KPI 2009 - Universiti Sains Malaysia ( USM ), Kampus Kejuruteraan
Transcription
KPI 2009 - Universiti Sains Malaysia ( USM ), Kampus Kejuruteraan
AMANAT TAHUNAN DEKAN STRENGTENING THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (KPI) AND KEY INTANGIBLE PERFORMANCE (KIP) FOR 2010 Hamidi Abdul Aziz Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Awam, Kampus Kejuruteraan, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, MALAYSIA 8 March 2010 1 ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our 2010 KPI 3.0 Our 2010 KIP 4.0 Approaches 5.0 Challenges 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 1.0 APEX AND OUR PRESENT KPI APEX Challenges under APEX: 8 pillars • Nurturing and learning. • Research and innovation. • Services and external activities. • Students and alumni services. • Graduate studies. • Concentration of talent. • Resources. • Supportive governance. 3 OUR PRESENT KPI • Everyone has given the best. Thank you so much for your contribution. • We need to continue to work harder. • Where are we? 4 STATISTIK PELAJAR, STAF PENTADBIRAN, STAF AKADEMIK PTJ 2009 Profesor STAF PELAJAR Akademik Pelajar Siswazah A B C Profesor Madya Pensyarah Kanan Pensyarah Guru Felo Profesor Kunjungan Jumlah Pentadbiran 41-54 27-40 1-26 Jumlah JUMLAH KESELURUHAN Nisbah 0 0 5 11 6 12 4 1 0 39 Doktor Falsafah, PhD 78 Master, Msc 134 Jumlah 212 Ijazah Pertama 2 2 31 35 74 1 358 Jumlah 358 570 7.70 PENCAPAIAN BAGI TAHUN 2008 vs 2009 No Summary and Total Marks 1 2 3 4 Section B: Quantity and Quality of Researchers (25%) Section C: Quantity and Quality of Research (30%) Section D: Quantity of Postgraduates (10%) Section E: Quality of Postgraduates (5%) 2008 2009 Target Marks Full mark for 2010 Performance Marks Obtained Full mark Performance Target Marks Marks Obtained UNSATISFA CTORILY 18.17 25 UNSATISFA CTORY 22.7 15.21 25 22 UNSATISFA CTORILY 14.36 30 UNSATISFA CTORY 30 20.76 30 16 EXCELLENT 15.86 10 EXCELLENT 10 20.90 10 28 EXCELLENT 5.37 5 UNSATISFA CTORY 5 3.62 5 5 5 Section F: Innovation (10%) UNSATISFA CTORILY 4.69 10 OK 5 8.00 10 5 6 Section G: OK Professional Services and Gifts (7%) Section H: Networking UNSATISFA and Linkages (8%) CTORILY 7.00 7 OK 7 7.00 7 7 6.20 8 UNSATISFA CTORY 4.8 6.42 8 4.8 OK 0.0 0 OK 0 0.00 0 0 SORRY 71.65 95 OK 84.5 81.90 25 87.8 7 8 Section I: Support facilities (5%) TOTAL KPI 2010 berdasarkan pencapaian 2007-2009 N o Summary and Total Marks 2007 Performanc Marks e Obtaine d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2008 2009 Full mark Performan ce Marks Obtained Full mark Performanc e Target Marks Marks Obtained Full mark Target Panel’ Marks s for Comm 2010 ent 22 OK 17.1 25 UNSATISF ACTORILY 18.17 25 UNSATISF 22.7 ACTORY 15.21 25 OK 25.0 30 UNSATISF ACTORILY 14.36 30 UNSATISF ACTORY 30 20.76 30 16 OK 10.0 10 EXCELLE NT 15.86 10 EXCELLE NT 10 20.90 10 28 FAILED 2.1 5 EXCELLE NT 5.37 5 UNSATISF ACTORY 5 3.62 5 5 FAILED 0.0 10 UNSATISF ACTORILY 4.69 10 OK 5 8.00 10 5 Section G: Professional Services and Gifts (7%) Section H: Networking and Linkages (8%) FAILED 0.2 7 OK 7.00 7 OK 7 7.00 7 7 FAILED 0.4 8 UNSATISF ACTORILY 6.20 8 UNSATISF ACTORY 4.8 6.42 8 4.8 Section I: Support facilities (5%) OK 0.0 0 OK 0.0 0 OK 0 0.00 0 0 TOTAL SORRY 54.7 95 SORRY 71.65 95 OK 84.5 81.90 25 87.8 Section B: Quantity and Quality of Researchers (25%) Section C: Quantity and Quality of Research (30%) Section D: Quantity of Postgraduates (10%) Section E: Quality of Postgraduates (5%) Section F: Innovation (10%) PRESTASI PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ 2009 No Summary and Total Marks Marks Obtained until Sept 2009 Marks Obtained until Dec 2009 Full mark 1 Section B: Quantity and Quality of Researchers (25%) 20.50 15.21 25 2 Section C: Quantity and Quality of Research (30%) 14.13 20.76 30 3 Section D: Quantity of Postgraduates (10%) 27.77 20.90 10 4 Section E: Quality of Postgraduates (5%) 3.98 3.62 5 4.00 8.00 10 5 Section F: Innovation (10%) 6 Section G: Professional Services and Gifts (7%) 7.00 7.00 7 7 Section H: Networking and Linkages (8%) 4.72 6.42 8 0.00 0.00 0 82.11 81.90 95 8 Section I: Support facilities (5%) Total 5 melebihi 100 6 melebihi 75 75 PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ 2008 & 2009 75 ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our 2010 KPI 3.0 Our 2010 KIP 4.0 Approaches 5.0 Challenges 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 2.0 OUR 2010 KPI AKTIVITI UTAMA YANG TELAH DIJALANKAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ 2009: Aktiviti Utama dijalankan: 1. Bengkel KPI & KIP di Hotel Tanjung Bungah, Ogos 2009 2. Bengkel Penulisan Kertaskerja ISI Journal di Taiping, Nov.2009 3. Seperti perincian dalam Jadual B hingga I. CRITERIA 1. Critical mass 2. PhD Qualification or Equivalent & Professional a. Total number of staff with PhD/DSc, Deng b. b. Total number of staff with Professional Qualifications (such as medical, engineers,archite cts, accountants APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) Achieved 2009 KPI 2010 70% of academic staff will be involved as Principal Investigators (PI) (30% International) a) University funded + National grants b) International grants (18/31) *100% a) (26/29) *100% = 89.66 % 62% (3 internation al project) 49 projects 144% (2 internation al projects) 150% (10% international) 75% a) 73.53 % 75% 70% = 58.06 % a) (24/3 1)*10 0% =77.45% b) (3 /29 : Internation al) =10.34 a) (21/29)*10 0% b) 0 =72.41% b) 0 b) 0 Strategy -Output tabled in Majlis -SKT criteria -Confirmation criteria - All new staff to hold grant -Only recruiting staff with PhD holders (application from outside) - Those w/o PhD (Shaharudin, Mastura, Harris and Fared Murshed) to be sent for PhD in 2010. Request USM fund as their CGPA<3.0 CRITERIA 3. Research Experience (3 cohorts) 4. Number of recognitions/ awards/stew ardship conferred by national and international learned and professional bodies a) National b) Internatio nal APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) With 25% distribution of staff with >20 yrs experience, 35% with 1020 yrs and 40% with <10 yrs experience 2.94% distribution of staff with >20 yrs experience, 32.26% with 10-20 yrs and 64.52% with <10 yrs experience 4/29 (13.79% )dist ribution of staff with >20 yrs experience, 11/29 (37.93%) with 10-20 yrs and 14/29 (48.28% ) with <10 yrs experience 200 (40% international) 3 (66.67% international) a) 3 (0.07/staf) b) 1 (0.03/staf) KPI 2009 (2009) >20 yrs (20.59%) 10-20 yrs ( 29.41%) <10 yrs (50%) Achieved 2009 >20 yrs (7 staff=20.59 %) 10-20 yrs (10 staff= 29.41%) KPI 2010 >20 yrs (20.59%) 10-20 yrs ( 29.41%) <10 yrs (50%) <10 yrs (17 staff=50%) 5 (2 international) 4 (3 international) 5 (2 international) Strategy -PPKA is extending contract of Dr.Nordin (>20 yrs) and recruiting Prof. Koh Hock Lye; +2(Dr.Fauziah > 20 yrs); +1(10-20 yrs; Dr.Choong) (Notes: - Contract staff, previous experience prior to joining USM counted ? ) - Each program is instructed to get min. of 2 awards CRITERIA APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) Achieved 2009 1. Publicatio ns 2 papers in national /international refereed and cited journals per staff/yr 3 10 per civil school @ 0.34 per staff 25 per civil school @ 0.5 per staff 21 per civil school @ 0.62 per staff or Cumulative Impact Factor for the institution of not less than 500 11.195 per civil school @ 0.361 per staff 12.76 per civil school @ 0.44 per staff or Having a Cumulative Citation Index of 5,000/year 52 ? 