Game Manual - 12 O`Clock High!
Transcription
Game Manual - 12 O`Clock High!
SCENARIO NOTES E PI LEPS Y WA R N I N G PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE BEFORE PLAYING THIS GAME OR BEFORE ALLOWING YOUR CHILDREN TO PLAY. Certain individuals may experience epileptic seizures or loss of consciousness when subjected to strong, flashing lights for long periods of time. Such individuals may therefore experience a seizure while operating computer or video games. This can also affect individuals who have no prior medical record of epilepsy or have never previously experienced a seizure. If you or any family member has ever experienced epilepsy symptoms (seizures or loss of consciousness) after exposure to flashing lights, please consult your doctor before playing this game. Parental guidance is always suggested when children are using a computer and video games. Should you or your child experience dizziness, poor eyesight, eye or muscle twitching, loss of consciousness, feelings of disorientation or any type of involuntary movements or cramps while playing this game, turn it off immediately and consult your doctor before playing again. PRECAUTIONS DURING USE: • Do not sit too close to the monitor. • Sit as far as comfortably possible. • Use as small a monitor as possible. • Do not play when tired or short on sleep. • Take care that there is sufficient lighting in the room. • Be sure to take a break of 10-15 minutes every hour. USE OF THIS PRODUCT IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE SINGLE USE SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT WORLD WAR II ARRIVES EARLY IN THE PACIFIC Many additional man-years of development from a dedicated and experienced team including subject matter experts and experienced programmers has resulted in an improved War in the Pacific experience across the board. This is the entire War in the Pacific down to individual aircraft, vehicles, ships, guns and squads - more than just a game, it’s an encyclopedia of the war compiled from many sources to an unmatched level of detail. Add in a much improved AI and more secure PBEM play and you have the makings of a new classic! The Entire War in the Pacific on One Map! – If you thought the original map was something to behold, wait until you see the new one! Completely redone to a 40 nautical mile per hex scale (instead of the original 60 mile per hex scale) and with the original distance distortions and inaccuracies greatly reduced, this is the most accurate and most stunning map of the theater ever created. In addition, the smaller scale has allowed us to add a number of important bases that would not fit in the larger scale, but which played a key role in the strategy of various operations. On top of that, Admiral’s Edition now has off-map movement through map edge boxes representing major bases across the world, allowing more realistic movement of Allied assets and arrival of reinforcements and resources. Find out more at: www.matrixgames.com CONTENTS SCENARIO 1: BATTLE FOR KHARKOV 1942 (12 MAY - 22 JUNE 1942)..................................... 6 SCENARIO 2: OPERATION STURGEON CATCH 1942 (2 JUNE - 3 AUGUST 1942)...................... 7 SCENARIO 3: CASE BLUE – PHASE I (28 JUNE - 18 JULY 1942).............................................. 8 SCENARIO 4: OPERATION URANUS 1942 (19 NOVEMBER - 30 DECEMBER 1942)................... 9 SCENARIO 5: OPERATION KUTUZOV-RUMYANTSEV (5 JULY - 29 AUGUST 1943).................... 11 SCENARIO 6: CHERKASSY POCKET 1944 (24 JANUARY - 5 MARCH 1944)............................ 13 SCENARIO 7: RED ARMY RESURGENT (19 NOVEMBER 1942 – 17 MARCH 1943).................. 15 SCENARIO 8: DECISION IN THE UKRAINE (24 SEPTEMBER 1943 – 4 MAY 1944)................... 18 SCENARIO 9: RETREAT FROM LENINGRAD (22 JUNE 1944– 3 JANUARY 1945)..................... 23 SCENARIO 10: DRAMA ON THE DANUBE (20 AUGUST 1944– 5 MAY 1945)........................... 28 REFERENCES....................................................................................................................... 35 CREDITS ......................................................................................................................... 36 5 GARY GRIGSBY’S WAR IN THE EAST: DON TO THE DANUBE SCENARIO NOTES Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube includes ten new scenarios for use with the Gary Grigsby’s War in the East game. John Duquette designed, and wrote the scenario notes for, the first six shorter scenarios. Trey Marshall designed, and wrote the scenario notes for, the final four longer scenarios. SCENARIO 1: BATTLE FOR KHARKOV 1942 (12 MAY - 22 JUNE 1942) Historical Outcome. In the spring of 1942, the Soviets attempted to preempt the anticipated German summer offensive by launching their own offensive operation in the south in the vicinity of Kharkov. However, German intelligence efforts were very successful in detecting Soviet movements and concentrations prior to the attack. In addition, the Soviets underestimated the combat potential of the German forces marshalling in the Kharkov area while overestimating their own capabilities. On 12 May offensive was stopped cold by German armored counterattacks. A successful German pincer attack cut off the advancing Soviet troops in the “Barvenkovo Bulge”. The resulting pocket yielded the Germans over 240,000 Soviet prisoners of war. Play Tips. The Battle for Kharkov 1942 is a small scenario. Elements of two Soviet fronts and three Axis armies attack and counterattack as they struggle with bad weather. You can play either side against the AI or human versus human; in any case it’s a tough slog for both 6 sides. Both sides are evenly matched in this scenario so you are not going to have any deep penetrations if both players are equal in skill. Recommended Reading. Glantz, David M., “Kharkov 1942: Anatomy of a Military Disaster”, Sarpedon, 1998. SCENARIO 2: OPERATION STURGEON CATCH 1942 (2 JUNE - 3 AUGUST 1942) Historical Outcome. As part of Operation Barbarossa, the Germans were successful in occupying all of the Crimea in the fall of 1941 with one exception—the port city of Sevastopol. Despite several attacks by the German’s 11th Army in October and November, the Soviets managed to keep possession of this city on the Black Sea. After maintaining a seven-month siege, the Axis launched an all-out assault to take the city on 2 June 1942. The Luftwaffe’s VIII Fliegerkorps was used with great effect throughout the month-long battle to make up for the shortages of artillery in Mainstein’s 11th Army and the Rumanian Mountain Corps. After a fierce fight, Sevastopol finally fell on 4 July. As a result, 60,000+ Soviet soldiers and sailors marched into captivity. Play Tips. This small scenario provides a good opportunity for the Axis player to explore the ins-and-outs of conducting an air offensive in support of ground operations. It also provides the Soviet player an opportunity to take a look at the use of naval transport for either evacuating and/or reinforcing Sevastopol. Given the nature of this scenario it is recommended that you either play as the Axis versus the Soviet AI or as a human versus human game. Playing the Soviets against the Axis AI will prove disappointing because the AI cannot be induced to attack Sevastopol beyond the first turn. Recommended Reading. Forcyzk, Robert, “Sevastopol 1942: Von Manstein’s Triumph”, Osprey, 2008. 7 Hayward, Joel S.A., “Stopped at Stalingrad: The Luftwaffe and Hitler’s Defeat in the East, 19421943”, University Press of Kansas, 1998. SCENARIO 3: CASE BLUE – PHASE I (28 JUNE - 18 JULY 1942) Historical Outcome. In the summer of 1942, STAVKA fully expected the Axis to conduct its main offensive operations in the north against Moscow. The Germans designed Case Blue to take advantage of this Soviet belief. In Phase I, the Germans would attack in the direction of Voronezh to maintain the Soviet impression that the Axis offensive would turn north after Voronezh to threaten the capital from the south. Their true intention was to establish a defensive line along the Don River to protect the northern flank of the actual offensive that would take Army Group South to Stalingrad and into the Caucasus. Although the feint towards Voronezh was a success, the Soviet’s strong reaction to it tied down the Fourth Panzer Army for two critical—perhaps decisive—weeks in July. Play Tips. In this short scenario, the Axis player is provided an opportunity to practice the offensive skills they will need to have mastered for the opening turns of the 1942-45 Campaign. As the Axis player, drive as far as you can on game turn 1. This will determine whether or not 8 you will capture Voronezh. As the Soviet player, take every opportunity to delay the advance of the Germans towards Voronezh. Playing this as a human versus human game is a fast and furious nail-biter all the way to the end. Recommended Reading. Glantz, David M. & Jonathan M. House, “To the Gates of Stalingrad: Soviet-German Combat Operations: April-August 1942”, University Press of Kansas, 2009. SCENARIO 4: OPERATION URANUS 1942 (19 NOVEMBER - 30 DECEMBER 1942) Historical Outcome. Operation Uranus was the codename given to the Soviet offensive to encircle and destroy the German and Rumanian forces in and around Stalingrad. On 19 November 1942, the Soviet Southwest and Don Fronts (on the northern flank of the Axis forces 9 at Stalingrad) began their offensive. Although the Rumanians were able to contain the first Soviet attacks, by the end of November 20th, the Third and Fourth Rumanian armies were in headlong retreat to the south, west and east. On this same day, the Soviet Stalingrad Front began its offensive in the south. Axis reserves were unable to stop these Soviet spearheads. By the evening of November 22nd, the attacking Soviet fronts had linked-up at the town of Kalach, thus encircling the 290,000 Germans and Rumanians in the vicinity of Stalingrad. Instead of