Association of Leadership Educators
Transcription
Association of Leadership Educators
2014 JULY 13 - 16 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, USA ASSOCIATION OF LEADERSHIP EDUCATORS ANNUAL CONFERENCE VISIONS OF LEADERSHIP: REFLECTING ON THE PAST, FOCUSING ON THE FUTURE CONFERENCE CONTENTS WECLCOM TO SAN ANTIONIO PAGE 4-5 PAGE 38-40 ALE MISSION, VISION, & CONTEXT CONFERENCE KEYNOTES PAGE 6-7 PAGE 1-6 CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE CONFERENCE COORDINATION TEAM PAGE 8-9 PAGE 1-6 WELCOME TO SAN ANTONIO ALE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 10-25 PAGE 43-45 CONCURRENT SESSIONS CONFERENCE SPONSORS PAGE 26-33 PAGE 46-47 POSTER PRESENTATIONS ALE HISTORY PAGE 34-37 PAGE 48-51 ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS LOGISTICS ALE 2014 ALE MISSION, VISION, & CONTEXT OUR MISSION The mission of the Association of Leadership Educators, Inc., is to strengthen and sustain the expertise of professional leadership educators. OUR VISION The Association of Leadership Educators’ vision is to set the standard for Leadership Education. ALE will be the leading resource for the exchange and development of quality ideas, scholarship, and practice that impacts the field of Leadership Education. ALE establishes the bridge between research and practice in Leadership Education through an inclusive and engaging community of dynamic leadership educators, committed to consistently growing, thriving, and advancing the field of Leadership Education. OUR CONTEXT Building upon decades of experience, the Association of Leadership Educators embraces a wide variety of leadership educators. If you teach in the classroom, are affiliated with youth development organizations, do private consulting, work in student affairs, practice in the area of community development, or train the military, you may find ALE to be a great means of expanding your networks and learning more about the field of leadership education. ALE emphasizes the link between theory and practice, and the focus makes the association appealing to both those inside and outside academia. San Antonio, TX | 05 ALE 2014 CONFERENCE PROGRAM AT A GLANCE SUNDAY - 7.13.14 8:00AM - 12:00PM Pre Conference - Leadership Scholarship: An Intensional Process - Sabino 1:00PM - 3:00PM 2013-2014 ALE Board Meeting (board Members Only) - Encino 3:30PM - 5:00PM Development Focus Group - Sabino 4:30PM - 5:30PM First Time Attendee Welcome Session - Hidalgo 5:30PM - 7:00PM Opening Reception - Hildago Sponsored by University of Phoenix, School of Adavanced Studies Welcome Provided by Jeremy Moreland, PhD Evening Activities Guided Excursions & Dinner Groups 7:30PM River Cruise (Free - Reservations Required) - River Level Entrance WEDNESDAY - 7.16.14 7:30AM - 8:30 AM 8:30AM - 9:30AM 9:45AM – 11:15AM 11:30AM - 12:00PM 12:30PM – 5:00PM Continental Breakfast & Business Meeting – Navarro B Concurrent Session 6 Concurrent Session 7 Conference Closing, Conference Awards, & Officer Induction –Navarro B 2014-2015 Board Meeting (board members only) –LaBabia MONDAY - 7.14.14 7:00AM - 8:00AM Development Focus Group - Zapata Breakfast with JOLE - RSVP Required - Shilo’s Deli 7:30AM - 5:00PM Registration - Lobby Pre Function 8:00AM - 8:45AM Opening Session & Welcome - Navarro A 9:00AM - 10:30AM Concurrent Session I 10:30AM - 10:45PM Break 10:45AM - 11:45AM Concurrent Session II 12:00PM - 1:30PM Lunch & Keynote Presentation with James Kouzes - Navarro B 1:45PM - 3:15PM Concurrent Session III 3:15PM - 3:30 PM Break 3:30PM - 5:00PM Roundtable Sessions - Navarro A Evening Activities Guided Excursions & Dinner Groups 5:30PM River Cruise (Free - Reservations Required) - River Level Entrance TUESDAY - 7.15.14 7:30AM– 4:00PM 8:00AM– 9:30AM 9:45AM– 11:15AM 11:30AM– 1:00PM 1:00PM – 2:30PM 2:30PM– 3:15PM 3:15PM – 4:45PM 5:00PM– 6:00PM 6:00PM 6:30PM– 8:00PM 06 | San Antonio, TX Registration - Lobby Pre Function Continental Breakfast & Keynote (8:30) with Gordy Curphy – Navarro B Concurrent Session IV Lunch and Keynote Presentation by Suzanna and Hector Ramos -Navarro A Concurrent Session V Poster Presentation and Social – Snacks Provided - Navarro A Leadership Education in Action Plenary (LEAP) Session – Navarro A Free Time Meet in Lobby to travel to Awards Dinner Awards Dinner – Sunset Station Sponsored in part by Wiley Publishing San Antonio, TX | 07 ALE 2014 WELCOME TO SAN ANTONIO VICE PRESIDENT & CONFERENCE CHAIR WELCOME ¡Bienvenidos! On behalf of the 2014 Conference Planning Committee and the Board of Directors, welcome to San Antonio and to the 24th Annual Conference of the Association of Leadership Educators! Like ALE, San Antonio is exciting, vibrant, and has much to offer. San Antonio is the home of the best known battle in Texas, the Battle of the Alamo, where men and women gave selflessly of themselves to realize the vision of freedom for the state and its people – both then and now. As we take time to consider our Visions of Leadership; Reflecting on the Past and Focusing on the Future, let us not forget all those who paved the way for us today. This year’s conference provides many opportunities to focus on our relationships with others. You will have opportunities to engage your colleagues both formally and informally during meals, receptions, research and practice presentations, educator’s workshops, and discussion sessions. Also, we have two opportunities to recognize outstanding contributions of our members and conference presenters. Our keynote presenters will provide new perspectives on leadership and will challenge you to move outside your comfort zone. You’ll also several opportunities to take in the rich history of San Antonio. GREETINGS FROM THE PRESIDENT I am excited to welcome you to the 24th annual conference of the Association of Leadership Educators! Kelleen Stine-Cheyne and the entire conference planning committee have been working diligently to prepare and deliver an exceptional conference experience. We have a wonderful conference site, and San Antonio offers an abundance of cultural activities to enhance the experience. However, what excites me most is the opportunity to interact with and learn from you and the other conference participants. The people involved are what make our conference so exciting year after year. So, be sure to make new friends, ask those around you what they are learning about leadership, share your own ideas for enhancing leadership education, and be sure to follow-up after the conference. Adhering to our conference theme, the ALE board has spent time reflecting on the past and focusing on the future. I am pleased to report that the organization is in a healthy state and poised for opportunities on the horizon. We have experienced several years of strong membership growth, and wise management of resources has left us in solid financial health. As we embark upon a new strategic plan, we further strengthen the bridge between research and practice in Leadership Education through an inclusive and engaging community of dynamic leadership educators, committed to consistently growing, thriving, and advancing the field of Leadership Education. Your involvement will be critical as we continue to strengthen and sustain the expertise of professional leadership educators. Thank you for the contributions you are making to ALE and the visions of leadership that lie ahead! Sincerely, We hope you will take full advantage of all that the Association of Leadership Educators, the 2014 ALE Annual Conference, and San Antonio, Texas have to offer! While you are here, please take the time to thank the conference planning committee and our 20132014 Board of Directors who worked tirelessly to turn the vision for this conference into a reality. You’ll find the names of these individuals listed later in the program. Eric K. Kaufman President Association of Leadership Educators Kelleen Stine-Cheyne Vice President & Conference Chair Association of Leadership Educators For Internet Access in the Meeting Rooms: Select Network: Westin Meeting Passcode: educators2014 08 | Chapter Name Chapter Name | 09 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSIONS SESSION FORMATS Research Papers: A presentation of research by a single individual or team. Presentations are grouped together in 30 minutes timeslots. The session moderator helps keep time and move conversation along. Innovative Practice Papers: A presentation of practice by a single individual or team. Presentations provide the opportunity for short, to the point, discussion of a project, program, or practice tool/strategy (including case studies). Presentations are grouped together in 30-minute timeslots. The session moderator helps keep time and move conversation along. Educator Workshops: An interactive 90-minute demonstration or experiential session rooted in audience participation and active learning. Half or more of the time should be spent on experiential learning and active audience participation focused around an innovative educational practice or teaching and learning technique. Roundtable Discussions: An informal small group discussion on a topic of common interest. Roundtable discussions take place simultaneously in a large room; every 30 minutes a bell will ring allowing participants the opportunity to move to another roundtable or remain where they are. Roundtable Discussion are scheduled for Monday, at 3:30pm for 90 minutes in the Ballroom. For details about the Roundtable Discussions please see pages 34-37. Posters: A visual display of a program, paper, research, practice, or project staffed by the creator(s) during the hosted poster sessions on Sunday evening and Tuesday afternoon For details about the Posters please see pages 2633. Leadership Education in Action Plenary (LEAP) Session - Tuesday, July 15, 3:15 – 4:45pm: Navarro A: LEAP provides an exciting general session opportunity for attendees to engage in advancement of the Field of Leadership Education through constructive and collaborative dialogue. LEAP creates a space for leadership educators to share best practices with others from their specific area (i.e. consultants, human resource professionals, student development program administrators, tenure track faculty, etc.). Outcomes from this facilitated session will include collaborative networks and strategic outcomes to advance our field and positively impact the stakeholders we serve as a discipline. Tony Andenoro (University of Florida), Eric Buller (Miami University), and Dan Jenkins (University of Southern Maine) will facilitate this dynamic experience. Post Keynote Discussions: An informal small group discussion with each of our conference keynote speakers. For details about the keynote speakers please see pages 38-40. 10 | San Antonio, TX CONCURRENT SESSION I Monday, July 14, 2014, 9:00 AM to 10:30 AM Session 1A, Research Papers - Lantana, Lobby Level Presentation 1: An Examination of Leadership Development through an Interdisciplinary Leadership Minor Tyler J. Sorensen, Instructor in Agricultural Education, Oregon State University Aaron J. McKim, Graduate Student, Oregon State University Jonathan J. Velez, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University Researchers conducted a qualitative analysis of students’ experiences while enrolled in a leadership minor with the intent to determine what programmatic inputs spur leadership development. Researchers identified multiple themes that further articulate students’ perception of their experiences in the leadership minor. Implications and recommendations for leadership minors are discussed. Presentation 2: The Impact of Leadership Training on Emotional Intelligence: A Student Perspective Stevie Blakely, Coordinator, Center for Leadership Development, Tarrant County College-Trinity River Campus This qualitative phenomenological study explored the impact of leadership training on students’ Emotional Intelligence. Participants were enrolled in year-long, cohort-based leadership training programs and participated in semi-structured interviews. Results suggested that the social support gained through the leadership training programs is an impactful component on student Emotional Intelligence development, time management, stress management, and self-esteem. Presentation 3: Generational Differences in Perceptions of Leadership: A Look at Leadership Angel Futrell, Event and Outreach Coordinator, Texas A&M University Jennifer Williams, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University In this study, an online survey was sent to members of the Association of Leadership Educators asking respondents to rank-order ten leadership traits based on importance in an effective leader as well as rank-order the same leadership traits for prevalence in their students. The results were then divided into the Baby Boomer and X generations. Session 1B, Innovative Practice Papers - Villa, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: A Roadmap for Helping Students Develop the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership Sidney Hammond, Graduate Student, Texas A&M University Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University M’Randa Sandlin, Assistant Lecturer, Texas A&M University In a personal leadership course, the 5 Practices of Exemplary Leadership Model is incorporated into content throughout the semester. Experiential learning activities were adapted from various sources and implemented to enhance lecture for each of the five practices. Reflections reveal students believe the class activities influenced their development of the five practices. Presentation 2: Increase Your Teaching Impact: Using