20.117 per civil School @ 0.59 per staff KPI 2010 40 per civil School @1.0 /staff Strategy -SKT criteria -Seminar by prominent professor -Workshops -Attending scientific writing workshops -Confirmation criteria -Discourage attending conferences -Graduate students have to publish (2 ISI for Ph.D., 1 ISI for M.Sc.) CRITERIA APEX Publication s Total number of publications in noncitationindexed journal Total number of chapter in books Other publications that have created an impact to government/ society/policy 2007 (PPKA) 15 per civil school @ 0.65 per staff 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) KPI 2010 12 per civil school @ 0.41 per staff 0.5 /staff 16 per School @0.47/sta ff 20 per School @0.6/staff 0 0.01/staf 80 per School @2.35/sta ff 6 per School @0.16/staff 51 per civil school @ 1.76 per staff 1.0/staf 53 per School @1.56/sta ff 76 per School @2.0/staff 39 per civil school @ 1.56 per staff 39 per civil school @ 1.56 per staff Achieved 2009 Strategy -SKT criteria -Seminar by prominent professor -Workshops -Attending scientific writing workshops -Confirmation criteria -Discourage attending conferences -Graduate students have to publish (2 ISI for Ph.D., 1 ISI for M.Sc.) CRITERIA 2. Research grants for S&T academic staff APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) At RM 80000/sta ff/yr of which at least 10% is from internatio nal sources and 20% from private sector At RM 154,2490 /staff/yr of which at least 4.02% is from internatio nal sources and 6.2% from private sector At RM 38,996.63 staff/yr of which at least 0% is from international sources and 15.8% from private sector a) Government funding (RM32,835.93 /staff/yr) b) Private fundings (including contract research) (6160.70/staff /yr) c) International fundings (0) RM 185,000/staf f /yr (about the same percentage as in year 2008) Achieved 2009 RM962,238 per School (28.3K/staff (national) RM424,504 per School (12.5K/staff (private) RM0 KPI 2010 RM50K/staf f (national) RM10K/staf f (private) RM3K/staff (internation al) Strategy -SKT criteria -Seminar by prominent professor -Workshops -Attending scientific writing workshops -Confirmation criteria CRITERIA APEX 3. Research expenditure Should not be less than 70% of grants attained/ y 4. Post-docs appointed 70/yr 2007 (PPKA) 41.43% (based on amount spent) -**** None 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) Achieved 2009 32.3% (based on amount spent) -**** 40% 30.3% Note: -Money not received (RM2,599,8 in the same year; so, 13.13 out spending can only of begin in the RM8,572,39 following year 5.20) - difficult to get statement of expenditure - problem in getting amount received for a particular year 1 (Internation al) 4 (Ismail, Rozi, Hamidi(2)) 1 KPI 2010 40% 2 Strategy SECTION D-QUANTITY OF POSTGRADUATES (10%) CRITERIA APEX 1. Number of PhDs graduated 1 PhD:5 staff 2. Number of Ph.D. enrolled: a) Total number per year b) Ratio of Ph.D. enrolled per academic staff >50% (at least 10% addressing issues related to sustainable dev.) 2 PhD:1 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) 5 PhD.:31 Staff 2 PhD.:29 Staff = 1 PhD: 6.2Staff 182PG:31 staff = 5.87 PG : 1 staff = 1 PhD: 14.5 Staff 62 PhD:29 staff = 2.14 PhD : 1 staff KPI 2009 (2009) Achieved 2009 5 : 38 staff (Azhar, Zawawi, Chong, Alik, Saberi) =1Ph.D.:7.6 staff 4:34 115PG:39 Staff(incl. Postdoc + Dr.Farhan) (as of July 2009) =2.95PG:1 staff a) Total Ph.D.=78 (8 new Ph.D.) KPI 2010 5:36 Strategy -push the supervisors b) 2.25 staff. :Ph.D. a) 10 new Ph.D. b) 3.6 Ph.D. :staff -Headstart is on - Fellowship IPS SECTION D-QUANTITY OF POSTGRADUATES (10%) CRITERIA APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) Achieved 2009 3. Postgraduates enrolment a) Ratio of postgraduate to academic staff 3 PG:1 staff 182PG: 496 UG = 1PG:2.73 UG a) 169 PG: 29 staff =5.83:1 183PG:387U G(as of July 2009) =1PG:2.11U G a) 212PG: 34 staff=6. 