Review and Comment Submittal - Hermantown Community Schools

Transcription

July 15, 2013
Ms. Dr. Brenda Cassellius, Commissioner
Minnesota Department of Education
1500 West Highway 36
Roseville, MN 55113-4266
RE:
ISD #700 Review & Comment Submittal
Dear Commissioner Cassellius,
In accordance with MN Statute 121.15, ISD #700, Hermantown Public Schools, hereby submits the
following long range facility plan for review and comment by MDE. Renovate and add an addition to the
Hermantown Elementary School. Close the Hermantown Middle school and move those students to the
existing High School and renovate the existing High School (for the Middle School students). Construct
an addition to the existing High School to be the “new” High School.
The District Board of Education intends to present a bond issue to voters this fall, in a single question
totaling $48,895,000. The purpose of which is to discontinue use of the Middle school that cannot be
responsibly renovated, improve academic programming spaces, and add necessary space to the existing
elementary school, address district-wide deferred maintenance, improve student health and safety, and
enhance student and community activities areas. These needs were identified from an extensive long
range facilities plan study that the District undertook over the past year. Details of the proposed projects
are provided in the attached submittal.
Please call me directly at 218-729-9313 (x1003) or email ([email protected]) if
you require additional information or have further questions. We are excited to get this project underway
as we believe it will greatly contribute to the quality of our learning environment and enhance our
community for decades to come. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Brad Johnson
Superintendent of Schools
HERMANTOWN COMMUNITY
SCHOOLS
ISD #700
REVIEW & COMMENT
SUBMITTAL
FOR
2013 BOND REFERENDUM
July 2013
4307 Ugstad Road
Hermantown, MN
55811
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE(S)
0. Basic Information........................................................................................................................... 2
1. Geographic Area and Enrollment Projections ............................................................................ 3
2. Existing Facilities by Year Constructed....................................................................................... 6
3. Specific Facility Deficiencies & Benefits ...................................................................................... 8
4. Relationship of Projects to District’s Priorities ......................................................................... 32
5. Transportation Connections ....................................................................................................... 34
6. Cooperative Use ........................................................................................................................... 35
7. Project Description, Estimated Expenditures & Project Dates ............................................... 36
8. Sources of Financing .................................................................................................................... 47
9. Operational Budget...................................................................................................................... 52
10. Site Issues ...................................................................................................................................... 53
11. Indoor Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 54
12. HVAC Code Standards ............................................................................................................... 55
13. Desegregation Requirements ...................................................................................................... 55
14. Facility Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 56
15. Acoustic Design ............................................................................................................................ 57
16. Local Infrastructure Requirements ........................................................................................... 58
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ISD #700 – Hermantown Public Schools
2013 Referendum R&C Submittal
Page 1
0. Basic Information
In accordance with Minnesota Statute 123B.71 (2009), the School Board submits the following
information to the Commissioner of Education for review and comment. The information is organized in
the outline format as shown in the Department of Education’s “Review and Comment Checklist”.
Basic Information:
• Address:
Independent School District #700
Hermantown Public Schools
4307 Ugstad Rd.
Hermantown, Minnesota 55811
Contact: Brad Johnson
Superintendent of Schools
[email protected]
Phone: 218-729-9313 (x1003)
• School Board:
Deanna Gronseth - Chair
Stephanie Hamell – Vice Chair
Laura Thorsvik – Clerk/Treasurer
Greg Carlson
Leo Plewa
Aaron Salmela
•
Financing:
$ 48,895,000 (including bonding costs)
• Fiscal Consultant:
Northland Securities, Inc.
45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Contact: Mike Hoheisel, Sr. VP
Phone: (612) 851-4919
• Project Consultant:
Johnson Controls, Inc.
4627 Airpark Boulevard
Duluth, Minnesota 55811-5798
Contact: Jeff Schiltz
[email protected]
Phone: (218) 727-8996 (x6764)
Fax: (218) 727-7945
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2
1. The geographic area and population to be served,
a) Preschool through grade 12 student enrollments for the past five years, and
b) Student enrollment projections for the next five years.
A demographic study of the District was completed in November of 2012. A full copy of the study can
be provided if desired. The findings showed there will be a fairly flat trend in enrollment. Hermantown
has a net gain through open enrollment and this is expected to stay fairly steady.
The Chart below illustrates the historic and projected enrollments for ISD #700.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 700
ACTUAL & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
5 Yr Projections
Past Five Years
ISD 700 Pre-K thru 12 Enrollment
2007 - 2008 2,047
2008 - 2009 2,049
2009 - 2010 2,090
2010 - 2011 2,143
2011 - 2012 2,152
Current 2012 - 2013 2,078
2013 - 2014 2,086
2014 - 2015 2,089
2015 - 2016 2,085
2016 - 2017 2,078
2017 - 2018 2,075
Independent School District No. 700 primarily serves the city of Hermantown area. It also serves all or a
portion of the following townships: Fredenberg, Canosia and Rice Lake. The district serves a population
of about 11,400 (2010 data) and covers approximately 92 square miles. See the following maps:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5
2. A list of existing school facilities
a) by year constructed,
b) their uses, and
c) an assessment of the extent to which alternate facilities are available within the school district
boundaries and in adjacent school districts.
Independent School District No. 700 operates eight buildings. Four are educational; High School, Middle
School, Elementary School and Area Resource / Family Education Center. The other four are the District
Administration Building, Bus Barn, Maintenance Garage and a Hockey Arena. The High School,
Elementary, District Administration Building, Bus Barn / Maintenance Garage and a Hockey Arena all
reside on a 191 acre site.
Hermantown Elementary School (Grades K – 3)
5365 West Arrowhead Road
Hermantown, MN 55811
Site Area
Portion of 191 Acre Site
Building Area
Original
1960
Addition One
1964
Addition Two
1992
Addition Three
1999
TOTAL AREA = 58,888 sq. ft.
Hermantown Middle School (Grades 4 – 8)
4289 Ugstad Road
Site Area
22 Acres
Building Area
Original
1937
Addition One
1949
Addition Two
1957
Addition Three
1958
Addition Four
1986
Addition Five
1987
Addition Six
1992
Hermantown High School (Grades 9 – 12)
4335 Hawk Circle Drive
Site Area
Portion of 191 Acre Site
Building Area
Original
1988
Addition
2000
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6
Hermantown Area Resource / Family Education Center (PreK, not owned by District)
5028 Miller Trunk Highway
Building Area
Original
1974
District Administration Building
4307 Ugstad Road
Building Area
Addition
1951
Hermantown Bus Barn
Building Area
Original
1975
Addition
1978
Hermantown Maintenance Garage
Building Area
Original
1969
Addition
1989
Hermantown Hockey Arena
4309 Ugstad Road
Building Area
Addition
1988
No suitable alternative facilities are available within the district or in adjacent districts with the exception
of the Central High School, currently for sale by the Duluth School District #709. This facility is in need
of extensive repairs, is oversized for the Hermantown’s Districts needs and is located outside of the
Hermantown district. Reinvestment and/or replacement of ISD #700’s existing facilities are the logical
viable option for the district.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7
3. A list of the specific deficiencies of the facility
a) demonstrating the need for a new or renovated facility to be provided,
b) a list of the specific benefits that the new or renovated facility will provide to
i. students,
ii. teachers, and
iii. community users served by the facility.
The District took an in-depth look at the deficiencies of its facilities from two points of view. The first
was educational adequacy - how well does the layout of the facility meet the educational methods of
today and in the future? The second focused on the facility and site itself - what needs to be
repaired/replaced. This ranged from parking lots to mechanical/electrical systems to floorings to building
envelope.
Four citizen advisory committees (Technology & Education; Facilities; Finance; and Communications &
Outreach) were created to advise the Board on the long-range facilities plan. These volunteer committees
dedicated countless hours to reviewing data, research, brainstorming, touring other schools and evaluating
options. In their recommended plan, they concluded:
• Investments in repairs and maintenance are helping manage our aging infrastructure, but
fundamental safety, health and educational issues still remain.
• The middle school does not meet many educational adequacy requirements and overwhelming
consensus from our Citizen Advisory Committee is that the middle school has outlived its
designed use and remodeling the facility for school purposes is not cost effective.
• The elementary and high schools do not meet some of the current standards but improvements
can happen by investing in these existing buildings.
• Grade configuration within the buildings of Early Childhood-4, 5-8, 9-12 will best meet
educational needs for the next generation of students.
• Move 5-8 middle school students into the existing high school and build a new 9-12 high school
next to the existing high school with some spaces that can be shared between the schools and with
the community.
Hermantown Community Schools has developed, with the help of a planning consultant and the citizen
groups, a capital facilities plan outlining necessary facility improvements and replacements. On June 24,
2013, the Administration and School Board endorsed the following plan summarized below:
•
•
•
Keep and remodel the elementary school to serve K to grade 4 students (adding pre-K in the
future). Remodeling will improve safety/security, address educational adequacy deficiencies and
improve air quality.
Close the middle school and move grade 5 to 8 students to the existing high school that will be
remodeled to improve safety/security, address educational adequacy deficiencies and improve air
quality.
Build a new high school for 9-12 students adjacent to the current high school to maximize
