Onion Insect Biology and Management
Transcription
Onion Insect Biology and Management
Onion Insect Biology and Management Peter J. Jentsch Cornell University’s Hudson Valley Laboratory Highland, NY 12528 Seed Treatments for Managing Onion Maggot in Three NY Sites. - 2007 Mean % onion plants killed by onion maggot Treatment Seed Treater Sodus Elba Pine Island 1 Non-treated Incotec 14.5 a 7.2 a 17.2 a 2 Lorsban 4E (drench) Incotec 0.0 d 0c 11.9 b 3 Trigard 75WP Incotec 1.8 cd 0c 1.8 e-g 4 Lorsban + Trigard Incotec 0.7 cd 0c 0.2 fg 5 Entrust Incotec 2.7 cd 0c 2.7 e-g 6 Mundial 500 Incotec 2.8 cd 0c 3.6 e-g 7 Poncho 600 Incotec 2.5 cd 0c 0.8 fg Planted on 24 April in Sodus, 4 May in Pine Island and 7 May in Elb a . Onion Bulb Mite Biology: Overwinters in the soil and found in cover crop seed coat feeding on fungi. Also very abundant OW on volunteer field onion and cull piles. LT50 Adult ♀= 17oF, LT50 Egg = 10oF Under ideal conditions OBM increase in number to feed on developing onion in early spring to reduce stand count. OBM on barley All three life stages (adult, egg & nymph) found throughout the year. OBM on volunteer onion Impact of Seed Treatments on Onion Bulb Mite Efficacy of onion seed-treatments against OMB establishment and survival in greenhouse bioassays. Cornell’s Hudson Valley Lab, Highland NY, 1999. Average number of bulb mite . Treatment Rate 20 DAP roots bulb 30 DAP bulb 40 DAP bulb Carzol 50g/kg 0.5b 0.2a - - Vydate 50g/kg 0.2ab <0.1a 0.5a 5.8b Fipronil +Carzol 30g/kg 50g/kg <0.1ab <0.1a 0.0a 0.0a Fipronil +Vydate 30g/kg 50g/kg 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a Fipronil 30g/kg 0.0a 0.0a 0.4a 0.2a Untreated - 3.4c 3.1b - - Seedcorn Maggot Biology: Invasive pest from European origin. Adult flies emerge during late April and early May. Eggs are deposited on or near the soil surface, plant stems at the soil surface. Eggs hatch in a few days and the maggots work their way into the soil in search of food. They complete their development in a week to 10 days. Egg to adult is between 3 to 4 weeks. There are 3 to 5 generations each year in NY. Trigard is ineffective against the SCM. Lorsban / Trigard combination is required to manage the OM and SEC in NY. Mature seedcorn maggot Getting the Upper Hand on Onion Thrips and IYSV Brian A. Nault Associate Professor Department of Entomology Cornell University, NYSAES, Geneva, NY Outline of Presentation I. Overview of Onion Production in NY, Thrips and Iris Yellow Spot Virus (IYSV) II. Potential Sources of IYSV in NY III. Thrips Densities, Prevalence of IYSV and their Relationship in Onion Fields IV. Thrips Management Onion Production in New York • Dry bulb onion, Allium cepa L. • Fresh-market crop valued at $45 to 55 million/yr • 13,500 acres • Onion crop in NY ranks 6th in the US Major Onion Producing Regions in NY Oswego Co. Orleans Co. Wayne Co. Genesee Co. Geneva Yates Co. Ithaca Orange Co. Onion Planting Planting onion seeds Transplanting onion plants 87% of acreage 13% of acreage *Onions are rarely rotated into other fields Onion Production in New York Transplanting Harvest Direct seeding 15-Mar 14-Apr 14-May 13-Jun 13-Jul 12-Aug 11-Sep 11-Oct Thrips Infestations in New York Onion Fields Thrips in Direct seeded Thrips in Transplants Transplanting Direct seeding 15-Mar 14-Apr 14-May Harvest 13-Jun 13-Jul 12-Aug 11-Sep 11-Oct Onion Thrips Life Cycle Adult - All female populations - Mating is not necessary for reproduction! PARTHENOGENESIS - In NY, all female AND male + female populations exist. - Live for 13 to 47 d Onion Thrips Life Cycle Adult Egg - 60 to 200 eggs/female - Deposited singly in leaves - Hatch in 4-10 days Onion Thrips Life Cycle Adult Egg Hatch in 4-10 days Larva (2 instars) Lasts 7-14 days Onion Thrips Life