docThe high-speed cross-border ERTMS The high
download 
Report Transcription
The high-speed cross-border ERTMS The high
The high high-speed speed cross cross-border border ERTMS operation between The Netherlands and Vincent PASSAU Belgium May 2012 ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -1 ERTMS level 2 - Maturity of products and deployment p y SWEDEN Botniabanan 1 RBC 2010 NETHERLAND S Betuweroute 3 RBC 2007 NETHERLAND S HSL Zuid 2 RBC 2009 UK Cambrian pilot line 1 RBC 2010 SWITZERLAND Mattstetten-Rothrist BELGIUM HSL4BELGIUM 1 RBCBELGIUM 2009 SWITZERLAND Lotschberg 1 RBC 2007 BELGIUM 2009 HSL3 2009 1 RBC 2007 1 RBC 2006 ITALY Bologna-Firenze 4 RBC 2009 SPAIN Madrid-Lerida 5 RBC 2011 Number of Lines in commercial service in Europe with ERTMS Level 2 in operation ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 Date are commercial entry to service - as of end February 2012 -2 ITALY Milano-Bologna 3 RBC 2008 ITALY Torino-Milano 2 RBC 2006 ITALY Roma-Napoli 4 RBC 2005 Only ONE high speed cross border with full ETCS control First High Speed Cross Border Operation b between B Belgium l i and d the Netherlands with ERTMS S L2 SWEDEN Botniabanan 1 RBC 2010 NETHERLAND S Betuweroute 3 RBC 2007 NETHERLAND S HSL Zuid 2 RBC 2009 UK Cambrian pilot line 1 RBC 2010 SWITZERLAND Mattstetten-Rothrist BELGIUM HSL4BELGIUM 1 RBCBELGIUM 2009 SWITZERLAND Lotschberg 1 RBC 2007 BELGIUM 2009 HSL3 2009 1 RBC 2007 1 RBC 2006 . ITALY Bologna-Firenze 4 RBC 2009 SPAIN Madrid-Lerida 5 RBC 2011 Number of Lines in commercial service in Europe with ERTMS Level 2 in operation ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 Date are commercial entry to service - as of end February 2012 -3 ITALY Milano-Bologna 3 RBC 2008 ITALY Torino-Milano 2 RBC 2006 ITALY Roma-Napoli 4 RBC 2005 On the Belgium side - Alstom ERTMS experience “L4 – Antwerp to The Netherlands border” line border operation (in level 2) since 13 Dec. 2009 •Commercial ATP − Nominal : ERTMS level 2 (SRS 2.3.0) − Fall back : ERTMS level 1 (160 km/h) • level 1 used for domestic service − 1 RBC − Interface with HSL Zuid • Line − 35 km double track − Headway: 3 min − High speed line (300 km/h) • Operation O ti − Passenger traffic − 15 runs/days − Thalys Th l in i operation ti (ERTMS llevell 2) ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -4 On the Dutch Side – Siemens/Thales “HSL Zuid (Amsterdam - Belgium Border)” Line Commercial operation (in level 2) since 13 Dec Dec. 2009 • ATP − − − − − Nominal : ERTMS level 2 (SRS 2.3.0) F ll b Fall back k : ERTMS llevell 1 (160 kkm/h) /h) National ATB 2 RBC Interface with HSL L4 • Line − 95 km double track (South) ( ) − Headway: 3 min − High speed line (300 km/h) • Operation − Passenger traffic − 15 runs/days − Thalys in operation (ERTMS level 2) ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -5 System Configuration SIG Subsystem ERTMS Cross Border between The Netherlands and Belgium g ERTMS allows seamless cross border operation at 300 km/h, km/h isn’t it? ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -6 The Challenges • Not just a border between two countries ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -7 − Two signalling systems and principles − Two Infrastructure Owners − Two GSM-R networks with different operators − Three Suppliers − Two different ETCS Baselines − Two different combinations between ETCS Level 1 and Level 2 − RBCs from different Suppliers with different interfaces and principles − Two T diff different t Traffic T ffi Control C t lC Centres t − Two different Interlockings From a driver’s point of view Do you speak ETCS? • The operational rules are different in both countries − The “translation” translation of national signalling principles into “ETCS” principles is different. e s need eed to o know o the e ope operational a o a − Drivers rules on both sides of the border − Effort is now being made at European level to harmonise operational principles and transition scenarii • Initial Contracts were awarded based on SRS 2.2.2 − Room for incorpoartion of « DC » Change Requests − Eventually upgraded to SRS 2.3.0 ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -8 Multiple Interfaces to manage • Both projects were contracted before the solution to interface them were fully specified at European level Source : Infraspeed & Siemens, 2008 ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 -9 Multiple Interfaces to manage Traffic Regulation Traffic Regulation Route Management Route Management Route Protection Route Protection Train Control Train Control ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 10 Multiple Interfaces to manage Traffic Regulation Traffic Regulation VPT+ EBP SIMIS SSI Route Management Route Protection Route Protection Train Control ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 11 Route Management RBC (T) RBC (A) Train Control RBC Interface – Progressive approach RBC (T) RBC (A) • Initial situation − At the time of the contract, contract no European interface was specified for the hand-over between RBCs (except the functional part-FIS) − Thales RBC and Alstom RBC did not use the same protocols • The Th border b d crossing i was realised li d iin ttwo steps t • First step : level 1 − N No llevell 2 / llevell 2 di directt ttransition iti − Transition B-NL and NL-B through a pure level 1 area (available as part of the fall-back system) at 160 km/h − Tested successfully beginning 2007 • •Second step : RBC – RBC Gateway − In p parallel of the realisation of the first step, p, a g gateway y solution was decided, for protocol translation − Hand-over management functions remain inside each RBC − First tests in October 2007, final tests with HSL Zuid beginning 2008 ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 12 Alstom RBC – RBC GATEWAY at the Border • RBC-RBC Interface not fully specified at contract time (only FIS). • Within project timeframe, decison taken to develop a Gateway for transport & safety layers • Latest UNISIG Baselines now includes standard FFFIS interface (Subset 039) RBC Thales ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 13 RBC Alstom Conclusions • Beyond ERTMS, Cross Border Operation is a complex project to be managed in a multi-parties environment − Many players involved with diverse understanding d t di off functionalities f ti liti − Several Interfaces with missing information and/or evolving standard • With the advantage of the experience gained from previous projects − Off Offer the th fl flexibility ibilit tto solve l specific ifi iissues (e.g. interfaces) − Support the customer to manage evolution of specifications − Promote the use of open interfaces and support harmonisation of operational To provide signalling solutions concepts ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 14 needs meeting customer Alstom Transport www.alstom.com/transport Thank you! ALSTOM - Danish Rail Conference 2012 - 15