efficiencies of space and encourage community use of the school while maintaining a safe/secure
learning environment for students.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8
Hermantown Elementary School Deficiencies & Assessment Information
Hermantown Elementary School
Educational Adequacy Assessment:
Classroom Size/Suitability:
MN Dept of Education guidelines indicate 850-950 sq. ft. in an elementary classrooms for
approximately 25-30 students, and 1200 sq. ft. for kindergarten classrooms. Adequate storage, a sink
with hot and cold water, and adequate number of electrical outlets are also essential. All classrooms at
Hermantown Elementary are adequately sized, with the exception of 2 kindergarten rooms that are
875 sq. ft. each. All classrooms and other instructional spaces have Smartboards, 2-3 computer drops
and 4-5 electrical outlets. Classrooms have a sink and water fountain. In addition, several of the
classrooms have a washroom. Storage is adequate in many classrooms, yet inadequate in eight grade
2 and 3 classrooms. Upgrades from coat room hooks to “cubbies” in the coatroom area would
increase privacy/space for each child’s belongings and increase the available storage above the
cubbies.
Cafeteria/Kitchen/Serving:
MDE guidelines indicate 12-13 sq. ft. per elementary student, with a full prep kitchen of 1000-2000
sq. ft., and a serving only kitchen of 500-1000 sq. ft. The gymnasium at Hermantown Elementary also
serves as the cafeteria for approximately 2 hours each day. While the cafeteria dining space is
adequate, physical education time in the gym is significantly impacted. The kitchen area of
approximately 775 sq. ft. is undersized, with much of the equipment somewhat outdated.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9
Hermantown Elementary School Deficiencies & Assessment Information (Continued)
Building Security & Supervision:
MDE guidelines include magnetic or electronically controlled locking system for all doors, one
visitor entrance, adjacent to the main office with a monitor camera, and I.D. card access. All doors are
electronically controlled, with I.D card access, with the exception of the main entrance to the
building. While this entrance is in close proximity to the main office, the only supervision is a 4x4
window, allowing the secretary a view of visitors entering.
Main Office/Nurse/Support Services:
MDE guidelines indicate approximately 200 sq. ft. for a main office reception/waiting area, 200 sq. ft.
for a principal’s office, 100 sq. ft. for a secretarial work station, approximately 200 sq. ft. for a
work/mail room, and 150 sq. ft. for a conference room. School nurse and health services area are to
be 400-500 sq. ft., with sink/washroom, locking medicine storage, a nurse and assistant area, and a
cot room area. The office reception/waiting area and the secretary work station total over 400 sq. ft.,
with approximately 150 sq. ft. for the principal’s office, and approximately 400 sq. ft. for nurse/cot
area/washroom. The office area also has a conference room of 150 sq. ft. All office spaces are
adequate.
Science/Art
With the increase in a “hands-on” curriculum in elementary schools, MDE recommends separate or
combined art and science rooms for learning activities that cannot adequately be provided in
classrooms. An art/science room should be 1000-1200 sq. ft. for approximately 25-30 students, with
adequate storage, kiln area, sinks, etc. The Hermantown Elementary art space of 870 sq. ft. is
undersized, although it does have 2 sinks, and adequate storage. There is ample natural light provided
by large windows. The kiln should be in a separate small room or area. While science FOSS kits have
a large, organized storage space, science instruction is limited to general purpose classrooms.
Music Classrooms/Practice Areas/etc:
MDE recommendations indicate a space of 1100-1200 sq. ft. for elementary music with adequate
instrument/other music equip storage, and acoustical treatment to eliminate disruption to other
instructional areas. The music room (967 sq. ft.) is undersized, yet has adequate storage and high
ceilings that provide adequate acoustics.
Teacher/Staff Collaborative Planning Areas:
MDE guidelines suggest planning workstations of approximately 10-20 sq. ft. per teacher/ staff
members, teacher aides, and volunteers for conference, kitchenette, storage, and printing and copying,
with privacy toilets adjacent to the staff dining/break room area. The staff lounge at Hermantown
Elementary is a large (867 sq. ft.) and adequately furnished space, with natural light, and in close
proximity to staff washrooms. The staff workroom is across the hall from the main office. At almost
800 sq. ft. it is adequately sized, but the presence of a vault (179 sq. ft.) in the middle of the space is
less than optimal.
Student Commons/Break-Out Areas:
MDE guidelines indicate that common resource and support spaces permit teachers to use a wider
variety of instructional styles in working with students with different learning styles. Important
elements include adequate spaces of 150-200 sq. ft. for small groups, team learning, and conferences.
There is a large multi-purpose room (2139 sq. ft.), but it is heavily scheduled, allowing little time for
small groups, tutoring, team learning, etc. There are no other student breakout/small group areas,
beyond the classrooms and hallway.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10
Physical Education/Athletics/Locker Rooms:
MDE guidelines indicate an elementary gymnasium of 6000-8000 sq. ft. for 30-60 students with two
stations of approximately 3000-4000 sq. ft. Adequate storage and office space is also important. The
one station gymnasium is significantly undersized (4158) for a full range of physical education
activities, and also serves as the school cafeteria for 2 hours each day. The physical education
instructor must set-up and tear down equipment frequently, and teaches kindergarten classes in the
multipurpose area. Storage space for equipment is limited to a small room off of the stage.
Site Suitability: Fields/Green Space, Playgrounds, etc:
MDE suggests that to provide adequate spaces for outdoor elementary physical education and sports
activities, a minimum of 6.8 acres be set aside for field spaces/playground and transition areas
between fields. This school has very adequate outdoor space, with 2 large apparatus/playground areas
(each over 10,000 sq f) 2 large blacktop areas basketball, 4 square and other games, and large green
space/grass area. A roof covered outdoor classroom is just adjacent to the green space area.
Unfortunately, neither apparatus/playground area is handicapped accessible, one with rubber chips,
and the other with pea stone as ground cover.
Parking and Bus Drop-off: Staff/Students Parents:
MDE guidelines include adequate staff/parent and bus parking based upon enrollment and size of
performance spaces/ gymnasiums etc. Separate bus and staff/parent areas are important with clear
entries and exits. Parking lots should be located where easy and direct visual observation is possible.
It is also important to keep vehicle traffic out of sports and play areas. Hermantown Elementary has
separate parent/bus drop-off/pick-up areas, with ample staff/visitor parking spaces. (approximately
120 spaces). With parent car access in front of the building and bus access in the side lot, there has
been some discussion about the best use of these spaces for busses and parents. Event/program
parking is limited, with many cars parked on Arrowhead Road during these occasions.
Technology:
MDE states the following regarding technology: “Technology needs to be made available to students,
staff, and community users in increasingly diverse forms and settings, including classrooms,
library/media centers, offices and support spaces, as well as in computer labs.” All classrooms and
other instructional spaces at Hermantown Elementary have Smartboards and 2 to 3 computer drops
per room. The computer lab is undersized (691 sq. ft.), but with rapid changes in technology to
wireless access w/ iPads and movable carts, labs may undergo significant changes in the future.
Library/Media Center: Location/Size/Layout:
MDE recommendations for an elementary library/media center are approximately 2500 sq. ft.,
including entrance/circulation and distribution area, seating/stacks/computer access, classroom/story
area and office/workspace. The library/media center (1706 sq. ft.) is undersized for circulation,
stacks, story area, etc. The workroom/storage area (294 sq. ft.) is small, but functional.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11
Special Education/Support Spaces:
MDE guidelines indicate 450 sq. ft. for 5-8 students in an individualized instruction setting, and 8001000 sq. ft. in a classroom setting. Students with severe disabilities and/or personal hygiene issues
need separate self-contained rooms, and spaces for sinks, toilets, diapering, showering, changing,
and laundry. Spaces for a time-out and physical therapy may also be necessary. Special education
spaces for EBD (430 sq. ft.), LD(420 sq. ft.), DCD (480 sq. ft.), Speech/Language (243 sq. ft.), and
OT (420 sq. ft.) are adequate. PT uses the multipurpose center.
Auditorium/Performing Arts Spaces:
MDE guidelines indicate an elementary performance area with seating for 250 of approximately 2500
sq. ft., and a stage/performance area of 1500 – 2000 sq. ft.. The gymnasium at Hermantown
Elementary (4158 sq. ft.) serves as the auditorium/performance area. It does have a 720 sq. ft. fixed
stage, providing good viewing, although physical education instruction is impacted during these
times.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12
Facilities Assessment:
Site & Hard Surfaces Assessment
An evaluation of the existing parking lots, driveways, sidewalks, concrete slabs, curbs and gutters
was performed at each of the District’s facilities to determine an appropriate pavement and exterior
concrete maintenance plan, schedule and short-term replacement budget. All of the areas were
visually inspected, assessed and prioritized for immediate or future repair, re-surfacing or
replacement. No immediate-need items in the assessment were selected or scheduled as a part of this
project.
ADA / Accessibility Assessment
All aspects of accessibility related to each building and site were reviewed for compliance with
current building codes and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Staff toilets throughout the building have violations with turning radius, grab bars, required
clearances, and required approaches. One pair of staff toilet rooms on each side of the building (four
total), would be remodeled to meet ADA requirements.
Building Envelope Assessment
All of the existing roofing sections and exterior walls throughout the District were surveyed and
evaluated to determine the most immediate needs for repair and replacement. Window and door
replacements were identified through a combination of District personnel interviews and field
inspections.
The most critical building envelope deficiencies that were noted and selected are replacing weather
strips and seals on all exterior doors and selected interior doors. Re-sealing of selected roof vents.
Interior Finishes Assessment
While the District’s buildings have been well-maintained, the interior finishes including flooring,
ceilings, walls and casework in the Elementary School were found to be in good condition. The
condition of existing interior doors and hardware were also evaluated and deemed to be in good
condition.
Mechanical Assessment
There are a significant number of mechanical issues and systems that were evaluated as a part of the
