UMMiSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
Transcription
UMMiSITI MALAYSIA SABAH
SURVIVAL ANAL YSIS OF DIABETIC PATIENTS IN QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, KOTA KINABALU WONG YEW LEONG Ytlll-u.) II" .. \/"\1 ~ UMMiSITI MALAYSIA SABAH THIS DISSERTATION IS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PRE-REQUIREMENT TO BE CONFERRED THE DEGREE IN BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MA THEMA TICS WITH ECONOMICS PROGRAMME MA THEMA TICS WITH ECONOMICS SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA SABAH APRIL 2007 ·: I (-.-~---~-.-~--~-~-------- 'BOR.4.t"'fG P.ENGlF'.SA!EL4..N ~TA11'U£ TESlfS@ , I I ,rrJ"Vlv4C" JUDUL: ItNAl:{~/S OF I I I ~ ON 6 Saya Y£IIV LE ON ~ (HURUF BESAR) mcngal..-u mcmbenarkan tesis (LPSlS~kt~safah) · ini.disimpan di Pcrpustakaan Univcrsiti Malaysia Sabah dcng'~n syarat-syarnt kegunaan scpctti berikut I. Tesis adalab bakmilik Universiti Malay,tia Sabah. 2. ~ell'ustakaan Universiti Malaysia SAbah dibenarkan membuat salinan untuk tujuan pengajian sabaja. 3. PCll'ustakaan dibcnarkao membuat s:dilu.n tcsis ini scbagai bahan pcrtukaran antara institusi pengajian tinggi. 4. ""Sila tandakan ( I ) (Mcngandungi maldumat yang berdaIjah keselamatan. atau kepcnti!lgan Malaysia scpecti yang tetmaktub di dalam AKTA:RAliSIA RASMI t912) SULIT [2J TERHAD D TIDAK TER1{AD (Mengandungi maldumat TERHAD yang tclah ditentukan oleh organisasilbadan di maoa penyclidikan dijalankan) ~ (TANDA TANGAN PENULtS) Ala.m.1t Tctap:_ TMN " A:. T q" jJ.M Ik.T ttLlSIt ~, Pli. flTI klrlj~y, '7·IItDIlD ~Etl SA A9 Nama Penydia .~ Tarjk.h: _ _~ ":"ifll4 -~jf(-,:~:t!..-.- _ _ __ CAT A TAN: Tarikh: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ " Potong yang tidak bcrkcnaan. Jika tcsis ini SULIT atau TERHAD. sill! lampirkan sura! daripada pihak bcrIcua.worganisasi herken3..al\ dengan menyatakan sekaJi scbab dan tcmpoh I~is ini pcrlu dilccbskan scbagai SULIT dan TERHAD. @ Tcsis dimaksudkan scbagai tcsis bagi Iju..ah Doktor Falsa!:.&h dan Sasjana secara penyelidil:an, i!.t3U discltasi bag; pcncajian sccara kclja kUrnJs dan pcnyelidik.an. atau Laporan Projck Sarjana Muda (LPSM). . a. ~.., ii DECLARATION I declared that this dissertation is my original work except for the quotations and summary that has been cited in the reference. 20 April 2007 WONG YEW LEONG (HS 2004-1813) iii CERTIFIED BY Signature 1. SUPERVISOR (pN. sm RAHAYU BT. MOHD HASHIM) 2. EXAMINER 1 (pN. SURIANI BT. HASSAN) 3. DEAN )~~'1- (ASSOCIATE PROF. DR. SHARIFF AK OMANG) _---'~ _ _ _ __ UMS UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Pn. Siti Rahayu for her guidance and time in helping me to fInish up the dissertation on time. She has given lots of suggestions and guidance regarding the running of the analysis. She also mentioned what are the essential items that are needed in each section so that I would not miss out any important information. Next, I would also express my thanks to my friends especially Ai Chang, Nick and Yee Chi for their support. They have also given me suggestions. We have spent time discussing the appropriate infonnation needed from the fIrst chapter to the end. Next, I would like to thank the staffs in Queen Elizabeth Hospital especially Mr. Dominique and Mr. Abdul Rahman for their dedication and time in fulfIlling my needs for this dissertation. They were patience in answering all my questions. Not forgetting my family for their uncountable moral supports. I would not forget their dedication and involvement although they are getting nothing from their contributions. Finally, I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to all the other anonymous members whose names I can't remember for their contributions to this dissertation. Without the help and guidance of all those involved, this dissertation might not have been completed. v ANALISIS MANDIRI PESAKIT DIABETES DI HOSPITAL QUEEN ELIZABETH, KOTA KINABALU ABSTRAK Diabetes merupakan salah satu penyumbang utama terhadap kematian yang melibatkan penyakit bukan sahaja di Malaysia malahan di seluruh dunia. Oleh yang demikian, adalah penting sekiranya aliran ataupun golongan umur utama yang menghidapi penyakit ini dapat ditentukan agar pihak yang berwajib dapat melaksanakan usaha bagi menurunkan kadar kematian penyakit ini. Objektifutama kajian ini dilakukan adalah untuk melakukan analisis kemandirian bagi menentukan kadar kemandirian pesakit diabetes di Sabah, menentukan aliran kemandirian pesakit diabetes, menghitung fungsi mandiri, fungsi ketumpatan dan fungsi hazard melalui jadual sifir usia dan menentukan samada wujudnya perbezaan 'secara bererti antara jantina, etnik dan kategori umur yang menghidapi penyakit ini dengan menggunakan ujian log-rank. Data pesakit telah diarnbil dari Hospital Queen Elizabeth (QEH), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Pembolehubah yang diperlukan dalam kajian ini adalah, jantina, umur, jangka hayat kemandirian dan etnik. Fungsi kemandirian, fungsi ketumpatan dan fungsi hazard digunakan. Plot penganggar Kaplan-Meier diplotkan sebagai sokongan bagi penentuan kadar kemandirian bagi pesakit diabetes di Sabah. Didapati bahawa fungsi mandiri pesakit diabetes adalah tinggi manakala kebarangkalian ketumpatan dan kadar hazard adalah rendah. Keputusan juga menunjukkan bahawa tiada wujudnya perbezaan secara hererti antara jantina, etnik dan kategori umur. Ini hermakna bahawa semua orang mempunyai risiko yang sarna menghidapi penyakit ini tanpa mengira jantina ataupun etnik. vi ABSTRACT Diabetes has been known as one of the major contribution of mortality not only in Malaysia but also around the world. Hence, it is important if the trend or the major groups suffered by this disease can be determined so that they can benefit through efforts by major parties to lower the risk of death. The objectives of this research are to conduct a survival analysis to detennine the survival rate of diabetic patients, to determine the trend of survival in diabetic patients, to compute survival function, density function and hazard function from life table and to determine whether significance difference exists among genders, ethnics and ages by using log-rank test. The data was collected from Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH). The variables included in this study are gender, age, time of survival and ethnics. Survival function, density function and hazard function were used. Log-rank test was also perfonned in this dissertation to compare between two factors to determine whether significant difference existed in the variables or not. Kaplan-Meier estimator plot was also plotted to determine the survival pattern of the patients with diabetes in Sabah. It showed that the survival function of diabetic patients was high while the density probability and hazard rate was low in Sabah. The result also showed there was no significance difference existed among genders, ethnics and ages. This implied that all of them had the same risk in being diagnosed with this disease regardless of genders and ethnics. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEC LARATION ii CERTIFIED BY III ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv ABSTRAK v ABSTRACT vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Vll LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii LIST OF SYMBOLS xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Diabetes 2 1.1.1 The History of Diabetes 2 1.1.2 Type 1 Diabetes 4 1.1.3 Type 2 Diabetes 4 1.1.4 Gestational Diabetes 5 1.1.5 Main Complications of Diabetes 5 Current Issues 6 1.2.1 Diabetes in the World 8 1.2 viii 1.2.2 Diabetes in Asia 8 1.2.3 Diabetes in Malaysia 9 Survival Analysis 12 1.3.1 Life Table Analysis 13 1.3.2 Kaplan-Meier Estimator 13 1.3.3 Log-Rank Test 14 1.3.4 Cox Proportional Hazard Model 15 1.3.5 Censored Data 16 1.4 Objectives 17 1.5 Scope of Study 18 1.3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 19 2.1 Past Researches on Diabetes 19 2.2 Past Researches on Survival Analysis 25 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Variables of the Research 30 3.3 Data Source and Subject 30 3.4 Life Table 31 3.5 Survival Function 33 3.6 Density Function 36 3.7 Hazard Function 38 3.8 Kaplan-Meier Estimator 40 3.9 Log-Rank Test 41 UMS UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH ix CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSIS 45 4.1 Sample 45 4.2 Descriptive Analysis 45 4.3 Life Table 51 4.4 Survivorship Function 52 4.5 Density Function 57 4.6 Hazard Function 62 4.7 Kaplan-Meier Plot 66 4.8 Log-Rank Test 69 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 81 5.1 Genders 81 5.2 Ethnics 83 5.3 Age 85 5.4 Survivorship Function 86 5.5 Density Function 88 5.6 Hazard Function 89 5.7 Log-Rank Test 90 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 92 LIST OF REFERENCES 94 APPENDICES x LIST OF TABLES Page Table Number 1.3 Adult obesity in 2002 and estimated level in 2010, expressed as percent of people ~ 15 years of age with 1.4 10 BMI~30 Diabetes prevalence in people over 20 years of age in 2000 and predicted 11 for 2030 in countries with more than 100 million inhabitants 3.1 Variables of the research 30 4.19 Table showing the summary of deaths and censoring occurred according 70 to genders 4.21 The value of chi-square and its significance value for log-rank test 72 4.22 Computations of E/ and E2 of log-rank test 74 4.23 Table showing the summary of deaths and censoring occurred according 75 to ethnics 4.25 The value of chi-square and its significance value for log-rank test 78 4.26 Table showing the summary