attempting a breakout, the German OKH decided that Axis forces in Stalingrad would hold in place, and that forces outside the pocket would be assembled to affect their relief. This relief effort, Operation Winter Storm, ended unsuccessfully on 23 December leaving the German 6th Army to its fate. Play Tips. In this medium-sized scenario, players are given an opportunity to explore the key events involved with the encirclement battle for Stalingrad. The Soviet player must quickly establish the encirclement. Once that task is complete, efforts should focus on maintaining the encirclement and repelling Axis relief forces. The Axis player faces some tough decisions in the first few turns. Should Stalingrad be held or abandoned? If held, how and where should its defenses be established? From what direction(s) should the relief forces attack? If Stalingrad is abandoned, can sufficient victory points be gained by other means to win the game? Playing against the AI, this scenario provides the Axis player an opportunity to explore the requirements involved in re-establishing a shattered front line and relieving encircled forces. Playing this scenario human versus human will provide a short—but challenging—gaming experience for both players. Recommended Reading. Glantz, David M. & Jonathan M. House, “When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army Stopped Hitler”, University Press of Kansas, 1995. Morzik, D. Fritz, “German Air Force Airlift Operations”, University Press of the Pacific, 2002. Ziemke, Earl F., “Stalingrad to Berlin: The German Defeat in the East”, Barnes & Noble, Inc., 1996. 10 SCENARIO 5: OPERATION KUTUZOVRUMYANTSEV (5 JULY - 29 AUGUST 1943) Historical Outcome. Operation Kutuzov-Rumyantsev represents the seizure of the strategic initiative on the Eastern Front by the Soviets. These twin offensives were conducted at the culmination of the German’s 1943 summer offensive against the Kursk salient. In the north, Operation Kutuzov was conducted by the Soviet’s Western, Bryansk, and Central Fronts against the German 2nd Panzer and 9th Armies located in the Orel salient. The goal of this offensive was threefold. First, it was to put pressure on Army Group Center which was engaged at the time in fighting the Battle of Kursk. Second, it was designed to reduce the Orel salient and thus shorten the length of the front line. Last, but not least, the objective of Operation Kutuzov was to encircle and destroy a large number of German divisions in the Orel salient. In the south, Operation Rumyantsev was an offensive operation conducted by the Voronezh and Steppe Fronts in the Belgorod sector of the Kursk salient. The objective of this operation was to follow-up the success achieved through the defeat of Army Group South’s portion of Operation Citadel. 11 Once launched, Operation Kutuzov proved an immediate success. German reserves earmarked for the Battle of Kursk were moved instead to resist the advances of Soviet forces involved in Operation Kutuzov. A see-saw battle ensued as each side sent reinforcements into the melee around Orel. Threatened with imminent encirclement, the Germans decided to evacuate the Orel salient. Operation Rumyantsev began on 3 August 1943. This operation also enjoyed immediate success. The German defenders were pushed back steadily, and Belgorod and Kharkov were soon liberated by Soviet forces. This was the last time that Kharkov changed hands during the War in the East. Operation Kutuzov-Rumyantsev led to the retreat of German forces behind the Dnepr River, and it set the stage for the liberation of Smolensk and Kiev in autumn 1943. Play Tips. This medium-sized scenario is a challenge to play against the AI for both sides. It also provides a tough but enjoyable match between two human players of equal skill. The Soviet player should focus less on deep penetrations and more on grinding down the Axis bit by bit. Every Axis unit destroyed with ease means one less unit to hold a hex on the front, and perhaps one less Axis mechanized unit that can be kept in reserve. If you follow this strategy, then by the end of the game you just might be able to blow the front wide open. The Axis player needs to discover and employ every defensive advantage the terrain has to offer. Always keep a mobile reserve that can blunt, stop, or divert any Soviet axis of advance. Try to get the Soviet to shift his advance to another “more favorable” avenue. If he is shifting forces—he is not attacking with them (or at least has less movement points available to do so). Recommended Reading. Glantz, David M. & Jonathan M. House, “The Battle of Kursk”, University Press of Kansas, 1999. ---------, “When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army Stopped Hitler”, University Press of Kansas, 1995. Ziemke, Earl F., “Stalingrad to Berlin: The German Defeat in the East”, Barnes & Noble, Inc., 1996. 12 SCENARIO 6: CHERKASSY POCKET 1944 (24 JANUARY - 5 MARCH 1944) Historical Outcome. In January 1944, a race was on between the Axis Army Group South and the Soviet’s 1st and 2nd Ukrainian Fronts. Which side would be first in taking advantage of the Cherkassy salient? Army Group South planned to launch Operation Watutin at the end of January. The minimum goal of this offensive was to spoil any attack by the 1st Ukrainian Front against the western face of the Cherkassy salient. At best, it was hoped that the forces of Operation Watutin could re-capture Kiev. On the Soviet side, the Korsun–Shevchenkovsky Offensive was designed to cut-off and destroy the German forces located in the Cherkassy bulge. On 24 January, the Soviets launched their offensive first and thus won the race. The 1st and 2nd Ukrainian Fronts were successful in quickly trapping elements of the German 8th Army in a pocket near the Dnieper river city of Cherkassy. During the weeks of fighting that followed, 13 the Soviets tried to destroy the pocket. The Germans assembled a relief force that attacked towards the encirclement from the south. The surrounded German units succeeded in breaking out and linking-up with the relief force--but at a very high cost. Nearly a third of the pocketed forces were killed, wounded, or captured. Play Tips. The Cherkassy Pocket is a small scenario. It is an even fight with lots of mechanized units to play with. It’s just the right size for a quick, fun game versus the AI or another human. For the Soviets, pocket the German forces with a clear idea from the start of how you are going to keep them in it. Use forces in the Zhitomir and Krivoi Rog sectors to launch spoiling attacks to fix or divert German mobile forces away from their relief efforts. For the Axis, you have a large number of mechanized forces available in this fight—but you can’t be everywhere. Figure out what you can afford to give up (point-wise) and concentrate your combat power to save your forces in the pocket. Recommended Reading. Glantz, David M. & Harold S. Orenstein, “The Battle for the Ukraine: The Red Army’s Korsun’Shevchenkovsii Offensive, 1944”, Routledge, 2003. Nash, Douglas E., “Hell’s Gate: The Battle of the Cherkassy Pocket, January-February 1944”, RZM Publishing, 2009. Zetterling, Niklas & Anders Frankson, “The Korsun Pocket”, Casemate, 2008. 14 SCENARIO 7: RED ARMY RESURGENT (19 NOVEMBER 1942 – 17 MARCH 1943) Historical Background Stalingrad, a city that began as a simple minor objective on the Volga during the planning and opening stages of Operation Blue in the summer of 1942. As the Germans successfully blitzed into the Caucasus and Don Steppes, Hitler became more and more obsessed with the city and hurled more and more German divisions to capture the city. Stalin was just as obsessed and refused to let his namesake become a trophy for the fascist invaders and so the meat grinder-like struggle for Stalingrad ensued for months. While the Germans sent more German divisions to fight in Stalingrad, they needed more and more of their allies to support the flanks. While 6th Army struggled for Stalingrad, Army Group A was nearly spent in the Caucasus by mid November 1942. The logistical situation and losses had just about stalled out the army group far short of its objective to capture the oilfields at Baku. It was the deepest into Soviet Russia that the Germans would ever get. The Soviets meanwhile, had been busy planning its Operation Uranus for months. On the 19th of November, 1942, the Soviets struck with a double envelopment aimed at encircling the Germans at Stalingrad and proving that the Germans were not invincible. Southwest Front smashed the Rumanian 3rd Army holding the left flank of the German 6th Army at Stalingrad while the Stalingrad Front routed the Rumanian elements of the 4th Panzer 15 Army on the 20th of November just south of Stalingrad. The poorly equipped Rumanians were routed, leaving huge holes all along the flanks of 6th Army allowing Soviet mobile formations to maneuver in its rear. The only hope for the Axis lay in the XXXXVIII Panzer Corps comprised of the 22nd Panzer and 1st Rumanian Armored Divisions but the corps barely managed to escape the onslaught itself much less check the offensive. Manstein was given command of the newly created Army Group Don on the 20th of November and tasked with restoring the front around Stalingrad and on the 21st, Hitler ordered the 6th Army to stand fast and not attempt a breakout. The ring closed around the 6th Army when the 4th Tank and 4th Mechanized Corps met at Sovetskiy on the 23rd. An overstrained Luftwaffe began its aerial relief effort of bringing supplies into the pocket by air but the rate of re-supply could clearly not sustain the 6th Army for long. On December 1st, Army Group Don prepared to launch Operation Winter Storm with the goal of breaking through to Stalingrad. Spearheaded by the LVII Panzer Corps (the fresh 6th and 23rd Panzer Divisions) and striking from Kotelnikovo with two Rumanian corps covering its flanks, this force would be the main