mechanical facility assessment. The primary focal points are the evaluation of the heating systems
and ventilation systems and their adequacy in efficiently meeting the District’s educational, comfort
and energy needs. The remainder of the analysis was segmented into evaluation of dehumidification
systems, deferred maintenance needs, building automation system improvements, plumbing, piping
and domestic water items.
Service technicians inspected the majority of the mechanical equipment to determine equipment that
needs to be cleaned, repaired, replaced and calibrated as needed to restore operational systems and
components.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13
The most significant deficiencies that were noted and selected for improvements are:
• Classroom spaces served by unit ventilators (1960 and 1964 addition) and the library suffer
from inadequate ventilation and exhaust (as measured by a test and balancing contractor), poor
air filtration and air movement, and fan noise. New central air-handling ventilation systems
with variable-air-volume (VAV) boxes would be installed to provide individual room control.
• The kitchen cooler condenser is a once through cooler, which is prohibited by current energy
code. Provide a new cooler compressor and roof-mounted condensing unit.
• Replace the remaining original domestic water galvanized piping – most was recently replaced
and this allocation would complete the retrofit
• Upgrades to the existing building automation system and replacement of outdated pneumatic
controls system components
• Addition of a sprinkler fire protection system to cover the entire building. Currently only the
boiler room and kitchen areas are covered
Electrical Assessment
An overall electrical assessment of each building was performed with respect to electrical service,
capacity and panels, lighting, motor controllers and miscellaneous sub-systems.
Specific electrical deficiencies noted and selected include:
• Replacement of main service transformer and switchboard
• Replacement of 1960 & 1964 service panels throughout except for the media center and
multipurpose rooms
• Replacement of battery-pack egress lighting with new emergency lighting
Fire & Security Assessment
The existing fire protection, fire alarm and security systems were evaluated to determine compliance
with building codes and fire and life safety standards. A combination of District staff interviews and
field inspections were used to evaluate the need and desire for security cameras, access control and
intrusion alarms.
Specific deficiency items that were noted and selected include:
• Upgrade the existing fire alarm system with a new analog addressable system. The current
conventional, hard-wired zoned system lacks point by point identification and has limited
flexibility for expansion and service
• Upgrade the existing electronic key access control system – re-using existing devices but
enhancing management and scheduling of doors, access and lockdown
Technology Assessment
The Districts planning consultant collaborated with Compudyne, whom has previously assisted the
District with technology upgrades, to determine appropriate technology upgrades to enhance delivery
of K-12 education. Only upgrading of technology infrastructure have been selected or scheduled as a
part of this project.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14
Hermantown Middle School Deficiencies & Assessment Information
Hermantown Middle School
MN Dept of Education guidelines indicate 850-950 sq. ft. in a classroom for approximately 25
students. Most classrooms with the exception of the 1992 addition (850 sq. ft. per room) are
undersized at 635-750 sq. ft. and lack appropriate storage space with limited technology and electrical
support.
MDE guidelines indicate 12-16 sq. ft. per middle school student, with a full prep kitchen of 10003000 sq. ft., and a serving only kitchen of 500-1000 sq. ft. The cafeteria serving and prep area are
undersized at 1,617 sq. ft. which limits the ability to provide on-site preparation and increases serving
time. The cafeteria also serves as a teaching station for physical education at 3,126 sq. ft. is
undersized as a cafeteria and as a gymnasium.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15
Hermantown Middle School Deficiencies & Assessment Information (Continued)
MDE guidelines include magnetic or electronically controlled locking system for all doors, one
visitor entrance, adjacent to the main office with a monitor camera, and I.D. card access. The main
entrance is not adjacent to the office for supervision. Due to parking and parent drop-off there are
two major entrances and limited supervision at both locations. Remodeling and additions to the
building has created multiple hallways and access points limiting the ability of staff to adequately
supervise all corridors and stairways.
MDE guidelines indicate approximately 300 sq. ft. for main office reception/waiting area, 200 sq. ft.
work/mail room, and a 200 sq. ft. conference room. School nurse and health services area should be
approximately 700 sq. ft. with sink/washroom, locking cabinets and cot areas. The nurse area has one
cot in a confined space (218 sq. ft.) with limited privacy for students and the nurse. The main office
reception area is adequate (537 sq. ft.) but available support offices and conference areas are limited.
Science Classrooms/Labs;
Science lab/classrooms have a 1200-1400 square footage recommendation from MDE. A teacher
demonstration table and additional storage/counter space with sinks is recommended. Science
lab/classrooms are under-sized (737 to 851 sq. ft.) and lack appropriate storage, water access and
counter space. Demonstration areas, better ventilation and additional electrical outlets are necessary.
Art Classroom/labs:
MDE guidelines indicate 1200-1500 square footage with additional space for kiln, storage and office
area. Cabinetry should include storage and additional sinks for student work. The art classroom is
adequate at 1,524 sq. ft.. Some storage and support spaces are also available. Separation of kiln area
is a concern along with ventilation of the area. Additional sink areas have been identified by staff as a
need.
Music Classroom/Practice Areas/etc:
MDE recommendations indicate a space of 1500-2000 sq. ft. for instrumental and 1200-1500 sq. ft.
for choral music. Location should be in an area that is easily accessible to performance areas and
minimizes noise for classrooms. The instrumental area is slightly under sized (1,256 sq. ft.) and lacks
adequate practice rooms and instrument storage. The vocal music room is undersized (938 sq. ft.) and
lacks appropriate acoustics. The risers in the vocal music area are in disrepair. Music for the lower
grades is taught in an undersized traditional classroom.
Teacher/Staff Collaborative Planning Area:
MDE guidelines suggest planning workstations of approximately 10-20 sq. ft. per teacher/itinerant
staff members, teacher aides, and volunteers for conference, kitchenette, storage, and printing and
copying, with privacy toilets adjacent to the staff dining/break room area. The teacher planning area is
under sized with poor adjacency to most staff teaching areas and the staff lounge. Teacher
washrooms are all located on the 2nd floor.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16
variety of instructional styles in working with students with different learning styles. Important
elements include adequate spaces of 150-200 sq. ft. for small groups, team learning, and conferences.
There are no spaces dedicated for small group/breakout space in the middle school.
MDE guidelines indicate a 2 station middle school gymnasium of 12,000 to 14,000 sq. ft. for 30-60
students with an auxiliary gym of about 7000-8000 sq. ft. One gym station is available at 5,806 sq. ft.
which is less than the recommended size. Locker rooms are located in proximity to the gymnasium
and are adequate for the current class sizes. Additional locker rooms for team sports are on the lower
level and lack appropriate ventilation, lighting and humidity control. Office areas are located in the
locker rooms which allow for good supervision but poor access for students of the opposite gender
who may need to contact their instructor.
Site Suitability - Fields/Green Space, Playgrounds, etc:
MDE suggests that to provide adequate spaces for outdoor elementary physical education and sports
activities, a minimum of 34 acres be set aside for field spaces/playground and transition areas
between fields. Adequate outdoor spaces are available for school use adjacent to the school site with
playground equipment and open field space. The quality of the turf on fields is a safety concern for
staff.
Parking and Bus Drop-off - Staff/Students/Parents:
entries and exits. Parking lots should be located where easy and direct visual observation is possible.
Adequate parking is available for staff and visitors. Separate bus and parent drop-off is available
however the separation does cause a security/supervision issue for the site.
Technology:
library/media centers, offices and support spaces, as well as in computer labs.” Recommendations for
computer labs indicate approximately 1000-1200 sq. ft. for 20-30 students. Computer labs are
available to students and staff. Most classrooms have access to smart board technology. Rapid
changes in wireless technology and hardware may require additional modification to computer lab
stations.
Library/Media Center - Location/Size/Layout:
MDE recommendations for a middle school media center are approximately 2500 sq. ft., including
entrance/circulation and distribution area, seating/stacks/computer access, classroom/story area and
office/workspace. The size of the media center (2,128 sq. ft.) is slightly under sized and adjacency to
computer labs limits the ability to supervise both spaces or for easy transitions for students and staff.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17
Special Education/Support Services:
MDE guidelines indicate 450 sq. ft. for 5-8 students in an individualized instruction setting, and 8001000 sq. ft. in a classroom setting. Students with severe disabilities and/or personal hygiene issues
need separate self-contained rooms, and spaces for sinks, toilets, diapering, showering, changing,
and laundry. Spaces for a time-out and physical therapy may also be necessary. Special education
spaces do not meet guidelines and available space for student personal needs and behavioral needs is
not adequate.
Auditorium/Performance Arts Spaces:
MDE guidelines indicate the importance of providing an area for school performances. An
auditorium with a stage and seating for approximately 250 would be approximately 4500 sq. ft.. This
would not include optional areas such as dressing rooms, make-up rooms, costume storage and scene
shop. The gymnasium has a bleacher area which serves as a performance space (auditorium) for
school functions.
Career and Technical Education
MDE guidelines indicate the technical education area should consist of a shop area of 2000-3000 sq.
ft. with appropriate ventilation and storage areas. Family and Consumer Science areas should be
1200-1500 sq. ft. with appropriate storage and work stations dependent on curriculum. A shop area is
available that meets space guidelines (1,776 and 1,063) along with an adequately sized FACS
classroom and lab area (1,199 sq. ft.). Equipment for current and future programming requires
upgrading with additional power and ventilation improvements in all areas.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20
replacement.
Key deficiencies are indicated below:
• Parking lot repair or replacement of concrete surfaces at several locations due to deterioration
