Gloster F. 5/34 and A6l\/l Zero Fighter
Transcription
Gloster F. 5/34 and A6l\/l Zero Fighter
Gloster F. 5/34 and A6M Enigma Zero Fighter of Jiro Horigoshi and his design roots Jiro Anzai On the 48th Congress Matchikaneyama campus, the Principle Section, of the Japanese Psychological Association held at Osaka 0n 14th but F. 5/34 and the Japanese September, also read 1984,I a paper on University's had not only acted as a coordinator the British Gloster Eχperimental Navy's carrier-based fighter Zero A6M's prototype. Te!escoping matter, I have compared nine other single-seat monoplanes of the days, ranging from Mark Seversky V-48B, 1, Curtiss P40-A, Vought V-143 P-35, Vultee Vanguard Grumman to two Italian fighters, all together nine of the monoplane out with the only one plane, in about 18 vital parts, that earned of Fighter the Spitfire F-4-F3, and fighters, and come 1 5 points of similarity, the while the two others scoring g points, three others 6 points, and finally three others ge廿ing only two points in smimilarity score. Of these comparisons, points was no other than the Gloster Eχperimental For all this, my an expose aeronautics tentative conclusion of debuking the case presented. one verging on the eχpos6 of debunking celebrated F. 5/34, as shown was such that one could nature; in fact, at the time eχpert to examine fighter of the World War the sole aircraft that scored 15 l was more in the chart. not possibly have or less asking for the real Either its very nature had been nature on the Japan's No.l II or Zero, or else my called it men were no longer quest had seemed to have fallen on stone ears. Nevertheless, l kept searching and researching this matter until my to get at the root was so enhanced about what this time some ex-RAF that l resolved to visitEngland: veterans who l had said in that congress; this move the same period l had pub!ished psychological interpretation," publishing house. To from my have of my throttled on my 5 th Japanese the PHPけhe book famed of this to Assistant Gordon given me some of the basic material concerning chatけhe it so happened work to know activity, no doubt; but at about Matsushita of Midway Electric Works' Museum at Hendon, Leith there, and Mr. Leith was kind enough point that has been desire that it was had wired me entitled “Battle cut the preface short. ! visited the RAF sented a copy During'our heard as aircraft designer of the country interested in pressing the issue to the original root, for a while my taken − a affiliated and preto have the said Gloster F. 5/34。 sticking to my 77 mind again came to the surface; Jiro Anzai that is, be it Sidney when Cum's Hurricane or Folland's Gloster, or Mitchell's Supermarine their designed craft had been lined up chronologically, there seem colour and thread which can be identified as something designer's, a sort of engineer's Scarlet Thread. Spitfire, to have been a peculiar idiosyncratic peculiar to the particular What seems to be so odd is for allits remark- able exploits as the actual service fighter, the Zero's very configuration is such an abrupt break from the Type or the 96 carrier-based fighter or the Zero's predecessor, and Zero's break-off immediate from successor-to-be, (also designed its predecessor). How forgotten, there had on the experimental and in each case, even though been in the Allied camp, stage, whose the World's Aircraft some It was sometime widely from specs and pictures had been published sea to mountain, turned specializing in engineering books, out to be a copy theless, my Army Gad! fighter plane whose on crafts not only in Jane's All and I had streamlined came naming of Sankaido, betrays they published aircraft and other motorized forth with the special appendix been poring our fascinated eyes came out to be new never- on every page of this across to the configuration of the shape, taken as a whole looked picture of the UN's issue, filledwith line drawings, with of the top secret stamp, it turned eager turning we the so much like the configuration carrier-based fighter plane or A6M fighter! At the closer scrutiny my undercarriage, with tailplane; moreover, brother discovered the equally disimilar layout compared tail cone, indeed as if it had swallowed some this darwing's craft had Alice's puffing-up 15 points of similarity between tail