competition rules - Concurso de Ideas "Parque Lineal Ferrocarril de

Transcription

ww
INTERNATIONAL IDEAS
COMPETITION
CUERNAVACA RAILWAY LINEAR PARK
COMPETITION RULES
INTERNATIONAL IDEAS COMPETITION FOR
THE CUERNAVACA RAILROAD LINEAR PARK
CDMX / 2016
2
COMPETITION RULES - INTERNATIONAL IDEAS COMPETITION
3
FOR THE CUERNAVACA RAILWAY LINEAR PARK
CALL FOR ENTRIES
The Mexico City Government, via the Secretaría de Desarrollo
Urbano y Vivienda SEDUVI (Department of Housing and Urban
Development) and the Borough of Miguel Hidalgo (the Convening
Committee, see Glossary for description), with the participation
of SAC-G (Granadas Cooperative Operating Area) is putting out
a call to teams of urban designers, architects, and landscape
architects who are interested in participating in the Cuernavaca
Railway Linear Park International Architecture and Landscape
Design Competition. Participants may be both Mexican and
international.
In order to ensure transparency and guarantee that the best
architectural proposal is selected, the Convening Committee
designates the CAM-SAM (Mexico City Institute of Architecture,
Mexico City Association of Architects) (“CAM-SAM” by its Spanish
acronym), as the competition’s Technical Coordinator.
The Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park will be built within the
area granted by bailment to the Borough of Miguel Hidalgo by
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México S.A. de C.V. (the Valley
of Mexico Railway and Terminal Corporation).
Competition Technical Coordinator: Mexico City Institute of
Architecture, Mexico City Association of Architects (CAM-SAM).
4
INDEX
Call for entries
03
Rules & guidelines
06
Introduction
08
Competition procedure
08
Requirements for participation
09
Prizes
09
Area of competition
10
Program
11
Objetives
11
Structure & strategy
14
Sections
15
Strategic intersections
15
Information and registering to participate
22
Registration and document submission
22
Official enrollment
22
Language
22
Phase I: Submission guidelines
23
Selection and anouncement of finalists
24
Confirmation
24
Phase II: Scope
24
Site visit & community dialogue
24
Phase II: Submission guidelines
24
Oral presentation
26
Final valuation
26
Proposal submission
27
Calendar of events
27
Jury
29
Tecnical Coordination Committee
30
Scientific Committee
31
Advisory Committee
31
Contract adjudication
32
additional information
33
Exhibition of projects
33
Forms and appendix
34
Glossary
35
5
ww
RULES AND GUIDELINES
7
PARQUE LINEAL FERROCARRIL DE CUERNAVACA
8
INTRODUCTION
Recovering residual urban spaces, including unused railways, has become a global trends as a strategy to reclaim public space. The
borough of Miguel Hidalgo in Mexico City aims to recover the underutilized infrastructure of the Cuernavaca Railway and turn it into
a dynamic public space. To this end, the borough is calling for projects from teams of architects, urban designers, and landscape
architects, both Mexican and international, who wish to participate in the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park International Design
Competition.
The project seeks to honor the site’s history while responding to an imminent need for green and recreational spaces, and to expand
opportunities for the local community to interact with one another in the public space.
The Convening Committee seeks innovative proposals to recover railway infrastructure located on the rails of the former Cuernavaca
Railway, in the stretch between two thoroughfares, the Avenida Ejército Nacional and the Calzada de los Gallos, and to transform
these urban remains into a public space that uses the landscape as water-management infrastructure. The linear park will be 4.6km
in length. It will promote responsible rainwater management, which will be used both for park maintenance and to reinsert rainwater
into the aquifer. Additionally, it will enhance social development and sustainable mobility within the region.
Diverse structures, including bridges, industrial buildings, bicycle lanes, avenues, museums, high- and low-density housing, and city
infrastructure, are part of the urban fabric that runs through, bounds, and contrasts with the study area. Given this, proposals should
be sensitive both to the complexity and diversity of the surroundings, and the specific needs of the local community. Additionally,
proposals should respond to the objectives, rules, and regulations laid out further in this document.
This Competition represents an unequivocal opportunity to transform the urban landscape of Mexico City. The Convening Committee
calls on the creativity of architects, urban designers, and landscape architects, to develop proposals that can become an urban
reference for the future.
COMPETITION PROCEDURE
Following the online registration and receipt of documents that validate participants’ academic degree (professional accreditation
recognized by the Department of Public Education (“SEP” by its Spanish acronym) and/or the equivalent for the country where the
participants completed their professional studies), participants who fulfill the requirements will be notified of their official enrollment
in the competition.
The participants who fulfill the requirements will present an overall schematic design proposal for the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
The Jury will analyze and evaluate each one of the participant’s schematic design proposals anonymously, and will select five finalists.
The finalists will be invited to participate in Phase II of the Competition. The Jury will also select an alternate proposal in case one of the
finalists does not wish to proceed in the Competition.
The five selected finalists will be asked to confirm their interest in proceeding with the Competition via email. In the event that one of
them does not confirm their interest, the alternate will be invited to take their place.
Each one of the 5 finalists will be asked to develop a detailed schematic design, based on their overall proposal, for a section of the
park and the intersections that bound it. The section and intersections to be designed will be assigned before beginning Phase II.
Phase II of the competition will not be anonymous. In this phase, finalists will present their proposals using the materials and format
described further on in this document, and will give an oral presentation before the Jury and the Advisory Committee. The Jury and
Advisory Committee will be described further on in this document.
The Jury will analyze and evaluate the proposals on the basis of the materials submitted and the oral presentation. Their decision will
be announced publicly by the CAM-SAM on the dates listed in the Calendar of Events. The results will not be subject to appeal.
