Santa Margarita Water District

Transcription

Santa Margarita Water District
Santa Margarita Water District
Five Year Capital Improvement Program Update
For Fiscal Year 2014/2015
October 2014
Santa Margarita Water District
26111 Antonio Parkway
Rancho Santa Margarita (Las Flores), CA 92688
P.O. Box 7005
Mission Viejo, CA 92690-7005
Executive Summary
The purpose of the Santa Margarita Water District (District) Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) update for fiscal year (FY) 2014/15 is to identify the capital finance
requirements for the anticipated projects for the next five years. These projects include
the construction of new facilities to support development, new facilities to improve
existing conditions or in response to the changing needs of the District and the
replacement of those capital facilities that have reached the end of their useful lives. The
CIP is split into five separate annual projected budgets as well as identification of those
projects that have not begun or are currently underway that had been identified in
previous CIP updates. The CIP is intended to identify the District’s capital requirements
and the possible funding sources. Each of the projects listed will be brought back to the
Board of Directors to obtain specific project approval prior to initiating significant work.
The projects included in the five year CIP do not include repair and maintenance
activities. Repair and Maintenance (R&M) activities are those that are generally
performed by District field personnel that are funded by the annual operating budget.
These activities include repairs of line breaks, replacement of small equipment (under
$50,000), minor upgrades to stations such as new control devices or valves. Under the
CIP the District has the following categories of improvements:


Capital Improvement: This includes projects that may be related to water
reliability facilities, recycled water expansions, modifications to the pumping or
treatment facilities as well as projects to support new development. These projects
are referred to as Improvement Projects.
Capital Replacement: These projects are related to the scheduled repair and
rehabilitation of existing facilities over $50,000. The projects may include
upgrades of the facility as part of the work. These projects are referred to as
Replacement Projects.
Table ES-1 summarizes the proposed CIP budgets for the next five years by fiscal year
(FY).
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 1
Table ES-1
Summarized CIP Budgets
Fiscal Year Project
Starts
Current Projects
FY 2008 – 2009 or before
FY 2009 – 2010
FY 2010 – 2011
FY 2011 – 2012
FY 2012 – 2013
FY 2013 – 2014
Subtotal Existing
Anticipated Projects
FY 2014 – 2015
FY 2015 – 2016
FY 2016 – 2017
FY 2017 – 2018
FY 2018 – 2019
Subtotal Projected
Total
Total Budget
(Million $)
$ 5.45
$ 3.69
$ 6.13
$ 30.01
$ 11.01
$ 71.27
$ 127.55
$ 86.29
$ 48.06
$ 60.91
$ 40.26
$ 9.86
$245.38
$372.93
The total 5 Year CIP budget amount for FY 2014/15 is roughly $40 million more than the
total identified in the FY 2013/2014 CIP update. In addition, the 5 Year CIP total for FY
2014/15 is also approximately $140 million higher than the 5 Year CIP Update total
presented in FY 2012/13. The increase for the total budget from FY 2013/14 to FY
2014/15 is due to new Ranch Plan development, new improvement projects, revised
replacement projects budget amounts and updated project cost information. The majority
of the Improvement Projects identified in the FY 2014/15 are associated with new
development in the Rancho Mission Viejo (RMV) Ranch Plan. In addition to growth
related activities there are other projects that are either on-going or planned to occur in
the next five years. The summary listing of the existing and anticipated projects for FY
2014/15 segregated by facility type is as follows.
Domestic Water



Zone I pipelines and reservoirs (Middle Chiquita facilities) to support Sendero
Village and PA-2.
Zone II pipelines and reservoirs (Tesoro) to support PA-2.
Three pressure reducing stations (PRS) at three separate sites in Sendero
Village.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 2











In-tract domestic water pipelines within the Sendero Village development.
Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) and the associated pump
station.
Transmission pipelines in Cow Camp Road to serve the PA-2 development
and future development in PA-3 and PA-4.
Pipelines that were relocated due to the County of Orange’s Antonio Parkway
Widening project.
Zone II pipelines and a 3 million gallon reservoir (Tesoro).
Recoating of the Casta del Sol, Plano and Star Ranch reservoirs.
Upgrades at the Lakeside, Mesa, AMP, Foothill, Island and Antonio pump
stations.
Miscellaneous cathodic protection upgrades.
Miscellaneous valve replacements.
Miscellaneous PRS electrical and SCADA upgrades.
Groundwater development from the San Juan Basin groundwater basin.
Recycled Water











Zone A pipelines and reservoir (Middle Chiquita facilities) to support Sendero
Village and PA-2.
Two recycled water pump stations to serve the Sendero/Ladera areas.
Pipelines to serve the in-tract areas of Sendero Village.
Zone B pipelines and a 2 million gallon reservoir (Tesoro) to serve PA-2.
Cañada Gobernadora Multipurpose Basin project to capture urban runoff.
Califia retrofit project to construct approximately 11,000 feet of various sized
pipes.
Interconnection between Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) and Coto
de Caza.
Miscellaneous retrofit projects.
Recoating La Paz reservoir.
Miscellaneous pipeline upgrades.
Design of the Trampas Canyon Seasonal Storage Reservoir.
Wastewater





In-tract wastewater pipelines in Sendero Village.
Plano Lift Station force main replacement project.
Replace pumps at the Horno lift station.
Replace pumps at the Cordova lift station.
District water reclamation plants:
Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant
 Belt press replacement
 Blower expansion project
 SCADA and communication expansion
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 3
 Odor Control expansion
 Influent Force Main Replacement
 Influent Pump Station Expansion
 Grit dewatering expansion/upgrade
 Chlorine contact basin expansion
Oso Creek Water Reclamation Plant
 Warehouse roof repair
 Influent pump replacement
 Zone B pump station pump replacement
 Influent screen replacement
 Chlorine contact basin modifications
Miscellaneous


Installation of solar power generation facilities at Administration Building and
Chiquita WRP.
Initial planning for future District facilities to serve PA-3.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 4
1.0
BACKGROUND
Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD) is Orange County’s second largest water district
providing water and wastewater treatment services to more than 150,000 people within
an area of 62,674 acres. The District’s service area is bound by El Toro Road in the City
of Lake Forest on the north, by the Cleveland National Forest on the east, by San Diego
County and the United States Marine Corp Camp Pendleton on the south, and by the City
of San Juan Capistrano and Moulton Niguel Water District on the west. The general
limits and location of SMWD are shown in Figure 1-1.
The District is divided into eight Improvement Districts (I.D.). These districts were
formed to meet the needs of specific portions of SMWD based on such factors as land
use, topography, land ownership boundaries and the timing and characteristics of water
supply and waste water treatment needs. The Cities of Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa
Margarita and the unincorporated communities of Coto de Caza, Las Flores, Ladera
Ranch and Sendero as well as the remaining undeveloped portion of the Rancho Mission
Viejo are within the service boundary of SMWD.
The District receives its water from three sources, imported water through the Municipal
Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), recycled water generated at the district’s
water reclamation plants and through the capture of urban runoff. MWDOC is Orange
County’s wholesale supplier and is a member agency of the Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California (Metropolitan).
The District’s system consists of over 1,300 miles of water and sewer lines, 29 domestic
water reservoirs, 9 non-domestic water reservoirs, two water reclamation plants, and
three urban runoff collections points. All of the District’s domestic water supply
purchased through MWDOC from Metropolitan is delivered to the region from Northern
California via the State Water Project (SWP) and from the Colorado River via the
Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA). Water from both sources is treated at the Diemer
Filtration Plant in Yorba Linda prior to delivery to the District. The major transmission
lines that deliver domestic water to the District are the Allen-McColloch Pipeline, the
Aufdenkamp Transmission Main and the South County Pipeline. Construction has begun
on the Baker Filtration Plant which will serve as another treatment facility for the
imported water and/or possibly water from Irvine Lake or other sources.
2.0
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is to identify the anticipated
capital finance requirements for the next five years that relate to the construction of new
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 5
facilities to support development, new facilities to improve existing conditions or in
response to the changing needs of the District and the replacement of those capital
facilities that have reached the end of their useful lives. The CIP is split into five separate
annual projected budgets as well as identification of those projects that have not begun or
are currently underway. The document has been further divided between those projects
that are related to new construction and those projects that are the rehabilitation or
replacement of existing facilities.
The District’s Five Year CIP is updated annually for consideration and approval by the
District’s Board of Directors. CIP includes Improvement projects that are expansions or
improvements to existing facilities as well as Replacement projects that are intended to
repair and/or replace existing facilities that have reached the end of their useful life.
Adjustments are made to the CIP in response to changing economic conditions, land
development activity, completion of new facilities or related changes to Replacement
projects. The development of the CIP process first occurred as part of the Fiscal Year
(FY) 1996/97 budget process.
Because of periodic revisions, the CIP is considered a “dynamic” document. Of the five
year period covered in the CIP, the upcoming fiscal year is the most detailed and accurate
since it is based on the most current plans as well as ongoing projects. Typically the first
year of the CIP budget is presented and recommended to be adopted as a portion of the
District’s capital budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
The main function of the CIP is to define the capital obligations and anticipated facility
needs for the near future. It also serves as a guideline for the District to develop cash
flow projections, define project funding and District resource requirements, labor, and
level of effort. Each of the forecast elements such as demands, costs, inflation, and
construction activity carry an element of uncertainty.
All of the District’s proposed capital construction projects are listed in the CIP document.
Operations, Finance and Engineering staff have collectively developed the project lists,
funding sources, budgets and anticipated schedules.
The CIP is the basis for the following items:




Schedule preparation of request for proposals for new design work
Schedule award of construction projects
Anticipate funding requirements
Schedule major rehabilitation and repairs
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 6


Establish project numbers and potential funding sources
Project cash flow to incorporate into the District’s investment strategies
Proposed funding to complete the projects listed in the CIP is not always fully defined in
the document. Existing funding that is available for projects is provided in the tables or,
if not, an assumed financing source is indicated for future projects. The CIP project list
can be used to assist in the determination of future funding requirements.
3.0
DEFINITIONS
A variety of short notations, project-identifying codes, and other references not
commonly found in daily usage are contained in the tables within the CIP document.
Appendix A is a list of definitions to help explain what the notations and terms in the
CIP tables or elsewhere mean.
4.0
ASSUMPTIONS
In addition to incorporating the revised Replacement project list, preparing the CIP
update involves reviewing the District’s current CIP, adjusting project items, budget data
and schedules along with recent information acquired from land development activities.
Data for new facilities or improvement projects have been compiled into project-specific
line items that are associated with improvement district(s). The line items comprise the
best assessment of facilities that are anticipated to be constructed or modified during the
next five years. The following is an overview of the major uses of the CIP, basic
assumptions and the rationale for making them:
1.
A primary use of the CIP is the cash flow projection function. This estimates the
monthly funding requirements for the first three fiscal years. Cash flow
estimating is based on similar historical projects to develop the anticipated
expenditures. The Finance Department, using the expense history along with
budget and start-date information provided by the Engineering Department,
estimates a monthly cash flow scenario for the initial three-year period of the five
year projection. Due to the increased uncertainty associated with long term
projections, the remaining two years of the CIP are estimated as lump sum
amounts only.
2.
The CIP assumes development related improvements will continue to occur
within the District. Those facilities needed to serve the initial phases of the
Rancho Mission Viejo’s (RMV) Ranch Plan are currently being constructed. The
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 7
facilities required to support later stages of the development are projected based
on a District prepared Plan of Works (POW) update for Improvement District
(ID) Nos. 4C, 4E, 5 and 6. Residential tract infrastructure for Sendero Village
(formerly referred to as PA-1) near the Antonio Parkway and Ortega Highway
intersection within ID No. 4E is generally complete. Home construction in
Sendero Village is anticipated to continue for another year or more but by May
2014, approximately 500 homes had been sold. Section 6.0 provides an overview
of the anticipated development activities in the various Improvement Districts.
3.
Funding for a project line item is identified if it is currently available. The CIP
does not, by design, attempt to establish the source of funds for future projects but
in some instances identifies possible funding sources. The District has a capital
funding policy to establish the source of financing for any specific project.
4.
Budget estimates for all projects in this update are expressed in FY 2014/2015
dollars. ENR’s 2014 First Quarter cost report indicated that the Building Cost
Index (BCI) for 2014 has increased just 1.7% over pricing data collected during
2013.
The District’s FY 2014/15 CIP therefore applies minimal budget escalation for
projects through June 2015 but includes an annual three percent (3%) inflation
factor for each of the following fiscal years. The CIP will continue to be
monitored for labor and materials price increases and adjustments will be made if
warranted.
Several project budgets have been reassessed to account for additional
expenses that were not anticipated when the original budget was established.
Budget adjustments are typically performed in the annual update of the CIP at
the beginning of each fiscal year. Due to recent bid results for a project or
other circumstances, some project budget modifications (increase or decrease)
have been made in this update.
The District’s revised April 2013 Plan of Works (POW) document that
evaluated facilities to serve future Ranch Plan areas was submitted for District
Board acceptance in early 2013. Relying on the revised 2013 POW, the FY
2014/15 CIP Update tables for Ranch Plan areas list major facility descriptions
and budget information for ID Nos. 4C, 4E, and 5 (Sendero Village, Ranch
Plan PAs 2, 3, 4 and beyond).
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 8
The revised 2013 POW applied a domestic water system service strategy for
future Ranch Plan communities that minimized supply pumping requirements
from the South County Pipeline (SCP). Delivery of domestic water by gravity
to the highest (and lowest after pressure reduction) service zones in future
Ranch Plan communities area without any energy expenditures for pumping
significantly reduces the District’s long term operation and maintenance costs.
The District’s 2013 POW was also based on a recycled water (RW) system
concept that would supply lower elevation Ranch Plan areas (generally near
San Juan Creek) from transmission main pipelines connected to a large
seasonal storage reservoir (SSR). The RW SSR is proposed to have a
maximum water level of 580-feet elevation (above mean sea level) and is
anticipated to be located on the south side of Ortega Highway. After proposed
RW system pumping modifications at the Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant
(CWRP), the SSR would be supplied directly from the CWRP tertiary
production facilities. These future modifications would allow RW to be
produced and pumped continuously (year round) to the SSR facility for filling
(storage) when irrigation demands are low. During peak summer demands,
both the SSR and the CWRP tertiary facilities would both supply irrigation
needs.
The construction of Sendero Village required the relocation of the Chiquita
WRP access road entrance to the east side of Antonio Parkway and off of
future Cow Camp Road (CCR). RMV is constructing a sewage lift station to
serve development near the intersection of Antonio Parkway and Ortega. This
facility is scheduled to be in operation by October 2014. Remaining
development related earthwork in the Sendero Village area involves
construction of future estate lots (approximately 20 or more custom home
sites) and for a proposed future convalescent care and recovery facility. No
schedule has been established by RMV for this remaining custom home site
work but the District speculates that this activity will occur several years in the
future.
Mass grading for the first PA-2 phases is ongoing and is proposed to be
completed in late 2014. RMV’s PA-2 infrastructure construction within major
street alignments is anticipated to begin in July 2014.
The following a partial overview of currently active CIP Funded construction
projects.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 9

PRS 1, 2 and 3 (C-1747 and C-1747A) Construction is nearly complete for
three combined pressure reducing and RW pump station facilities that will
serve the Sendero Village area.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 10

Middle Chiquita Canyon Water Facilities (C-1766, C-1766A, C-1767A,
and C-1767B) Grading is complete for the Middle Chiquita Canyon (MCC)
Water Facilities to serve the Sendero area (and also initial PA-2 areas).
This earthwork activity was needed to create alignments and tank sites for
domestic water and RW pipelines and reservoir facilities.
Initial re-vegetation of newly graded slopes and road side areas has begun
in accordance with habitat restoration criteria defined the US Fish and
Wildlife Service. A mitigation and maintenance program for the slope
areas, pipeline alignment edges and perimeter of tank sites has begun in the
previously defined areas.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 11
o Construction of the Zone I DW and Zone A RW pipelines, C1766A, in the MCC area are virtually complete. The pipelines
began water filling in second quarter 2014. This work is being
performed under the C-1766A contract.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 12
o Erection of (2) Zone I (650-high water level) 2-Million Gallon steel
tanks (C-1767A) and Zone A (580-high water level) 4-Million
Gallon RW steel tank (C-1767B) is under construction with
completion anticipated in the third quarter of 2014.

Other District Related Construction Activity
In 2013, the District approved an interconnection agreement with the City
of San Juan Capistrano (CSJC) for various domestic and RW facilities
located near the Sendero Village community. Although not shown as a
specific project on the FY 2014/15 CIP Update, one RW interconnection
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 13
funded by the CSJC was completed near the intersection of Ortega
Highway and La Pata Avenue. This RW interconnection became active in
March 2014 and delivers up to 300 gallons per minute of RW to a new
pipeline built by CSJC within the RMV Riding park (or Blenheim field)
property. The RW interconnection is interruptible and only intended to
supply the CSJC with irrigation water during non-summer months.
Plans are being completed for the construction of a CSJC emergency
domestic water interconnection facility on the east side of La Pata Avenue
and just south of Ortega Highway. The interconnection will be situated
adjacent to the entrance of a new apartment complex. RMV is scheduling
to complete the interconnection by late 2014 and when needed, the facility
will reduce water pressure to supply the Ortega and Antonio Parkway area
of Sendero Village.
New construction impacting District facilities near the Sendero Village area
is the County La Pata Avenue Gap Closure construction contract.
Construction started in early 2014 to widen La Pata Avenue and extend it
southward to San Clemente. The road alignment will be mass graded
through the County’s Prima Deshecha Landfill property and the landfill
entrance will be significantly modified in the process. Only small sections
of existing District RW pipeline facilities are proposed to be modified as
part of the project but the District is currently supplying RW and
potentially domestic water from the Talega area for the County grading
contractor.
5.
Project budget estimates for linear projects such as water and sewer pipelines in
the CIP are based on conservative construction cost estimating values and
typically include all appurtenant facilities. Construction cost estimates are
determined using recent historical values, inflation estimates, discussion with
contractors and suppliers, and general engineering economy principles. Once the
anticipated installation cost is established, appurtenances, engineering design and
construction support services, staff time, contingency costs, overhead burden and
administration costs are included as a percentage of the installation costs to form a
project budget. Typically, the total amounts for these portions of the project are
estimated at approximately 25% of the construction cost. For larger projects, the
percentage drops and for smaller projects, it may increase. No allowance for
capital interest accruing over the course of the project life is included in the
budget amounts.
6.
Listing of a project on the CIP does not constitute authority to award engineering
project will be subject to the District's purchasing policy and may require review
and approval by the Board of Directors.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 14
5.0
FUNDING SOURCES
The District evaluates the funding requirements for each of the projects listed in the
tables that comprise the updated CIP. Figure 5-1 displays a map with the ID boundaries
that have been formed to finance capital projects. A description of the fund sources
available to the District and their applicable use is provided below. The number in
parentheses corresponds to the fund account shown on the tables.
Operating Capital (001): Funds generated from the operating budget for use at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. Uses include payments as determined by the annual
benefit analysis for debt service on general benefit facilities owned by the District; funds
set aside for repair and replacement of existing capital improvements; funds used for
advances on the low interest loan; and funds set aside for reserves. An overview of major
projects listed in the Operating Capital account follows:

Cañada Gobernadora Multi-Purpose Basin (Gobernadora) In partnership with
RMV and the County, an urban water runoff collection and storm water detention
basin is being constructed by the District. Located in Cañada Gobernadora
Canyon just beyond the southern boundary of the Coto de Caza community, the
construction area for this surface and ground water collection facility is
approximately 32 acres and is approximately 50% complete. Urban runoff water
collected at the Gobernadora facility is intended to be pumped into storage at the
Portola Reservoir site in northern Coto de Caza to reduce the amount of domestic
water being used for irrigation purposes. Construction is scheduled to be
completed in 2015. Project funding is being acquired from State of California
grants, contributions from the County and also from RMV.

