CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#09-2AR
Transcription
CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#09-2AR
Agenda Item #3.H.7 12/14/09 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#09-2AR The amendment package was adopted without revision from the proposed amendment package and no objections were raised by an affected party or DCA. For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 2 Amendment #LUZ2009-06001 2337 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Future Land Use Map (Lokey) 1. Local Government Name: City of Clearwater 2. Amendment Number: 09-2AR 3. Is the RPC precluded from commenting on the proposed plan or element pursuant to s. 163.3184(5). F.S., or Rule 9J-11.0084, L.O.F.; or commenting on the proposed amendment (NO) pursuant to s.163.32465(4)(b), F.S.? (YES) 4. Date DCA Notified RPC that Amendment Package was Complete, if Applicable: 5. Date Amendment Review must be Completed and Transmitted to DCA: 6. Date the Amendment Review was transmitted to DCA: 7. Description of the Amendment: “This future land use map amendment and rezoning application involved property comprising approximately 0.613 acres in an area located on the south side of Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., approximately 1,090 feet west of Edenville Avenue and approximately 1,740 feet east of Belcher Road. This property has a future land use plan classification of Residential Medium (RM) and a zoning designation Mobile Home Park (MHP). The applicant is requesting to amend the future land use plan classification of the site to the Commercial General classification and to rezone the property to the Commercial (C) district. The amendments will make the future land use plan and zoning atlas consistent with the actual use of the property since 1995, as well as the parcels to the east and west, which are under the same ownership. The property consists of an approximately 20,000 square foot vehicle display area, and approximately 6,000 square feet of pervious surface (detention area and landscape islands).” “Historically the parcel was used to gain access to Hillcrest Mobile Home Park to the south. Second Street, a private street within the Park, connected to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. via the parcel. In 1990 Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. acquired the entire mobile home park and shortly after removed the existing mobile homes from the subject parcel and closed off the access between it and the rest of the Park. Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. acquired the parcel to the east in 1988, while the parcel to the west has been an automobile dealership since 1959. In 1995 the subject parcel was approved for a Conditional Use to permit outdoor retail sales/or storage of vehicles (the existing use on the contiguous parcels to the east and west). In 1996 Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. declared a Unity of Title between the subject parcel and the adjacent parcel to the ease and west. A detention area in the southeast portion of the parcel, as well as, a concrete wall extending nearly the entire length of the parcel, serve as buffers.” For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 3 Please complete the following table for each individual proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) only: Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category ResidentialMedium Commercial General Existing Maximum Density (DU/Acre) 15 DU/AC Proposed Maximum Density (DU/Acre) --- Existing Maximum Intensity (FAR) --- Proposed Maximum Intensity (FAR) 0.55 FAR Net Increase or (Decrease) in Maximum Density 0 Non-Residential Net Increase or (Decrease) in Potential Floor Area 0 8. Is the Amendment consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan? Consistent with SRPP. 9. Applicable Strategic Regional Policy Plan Goals and Objectives: Economic Development: 2.15 Transportation 5.23 10. The effects on the Proposed Amendment on Regional Resources or Facilities Identified in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. 11. Extra-Jurisdictional Impacts that would be Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the Affected Local Government: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. Analysis of the effects of the proposed amendments on the following issues to the extent they are addressed in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan on: 12. Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 13. Impacts to significant regional resources and facilities identified in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan, including, but not limited to, impacts on groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. 14. Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 4 15. Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan including, but not limited to, protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. 16. Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities including, but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: “Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, new car sales developed at the absolute maximum intensity, 14,686 sf, in the Commercial District would result in 38 PM Peak trips to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. The existing zoing district, Mobile Home Park, only result in 5 PM Peak trips to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. However, the property is already being use for new car sales and hasn’t been used as a Mobile Home Park since Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. bought the property in 1990. In this situation the current use is the proposed use, even though the current zoning district is Mobile Home Park.” 17. Adequacy and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane clearance times, and hazard mitigation: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. 18. Analysis of the effects of extra-jurisdictional impacts which may be created by the amendment: Not applicable to the adopted amendment. For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 5 For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 6 For Council meeting of December 14, 2009 Report prepared December 3, 2009 Staff Contact: Jessica Lunsford, ext. 38 7