Fishback Creek Public Academy - Metropolitan School District of
Transcription
Fishback Creek Public Academy - Metropolitan School District of
Fishback Creek Public Academy Metropolitan School District of Pike Township 8301 W. 86th Street Indianapolis, Indiana Fabrice Decaudin, Principal Beth Lotti, Assistant Principal SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2014-2015 Name of School: Fishback Creek Public Academy Address: 8301 W.86th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46278 Phone: (317) 347-8470 Principal: Fabrice Decaudin Superintendent: Mr. Nathaniel Jones, Ed. S. By signing this document, I demonstrate my support for the School Improvement Plan submitted by the above-mentioned school district. School Improvement Team Members: NAME Fabrice Decaudin Beth Lotti Kathy Cooper Valerie Ligon Susie Swenson Jon Fleetwood Abby Loe Amy Hedges Gina Weaver AFFILIATION Principal Assistant Principal Parent SIGNATURE DATE Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher 2 Table of Contents Title I Schoolwide Plan Component Checklist p. 4 Statement of Mission and Vision p. 5 I. Introduction A. Description of School B. Description of Community C. Parent and Community Engagement & Community Resources D. Description and Location of Curriculum and Description of Educational Programs E. Description of Assessment Instruments p. 6 p. 10 p. 14 p. 18 p. 21 2. Additional Supports for Student Success p. 22 3. Technology as a Learning Tool p. 24 4. Safe and Disciplined Learning Environment p. 26 5. Cultural Competency p. 27 6. Coordination and Integration of Funds and Resources p. 28 7. Summary of Data (Comprehensive Needs Assessment) p. 28 8. School Improvement Action Plans p. 39 9. Professional Development p. 45 10. Statutes and Rules to be Waived 11. Appendix p. 48 p. 49 3 Title I Schoolwide Component Checklist Title I Schoolwide Plan: Page Number 1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the whole school 2. Implementation of schoolwide reform strategies that: Provide opportunities for all children to meet proficient and advanced levels of student academic achievement Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that: Strengthens the core academic program Increases the amount of learning time Includes strategies for serving underserved populations Includes strategies to address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly low achieving children and those at risk of not meeting state standards Address how the school will determine if those needs of the children have been met Are consistent with and are designed to implement state and local improvement plans, if any 3. Highly qualified teachers in all core content area classes 4. High quality and on-going professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals 5. Strategies to attract high-quality, highly qualified teachers to this school 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement, such as literary services 6 a. Description how the school will provide individual academic assessment results to parents 6 b. Strategies to involve parents in the planning, review, and improvement of the schoolwide plan 7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a state-run preschool program 8. Opportunities and expectations for teachers to be included in the decision making related to the use of academic assessment results leading to the improvement of student achievement 9. Activities and programs at the school level to ensure that students having difficulty mastering proficient and advanced levels of the academic achievement are provided with effective, timely additional assistance 10. Coordination and integration of federal, state and local funds; and resources such as in-kind services and program components 10 a. A list of programs that will be consolidated under the schoolwide plan (if applicable) Pg.28-38 Pg. 20 8, 11,18,20, 3944;57-62 Pg. 6-7 Pg. 8;20;57-62 Pg. 9 Pg. 11-18 Pg. 11-18:22 Pg. 11-18;22 Pg. 20-24 Pg. 20-27;38-44 Pg.11-13;22;3844 Pg.20-27 Pg.27 4 MSD of Pike Township Mission Statement (Updated with input from all stakeholders 2011) MSD of Pike Township aims to develop students who: develop an intrinsic passion for learning in and beyond school take ownership and develop independence through choice and participation in authentic learning environments challenge their intellectual curiosity using inquiry, critical thinking, multiple perspectives and problem solving communicate their thoughts and ideas effectively through shared dialogue and collaboration develop global understanding and respect of various cultures accept risks in order to be an agent of change in society reflect on their learning and see innovative possibilities Core Beliefs (Updated with input from all stakeholders 2011) 1. Students learn best when they are actively engaged in a learning process that uses a variety of instructional approaches. 2. Student achievement and growth improves when relevant learning goals are set and feedback is provided through assessment. 3. The school community benefits from a safe and inviting environment that fosters mutual respect for all differences and values students’ prior educational and cultural backgrounds. 4. Students meet high expectations when provided opportunities to develop socially, emotionally and academically. 5. Students benefit when effective educators engage in practices that are student centered and support ongoing improvement of teaching and learning. 6. Students benefit when school, family, and caregivers are active partners in education and have high expectations for success. 5 1. Introduction A. Description of School Fishback Creek Public Academy is located in the northwest corner of Pike Township at 8301 West 86th Street, which is also in the northwest corner of Marion County. Fishback Creek Public Academy is an urban school that serves a diverse population with a wide variety of ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds that reflect Pike Township. Fishback is a Continuous Calendar School (Year Round) so we do not follow the traditional calendar. 2014-15 Enrollment and Demographics School FCPA School FCPA Pre-K 44 Kdg 76 1st 87 2nd 92 3rd 98 Asian Black Hispanic Multi White 3% 48% 10% 11% 28% 4th 92 5th 92 Exc. Lrn. 18% Total 581 ENL 10% SES 40% Highly-Qualified Staff 0-2 Years Experience 3-5 Years Experience 6+ Years Experience Bachelors Degree Masters Degree 3 8 27 17 21 7% 21% 72% 45% 55% 6 First Name Last Name Katherine Abel Lana Christine Beers Billings Julianne Boushehry 7/30/1999 Third Grade Holly Collins Monica Nicholas Fabrice Condon Cooper Decaudin Jennifer Alicia Jonathan Filka 8/18/1998 Second Grade Fisher 3/26/2012 Third Grade Fleetwood 8/10/2011 First Grade Christine Gordon Hire Date Department Name 8/4/2003 Third Grade 7/31/1998 Kindergarten 9/27/2004 Fourth Grade 8/1/2000 Fourth Grade 7/31/1998 Second Grade 8/4/2009 Fifth Grade (HA) 7/1/2011 Administrative 8/19/1996 Kindergarten Christopher Gordon 7/31/1998 Physical Education Amy Kristin Amanda Jaclyn Amanda Harmon Harnest Hedges Helman Hoff 8/4/2003 8/6/2007 8/11/2003 8/6/2007 9/26/2011 Melanie Audrey Elise Joy Kelly Kirby 1/6/1999 Special Education Preschool 8/14/2006 Exceptional Learners 1/6/2014 Exceptional Learners Second Grade First Grade Special Education Preschool Third Grade (HA) Fifth Grade Degree/Rules M/Rules 4647 M/Bulletin 400 B/Rules 46-47 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 2002 M/Rules 2002 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 2002 B/Rules 2002 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 2002 B/Rules 46-47 B/Rules 2002 B/Rules 2002 M/Bulletin 400 M/Rules 2002 B/REPA HQ Method Licensure Area Praxis II General Elementary (1-6; 7/8 Non Dept) HOUSSE NTE General Elementary; MR General Elementary NTE General Elementary/Reading Praxis II General Elementary; MiMH HOUSSE Praxis II N/A General Elementary; 7/8 ND Primary/Intermediate Generalist Building Level Administrator HOUSSE Praxis II Praxis II General Elementary; ESL Primary/Intermediate Generalist Preschool; Elementary Generalist HOUSSE General Elementary/Kdg N/A PE Praxis II Praxis II Praxis II Praxis II Praxis II General Elementary Primary/Intermediate Gen; Mild Interv. Early Childhood Sped; General Elem; Kdg Primary/Intermediate Generalist Primary/Interm Generalist HOUSSE N/A Praxis II Choral (General); LD; MiMH Communications Disorders Mild Intervention K-6; Elem. Generalist 7 Christiana Lahmon Christopher Laurino 8/2/2004 Fifth Grade 8/6/2010 Exceptional Learners Valerie Abigail Ligon Loe 8/4/2003 First Grade 8/6/2012 Fourth Grade (HA) Beth Crystal Travis Tiehl Lotti Lowery Munson Reynolds 7/28/2003 8/5/2008 8/8/2011 8/2/2004 Aleeya Cynthia Reynolds Schwein 8/4/2003 Exceptional Learners 7/31/2002 Music Janice Shade 1/17/1989 Second Grade (HA) Joan Shepherd 8/14/2006 Exceptional Learners Susan Jennifer Gabriella Swenson Tolle Villamil 8/11/2008 Librarians 8/4/2003 Fourth Grade 8/6/2010 First Grade (HA) Sarah Gina Wall Weaver 8/4/2009 Fifth Grade 8/15/2005 Curriculum and Programs Administrative Exceptional Learners Visual Arts Kindergarten Full Day M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 2002 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 2002 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 2002 B/REPA B/Rules 46-47 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 46-47 M/Rules 4647 M/Rules 4647 M/Bulletin 400 B/Rules 46-47 B/Rules 2002 M/Rules 4647 B/Rules 46-47 