2PG:St aff b) 212PG: 358UG =1PG:1 .7UG b) 1PG:1.7 UG 24.36% 25% b) Ratio of postgraduates (based on research and mixed mode) to undergraduates 4. Percentage of international postgraduates b) 0.26 20% (> 60% externally fully funded, 10% from countries of bottom billion) 18.13% 21.89% 22% KPI 2010 Strategy a) 4 PG:staff -Roadshow at Embassys - Web PPKA in Arabic SECTION E-QUALITY OF POSTGRADUATES (5%) CRITERIA APEX 2007 2008 (PPKA) (PPKA) 1. Entry 70% 39.01 qualification at postgr % Bachelor level aduate s with CGPA ≥3 69.82% KPI 2009 Achieved (2009) 2009 KPI 2010 Strategy 50% 65% -fellowship, headstart -USM graduate obtained CGPA<3.0 10% - Percentage of postgraduate intake with CGPA ≥ 3.25 or equivalent 2. Fellowships/ >20% grants awarded to postgraduates via research mode 59.11% 49.26% 24.32 % 5.92% 25% 0.55% - Roadshow Updated PPKA web Leaflets SECTION F-INNOVATIONS (10%) CRITERIA APEX 2007 (PPK A) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 1. Number of patents attained/number of products commercialized/ number of technology know-how licensing/ number of IPR/copyrights (including original writings) At least (200 cumulative) 2 Granted (0) 4 a) Grant ed 1 b) Filed 1 c) Pendi ng 3 (Natio nal) a) Granted 1 b) Filed 2 2. Total number of products licensed for commercialization ?? 0 0 0 3. Total number of technology know-how licensing ?? 0 0 4 2 4. IPR of original writing ?? 0 0.01 no./year/ staff 6 5 0 0.03 no./year/ staff 2 Other IPR/copyrights/trademar ks Pending (1 active/yr) Strategy - USM should pay the maintenance fee SECTION G: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND GIFTS (7%) CRITERIA 1. Income generated from training courses/ services/ consultancy/ postgraduate student fees/ endowment/ gifts APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 (2009) RM120mil lion/yr RM505,3 02.36 RM870,0 00 (RM0.03 million/st aff/year) RM1,000,0 00 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 Strategy RM103, 675 Courses (RM60,0 00) -Have tried but cost expensive; -To organize in campus to reduce cost - min. 2 per program - visit JKR , other agencies for promotion -Budget to fund workshops to be requested from USM -USAINS markup too much Testing (RM800 00) 2. Income generated from consultancy (excluding contract research) RM1,34 0,928 (Active in financial year) 3. Endowment (including professorial chairs) 0 4. Gifts (money, equipments, research materials, etc. worth > RM5,00 0 RM1,50 0,000(A ctive in financial year) RM10,0 00 SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITER IA MRU@ 2005 APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 1. Internati onal institutio n participat ion in research related activities MoU a) Total numbe r signed b) Total numbe r of progra mme imple mente d (10% decreas e over the previou s year) 0 0 Cluster Haji -MOA(Idaman Bersih) - Joined research between IPTA (Azam, Taksiah, Ismail, Fauziah, etc.) - membership?? a) 1 a) 2 b) 1 b) 2 c) Total number of staff involved in joint research project. ?? 3 10 10.34 - Joined research , Dr.Shahid Kabir - Libya, Prof.Meor -project Dr.Ismail -Minesota, Singapore -student exchange, Germany, India -Joewono, Germany - field supervisor (oversea) – Meor, Taksiah, Badorul - THES supplement list; student sent abroad for training(Nasehir, Faizal, Marliana, Yusri). -Aida, Lau, Ashraf, Remy, Salahuddin Strategy SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITER IA MRU@ 2005 APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieved 2009 KPI 2010 d) Total number of international students participating in undergraduate / postgraduate/ exchange programme. ?? 0 0 0 3 5 e) Total number of students sent abroad for training. ?? 6.90 % of staff 0 1 3 f) number staff abroad training. ?? 10.34% of staff 0 6 a) 3 international Total of sent for b) 3 national STRATEGY SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITERIA MRU@ 2005 2. Membership a) Total number of in international membership in bodies/associati international ons bodies/associations. b) Total number of staff appointed as leader/committee for the international bodies/associations. 