effort. XXXXVIII Panzer Corps was also prepared to launch a smaller attack from its Chir bridgehead as Paulus was to have his armored elements prepared to breakout to Kalach from inside the pocket to link up with the relieving elements. The Soviets did not give the Germans time to mass as assaults on the pocket forced Paulus to pull his mobile units from supporting Manstein’s plan to deal with the new threats. Attacks along the Chir also forced Manstein to prematurely commit the XXXXVIII Panzer Corps and so it was unable to participate in Winter Storm. By December 9th, Operation Winter Storm had dwindled to a two division attack and it began on the 12th. The LVII Panzer Corps made good but not great progress on the first couple of days of the attack. By the 19th of December, the corps was reinforced by a third panzer division (17th) and got within forty miles of the pocket but losses and Soviet resistance were stalling out the drive. Again, Manstein requested that 6th Army be allowed to breakout but Hitler again refused. The Soviet 6th Army and 1st Guards Army struck the Italian 8th Army line along the Don River on the 16th of December with 3rd Guards Army joining a couple of days later. Within days, the Italian army had been smashed ripping open a 100 mile gap in the Axis lines. The Germans had no choice but to pull out elements of the LVII Panzer Corps from its limit of advance to shore up the demolished line. Meanwhile, 6th Army was languishing in its encirclement having been short on rations for a full month while the temperature lingered around freezing. By late December, Army Group Don’s lines were still under heavy pressure forcing even more re-deployments that were sapping the striking power that would allow Manstein to continue his relief efforts. By the end of the month, 16 the Soviets threatened to capture Rostov which would sever lines of communication with Army Group A, still withdrawing from the Caucasus region. By late January 1943, Fretter-Pico’s army along with Army Detachment Hollidt was settled behind the Donets River, with the 4th Panzer Army holding along the Donets and Manich Rivers. Army Group Don was now over 150 miles from Stalingrad. ^ Don Front, under General Rokossovskiy, commanded the seven Soviet armies now ringing the German perimeter at Stalingrad. 6th Army was starving and exhausted with only 90 tons of supplies being delivered everyday out of a minimum daily requirement of 300 tons. Still, Paulus refused all overtures of surrender and continued to resist. Rokossovskiy began his assault on the pocket on the 10th of January and made minimal gains. A few days later the Germans prevented breakthroughs by withdrawing back deeper into its own pocket. The Pitomnik airfield fell on 16th which was a serious blow because it was the best airfield in the pocket. Losses of the Luftwaffe airfields at Tatinskaya now forced the Germans to fly from Rostov, over 200 miles away. 6th Army stopped issuing rations to the wounded on the 28th to help preserve the strength of the fighting men. On the 29th, the pocket was split in two and XIV Panzer Corps was utterly destroyed. By the 2nd of February, the 6th Army had been eliminated with an estimated loss of 200k men. German Player Strategy The German player will be faced with a loose pocket being formed around Stalingrad by the time he starts his first turn and will be forced with the critical decision whether to try and hold or pull back. The Germans are still weak in this area and rely on their weak allies for support so expect the Soviets to try to continue to complete an encirclement. You should immediately start withdrawing Army Group A out of the Caucasus region to firm up your extended lines as this could also free up more forces to stabilize Army Group Don’s front. The longer you can delay major retreats, the better as you will slowly get more powerful reserves that can be used to launch powerful counterattacks as these units still outclass any units the Soviet player can deploy. Soviet Player Strategy Destroy the 6th Army! They are worth a lot of victory points so do whatever you can to keep him from withdrawing and developing a stable front. You can concentrate your offenses against the weaker Axis allies with great success which forces the German player to send even more German units to bail them out. For the rest of the year, you can afford to be very aggressive but be wary at the turn of the year as the Germans will start accumulating powerful panzer reserves which will totally outclass any unit you can muster. If you have allowed the Germans breathing space, expect a vicious counterattack. The key is to keep the momentum going and keep the initiative away from the Germans by making him respond to your moves and not vice versa. 17 Designer Notes This is a fun scenario to explore the emerging capabilities of the Soviet army in late 1942 and early 1943. The Soviets are starting to show their own proficiency in the art of maneuver. Also, the Caucasus region is an area that is often neglected in war games so you get a chance to see the impact of the defeat of the 6th Army at Stalingrad with the disposition of Army Group A and its vulnerabilities. This is a match where a strong player could do well on either side. The Soviets are capable of being very aggressive and mobile but if they allow the Germans time to consolidate, the Germans can make very effective counterattacks. SCENARIO 8: DECISION IN THE UKRAINE (24 SEPTEMBER 1943 – 4 MAY 1944) Historical Background Operation Citadel marked Germany’s last attempt to retain the initiative in its drive to conquer the Soviet Union on 4 July 1943. After a week of heavy sustained offensive operation, Army Group Center bogged down in the thick Soviet defenses while Army Group South managed to achieve an impressive penetration spearheaded by the II SS Panzer Corps near Prokhorovka. 18 But these gains were not the sweeping encirclement battles against an inept enemy such as the summer of 1941 as the Germans were forced to breach numerous successive defensive lines while constantly under heavy Soviet counterattacks. By the 14th of July, Army Group South was on the verge of success as it seemed the enemy in front of 4th Panzer Army was severely weakened and ready to break. The same could not be said of its flanks as Army Group Center and the southern flank of Army Group South (6th Army and 1st Panzer Army) were under severe Soviet pressure. Soviet offensives against Orel, Kuybyshevo, and Izyum forced the Germans to halt their offensive and respond to the oncoming Soviet assaults and thus Operation Citadel came to a halt. For the next three months, Army Groups A and B would fight a dogged fight back towards the Dnepr River. The Soviets would continually make deep penetrations to which the Germans would respond with local counterattacks by their mobile forces to allow the German infantry time to withdraw. This campaign of attrition was exacting huge tolls on both sides. The Soviets were unable to pocket any major German units but were still making impressive gains at a huge cost. Germans units were getting mauled with many infantry divisions at Kampfgruppe strength (regimental) by the time they started occupying positions on the west bank of the Dnepr in September 1943. On 4 September, the German 6th Army withdrew to the Kalmius River but the 1st Panzer Army to the north was too weak to maintain contact. Two days later the Soviets broke through the seam and threatened a major encirclement, and so the race for the Dnepr began. The two German armies covered about 140 miles in four days and managed to cut off many Soviet spearheads but at the cost of even more unsustainable casualties. By the 12th of September, the retreat had to slow to allow the German 17th Army to withdraw out of the Crimea. In mid September, the Germans concentrated their crossings on the five bridgeheads at Kiev, Kanev, Cherkassy, Kremenchug, and Dnepropetrovsk. The Soviets desperately wanted to prevent the orderly withdrawal of the Germans behind the natural defenses along the Dnepr River. Army Group South wanted to withdraw behind the Dnepr as quickly as possible but was thwarted by Hitler’s insistence on a phased withdrawal only under heavy contact. The result was that the Soviets arrived at the Dnepr with some German forces still deployed on the eastern side. The first large scale attempt to cross the Dnepr River began on 23 September when a Soviet tank brigade almost reached the Kanev bridge where it was shot up by two German anti-tank guns and lost sixteen tanks. As the German units got closer to the Dnepr, the bridgeheads on the eastern bank progressively got smaller but constant Soviet attacks prevented the Germans from redeploying their mobile forces from the bridgeheads and into the river defenses as quickly as they would have liked. The desire of the German Ukraine administration to withdraw as much industrial capacity as possible also delayed the German withdrawal. On the night of the 24th of September, the Soviets dropped two parachute brigades around Kanev in an attempt to establish a strong bridgehead and then to allow mechanized forces to launch a breakthrough. The parachute elements were widely spread across their drop zones and couldn’t effectively mass their forces. The Germans reacted quickly with mobile forces and destroyed the airborne attack. 