Praxis II Praxis II General Elementary; Kdg; Spanish Mild Intervention HOUSSE Praxis II General Elementary Primary/Intermediate Generalist N/A Praxis II Praxis II Praxis II Elementary Administration Intense Intervention Visual Arts P-12 General Elementary; Kdg N/A Praxis II Speech/Lang/Hearing Clinician Music: General, Choral, Instrumental HOUSSE General Elementary; Kindergarten HOUSSE Gen Elem/SEH/LD HOUSSE Praxis II Praxis II LD; Men. Ret; Gen Elem; Lib Svcs General Elementary(6/7 ND); Kdg Primary/Intermediate Generalist Praxis II Praxis II General Elementary Occupational Education 8 Recruitment of Highly Qualified Staff Component 5: Strategies to Attract Highly Qualified Teachers to the School The Metropolitan School District of Pike Township strives to hire the very best teacher candidates to serve the students, parents, and staff of the district. It is imperative that all employees are treated with respect and dignity throughout the employment process. Through Pike’s expectation of reaching the next level in service to their students, they are committed to hiring individuals who meet the requirements of highly qualified under the provisions of No Child Left Behind and who have the passion and desire to make a difference in the lives of all students. Characteristics of employees that are important to the Board and Superintendent are: Willingness to make students “first” in all decisions Ability to communicate clearly and appropriately Willingness to support the needs of the school district, department and schools Ability to implement the district’s vision and support its mission Willingness to participate in district initiatives and activities to help advance Pike to the next level of excellence Willingness to serve as a positive ambassador for the school district, sharing its many positives throughout the community Willingness to invest in his/her professional development to strengthen skills and increase knowledge Possess the appropriate license, skills and training to perform the assigned duties Ability to work with our diverse population and challenge all students to succeed Present a professional appearance Employment and recruitment strategies to enhance the employment of highly-qualified teachers are: Partnerships developed with local and area universities to help identify and attract the best candidates Extensive use of district website to advertise current and projected teaching vacancies Listing of vacancies on various list serve websites to include the Indiana Department of Education, local and area universities, and appropriate professional organizations Conduct team approach interviews for all candidates to fully assess individual teaching talents and abilities Conduct extensive criminal background and reference checks on all candidates to ensure they meet the acceptable characteristics listed above and are a proper fit for our district 9 B. Description of Community Pike Township is a residential urban community of approximately 77,895 people with an assessed valuation of $4.4 billion, resulting in one of the lowest tax rates in the state of Indiana. The Pike community has a well-balanced mix of light industry and varied retail and shopping plazas that offer a variety of dining, entertainment, and employment opportunities. Located in the northwest section of Marion County, district boundaries include 96th Street on the north, Township Line Road on the east, 38th Street on the south, and County Line Road on the west. Pike Township is recognized as a richly diverse community throughout the state of Indiana and, The MSD of Pike Township proudly reflects its community's rich racial, cultural, ethnic and socio-economic diversity. Pike schools have an 88% population of multiethnic students. The district has more than 760 international students who represent 69 countries and speak 58 native languages. American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Native Hawaiian Two or More Races White 0.1% 2.0% 59.0% 20.6% 0.0% 6.7% 11.6% English Language Learners 16.9% Exceptional Learners Free & Reduced 13.6% 64.2% The MSD of Pike Township is one of the largest school communities in the metropolitan Indianapolis area, with over 11,069 scholars, from kindergarten to high school. It offers a wide variety of educational programs to support the varied needs of its growing student population. All learners are immersed in a college going culture and, at the high school level, scholars are offered the opportunity to participate in the prestigious International Baccalaureate Program, take advantage of Dual Credit Courses, and encouraged to participate in Advanced Placement courses. The MSD of Pike Township’s facilities are considered some of the most beautiful and technologically advanced in the Midwest. All schools are equipped with state-of-the-art media centers, classrooms, lunch rooms, and gymnasiums. The student to computer ratio for the district is approximately 1.5 to 1, among the highest in the state. Educators and scholars also have access to technology and 10 techno-educational delivery systems such as: Interactive White Boards (Interwrite, Promethean, Mimio); Learner Response Systems; Individualized 1 to1 Technology Professional Development available to teachers when needed or requested in addition to On-Line, On-Demand Professional Development; Interactive Learning Management System that includes collaboration tools for teachers (My Big Campus); IPads, Ipods, and Mobile Device Management; Document Cameras; Mobi Tablets; and Distance Learning Access. The district is comprised of 14 schools: nine elementary schools, three middle schools, and a high school with a separate and completely independent Freshman Center. The MSD of Pike Township has two calendar options available to parents - traditional and continuous (year-round). Three of the elementary schools, Fishback Creek Public Academy, New Augusta Public Academy South, and Eagle Creek Elementary and one middle school, New Augusta Public Academy North, operate on a continuous calendar schedule. An alternative school, the Pike Preparatory Academy, is available for middle and high school students who benefit from an alternative learning environment. Scholars also have access to exemplary athletic facilities, the Pike Performing Arts Center, a planetarium, and the Community Computer Lab. C. Parent and Community Engagement and Involvement District and building administrators actively seek and maintain community input and involvement in all aspects of school programs and operations. The district and school employs an extensive network of communication tools to ensure community awareness and involvement. Some district examples include the Pike website, quarterly district newsletter, school newsletters, Skyward student management system, local media, and automated phone system (Blackboard Connect). Fishback Creek’s parents and guardians utilize email, phone, conferences, and learning logs to communicate regularly with school personnel. Fishback Creek Public Academy currently works closely with parent and community groups to convey information about the district’s emphasis on the college and career ready Indiana academic standards. The college and career ready standards are the basis for instruction, assessment and reporting student progress and achievement. We believe that parents will obtain a clearer understanding about their child’s ongoing learning process and provide new ideas for supporting the learning process in the home environment. 11 To increase parent and community engagement, the following strategies will be implemented: Fishback Creek encourages and welcomes parental involvement and participation in all aspects of the school. The PTO and teaching staff collaborate to plan events and activities for families. The school calendar reflects numerous activities including: The Ice Cream Social-beginning of the year welcoming all families back to school Scholastic Book Fairs Evening musical performances Fall Festival Family Fitness Night when families can use our equipment to play and get fit Run for the Arts – an annual fundraiser designed to raise money for cultural arts programs Grandpersons’ Day Muffins with Mom Donuts with Dad Student Ambassadors: Pennies for Patients, Can Food Drive, and Pop tabs for Riley Young Audiences Roller Skating Parties Risk Watch with the Pike Fire Department Field Day Relay for Life Study trips Learning Celebrations Parent Teacher Conferences Back to School Night Oasis Tutors Scrabble Club Chess Club News Crew Acting Club Art Workshops Fitness Explorers Boy and Girl Scouts Chorale Math and Science Nights Wellness/Literacy Night Blood Drive Million Mile Walk Water Safety 4-H BullySafe Indiana Gallery Nights Fishback Creek Parent Academy Lego Robotics Club Stop Motion Club The Fishback Creek parent community is very involved in school life as evidenced by our consistent and high parent volunteer rate. Parents come in daily to work with children and assist teachers. This keeps parents aware of classroom practices and activities, which helps to bridge understanding of what we do. Our parent volunteers primarily work with children when they volunteer. 