The members of the Advisory Committee will have a voice, but no vote, during the final evaluation.
9
REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICIPATION
Registration will take place online. After participants have registered and submitted documents to validate their academic degree
electronically, participants who satisfy the requirements will be notified and will be officially enrolled in the Competition.
This Competition is public and open, without exception, and its call for entries is open to Mexican architects, urban designers, and
landscape architects, as well as foreign professionals from these same disciplines. Participants must hold professional accreditation
recognized by the Department of Public Education (SEP) and/or the equivalent for the country in which they completed their education.
Participants may work in teams.
Employees of the sponsoring institutions, members of the Scientific Committee, members of the Jury, members of the Technical
Coordination Committee, as well as employees or relatives (spouses or blood relatives of up to four degrees of consanguinity, by
affinity or marriage) of the aforementioned people, may not participate in the Competition.
In the event that the architect, urban planner, landscape architect, or team that wins the Competition does not have tax residency in
Mexico, he or she will be asked to form a temporary partnership with a Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm
that has not participated in any phase of the Competition. The Mexican partner must have the technical and material capacity—which
will be demonstrated via a portfolio of work that meets a set of requirements, which will be shared at the appropriate moment—as
well as the infrastructure necessary to complete a design development and construction documents for a project of this size. The
Mexican collaborator will be required to meet legal, administrative, and tax requirements before finalizing the contract.
The winning team and its Mexican collaborator will be asked to submit a copy of the partnership agreement between the two parties.
The agreement will indicate acceptance that the Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm will be the party to
enter into a contract with the entity chosen by the Convening Committee. If the winner does not have a relationship with a Mexican
architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm with the required characteristics, the Technical Coordinator and the Scientific
Committee will be available to recommend someone suitable.
PRIZES
The 5 competition finalists will be compensated $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand Mexican pesos and 00/100 cents) plus tax
(“IVA” by its Spanish acronym) to cover the costs of developing the project during Phase II. The payment will be made by the Technical
Coordinator of the competition to each participant or team representative, as long as his or her proposal is complete and submitted
on time, following submission of the required invoice or tax receipt.
It is understood that no participant will require any payment beyond that which has been described here, except for the participant
or team who wins the Competition.
In addition to the $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand Mexican pesos and 00/100 cents) for payment of expenses established in the
previous paragraph, the winner will receive a contract to complete Design Development and Construction Documents for the entirety
of the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
This contract will include compensation of $19,500,000.00 (nineteen million, five hundred thousand Mexican pesos 00/100 cents) plus
tax (IVA).
The participants of Phase II of the Competition agree to accept this fee in the event that they win.
In the event that the contract is not seen through for reasons not attributable to the participant or team that wins the Competition, the
Convening Committee will provide the winning participant or team $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand Mexican pesos 00/100 cents)
plus tax (IVA) in compensation, in addition to the Compensation of Costs for project development in Phase II.
10
AREA OF THE COMPETITION
The initial assessment concludes that the current city structure surrounding the rails of the Cuernavaca Railway, in the stretch bounded
by the Avenida Ejército Nacional and the Calzada de los Gallos, is underutilized and fragmented. The 4.6 linear km that make up the
study area are crossed by 8 major thoroughfares, making it difficult to appreciate as a single, continuous public space.
Calzada de
los Gallos
Calzada
México-Tacuba
Avenida Marina
Nacional
Calzada Mariano
Escobedo
Avenida
Moliere
Avenida Río
San Joaquín
Boulevard Miguel de
Cervantes Saavedra
Avenida Ejército
Nacional
Approximate total surface area: 130, 914.07 m2
Total length: 4,528m
Total number of intersections: 26
Maximum width: 40.77m
Minimum width: 9.7m
Area restricted for train transit: 3m on either side of the tracks
11
PROGRAM
One the goals of the current call for entries is to define the scope of the project. Each participant will define the scope of their project
using their own analysis and diagnostic of the study area, as well as the design objectives described further on in this document.
Be advised that the proposals should take into account the diversity and complexity of the urban fabric within the study area, and
should integrate some of the elements listed below. However, it is up to each of the participants to include or omit these elements,
and/or to incorporate other elements not listed:
Illumination, public bathrooms, bicycle and pedestrian trails, gardens, flood protection systems, wooded areas, gathering and resting
spaces, exercise equipment, playgrounds, shaded areas, water features, street furniture, kiosks, etc.
Note: Rules, recommendations, and restrictions from PEMEX, FERROVALLE, Gas Natural, Calle Segura AEP, etc., which are included in
the Appendix to this document, must be taken into account in the design of the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
These documents will be included in “Forms and Appendix” section of this document, and will be available for download from the
website www.parquelinealfc.mx
OBJETIVES
Sustainability
The Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park should be thought of as a project that treats landscape as a piece of water management
infrastructure. This intervention should be a paradigm of responsible rainwater management, both for park maintenance, and for
reinsertion of rainwater into the aquifer.
Multi-scalar
To understand the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park not just on a local scale, but also on a scale of regional and metropolitan importance.
Mixed-use
Promote strategies for mixed-use. The Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park should be understood not just as a pedestrian and biking hub,
but also as a mixed-use link between different means of transportation: public and private, collective and individual.
Integration of urban stakeholders
The presence of various city stakeholders all along the Linear Park, including educational, recreational, and private and public cultural
institutions, is significant. As such, the Linear Park has the potential to bring together existing networks and strengthen the relationships
between them. Proposals should include, promote, and advance the participation of diverse stakeholders in the Linear Park.
Socially inclusive
The Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park should be socially inclusive. The Convening Committee seeks proposals that promote and
strengthen existing relationships between residents of the areas surrounding the future Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park, taking care
not to encourage or underline social, economic, religious, gender-based, and other differences.
