KPI 2009 - Universiti Sains Malaysia ( USM ), Kampus Kejuruteraan

Transcription

KPI 2009 - Universiti Sains Malaysia ( USM ), Kampus Kejuruteraan
AMANAT TAHUNAN DEKAN
STRENGTENING THE KEY
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (KPI)
AND KEY INTANGIBLE
PERFORMANCE (KIP) FOR 2010
Hamidi Abdul Aziz
Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Awam,
Kampus Kejuruteraan,
14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, MALAYSIA
8 March 2010
1
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our 2010 KPI
3.0 Our 2010 KIP
4.0 Approaches
5.0 Challenges
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
1.0 APEX AND OUR PRESENT KPI
APEX
Challenges under APEX: 8 pillars
• Nurturing and learning.
• Research and innovation.
• Services and external activities.
• Students and alumni services.
• Graduate studies.
• Concentration of talent.
• Resources.
• Supportive governance.
3
OUR PRESENT KPI
• Everyone has given the best. Thank you
so much for your contribution.
• We need to continue to work harder.
• Where are we?
4
STATISTIK PELAJAR, STAF PENTADBIRAN, STAF AKADEMIK PTJ 2009
Profesor
STAF
PELAJAR
Akademik
Pelajar Siswazah
A
B
C
Profesor Madya
Pensyarah Kanan
Pensyarah
Guru
Felo
Profesor Kunjungan
Jumlah
Pentadbiran
41-54
27-40
1-26
Jumlah
JUMLAH KESELURUHAN
Nisbah
0
0
5
11
6
12
4
1
0
39
Doktor Falsafah, PhD
78
Master, Msc
134
Jumlah
212
Ijazah Pertama
2
2
31
35
74
1
358
Jumlah
358
570
7.70
PENCAPAIAN BAGI TAHUN 2008 vs 2009
No Summary and Total
Marks
1
2
3
4
Section B: Quantity
and Quality of
Researchers (25%)
Section C: Quantity
and Quality of
Research (30%)
Section D: Quantity of
Postgraduates (10%)
Section E: Quality of
Postgraduates (5%)
2008
2009
Target
Marks
Full mark for 2010
Performance
Marks
Obtained
Full
mark
Performance
Target
Marks
Marks
Obtained
UNSATISFA
CTORILY
18.17
25
UNSATISFA
CTORY
22.7
15.21
25
22
UNSATISFA
CTORILY
14.36
30
UNSATISFA
CTORY
30
20.76
30
16
EXCELLENT
15.86
10
EXCELLENT
10
20.90
10
28
EXCELLENT
5.37
5
UNSATISFA
CTORY
5
3.62
5
5
5
Section F: Innovation
(10%)
UNSATISFA
CTORILY
4.69
10
OK
5
8.00
10
5
6
Section G:
OK
Professional Services
and Gifts (7%)
Section H: Networking UNSATISFA
and Linkages (8%)
CTORILY
7.00
7
OK
7
7.00
7
7
6.20
8
UNSATISFA
CTORY
4.8
6.42
8
4.8
OK
0.0
0
OK
0
0.00
0
0
SORRY
71.65
95
OK
84.5
81.90
25
87.8
7
8
Section I: Support
facilities (5%)
TOTAL
KPI 2010 berdasarkan pencapaian 2007-2009
N
o
Summary and
Total Marks
2007
Performanc Marks
e
Obtaine
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2008
2009
Full
mark
Performan
ce
Marks
Obtained
Full mark
Performanc
e
Target
Marks
Marks
Obtained
Full mark
Target Panel’
Marks
s
for
Comm
2010
ent
22
OK
17.1
25
UNSATISF
ACTORILY
18.17
25
UNSATISF 22.7
ACTORY
15.21
25
OK
25.0
30
UNSATISF
ACTORILY
14.36
30
UNSATISF
ACTORY
30
20.76
30
16
OK
10.0
10
EXCELLE
NT
15.86
10
EXCELLE
NT
10
20.90
10
28
FAILED
2.1
5
EXCELLE
NT
5.37
5
UNSATISF
ACTORY
5
3.62
5
5
FAILED
0.0
10
UNSATISF
ACTORILY
4.69
10
OK
5
8.00
10
5
Section G:
Professional
Services and
Gifts (7%)
Section H:
Networking and
Linkages (8%)
FAILED
0.2
7
OK
7.00
7
OK
7
7.00
7
7
FAILED
0.4
8
UNSATISF
ACTORILY
6.20
8
UNSATISF
ACTORY
4.8
6.42
8
4.8
Section I:
Support facilities
(5%)
OK
0.0
0
OK
0.0
0
OK
0
0.00
0
0
TOTAL
SORRY
54.7
95
SORRY
71.65
95
OK
84.5
81.90
25
87.8
Section B:
Quantity and
Quality of
Researchers
(25%)
Section C:
Quantity and
Quality of
Research (30%)
Section D:
Quantity of
Postgraduates
(10%)
Section E:
Quality of
Postgraduates
(5%)
Section F:
Innovation (10%)
PRESTASI PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ 2009
No Summary and Total Marks
Marks Obtained until
Sept 2009
Marks Obtained until
Dec 2009
Full
mark
1
Section B: Quantity and Quality of
Researchers (25%)
20.50
15.21
25
2
Section C: Quantity and Quality of
Research (30%)
14.13
20.76
30
3
Section D: Quantity of
Postgraduates (10%)
27.77
20.90
10
4
Section E: Quality of Postgraduates
(5%)
3.98
3.62
5
4.00
8.00
10
5 Section F: Innovation (10%)
6
Section G: Professional Services
and Gifts (7%)
7.00
7.00
7
7
Section H: Networking and
Linkages (8%)
4.72
6.42
8
0.00
0.00
0
82.11
81.90
95
8 Section I: Support facilities (5%)
Total
5 melebihi 100
6 melebihi 75
75
PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ
2008 & 2009
75
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our 2010 KPI
3.0 Our 2010 KIP
4.0 Approaches
5.0 Challenges
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
2.0 OUR 2010 KPI
AKTIVITI UTAMA YANG TELAH DIJALANKAN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN PENCAPAIAN KPI & KIP PTJ 2009:
Aktiviti Utama dijalankan:
1. Bengkel KPI & KIP di Hotel Tanjung Bungah,
Ogos 2009
2. Bengkel Penulisan Kertaskerja ISI Journal di Taiping,
Nov.2009
3. Seperti perincian dalam Jadual B hingga I.
CRITERIA
1. Critical mass
2. PhD Qualification
or Equivalent &
Professional
a. Total number of
staff with
PhD/DSc, Deng
b. b. Total number
of staff with
Professional
Qualifications
(such as medical,
engineers,archite
cts, accountants
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieved
2009
KPI 2010
70% of academic
staff will be
involved as
Principal
Investigators
(PI) (30%
International)
a) University
funded +
National
grants
b) International
grants
(18/31)
*100%
a) (26/29)
*100%
= 89.66 %
62%
(3
internation
al project)
49
projects
144% (2
internation
al projects)
150% (10%
international)
75%
a) 73.53
%
75%
70%
=
58.06 %
a) (24/3
1)*10
0%
=77.45%
b) (3 /29 :
Internation
al)
=10.34
a)
(21/29)*10
0%
b) 0
=72.41%
b) 0
b) 0
Strategy
-Output tabled in
Majlis
-SKT criteria
-Confirmation criteria
- All new staff to hold
grant
-Only recruiting staff
with PhD holders
(application from
outside)
- Those w/o PhD
(Shaharudin,
Mastura, Harris and
Fared Murshed) to be
sent for PhD in 2010.
Request USM fund
as their CGPA<3.0
CRITERIA
3. Research
Experience
(3 cohorts)
4. Number of
recognitions/
awards/stew
ardship
conferred by
national and
international
learned and
professional
bodies
a) National
b) Internatio
nal
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
With 25%
distribution
of staff
with >20 yrs
experience,
35% with 1020 yrs and
40% with
<10 yrs
experience
2.94%
distribution
of staff
with >20 yrs
experience,
32.26% with
10-20 yrs
and
64.52% with
<10 yrs
experience
4/29
(13.79% )dist
ribution of
staff with >20
yrs
experience,
11/29
(37.93%) with
10-20 yrs and
14/29
(48.28% )
with <10 yrs
experience
200
(40%
international)
3
(66.67%
international)
a) 3
(0.07/staf)
b) 1
(0.03/staf)
KPI 2009
(2009)
>20 yrs
(20.59%)
10-20 yrs (
29.41%)
<10 yrs
(50%)
Achieved
2009
>20 yrs (7
staff=20.59
%)
10-20 yrs
(10 staff=
29.41%)
KPI 2010
>20 yrs
(20.59%)
10-20 yrs (
29.41%)
<10 yrs
(50%)
<10 yrs (17
staff=50%)
5 (2
international)
4 (3
international)
5 (2
international)
Strategy
-PPKA is extending
contract of Dr.Nordin
(>20 yrs) and
recruiting Prof. Koh
Hock Lye;
+2(Dr.Fauziah > 20
yrs); +1(10-20 yrs;
Dr.Choong)
(Notes:
- Contract staff,
previous experience
prior to joining USM
counted ? )
- Each program is
instructed to get min.
of 2 awards
CRITERIA
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieved
2009
1.
Publicatio
ns
2 papers in
national
/international
refereed and
cited journals
per staff/yr
3
10 per
civil
school @
0.34 per
staff
25 per
civil
school @
0.5 per
staff
21 per civil
school @ 0.62
per staff
or
Cumulative
Impact Factor
for the
institution of
not less than
500
11.195 per
civil school
@ 0.361
per staff
12.76 per
civil
school @
0.44 per
staff
or
Having a
Cumulative
Citation Index
of 5,000/year
52
?
20.117 per
civil School @
0.59 per staff
KPI 2010
40 per civil
School @1.0
/staff
Strategy
-SKT criteria
-Seminar by
prominent professor
-Workshops
-Attending scientific
writing workshops
-Confirmation criteria
-Discourage
attending
conferences
-Graduate students
have to publish (2 ISI
for Ph.D., 1 ISI for
M.Sc.)
CRITERIA
APEX
Publication
s
Total number
of
publications
in noncitationindexed
journal
Total number
of chapter in
books
Other
publications
that have
created an
impact to
government/
society/policy
2007
(PPKA)
15 per
civil
school @
0.65 per
staff
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
KPI 2010
12 per
civil
school @
0.41 per
staff
0.5 /staff
16 per
School
@0.47/sta
ff
20 per
School
@0.6/staff
0
0.01/staf
80 per
School
@2.35/sta
ff
6 per
School
@0.16/staff
51 per
civil
school @
1.76 per
staff
1.0/staf
53 per
School
@1.56/sta
ff
76 per
School
@2.0/staff
39 per