Emotional Intelligence to Teach Emotional Intelligence Gregory T. Gifford, Leadership Development Faculty, Federal Executive Institute Robert L. McKeage, Associate Professor of Management, University of Scranton This practice session discusses the impact of using emotional intelligence behaviors to facilitate training sessions on emotional intelligence, particularly with audiences that may be somewhat resistant. During this session, linkages will be made between constructs of the Bar-On EI behaviors model and how leadership educators can utilize EI to bring out negative and positive experiences of students and analyze those experiences using EI. San Antonio, TX | 11 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION I cont. Presentation 3: Understanding Contemporary Student Leadership Frameworks and Competencies Gary M. Morgan, Founder, Student Leadership Excellence Academy Four time-tested leadership frameworks that are directly related to student leadership development will be shared in the context of presented along with their mapping to the recently published Student Leadership Competencies Database that lets students evaluate themselves across 60 leadership competencies common across more than 500 academic programs. This mapping also helps to understand and demonstrate the effectiveness of leadership programs. Session 1C, Educator Workshop - Zapata, Ballroom Level Online Opportunities: Innovative Ways to Focus on Learning when Teaching Online Carol Wheeler, Assistant Professor of Leadership, Our Lady of the Lake University Clinton M. Stephens, Lecturer in Leadership Education, Iowa State University The field of leadership education has approached online learning with trepidation. To date little scholarship has been published in the field, and skepticism abounds. Having collectively taught 15 online courses, we often get skeptics asking “How do you teach leadership online?” This workshop is our response. The target audience are the skeptical leadership educators but we welcome both current and curious leadership educators who want to learn more of how to teach leadership online. Session 1D, Educator Workshop - Encino, Lobby Level Leading From Within: Key Tenets of Positive Psychology Lori Rothstein, Assistant Extension Professor, University of Minnesota Extension Denise Stromme, Assistant Extension Professor, Columbia Southern University This hands-on experiential workshop introduces participants to key tenets of positive psychology that enhance individual well-being through employing gratitude and mindfulness strategies. Participants will have the opportunity experience activities they can use in their own workshops to increase well-being in their community, work, and personal lives. Session 1E, Educator Workshop - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Seven Principles of Good Practice for Effective Global Leadership Education Jeni McRay, Assistant Professor of Leadership Studies, Fort Hays State University Jill Arensdorf, Assistant Professor of Leadership Studies & Department Chair, Fort Hays State University Justin Greenleaf, Assistant Professor of Leadership Studies, Fort Hays State University Heather Marie Kriley, International Instructor of Leadership Studies, Fort Hays State University Brett L. Whitaker, International Coordinator & Instructor of Leadership Studies, Fort Hays State University This educator workshop covers Fort Hays State University’s Seven Principles of Good Practice for Effective Global Leadership Education. FHSU has broad experience offering both curricular and co-curricular global leadership programs. The workshop provides a forum for FHSU faculty to share best practices and engage participants in developing new global offerings at their own institutions. CONCURRENT SESSION II Monday, July 14, 2014, 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM Session 2A, Research Papers - Lantana, Lobby Level Presentation 1: Examining the Relationship between Role Models and Leadership Growth during the Transition to Adulthood Jill R. Bowers, Visiting Teaching Associate, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign David M. Rosch, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Daniel A. Collier, Doctoral Student, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign We employed a qualitative, grounded theory study in which we interviewed emerging adults (N = 23) about their perceptions of their own leadership development. Our analysis resulted in a role model contingent framework for youth leadership development facilitated by the qualities of relational role models, their knowledge of opportunities and belief in youths’ potential, youth organizational involvement, and positional role models. Presentation 2: An Examination of Mentoring Relationships and Leadership Capacity in Resident Assistants Sherry Early, Faculty & Interim Program Coordinator, HESA, Ohio University I examined mentoring relationships and resident assistants’ (RA) leadership capacities. The type of mentor and the gender match and race match of the mentor-protégé pairs were also investigated. These findings fill gaps between research and practice and provide incentives for stakeholders of collegiate environments to mentor resident assistants. Session 2B, Research Papers - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Examining Agricultural Leadership Students’ Followership and Self-Directed Learning Style Jennifer Williams, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University The leader has typically been the myopic center of studies involving leadership on the collegiate level. Understanding the relationship between followership and learning will aid the leader (educator) in creating effective followers. Followership styles indicated students were more engaged, but less likely to be critical thinkers and the less self-directed students were more likely to be dependent followers with less critical thinking capacity. Presentation 2: The Development of Leadership Identity through an Interdisciplinary Leadership Minor Tyler J. Sorensen, Instructor in Agricultural Education, Oregon State University Aaron J. McKim, Graduate Student, Oregon State University Jonathan J. Velez, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University Researchers analyzed students’ experiences while enrolled in a leadership minor with the intent to explore leadership identity development. Researchers identified the development of leadership identity and the development of leadership skills among outcomes of leadership minor involvement. Implications and recommendations for leadership development programs are discussed. Session 2C, Innovative Practice Papers - Zapata, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: The History of You: Using Genealogy in the Undergraduate Leadership Classroom Ashley L. Powell, Graduate Student, Louisiana State University What is your story? What do you want your legacy to be? Students enrolled in personal leadership courses are often asked questions such as these at the beginning of each semester. The History of You innovative practice aims to engage students in reflecting on family history to assist in focusing on the development of leadership identity to impact future leadership behavior. 12 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 13 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION II cont. Presentation 2: Becoming Student-Athlete Champions: Identifying Athletic Role Models as Leaders Lori Moore, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University Sarah P. Ho, Academic Advisor & Course Instructor, Texas A&M University The Champion assignment requires student-athletes to identify role models that inform them about life lessons and transitions from sport to non-sport identities. Analysis of the assignment revealed that student-athletes selected leaders in and out of their social groups. The assignment also appeared to help this group of student-athletes merge their student and athlete identities. Session 2D, Innovative Practice Papers - Villa, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Learning to Thrive, not just Survive: Teaching Leadership to Increase Student Transition Success Clinton M. Stephens, Lecturer in Leadership Education, Iowa State University Cameron Beatty, Doctoral Candidate, Iowa State University Five first-year leadership classes were studied in how they contributed to the increase in student’s ability to thrive in college. This session will share how leadership classes can be designed to contribute to first-¬year students’ successful transition to college. Implications and tools for adding to your own programs will be discussed. Presentation 2: Mentoring distance-based graduate students Felix Arnold, Assistant Director of Transformational Leadership & Academic Excellence, Purdue University With the advent of new technology and the push to have more classes offered online to accommodate growing numbers of students with limited space, professors, and funding on college campuses, a transition is taking place in higher education. This practice presentation examines the mentoring relationship between academic advisors and graduate distance-based students. Session 2E, Innovative Practice Papers - Encino, Lobby Level Presentation 1: Popular Press Leadership Book Project: Becoming a Discerning Reader Barbara Altman, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University - Central Texas This innovative practice session will present an upper division undergraduate leadership class project in which students read a popular press leadership book and critique its contribution to leadership theory and practice. Students share their critiques with fellow students, with the goal of students becoming discerning readers of such books. Presentation 2: Connecting Concepts to Real World Examples: The New York Times in Leadership Matthew Sowcik, Assistant Professor, Wilkes University Summer F. Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University William G. Weeks, Associate Professor, Oklahoma State University A common thread throughout leadership education is the importance of connecting theory and practical application. The NY Times in Leadership Program (NYTL) was designed to give professors/students opportunities to connect leadership concepts to real-world examples. This session examines the NYTL and how two different universities are utilizing the resource. CONCURRENT SESSION III Monday, July 14, 2014, 1:45 PM to 3:15 PM Session 3A, Research Papers - Zapata, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: The journey to authenticity: An analysis of undergraduate personal development Meagan Scott, Graduate Teaching Associate, Oklahoma State University Ashley S. Whiddon, Graduate Teaching Associate, Oklahoma State University Nicholas R. Brown, Evaluator & Instructor, Oklahoma State University Penny P. Weeks, Associate Professor, Oklahoma State University Oklahoma State University offers a course that provides personal authentic leadership development as an essential building block toward the global leadership crisis. This instrumental case study sought to determine how students changed throughout the course. Four themes emerged: (a) self-evolution, (b) cognitive gain, (c) perceived self-awareness, and (d) framework confusion. Presentation 2: The Effects of Affect: How Implicit Facial Expressions Impact Explicit Projections of Transformational Leadership Nicholas Clegorne, Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech University Sarah K. Hanks, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech University Curtis R. Friedel, Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech University Eric K. Kaufman, Associate Professor, Virginia Tech University To learn more about the impacts of charismatic leadership in the classroom, the researchers employed an exploratory design utilizing Noldus FaceReader (an advanced facial recognition program) and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Significant correlations were found between facial expression and transformational leadership factors including Idealized Influence (attributed) and Inspirational Motivation. Presentation 3: Exploring Instructional and Assessment Strategy Use in Online Leadership Education Daniel M. Jenkins, Assistant Professor of Leadership & Organizational Studies, University of Southern Maine, LewistonAuburn College This research explores the instructional and assessment strategies used most often by leadership educators who teach online, academic credit-bearing leadership studies courses at graduate- and undergraduate-levels. Findings from this study suggest that discussion-based pedagogies, most commonly facilitated in online discussion boards, dominate both areas. Reflection, case studies, and group or individual projects were also used frequently. Session 3B, Educator Workshop - Villa, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Playing Stratego to Teach Competitive Strategy and the Influences of Environmental Change Coleman Patterson, Director of Leadership Studies, Professor of Management & Leadership, Hardin-Simmons University Stratego, a board game by Milton-Bradley, is an excellent tool for teaching business-level strategy and the effects of environmental change. Workshop participants will play Stratego and spend time debriefing the exercise and identifying various leadership and management concepts at play within the activity. Participants will gain enough experience in the workshop to use this game in their teaching positions. (traditional and online formats). A very special thanks is extended to Dan Jenkins and his Concurrent Sessions Committee for their hard work with the conference presentation selection process. 