Promoting social and cultural activity
The proposals ought to envision programs and strategies that promote regular, active use of the public space.
The Convening Committee seeks projects that center the site’s history. Proposals should salvage and help to renew of a sense of
belonging, tradition, and identity in the neighborhoods that surround the future Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
ww
ww
14
STRUCTURE AND STRATEGY
The 4.6 linear kilometers between Avenida Ejército Nacional and the Calzada de los Gallos, which make up the future Cuernavaca
Railway Linear Park, are fragmented by eight main roads (six strategic intersections). These roads make it difficult to read the area as a
single, continuous space. As such, it is essential to rethink each of the six strategic intersections that currently fragment the space as
potential urban sutures that could hold it together.
Although the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park should be thought of as a holistic project, both the Design Development and Construction
Documents,
as FC
wellDE
as CUERNAVACA
the construction of the park are expected to happen in three stages, each of which corresponds to one of
PARQUE
LINEAL
the three sections laid out in the diagram (T1, T2, T3). The order of implementation of these stages is not yet defined, and will not be
DIVISIÓN
POR
disclosed
untilTRAMO
Phase II of the Competition.
T3
IN8
IN4
T2
T1
IN7
IN2
IN1
IN6
IN5
IN3
IN1
IN2
IN3
IN4
IN5
IN6
IN7
IN8
Strategic
Intersecciones
intersection
estratégicas
Section
Tramo
T1
T2
T3
15
SECTIONS
T1
Avenida Ejército Nacional a Avenida Río San Joaquín
57,236.71 m2
T2
Avenida Río San Joaquín a Avenida Marina Nacional
25,058.81 m2
T3
Avenida Marina Nacional a Calzada de los Gallos
48,618.55 m2
STRATEGIC INTERSECTIONS
IN2
IN3
IN4
IN1
IN1
Avenida Ejercito Nacional
IN2
Boulevard Miguel de Cervantes
Saavedra
IN3
Avenida Moliere
IN4
6,778.60 m2
Avenida Río San Joaquín
23,315.43 m2
17,323.91 m2
IN6
IN8
IN5
IN7
IN5
Calzada Mariano Escobedo
IN6
Avenida Marina Nacional
13,043.69 m2
IN7
Calzada México-Tacuba
28,232.27 m2
IN8
Calzada de los Gallos
7,689.42 m2
16
IN 1-2 / Avenida Ejército Nacional to Boulevard Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra
INTERSECCIÓN 1-2
PLAZA CARSO
MUSEO
JUMEX
BLVD. MIGUEL DE CE
RVANTES SAAVEDRA
ACUARIO
INBURSA
ELIZONDO
CORPORATIVO
ANTARA
AV. EJERCITO NACIONA
L
17
IN 3 / Boulevard Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra to Avenida Moliere
AV
.M
OL
IER
E
INTERSECCIÓN 3
CANCHA Y JUEGOS
INFANTILES
BLVD. MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SAAVEDRA
18
IN 4 / Avenida Moliere to Avenida Río San Joaquín
INTERSECCIÓN 4
METRO
SAN
JOAQUÍN
CORONA
AV. RÍO S
AN
JOAQUÍN
SKATEPARK
MERCADO
GRANADAS
BAJO
PUENTES
CORONA
JUEGOS
NIÑOS
IA
OV UÍN
CL Q
CI JUA
N
SA
19
IN 5-6 / Calzada Mariano Escobedo to Avenida Marina Nacional
NTERSECCIÓN 5-6
CA
LZADA G
RAL. M
UNIVERSIDAD
UNITEC
BICIESCUELA
ARIANO
DO
ESCOBE
.M
AV
SUEPERMERCADO
IN
AR
A
QUIOSCO
JUEGOS
INFANTILES
AL
ON
CI
NA
LAGO B
OLSENA
20
IN 7 / Avenida Marina Nacional to Calzada México-Tacuba
INTERSECCIÓN 7
PLAN
SEXENAL
INSTITUTO
POLITÉCNICO
NACIONAL
METRO
POPOTLA
MANUE
L CARP
CA
LZ
COLEGIO
MILITAR
AD
A
MÉ
XI
CO
-T
AC
UB
A
IO
21
IN 8 / Calzada México-Tacuba to Calzada de los Gallos
INTERSECCIÓN 8
CALZ
ADA D
E LOS
GALL
PLAN SEXENAL
INSTITUTO
POLITÉCNICO
NACIONAL
OS
22
INFORMATION AND REGISTERING TO PARTICIPATE
Information is available on the website www.parquelinealfc.mx and from 10:00h (GMT-5:00) to 18:00h (GMT-5:00), on business days,
at the email address [email protected]
REGISTRATION AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSION
Registration is required, and will take place online at the following address www.parquelinealfc.mx . Registration will take place during
the period established in the Calendar of Events.
Online registration form “A” will include the name of the team representative and of his or her associates and collaborators. It will also
include their addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and other contact information. It is crucial that this form be fully filled
out.
In addition to registration form “A,” participants should attach the following documents:
A) Simple copy of the participant’s Federal Taxpayer Registry (“RFC” by its Spanish acronym) code. (Mexican participants only).
B) Simple copy of the team representative’s professional accreditation. This accreditation must be recognized by the Department of
Public Education (SEP) and/or its equivalent in the country where the person completed his or her professional studies.
Interested parties who send in their documentation will receive an email as confirmation of receipt. This email is merely informative,
and will never be considered official enrolment.
Participants are responsible for checking that documents are attached and that the form is filled out correctly.
OFFICIAL ENROLLMENT
Officially enrolled participants will be notified of their participation in the Competition via email on the date specified in the Calendar
of Events.