cone F. 5/34 had a funny-looking the Zero and Gloster as I had come thirty four years after the V-J Day, Bill Gunston's say as follows: Mitsubishi A6M ― 78 ― that housed pill! For all that, inasmuch forty years later, our on-the-spot insight cannot be dismissed as a mere For some quite dissimilar of the vertical tailplane against the horizontal to the Zero's gracefully slenderized retracted tailwheel, this one or Glosetr Experimental some at large had prototype-like of various aircraft, with usual specs of performances; one of our of the then-relased-to-the-public Zero and Navy data; for allits ominous elder brother and the world in the intent of crowning of the Allied Aircraft brochure pages of line or skelton drawings booklet, and Seas; as their name the vesrsions for school children. This company brief performance complete ENCOUNTER Pavillion of Mountains exploits by the Japanese Imperial which the resembling after the Fall of Singapore, that the publisher by the name translated means craft, including another years before, but also in other aviation magazines. CHILDHOOD which Horigoshi, Raiden is it that in the two out of three, each successor had taken an entirely different configuration, mercifully by the interceptor the sausage-like as there are to discover child's fancy. Classic Fighters came out to Gloster F. 5/34 and A6M In all important Japanese Navy respects the design Zero Fighter of this carrier-based fighter of the Imperial was ordinary to the point of being old-fashioned.!t was, for eχample, almost identical in size, shape, weight, engineering detail design and performance the British Glosetr F. 5/34 flown in December ]937, almost ]8 months to before the Japanese fighter ‥‥I To be sure. there have proclaim been many articles and books including Ziro Horigoshi's the similarity is superficial, and in fact a lot of ingenuities are woven that into the craft, designed by him. For all that, there are several matters that had crossed my not so negligently pass by. little as l know about mind, the facts which aviation, aerodynamics I could and its engineering details. OF THE ANTI-SPIN Of the plane's anti-spin tendency, Concerning ment into proved tliat the original Zero a flat spin from made at the Naval Technology fighter design did have the tendency Establislト of getting which it could not possibly recover. To rectify this some to the tailconfiguration; that was the back-ing away the vertical tailplane, and plane, TAKEN Dr. Horigoshi says as follows: spin, the vertical windtunneにests merits were of MEASURE thus enhancing bringing upwards assess- of the position the position of the horizontal tail- the directional stability of the aircraft at a greater ang!e of attack? When said in a technical jargon, there seems had one taken a second what might have been thought made For had been and tried to envisage from nothing so extraordinary the above-mentioned but description the original tail configuration in respects to the fusalage, one would have seen a certain configuration F。5/34 to have the shape of which nearly superimposes that of the Gloster in 1937。 we forwarded the vertical plane of the present-day remaining Zero's iai!けhe relation of the vertical tailplane closer to that of Gloster's tailplane configuration, and likewise the lowering of the horizontal tai】planespreadout one step or more closer to tlie extraordinary alongside the aft fuselage, would have come tailplane position realized on the 1937 Gloster Experimental. Only had difference prominent that contraption which would open been is. even a hidden automatically assessed thus farけhat sausage-like configuration; but container in which antiflat spin parachute concealed. as in case of another British military aircraft Blackburn 1)Bill Gunston, Classic・Fighter緋London: Hamlyn, 1978), p」00. 