12 Parent/community involvement and engagement activities planned for the 2014-2015 school year include the following: August 19: Back to School Night/ Title1Meeting Title 1 video and PowerPoint linked to website September 5: Grandparent’s Day October: Spirit Day/Homecoming Carnival November: Book Fair/Science Night December: Fundraiser Mega Party February 6: Health Fair Night February: Book Fair Week- February Family Night/Fishback Literacy Fair April 22: Kindergarten Round Up April 23: Math Night May 1: Father Daughter Dance May 9: Mom’s Muffins/Flower Sale June 13: Dad’s Donuts Aug/Sept/Oct/Nov./Jan./Apr: Skating Party June: Fishback’s Finale/Field Day 13 Community Resource Chart Type of organization or Agency Name Social Service Agencies Family Service Association Contact Person and Number Potential Resources available to impact the school Tonya Monnier 317-387-2212 Cummins Behavioral Health Lisa Deese 317-347-5509 Foster Care, Assistance for low income families, Help to find jobs Individual and small group counseling for emotional and social behavior skills. Pecar Health Center General 317-630-6451 Health Agencies Community Family Practice Group Dr. Mecca Maxey-Smartt, MD 10122 East 10th Street Suite 100 Indianapolis, Indiana 46229 Pre-natal examinations, dental services, routine check-ups, immunizations, nutrition programs and health screenings for children with vision, hearing, tuberculosis and scoliosis problems. Medical care support. Public Safety Agencies Pike Police Department/Security Pike Fire department Educational Institutions IUPUI Allen Kasper 317-388-9290 Capt. Dane Murray 317-347 -5860 Inga Randall 317-99-3179 General 317-940-9385 Butler University Provides protection when needed and materials to pass out to students. Provides fire safety materials to the schools Student teachers, researchers, field experience, etc. Provides student teachers and professional development for teachers 14 Educational Institutions Foundations Faith based Agencies Businesses Pike Educational Foundation Elaine Raszkowski (317) 387-2542 [email protected] Sharing Place West General (317) 298-3180 [email protected] Eagle Creek Community Church General [email protected] (317) 291-9619 Traders Point Christian Church General [email protected] Pike Township Administrator General – ask for Township administrator when calling (317) 327-5157 [email protected] Chicago Title Insurance General 101 West Ohio Indianapolis, Indiana (317) 684-3800 Charlotte Thurman 5313 West 74th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 317.824.0900 www.henryschein.cm Henry Schein Company Writes grants for services for pike and teaches teachers how to write grants. Enhances education by providing scholarships for students and grants for teacher driven projects Provides clothing and food Accepts donated clothing and redistributes it at no charge to persons in need Provides emergency food assistance for residents in the following zip codes: 46123 (Avon), 46214, 46222, 46224, 46234, 46241, 46254, 46260, 46268 and 46278 Assists with the establishment of new neighborhood organizations. Brings community groups together that may benefit from combining forces in addressing common issues. Attends community meetings to hear citizen and business concerns first hand and addresses them with the appropriate government official. Provided presents and foods for families during the holidays Provided book bags filled with school supplies. 15 Jimmy Johns 5550 West 86th Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 317.337.9183 Provided sandwiches and coupons for teachers. Panera Bread Justin Holmes 6050 West 86th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46278 317.871.0833 www.panerabread.com Emmanuel Smith 5811 East 38th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46218 317.547.5814 William Shrewsberry 7168 Graham Road Suite 100 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250 317.841.4799 7125 Georgetown Rd. Indianapolis, IN 46268 317.295.0875 9111 Michigan Rd. Indianapolis, IN 46268 317.876.5480 6525 Zionsville Rd. Indianapolis, IN 46268 317.275.4480 6020 West 86th Street Indianapolis, IN 46268 317-876-3420 Donated food for various school functions. Mary McDonald 7625 New Augusta Road 317-513-3798 Intergenerational tutoring Lavina, Smith and Summers Funeral Home Shrewsberry and Associates Marco’s Pizza Texas Roadhouse Indianapolis Public Library Pike Branch Chilis Oasis Tutoring Donations for school uniforms. Donations for school uniforms. Discounts and achievement incentives Discounts and achievement incentives Library Card sign-ups, visits Discounts and achievement incentives 16 Teacher’s Credit Union 5130 West 71st Street Indianapolis, IN 46268 Discounts and achievement incentives Coldstone Creamery 6010 West 86th Street Indianapolis, IN 46278 Discounts and achievement incentives Abuelo’s 5910 West 86th Street Indianapolis, IN 46278 Discounts and achievement incentives Big Blue Colts Camp Phil Andrews 317-808-5322 Play 60 Initiative Culvers 5020 West 71st Street Indianapolis, IN 46268 Discounts and achievement incentives 17 D. Description and Location of Curriculum and Description of Educational Programs Curriculum is aligned with the guidance of the Indiana Academic Standards college and career ready adopted by the Indiana State Board of Education. Curriculum maps have been developed for K-12 in all content areas to serve as a guide for instruction and assessment. Copies of the curriculum for the MSD of Pike Township are available at the administrative office at 6901 Zionsville Road and on the web at www.pike.k12.in.us. In addition, copies of the curriculum may be found at Fishback Creek Public Academy located at 8301 West 86th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. Appropriate parts of the curriculum are routinely distributed to parents as are copies of the Indiana Academic Standards for each grade level. The M.S.D. of Pike Township utilizes a balanced literacy program which includes reader’s and writer’s workshop. A 90-minute reading block is implemented daily anchored within a Unit of Study that includes direct, explicit, ongrade level instruction, independent reading at student’s level, one-on-one and small group conferring, small group strategy and/or guided reading groups, vocabulary and word study and writing in response to reading. Literacy instruction continues with a 60-minute writing block as well as reading and writing across the curriculum. Math instruction includes Envision mathematics as an instructional resource along with small group instruction to respond to students’ needs. K-8 Scope & Sequence curriculum guidance has been developed for consistent ELA & math instruction across the district. Curriculum Advisory Teams in each content area are established to strengthen K-12 articulation. These teams also provide: ongoing program evaluation, review and select appropriate materials, develop common assessments, network with colleagues on best instructional practices, collect input from stakeholders, review current research practices, and analyze student data to align teaching strategies with student needs. A process is in place for teachers to review curriculum alignment, maps and assessment tools annually. A Standards-Based Education Committee, comprised of K-12 educators, review the teacher recommendations as a part of this evaluation and renewal process. 18 MSD of Pike Township teachers follow a district-created Model for Effective Instruction: A Guide to Best Practices (see appendix) which includes numerous best practices founded in educational research. This model is a part of the criteria used in the teacher evaluation process which details goals and expectations for teaching and learning. Student engagement is emphasized in this model through effective classroom organization, a positive learning environment, stimulating instruction and ongoing assessment. Data-driven instruction is emphasized through the thorough analysis of formative and summative assessment data using such tools as NWEA, Acuity, ISTEP +, ACCESS, Benchmark assessments, running records, and pre- and post- classroom assessments. The Fishback Creek Public Academy curriculum follows the State standards and the M.S.D. of Pike Township curriculum maps and scope and sequences for instruction. Teachers work in Professional Learning Communities. In these communities, teachers plan lessons based on the results of student assessments. As part of differentiating instruction, schools cluster groups of students who function academically higher in one classroom at each grade level. This is to accommodate students who function high academically, but did not meet the cut off for High Ability qualifications. This second tier of High Abilities programming came to all elementary schools in the 20082009 school year. This program is different than the high abilities self-contained classroom in that the curriculum is not accelerated but rather enriched with an emphasis on critical thinking skills. Cluster grouping is a method of organizing a heterogeneous grade level by purposefully placing academically talented students with similar abilities in classrooms so that they may be provided with a more rigorous and differentiated instructional program. Cluster grouping classrooms will offer instruction with a peer group of students who have similar abilities and talents within a general education classroom setting. Comparable to, but not synonymous with the Honors Program at the middle school, students will benefit from opportunities that enrich and challenge them throughout their elementary school experience. High Abilities testing data will determine students that qualify for Cluster Classroom placement. District administrators promote management