This email will include a certificate of registration, which will contain a unique and unrepeatable registration code. This code will be
needed to submit their proposals.
Only one certificate and one code will be submitted per participant or team.
In cases for which the information presented in Registration Form “A” is incomplete or untrue, or in cases where required documentation
is not submitted, a registration certificate will not be issued for the participant or team in question. In such cases, the participant will
not be officially registered in the Competition.
LANGUAGE
Spanish will be the official language of the Competition. However, proposals can be submitted in English.
All proposals ought to be submitted in one of those two languages, including any additional information, such as text on the presentation
boards and in the project narrative.
23
PHASE I: SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
A) One A0 format (1189mm in width x 841 mm in height), landscape-oriented presentation board, which shows the schematic design
proposal for the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
The presentation boards may include floor plans, perspectives, axonometric views, sections, elevations, diagrams, drawings, text,
photographs, or whatever graphic resources the participant chooses to best express his or her proposal. Participants are free to
choose both the scale and the type of graphic representation used.
The presentation board should be mounted on a white foam board, and will be identified using an 8-character identification code
(numbers and/or capital letters, without spaces) chosen by each of the participants. The code will be located in the lower right-hand
corner of each slide, following the guidelines of the diagram below. (Diagram with typeface and specifications).
Typeface for 8-character
identification code: Arial 48 pts.
Margins: 2.5 cm
Note: The presentation board should contain no indication of the participants’ identities, such as names, logos, or references that
suggest or reveal their identities. Such indications will lead to disqualification.
B) Project narrative: A closed envelope that contains a statement of no more than 500 words, including the title, description, and
justification for the proposal.
The project narrative will be presented in an open format, printed on white, Bond, letter paper, with a cover sheet. It should be
identifiable only via the 8-character identification code chosen for each of the participants, both in the cover sheet and on the outside
of the envelope.
C) A closed envelope, attached to the back of the foam board, identifiable on the outside via the 8-character identification code chosen
by each participant. The envelope should contain a copy of the registration certificate previously emailed by the Technical Coordinator
of the competition
D) A data storage device (USB) identified only using the 8-character identification code chosen by each of the participants, containing
the presentation board in PDF format and the project narrative in .doc and .pdf format. The participant is responsible for ensuring that
the information is saved on the USB device.
The resolution of perspectives, images, and graphics should be 300 pixels per inch.
In addition to being innovative and forward-thinking, the proposals ought to be feasible to build. As such, participants should aim for
an approximate cost of $3,000 Mexican pesos and 00/100 cents per m2 of construction (does not include the building of underground
infrastructure).
It is advisable to include a vegetation palette as part of the proposal.
Proposals must fulfill the full scope of the project, as described in this document. Incomplete submissions that do not follow the
guidelines described in this document will be automatically disqualified.
24
SELECTION AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF FINALISTS
The Jury will analyze and evaluate each participant’s proposal anonymously, and will shortlist five proposals. Finalists will be officially
notified via email on the date specified in the Calendar of Events. The email will invite them to participate in Phase II of the Competition.
The Jury will select one proposal as an alternate, in case one of the finalists does not wish to continue on to the next phase of the
Competition.
CONFIRMATION
The five selected finalists will be asked to confirm their interest in remaining in the Competition. Confirmations should be sent via email
to the address: [email protected] on the date specified in the Calendar of Events.
In the event that one of the finalists does not confirm, the alternate will be invited to participate.
PHASE II: SCOPE
Each of the 5 finalists will be asked to develop a detailed schematic design, based on their overall design proposal, for a section of the
park and the intersections that bound it. The section and intersections to be designed will be assigned before Phase II begins.
The proposals will be presented in no more than four A0 format (189mm in width x 841 mm in height), landscape-oriented presentation
boards, in accordance with the diagram and the requirements described in the diagram with regard to typeface and specifications.
These are described further on in this document.
SITE VISIT AND COMMUNITY DIALOGUE
The site visit will occur on the date specified in the Calendar of Events.
In order to share the proposals with the community and include community perspectives in the design process, a series of neighborhood
workshops and round-table discussions will take place that same week. These events will include community representatives and the
members of the teams selected for Phase II.
Participants selected to compete in Phase II should attend the site visit and community dialogue sessions. They will be asked to
confirm their attendance by email to [email protected]
The site visit and community dialogue sessions will be mandatory.
The Convening Committee will not cover the costs of participants’ transportation and travel expenses, even if they live outside Mexico
City.
PHASE II: SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
A) Up to four A0 format (1189mm in width x 841 mm in height ) landscape-oriented presentation boards, which show the evolution of
your overall conceptual proposal, as well as the detailed development of one section and the intersections that bound it. The section
and intersections to be designed will be assigned before Phase II begins.
The presentation boards may include floor plans, perspectives, axonometric views, elevations, diagrams, drawings, text, photographs,
or whatever graphic resources the contestant chooses. Participants are free to choose both the scale and the type of graphic
25
representation used.
The presentation boards should be mounted on white foam board, and will be identified using the 8-character identification code
(numbers and/or capital letters, without spaces) previously chosen by each of the participants. The code will be located in the lower
right-hand corner of each slide. The slides will be numbered in the lower left-hand corner, and will follow the guidelines of the diagram
below. (Diagram with typeface and specifications).
8-character identification code typeface: Arial 48 pts.
Margins: 2.5 cm
Note: The presentation boards should contain no indication of the participants’ identities, including names, logos, or references that
suggest or reveal their identities. Such indications will lead to disqualification.
B) Project narrative: A closed envelope containing a statement no more than 5 pages long, including the title, description, and rationale
for the proposal. It should also include the strategy and timeline for implementation of the project, and its justification.
