Milestones 2013 - Pulaski Technical College
Transcription
Milestones 2013 - Pulaski Technical College
Milestones Volume 9 2013 Milestones is a publication of: Pulaski Technical College 3000 West Scenic Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118 501-812-2200 www.pulaskitech.edu 1 Adviser Joey Cole Editorial Board Matt Chase Lea Clyburn Joan Dudley Kate Evans Laura Govia Jason Hancock Leslie Lovenstein Jonathan Purkiss Managing Editors Sandy Longhorn Leslie Lovenstein Founding Editors Wade Derden and Angie Macri Design/Cover Art Amy Green Our Thanks To: Dr. Margaret Ellibee; Dr. Michael DeLong; Patricia Palmer; Mary Ann Shope; Cindy Harkey; David Glover; Cindy Nesmith; Lilly Dixon; BJ Marcotte; Tim Jones; Amy Green; Tracy Courage; Tom Melson; Lennon Parker; Tim Walbert; Melinda Gaston; Billie Egli; Tena Carrigan; Michelle Anderson; Kelly Owens; Wendy Davis and the staff of the Pulaski Technical College Libraries; members of the Pulaski Technical College Library Committee; the staff of the Pulaski Technical College Physical Plant; and the faculty, staff, and students who have continued to show interest and enthusiasm in this publication. ©2014 Pulaski Technical College Works appearing in Milestones are printed with the permission of the authors. Copyright reverts to authors immediately following publication. Milestones is published annually by Pulaski Technical College through the Division of Fine Arts and Humanities. Submissions to Milestones are accepted year-round via e-mail at [email protected]. The publication accepts academic essays, personal narratives, and creative nonfiction. Anyone associated with Pulaski Technical College is encouraged to submit to Milestones. The views and opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Pulaski Technical College or those of any of the college personnel or people responsible for publishing this journal. Please note: The language and content contained in this journal may not be suitable for all readers. 2 MILESTONES 2013 Volume 9 TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S Editor’s Note 5 Arachnophobia and First Impressions of The Hobbit 8th Annual National Library Week Essay Contest Winner Vashti Hanline 7 An Imperfect Dollhouse Zachary Griffin 11 Four-Letter Words Robert McCarville 17 The Instruments of Darkness in “Sonny’s Blues” Kimberly Ogden 21 The Gym Rat’s Secret Jeannine Smith 28 Inside the Tormented Mind of Edgar Allan Poe Barbara Riveira 31 The Honesty of a Nag Treell M. Gorden 45 Generation TeXt Jeremy D. Hardison 49 Manipulation, Murder and Mayhem: The Psychopathology of Iago Vicki McDonald 54 3 TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S 4 The Brilliant but Doomed Design of the Wankel Rotary Engine Ryan Abbey 62 Unity in Diversity amongst Non-Conformists: A Message from Mark Twain’s “The War Prayer” Jonathan Whitehead 69 Equating Equals Shara Richards 75 Visitation Elizabeth L. Sullivan 79 May He Rest in Peace Thomas Goss 83 Contributors 90 Editor’s Note The labor of many individuals has made the publication of Milestones Volume 9 possible. This journal came to life in 2004 through the vision and perseverance of Angie Macri and Wade Derden. Together they established Milestones as both a showcase of student excellence and a source of pride for Pulaski Technical College. In 2011, Sandy Longhorn became Managing Editor and built upon this solid foundation, and with the help of the editorial board, she oversaw the transition of Milestones to a model for students and a tool for instructors. Since serving as the Managing Editor of Milestones beginning in 2014, I have a heightened sense of appreciation for the work the previous editors have put into the journal. It is only because of the foundation, organization, and standard of excellence they have set that I feel confident in my ability to continue their tradition of excellence. I would like to thank Angie, Wade, and Sandy for their service and support. In addition to the previous editors, numerous students and instructors have poured their energy into this publication. Instructors have created and facilitated writing assignments, students have completed those assignments with feedback from their peers and instructors and bravely submitted their work to Milestones, and the members of the editorial board have selected the best of those contributions and edited them. Volume 9 is proof that the collaborative writing process works and is a reminder of not only the determination of our students, but also of their thoughtfulness and talent. 5 As you read through the varied essays in this publication, I urge you to think about the significance of writing in your life. I sincerely hope you will consider contributing your writing to Milestones and become a part of this process. Leslie Lovenstein 6 8th Annual National Library Week Essay Contest Winner VA S H T I H A N L I N E Arachnophobia and First Impressions of The Hobbit Life seems determined to give me arachnophobia (the fear of spiders) and it has quite nearly succeeded. The most recent episode involved me, my bathtub, and a spider three inches in diameter. Suffice it to say that the resulting freak-out was both noisy and hilarious. My most notable episode of arachnophobia had nothing to do with literal spiders, though. It occurred when I was ten years old while attempting to read a book called The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien. From that rocky start, though, I have grown to fall in love with Tolkien's writing. Tolkien's books have since influenced my life for the better, despite originally terrifying me. To say I disliked The Hobbit the first time I cracked it open would be an understatement. At age ten I read voraciously, and the more books I could get my hands on the better for all concerned. I'd heard of The Lord of the Rings a couple of times. The older siblings of my friends and the parents of said friends raved about the series loudly and vigorously. When a family I knew watched the movies while babysitting me, though, I caught a few glimpses of orcs that utterly terrified me. They made enough of an impression that I refused to rush in blindly. I knew that The Hobbit preceded The Lord of the Rings, so I decided to borrow an illustrated version from the library. I tentatively cracked open the book to a random page. It happened to have a beautifully-drawn, full-page illustration, which immediately drew my attention. 7 The picture I landed on, despite the artistic quality, couldn't have been worse. It depicted a number of suspicious cobweb-covered bundles against a forest-like background. When I read the opposite page, I discovered to my absolute horror that the bundles were dwarves and the webs were made by giant spiders. There had to be some mistake, I thought, so I proceeded to read a few pages. My revulsion did not abate with the pages I turned, though. Instead, the book subjected me to a series of unpleasant images in which poor innocent-sounding people fought for their lives against those ghastly monsters. Tolkien described the spiders in all-too-loving detail, capturing me in a world with them even better than the illustration. I panicked, shut the book and put it in the library returns pile with a dull, sick feeling that I would never sleep again. Six years later, I still had not read anything by Tolkien or fully watched a movie based on his books. I could still remember that horrid picture filled with webs and the poor dwarves about to be devoured by nightmare-sized spiders. Still, all sorts of people, whether random strangers or friends whose opinions I respected, recommended that I read The Lord of the Rings. I finally decided to gather my tattered courage and brave The Hobbit. This time, I vowed, I would not get an illustrated version. To my surprise, almost nothing in The Hobbit scared me even slightly. Ironically, the terrifying part with the spiders was the only part that could possibly terrify me. Instead, I loved the simple themes and the fairy-tale-like plot I found in the story. I finished the book in two days and went back to the library to borrow The Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings took me about a week to finish. By the time I did, I had developed an obsession. The twisting plot combined with the incredibly detailed world the story was based in (called MiddleEarth) left me in awe. Tolkien's use of invented languages in particular intrigued me, and I looked them up online. In the process of my 8 research I stumbled across a nerdy, family-friendly little forum called “The Lord of the Rings Fanatics Plaza” centered around Tolkien's works. I had never been interested in forums before, but something attracted me to this one. I had a bit of extra time on my hands, so I signed up. That forum began a series of new discoveries. The people themselves were friendly, and they wrote better than the majority of people on the internet. Like me, they loved books. Moreover, a section of the forum was dedicated to “role-playing,” where they would write as though characters made by them inhabited Middle-Earth, and where they interacted with other members of the forum. I'd never run across role-playing before, but I liked the idea. Despite my previous inability to finish stories I started, I decided to try role-playing myself. Gradually I became more involved in the forum. The forum changed my life. As I had hoped, role-playing developed my writing abilities and my motivation to finish the stories I started. Studying Tolkien's fictional languages with the help of the people on the forum brought me to realize my intense love of linguistics. The introduction to simple code I had with forum codes helped me discover my even more intense love for computers and working with them, which led me to major in computer science. Eventually my forum friends persuaded me to try National Novel Writing Month, in which the participants attempt to write a 50,000 word novel in a month. To my surprise, I succeeded. Most importantly, my shared love of Tolkien's books led me to meet amazing people whom I would not have met otherwise, and helped my relationships on and off the internet. I've had many an instant connection with a stranger because we both recognized a reference to The Lord of the Rings. When my stepfather divorced my mother, I mostly secluded myself, but thanks to my forum friends I was never entirely alone during my worst moments. Recently, I flew 9 to North Carolina to be a bridesmaid at the wedding of a girl I met on that forum. The Hobbit even helped my relationship with my mother. We read the book together, and then she bought tickets for me to see the midnight premier of the movie An Unexpected Journey, both of which inspired some great shared moments. My arachnophobia hasn't disappeared, but my fear of The Hobbit died long ago, unmourned and unmissed. In its place remains gratitude. If I'd not given Tolkien's books a second try, if I had let a first impression of a book sway me, I would have never met some dear friends or discovered some of my greatest passions. I would not have had those friends during some of my toughest moments. A book, I discovered, sometimes holds an unexpected power: the power to change a life. 10 Z A C H A RY G R I F F I N An Imperfect Dollhouse Henrik Ibsen, a Norwegian playwright, wrote A Dollhouse in 1879. This play was one of the first steps taken during the Victorian Age to urge and defend the progress of modern society. Ibsen desired to address the theme of freedom in the eyebrow raising, unorthodox view of women’s potential for personal freedom. By having Nora, the protagonist, decide to leave her family at the end of the play, Ibsen attacks the way society typically expects women to live their lives. With his modernistic views, Ibsen attacked society’s views by supporting individual freedom, feminism, and a revolution against Victorian social norms. Ibsen was a man on the brink of social revolution who heralded the idea that true freedom comes only from the truth. Proposing societal change would demand a shift in paradigm. Critic Bjorn Hemmer explains this shift when he states, “‘Truth’ alone – that truth of the new age such as Brandes and as Ibsen saw it – could achieve liberation. Without truth there could be no change, no genuine ‘freedom’” (68). Ibsen’s play presents a dramatic conflict between what society has made truth be, according to its traditions, and the truth that Nora finds - contradicting all of society’s expectations of her. The playwright’s commitment to the idea that true freedom comes only from truth is the driving force behind Nora walking out on her husband as she realizes that her “duties” no longer hold her captive. Ibsen changes the tone he has used to characterize Nora when truth unfolds before her eyes as she watches her husband’s display of outrage when he finds out that she has forged a signature for a large loan: HELMER. Miserable creature—what have you done? 11 NORA. Let me go. You shall not suffer for my sake. You shall not take it upon yourself. HELMER. No tragedy airs, please. … Here you shall stay and give me an explanation. Do you understand what you have done? Answer me? Do you understand what you have done? NORA. … Yes, now I am beginning to understand thoroughly. (1797) With this “understanding” of what she has done, Nora has embarked upon and discovered a new truth – that she has sacrificed everything for a man who cares more about the morals and views of society than her. This revelation symbolizes Ibsen’s theme of freedom coming only from truth, because Nora sees through the walls that have held her captive for so long, setting her free. Ibsen’s idea of social reform embraced feminism. He was very aware of women’s inferior place in society and realized this must change before progress could be made in society. Although for political reasons Ibsen would not proclaim himself a feminist, he thoroughly supported their cause as indicated by part of a speech made at the Banquet of the Norwegian League for Women’s Rights: The task always before my mind has been to advance our country and to give our people a higher standard. To achieve this, two factors are important. It is for the mothers, by strenuous and sustained labor, to awaken a conscious feeling of culture and discipline. This feeling must be awakened before it will be possible to lift the people to a higher plane. It is the women who shall solve the human problem. As mothers they shall solve it. And only in that capacity can they solve it. Here lies a great task for woman. (Ibsen 338) Because of Ibsen’s understanding of the expected roles of women within the family and society, he could see the potential impact that they 12 could have in regards to changing society’s view of themselves. The Victorian standards for women could be described as “duties.” These duties included being interested or involved in the affairs of her household and children only – never in public interests or the law, these were assigned to men only. Ibsen illustrates this in the scene between Nora and Helmer as Helmer is insulted by her betrayal to her “duties”: HELMER. It’s shocking. This is how you would neglect your most sacred duties. NORA: What do you consider my most sacred duties? HELMER: Do I need to tell you that? Are they not your duties to your husband and your children? NORA: I have other duties just as sacred. HELMER: That you have not. What duties could those be? NORA: Duties to myself. HELMER: Before all else, you are a wife and a mother. NORA: I don’t believe that any longer. I believe that before all else I am A reasonable human being, just as you are— or, at all events, that I must try and become one. I know quite well, Torvald, that most people would think you right, and that views of that kind are to be found in books; but I can no longer content myself with what most people say, or with what is found in books. I must think over things for myself and get to understand them. (1802) Within this scene, the authorial intent is to demonstrate how Nora has risen above society’s inferior view of women and their tasks. Nora has risen to equality with men, becoming an individual instead of a “woman.” She can no longer define herself in the confines of “wife” or “mother.” Ibsen claims that to effectively be either of these, Nora must first discover her true individual self. The Victorian social norms dictated that women were essentially property owned by the men of society. Ibsen displays great irony 13 when Nora leaves her family, undermining her husband’s ownership of her and embodying true freedom. Since women did not work and stayed inside the home, not bringing any financial support into it, men were perpetually encouraged to carry this idea of ownership. At the beginning of the play, Ibsen portrays Nora as a housewife who crochets, does needlework and embroidery. Her identity at that time comes from what she does for her children and husband, most importantly in pleasing them. This idealism is what Ibsen wanted dismantled so that a woman could become her true self and be set free from traditional expectations. According to Tori Moi, “Ibsen’s critique of idealism is the condition of possibility for his revolutionary analysis of gender in modernity…. Nora’s struggle for recognition as a human being is rightly considered an exemplary case of women’s struggle for political and social rights” (257). Nora does not want to be only a housewife owned by her husband, living to please only him and his whims, but she wants her own autonomy, her own voice. Ibsen uses Nora’s character to defy what was commonly considered appropriate for women. The following scene demonstrates the height of a husband’s idealistic thinking in the Victorian Age: HELMER: You have no idea what a true man’s heart is like, Nora. There is something so indescribably sweet and satisfying, to a man, in the knowledge That he has forgiven his wife—forgiven her freely, and with all his heart. It seems as if that had made her, as it were, doubly his own; he has given her a new life, so to speak; and she has in a way become both wife and child to him. (1799) There is very little more to say upon the subject of ownership after reading Helmer’s narcissistic interpretation of it. The audience sees inside Helmer’s heart, a person who truly believes that forgiveness equals dominance, power, and ultimately ownership. The irony Ibsen uses to paint a dramatic picture is when the totally unexpected happens 14 to Helmer: A woman, his wife, who was once owned, after realizing the truth, gains her freedom and leaves her husband and children. Ibsen’s attack on society’s expectations of how women should live their lives directly relates to his own personal feelings that individual freedom is the highest calling. Ibsen challenges the audience to look inside their own lives and to identify if this problem of typifying women’s roles exists in their own homes or minds. Ibsen concludes his play with the weakest character actually becoming the strongest, declaring that although women have been undermined and excused, given no real thought as to being someone with their own opinions and ideas, they are actually undeniably the carriers of society into modernization. As Ibsen stated in his speech, women must be active in their roles as wives, home makers, mothers, and individuals to push through into society this idea of individual freedom. 