civil
school @
1.56 per
staff
39 per
civil
school @
1.56 per
staff
Achieved
2009
Strategy
-SKT criteria
-Seminar by prominent
professor
-Workshops
-Attending scientific
writing workshops
-Confirmation criteria
-Discourage attending
conferences
-Graduate students have
to publish (2 ISI for
Ph.D., 1 ISI for M.Sc.)
CRITERIA
2. Research
grants for
S&T
academic
staff
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
At RM
80000/sta
ff/yr of
which at
least 10%
is from
internatio
nal
sources
and 20%
from
private
sector
At RM
154,2490
/staff/yr
of which
at least
4.02% is
from
internatio
nal
sources
and 6.2%
from
private
sector
At RM 38,996.63
staff/yr of which
at least 0% is
from
international
sources and
15.8% from
private sector
a) Government
funding
(RM32,835.93
/staff/yr)
b) Private
fundings
(including
contract
research)
(6160.70/staff
/yr)
c) International
fundings (0)
RM
185,000/staf
f /yr
(about the
same
percentage
as in year
2008)
Achieved
2009
RM962,238
per School
(28.3K/staff
(national)
RM424,504
per School
(12.5K/staff
(private)
RM0
KPI 2010
RM50K/staf
f (national)
RM10K/staf
f (private)
RM3K/staff
(internation
al)
Strategy
-SKT criteria
-Seminar by prominent
professor
-Workshops
-Attending scientific
writing workshops
-Confirmation criteria
CRITERIA
APEX
3. Research
expenditure
Should
not be
less than
70% of
grants
attained/
y
4. Post-docs
appointed
70/yr
2007
(PPKA)
41.43%
(based
on
amount
spent)
-****
None
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieved
2009
32.3%
(based on
amount
spent)
-****
40%
30.3%
Note:
-Money not received (RM2,599,8
in the same year; so, 13.13 out
spending can only
of
begin in the
RM8,572,39
following year
5.20)
- difficult to get
statement of
expenditure
- problem in getting
amount received for
a particular year
1
(Internation
al)
4 (Ismail, Rozi,
Hamidi(2))
1
KPI 2010
40%
2
Strategy
SECTION D-QUANTITY OF POSTGRADUATES (10%)
CRITERIA
APEX
1. Number of
PhDs
graduated
1 PhD:5 staff
2. Number of
Ph.D.
enrolled:
a) Total
number
per year
b) Ratio of
Ph.D.
enrolled
per
academic
staff
>50%
(at least 10%
addressing
issues
related to
sustainable
dev.)
2 PhD:1
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
5 PhD.:31
Staff
2
PhD.:29
Staff
= 1 PhD:
6.2Staff
182PG:31
staff
= 5.87 PG : 1
staff
= 1 PhD:
14.5 Staff
62
PhD:29
staff
= 2.14
PhD : 1
staff
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieved
2009
5 : 38 staff
(Azhar, Zawawi,
Chong, Alik,
Saberi)
=1Ph.D.:7.6
staff
4:34
115PG:39
Staff(incl. Postdoc +
Dr.Farhan) (as
of July 2009)
=2.95PG:1 staff
a) Total
Ph.D.=78 (8
new Ph.D.)
KPI 2010
5:36
Strategy
-push the
supervisors
b) 2.25
staff. :Ph.D.
a) 10 new
Ph.D.
b) 3.6
Ph.D. :staff
-Headstart is on
- Fellowship IPS
SECTION D-QUANTITY OF POSTGRADUATES (10%)
CRITERIA
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieved
2009
3.
Postgraduates
enrolment
a) Ratio of
postgraduate to
academic staff
3 PG:1 staff
182PG: 496
UG
= 1PG:2.73
UG
a) 169 PG:
29 staff
=5.83:1
183PG:387U
G(as of July
2009)
=1PG:2.11U
G
a) 212PG:
34
staff=6.
2PG:St
aff
b) 212PG:
358UG
=1PG:1
.7UG
b) 1PG:1.7
UG
24.36%
25%
b) Ratio of
postgraduates
(based on
research and
mixed mode) to
undergraduates
4. Percentage
of international
postgraduates
b) 0.26
20%
(> 60%
externally
fully funded,
10% from
countries of
bottom
billion)
18.13%
21.89%
22%
KPI 2010
Strategy
a) 4
PG:staff
-Roadshow at
Embassys
- Web PPKA in Arabic
SECTION E-QUALITY OF POSTGRADUATES (5%)
CRITERIA
APEX
2007 2008
(PPKA) (PPKA)
1. Entry
70%
39.01
qualification at postgr %
Bachelor level aduate
s with
CGPA
≥3
69.82%
KPI 2009 Achieved
(2009)
2009
KPI 2010
Strategy
50%
65%
-fellowship,
headstart
-USM graduate
obtained CGPA<3.0
10%
-
Percentage of
postgraduate
intake with
CGPA ≥ 3.25 or
equivalent
2. Fellowships/ >20%
grants awarded
to
postgraduates
via research
mode
59.11%
49.26%
24.32
%
5.92%
25%
0.55%
-
Roadshow
Updated PPKA
web
Leaflets
SECTION F-INNOVATIONS (10%)
CRITERIA
APEX
2007
(PPK
A)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
Achieve
d 2009
KPI 2010
1. Number of patents
attained/number of
products
commercialized/
number of technology
know-how licensing/
number of
IPR/copyrights
(including original
writings)
At least
(200
cumulative)
2