Baker Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD),
Moulton Niguel Water District (MNWD), El Toro Water District (ETWD),
Trabuco Canyon Water District and the District formed a partnership to construct
the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) project. The Baker WTP
facility will be a domestic water treatment facility located in the northern portion
of Lake Forest at an out-of-service treatment plant site previously operated by Los
Alisos Water District. The Baker WTP supply sources will be untreated water
provided by Metropolitan, possibly untreated water from the Cadiz project or
other similar sources, and on certain occasions, raw water from Irvine Lake.
IRWD is the project management participant and by agreement, the District’s
proposed capacity allocation is 13 cubic feet per second (cfs) of the total 43.5 cfs
facility capacity (29.885% share). When placed in operation in early 2016, the
Baker WTP will provide a continuous water supply (base load) to the District.
During cool weather months, the facility is anticipated to produce over 50% of the
District’s domestic water supply needs with delivery through the existing South
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 15
County Pipeline and turn out facility system. To supplement the water reliability
bond fund amounts, $5,181,000 was added to the CIP as a separate line item in
the District’s Operating Capital account.
Baker WTP bids were opened by IRWD in late 2013 with the winning bid being
$77.5 Million. The construction price was also approximately 20% higher than
the engineering consultant’s opinion of probable construction cost. IRWD
awarded the Baker WTP construction contract in late 2013. To allow the District
to also approve IRWD’s construction contract in early 2014, the Board authorized
a budget increase to $10,249,610 in the Operating Capital account. After the
contract award, IRWD increased the total Baker WTP project budget for all
design and construction activity to $103.6 Million. The District also approved a
Baker Pipeline capacity transfer and sale agreement with MNWD and ETWD in
early 2014. The revenue from the sale of excess Baker Pipeline capacity to these
agencies (approximately 18 cfs) amounted to $4.1 Million.
Capital Replacement Reserve (001): Funds designated by the Board to be used for repair,
replacement or improvements at existing facilities. Seven new projects have been added
to the five year projection and four projects were completed and subsequently removed
from the previous list. There are now a total of 71 projects identified on the Replacement
project list.
As described previously, Operations staff expects to perform many of the
equipment repairs under $40,000 utilizing the annual operating budget as a
funding source. Only major maintenance expenditures over this amount have been
listed within the updated CRP.
Replacement of major components at the Chiquita WRP that are near the end of
their useful life has been deferred in past CIP updates. Completion of the
Chiquita WRP Master Plan study in 2011 outlined options to upgrade or change
out older process equipment. Following the Chiquita WRP master plan
recommendations but delayed for a period of time, replacement of bio-solids
dewatering belt presses and other equipment are now proposed to start during FY
2014/2015. An alternative fund source for design services, equipment purchases
and construction expenses for expansion related work at the Chiquita WRP site is
proposed from funds acquired from the Talega Special Tax Bonds.
Improvement District No. 1W Series F General Obligation Bonds (107): Funds generated
from the sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 1 (Mission Viejo area) for
construction of water facilities. - The funds are restricted to only those water facilities
that benefit ID No. 1 for new capital projects and for extending the life of existing capital
facilities constructed with the bonds. Available funds were allocated towards four
projects to install electrical power and telemetry monitoring systems at existing pressure
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 16
reducing station facilities. The recoating of two steel tank reservoirs located in the Casta
del Sol private community is also part of the project group.
Improvement District No. 1S Series E General Obligation Bonds (111): Funds generated
from the sale of bonds within ID No. 1 for construction of sewer facilities. The funds are
restricted to use only on those sewer facilities that benefit ID No. 1 for new capital
projects and for extending the life of existing capital facilities constructed with the bonds.
Staff obtained an opinion from Bond Counsel that the funds were not restricted to sewer
facilities but could be used for any project included in the ID No. 1 Plan of Works. The
majority of the remaining funds are encumbered by the CIP.
Improvement District No. 2 Series General Obligation Bonds (220): Funds generated
from the sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 2 for construction of water and
sewer facilities. - The funds are restricted to only those water and sewer facilities that
benefit ID No. 2 for new capital projects and for extending the life of existing capital
facilities constructed with the bonds.
Improvement District No. 2A Series General Obligation Bonds (221): Funds generated
from the sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 2A for construction of water and
sewer facilities. - ID No. 2A is not coterminous with ID No. 2 and was formed to fund
facilities to support increased development densities. The funds are restricted to the use
of ID No. 2A for new capital projects and for extending the life of existing capital
facilities constructed with the bonds.
Improvement District No. 2 Revenue Bond Series 2009 (233): A $6.1 Million
component of a $37 Million revenue / reliability facility bond that supported design and
construction of the UCR Storage Reservoir project, the IRWD Phase A through D
Interties and the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) Facility. These
projects are intended to provide 7 to 10 days of domestic water supply to existing
communities within ID Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7 in the event of an emergency. Other than the
habitat restoration work at the Upper Chiquita Reservoir (UCR) site, the Baker WTP is
the last of the water reliability projects still in construction. Supplemental funding in the
amount of $1.4 Million (District share) from Proposition 50 grant funds has been
approved by the California Department of Health Services and will partially finance these
projects.
Improvement District No. 3 Series General Obligation Bonds (321): Funds generated
from the sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 3 for construction of water and
sewer facilities. The funds are restricted to the use of ID No. 3 for new capital projects
and for extending the life of existing capital facilities constructed with the bonds.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 17
Available funds have been assigned to the SCADA system Phase 3 upgrade and to design
or continue evaluation of potential facilities needed to convert existing irrigation systems
within the Rancho Trabuco area to recycled water use.
Improvement District No. 3 Revenue Bond Series 2009 (333): A $4 Million component
of a $37 Million revenue/water reliability facility bond that supported design and
construction of the UCR Storage Reservoir project, the IRWD Phase A through D
Interties and the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) Facility. These
projects are intended to provide 7 to 10 days of domestic water supply to existing
communities within ID Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7 in the event of an emergency. Other than the
habitat restoration work at the Upper Chiquita Reservoir (UCR) site, the Baker WTP is
the last of the water reliability projects still in construction. Supplemental funding in the
amount of $1.4 Million (District share) from Proposition 50 grant funds has been
approved by the California Department of Health Services and will partially finance these
projects.
Improvement District No. 4 Series General Obligation Bonds (427): Funds generated
from the sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 4 for construction of water and
sewer facilities for the benefit of the entire improvement district. The funds have been
subject to the annual benefit assessment for allocation of the proceeds and debt service to
the communities within ID No. 4. Funds are available for all projects within the CIP.
Improvement District No. 4B General Obligation Bonds (429): Funds generated from the
sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 4B in 2003 for construction of water and
sewer facilities for the benefit of the entire improvement district. Funds have been
allocated to projects in Ladera Ranch. A portion of the bond funds are intended to
construct improvements in Chiquita Canyon and near Antonio Parkway that will provide
needed redundant domestic water service to Ladera Ranch. The proposed water system
improvements will also serve the Sendero Village planned community (formerly referred
to as Ranch Plan PA-1).
Improvement District No. 4 Revenue Bond Series 2009 (433): A $26.8 Million
component of a $37 Million revenue/water reliability facility bond that supported design
and construction of the UCR Storage Reservoir project, the IRWD Phase A through D
Interties and the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) Facility. These
projects are intended to provide 7 to 10 days of domestic water supply to existing
communities within ID Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7 in the event of an emergency. Other than the
habitat restoration work at the Upper Chiquita Reservoir (UCR) site, the Baker WTP is
the last of the water reliability projects still in construction. Supplemental funding in the
amount of $1.4 Million (District share) from Proposition 50 grant funds has been
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 18
approved by the California Department of Health Services and will partially finance these
projects.
Improvement District No. 4C (489): District facilities and related improvements to
support the Ranch Plan PA-2 development in Chiquita Canyon (ID No. 4C) are
potentially to be funded from a future bond issue or other source. Project line items
shown in the FY 2014/15 CIP Update Table No. 1 for ID 4C were revised in last year’s
CIP update to be consistent with the facilities and cost estimates of projects shown in the
District’s revised 2013 POW document.
Improvement District No. 4D Community Facility District Bonds (CFD) (490): Funds
generated from the sale of bonds joint community facilities districts. The first CFD was
formed by the District and the Capistrano Unified School District to support development
and capital improvements within the Ladera Ranch planned community. The second CFD
was formed by the County over the Covenant Hills Portion of Ladera Ranch. To date the
District has only funded recycled water and odor control related projects from the CFD
bonds.
Improvement District No. 4E CFD Bond Issue (492): the District sold CFD Bonds in
mid-2013 to fund construction of water and wastewater facilities to serve the Sendero
Village planned community and other infrastructure. Master developer improvements and
residential tract model sites were completed to allow a grand opening event to take place
in June 2013. According to information provided by RMV in late March 2014, 440
dwelling units had been sold in Sendero Village. Reimbursement of ID No. 4 funds has
been completed to reverse a reallocation process that was approved by the District in
2008 and again in 2010. The ID No. 4 Bonds were temporarily reallocated to ID No. 4E
for water, sewer and recycled water pipeline improvements installed as part of County
widening projects for Ortega Highway, Antonio Parkway and La Pata Avenue. Except for
District payment of the final County invoice, all Antonio Parkway Widening project
work was substantially complete in May 2013.
Improvement District No. 5 Future Bond Issues (590): Funds for the construction of
facilities to serve the portion of the remaining undeveloped area within the District
located north of the Ortega Highway and south of Coto de Caza. Development is
proposed as PA-3 of the Ranch Plan. The proposed project line items in Table No. 1 of
the FY 2014/15 CIP Update for ID No. 5 were revised in the last CIP Update and reflect
projects listed in the District’s revised 2013 POW document.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 19
Improvement District No. 6 Future Bond Issues (691): Funds for the construction of
facilities located south of the Ortega Highway and northeast of San Clemente.
Development is proposed as part of the Ranch Plan with PAs 4, 5 and 8.
Improvement District No. 7 Community Facility District Bonds (731): Funds generated
from the sale of bonds for the Talega Community Facilities District. For the FY 2014/15
CIP Update, nearly all available funds were applied to the Baker WTP construction phase
budget. Other than habitat restoration work at the Upper Chiquita Reservoir (UCR) site,
the Baker WTP is the last of three water reliability projects (UCR Emergency Storage
Reservoir project, the IRWD Phase A through D Interties and the Baker Pipeline Water
Treatment Plant Facility) that are intended to provide 7 to 10 days of emergency domestic
water supply to existing communities within ID Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7. Other primary
projects in the 731 bond issue are for UCR site restoration, SCADA system master
planned upgrades, wastewater system repairs and Chiquita WRP Phase IV capacity
expansion improvements.
Improvement District No. 7 Future Bond Issue (792): Proposed funds for the Talega
portion of design and construction expenses on the future Ortega Reservoir seasonal
storage facility and the proposed Phase IV Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant Expansion.