and foster collaboration of all departments in an effort to effectively maintain continuous improvement of student achievement. The district administrators along with the Strategic Planning Committee provide direction for the building principals and cultivate a deeper understanding of the school improvement planning process. Activities are shared to help schools focus on methods to strengthen the learning climate, instructional practice, and student achievement. Data review, analysis, and reflection are part of an 19 organizational structure that is designed and used to continually revisit instructional effectiveness and student needs. During the 2013-2014 school year, the Fishback Creek Public Academy School Improvement Committee analyzed data and set goals for school progress. Teachers provided input and supporting strategies for school improvement. In PLCs and Core team meetings teachers analyzed data to improve instructional strategies and student achievement. The school administration met with all grade levels to discuss grade level goals, instructional audit results, retention, and ISTEP+ performance. Student Data to Drive Instruction: Fishback Creek educators will look at data at the beginning of the 2014-2015 school year to identify areas of need. During the first trimester, instructional staff will meet with administration to refine our PLC process. Outside experts will be brought in to support teachers (i.e., district data specialist) through this exploration. Teachers will work with grade levels and identify areas of improvement. Each grade level will find a common area of improvement and develop their plan to improve the area of weakness. The plans will include professional readings and shared strategies. Grade levels will continue to look at data to monitor goals and make changes throughout the school year. With grade levels developing their own goals, educators will be focused on continual improvement throughout the school year which allows them to meet the needs of all students. All plans and minutes of meetings will be uploaded to the Fishback Creek Common Drive where it will be accessible to all instructional staff. 20 School Wide Areas of Focus: Staff meets weekly throughout the year for professional development and PLC and/or District professional development. August-October will focus on Developing a Positive Classroom Environment: Procedures, routines, and expectations, acknowledging and reinforcing positive behavior, relationship and community building, engagement and collaborative structures, culturally responsive teaching, response to data. November-January will focus on High Expectations for Academic Growth and Achievement: Reader’s and Writer’s Workshop with an emphasis on conferring/small group instruction/writing development. January-April will focus on Responsive Writing and Test-Taking Strategies: Constructed Response, Extended Response, Organization strategies and Essays. April-June will focus on Differentiated Professional Development: teachers will attend and continue to hone skills that focus on their area of need. Each grade level will organize their grade level data in a way meaningful to them (folders, binders, etc.). Grade levels will use their organization system to progress monitor, find areas of strength/weakness, and support best practices. E. Description of Assessment Instruments The MSD of Pike Township utilizes a comprehensive collection of assessment instruments in order to monitor the education progress of all students. The complete list of assessments is as follows: Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress-Plus (ISTEP+) – ISTEP+ is a standardized test that is mandated by the State for all students in grades 3-8 and tests math and language arts skills. In 5th and 7th grades, science is also tested. In 4th and 6th grades, social studies is tested as well. ISTEP+ End of Course Assessments (ECAs) – ECAs are standardized assessments required for students enrolled in English 10 and Algebra I as the state mandated graduation examination. Students also are 21 required to take a Biology I End of Course Assessment; however, students do not have to pass this assessment as a graduation requirement. Indiana Reading Evaluation and Determination (IREAD-3) – IREAD 3 is a foundational reading skills assessment required by all students in third grade as required by state mandate. Indiana Standards Tool for Alternate Reporting (ISTAR) – used for students in grades 3-8 and 10 whose individual education plans designate as an alternative assessment to ISTEP+. ACCESS – ACCESS is a standardized language acquisition assessment that assesses speaking, listening, reading, and writing. It is administered annually to limited English proficient students in grades K-12 as required by federal mandate. Acuity (Predictive and Readiness) – Acuity is for students in grades 3-8 to assess reading and mathematics three times per year. Students in grades 4 and 6 take a predictive science test. Students in grades 5 and 7 take a predictive social studies test. Students enrolled in Algebra I and English 10 take Acuity as a predictive assessment for how students may perform on ISTEP+ End of Course Assessments (ECAs). Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) – NWEA is an assessment given two times per year for students in grades K-2 in the areas of reading and mathematics to measure student growth over time based on national norms. Otis-Lennon School Ability Test (OLSAT), Test of Mathematical Abilities for Gifted Students (TOMAGS), and Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) – are assessments utilized for the identification of students for the high abilities program. 2. Additional Supports for Student Success Assistance for Students in Need of Additional Academic Support Fishback Creek Public Academy uses a variety of timely, and effective instructional practices to meet the needs of students as well as providing additional assistance for students experiencing difficulty mastering the standards. Response to Instruction is a process that documents how well students respond to changes in instruction. The instruction is research based interventions in the general education classroom. These interventions are monitored 22 and students are assessed for progress. Data collected from monitoring is used to shape instruction and educational decisions. Professional Learning Communities (PLC) meet weekly to discuss strategies to meet student needs. These strategies are documented and assessed. The Core team meets once a week to ensure students’ instructional and social needs are met. Students are referred to Core when strategies have been exhausted at the PLC level and students are not making the necessary progress based on the data. Students in grades 3, 4, and 5 are tutored in preparation for ISTEP+. Title I, Special Education and English Language Learner staff collaborate with general education teachers to address diverse student needs to prepare for this statewide test. Teachers use differentiated instruction in reading and in math. Oasis tutors work with first through third grade students on reading. Students from IUPUI and Marion University work with students as well. Support for Transitions from Preschool to Kindergarten and 5th to 6th Grade Pike Township also collaborates with all Pike preschools/daycares on a quarterly basis in an effort to strengthen early childhood experiences and prepare future Pike students for Kindergarten. These sessions are facilitated by Pike Kindergarten teachers and instructional coaches to increase awareness of Indiana Academic Standards and research-based instructional practices at the Kindergarten level. In addition, Pike has opened a pilot pre-school site that is available to Pike employees and community members. Curriculum is based on the Foundations to the Indiana Academic Standards Once students are enrolled in Pike, they become part of a strong network that ensures that their individual needs are met. Students’ needs are met through Collaborative Team meetings that encompass School Psychologists, Speech Lang. Pathologists, ENL, Title I, Behavior Consultant, and administrators to ensure a seamless transition from classroom interventions to tiered services K-12. Pike township also offers an annual kindergarten round up at a central location to help parents prepare for this transition. At Fishback Creek Public Academy we are offer tours throughout the school year where parents can visit and ask questions of the building administrator regarding the educational facility and the kindergarten curriculum. 