Granted
(0)
4
a) Grant
ed 1
b) Filed
1
c) Pendi
ng 3
(Natio
nal)
a) Granted
1
b) Filed 2
2. Total number of
products licensed for
commercialization
??
0
0
0
3. Total number of
technology know-how
licensing
??
0
0
4
2
4. IPR of original
writing
??
0
0.01
no./year/
staff
6
5
0
0.03
no./year/
staff
2
Other
IPR/copyrights/trademar
ks
Pending
(1
active/yr)
Strategy
- USM should pay
the maintenance
fee
SECTION G: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND GIFTS (7%)
CRITERIA
1. Income
generated from
training courses/
services/
consultancy/ postgraduate student
fees/ endowment/
gifts
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
(2009)
RM120mil
lion/yr
RM505,3
02.36
RM870,0
00
(RM0.03
million/st
aff/year)
RM1,000,0
00
Achieve
d 2009
KPI 2010
Strategy
RM103,
675
Courses
(RM60,0
00)
-Have tried but cost
expensive;
-To organize in campus
to reduce cost
- min. 2 per program
- visit JKR , other
agencies for promotion
-Budget to fund
workshops to be
requested from USM
-USAINS markup too
much
Testing
(RM800
00)
2. Income
generated from
consultancy
(excluding contract
research)
RM1,34
0,928
(Active
in
financial
year)
3. Endowment
(including
professorial chairs)
0
4. Gifts (money,
equipments,
research materials,
etc. worth >
RM5,00
0
RM1,50
0,000(A
ctive in
financial
year)
RM10,0
00
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITER
IA
MRU@
2005
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
Achieve
d 2009
KPI
2010
1.
Internati
onal
institutio
n
participat
ion in
research
related
activities
MoU
a) Total
numbe
r
signed
b) Total
numbe
r of
progra
mme
imple
mente
d
(10%
decreas
e over
the
previou
s year)
0
0
Cluster Haji
-MOA(Idaman Bersih)
- Joined research between IPTA
(Azam, Taksiah, Ismail, Fauziah,
etc.)
- membership??
a) 1
a) 2
b) 1
b) 2
c) Total
number of
staff
involved in
joint
research
project.
??
3
10
10.34
- Joined research , Dr.Shahid
Kabir
- Libya, Prof.Meor
-project Dr.Ismail
-Minesota, Singapore
-student exchange, Germany,
India
-Joewono, Germany
- field supervisor (oversea) –
Meor, Taksiah, Badorul
- THES supplement list; student
sent abroad for training(Nasehir,
Faizal, Marliana, Yusri).
-Aida, Lau, Ashraf, Remy,
Salahuddin
Strategy
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITER
IA
MRU@
2005
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI
2009
Achieved
2009
KPI 2010
d)
Total
number
of
international
students
participating in
undergraduate
/
postgraduate/
exchange
programme.
??
0
0
0
3
5
e)
Total
number
of
students sent
abroad
for
training.
??
6.90 % of
staff
0
1
3
f)
number
staff
abroad
training.
??
10.34%
of staff
0
6
a) 3
international
Total
of
sent
for
b) 3 national
STRATEGY
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITERIA
MRU@
2005
2. Membership a) Total number of
in international membership
in
bodies/associati international
ons
bodies/associations.
b) Total number of
staff appointed as
leader/committee
for the international
bodies/associations.
3. InternationalTotal number of
projects
staff
secured
international
projects (research/
training/
consultancy)
(i)
Total
number of staff
involved as project
leader
(ii)
Total
amount
of
international grants
secured
APEX
??
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
Achieve
d 2009
KPI 2010
18
0.17/staff
19
20
0.56/staff
0.55/staff
11
32.4% of
staff
7% of
staff
3
4
??
7
??
4
5.00% of
staff
i) 2
ii) RM1
94,12
6
Strategy
-USM is paying for the
fee
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
-Request budget for
Vot 21000 from USM
- Each program to get
min. of 2 awards
-Visiting professor
without sabbatical
-AUN-SEED-NET
fellowship
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITERIA
MRU@
2005
4.
Total number of staff
International awarded international
award/
fellowship/schorlarshi
fellowship/sch
p
olarship
5.
International
Professional
bodies
a. Total number of
staff accepted as
members in the
professional bodies/
associations
b. Total number of
staff appointed to
chairmanship/
committee position in
the professional
bodies/associations at
international level
APEX
??
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
Achieve
d 2009
KPI 2010
13.79%
of staff
0.17/staff
3
5
(0.1/staf)
(0.15/staf)
18
20
0