2)Jiro Horigoshi and M. Okuniiya, 'ZeroFigノiter(TokyoトKyodoshuppan, −79− 1953), p,7フ. Saia, Jiro Anzai the story would have suggested in my Osaka been taken an altogether Dr. Horigoshi's meticulous prototype or the first model Is it not because Eχperimental, different picture. University deliberation. When description takes entirely a different hue. put into the windtunnel Horigoshi This possibility,l had already taken in this shade, what thought Why did the Zero's tests develop an unrecoverable had gotten an inspiration form but given no second seems to have the confuguration flat spin? of the Gloster to the blimp-like part, and only came to slender- ized the original tail part, its end result was the flat spin? Whether Freud's these meticulous slip of tongue description by Horigoshi or the designer's unconscious a position to know. But these facts remain were something close to Dr. Sigmund e汀ort at setting facts as facts,I am not in to be wanting a proper assay by the genuine aviation eχpert for trialof fire eχamination. What about the Raiden strange similarity between Horigoshi and Interceptor and the Vultee Vanguard's the later materialized production the preceeding Experimental 61? There service craft Raiden Craft by Vultee that ended are also a designed by in the eχperimental stage. As days progressed so rapidly in the wartime deteriorating rapidly for the Japanese, brother and l were found !y drew began ourselves us closer to the world poring over the new of air-craft productions, my colleagues fighter that should ing with l must as soon were new hotly bring down discussing a feeling of d&ja vue, that feeling one would have seen somewhere, as l got home, Asahi, until I came this period l (Thunderbolt), of this newly relased as well as fighters√「had been wonderoccasionally get when one is eχhausted. an interceptor like this. Yet I could not quite track it down, I started to track it down, up to several of them. that of Raiclen, its name of the Raiden the picture image bombers During or early 1945, our Newspaper by the name about a lot of enemy was Λmerican my natural- and on our sparse holidays, we again it was late 1944 interceptor both student workersいhis as well as back issues of aviation magazines. flashed a picture of the Navy's or fortunes began so rapid was our skinking that pretty soon at factory lines as mobilized also got a jolting eχperience of encountering; while years, the tide of war and getting out all those back issues of the Koku The configuration of this interceptor is so alike to Company Vultee's Vanguard 61,again an eχperimental Aircraft。 l had stiffled my mouth configuration, its shape when of langding I came to the picture, because gear, wheel's arrangement table tail wheel with its split-open doors, looked latticed canopy or cockpit, this one this time again the total even to the completely so alike; moreover, had the latticed cockpit retrac- unlike Zero's clearcul part that continued rest of aft fuselage in one piece (this had been at least two years of the Pacific War with the the Allied fighters characteristics/In turn the Allied war defense manuals used out. clearcut bubble on this point, this Raiden seeming copy ceptors had canopy of the Western eχtended long as distinctively Japanese). For tradition; moreover, propeller transmission −80− as we found shafts, with to emphasizeけhat after the war, both eχtremely deep bulged is a the inter- and curved ^"^\ Other ■7 ^\ Monoplane 7f A6Ml\Fighters Gloster Spitfire Curtiss Seversky Fiat-50 Vultee Macchi-20.0 Vanguard V-48B Grumman Vought F4F-3 V-143 1 P-40-A P-35 X X X X X X o X 11.63 11.25 11.30 10.97 10.74 10.58 11.00 11.58 10.40 X X X X X o o o X 9.76 9.15 9.60 7.70 7.80 8.19 8.50 7.93 X X X o o X X X 2,450 2,680 3,080 2,540 2,200 2,659 2,659 1,982 o o o X X X X X X 21.36 o 22.50 21.93 20.40 18.25 16.30 18.30 24.20 X X X X X X 17.38 o 115.0 119.0 140.0 125.0 131.5 135.0 145.0 X o X F. 5/34 Propeller & Spinner Cowling 61 Air Intake- Canopy & Cockpit' r uselage Main Wing Tailplane Horizontal Tailplane& Elevator Main j Undercarriage J o Wing 12 Span (m) Total Length (m) 8.7 o Total Weight (kg) 2,343 Wing I 22-44 Area (m) Loading 100.3 o Speed (k/h) 508.8 506 o Power 875 Plant (HP) 840 SimilarityScores 15 (O=l point each) X 587 X 530 X 2,400 8.90 o no.o o 515 115.0 X 481 483 481 505 563 o o X X X X X X 1,030 1,260 950 840 840 1,200 1,200 750 2 2 2 6 9 9 6 6 SuperficialSimilaritiesb etween Zero and other fightersof the period (1936―1941) i Data assessed by Jiro Anzai. Gloster F. 5/34 and A6M cowling around air-cooled radial engines! But the similarity hunch I swore Zero Fighter myself of mine that l would situations fanned was only limited to the outward not slip this find even the witchhunting to my antispy campaigns configuration, and yet brother, for the deteriorating war