5th-6th Grade Transitions Support for Transitions from 5th to 6th 23 Fishback Creek Public Academy offers a variety of activities and events to ensure the successful transition of student from 5th to 6th grade. Activities include: Tour of the middle school and introduction to middle school administrators and counselors Family Orientation Night in June and August at the middle school (Phoenix Experience) Summer schedule pick-up at the middle school (tours continue, practice locker combinations, etc.) Music program at Pike Performing Arts Center to introduce musical opportunities at the middle school and high school Fifth grade teachers send information to the middle school about their students Students with special needs’ teacher and administrator meet with the middle school to discuss IEPs, 504s, and Core Team interventions FCPA administrator shares with middle school administrator information about children that may benefit from early administrator contact Fifth graders prepare for adherence to the middle school dress code Fifth grade teachers help students learn how to check grades online and pull off missing assignments 3. Technology as a Learning Tool Fishback Creek Public Academy is equipped with the necessary technology to support student learning. There are 2 computer labs with printers and software. Each classroom has a teacher and student stations. Each Community is equipped with 10 desktop computers creating a mini lab along with the three classroom computers in each classroom. The systems are networked with Internet access. There is a video network that extends to each instructional area in the building offering centralized video distribution, television broadcasting and distance 24 learning. A variety of peripherals are available throughout the building including scanners, digital cameras, and optical image projection. The staff uses this technology as a tool for learning throughout the curriculum. Students frequently use computers for writing, research, and preparing electronic presentations. The computers are also used for skill practice. Fishback Creek Public Academy telecommunication technology has allowed classes to take distance learning fieldtrips. Teachers are trained to use the available technology and software. Technology is also used in analyzing assessment data and research and developing best instructional practices. The following technological tools are used at Fishback Creek Public Academy: LCD projectors Overheads Distance Learning iPods iPads Video/Digital Cameras Mobis Document Cameras SmartBoards Classroom Performance Systems Clicker Netbooks Desktops Scanners Laptops Software: FastMatth World Book Online Discovery Learning Acuity eBooks Catalyst Audio Books Brain Pop Destiny/Destiny Quest Rosetta Stone Classroom Rosetta Stone Foundations for K-12 25 Assistive Technology such as: BoardMaker software Big Mack (voice output device) Go Talk (voice output device) 4. Safe and Disciplined Learning Environment In order to provide a safe and disciplined learning environment, Fishback Creek Public Academy completed the HEA1419 plan which encompasses student engagement strategies and collaborative structures, Positive Behavior Intervention Supports, Pike Support Academy, and Cummins Behavioral Health, as a means to achieving a safe and orderly environment. Based on district expectations, teachers develop standards-based lessons that keep students engaged thus reducing the incidence of misbehavior. Student achievement at Fishback Creek Public Academy will continue to increase as teachers create a safe environment where each student can be respected, learn in a safe environment, and grow as an individual. Through the PBIS PLC, teachers can gain the support and training necessary to provide a safe learning environment. Fishback Creek will continue implementing the HEA 1419 plan during the 2014-2015 school year which was designed and created to improve behavior and discipline in school. This plan focuses on classroom management, mental health services, compliance with zero tolerance laws and policies, family strengthening programs, school programs, methods and procedures for suspensions, and annual review of discipline data. Schools also implement the Bully Safe Indiana curriculum. There is a district wide discipline plan that outlines a list of infractions and consequences. Students, staff, and patrons are expected to follow the Human Dignity policy in maintain the respect and dignity of all. Behavior plans are develop with the assistance of teachers and parents to positively support student performance at school. Students who have repeated social or behavioral problems are referred to Cummins Behavioral Health for support. In addition, the M.S.D. of Pike Township implements Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS) 26 in all schools at the classroom and school level. Professional development is provided by district-level staff and school-based PBIS teams are in place at each building. 5. Cultural Competency The Fishback Creek Public Academy community is a diverse environment of African American, Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, and African students. The staff welcomes these differences through community circles, parent/student conferences, and celebrating student’s cultural heritage. Community Circle, and by using Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures, is a culturally competent instructional strategy because it celebrates each student’s opinions, prior knowledge and experiences, uniqueness, and talents. Other culturally competent strategies and events would include: Displaying and reading books that show diversity Displaying pictures and photographs that show diversity Allowing students to display family photographs in the classroom Student of the Week activities Inquiry Projects that allow for student choice and interest Honoring all students’ backgrounds, cultural heritage, ethnicity, gender, abilities, etc. Focusing on all students’ assets The staff works hard to make sure parents are informed in the English language and native language of instructional and extracurricular events. An appreciation of cultures is embedded in instruction. The staff reflects the student population. Because students see themselves in the staff who serve them, students have role models they can emulate and make social connections. The staff collaborates to structure curriculum in enabling students to view concepts, issues, events, and themes from the perspective of different cultural groups. The staff strengthens the assessment practices and procedures to reflect the diversity of student strengths and appreciation of multiple intelligences. Teachers differentiate lessons to meet the learning needs of all students. 27 6. Coordination and Integration of Funds and Resources While Fishback Creek Public Academy has chosen to coordinate the program efforts, we will not consolidate program funds at this time. Therefore, we will ensure that all Title I, Part A funds are used to address specific educational needs of children as well as our goals articulated in the schoolwide plan. Additionally, all children are allowed to participate in activities funded by Title I, Part A funds aligned with the schoolwide plan. 7. Summary of Data (Comprehensive Needs Assessment) The data collected for the CNA is summarized in the following: The tables below indicate where FCPA has placed since 2007 in the areas of Mathematics and Language Arts. 28 Math and Language Arts continue to show lower growth and higher achievement. It is our goal to move FCPA to the Higher Growth/Higher Achievement Quadrant. 29 The following table identifies the percentage of students, overall and by subgroups, who passed the spring ISTEP+ (Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus). Subgroup categories are identified when there are 10 or more qualifying students at that grade level. ISTEP+/IMAST/ISTAR Data FCPA 3rd Overall 3rd Black 3rd White 3rd SpEd 3rd F/R 3rd LEP 4th Overall 4th Black 4th White 4th SpEd 4th F/R 4th LEP 5th Overall 5th Black 5th White 5th SpEd 5th F/R 5th LEP Total Overall Total Black Total White Total SpEd Total F/R Total LEP 11-12 % Pass ELA 89% 77% 100% 75% 83% 70% 86% 85% 96% 82% 83% 64% 73% 67% 83% 43% 70% 71% 82% 76% 94% 61% 79% 68% 12-13 % Pass ELA 90% 89% 95% 85% 85% 80% 76% 74% 89% 76% 63% 25% 78% 75% 89% 80% 67% 54% 81% 80% 91% 80% 72% 47% 13-14 % Pass ELA 84% 93% 88% 82% 79% 45% 86% 89% 88% 77% 83% 50% 78% 77% 88% 92% 58% 40% 83% 87% 88% 83% 75% 44% 11-12 % Pass Math 87% 84% 96% 83% 80% 80% 75% 65% 85% 55% 67% 64% 85% 79% 96% 76% 80% 71% 82% 76% 92% 73% 76% 71% 12-13 % Pass Math 85% 79% 95% 54% 88% 100% 73% 68% 89% 69% 53% 50% 88% 81% 100% 90% 80% 85% 82% 77% 95% 69% 74% 73% 13-14 % Pass Math 85% 86% 96% 64% 82% 55% 83% 80% 88% 69% 83% 83% 80% 74% 88% 92% 68% 67% 83% 80% 91% 75% 78% 66% 30 The data reflects that we are beginning to bridge the gap between our White and Black students. Our Black demographic scores have increased overall over the last 3 years. We do see an increased need to focus on our LEP population. To aid us in our work to close the achievement gap, we will begin holding vertical articulation to determine why these gaps exist. We will consult with district specialists. Through teacher PLC meetings, teachers look for trends in the data of our LEP and Black subgroup to determine need and discuss various strategies during PLC meetings to adjust instruction accordingly. The following table identifies the percent of students that are proficient in each standard on the 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. Percent of Students Proficient on Indiana Academic Standards Standard 3rd – Vocabulary 3rd – Nonfiction/Informational Text 3rd – Literary Text 3rd – Writing Process 3rd – Writing Applications 3rd – Language Conventions 3rd – Number Sense 3rd – Computation 3rd – Algebra & Functions 3rd – Geometry 3rd – Measurement 3rd – Problem Solving 4th – Vocabulary 4th – Nonfiction/Informational Text 4th – Literary Text 4th – Writing Process 4th – Writing Applications 4th – Language Conventions 4th – Number Sense 4th – Computation 4th – Algebra & Functions 4th – Geometry 4th – Measurement 2009-10 82 82 84 85 85 87 72 73 73 74 76 75 79 79 77 79 80 81 69 65 66 67 63 2010-11 93 94 92 93 95 93 94 91 93 94 94 97 79 81 