success? On the western highland side of Sangay, there is as yet no serious threat to the forest, since there is very little illegal logging in this area. On the other hand, overgrazing and misguided natural resource management methods are real threats to the paramo ecosystem on the western fringe of the park and beyond. Sustainable levels of grazing and improved vegetation management are in the best interest of both the herdsmen and the ecosystem. But to persuade them to change their ways, especially to quit their counterproductive habit of burning patches of land to stimulate regrowth, will take a lot of patience and trust on the part of the Natura project officers. Fortunately the officers seem well qualified in this respect. The highlanders’ traditional antipathy to anybody who vaguely resembles an authority make the task all the harder. On Sangay’s eastern lowland side, there are three major threats to the forest: the advance of the agricultural frontier towards the limits of the national park, illegal logging and the hunting practices of the Shuar Indians. The latter problem is hard to tackle, since hunting is considered culturally, rather than nutritionally, important. However, the intensity of hunting has declined significantly with the increasing importance of agriculture and cattle-raising in the Shuar economy. Logging, though on a small scale, and clearing new land for agriculture pose greater threats. Both can be countered by offering alternative livelihoods. But this is not an easy task. The decisive question is ‘whether we will actually be able to identify and develop livelihoods that are viable alternatives to logging’, as one of the project officers put it. Several alternatives are currently being put to the test with the eager participation of the local people, who have traditionally felt neglected by central government and development organisations. The third potential source of future ecological concern is the road that will, within a few years, cut the park in two. This will open up a large area to loggers, hunters and farmers. Both the park authorities and the Natura project are aware of the risks and are taking pre-emptive action. ▲ W FINDING DEFENDERS FOR A TROPICAL FORTRESS • 19 • PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION IN ECUADOR'S SANGAY NATIONAL PARK EquadorDef 06-03-2001 12:09 Pagina 20 Acknowledgements All texts written by Gaston Dorren of Bureau M&O - Environment & Development Productions © WWF March 2001 Published by the DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio based at WWF International. For further copies contact Astrid Bjorvik, Finance/Communications Co-ordinator, DGIS-WWF Tropical Forest Portfolio WWF International, Avenue de Mont Blanc 27, 1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 364 90 16, Fax +41 22 364 06 40, E-mail: [email protected] Cover pictures:WWF-Canon/Kevin Schafer Layout and design: MMS Grafisch Werk, Amsterdam,The Netherlands Production: Bureau M&O, Amsterdam,The Netherlands This publication receives outside financing. Citation is encouraged. Shorts excerpts may be translated and/or reproduced without prior permission, on the condition that the source is indicated. For translation and/or reproduction in whole,WWF International should be notified in advance. Responsibility for the contents and for the opinions expressed rest solely with the author; this publication does not constitute an endorsement by WWF International or the financier.The material and the geograpical designations in this magazine do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Printed on environmentally friendly paper