15 Works Cited Hemmer, Bjorn. “Ibsen and the Realistic Problem Drama.” The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1994. 68-88. Print. Ibsen, Henrik. “Speech at the Banquet of the Norwegian League for Women’s Rights.” Ibsen Letters and Speeches. Ed. Evert Sprinchorn. New York: Hill and Wang, 1964. 337-38. Print. Rpt. in Ibsen’s Selected Plays: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Brian Johnston. New York: Norton, 2004. 437. Print. ---. A Dollhouse. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts and Robert Zweig. 10th ed. Boston: Longman, 2012. 1758-804. Print. Moi, Tori. “‘First and Foremost a Human Being’: Idealism, Theatre, and Gender in A Doll’s House.” Modern Drama 49.3 (Fall 2006): 256-84. Literary Reference Center. Web. 15 July 2011. 16 R O B E RT M c C A RV I L L E Four-Letter Words "My son got 'kilt' yesterday," he slurred as he walked up to me. His outstretched arms surrounded me in an embrace. My mind began to race for an appropriate response. Just how, exactly, are you supposed to respond when a random stranger hugs you and tells you that his son wore a Scottish outfit the previous day? My subconscious double-clutched a thought and backfired a response to my mind. Be careful of the words you use as they may return one day to haunt you. The stranger looked at me through puffy, bloodshot eyes. His tear-stained face looked slightly up at me. He was about five foot six to my five eleven. He had a gold cap on one of his front teeth and several layers of gold circling his neck. He was dressed all in black except for his white shoes. I had a drunken stranger with his arms around me, looking into my eyes. Already reeling, his next words, "I love you, you know that," overloaded my brain. "Thank you. I love you too," I quipped, unthinking to whiteshoe guy for lack of anything intelligent to say. He began to cry and tell me about how his son got “kilt.” I interjected random bits of condolence as societal custom dictates. Realization dawned slowly that his son was not Scottish. I didn’t even know this guy's name. I walked my dog by his house in the evening. I walked by a lot of houses. "I will come back soon," I also said without thinking, "and check on you." "Okay," he sniffled and tottered back to a house filled with people also wearing black. I continued the walk, thinking about the strange encounter. As the night deepened, a shadowy ghost of a past encounter sent a chill of memory up my spine. Many years ago, I worked for a delivery service. On a courier 17 run one warm summer day, the van had a tire go flat. I exited the highway at the Dixon Road exit and looked for a place to change to the spare tire. I located a neglected driveway not far from the exit and pulled in. The pitted drive led up to a matching house that time had almost finished consuming. Loose shingles and broken shutters lay on the ground mixed with fallen branches from the large oaks dotting the yard. Layers of dust held the chipped and faded paint to the rickety wooden structure. "Who's that?" an old man called out from a shadowy corner of the front porch. "Is someone there?" "Hello," I said loudly, approaching the porch, "the tire on the van is flat. Do you mind if I change the tire in your drive?" He agreed, provided I do him a favor first. Looking in my direction with milky, vacant eyes, he asked me into his house. He said that on a table next to the sofa was a Bible. He asked if I would get it and read to him from it. “I’m going blind and can’t read anymore,” he said. I looked at him with a sense of caution mixed with curiosity. The only threat posed by his shrunken frame in his vintage Sunday best seemed to be of crumbling to dust if touched. I cautiously climbed onto the porch and looked through the mesh screen door and saw the sofa and the book next to it. Ten seconds later, I had the Book and asked where he'd like me to read. “Anywhere,” he responded quietly, his milky eyes glistening in anticipation. I opened his Bible and let the fates decide the page. I began to read. Time seemed to slow as I stood over him reading passage after passage. The words issued forth from me, flowing in a voice not entirely my own. After a few pages, his eyes closed. After a few more, his breathing settled to a slow, rhythmic pattern. I closed the book and set it on the small table next to him. As I turned to go, he said quietly, "Son, will you come back and read to me again sometime?" I absently responded, "Sure, I will come back soon." I retraced 18 my steps across the creaking porch, down the faded wooden steps, and along the drive to the waiting van. I changed the tire and got back on my route. The dash clock reminded me that I was now an hour behind schedule. I had ten hours of driving ahead of me that I needed to squeeze down into nine. I got back on the highway and began mental recalculations, promptly forgetting all about the man, the Book, and my words. One day, what felt like only a couple of years later, I began to think of the old man on Dixon Road. Dixon Road was about a twenty minute drive from my house. I began the drive back in time. I took the ominously familiar exit and turned for the pitted driveway... and into a gas station parking lot. No house, no driveway, no blind old man sitting alone on his porch. I waited too long, I thought to myself. But then, what kind of psychopath would have actually wandered back up to a random stranger to read from his Bible to him? The same kind of psychopath that would do it in the first place, it would seem. I went into to the old gas station and bought a soda and began chatting with the owner. He remembered moving into the area about ten years ago when the station was new. He thanked me for the purchase and invited me to return soon. I smiled at him and waved goodbye, without another word. I sat in the parking lot for a few minutes, reflecting on the past with regret and allowed feelings of melancholy to wash over me. There were so many times that I had thought about the old man, but I never seemed to have had the time to stop for him. The speed of life seemed to always get in the way of the living. About half way home, the math kicked in. What had felt like a couple of years had been almost fifteen of them. The next evening, I saw white-shoe guy’s house as I walked the dog. Ghostlike, the tree branches beckoned me in as a breeze sighed overhead. I turned up the drive as haunting visions of the past 19 overlaid the present. I “came back,” I tell myself as the weight of an old ghost faded silently from my soul. Over fifteen years of regret had burdened me over some four-letter words that I said that day so long ago. Tonight, I fulfilled those words, both past and present. My head was lifted slightly higher by the time I reached the other end of the drive. I knocked as I reached the door and waited for freedom to answer. 20 K I M B E R LY O G D E N The Instruments of Darkness in “Sonny’s Blues” James Baldwin’s symbolic use of darkness takes on many different representations throughout the short story “Sonny’s Blues.” Detailing Brother’s and Sonny’s constant inner struggles, this story takes its readers through the closed off world Brother pretends to live in, Mama’s account of familial tragedy, little Grace’s death, Sonny’s addictions, and Sonny’s performance in the jazz club, which eventually brings the two brothers together. Baldwin’s use of dark and light plays on the circumstances in which people are conditioned to survive not only in their familial roles, but also in their community roles, and how they view the world at large and deal with it on a personal level. In the beginning of the story, Brother attempts to use the coping mechanism of denial so that he does not have to see or hear what is truly going on around him or what he calls, “the light.” After reading about Sonny’s arrest for possession of heroin, Brother states, “I couldn’t believe it” (Baldwin 63). Later, while in the classroom, Brother also says, “I had suspicions,” and “I had kept it outside me for a long time” (Baldwin 64; emphasis added). Thus Brother personally acknowledges that he has known but hasn’t allowed himself to process the reality. In “‘Sonny’s Blues’: James Baldwin’s Image of Black Community,” John M. Reilly states, “the storyteller reveals … a conventional way of thinking … [and] attitude … as a defense.” This is further established by Charles Duncan in “Learning to Listen to ‘Sonny’s Blues,’” as Duncan states, “[Brother’s] social assimilation has distilled in him a distrust of anything unconventional.” When talking about his students, Brother references that “all they really knew were two darknesses … their lives … and the 21 movies” (Baldwin 64), suggesting to the reader that their circumstances are bleak and perhaps there is no escape other than fantasizing through the movies what their lives could be like. Robert Reid reinforces this in his short story criticism “The Powers of Darkness in ‘Sonny’s Blues’” by stating, “Illusions must replace an unacceptable reality.” On many occasions throughout the story, Brother alters reality with more glamorized memories. For example, when reminiscing about the last time he saw his mother alive, Brother states that the memory is “all mixed up in [his] mind” with past memories of Mama, younger in “pale blue … sitting on the sofa,” but during the actual conversation she was “in black, by the window” (Baldwin 70). This once again exhibits Brother selectively covering up darker occurrences with brighter memories of the past. Although Brother believes that he has made it out of the darkness and has conformed to mainstream society, many excerpts from “Sonny’s Blues” suggest otherwise. The first glimpse of this is when Brother states, “It might be said, perhaps, that I had escaped … I was a school teacher” (Baldwin 69). Although Brother is now a school teacher, he is teaching at a school around the same type of people and situations he grew up with on a daily basis. Brother also personally acknowledges right before he arrives at his home with Sonny, “We live in a housing project,” which is “rundown.” Brother states, “I had the feeling that I was simply bringing him back into the danger he had almost died trying to escape” (Baldwin 69), thus showing the reader Brother is not nearly as removed as he thinks he is. Brother looks at the world around him at large without listening to the causes or circumstances of the conditions he is judging. While he is talking to “a boy from around [the] block” in the school courtyard, Brother admits to himself “I felt guilty … for never having supposed that the poor bastard had a story of his own, much less a sad one,” showing Brother’s judgment of the way others deal with 22 their circumstances if it is not the same way he has dealt with his (Baldwin 65). By doing so, Brother uses both denial and a sense of being above or outside of his community in order to cope with the “darkness” of violence, poverty, and drug-use that surrounds them. Yet, in doing so, he blinds himself to his own isolation and pain. Baldwin’s next use of light and dark appears when Mama tells Brother of his uncle’s death, which Brother’s father witnessed. The use of light and dark to “illuminate” this experience helps Mama as she tries to explain to Brother that things are not always as they may seem. Mama starts by telling Brother “there was a moon that night, it was bright as day” (Baldwin 71). As she continues to describe the incident and Father’s brother getting hit, she elaborates, “your Daddy … never … seen anything as dark as that road after the lights of the car had gone away” (Baldwin 72), thus describing how the evening started very bright but what was to follow would darken things so deeply that it altered Brother’s father forever. Mama attempts to awaken Brother to the harsh realities surrounding him and encourages him to create a better relationship between himself and Sonny by speaking of familial tragedy that nobody “ever talked about” (Baldwin 71). Mama tells Brother “there’s a lot that you don’t know.” She goes on to say, “You got to hold on to your brother” and “you got to let him know you’s there” (Baldwin 72). Although Mama has tried to bring the two brothers closer together, it is apparent that she has not been successful as the story opens with Brother not having any contact with Sonny and “read[ing] about [his arrest] in the paper” (Baldwin 63). Baldwin uses the “darkness” of death and suffering of Brother’s daughter, Grace, to catch his attention and open his eyes. Brother’s guilt over his misjudgment of Grace’s condition provokes his thought of Sonny after no contact between the two for so long. Brother exclaims, “I suddenly thought of Sonny. My trouble made his 23 real” (Baldwin 77). Brother’s mistakes give way to a new sensitivity to Sonny’s mistakes. The brothers’ last confrontation before this realization had escalated to them both being so “mad” that Sonny says, “[I am] dead as far as [you are] concerned,” and Brother leaves “whistling” the tune “you going to need me, baby” (Baldwin 77). According to James Tackach in his critical essay “The Biblical Foundation of James Baldwin’s ‘Sonny’s Blues,’” this story centers on the “troubles … intolerances of … pain, … awakening … reconciliation … and… redemption” of the two brothers. Ironically, after Grace’s death, the reader is left believing that Brother is now in a position to need Sonny and think about possible mistakes he could have made with him as well. It is important that the character of Sonny first comes into the story in the form of Brother’s thoughts. Brother first describes Sonny with a memory from “when he was about as old as the boys in my classes,” when “his face had been bright and open … [with] wonderfully direct brown eyes” (Baldwin 64). After reminiscing about Sonny, Brother “wondered what he looked like now” and encounters a “high and raggy” character from their youth (Baldwin 64). It seems no mistake that Baldwin uses this unnamed character to show Brother and the reader a vision of what Sonny might look like since the character himself appears to be strung out: “his eyes looked strange … yellow,” and “the sun deadened his damp dark brown skin” (Baldwin 65). This example seems to be how Baldwin uses a “dark character” to contrast the character prior to sin suggesting the forces of “dark” and “light” in another meaning. Duncan describes Baldwin’s symbolic use of the character of “a boyhood friend” as “destined to share Sonny’s … plight … [of] drug-induced self-destruction.” Baldwin uses several descriptions of Sonny in the play on light and darkness to suggest that Sonny is fighting the darkness within himself. When Brother meets Sonny in New York shortly after his release, Brother explains, “when 24 we shook hands, [he] looked out from the depths of his private life, like an animal waiting to be coaxed into the light” (Baldwin 68). Although Baldwin casts a dark shadow over Sonny’s character, he also uses Sonny to “shine” the most light on Brother’s life with truth and healing. During their reunification in New York, Brother recollects when Sonny was born: I was remembering … that I had been there when he was born; and I had heard [his] first words …When he started to walk, he walked from our mother straight to me. I caught him just before he fell when he took the first steps he ever took in this world. (Baldwin 68) This fond memory of Brother’s would indeed be the "bridge … [that] would operate between [them]” (Baldwin 68) and symbolically gives readers a glimpse of the role-reversal between the brothers that is yet to come. The reader is finally able to experience the most “light” or insight along with the character of Brother when he enters the darkest environment he could go to with Sonny, down a “dark street” into a “night club” where “the lights were very dim” and entering into “Sonny’s world … his kingdom.” Once inside, Brother witnesses Sonny’s celebrity amongst the crowd and is seated “at a table in a dark corner” and next describes the lighting on the stage as “the circle of light” as he awaits Sonny and the other band members to begin (Baldwin 82). Sonny is then “illuminated” in more ways than one in the “indigo light” bringing a new view as well as ears that finally can hear through the music. Brother states, “the atmosphere … in the room began to change” and “they all looked different” (Baldwin 83). Readers feel Brother’s change in perspective as Sonny takes center stage in the spotlight, allowing Sonny’s redemption to occur and his true identity to be established as Brother “heard… understood… 25 and felt, for the first time” (Baldwin 83). Richard Albert states, “the narrator’s reb[orn] through his experience of hearing Sonny play the blues” in “The Jazz-Blues Motif in James Baldwin’s ‘Sonny’s Blues,’” During Sonny’s performance, Brother is flooded with memories of loved ones, both past and present. Through processing these painful experiences he states, “it brought something else back to me, and carried me past it,” leaving the reader feeling the “freedom” and deliverance from Brother’s bondage of denial (Baldwin 83). With this rebirth of characters, Baldwin not only challenges the characters coming into their own, gaining understanding and accomplishments of both Brother and Sonny, but also the readers to reassess their own perceptions of life. Baldwin’s use of dark and light is his instrument throughout this story illustrating good and bad in the characters’ lives, community, and circumstances. The illumination of high points in a character’s life as well as the dimness of low points plays on the situations in which people in general are conditioned to survive. “Sonny’s Blues” challenges growth and leaves readers to assess the character’s thoughts, actions, and viewpoints on a more personal level. Through the division and reunification of Brother and Sonny, Baldwin shows that the only true instrument for redemption is reality. 