and fatigue.
current building codes and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). As building renovations
occur or replacements are scheduled for items such as gymnasium bleachers or auditorium seating,
these items will need to be corrected.
Specific areas of non-compliance or concerns include:
• Counter-height modifications are needed for the 1991 classroom addition area and the nurse
room.
• Limited or no sink and work surface accessibility and knee clearances in the science
classroom and art room.
• NW student toilet rooms do not have at least one ADA compliant stall.
• Locker room toilet stalls do not have adequate stall widths or grab bars nor do sinks meet the
required approach.
• There are no ADA compliant food lab stations in the food labs
• Inadequate approach for drinking fountains in hallways.
• Insufficient wood cabinet hardware for pulls for all built-in wood cabinetry
inspections.
The most critical building envelope deficiencies noted are:
• The 1992 addition single-ply roofing segment is at the end of its expected life and should be
replaced.
• Deterioration of most of the varied build-year window vintages not recently replaced.
• Identified exterior hollow-metal doors and their associated glazing and transoms are in need of
replacement.
• Replace weather strips on exterior doors.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21
While the District’s buildings have been well-maintained, many of the interior finishes including
flooring, ceilings, walls and casework are out of date and are showing signs of wear. The condition
of existing interior doors and hardware were also evaluated.
Interior finishes that have been identified as priority replacements or upgrades are:
• Replacement of door hardware and locksets for ADA compliance, security improvements and
reduced numbers and variety of locksets.
• Replacement of media center carpet.
• Replacement of media center and lab casework.
• Remediation of flood damage on lower level.
• Replacement of wood door frames, wainscot, and base in the 1938 building.
• Replacement of sinks in the 1991 student toilet rooms.
• Replacement of kitchen serving doors, cabinetry, and ceilings.
• Replacement of choir room risers.
• Replacement of gymnasium and cafeteria wall finishes.
• Replacement of locker room finishes and doors.
• Repair of corridor wall, ceiling, and VCT floor finishing materials.
• Replacement of classroom ceiling tile.
systems, maintenance needs, building automation system improvements, plumbing, piping and
domestic water items.
Separate sections at the beginning of this report summarize the utility analysis and results from the
comfort and energy survey.
components.
The most significant deficiencies noted are:
• Classroom spaces served by unit ventilators suffer from inadequate ventilation (as measured by
a test and balancing contractor) and exhaust, poor air filtration and air movement, and fan noise
• Upgrades to the existing building automation system and replacement of any outdated
pneumatic controls system components.
• Existing domestic water galvanized piping should be considered for replacement; the
deterioration of this original piping system can result in increased lead levels in the drinking
water.
• Addition of a sprinkler fire protection system to cover the entire building. Currently only the
boiler room and kitchen areas are covered.
• Properly ventilate the FACS lab dryer.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22
Additional items that need to be reviewed and prioritized are:
• Consider the addition of dehumidification control to meet ASHRAE standard design
conditions and for moisture control.
Specific electrical deficiencies noted include:
• Replacement of panels and feeders throughout except for the media center
• Replacement of battery pack egress lighting with new.
• Electrical service revisions as needed to meet building ventilation and system upgrades.
intrusion alarms.
Specific deficiency items include:
• Limited access control flexibility; the MS has limited access control, managing eight exterior
entrances.
In the case of an emergency building lockdown, the inability of the staff to lock the doors from within
their classrooms was also raised by multiple District personnel.
The districts planning consultant collaborated with Compudyne, whom currently assists the district
with technology upgrades, to determine appropriate technology upgrades to enhance delivery of K-12
education. Many of these items are district wide and are only shown in the Administration Building
section of this book.
Specific deficiencies identified include:
• Addition of WLAN switches to support current demand from and anticipated increase in
wireless devices.
Additional items that need to be reviewed and prioritized are:
• Replacement of battery backup power supplies in the data closet.
• Replacement of switches with Gigabit switching.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23
Hermantown High School Deficiencies & Assessment Information
Hermantown High School
MN Dept of Education guidelines indicate 850-950 sq. ft. in a secondary classroom for approximately
20-28 students. Adequate storage, natural daylight electrical outlets, computer drops, and a smart
board are important factors for a secondary school classroom. Classrooms are undersized (10
classrooms are 713 sq. ft.) based on current use and class sizes.
MDE guidelines indicate 12-16 sq. ft. per middle/high school student, with a full prep kitchen of 15002500 sq. ft., and a serving only kitchen of 750-1000 sq. ft. Cafeteria serving area is under sized and
lacks space to meet current menu guidelines. No space is available for full scale dish washing.
Proximity to loading and storage is adequate. Seating area is small (3,645 sq. ft.) with elevation
changes and locker areas in the cafeteria.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24
Hermantown High School Deficiencies & Assessment Information (Continued)
MDE guidelines include magnetic or electronically controlled locking system for all doors, one visitor
entrance, adjacent to the main office with a monitor camera, and I.D. card access. With some
modifications, the main entrance to the building could be secured, however multiple entrances are
open with easy access and no electronic control of entrances. Stairwells are narrow which may
constrict student flow in an emergency.
MDE guidelines indicate approximately 300 sq. ft. for main office reception/waiting area, 200 sq. ft.
work/mail room, and a 200 sq. ft. conference room. School nurse and health services area should be
approximately 700 sq. ft. with sink/washroom, locking cabinets and cot areas. The main office area is
adequately sized at 878 sq. ft. Traffic flow and layout are a concern for office staff. Nurse area is
under-sized (218 sq. ft.) with no separation between cots and work station.
Science Classrooms/Labs:
MDE recommends 1200-1500 sq. ft. for 24 students in a classroom/lab. Additional space for lab
preparation, storage of specimens, chemicals and other materials is necessary. Science labs are small
for current class sizes ranging from 903 sq. ft. to 1,061 sq. ft. Support spaces and cabinetry are
provided for work stations but adequate electrical and technology access is limited.
Art Classroom/Labs:
MDE guidelines indicate 1200-1500 sq. ft. for 20-28 students in a multipurpose, drawing/painting or
ceramics room, with an additional 400 sq. ft. for a kiln and a glazing/clay/damp room, and 350 sq. ft.
for storage. Ceilings should be 10-14 ft high, with proper ventilation and exhaust hood to handle
fumes, odors, dust, and contaminant vapors. Multiple sinks are also necessary. Art classrooms are
adequate at 1514 and 1455 sq. ft. with one teacher using both spaces they meet the needs of current
programming.
Music Classrooms/Practice Areas/etc:
MDE recommendations indicate a space of 1500-1800 sq. ft., with ceilings of 16’- 20’ for 60-75
students in choral music, and 2000-2500 sq. ft. with 18’- 22’ high ceilings for 60-75 students in
instrumental music. Practice rooms, a music library room, and adequate instrument storage are also
important considerations. The music classrooms are adequate at 1,995 sq. ft. and 1,246 sq. ft. with
support spaces of 1,185 sq. ft.
Teacher/Staff Collaborative Planning Area:
MDE guidelines suggest planning/workstations of approximately 10-20 sq. ft. per teacher/itinerant
staff member, teacher aides, and volunteers for conference, kitchenette, storage, and printing and
copying, with privacy toilets adjacent to the staff dining/break room area. Teacher planning and break
room are located near the cafeteria and office area but are undersized. Washrooms for staff are located
near planning area. No washrooms or planning area were identified for staff on the second floor.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25
variety of instructional styles in working with students, and enable individual or groups of students to
work independently on projects. Size recommendations include 15 sq. ft. per student in a large group
space, 1500-2000 square feet for 125-175 students in a team learning space. Current student commons
is limited to the cafeteria area. Hallways are small with little potential for small group work.
MDE guidelines indicate a middle/high school gymnasium of 12000-14000 sq. ft. with two stations of
approximately 6000-7000 sq. ft. Additional space is necessary for gymnastics, wrestling,
weights/fitness and locker rooms. The gymnasium is undersized at 10,893 sq. ft. Limited gym space
available at other schools leads to difficulty meeting athletic demands. The fitness area is also
undersized at 1,365 sq. ft. Locker rooms are adequately sized but have exiting issues for security and
access to field space.
Site Suitability - Fields/Green Space, Playgrounds, etc:
MDE suggests that to provide adequate spaces for outdoor high school physical education and sports
activities, approximately 40 acres be set aside for outdoor physical education, athletics, and
community recreational use activities. Some outdoor facilities are located adjacent to the school and
are adequate in size however; some athletic fields are off site and require students to walk along streets
to access. The quality of turf on practice fields is also a concern for staff. Students and staff have
asked for artificial turf on the stadium field due to over-use by the number of teams needing access.
Parking and Bus Drop-off - Staff/Students/Parents:
entries and exits. Parking lots should be located where easy and direct visual observation is possible. It
is also important to keep vehicle traffic out of sports and play areas. Adequate parking and bus
loading areas are available for staff and students.
Technology:
library/media centers, offices and support spaces, as well as in computer labs.” Recommendations for
computer labs indicate approximately 1000-1200 sq. ft. for 20-30 students. Computer labs are
available to students and staff. Most classrooms have access to smart board technology. Rapid
changes in wireless technology and hardware may require additional modification to computer lab
stations.
Library/Media Center - Location/Size/Layout:
MDE recommendations for a middle/high school library/media center are approximately 3200-3500
sq. ft., including entrance/circulation and distribution area, seating/stacks/computer access, classroom
area and office/workspace. The media center is adequately sized (4,854 sq. ft.) with appropriate
support spaces but is inconvenient for community use and lacks natural daylight. It is in a central
location near most classrooms.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26
Special Education/Support Spaces:
MDE guidelines indicate 450 sq. ft. for 5-8 students in an individualized instruction setting, and 8001000 sq. ft. for a classroom setting. Students with severe disabilities and/or personal hygiene issues
need separate self-contained rooms, and spaces for sinks, toilets, diapering, showering, changing, and
laundry. Spaces for a time-out and physical therapy may also be necessary. Special Education
classrooms are under sized and lack support spaces for life skills programs.
Auditorium/Performing Arts Spaces:
MDE guidelines indicate a middle/high school auditorium/performance area, including the stage, of
approximately 8000 sq. ft. for seating of approximately 500. This does not include optional areas such
as dressing rooms make-up rooms, costume storage and scene shop. The Auditorium is small with
limited seating (less than 300). It serves as a lecture hall and faculty meeting space.
Career and Technical Education:
MDE guidelines indicate 2000-3000 sq. ft. for up to 25 students in a Woods/construction or
Agribusiness classroom/lab. Diverse programming and dynamic changes to programming suggest the
need for flexible, large spaces with adequate ventilation and power supply. The Technical Education
area is adequate for a traditional woods program (2327 sq. ft.) with some space dedicated to computers
and robotics. Additional square footage is necessary for added programming to meet future
educational needs.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 27
replacement.
Key deficiencies identified and selected are indicated below:
• Asphalt parking lot and sidewalk repair or replacement at several locations due to
deterioration and fatigue.
• Concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter replacements at several locations.
• Installation of several ADA-compliant pedestrian ramps at curbs.
current building codes and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). As building renovations
occur or replacements are scheduled for items such as gymnasium bleachers or auditorium seating,
these items will need to be corrected.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28
Specific areas of non-compliance or immediate needs include:
• Remodel of locker room toilet stalls, urinals and sinks to meet ADA compliance.
• Remodel of main toilet rooms on the main and upper levels to meet State accessibility
requirements. Although several adjustments have been made, some grab bars, urinal heights
and sink level handles need to be adapted.
inspections.
The most critical building envelope deficiencies noted are:
• Replace weather strips and seals on exterior and interior doors, overhead doors and roof
vents.
While the District’s buildings have been well-maintained, many of the interior finishes including
flooring, ceilings, walls and casework are out of date and are showing signs of wear. The condition
of existing interior doors and hardware were also evaluated.
Interior finishes that were identified as priority replacements and selected for upgrades are:
• Replacement of all student toilet room partitions.
• Removal of all counter tops from student toilet rooms; Patch wall tiles and install new wallmounted sinks with ADA hardware.
systems, deferred maintenance needs, building automation system improvements, plumbing, piping
and domestic water items.
components.
The most significant mechanical deficiencies that were identified and selected are:
• Classroom spaces served by unit ventilators (1988 and 2000 addition) suffer from inadequate
ventilation and exhaust (as measured by a test and balancing contractor), poor air filtration
and air movement, and fan noise. New central air-handling ventilation systems with variableair-volume (VAV) boxes would be installed to provide individual room control.
• Replacement of ineffective gravity roof hoods that are causing water leaks.
• Add natural gas shutoff valves for three science labs.
• The art room, media center storage room, and auditorium mechanical room require revisions
to the sprinkler heads to comply with the required clearances.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29
Upgrades to the existing building automation system and replacement of out-dated pneumatic
controls system components.
•
The only specific electrical deficiency that was selected for inclusion is the replacement of batterypack egress lighting with new emergency lighting.
intrusion alarms.
Specific deficiency items that were noted and selected include:
• Upgrade the existing fire alarm system with a new analog addressable system. The current
conventional, hard-wired zoned system lacks point by point identification and has limited
flexibility for expansion and service.
• Upgrade the existing electronic key access control system – re-using existing devices but
enhancing management and scheduling of doors, access and lockdown.
The districts planning consultant collaborated with Compudyne, whom has previously assisted the
district with technology upgrades, to determine appropriate technology upgrades to enhance delivery
of K-12 education.
The most important improvement to technology that was selected for implementation is the addition
of more wireless switches to support both the current demand from and anticipated increase in
wireless devices.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 30
Benefits of New & Renovated Facilities
The benefits of this project are best described, not on a site-by-site basis, but as a whole for the entire
Hermantown District. The District's goal is to develop a long-range facilities plan impacting all the
District facilities.
Specific benefits of the plan include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Improved health and safety of students and staff.
School occupants are more protected during emergency situations.
Healthy indoor learning environments.
Facilities that comply with all applicable codes and regulations.
High performance learning environments.
Classroom dimensions conducive to learning and teaching styles.
State-of-the-art laboratory and vocational facilities.
Improved classroom technology capabilities.
Improved facility infrastructure.
Increased energy efficiency of facilities and equipment.
Improved reliability of technology systems and infrastructure.
Facilities designed for increased community use.
Facilities that address the needs of all students.
Adequate building access to students with special needs.
Learning spaces designed for integration of students with special needs.
Facilities designed to respond to a variety of learning styles/approaches.
Facility equity across the District.
Program equity between schools across the District Schools located in population
centers.
Maximize energy efficiency and green design for new buildings.
Improve transportation efficiencies and safety.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 31
4. The relationship of the projects to any priorities established by
a) the school district,
b) educational cooperatives that provide support services, or
c) other public bodies in the service area.
There has been significant history over the past 5 years that demonstrates the relationship of the overall
long range facility plan being presented and how it meets priorities established by the District, the
Community, educational support services and other government bodies. In 2009 Hermantown School
District 700 developed a facilities improvement plan that was presented to the voters and was rejected by
a wide margin. Through a leadership training project, a group of citizen leaders identified the facilities
needs again in 2010. In 2011, Advance Hermantown, a group of citizen volunteers dedicated to
improving our community, surveyed residents to identify the community’s highest priorities to continue
our great quality of life. Nearly 90% of survey respondents said education is a top priority and more than
63% stated that our school facilities are unacceptable and our kids and community deserve better. In the
fall of 2011, ISD 700 determined it is in the best interests of all students and residents of the District to
develop and implement a Long-range Facilities Plan. To develop the Long-range Facilities Plan, the
Board authorized the District’s administration, and it’s consultants to complete the public conversations
and research necessary to draft a Long-range Facilities Plan that supported the priorities of the
educational and community stakeholders.
Beginning in the Fall of 2012, assessments were conducted, in-depth reports were compiled and much
time and effort was invested in communicating with the community and gathering important feedback
relative to the District’s facilities and their role in education now and in the future. Multiple meetings
with organizations and groups, including parents, community members, staff and students were
conducted. A thorough and broad ranging expert analysis involving a great number of hours by
professional experts was conducted to assist the District in its evaluation. The District has also gathered
information via email, feedback forms, phone and one-on-one conversations.
The District and its consultants provided detailed reports to the School Board. One key report was an
Ideation Report (which can be found on the District’s website). The District held 14 input sessions with
various stakeholder groups. Students, administration, school board, support staff, parents, business
leaders, senior citizens, community members and teachers were all participants in gathering information
to help with the planning process. Clearly from the Ideation sessions, the Hermantown community values
education and wants value for their investments. Additional key findings from the stakeholder listening
sessions are listed below.
Overall key findings:
• Schools are the center and focal point of the community.
• Quality education is valued.
• Quality Teachers.
• Good parent involvement.
• Fiscally conservative community.
o value receiving for the taxes
o Show us the need
o Well thought out plan
o Shared spaces
o No band aids
• Difficult to communicate with residents.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 32
•
•
•
•
Value athletics.
Desire to enhance the arts/ theater.
Students see college as next step in life.
Entrepreneurial spirit exists.
Facility Issues and opportunities identified by listening sessions:
– Overall District facilities:
• Kitchen/cafeteria needs at all schools
• Healthy indoor environment / air quality needs all schools
• Desire/need for more gyms and enhanced athletic spaces
– General feeling Middle school has a lot of needs and may be at the tipping
point
• Rodents
• Air quality/mold
• Ceilings falling in
• 80 years old
– Early childhood
• Move to the elementary school or district campus desired
– High School
• building built too small
• Cafeteria commons area
• Auditorium needs
• Stairwells & corridors too small
• More gym space needed
• Turf field desired
– Elementary
• Parent drop-off improvements
• Air quality
• Breakout spaces
The District Administration and the School Board firmly believe the plan adopted by the School Board
best meets the District and stakeholder priorities even though items such as the turf field and the moving
of the early childhood center isn’t included in the current plan.
The Board is fundamentally committed to providing quality programming for all students and is
committed to using General Fund dollars efficiently and effectively. The Board recognizes the
educational adequacy and physical condition of the District’s facilities impacts educational programs.
The Board also recognizes the culture within each of the District’s schools is important and impacts the
quality of educational programs.