3. InternationalTotal number of projects staff secured international projects (research/ training/ consultancy) (i) Total number of staff involved as project leader (ii) Total amount of international grants secured APEX ?? 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 18 0.17/staff 19 20 0.56/staff 0.55/staff 11 32.4% of staff 7% of staff 3 4 ?? 7 ?? 4 5.00% of staff i) 2 ii) RM1 94,12 6 Strategy -USM is paying for the fee -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM - Each program to get min. of 2 awards -Visiting professor without sabbatical -AUN-SEED-NET fellowship SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITERIA MRU@ 2005 4. Total number of staff International awarded international award/ fellowship/schorlarshi fellowship/sch p olarship 5. International Professional bodies a. Total number of staff accepted as members in the professional bodies/ associations b. Total number of staff appointed to chairmanship/ committee position in the professional bodies/associations at international level APEX ?? 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 13.79% of staff 0.17/staff 3 5 (0.1/staf) (0.15/staf) 18 20 0 3 ?? 1.0% of staff ?? 0 5.00% of staff Strategy -USM is paying for the fee -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM - Each program to get min. of 2 awards -Visiting professor without sabbatical -AUN-SEED-NET fellowship SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITERIA 6. National InterInstitution participation 7. Member in Professional bodies at national level MRU@ 2005 a. Total number of MOUs signed government/privat e agencies/industries) b. Total number of program implemented under each MoU a. Total number of staff accepted as members in the professional bodies/ associations a. Total number of staff accepted as member in professional bodies/associations b. Total number of staff staff appointed to chairmanship/ committee position in the professional bodies/associations APEX 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 Strategy ?? 0 0.17/staff a) 1 b) 1 a) 2 b) 2 -USM is paying for the fee -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM ?? 0 5.00% of staff 23 35 -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM (0.7/staff) (1/staff) 23 (0.7/staff) 35 (1/staff) ?? 2007 (PPKA) 44.83% of staff 6.90% of staff 23 (0.7/staff) 5 - Each program to get min. of 2 awards -Visiting professor without sabbatical -AUN-SEED-NET fellowship SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITERIA MRU@ 2005 8. National a. Total number of projects – staff involved provide in joint similar research information project as international participation b. Total number of students participating in undergraduate/ postgraduate/ exchange programme c. Total number of students sent for training. d. Total number of staff sent for training APEX 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achiev ed 2009 KPI 2010 ?? 58.62% of staff 0.17/sta ff 31 60 -USM is paying for the fee -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM ?? 0 5.00% of staff 0 10 -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM ?? ? Industrial training 126 Industrial training 63 - Each program to get min. of 2 awards 19 5 13.79% of staff Strategy -Visiting professor without sabbatical -AUN-SEED-NET fellowship SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%) CRITERIA 9. National award/ fellowship/scholar ship APEX ?? 2007 (PPKA) 2008 (PPKA) KPI 2009 Achieved 2009 KPI 2010 ? 