of deaths and censoring occurred according 78 to categories of ages 4.27 The value of chi-square and its significance value for log-rank test 79 5.1 Vital population statistics based on 1991 census of people living in Kota 84 Kinabalu xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Number Page 1.1 The number of diabetic patients in 2010 7 1.2 The estimated number of diabetic patients in 2030 7 1.5 An example of Kaplan-Meier estimator plot 14 4.1 The number of female and male diabetic patients in QEH with 1 46 represents male and 2 represents female 4.2 The number of diabetic patients in QEH based on ethnics 47 4.3 The pie chart showing the number of diabetic patients admitted to QEH 48 based on percentage 4.4 The histogram above shows the number of patients that were registered 49 in QEH based on the age factor 4.5 The figure above shows the status of diabetic patients in QEH 50 4.6 Survival function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 53 4.7 Survival function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 54 divided into male and female 4.8 Survival function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 55 divided into ethnics 4.9 Survival function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 56 divided into different categories of ages 4.10 Density function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 57 Xli 4.11 Density function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 59 divided into male and female patients 4.12 Density function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 60 divided into male and female patients 4.13 Density function of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 61 divided into categories of ages 4.14 Hazard rate of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 63 4.15 Hazard rate of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 64 divided into male and female patients 4.16 Hazard rate of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 65 divided into ethnics 4.17 Hazard rate of diabetic patients admitted to QEH, Kota Kinabalu 66 divided into categories of ages 4.18 Kaplan-Meier plot for the diabetic patients in QEH for year 2005 67 4.20 Log-rank plot for the factor of genders 71 4.24 Log-rank plot for the factor of ethnics 77 4.28 Log-rank plot for the factor of ages 80 Xlll LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADA American Diabetes Association BC Before Christ BMl Body Mass Index CDC Centers for Disease Control CHF Congestive Heart Failure CPHM Cox Proportional Hazard Model DCCT Diabetes Control and Complication Trials HRQoL Health-related Quality of Life IDDM Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus NDFS National Diabetes Fact Sheet NHS Nurses' Health Study NIIDM Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus OR Odds ratio PL Product Limit POAG Primary Open-angle Glaucoma QEH Queen Elizabeth Hospital RR Rate Ratio SMR Standardized Mortality Ratio SPSS Statistical Packages for Social Sciences UN United Nations WHO World Health Organization xiv LIST OF SYMBOLS % Percentage > more than > more than or equal to < less than or equal to < less than ± plus-minus sign / over 00 infinity = equal At delta t At~O limit as delta t approaches 0 f- not equal to I chi-square L summation (l alpha ;:::: almost equal to CHAPTERl INTRODUCTION Diabetes has been known as one of the major contribution of mortality not only in Malaysia but also around the world. In America alone, according to the latest figure released by Department of Health and Services under Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in 2005, the total prevalence of diabetes by all ages were estimated at 20.8 million people or around 7.0% of the total population in America. Although the percentage rate was overall quite low, recent researches that were conducted in the past few years sensed that the trend was growing continuously particularly in the 60 and above age category. Now, about one in every four hundred to six hundred children and adolescents has Type 1 Diabetes and the people under the 60 and above age category accounted for 20.9010 of total cases (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). In Malaysia, diabetes was placed second behind heart disease for the total number of death. Detailed researches on the mortality rate of diabetes have not been done thoroughly in Malaysia. Hence, it is important if the trend or the major groups suffered by this disease can be determined so that they can benefit through efforts by major parties to lower the risk of death. To do so, 2 estimation of mortality rates in diabetes in Malaysia need to be conducted by using survival analysis techniques. Among them are Kaplan-Meier estimators, survival, density and hazard function. By conducting these tests, the survival rates of patients suffering from diabetes can be calculated. 