For CIP reporting purposes, the budget and expense information for the Phase IV
Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant Expansion from this fund source has been combined
with the same project line item in the 731 Bond issue (described above).
Improvement District No. 8 General Obligation Bonds (829): Funds generated from the
sale of general obligation bonds within ID No. 8 for construction of water and sewer
facilities. The funds are restricted to the use of ID No. 8 for new capital projects such as
upgrades to the SCADA system and for extending the life of existing capital facilities
constructed with the bonds.
Upon adoption of the capital budget for the initial fiscal year it is anticipated, funds will
be allocated and encumbered as shown on the CIP. As the projects are completed, any
unused fund amounts will be transferred, with limitations on use remaining in place.
Projects with finance sources from outside the District (such as jointly-owned facilities)
are not listed in the budget.
6.0
PROJECTS EXCEEDING BUDGET AMOUNTS
In accordance with District procedure, any projects that exceeded their budget are to be
reported to the Board for review. In some cases, CIP budgets for ongoing projects have
been adjusted to cover the accrued and anticipated additional expenses needed to finish
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 20
construction or complete the design phase of work. During the year, projects requiring
additional funding are presented to the Board along with a recommendation for the
amount of budget adjustment.
7.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The attached Table 1 is a summary of the CIP for all projects anticipated to be active
within the five-year window from FY 2014/2015 through FY 2018/2019 presented by
potential funding source. The second table, Table 2, presents the proposed projects by
type of facility such as water, wastewater, and recycled water.
Exhibit A is a revised summary by ID of projected new growth to occur in the District
over the next five fiscal years. The projection summary indicates that by June 2015,
approximately 600 new single family residences and 500 multiple family units may be
occupied. Most of the projected new occupancies will occur in Ranch Plan areas. With
fill-in residential units anticipated to be built in existing community areas and new homes
being occupied in Sendero Village, by mid-2015 a total of approximately 1,100 new
single and multiple family units could be served by the District.
Exhibit B displays the projected District growth in five-year increments until 2035. In
addition to the Ranch Plan entitlement amount (Ranch Plan has an entitlement of 14,000
residential units), RMV has advised the District that the County has allocated a maximum
of 400 affordable housing units to potentially be built within the RMV development
areas. The paragraphs below provide more detail on the dwelling unit projections.
RMV advised the District that 440 dwelling units had been sold in Sendero Village
(Sendero - formerly referred to as Ranch Plan PA-1) by late March 2014. RMV data
provided to the District indicated that most of the sales were condominium or townhome
residences. The District’s Customer Service staff however indicated by early April, only
112 residential meters had been installed in Sendero. Home purchase interest in the
Sendero area is projected to remain strong and almost 600 more units are anticipated to
be sold and occupied by June 2015. A 300 unit apartment complex is also scheduled to be
completed by late 2014 at the east corner of the Ortega Highway and La Pata Avenue
intersection.
Mass grading of the initial phases of Ranch Plan PA-2 development area began in late
2013. Master developer water, sewer and recycled water pipeline construction to serve
approximately 65% of the total PA-2 development area is anticipated to begin in late
third quarter of 2014. Home sales in the Ranch Plan PA-2 area are expected to start in
late 2015 or during early 2016. RMV estimates that by mid-2016, 150 dwelling units may
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 21
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
Talega Valley
Hidden Ridge (MV)
Total Multi-Family
RMV Gobernadora PA 3
RMV Gabino PA 4
RMV Trampas Canyon PA 5
RMV Cristianitos Meadow PA 6
RMV Cristianitos Canyon PA 7
RMV TRW PA 8
RMV Casitas PA 9
Talega Valley
Hidden Ridge (MV)
Total Single Family
Mission Viejo
Coto de Caza
Rancho Trabuco
Rancho Santa Margarita
Las Flores
Ladera Ranch
Sendero Village PA 1
Orange County Affordable Housing
Chiquita Canyon PA 2
RMV Gobernadora PA 3
RMV Gabino PA 4
RMV Trampas Canyon PA 5
RMV Cristianitos Meadow PA 6
RMV Cristianitos Canyon PA 7
RMV TRW PA 8
RMV Casitas PA 9
Community
Mission Viejo
Coto de Caza
Rancho Trabuco
Rancho Santa Margarita
Las Flores
Ladera Ranch
Sendero Village PA 1
Chiquita Canyon PA 2
Grand total
I. D. No. 1
I. D. No. 2
I. D. No. 3
I. D. No. 4A
I. D. No. 4B
I. D. No. 4D
I. D. No. 4E
I. D. No. 4C / 5
I. D. No. 4C
Subtotal 4
I. D. No. 5
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
Subtotal 6
I. D. No. 7
I. D. No. 8
Improvement
District
I. D. No. 1
I. D. No. 2
I. D. No. 3
I. D. No. 4A
I. D. No. 4B
I. D. No. 4D
I. D. No. 4E
I. D. No. 4C
Subtotal 4
I. D. No. 5
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
Subtotal 6
I. D. No. 7
I. D. No. 8
FY 14-15 CIP-Exhibit A & B_ 4-22-14_SMWD DU projection.xlsx
Type
of
Units
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Exhibit A
1,226
57
18,388
54,213
2,632
173
35,825
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
88
10,733
603
502
502
502
1,105
4
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2014 fiscal year
16,255
4,402
2
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,730
12
112
585
9,878
597
-
1,226
57
18,890
55,318
2,636
173
36,428
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
11,235
168
100
100
200
200
368
4
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2015 fiscal year
16,255
4,404
2
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,742
12
697
150
10,475
162
-
1,226
57
19,090
55,686
2,640
173
36,596
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
100
100
11,435
-
182
1,050
868
182
182
-
2
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2016 fiscal year
16,255
4,406
2
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,754
12
697
150
852
10,637
864
-
Projected Growth in Number of Dwelling Units per Fiscal Year
Santa Margarita Water District
1,226
57
19,272
56,736
2,642
173
37,464
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
100
282
11,617
-
240
854
614
240
240
-
-
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2017 fiscal year
16,255
4,408
2
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,766
12
697
1,002
600
11,501
612
-
500
1,215
715
200
200
300
-
-
1,226
57
20,012
58,805
2,642
173
38,793
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
100
722
12,057
300
-
Projected
Number of
units as of
June 2019
16,255
4,411
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,790
697
2,004
12,527
300
-
4/26/2014
SMWD Engineering Dept.
1,226
57
19,512
57,590
2,642
173
38,078
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
100
522
11,857
-
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2018 fiscal year
16,255
4,410
1
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,778
12
697
1,602
402
12,113
414
300
-
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
Talega Valley
Hidden Ridge (MV)
Total Multi-Family
RMV Gobernadora PA 3
RMV Gabino PA 4
RMV Trampas Canyon PA 5
RMV Cristianitos Meadow PA 6
RMV Cristianitos Canyon PA 7
RMV TRW PA 8
RMV Casitas PA 9
Talega Valley
Hidden Ridge (MV)
Total Single Family
Mission Viejo
Coto de Caza
Rancho Trabuco
Rancho Santa Margarita
Las Flores
Ladera Ranch
Sendero Village PA 1
Orange County Affordable Housing
Chiquita Canyon PA 2
RMV Gobernadora PA 3
RMV Gabino PA 4
RMV Trampas Canyon PA 5
RMV Cristianitos Meadow PA 6
RMV Cristianitos Canyon PA 7
RMV TRW PA 8
RMV Casitas PA 9
Community
Mission Viejo
Coto de Caza
Rancho Trabuco
Rancho Santa Margarita
Las Flores
Ladera Ranch
Sendero Village PA 1
Chiquita Canyon PA 2
Grand total
1,226
57
18,388
54,213
2,632
173
35,825
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
88
10,733
603
502
502
502
1,105
4
Projected
Projected number of
Number of new units
units as of
for the
June 2014 fiscal year
16,255
4,402
2
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,730
12
112
585
9,878
597
-
1,226
57
18,890
55,318
2,636
173
36,428
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
11,235
-
Projected
Number of
units as of
June 2015
16,255
4,404
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,742
697
10,475
1,113
200
200
300
500
1,613
Projected
number of
new units
for the
fiscal year
1
12
400
412
700
-
1,226
57
20,512
60,418
2,642
173
39,906
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
100
922
12,257
600
-
Projected
Number of
units as of
June 2020
16,255
4,412
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,802
697
2,404
12,939
1,000
601
200
200
801
Projected
number of
new units
for the
fiscal year
1
600
-
1,226
57
22,212
65,999
2,642
173
43,787
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
300
1,122
12,657
1,900
-
Projected
Number of
units as of
June 2025
16,255
4,417
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,850
697
2,532
13,115
4,700
-
Projected Growth in Number of Dwelling Units in Five Year Increments
I. D. No. 1
I. D. No. 2
I. D. No. 3
I. D. No. 4A
I. D. No. 4B
I. D. No. 4D
I. D. No. 4E
I. D. No. 4C / 5
I. D. No. 4C
Subtotal 4
I. D. No. 5
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
Subtotal 6
I. D. No. 7
I. D. No. 8
Improvement
District
I. D. No. 1
I. D. No. 2
I. D. No. 3
I. D. No. 4A
I. D. No. 4B
I. D. No. 4D
I. D. No. 4E
I. D. No. 4C
Subtotal 4
I. D. No. 5
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
I. D. No. 6
Subtotal 6
I. D. No. 7
I. D. No. 8
FY 14-15 CIP-Exhibit A & B_ 4-22-14_SMWD DU projection.xlsx
Type
of
Units
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Exhibit B
Santa Margarita Water District
480
480
480
-
Projected
number of
new units
for the
fiscal year
330
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
780
1,226
57
23,179
68,889
1,620
2,642
173
45,710
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
300
1,122
12,657
2,087
300
480
-
Projected
number of Projected
new units Number of
for the
units as of
fiscal year June 2035
16,255
4,420
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,850
697
2,532
13,115
5,000
300
700
330
290
-
4/26/2014
SMWD Engineering Dept.
780
1,226
57
23,179
68,749
1,480
2,642
173
45,570
4,684
549
1,139
6,581
836
3,228
590
300
1,122
12,657
2,087
300
480
-
Projected
Number of
units as of
June 2030
16,255
4,420
2,485
3,892
1,144
4,850
697
2,532
13,115
5,000
300
700
330
150
-
be occupied. An estimated 100 of the proposed County affordable housing units have
been allotted to the PA-2 community area and may be also occupied by mid-2016.
The Cow Camp Road (CCR) alignment extends eastward from Antonio Parkway about a
half mile north of Ortega Highway and is planned to be built in a phased process to the
west edge of the future Foothill Transportation Corridor (State Route 241). Construction
is estimated at 35% complete on the first CCR Bridge that will span over Chiquita Creek
to the east side of Chiquita Canyon. By late 2014, RMV proposes to extend the north
side of future CCR to near the possible future State Route 241 alignment. The second
CCR bridge will be constructed by RMV when the County determines that PA-2 has
reached a certain occupancy level.
The proposed PA-3 planned community area is located to the east of PA-2 and adjacent
to the east side of Cañada Gobernadora Creek. RMV has revised dwelling unit
projections to indicate that residential occupancies will not start in PA-3 until 2019.
Without specific information on where County affordable housing units will be built, the
District’s summary has allotted the remaining 300 of the County units to the PA-3 area.
The District has completed all grading and initial restoration activity and is currently
installing new domestic water and recycled water pipelines and reservoirs in Middle
Chiquita Canyon to support Sendero Village and future PA-2. The new transmission
mains and reservoirs are scheduled to begin operation by November 2014. The District
also approved a RMV funding agreement in early 2014 to allow design to proceed for a
sewer lift station serving PA-2 and a new South County Pipeline Service connection that
will supply domestic water to most of the Ranch Plan development area.
District pipelines to serve PA-1 were also installed by the County as part of the Antonio
Parkway Widening project which were generally complete by May 2013. The final
invoice for this project however was submitted to the District in late March 2014. The
County invoice is under review and may include billing for change order work that the
District did not agree to compensate to the County or their contractor.
In the Coto de Caza community, only a few homes per year are forecasted to be
completed on remaining open lots until build out occurs in 2025. Construction on custom
homes in the Ladera Ranch Covenant Hills (CH) area has also progressed slowly. Due to
approximately 120 open lots remaining in the Ladera Ranch Covenant Hills private
community, an average of 12 custom homes per year are expected to be completed until
all open lots are filled in 2024.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 22
In late 2013, over 40 undeveloped or unused home site lots remained in the last tract
areas within Talega Valley. District Customer Service staff recently noted that by May
2014 only three new meters had been issued over the last several months for new home
construction. Due to the quantity of open lots remaining, home sales are anticipated to
continue gradually until anticipated build-out date in 2017.
The following is a brief summary of the major design or construction projects in the CIP:

Operating Capital: Funds generated from the operation of the District that are set
aside to construct facilities to increase reliability or reduce costs. Major projects in
this group include; the Canada Gobernadora Multipurpose Basin (three separate line
items) and support pipelines, SCADA system improvements, wastewater facilities for
the Boy Scouts of America facility at Upper Oso Reservoir (site tenant) and studies
for the Ortega (Trampas) Recycled Water Seasonal Storage Reservoir.
A new addition to the Operating Capital (OC) account for the FY 2014/15 CIP
Update is the Solar Energy project line item and budget of $1.3 Million. Once
constructed, the Solar project is proposed to be reimburse the OC funding source with
avoided power costs (energy savings). A construction contract for the Baker Pipeline
Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) project was awarded by Irvine Ranch Water
District early in 2014 so the design budget line item for this project was removed.
Due to a much higher than expected total construction cost, the District’s share of the
Baker WTP construction phase budget in the OC project group of the FY 2014/15
CIP Update was increased to approximately $10.25 M.

Replacement Projects: The District implemented a Capital Replacement Program
(CRP) in 2004. This has been converted into the Replacement Projects approach. A
spreadsheet based computer model was developed as part of the original CRP
implementation process to assist with predicting expenses for future capital
replacements or repair work at various facilities. In general, the CRP model performs
computations to identify when cyclical repairs or replacements are needed at District
facilities (or for pipelines) and provides an estimate of the potential expense amount.
In some cases and if alternative funding is available, Replacement Projects may also
be partially financed by bond funds. As noted earlier, some projects within the fiveyear period have been deferred, deleted or reduced in budget while others have had
budget increases or are expected to be performed earlier or later than originally
proposed. Exhibit C provides a list of projects that were completed or removed from
the CIP Update document by June 2014.

ID No. 1 serves the community of Mission Viejo. Regional intertie facilities are
proposed to be constructed by MNWD but funded by the District to deliver domestic
water from the East Orange County Feeder No. 2 to El Toro Water District’s R-6
Reservoir as a second supply source to this facility. Construction of this less
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 23
EXHIBIT C
PROJECTS NO LONGER IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015
Contract
No.
C-1749
Project
Code
O70
Fund
No.
490
Description
Ladera Zone C RW Pump Station
Capitalize
YES
Expense
NO
Delete
NO
G13D11
CRP
Trabuco LS -Pump 1 & 2 Rplcmnt
YES
NO
NO
C-1744
3C6
233
Baker Pipeline WTP Ph I - Design
YES
NO
NO
C-1744
3C6
333
Baker Pipeline WTP Ph I - Design
YES
NO
NO
C-1744
3C6
433
Baker Pipeline WTP Ph I - Design
YES
NO
NO
C-1744
3C6
731
Baker Pipeline WTP Ph I - Design
YES
NO
NO
Engrng
W03
492
Water Bridge Well pipeline
NO
NO
YES
C-1228_
G00BL2
CRP
NO
NO
YES
C-1766A
1C4
429
NO
YES
NO
C-1219D
Regulating Res. –safety landing /
replc ladder
SC-6 Conn. and WTM to PA-1
expensive regional intertie facility is proposed to start in late 2014 and was selected in
lieu of a new pump station (originally proposed as the Gateway Pump Station
facility). Projects for ID No. 1 include: various pressure reducing station electrical
upgrades, conversions of domestic water irrigation sites to recycled water use and
repainting of two steel tanks located within the Casta del Sol private community.
Additional projects are listed under the 111 wastewater bond for ID No. 1. The line
items in Fund 111 include: recycled water conversions, SCADA system
improvements, pump station repairs and partial funding for an IRWD sewer
replacement project for the English Canyon service area along Los Alisos Boulevard.