19 On October 6th, the Soviets established a small bridgehead northwest of Kanev that would serve as a major offensive start point to unhinging the German Dnepr line. The slow German withdrawal allowed the Soviets several key bridgeheads when German units could not occupy their defensive lines in time. So instead of German forces digging in along a strong, natural barrier and then getting some much needed rest, they found themselves involved in pitched battles attempting to hold the line. After bloody fighting at Zaporozhye during the first two weeks of October, the city fell on the 23rd to Soviet forces. The German 6th Army struggled to hold the area near Melitopol to allow the 17th Army time to withdraw from the Crimea. After losing Zaporozhye, 6th Army was forced into a routed retreat to the Dnepr, thus sealing the 17th Army and its Rumanian allies trapped in the Crimea. The 6th Army now occupied defensive positions along the Dnepr near Nikolaev and Kherson. The Soviets launched a strong attack from just south of Kiev which resulted in the fall of Kiev on 6 November, Zhitomir on the 12th, and Korosten on the 17th. Manstein attacked fiercely with reserves he had wrangled from Hitler together with the 8th Army, driving the Soviets 60 miles back towards Kiev, and nearly destroying the 3rd Tank Army. The Soviet threat at Kiev forced Manstein to abandon his plans to re-establish contact with the 17th Army in the Crimea and so its fate was sealed. The German XLVII Panzer Corps spearheaded another counterattack on 4 December along the Zhitomir-Korosten line to relieve the encircled LIX Corps. The offensive was such a success that the Germans linked up with the encircled LIX Corps within days. The German offensive was so successful that two Soviet armies were mauled and incapable of returning to offensive action. The result was that a Soviet threat was neutralized west of Kiev and the line was shortened but it came at a price in the 8th Army’s sector. Cherkassy fell on 10 December and gaps were showing themselves in both 8th Army and 1st Panzer Army that could not be filled. The effective spoiling attacks by Mainstein could not prevent the inevitable. 2nd Ukrainian Front launched its own assault on Kirovograd on 8 January and threatened the southern flank of the German forces holding the Dnepr River defenses near Kanev. After twelve days of fighting, the Soviet force was severely weakened by a very reactive and mobile German defense. The Germans, unable to hold their ground with weak forces after an effective defense, again found themselves falling back and Kirovograd fell on the 10th of January. After a series of German counterattacks and Soviet breakthroughs south of Cherkassy, a German force found itself surrounded at Korsun on 31 January and the weak German units in the area were in no position to try and effect a relief. III and XLVII Panzer Corps attempted several times to re-establish contact with the encircled forces but mud hampered their efforts. The encircled forces under the command of General Stemmermann (60,000 troops under XLII and XI Corps along with various other units) were ordered to breakout on the 14th of February in which around 70% of the force escaped. The Korsun operation had the effect of pulling much of the German mobile resources away from the neighboring armies and allowing the Soviets to launch renewed attacks along Army 20 Group South’s line. Rovno fell on 5 February with the defending 4th Panzer Army effectively mauled during the offensive. By the 20th of March, 1st Ukrainian Front had breached the Dneister River and captured Brody and Dubno. The now isolated 1st Panzer Army was facing attacks from the north and east and it found itself withdrawing into the Carpathian foothills along the Dneister River. To the south, the German 8th and 6th Armies were also getting their own mauling as the Soviets advanced a hundred miles in just five days. By the end of March, the front was along the Pruth River and on the Rumanian border. By late March, the 1st Panzer and 8th Armies found themselves again fighting for their lives near the Ukraine-Polish-Rumanian border. A series of Soviet blows from Tarnopol and southeast of Vinnista isolated the 1st Panzer Army around Kamenets-Podolsky. The commander of the 4th Panzer Army, General Hube, was ordered by Manstein to conduct a breakout to the west and re-establish contact with the flank armies. Under extremely poor weather conditions and heavy Soviet pressure, Gen. Hube extracted his force and occupied defensive positions along the Seret River on 9 April. The newly assembled 1st Hungarian Army around Stanislav would form the 1st Panzer Army’s left flank. After a few Soviet attacks on the new line with increased casualties and German reinforcements, the Soviets decided to dig in. With the Soviets breaching the Dnepr River, there seemed little reason to hang on to the Crimea. The Sevastopol garrison with the German 17th Army and its Rumanian allies were bottled up there (around 200k men), but Hitler was insistent they hold. The Soviets launched their assault on the Crimea on the 8th of April with a dual assault from the northern and eastern sides of the peninsula. By the 16th, fighting raged on the outer forts of Sevastopol. The final Soviet offensive began on the 5th of May and by the 8th, even Hitler conceded that the defense of the Crimea had run its usefulness. A last minute withdrawal from Sevastopol across the Black Sea to Rumania began with over 100k men successfully withdrawn and a blown opportunity for the Soviets. May 1944 would start relatively quiet with both sides digging in and replacing their losses. The Soviets were preparing their masterstroke to destroy Army Group Center in its summer campaign while the Germans retained a majority of its mobile units under Army Group South (now Army Group North and South Ukraine) where it expected the next blow. This successful Soviet deception was one of the key ingredients to the destruction of Army Group Center during Operation Bagration. 21 German Player Strategy The German player faces a situation where his forces are worn out and not deployed very efficiently with a good portion of his armored forces on the wrong side of the Dnepr with Soviet forces already across the river. The 17th Army is still in the Caucasus and is dangerously exposed. The 1st objectives should be to move the rest of your forces across the Dnepr and establish a river defense line and then begin moving the 17th Army out of the Crimea. The next objective should be to marshal your mobile forces to defeat the numerous Soviet breakthroughs that will inevitably come. With your infantry divisions so weak, your mobile panzer divisions are your only hope in holding back the Soviets. The Soviets are also very mobile and will achieve breakthroughs so if you can cut off these spearheads and destroy them, you might stand a chance at weathering the Soviet assault. Otherwise you will face the slow grinding away of your infantry and increased breakthroughs. Mass your stronger mobile units in striking counterattacking forces and try to avoid keeping them on the front line long. Keep them behind your lines so that you have the flexibility to move them to the next hotspot or counterattack. The only things saving you from defeat are these mobile units. Use your worn out depleted units and Axis minor units for building your subsequent fall back lines along natural defensive barriers. You will receive strong reinforcements so it will be up to you whether to use them in building defensive lines or trying to save another desperate situation. Soviet Player Strategy The key to winning this scenario as the Soviets is keeping up constant pressure on the German player. You will want to first establish several strong bridgeheads over the Dnepr followed by a strong thrust along the Azov Sea to bottle up the 17th Army in the Crimea. The German’s main weakness is his infantry so take every opportunity to hammer his infantry and attempt to encircle them. Your mobile formations are good but they are vulnerable to German mobile attacks so you do not want to overextend your breakthroughs. What you want to avoid is allowing the Germans to mass his armor so make every attempt to engage his armor at every opportunity. Designer Notes These Army Group sized scenarios are my absolute favorite type of scenarios in Gary Grigsby’s War in the East as they are small enough not to be overwhelming and the victory objectives are concrete and clearly identifiable. I think that this scenario is the best scenario for two players who enjoy a move/counter-move battle. The Soviets are very strong with effective mobile forces but the German panzer and SS panzer divisions are the battle masters at a point in the war where around 80% of all German armor in the East is in the Ukraine. It is very much a very tense maneuver battle which I guarantee will be filled with drama. The German line will be smashed at numerous times forcing a general retreat and the German player can be quite capable of unleashing devastating defensive blows with its armored forces. The stakes could not be any higher. 22 SCENARIO 9: RETREAT FROM LENINGRAD (22 JUNE 1944– 3 JANUARY 1945) Historical Background The Soviet offensives to relieve the German siege and blockade of Leningrad began in January 1944 with the very ambitious goals of destroying the 18th Army and opening up a pathway through Estonia. Although the Soviets were successful in relieving the city, the battered Army Group North escaped almost 300 km into the better fortified Panther Line, a much more defensible position. Smaller offensives in the spring of 1944 were unsuccessful in breaching the German lines. Army Group North, sitting in superior defensive positions, would have its fate decided on it southern flank. For months, the Soviet 1st Baltic Front had been preparing for its attack against the far northern portion of Army Group Center’s 3rd Panzer Army. Army Group North had been aware of the Soviet buildup to its south as early as late May. On the 22nd of June, 1944 the Soviets launched their grand summer campaign called “Operation Bagration” and its goal was to crush the German Army Group Center around Minsk. On the first day, the 3rd Belorussian Front smashed the 3rd Panzer Army lines and encircled Vitebsk on the 24th, while Soviet forces poured into the gap and drove 50km within days. 3rd Panzer’s IX Corps was already weakened, because it had sent its reserves elsewhere to Army Group Center, and found itself getting hammered near 23 Polotsk. Army Group North reacted quickly by sending more and more units from its sector to attempt to shore up the shattered lines on its southern flanks. 