14 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 15 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION IV CONCURRENT SESSION III cont. Session 3C, Educator Workshop - Lantana, Lobby Level Preparing the Next Generation of Pro-social Leaders through Six Strategic Components Astrid Garza, Leadership Professor, Universidad de Monterrey Jorge Salcedo, HR and Business Administration Program Director, Universidad de Monterrey Our global context aims for improvement and for a positive change in many areas. So, how can we as educators promote the development of leaders who will use their skills for the society’s betterment? Learn six strategic components that encourage the development of pro-social leaders, which have been successfully implemented at the Universidad de Monterrey, Mexico. Session 3D, Educator Workshop - Encino, Lobby Level Intentional Reflective Practices in a Multicultural Classroom: Strategies for Growth, Development and Layered Leadership Learning Jennifer C. Wyatt, Assistant Professor, Murray State University Through an interactive and engaged delivery, this workshop is designed to provide leadership educators with innovative strategies to integrate intentional reflective processes into their lives as leadership practitioners. Reflective leadership applications for student growth and development will also be explored in the context of today’s multicultural classroom (traditional and online formats). Session 3E, Post Keynote Discussion - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Post keynote discussion w/ Jim Kouzes Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 9:45 AM to 11:15 AM Session 4A, Research Papers - Lantana, Lobby Level Presentation 1: Building Leaders: A National Examination of the Leadership Capacities Within Engineering Undergraduate Students Clinton M. Stephens, Lecturer in Leadership Education, Iowa State University David M. Rosch, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign We examined a national representative sample (N=90,444) of students enrolled in four-year universities, including a comparison sample of full-time students in engineering majors. Our results suggest that engineering students do not differ from comparable peers in leadership capacity in college, yet are less involved in group experiences in high school and college, participate in fewer leadership initiatives, and identify less often with faculty mentors. Presentation 2: Self-Perceived Career and Interpersonal Skills Gained from Participation on a Collegiate Livestock Judging Team: A Longitudinal Study Dennis Duncan, Professor, University of Georgia Frank Flanders, Assistant Professor, University of Georgia Nick Fuhrman, Associate Professor, University of Georgia Collegiate livestock judging is primarily an extracurricular activity that reinforces concepts taught in the classroom. Previous research has determined that participating on a livestock judging team can aid in the development of perceived life skills. Participants of this study indicated that their experience on a collegiate team helped them develop professional public speaking skills; learn the value of hard work and dedication; and be task and goal oriented. Presentation 3: Strategies for Effective Leadership Development in Africa and the Role of Transformational Leadership Theory Frank Banfill, President / Doctoral Student, MaxPoint Missions / Indiana Institute of Technology More than one billion people call the African continent home and many of them face a myriad of problems. Africans turn to their leaders for answers yet many of their problems are linked to the weaknesses of the leaders themselves, underscoring the need for best strategies in leadership development. This paper reflects on past leadership development approaches while focusing on incorporating transformational leadership theory into future leadership education. Session 4B, Educator Workshop - Zapata, Ballroom Level Training Supervisors of Student Interns to Utilize the Situational Leadership® II Model Gaea Hock, Assistant Professor, Mississippi State University Laura Lemons, Assistant Professor, Mississippi State University Leadership education students are routinely asked to participate in experiential learning opportunities in which they are mentored by someone outside of academia. It is important to make these experiences as worthwhile, educationally and personally, as possible. The student teaching internship is a key component of the teacher preparation process. We have experience teaching supervisors to utilize the Situational Leadership® II Model when working with student interns. The purpose of this workshop will be to demonstrate how supervisors of student interns can be trained to use this model and discuss its implementation to enhance the leadership scenario. 16 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 17 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION IV cont. Session 4C, Educator Workshop - Villa, Ballroom Level Who Am I? Using SWOT Analysis to Teach Self-Assessment and Strength Recognition Jackson Alexander, Graduate Research & Teaching Assistant, University of Arkansas K. Jill Rucker, Assistant Professor, University of Arkansas Before a leader can lead others, they must know themselves. An effective leader knows his or her strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of this educator workshop proposal is to outline a curriculum unit designed to increase an individual’s self-awareness and be able to identify personal strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to build effective teams. Session 4D, Educator Workshop - Encino, Lobby Level Learning to Lead by Leading a Discussion Sara Brierton, Instructional Designer of Distance Education, North Carolina State University Jacklyn A. Bruce, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University Leading a discussion is a skill useful in almost any field and essential in education, especially in leadership education. In this educator’s workshop we will walk participants through the basics of discussion facilitation, and then taking it one step further, we will break down the teaching and evaluation of three skills necessary for successful discussion facilitation. At the end of the session, learners will walk away with handouts and strategies that will assist in the future teaching of the skills needed for undergraduates to be successful discussion facilitators. Session 4E, Post Keynote Discussion - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Post keynote discussion w/ Gordy Curphy CONCURRENT SESSION V Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM Session 5A, Research Papers - Lantana, Lobby Level Presentation 1: Work-life balance and leadership opportunities Deborah N. Smith, Asst. Dept. Chair, Director, and Associate Professor of Leadership Studies, Kennesaw State University Deborah Roebuck, Professor of Management, Kennesaw State University Terri El Haddoui, CEO, The Edge Connection at Kennesaw State University This qualitative study focuses on how women of three different generations, Generation Y, Generation X and Baby Boomers, balance work-life commitments and how their choices have impacted their ability to obtain workplace leadership positions. The researchers also offer suggestions for how leadership education programs can use the findings to make their curriculum more relevant to female students. Presentation 2: Understanding the Nature of Eco-Leadership D. Adam Cletzer, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech University Eric K. Kaufman, Associate Professor, Virginia Tech University Rachael E. Kennedy, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech University Leadership is increasingly viewed not as the effect of an individual, but rather a collective process. In an effort to better understand this ecological approach to leadership, this applied research study examined community groups, investigating the relationship between their leadership culture, cohesiveness, and community project involvement. Session 5B, Educator Workshop - Zapata, Ballroom Level Strategies for Women in Novice Leadership Positions Michelle Manganaro, Faculty, University of Phoenix, SAS Chantell M. Cooley, Vice President of Training & Development / Owner, Columbia Southern University This educator workshop gives participants time to consider core issues encountered by newly engaged leaders in the 21st Century. The presenters share their own personal experiences in novice leadership roles and a practical guidance model. Leadership educators will likely reflect on their own development and gain new topical insights and best-practice strategies for use in leadership training. Session 5B, Educator Workshop - Encino, Lobby Level Modeling the Way: Leaders Teaching Leaders through Inclusive Pedagogies Daniel M. Jenkins, Assistant Professor of Leadership & Organizational Studies, University of Southern Maine, LewistonAuburn College Matthew Sowcik, Assistant Professor, Wilkes University Leaders lead by example. Research suggests that, in the same way, leadership educators model inclusiveness and facilitate learning environments that emphasize discussion-based pedagogies. This session will engage participants in dialogue about leadership educators’ instructional strategy preferences, describe the transfer of classroom-based inclusive pedagogies to real world settings, and involve participants in activities that demonstrate the technique and allow for practice. Session 5E, Post Keynote Discussion - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Post keynote discussion with Suzanna and Hector Ramos 18 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 19 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION VI Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM Session 6A, Research Papers - Villa, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Examining the Scope of Agricultural Leadership Education Aaron J. McKim, Graduate Student, Oregon State University Jonathan J. Velez, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University Lori L. Moore, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University Carrie A. Stephens, Associate Professor, University of Tennessee This national study examines the scope and type of programs offered in agricultural leadership education. Results revealed leadership courses and minors serve the highest numbers of students with 7,904 and 1,581 students respectively. Distribution of enrollment and perceived support were examined and recommendations are made for future research. CONCURRENT SESSION VI cont. Session 6C, Research Papers - Navarro A, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Mindsets of leadership education undergraduates: an approach to program assessment Sarah P. Ho, Academic Advisor & Course Instructor, Texas A&M University Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Students (N=313) in undergraduate leadership degree programs at Texas A&M University were surveyed to determine their leadership mindset. This study assessed hierarchical and systemic thinking preferences. Significant differences in thinking were found between gender and academic classification. Findings indicate formal leadership coursework influences students’ leadership mindsets. Presentation 2: Students’ Voices: Exploring Outcomes of a Yearlong Leadership Development Program Kellie A. Strawn, Leadership Academy Director, Oregon State University Jonathan J. Velez, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University Aaron J. McKim, Graduate Student, Oregon State University This qualitative study explores the learning outcomes associated with specific experiences in a one-year, intensive leadership development program at a large northwest research university. Results highlight student growth resulting from faculty mentoring, a yearlong seminar course, and sustained community involvement. Presentation 2: Addressing global crisis: Using authentic audiences and challenges to develop adaptive leadership and socially responsible agency in leadership learners Anthony C. Andenoro, Assistant Professor of Leadership Education, University of Florida Dana L. Bigham, Leadership Lecturer, University of Florida Teresa C. Balser, Professor of Soil Science, University of Florida This qualitative study provides insight into the impact of an interdisciplinary undergraduate course on the development of global capacities and commitments within complex adaptive contexts. The researchers note findings that demonstrate the development of socially responsible agency, along with adaptive leadership capacity and systems thinking. Further the authors present a compelling conceptual model, which is transferable to like contexts and has the potential for broad implications. Session 6B, Research Papers - Lantana, Lobby Level Session 6D, Innovative Practice Papers - Zapata, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: An evaluation of student perceptions on the impact of curricular and co-curricular activities on their changes in leader behaviors Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University M’Randa Sandlin, Assistant Lecturer, Texas A&M University Leadership educators seek to understand how they can better develop leadership among their students. The purpose of this study was to understand how students perceive changes in their leadership practices, while taking a personal leadership education course. This study found that curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular activities had a significant impact on the students’ perception of their change in leadership behaviors. Presentation 1: Bringing Realism to Leadership Education Projects: The Bike Ride Across Texas (BRAT) Coleman Patterson, Director of Leadership Studies, Professor of Management & Leadership, Hardin-Simmons University Bob Sanderson, Kinesiology Instructor, McMurry University Presentation 2: Do perceptions of presidential leadership capacity influence voting when controlling for party affiliation? Using a transformational leadership framework to explore young voter political attitudes Adrian B. Popa, Associate Professor, Gonzaga University Michael Hazel, Associate Professor, Gonzaga University This study explores the relationship between young voters’ leadership assessment of presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, and their reports of voting behavior during the 2012 Presidential election. Leadership perceptions were collected from 1,087 respondents prior to the election. Results indicate that candidate leadership assessments have a significant effect on candidate preference after controlling for the impact of party identification and self-perceived political efficacy. 