ID Nos. 2 and 2A serve the community of Coto de Caza. Development activity is
primarily construction of custom homes on remaining open residential lots. The CIP
project list includes the Cañada Gobernadora (CG) collection basin improvements to
collect and pump surface water to the existing recycled water distribution system
serving Coto de Caza. The CG basin work is approximately 50% complete and is
partially supported by Proposition 50 and other funds. Bond-funded projects involve
SCADA system upgrades, future pipeline facilities, the Phase IV Expansion of the
Chiquita Water Reclamation plant and the water system reliability projects (UCR site
restoration and construction of the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant WTP).

ID Nos. 3 and 3A include Rancho Trabuco, the portion of the City of Rancho Santa
Margarita east of Trabuco Creek. Proposed expansion of recycled water facilities
along Los Alisos Boulevard and Melinda Road has been deferred until 2015. Studies
will continue and District staff may use available operating, Replacement Projects
reserve funds or bond funds to start these projects. Major current CIP projects for ID
No. 3 are the water system reliability projects (UCR site restoration and construction
of the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant).

ID No. 4A encompasses the City of Rancho Santa Margarita west of Trabuco Creek
and a portion of ID No. 4. A new commercial development and sports complex
project is currently being considered by the City of Rancho Santa Margarita on the
east side of Antonio Parkway but limited activity has occurred to date.

ID No. 4B serves the communities of Las Flores and Ladera Ranch. Improvement
projects are generally complete within these planned community areas but projects
related to Ranch Plan development activity for redundant or new domestic water or
RW service are active.

ID No. 4C includes the Chiquita Canyon area and the future PA-2 development
project where residential occupancies are scheduled to start within FY 2016/17. Mass
grading for approximately 65% of the PA-2 project is now in process and master
development improvement plans for this same area are now under District review. A
proposed Community Facilities District bond potentially to be organized by the
County of Orange (County) is planned to finance District and County improvements.
Until bond proceeds or other fund sources are potentially available however, a
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 24
Reimbursement Agreement (RA) has been approved by the District to allow RMV to
fund design service contracts for PA-2 related infrastructure.
During the first months of 2014, several domestic water, sewer and RW facilities
entered the design phase for service to Sendero Village, PA-2 and future Ranch Plan
development areas. A majority of the projects listed on the FY 2014/15 CIP update
for ID No. 4C are based on the project list created as part of the District’s 2013 POW
document for Ranch Plan areas. Capacity in the Chiquita WRP Phase IV expansion
project has also been allocated to the PA-2 area.

ID No. 4D encompasses the communities of Ladera Ranch and Covenant Hills.
Custom home construction activity in Covenant Hills appears to be averaging about
10 to 12 homes per year. Due to the number of lots remaining open in the Covenant
Hills private community (over 120) in early 2014, build out is now projected to occur
by 2020. A portion of the CIP includes the odor control projects that are currently
being built or considered along with design work for a future emergency domestic
water storage facility.

ID No. 4E includes the Sendero Village (formerly referred to as RMV’s PA-1
development area) located near the intersection of Ortega Highway and Antonio
Parkway. Sendero Village master developer construction is generally complete and
the first occupancies within merchant builder properties began during fall of 2013.
The District issued a Community Facilities District bond fund and proceeds were
received in July 2013 to finance District improvements to serve this area.
Repayment is in process for RAs executed with RMV in 2008 and 2010. These RAs
temporarily loaned ID No. 4 bonds to fund pipeline improvements as part of the
Ortega Highway and Antonio Parkway Widening projects. Current CIP projects for
ID No. 4E include: payment to the County for water and sewer pipeline
improvements Antonio Parkway, completion of pressure reducing stations and RW
facilities at three separate sites and water and RW improvements in the Middle
Chiquita Canyon (MCC) area. The MCC projects include grading, pipeline and
reservoir facilities to serve domestic water and RW systems in the Sendero Village
and future PA-2 areas. Funding is also provided to purchase capacity in the Phase IV
expansion of the Chiquita Plant is also reserved for this development area.

ID No. 5 includes PA-3 of the Ranch Plan and is located on the east side of Cañada
Gobernadora south of the Coto de Caza planned community. First residential
occupancies are projected to occur during FY 2018/19. No funding source has been
established yet for this area.

ID No. 6 is located generally north and east of Talega and south of Ortega Highway.
Proposed Ranch Plan development projects include future PA-4, PA-5 and PA-8.
The Nichols Institute complex and supply water well system is still the only District-
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 25
operated facility in ID No. 6. No funding source has been established yet for this
area.