The project narrative will be presented in an open format, printed on white, Bond, letter paper, with a cover sheet. It should be
identifiable only via the 8-character identification code chosen by each of the participants, both in the cover sheet and on the outside
of the envelope.
This document may be accompanied by graphic material necessary to comprehend the proposal. This material will not count towards
the page limit.
C) A 3- to 5-minute virtual tour of the project. The aim of this virtual tour will be to give the general public an a clear, synthetic overview
of the project in its entirety. The Convening Committee recommends using this resource to show the way that your project will be
integrated into its immediate urban surroundings, allowing the viewer to have an immersive experience of the future Cuernavaca
Railway Linear Park.
The virtual tour will be submitted as a DVD, in a closed envelope identifiable only via the 8-character identification code chosen by each
of the participants, both on the DVD and on the outside of the envelope.
D) A data storage device (USB) identified only using the 8-character identification code chosen by each of the participants, containing
the presentation board in PDF format and the project narrative in .doc and .pdf format. The participant is responsible for ensuring that
the information is saved on the USB device.
The resolution of perspectives, images, and graphics should be 300 pixels per inch.
In addition to being innovative and forward-thinking, the proposals ought to be feasible to build. As such, participants should aim for
an approximate cost of $3,000 Mexican pesos and 00/100 cents per m2 of construction (does not include the building of underground
infrastructure).
Proposals must meet the full scope of the project, as described in this document. Incomplete submissions that do not follow the
guidelines described in this document will be automatically disqualified.
26
ORAL PRESENTATION
Phase II of the Competition is not anonymous. In this phase, finalists will have the opportunity to present their proposals orally before
the Jury and an Advisory Committee made up of civil servants, specialists, and community representatives. The members of the
Committee will have a voice, but no vote, in the final evaluation process.
The location, date, and time of the oral presentation will be announced to participants during Phase II of the Competition.
During the oral presentation, participants will have 25 minutes to present their proposals. These presentations will be followed by a
question and answer session lasting no more than 25 minutes.
During the presentations, participants may use whatever resources they like to complement the submitted presentation boards,
including digital presentations, videos, animations, models, etc.
FINAL EVALUATION
The final evaluation sessions will take place behind closed doors. Those sessions will be limited to the members of the Jury, the
members of the Scientific Committee, the members of the Technical Coordination committee, and the members of the Advisory
Committee.
Advisory Committee members will have the right to a voice but no vote. The Jury will take into account their observations and comments
in casting its vote and selecting the first-, second-, and third-place winners.
Technical Coordination committee members and Scientific Committee members will attend the evaluation sessions as observers, in
order to ensure transparency and legitimacy in the process. They will not have the right to voice or vote.
The Jury’s deliberations will take place in private, without the Advisory Committee. Members of the Scientific Committee and members
of the Technical Coordination committee will participate in these activities as observers.
The jury will analyze and evaluate the proposals on the basis of the material submitted and the oral presentation. Its decision will be
announced publicly, and will not be subject to appeal.
It will be essential for Jury members to participate in each of the competition’s final evaluation meetings. Only in the event that a
member of the Jury encounters an insurmountable obstacle that makes it impossible for him or her to fulfill his or her commitment,
will he or she be replaced by an alternate chosen by the Scientific Committee and the Technical Coordination committee.
The Jury’s decisions will be made via majority vote. In the event of a tie, the President of the Jury will have a decisive vote.
The Jury will write a memorandum regarding each of the five finalist projects, explaining its comments and observations. The memo
will explain, among other things, the reasoning and arguments behind the selection of the winning proposal.
The Jury will have the power to eliminate any proposal that does not fulfill the competition requirements, or follow the instructions and
pre-established guidelines, from the competition.
The Jury will choose a single winner, as well as second and third place winners. It may also grant special recognition, such as honorable
mentions and other forms of recognition, to projects they consider exceptional.
27
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Proposals will be accepted between 10:00h (GMT-5:00) and 18:00h (GMT-5:00) on business days, on the dates specified in the Calendar
of Events. They will be accepted at the following address:
Colegio de Arquitectos de México CAM-SAM
Av. Constituyentes No. 800
Lomas Altas
Del. Miguel Hidalgo
CP 11950
Ciudad de México
México
Participants may send their proposals using a courier, as long as the proposals are physically received at the designated site at the
designated dates and times. Proposals will not be accepted electronically.
Once the Competition is completed, participants who wish to pick up their proposal materials may do so at the same address where
they submitted them. They must pick them up within one month after the close of the public exhibition of the projects.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
August 2016
S
7
September 2016
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10 11 12 13
S
4
M
5
T
6
W
7
October 2016
T
F
S
1
2
3
8
9
10
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10 11 12 13 14 15
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
9
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
28 29 30 31
25 26 27 28 29 30
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
November
S
6
M
7
December 2016
2016
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10 11 12
S
4
M
5
T
6
W
7
SITE VISIT
T
F
S
1
2
3
8
9
10
DEADLINE
CONFIRMATION
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMPETITION DECISION
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
WINING CEREMONY
27 28 29 30
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
CALL FOR ENTRIES
PHASE I
PHASE II
EVALUATION PERIOD
28
DATE
CALL FOR ENTRIES
August 22 – September 9, 2016
Online registration and document submission
September 12 – September 16, 2016
Official enrolment, review of aspiring participants’
19 de septiembre de 2016
Participants are notified of their official enrolment
DATE
PHASE I
September 28, 2016
Responses
October 14, 2016
Deadline to submit Schematic Design proposals
October 17 – October 21, 2016
Evaluation by the jury and selection of 5 finalists
October 21, 2016
Announcement of Phase I results
October 24, 2016
Finalists confirm participation
DATE
PHASE II
November 7 – November 11, 2016
Community dialogue sessions
October 17 – October 28, 2016
Q & A period
November 2, 2016
Responses
December 5, 2016
Deadline to submit proposal for design development
December 9, 2016
Oral presentation before the Committees and the Jury
DATE
DELIBERATION
December 16, 2016
Competition awards ceremony
August 22, 2016
September 19 – September 23, 2016
November 7, 2016
December 13, 2016
Publication of call for entries
documents
Q & A period
Site visit and clarification meeting
and construction documents
Announcement of competition results
29
MEMBERS OF THE JURY
Arch. Juan Herreros
Arch. Félix Sánchez
Aguilar
Arch. Eliseo Arredondo
Founder of Estudio Herreros, PhD Architect,
Chair Professor of Architectural Design at
the Madrid School of Architecture, and
Full Professor at the Columbia University
GSAPP in New York. He has given
hundreds of lectures, courses, seminars,
and research workshops around the world.