The Board and School Administration has worked with Community Education, the City of Hermantown
Administration and Council, the Hermantown Chamber, and specifically held meetings in Fredenberg
Township to gain insight and feedback to the overall plan and process. The district currently partners
with the Proctor School District with Community Education and implementation of this plan will
positively impact Community Education opportunities within the Hermantown schools with better spaces
conducive to Community Education. The District is also working with the YMCA for a potential
community partnership for the future.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 33
5. A description of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections between the school and nearby
residential areas that make it easier for children, teachers, and parents to get to school by
walking, bicycling, and taking transit.
The City of Hermantown is currently working on a Safe Routes to Schools grant in partnership with the
School District.
The proposed improvements will have minimal impact on the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections.
The scope of work is limited to the existing site acreage and the existing bicycle and walk paths to these
schools will remain in use. There is no existing mass transit systems serving this area and housing is
fairly sparse, with minimal density, near and around the schools.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 34
6. A specification of how the project will
a) maximize the opportunity for cooperative use of existing park, recreation, and other public
facilities, and
b) how the project will increase collaboration with other governmental or nonprofit entities.
The Hermantown Community School buildings are currently used extensively by varying community
groups. Addressing the deferred maintenance and health & safety projects and adding an addition to the
Hermantown Elementary school will extend the life of this building and keep this building safe and
comfortable for community members during the evening and weekend hours. Removing the existing
Middle school from use and moving the Middle School students (grades 5 – 8) into the existing High
School will improve safety/security, address educational adequacy deficiencies and improve air quality.
Building a new high school for 9-12 students adjacent to the current high school will maximize
efficiencies of space and encourage community use of the school while maintaining a safe/secure learning
environment for students.
List of the entities that would use the new and updated facilities:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Community Education
Youth Activities
Hermantown Girl Scouts
Hermantown Boy Scouts
Elementary PTO
Early Childhood
MN Firearm Safety
MN Association for Justice
Jr. Olympic Volleyball
National Guard
Senior Citizens
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 35
7. A narrative description of the project, including
a) the specification of site and outdoor space acreage as provided in the Guide for Planning
School Construction Projects in Minnesota. Only usable acreage should be included.
b) square footage allocations for new and converted classrooms, labs and support spaces,
c) a floor plan of the project, if applicable, .
d) estimated expenditures in reasonable detail for the project, and
e) the date(s) the project will begin and be completed.
As mentioned earlier, the Hermantown Community Schools has developed, with the help of a planning
consultant and citizen groups, a capital facilities plan outlining necessary facility improvements and
replacements. On June 24, 2013, the Administration and School Board endorsed the following plan
summarized below:
•
•
•
Keep and remodel the elementary school to serve K to grade 4 students (adding pre-K in the
future). Remodeling will improve safety/security, address educational adequacy deficiencies and
improve air quality.
Close the middle school and move grade 5 to 8 students to the existing high school that will be
remodeled to improve safety/security, address educational adequacy deficiencies and improve air
quality.
Build a new high school for 9-12 students adjacent to the current high school to maximize
efficiencies of space and encourage community use of the school while maintaining a safe/secure
learning environment for students.
The new High School, Middle School (existing High School) and Elementary School will now all reside
on the 191 acre site (75% is estimated usable land). Below is a table from the Guide for Planning School
Construction Projects in Minnesota. Based on the table and Hermantown Schools proposed District
configuration the guideline for site size would be between 70 and 90 acres (Elementary School + Middle
Level School + Small High School). Accounting for students and community use, this would add 21+
acres to the total.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 36
Hermantown Elementary School Projects
$3,305,601 (excluding financing costs)
The district and citizen facility committee prioritized projects from the elementary school assessment
information. A brief line item description and cost which includes any/all associated fees is shown in the
following table.
Hermantown Elementary School
Final Facilities & Finance Committee's Selected Priority Scopes of Work
Item #
2013
Estimated Cost
Deficiency Decription
Action
Priority
Installation Cost Including
Year
3% Inflation
ES-ADA-2
Staff Toilets
$
153,600
1
2014
$
ES-BE-3
Building Envelope Infiltration Reduction
$
6,560
1
2014
$
158,208
6,757
ES-M-1
H&V For 1960 Classrooms-VAV
$
870,400
1
2014
$
896,512
ES-M-3
$
1,132,800
1
2014
$
1,166,784
ES-M-5
H&V For Library
$
147,200
1
2014
$
151,616
ES-M-26
Three compartment sink
$
1,280
1
2014
$
1,318
ES-M-27
Once Through Cooler Compressor
$
12,800
1
2014
$
13,184
ES-M-28
Galvanized Domestic Water Piping
$
10,000
1
2014
$
10,300
ES-M-32
Fire Protection
$
294,400
1
2014
$
303,232
ES-M-33
1960 & 64 Building Automation System
$
117,760
1
2014
$
121,293
ES-M-34
1992 & 99 Building Automation System
$
16,000
1
2014
$
16,480
ES-E-1
Electrical Service
$
167,131
1
2014
$
172,145
ES-E-2
Electrical Panels
$
112,306
1
2014
$
115,675
ES-E-6
Egress Lighting and Exit Signs
$
71,085
1
2014
$
73,217
ES-FS-1
Electronic Access Control
$
19,200
1
2014
$
19,776
ES-FS-2
Fire Alarm System Upgrade
$
76,800
1
2014
$
79,104
$
3,209,322
$
3,305,601
Hermantown Elementary School - Selected Priority Scopes, Subtotals:
Hermantown Elementary Additions
Expand the existing Hermantown Elementary School through construction of six (6) standard classrooms,
three (3) kindergarten classrooms, gymnasium and kitchen serving area. Further refinement will occur
through continued staff and community input throughout the design process. The District acknowledges
the fact that the elementary school will still be a bit below MDE size guidelines, however, the biggest size
challenges within the school are being addressed with the addition of the gym which replaces the need for
the cafeteria to also serve as the gym. Also, two current classrooms that serve as K rooms will also free
up for other uses. In addition the kitchen serving expansion allows the cafeteria to be larger to
accommodate the additional students. Lastly, the District is moving away from the need for computer
labs in the future, which would allow for the media center to expand if necessary in the future. The
District is confident the size of the facility will meet its student needs for the foreseeable future. In
addition, the District's long range planning committee recommendation to the District was to restrict open
enrollment to address resident enrollment growth that might create any future capacity issues.
Six (6) standard classrooms addition, hallway
and a new set of restrooms
Three (3) kindergarten classrooms
Kitchen serving addition
Gymnasium
Office/storage for gymnasium
TOTAL
7,000 sq. ft.
$1,586,200
4,500 sq. ft.
1,500 sq. ft.
9,000 sq. ft.
580 sq. ft.
22,580 sq. ft.
$1,019,700
$611,820
$2,180,819
$5,398,539
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 37
The following diagram is provided as a potential conceptual configuration of the addition to the
elementary school to confirm fit within existing context and to provide visualization of the space
program. It is by no means indicative of the final project. Further refinement will occur through
continued staff and community input throughout the design process.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 38
Existing High School (New Middle School) Projects
The existing high school is to be remodeled to house the middle school (grades 5 – 8) students. The
district and citizen facility committee prioritized projects from the high school assessment information.
A brief line item description and cost which includes any/all associated fees is shown in the following
table.
Hermantown High School
Final Facilities & Finance Committee's Selected Priority Scopes of Work
Item #
Deficiency Decription
HS-S-2
HS-S-3
HS-S-4
HS-S-6
HS-S-7
HS-S-8
HS-S-9
HS-SS-1
HS-SS-2
HS-SP-1
HS-ADA-3
HS-ADA-4
HS-BE-4
HS-IF-43
HS-IF-44
HS-M-1
HS-M-3
HS-M-7
HS-M-8
HS-M-31
HS-M-32
HS-M-33
HS-E-3
HS-FS-1
HS-FS-2
HS-T-1
Asphalt & Concrete Repair
Concrete, ADA Ramp Repair
Asphalt Pavement
Concrete & Drainage Repair
Concrete Sidewalk and Drainage Repair
Asphalt Sidewalk Repair
Asphalt, Concrete Sidewalk, and ADA ped
Concrete Sidewalk Repair
Concrete Sidewalk Repair
Parking Lot Pavement
Locker Room Toilets
Toilet Rooms
Building Envelope Infiltration Reduction
Toilet Room Partitions
Toilet Room Sink Counters
Gravity Roof Hoods
Dryers Improperly Connected
Natural Gas Shut-off Valves
Fire Protection Sprinkler Heads
Building Wide Building Automation System
Egress Lighting and Exit Sign
Upgrade Elec. Key System to Access Control System
Fire Alarm System Upgrade
Wireless
Hermantown High School - Selected Priority Scope:
2013
Estimated Cost
$
20,565
$
59,350
$
8,791
$
550
$
3,588
$
16,707
$
712,096
$
4,576
$
915
$
38,995
$
25,600
$
25,600
$
8,672
$
23,040
$
30,720
$
3,072,000
$
390,400
$
64,000
$
2,560
$
4,480
$
3,200
$
128,000
$
145,887
$
23,040
$
192,000
$
38,400
$
5,043,732
Action
Priority
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Installation Cost Including
Year
3% Inflation
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
$
21,182
$
61,131
$
9,055
$
567
$
3,695
$
17,208
$
733,459
$
4,713
$
943
$
40,165
$
26,368
$
26,368
$
8,932
$
23,731
$
31,642
$
3,164,160
$
402,112
$
65,920
$
2,637
$
4,614
$
3,296
$
131,840
$
150,263
$
23,731
$
197,760
$
39,552
$
5,195,044
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 39
New Hermantown High School
As mentioned, the existing high school will now house the grade 5 – 8 middle school students. In order
to house the grade 9 – 12 students, an addition (the “New” high school) will be connected to the existing
high school facility. The new high school would be configured to house Grades 9 to 12 and is planned to
be 134,425 square feet based on the Minnesota Department of Education document “Guide for Planning
New Construction Projects” and the input and feedback from the school district’s Facilities and Finance
Committees.
Key features that were considered and selected for inclusion with the new high school are:
• Three station gymnasiums
• A 680-seat auditorium
• There are efficiencies in planning, design and function through the use of shared spaces between
the HS and MS building that allow for more efficient use of the space and elimination of
potentially duplicated spaces (approximately 20,000 sq. ft.). Specific examples include kitchen,
music spaces, auditorium, etc.
The following pages describe the preliminary program for the grades 9-12 section of the proposed facility.