20 | San Antonio, TX Presentation 2: The Hunger Project: Developing Civic Leadership through Service-Learning Kerry L. Priest, Assistant Professor, Kansas State University Tamara Bauer, Instructor, Kansas State University Leigh E. Fine, Visiting Assistant Professor, Kansas State University Service-learning can provide students with meaningful connections to a cause, the campus, and the community. This paper illustrates how faculty, students, and community partners designed and implemented a semester-long servicelearning experience for the purpose of exercising leadership to make progress on the social issue of hunger. We describe how service-learning can be a catalyst to explore and engage the learning nexus of social challenges, leadership, and civic engagement. Session 6E, Innovative Practice Papers - Encino, Lobby Level Presentation 1: Power in Partnerships: Visioning through Collaboration Daria Graham, Associate Director, Office of Multicultural Affairs, University of Dayton Cari Wallace, Assistant Vice President, Student Development, University of Dayton The University of Dayton’s Leadership Consortium is a group of faculty, staff, and students who come together in efforts to provide a resource for students who are interested in leadership programs and opportunities on and off campus. This session will detail benefits and challenges of this type of cross-institutional collaboration. San Antonio, TX | 21 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION VI cont. THUR Oct. 30 - SUN Nov. 2, 2014 Presentation 2: Building the Foundation; Creating the Vision: The Leadership Toolbox and Toolbox Express Daria Graham, Associate Director, Office of Multicultural Affairs, University of Dayton Justen Cox, Graduate Assistant for Leadership Development, University of Dayton The University of Dayton’s Leadership Toolbox and Toolbox Express is a resource that provides a foundation for leadership experiences that include trainings and meetings. This session will detail the formation, content, usage, and assessment of the Toolbox and Toolbox Express. San Diego 16 Annual Global Conference th Conscious Leading for Global Change: Emergence of our Collective Realities Find out more and register today! www.ila-net.org/Conferences 22 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 23 ALE 2014 CONCURRENT SESSION VII Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 9:45 AM to 11:15 AM Session 7A, Innovative Practice Papers - Zapata, Ballroom Level Presentation 1: Social Media Activism: Building International Leadership Capacity in US/International Student Relationships Caitlin G. Bletscher, Graduate Assistant, Leadership Education, University of Florida Anthony C. Andenoro, Assistant Professor of Leadership Education, University of Florida This presentation explores a case study to develop a conceptual framework for leadership educators to build international leadership capacity. After establishing meaningful international relationships, a student leader developed a social media response to the current Venezuelan instability. This innovative practice provides a communicative, globally local initiative for international leadership development. Presentation 2: An Integrated Social Media Learning Community to Develop Leadership in Retail Food Safety Managers Matthew Agle, Graduate Student, North Carolina State University North Carolina Cooperative Extension is currently developing a food safety certification for retail food managers. This will include continued educational engagement with participants through a virtual learning community using integrated social media and communication methods focused on managers who foster a culture of food safety through transformational leadership. Presentation 3: Doing The Right Thing: Ethical Leadership and the Decision-Making Process Bradley J. Burbaugh, Graduate Research Assistant, Virginia Tech University D. Adam Cletzer, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech University Tinesha Woods-Wells, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech University This case study examines the principles and real-world application of ethical leadership and decision making. Contextualized in the ongoing controversy of the “revolving door” between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Monsanto Corporation, this case study asks students to identify core values and apply them to a real-world scenario using the Principles of Ethical Leadership and the Ethical Decision-Making Model as guides. CONCURRENT SESSION VII cont. Session 7D, Educator Workshop - Villa, Ballroom Level Integrating Creativity and Creative Problem Solving into the First Year Experience Jack Hernandez, Counselor, Lone Star College Two challenges faced by many First-Time in College (FTIC) students is that of not being actively engaged in their coursework along with not obtaining a deeper level of learning of the course content. These two issues could lead to students not transitioning appropriately into further coursework and nor having success in college. The presenter will make a case for integrating creativity and creative problem strategies into a community college Student Success course as a way to address engagement and learning. Creativity and creative problem solving is a skill-set that has been linked to key leadership skills and can readily with students. The 24th ALE Annual Conference Proceedings will provide extended perspectives about our presented sessions and posters online at http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ following the conference. Session 7B, Educator Workshop - Lantana, Lobby Level Resilient Leadership for Women - Strategies for Hope and Productivity Molly McGowan, Director, Leadership Institute & Community Service Center, Rochester Institute of Technology Women are faced with many challenges today, from managing the pressures of work and maneuvering through the leadership labyrinth to balancing personal wellness and family commitments. Without strategies for managing these challenges, women can more easily lose hope, get stuck in negativity and decrease their productivity. In this workshop, participants will engage in three unique exercises that are proven to help leaders overcome setbacks, focus on positive outcomes, and regain hope – keys to becoming strong resilient leaders! Session 7C, Educator Workshop - Encino, Lobby Level Teaching Leadership from a Systems Thinking Perspective Christina Wesanen-Neil, Assistant Director of Leadership Programs, University of Arizona Our emerging global society demands that we broaden teaching leadership from the individual’s to a larger systems’ perspective. We should integrate systems thinking into the way and what we teach about leadership. In this workshop, participants will value systems thinking in leadership education by understanding and applying systems thinking. 24 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 25 ALE 2014 POSTERSRESEARCH Using Student Temperaments to Impact the Planning of Agriculture Leadership Coursework Ashley L. Powell, Graduate Student, Montana State University Carl Igo, Associate Professor, Montana State University At universities across the globe, non-retained students means lost revenue. Emerging research has focused on means to better educate and retain students within colleges of agriculture. This study joined previous research in the attempt to positively impact college of agriculture student retention and course planning. A Model for what Beef Industry Leadership is and how Leaders come to be B. Lynn Gordon, Assistant Professor, South Dakota State University Jason D. Ellis, Associate Professor, Kansas State University The purpose of this study was to gain a greater understanding of what brings people to industry leadership roles and to identify future leadership needs of membership-based organizations. This project established a model for how beef industry leaders come to serve in formal positions of volunteer peer membership organizations, the value and role of volunteers as leaders, and how industry leadership is defined as a result. The Impact of an Ethics Class on Student’s Cognitive Moral Development Barry Boyd, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University Everleigh Hayes, Graduate Teaching Assistant, Texas A&M University Jennifer Williams, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Most leadership courses incorporated ethical principles into existing courses, but more programs are adding courses specifically focusing on ethics. Given the current neo-charismatic movement of leadership, combining leadership concepts with ethical theory gives students the proper scaffolding for being effective, ethical leaders. One way for students to begin learning and applying ethical theories to their lives is to create a personal code of ethics. While the literature has focused on organizational codes of ethics, the need to examine ethical foundations of leadership students is evident. Evaluating the Community Impact of Service Learning: Preliminary Development of a Grounded Theory Brent Goertzen, Associate Professor, Fort Hays State University Justin Greenleaf, Assistant Professor, Fort Hays State University Danielle Dougherty, Undergraduate Student, Fort Hays State University The purpose of the project is to conduct a grounded theory study of community leaders’ perceptions of the impact of service-learning projects. The central research question driving the present study is: “How have ‘service-learning project teams’ impacted your organization and community?” The participants were comprised of community leaders who have supervised and worked with student project teams from a fieldwork in leadership studies course offered at a regional, public university. Employer Perceptions of Desired Leadership Competencies in Employees Post-Graduation G. Cameron Jernigan, Graduate Assistant, University of Arkansas Jill Rucker, Assistant Professor, University of Arkansas Previous studies have analyzed needed graduate competencies in agricultural communications, agricultural economics, animal science, and general agriculture. However, a study has not been conducted specifically pertaining to desired leadership competencies. Therefore, the purpose of this emerging research proposal is to analyze leadership competencies desired by agricultural graduates at [university] University. 16 | Chapter Name Competencies in Leadership, Education, and Research: Roses by Other Names Jacklyn A. Bruce, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University Sara Brierton, Instructional Designer, North Carolina State University What does it take to be a leader, what are the key competencies of leadership? Are these so different from competencies of other disciplines, other researchers, educators, and thinkers? An examination of just a few respected and popular texts suggests there are core competencies shared by several fields. Examining the Developmental Influences that Impact Women in Sports’ Leadership Identity Development Jami Lobpries, Doctoral Student, Texas A&M University Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University This study examined the developmental influences of current female leaders in sport. Three women leaders in sport contexts were interviewed to gain perspectives of developmental influences on their leadership identity development. Two themes emerged which were role of sport and the role of former coaches. Academic Freedom as Leadership in Higher Education: Foundations for Emerging Research Jerald Walz, Doctoral Candidate, Virginia Tech This poster examines academic freedom as leadership. It explains what makes universities unique, examines governance as leadership, reviews how Academic Freedom has been (re)defined, and suggests theoretical lenses for leadership in universities. The presentation draws conclusions and suggests possibilities for future research. “Don’t fix what ain’t broke” Strategic leaders’ utilization of entrepreneurial capability Lane Wakefield, Doctoral Student, Texas A&M University Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Leadership educators may feel the need to help struggling organizations as fast as they can. This quantitative study was completed to observe all 30 of the National Basketball Association’s (NBA) franchises and their senior leadership. Data was collected from transactions made by each organization, almost all of which are the