Cycle Adult Prepupa + Pupa Do NOT feed In soil for 5-7 days Egg Hatch in 4-10 days Larva (2 instars) Lasts 7-14 days Onion Thrips Life Adult * Cycle *17-30 days total Prepupa + Pupa Egg In soil for 5-7 days Hatch in 4-10 days Larva (2 instars) Lasts 7-14 days Onion Thrips Survival, Fecundity and Generation Times (Days) at Various Temperatures 680 F 47 Days 770 F 25 860 F 13 Eggs laid/ female 210 165 63 Generation time 48 30 17 Factor Survival Murai (2000) Onion Thrips Population Growth Date July 1 July 8 July 15 July 22 July 29 August 5 August 12 August 19 August 26 September 2 Number generations Number of Females 680 F 1 210 1 Onion Thrips Population Growth Date July 1 July 8 July 15 July 22 July 29 August 5 August 12 August 19 August 26 September 2 Number generations Number of Females 680 F 770 F 1 1 165 210 27,225 1 2 Onion Thrips Population Growth Date July 1 July 8 July 15 July 22 July 29 August 5 August 12 August 19 August 26 September 2 Number generations Number of Females 680 F 770 F 860 F 1 1 1 63 165 3,969 250,047 210 15,752,961 27,225 1 2 4 Iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) • Family: Bunyaviridae Genus: Tospovirus • Only transmitted by onion thrips (i.e., not seed-transmitted) • Symptoms may be obvious on scape, but not leaves - Lesions can coalesce, weaken scape, resulting to seed loss - Reduces photosynthesis, affecting bulb yield Iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) • First detection in NY occurred in an onion cull pile in Elba in June 2006 (Hoepting et al. 2006) • Confirmed via DAS-ELISA and RT-PCR • First detection in a bulb crop in Elba in late July 2006 Elba, NY IYSV Detection Survey Results 2006 Orleans, Genesee, Yates, Livingston, Wayne, Ontario: 37 out of 41 fields (90%) 2007 Oswego : 7 out of 9 fields (78%); 45% of samples IYSV positive County surveyed Orange: 8 out of 10 fields (80%); 52% of samples When does IYSV occur and where does it come from? IYSV? Thrips in Direct seeded Thrips in Transplants Transplanting Direct seeding 15-Mar 14-Apr 14-May Harvest 13-Jun 13-Jul 12-Aug 11-Sep 11-Oct Outline of Presentation I. Overview of Onion Production in NY, Thrips and Iris Yellow Spot Virus II. Potential Sources of IYSV in NY III. Thrips Densities, Prevalence of IYSV and their Relationship in Onion Fields IV. Onion Thrips Management Potential Sources of IYSV in NY Transplants from Arizona Volunteer onions Weeds Bulbs imported from western US Testing Plant Samples for IYSV • DAS-ELISA • Some samples testing (+) confirmed w/ RT-PCR • For onions, multiple leaves and bulbs tested separately • 1 g/10 ml extraction buffer • 20 minutes • Threshold = 3x (-) control • AgDia supplies center Transplants Tested for IYSV in 2007 Cultivar No. of Plants Sampled Yellow Bulb Corona Highlander Kasmer Homegrown Milestone Millennium Ricochet Empire Sweet 300 600 600 600 300 600 600 Red Bulb Mercury Red Wing Red Zeppelin Rhumba 600 600 300 300 Note: DAS-ELISA was used to test plants for IYSV Transplants Infected with IYSV in 2007 Cultivar No. of Plants Sampled No. of IYSV Infected Yellow Bulb Corona Highlander Kasmer Homegrown Milestone Millennium Ricochet Empire Sweet 300 600 600 600 300 600 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red Bulb Mercury Red Wing Red Zeppelin Rhumba 600 600 300 300 0 0 0 0 Note: DAS-ELISA was used to test plants for IYSV Volunteer Onions Sampled in 2007 9 sites; 30 plants/ site Orleans Co. 4 sites Wayne Co. 1 site Oswego Co. 1 site Geneva Ithaca Genesee Co. Yates Co. 2 sites 2 site Orange Co. No. of IYSV (+) Samples Volunteer Onions Infected with IYSV in 2007 (n= 30 plants/site; 355 plants total) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 GEN-1 GEN-2 ORL-1 ORL-2 ORL-3 ORL-4 OSW Field Location WAY YAT Testing Weeds