He has been appointed juror in numerous
national and international competitions,
biennials and international awards.
Founder of Sánchez Arquitectos y
Asociados.
Completed
professional
studies
at
the
UNAM
(National
Autonomous University of Mexico), earning
an Honorable Mention and gold medal.
Earned a Master’s Degree in Urban Design
from the University of Pennsylvania in the
United States. He is Professor Emeritus at
the Academia Nacional de Arquitectura.
Studied architecture at the UNAM
and completed postgraduate studies
in landscape architecture at L ́Ecole
Nationale D ́Horticulture et Paysage in
Versailles, France. Founder and President
of the Sociedad de Arquitectos Paisajistas
de México S.A.P.M. (Mexico Society
of Landscape Architects). Has won
awards and recognition for his landscape
architecture work, for advancing his field,
and for his work with the professional
association.
Arch. Laura Alonso
Lutteroth
Arch. Ernesto
Betancourt
Arch. Sergio Flores
Peña
Architecture graduate of the Universidad
Iberoamericana. Has studied landscape
architecture in Mexico and Louisiana.
Member of the International Federation of
Landscape Architects and of the American
Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA).
She is the founder of the Tierra Viva firm.
Completed professional studies in
architecture at the UNAM as well as a
postgraduate degree in city management
from the Universidad Iberoamericana and
the Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya.
Has collaborated with the Autoridad del
Espacio Público (AEP) and the Secretaria
de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda (SEDUVI).
Studied architecture at the UNAM, where
he specialized in Housing. Completed
two Master’s Degrees from the University
of California at Berkeley: a Master’s in
Landscape Architecture (specialized in
Environmental Planning) and a Master’s
in Urban and Regional Planning. He has
worked in Mexico, the United States,
Guatemala, Venezuela, and Honduras.
30
Eng. Melesio Gutierrez
Eng. Roberto Ruiz
Arch. Rafael
Fierro
Civil Engineer with a Master’s Degree
in Urban Planning from the UNAM.
Professional
expertise
in
Project
Management as well as Technical Auditing
of projects and services. Member Emeritus
of the Mexico College of Civil Engineers.
Tenured Professor at the Academy of
Engineering. Member of the Committee of
Social Witnesses within the Secretaría de
la Función Pública.
Civil engineering graduate of the UNAM.
He has been the Resident Supervisor of
Projects for the UNAM Project Management
Office, Coordinator of Advisors for the
Undersecretary of Communications and
Technological Development of the SCT,
DRO for the Mexico City Government,
and Co-Manager of Structural Security for
Mexico City. He is a member of the Board
of Trustees of the Mexico College of Civil
Engineers.
Iberoamericana. Earned a diploma in the
History of Mexico City. Earned a Master’s
Degree from the National Autonomous
University of Mexico (UNAM). Served as
the Director of the Universidad Anáhuac,
Casa Lamm, and the Instituto Cultural
Helénico for several years. Expert in the
history of the area of study. Has blogged
at polancoayeryhoy.blogspot.com/ since
2010.
TECHNICAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Antonio Gallardo
Augusto Álvarez
Architecture graduate of the National
Autonomous University of Mexico. Earned
a diploma in urban design from the
International Academy of Architecture in
Sofia, Bulgaria, and Kobe, Japan. Earned
a Master’s Degree in Education from
the Postgraduate Studies Division of the
Centro Universitario México. Professor
in the Mexican School of Architecture,
Communication, and Design at the
Universidad la Salle.
Iberoamericana in Mexico. Completed
postgraduate
coursework
at
the
Architectural Association School of
Architecture and the London School
of Economics in London, Engliand. He
is a member of the American Institute
of Architects and a Professor Emeritus
at Mexico’s National Academy of
Architecture.
Technical Coordinator
Technical Coordinator
31
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
Meir Lobaton Corona
Nayeli Galindo Cano
Architecture graduate of the UIA, with a
Master’s Degree in Architecture from the
Columbia University GSAPP in New York.
Has received grants from CONACYT
and has won several prizes, including
the Lucille Smyser Lowenfish Memorial
Design Prize. Professional highlights
include participating in the Rising Currents
exhibit at MoMA in New York, and in the
22nd Edition of the International Garden
Festival at Chaumon-sur-Loire.
Iberoamericana, with a Master’s Degree
in Housing and Urbanism from the
Architectural Association School of
Architecture in England. She has worked
with firms in London and participated in
urbanism and architecture seminars in
England, Brazil, Germany, and Italy. She
recently presented an exhibition at the XXI
Triennale di Milano.
President
Coordinator
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Roberto Remes Tello de
Meneses (AEP) President
Rodolfo Díaz Covarrubias
(SAC-G) Coordinator
Félix Jiménez Vilaseñor
(CAM-SAM) Coordinator
General coordinator of Public Spaces
Authority
(AEP)
of
Mexico’s
city
government.