Further refinement will occur through continued staff and community input throughout the design
process.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 40
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 41
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 42
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 43
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 44
The following diagram is provided as a potential conceptual configuration of a new high school to
confirm fit within existing context and to provide visualization of the space program. It is by no means
indicative of the final project. Further refinement will occur through continued staff and community input
throughout the design process.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 45
Complete Project Summary
All work outlined in the section is scheduled for design to commence shortly after voter approval. The
majority of the construction will take place starting the summer of 2014 and continue to the fall of 2015
for substantial completion.
Site
Existing Elementary
Elementary Additions
Existing HS (New Middle School)
New High School
Total
Expenditure
$3,305,601
$5,398,539
$5,195,044
$34,562,164
$48,461,349
The total project cost comes to $48,461,349. This excludes bonding costs. Adding bonding costs,
capitalized interest and rounding amount brings the total issuance to $48,895,000. An estimated
expenditure breakdown by fiscal year is as follows:
Fiscal Year
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
Total
Expenditure
$8,000,000
$36,000,000
$4,895,000
$48,895,000
It is the districts intent to initially consider partnerships with the City or Community for use of the
existing middle school. In the event no viable partnerships are agreed to after two years of vacancy, it is
the districts intent to demolish the existing building utilizing its capital funds or any remaining bond
proceeds. Vacant land could then be used for green space or future athletic fields. Continued input from
the community and district will ultimately determine its final use.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 46
8. The source(s) of financing the project;
a) if multiple sources of funding are to be used, provide all components of the financing plan,
b) scheduled date and required notice for a bond issue or school board action,
c) a schedule of bond payments, including estimated debt service equalization aid,
d) the effect of a bond issue (or lease levy) on local property taxes by property class and
valuation,
e) total project cost must include:
i. total construction cost, and
ii. bond issuance/financing costs (if applicable), and
f) other financing information as required:
i. Alternative Facilities Bonding and Levy funded projects should be described in
sufficient detail to allow cross-walking between the review and comment, the
alterative facilities database, and UFARS reporting.
ii. Health and safety projects should be described in sufficient detail to allow crosswalking between the review and comment, health and safety database, and UFARS
reporting.
Pursuant to State and Voter approval of the project, the school board of Independent School District No.
700, Hermantown shall be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount
not to exceed $48,895,000. The summary can be seen below:
Name of Issue
Dated Date
Project Amount
G.O. School Building
Bonds, Series 2014A
02/01/2014
$48,461,349
Total Borrowing
Amount
$48,895,000
VOTER APPROVAL
The District intends to ask permission this fall from the voter’s via a school building bond referendum to
fund identified projects with the above listed bond issue.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 47
OUSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS
The District’s General Obligation Debt Summary is shown below.
Fiscal
Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Existing
Debt
634,368.76
638,168.76
629,568.76
337,800.00
340,800.00
343,200.00
STATE DEBT EQUALIZATION
The District does not expect to receive State debt equalization based on their annual future debt payment
are not expected to fall into the second tier of equalization.
SECTION 8 AUTHORS
Northland Securities, Inc. has prepared the documents along with ISD #700, Hermantown in Section 8 of
this Review and Comment request. Please contact Patrick Chaffey, Director of Business along with
Michael Hoheisel or Matthew Rantapaa with any questions or for more information.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 48
$48,895,000 G.O. SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS, SERIES 2014A
The sources and uses of funds and net debt service schedule for the $48,895,000 General Obligation School
Building Bonds, Series 2014A are shown below:
Sources & Uses
Dated 04/01/2014 | Delivered 04/01/2014
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds
$48,895,000.00
Total Source s
$48,895,000.00
Uses Of Funds
T otal Underwriter's Discount (0.600%)
Costs of Issuance
Deposit to Project Construction Fund
Rounding Amount
293,370.00
137,765.00
48,461,349.00
2,516.00
Total Use s
$48,895,000.00
Net Debt Service Schedule
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+I
Existing D/S
Net New D/S
02/01/2015
02/01/2016
02/01/2017
02/01/2018
02/01/2019
02/01/2020
02/01/2021
02/01/2022
02/01/2023
02/01/2024
02/01/2025
02/01/2026
02/01/2027
02/01/2028
02/01/2029
02/01/2030
02/01/2031
02/01/2032
02/01/2033
02/01/2034
02/01/2035
02/01/2036
02/01/2037
02/01/2038
02/01/2039
955,000.00
710,000.00
1,045,000.00
1,090,000.00
1,135,000.00
1,230,000.00
1,290,000.00
1,355,000.00
1,420,000.00
1,495,000.00
1,580,000.00
1,660,000.00
1,750,000.00
1,850,000.00
1,955,000.00
2,060,000.00
2,180,000.00
2,305,000.00
2,430,000.00
2,570,000.00
3,020,000.00
3,185,000.00
3,355,000.00
3,540,000.00
3,730,000.00
1.200%
1.350%
1.550%
1.750%
1.950%
2.250%
2.550%
2.750%
2.950%
3.100%
3.250%
3.400%
3.550%
3.700%
3.800%
3.900%
4.000%
4.050%
4.100%
4.150%
4.200%
4.250%
4.300%
4.350%
4.400%
1,474,106.25
1,757,467.50
1,747,882.50
1,731,685.00
1,712,610.00
1,690,477.50
1,662,802.50
1,629,907.50
1,592,645.00
1,550,755.00
1,504,410.00
1,453,060.00
1,396,620.00
1,334,495.00
1,266,045.00
1,191,755.00
1,111,415.00
1,024,215.00
930,862.50
831,232.50
724,577.50
597,737.50
462,375.00
318,110.00
164,120.00
2,429,106.25
2,467,467.50
2,792,882.50
2,821,685.00
2,847,610.00
2,920,477.50
2,952,802.50
2,984,907.50
3,012,645.00
3,045,755.00
3,084,410.00
3,113,060.00
3,146,620.00
3,184,495.00
3,221,045.00
3,251,755.00
3,291,415.00
3,329,215.00
3,360,862.50
3,401,232.50
3,744,577.50
3,782,737.50
3,817,375.00
3,858,110.00
3,894,120.00
638,168.75
629,568.75
337,800.00
340,800.00
343,200.00
-
3,067,275.00
3,097,036.25
3,130,682.50
3,162,485.00
3,190,810.00
2,920,477.50
2,952,802.50
2,984,907.50
3,012,645.00
3,045,755.00
3,084,410.00
3,113,060.00
3,146,620.00
3,184,495.00
3,221,045.00
3,251,755.00
3,291,415.00
3,329,215.00
3,360,862.50
3,401,232.50
3,744,577.50
3,782,737.50
3,817,375.00
3,858,110.00
3,894,120.00
Total
$48,895,000.00
-
$30,861,368.75
$79,756,368.75
$2,289,537.50
$82,045,906.25
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 49
DEBT STRUCTURE WITH DEBT STATISTICS
The debt structure and associated debt statistics are shown below.
Debt Service Schedule
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+I
02/01/2015
02/01/2016
02/01/2017
02/01/2018
02/01/2019
02/01/2020
02/01/2021
02/01/2022
02/01/2023
02/01/2024
02/01/2025
02/01/2026
02/01/2027
02/01/2028
02/01/2029
02/01/2030
02/01/2031
02/01/2032
02/01/2033
02/01/2034
02/01/2035
02/01/2036
02/01/2037
02/01/2038
02/01/2039
955,000.00
710,000.00
1,045,000.00
1,090,000.00
1,135,000.00
1,230,000.00
1,290,000.00
1,355,000.00
1,420,000.00
1,495,000.00
1,580,000.00
1,660,000.00
1,750,000.00
1,850,000.00
1,955,000.00
2,060,000.00
2,180,000.00
2,305,000.00
2,430,000.00
2,570,000.00
3,020,000.00
3,185,000.00
3,355,000.00
3,540,000.00
3,730,000.00
1.200%
1.350%
1.550%
1.750%
1.950%
2.250%
2.550%
2.750%
2.950%
3.100%
3.250%
3.400%
3.550%
3.700%
3.800%
3.900%
4.000%
4.050%
4.100%
4.150%
4.200%
4.250%
4.300%
4.350%
4.400%
1,474,106.25
1,757,467.50
1,747,882.50
1,731,685.00
1,712,610.00
1,690,477.50
1,662,802.50
1,629,907.50
1,592,645.00
1,550,755.00
1,504,410.00
1,453,060.00
1,396,620.00
1,334,495.00
1,266,045.00
1,191,755.00
1,111,415.00
1,024,215.00
930,862.50
831,232.50
724,577.50
597,737.50
462,375.00
318,110.00
164,120.00
2,429,106.25
2,467,467.50
2,792,882.50
2,821,685.00
2,847,610.00
2,920,477.50
2,952,802.50
2,984,907.50
3,012,645.00
3,045,755.00
3,084,410.00
3,113,060.00
3,146,620.00
3,184,495.00
3,221,045.00
3,251,755.00
3,291,415.00
3,329,215.00
3,360,862.50
3,401,232.50
3,744,577.50
3,782,737.50
3,817,375.00
3,858,110.00
3,894,120.00
Total
$48,895,000.00
-
$30,861,368.75
$79,756,368.75
Date And Term Structure
Dated
Delivery Date
First Coupon Date
4/01/2014
4/01/2014
2/01/2015
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars
Average Life
Average Coupon
$775,595.83
15.862 Years
3.9790529%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
T rue Interest Cost (T IC)
4.0168780%
3.9801163%
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 50
TAX IMPACT
The impact of the voter-approved request on various types and sizes of properties is shown below.
Assumptions
Pay 2014 - New Debt at 105%
2,550,562
Estimated Second Tier State Aid (usually starts second year of debt program)
-
New Debt levy after State Aid
2,550,562
Net Levy Change
2,550,562
Net Levy Change
2,550,562
Est. Pay 2014 NTC (adj. for MV Exclusion with no increase from est. Pay 12)
12,113,891
Est. Net Rate Increase:
21.0548%
Residential Homestead
Commercial / Industrial
$100,000
$151.09
$100,000
$315.82
$125,000
$208.46
$125,000
$394.78
$150,000
$265.84
$150,000
$473.73
$175,000
$323.21
$175,000
$579.01
$200,000
$380.59
$200,000
$684.28
$225,000
$437.96
$225,000
$789.56
$250,000
$495.33
$250,000
$894.83
$300,000
$610.08
$300,000
$1,105.38
$500,000
$1,052.74
$500,000
$1,947.57
$750,000
$1,710.71
$750,000
$3,000.32
$1,000,000
$2,368.67
$1,000,000
$4,053.06
$1,500,000
$3,684.60
$1,500,000
$6,158.54
Apartment Bldgs. (2 or More Reg. Units)
Seasonal / Recreational
$100,000
$263.19
$100,000
$210.55
$125,000
$328.98
$125,000
$263.19
$150,000
$394.78
$150,000
$315.82
$175,000
$460.57
$175,000
$368.46
$200,000
$526.37
$200,000
$421.10
$225,000
$592.17
$225,000
$473.73
$250,000
$657.96
$250,000
$526.37
$300,000
$789.56
$300,000
$631.65
$500,000
$1,315.93
$500,000
$1,052.74
$750,000
$1,973.89
$750,000
$1,710.71
$1,000,000
$2,631.86
$1,000,000
$2,368.67
$1,500,000
$3,947.78
$1,500,000
$3,684.60
Dwelling
100,000
Acres
Total EMV
Homestead Agricultural Land
Value Per Acre
2,000
RMV
NTC
80
$260,000
$102,000
$1,529
Tax Impact
$322.01
160
$420,000
$102,000
$2,329
$490.45
320
$740,000
$102,000
$3,929
$827.33
640
$1,380,000
$102,000
$7,819
$1,646.36
Non-Homestead Agricultural Land
Dwelling
0
Value Per Acre
Acres
Total EMV
2,000
RMV
NTC
80
$160,000
$2,000
$1,600
Tax Impact
$336.88
160
$320,000
$2,000
$3,200
$673.76
320
$640,000
$2,000
$6,400
$1,347.51
640
$1,280,000
$2,000
$12,800
$2,695.02
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 51
9. An analysis of how the proposed new or remodeled facility will affect
a) school district operational or administrative staffing costs, and
b) how the district's operating budget will cover any increased operational or administrative
staffing costs.
c) If the district is adding additional square footage, include assumptions and calculations used
in calculation of the estimated the general fund operation cost.
d) If the district is updating mechanical systems, provide detail on how the new HVAC system
will impact general fund operating costs compared to the current system.