responsibility of the General Manager (GM). Leadership development practices can utilize lessons learned in entrepreneurial capability to empower future strategic leaders in fast-paced environments. Lead the Way: Student Veterans’ Perceptions of Military and Civilian Leadership Laura Lemons, Assistant Professor, Mississippi State University Col (Ret) Kenneth D. McRae, Director, G.V. “Sonny” Montgomery Center for America’s Veterans, Mississippi State University The multitude of challenges facing veterans who are transitioning back to a civilian can be daunting. One such challenge is adjusting to the differences in leadership structure that veterans will encounter as they enter civilian organizations. The military offers a highly structured leadership doctrine. Leadership in the civilian world is much more broadly defined and far less structured. The purpose of this study is to investigate student veterans’ and servicemen’s perceptions of leadership in the military and in civilian life. Leadership Assessments in Student Organizations Sarah Wright, Graduate Assistant, University of Arkansas K. Jill Rucker, Assistant Professor, University of Arkansas The purpose of this study is to analyze organizations that promote leadership development and provide leadership opportunities for students enrolled in the College of Agriculture at a southern land-grant institution. Additionally, the study will analyze the leadership skills and traits exhibited by members in the leadership organizations to develop a student leadership profile. Chapter Name | 17 ALE 2014 POSTERSRESEARCH CONT. Investigating Followership Styles of Caribbean Students: Are Students Ready for Agricultural Leadership Roles? Robert Strong, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Jennifer Williams, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University Larry Dooley, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University The purpose of this study was to examine agricultural students’ levels of followership at a large university in the South United States. The study sought to: (a) Describe students’ followership style; (b) Describe students’ levels of critical thinking and engagement; and (c) Examine the effect of personal characteristics on followership style. Understanding Opinion Leaders of Agricultural Cooperatives: Examining the Role of Leadership in Global Food Security Larry Dooley, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University Robert Strong, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University This study had two objectives: (a) initiate the need of cooperatives for farmers in the community; and (b) evaluate practices, techniques and products of small farmers in the community. Most participants established the need for education, organization, and marketing; but had no knowledge of how to reach their need. Results from this study prove an establishment of local cooperatives is a solution to achieving the need for education, marketing and organization as a community. Exploring Individual Capacity for Development of the Five Practices of Exemplary Leaders in a High-Impact Undergraduate Program Kelsey Hirsch, Undergraduate Student, Texas A&M University Summer Odom, Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University This study examined how a [Student International Leadership Program] (SILP) contributed to the development of undergraduate students’ five leadership practices. Analysis of student reflections revealed students attribute the [SILP] project, reflective writings, and topics discussed as influencing their highest scored practice. Community Leadership: Many Voices, One Message Ginger Bushey, Doctoral Student, North Carolina State University Jacklyn A. Bruce, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University Matthew Agle, Graduate Student, North Carolina State University In this qualitative study, non-formal leaders located in small communities throughout Costa Rica were interviewed in order to discover and understand their roles and how they view “community”. Five individuals were interviewed using a semi-structured protocol. What emerged from the study was a sense that these individuals were passionate not only about their personal communities (where they live) but the larger community (their country and their world). A greater conceptualization of that sense of community, the interconnectedness, the sense of social responsibility and a commitment to the protection of the environment all emerged as important paradigms. Exploring Leadership Skill-Development and the Related Curricular Experiences in a Year-Long Leadership Development Program Aaron McKim, Graduate Student, Oregon State University The purpose of this research was to identify leadership skill development among students enrolled in a year-long leadership development program, and to provide curricular experiences related to the areas of leadership skill development. Curricular experiences related to the top five leadership skill areas developed are discussed. Reflections of Follower Development in Relation to the Student Teaching Experience Gaea Hock, Assistant Professor, Mississippi State University The student teaching experience is an experiential learning program allowing student teachers to practice their teaching methods and gain confidence as a professional. It is also an important tool in helping prepare and promote graduates to enter the teaching profession after graduation. The purpose of this qualitative research study was to investigate the development of student teachers in a follower situation and their intent to teach after completion of the student teaching experience. Student teachers recognized their own development through the experience and the importance of having a positive relationship with their cooperating teacher (leader) to help ensure success. The intent to teach of most student teachers in this study was decided prior to the experience, but several mentioned that the intent became more set due to the experience. Future research should continue to find methods and experiences to encourage agricultural education students to enter the profession at the completion of their student teaching experience. Social Justice Involvement Shapes Student Leaders’ Identity Rachael Kennedy, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech There is a dearth of research into student leaders working on social justice and hunger. This phenomenological study explored the experiences of student leaders in an anti-hunger, social justice organization. From their stories, we develop an understanding of how their identity is shaped. Thus, knowledge of grassroots student leadership is expanded. nytimes.com/edu 28 | San Antonio, TX Expect the World. San Antonio, TX | 29 ALE 2014 POSTERSPRACTICE Camp Brosius Leadership Development Program Allison Plopper, Lecturer, IUPUI Rachel Swinford, Lecturer, IUPUI Four years ago the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Department of Kinesiology worked with the Military Science Department to adopt and modify the Army ROTC’s Leadership Development Program to align with the Department of Kinesiology’ student learning outcomes. As a graduation requirement, all students in the Department of Kinesiology are required to attend a 1-week residential leadership development camp at Camp Brosius in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. At this camp students are placed into teams, or as we call it “families”, and work with this team throughout the week in a series of leadership and team-building challenges. Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Five Theory X Leadership Style Beliefs/Assumptions Awoke D. Dollisso, Senior Lecturer, Iowa State University Overall, the findings indicate that although a significant minority hold predispositions towards Theory X beliefs, most of these students have predispositions towards Theory Y beliefs, which is a people-oriented leadership style. These findings make students’ aware of their own and their peers’ leadership style tendencies, and may cause them to reflect, and examined their own assumptions and beliefs. Teaching Moral Theories Using Lone Survivor Barry Boyd, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University Students are connected to pop culture and as such, pop culture can be used to gain their interest and help them see connections between moral theory and real-life moral dilemmas. Using Lone Survivor as a case, Students were able to justify the application of several moral theories to the SEAL team’s dilemma. Students were also able to identify the moral development of each SEAL team member using Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development. Towards a Conceptual Model of Change Emily R. Perdue, Doctoral Student, Texas A&M University Sarah P. Ho, Doctoral Student, Texas A&M University The word “leadership” encompasses a broad array of theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Change is an important aspect of leadership and is more often than not an expected outcome or result of any particular theory or model. This poster is a visual depiction of a conceptual framework developed by the author to illustrate four stages of change development: information, collaboration, transformation and implementation, and celebration or ICTC. The Great Debate: An Exploration of Using Debate in the Leadership Classroom G. Cameron Jernigan, Graduate Assistant, University of Arkansas Jill Rucker, Assistant Professor, University of Arkansas Debate is an activity used to reinforce concepts, promote critical thinking, and develop oral communication skills. However, a review of leadership education literature lacks citing the use of debate in the leadership classroom. Therefore, the purpose of this proposal is to describe the use of debate in an upper division leadership course at a southern land-grant institution. Expanding an Instructor’s Capacity to Recognize Social Patterns in an Experiential Leadership Class: A First Person Inquiry Peter Maribei, Doctoral Student, University of San Diego Conor McLaughlin, Doctoral Student, University of San Diego 30 | San Antonio, TX GLEE-dership Kathryn Ingerson, Extension Educator, Purdue Extension Jacklyn A. Bruce, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University The students within the show deal with real-life situations that typical high school students could face (crushes, school problems, sports drama, graduation, etc.). Throughout the seasons and the situations they face, Glee characters develop and provide examples of both good and poor leadership qualities. It is these leadership qualities that can be brought into the classroom to teach students about leadership styles. I Am Their Leader-- Where Do I Start? Ginger Bushey, Doctoral Student, North Carolina State University Jacklyn A. Bruce, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University Matthew Agle, Graduate Student, North Carolina State University Leading Ladies John Hall, Assistant Professor, Tennessee State University Shawneis Jones, Undergraduate Honors Student, Tennessee State University Tyra Laster, Undergraduate Honors Student, Tennessee State University The goal of the projected program is to use an alternative teaching method focused on implementing forms of pop culture to improve the development of two major foundations of success in young women: self-confidence and leadership. Leadership Autobiography: Identifying Early Leadership Experiences M. Reid Stavinoha, Academic Advisor/Graduate Student, Texas A&M University Lori L. Moore, Associate Professor, Texas A&M University By reflecting on past experiences students are able to identify instances where they first remember being exposed to leadership, have provided leadership, and have hesitated to provide leadership. By reflecting on these experiences, students are able to describe how these experiences have influenced their understanding of leadership as a concept, and to begin to describe the context where they will most likely practice leadership in their future. I Lead Maroon: Promoting Leadership Education, Training, & Development Melissa R. Shehane, Assistant Director, Leadership and Service Center-Department of Student Activities, Texas A&M University Kathryn A. Sturtevant, Student Development Specialist III, Leadership and Service Center-Department of Student Activities, Texas A&M University Melanie Smith, Graduate Assistant, Leadership and Service Center-Department of Student Activities, Texas A&M University The purpose of the I Lead Maroon program is to guide participants in developing their identity as leaders through engaging in leadership development, education, and training opportunities while at the university. Our goal is for I Lead Maroon to be a model program in leadership arenas within higher education. Leader Perspectives on Issues of Food Security and Hunger: Four Cases for the Leadership Classroom Penny Pennington Weeks, Professor, Oklahoma State University Many of our students will be responsible for decisions related to food security and hunger in the U.S. and around the globe. What are we doing to prepare the next generation to take on this role? Preview recently developed food security and hunger case studies through our interactive poster session. San Antonio, TX | 31 ALE 2014 POSTERSPRACTICE CONT. Finding Your Path: Using a Pathway Model to Link Leadership Research and Practice Bradley Burbaugh, Graduate Research Assistant, Virginia Tech Megan M. Seibel, VALOR Director and Extension Specialist, Virginia Tech Thomas G. Archibald, Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Virginia