0.17/staff 1 5 Strategy -USM is paying for the fee -Request budget for Vot 21000 from USM SECTION I- SUPPORT FACILITIES (5%) CRITERIA SUB CRITERIA APEX 1. Accreditated Laboratories (accreditation to GLP/GRP/GMP/ ISO17025) fully operational and calibrated Total 70% number with laboratories GRP; (accreditatio GLP/ n to GMPGLP/GRP/I >8 SO17025) labs fully operational and calibrated 2. Library facilities a. Total Library number – 1.5 of million books/tit titles les b. Total number of online books/tit les (X1000) 2007 (PPKA) 0 2008 (PPKA) 0 KPI 2009 Achieve d 2009 KPI 2010 Strategy SECTION I- SUPPORT FACILITIES (5%) CRITERIA SUB CRITERIA APEX 2007 (PPKA) 3. Supporting facilities including networking and shared facilities service centre or recreational centre access to high end research facilities Total number of supporting facilities (%) 70% with GRP; GLP/ GMP>8 labs 0 2008 (PPKA) 0 KPI 2009 Achiev ed 2009 KPI 2010 Strategy 2.5 Priority: My wish • Involved in consultancies/testing/seminar/short courses/conferences: – Minimum 1 consultancy per year as project leader – Involved in testing – Minimum 1 Short course per discipline per year. 33 2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d) • Involved in community professional activities: – – – – services and Technical committee member. Reviewer of technical paper. Keynote speaker. Examiner. Maintain a good record. • Involved in university services. – Various committee member at USM, Engineering and PPKA. – Involved in sports. 34 2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d) • Closer relationship between staff/student – Kelab • Staff involves in riadah. 35 ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our 2010 KPI 3.0 Our 2010 KIP 4.0 Approaches 5.0 Challanges 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 1. Research niche areas Development of Nexus Kajian Bencana (NKB) Landfill closure and remediation of Mina landfill, Makkah 2. OBE and accreditation. A few years of preparation (documentations, submission, visit by panel). 2 years accreditation has been granted for 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 graduates. EAC will come again next year for the remaining intakes. More preparation and more time will be spent. 3. M.Sc. By mixed-mode: 3 programmes. Intangible output-human resource to many IPTA, IPTS, others. Research work is publishable. Teaching/supervision load, especially to environmemntal engineering group is heavy. 4. Research clusters: Waste management group. NCER Clean Air group. HITEC. Disaster management group. Hari perundingan. Sustainable construction 5. Community projects: Bekalan air untuk orang asli. Projek ekspedisi Sg. Sedim, Sg. Pinang. Pembinaan jeti di Kuala Kedah untuk nelayan. 6. Research collaborations: AUN-SEED-NET. DPRI, Kyoto Univ. Stuttgatt, Germany JSPS group. Imperial College. Haj cluster 7. Conferences and short courses: AWAM’s bi-annually conference. ISG 2010 Short courses-4 times per year. Two per Visiting potential clients. Hari perundingan. Rancangan 8. Promotion: 9. Other publications: Books. Chapter in books 10. Members to various technical committees: International-ISO/TC, IHP, ATC10, AUN-SEED-NET National level-SIRIM, CIDB, FRIM, MOSTI, MTIB, ISM, GLS, Councils, Hill slope, ISG, Hamidi, MWA, PERKOM, MANCID, MSSA, REAM, IEM, EAC, ENSEARCH, MHS, IEPM, Matrikulasi KPM. USM level-……. 11. Testing services to outside organisations: Politeknik. Sekolah. 12. Industrial advisory committee: To other IPTA/IPTS 13. Involvement in Professional body: Sub-committees in the Institution of Engineers Malaysia (IEM). Interview panel for Ir’s application. Speakers 14. Involvement in engineering societies: CIDB committees. PERKOM. NAHRIM REAM 15. Development of various Standards, SOP, Manuals: MASMA SIRIM REAM JKR 16. Expert panel: JAS JKR JPS NAHRIM Jabatan Pembetungan 17. Review of technical paper: ISI journal Citation indexed journal National level journal Proceedings/Conferences paper 18. Editorial Board member: Associate editor Member of the editorial board Editor to Special Issues 19. Students’ Competition: Bridge. UTP-Frisbee. I Struct E CIDB Thesis 20. Involvement in Kampus Sejahtera project: Slope stability. Tasek Harapan. Traffic management. Air pollution study. 21. USM committees: So many…. 