1.1 Diabetes Diabetes is a group of diseases marked by high level of glucose resulting from defects in insulin production, insulin action or both. It can lead to serious complications and premature death but steps to control the disease and lower the risk of complications do exist. Diabetes was divided into two main different types of diabetes which are Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. The fonner was previously called insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or juvenile-onset diabetes while the latter was previously called noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or adult-onset diabetes (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). 1.1.1 The History of Diabetes History of diabetes has begun since it was first discovered on papyrus by Ebers in Egypt, 1552 B.C. The first diabetes word was used was by Aretaeus of Cappadocia in the late second century B.C. In 1869, Paul Langerhans, a Gennan medical student, announced in a dissertation that the pancreas contains two systems of cells. One set secretes the normal pancreatic juice; the function of the other was unknown. Several years later, these cells 3 were identified as the islets of Langerhans. History tributed Oskar Minkowski and Joseph von Mering for their discovery that the pancreas played a major role in diabetes in the year 1889. These Europeans discovered that when they took the pancreas out of animals, they exhibited all the indicators associated with diabetes. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Edward Sharpey-Schafer, a Scot, hypothesized that those suffering from diabetes were lacking a substance that was made by the pancreas. He named this chemical insulin. In 1921, it was Frederick Grant Banting and Charles Herbert Best who continued diabetes research. Their experiments showed that diabetes symptoms and risk factors could be reduced by transferring pancreatic insulin from healthy dogs to diabetic dogs. For this amazing discovery, Frederick Banting later received the Nobel Prize. Insulin became widely available worldwide within a very short period of time. Most the other major historical achievements of diabetes treatment had happened during these years. In 1922, Leonard Thompson was the first person to be injected with insulin in Toronto. In 1934, the first national diabetes association was formed, Diabetic Association, in U.K. In 1970, the first glucose meter was developed. In 1983, first biosynthetic human insulin was introduced. In 1993, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) report was published. The DCCT results clearly demonstrate that intensive therapy (more frequent doses and self-adjustment according to individual activity and eating patterns) delays the onset and progression of long-term complications in individuals with type 1 diabetes (Canadian Diabetes Association, 2006). 4 1.1.2 Type 1 Diabetes IDDM developed when the body's immune system destroyed pancreatic beta cells, the only cell in the body that makes the honnone insulin that regulated blood glucose. In other word, it occurred when the body was unable to produce any insulin. To survive, people with IDDM must have insulin injected or pumped. It usually strikes children and young adults that accounted for 5% to 10% of total diagnosed cases of diabetes. According to CDC, risk factors for Type 1 Diabetes may be autoimmune, genetic or environmental. Several clinical trials of methods of the prevention of this disease are currently in progress or are being planned since there is still no known way to prevent this disease (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). 1.1.3 Type 2 Diabetes Most of the diagnosed cases of diabetes were of Type 2 Diabetes which accounted for about 90% to 95% of total cases. It usually begins as insulin resistance, a disorder in which the cells do not use the insulin properly. As the need for insulin rises, the pancreas gradually loses its ability to produce it. In other word, it means that the body was still producing insulin but not enough. Type 2 Diabetes is associated with older age, obesity, family history of diabetes, history of gestational diabetes, impaired glucose metabolism, physical inactivity and raceiethnicity (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). 5 1.1.4 Gestational Diabetes Another type of diabetes that occurred was called gestational diabetes which affected women during pregnancy in which it was a form of glucose intolerance. It was also more common among obese women and women with a family history of diabetes. During the pregnancy period, they were required to be treated to normalize maternal blood glucose level to avoid complications in the infant. It was said that about 5% to 10% of these women would suffered from Type 2 Diabetes and another 20% to 50% of women with gestational diabetes would have the chance of developing diabetes in the next 5 to 10 years. Since this research is only focusing on two main types of diabetes, further discussion on the latter is not included (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). 