3
??
1.0% of
staff
??
0
5.00% of
staff
Strategy
-USM is paying for the
fee
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
-Request budget for
Vot 21000 from USM
- Each program to get
min. of 2 awards
-Visiting professor
without sabbatical
-AUN-SEED-NET
fellowship
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITERIA
6. National
InterInstitution
participation
7. Member in
Professional
bodies at
national level
MRU@
2005
a. Total number of
MOUs signed
government/privat
e
agencies/industries)
b. Total number of
program
implemented under
each MoU
a. Total number of
staff accepted as
members in the
professional bodies/
associations
a. Total number of
staff accepted as
member in
professional
bodies/associations
b. Total number of
staff staff
appointed to
chairmanship/
committee position
in the professional
bodies/associations
APEX
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
Achieve
d 2009
KPI 2010
Strategy
??
0
0.17/staff
a) 1
b) 1
a) 2
b) 2
-USM is paying for the fee
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
??
0
5.00% of
staff
23
35
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
(0.7/staff)
(1/staff)
23
(0.7/staff)
35
(1/staff)
??
2007
(PPKA)
44.83%
of staff
6.90% of
staff
23
(0.7/staff)
5
- Each program to get min.
of 2 awards
-Visiting professor
without sabbatical
-AUN-SEED-NET
fellowship
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITERIA
MRU@
2005
8. National a. Total number of
projects –
staff involved
provide
in
joint
similar
research
information
project
as
international
participation
b. Total number of
students
participating
in
undergraduate/
postgraduate/
exchange
programme
c. Total number of
students sent
for training.
d. Total number of
staff sent for
training
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI
2009
Achiev
ed 2009
KPI
2010
??
58.62%
of staff
0.17/sta
ff
31
60
-USM is paying for the fee
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
??
0
5.00%
of staff
0
10
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
??
?
Industrial
training
126
Industrial
training
63
- Each program to get min. of
2 awards
19
5
13.79%
of staff
Strategy
-Visiting professor without
sabbatical
-AUN-SEED-NET
fellowship
SECTION H: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES (8%)
CRITERIA
9. National award/
fellowship/scholar
ship
APEX
??
2007
(PPKA)
2008
(PPKA)
KPI 2009
Achieved
2009
KPI 2010
?
0.17/staff
1
5
Strategy
-USM is paying for the fee
-Request budget for Vot
21000 from USM
SECTION I- SUPPORT FACILITIES (5%)
CRITERIA
SUB
CRITERIA
APEX
1. Accreditated
Laboratories
(accreditation to
GLP/GRP/GMP/
ISO17025) fully
operational and
calibrated
Total
70%
number
with
laboratories GRP;
(accreditatio GLP/
n to
GMPGLP/GRP/I
>8
SO17025)
labs
fully
operational
and
calibrated
2. Library
facilities
a. Total
Library
number
– 1.5
of
million
books/tit titles
les
b. Total
number
of online
books/tit
les
(X1000)
2007
(PPKA)
0
2008
(PPKA)
0
KPI
2009
Achieve
d 2009
KPI
2010
Strategy
SECTION I- SUPPORT FACILITIES (5%)
CRITERIA
SUB
CRITERIA
APEX
2007
(PPKA)
3. Supporting
facilities
including
networking and
shared facilities
service centre or
recreational
centre access to
high end
research
facilities
Total
number of
supporting
facilities (%)
70%
with
GRP;
GLP/
GMP>8
labs
0
2008
(PPKA)
0
KPI
2009
Achiev
ed 2009
KPI
2010
Strategy
2.5 Priority: My wish
• Involved in consultancies/testing/seminar/short
courses/conferences:
– Minimum 1 consultancy per year as project leader
– Involved in testing
– Minimum 1 Short course per discipline per year.
33
2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d)
• Involved in community
professional activities:
–
–
–
–
services
and
Technical committee member.
Reviewer of technical paper.
Keynote speaker.
Examiner. Maintain a good record.
• Involved in university services.
– Various committee member at USM, Engineering
and PPKA.
– Involved in sports.
34
2.5 Priority: My wish (cont’d)
• Closer relationship between staff/student
– Kelab
• Staff involves in riadah.
35
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our 2010 KPI
3.0 Our 2010 KIP
4.0 Approaches
5.0 Challanges
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
1. Research niche areas