Tech This approach to leadership development evaluation is valuable because it highlights the relationship between activities and outcomes (i.e. program effectiveness) and, more specifically, how a program works. Conversely, if a program fails to achieve its intended outcomes or is ineffective, a pathway model approach can be helpful in determining where the breakdown occurred between program theory and outcomes. Learners Into Leaders Yael Hellman, Associate Professor, Woodbury University This poster outlines a workshop that creates a participant-centered group environment and ignites participants’ unique energies and openness. While some educators find participant-led interactive instruction foolish or frightening at first, decades of research and teaching have proven that this approach best develops deep, lasting leadership skills through their immediate, hands-on practice. So, if we really think that facilitation teaches best, then this Workshop will teach participants by experiencing what they want their own students to experience. Leadership skills acquisition: A progressed situational competency model for leadership pedagogy Christopher Ahlstrom, Assistant Professor, Salisbury University As a skill, leadership can be framed within linked competencies to develop an authentic, relevant, and instructable curriculum. The five-stage model of skill acquisition written by Hubert Dreyfus provides a guiding framework that is generic and situational; enabling for the learner to better cope with complexity and develop intuitive skills. This model moves the learner as a “novice” along the continuum of learning through instructor guidance and coaching to developing an enhanced self-efficacy. Leadership After Dark: An Alternative Delivery Method for an Introductory Leadership Course William Weeks, Professor, Oklahoma State University Penny Pennington Weeks, Professor, Oklahoma State University This poster describes how faculty modified an existing one-credit hour introductory leadership course from a 16-week format to a three-evening format and did so with good success. Faculty used the Student Leadership Challenge (Kouzes and Posner, 2008) as a text and framework for the class. Helping Youth Maximize their Agricultural eXperience! [State] FFA’s HYMAX Academy challenging students to reach success! Robin Peiter Horstmeier, Associate Professor and Consultant, University of Missouri [State] Agricultural leaders identified an important need for people to advocate for the agricultural industry. As a tribute to the retiring State FFA Advisor, many donated funds in honor of his many years of service to youth and agriculture. These funds provide the means to create and implement the HYMAX Academy, targeted to provide leadership experiences to entering high school sophomores. The focus of this Academy is to combine leadership, communication, personal development, and agriculture literacy and challenge Academy members to be AGvocates. The goal is these Academy members will be able to effectively tell the story of Agriculture and to be leaders within their own home community. Process-driven Pedagogy for Learning and Living Leadership: Engaging Three Models of Learning and Community Development for Student Success Sarah K. Hanks, Doctoral Student, Virginia Tech Nicholas A. Clegorne, Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech This poster shares a model for leadership education piloted in a living-learning community. Outcomes are derived from an emphasis on co-curricular reflective process applying student learning to lived experience. Connections are made to Social Change Model of Leadership Development (HERI, 1996) and the Hierarchy of Community Needs (Fenwick, 2010). immediate, hands-on practice. So, if we really think that facilitation teaches best, then this Workshop will teach participants by experiencing what they want their own students to experience. 32 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 33 ALE 2014 ROUNDTABLES SESSION FORMAT Roundtable Discussions are designed for small group discussions on topics of common interest. The organizer frames the topic and facilitates a discussion with participants joining the table. A bell will ring every 30 minutes allowing participants the opportunity to move to another roundtable or remain where they are. Roundtable Discussion Table 1: The Future is Here: A Dialogue on Developing Online Leadership Courses that Promote MultiDimensional Learning Mary Filice, Associate Chair & Associate Professor, Columbia College Chicago Beth Ryan, Lecturer, Columbia College Chicago This roundtable will explore creative ways to align past and current leadership topics with 21st Century distance learning modalities. Participants will engage in a dialogue to investigate increasing student engagement in online leadership course; the development of strong organizational, problem solving, and critical thinking activities that develop student’s interpersonal leadership skills; the demonstration of emotional, cultural, and contextual intelligences; and the creation of online learning assessments. Roundtable Discussion Table 2: E-portfolios as a pedagogical tool for leadership education: Why do them? How to best use them? What do they produce? Francesca Lo, Director, Husky Leadership Initiative, University of Washington E-portfolios have gained prominence as a powerful pedagogical tool to help students articulate and integrate their learning across multiple experiences both inside and outside the classroom. This roundtable will provide participants an opportunity to discuss the questions of purpose, design, and outcomes of e-portfolios in the practice of leadership education. Whether having used e-portfolios extensively or contemplating their potential use, participants will leave this session with new ideas to consider in utilizing this exciting teaching and learning tool. Roundtable Discussion Table 3: Enhancing and Evaluating the Facilitative Approach to Leadership Education Yael Hellman, Associate Professor, Woodbury University Most leadership educators concur that the most effective method for training adults to lead is facilitative. Such interactive, hands-on, cooperative, and learner-driven teaching best matches the needs of each mature learner (as adult educational theory suggests) and best integrates them with organizational needs (increasing worker cooperation; encouraging visionary and ethical leadership; improving communication with and responsiveness to the community and clients). Facilitative teaching calls on learners’ life experiences and professional interests, and practices skills within a supportive group (following group dynamics theory). Such learning applies immediately to the work environment, and lets participants clarify their leadership vision and discover how to achieve it collaboratively with those they lead. So the overriding issues of this roundtable, and the topics it will explore, are 1) how educators can achieve facilitative goals in their classrooms; 2) how educators can assess their success in the facilitative classroom; and 3) how educators can contribute to a reliable body of research on the real-life benefits of facilitative training in leadership. 18 | Chapter Name Roundtable Discussion Table 4: Exploring the Dark Side of Service Learning and Servant Leadership Narratives Nicholas Clegorne, Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech University The objectives of this roundtable are two-fold. First, participants will engage be able to better articulate an increasing body of critical literature that often regards service learning as harmful related to social justice (Davis, 2006; Eby, 1998; Howard, 2011). Second the participants will share their own experiences and work cooperatively to imagine more socially just service experiences. In the presenter’s experience, the latter objective supports the former. Evidence will be shared demonstrating that students exhibited alarming tendencies to colonize community spaces and members through service. Here “to colonize” is used as in post-colonial theory (e.g. Said, 1979) and refers to an active attempt by one individual or population to project their own values and expectations on a separate, sovereign community. Specifically, students shared narratives in which they privileged themselves as heroes while representing community members as beside the point or invalid. Ultimately we will explore curricula that disrupt hero-centered conceptualizations of service learning curricula in leadership education programs. Roundtable Discussion Table 5: Finding Common Ground: Agricultural Leadership Educators Discuss the National Leadership Education Research Agenda Penny P. Weeks, Professor, Oklahoma State University Anthony C. Andenoro, Assistant Professor of Leadership Education, University of Florida Nicole Stedman, Associate Professor, University of Florida Have you considered how the National Leadership Education Research Agenda (NLERA) impacts your research program? The roundtable discussion will serve as a forum for agricultural leadership educators to compare the NLERA to the National Research Agenda of Agricultural Education and Communication and to discuss the impact on personal research agendas. Roundtable Discussion Table 6: Getting Along? Developing a Culture of Cohesion in a Department of Leadership Studies Jill Arensdorf, Assistant Professor of Leadership Studies & Department Chair, Fort Hays State University Teaching leadership is a passion that we share, but how do we model what we teach on our respective departments, units, and programs? This roundtable will give participants an opportunity to discuss ideas about how to build an engaging culture that incorporates elements of leadership studies. Roundtable Discussion Table 7: Leadership and Communication: Intentionally Merging Communication with Leadership Education Kris Gerhardt, Assistant Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University Eric Buschlen, Assistant Professor, Central Michigan University Although there is an indication in the leadership literature that communication skills are critical to leadership, some current research on the curricular design of leadership programs indicates that there are very few dedicated communication courses commonly included as curricular requirements. This roundtable will provide an opportunity to discuss the importance of communication skills to our students and what this means for the future curricular design of academic leadership programs. Roundtable Discussion Table 8: Reflecting on Service-Learning Experiences, Implications for Future Classroom Use Dennis Duncan, Professor, University of Georgia Natalie Coers, Program Coordinator, University of Florida Implementing service-learning and/or service experiences in the leadership classroom merits opportunities for students to apply classroom concepts through meaningful work within a community. This roundtable discussion will focus on sharing past experiences with this pedagogy, reflection of best practices, and consideration of implications these practices could have within leadership education. Chapter Name | 19 ALE 2014 ROUNDTABLES CONT. Roundtable Discussion Table 9: Teaching Employee Engagement: Moving from Good Ideas to Great Results Arron Grow, Associate Professor of Organizational Leadership, City University of Seattle Research has uncovered a troubling pattern among American workers. A majority of American workers (approximately 70%) feel that they are either not engaged, or actively disengaged from their organizations. Leadership education addresses employee engagement with many high-potential recommendations and still the issue persists. The negative impact that employee disconnectedness has on an organization has been widely documented (Gosney, 2013; Paterson, 2013; and Bierla, 2013). This roundtable will provide a forum for going beyond simple ideas for teaching engagement. In this roundtable presentation, leadership educators will be asked to 1) identify new and unique ways to improve employee engagement and 2) consider strategies for implementing these methods in the workplace. Roundtable Discussion Table 10: Teaching the Impact of Mentoring on Leadership Development in a Virtual Environment David G. Wolf, Affiliate Assistant Professor, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University David K. Ober, Adjunct Professor, Eastern University There is substantial evidence to suggest the mentoring process has significant advantages and benefits for new and aspiring leaders. Teaching the process in an online setting has significant challenges because mentoring has traditionally taken place in a face-to-face environment. This roundtable will provide a forum to discuss and explore the qualitative research model to teach mentoring in the challenging virtual environment. Roundtable Discussion Table 11: The Future of Education Reform: The Role of Emotional Intelligence for School Leaders Marie Cianca, Associate Professor, St. John Fisher College Shannon Cleverley-Thompson, Visiting Assistant Professor, St. John Fisher College With the demands for better outcomes and greater change from school leaders, such as superintendents, principals, central and building-level administrators, there is a need to understand how emotional intelligence can help leaders meet these new demands in the near future. There are three models of emotional intelligence from Daniel Goleman, Salovey, Mayer and Caruso, and Bar-On that may have benefits to offer school leaders. The facilitators currently teach in an Executive Leadership Doctoral Program and wish to gain insights from program graduates who are current leaders in their fields. However, before a study is developed, it would be helpful to discuss and gather advice from others interested in this topic to best capture ideas and perceptions on the study of emotional intelligence to enhance training for school leaders. Roundtable Discussion Table 12: The Millennial Student Will Rock Your World Kelly Coke, Instructor of Adult Education & Leadership, Texas A&M University-Texarkana Marlena Ballard, Academic Coach, Lynn University This roundtable discussion will contain research and implications about educating students from the millennial generation. It includes helpful information about effective teaching, learning, and academic coaching methods when working with these students. Participants will be able to identify effective ways of instructing, motivating and engaging multiple generations inside and outside of the classroom. Participants will be able to know the unique characteristics of the millennial generation in terms of developing more effective strategies for educating and retaining this new community of learners. Roundtable Discussion Table 13: Women in Novice Leadership Positions Michelle Manganaro, Faculty, University of Phoenix, SAS Chantell M. Cooley, Vice President of Training & Development / Owner, Columbia Southern University What is specific about first time leadership roles? What are the novice leader realities for women in particular? Synopsis of the presenters’ White Paper will guide debate about core issues affecting women in leadership roles in the 21st Century. A practical Guidance Model will offer solutions. 