1.1.5 Main Complications of Diabetes Among the main complications of diabetes are heart disease and strokes (65% of deaths in people with diabetes), high blood pressure (about 73%), blindness where diabetes is the leading cause of new blind cases among adults aged 20 to 74 years old, kidney disease (44% new cases), nervous system disease (60% to 70%), amputations (>60%), dental disease, complication of pregnancy, biochemical imbalance and others. Type 1 and 2 Diabetes has different kinds of symptoms. In Type 1 Diabetes, the major symptoms are frequent urination, unusual thirst, extreme hunger, unusual weight loss, extreme fatigue and irritability. In Type 2 Diabetes, the major symptoms are any of the Type 1 Diabetes 6 symptoms, frequent infections, blurred vision, cutslbruises that are slow to heal, tingling/numbness in the hands/feet and recurring gum, skin or bladder infections (National Diabetes Fact Sheet United States, 2005). 1.2 Current Issues As cited in the National Diabetes Fact Sheet (NDFS) from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC), diabetes was the sixth major killer for mortality in term of health related field in America in 2005 (Centers of Disease Control, 2006). Not only that, diabetes has not only been identified as major health problem in the Western countries alone, it was also at the forefront of the current epidemic of diabetes in Asia Pacific region too (Cockram, 2000). According to that research, the prevalence rate of Type 1 and 2 Diabetes was on the rise and that included Malaysia with an estimated of about 50 million of diabetic sufferers just in China and India alone in 2025. According to World Health Organization (WHO), the numbers of diabetic patients in Malaysia would tripled in 2030 with estimated patients of about 2,479,000 from the 942,000 in 2000 (King, 2006). The main concern is the increasing trend for Type 2 Diabetes particularly in young people. In children and adolescents in some part of Asia Pacific region, Type 2 Diabetes now outnumbered Type 1 Diabetes by a ratio of 4:1. It was found that the diabetes was caused by many factors such as the physical activities, lifestyle, diet and others. Now, most of the nations from East to West are currently holding lots of international conferences and seminars on how to curb this epidemic from rising. Listed below were the figures for the numbers of diabetic patients in 2000 and the estimated numbers of diabetic patients in 2030. In the 7 India, 6 was for developed countries, 7 was for America and 8 was for other developing countries which includes Malaysia. The value in the chart was in millions of people. The Number of Diabetic Patients In 2000 87.78 9.82 Figure 1.1- The number of diabetic patients in 2000 (Yach et ai, 2006) The &tIm.tad Number of Diabetic Patlants In 2030 200.2 Figure 1.2-The estimated number of diabetic patients in 2030 (Yach et ai, 2006) 8 1.2.1 Diabetes in the World Diabetes was considered as one of the main global health issues in the world and the trend of diabetic sufferer was currently showing a significant increase. According to Health Department, the estimated number of people with diabetes will increase from 151 million people in 2000 to about 221 million people in 2010. An increase of 70 million people was equivalent to an increase of 46% within 10 years of time frame. Prediction compiled by Dr Hillary King of the World Health Organization (WHO) indicated that this figure will rise to 300 millions by the year 2025 (King, 2006). 1.2.2 Diabetes in Asia In Asia, India and China were the countries with the highest rate of prevalence of diabetes. These countries would be expected to continue their domination as the nation that has the highest rate of prevalence of diabetes in 2025. Although the rate of increase of diabetic patients in China was quite moderate, contributing 38 million of diabetic patients from the world population, it was the other way round in India. It will contribute about 58 million of diabetic patients from the population in term of diabetes prevalence. The increase in term of prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes among children and young teenagers in Japan were said to be related with obesity factor and historical roots. The scenario happened in Hong Kong was due to changes in lifestyle, physical activity and excessive intake of food that have high calories (Yach et ai, 2006). UMS