Development of Nexus Kajian Bencana (NKB)
Landfill closure and remediation of Mina landfill, Makkah
2. OBE and accreditation.




A few years of preparation (documentations, submission,
visit by panel).
2 years accreditation has been granted for 2008/2009 and
2009/2010 graduates.
EAC will come again next year for the remaining intakes.
More preparation and more time will be spent.
3. M.Sc. By mixed-mode:




3 programmes.
Intangible output-human resource to many IPTA, IPTS, others.
Research work is publishable.
Teaching/supervision load, especially to environmemntal
engineering group is heavy.
4. Research clusters:







Waste management group.
NCER
Clean Air group.
HITEC.
Disaster management group.
Hari perundingan.
Sustainable construction
5. Community projects:



Bekalan air untuk orang asli.
Projek ekspedisi Sg. Sedim, Sg. Pinang.
Pembinaan jeti di Kuala Kedah untuk nelayan.
6. Research collaborations:






AUN-SEED-NET.
DPRI, Kyoto Univ.
Stuttgatt, Germany
JSPS group.
Imperial College.
Haj cluster
7. Conferences and short courses:



AWAM’s bi-annually conference.
ISG 2010
Short courses-4 times per year. Two per


Visiting potential clients.
Hari perundingan.
Rancangan
8. Promotion:
9. Other publications:


Books.
Chapter in books
10. Members to various technical committees:



International-ISO/TC, IHP, ATC10, AUN-SEED-NET
National level-SIRIM, CIDB, FRIM, MOSTI, MTIB, ISM, GLS,
Councils, Hill slope, ISG, Hamidi, MWA, PERKOM, MANCID,
MSSA, REAM, IEM, EAC, ENSEARCH, MHS, IEPM, Matrikulasi
KPM.
USM level-…….
11. Testing services to outside organisations:


Politeknik.
Sekolah.
12. Industrial advisory committee:

To other IPTA/IPTS
13. Involvement in Professional body:



Sub-committees in the Institution of Engineers Malaysia (IEM).
Interview panel for Ir’s application.
Speakers
14. Involvement in engineering societies:




CIDB committees.
PERKOM.
NAHRIM
REAM
15. Development of various Standards, SOP, Manuals:




MASMA
SIRIM
REAM
JKR
16. Expert panel:





JAS
JKR
JPS
NAHRIM
Jabatan Pembetungan
17. Review of technical paper:




ISI journal
Citation indexed journal
National level journal
Proceedings/Conferences paper
18. Editorial Board member:



Associate editor
Member of the editorial board
Editor to Special Issues
19. Students’ Competition:





Bridge.
UTP-Frisbee.
I Struct E
CIDB
Thesis
20. Involvement in Kampus Sejahtera project:




Slope stability.
Tasek Harapan.
Traffic management.
Air pollution study.
21. USM committees:

So many….
22. Student Activities:



Bakti Siswa
Student development
Visit to Latihan Industri
23. Community services:

Jurutera masuk kampung
24. Others:

 Mentor mentee
External assessor to promotion exercise.
 Pusat Islam activities
 HELWA activities