ID No. 7 is the Talega Valley area and with 10 or less single family house lots
remaining without structures. Due to the anticipated higher than average home prices
to complete occupied homes on these lots; build-out is projected for 2017. The CIP
includes Talega bond funding for water reliability projects and remaining work to
upgrade, replace or expand capacity of existing wastewater facilities at the Chiquita
WRP. SCADA system improvements and repair of existing sewer force main
pipelines serving the Talega area are also CIP line items funded by ID No. 7.
The remaining water system reliability projects funded by Talega bonds (UCR
restoration and the construction portion of the Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant)
are also still active. The Baker Pipeline WTP construction cost awarded by Irvine
Ranch Water District in early 2014 was much higher than expected and the District
expects to expend all Talega funds budgeted for this project.
Most of the projects listed in the CIP support new development and are supported from
General Obligation bond or CFD bond funds. The second largest group is maintenance,
refurbishment or related activity shown in the Replacement Projects (CRP Reserve). The
individual line item sources of funds are included within Table 1 with the category of
fund.
The following is a brief description of the projects that are currently underway or are
proposed to being in FY 2014/15. These projects have been separated into one of four
separate categories; domestic water, recycled water, wastewater and miscellaneous.
Domestic Water
Zone I pipelines and reservoirs (Middle Chiquita facilities) to support Sendero
Village and PA-2. The entirety of these projects will be completed by the end of
December 2014. The facilities included in these projects are; 11,500 feet of 24”
pipeline, two reservoirs with a capacity of 2 million gallons each and the
associated grading and appurtenances.
Three pressure reducing stations (PRS) at three separate sites in Sendero Village
to provide the proper operating pressure for the respective areas within the
development. These facilities are complete and are operational.
In-tract domestic water pipelines within the Sendero Village development have
been completed and are operational.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 26
Baker Pipeline Water Treatment Plant (Baker WTP) and the associated pump
station administered by Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) construction contract
were awarded in late 2013. This project is currently under construction.
Transmission pipelines in Cow Camp Road to serve the PA-2 development and
future development in PA-3 and PA-4. This involved approximately 2,850 feet of
24” pipe and 1,000 feet of 20” pipe along with the various appurtenances. The
work in the Cow Camp Road Bridge area is complete with the work to the eastern
boundary of PA-2 anticipated to be complete by March 2015.
Pipelines that were relocated due to the County of Orange’s Antonio Parkway
Widening project have been completed and are operational.
Zone II pipelines and a 3 million gallon reservoir (Tesoro) are to be designed and
constructed during FY 2014/15-2015/16 which includes approximately 10,000
feet of 24” pipeline. This facility is in design with the initial component that runs
between the Zone I reservoir and Chiquita Road to be installed by the end of
2014.
Miscellaneous upgrade projects at various pump stations, PRS sites, cathodic
protection locations and valve replacements. Also to be completed is the recoating
of the Casta del Sol, Plano and Star Reservoirs.
Additional studies of the feasibility of optimizing the San Juan Basin through
adaptive management, storm water and recycled water recharge and additional
extraction wells and treatment.
Recycled Water
Zone A pipelines and reservoir (Middle Chiquita facilities) to support Sendero
Village and PA-2. These projects which included 6,500 feet of 30” pipeline, 5,000
feet of 20” pipeline and one (4) million gallon reservoir are almost complete but
are operational.
A recycled water pump station to serve the Sendero/Ladera areas will be designed
and constructed.
All of the recycled water pipelines to serve the in-tract areas of Sendero Village
have been completed and are operational.
Zone B pipelines and a 2 million gallon reservoir (Tesoro) are to be installed
during FY 2014/15-2015/16 which includes approximately 10,000 feet of 20”
pipeline. This facility is in design with the initial component that runs between the
Zone A reservoir and Chiquita Road to be installed by the end of 2014.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 27
Transmission pipelines in Cow Camp Road to serve the PA-2 development and
future development in PA-3 and PA-4. This involved approximately 1,500 feet of
30” pipe along with the various appurtenances. The work in the Cow Camp Road
Bridge area is complete with the work to the eastern boundary of PA-2 anticipated
to be complete by March 2015.
Cañada Gobernadora Multipurpose Basin project to capture urban runoff and
reuse the collected flows to replace domestic water demands in the Coto de Caza
are will be completed in FY 2014/15.
Califia retrofit project to construct approximately 11,000 feet of various sized
pipe to supply 52 potential customers approximately 230 af/yr of recycled water.
Miscellaneous retrofit projects will be pursued to continue the expansion of the
recycled water system to reduce potable water demands in the Mission Viejo,
Rancho Santa Margarita and Coto de Caza areas.
A possible interconnection between the new Middle Chiquita Zone A tank and the
Gobernadora Basin project will allow the transfer of recycled water between the
Chiquita WRP and Coto de Caza to supplement the urban runoff capture.
Miscellaneous upgrade projects relating to tank recoating, pipeline repairs and
cathodic protection replacement.
The design of the Trampas Canyon Seasonal Storage Reservoir will begin for
both the 3,000 and 5,000 acre foot storage options. This project will provide much
needed seasonal storage to allow for the expansion of the recycled water system
within the District, including PA-2, and possibly surrounding water agencies.
Based on planning documents, this storage will be needed in the same general
time frame as the completion of the PA-2 development.
Wastewater
In-tract wastewater pipelines in Sendero Village have been completed and are
operational.
Plano Lift Station force main replacement project is ongoing with construction
anticipated to be completed by August 2015. This 24” force main is being
installed to replace the force main that failed previously. The project includes
constructing a bridge across the creek that crosses the force main alignment.
Replace the pumps at the Horno lift station. This will provide more efficient and
reliable wastewater pumping from this existing lift station. The current operation
utilizes a double pump in series methodology to provide the necessary pressures
to lift the wastewater flows. The revised approach will be to install a single pump
that has the necessary head producing characteristics.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 28
Replace the pumps at the Cordova lift station. This will provide more efficient
and reliable wastewater pumping from this existing lift station. The current
operation utilizes a double pump in series methodology to provide the necessary
pressures to lift the wastewater flows. The revised approach will be to install a
single pump that has the necessary head producing characteristics.
The following projects will take place at the District’s water reclamation plants:
Chiquita Water Reclamation Plant (CWRP):
 Belt press replacement
 Blower expansion project
 SCADA and communication expansion
 Odor Control expansion
 Influent Force Main Replacement
 Influent Pump Station Expansion
 Grit dewatering expansion/upgrade
 Chlorine contact basin expansion
Oso Creek Water Reclamation Plant (OCWRP):
 Warehouse roof repair
 Influent pump replacement
 Zone B pump station pump replacement
 Influent screen replacement
 Chlorine contact basin modifications
Miscellaneous
Installation of solar power generation facilities at the District’s administration
building and the Chiquita WRP. This project is intended to provide the District
with cost effective, sustainable power that will ultimately reduce the District’s
energy bills. This project also helps minimize the negative impacts that may occur
if the utility must resort to rolling brown or black outs to satisfy peak demand
periods.
Initial planning has begun for the future District facilities to serve PA-3 is
occurring for work anticipated to begin in 2017 or 2018.
8.0
Fiscal Year 2014/15 Capital Budget
The summary of the proposed facilities to be worked on in FY 2014/2015 are included in
the Table 1. It includes all the projects currently authorized and the new projects that are
projected to start during the year.
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 29
APPENDIX "A"
Definitions from the Capital Improvement Program
14/15
Scheduled to start work in the Fiscal Year 2014/2015 (typical of all
years).
Budget
The amount of money set aside for the total cost of the project.
The amount is either a lump sum or it can be calculated by
multiplying the unit price by the number of linear feet.
CFD
Community Facilities District
CIP
Capital Improvement Program, a summary of the projected new
construction and rehabilitation projects the District will perform in
the next five years.
Connection
Project to be funded from the Improvement District No. 1
Connection Fee Program.
Contract No.
Engineering department file reference. The Contract Numbers are
assigned when a project is started.
CP
Cathodic Protection
CIP
Capital Improvement Program
CRP
Capital Replacement Program established to help predict when
equipment requires upgrade and replacement
CRR
Capital Replacement Reserve established to fund replacement
CTM
Connector Transmission Main
Description
Description of project and location.
Design
Currently under design
Encumbrances
Remainder to be paid on a project.
Expended
The amount of money currently expended on the project.
FM
Force Main
GIS
Geographical Information System
HP
Horsepower
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 3
Improvement
District
SMWD is divided into 8 Improvement Districts (ID) by geographic
boundaries. Each ID provides its own source of capital to support new
construction within its boundaries. Some IDs have sub-districts within
their boundaries.
ID 1
Mission Viejo
ID 2
Coto de Caza
ID 2A
Portion of Coto de Caza
ID 3/3A
Rancho Trabuco
ID 4
Combined Area of 4A, B, C, D & E
ID 4A
Rancho Santa Margarita
ID 4B
Las Flores
ID 4C
Chiquita Canyon (Ranch Plan Planning Area 2)
ID 4D
Ladera Ranch
ID 4E
Ortega Highway Area (now entitled the “Sendero Village” Planned
Community)
ID 5
Ranch Plan Planning Area 3
ID 6
Ranch Plan Planning Areas 4, 5 and 6
ID 7/7A
Talega Valley
I/O
Inlet/Outlet Line
LF
Linear Feet
LS
Lift Station
MP
Master Plan
MGD
Million Gallons per Day
NDWTM
Nondomestic Water Transmission Main
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 4
N/O
North of
POW
Plan of Works
P. C.
Most of construction is done and/or partially complete (a portion of
the project may also have been capitalized).
Proj.
Project
Project Code