16th Army’s I Corps found itself embroiled with the battles of 3rd Panzer Army. The army group’s only reserve mobile unit (12th Panzer Division) was also sent south to try and stem the tide. As a result, 16th Army’s right flank became ever extended to the west as more and more forces were added. By the 28th, the 1st Baltic Front had achieved its breakthrough near Lepel and the 3rd Panzer Army commander (General Reinhardt) reported that his army no longer had the strength to resist. Army Group North had lost contact with Army Group Center and Army Group North was in danger of being encircled. More units were dispatched from Army Detachment Narva, 16th Army, and 18th Army, to shore up its shattered southern flank near Daugavpils. In all, eight German divisions had been withdrawn from the Panther line to its southern flank. Army Group North commander (General Lindemann) reported that his army group could no longer hold the eastern lines. Soviet mechanized forces at Dzisna clearly showed an envelopment was in progress. Instead of allowing Army Group North to withdraw, Hitler ordered aggressive counterattacks towards Polotsk to cut off the Soviet units and regain contact with Army Group Center. The main threat remained at Daugavpils with the Soviet mechanized forces poised to break through to the Baltic coast. As a renewed Soviet offensive began at Polotsk in early July, it was clear that a German offensive was not going to be successful and Hitler conceded that a withdrawal was the best option. By the 3rd of July, Minsk had been captured and Vilna was in danger of being lost to the Soviets. On the 4th, General Lindemann was replaced by General Friessner as commander of Army Group North with orders to hold his line and re-establish contact with the 3rd Panzer Army. By the 10th, a dangerous gap of up to 35km was opened up between the two army groups west of Daugavpils with neither army group possessing enough strength to close it. Army Detachment Narva dispatched more forces to try and close the gap while the Soviets opened their own attacks on the German 16th Army on the Panther line. Most assaults by the Soviets had been repulsed on the Panther except in the VI SS Corps sector as the Soviets renewed their attacks. Drained from the numerous withdrawals of frontline divisions to shore up the southern flank, the Germans on the Panther Line could no longer hold. The boundary between the 16th and 18th Army was also being threatened, potentially splitting Army Group North in two. On the 20th of July, Friessner reported to Hitler that every available man was serving on the line, that he had absolutely no more reserves to plug any additional holes, and that a breakthrough of German lines was imminent. With 3rd Panzer Army further 24 withdrawing to the east, the gap between the army groups was widening. On the 22nd, Army Detachment Narva began withdrawing from the Narva sector. The decisive breakout came on the 27th with 3rd Guards Mechanized Corps capturing Jelgava. Tuckums, on the Baltic coast, was captured the next day. Army Group North’s last rail line to Prussia was severed and the army group was encircled. Severe logistical shortages prevented Army Group North from successfully launching a counter offensive. STAVKA rapidly reinforced the avenues most likely to be used in a relief attempt, while 2nd and 3rd Baltic Fronts resumed their attacks towards the northeast and Riga in hopes of smashing Army Group North for good. The Germans slowly withdrew away from the Panther Line and Estonia, under heavy Soviet pressure, west towards Riga in an ever decreasing pocket. Faced with more breakthroughs into the pocket by 10 August, Army Group North was facing near collapse. Friessner briefed that only if Army Group North abandoned Estonia, 18th and 16th Army continued to withdraw towards Riga, and sufficient forces outside the pocket broke though, would the army group survive. The relief effort for Army Group North began on the 16th of August with the XXXX and XXXIX Panzer Corps with Panzerverband Strachwitz. XXXX Panzer Corps was to push towards Siauliali and capture Jelgava while XXXIX Panzer Corps was to strike through Autz also towards Jelgava. Strachwitz would cover the north flank and conduct the actual linkup with Army Group North. 16th Army was to drive west and also make contact with the relief force. 1st Baltic Front discontinued its attack against the pocket and shifted its attention against the new threat. On the 19th, Strachwitz re-captured Tuckums and re-established contact with the 16th Army. In the next few days, the overland connection to Army Group North was reinforced and heavily guarded to allow Army Group North the time and space to withdraw. The two Panzer Corps south of Strachwitz continued to meet heavy resistance without significant gains. The Soviets were driven to eliminate this German threat in the Baltics once and for all so they could add these forces to the main drive on Germany proper. 1st Baltic Front was to breakthrough from Bauska to Riga, which was a vital strongpoint in the German defense, and once again encircle Army Group North. 2nd and 3rd Baltic Fronts were tasked with splitting the army group from the east in any way possible to disrupt the withdrawal. Leningrad Front was to advance from Tartu and try to separate Army Detachment Narva away from the ports where it might try to escape. Guderian believed that it was necessary to make preparations to evacuate the Baltic countries and told Army Group North to prepare to execute when the decision was made. In the meantime, 16th Army was to maintain the western edge of the land bridge around Jelgava-Riga while the 18th Army was to hold its position long enough to allow Detachment Narva to withdraw out of Estonia. By mid September, the withdrawal was well under way. On the 21st of September, 3rd Panzer Army was assigned to Army Group North and holding the lines of communication into Prussia. By this time, elements of the Narva Detachment were re-deploying under the command of the 16th Army in the Riga area. Evacuations from the seaports of Tallinn and Paldiski were completed by the 22nd with over 50k men evacuated out of Estonia. 25 On the 24th of September, the 1st Baltic Front halted its attack to the north and northeast against Riga and shifted its assault to the west. By the 27th, Army Group North had successfully withdrawn into its ‘Segewold’ positions in the Latvian Courland region in which it was expected to defend. 3rd Panzer Army was positioned to defend the region of Tilsit-Memel-Liepaja and the Army Group’s vital overland line of communications to Prussia. It was expected to defend 200km of front with five worn out divisions. The weak 3rd Panzer Army prompted Army Group North to request the withdrawal out of Latvia. At the beginning of the month of October, desperately needed Army Group North units were ordered to withdraw out of the Baltics and to report to Army Group Center. An already fragile army group was getting weaker by the day as the buildup of fresh forces in the 1st Baltic Front in front of the 3rd Panzer Army’s position continued. 1st Baltic Front launched its offensive against the 3rd Panzer Army in force on the 5th of October and cracks began to form immediately even with the heavy German resistance. Again, the 3rd Panzer Army collapsed and Army Group North was encircled, as the 1st Baltic Front nearly captured Liepaja. 16th and 18th Armies had to readjust to prevent being rolled up along the Baltic coast from the south. Riga was abandoned without a fight as the Germans withdrew across the Daugava River. On the 10th, 3rd Panzer Army was reassigned to Army Group Center and Memel was encircled. A weak attack was launched from the Tilsit bridgehead to try and link back up with Army Group North. Spearheaded by the Hermann Goring Panzer Corps, this offensive was halted on the 18th and Tilsit was evacuated. Army Group North was now on its own. Fresh from its re-encirclement of Army Group North, the Soviets launched renewed attacks against the bottled up army group in expectation of a final death blow, but the attacks made no gains. For the next four and a half months, the Soviets would launch vicious attacks, rest 26 and refit, and then launch more attacks. They never gained any significant territory. In January, the Soviets started withdrawing more and more forces from the ring around the Courland pocket to support its drive on Germany. In March, the attacks almost completely stopped with the Soviets being content to let the Germans manage their own virtual prisoner of war camp. Army Group North’s purpose was simply to tie up as many troops as possible. When V-E day came, Army Group North had the distinction and honor of being the only intact army group in the German armed forces. German Player Strategy The goal for the Germans here is simply to survive. The right flank of Army Group North will collapse and you will be forced to send more and more forces to contend with the threat. You will also be severely short on mobile units compared to the Soviets until your reinforcements arrive in August. Find a good defensible line that can gain you enough weekly VPs to prevent the Soviets from gaining a lead and dig in. Soviet Player Strategy Speed, speed, speed. Get over and across the major terrain barriers before the Germans can dig in. Try to reach the Baltic coast by August and fend off the German reinforcements. You will want to bottle the Germans up somewhere that doesn’t have a port that allows resupply. Try and do mini-encirclements and destroy a division here and there. Every division the German player loses makes it that much harder for him to defend a potential pocket. Designer Notes The reason I like this scenario is that it is obscure and not a battle often covered in wargames. It’s guaranteed to deliver a dramatic and stressful game. The German player has a bit of an advantage in that he doesn’t have to worry about the political decisions that were made that halted the overall withdrawal of Army Group North. It is also an interesting contrast to the “Road to Leningrad” scenario in reverse, and it is small enough to be manageable without being overwhelmed by one of the massive campaign battles. 