26 Works Cited Albert, Richard N. “The Jazz-Blues Motif in ‘Sonny’s Blues.’” College Literature 11.2 (1984):178-185. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Christopher Giroux. Vol. 90. Detroit: Gale Research, 1996. Literature Resource Center. Web. 7 Nov. 2012. Baldwin, James. “Sonny’s Blues.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Allison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Shorter 10th ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2010. 63-85. Print. Duncan, Charles. “Learning to Listen to ‘Sonny’s Blues.’” Obsidian II 9.2 (1994): 1+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 1 Oct. 2012. Reid, Robert. “The Powers of Darkness in ‘Sonny’s Blues.’” CLA Journal 43.4 (June 2000): 443-453. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Jelena O. Krstovic. Vol. 98. Detroit: Gale, 2007. Literature Resource Center. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. Reilly, John M. “‘Sonny’s Blues’: James Baldwin’s Image of Black Community.” Negro American Literature Forum 4.2 (July 1970): 56-60. JSTOR. Web. 2 Dec. 2012. Tackach, James. “The Biblical Foundation of James Baldwin’s ‘Sonny’s Blues.’” Renascence: Essays on Value in Literature 59.2 (2007): 109+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 7 Nov. 2012. 27 JEANNINE SMITH The Gym Rat’s Secret There it is in all of its intimidating glory, appearing architecturally inviting, misleadingly unthreatening, and complete with two feverishly swinging double-doors which tempt passers-by to enter. The doors were custom designed to serve as a protective barrier to the community—one too terrifying to cross…one that separates us from them. This is the entrance to a mystical land known as “the gym”—a place where mere peasants are transformed into indestructible beings. If one brave soul could muster up enough courage to enter, he would gain a rare opportunity to observe the unimaginable—the mythological…the rarest-of-the-rare species that researchers now respectfully refer to as “gym rats” (a.k.a. “meat heads” or “beefcakes”). Mass herds of the smelly beasts run wild in these parts, easily recognizable by their trade-mark galloping, panting, grunting, and glistening, all distinguishable characteristics of their breed. Yes, they travel in packs of neon-colored, spandex-laden enticement eager to flex their stacked pectorals into the tell-all reflective walls of their natural habitat (or as an impressive courtship display directed towards the female “gym rat” species). The powerful “gym rat” has evolutionarily adapted to its treacherous environment of steel and iron. They thrive here. And that makes all others who impose on the “gym rat’s” territory the illegal aliens… the “prey.” For example, a member of a less threatening species, the “couch potato” (a.k.a. “muffin top” or “beer belly”) realizes that there has to be some sort of secret regimen that the “gym rats” protect. He longs to discover just how the chiseled, barbell-toting rodents achieve their physical perfection. So what is the “gym rat’s” secret? How does the docile “couch potato” join this elite race of rats and become adopted into the 28 pride as one of its own? The "gym rat’s" immaculate physique is maintained through combining both strength training and cardio exercise. Strength training and cardio exercise each have their own specific benefits, but they are most effective when practiced together. When the couch potato is ready to infiltrate the gym rat’s secret society, he must first adopt a habitual routine which includes regular cardio exercise. Cardio exercise offers many benefits which cannot be achieved by using strength training alone. Some examples of cardio exercise include walking, running, cycling, Zumba, or an elliptical machine workout. Excess weight is most quickly and effectively burned off through cardio exercise, which then allows the appearance of underlying muscle to show through. It is a common misconception that one should radically cut calories during this process. However, it is important to eat six to seven small meals a day including a diet rich in protein, fiber, fruits, vegetables, healthy fats, and most importantly, at least sixty-four ounces of water. This will increase the efficiency of the body’s metabolism, restore hydration, and add valuable nutrients for extended energy. Another important aspect to consider when addressing cardio exercise is to incorporate adequate rest. One should abstain from cardio exercise at least two days per week and especially when feeling lethargic or extremely low in energy. With the new and improved working efficiency of his heart, the couch potato will begin to feel more energized, less winded, and ultimately leaner. He has now gained the endurance necessary to incorporate the second key to the gym rat’s success—strength training. Strength training, the most overlooked weapon in the gym rat’s arsenal, is the key to obtaining a powerfully sculpted physique. Strength training is most commonly defined as the lifting of heavy objects in a series of repetitive sets. Some of the most popular strength training equipment includes barbells, dumbbells, kettle bells, and freeweight machinery. It is necessary to tighten and tone the physique 29 after a significant weight loss due to cardio exercise, where excess, flabby skin can be present. A protein and carbohydrate packed diet is essential when strength training because extra energy is extended and burned by the body. If ample amounts of carbohydrates and protein are not digested, one can feel shaky, low in energy, and even nauseous during a workout. It is common to experience muscle soreness the day after an intense strength training session. This can be remedied by allowing the body to rest one to two days between major muscle groups; it is imperative to allow torn muscle fibers time to rebuild. If the couch potato maintains a frequent strength training routine, he will see areas of major improvement including skin elasticity, bone density, joint mobility, muscle strength, increased energy level, improved sleep quality, and a heightened self-esteem. Results are measurable, noticeable, and successful when the couch potato incorporates both cardio exercise and strength training into his daily lifestyle. No longer will he shy away from the intimidating terrain of the gym, for he now seamlessly blends in, unnoticeable to his pack of predators. Finally, once and for all, he stands enlightened to the coveted secret in its entirety—gym rats are nothing more than former couch potatoes in disguise. 30 BARBARA RIVEIRA Inside the Tormented Mind of Edgar Allan Poe Edgar Allan Poe is well known for his gothic influence in both poetry and short fiction. Just mentioning the name "Poe" in a crowded room seems to warrant negativities from all directions. Most people describe his work as scary, haunting, dark, or depressing. Some even react with a noticeable shudder. Little do they know, this is just the reaction Poe wanted from his audience. It is difficult for people to grasp how one's mind could be so preoccupied with chilling topics such as death, mourning, desperation, and madness. Jeffrey Scraba sums this up by saying, "[Poe] wants his readers to understand the thought processes of the fictional characters who speak the words of his poems," as well as his short stories (35). Perhaps this would be better understood if Poe’s personal life were examined before readers delve into his literary works, as there are obvious connections between the two. His personal tragedies surrounding death and abandonment heavily influenced some of his best known works, including the poems "The Raven" and "Annabel Lee" along with his short story "The Fall of the House of Usher." As a young child, Poe lost both of his parents. Poe was abandoned by his alcoholic father shortly following his birth. Soon after this his mother, Elizabeth, became ill with tuberculosis and died in December 1811 when Poe was barely three years old. This affected the young boy deeply and changed his outlook on life indefinitely. According to Bonaparte, "Poe's...[childhood] dreams were nightmares— nightmares of a mother who died of consumption with her three-yearold son by her side, her cold, lifeless hand resting on his cheek. It was this moment that was never to fade from his memory" (qtd. in Donschikowski). 31 The emotional scars left by this tragic event proved to be so psychologically damaging that Poe would never heal from them. Though he was adopted by a wealthy couple, Frances and John Allan, the bond between the young boy and his foster parents never flourished. Poe longed for a parental connection that he would unfortunately never find. Sanna Dhahir notes that "biological records stress that although the couple took good care of Poe's financial needs and provided him with excellent schooling, they somehow failed to understand or minister to his emotional needs." Sadly, all the money in the world would not remedy the emotional trauma of one scarred so deeply. After dropping out of the University of Virginia and severing ties with his adoptive parents, Poe went to live in Boston with his Aunt Clemm. It was during this time that he fell in love with his young cousin Virginia, whom he married when she was just 13 years old. She was later to die at a young age from tuberculosis, the same disease that killed Poe's mother. Bonaparte suggests that, "by choosing an obviously consumptive girl for his wife...Poe found means to stage the sadistic drama, for himself, of an agonizing death like that he had watched so breathlessly as a child" (qtd. in Donschikowski). If this is the case, one has to wonder if Poe's personal goal in life was one of self-inflicted torture, or if he was just simply so preoccupied with death that he could not see past it. However, it is also possible that he may have used his writing as a means of attempting to relive the trauma in order to eventually overcome it. His emotional trauma and loneliness as a child eventually led to alcoholism in his adult life. Carlson explains the influence of alcohol on Poe by stating, "Poe was an alcoholic, which produces depression and during his alcoholic state of mind he reveled in the quagmire of his tormented life, wallowed in the pain and suffering and expressed that suffering in his prose and poetry" (qtd. in Donschikowski). This is certainly a fair statement when the characters and situations created by Poe in his poetry and short stories are evaluated. One can see 32 traces of Poe's emotions surrounding his mother's death embodied in the student in "The Raven." Later, after the death of his young bride, Virginia, he wrote "Annabel Lee" which deals with the death of a child bride and the emotions felt by her ever-grieving husband. Finally, in "The Fall of the House of Usher," one meets Roderick Usher, a character who has let his life be taken over completely by the tragedies surrounding him, much in the same way that Poe could never let go of the tragic events that shaped his life. A common theme shared by many of Poe's works, including "The Raven," "Annabel Lee," and "The Fall of the House of Usher," is one of melancholic oppression, brought about by the death of a loved one, which ultimately leads to insanity. The speaker in the "The Raven" is a college student who is unable to eradicate himself from "sorrow for the lost Lenore" (Poe line 10). This sorrow places him on a frightful trip from which he will never mentally return. He is ultimately left to dwell within the memories of the past forevermore. There is a similar situation presented in "Annabel Lee"; however, it is written in the form of a grotesque fairytale that ends with shocking imagery. In the final stanza of the poem, it is revealed that though the death of the child-bride took place many years ago, the speaker has spent every night of his life by her side. He sates: And so, all the night-tide, I lie down by the side Of my darling- my darling- my life and my bride, In the sepulchre there by the sea, In her tomb by the sounding sea. (Poe 38-41) This shows that the speaker has chosen to stay frozen in time and has never mentally progressed past the point when Annabel Lee died. Kelly advances this idea by saying, "that the speaker of 'Annabel Lee' cannot grow out of his grief, which some might consider an embarrassing personality weakness, can actually be a source of pride in the experience-obsessed world of a Poe poem." This is certainly a valid 33 claim due to Poe's personal history with tragedy. Similarly, "The Fall of the House of Usher" shares a parallel theme with "The Raven" and "Annabel Lee," but Poe provides an interesting twist in this wellknown short story. Not only is the main character, Roderick Usher, on the brink of mental collapse due to the impending death of his twin sister who is his only living relative, but also he has been strangely afflicted by the disintegration of the family mansion they both occupy. Poe relies heavily on the use of literal and figurative imagery to set the gothic tone for these three works. In "The Raven" the student relays that his story takes place on a "dreary," dark night in the "bleak December" (Poe 1,7). He also remembers that on that night "each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor" (Poe 8). Just these lines alone create the eerie atmosphere Poe desires for this piece. Add to that the fact that the student is up late studying all alone in an attempt to keep his mind off his deceased girlfriend, and things get pretty spooky. The slightest noise becomes all sorts of frightful things in the mind of this fragile mourner. He is then approached by a large raven outside his window. The image of the raven is also painted for the reader in great detail so they will literally know what the speaker is seeing when he encounters the bird. This is accomplished through the use of words such as "ebony," "grave," "grim," and "ancient" (Poe 43, 44, 45, 46). From this description one can safely assume that the raven is deep black in color and carries itself in a foreboding manner. After the physical characteristics of the bird are engraved in the reader's mind, the raven is personified through its ability to speak. The student finds this odd, but it soon becomes clear that the bird can only utter one word— "Nevermore" (Poe 48). Where most people would flee from the room screaming if a large, black bird entered the window and talked to them, the emotionally troubled student places his chair directly in front of the bird so that he 34 may analyze it closer. He begins to envision the raven as a "...fowl whose fiery eyes...[burn] into [his] bosom's core" (Poe 74). He commences to refer to the raven as a "thing of evil" (Poe 85) and questions whether it is truly "bird or devil" (Poe 85). Then in a twisted sense of logic that points towards insanity, fully knowing beforehand what the answer will be, he asks the bird if "within the distant Aidenn, / [his soul] shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels name Lenore" (Poe 93-94). The raven croaks the only possible answer - "Nevermore" (Poe 96). The student's irrational response makes clear the extent of his damaged psyche: "Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend," [he shrieks], upstarting"Get thee back into the tempest and the Night's Plutonian shore! Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken! Leave my loneliness unbroken!- quit the bust above my door! Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!" (Poe 97-100) However, the raven makes clear that he plans to leave the student "Nevermore" (Poe 102). The image displayed by this conversation is one of pure torture being imposed upon the student. By the raven becoming a permanent fixture in the student's chamber, this insures that he will never forget the woman he loves. Dhahir observes that, "the raven clearly comes across as the speaker's double or alter ego, a projection of the horrorladen contents of his psyche." This is almost undeniable as the declining mental stability of the speaker becomes more and more evident as the poem progresses. The final stanza of the poem expresses the 35 sorrowful state in which the student shall spend the rest of his life: And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door; And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming, And the lamplight o'er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor; And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor Shall be lifted- nevermore! (Poe 103-108) Where the imagery in "The Raven" is horrific throughout the poem, Poe approaches "Annabel Lee" from a different perspective. The opening image he provides for the reader of this poem is one of a child's fairytale complete with a "kingdom by the sea" (Poe line 2). However, what begins as a beautiful story reminiscent of childhood love, soon becomes filled with the horrific images that Poe is famous for. The speaker is really a grieving husband who is looking for someone or something to blame for the loss of his wife. The speaker first accuses vengeful "winged seraphs in heaven" (Poe 11). Julienne Empric explains this by stating, "To justify the loss, to find some cause proportionate to the effect he has experienced, the narrator must temper his idea of the seraphic with the demonic." It is the speaker's claim that he and his young wife were so happy together that even the angels in heaven could not help but envy them. Therefore, it must have been the jealous angels who sent a "wind...out of the cloud by night, / Chilling and killing [his] Annabel Lee" (Poe 25-26). The speaker then shifts the blame from the angels who made her sick to "her highborn kinsmen [who] came / And bore her away...to shut her up in a sepulchre / In this kingdom by the sea" 36 (Poe 17-20). It is obvious that his warped mind cannot grasp the idea that burial is a normal occurrence following death. He goes on to paint a very vivid picture of the fact that he will never voluntarily be separated from the love of his life. In the next to last stanza of the poem, the speaker states: But our love it was stronger by far than the love Of those who were older than weOf many far wiser than weAnd neither the angels in heaven above, Nor the demons down under the sea, Can ever dissever my soul from the soul Of the beautiful Annabel Lee. (Poe lines 27-33) To complete this claim, the speaker reveals in the final stanza that he physically sleeps every night by the side of his beloved dead wife, "[i]n her tomb by the sounding sea" (Poe 41). The reader must keep in mind that the speaker has stated in the first line of the poem that his child bride died "many and many a year ago" (Poe 1). Thus, the morbidity that has been lurking behind the scenes all along is shifted into full focus. The same sense of emotional unraveling appears in "The Fall of the House of Usher." Poe also relies heavily on imagery and symbolism to convey the emotional state of his characters, especially Roderick Usher. The story is chock-full of literal and figurative imagery that absolutely bring it to life. The story is told through the eyes of a narrator who is not part of the Usher family, but is simply a boyhood friend of the main character, Roderick Usher. The narrator has not seen his friend in many years and is surprised by a sudden desperate letter summoning him the House of Usher due to Roderick's being very ill. The narrator states that "it was the apparent heart that went with [the] request...that allowed [him] no room for hesitation" (Poe 263). Upon arriving at the House of Usher, the narrator describes the scene in great detail. He says that although he cannot explain why, 37 "with the first glimpse of the building, a sense of insufferable gloom pervade[s] [his] spirit" (Poe 263). In attempting to figure out the reason for the sudden oppression, the narrator gets the ominous feeling that the entire mansion is covered with "a pestilent and mystic vapor, dull, sluggish, faintly discernible, and leaden-hued" (Poe 264). He goes on to describe the mansion in great detail stating: Its principle feature seemed to be that of excessive antiquity. The discoloration of ages had been great. Minute fungi overspread the whole exterior, hanging in a fine tangled web-work from the eaves...No portion of the masonry had fallen; and there appeared to be a wild inconsistency between its still perfect adaptation of parts, and the crumbling condition of the individual stones. (Poe 264) This presentation of the house, along with the mention of a barely noticeable fissure which zigzags down the front wall of the house, make it evident to the reader that the mansion is in a state of disrepair. The narrator also comments on the "vacant eye-like windows" (Poe 263) of the house, making it appear to be a living entity, but soulless and haunting. Although the narrator is greatly disturbed by the appearance of the house and its surroundings, he bravely enters what he refers to as the "melancholy House of Usher" (Poe 263). Once he is shown to the chamber of his friend, he cannot believe how greatly altered Roderick's appearance is compared to how he remembers him. He gives the following grave depiction of his friend: The now ghostly pallor of the skin, and the now miraculous lustre of the eye, above all things startled and even awed me. The silken hair, too, had been suffered to grow all unheeded, and as, in its wild gossamer texture, it floated rather than fell about the 38 face, I could not, even with effort, connect its Arabesque expression with any idea of simple humanity. (Poe 266) He goes on to explain that Roderick's overall manner and actions suggest a severe nervous condition. However, when Roderick outlines the unusual symptoms he experiences on a daily basis, it evokes the question of a serious mental illness. He claims to have "suffered much from a morbid acuteness of the senses" (Poe 266). In other words, his sense of taste, touch, smell, sight, and sound are in overdrive. Therefore, he cannot tolerate venturing outside his home and has ultimately become a prisoner there. The only family member who shares the home with Roderick is his twin sister, Madeline. The brother and sister are the last surviving heirs of the Usher line. Unfortunately, Madeline is also very ill, and Roderick fears that she will die before him. The narrator only actually sees Madeline once while she is still alive. This occurs on the night of his arrival and his ghostly perception of her is intermingled with an overwhelming feeling of dread that he cannot explain. The disease that Madeline suffers from has long been a mystery to her physicians. They can only characterize her condition as "a settled apathy, a gradual wasting away of the person, and frequent although transient affections of a partially cataleptical character" (Poe 476). A cataleptic state is defined as one where the person affected is completely comatose in appearance, thus seeming to be dead. It is during one of Madeline's cataleptic spells that her brother mistakes her for dead and places her, along with the help of the narrator, inside a tomb deep within the house that was once used for a dungeon. Jeffery Folks notes that "consciously or not, Roderick imposes a death sentence of a sort on the individual who is closest to him and who therefore shares in his secrets and his history, indeed in his conception.” Following this hasty act, Roderick becomes more agitated 39 than ever and appears to be keeping a secret from the narrator. The house also becomes more life-like and agitated. Stableford surmises that this is supernatural in nature, saying "The hypertensive Roderick hears the miscellaneous knocks, creaks, and rumbles even more keenly, and the transformation imposed upon them by his vivid imagination are fed back into the fabric of the house." This is certainly the image that Poe is trying to produce, that Roderick and the house are simply two parts of one whole. Therefore, whatever affects one will also affect the other. This is most effectively reflected in a song that Roderick composes and performs for the narrator which is entitled "The Haunted Palace." The lyrics of the song evidence the drastic decline that has taken place over the years for both the Usher mansion as well as the family. The first four stanzas of the melody describe the Usher estate in its early years as a "fair and stately palace” (Poe 3) with “Spirits moving musically” …“Round about a throne, where sitting” … “The ruler of the realm was seen” (Poe 19, 21, 24). Usher’s song continues to describe “A troop of Echoes whose sweet duty / Was but to sing, / … / The wit and wisdom of their king" (Poe 29-32). However, in the fifth stanza the fact that the palace has fallen further into ruin with each passing descendant comes to light. Roderick expresses this by mournfully singing that "evil things, in robes of sorrow, / Assailed the monarch's high estate” (Poe 33-34), and the beauty of the house “Is but a dim-remembered story / Of the old time entombed" (Poe 3940). After his performance of the song, Roderick confesses to the narrator that it is his belief that the physical structure of the house has always had a direct psychic connection with the Usher descendants. Poe writes, "The result was discoverable, he added, in that silent yet importunate and terrible influence which for centuries had moulded the destinies of his family, and which made him—what he was" (271). The most dramatic scene in the story takes place on the final 40 night of the narrator's visit and involves the greatest use of imagery by the author. Gone completely mad by now, Roderick enters the chamber of his boyhood friend in an obvious panic. He flings open the window shutters and emits access to a terrible storm which is brewing outside. The narrator describes the storm saying: The impetuous fury of the entering gust nearly lifted us from our feet. It was, indeed, a tempestuous yet sternly beautiful night, and one widely singular in its terror and beauty. A whirlwind had apparently collected its force in our vicinity; for there were frequent and violent alterations in the direction of the wind...the clouds...with life-like velocity flew careering from all points against each other, without passing away into the distance...under the surfaces of the huge masses of agitated vapor, as well as all terrestrial objects immediately around us, were glowing in the unnatural light of the faintly luminous and distinctly gaseous exhalation which hung about and enshrouded the mansion. (Poe 273-274) With Poe's brilliant description he places the reader in view of a storm seemingly straight from the pits of hell. It is during this storm that Madeline finally breaks free from the dungeon in which she is entombed. Roderick, sensing the presence of his twin sister, meets her emaciated body in a final embrace before both siblings surrender to death. The narrator is so overwhelmed by the events of the evening that he flees as quickly as he can from the chamber and exits the mansion. As he is crossing the causeway that connects the house to the land surrounding it, he turns around just in time to witness the final demise of the House of Usher. He relays the following sight: 41 Suddenly there shot along the path a wild light, and I turned to see whence a gleam so unusual could have issued: for the vast house and its shadows were alone behind me. The radiance was that of a full, setting, and blood-red moon which now shone vividly through that once barely-discernible fissure of which I have before spoken as extending from the roof of the building, in a zigzag direction, to the base. While I gazed, this fissure rapidly widened-there came a fierce breath of the whirlwind--the entire orb of the satellite burst at once upon my sight--my brain reeled as I saw the mighty walls rushing asunder--there was a long tumultuous shouting sound like the voice of a thousand waters--and the deep and dank tarn at my feet closed sullenly and silently over the fragments of the "House of Usher." (Poe 276-277) Since Roderick and the house are supernaturally connected, with his death, the mansion must also cease to exist. On this horrific evening the narrator not only sees the physical structure collapse, he also witnesses the complete and total demise of the Usher family line through the death of his boyhood friend. Another element that seems to wind its way through Poe's masterpieces is that of symbolism. Two obvious symbols presented in "The Raven" are that of the raven itself and also the month of December. Both of these things have similar connotations attached to them. The raven is widely perceived to be a symbol of death or ill-omen and December is an archetypal symbol for the end of life. Dhahir pays particular attention to these two symbols and surmises, "it is on a stormy December night that the raven, a symbol of death, enters the speaker's life, never to leave it again." Looking at the symbolism in the poem from this perspective, a direct connection can easily be 42 made between the circumstances surrounding the student and the circumstances surrounding the tragic death of Poe's mother. Just like the speaker in the poem, death entered Poe's life on a December night, never to leave his memory again. There are also two archetypal symbols used by Poe in "Annabel Lee." The sea has always been used to represent life and the night has always been used to signify death. It is arguable from Poe's usage of these symbols that he sees life and death as one-in-the-same. It is interesting that he places the child-bride's tomb of death beside the sounding sea of life. Another parallel is formed when the speaker reveals that he dreams about Annabel Lee nightly as he sleeps beside her in the tomb. In his warped mind he is able to relive his time with her through his dreams in the nightly hours of death. The symbolism in "The Fall of the House of Usher" is seen most effectively in the house itself. According to Stableford, "the symptoms of moral and psychological decline exhibited in the character of Roderick Usher are faithfully reflected in the fabric of the building, to the extent that the house becomes a model of his mind." This is a very accurate description of the relationship Poe designs between Roderick and the mansion that bears his family name. Edgar Allan Poe had a writing style like no other poet or author of his time. Because of this, his works were not widely accepted or appreciated until after his death. His unique writing style was partially accomplished through his artistic use of theme, imagery, and symbolism. However, the real driving force behind his ability came from living through personal tragedies that were ever present in his tortured mind, effectively sculpting every character he created. 43 Works Cited Dhahir, Sanna. "Literary Contexts in Poetry: Edgar Allan Poe's ‘The Raven.’” Literary Contexts in Poetry: Edgar Allan Poe's “The Raven” (2007): 1. Literary Reference Center. Web. 20 April 2013. Donschikowski. “Edgar Allan Poe: Behind the Madness.” Sample Research Project. Thetalon.org. n.d. Web. 1 May 2013. Empric, Julienne H. “A Note on ‘Annabel Lee.’” Poetry for Students. Ed. Ira Mark Milne. Vol. 9. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 May 2013. Folks, Jeffery J. "Edgar Allan Poe and Elias Canetti: Illuminating the Sources of Terror." Short Story Criticism. Vol. 111. Detroit: Gale. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 May 2013. Kelly, David. "Overview of ‘Annabel Lee.’" Poetry for Students. Ed. Ira Milne. Vol. 9. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 May 2013. Poe, Edgar Allan. "Annabel Lee." The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. Ed. Arthur Hobson Quinn. New York: Dorset Press, 1989. 86-87. Print. ---. "The Fall of the House of Usher." The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. Ed. Arthur Hobson Quinn. New York: Dorset Press, 1989. 262-277. Print. ---. "The Raven." The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Shorter 10th Edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 2010. 785-788. Print. Scraba, Jeffrey. "Repetition and Remembrance in Poe's Poetry." Critical Insights: The Poetry of Edgar Allan Poe Oct. 2010, 34-35. Literary Resource Center. Web. 25 Apr. 2013. Stableford, Brian. "The Fall of the House of Usher." Cyclopedia of Literary Places. Feb. 2003: 1. Literary Reference Center. Web. 9 May 2013. 44 TREELL M. GORDEN The Honesty of a Nag Liz Rosenberg’s “The Silence of Women” is a poem that can speak to the masses. Rosenberg’s poem speaks of a brutal truth that comes with age for a lot of women and the punishment their husbands must endure. As time has passed, most societies still remain greatly poised in the masculine. For centuries it has been the duty of women to hold together families and keep up appearances by standing by their men, even when the men are undeserving of such a loyalty. There is also a certain taboo that accompanies divorce today and in days of the past. In Rosenberg’s poem, the speaker talks about the softening of men as if after all of their years they have finally realized the error of their ways or perhaps they have outgrown the gusto of past behaviors. The speaker compares the changes that take place within the hearts of men and women. The speaker believes that the hearts of men grow fonder as the hearts of women grow bitter. The setting of the poem takes place over a lifetime of marriage, and the situation revolves around the marriage becoming unbearable. Accompanying the setting is the speaker’s language formed in the defense of women, which works well to create a tone of vile honesty. The speaker introduces the situation of the poem by saying, “Old men, as time goes on, grow softer, sweeter / while their wives get angrier” (lines 1-2). The speaker makes it clear to the reader that the anger of women is, in fact, developed over the course of a lifetime when she says, “A lifetime of yes has left them / hissing bent as snakes” (6-7). The speaker tells of oppressed women who have had obligations and responsibilities their entire lives that are not necessarily their own. The wants and needs of a husband along with the wants and needs of children can be overwhelming for any housewife. Without 45 doubt, every housewife and mother has experienced feelings of being overwhelmed. The duties of Cinderella chores can often lead a woman to wonder about what else she could have done in life besides raising a family that demanded every ounce of her energy and time. The speaker also mentions the outright spitefulness of older married women when she says, “You see them hauling men across the mall / or pushing them down in chairs” (3-4). The speaker even mimics the women as she repeats their words, “Sit there! and don’t you move!” (5). The women the speaker defends have lived lives full of mixed emotions, lives that these women probably wouldn’t trade, but at times lives they resent all the same. Secondly, Rosenberg uses the speaker’s language to defend the angry women of her poem. The diction of the poem is simplistic yet strong. The speaker explains that after a lifetime of oppression the women can no longer hold back their urge to fight back. These women are angry for what seems to be no reason, when in reality, they are unleashing a lifetime of pent up rage and aggression. In their own minds, they are gaining revenge by sentencing their husbands to live the remainder of their lives in grief and walking on eggshells. The speaker believes that these women have lost all faith in everything; even their own bodies will betray them. The speaker demonstrates this when she claims, “It seems even their bones will turn / against them, once the fruitful years are gone” (8-9). The speaker describes the turn in character by stating, “Something snaps off the houselights / and the cells go dim” (10-11). She speaks as if in an instant these women are thrown into a world of bitter disgust. After their transformation, the speaker describes the angry howl of the scorned women when she says, “whose shrilling is a soulful wind” (16). The speaker’s description of the women’s shrilling lets the reader know that it is not without purpose but with pain. The women are holding onto their very last limbs in life. The speaker clarifies the desperation of these 46 oppressed women when she reveals, “but must make music / any way it can” (19-20). The women must be heard even if it is as an unreasonable old nag. To rant in such a fashion coincides with the poem’s theme of wicked candor. The speaker, situation and setting combine to create Rosenberg’s theme of brutal honesty. Rosenberg sets the tone for this poem by describing the women with verbs containing strong meaning when in reference to women such as “bent” (7), “snaps” (10), “pushing”(4), “scattered” (14), and “shrilling” (16). Through specific language, Rosenberg lets the reader know that it is too late for the women of the poem by writing, “blown through an instrument / that cannot beat time” (17-18). The saddening aspect of the poem is that these women have yet to realize in some ways that it is too late. The speaker lets us know that these women are trying to regain what they have lost when she says, “the chicken hatching back into the egg” (12). The years of their lives spent toiling for their families can never be regained. While people say that hard times are temporary, the years they steal are very permanent. This poem offers no solution, only a warning to evade what the speaker calls, “Oh lifetime of silence!” (13). “The Silence of Women” is a poem composed of simple diction and at first glance may appear to be the comical ongoing life of an elderly married couple. Further investigation of the poetic elements show that the poem is full of anger and regret conveyed as harsh honesty. Rosenberg enlightens the reader to what it is like to look back on a life of regret. There is no cure for the ailment unfortunately, only a fair warning for women to be careful of what they become a part of and what they are willing to claim responsibility for. 47 Works Cited Rosenberg, Liz. “The Silence of Women.” The Norton Introductory to Poetry. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. 9th ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2007. 335. Print. 48 JEREMY D. HARDISON Generation TeXt The thought of leaving home today without a phone is absolutely terrifying. Communication technology has effectively handcuffed society to these small electronic devices. However, this has little to do with the ability to make and receive calls. Instant messaging, texting, and social networks have become the standard way of conversing. The taps on a smartphone and clicks of the keyboard have become the depressingly silent sound of communication. These mediums of social exchange are creating a narcissistic culture emphasizing less accountability, self-control, and patience. As a result, social skills, as society defines them, are declining at a rapid pace. Looking someone in the eye during a conversation meant a great deal in the past. This act has conveyed confidence and truthfulness in many cultures since the beginning of time. What happens when we take away the need to stand in front of someone and speak to them? A recent study conducted by the Pew Research Center showed that 97% of young adults (ages 18-29) that own a cell phone use texting as a means of communication (Rainie 6). The same institute found that 63% of teens and young adults text daily while only 39% talk on the phone daily (Purcell 23). These numbers indicate a growing trend toward non-verbal communication. In short, the ability to discern the meaning behind someone’s tone of voice or the physical cues in faceto-face conversations is being negated. The ability to lie is certainly not a recently discovered skill, but lying through electronic communication nullifies the need to be skilled at it. In fact, conversations require less tact, and subsequently are taken less seriously. For example, that football player that was just insulted through a text message can’t physically hurt anyone 49 through a phone. No one is around to see the girl’s tears or hear her sobs because the football player casually commented on how fat she looks in her latest series of Facebook photos. These interactions are commonplace. The consequences are rarely felt or dealt with by the offender because there are no visual or auditory signs of trauma. The girl cries alone in her room and contemplates suicide. The football player has no idea the extent of the damage he has caused, and there is no accountability. These avenues of communication provide no feedback of emotional cues to trigger an emotional response of guilt in the initiator. Responsibility to treat members of the community with respect and dignity are no longer required. To expand on another example, the captain of the football team was just belittled in a mass text conversation by someone resembling Harry Potter, and there is nothing he can do about it. Mr. Potter is now on top of the world emotionally. He posts what happened on Facebook and is proud to see that half of his friends have liked his status. They have just rewarded him for insulting an individual capable of delivering serious bodily harm. His confidence soars, and a sense of invincibility sets in. The social awkwardness that has plagued him begins to ease. Taking away the threat of social and physical repercussions effectively reinforces a dwindling boundary in self-control. The lack of response leads to more daring and outlandish opinions being thrown out without remorse. Oddly, this becomes a game of attempting to actually invoke a response that we equate with emotion. This game is considered by some to be an art form, lovingly called “trolling.” This is most often seen on internet forums and social networking sites. These bastions of humanity, creatively nicknamed “trolls,” are a prime example of the lack of self-control running rampantly through the information super-highway. Social networking sites provide an ideal opportunity to share photos, thoughts and convictions, and general updates on life with 50 friends and family. However, this idea itself is narcissistic in nature. Often the person portrayed online is the most idealistic version of himself or herself. When portraying one’s best, one often feels the need to be rewarded for how amazing he or she is. There is a certain level of expectation that each picture, post, and share will be met with grand approval in the form of likes and comments. Failure to do so can lead to complications between friends and a culling that leads to a group of more like-minded individuals. These thoughts and reactions are happening instantly with the capability of smart phones, tablets, and laptops to instantly access these sites. Walk around any college campus and most students have their heads buried no longer in books, but in these electronic devices. Often, they are greedily posting and waiting on reactions to comments. Text messaging is likewise subject to this need for instant gratification. A lack of immediate response to a text is considered unacceptable given the accessibility of texting. The decline of patience spirals down to the formal use of the English language. Words, and even whole phrases, become shorter in an effort to maximize the speed with which we communicate. It is now bleeding over into situations requiring proper use of the English language. A teacher recently said, “I see the letter u instead of the word you in students’ essays all the time” (Lovenstein). On the whole, most young adults find no reason for a face-toface discussion in today’s world. Laughter is being replaced by silent letters. Smiles are no longer a visual masterpiece of genuine happiness. These are now just digital icons, emotes, and abbreviations on a blank background. The sound of a friend’s voice is becoming alien. This lack of material, social interaction deprives us of emotional happiness and causes us to become more withdrawn and introverted. Monumental information, capable of changing lives, is now commonly delivered from machine to machine, with complete disregard for the emotional element. In addition, communicating through electronics robs us of 51 the physical senses that allow our minds to create beautiful and everlasting memories. Few people in this world can remember the sight, sound, and smell around them at the precise moment they received a text message. These new issues represent a disturbingly subtle, and unconscious, shift away from instinctive human behavior. Maybe it’s time to leave the handcuffs at home. 52 Works Cited Lovenstein, Leslie J. Pulaski Technical College. North Little Rock, AR. 03 Apr. 2013. Lecture. Purcell, Kristin. “Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths about Teen Online Behavior.” Pew Internet and American Life Project. Pew Research Center. 11 July 2012. Slideshow. Web. 07 Apr. 2013. Rainie, Lee. “Cell Phone Activities 2012.” Pew Internet and American Life Project. Pew Research Center. 25 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Apr. 2013. 53 VICKI McDONALD Manipulation, Murder and Mayhem: The Psychopathology of Iago The wicked Iago’s adeptness at deceiving the other characters in the play is crucial to the tragic plot of Shakespeare’s Othello. Throughout the play, Iago manipulates the people around him and persuades them to see precisely what he wants them to see in order to gain his desired outcome. The very people Iago manipulates view him as a trusted friend. In fact, throughout the play, he is often referred to as “Honest Iago.” How is our villain able to accomplish this feat, and what are the motives for his actions? Many would reply that his motivations are jealousy and greed. I disagree. I propose that Iago has no motive for his deeds. Rather than being driven by envy or greed, this character is compelled by the primal urges of his antisocial personality. In other words, Iago is a psychopath. Psychopathy is a mental disorder in which an individual manifests amoral and antisocial behavior, exhibits a lack of ability to love or establish meaningful relationships, suffers from extreme egocentricity, and fails to learn from experience. I believe this paints an accurate portrait of Iago. He is unable to have genuine friendships and does not even have a meaningful relationship with his own wife. He lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. Iago is loyal to no one, but operates in his own best interest, ruthlessly exploiting people with no regard for their feelings. Like most psychopaths, Iago is aggressive and exceedingly impulsive. No matter how unpredictable or antisocial he may be, Iago does not see anything wrong with his impetuous behavior. He is a very dispassionate character. As author Fred West points out in his article, “Iago the Psychopath,” Iago is “by no means a man of strong feelings and passions…but 54 decidedly cold by temperament" (West 29). Even though he may shout and proclaim his indignation, it is only an act to reinforce his lies. He is capable of committing violent acts without feeling guilt. Thus, Iago exhibits the characteristics of a true psychopath. Why do his fellow characters believe he is trustworthy? In his book The Mask of Sanity, in which he describes his clinical interviews with incarcerated psychopaths, clinical professor of psychiatry Hervey Cleckley, M.D. states, "More often than not such a person will seem particularly agreeable and make a distinctly positive impression when one first meets him. Alert and friendly in his attitude, he is easy to talk with and seems to have a good many genuine interests…He looks like the real thing" (Cleckley 382). Since the other characters trust him implicitly, one could assume that Iago has not previously committed any horrendous acts. But how is this possible, given his psychopathic nature? As a soldier, Iago was able to channel his asocial tendencies into the savagery of war, where he was able to perpetrate vicious acts without fear of retribution. Rather than being regarded as a criminal, he was considered a war hero. As we enter the play, Iago has discovered that Othello chose Cassio as his lieutenant, even though Iago had seniority and more experience in battle. We also find Iago defending himself against Roderigo’s charge that he is a coward for serving the person he claims to hate. Iago sees the accusation as an insult to his honor. He professes his hatred of the Moor to Roderigo and claims to serve Othello only to fulfill his own needs, saying, “O sir, content you. / I follow him to serve my turn upon him” (1.1.38-39). Furthermore, Iago claims, “In following him, I follow but myself, / Heaven is my judge, not I for love and duty, / But seeming so, for my peculiar end” (1.1. 55-57). He later professes, “I am not what I am” (1.1.65). In explaining himself to Roderigo, Iago has set himself up. In his vanity, he perceives himself 55 as more intelligent than those around him. To prove his superiority, he now has to devise a plan to steer circumstances in his favor and lure his supposed enemies into his trap. Since there is no war at the very beginning of the play to keep Iago occupied, he feels a childish need for excitement. Perhaps from sheer boredom, he takes what is closest at hand, the recent marriage of Othello and Desdemona, and concocts some mischief to entertain himself. He urges Roderigo to inform Brabantio of Desdemona’s elopement with Othello: “Call up her father, / rouse him. Make after him, poison his delight” (1.1.64-65). Iago gleefully shouts insults at the senator from his position of concealment. He then proceeds to inform Othello of Roderigo’s actions and the imminent arrival of his new father-in-law, who will seek an end to the marriage. He uses the other characters as pawns in this game that he has created and that he plans to win. They are simply tools he uses when devising schemes for his own amusement. He executes his hateful and underhanded schemes without sufficient motivation in the normal sense. He has no true motive. His only real motivation seems to be a need for his own indulgence. Causing others pain seems to afford him a disinterested pleasure. When Roderigo voices his intent to commit suicide, Iago cynically lists all the reasons why he should not go through with it and convinces him to change his mind with the promise that Roderigo will be able to seduce Desdemona. Roderigo is to liquidate his assets and join Iago in Cyprus, where they will carry out the plan. This is not done out of any love, friendship, or concern, but for Iago’s own selfish reasons. Roderigo has been useful to Iago by providing money: “Thus do I ever make my fool my purse. / For I mine own gained knowledge should profane / if I would time expend with such a snipe but for my sport and profit” (1.3.352-354). 56 Iago is also planning to use Roderigo in his schemes against both Cassio and Othello. Iago seeks to discredit Cassio and take his place as lieutenant while exacting revenge upon Othello for overlooking him for the position. He also suspects that Othello has had an affair with his wife Emilia: I hate the Moor, And it is thought abroad that ’twixt my sheets He has done my office. I know not if’t be true; But I, for mere suspicion in that kind, Will do as if for surety. He holds me well; The better shall my purpose work on him. Cassio’s a proper man. Let me see now, To get his place and to plume up my will In double knavery…Let’s see. After some time, to abuse Othello’s ear That he is too familiar with his wife. (1.3.354-364) It does not matter to Iago whether Othello has actually committed adultery with Emilia. He intends to proceed as though he is certain the affair occurred. Rather than provocations for the horrible acts he performs, Iago’s reasons and excuses come to him more as afterthoughts. His socalled motives are merely justifications that have little to do with proven fact. It is a typical trait of the psychopath to find reasonable excuses for his actions and then begin to believe them himself. Once in Cyprus, Iago begins to enact his deceitful plan. After instructing Roderigo to anger Cassio to the point of violence, he begins to circulate a rumor that Cassio is an alcoholic. Iago lies consistently and flawlessly. He acknowledges that Cassio is more refined, but this does not damage his narcissistic self-confidence. He can make Cassio the victim of his superiority by using his own coarseness to his advantage. After successfully causing Cassio to be dismissed as Othello’s lieutenant, Iago commences the next phase of his plan by advising him to seek Desdemona’s assistance. Though his advice seems 57 reasonable, Iago remains true to his duplicitous nature: How am I then a villain To counsel Cassio to this parallel course, Directly to his good? Divinity of hell! When devils will the blackest sins put on, They do suggest at first with heavenly shows as I do now. (2.2.308-313) Once again, it would seem that Iago is not what he appears to be. He masterfully presents his affected mask to the world. Now that he has gained the trust of Roderigo and Cassio, it is time for Iago to turn his attention to Othello. He begins planting in Othello’s mind seeds of doubt about Desdemona’s love and fidelity by making him suspicious of her relationship with Cassio: Look to your wife, observe her well with Cassio. Wear your eyes thus, not jealous nor secure. I would not have your free and noble nature Out of self-bounty be abused. Look to’t. (3.3.197-200) Iago’s lies are made all the more plausible by his seeming reluctance to voice them aloud to Othello. While stating common wisdom about the errors of jealousy, he manages to slyly reinforce them in Othello’s mind. He then plants Desdemona’s stolen handkerchief on Cassio and arranges for Othello to “overhear” Cassio boasting about his alleged affair with Desdemona. But everything Othello heard was a misrepresentation of facts, a sly twisting of the truth. Later, as Iago vows to kill Cassio, he employs reverse psychology by asking Othello to let Desdemona live, thereby assuring her death at Othello’s hands. Iago is an exceptionally skilled manipulator, another psychopathic trait. Roderigo tires of being used by Iago and confronts him. As his last act of deception, Iago persuades him to kill Cassio. Though Roderigo is unsure, Iago somehow manages to convince him. It is 58 Iago’s hope that the two will actually kill each other, but he is prepared to step in if necessary to ensure that both die: Now, whether he kill Cassio, Or Cassio him, or each do kill the other, Every way makes my gain. Live Roderigo, He calls me to a restitution large Of gold and jewels that I bobbed from him As gifts to Desdemona. It must not be. If Cassio do remain He hath a daily beauty in his life That makes me ugly. And besides, the Moor May unfold me to him—there stand I in much peril. No, he must die. (5.1.12-22) From his place of concealment, Iago manages to wound Cassio. He later pursues Roderigo and murders him, unaware of the damning letters in Roderigo’s coat pocket. Meanwhile, Othello has killed Desdemona. When Iago is apprehended, he slays his own wife in an attempt to escape. So it would seem that our villain is capable of homicide. Yet no one, aside from Roderigo, suspects Iago of lying until the final scene of the play, when everyone, including his wife Emilia, is shocked at the discovery of his deception. Othello, unable to endure these tragic events, ends his own life. Iago does not show any remorse for his deeds. He merely retreats behind a wall of rebellious unresponsiveness now that he has lost the power to manipulate the others saying, “Demand me nothing. What you know, you know. / From this time forth I never will speak word” (4.2.299-300). Since he is no longer free to act, he can at least choose not to act. He remains silent and indifferent to their threats. This is his final act of power over the other characters. They are all left wondering what really happened and why it happened. Only Iago knows the whole story, but he remains steadfastly silent. 