Placemaking Workshop 1 Proceeding Report

Fort Atkinson
Community Placemaking Initiative
Proceedings Report
Workshop 1
December 3, 2015
Participants
Chris Buckingham-Taylor
Cole Hebbe
Roy Budlong
Mason Becker
Maggie Mielke
Tom Kulczewski
Jeff Armstrong
E. Bus
Andy Selle
Maria Lomea
Beth Gerard
Anna Everson
Merrilee Lee
Jim Nelson
Kelly Turkerrst
Matt Trebatoski
Walt Christensen
Jude Hartwick
Paul Christensen
Lydia Statz
Megan Findlay
Mike Foerster
Bruce Waller
Rudy Bushcott
Matt Loup
Carrie Chisholm
Chris Scherer
Andy Yocom
Leslie LaMuro
Paul Kotz
Ann Engelman
Facilitated and Compiled By:
Steve Grabow, Professor and Community Development Educator
University of Wisconsin-Extension, Jefferson County Office
January 14, 2016
Table of Contents
Page
Section 1: Background, Workshop Objectives and Presentation .................................. 1
Section 2: Assessment Activity and Facilitated Findings ............................................... 2
Section 3: Assessment Tool Compiled Findings ........................................................... 6
Appendix: ..................................................................................................................... 28
Agenda ..................................................................................................................... 29
Community Assessment and Evaluation Activity: Assessment Tool ........................ 30
Principles of Community Placemaking & Making Places Special Presentation ........ 36
Section 1
BACKGROUND, WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES AND PRESENTATION
An overview of the Fort Atkinson Community Placemaking Initiative was provided by the City
Council President and the City Manager. The facilitator presented the additional context about
the project along with the following Workshop 1 objectives:



To raise community awareness around principles of community placemaking.
To assess the extent to which principles of placemaking are evident in Fort Atkinson. (All
should have a copy of the “Community Assessment and Evaluation Activity” tool). (See
Appendix for a sample of the tool.)
To initiate broad community dialogue around placemaking.
The facilitator provided a presentation on the Principles of Community Placemaking. Please
refer to the appendix for the actual PowerPoint presentation.
1
Section 2
ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY AND FACILITATED FINDINGS
The facilitator distributed the assessment tool and had participants complete the tool on their
own. Once completed, participants then discussed their responses with their neighbor in small
groups. During this time they were to:


Identify those principles that you have rated as “strengths” or strongly evident and can
be built on in the future.
Identify those principles rated as “weaknesses” or less evident and may need attention.
The facilitator then led the participants in a facilitated group discussion. The findings shared with
the group are captured in this section. The ideas are organized by “functional components.” As
a cross-tabulation with compilation from the assessment tool findings, the mean and rank from
that assessment, by principle, is also shown in this section.
Which principles are “strengths” and strongly evident in Fort Atkinson and can
be built on in the future? (Indicate Principle Number and Why)
User-Friendly and Efficient Circulation
a. Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly Environments.
o Take for granted; friends come to town to use
o Mean: 4.14 Rank: 2
Preserved Natural and Cultural Resources and Environment
b. Principle 10: Environmental Resources and Parks: Preserved and Consciously
Integrated into the Fabric of the Community.
o Very attractive; evident driving into town; activity in Parks, Concerts
o Mean: 4.19 Rank: 1
c. Principle 10: Environmental Resources and Parks: Preserved and Consciously
Integrated into the Fabric of the Community.
o Evident in Riverwalk, New shelter at Haumerson’s Pond.
o Mean: 4.19 Rank 1
d. Principle 11: Preserved Farmland and Related Open Space.
o Evident in extensive farmland and open space
o Mean: 3.97 Rank 3
e. Principle 12: Preservation and Integration of Historic and Cultural Resources.
o Evident in Dairy Shrine, Fort; tied into identity; downtown nice
o Mean: 3.84 Rank 4
2
Enhanced Local Identity and Sense of Place
f. Principle 14: Well-designed Public Buildings and Public Spaces: Enlivened by
Works of Art and Sculpture.
o Evident in Library, Municipal Building, bike trail art; historical homes
preserved
o Mean: 3.62 Rank 7
Attributes to Instinctively Draw Us To Places
g. Principle 16: Drama and Dignity.
o Evident in Fireside, Hoard Museum, Library, Fort Atkinson Club, Aquatic
Center
o Mean: 3.57 Rank 8
h. Principle 18: Reflection of Local Values.
o Evident in Hoard Museum, Jones Park, Library, Fort Atkinson Club
o Mean: 3.57 Rank: Rank 8
i.
Principle 19: Many Choices and Many Things to Do.
o Young families, many things to do, school events, sleigh rides, Christmas
parade, farmers market
o Mean: 3.43 Rank 11
3
Which principles are “weaknesses” and less evident and may need attention in
the future? (Indicate Principle Number and Why)
Effective and Functional Physical Configuration
a. Principle 2: Strong Urban Center.
o Mixed feelings on this.
o Downtown activities attended by same.
o Are we welcoming “teens” to City center? (Need sense of stewardship for
our teens.)
o Need to fill vacant storefronts
o Need to develop west of the Bypass or Not develop west of bypass
o Mean: 3.43 Rank: 11
b. Principle 2: Strong Urban Center.
o How do we invite people to the City Center when people are already in
City? (like when at high school events); consider where people are, and
then how do we pull the in/off the By Pass/from school.
o Mean: 3.43 Rank: 11
c. Principle 3: City-centered Redevelopment and Infill
o Need to fill in abandoned areas (K-Mart/Business Park)
o Bypass affecting downtown/changing economy of downtown business
(look at successful communities – how they attract traffic to downtown).
o Mean: 3.03 Rank 18
d. Principle 4: Integration of Housing and Employment.
o Downtown housing is limited; living above downtown business; help to
make a culture center.
o Mean: 3.19 Rank: 16
e. Principle 6: Avoidance of Low-density Residential Development on the Urban
Fringe.
o Avoid low density on fringe-spread growth is more costly for public
services. (different perspectives on this)
o Mean: 3.22 Rank: 15
f. Principle 7: A Mix of Housing Types and Households with Different Income
Levels.
o Mix of housing; needs for 20’s/younger folks
o Mean: 3.70 Rank: 6
4
User-Friendly and Efficient Circulation
g. Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly Environments.
o Not a lot of bike racks
o Mean: 4.14 Rank: 2
h. Principle 9: High Quality and Convenient Public Transit and Transportation.
o Weak on public transit
o What do small towns do?
o Problem with non-sensored arrows/downtown
o Difficult to navigate downtown at 3:15 p.m.
o Need more sidewalks; education/people in cars don’t stop
o Rural areas – bike share – see Wisconsin Rapids
o Options: trolley /bus/other
o Is there demand for transit in small towns?
o Mean: 2.43 Rank: 19
Enhanced Local Identity and Sense of Place
i.
Principle 13: Strong Local Character, Community Identity and Sense of Place.
o A strength and deficit: Have differences but need to come together.
o Identity changing due to changing demographics (growing Hispanic
population/not represented fully; do have some; changes with competing
demands.
o Mean: 3.50 Rank 10
Attributes to Instinctively Draw Us To Places
j.
Principle 19: Many Choices and Many Things to Do.
o Vary based on demographics: weak for young professionals and young
families; more needs beyond summer months (except bars); forces travel
to Madison/Milwaukee; Ideas: mini whole foods
o Mean: 3.43 Rank 11
Other Considerations Raised:
o Bring people together to collectively plan together: Economic
development/schools/hospital/MATC (too many silos in our planning)
o Economic Engine – challenge this a bit. Culture and environment, land
use is important for quality of life too; all trying to “better” the community.
o Economics: needs to be brought in to discussion – How do we make
downtown a destination (including companies/business)
o Hope to focus on things we can change.
5
Section 3
ASSESSMENT TOOL COMPILED FINDINGS
This section provides the input received from the “Community Assessment and Evaluation Activity” tool/survey. This
includes quantitative results that rate the extent to which each principle is evident. In addition, comments on each principle
along with the last question for “general comments and observations” have been compiled. The results from the last
question have been organized by “theme” and have been arranged by frequency.
#
1
2
3
4
1. FUNCTIONAL AREA I: EFFECTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION
Not
Barely
Strongly
Somewhat Evident
Question
Evident
Evident
Evident
Evident (3)
(4)
(1)
(2)
(5)
Principle 1: Compact Communities and Clear
Urban/Rural Differentiation
Compact development that doesn't sprawl,
enabling urban and rural areas to be clearly
differentiated from one another.
Principle 2: Strong Urban Center
Urban places with a strong center (downtown),
where multiple uses and activities are clustered
in fairly close proximity (strong village and city
centers).
Principle 3: City-centered Redevelopment and
Infill
Infill development within existing urban areas
and reclaiming marginal and abandoned areas.
Principle 4: Integration of Housing and
Employment
Integration of housing, employment centers and
shopping areas, so that communities contain
places to live, work and shop, and contain a full
range of facilities.
Total
Responses
Mean
0
1
12
18
6
37
3.78
0
3
17
15
2
37
3.43
0
11
15
10
1
37
3.03
1
3
22
10
1
37
3.19
6
5
6
7
Principle 5: Vital, Distinctive and Varied
Neighborhoods
Vital, distinctive and varied neighborhoods in
close proximity to the community center.
Principle 6: Avoidance of Low-Density
Residential Development on the Urban Fringe
Compact new development on the community
edge that is integrated with the existing
community pattern.
Principle 7: A Mix of Housing Types and
Households with Different Income Levels
A mixture of housing types that meets the needs
of a variety of households with different income
levels.
0
4
17
14
2
37
3.38
1
8
10
16
1
36
3.22
0
2
12
18
5
37
3.70
7
Statistic
Min Value
Max Value
Mean
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Total
Responses
Principle 1:
Compact
Communities
and Clear
Urban/Rural
Differentiation
Compact
development
that doesn't
sprawl,
enabling
urban and
rural areas to
be clearly
differentiated
from one
another.
Principle 2:
Strong
Urban
Center
Urban
places with
a strong
center
(downtown),
where
multiple
uses and
activities
are
clustered in
fairly close
proximity
(strong
village and
city
centers).
2
5
3.78
0.56
Principle 3:
City-centered
Redevelopment
and Infill
Infill
development
within existing
urban areas
and reclaiming
marginal and
abandoned
areas.
Principle 4:
Integration
of Housing
and
Employment
Integration
of housing,
employment
centers and
shopping
areas, so
that
communities
contain
places to
live, work
and shop,
and contain
a full range
of facilities.
2
5
3.43
0.53
2
5
3.03
0.69
0.75
0.73
37
37
Principle 5:
Vital,
Distinctive and
Varied
Neighborhoods
Vital,
distinctive and
varied
neighborhoods
in close
proximity to the
community
center.
Principle 6:
Avoidance of
Low-Density
Residential
Development
on the Urban
Fringe
Compact
new
development
on the
community
edge that is
integrated
with the
existing
community
pattern.
Principle 7: A Mix of
Housing Types and
Households with Different
Income Levels A mixture
of housing types that
meets the needs of a
variety of households with
different income levels.
1
5
3.19
0.55
2
5
3.38
0.58
1
5
3.22
0.86
2
5
3.70
0.60
0.83
0.74
0.76
0.93
0.78
37
37
37
36
37
8
2. Comments on Functional Area I: Effective and Functional Physical Configuration
Principle 1: Compact Communities and Clear Urban/Rural Differentiation
Strengths:
 Strong natural and road boundaries.
 By-pass, Hoard Farm, Rivers
Weaknesses:
 Less evident on south side; city-town boundary
 Sprawl contained by natural barriers, less so by ethic.
Observations:
 Some attempts at containing growth - i.e. in industrial parks and within by-pass. Not sure how strongly this is embraced; however,
or just result of regular development pressure.
 Currently OK but future expansion beyond bypass a true concern.
Principle 2: Strong Urban Center
Weaknesses:




Need for better downtown outdoor draw for community gathering.
Lacking on multiple uses of downtown.
Downtown has ebbed and flowed; strength and vibrancy - very little basic needs - town clothing, shoes.
Clear downtown - use is limited or not a destination
Observations:





Weekends are different than weekdays
Not sure of "multi-use" aspect.
Most especially cultural uses/activities in City Center
We should find our most productive tax base from our core downtown.
Unfortunate lack of city square is corrected by farm market, summer concerts.
9
Principle 3: City-Centered Redevelopment and Infill
Weakness:
 Would be nice to see something in the old K-Mart building.
 Reclaiming old school and Verlo yes vacant K-Mart, vacant south business needed.
 Some large, empty properties (mostly privately owned and not for sale)
Observations:
 I know this is always the first hope of our economic development efforts.
 This option is not sought much or appreciated by previous administration.
Principle 4: Integration of Housing and Employment
Strengths:
 New development of Creamery Building helps.
Weaknesses:
 Not fully
 Lacking in the full range.
Observations:
 I'd be interested to know what portion of Fort Atkinson residents work elsewhere.
 Downtown and concentric neighborhoods are great for this.
Principle 5: Vital, Distinctive and Varied Neighborhoods
Strengths:
 Varied housing within walking to downtown.
 Historic neighborhoods and "decades" neighborhoods in regard to when they were developed.
Weaknesses:
 Limited neighborhoods with distinctiveness
Observations:
 The more distinctive and varied the neighborhood, usually the closer it tends to be to commerce/central. Older housing stock.
Principle 6: Avoidance of Low-Density Residential Development on Urban Fringe
Weakness:
10
 We have low productivity, large parking lot car-led glop.
Observation:
 Trail/sidewalk connections slowly integrated to connect
Principle 7: A Mix of Housing Types and Households with Different Income Levels
Strengths:
 Nice mix currently but not a lot of opportunity for growth.
 Affordable housing, yes.
Weaknesses:
 Need more rentals. Need more elderly housing.
 Could use more apartments for younger professionals, families.
Observations:
 I would love to see co-housing units or buildings put up/built in Fort Atkinson.
 Homes or converted homes. No apartments or high density buildings.
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
13
11
3. FUNCTIONAL AREA II: USER-FRIENDLY AND EFFICIENT CIRCULATION
Not
Barely Somewhat
#
Question
Evident
Evident
Evident
(1)
(2)
(3)
1
2
Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly
Environments
Pedestrian friendly environments with a pattern of
development that supports and encourages
sidewalk pedestrian activity and bicycle path travel.
Principle 9: High Quality and Convenient Public
Transit and Transportation
Transportation that is coordinated with land use
and development, and provides multiple routes and
approaches for cars, bikes, pedestrians and other
modes.
Statistic
Min Value
Max Value
Mean
Variance
Standard Deviation
Total Responses
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
Total
Responses
Mean
0
2
4
18
13
37
4.14
9
10
11
7
0
37
2.43
Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly
Environments Pedestrian friendly environments with
a pattern of development that supports and
encourages sidewalk pedestrian activity and bicycle
path travel.
Principle 9: High Quality and Convenient
Public Transit and Transportation
Transportation that is coordinated with land
use and development, and provides multiple
routes and approaches for cars, bikes,
pedestrians and other modes.
2
5
4.14
0.68
0.82
37
1
4
2.43
1.14
1.07
37
12
4. Comments on Functional Area II: User-Friendly and Efficient Circulation
Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly Environments
Strengths:







This is great in Fort Atkinson.
Bike trail, many sidewalks
Bike path is one of our greatest features.
Better closer to city center
Love the bike path and lanes. Like the well-marked crossings. But, walking is a problem if you intend to shop/work.
I appreciate the emphasis on bike access and new effort to promote walking and access to paddling.
The bike paths are very nice.
Weaknesses:




Need more sidewalk; infill
Room for improvement.
Could improve or enforce pedestrian cross walks, especially downtown.
Many areas connected; new subdivisions - no.
Observations:
 Nice bike path and river walk but crossing Madison Ave., Janesville Ave., Whitewater Ave. is very difficult.
 Bike - yes; can't walk to or in newer developed areas
 Rural bike share in Wisconsin Rapids
13
Principle 9: High Quality and Convenient Public Transit and Transportation
Strengths:


Better closer to city center
Some handicap services - glad for those.
Weaknesses:






No transit for those unable to bike or walk.
Brown Cab is only public transit. Street repairs and maintenance a big concern.
Better pedestrian in new areas.
Only cab company. No bus, etc.
Very inconvenient transportation downtown.
Fort and the county need public trans - i.e. bus, rail, esp.
Observations:

Do we have any public transportation?
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
15
14
5. FUNCTIONAL AREA III: PRESERVED NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
Not
Barely
Somewhat
Strongly
Evident
#
Question
Evident
Evident
Evident
Evident
(4)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
1
2
3
Principle 10: Environmental Resources and Parks:
Preserved and Consciously Integrated into the
Fabric of the Community Environmental resources,
natural amenities, scenic qualities, parks,
recreation and open space that are preserved and
are consciously integrated into the fabric of the
community.
Principle 11: Preserved Farmland and Related
Open Space
Preserved farmland and related open space,
wildlife habitats and environmental corridors
reflecting responsibility for the respect of land.
Principle 12: Historic and Cultural Resources
Consciously Preserved and Integrated into
Contemporary Settings
Historic and cultural resources consciously
preserved and integrated into contemporary
settings, including reuse of serviceable buildings.
Statistic
Min Value
Max Value
Mean
Variance
Standard Deviation
Total Responses
Total
Responses
Mean
0
0
6
18
13
37
4.19
0
3
6
17
11
37
3.97
0
4
6
19
8
37
3.84
Principle 10: Environmental Resources
and Parks: Preserved and Consciously
Integrated into the Fabric of the
Community Environmental resources,
natural amenities, scenic qualities,
parks, recreation and open space that
are preserved and are consciously
integrated into the fabric of the
community.
Principle 11: Preserved
Farmland and Related Open
Space Preserved farmland and
related open space, wildlife
habitats and environmental
corridors reflecting
responsibility for the respect of
land.
Principle 12: Historic and Cultural
Resources Consciously Preserved
and Integrated into Contemporary
Settings Historic and cultural
resources consciously preserved
and integrated into contemporary
settings, including reuse of
serviceable buildings.
3
5
4.19
0.49
0.70
37
2
5
3.97
0.80
0.90
37
2
5
3.84
0.81
0.90
37
15
6. Comments on Functional Area III: Preserved Natural and Cultural Resources and Environment
Principle 10: Environmental Resources and Parks:
Strengths:






Could use additional directional signage to highlight these assets.
Many high quality parks, some neighborhood parks.
Our parks definitely help define our community.
Correct Parks, River walk, Correct planning for neighborhood spaces
Parks, Riverwalk, Haumerson’s Pond
Our City parks are treasures. Could use more trees downtown and more native park plantings. Hard to get to any wildness.
Observations:
 Parks are developed for use by public.
 Future development will need to be carefully planned.
Principle 11: Preserved Farmland and Related Open Space
Strengths:
 Greenway along Janesville Ave provides an excellent green corridor.
 Jones/Hoard properties.
Weaknesses:
 Usually driven by wetlands making undesirable for development. We lose our share of farms to development.
 Fort could do a better job of controlling light trespass and pollution.
16
Principle 12: Historic and Cultural Resources Consciously Preserved and Integrated into Contemporary Settings
Strengths:
 Creamery building, many older downtown buildings.
 Downtown buildings, old parks
 Hoard Museum is wonderful. Downtown buildings updated. Library/Fort Atkinson Com Center wonderful plusses. Redone
fountain at Barrie very good example.
Weaknesses:
 Our "culture" is changing - but doesn't always reflect our growing diverse population.
 Many pieces of historic architecture have been removed for parking lots.
 New construction tends to be hodgepodge, generic and car-centric.
Observations:
 Verlo, Library, Museum, Churches, downtown heavily preserved. Lack of contemporary settings, very heavy on
blending/preservation/conservative design.
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
10
17
7. FUNCTIONAL AREA IV: ENHANCED LOCAL IDENTITY AND SENSE OF PLACE
Not
Barely
Somewhat
#
Question
Evident
Evident
Evident (3)
(1)
(2)
1
2
Principle 13: Strong Local Character,
Community Identity and A Sense of Place
Strong local character, community identity
and sense of place reflecting the character
and needs of the community.
Principle 14: Well-Designed Public Buildings
and Public Spaces Enlivened by Works of Art
and Sculpture
Well-designed public buildings and public
spaces that strengthen community sense of
place, often reinforced and enlivened by
works of art and sculpture.
Statistic
Min Value
Max Value
Mean
Variance
Standard Deviation
Total Responses
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
Total
Responses
Mean
0
4
13
16
3
36
3.50
1
5
9
14
8
37
3.62
Principle 13: Strong Local Character, Community
Identity and A Sense of Place Strong local character,
community identity and sense of place reflecting the
character and needs of the community.
Principle 14: Well-Designed Public Buildings
and Public Spaces Enlivened by Works of
Art and Sculpture Well-designed public
buildings and public spaces that strengthen
community sense of place, often reinforced
and enlivened by works of art and sculpture.
2
5
3.50
0.66
0.81
36
1
5
3.62
1.13
1.06
37
18
8. Comments on Functional Area IV: Enhanced Local Identity and Sense of Place
Principle 13: Strong Local Character, Community Identity and A Sense of Place
Strengths:
 Ties to Fort, River in signage and promotion and appearance evident.
 Bridge, main street, etc.
Observations
 This is changing with baby-boom generation
Principle 14: Well-Designed Public Buildings and Public Spaces Enlivened by Works of Art and Sculpture
Strengths:







Continues to improve
Lots of public art and strong arts community - bike trail, sculptures downtown, art within buildings (library, museum, hospital).
Jones Park sculptures, McCoy Park Memorial.
Plenty of art, preserved buildings and homes
Library, Museum, historical homes
Love the catfish! Love the Blackhawk Statues!
Library, use of parks for special events, new community center (club)
Weaknesses:

Are in some areas, but most public buildings are "blah".
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
8
19
9. FUNCTIONAL AREA V: ATTRIBUTES THAT INSTINCTIVELY DRAW US TO PLACES
Not
Barely
Somewhat Evident
# Question
Evident Evident
Evident (3)
(4)
(1)
(2)
1
2
3
4
5
Principle 15: Connectivity
Vehicular, pedestrian and transit connectivity and ease of
movement from one part of the community to another.
Principle 16: Drama and Dignity: Real Places Landmarks
and building facades providing evidence that it is a real
place, not just superficial.
Principle 17: Variety and Whimsy
Variety and whimsy expressed in architectural forms and
design details.
Principle 18: Reflection of Local Values
Reflection of local values; appropriate architectural styles,
materials and vegetation.
Principle 19: Many Choices and Many Things to Do with
Sociable Settings
Many choices and many things to do with sociable
settings; not just consumerism and shopping; not just a
workplace or a bedroom community.
Strongly
Evident
(5)
Total
Responses
Mean
0
7
17
10
3
37
3.24
0
3
13
18
3
37
3.57
1
5
20
11
0
37
3.11
0
2
13
21
1
37
3.57
2
6
9
14
6
37
3.43
20
Statistic
Min Value
Max Value
Mean
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Total
Responses
Principle 15:
Connectivity
Vehicular, pedestrian
and transit
connectivity and ease
of movement from
one part of the
community to another.
Principle 16: Drama
and Dignity: Real
Places Landmarks and
building facades
providing evidence that
it is a real place, not
just superficial.
Principle 17:
Variety and
Whimsy Variety
and whimsy
expressed in
architectural forms
and design details.
Principle 18:
Reflection of Local
Values Reflection
of local values;
appropriate
architectural
styles, materials
and vegetation.
Principle 19: Many Choices
and Many Things to Do with
Sociable Settings Many
choices and many things to
do with sociable settings;
not just consumerism and
shopping; not just a
workplace or a bedroom
community.
2
5
3.24
0.74
2
5
3.57
0.59
1
4
3.11
0.54
2
5
3.57
0.42
1
5
3.43
1.25
0.86
0.77
0.74
0.65
1.12
37
37
37
37
37
21
10. Comments on Functional Area V: Attributes that Instinctively Draw Us to Places
Principle 15: Connectivity
Strengths:
 Downtown area is a yes.
 4 for vehicular
 Connectivity - good start, will improve as bike lanes are added.
Weaknesses:





New subdivisions lacking in connectivity by trail and sidewalks.
Community segments are very segregated.
Better, but Madison Ave, Janesville Ave, Whitewater Ave. are very difficult to cross.
2 for pedestrian.
Walking not easy downtown or in any commercial area.
Principle 16: Drama and Dignity: Real Places
Strengths:





Fireside, Library, Hoard Museum.
Fireside, Library, Fort Club, Creamery Building, Farmer's Market, Parks, Jones Park, Riverside Park, museum, downtown, Riverwalk.
Downtown and neighborhoods good
Library, Museum, Fireside, Fort Club.
Bridge & Verlo Building.
Weaknesses:
 Newer edge developments – no.
Observations:
 Some significant skyline but water tower and parks located on major roads; help add drama to busy areas/roadways.
22
Principle 17: Variety and Whimsy
Strengths:
 Most evident downtown in former High Pointe properties.
 Again, more in city center.
Weaknesses:
 Limited in whimsy; more historic and conservative.
 Some variety, little whimsy.
Principle 18: Reflection of Local Values
Strengths:
 City is heavily planted with TREES, business and homes landscape appropriately. Midwest, conservative.
 Museum, Library, Jones Park
 Pubic appreciation of keeping/preserving farmland, open space.
Principle 19: Many Choices and Many Things to Do with Sociable Settings
Strengths:





Many cultural activities, farmer's market, Generals baseball, etc.
Museum, Library, Fort Club, Soulful Toad, Municipal Building, Parks - Jones Park, Barrie Park, Haumerson’s Pond
Good recreation and events
Great parks systems that offer variety of events.
Community supporting events that bring residents together.
Weaknesses:
 We do not have gathering spots for young professionals - other than bars.
 Central District lacks a green meeting location for community but many choices in other areas of the City.
 Very much where Fort is lacking.
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
11
23
11. General Comments and/or Observations. Please provide any additional comments or observations regarding what is
important to you as we further consider the principles of placemaking, Fort Atkinson's future and ways to improve our
community!
Collaboration/Work Together/Plan/Education:








Growth is necessary and should be planned for strategically. The City needs to become more united - many silos that work hard
but independently from each other. Hospital, School district, Business, and City need to work together and be considered equally
as important influences on success of a community. Stronger engagement by youth/buy in.
Fort Atkinson has a strong sense of who it is as a community based off of its history and recent past (within last 30 years to 50
years). We need to decide as a community where do we want to be in 30-50 years and how do we plan to get there.
More Community Partnerships- internal and external: Whoever has the most partnerships wins. We have a start. Businesses and
not-for-profit groups work together but there could be more over-arching cooperation. That would include a more proactive
approach to identified projects in Fort Atkinson.
Has Fort Atkinson considered being a part of the Main Street program? Build partnerships with Jefferson, UW Whitewater and
MATC. I don't get the feeling that MATC pays that much attention to Fort Atkinson. They should. I hope I am wrong about this.
Community Conversations - Engage citizens, parents and on-going research into successful models from other communities. We
are beginning to do this now. One specific example is to insure that the tradition of a daily newspaper be continued. Find
additional ways for the city to use that more effectively.
Encourage more informed city administration and staff. Assess how the city keeps up to date on new trends and opportunities.
What newspapers and periodicals do they read and what conferences, meetings and associations do they attend on behalf of our
city? This will help us with the next item.
Insure our Planning, Zoning and City Council members are provided the most pertinent information regarding issues that come
before them. Land use issues are layered and complicated. Sometimes they can be emotional. Transparency and even more
important, the perception of transparency, is critical.
Insure that the City Council remains apolitical. Provide on orientation for new Council and Committee members.
24
Economic Development/Business:








No discussion of industries role. No discussion of bring in quality jobs. Appears to be mostly a discussion of a bedroom
community.
More popular business names and stores here in town may better the community such as a Starbucks which pose as a hub to
hang out and socialize and also as a thriving business which would better the community.
I'm a little concerned that this initial assessment has not addressed schools, healthcare, manufacturing and the core job/growth
needs of an economically strong community.
Fort needs an injection of investment dollars. Unfortunately, many of the buildings that could have been repurposed were torn
down. New buildings (with character) will have to be erected.
We so hungry for economic development, vigilance and again, pro-active, not reactive, thinking about our future will be important.
Find additional revenue streams for the city. Revenue for road maintenance is a good start. More informed city staff will contribute
additional ideas.
A bakery. Not just for the goods but for building community traditions. This happens at bakeries with a seating area. Lake Mills
Waterhouse Bakery is a great model. Also, watch the PBS show "A Few Good Bakeries" available for streaming for free at
PBS.org. They facilitate community engagement and tradition.
A real delicatessen. We need a deli that makes creates real, fresh food. Currently the delicatessen's at the grocery stores are all
about opening a can or a jar and putting it in a display case. Processed food is not real food.
Housing/Residential:




I have found that persons (my family) wanting a single family home/neighborhood has the value lowered by nearby mutli-family
housing. I wish Fort Atkinson has a development outside the city center that was just single family housing with 1/2-1 acre lots. It
would attract many more families like mine.
Additional residential lots of various sizes.
Develop a new neighborhood on that property that includes community co-housing and small affordable housing units. The whole
housing trend is downsizing. This will also help city revenues.
Rental Owners, residence and business need to pay more attention to property appearance and maintenance. Jordan Apartments
on Main Street next to the Chamber is just one example of this. And, because it is so prominent, it is a terrible eyesore to our
downtown.
Identity:



I have traveled extensively, so I'm a tough grader. Fort Atkinson has improved steadily since 1985 and is continuing in the right
direction.
Fort has a unique identity and seems willing to both preserve its heritage and adopt to changes and paradigm shifts.
Overall, Fort has done a great job preserving its heritage. It has always, eventually found ways to recycle its buildings to
redevelopment
25
Parks/Recreation/Natural Resources:



We have an Aquatic Center and Tennis Courts, volleyball, the pool, a basketball court in the municipal building and by the Aquatic
Center. I feel we need something for kids and adults that skateboard, BMX, scooter, etc. where kids and adults have a fun place
to use these items, like a Skate Park because if I for example want to scoot I have to go to Jefferson or Whitewater as the nearest
places that have Skate Parks. I want to see a local park here in Fort Atkinson.
Contribute to a clearer and cleaner river. I would like to be able to see the bottom of the shallow Rock River. The river runs
through the center of our town. It is one of our assets.
Somehow, agricultural runoff needs to be addressed. It is currently exempt from water quality laws and is a big contributor to the
ill-health of the river.
Transportation:



Principle 9 - I think a public transportation system between cities could bring progress to our communities.
Public Trans - Fort should consider bike share - see Wisconsin Rapids example Fort has great "bones" but needs to reinforce and
better utilize them, especially on the edge of town.
Extend the bike trail using the soon to be abandoned Lorman scrap yard tracks.
Urban Center/Downtown:



I agree with downtown vitalization; however, I'm concerned about feasibility with traffic/parking and flow.
Diversity of commerce in urban center. Parking. Both would draw people to urban center.
Downtown revitalization will continue to be important. Why is industry not mentioned? How do we attract quality employees and
retain them?
Mixed Use:


More cultural happenings around the river. Sidewalks and walkable neighborhoods in new developments. More revitalization of
existing buildings. New ventures of mixed use (i.e. K-Mart area!).
I'd like to see more diversity, more integration of living/work/shopping, more choices of things to do.
Culture:

Build a Cultural Corridor as a Regional Destination. Starting at the museum, Merchants Avenue to the library, one block east,
across the vacant lot (green space) to the Fort Atkinson Club. This is not my idea but I support it.
Land Marks/Entry:

We need to redesign/rebuild our City entry points - North side old K-Mart for example. Not a good impression for people coming in
to town.
Younger Generation/Activity:

I feel we are very strong in many aspects; however, we have very few opportunities to entertain younger generations (teens-20's).
26
Statistic
Total Responses
Value
25
27
Appendix
28
Fort Atkinson Community Placemaking Initiative
AGENDA
Thursday, December 3, 2015
Luther School Board Room
6:00 pm – 8:00 pm
 Welcome and Background: Council President Paul Kotz and City Manager
Matt Trebatoski
 Additional Context: Steve Grabow, UW Extension
Workshop Objectives
o To raise community awareness around principles of community
placemaking
o To assess the extent to which principles of placemaking are evident in
Fort Atkinson. (All should have a copy of the “Community Assessment and
Evaluation Activity” tool)
o To initiate broad community dialogue around placemaking.
 Presentation: Principles of Community Placemaking
 Assessment Exercise
o Fill out survey/tool (10 minutes)
o Discuss with neighbor (10 minutes with person next to you)
 Identify those principles that you have rated as “strengths”.
(5-Strongly Evident)
 Identify those principles rated as “weaknesses”.
(1, 2 or 3- Less Evident)
o Facilitated Group Discussion
 Which principles are strongly evident in Fort Atkinson and can be
built on in the future? (Indicate Principle Number and Why)
 Which principles are less evident and may need attention in the
future? (Indicate Principle Number and Why)
 Wrap Up and Next Steps (Steering Committee)
o Drop off your completed “Assessment” survey form in back as your leave!
_________________________________________________________________________________
Fort Atkinson Community Placemaking Initiative Website:
http://www.fortatkinsonwi.net/our_community/community_placemaking_initiative/index.php
Prepared By: Steve Grabow, Professor and Community Development Educator, UW Extension, Jefferson County
Office, November 30, 2015
29
Community Assessment and Evaluation Activity
Background on This Assessment Tool:
The UW Extension, Jefferson County Office is working with Fort Atkinson on a five-month community placemaking*
initiative. A wide variety of placemaking resources have been developed by UW Extension, and are being shared
with those interested in being involved. (The City has developed a website with these resources to help familiarize
you with placemaking concepts and this project---see link**.) As part of the process, an assessment/evaluation
survey has been developed, and you are invited to share your perspectives and reactions.
Purpose and Use of This Assessment Tool:
The main purpose of this assessment tool is to get your initial reaction on the extent to which 19 principles of
placemaking are evident in Fort Atkinson. The results of this assessment will inform the community about the
“perceived” level to which Fort Atkinson is performing on each of these principles or characteristics. It is hoped that
your input will stimulate community energy around areas that are seen as strengths (so that we can build on our
assets and successes). Your input will also be used to provide more clarity on potential areas to address for those
principles that are rated low (so that we can respond to suggested weaknesses or areas needing attention).
Instructions:
Review each item. Place a mark (an “X” or fill in the circle) that best represents your opinion about the extent to
which each of these 19 principles of placemaking is evident in Fort Atkinson. If you wish, add an additional
commentary or observations that you have about each principle. A wrap-up comment section is provided at the end
of the tool. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Grabow at UW Extension ([email protected]
or 920-674-7295) or Kim Buchholz at UW Extension ([email protected] or 920-674-7297). Thank you for
caring about your community!
____________________________________________________________________________________
Important Note: This survey is asking only for your opinions and perspectives. You do not need to be an “expert” on
placemaking to respond to this assessment. Your input enables “initial impressions” on your views about your
community. There is no right or wrong response! In many ways, this is just a starting point for community dialogue
around placemaking.
*Definition of Placemaking:
Relates to planning endeavors focused on spatial development, urban design and city form, public realm,
streetscapes and related infrastructure and the general imaging and re-imaging of places. (Szold, 2000)
**Community Placemaking Initiative Website:
http://www.fortatkinsonwi.net/our_community/community_placemaking_initiative/index.php
30
For each of the following principles below, rate the extent to which you believe the principle is evident in
Fort Atkinson.
Not
Evident
(1)
Barely
Evident
(2)
Somewhat
Evident
(3)
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
FUNCTIONAL AREA I: EFFECTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION
Principle 1: Compact Communities and
Clear Urban/Rural Differentiation
Compact development that doesn’t sprawl,
enabling urban and rural areas to be
clearly differentiated from one another.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 2: Strong Urban Center
Urban places with a strong center
(downtown), where multiple uses and
activities are clustered in fairly close
proximity (strong village and city centers).
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 3: City-centered
Redevelopment and Infill
Infill development within existing urban
areas and reclaiming marginal and
abandoned areas.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 4: Integration of Housing and
Employment
Integration of housing, employment centers
and shopping areas, so that communities
contain places to live, work and shop, and
contain a full range of facilities.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 5: Vital, Distinctive and Varied
Neighborhoods
Vital, distinctive and varied neighborhoods
in close proximity to the community center.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





31
Not
Evident
(1)
Barely
Evident
(2)
Somewhat
Evident
(3)
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
FUNCTIONAL AREA I: Continued
Principle 6: Avoidance of Low-Density
Residential Development on the Urban
Fringe
Compact new development on the
community edge that is integrated with the
existing community pattern.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 7: A Mix of Housing Types and
Households with Different Income
Levels
A mixture of housing types that meets the
needs of a variety of households with
different income levels.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