22. Student Activities: Bakti Siswa Student development Visit to Latihan Industri 23. Community services: Jurutera masuk kampung 24. Others: Mentor mentee External assessor to promotion exercise. Pusat Islam activities HELWA activities NGO’s: MBK etc ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our 2010 KPI 3.0 Our 2010 KIP 4.0 Approaches 5.0 Challenges 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 4.0 APPROACHES I will still maintain the 3 approaches: 1) Improving infrastructure and physical needs (Resources). 2) Maintaining adequate and quality human capital (Talent). 3) Improving good working environment (Governance). 46 3.1 Improving infrastructure and physical needs (Resources) • Improving facilities to support teaching and learning. • Number of laboratories. • Laboratory facilities/equipment. • Initial work for attaining lab with ISO17025. • Graduate, RO/RA rooms. • Computer/printer and internet. • Lecture room facilities. • Facilities for undergraduate students-common space. 47 • Recreational facilities-within our means. 3.2 Maintaining adequate and quality human capital (Talent) • Keeping the existing staff. • Continue recruiting (e.g. J17). • New ASTS and maintaining good contact with existing ones. • Selecting the best (First class). • Only appoint and maintain productive contract staff. • Increasing the number of Ir’s. • Sending all non-Ph.D. staff to further their studies asap. 48 • Above 95% Ph.D. holder in 5 years. 3.3 Improving good working environment (Governance) • School administrative team. • Reassignment of administrative staff and equating the loading. • Strengthening the technical team with backup system. • Involvement of all staff in PPKA system. • Think-tank group. • Narrowing the gap between staff/management team, between staff/student: – Sports, Hari keluarga, students activities, khenduri, ceramah 49 3.3 Improving good working environment (Governance) (cont’d) Through: -Kelab kebajikan -PKA -ACEPRO 50 ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our 2010 KPI 3.0 Our 2010 KIP 4.0 Approaches 5.0 Challenges 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 5.0 CHALLENGES • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining old teaching style? Late to office and not compensated? Late to lecture? Punch and out? Can lab start at 0810 am? Maintaining good working order of instrument in lab? Limited budget for 2010? We need to increase number of p/g students? Limited space? 52 Old equipment? 5.0 CHALLENGES (cont’d) • Difficult to comply with due dates: – – – – – – Exam question Course plan/teaching plan Updating of folios Coursework and exam mark. Returning the course work/assignment/test. Late to provide response. • Involvement in PPKA’s activities – Staff activities – Student activities • Struggling to produce quality outputs • Distribution of teaching load. 53 CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH GRANTS PPKA, 2010 STAFF Contract lecturer Local lecturer (Professor) Local lecturer (Assoc. Prof.) Senior lecturer Local lecturer Guru REQUIREMENT (AS HEAD) PEAR YEAR To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To obtain at least 2 Science Fund or Equivalent To obtain two external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To obtain one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To head or be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To apply at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term 54 To obtain 1 USM Short Term CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATIONS PPKA, 2010 STAFF Contract Local lecturer (Professor) Local lecturer (Assoc. Prof.) Senior lecturer Local lecturer Teacher CRITERIA (AS HEAD) PER YEAR To submit 3 papers to international journal factor To publish 2 of them To submit 3 papers to international journal factor To publish 2 of them To submit 2 papers to