The project code is a three digit number that is unique to each
project. This code is established by the Finance department and
represents the address in the finance database.
Project Status
The project status indicates the current state the project is in or the
Fiscal Year it is intended to start.
Proposed Funding
Source No.
Represents a unique source of cash such as a specific bond issue.
PRS
Pressure Reducing Station
PS
Pump Station
Remaining
The amount of the money remaining in the budget after subtracting
the expended portion.
Replct Funds
Proceeds from the Improvement District No. 1 Replacement
Projects Assessments
RW
Recycled Water (previously
Nondomestic Water)
SCADA
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SJBA
San Juan Basin Authority
S/O
South of
STUDY
An analysis is underway or potential costs are being reviewed
TBD
To Be Determined.
TS
Trunk Sewer
referred
to
exclusively
as
FY 2014/15 CIP Update
Page 5
U. C.
Under Construction
WRP
Water Reclamation Plant
WTM
Water Transmission Main
203,215,822
FUTURE BOND ISSUE ID 6 (691) Ranch Plan Areas 4, 5, 6
-
95,530,704
127,550,664
486,596,704
553,597,064
TOTAL BOND AND CFD
GRAND TOTALS
Last Updated: 9/26/2014
5,200
12,402,600
61,200
12,462,600
49,022
52,046
32,575,688
592,000
28,747,048
10,126,400
2,995,000
3,382,000
1,533,000
47,000
2,303,700
20,000
-
50,000
650,000
7,605,000
-
-
535,000
1,575,000
5,495,000
15,001,610
9,413,350
BOND ISSUE 8 SERIES A (829) Hidden Ridge MV
CFD BOND ISSUE ID 7 (731) Talega
6,624,000
129,274,846
BOND ISSUE ID 5 (590) Ranch Plan Area 3
FUTURE BOND ISSUE ID 7 (792) Talega
42,964,588
CFD BOND ISSUE ID 4E (492) Ortega Hwy
592,000
65,265,948
BOND 4C FUTURE BOND (489) Chiquita Canyon
CFD BOND ID 4D (490) Ladera Ranch
3,870,000
10,126,400
BOND 4 SERIES 2009 A (433) RSM
5,353,600
BOND 4 SERIES D (427) Ladera Ranch
BOND 4 SERIES B (429) Las Flores
1,533,000
BOND 3 SERIES 2009 A (333) Rancho Trabuco
350,000
2,303,700
BOND 3 SERIES 1984 (321) RSM
BOND 2 SERIES 2009 A (233) Coto de Caza
75,000
BOND 2 SERIES (220) Coto de Caza
1,146,000
83,000
BOND 1 S SERIES F (111) Mission Viejo
BOND 2A SERIES (221) Coto de Caza
1,295,000
BOND 1 W SERIES F (107) Mission Viejo
BONDS and CFD
33,435,400
5,536,200
BUDGET 2014/2015
TOTAL CAPITAL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM RESERVE
3,340,000
BUDGET 2013/2014
16,994,200
2,070,000
BUDGET 2012/2013
FUTURE BUDGET 2015/2016 & Beyond
5,495,000
24,151,610
9,413,350
Contract Budget
Contract Budget . Prior 2014/2015
BUDGET PRIOR TO 2012-2013
CAPITAL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM RESERVE
TOTAL OPERATING CAPITAL
OPERATING CAPITAL
TOTAL GRANT
GRANT
Contract Name
SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT
86,288,000
74,801,800
56,000
60,000
-
14,251,200
19,374,000
10,388,900
-
26,502,700
-
865,000
1,920,000
-
303,000
-
340,000
75,000
21,000
645,000
8,836,200
-
5,536,200
2,805,000
495,000
-
2,650,000
-
Contract Budget
2014/2015
48,055,900
37,061,800
-
-
6,624,000
11,734,300
10,455,600
-
-
7,388,300
-
10,000
51,600
-
-
-
786,000
-
12,000
-
4,494,100
4,494,100
-
-
-
-
6,500,000
-
Contract Budget
2015/2016
60,905,100
58,230,100
-
-
-
-
56,781,900
-
-
1,448,200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,675,000
2,675,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contract Budget
2016/2017
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
40,258,800
36,621,600
-
-
-
-
35,441,900
-
-
1,179,700
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,637,200
3,637,200
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contract Budget
2017/2018
9,857,300
7,169,400
-
-
-
-
7,169,400
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,687,900
2,687,900
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contract Budget
2018/2019
180,681,300
177,181,300
-
-
-
177,181,300
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,500,000
3,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contract Budget
Yrs 2019/2020+
553,597,064
486,596,704
61,200
12,462,600
6,624,000
203,215,822
129,274,846
42,964,588
592,000
65,265,948
10,126,400
3,870,000
5,353,600
1,533,000
350,000
2,303,700
1,146,000
75,000
83,000
1,295,000
33,435,400
16,994,200
5,536,200
3,340,000
2,070,000
5,495,000
24,151,610
9,413,350
26,411,105
18,536,437
3,582
1,623,521
-
49,022
52,046
14,339,762
239,905
10,048
308,392
1,316,886
280,936
46,836
32,179
73,308
13,690
-
34,244
112,080
1,853,410
-
-
340,452
506,145
1,006,813
2,316,867
3,704,391
43,207,674
24,532,557
106
1,699,098
-
-
-
9,676,535
30,736
-
9,432,651
8,795
8,460
1,432,562
950
2,241,249
404
-
1,011
-
474,580
-
-
3,155
98,055
373,370
10,284,589
7,915,948
Open
Encumbrances
2,860,892
80,372
-
6,297
-
-
-
-
-
-
55,105
-
-
5,870
-
13,100
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
-
-
-
-
73,531
2,206,989
(Grant, RMV, etc.)
Reimbursement
AS OF: MARCH 31, 2014
Contract Budget
Totals
Expended to Date
.2
Project Listing and 2014/2015 Budget By Capital Type
486,839,177
443,608,082
57,512
9,146,278
6,624,000
203,166,800
129,222,800
18,948,291
321,359
65,255,900
440,462
2,544,319
5,064,204
59,472
316,871
2,243
1,131,906
75,000
47,745
1,182,920
31,607,410
17,494,200
5,536,200
2,996,393
1,465,800
4,114,817
11,623,685
-
Not Encumbered
or Spent
42,164,523
27,731,571
3,584
1,628,418
-
49,022
52,046
23,855,593
240,308
95,525
1,001
1,327,250
281,059
2,209
32,201
3,307
13,700
-
34,268
112,080
3,102,697
8,062
1,643,896
85,916
570,071
794,752
2,403,604
8,926,651
Expended to
Date
24,789,417
19,721,837
46
1,534,067
-
-
-
5,639,163
30,333
1,282,098
8,082,597
185
4,384
1,227,528
413
1,920,407
176
-
440
-
416,821
-
33,940
5,578
125,491
251,812
121,271
4,529,488
Open
Emcumbrances
2,860,892
80,372
-
6,297
-
-
-
-
-
-
55,105
-
-
5,870
-
13,100
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
-
-
-
-
73,531
2,206,989
(Grant, RMV, etc.)
Reimbursement
439,223,668
489,504,016
57,570
9,306,412
6,624,000
203,166,800
129,222,800
13,469,832
321,359
63,888,325
2,097,907
2,542,565
5,068,157
309,133
317,386
393,086
1,132,124
75,000
48,292
1,182,920
30,415,882
17,486,138
3,858,364
3,248,506
1,374,438
4,448,436
21,700,266
(1,835,800)
Not Encumbered
or Spent
AS OF: AUGUST 31, 2014
Page 1 of 1
Last Updated: 9/26/2014
29,408,316
553,597,064
GRAND TOTAL
134,095,840
12,112,200
290,000
28,618,240
1,461,800
90,937,200
434,400
212,000
30,000
190,861,586
23,174,400
6,808,600
45,184,426
1,710,000
94,457,050
225,960
137,800
19,163,350
199,231,322
22,606,100
896,600
86,775,444
218,600
11,570,000
76,709,050
236,640
180,200
38,688
127,550,664
1,481,116
26,022,180
4,260,000
290,000
9,125,500
200,000
11,605,000
355,680
186,000
-
37,433,542
12,500,000
960,000
6,771,500
1,500,000
3,038,000
129,792
120,900
12,413,350
62,613,826
5,275,000
700,000
46,737,310
50,000
4,555,000
4,960,000
169,728
158,100
8,688
Contract Budget
Prior 2014/2015
Contract Budget Column5
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
Miscellaneous: Solar, Cell Towers & Other
TOTAL WASTEWATER
Wastewater - Lift Stations Total
Wastewater - Odor Control Total
Wastewater - Pipelines Total
Wastewater - Various Sewer Repairs
Wastewater - Wastewater Treatment Total
Wastewater - SCADA
Domestic Water - Admin Facility Total
Wastewater - Miscellaneous Total
WASTEWATER (WW)
TOTAL RECYCLED WATER
Recycled Water - Tanks Total
Recycled Water - Pump Stations
Recycled Water - Pipelines Total
Recycled Water - Pressure Reducing Stations
Recycled Water - Reservoirs Total
Recycled Water - SCADA Total
Domestic Water - Admin Facility Total
Recycled Water - Urban Runoff
RECYCLED WATER (RW)
TOTAL DOMESTIC WATER
Domestic Water - Tanks Total
Domestic Water - Pump Stations Total
Domestic Water - Pipelines Total
Domestic Water - Valve Replacement Total
Domestic Water - Pressure Reducing Stations Total
Domestic Water - Reservoirs: Dams, UOR & UCR Total
Domestic Water - SCADA
Domestic Water - Admin Facility Total
Domestic Water - Miscellaneous: Solar, Cell Towers & Other Total
DOMESTIC WATER (DW)
Contract Category (Domestic Water, Recycled Water, Wastewater, Misc.)
SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT
86,288,000
2,400,000
56,235,100
5,496,000
2,467,500
400,000
47,815,600
26,000
30,000
15,721,150
1,950,300
2,543,000
6,249,000
210,000
4,456,950
45,000
16,900
250,000
11,931,750
4,631,800
145,000
3,422,000
50,000
2,859,600
771,250
22,100
30,000
Contract Budget
2014/2015
48,055,900
-
4,595,300
288,100
12,000
206,000
4,089,200
-
39,595,200
33,095,200
6,500,000
3,865,400
51,600
3,298,800
515,000
-
Contract Budget
2015/2016
5,471,900
8,157,100
53,000
530,500
21,658
-
Contract Budget
2016/2017
60,905,100
25,527,200
9,338,680
1,280,300
6,493,000
212,200
1,327,700
25,480
-
11,805,062
4,349,400
7,439,100
16,562
-
14,234,158
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
40,258,800
-
3,689,940
682,200
218,500
2,763,000
26,240
-
13,871,656
4,374,700
3,305,600
6,174,300
17,056
-
22,697,204
7,227,400
14,320,900
65,600
1,061,000
22,304
-
Contract Budget
2017/2018
9,857,300
-
2,242,200
787,800
225,100
1,202,300
27,000
-
3,066,250
3,048,700
17,550
-
4,548,850
2,477,000
2,048,900
22,950
-
Contract Budget
2018/2019
180,681,300
-
31,972,440
9,838,040
22,134,400
-
69,368,726
15,501,826
53,866,900
-
79,340,134
8,362,334
70,977,800
-
Contract Budget
Yrs 2019/2020+
553,597,064
29,408,316
134,095,840
12,112,200
290,000
28,618,240
1,461,800
90,937,200
434,400
212,000
30,000
190,861,586
23,174,400
6,808,600
45,184,426
1,710,000
94,457,050
225,960
137,800
19,163,350
199,231,322
22,606,100
896,600
86,775,444
218,600
11,570,000
76,709,050
236,640
180,200
38,688
26,411,105
111,116
3,611,113
606,777
14,303
1,713,089
162,000
797,706
248,781
68,457
-
13,528,672
3,773,560
890,307
1,219,416
1,479,178
646,882
88,900
44,497
5,385,932
9,160,203
113,803
4,947,856
6,157
2,525,309
1,383,948
116,254
58,189
8,688
43,207,674
65,000
366,391
203,081
40,233
113,425
7,190
2,462
-
13,249,982
4,962,604
1,292
4,675
5,128
85,213
2,624
1,600
8,186,846
29,526,301
25,983,289
107,939
3,429,549
3,431
2,093
-
Open
Encumbrances
2,860,892
-
-
-
2,780,520
500,000
2,280,520
80,372
34,130
46,242
-
(Grant, RMV, etc.)
Reimbursement
AS OF: MARCH 31, 2014
Contract Budget
Totals
Expended to Date
Project Listing and 2014/2015 Budget by Facility Category
486,839,177
29,232,200
130,118,336
11,302,342
275,697
26,864,918
1,299,800
90,026,069
178,429
141,081
30,000
166,863,452
14,438,236
5,917,001
44,460,335
225,694
93,724,955
134,436
91,703
7,871,092
160,625,190
22,606,100
782,797
55,878,429
212,443
8,936,752
71,941,795
116,955
119,919
30,000
Not Encumbered
or Spent
42,164,523
111,116
6,386,907
675,727
14,303
3,007,395
170,000
2,169,490
248,950
101,043
-
22,997,257
6,794,498
931,603
1,232,071
1,478,942
1,383,138
88,961
65,678
11,022,366
12,669,242
8,349
112,080
6,774,363
6,157
2,606,194
2,951,191
116,334
85,886
8,688
Expended to
Date
24,789,417
-
730,795
438,430
6,293
2,500
277,012
3,129
3,431
-
7,796,733
2,871,654
1,333
207,224
3,097
84,106
1,142
2,230
4,625,947
16,261,889
202,549
13,365,982
330,592
2,358,356
1,493
2,917
-
Open
Emcumbrances
2,860,892
-
-
-
2,780,520
500,000
2,280,520
80,372
34,130
46,242
-
(Grant, RMV, etc.)
Reimbursement
AS OF: AUGUST 31, 2014
489,504,016
-
29,297,200
126,978,138
10,998,043
275,697
25,604,552
1,289,300
88,490,698
182,322
107,526
30,000
162,848,116
13,508,248
5,875,664
44,245,131
227,961
92,989,806
135,857
69,892
5,795,557
170,380,563
22,395,202
784,520
66,669,229
212,443
8,633,214
71,445,745
118,813
91,397
30,000
Not Encumbered
or Spent
Page 1 of 1