so much so that l was scraed to death for even harbouring such a find. By then even girls'school kids had been dragged into factory lines, some even moreover, my of them given the very honour only a month before ! had been relative, that she had teacher on account been of servicing the military planes in airdromes; disclosed from a beautiful elder girl of 17 years; left tied, with her hands of her having spilled a vitalinformation and feet in one, by her fencing concerning this accused spilling turned out to be just deploring of the worsening were so many mechanical bugs developed the military situation, situations,in which there that very few service craft could ever reach even the second lines. With myself the war over, my line had of course shifted to other direction, and having turned a historical psychologist with interest in the history of the RAF Then one popular day l came nonfiction fighter,it went elongated than anything to overshoot seems to be an absurd Yanagidaけhe while showing until it gave a lauding hand the Raiden as an evidence curious coincidence equally credit-given (among Here again, even account? a paean to Horigoshi written by the very of praises on the Zero even for his adapting the of his ingenuity. And seems this caused me more Eχperimental Fighter preceeds configuration markedly to have been occurring in the less-known but the Japanese circle)interceptor designed by Dr. Horigoshi. the original performance oblivion)also extended smothered else to set the records right. Indeed, another Vanguard across what writer Kunio shaft into special interest in the British History, my returned. some (again remained as the prototype three years the appearance resembles, propeller shaft, and specs are not so far dissimilar,with the Vultee now tliistime complete in such with stage and of the Raiden. But the important the canopy faded into again, its basic detail as the use of and aft fuselage as one-piece dorsal line configuration! About Length 57 specsいhe Vultee's wingspan is 10.70 meters as against the Raiden's 10.80. o臼he Vultee is 8.90 meters as against 9.47 meters of the Raiden; centi meters are di叩erence anyhow, always benefit by which certainly refining on Vultee 61, our Raiden within the prototype, provided have is 2,861 kg, which to form one would question that the posterior can as against 2,272 an additional 140 kg weight for the heavier armament craft with eχtended fuel capacity enforced be too quick means to think the copier has enough the designer's ability. Weight-wise, this can be easily accountable lmay but here we Overall skill to copy, kilograms added: intsalled in the actual combat of again, service by the Japanese Navy. a hasty conclusion; on the surface it may ⇔← kヴ〃〃i〃〃=-・ご〃・--・a〃=一匹φ=r〃・="・=・・・・ふ←〃-w-〃J-.J→ 3)Kunio Yanagida, Zero Fighter(Tokyo: Bungeishunjyu-sha, 1985), p.155. 4)Jane's Ail the World'sAircraft,1938,1939, 1940 and 1941 Editions. 81 seem so; but l Jiro Anzai earnestly urge the reader to have more One of the fact that I cannot statement mission as if of the said Horigoshi's ingenuity; were some possibly swallow brazen-faced several attempts by patience and follow the lines with me Japanese before liisadaption. is stemmed from the eχistence of the to the effect that extended Lawk a mercy, For eχample, American propeller shaft transthere had been teclinological achivement; P-39 missions all over the for the Zero in the Pacific Theatre should not negate her in fact, the Airacobra was far and cessor in realizing not only the eχtended shaft transmission through at least Bell Aircraft Corporation's Airacobra is one of the service aircraft that had been flying actual combat world, the fact it had been no match to the end. its center aχisけhus turning herself the most wide known as the early sue- but the inner-shaft 37 mm formidable cannon anti-tank buster in the later stage of war. The readers even thankless task, you others would at this point would are heading come say, to the effect that what towards the precipice from out to say there already have been innovative genius in the person of the late Dr. Horigoshi, great man with Horigoshi for his innovating a paean fighter, and many Yes, of praises even from “Reduced other Japanese it is just on the same Speaking Bomber on the Type you you are trying to is a are