NGO’s:
 MBK
 etc
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our 2010 KPI
3.0 Our 2010 KIP
4.0 Approaches
5.0 Challenges
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
4.0 APPROACHES
I will still maintain the 3 approaches:
1) Improving infrastructure and physical needs
(Resources).
2) Maintaining adequate and quality human
capital (Talent).
3) Improving good working environment
(Governance).
46
3.1 Improving infrastructure and physical
needs (Resources)
• Improving facilities to support teaching and
learning.
• Number of laboratories.
• Laboratory facilities/equipment.
• Initial work for attaining lab with ISO17025.
• Graduate, RO/RA rooms.
• Computer/printer and internet.
• Lecture room facilities.
• Facilities for undergraduate students-common
space.
47
• Recreational facilities-within our means.
3.2 Maintaining adequate and quality
human capital (Talent)
• Keeping the existing staff.
• Continue recruiting (e.g. J17).
• New ASTS and maintaining good contact with
existing ones.
• Selecting the best (First class).
• Only appoint and maintain productive contract
staff.
• Increasing the number of Ir’s.
• Sending all non-Ph.D. staff to further their
studies asap.
48
• Above 95% Ph.D. holder in 5 years.
3.3 Improving good working environment
(Governance)
• School administrative team.
• Reassignment of administrative staff and
equating the loading.
• Strengthening the technical team with backup
system.
• Involvement of all staff in PPKA system.
• Think-tank group.
• Narrowing the gap between staff/management
team, between staff/student:
– Sports, Hari keluarga, students activities, khenduri,
ceramah
49
3.3 Improving good working environment
(Governance) (cont’d)
Through:
-Kelab kebajikan
-PKA
-ACEPRO
50
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our 2010 KPI
3.0 Our 2010 KIP
4.0 Approaches
5.0 Challenges
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
5.0 CHALLENGES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintaining old teaching style?
Late to office and not compensated?
Late to lecture?
Punch and out?
Can lab start at 0810 am?
Maintaining good working order of instrument
in lab?
Limited budget for 2010?
We need to increase number of p/g students?
Limited space?
52
Old equipment?
5.0 CHALLENGES (cont’d)
• Difficult to comply with due dates:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Exam question
Course plan/teaching plan
Updating of folios
Coursework and exam mark.
Returning the course work/assignment/test.
Late to provide response.
• Involvement in PPKA’s activities
– Staff activities
– Student activities
• Struggling to produce quality outputs
• Distribution of teaching load.
53
CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH GRANTS PPKA, 2010
STAFF
Contract lecturer
Local lecturer
(Professor)
Local lecturer
(Assoc. Prof.)
Senior lecturer
Local lecturer
Guru
REQUIREMENT (AS HEAD) PEAR YEAR
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To be involved in at least one external fund (research or
consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To obtain at least 2 Science Fund or Equivalent
To obtain two external fund (research or consultancy)
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To obtain one external fund (research or consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To head or be involved in at least one external fund
(research or consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
To apply at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent
To be involved in at least one external fund (research or
consultancy)
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
54
To obtain 1 USM Short Term
CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATIONS PPKA, 2010
STAFF
Contract
Local lecturer
(Professor)
Local lecturer
(Assoc. Prof.)
Senior lecturer
Local lecturer
Teacher
CRITERIA (AS HEAD) PER YEAR
To submit 3 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 2 of them
To submit 3 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 2 of them
To submit 2 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 1 of them
To submit 2 papers to international journal
factor
To publish 1 of them
To submit 1 paper to international journal
factor
To publish 1 paper in national journal
To submit 1 paper to national conference
with impact
with impact
with impact
with impact
with impact
55
CRITERIA FOR CONFIRMATION PPKA, 2010
Criteria
Teaching
Research
grant
Publication
One year
Involved in teaching as
assigned, and
Obtained at least 1 Science
Fund or Equivalent, and
Published* at least 2 papers
in
national/international
refereed and cited journals,
and
Supervision Supervising at least 1 Ph.D.
student and 1 M.Sc. student
(as main or co-supervisor),
and
Others
Has involved in at least 1
consultancy/equivalent
project, or
Has become a member of
Technical/committee
at
national level, and/or at
USM level, or
Has involved in at least 1
community/equivalent
project, or
Two year
Involved in teaching as
assigned, and
Obtained at least 1 USM
short
term
grant
or
equivalent, and
Published* at least 1 paper in
national/international
refereed and cited journals,
and
Supervising at least 1 Ph.D.
student and 1 M.Sc. student
(as main or co-supervisor),
and
Has involved in at least 1
consultancy/equivalent
project, or
Has become a member of
Technical/committee
at
national level, and/or at
USM level, or
Has involved in at least 1
community/equivalent
project
3 year
Involved in teaching as
assigned, and
Obtained at least 1 USM
short
term
grant
or
equivalent, and
Published* at least 1 paper in
national/international
refereed and cited journals,
and
Supervising at least 1 M.Sc.
student (as main or cosupervisor), and
Has involved in at least 1
consultancy/equivalent
project, or
Has become a member of
Technical/committee
at
national level, and/or at USM
level, or
Has involved in at least 1
community/equivalent
56
project
*Published, In Press, Accepted (with letter from Editor). Previous published paper prior to joining USM is not acceptab
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
1.0 APEX and our present KPI
2.0 Our priority
3.0 Approaches
4.0 Challenges
5.0 SKT 2009
6.0 Some of the projects for 2010
6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010
• Getting full accreditation.
• JK Pensyarah-Pelajar for getting input into
curriculum.
• JK Pengurusan PPKA.
• To increase number of short courses.
• To involve in projects related to bottom billion:
–
–
–
–
Water supply for orang asli
Sg. Pinang/Sg. Sedim project
Community project-design of jetty
Other community projects
• International projects.
• ISO17025-initial work
58
6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010
• All academic staffs will have research grants.
• Increase in publications:
– Briefing by Dean to staff
– Other workshops
– Briefing to students
•
•
•
•
•
Increase in consultancy works.
Appointments of post-docs.
Nexus Kajian Bencana.
Incentives to student-u/g and p/g.
To get detailed projects under each MoU
signed.
59
• KPI data retrieval system-KPI box
6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010
• Assignment submission box for u/g.
• Wifi at PPKA-u/g to register account.
• Projects by technical team:
– SPICK
– TRUSS@Civil
– KPI web
•
•
•
•
•
•
Projek-projek ubahsuai.
RMK10, IDB, RU grants.
Curriculum review.
Annual Report.
Hari Perundingan 2?
Sukan dalaman
60
6.0 SOME OF THE PROJECTS FOR 2010
• Ceramah kerohanian/motivasi.
• Monument PPKA?
• PPKA square?
• Student competition.
• Benchmarking of our u/g programme.
• Tracer + PO/PEO study.
• Strengthening u/g delivery:
– CW display
– Distribution of assignment loading
61
LAST WORDS
• We do work for the seek of Allah SWT and not
for the Dean/VC….
• I do not carrots to give. I leave it to Allah
SWT to reward you.
• I need support from all….
• Insyaallah, I will try my level best to serve as
Dean. Make doa for me….
62