The District and its technical advisors estimate that new operational costs associated with this project will
be budget neutral, with the exception of the new sq. ft. being added to the elementary and high school.
This is accomplished by utilizing new design strategies and equipment technologies to minimize the
additional energy requirements of added ventilation and dehumidification. Furthermore, maintenance of
these IAQ improvements will not require additional maintenance staff. In fact, elimination of the existing
antiquated systems will result in a reduction of repair and maintenance costs. In addition, the District has
several energy efficiency improvements included in the scope of work that will reduce energy use.
New spaces and equipment will be more efficient than the existing, but increases in required outside air
requirements will most likely negate these savings. Preliminary estimates indicate a net gain of
approximately 61,460 additional sq. ft. being added to the District. The District is replacing
approximately 98,517 sq. ft. operating at an average energy cost of $0.86/sq. ft. with an assumed new
average energy cost of $0.80/sq. ft., resulting in a savings of $5,911. The District expects an increase in
energy consumption for the 61,460 additional sq. ft. of $49,168 based on an average energy use of
$0.80/sq. ft. per year. The expected increased energy consumption for the project is $43,257. An annual
estimated cost of $50,000 is being planned for additional operation and maintenance expenditures for
things such as additional custodial staffing due to the additional square footage of the plan.
The Districts plan merges the middle school and high school into one location. This will enhance staffing
efficiencies particularly with itinerant staff that presently work in both facilities. Another example of
staffing efficiency could be with kitchen staff.
The District anticipates $25,000 in annual operation, maintenance and utility spend to maintain the middle
school while vacant.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 52
10. A description of the consultation with local or state road and transportation officials on
a) Multimodal school site access, safety issues, and
b) ways that the project will address those issues.
The project is reducing the number of sites and site access points by no longer using the middle school.
The existing site access points will remain as currently provided at the elementary and high school. No
additional work or modifications to public roadways is anticipated.
The City of Hermantown is currently working on a Safe Routes to Schools grant in partnership with the
School District.
The School District and City have begun discussions on transportation issues already. Specifically,
during design, the project team will work closely with St. Louis County Transportation and City of
Hermantown to meet their guidelines and requirements.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 53
11. A description of how
a) indoor air quality issues have been considered, and
b) a written certification signed by the project architect that the architects, and engineers
designing the facility have professional liability insurance.
Indoor Air Quality & Engineer Liability Insurance
The Plan prepared by the District’s program manager (Johnson Controls Inc.), included an analysis of the
District’s existing mechanical systems. Alternatives were weighed and recommendations tendered to the
school board and superintendent.
As experienced school systems design engineers, Johnson Controls has developed a standard for building
systems which addresses the growing concerns regarding indoor air quality. Proposed solutions include
centralized air systems that can be easily operated and maintained to provide adequate air changes
throughout the facility. These systems are fully ducted (supply and return) with outdoor intakes located
away from any contamination sources. Proper piping and ductwork insulation will be specified to prevent
condensation.
All new systems will be designed to meet current ventilation codes as well as other applicable codes and
ASHRAE standards. Monitoring of outdoor air and total airflow will be included in the scope of the
building automation system. The commissioning work proposed for these projects include the staterequired mechanical system operational verification.
Interior paints and adhesives will be specified as low volatile organic compound (VOC)-emitting, and an
adequate “bake-out” time will be allotted in the construction phasing to allow for off-gassing prior to
occupancy.
The project architects will design the building shell with proper use of vapor barriers. Special care will be
given to wall cavity, low wall/high wall intersections, roof/wall intersections, roof flashing and
window/wall flashing details to prevent moisture intrusion.
Care will be taken during construction to keep dust and debris out of ductwork and untouched adjacent
spaces. A clean-to-dirty air flow transfer will be maintained. Building materials will be kept dry during
construction to prevent growth of fungi and bacteria.
All engineers and architects hired by the District for these projects will be required to maintain
professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 and have significant experience in preventing
indoor air quality issues in Minnesota school facilities.
Signature Certification:
MN# 26118
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 54
12. As required under Minn. Stat. § 123B. 72, provide
a) written certification signed by the project architect that the plans and designs for the
extensively renovated or new facility's
i. heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems will meet or exceed code standards,
ii. will provide for the monitoring of outdoor airflow and total airflow of ventilation
systems, and
iii. will provide an indoor air quality filtration system that meets codes.
The District’s engineering firm, Johnson Controls Inc., as required under Minnesota Statute 123B.72
(2009), hereby certifies all HVAC improvements will meet or exceed code standards. All necessary
certifications will be submitted along with proper commissioning documentation that the HVAC systems
meet mechanical code standards, airflow monitoring requirements and filtration guidelines as addressed
in Minnesota Statute 123B.71 and 123B.72.
Signature Certification:
MN# 26118
13. A specification, if applicable, of any desegregation requirements that cannot be met by any
other reasonable means.
Hermantown Community Schools has no known desegregation requirements.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 55
14. A specification, if applicable, of how the facility will utilize environmentally sustainable school
facility design concepts.
Sustainable school buildings are achieved by:
Enhance indoor environmental quality, conserve energy and water resources- In both the retrofit and
new construction projects the engineers will have the opportunity to enhance the indoor environment,
conserve energy and make use of renewable resources through the use of new technology. The analysis of
new ventilation, cooling, heating, lighting, and envelope systems will allow the District to weigh the
advantages and disadvantages to determine what is best for each situation.
Use resource-efficient materials - Over the last ten years the use of biodegradable and environmentally
friendly materials has become more and more common. Materials such as recycled paints, carpet,
linoleum, and roofing membranes are just a few examples of materials that will be considered.
Minimize construction waste - The Construction Manager on these projects will require all
subcontractors to follow recycling policies.
Optimize maintenance and operations - Through the use of new technologies and materials the
efficiency and operation of the buildings can be enhanced to minimize the use of nonrenewable resources.
Operational efficiencies will be considered in the mechanical and electrical systems and weighed against
first cost and long term payback.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 56
15. A description of how the architects and engineers have considered the American National
Standards Institute Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements and Guidelines for
Schools of the maximum background noise level and reverberation times.
The ANSI criteria is concerned with addressing (4) key areas related to acoustical design:
• Room acoustics (dB ranges and reverberation times).
• Minimizing background noise from HVAC and electrical systems.
• Classroom sound isolation from interior and exterior sources.
• Impact isolation for multi-story classroom facilities.
Acoustic design in Schools is achieved by:
Appropriate exterior wall cavity design – providing proper insulation, air space, and differing materials
allows for different sound transmissions to be reflected or absorbed by the wall design. Additionally,
many of the methods currently utilized to provide protection from exterior environments perform added
function as sound isolating elements.
Minimizing sound transmission through interior partitions – provide insulation top of deck, with a
minimum of one side of gypsum board carried to the top of deck. Continuously caulk along the top edge
of the partition wall at the deck. At masonry walls, consider foam or sand filled cores. For operable
walls, specify minimum STC rating requirements.
Minimizing reverberation times – provide variation in perimeter walls of rooms over 10,000 sq. ft., and
install acoustic isolation panels to accommodate additional absorption. For music spaces, provide nonparallel walls to minimize reverberation from instruments. Utilize acoustic ceiling tile and carpet for
larger spaces.
Performance based criteria for mechanical specifications – specify minimum standards for acoustic
performance of HVAC systems including:
• System Components including low-velocity diffusers and fans.
• Limit duct velocity in design and require T&B to verify performance.
• Provide sound attenuators in duct and air handling unit connections.
• When utilizing unit ventilators, consider ducting supplies with perforated and/or double-lined
ductwork.
• Locate VAV terminals above ceilings in common areas as opposed to above classrooms.
• Provide vibration isolators at all equipment.
Reduce Impact Isolation in classroom areas - align circulation and corridor spaces from floor to floor
to minimize traffic above classroom areas. For areas identified with conflict areas located vertically
above classrooms, consider acoustics isolation springs for suspended ceilings, and/or sound attenuation
isolation above suspended ceiling systems.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 57
16. Any existing information from the relevant local unit of government about the cumulative costs
to provide infrastructure to serve the school, such as utilities, sewer, roads, and sidewalks.
The projects are limited to existing facility sites and no anticipated work is expected beyond these sites.
Any required work on-site is budgeted within the existing scopes of work for the proposed project.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 58

Review and Comment Submittal - Hermantown Community Schools

Transcription

Similar documents

SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL From: To: Submittal listing:

Facility Rental Packet

Directions from NCTAMS to Helemano Elementary School

battleon thethames - Majorca Daily Bulletin

Math Classes - Hermantown Community Schools

Referen....dum and dumber

Castori Elementary School - Twin Rivers Unified School District

the flyer here

Write Source - cloudfront.net

Scandinavian designs