36 | San Antonio, TX Roundtable Discussion Table 14: Teaching Leadership Students How to Set an Organizational Agenda Donna Blaess, Associate Professor of Leadership, Concordia University Chicago Kathryn Hollywood, Professor of Leadership, Concordia University Chicago One of the major teaching responsibilities of leadership educators is to instruct students set in developing an organizational agenda that guides and monitors the work of an organization. To what extent do leadership educators possess the theoretical and instructional skills to support students in this endeavor? This roundtable will offer participants the opportunity to discuss their understanding of setting an organizational agenda as well as to share teaching and learning experiences and ideas. Roundtable Discussion Table 15: Advancing Qualitative Research in Leadership Education Kerry Priest, Assistant Professor, Kansas State University School of Leadership Studies Is there a space in leadership education scholarship for contemporary forms of qualitative research? How could advancing qualitative research support and enhance the National Leadership Education Research Agenda? This roundtable invites leadership educators to discuss personal experiences, observations, and interpretations of the challenges and opportunities for qualitative research in our scholarship and practice. Roundtable Discussion Table 16: Advancing the Notion of Teacher Leadership Holes From the Past and Opportunities For the Future Chaney Mostley, Director of the Academies of Nashville, Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools John Hall, Undergraduate Honors Student, Tennessee State University The relationships between teachers and students align with and are supported by numerous theories of leadership, but research on teacher leadership in this regard is minimal. Participants in this discussion will reflect on their own leadership actions as teachers and identify opportunities for conducting research on teacher leadership. Roundtable Discussion Table 17: Governance as leadership in the nonprofit sector: A vision for the future Sarah K. Hanks, Doctoral Candidate, Virginia Tech Effective leadership in the nonprofit sector requires the careful diagnosis of the complex problems facing organizations today. This roundtable will explore the parallels between leadership and governance as a means to address Tame, Wicked, and Critical problems (Grint, 2010b). Roundtable Discussion Table 18: The Inter-Association Leadership Education Collaborative: Bringing Organizations Together for Transdisciplinary Possibilities Anthony C. Andenoro, Assistant Professor of Leadership Education, University of Florida William D. Smedick, Director of Leadership Programs & Assessment Initiatives, Johns Hopkins University Leadership educators across the United States are faced with the challenge of creating dynamic educational and developmental experiences for their leadership learners. To gain perspective for how to do this effectively, leadership educators often turn to their professional organizations. However, professional leadership organizations such as the Association of Leadership Educators (ALE) and the National Association for Campus Activities (NACA) often provide similar development opportunities and address similar needs for the field of Leadership Education. This was the impetus for the creation the creation of the Inter-¬Association Leadership Collaborative (ILEC). In July of 2013, seven member-based Leadership Education organizations (ACUI, ACPA, ALE, NASPA, NCLP, NACA, and ILA) came together at the University of Maryland, to discuss ways of supporting, promoting, and advancing the realm of Leadership Education and the professional development opportunities for leadership educators in higher education. This innovative summit created a foundation for dynamic transdisciplinary outcomes and the development of our field. This roundtable discussion aims to facilitate dialogue about gaps within the field of Leadership Education and create strategic direction for the transdisciplinary outcomes that ILEC aspires to achieve. San Antonio, TX | 37 ALE 2014 CONFERENCE KEYNOTES JIM KOUZES Author of The Leadership Challenge & the Dean’s Executive Fellow, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University Jim Kouzes sets the standard of Leadership Education and has been doing so for nearly 3 decades. Probably best known for his 5 Practices of Exemplary Leadership and the Leadership Challenge, used by Leadership Educators all over the world. However along with being an exemplary leadership educator, consultant, bestselling author, awardwinning speaker and, according to the Wall Street Journal, one of the twelve best executive educators in the United States, he also has an amazing leadership narrative. Jim Kouzes has been thinking about leadership ever since he was one of only a dozen Eagle Scouts to be selected to serve in John F. Kennedy’s honor guard when Kennedy was inaugurated President of the United States. Kennedy’s inaugural call to action —“Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” — inspired Jim to join the Peace Corps, and he taught school in Turkey for two years. That experience made Jim realize that he wanted a career that offered two things: the chance to teach and the opportunity to serve. It was in his first job back in the U.S. where Jim trained community action agency managers that he found his calling. Jim has devoted his life to leadership development ever since. Currently Jim is the Dean’s Executive Fellow of Leadership for the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University and lectures on leadership around the world to corporations, governments, and nonprofits. In 2010, Jim received the Thought Leadership Award from the Instructional Systems Association, the most prestigious award given by the trade association of training and development industry providers. He was listed as one of HR Magazine’s Most Influential International Thinkers for 2010 and 2011, named one of the 2010 and 2011 Top 100 Thought Leaders in Trustworthy Business Behavior by Trust Across America, and ranked by Leadership Excellence magazine as number sixteen on its list of the Top 100 Thought Leaders. In 2006, Jim was presented with the Golden Gavel, the highest honor awarded by Toastmasters International. A highly-regarded leadership scholar and an experienced executive, Jim served as president, CEO, and chairman of the Tom Peters Company from 1988 through 1999, and prior to that led the Executive Development Center at Santa Clara University (1981–1987). He founded the Joint Center for Human Services Development at San Jose State University (1972–1980) and was on the staff of the School of Social Work, University of Texas. His career in training and development began in 1969 when he conducted seminars for Community Action Agency staff and volunteers in the war on poverty. Following graduation from Michigan State University (BA degree with honors in political science), he served as a Peace Corps volunteer (1967–1969). 38 | San Antonio, TX GORDY CURPHY President, Curphy Consulting Gordy Curphy brings a dynamic presence and his passion for engaging organizations in the process of solving complex leadership challenges. His consulting efforts help top leaders develop business strategies; build annual scorecards and plans; drive organizational alignment, execution, and engagement; manage talent; and operate as high performing teams. Taking a science-practitioner approach to leadership, Gordy has spent the past 30 years researching, writing about, teaching, practicing, and providing consulting advice on leadership. He has written 19 books on leadership and teams and is the co-author of Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience (8th ed.). To date, over 450 colleges and universities in the United States, Canada, Europe, India, and China have adopted this number one selling textbook. In 2012 he and Bob Hogan published The Rocket Model: Practical Advice for Building High Performing Teams, a book intended to help leaders transform direct reports into cohesive, goal-oriented teams. As a practitioner, Gordy has held numerous leadership positions in the United States Air Force and various consulting firms. In addition to running his own business since 2002, Gordy has led start-ups, turn arounds, major organizational change initiatives, and rapid growth companies. As a consultant, he has done over 2,500 executive assessments, worked with over 200 teams, and designed and delivered hundreds of executive coaching and leadership development programs to global clients. Gordy earned his BS in Organizational Behavior from the United States Air Force Academy, his MA from St. Mary’s University in San Antonio, Texas, and his Ph.D. in Industrial and Organizational Psychology from the University of Minnesota. He currently resides in St Paul, Minnesota with his wife and two children. San Antonio, TX | 39 ALE 2014 CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE HECTOR & SUZANNA RAMOS Creative Problem Solving Consultants, Osborn-Parnes Hector and Suzanna come from diverse backgrounds (Spain and Singapore) but they share one passion the study of creativity and its application to Leadership. Hector’s area of expertise is the Osborn-Parnes’ Creative Problem Solving (CPS) and Decision Making frameworks, including creative cognition and related instruments to enable groups to discover and leverage on their creative and innovative potential and abilities Suzanna’s expertise is the facilitation of idea generation sessions, leveraging on principles of dialogue and reflection for collaborative creative thinking. They both completed their Master of Science degrees in Creative Studies and Change Leadership from the State University of New York, Buffalo. During the course of their studies, Suzanna received the President’s Medal for “Outstanding Graduate Student” and “Outstanding Master’s Thesis Award” while Hector received the “International Center for Studies in Creativity Alumni Foundation Achievement Award”. They are currently doctoral candidates at Texas A&M University, pursuing Ph.D.’s in Educational Psychology with a concentration in Creativity, Cognition, and Giftedness. Suzanna is researching building academic literacy of children from poverty, while Hector is investigating cognitive fixation in spiritual leadership. Prior to their doctoral studies, Suzanna and Hector had accomplished careers in their respective fields. Suzanna had a career in education and served as a teacher, department head, assistant principal, and professional development officer facilitating teachers in action research. She has facilitated and trained groups from the Asia Business Forum (Singapore), Board of Cooperative Educational Services - Gifted and Talented Education (Spencerport, New York), and Women’s Leadership Forum (Texas A&M University). Hector has a background in publishing and was also a trainer and facilitator in South East Asia and the Middle East. He has facilitated and coached individuals and groups from the Civil Service College (Singapore), a Banking Directors Group (Dubai, United Arab Emirates), business directors undergoing the Buffalo College Creativity Certification Program (Mexico), and Group Leadership Forum (Texas A&M University). 