international journal factor To publish 1 of them To submit 2 papers to international journal factor To publish 1 of them To submit 1 paper to international journal factor To publish 1 paper in national journal To submit 1 paper to national conference with impact with impact with impact with impact with impact 55 CRITERIA FOR CONFIRMATION PPKA, 2010 Criteria Teaching Research grant Publication One year Involved in teaching as assigned, and Obtained at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent, and Published* at least 2 papers in national/international refereed and cited journals, and Supervision Supervising at least 1 Ph.D. student and 1 M.Sc. student (as main or co-supervisor), and Others Has involved in at least 1 consultancy/equivalent project, or Has become a member of Technical/committee at national level, and/or at USM level, or Has involved in at least 1 community/equivalent project, or Two year Involved in teaching as assigned, and Obtained at least 1 USM short term grant or equivalent, and Published* at least 1 paper in national/international refereed and cited journals, and Supervising at least 1 Ph.D. student and 1 M.Sc. student (as main or co-supervisor), and Has involved in at least 1 consultancy/equivalent project, or Has become a member of Technical/committee at national level, and/or at USM level, or Has involved in at least 1 community/equivalent project 3 year Involved in teaching as assigned, and Obtained at least 1 USM short term grant or equivalent, and Published* at least 1 paper in national/international refereed and cited journals, and Supervising at least 1 M.Sc. student (as main or cosupervisor), and Has involved in at least 1 consultancy/equivalent project, or Has become a member of Technical/committee at national level, and/or at USM level, or Has involved in at least 1 community/equivalent 56 project *Published, In Press, Accepted (with letter from Editor). Previous published paper prior to joining USM is not acceptab ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1.0 APEX and our present KPI 2.0 Our priority 3.0 Approaches 4.0 Challenges 5.0 SKT 2009 6.0 Some of the projects for 2010 6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010 • Getting full accreditation. • JK Pensyarah-Pelajar for getting input into curriculum. • JK Pengurusan PPKA. • To increase number of short courses. • To involve in projects related to bottom billion: – – – – Water supply for orang asli Sg. Pinang/Sg. Sedim project Community project-design of jetty Other community projects • International projects. • ISO17025-initial work 58 6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010 • All academic staffs will have research grants. • Increase in publications: – Briefing by Dean to staff – Other workshops – Briefing to students • • • • • Increase in consultancy works. Appointments of post-docs. Nexus Kajian Bencana. Incentives to student-u/g and p/g. To get detailed projects under each MoU signed. 59 • KPI data retrieval system-KPI box 6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010 • Assignment submission box for u/g. • Wifi at PPKA-u/g to register account. • Projects by technical team: – SPICK – TRUSS@Civil – KPI web • • • • • • Projek-projek ubahsuai. RMK10, IDB, RU grants. Curriculum review. Annual Report. Hari Perundingan 2? Sukan dalaman 60 6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010 • Ceramah kerohanian/motivasi. • Monument PPKA? • PPKA square? • Student competition. • Benchmarking of our u/g programme. • Tracer + PO/PEO study. • Strengthening u/g delivery: – CW display – Distribution of assignment loading 61 LAST WORDS • We do work for the seek of Allah SWT and not for the Dean/VC…. • I do not carrots to give. I leave it to Allah SWT to reward you. • I need support from all…. • Insyaallah, I will try my level best to serve as Dean. Make doa for me…. 62