27 SCENARIO 10: DRAMA ON THE DANUBE (20 AUGUST 1944– 5 MAY 1945) Historical Background Since late April 1944, the front along the Rumanian-Ukrainian border had been somewhat quiet. Army Group South Ukraine’s left flank comprising of Army Group North Ukraine’s 1st Hungarian Army had been pushed out of the Stanislav area and into the more defensible Carpathian Mountains along the Hungarian border and thus providing a very stable defensive line. The front in Rumania had been quiet in the early summer of 1944, allowing the Germans and Rumanians to prepare and rehabilitate shattered divisions from their costly withdrawal from the Ukraine. This calm was not without a strategic cost, for further north, Army Group Center collapsed and Army Group North was desperately fighting Soviet attempts to encircle the Germans in the Baltics. As a consequence, Army Group South Ukraine had to give almost all of its armored forces to the desperate fighting to the north. The only armored reserves available to the army group where the recuperating 20th and 13th Panzer Divisions, 10th Panzergrenadier Division, and the underequipped 1st Rumanian Armored Division. The Soviets were not sitting idly by as they had their own plans by completing their buildup of assault forces without detection from the Germans and Rumanians. 28 The 20th of August marked a day often referred to as “Black Sunday” by the German participants and marked the second time in less than two years that the German 6th Army would be destroyed. Taking advantage of the low Rumanian morale, Soviet units concentrated their fire on them resulting in most Rumanian units simply melting away without a fight. This left the Germans, who relied on the Rumanians to cover their flanks, extremely vulnerable. As per their doctrine, the Germans hurled whatever reserves they could muster including the 20th Panzer and 10th Panzergrenadier Divisions, but these counterattacks could not turn the tide. The weak German Luftwaffe could only provide token support amidst an effective Red Air Force. By the next day the situation was becoming chaotic for the German units. Soviet penetrations forced German headquarters to relocate. Communications were crumbling. The Germans desperately tried to protect their flanks but were overwhelmed and helpless. By nightfall of the 21st, the Soviets had penetrated over 30 miles in multiple areas and were already approaching German 6th Army headquarters. General Friessner, Army Group South Ukraine’s commander, ordered General Fretto-Pico to withdraw his army to the west immediately but it was already too late by time the movement started. By the 23rd of August, the remnants of the 3rd Rumanian Army was bottled up and isolated along the Black Sea coast. The double envelopment by the 2nd and 3rd Ukrainian Fronts had concentrated their shock forces on the 3rd and 4th Rumanian Armies with the objective being Husi. This plan effectively knocked the Rumanian forces out of the war for the Germans, encircled the 6th Army in place along with half of the 8th Army. It was a masterstroke of planning and execution which led to the immediate collapse and subjugation of Rumania. Also on the 23rd, Antonescu reported to the royal palace in Bucharest to brief the king on the situation and was arrested. The Rumanian king announced the formation of a new government and cessation of hostilities against the Allies. He then ordered all Wehrmacht troops out of Rumania in 14 days. As a final measure, the king renounced the Treaty of Vienna in which Rumania had ceded parts of Transylvania to Hungary. Hitler ordered Friessner to immediately arrest the king and restore Antonescu to the control of Rumania. Friessner was given control over the 5th Flak Division stationed at Ploesti to do so. The division was further reinforced by the Brandenburg Parachute Regiment airlanded into the Otopeni Airport. The German attempt to recapture Bucharest was a failure, so Friessner had to worry about a hostile Rumanian government in addition to trying to withdraw his army group from destruction. A final, desperate attempt of the 6th Army to break out the encirclement began on the night of the 25th of August and was a dismal failure as the Soviets drove deep into the pocket and severely disrupted the attempt. Estimates mark the 6th Army losses around 150k men. These turn of events started the general withdrawal of the 8th Army (minus IV Corps surrounded with the 6th Army) as it attempted to block the Carpathian passes into Transylvania leaving the 29 rest of Rumania completely exposed. Remaining pockets of the German 6th Army and some elements of the 8th Army continued to resist until early September. The 5th Flak Division also surrendered at Ploesti around this time along with the elite Brandenburg Parachute Regiment outside Bucharest. Total German losses in Rumania to this point were estimated at between 200k and 300k. Friessner had only five divisions left intact to work with for the coming defense of Hungary in addition to the 1st Hungarian Army defending the northern Carpathians and Fritto-Pico’s 6th Army stragglers on his right flank. The 2nd Hungarian was quickly activated and sent to Transylvania where it struck the advancing, and now Soviet allied, Rumanian 4th Army at Cluj with great success. The Hungarian 3rd Army was also being formed to attempt to close the gap and block the mountain passes at Sibiu on the 6th Army’s right flank but they were too late. Just as in Bucharest, the Hungarians were getting nervous with the Soviets approaching their borders, The Hungarians began secret negotiations with the Soviets. Hungary also demanded that the Germans send five panzer divisions within twenty-four hours or it would defect to the Soviets and General Guderian reluctantly agreed. By the 23rd of September, the Soviets had moved into Arad very near the Hungarian border. Hitler, very concerned about the loss of Hungary and its oil and other economic resources, ordered Hungary to be reinforced at once. Army Group South Ukraine was also redesignated as Army Group South. SS Panzergrenadier Division “Polizei”, and LVII Panzer Corps (with 23rd and 24th Panzer Divisions) were rapidly sent to shore up Army Group South. The Soviets slowed for the rest of September while they conquered Bulgaria and moved into Yugoslavia. This relief gave Friessner time to salvage his army group and prepare for the next phase of the proper invasion of Hungary. Hungarian Admiral Nicholas Horthy was still negotiating with the Soviets to declare an armistice in late September and a treaty was signed on 11th October. However, Hitler was prepared for this after being surprised by the Rumanian defection. Germany sent SS General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski and SS Major Otto Skorzeny to plan an operation to stop the defection. Horthy’s son, who played a significant role in the negotiations, was captured by Skorzeny and the cabinet did not approve Horthy’s armistice. The Germans, with elite units, captured the royal palace and installed a new pro-German government. Germany’s ally, and its rear area, was secure. On October 6th, the Soviets launched a new offensive by the 2nd and 4th Ukrainian Fronts aimed at enveloping both Army Group South and Army Group Heinrici (1st Panzer Army and 1st Hungarian Army). Soviet logistics simply could not support such an offensive, especially with the rail gauge differences. 1st Hungarian Army was quickly routed but 1st Panzer Army held the 4th Ukrainian Front on the Carpathians. The Pliev Mechanized Group broke through the 3rd Hungarian Army but was met with a furious counterattack from the newly arrived 23rd Panzer Division at Oradea and Pliev was forced to withdraw. The Axis forces were nevertheless forced to withdraw near Debrecen where they attempted to make a stand. 30 The Pliev Mechanized Cavalry group again punched through the Axis lines and captured Nyiregyhaza on the 22nd of October and also blocked the 8th Army’s line of retreat. The Germans struck the extended Pliev group with III Panzer Corps from the west and 8th Army from the east and encircled the Pliev Group consisting of the 1st Tank and 2nd Guards Cavalry Corps. 4th Ukrainian Front desperately tried to relieve the encircled Pliev Group but failed. The Soviets lost around 25k men and over 600 tanks while the Germans recaptured Nyirgyhaza on the 29th of October. On the 29th of October, 2nd Ukrainian Front under General Malinovsky struck the 3rd Hungarian Army. The Hungarians were routed as the LVII Panzer Corps fought to hold the line. The Soviets had advanced thirty miles within days with mechanized forces moving into 6th Army’s rear and the 6th Army began retreating towards Budapest. The III and LVII Panzer Corps only managed to halt the Soviets briefly a few scant miles outside Budapest. The 8th and 22nd SS Cavalry Divisions were deployed around Budapest to bolster the defenses, as a costly city battle raged with savage fighting reminiscent of Stalingrad a couple of years earlier. During the first week of November, Timoshenko’s 3rd Ukrainian Front entered Hungary from the south, fresh from its liberation of Belgrade. Defending southern Hungary fell to the 2nd Panzer Army which was ironic because this army had no tanks and was tasked with defending the crucial Hungarian oilfields at Nagykanisza. The Soviets renewed their offensive on November 11th and by December 8th had captured Vac and Estergom on the Danube just north of Budapest. The 3rd Ukrainian Front kept pounding the BalatonLake Velencze Line and it was clear that the Soviets were attempting to envelope Budapest from the north and south. Friessner tried to block the penetrations with his panzer reserves but the divisions were worn out and were unable to check the Soviet advances. Friessner asked to withdraw from Budapest but Hitler declared it a fortress city to be held to the last man. Hitler assumed operational control of the battle from Berlin and ordered renewed armored attacks by the III Panzer Corps between Lake Balaton and Velecze which were unsuccessful. The Soviet 46th Army and 6th Guards Tank Army linked up at Estergom on Christmas Eve, surrounding Budapest. IX SS Corps and I Hungarian Corps were the main elements encircled at Budapest and tasked to defend the fortress. They were comprised of the 8th and 22nd SS Cavalry Divisions, Feldernhalle Panzergrenadier Division, 13th Panzer Division, Hungarian 1st Armored, 10th, and 12th Infantry Divisions and other various units. 