59 Though his successful manipulations were certainly aided by Roderigo’s desperate love for Desdemona, Othello’s and Cassio’s trusting natures, Emilia’s desire to please her husband and Desdemona’s innocence, it is Iago’s complete lack of conscience that enables him to lie so easily and so well. He shows no regret for his actions or the misfortune they have caused. Iago is precisely the same from the beginning of the play to the end: completely devoid of conscience. This inability to feel guilt is a major characteristic of the true psychopath. Despite his admonitions to the contrary, Iago is what he is. He does not so much choose to act as he expresses the nature of his being. "The individual cannot escape the nature he is born with, but must act as this nature requires him to act” (West 27). 60 Works Cited Abernathy, Julian. "Honest Iago." Sewanee Review. 30.3 (1992): 336344. Web. 8 Mar. 2013. Cleckley, Hervey. The Mask of Sanity: An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues about the So-Called Psychopathic Personality. 5th ed. Augusta: C.V. Mosby Co., 1988. The Cassiopaean Experiment. Web. 16 Mar. 2013. Shakespeare, William. Othello. Literature: Reading Fiction, Poetry and Drama. Ed. Robert DiYanni. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007. 1455-1543. Print. Stempel, Daniel. "The Silence of Iago." PMLA. 84.2 (1969): 252-263. Web. 16 Mar. 2013. West, Fred. "Iago the Psychopath." South Atlantic Bulletin. 43.2 (1978): 27-35. Web. 16 Mar. 2013. 61 R YA N A B B E Y The Brilliant but Doomed Design of the Wankel Rotary Engine Imagine a car with twice the power and half the parts. Imagine a car which has no need for a cam shaft, a valve spring, or a timing belt. Imagine a car that has only two spark plugs which can produce the power of a six cylinder conventional engine even if one of the two should fail. This futuristic technology is here and has been for the last half century. This design is called the Wankel rotary engine; it is a work of art as much as science but that has not been enough to make it the industry standard of the United States. This design is superior but is not likely to ever outpace the conventional internal combustion engine because of the inherent resistance to change in an industry reinforced by unfortunate world events during the designs consideration by those powerful enough to use it. The rotary engine is beautiful in its design. Its inherent simplicity of design and symmetry of motion make it superior in many ways to the conventional piston internal combustion engine. In order to appreciate the value of such an engineering feat, a person must first have a basic understanding of how the engine operates as compared to what is considered a normal car’s engine. In a conventional fourstroke engine, the piston will first move down in its cylinder with the intake valve open to pull in a mixture of air and fuel. This is called the intake stroke. Then the piston will change direction and the intake valve will close, causing the fuel and air to be compressed in a now sealed chamber. This is the compression stroke. The power stroke follows as the fuel and air, heated by the compression, are ignited (usually by a spark plug), which forces the piston back down as the gas burns and expands. Finally, the piston will again change direction after reaching 62 the bottom of the cylinder and move up with the exhaust valve open, forcing the spent exhaust out the tail pipe. Although this is the established norm of how a car is powered, a closer analysis shows inherent inefficiencies in the way it operates. Consider first that of the four strokes explained only one produces any power. The other three require energy to perform, which is provided by the inertia of the flywheel and/or other pistons in the engine. The second thing to be considered is the inherent stop-start nature of how the engine parts move. The piston must stop its direction of travel and accelerate in the opposite direction four times in the completion of only one cycle. Similarly the valves must briefly rocket open and closed for the engine to operate. Compare this now to the operation of a rotary design engine as explained and illustrated by Energy Conversion written by Kenneth Weston. In a rotary engine (See Figure 7.4), an almost triangular rotor moves within an oval-shaped housing with the corners of the triangle in constant contact with the inner surface creating three chambers at all times. Observe how the movement of the triangle around the drive shaft traps the fuel air mixture and carries it through the compression, power, and exhaust phases without ever stopping its motion or using any valves. Once a basic understanding of the inner workings of the engine is achieved, it is easy to see why such a design can be called superior. 63 (Weston 264) A rotary engine exhibits several advantages over conventional engines. Weston goes on to explain: Higher operating speeds, ease of balancing, and absence of vibration are a few of the benefits. The high operating speeds allow the engine to produce twice as much power as a reciprocating engine of the same weight. It has significantly fewer parts and occupies less volume than a reciprocating engine of comparable power. (261) 64 Because a rotary engine lacks the need for any valves, the design does not require linkages to move those valves or any timing equipment associated with synchronizing the piston with individual valve operations. This reduces the overall size and weight of the engine but not its power output. With less machinery needed, the engine can be made larger and more powerful for the same weight. In short, the rotary engine has a much greater thrust-to-weight ratio brought on by its simplicity. The lack of moving parts is another benefit in the sense that there is simply less to break and less to manufacture. The simplicity of the design also lends itself to other applications which would be nearly impossible for a conventional engine. Berkeley University research which used the design is an excellent example, having manufactured a miniature rotary engine approximately the size of a nine volt battery (Zandonella). Finally, the lack of vibration due to the unidirectional movement of the engine should be taken into consideration. Outside of the energy wasted in reversing the motion of internal masses within the engine, the constant rotation of the moving parts of a rotary engine make this design vibration free compared to conventional motors. These benefits make the design stand out, yet it is relatively unknown to the general public and uncommon on the roads of America. Its implementation has been far from thorough since its conception in 1954 (Weston 261). Several factors in the history of the automotive rotary engine have led to it being an alternate and unique rather than standard design. Arguably the most significant of these is an inherent resistance to change in the automotive industry, as John Hege explains in The Wankel Rotary Engine. In the early 1970s, General Motors was the only American manufacturer to have purchased the manufacturing rights to the Wankel rotary design. Implementation of such a radically different design in automotive engineering could only be brought to the masses through an industry giant such as GM. Yet even with such 65 a unique and powerful opportunity, GM was still hesitant to build any car that did not operate on conventional pistons. Hege explains one major negative influence in the manufacture of a rotary car for GM had to do with another revolutionary production car made just before the Wankel became of interest. The Corvair is described as “the most innovative (and ill-fated) car ever to come out of General Motors” (Hege 108). This car featured a unibody design, air-cooled engine and most uniquely an engine mounted behind the rear axle. The design sold well but became known for unusual handling characteristics brought on by its engine placement combined with independent swing arm suspension. These design elements resulted in a tendency for the rear wheels to tuck under the car in a turn when heavily loaded. This characteristic, according to Hege, would be exploited by a selfproclaimed consumer advocate named Ralph Nader who launched his career with his book which described the Corvair as a demonstration of all that was wrong with the automotive industry. Such events caused the end of Corvair production in 1969 and reluctance on the part of GM executives to attempt any new radical design. The design would continue to be plagued with unfortunate events which prevented GM from making the full investment needed to begin manufacture of the unique components that go into the construction of the device. Just as GM was building prototypes of a Corvette run by a mid-mounted rotary, war in the Middle East would force a rise in fuel prices in the United States making the design a poor choice for American consumers at the time. While the design offers considerably greater power for a given weight and volume, the design is not as fuel efficient as conventional engines simply because of the nature of its operation. The Japanese company of Mazda began struggling to sell the RX-2 rotary powered cars, which were beginning to flourish in the US, but interest in the project was lost due to a dismal 17.3 miles per gallon (Hege 121). The timing of industry and world events 66 have resulted in a lack of interest in risking a change to the tried and true method of propulsion used in the automotive industry of America today. While the ingenious design of the Wankel rotary engine makes it a more elegant and powerful machine compared to our conventional piston engines, that alone is not enough to make it an industry standard. The challenge of manufacturing a radically different design to rival a technology which has been perfected for over a hundred years leads to an overall resistance to change in the industry. What interest has occurred in our history has waned as a result of circumstance. Although the design could easily outpace the conventional motor in time, the investment needed to develop the technology beyond that of our industry standard will likely deter the automotive industry indefinitely. 67 Works Cited Hege, John. The Wankel Rotary Engine: A History. Jefferson: McFarland & Company Inc., 2001. eBook. Nook. Weston, Kenneth. Energy Conversion. Tulsa U, 2000. Web. 16 June 2013. Zandollena, Catherine. Press Release. Berekley.edu, 2001. Web. 16 June 2013. 68 J O N AT H A N W H I T E H E A D Unity in Diversity amongst Non-Conformists: A Message from Mark Twain’s “The War Prayer” Samuel Clemens, otherwise known as Mark Twain, penned his poem “The War Prayer” during the Philippine-American war. “The War Prayer” is a bitter satire piece of literature that was rejected by Twain’s publishing company on March 22 of 1905 as having been unsuitable for a women’s magazine. Consequently, “The War Prayer” remained unpublished for the remainder of Twain’s life, but shortly afterwards, following his death in 1910, it was finally published. “The War Prayer” is Mark Twain’s subtle critique of organized religion and nationalism. The flags, nation, and religion of the community remain unnamed, but their ambiguity helps to intensify and expand the boundaries of its message to every nation and religion around the world. Mark Twain’s critique of organized religion and nationalism is a product of his fluid and yet fragmented philosophy. Concerning Twain’s ideology, John Bird quoted Bruce Michelson in the book Constructing Mark Twain as having said, “To try to define or confine Mark Twain ideologically is therefore a risky business, for the range and reflexivity of his own work can easily outrun - or overthrow discourse about economic and political configurations of the self” (qtd. in Skandera-Trombley 214). This is because Twain struggled with harmonizing his religion with his philosophy, and this struggle consequently led to the fragmentation of his ideology. For example, the antagonistic tone of “The War Prayer” strongly suggests that Twain harbored a skeptic attitude towards religion, but the imagery given to the heroic stranger seems to suggest that Twain was far from an atheist. Thus, the hybridization of atheism and progressive theism 69 in “The War Prayer” gives the poem a voice that transcends political ideology, time, and religion. It is important to understand Twain’s fragmented and fluid philosophy in “The War Prayer” because in seeing it, we are able to connect with his sentiments and the human struggle of reformation and the pursuit of knowledge. It is evident in “The War Prayer” that Twain is not a polished philosopher or politician, but his willingness to share his ideology provides the reader with the opportunity to engage in the continuous reformation of politics and religion. Twain’s epistemology provides a strong link between the progressive theists and atheists. It resembles that of the famous skeptic David Hume. Twain’s confession of this is quoted by Alexander E. Jones in “Mark Twain and the Determinism of What Is Man?” Twain states, “Incidentally, I observed that the human machine gets all its inspirations from the outside and is not capable of originating an idea of any kind in its own head...” This is significant because Hume’s epistemology provided Twain with the ideas needed to unite spiritual and non-spiritual persons against the bigotry of the state and church. Twain implies that moral virtues are discovered through one’s reflection upon life’s empirical experiences and that these virtues are not contingent upon one’s religious or emotional inspirations. For Twain, the impressions we experience through our human faculty should be the foundation upon which we build society since our humanity is what links us together in solidarity. When we submit to the authority of superstition, we are likely to find ourselves in the same predicament of the church in “The War Prayer,” where their allegiance to authoritarian figures and religion prevented them from seeing the apparent immorality of their “silent” prayer. The lone, aged stranger was the only one willing to abandon the mysticism of religion and challenge the authority of the church and state to establish doctrine and ethics. The imagery of a depraved and incompetent congregation being guided by an eloquent preacher is the speaker’s way of identifying 70 the church’s ability to corrupt a nation and the moral stature of its people. The moral depravity of the congregation can be seen when the aged stranger noiselessly makes his way down the main aisle. The speaker in “The War Prayer” states, “With all eyes following him and wondering, he made his silent way.” Prayer is a time when the religious are expected to hang their heads and close their eyelids, but here, the only person with closed eyelids is the preacher. Nothing is more evident of a weak and superficial faith than the congregation’s apparent lack of devotion to their service. Their thoughtless devotion is also accompanied by their incompetence. The speaker states in the closing line that the congregation “believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said.” The superficial devotion and religion of the majority prevented them listening to the aged stranger. This imagery reflects Mark Twain’s pessimistic and hopeless perspective on organized religion shared by both progressive theists and atheists. In “The War Prayer,” the aged stranger is symbolic of Twain’s life. The aged stranger represents a minority of people, including Twain, who were rejected or dismissed as fanatics by the belligerent multitudes. The oppressive behavior of the majority is captured when the speaker identifies the non-conformists. The speaker says: It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast a doubt upon its righteousness straightway got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety’s sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way. Twain felt as though he was one of the “half dozen rash spirits.” Mark Twain had experienced the same persecution in his own life. Mark Twain is quoted by Jones as having said that, “I laid one chapter of my gospel before the Monday Evening Club in Hartford, a quarter of a 71 century ago, and there was not a man there who didn’t scoff at it, jeer at it, revile it, and call it a lie, a thousand times a lie!” (qtd. in Jones 2). Twain also stated in 1907 concerning his gospel, “I have talked my gospel rather freely in conversation for twenty-five or thirty years and have never much minded whether my listeners liked it or not...” (Jones 2). Revolutionaries, like Twain, who are marginalized or mocked resemble the aged stranger. It usually takes a great amount of time and experience, as it did Twain, to formulate revolutionary ideas, thus the aged stranger is a man who represents Mark Twain’s matured philosophy. The stranger is any man or woman whose ideology has alienated them from their community. Although Twain’s perspective on organized religion and nationalism may seem extreme, Tom Quirk stated in the book Constructing Mark Twain, “We may well turn to his late fictions with a more vital and practical attention than we have in the past. In a word, when and if methods of critical inquiry catch up to what is known about the physical universe, we may find that Twain is cordially waiting for us at the end of our difficult intellectual trek” (qtd. in Skandera-Trombley 198). Mark Twain’s struggle to find justification in the PhilippineAmerican war can be seen in “The War Prayer.” After the aged stranger puts into words the unspoken prayer of the congregation he says: We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. There is a strong sense of irony in “The War Prayer,” irony so strong that Twain must have seen it in the Moro Massacre. The Americans, who supposedly stood for life, liberty, and Christianity, ended up stripping away the Moro people’s rights and “slaughtering” every last man, woman, and child. General Wood gave the Americans an order to “Kill or capture” the “savage” Moro peoples (Twain, “Comments”). 