UNIV£RSITI MALAYSIA SABAH 9 1.2.3 Diabetes in Malaysia Malaysia was classified as the fourth nation with the highest prevalence rate of diabetes patients in Asia According to International Diabetes Institute. the number of diabetes patients in Malaysia was expected to raise from 800.000 patients in 2002 to 1.3 million patients in 2010. A National Survey that was conducted in 2000 also showed that the prevalence of diabetes exceeds 7% of the adult population. Meanwhile. (Yach et al. 2006) reported that overweight and obesity was long has been regarded as the main driver of diabetes. In Malaysia. the percentage of obese males and females with body mass index (BMI) > 30 was 1.6 and 6.8 respectively in 2002. This figure will rise to 1.7 and 11.0 in 2010 respectively. The table below showed the rate of adult obesity in 2002 and estimated level in 2010 for selected countries. UMS UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH 94 LIST OF REFERENCES Barcelo, A., Bosnyak, Z & Orchard, T. 2006. A Cohort Analysis of Type 1 Diabetes Mortality in Havana and Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 1-6. Bertoni, A. G., Kirk, K. J., Goff Jr D. C. & Wagenknecht, L. E. 2004. Excess Mortality Related to Diabetes Mellitus in Elderly Care Beneficiaries. Ann Epidemiol (14), 362-367. Tomlin, A. M., Tilyard, M. W., Dovey, S. M., & Dawson, A. G. 2006. Hospital Admissions in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Case-Control Study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (73), 260-267. Cockram, C. S. 2000. The Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus in the Asia-Pacific Region. Hong Kong Medical Journal 6 (1), 43-52. Yach, D., Stuckler, D. & Brownell, K. D. 2006. Epidemiologic and Economic Consequences of the Global Epidemics of Obesity and Diabetes. Nature Medicine 12 (1), 62-66. Bakri, R. 1996. Second National Health and Morbidity Survey- Diabetes. Report of the Second National Health and Morbidity Survey Conference (9). Lee, E. T., & Wang, J. W. 2003. Statistical Methods for Survival Data AnalYSis. (3 rd ed). John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pg 1-134. Otero-Ravina, F., Martinez M. R., Selles, C. F., Gutierrez, M. G., Blanco, M. D., Martinez de Rituerto, S. T., Perez, E. V., Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. R. & Jack, D. S-G. 2005. Analysis of Survival After Liver Transplantation in Galicia, Spain. Transplantation Proceedings (37),3913-3915. (i) UMS .. ~ UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SA BAH 95 rd Pickup, J. C. & Williams, G. 2003. Textbook ofDiabetes 1. (3 ed). Blackwell Science Ltd., U.S.A. Tilling, L. M., Darawil, K. & Britton, M. 2006. Falls as a Complication of Diabetes Mellitus in Older People. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (20), 158-162. Pasquale, L. R, Jae, H. K.., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., Rosner, B. A. & Hankinson, S. E. 2006. Prospective Study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Women. Ophthalmology 7 (113), 1081-1086. McNeely, M. J. & Boyko, E. J. 2005. Diabetes-Related Comorbidities in Asian Americans Results of a National Health Survey. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (19), 101-106. Back, M. R, Leo, F., Cuthbertson, D., Johnson, B. L., Shames, M. L. & Bandyk, D. F. 2004. Long Term Survival after Vascular Surgery: Specific Influence of Cardiac Factors and Implications for Preoperative Evaluation. Journal of Vascular Surgery 40 (4), 752-760. Boguslawa, N-S., Moczulski, D. & Grzeszczak, W. 2002. Risk of Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: Results of Longitudinal Study Design. Journal ofDiabetes and Its Complications (16), 271-276. Modrego, P. J., Mainar, R & Turull, L. 2004. Recurrence and Survival after First-Ever Stroke in the Area of Bajo Aragon, Spain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Neurological Sciences (224), 49-55. Belchetz, P. & Hammond, P. 2003. Mosby's Color Atlas and Text of Diabetes & Endocrinology. Elsevier Science Ltd., London. 96 Sudha, S. D., Avinash, Z., Rajashree, M., Shilpa, M., Sujata, R. & Kalpana, T. 2006. To Identify the Risk Factors for High Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Indian Rural Population. International Journal ofDiabetes in Developing Countries 26 (1), 19-23. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R. & King, H. 2004. Global Prevalence of Diabetes: Estimates for the Year 2000 and Projections for Year 2030. Diabetes Care (27), 1047-1053. Wee, H-L., Li, S-C., Cheung, Y-B., Fong, K-Y. & Thumboo, J. 2006. The Influence of Ethnicity on Health-Related Quality of Life in Diabetes Mellitus: A Population Based, Multiethnic Study. Journal ofDiabetes and Its Complications (20), 170-178. Monthly Statistical Bulletin Sabah, 2005.