31 These elements had been fighting bloody engagements within the city since the 10th of November. The Soviets thought they could capture Budapest in a matter of a few days but the Axis defenders were making the Soviets pay for every city block and tied up over 250k Soviet troops. The German defensive lines within the city slowly shrank but the Soviets were taking enormous casualties. To relieve the city, Hitler ordered the IV SS Panzer Corps (3rd and 5th SS Panzer Divisions) to Hungary to spearhead the relief attempt. Early on New Year’s day, the IV SS Panzer Corps and Group Pape (6th and 8th Panzer Divisions) struck near Estergom under Operation Konrad and achieved a local breakthrough. III Panzer and I Cavalry Corps launched a diversionary attack near Szekesfehervar further to the south. Malinovsky quickly deployed his reserves and checked the III Panzer and I Cavalry Corps but the IV SS Panzer Corps was not stopped. However, a decisive breakthrough by the Germans was not achieved. By the 3rd of January, Malinovsky hurled the 1st and 7th Guards Mechanized, 5th Guards Cavalry, and 21st Rifle Corps to halt the SS advance. By the 8th of January, the Germans were stopped cold just 15 miles from the outskirts of Budapest. IV SS Panzer Corps was pulled out of the line and re-assembled at Gran. On the 10th of January, the IV SS Panzer Corps started its second relief attempt from Gran and towards Vac under Konrad II. On the 12th, it captured Pilisszenkereszt and was within 14 miles of Budapest. The next day, to the IV SS Panzer Corp’s disbelief, they were withdrawn from the offensive under Hitler’s orders who did not believe the operation could be a success. Hitler devised a new plan that far exceeded the original goal of relieving Budapest but had now transformed into a double envelopment attack to encircle and destroy the Soviet forces west of Budapest. As part of Operation Konrad III, the IV SS Panzer Corps was redeployed again to the northern tip of Lake Balaton, and along with the III Panzer Corps smashed the Soviets on the 18th of January. Dunapentele on the Danube was taken on the 19th, only a dozen miles from Budapest. The garrison in Budapest could have broken out, but Hitler refused and demanded the recapture of the city. Marshal Tolbukhin requested to withdraw to the east bank of the Danube, but was denied by Stalin. IV SS Panzer Corps, depleted, spent, and down to less than thirty tanks, was stalled. The Soviets began new attacks against IV SS Panzer Corps on the 27th and the Germans were forced to retreat. Although demonstrating impressive offensives this late in the war, the Germans had nothing to show for their efforts except high casualties and worn out divisions. Army Group South suffered around 35k casualties during the Konrad offensives. The 3rd SS, 5th SS, and 1st Panzer Divisions all together had barely thirty functioning tanks, and fuel and ammunition reserves were desperately diminished. On the 30th, IX SS Corps in Budapest reported its situation as critical. Collapse was imminent as brutal fighting within Budapest continued. SS General Pfeffer-Wildenbruch, commander IX SS Corps, ordered a breakout without orders, to begin on 11 February, but few Germans managed to make it back to their lines as they scattered and were destroyed by the Soviets. The battle ended, it earned the honor of being the “Stalingrad of the SS.” 32 In a last gasp attempt, the last German major offensive was decided by Hitler to be launched into Hungary as part of Operation Spring Awakening. This was planned as a repeat attempt of Operation Konrad III to encircle and destroy Soviet forces west of Budapest and provide some breathing space around the oilfields of Nagykhaniza. Backed by the strongest German army in 1945, the almost full strength 6th SS Panzer Army, it was an impressive force of armored might that would be spent at Hitler’s whim on obscure and questionable objectives in Hungary. The operation was planned for the first week of March and began on the 6th of March. In a repeat of the previous Konrad offensives, impressive gains by the Waffen SS forces striking from North of Lake Balaton were countered by massive Soviet reinforcements. By mid March the offensive was stalling. The 2nd Panzer Army, south of the 6th SS Panzer Army, did not do nearly as well in the attack. In just a few days, the Soviets had driven the Germans back to their original start points. Germany had spent its last armored reserve and would not be able to mount an offensive at this scale for the rest of the war. Germany could only try desperately to hold the line. By the end of March, the Soviets crossed into Austria and Vienna fell on the 13th of April. The shattered remnants of the 6th Army were fighting for survival near Gran and the 3rd Hungarian Army was virtually destroyed thirty miles west of Budapest as Army Group South effectively collapsed. German Player Strategy The Germans face a disaster before they even get to move a single unit. If the Soviet player executes his first turn effectively, the Soviet mobile units will smash the two Rumanian armies on the flanks and drive deep into the German rear of the 6th and 8th Armies. With little mobile units and reserves to check these penetrations, the Germans will simply be fighting for 33 survival. The Rumanians will most likely completely withdraw from the war within the first two turns so do not expect any help from your Rumanian units whatsoever. In fact, Rumania is guaranteed to surrender before you have a chance to use any Rumanian units as long as the Soviets capture a surrender trigger city, like Vaslui or Husi, on their first turn. The first objective for the Germans is to attempt to save whatever you can from being destroyed and begin withdrawing into the Carpathians. It will be a race to see who will get their first but if you can occupy some good defensive positions in the mountains, you stand a chance of delaying the Soviets long enough for reinforcements to arrive. You may be forced to fight your way through some weak Soviet Rumanian units in order to reach the southern passes before the Soviet troops can secure them. You will not have enough troops to make a continuous front line along the Carpathians and along the Hungarian-Rumanian border so your defenses will be breached in time. You will receive strong reinforcements and the key to surviving this campaign is what to do with those reinforcements. Instead of grand offensives, it may be best to focus on cutting off Soviet penetrations and attempting to destroy them to take the mobility out of the Soviet forces to even the odds a bit. Another option is to use some of the weaker reinforcements, including rebuilding 6th Army divisions, to build a fortified line anchored on good terrain around Budapest. If you can slow the Soviets in the mountains and fight a delaying action across central Hungary, you may give yourself enough time to prepare strong defensive works for your forces to occupy. Your Hungarian allied units are not nearly as strong or capable as your German units so you will be forced to reinforce them. Soviet Player Strategy Soviet strategy is quite simple. Smash the Rumanians and drive deep into the Rumanian rear and try and encircle and destroy as many Germans as you can. On your first turn you should be able to pocket the 6th Army and force the Rumanians to switch sides. Keep enough mobile forces driving as fast as you can to secure the mountain passes into Hungary before the Germans can stabilize the front. The Hungarian units are relatively weak so if the Germans use them as complete armies, concentrate your offensives on these easier targets. Be wary of the German panzers and SS units as these are still very strong and capable of crashing your best plans. Whenever the Germans mass their mobile forces, concentrate your reserves and try to wear them down as much as possible. Designer Notes If you like crisis management scenarios, this will be a fun one to play as the Germans. The Germans will have a crisis immediately and the German player will have to use great skill to use his reinforcements to stabilize the front. This scenario, like Decision in the Ukraine, is attractive for a German player because it uses some very strong late war German units such as the 6th SS Panzer Army arriving in February and you get to see your Axis allies trying to defend their homes. The Soviet side is interesting because we see how well the Soviets have learned from their devastating losses in 41 and 42 and become such an effective and maneuverable force. 34 REFERENCES Axworthy, Mark, “Third Axis, Fourth Ally. Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 19411945”, Hailer Publishing, 1995 Bergstrom, Christer, “Bagration to Berlin. The Final Air Battles in the East: 1944-1945”, Ian Allen Publishing, 2008 Bergstrom, Christer, “Stalingrad. The Air Battle: 1942 through January 1943”, Ian Allen Publishing, 2007 Glantz, David M., “The Battle for the Ukraine, The Red Army’s Korsun-Shevchenkovskii Offensive, 1944”, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2003 Glantz, David M., “The Soviet Airborne Experience”, Combat Studies Institute, 1984 Glantz, David M., “The Battle for Leningrad. 1941-1944”, University Press of Kansas, 2002 Glantz, David M., “Armageddon in Stalingrad. September – November 1942”, University of Kansas Press, 2009 Haupt, Werner, “Army Group South, The Wehrmacht in Russia 1941-1945”, Schiffer Military History, 1998 Hinze, Rolf, “Crucible of Combat, Germany’s Defensive Battles in the Ukraine 1943-1944”, Helion & Company Ltd, 2009 Jentz, Thomas, “Panzer Truppen. Volumes 1 and 2”, Schiffer Military Publishing, 1996 Krivosheev, G.F., “Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century”, Greenhill Books, 1993 Kurowski, Franz, “Bridgehead Kurland. The Six Epic Battles of Heeresgruppe Kurland”, J.J. Fedorowciz Publishing, 2002 Madeja, Victor W., “Russo-German War Winter-Spring 1944”, Valor Publishing Company, 1988 Madeja, Victor W., “Russo-German War Summer-Autumn 1943”, Valor Publishing Company, 1987 Mitcham, Samuel W. Jr., “Crumbling Empire, The German Defeat in the East, 1944”, Praeger Publishers, 2001 Nafziger, George F., “Rumanian Order of Battle World War II, An Organizational History of the Rumanian Army in World War II”, Privately published, 1995 Niehorster, Leo, “The Royal Hungarian Army, 1920-1945”, Axis Europa Books, 1998 Newton, Steven H., “Retreat from Leningrad, Army Group North 1944/1945”, Schiffer Publishing, 1995 Military Research Department of General Staff, “Battle of the Soviet Army Part III, January – December 1943”, Military Publishing House of the Ministry of Defense, 1972 Sharp, Charles C., “Soviet Order of Battle World War II”, Published by George Nafziger, 1995 35 Tieke, Wilhelm, “The Caucasus and the Oil, The German-Soviet War in the Caucasus 1942/43”, J.J. Fedorwicz Publishing , 1995 Various Authors, “Slaughterhouse, The Handbook of the Eastern Front”, The Aberjona Press, 2005 Lexicon der Wehrmacht, http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/inhaltsverzeichnis1.htm Panzerkeil, http://www.ordersofbattle.darkscape.net/site/sturmvogel/Panzerkeil.html The Luftwaffe, 1933-1945, http://www.ww2.dk/ VVS of RKKA, http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bfhome&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fallaces.ru&lp=ru_en&btnTrUrl=Translate Romanian Armed Forces in the Second World War, http://www.worldwar2.ro/ generali/?section=29 OKW Lage Situation Map, Southern Russia dated 19 November 1942 OKW Lage Situation Map, Ukraine dated 12 November 1943 OKW Lage Situation Map, Rumanian dated 18 August 1944 CREDITS 2BY3 GAMES PRODUCER Joel Billings SCENARIO DESIGN AND HISTORICAL RESEARCH John Duquette, Trey Marshall PROGRAMMING Gary Grigsby, Pavel Zagzin PLAYTESTERS Steven Clarke, Flavio Carrillo, Jeff Duquette, Lee Elmendorf, Pieter de Jong, Scott Koberstein, Bob Malin 36 S L I T H E R I N E LTD. AND MATRIX G AMES LTD. SING L E U SE SO F T WA RE L IC E N S E AG RE EMEN T READ THIS SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT (“LICENSE”) CAREFULLY BEFORE PROCEEDING TO INSTALL THE SOFTWARE. BY PRESSING “AGREE,” YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE, PRESS “DISAGREE”. THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BETWEEN YOU AND SLITHERINE LTD. AND OR MATRIX GAMES LTD. AND/OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR SUB LICENSEES. 1. General. This software product in its entirety is copyrighted and is protected by international law. The software and any accompanying documentation or media including this License whether on disk, in read only memory, or in any other form are licensed, not sold, to you by Slitherine Ltd. and or Matrix Games Ltd. and is for use only under the terms of this License. Slitherine and or Matrix Games reserve all rights not expressly granted to you. The rights granted herein are limited and do not include any patents or intellectual property rights. Slitherine and or Matrix Games expressly retain ownership of the Software itself. 2. Permitted License Uses and Restrictions. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Software on a single computer at any time. This License does not allow the Software to exist on more than one computer at a time, and you may not make the Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple computers at the same time. You may not copy, reproduce, translate, decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, modify, or create derivative works from the assembled code or any part thereof. The software may contain an Editor that allows purchaser to create new assets, modify existing assets or files or create custom levels, scenarios or other materials for use solely in connection with the existing software (“new materials”). Purchaser is not permitted to use, or allow third parties to use the Editor and/or any new materials created, for any commercial purposes whatsoever, or in any other software, without the express prior written permission of Slitherine Ltd. and or Matrix Games Ltd. Any persons so doing is committing an offence and or a copyright violation and will be subject to appropriate civil or criminal action at the discretion Slitherine Ltd. and or Matrix Games Ltd. 3. Game Servers. Use of the software by purchaser on Slitherine’s or Matrix Games servers is allowed entirely at the discretion of Slitherine and or Matrix Games, who at their sole discretion reserve the right to remove, deny or prevent any purchaser from using the Companies servers for any reason whatsoever including unreasonable, abusive or offensive language or behaviour and without consultation or notice. 4. Support & Multiplayer. In certain situations and at their sole discretion Slitherine Ltd. and or Matrix Games Ltd. may refuse technical support and access to multiplayer or online functionality, including but not limited to the following; the user attempts or assist other to to bypass security measures on the software, or the user is abusive to Slitherine and or Matrix Games staff and or it’s community, or Slitherine or Matrix Games has reason to suspect the user is attempting to cheat or assisting others to cheat. 5. Transfer. Purchaser may not rent, lease, lend or sublicense the Software to any person or entity. 6. Termination. This License is effective until terminated. Your rights under this License will terminate automatically without notice from Slitherine and or Matrix Games if you fail to comply with any term(s) of this License. Upon the termination of this License, you shall cease all use of the Software. 7. Warranty. This Software is provided without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, which are hereby disclaimed. In no event will Slitherine Ltd and or Matrix Games Ltd be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from possession, use, or malfunction of this software product. 8. Disclaimer. You expressly acknowledge and agree that use of the software is at your sole risk and that the entire risk as to satisfactory quality, performance, accuracy and effort rests with you. The software is provided “as is”; with all faults and without warranty of any kind, and Slitherine Ltd and or Matrix games or their licensors, subsidiaries, affiliates or sub licensees hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to the software, express, implied or statutory. Slitherine and Matrix Games do not warrant against interference of your enjoyment of the software, nor that the functions contained in the software will meet your requirements, nor that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted or error-free, or that defects in the software will be corrected. No oral or written information or advice given by Slitherine and or Matrix Games or any authorized representative shall create a warranty. Should the software prove defective, you assume the entire cost of all necessary servicing, repair or correction. 9. Limitation of Liability. Is restricted to the full extent not prohibited by law, in no event will Slitherine and or Matrix Games be liable for personal injury, or any incidental, special, indirect or consequential damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, damages for loss of profits, loss of data, business interruption or any other commercial damages or losses, arising out of or related to your use or inability to use the software, however caused, regardless of the theory of liability (contract, tort or otherwise) and even if Slitherine or Matrix Games has been advised of the possibility of such damages. In no event shall Slitherine Ltd and or Matrix Games Ltd. total liability to you for all damages (other than as may be required by applicable law in cases involving personal injury) exceed the amount which the purchaser paid for the software or Fifty US Dollars ($50) whichever is less. The foregoing limitations will apply even if the above stated remedy fails in its essential purpose. 10. Controlling Law and Severability. This License will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. If for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision, or portion thereof, to be unenforceable, the remainder of this License shall continue in full force and effect. 11. Complete Agreement; Governing Language. This License constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the use of the Software licensed herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous understandings regarding such subject matter. No amendment to or modification of this License will be binding unless in writing and signed by Slitherine Ltd and Matrix Games Ltd. Any translation of this License is done for local requirements and in the event of a dispute between the English and any non-English versions; the English version of this License shall govern.