Granadas Cooperative Operating Area
(SACG) lider.
President of Mexico City Institute of
Architecture, Mexico City Association of
Architects (CAM-SAM).
Members:
1 representative of the borough of Miguel Hidalgo;
1 representative of SEDUVI;
1 representative of the Department of Transportation (“SEMOVI” by its Spanish acronym);
1 representative of the Department of the Environment (“SEDEMA” by its Spanish acronym);
1 community representative: President of the Citizen Council and Coordinator of the Neighborhood Committee
32
CONTRACT ADJUDICATION
The contract to carry out Design Development and Construction Documents for the full Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park (SEDUVIDMH) will be signed together with the Mexican architect or firm acting as team representative, as long as he or she meets the legal
and administrative requirements of the contract.
Before signing the contract, the architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or team that wins the Competition must demonstrate
the technical and material ability, demonstrable via a portfolio of work that meets requirements that will be announced in due course,
as well as the infrastructure necessary, to carry out the design development and develop the construction documents for a project
of this size. If he or she does not, he or she will be asked to form a temporary partnership with a Mexican architect, urban designer,
landscape architect, or firm that has not participated in any phase of the Competition. The Mexican partner must have the technical
and material capacity—which will be demonstrated via a portfolio of work that meets requirements which will be shared at the
appropriate moment—as well as the infrastructure necessary to complete a design development and construction documents project
of this size. The Mexican collaborator will be required to meet legal, administrative, and tax requirements before finalizing the contract.
For this purpose, the parties will be asked to submit a copy of the temporary partnership agreement between the two parties. The
agreement will indicate acceptance that the Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm will be the party to enter
into a contract with the entity chosen by the Convening Committee. If the winner does not have a relationship with a Mexican architect,
urban designer, landscape architect, or firm with the required characteristics, the Technical Coordinator and the Scientific Committee
will recommend someone suitable.
The Technical Coordinator and the Scientific Committee will be in charge of confirming that the collaborating Mexican architect, urban
designer, landscape architect, or firm that has not participated in any phase of the Competition has the necessary technical and
material ability, demonstrable via a portfolio of work that meets requirements that will be announced in due course, as well as the
infrastructure necessary to carry out a design development and construction documents project of this size.
In the event that the architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or team that wins the Competition does not have tax residency
in Mexico, he or she will be asked to form a temporary partnership with a Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or
firm that has not participated in any phase of the Competition. The Mexican partner must have the technical and material capacity—
which may be demonstrated via a portfolio of work that meets requirements which will be shared at the appropriate moment—as
well as the infrastructure necessary to complete a design development and construction documents project of this size. The Mexican
collaborator will be required to meet legal and administrative requirements before entering into a contract.
For this purpose, the parties will be asked to submit a copy of the temporary partnership agreement between the two parties. The
agreement will indicate acceptance that the Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm will be the party to enter
into a contract with the entity chosen by the Convening Committee. If the winner does not have a relationship with a Mexican architect,
urban designer, landscape architect, or firm with the required characteristics, the Technical Coordinator and the Scientific Committee
will recommend someone suitable.
In the event that the winner does not have a partner in mind, the Technical Coordination committee and the Scientific Committee may
recommend a Mexican architect, urban designer, landscape architect, or firm that has the technical capacity, material capacity, and
infrastructure needed to carry a design development and construction documents project of this size.
If, for some reason, there is a significant obstacle to hiring the first-place winner, the contract will be assigned according to the order
of the prizes or recognitions issued by the Jury.
The Convening Committee commits to offering the winner a contract to direct architecture during construction. The scope of the
contract and compensation will be determined using fee rates from the CAM SAM and/or the Federation of Architecture Associations
in Mexico.
33
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This document contains the rules and is applicable to all aspects of the development and execution of the Competition of Ideas for
the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park, starting from the date of its publication.
Any unforeseen situation not addressed in these Rules and in the Appendix will be analyzed and resolved by the members of the
Competition’s Technical Coordination committee and Scientific Committee. These modifications should be made known to participants,
as needed, through the available modes of communication.
Submitted materials should not be made available to the public, the press, or other media outlets prior to the official announcement
of the winner. Participants who violate this rule will be disqualified.
Participants will cede the right to disseminate, reproduce, and publish proposals to the Convening Committee. The Convening
Committee commits to ensuring that publication will always be accompanied by the names of the authors of each proposal.
The authors have and will maintain intellectual property rights over their projects.
Neither the Jury, the Convening Committee, nor the Technical Coordination committee of the Competition will assume any responsibility
for mail service conditions or electronic, technical, and natural-disaster related problems that may obstruct the receipt of documents
and proposals.
The conditions, programs, and scope of this Competition will be applied in an identical fashion to all participants, without regard to
nationality.
EXHIBITION OF PROJECTS
Following the official announcement of the winner, an exhibit will be organized. It will be free and open to the public.
34
FORMS AND APPENDIX
Each of the enrolled participating teams will receive a packet with information necessary for the development of their proposals.
The Technical Coordination of the Competition will communicate instructions and supplementary information approved by the
Scientific Committee and the Technical Coordination Committee of the Competition to the participants admitted into Phase II.
The following documents, in the Appendix, are available for download at the website www.parquelinealfc.mx under the highlighted
forms.
CODE
Appendix 1
TITLE
Historical Background
FILE
.pdf
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Urban diagnostic
Cadastral, uses, colonias Map
Topographical Map
Phase I: Diagram with typeface and
specifications for slides
Phase II: Diagram with typeface and
specifications for slides
Photographs
Site video
IGeographic
Regulations: Pemex, Ferrovalle, Gas
Natural, AEP
Strategy and intersections
.pdf
.dwg
.dwg
.dwg
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
Appendix 8
Appendix 9
Appendix 10
Appendix 11
.dwg
.jpg
.mp4
. pdf
.pdf
35
GLOSSARY
Advisory committee: An entity made up of diverse representatives of the borough, of other agencies, and of professionals from
various fields. Members will be present during the evaluation sessions in Phase II. They will have a right to a voice but no vote.