for IYSV • 2006 and 2007 • 12 locations • 29 plant species • 120 plants tested Dandelion Weeds Infected with IYSV in 2006-2007 No. of IYSV Infected Plants Weed Species Biology DAS-ELISA RT-PCR Common burdock, Atrium minus biennial 10 yes Dandelion, Taraxacum officinale perennial 4 yes Wild raspberry, Rubus spp. perennial 2 N/A Sowthistle, Sonchus arvensis perennial 1 N/A Bramble spp. perennial 1 N/A Common purslane, Portulaca oleracea annual 1 N/A Common ragweed, Amrosia artemisifolia annual 4 yes Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus annual 1 N/A Unidentified Brassica spp. weed annual 1 N/A - 0 - 20 other weed species Total 25/120= 21% II. Potential Sources of IYSV in NY Summary Transplants – 0% infected Volunteer onions – < 2% infected Weeds – 21% infected Bulbs imported from western US – N/A Outline of Presentation I. Overview of Onion Production in NY, Thrips and Iris Yellow Spot Virus (IYSV) II. Potential Sources of IYSV in NY III. Thrips Densities, Prevalence of IYSV and their Relationship in Onion Fields IV. Onion Thrips Management Direct-seeded (DS) and Transplanted (TR) Onion Fields Sampled in 2007 Direct Seeded Transplanted Direct-seeded (DS) and Transplanted (TR) Onion Fields Sampled in 2007 • Transplants may be infested with thrips before planting • Thrips may preferentially colonize transplants Direct Seeded Transplanted Elba Muck (E-1 through E-8) Varieties Santana Sedona Santana Sherman Highlander Sedona Sherman Highlander DS TR Sampling Design 60 Sampling Points Samples taken every 2 weeks starting June 11 5 plants for IYSV analysis Thrips: adults & larvae Early Season Onion Thrips Pressure Mean Number Thrips per Field (mean of first 2 sample dates; before spraying) 250 Direct Seeded 200 150 100 N=6 p = 0.01 50 Transplant N=6 p = 0.02 0 Larvae Adults Cumulative counts: 11 + 25 June 2007 IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July E-1 Santana – DS 0 E-2 Santana – TR 0 E-3 Sedona – DS 0 E-4 Sedona – TR 0 E-5 Sherman – DS 0 E-6 Sherman – TR 0 E-7 Highlander – DS 0 E-8 Highlander - TR 1 L-9 Milestone – DS 0 L-10 Milestone – TR 0 6 Aug 20 Aug 4 Sept 17 Sept IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July 6 Aug E-1 Santana – DS 0 0 E-2 Santana – TR 0 0 E-3 Sedona – DS 0 0 E-4 Sedona – TR 0 3 E-5 Sherman – DS 0 2 E-6 Sherman – TR 0 1 E-7 Highlander – DS 0 Harvested E-8 Highlander - TR 1 Harvested L-9 Milestone – DS 0 0 L-10 Milestone – TR 0 0 20 Aug 4 Sept 17 Sept IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July 6 Aug 20 Aug E-1 Santana – DS 0 0 1 E-2 Santana – TR 0 0 4 E-3 Sedona – DS 0 0 1 E-4 Sedona – TR 0 3 3 E-5 Sherman – DS 0 2 11 E-6 Sherman – TR 0 1 3 E-7 Highlander – DS 0 Harvested Harvested E-8 Highlander - TR 1 Harvested Harvested L-9 Milestone – DS 0 0 0 L-10 Milestone – TR 0 0 2 4 Sept 17 Sept IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July 6 Aug 20 Aug 4 Sept E-1 Santana – DS 0 0 1 2 E-2 Santana – TR 0 0 4 6 E-3 Sedona – DS 0 0 1 5 E-4 Sedona – TR 0 3 3 harvested E-5 Sherman – DS 0 2 11 23 E-6 Sherman – TR 0 1 3 Harvested E-7 Highlander – DS 0 Harvested Harvested Harvested E-8 Highlander - TR 1 Harvested Harvested Harvested L-9 Milestone – DS 0 0 0 0 L-10 Milestone – TR 0 0 2 Harvested 17 Sept IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July 6 Aug 20 Aug 4 Sept 17 Sept E-1 Santana – DS 0 0 1 2 harvested E-2 Santana – TR 0 0 4 6 harvested E-3 Sedona – DS 0 0 1 5 harvested E-4 Sedona – TR 0 3 3 harvested harvested E-5 Sherman – DS 0 2 11 23 32 E-6 Sherman – TR 0 1 3 Harvested harvested E-7 Highlander – DS 0 Harvested Harvested Harvested harvested E-8 Highlander - TR 1 Harvested Harvested Harvested harvested L-9 Milestone – DS 0 0 0 0 harvested L-10 Milestone – TR 0 0 2 Harvested harvested Thrips Pressure