84 84 76 75 68 59 71 78 73 2011-12 89 85 87 87 89 89 84 85 79 84 83 82 87 84 78 84 84 84 74 70 74 71 72 2012-13 88 88 89 90 89 89 86 80 81 78 84 86 74 78 69 74 74 73 80 75 79 78 73 2013-14 80 83 84 83 82 83 81 86 81 86 85 85 85 90 79 86 90 90 83 83 83 81 81 31 4th – Data Analysis & Probability 4th – Problem Solving 5th – Vocabulary 5th – Nonfiction/Informational Text 5th – Literary Text 5th – Writing Process 5th – Writing Applications 5th – Language Conventions 5th – Number Sense 5th – Computation 5th – Algebra 5th – Geometry 5th – Measurement 5th – Data Analysis & Probability 5th – Problem Solving 68 73 82 79 79 83 83 83 85 90 89 89 89 89 88 67 80 67 71 70 71 76 74 78 77 76 77 78 79 79 72 75 73 73 75 76 80 76 86 84 85 85 87 86 84 72 75 76 76 76 80 81 78 84 89 88 89 88 82 87 76 81 76 76 76 74 77 78 83 82 78 82 81 77 80 32 After analyzing the data by following an entire cohort, it is apparent that we have significant drops once students enter 4th grade. We did see an increase in scores in all areas except Nonfiction/Informational Text and the Writing Process. We need to work on retention of grade level information. Following that same cohort in mathematics, students dropped in all areas in once they hit 4th grade. Once the students entered 5th grades the scores went up in all areas except in Algebra and Functions. Trends show a decrease in mastery in E/LA when student enter the fourth grade and fifth grade while math scores rise in 5th grade. Our plan is to address this continual decrease in 4th grade by having more vertical articulation meetings across grade levels. We will also look at the implementation and execution of lesson planning to fully meet the needs of all learners. Teacher grade level assignments have also been changed throughout the school. We will seek input from district specialists in the area of Mathematics and Language Arts to help guide this discussion. The following table provides the percent of students receiving a particular score on the ISTEP+ Applied Skills Writing Applications and Language Conventions Frequency Distribution rubric. ISTEP+ Applied Skills Writing Applications and Language Conventions Frequency Distribution by Percentage of Students Grade 3rd Writ. App. 3rd Lang. Conv. Year 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points 5 points 6 points 2011 0 5 30 40 25 0 2012 0 7 33 43 11 0 2013 2 12 24 43 12 4 2014 0 13 32 36 14 2 2011 1 1 36 60 2012 0 21 49 27 2013 0 8 40 49 2014 0 16 31 51 33 4th Writ. App. 4th Lang. Conv. 5th Writ. App. 5th Lang. Conv. 2011 2 16 43 33 3 0 2012 0 10 29 44 12 3 2013 1 20 34 33 5 1 2014 1 10 42 35 5 4 2011 1 14 39 44 2012 0 22 49 27 2013 1 18 38 38 2014 2 10 42 42 2011 1 6 39 42 8 1 2012 0 3 31 50 14 3 2013 0 2 41 47 7 1 2014 0 4 27 58 11 0 2011 1 8 42 47 2012 0 8 66 25 2013 0 3 33 63 2014 0 6 36 57 Review of this data shows the following: When following the 2012 cohort we were able to see an increase in students scoring 4 points out of 6 in Writing Applications in 5th grade. Again the 4th graders dropped but showed a 20% increase in 5th grade. We will continue to address this through vertical articulation among grade levels and input from district specialist in the area of writing. Our instructional coach will work with teachers during the Writing Workshop block to make sure teachers are utilizing the workshop time effectively. 34 The following tables provide the annual Northwest Evaluation Assessment (NWEA) MAP RIT growth and average RIT scores for all grade levels compared to the NWEA norm. NWEA Average RIT Growth Grade K Rdg K Math 1st Rdg 1st Math 2nd Rdg 2nd Math 09-10 09-10 10-11 10-11 11-12 11-12 12-13 12-13 13-14 13-14 FCPA Norm FCPA Norm FCPA Norm FCPA Norm FCPA Norm Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth Growth 16.5 11.4 15.4 11.4 16.5 14.7 16.9 14.6 17.2 15.0 17.3 13.0 18.0 13.0 18.0 15.4 20.3 15.1 22.4 16.4 15.2 13.0 14.9 16.9 14.9 16.9 19.7 16.9 21.0 16.9 17.4 14.7 16.0 15.3 15.8 14.4 23.6 15.0 23.1 15.2 6.7 12.0 14.4 13.9 13.0 13.4 10.8 12.8 14.0 13.1 8.2 12.5 12.9 12.9 9.7 12.6 12.5 12.5 17.2 13.0 Year-End NWEA Average RIT Score Grade K Rdg K Math 1st Rdg 1st Math 2nd Rdg 2nd Math 09-10 FCPA Avg 159.4 160.4 178.5 183.8 190.3 193.6 09-10 Norm Avg 156.3 158.1 171.9 176.7 189.6 190.8 10-11 FCPA Avg 163.6 165.5 179.2 182.7 188.8 193.0 10-11 Norm Avg 156.3 158.1 171.9 176.7 189.6 190.8 11-12 FCPA Avg 162.7 164.7 185.2 187.7 191.0 191.9 11-12 Norm Avg 157.7 159.1 176.9 179.0 189.6 191.3 12-13 FCPA Avg 163.2 168.2 185.0 191.0 193.1 195.4 12-13 Norm Avg 157.7 159.1 176.9 179.0 189.6 191.3 13-14 FCPA Avg 160.7 162.8 186.1 190.3 194.5 197.4 13-14 Norm Avg 157.7 159.1 176.9 179.0 189.6 191.3 Review of this data shows that Fishback Creek’s Average End of Year NWEA Average RIT score was higher than the norm group in reading and math in all but the 2010-11 school year in 2nd grade reading. 35 2013-14 Percentage of Points Obtained on Acuity Standard 3rd – Overall ELA 3rd – Vocabulary 3rd – Nonfiction/Informational Text 3rd – Literary Text 3rd – Writing Process 3rd – Writing Applications 3rd – Language Conventions 3rd – Overall Math 3rd – Number Sense 3rd – Computation 3rd – Algebra & Functions 3rd – Geometry 3rd – Measurement 4th – Overall ELA 4th – Vocabulary 4th – Nonfiction/Informational Text 4th – Literary Text 4th – Writing Process 4th – Writing Applications 4th – Language Conventions 4th – Overall Math 4th – Number Sense 4th – Computation 4th – Algebra & Functions 4th – Geometry 4th – Measurement 4th – Data Analysis & Probability 5th – Overall ELA 5th – Vocabulary 5th – Nonfiction/Informational Text 5th – Literary Text 5th – Writing Process 5th – Writing Applications 5th – Language Conventions 5th – Overall Math 5th – Number Sense 5th – Computation 5th – Algebra 5th – Geometry Acuity A 68 72 65 69 57 64 69 81 90 78 87 79 62 67 74 69 60 61 79 67 67 76 84 66 54 60 55 70 68 67 64 56 70 81 65 75 77 55 63 Acuity B 64 70 57 74 46 47 68 78 90 89 76 66 57 62 69 72 60 52 56 36 67 72 81 67 62 52 62 70 66 73 61 81 56 88 64 79 72 45 70 Acuity C 67 72 68 70 55 63 69 78 86 94 64 81 65 56 55 59 53 30 47 71 71 73 79 75 72 61 69 69 70 74 61 68 56 79 68 86 60 59 58 36 5th – Measurement 5th – Data Analysis & Probability 58 53 64 45 79 74 This is our third year using the Acuity predictive tests. The data above compares students overall points earned in each subcategory. Test A measures 2/3 previous year standards 1/3 grade level, Test B 2/3 grade level, 1/3 previous year, and Test A all grade level standards. Teachers break down the data and look for student mastery in the skills taught. 2011-2014 ISTEP+/IMAST/ISTAR Percentage Passing 3rd Grade 2011 E/LA % Pass 3rd Grade 2012 E/LA % Pass 92% 88% 3rd Grade 2013 E/LA % Pass 90% 3rd Grade 2014 E/LA % Pass 84% 4th Grade 2011 E/LA % Pass 79% 4th Grade 2012 E/LA % Pass (-7) 85% 4th Grade 2013 E/LA % Pass (-12) 76% 4th Grade 2014 E/LA % Pass (-4) 86% 5th Grade 2011 E/LA % Pass 69% 5th Grade 2012 E/LA % Pass 5th Grade 2013 E/LA % Pass 5th Grade 2014 E/LA % Pass (-7) 72% (-7) 78% (+2) 78% 3rd Grade 2011 Math % Pass 93% 3rd Grade 2012 Math % Pass 85% 3rd Grade 2013 Math % Pass 85% 3rd Grade 2014 Math % Pass 85% 4th Grade 2011 Math % Pass 66% 4th Grade 2012 Math % Pass (-19) 74% 4th Grade 2013 Math % Pass (-12) 73% 4th Grade 2014 Math % Pass (-2) 83% 5th Grade 2011 Math % Pass 74% 5th Grade 2012 Math % Pass (+20) 86% 5th Grade 2013 Math % Pass (+14) 88% 5th Grade 2014 Math % Pass (+7) 80% The data represented above contains percentage passing ISTEP+/IMAST/ISTAR English/language arts and math. At FCPA our student turnover is very low. We can rely more on our data that are gleaned from following grade levels when we look at it horizontally as well as by cohort. You will notice a decline once students enter 4th and 5th grades in English Language Arts with the exception of 5th grade 2014. You will see an increase in math scores once students enter 5th grade following their 4th grade year. Once again we have the 4th grade drop of followed by an increase in 5th grade. 37 Teacher Survey Results: 38 The Next Steps for FCPA As we continue to analyze our needs we plan on implementing the following steps to help address the data trends: Teachers will meet in grade level PLCs to monitor student data and teacher strategies FCPA educators will meet with district specialist to enhance classroom instruction in the area of Math and Language Arts We will work with fellow teachers through Literacy and Math PLC’s We will simplify our RtI process to become more responsive to student needs We will have vertical articulation meetings among grade levels to discuss strengths and weaknesses of each cohort We will utilize the Quality Assurance Review process to monitor compliance toward Math and Language Arts Goals led by our Math and Literacy PLC We will look into securing more technology for our students and teachers. Teachers will share successful strategies during professional development meetings 39 7. School Improvement Action Plans The Fishback Creek Public Academy staff and school improvement committee annually reviews and analyzes student achievement data. This analysis drives changes to improve instructional practices. The following documents and goal descriptions outline in detail Fishback Creek’s plan to improve student achievement in math and language arts. Attendance Goal and Strategies Fishback Creek Public Academy attendance during the 2013-14 school year was 97.3%. During the 2014-2015 school year, all students at Fishback Creek will improve the overall cumulative attendance rate by .7% as measured by attendance records in order to reach 98% attendance. To improve attendance at Fishback Creek Public Academy, the following strategies will be implemented: Students will be recognized for perfect attendance on morning announcements each trimester. Students will be recognized for perfect attendance in the newsletter each trimester. The school newsletter will highlight the importance of good attendance including the bi-weekly school wide attendance rate. Parents will be notified of attendance and tardy concerns by letter, contact by district attendance officer, and through the Core Team process. 