72 Mark Twain commented on the Moro Massacre in 1906 saying, “Apparently our little army considered that the ‘or’ left them authorized to kill or capture according to taste, and that their taste had remained what it has been for eight years, in our army out there - the taste of Christian butchers” (Twain, “Comments”). Twain describes them as both Christians and “butchers.” Christians, who are supposed to be imitating the life of Christ, decided to disregard the teachings of Jesus’s non-violent revolution and slaughter the Moro peoples. Likewise, in “The War Prayer,” the religious butchers are making a petition to the most merciful God. They are lifting up their voices and asking for invincibility, comfort, strength, and confidence so that they can “smite the foe.” The ironic part is that their God is the one who aids those who seek him with “humble and contrite hearts.” That is to say that the God “Who is the Source of Love” will be aiding the enemy. Mark Twain’s subtle critique of nationalism and organized religion in “The War Prayer” is the product of his life and philosophy. Many years of experience and meditation led Twain to reject the mysticism of religion and the “holy fire of patriotism.” Twain knew that such a message was too powerful for the day and time in which he lived. This is why he told his friend, Dan Beard, that he would not be publishing “The War Prayer” in his lifetime. In Paine’s biography of Mark Twain, he is quoted as having said, “I have told the whole truth in that, and only dead men can tell the truth in this world. It can be published after I am dead.” Twain’s anticipated rejection can be summed up in the congregation’s reaction in the final line of “The War Prayer”: “It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, /because there was no sense in what he said.” Twain’s message is a hopeless and pessimistic one. Even though Twain believed that humans have “the unique ability to distinguish right from wrong...” he also believed that we tend “to choose the wrong” (Jones 3). There is a message in “The War Prayer” for the non-conformists. It is that the way of justice is difficult and the depravity of the majority can be a hostile force. 73 Works Cited Jones, Alexander E. "Mark Twain and the Determinism of What Is Man?" American Literature 29.1 (1957): 1-3. Literary Reference Center. Web. 25 July 2013. Paine, Albert Bigelow. "Chapter Cxli: Literature and Philosophy." Mark Twain, a Biography. Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, 2006. Literary Reference Center. Web. 25 July 2013. Paine, Albert Bigelow. "Chapter CCXXXIV: Life at 21 Fifth Avenue." Mark Twain, a Biography. Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, 2006. Literary Reference Center. Web. 25 July 2013. Skandera-Trombley, Laura E., and Michael J. Kiskis. Constructing Mark Twain : New Directions In Scholarship. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2001. eBook Collection (EB SCOhost). Web. 26 July 2013. Twain, Mark. “Comments on the Moro Massacre.” Is.wayne.edu. Wayne State University. N.d. Web. 26 July 2013. ---. “The War Prayer.” United Holdings Group, 2011. Web. 26 July 2013. 74 SHARA RICHARDS Equating Equals The compelling poets Langston Hughes and Phillis Wheatley, in their poems “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” and “On Being Brought from Africa to America” respectively, both create an intelligently persuasive plea for equality among all people. They both use different techniques to help others heed their call to equality for each and every person. While Hughes implies that equality is a human right, Wheatley insists on equality being a Christian right. To help us understand their message, they use imagery, tone, and rhythm. Both poets focus on the equality of the individual. Hughes uses natural allusion in his poem to bring to mind individual humanity, that these “rivers” (line 8) he speaks of, we could all be a part of them. In fact, we have always been a part of the “ancient, dusky rivers” (9). The element of water has a crucial role in the functioning involvement and development of all people. In reviewing the poem, author Dean Rader informs us, “This notion of growing, of thriving is important for Hughes, because he wants his poem to carry the same invigorating power as rivers themselves.” Hughes imparts an idea that a river flows in unity, with all the waters flowing fluidly through all the rivers, that all the water is equal. Humans should flow like the rivers. In comparison, Wheatley uses the tone of her human joy at being present in this life and place to make herself more personable. When Wheatley writes, “Taught my benighted soul to understand” (line 2), this comprehension of humanity helps us empathize with her plight. Wheatley presents herself as a happy Christian sister speaking the truth to her fellow Christians. “Remember, Christians,” (9) she says. This Christian familiarity turns her into a Christian reader’s equal. “In fact, the whole thrust of the poem is to prove the paradox that in being en- 75 slaved, she was set free in a spiritual sense,” states the article “Overview: ‘On Being Brought from Africa to America.’” Yet while reading the poem, we don’t think of her as a slave but as a member of our extended family. By doing this, she puts herself on equal footing with everyone, as Hughes does with his river allusion. Hughes and Wheatley use different techniques, but both have the goal of persuading the reader. Hughes uses imagery of different rivers to walk us through time to show that he has always been a man of equality. He says, “human blood in human veins” (3) so that there is no difference from one human to another. Naming the rivers that have flowed in Africa such as the “Euphrates,” “Congo,” and “Nile” (5, 6, 7) brings to mind pride that these are places that all humans can go. The river turning “all golden in the sunset” (9-10) is an assessment in the happy ending that equality would give to all humans. In contrast, Wheatley uses rhythm to lull the reader into her train of thought. The happy tune of her iambic pentameter pulls us into her idea, to examine the words with clarity and gain understanding for her demand for equality. Her rhyme scheme helps the rhythm of her poem to flow. The rhyme follows the heartbeat; this heart beat that we all have helps us recognize each other through the identifying beat. Through imagery and sound, both authors remain persuasive. Both Hughes and Wheatley call on God as a reason for their bid for equality. Hughes’ call for God is subtle. The wording in The New International Version of The Holy Bible is as follows: “Jesus answered, ‘Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst again. Indeed, the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life’” (John 4.13-14). Hughes’ use of the word “rivers,” when translated to the biblical imagery that God is the living water, transforms his whole poem. “I’ve known rivers” (1) would mean he has known God. How could anyone who knows God not be an equal to 76 anyone else who knows God? That “My soul has grown deep” (4, 13) like God’s soul is a powerful thought. To be like God is to have love for every person no matter what. Hughes is showing that each person is made in God’s image and we can all be mirrors of goodness to each other. More dramatically, Wheatley calls out for Christian decency directly. The line “That there’s a God, that there’s a Savior too,” (4) lets us know that she has been saved just like the Christians reading her poem. She reminds us of our “redemption” (4), directing us to recall that God loves us all as His children and that God sees each one of us as equal, and we should be able to see one another as equals. That we can all ride the “angelic train” (8) is an appeal to Christians that as we will all be on even footing when we get to Heaven, we should be on even footing on earth as well. In this way, Hughes and Wheatley overlap. Phillis Wheatley in 1773 and Langston Hughes in 1926 both wanted the same thing: the chance to be equal. Throughout time people have always wanted to be treated with love, kindness, and understanding. It is human nature to want to be included and accepted. In different ways both Hughes and Wheatley help us fathom the human condition. The poets let us know that to be equal gives us the opportunity at individual freedoms and happiness that we would not have otherwise. Their wonderfully timeless poetry weaves thoughts and feelings of what we can achieve, that we can all comprehend each other on a deep and profoundly meaningful level. The poets let each and every person know that each counts as a whole, and that each adds to the immense capacity of the indomitable human spirit. 77 Works Cited Hughes, Langston. “The Negro Speaks of Rivers.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Shorter 10th ed. New York: Norton, 2010. 960-961. Print. The New International Version of The Holy Bible. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2001. Print. “Overview: ‘On Being Brought from Africa to America.’” Poetry for Students. Ed. Ira Mark Milne. Vol. 29. Detroit: Gale, 2009. Literature Resource Center. Web. 4 Apr. 2013. Rader, Dean. “Overview of 'The Negro Speaks of Rivers.’” Poetry for Students. Ed. Michael L. LaBlanc. Vol. 10. Detroit: Gale Group, 2001. Literature Resource Center. Web. 4 Apr. 2013. Wheatley, Phillis. “On Being Brought from Africa to America.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Shorter 10th ed. New York: Norton, 2010. 725. Print. 78 E L I Z A B E T H L . S U L L I VA N Visitation Visiting with a loved one is an experience most people take for granted. What if you had to visit your loved one in a maximum security prison? Most people do not think about such a visit. I know I never had. The only glimpse into prison I had was from “reality” shows that depict the worst our society has to offer. The odds of anyone close to me being in a place like that was a ridiculous thought, but in 2009, when my oldest brother was sentenced to life in prison, I found myself preparing for my first visit to a maximum security prison. I was twenty-seven the first time I went to visit my brother. It was a visit I had decided to make alone. The last time I had seen him was the year before, the day we buried our younger brother. My oldest brother went to jail for his crime the day after. I spent the eight hour drive to the prison thinking about how I had lost both of my brothers within days of each other. But, I was lucky that I would still be able to see one of them. The prison was not what I had imagined. It was a dark grey building with a hunter green roof. It was off by itself but not totally secluded from the rest of the town. Once I looked past the front of the massive structure, I could see the tall fences with the swirled silver barbwire that caged the less than appealing courtyard. It was empty and bare and surrounded by housing units. There was not much for anyone who was inside the courtyard to look at except for the sky. I could see why my brother was always hopeful for a cloudy day. At least that would give the inmates something to gaze upon. As I made my way through the first of many doors, I could see instantly why my brother had mentioned to be early. There was already a long line full of family members and friends anxious to see 79 their loved ones. I was surprised at the amount of young children that were there. I watched as they played with one another and ran around giggling. They appeared too young and innocent to be in such a dark place. I made it through the double-glass doors and eventually made my way to what could only be described as a ticket purchase box like they have at the theaters, but this one did not hand out tickets. Instead, it handed out keys to the red lockers that were lined up against the wall. This was where visitors had to leave all personal belongings. I reached my next stage at the metal detector. The guard directing me did not seem very pleasant. I assumed that the job demanded a bit of seriousness, so I tried to not let it bother me. After passing through the detector and showing my identification, the guard motioned for his peers to buzz me in. The family waiting room had a small television in the corner of the red brick room. To the left was a long line of windows that previewed the cubby-like phone booths like they show in movies with prison visit scenes. I later learned those phone booths were reserved for prisoners who receive visits while they are in solitary confinement, more commonly known as “the hole.” I could see the inmates entering the outside doors from the window. This made me so anxious that I almost felt sick to my stomach. It had been two hours since I had arrived, and I was finally going to see my brother! My brother was wearing a brown zip-up jacket, and despite the cliché, the only thing neon orange was the beanie on his head. He was taller then I remembered, and his once naturally dark skin that would take me weeks in a tanning bed to achieve had turned pale white. His build was massive. He had always been a muscular guy, but his physique had reached an extreme new level. His eyes were dark, as if he had not slept much, and his hair, once thick and brown, now had an overcast of grey. I did not remember the jaggedness of his bottom teeth, but the top were still perfectly aligned just as they had al- 80 ways been. It was nice to see something that looked familiar. We hugged briefly and then sat down. It was awkward at first because I was unsure of what to talk about. I did not want to upset him by talking about things in the outside world that he was missing out on, but he seemed happy to hear all the updates, especially updates on my daughter, who I had been pregnant with at the time of his conviction. I found myself curious to know what crimes the other inmates had committed, so I discreetly asked about those that sat around us. After all, it was a maximum security prison, so there must be serious offenders here. I thought I would be scared of having inmates around me, but to my surprise, I was relaxed and unafraid. The only thing I was thinking was how normal these men looked, now dressed in white T-shirts and grey sweat pants that they had changed into before coming into the visiting room. No one had tattoos on their face or crazy hairdos. They ranged in age and ethnicity. Everyone seemed to have the same smile on their faces, happy to see their loved ones. I wondered how such average looking men could end up in a place like that. I was unaware of just how strict the rules would be during visitation. Visitors were not supposed to look around or make gestures on a regular basis. Apparently, it is considered suspicious behavior. I was constantly aware of my mannerisms and tried not to look around for that reason. We were not allowed to touch, except for a hug when we greeted each other and said goodbye, but we could hold hands while at the table. That would have felt awkward holding my brother’s hand, and we laughed when my brother mentioned it. After four hours of visiting, it was time for lockdown. I dreaded this moment. I did not want to leave him. I had not seen him in a year, and four hours was not enough time. I could sense his sadness to leave as he gave me several big hugs. He was breaking the rules, but he did not seem to care. I could see that he was putting on a brave face for me as he was trying to hold back his tears. I was doing the 81 same. As he lined up with the rest of the inmates, he kept looking back at me, continuing to say he loved me. I tried to continue my brave face, but my emotions got the best of me and I wept. Walking out of that prison and not being able to take him with me was heart-rending. Visiting my brother in prison made me realize how important it is to be responsible and make good choices for my life. I know that it is not anyone’s intention to end up in a place like that, but the decisions people make for themselves can lead to being confined for several years, or even a lifetime. Knowing the reality of his situation has made me value and appreciate my time with my family and friends. I wish he had taken a different path for his life, but regardless of what he has done, he will always have my support and unconditional love. 82 THOMAS GOSS May He Rest in Peace When is revenge not only a desire, but a necessity? Edgar Allan Poe's short story “The Cask of Amontillado” grimly trudges through the macabre theme of revenge while presenting the reader with a meticulously written series of events that fully utilizes the literary concepts of irony, symbolism, and character interaction. Montresor, Poe's protagonist who may rightfully be deemed to display sociopathic habits, encounters his victim, Fortunato, during the peak of the carnival season. Upon leading Fortunato through a labyrinthine catacomb, Montresor elects to use live entombment