40 | San Antonio, TX Felix Arnold Robert Brescia Bradley Burbaugh David Cletzer Matt Creasy Lynn Gordon Stephanie Hilliard Dan Jenkins Eric Kaufman Sarah Klucjer Matt Kutz Laura Lemons Chris Leupold Susan Luchey Diana McFarland Jeremy Moreland Kate Polivka Ashley Powell Emily Prevost Kerry Priest David Rosch Jill Rucker Ingrad Smith Jonathan Velez CONCURRENT SESSIONS REVIEWERS Aaron McKim, Oregon State University Andree Swanson, Ashford University Angel Futrell, Texas A&M University Anna Bucy, Sinclair Community College Awoke D. Dollisso, Iowa State University B. Lynn Gordon, South Dakota State University Barb Altman, Texas A&M University-Central TX Barry Boyd, Texas A&M University Bradley Burbaugh, Virginia Tech Brent J. Goertzen, Fort Hays State University Brett Whitaker, Fort Hays State University Brian Polding, University of Phoenix Cari Sue Wallace, University of Dayton Carmen Zafft, University of Nebraska Carol Wheeler, Our Lady of the Lake University Chaney Mosley, Tennessee State University Charlotte Clay Johnson, University of Phoenix Chelsey Ahrens, Texas Tech University Christine H Shaefer, Marian University Clinton M. Stephens, Iowa State University Coleman Patterson, Hardin-Simmons University Dale H Eberwein, FPeLearning Systems Deana Raffo, Middle Tennessee State University Deborah N. Smith, Kennesaw State University Dennis Duncan, University of Georgia Donnette Noble, Roosevelt University Doris E. Cross, Organizational Change & Development Dr. Felicia A. Bridgewater, University of Phoenix Dr. Michelle Manganaro, University of Phoenix Emily R. Perdue, Texas A&M University Eric Kaufman, Virginia Tech Felix Arnold, Purdue University G. Cameron Jernigan, University of Arkansas Gaea Hock, Mississippi State University Gary M. Morgan, Student Leadership Excellence Academy Gina Descahmps, DBA Merrimack College Greg Bowden, California Baptist University Gregory T. Gifford, Federal Executive Institute Holly Jo Richardson, Virginia Military Institute Ilene Ringler, Kaplan University Ingrad Smith, Jackson State University Irma O’Dell, Kansas State University San Antonio, TX | 41 ALE 2014 ALE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2013-2014 Eric Kaufman - President Kelleen Stine-Cheyne – Vice President Deborah Smith - Secretary Greg Gifford - Treasurer Natalie Coers – Site Selection Jonathan Velez – Marketing & Public Relations Summer Odom – Awards & Recognition Gaea Wimmer Hock- Member Services. Kati Ingerson - Social Media Coordinator Jennifer Moss Breen – Resource Development Robin Horstmeier – New Partnerships Jacklyn Bruce - JOLE Editor Tony Andenoro – Past President 2014-2015 Kelleen Stine-Cheyne –President Jennifer Moss Breen – Vice President Dan Jenkins - Secretary Greg Gifford - Treasurer Natalie Coers – Site Selection Stephanie Hilliard - Marketing & Public Relations Kerry Priest - Awards & Recognition Gaea Wimmer Hock – Member Services & Communications Kati Ingerson - Social Media Coordinator Robin Peiter Horstmeier – Resource Development. Jacklyn Bruce - JOLE Editor Eric Kaufman – Past President CONFERENCE SPONSORS PLATINUM LEVEL School of Advanced Studies is home to doctoral programs at University of Phoenix and develops leaders who create new models that explain, predict and improve organizational performance in their fields. The practitioner degrees offered through the School of Advanced Studies at University of Phoenix are designed around the Scholar, Practitioner and Leader Model, incorporating lifelong learning (scholarship), social and workplace contribution (practice), and the ability to exert positive influence (leadership). With curriculum designed in collaboration with industry experts, School of Advanced Studies practitioner doctoral programs are offered in Education, Business, Management, and Health Administration. More information can be found at http://www.phoenix.edu/colleges_divisions/doctoral.html. GOLD LEVEL Wiley, through its Jossey-Bass and The Leadership Challenge brands, is committed to the leadership education and development of youth, college students, and professionals throughout the world. We provide essential knowledge, professional development, and educational tools to help youth educators, higher education faculty and staff, and campus leaders do their jobs well. Find us at www.josseybass.com/highereducation and www. studentleadershipchallenge.com. 42 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 43 ALE 2014 SILVER LEVELCONT. CONFERENCE SPONSORSCONT. SILVER LEVEL MASTER OF ARTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM • Blended online and on-campus classes enable you to continue with your job and other endeavors while earning an advanced degree. • Built on the Jesuit tradition of developing “people for others.” • Study abroad opportunities allow students to have a cross-cultural experience in leadership from a global perspective. • Servant Leadership component to enhance the leadership philosophies of justice, ethics, stewardship, and service. • Interdisciplinary approach gives students the opportunity to learn from a diverse student body and faculty, as well as analyze issues from multiple points of view and varied vantage points. Students come from different areas of the world, work in a multitude of professions, and are employed at a variety of career levels. This diversity provides exposure to different problems, solutions and ways of thinking that challenge them to expand their repertoire of skills. The curriculum is designed not only to teach leadership theory and best practices, but to help students to reflect on their abilities, their assumptions, and their beliefs about leadership. Most importantly, the program helps students to shape themselves into the leaders they want to be. 44 | San Antonio, TX The New York Times in Leadership is designed to give teachers, scholars, practitioners and students opportunities to connect leadership concepts to real-world examples. Through news articles, discussion questions, reading lists, video conferences, among other resources, you will expand your understanding of how leadership works in the 21st century. Every day, leaders and followers engage in a variety of activities in many different settings – business, nonprofit organizations, political institutions. They face local, as well as global, leadership challenges. Their responses to these challenges will give you valuable insights that will become powerful classroom discussion topics. The New York Times in Leadership covers three areas of interest – Context of Leadership, Issues in Leadership and Skills, Behaviors and Competencies. These are not neatly delineated areas. The news articles, therefore, will give you an opportunity to explore how these components of leadership play out in different areas. For more information go to http://nytimesinleadership.com/. OTHER SPONSORS San Antonio, TX | 45 ALE 2014 ALE HISTORY The Association of Leadership Educators, Inc. (ALE) grew out of a need for professional development of persons who work with leadership programs. The Association developed as a result of a series of successful annual Leadership Development Seminars. In the 1980s and ‘90s, opportunities were minimal for professional development in the field of leadership development through Cooperative Extension on the national level. Although many Home Economics Extension faculty delivered leadership development programs in their various states, linkage between the professional practice of leadership development and research in the field was lacking. The first Extension Leadership Development Seminar, called Empowering Adults As Leaders Through Home Economics Programs, was held on July 10, 1988 in Charlotte, NC. These early seminars were designed to “(a) strengthen the leadership skills of professionals who work to develop leadership capabilities of others and (b) strengthen and broaden the knowledge base which supports research, teaching and extension programs in leadership.” The second seminar, Developing Human Capital Through Extension Leadership Programs, was held August 6, 1989 in Manhattan, KS. At this key meeting, participants recognized the need for information sharing regarding leadership research, teaching, and practice. The Association of Leadership Educators was formalized at the third seminar held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on August 17-18, 1990, titled People Problems and Solutions: The Leadership Connection. Members of the planning committee proposed the development of a professional association that would provide opportunities to bridge theory, research and practice in leadership education. The “founding mothers and Tom,” as they are affectionately known, laid the groundwork and facilitated the discussion leading to the participants’ vote to form The Association of Leadership Educators. Participants in the 1990 conference had the opportunity to become Charter members of ALE by paying dues of $25. This persistent group was determined that ALE would succeed. Their vision was for a professional association that focused on leadership education, linked theory to practice, disseminated research and provided professional development opportunities for anyone engaged in leadership education, both formal and non-formal. The first official ALE conference and annual meeting was held in Denver, Colorado on September 13-14, 1991, with Elizabeth Bolton serving as President. Obviously there was widespread interest in a professional association linking theory and practice for leadership development, for at the first meeting there were over 40 presenters representing 20 states. In 2002, ALE launched the Journal of Leadership Education. Tom Gallager was the first editor of the journal. As an electronic peer-reviewed journal, it provides a forum for linking research to practice and is intended to promote a dialogue that engages both academics and practitioners. Issues of the Journal of Leadership Education contain Research and Theory Features, Idea and Application Briefs, as well a Commentary category for readers to share their views and thoughts about leadership education and to promote discussion. Established as the premier international professional organization for leadership educators, ALE has continued to grow and expand with membership in several foreign countries. Membership is open to any individual whose career interest is leadership education. As we celebrate our accomplishments as a professional association, we look forward to the future. A strong foundation of leadership has brought us to this point and certainly with the vision and unwavering dedication of the early leaders, ALE will continue to grow and expand as it engages members in fulfilling the mission to strengthen and sustain the expertise of professional leadership educators. 46 | San Antonio, TX THE FOUNDING MOTHERS & TOM Elizabeth B. Bolton (Chair), University of Florida Majorie Hamman, North Dakota State University Ann Hancook, Purdue University Tom Mounter, Clemson University Harriett Moyer, University of Wisconsin Katey Walker, Kansas State University Lynn White, Texas A&M University PAST CONFERENCE LOCATIONS 1990: Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1991: Denver, Colorado 1992: Orlando, Florida 1993: Chicago, Illinois 1994: Blacksburg, Virginia 1995: Colorado Springs, Colorado 1996: Burlington, Vermont 1997: Columbus, Ohio 1998: Charleston, South Carolina 1999: San Diego, California 2000: Toronto, Canada 2001: Minneapolis, Minnesota 2002: Lexington, Kentucky 2003: Anchorage, Alaska 2004: Memphis, Tennessee 2005: Wilmington, North Carolina 2006: Bozeman, Montana 2007: Fort Worth, Texas 2008: Spokane, Washington 2009: Providence, Rhode Island 2010: Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2011: Denver, Colorado 2012: Key West, Florida 2013: New Orleans, Louisiana 2014: San Antonio, Texas ALE PAST PRESIDENTS 1990-91: Elizabeth B. Bolton - University of Florida 1991-92: Ann Hancook - Purdue University 1992-93: Daryl Heasley - Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development 1993-94: Gary W. King - Kellogg Foundation 1994-95: Katey Walker - Kansas State University 1995-96: Christine A Langone - University of Georgia 1996-97: Martha Nall - University of Kentucky 1997-98: Steve Scheneman - Kansas University 1998-99: Karen Zotz - North Dakota State University 1999-2000: Marilyn B. Corbin - Pennsylvania State University 2000-01: Robin Orr - University of Illinois 2001-02: Larry Wilson - University Of Illinois 2002-03: Jeff Miller - Innovative Leadership Solutions 2003-04: Ken Culp - University of Kentucky 2004-05: Wanda Sykes - North Carolina State University 2005-06: Rick Rudd - University of Florida 2006-07: Penny Pennington Weeks - Oklahoma State University 2007-08: Barry Boyd - Texas A&M University 2008-09: Mark Russell - Purdue University 2009-10: Carrie Stephens - University of Tennessee 2010-11: Jackie Bruce - North Carolina State University 2011-12: Nicole Stedman - University of Florida 2012-13: Tony Andenoro - University of Florida San Antonio, TX | 47 ALE 2014 CONFERENCE EVALUATION PLEASE PROVIDE CONFERENCE FEEDBACK AT THE FOLLOWING LINK TO ENSURE QUALITY FOR THE FUTURE... http://tinyurl.com/2014ALE GET SOCIAL! TAKE PHOTOS AT ALE AND POSTE THEM TO FACEBOOK, TWITTER, AND INSTAGRAM! TAG THEM WITH #ALESanAntonio TWEET YOUR COMMENTS TO @ALE_Leadership AND USE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING HASTAGS: #ALE14Keynote (KEYNOTE SPEAKERS) #ALE14Session (SESSIONS) #ALE14Excursions (EXCURSIONS) 48 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 49 ALE 2014 CONFERENCE APP We are excited to offer a Zwoor Event App for this year’s conference. The app contains detailed information on all of the conference sessions and activities, and we encourage you to use it as your primary source of information for selecting sessions and navigating the conference. To access the app, download the app associated with your particular mobile device and use meeting code ALE2014. The following QR codes and links offer quick access. To access the conference information on any Internet device, simply go to: https://clients.zwoor.com/event/index/code/ALE2014 ZWOOR iPAD ZWOOR iPHONE ZWOOR ANDROID HD ZWOOR ANDRIOD ZWOOR KINDLE FIRE HOTEL INFORMATION 50 | San Antonio, TX San Antonio, TX | 51