40 MSD of Pike Township School Improvement Goal Action Plan Reading/Language Arts GOAL 1: The percent of students in grades 3-5 passing will meet or exceed the state percent passing by 5% on the 2015 ELA portion of ISTEP+. Benchmark: 80% of grade 3-5 students will increase E/LA Acuity Readiness scores by 10 percentage points from Readiness 1 to 3. 90% of Third Grade students will pass the 2015 IREAD-3 test. 80% of students in each classroom K-2 will meet their target growth in Reading NWEA test from Fall to Spring 2015. Timeline: August 2014 to June 2015 Instructional Strategies: Priority Areas for Improvement 1. Fully implement readers/writers workshop in all K-5 classrooms. 2. Conduct frequent checks for understanding responding with appropriate adjustments of instruction during every lesson. 3. Confer with students and keep conferring notes during independent reading and writing. 4. Teachers meet in grade level to discuss student assessment trends in writing. 5. Staff will provide Rosetta Stone for LEP students. 6. Selected staff will provide LEP students with purposeful after school tutoring in Language Arts. 7. LEP students will be placed in Summer Stretch remediation that do not pass IREAD-3. LEP students will be placed in Summer Stretch that do not pass ISTEP+ or show need in non ISTEP+ grades. 8. All levels of Depth of Knowledge questions, tasks, and activities will be implemented in all classroom Instructional Strategies Implementation Effectiveness Measures: Instructional Strategies 1. Fully implement readers/writers workshop in all K-5 classrooms. Instructional Effectiveness Goals: 90% of all teachers demonstrate fidelity to fully implementing readers/writers workshop by December 2014 and 100% by March 2015. Instructional Effectiveness Measure The principal/Instructional coach will meet with grade levels monthly to discuss the implementation of workshops and assist 41 2. Conduct frequent checks for understanding responding with appropriate adjustments of instruction during every lesson 100% of all teachers demonstrate fidelity to frequent checks of understanding and adjusting instruction appropriately in response to the checks for understanding by December 2015. 3. Confer with students and keep conferring notes during independent reading, writing, math, or any other independent work time daily 80% of teachers demonstrate daily conferring with students by October 2014 and 90% by March 2015. 4. Teachers meet in grade levels to analyze student writing 100% of all grade levels upload their PLC forms to the FCPA common drive PLC Folder on an ongoing basis. 90% of LEP students will participate weekly. 5. Staff will provide Rosetta Stone for LEP students. 6. Selected staff will provide LEP students with purposeful IREAD/ISTEP+ after school tutoring in Language Arts. 7. 3rd grade LEP students will be placed in Summer Stretch remediations that do not pass IREAD-3. LEP students will be placed in Summer Stretch that do not pass ISTEP+ or show need in non ISTEP+ grades. 8. All levels of Depth of Knowledge questions, tasks, and activities will be implemented in all classroom Goal Action Plan 95% of LEP students will participate weekly. 100% of students with Good Cause exception that do not pass IREAD-3 will be asked to attend Summer Stretch remediation. 100% of students that do not pass ISTEP+ or need additional assistance will be asked to attend Summer Stretch remediation. 100% of staff will participate in DOK professional development. teachers. Monitoring students writer’s notebooks The variety of methods teachers use to check for understanding will be recorded on PLC documents uploaded to the FCPA common drive. Principal/instructional Coach will monitor use of conferring notes and anecdotal records of students in all classrooms through monthly meetings with teachers/grade levels. Observation evidence of teachers conferring with students during independent reading, writing, math, and other independent work time during each Trimester in 2014-2015. Collection of student work samples Instructional Coach will monitor effectiveness of program through Running Records. LEP students will show growth or pass the IREAD/ISTEP+ assessment. 80% of students invited will pass IREAD-3 80% of students invited will increase at least one level on their running record. Teacher include DOK references in Lesson Plans and Classroom objectives. 42 Student Group #1-#4, #8 All students Evidence and Scientifically Based Research ` Assessments PLC Assessments Classroom Assessments Running Records Readers and Writers Workshop Model for teaching reading and writing Pike Township Best Practices and Scope and Sequence document District Wide Initiative Increase Learning Time Yes Yes NWEA Acuity Works Their Way By Bear, Invernizzi, Johnston, Templeton and Helman Word Nerds By Overturf, Montgomery & Smith (See detailed PD listed in Appendix) The Art of Teaching Reading by Lucy Calkins School Administrators Instructional Coach Teacher Leaders Monthly PD Inservice: Conferring, PLC process during PD Webbs Depth of Knowledge district resources Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades Teacher Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School From WWCH Person (s) Responsible The Art of Teaching Writing by Lucy Calkins Phonics and Poetry Lessons Fountas and Pinnell #5-#8 Subgroups Hispanic ELP PD Needs & Resources #5-#7 April 2015 IREAD-3 ISTEP+ Running Records NWEA Monthly PD Inservice: Explicit/Implicit Vocabulary Instruction and Word Work Yes Yes Focused PD on ELP and Hispanic subgroups School Administrators Instructional Coach Teacher Leaders 43 MSD of Pike Township School Improvement Goal Action Plan Mathematics GOAL 2: The percent of students in grades 3-5 will meet or exceed the state percent passing by 5% on the 2015 mathematics portion of Spring ISTEP+ test. Benchmark: 80% of 3-5 students will increase Math Acuity Readiness scores by 10 percentage points from Readiness 1 to 3. 80% of students in grades K-2 will meet their target growth from Fall to Spring on the Math NWEA 2015 test. Timeline: August 2014 to June 2015 Instructional Strategies: Priority Areas for Improvement 1. Conduct frequent checks for understanding responding with appropriate adjustments of instruction during every lesson. 2. Teachers participate in training with Ryan Flessner on extending their implementation of the process standards for mathematics through problem solving. 3. Explicitly teach multi-step problem solving. 4. Students explain and justify answers in writing and/or in discussions with peer groups, and whole class daily. 5. Implement teaching of appropriate mathematical practices daily. 6. Teachers meet in grade level to analyze student’s assessments in mathematics. 7. Selected staff will provide Hispanic students with purposeful after school tutoring in Math. 8. Hispanic students will be placed in Summer Stretch that do not pass ISTEP+ or show need in non ISTEP+ grades. 9. All levels of Depth of Knowledge questions, tasks, and activities will be implemented in all classroom. 10. All staff will participate in professional development from the district Math Specialists Instructional Strategies Implementation Effectiveness Measures: Instructional Strategies Instructional Effectiveness Goals: Instructional Effectiveness Measure 1. Conduct frequent checks for understanding responding with appropriate adjustments of instruction during every lesson. 100% of all teachers demonstrate fidelity to frequent checks of understanding and adjusting instruction appropriately in response to the checks for understanding by December 2014. The principal/Instructional coach will meet with grade levels monthly to discuss the implementation of methods of checking for understand and assist teachers as needed. 2. Teachers participate in training with Ryan 100% of teachers participating in training will Teachers will share knowledge through school 44 Flessner on to extend their implementation of the process standards for mathematics through problem solving. Teach math facts, families and factors, and conduct daily spiral reviews to develop math fluency for at least 10 – 15 minutes daily. demonstrate effectiveness by June 2015. professional development sessions. 3. Explicitly teach multi-step problem solving. 50% of teachers demonstrate effectiveness by February 2014, and 90% of teachers by June 2015. Teachers will include this in their weekly lesson plans uploaded to the FCPA common drive. 4. Students explain and justify answers in writing and/or discuss in peer groups, and whole class daily. 100% of teachers demonstrate effectiveness by December 2014. Teachers will collect student’s responses via exit slips, math notebooks and review through grade level PLC’s. 5. Implement teaching of appropriate mathematical practices daily. 