and IYSV Prevalence No. Positive Sites Larvae Adults 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Cumulative No. Larvae R2 = 0.429 N = 12, df = 10 P = 0.021 12000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Cumulative No. Adults R2 = 0.411 N = 12, df = 10 P = 0.025 2500 IYSV Over Time (out of 60 sites) *No positives on 11 and 25 June, 9 July Field Variety 23 July 6 Aug 20 Aug 4 Sept 17 Sept E-1 Santana – DS 1 2 harvested E-2 Santana – TR 4 6 harvested E-3 Sedona – DS 1 5 harvested E-4 Sedona – TR 3 3 harvested harvested E-5 Sherman – DS 2 11 23 32 E-6 Sherman – TR 1 3 harvested harvested E-7 Highlander – DS harvested harvested harvested harvested E-8 Highlander - TR harvested harvested harvested harvested L-9 Milestone – DS L-10 Milestone – TR 1 harvested 2 harvested harvested Spatial Distribution of Onion Thrips Transplanted Onions Spatial Distribution of IYSV No. times site tested positive Relationship Between Thrips and IYSV Thrips IYSV IYSV in New York Onion Fields Relative to Thrips Activity and Harvest IYSV Thrips in Direct seeded Thrips in Transplants Transplanting Harvest Direct seeding 15-Mar 14-Apr 14-May 13-Jun 13-Jul 12-Aug 11-Sep 11-Oct III. Prevalence of IYSV, Thrips Densities and Relationship in Onions - Summary • Transplanted fields had significantly more larval and adult thrips early in season • IYSV prevalence was greater in transplanted fields • Cumulative larval and adult counts are significant predictors of IYSV incidence • Transplanted onions may have less risk of yield loss because fields are harvested early Outline of Presentation I. Overview of Onion Production in NY, Thrips and Iris Yellow Spot Virus (IYSV) II. Potential Sources of IYSV in NY III. Thrips Densities, Prevalence of IYSV and their Relationship in Onion Fields IV. Onion Thrips Management General Approaches Taken to Manage Insects that Attack Vegetable Crops – IPM Tactics Chemical Control Plant Resistance Managing Vegetable Insect Pests Cultural Control Behavioral Control Biological Control IV. Onion Thrips Management A. Evaluation of onion varieties for thrips/ IYSV resistance B. Evaluation of insecticides for thrips control C. Sequences of products for season-long thrips control Onion Variety Screening Trial - 2007 Potter, NY • 22 varieties screened for resistance to onion thrips/ IYSV • varieties arranged in a RCBD replicated 4 times • ten plants per variety • recorded thrips on 10 plants/ plot and took damage rating Cumulative number of larvae/plant Screening Experiment a ab a-c a-c cd c-e d-f ef ef f Days after transplanting Lines with different letter are significantly different (P <0.05, Tukey’s test) Screening Experiment Variety Red Beauty BGS-236 Red Wing BGS-234 Infinity Red Bull Santana Milestone Nebula Fortress Millenium Bunker SYN-H7 606-1 BGS-230 Calibra Delgado Tioga Cometa Colorado 6 Peso OLYS05N5 Damage 4.4 ± 0.5 a 4.1 ± 0.9 a 4.1 ± 0.5 a 4.0 ± 0.4 ab 4.0 ± 0.7 ab 4.0 ± 1.1 ab 4.0 ± 0.4 ab 3.9 ± 0.9 ab 3.9 ± 0.8 ab 3.8 ± 0.3 ab 3.6 ± 0.3 a-c 3.5 ± 0.0 a-d 3.5 ± 0.4 a-d 3.4 ± 0.5 a-d 2.8 ± 0.3 b-e 2.4 ± 0.6 c-e 2.4 ± 0.5 c-e 2.4 ± 0.5 c-e 2.3 ± 0.6 de 2.0 ± 0.4 e 1.9 ± 0.3 e 1.6 ± 0.5 e *Damage rating taken 89 days after transplanting Leaf damage rating 1: No damage 3: 25% leaf area injured 5: 50% leaf area injured 7: 75% leaf area injured 9: 100% leaf area injured Means followed by different letters are significantly different (P <0.05, Tukey’s test) Prevalence of IYSV - 2007 Variety Red Beauty BGS-236 Red Wing BGS-234 Infinity Red Bull Santana Milestone Nebula Fortress Millenium Bunker SYN-H7 606-1 BGS-230 Calibra Delgado Tioga Cometa Colorado 6 Peso OLYS05N5 Infected (%) 5.9 16.7 13.8 11.1 3.0 15.4 12.9 3.2 11.6 8.0 15.4 12.0 15.4 31.0 8.0 9.7 18.6 4.3 2.7 10.7 8.3 8.8 Overall % Infected: 11.2% Four Varieties Showing Thrips Resistance: 6.6% Eighteen others: 12.2% A. Summary – Plant Resistance • Colorado 6, OLYSO5N5, Cometa and Tioga, had lowest densities of onion thrips and low levels of damage, suggesting that these varieties may be less susceptible or resistant. • IYSV prevalence levels were low, but the four onion varieties resistant to thrips tended to have lower % IYSV • Mechanism of resistance not known Evaluation of Insecticides for Thrips Control B. Evaluation of Insecticides for Thrips Control Product Active Ingredient Rate (amnt/acre) MSR oxydemeton -methyl 32 fl oz Lannate LV methomyl 48 fl oz Carzol SP formetanate hydrocloride 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 lb Radiant SC spinetoram 8 fl oz Agri-Mek 0.15EC abamectin 10, 12, 14 fl oz Movento 240SC spirote tramat 5, 8 fl oz Assail 30SG acetamiprid 5.4 oz * Products highlighted in yellow were labeled on onion in NY in 2007 * Carzol - Section 18 * MSR – Section 24c Insecticide Evaluation Trial - 2007 Potter, NY Variety ‘Infinity’ Planted 1 May 2007 First spray July 6 6 applications total 100 GPA; 40 psi flat fan nozzle Visual estimates of thrips damage (1= high; 10=none) Rating= 2 Rating= 10 SR La nn at C e ar zo l( 0. Ca 5) rz ol (0 .7 5) C ar zo l( 1. 0) R ad A ia gr nt i-M ek A (1 gr 0) i-M ek A (1 gr 2) i-M ek (1 M 4) ov en to (5 M ov ) en to (8 ) As sa il M U nt re at ed Mean Number of Larvae/Plant Final Thrips Count (Aug. 16, 2007) 200 180 F= 7.6; df= 12,36; P<0.0001 160 80 40 bc 20 cd de N=5 a 140 120 a 100 ab 60 cde cde e Treatments (rates) cde de de 0 Marketable Yield 500 Jum bo 400 bc Pulled 9/5; Weighed 10/1 Standard ab abc abc abc a c 300 200 a 100 ek i-M gr A Treatment (8 ) M ov en to 4) (1 nt C Jumbo P = 0.0116; Total Marketable P= 0.0481 ab ia ad R zo l( nn 1. at e 0) b La at U nt re c M SR 0 a a ar abc ed Marketable Yield (cwt/acre) Potter, NY B. Summary – Insecticide Evaluation Onion crop was best protected from onion thrips using: - Radiant SC (8 fl oz/acre) - Carzol SP (1.0 > 0.5 lb/acre) - Agri-Mek 0.15EC (10-14 fl oz/acre) - Movento 240SC (5-8 fl oz/acre) *may only control larvae Lannate and MSR provided fair to poor levels of protection, respectively Registration updates: Radiant received a Section 3 label in 9/07 Carzol considered for Section 18s in many States What sequences of products should be used to control thrips? C. Sequences of Products Evaluated for Onion Thrips Control - 2007 MSR, Carzol and then Radiant Radiant, Carzol and then Lannate Carzol, Radiant and then Lannate *Each product was applied during 2 consecutive weeks Mean Number of Larvae/Leaf/ Sampling Date Season Avg. Thrips Count - 2007 100 N=5 a 80 60 40 20 b b 0 d ate e r t Un e e ant i nat nat d n n a a a R L l/ /L zol/ rzo ant r i a a d C t/C Ra R/ ian MS zol/ d r a a R C F= 15.5; df= 3,9; P=0.0007 b Marketable Yield Marketable Yield (cwt/acre) Potter, NY 500 Pulled 9/5; Weighed 10/1 Standard Jum bo 400 ab a ab b 300 200 100 a a a a 0 Un t te rea d R MS /C ol z r a Jumbo P = 0.4743; Total Marketable P= 0.0464 /R a adi nt R an adi t/C o arz l/ na n a L C te o arz l/R an i d a t/ na n a L te C. Summary – Insecticide Sequences • All treatments were effective a) Starting with a weaker product and finishing with strong ones b) Starting with stronger products and finishing with a weaker one Acknowledgements Collaborators: Tony Shelton, Marc Fuchs, Cynthia Hsu and Christy Hoepting Funding: Graduate Students: Erik Smith and John Diaz NY Farm Viability Program Technical Assistance: M.L. Hessney, K. Straight, R. Taylor, B. English-Loeb, T. Evans, C. McGreggor, J. Bergman and H. Schoonover NY Onion Research and Development Program IR-4 Program Bayer Crop Science, Cerexagri, Dow, DuPont, Gowan and Syngenta The End