FUNCTIONAL AREA II: USER-FRIENDLY AND EFFICIENT CIRCULATION
Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike
Friendly Environments
Pedestrian friendly environments with a
pattern of development that supports and
encourages sidewalk pedestrian activity
and bicycle path travel.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 9: High Quality and
Convenient Public Transit and
Transportation
Transportation that is coordinated with land
use and development, and provides
multiple routes and approaches for cars,
bikes, pedestrians and other modes.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





32
Not
Evident
(1)
Barely
Evident
(2)
Somewhat
Evident
(3)
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
FUNCTIONAL AREA III:
PRESERVED NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
Principle 10: Environmental Resources
and Parks: Preserved and Consciously
Integrated into the Fabric of the
Community
Environmental resources, natural
amenities, scenic qualities, parks,
recreation and open space that are
preserved and are consciously integrated
into the fabric of the community.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 11: Preserved Farmland and
Related Open Space
Preserved farmland and related open
space, wildlife habitats and environmental
corridors reflecting responsibility for the
respect for land.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 12: Historic and Cultural
Resources Consciously Preserved and
Integrated into Contemporary Settings
Historic and cultural resources consciously
preserved and integrated into
contemporary settings, including reuse of
serviceable buildings.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





33
Not
Evident
(1)
Barely
Evident
(2)
Somewhat
Evident
(3)
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
FUNCTIONAL AREA IV: ENHANCED LOCAL IDENTITY AND SENSE OF PLACE
Principle 13: Strong Local Character,
Community Identify and A Sense of
Place
Strong local character, community identity
and a sense of place reflecting the
character and needs of the community.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 14: Well-Designed Public
Buildings and Public Spaces Enlivened
by Works of Art and Sculpture
Well-designed public buildings and public
spaces that strengthen community sense
of place, often reinforced and enlivened by
works of art and sculpture.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





FUNCTIONAL AREA V: ATTRIBUTES THAT INSTINCTIVELY DRAW US TO PLACES
Principle 15: Connectivity
Vehicular, pedestrian and transit
connectivity and ease of movement from
one part of the community to another.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________
Principle 16: Drama and Dignity: Real
Places
Landmarks and building façades providing
evidence that it is a real place, not just
superficial.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________










34
Not
Evident
(1)
Barely
Evident
(2)
Somewhat
Evident
(3)
Evident
(4)
Strongly
Evident
(5)
FUNCTIONAL AREA V: Continued
Principle 17: Variety and Whimsy
Variety and whimsy expressed in
architectural forms and design details.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________





Principle 18: Reflection of Local Values
Reflection of local values; appropriate
architectural styles, materials and
vegetation.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________