bound to jump; a cloud of witnesses to endorse and who the Hurricanes' Rigidity Concept" the are you to criticisesuch the Sidny Cum that had lauded of the control Dr. systems in Zero Navy's service craft. ground the able designer and better known One Attacker (Betty which l would like to argue. as the miserable in Allied Code guy name)has O Reconnaissance For even though less known that had designed as the Illfated Type to say as follows. Seaplane designed by Eitaro Sano, Honjyo says as follows: The most prominent that it is designed further than this Engineer a little man the compulsory Sano Hattori, himself watch feature of this plane (Type by was none a graduate of the team Seaplane ‥. Cheif advices from Moreover, of Tokyo responsible Designer Sano the college graduates greatly to the adavance with rigidity of control this problem 5)Kaikukai other than by means educational the Design Imperial it was system man Seaplane)is with section chief Mr. an Empror's for that fine aircraft or Type is a remarkably that had likable man, studied aerodynamics rigidty concept! Engineer had ever taught me there is such a phenomenon O as Observation as science ‥. to discover a rare phenomenon, of aviation technology. This is something come thus to do to solve Sano is the firstman as that? edit.,The Wakes of the Naval Eagles (Tokyo: Hara-shobo, 1983)、pp. 65−66 82 silver willing to accept in the aircraft ‥. in the end he had of reduced no that had hand-picked Department's University the fact history extended Director Hattori that had placed Sano while testing this plane, he had come contributing who O Observation formal grade school level. ‥ The for his excellent achivements; the chief whose Gloster F. 5/34 and A6M Had this gentlemanly Honjyo's and Dr. Horigoshi's grand statement come to a grave doubt The saying been about is not only an incidence seven pages of the expose (tucked into a huge from days, the volume Hara Shobo.in Honjyo Upon happens would rather protestingly by his twenty- Wakes by other aerial eχperts of of the Naval Eagles, published he seems to be wanting to claim the true It runs as follows: the series of the test flight for the Zero, Dr. Horigoshi final ideal ratio l got turned said guf- out to be the very one recommended talk goes on, in detail, and as we read them by carefully, there can be no doubt credibility that the ratio of the horizontal tailplane itself) to that of the elevators is none and theorizing; in fact on the same This ratio is the figure obtained the ratio obtained by me to my by me through on the medium insistence, and my tailplane (or the area of other than the ratio drawn page, Honjyo posing eversince for others to adopt. heeded true, Professor the start."^ the statement's experiences been Rigidity as his own contributed to be titled The fighter'scontribution. completing Honjyo's about have 1982. fawingly, "The you from must of Reduced spoken volume in fact inserted other passages by which credit for his Zero Now true, which the concept as to its originality. above, however, the by-gone Zero Fighter The point theorizing and actual experimenting, attackers which Zero out of Honjyo's goes on to declare, l had designed, and pro- fighter is the firstfighter craft that of years long insistence has been amply proven even in the Zero fighter!'' Put into a straight jargon, l cannot the area of rudder work into another break-0汀from phraseology, such as modern-day almost any l would say that like any that there indeed other complicated fighter!" great thanks that have provided me grateful for Assistant Gordon 6&7) Derek Library. l who am also extremely has most source illumi- all the Jane's at the Science Leith at the RAF kindly assisted me in securing the Gloster material. Ibid., pp. 61−62. N. James, be continued) go to Miss Bailey at the British Library for her thoughtful Reference Hendon, into that can claim “I solely nation, and several other efficient members Museum, piece of have been incorporated, can be no one (To My a the Gloster F. 5/34. airplane, a lot of other peoples' works piece of engineering designed the Zero had designed surface to the tailplane ratio, and itis in this part that the Zero has made definite and unmistakable Put but say that not Horigoshi, but Honjyo Gloster Aircraft since i 97 7 (London: −83− Putnam, 1987).