as his mechanism of choice, a concept that coincidentally haunted society during the time this piece was written. Yet these events are only discovered fifty years later when Montresor admits his concealed crime to an unknown confessor. Made out in the form of a written letter, Montresor's retelling of Fortunato's death begins with what appears to be an introduction to an old friend. The wording the narrator uses even suggests this when he addresses, “You, who so well know the nature of my soul” (Poe 101). Whoever the unnamed recipient of this letter is, the person has known Montresor for quite some time. Montresor then goes on to explain his philosophy and intent for writing, asserting that the injuries he bore from Fortunato are unredressed if vengeance is not taken, equally so should he not make Fortunato aware that he is the one enacting said revenge (Poe 101). Not only does Montresor scheme to murder his nemesis, he desires to make it somewhat of a spectacle for Fortunato, a maniacal one man show to demonstrate who it is that brings him to death. With only two speaking characters throughout this sinister tale, Poe laces a complex and intriguing interaction. Appearing to be sides of the same coin, both characters represent a diametrically 83 opposed persona. Within several of Poe's works, especially “The Cask of Amontillado,” Poe creates a duplicate of the protagonist before allowing one to kill the other (Bily 58). Fortunato is arrogant, quick to act, and plays the role of the gullible and perpetually inebriated fool. In contrast, Montresor holds a precise and calm demeanor that wields deceit, his smiling visage, and a silver tongue as key instruments for revenge. Yet, in regards to similarity, upon further observation these personae illustrate an internal dilemma, two mindsets of the same individual where one is a mirror image of the other's flaws. This conflicting paradigm, displayed in excruciating detail, sets the stage for Fortunato's ominous demise. By focusing upon Fortunato's dialogue and action, it becomes clear quite quickly that his self-important mentality rivals only his ignorance. One such profound example occurs when Fortunato impertinently asserts that “Luchresi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry” (Poe 101) and makes an almost identical comment again just moments later. Elena Baraban provides keen insight to this scene, declaring that this shows how Fortunato is not entitled to his arrogant reputation as an authority on wine. She goes on to explain how Poe even capitalizes “sherry” to demonstrate that his character is not using it correctly, a category of wine, but instead as a proper noun (Baraban 53). This heightened confidence and self-aggrandizement are what ultimately lead to Fortunato's downfall. He has assumed that Montresor is a friend. This false pretense, paired with his drunken stupor, keep him from realizing his friend's suspicious duplicity until it's far too late. The protagonist and narrator, Montresor, provides the reader with a great deal of information, though key points of his dialogue raise more questions than answers. For example, he states in narration that his “poor friend” had great difficulty replying due to the nitre around them (Poe 102). As Bill Delaney puts forth, Montresor uses the 84 phrase “my friend” or “my poor friend” six different times and seemingly gives Fortunato multiple chances to flee and live (34). Most notable of this is that Fortunato avoids these opportunities for freedom. More rests in here than the shallow explanation that Montresor has begun to feel pity or doubt. Poe's character instead knows quite well the magnitude of Fortunato's stubborn arrogance, a characteristic of his “poor friend” that would take years of injury to understand. Montresor manipulates this arrogance carefully, giving Fortunato the illusion that it is by his choice alone that he continues to venture deep into that dreadful grave. To greater emphasize the grievous differences between Montresor and Fortunato, Poe constructs this piece carefully, presenting a great deal of irony within his descriptions of the characters that continues until the climax. As the narrator states, Fortunato is wearing a “tight-fitting parti-striped dress, and ... conical cap and bells” (Poe 101). Montresor, on the other hand, wears a short cloak and mask (Poe 102), not unlike an executioner or a funeral mourner. With this attire Poe has decisively defined the characters with Fortunato playing the unaware fool, and Montresor his killer. Little has occurred in the story so far, yet already the reader has been given a looming sense of dismay. Later within the catacombs, the irony builds with detailed actions. It is not uncommon for catacombs to double as wine cellars in this time period, hence why Montresor is able to keep Fortunato well inebriated. The names of the wines Montresor offers have deeper significance, such as when he offers his victim a bottle of De Grave, a play on words for the fate that awaits Fortunato (Baraban 55). Further still, while Fortunato makes gestures for the masonic brotherhood, Montresor upon realizing this, retrieves a trowel from underneath his roquelaire (Poe 103). This action foreshadows the means in which Montresor plans to murder Fortunato, going so far as to show the comically dressed fool the instrument that will be his downfall. 85 Montresor's deception, and the clashing personalities of these two men, continues until close to the end, once Fortunato has been initially trapped. While setting the last several layers of brick and mortar, Montresor raises the torch above the partial-wall and in response came “a succession of loud and shrill screams, bursting suddenly from the throat of the chained form” (Poe 105). In return to this abrupt yelling, Montresor staggers, gathers his wits, and acts in a most peculiar manner. Instead of simply finishing his work, fleeing, or speaking some form of an apology, he surpasses Fortunato's cries with his own. The vulgar noises within that damp, underground necropolis of dire enemies screaming to the extent of their lungs would yield one obscenely dissonant noise, instead of two discernible voices (Bily 57). The unfeeling voice of Montresor in his last discussion with Fortunato significantly adds to the horror instilled within the reader. Baraban argues that “Montresor is perfectly calm and rational in his account. He never expresses pity for his enemy or feels remorse for what he did” (49). One significant question arises in response to Baraban's claim. Surely half a decade after these events transpired, Montresor has aged quite a bit, likely on his death bed. Therefore, why has he, fifty years later, brought this dark segment of his past to his confessor instead of simply allowing these secrets to die alongside him? If not for guilt, he has become obsessed with his past deeds, seeing himself as a rightful punisher for Fortunato's insult, and he wishes others to know what he has done. Furthermore, the last line, in pace requiescat, that occurs in the final narration of this piece translates to “May he rest in peace,” a phrase used in the Last Rites when a Catholic priest has listened to the confessions of a dying man during Requiem Mass. Montresor spitefully betrays his role as repenting sinner when he uses this phrase for Fortunato, pardoning him for the wrongs that justified revenge (Baraban 57). With this sense of finality, and the realization that these events occurred fifty years ago, Poe offers the reader a final sense of 86 closure in the events that have occurred, but the same may not necessarily be said of Montresor. His keen memories, from half a century past, are vivid recollections of the events that led to Fortunato's death, either hinting that he has set these events on a metaphorical pedestal in his mind, considering them his moment of glory, or that Fortunato's death has put great strain on his conscious so that this exposé is a form of relief. Either way, the admission of this information allows Montresor to feel that his story no longer resides in memory alone, but is now out in the open. The writing style in “The Cask of Amontillado” mimics the idea of cosmological unity in structure such that each line is purposefully placed, with no detail chosen arbitrarily (Mooney 433). With this in mind, interpretation of the story, and its symbols, takes a much more in-depth and enthralling turn. For example, Montresor's crest, a large foot crushing a snake that has bitten the heel, is a sign of a dignified and prideful family. The Montresors are not simply previously powerful and quite numerous, as Poe alludes to several times, but they repay their transgressors. Furthermore, the family motto of “Nemo me impune lacessit” translates to “No one provokes me with impunity” (Poe 108). For Montresor, his revenge upon Fortunato is no simple affair, but a matter of his and his ancestors’ honor (Baraban 52). This motto presents the resolve of Montresor while simultaneously referencing back to the “thousand injuries” that have drawn him to the point of homicide. Just before Montresor finishes erecting the wall before his victim, he sticks his torch through the remaining hole and lets it fall. In response comes only the jingling of bells from Fortunato's hat (Poe 105). The sound of bells in this short lived scene is an ironic symbol requiring knowledge about the time in which this was written to understand. When Poe created “The Cask of Amontillado,” a social phobia of premature burial was commonplace. A stigma of this period, several inventions were created in hopes of preventing live 87 entombments. One such device required attaching bells or alarms to the newly deceased where the slightest of movements, that could certainly indicate life, would cause said bells to deploy (Platizky). Yet in contrast to this, the bells upon Fortunato's hat do nothing more than fall upon deaf ears. No rescue comes, and the sound of his alarm heralds little more than the placement of the final stone to seal his tomb. One very powerful illustration, which may surprisingly be overlooked upon interpretation, is the connection between Fortunato and his tomb. The trap Montresor has created is no simple cage; it is a place where he has locked away his victim alongside his own neurosis. As pointed out by Leonard Engel, “Fortunato, as a character... becomes significant as the object of Montresor's self-hatred, of the projection of his guilt for his aristocratic family's decline” (59). Through the act of walling off Fortunato, Montresor has found closure with not only revenge, but contentment in feeling he has made amends with his family's fall from grace. Montresor later mentions in his last few lines of narration that not a single person has disturbed the remains for fifty years (Poe 105). In consideration, it is not a difficult feat to assume these events offered only partial closure, weighing so heavily on his mind that he can vividly recall them many years later. Poe's writing of “The Cask of Amontillado” comes at a time when fear of premature burial was common in society. This cultural phobia undoubtedly affected his writing, allowing one to speculate an initial inspiration for Montresor's heinous crime. Though this fear is now uncommon, the over-arching theme of revenge creates a horrifying, yet strangely romanticized, sense of doom within the reader that follows them throughout Poe's carefully crafted short story. His fixation to every detail weaves a complex tapestry of symbolic irony that has sparked much debate on the “single effect” for which Poe strives, ensuring that nothing is placed for mere convenience. Yet, one thing remains certain: “The Cask of Amontillado” demonstrates well the author's fascination, creative wit, and control of literary art. In pace requiescat. 88 Works Cited Baraban, V. Elena. “The Motive for Murder in ‘The Cask of Amontillado’ by Edgar Allan Poe.” Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 58.2 (2004): 47-62. JSTOR.Web. 10 Mar. 2013. Bily, Cynthia. “‘The Cask of Amontillado’ Criticism.” Short Stories for Students. Ed. Ira Mark Milne. Vol 7. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. 55-58. Print. Vol 35. Delaney, Bill. “Poe’s ‘The Cask of Amontillado.’” The Explicator 64.1 (Fall 2005): 33. Literature Resource Center. Web. 11 Apr. 2013 Engel, Leonard W. “Victim and Victimizer: Poe’s ‘The Cask of Amontillado.’” Short Stories for Students. Ed. Ira Mark Milne. Vol 7. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. 58-61. Print. Vol 35. Mooney, Stephen L. “Comic Intent in Poe’s Tales: Five Criteria.” Modern Language Notes 76.5 (May 1961): 432-434. JSTOR. Web. 15 Apr. 2013 Platizky, Roger. “Poe’s ‘The Cask of Amontillado.’” The Explicator 57.4 (Summer 1999): 206. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Apr. 2013 Poe, Edgar Allan. “The Cask of Amontillado.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. 10th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2010. 101-105. Print. 89 Contributors Ryan Abbey is a part-time student with Pulaski Tech where he is working toward his commercial pilot’s license. He is currently serving in the active duty Air Force at Little Rock Air Base where he maintains C-130 cargo planes. In his spare time, he greatly enjoys flying his own small plane, which he keeps hangered at home. Treell M. Gorden is a student at Pulaski Technical College who plans to work as an occupational therapy assistant. She enjoys spending time with her children more than anything in the world and exposing them to the literary arts by reading stories to them and encouraging them to tell stories of their own. Her favorite pastimes are writing short stories, reading, writing free verse poetry, drawing, and cooking. Thomas Goss is a student at Pulaski Technical College who plans to transfer to UALR to pursue a degree in computer science. His future goals include earning a PhD and making advancements in the fields of artificial intelligence and cryptography. In his spare time he enjoys programming, studying philosophy, and playing games. Zach Griffin is a student at Pulaski Technical College who plans on transferring to UALR to pursue a master’s in social work. Some of Zach's accomplishments include making history in his hometown by organizing Sherwood's first ever Veterans Day Parade, founding a non-profit organization "openvesselmissions," and serving in the United States Marines. Zach enjoys flying single engine airplanes and sailing the seas during long breaks from school. His goal is to finish school to continue traveling while counseling veterans online. 90 Vashti Hanline is a species characterized by its tendency to lurk in the blue light of a computer screen and incessantly poke at the keyboard. Online, it may most often be found skulking around lotrplaza.com, where it proceeds to closely imitate a related species, the Nerd. Jeremy D. Hardison is a student at Pulaski Technical College who plans to transfer to UALR and pursue a degree in writing. He enjoys golf and anything related to the Arkansas Razorbacks. Robert McCarville is finishing up his studies at Pulaski Technical College and plans to transfer to UALR to pursue a degree in human resources. He is president of PTC’s chapter of Sigma Kappa Delta English Honor Society and a member of the Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society. He loves to travel and will read most anything put before him. Vicki McDonald is a non-traditional student at Pulaski Technical College and a member of the Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society. She plans to transfer to UALR and pursue a degree in middle education with an emphasis on English/social studies. She is an avid reader and enjoys cooking and photography. After college, this mother of six and grandmother of three plans to share her love of reading, writing and history with children. Kimberly Ogden is a single mother attending Pulaski Technical College after thirty-five years away from school. Kimberly's writing journey began with Mr. Loibner-Waitkus asking her if she was Yoda while grading her papers. The adventure continued with Ms. Govia making her fall in love with every author she covered and never kicking Kimberly out of her office and with Mrs. Dudley keeping the notes Kimberly made on paper plates—either as mementoes or for their comic value! Kimberly would like to thank these instructors, and she would like to dedicate this essay to her children and thank them for giving her the courage to pursue her education. 91 Shara Richards is a mother of three wonderful little boys. She aspires to be a published author of children's stories. When she graduates from Pulaski Technical College, she will have an associate degree in business and in arts. She will transfer to UALR to get her bachelor of arts and then her master’s degree. She plans a future of doing charity work, writing, taking care of her children, and enjoying her life. She wants you to have a great day. Barbara Riveira is a student at Pulaski Technical College who plans to transfer to UALR and pursue a bachelor's degree in business. Her goal after graduation is to become a human resources director. She enjoys spending time with her husband and their three teenagers. She has always had a deep-seated love for reading and has just recently discovered a great passion for writing which she hopes to explore further in the future. Jeannine Smith, a native of central Arkansas, has recently left her profession as a licensed massage therapist to pursue a degree in psychology. She is currently a freshman at Pulaski Technical College and is still undecided as to where she will transfer after obtaining an associate of arts degree. In her spare time, Jeannine enjoys the fine arts, physical fitness, and above all, the Word of God. Elizabeth L. Sullivan is a student at Pulaski Technical College who is currently working on her two year degree in business/accounting. She enjoys spending time with her daughter and finding creative activities for the two of them to do. She also has a passion for food and loves trying new recipes. Jonathan Whitehead is a student ambassador at Pulaski Tech pursuing a double major in mathematics and philosophy. He believes in pacifism, equality and the power of solidarity in social activism. 92 Notes 93 Notes 94 Notes 95 Notes 96