1 representative of the borough of Miguel Hidalgo;
1 representative of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“SEDUVI” by its Spanish acronym);
1 representative of the Public Spaces Authority (“AEP” by its Spanish acronym);
1 community representative: President of the Citizen Council and Coordinator of the Neighborhood Committee
Appendix: Documents containing, among other things: forms, diagrams, diagnostic, historical background, scope, premises for
design, and guidelines for completion.
Borough: Administrative political body in Miguel Hidalgo.
Calendar of Events: Location, date, and time of Phase I and Phase II of the competition, publication of the call for entries, deadline
to register to participate, site visit, submission of Phase I and Phase II proposals, date of selection of winners, and awards ceremony.
Compensation of expenses: Payment to compensate participants for ideas and work performed.
Competition rules: A document containing the technical and administrative requirements that govern and are applicable to all
aspects of the development and execution of the Competition of Ideas for the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park, starting from the date
of the document’s publication.
Convening Committee: The Government of Mexico City, via the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“SEDUVI” by its
Spanish acronym) and the borough of Miguel Hidalgo.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (“SEDUVI” by its Spanish acronym): The Department of Housing and Urban
Development of the Mexico City Government is an agency of the Mexico City government, under the Mayor, responsible for design,
coordination, reorganization, housing development, and implementation of urban policy in Mexico City.
Granadas Cooperative Operating Area (“SAC-G” by its Spanish acronym): The Granadas Cooperative Operating Area is a polygonal
area created by SEDUVI as a planning mechanism. It is used to ensure that projects, actions, and guidelines designed to improve the
urban environment in the Granadas Operating Area are coordinated.
Finalists: Teams chosen by the Jury who will move on to Phase II of the Competition.
Jury: Entity whose purpose is to evaluate the proposals presented by the participants and choose the winner of the competition.
Mexico City Government: The Mexico City Government is the group of political and administrative institutions that govern the
capital of Mexico, in accordance with the Political Constitution of the United States of Mexico, the Governing Charter of Mexico City,
and other applicable laws created by the Congress of the Nation and the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District.
Participant: A Mexican architect, urban designer, or landscape architect, or an international professional from one of these disciplines.
Participants must be accredited, with a professional ID recognized by the Department of Public Education (SEP by its Spanish acronym)
and/or its equivalent in the country where the participant completed his or her professional studies. The participant must be officially
registered in the Competition.
Participating Team: A group of people with a representative (required) who is a Mexican architect, urban designer, or landscape
architect, or an international professional from one of these disciplines with professional accreditation recognized by the Department
of Public Education (SEP by its Spanish acronym) and/or its equivalent in the country where the participant completed his or her
professional studies. The participant must be officially registered in the Competition.
Public Spaces Authority (“AEP” by its Spanish acronym): A decentralized entity within the Mexico City Government’s Department
36
of Housing and Urban Development (“SEDUVI” by its Spanish acronym). The Public Spaces Authority (AEP by its Spanish acronym)
is the strategy office behind strategic planning, design, and development of public space in Mexico City. The office coordinates and
implements projects and initiatives to create more attractive, vibrant, diverse, and inclusive urban environments, by way of innovative
processes that take advantage of communities’ knowledge, inspiration, and potential.
Schematic Design: The set of ideas presented by the participants, including location proposals, stages of construction, aspects
of function, study drawings, documents, and other media, as well as the basic explanation of how the requirements are met. The
Schematic Design is expressed through drawings, graphics, text, perspectives, and floor plans, among other tools.
Scientific Committee: Responsible for developing the rules and guidelines of the competition, and for supervising logistics and
implementation, and ensuring transparency over the course of the competition. The named president should be present at all stages
of the competition.
The committee will offer support in terms of alignment with the competition objectives, both to members of the Technical Coordination
committee, in offering answers to participants’ questions, and to the Evaluation Committee, during its activities over the course of both
phases.
Technical Coordinator: Responsible for competition logistics, execution, and process. The Technical Coordination committee will be
in charge of communication with participants, coordinators, committees, and the jury at every stage
Winning participant: The participant who is chosen as the first place winner by the Jury and who enters into a contract to carry out
Design Development and develop the Construction Documents for the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park.
37
This document was elaborated by Mier Lobaton Corona office and comissioned by
borough Miguel Hidalgo under the supervision of CAM-SAM for the organization
of the International Ideas Competiton for the Cuernavaca Railway Linear Park. We
thank all those involved in the process specially Borough of Miguel Hidalgo, SEDUVI,
SACG, AEP, SEMOVI, SEDEMA, PEMEX, FERROCARRIL Y TERMINAL DEL VALLE DE
MÉXICO S.A. DE C.V. (FERROVALLE), Gas Natural, CAM-SAM and collaborators.
Copyright © 2016. Borough of Miguel Hidalgo.
Publication design by Nayeli Galindo
© photographers & institutions
Parque Lira No. 94
Col. Observatorio, C.P. 11860
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
Tel. +52 (55) 52 77 73 55
CDMX

competition rules - Concurso de Ideas "Parque Lineal Ferrocarril de

Transcription

Similar documents

What else is nearby? Eating in Cuernavaca

City of eternal spring

Rincón Dorado - Business Optimization

1947

TEPOZTLÁN, MEXICO

here our International Student Guide

Mexico Gold 50 Pesos AGW 1.2057 (Random Year)

Mexican Independence Day Colouring Page