Principle 19: Many Choices and Many
Things to Do with Sociable Settings
Many choices and many things to do with
sociable settings; not just consumerism
and shopping; not just a workplace or a
bedroom community.
Comments:
__________________________________
__________________________________
General Comments and or Observations. Please provide any additional comments or observations regarding what
is important to you as we further consider the principles of placemaking, Fort Atkinson’s future and ways to
improve our community!
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
35
1/8/2016
Principles of Community Placemaking &
Making Places Special
Fort Atkinson Community Placemaking Initiative
By Steve Grabow
Professor and Community Development Educator
UW-Extension, Jefferson County
Context for Principles
The guiding principles in this presentation
were inspired by a book entitled
Making Places Special by former UWExtension Specialist Gene Bunnell.
Bunnell’s research provides the outline for
the “Characteristics of Quality Places.”
His research includes the results of an
American Planning Association survey
of planners that identified the qualities
of special places. A similar survey of
Wisconsin planners was conducted in
1998 and 1993.
These resources have been organized
and adapted by Steve Grabow. See
“Principles and Practice of Community
Placemaking” for more details. (Draft,
May 2015)
1
1/8/2016
Intent
This presentation is intended to provide
a basic understanding of key principles of community design
for the citizenry and community leaders involved in planning and development.
Steve and his daughter researching sustainable and strategic spatial
planning in European communities
FunctionalAreaI
EffectiveandFunctionalPhysicalConfiguration
2
1/8/2016
Principle 1: Compact Communities and Clear Urban/Rural Differentiation
Compact development that doesn’t sprawl, enabling urban and rural areas to be clearly
differentiated from one another.
Compact development on the north side of Fort Atkinson
illustrating the city from the countryside
A clear distinction between the city and the countryside
City of Jefferson urban service area
Principle 2: Strong Urban Center
Urban places with a strong center, where multiple uses and activities are clustered in
fairly close proximity (strong village and city centers).
Downtown Asheville, NC offers multiple uses and
activities within close proximity of eachother
Baltimore’s Inner Harbor bustles at night with its vibrant
nightlife which has helped blossom the area into the cultural
center of the city
A model city centered around a central gathering place
3
1/8/2016
Principle 3: City-centered Redevelopment and Infill
City Centered Redevelopment and Infill.
La Crosse riverside redevelopment plans
Infill riverfront condominiums in Fort Atkinson
Hard Rock Cafe at Baltimore’s redeveloped Inner Harbor
Cottage Grove, WI now boasts a revitalized downtown
anchored by a large redevelopment project
Principle 4: Integration of Housing and Employment
Integration of housing, employment centers and shopping areas, so that communities
contain places to live, work and shop, and a full range of facilities.
Meadowmont neighborhood in Chapel Hill, NC offers
shops and businesses with residential upstairs
This multi-use development in Chapel Hill, NC typifies
the modern live, work, play setting
Apartment housing integrated into the fabric in La Crosse on the upper
levels of historic Main Street, with shops on the street level
4
1/8/2016
Principle 5: Vital, Distinctive and Varied Neighborhoods
Vital, distinctive and varied neighborhoods in close proximity to the urban center.
A model city showing a distinctive architectural style
reflected in the town center and adjacent residential areas
Distinctive small town “front
porch”neighborhoods near downtown.
Principle 6: Avoidance of Low-density Residential Development on the Urban Fringe
Avoidance of low-density residential development on the community fringe.
Middleton Hills, WI has higher density residential
development on the fringe of the community
City of La Crosse’s land use plan calls for dense growth
surrounded by greenspace on the urban fringe
A mix of residential housing types of moderate density with
a definite edge in Fort Atkinson
5
1/8/2016
Principle 7: A Mix of Housing Types and Households with Different Income Levels
A mixture of housing types that meets the needs of a variety of households with different
income levels.
Co-housing at Pacifica in Carrboro, North Carolina
A classic house tastefully converted to student rentals at
UW-Whitewater
A range of housing types to accommodate a variety of
income levels
FunctionalAreaII
User‐FriendlyandEfficientCirculation
6
1/8/2016
Principle 8: Pedestrian and Bike Friendly Environments
Pedestrian friendly environments (pattern of development that supports and encourages
sidewalk pedestrian activity and bicycle path travel).
City of Wisconsin Dells bicycle and
pedestrian paths and trails
Glacial River Trail in Fort Atkinson
Fort Atkinson riverwalk
Milwaukee’s Lakeshore State Park accomodates bikers and
pedestrians
Principle 9: High Quality and Convenient Public Transit and Transportation
High quality and convenient public transit coordinated with land use and development,
and concentrated development along transit corridors and proximity to transit stops.
The Intermodal Station in Milwaukee, WI connects
travelers through bus, bicycle, and train transportation
Multiple routes for cars, bikes & pedestrians defined by
colored areas at Harbor Park in Kenosha
A wide variety of modes of transportation allow for smooth
metropolitan movement in Madison, WI
7
1/8/2016
FunctionalAreaIII
PreserveNatural,CulturalResources
andEnvironment
Principle 10: Environmental Resources and Parks: Preserved and Consciously Integrated into the Fabric of the
Community
Environmental resources, natural amenities, scenic qualities, parks, recreation and open space that are preserved
and are consciously integrated into the fabric of the community.
Cravath Lake Park, Whitewater
Riverwalk plan, Wisconsin Dells
Milwaukee’s O’Donnell Park offers a green corridor along
the lakefront
8
1/8/2016
Principle 11: Preserved Farmland and Related Open Space
Preserved farmland and related open space, wildlife habitat and environmental corridors.
Wisconsin’s largest egg farm (near Palmyra in Jefferson
County) relies on preserved, working farmlands
A preserved farm in the rolling countryside near Lake
Mills, WI
La Crosse’s Riverside Park connects the natural waterway
with planned public space
Principle 12: Preservation and Integration of Historic and Cultural Resources
Historic and cultural resources consciously preserved and integrated into contemporary
settings.
Before and after photos of Sheboygan’s riverfront
boardwalk and fishing shanty revitalization
Celebrating our dairy heritage and cheese-making
tradition in an authentic setting in La Crosse
9
1/8/2016
FunctionalAreaIV
EnhancedLocalIdentityandSenseofPlace
Principle 13: Strong Local Character, Community Identity and Sense of Place
Strong local character, community identity and a sense of place.
Miller Brewing Company continues the beer brewing
tradition that Milwaukee is known for
Locally produced sculpture honors the Native
American history of Fort Atkinson
10
1/8/2016
Principle 14: Well-designed Public Buildings and Public Spaces: Enlivened by Works of Art and
Sculpture
Well-designed public buildings and public spaces that strengthen community sense of place, often
reinforced and enlivened by works of art and sculpture.
Locally designed Cravath Lake Park entrance,
Whitewater, reflects what is important to the community
Art and sculpture at the Fort Atkinson Municipal Building
Birge Fountain and Arts Center, Whitewater
FunctionalAreaV
AttributestoInstinctivelyDrawUstoPlaces
11
1/8/2016
Key Attributes of Places to Which we are Instinctively Drawn
Urban designers and planners have identified five key attributes which help us
conceptualize the intangible characteristics of quality places. These attributes
are summarized below and they are detailed in principles 15, 16, 17, 18 and
19.
Connectivity
Drama and Dignity
Variety and Whimsy
Reflection of Local Values
Many Choices and Many Things to Do
Principle 15: Connectivity
Vehicular, pedestrian and transit connectivity and ease of movement from one part of the
community to another.
Bike and pedestrian trails provide a connection to the
Mississippi River in La Crosse
Signage in Lake Mills, WI guides vehicular traffic and
pedestrians to destinations within the city
12
1/8/2016
Principle 16: Drama and Dignity
Landmarks and building facades providing evidence that it is a real place, not just
superficial.
The dramatic approach to Madison, WI, the state capitol
building and Monona Terrace
The first architectural Washington Monument dominates
the center of this Baltimore neighborhood
Principle 17: Variety and Whimsy
Expressed in architectural forms and design details.
The Pineapple Fountain reflects the friendly hospitality of
the people of Charleston, SC
The Milwaukee Art Museum’s Burke Brise Soleil is a
moveable, wing-like sunscreen along Lake Michigan
Catfish Alley, Fort Atkinson
13
1/8/2016
Principle 18: Reflection of Local Values
Appropriate architectural styles, materials and vegetation.
Rock River Bridge in Fort Atkinson, Photo: Gary Gramley
Mullen’s Dairy Bar mural in Watertown, WI reflects the
small town and agricultural values of Jefferson County
The glacial fieldstone wall at Riverside Park in
Watertown, WI uses the natural, local stone
Principle 19: Many Choices and Many Things To Do
Not just consumerism and shopping; not just a workplace or a bedroom community.
Sidewalk events bring people to downtown Fort Atkinson
Enjoying the natural scenery at the downtown Jefferson
dam
Multiple seating options and for a variety of uses at this Asheville park setting
14
1/8/2016
Final Thoughts Via Quotes
“Americans continue to yearn to live in places that are unique
and special and have a sense of place.”
~Gene Bunnell, Making Places Special
“It is possible to make places better, and preserve
and strengthen the qualities that make places special, by planning.”
~Gene Bunnell, Making Places Special
“To advance people-friendly places, we should encourage more sensitive, friendly
developments in which color, pattern, texture and materials – as well as technical
excellence and innovation – combine to create enjoyable places and attractive
buildings.”
~Francis Tibbalds, Making People-Friendly Towns
“One of the most important ingredients for successful planning is for people to believe
that planning matters – that taking the time to think through and envision the kind of
places we want our communities to be in the future is important, and that time spent
developing plans aimed at fulfilling our deepest aspirations is not wasted.”
~Gene Bunnell, Making Places Special
DiscussionandQuestions
Towhatextentaretheprinciplesofcommunity
placemakingevidentinFortAtkinson?(See
CommunityAssessmentandEvaluationActivity.)
15