90% of teachers demonstrate effectiveness by December 2014 and 100% of teachers by March 2015. Teachers will work with District level specialist on improving the implementation of appropriate mathematical practices. 6. Teachers meet in grade level to analyze student assessments in mathematics. 100% of all grade levels upload weekly PLC forms to the FCPA common drive. Instructional team/Math PLC will monitor the fidelity in which the PLC forms are submitted and offer feedback when needed. 7. Selected staff will provide Hispanic students with purposeful after school tutoring in Math. 8. Hispanic students will be placed in Summer Stretch that do not pass ISTEP+ or show need in non ISTEP+ grades. 9. All levels of Depth of Knowledge questions, tasks, and activities will be implemented in all classroom. 10. All staff will participate in professional development from the district Math Specialists 95% of Hispanic students will participate weekly. Hispanic students will show growth or pass the ISTEP+ assessment. 100% of students that do not pass ISTEP+ or need additional assistance will be asked to attend Summer Stretch remediation. 100% of staff will participate in DOK professional development. 80% of students invited will increase at least one level on their running record. 50% of staff will implement Balanced Math practices by June 2015 50% of classroom lesson plans will reflect Balance Mathematics lessons. Teachers include DOK references in Lesson Plans and Classroom objectives. 45 Goal Action Plan Student Group #1-6 All Students Evidence and Scientifically Based Research Indiana Mathematical Process Standards Making Sense by Hiebert Envision Intervention Kit Start Date Assessments August 2014 And Ongoing NWEA Acuity Math Matters By Chapin and Johnson Intentional Talk By Kazemi & Hintz Yes Yes PD Needs & Resources (See detailed PD listed in Appendix) Person (s) Responsible School Administrators Instructional Coach Teacher Leaders In-service: Incorporating The Mathematical Practices in Every Math Lesson Good Questions for Math Teaching K-6 By Sullivan and Lilburn Balanced Mathematics By University of Wisconsin Increase Learning Time Common Assessments From Reading to Math By Maggie Siena #7-#10 Hispanic District Wide Initiative November 2014 And Ongoing NWEA Acuity ISTEP+ 9. Professional Development Fishback Creek Public Academy teachers meet bi-weekly to participate in professional development activities to support student achievement. Implementation guidelines are used to assist teachers in their ongoing goal setting to strengthen their instructional practice. New teachers are paired with mentor teachers to ensure that they are meeting best practices as established by the district and state. As a result, professional development opportunities are designed and available through before school, after-school and occasional weekend sessions, Professional Learning Communities, summer institutes, and instructional coaching and modeling. 46 Fishback Creek Public Academy builds a culture of continuous improvement through Professional Learning Communities. Teachers meet weekly to discuss strategies and monitor student progress. Core team meetings are scheduled weekly to assist teachers in this process. A team of teachers meet to develop additional strategies for students who are not making improvements through the PLC process. School activities support academic goals and citizenship. The Fishback Creek Public Academy staff embraces professional development. The school district provides professional development opportunities for existing staff and new staff members. Professional development covers a wide range of staff needs. Some examples are: exploring our new Benchmark Reading Series and Scope and Sequence to enhance classroom instruction, implementing our PLC Data Process with fidelity, Using Skills Streaming to address behavior in the classroom, Brain Compatible learning for students. Follow up trainings or support continues so staff can make improvements in instruction. Opportunities for professional development are scheduled throughout the school year. Experts in an instructional area are willing to work with teachers on an as needed and individual basis. Additionally, these professional experiences are connected to RISE competencies in order to assist educators in the understanding of the RISE model. Mentoring new teachers is an important piece of our professional development. New teacher meetings are scheduled throughout the school year to address any additional questions. New teachers are placed with a mentor who provides support for the first two years. Grade level teammates support new teachers on an as needed basis and through grade level planning. The MSD of Pike Township has a comprehensive K-12 professional development program that focuses on enhancing the instruction of teachers through the identification of research-based best practices, knowledge to use data to guide teaching decisions and support for implementation through an instructional coaching model. The intended outcome was and continues to be improved student achievement. Pike’s professional development model emphasizing school improvement is achieved through workshops, instructional technology trainings, coaching, model teaching, planning meetings, book studies and facilitation based on the specific needs identified by each school. Fishback Creek Public Academy has participated in a variety of collaborative, standardsbased, professional development sessions aligned with curriculum and assessments such as: CPI Training, Curriculum Mapping, Positive Behavior Intervention Supports Training, Best Practice Institute, Connected Learning Assures Successful Students (C.L.A.S.S.) trainings, Skyward Training, Science Cohort, and SBE committee. The instructional 47 coaching model is one of many keys to unlocking the potential within Pike teachers to equip them to better meet the academic needs of Fishback Creek Public Academy’s diverse students. In addition, this professional development model is instrumental in supporting Fishback Creek Public Academy in achieving sustainable school improvement efforts. To ensure the transfer of new knowledge and skills into practice, teachers are observed and evaluated throughout the year. These tools are then used by district and building staff to monitor instructional practice and to guide professional development goal setting. Other professional development opportunities coordinated to enhance teachers’ understandings of high expectations and to improve cultural competency at Fishback Creek Public Academy involved teachers participating in C.L.A.S.S. trainings, TEACH Butler Science and Math workshops and IUPUI’s Standards for Effective Pedagogy workshop during the summer, as well as other district sponsored summer professional development opportunities within Pike Township. (See the detailed district Professional Development Plan in the Appendix). Fishback Creek Public Academy Professional Development Plan Professional Development 2014-2015 Dates Person(s) Responsible Topic Readers Workshop Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1,2and 3 District Literacy Specialist, Instructional Coach Literacy PLC Conferring, mini lessons, aligning Workshop to Acuity and NWEA data, Maintaining Reader’s workshop notebook DOK Writers Workshop Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1,2 and 3 District Literacy Specialist, Instructional Coach Literacy PLC Conferring, Mini Lessons, aligning Workshop lessons to Acuity and NWEA data Writing Process and Application, maintaining a Writer’s Workshop Notebook, DOK 48 Research Cycle Classroom Management Data Analysis School Security Math Workshop RISE Evaluation Cultural Competency STEM Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1, 2 and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1 and as needed Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1, 2 and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1,2, and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1,2 and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1, 2, and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshop Trimester 1, 2, and 3 Ongoing PD meetings and workshops Trimester 1,2, and 3 Media Specialist and Collaborating Teachers Inquiry Road to Research District Behavior Specialist PBIS PLC Positive Behavior Support Behavior Plans Literacy PLC Math PLC PBIS PLC Science PLC Technology PLC District Level Specialist Classroom Assessments/NWEA/ISTEP/Acuity reports Crisis Team School Security District Specialist Math PLC Math Workshop Indiana College and Career Ready Standards Incorporating Literacy Standards into Math, DOK Superintendent, Director of Human Resources, Building Level Administrators SLO RISE Competencies District Academic Support Specialist Instructional Coach Culturally Responsive Teaching STEM Cohort District STEM representative Cross curricular implementation of STEM 10. Statutes to Be Waived Fishback Creek Public Academy is not applying for any waivers. 49 50 Appendix 51 Teachers will: Teach new college and career ready Indiana Academic Standards-Based Curriculum using Pike Scope & Sequence and Curriculum Maps Use data-driven instruction to support individual student needs: Acuity, NWEA, ISTEP+/ECA, ACCESS, Common Assessments, Running Records, Aimsweb Writing Rubrics, and other formative classroom assessments Implement Balanced Literacy Model through Readers’ and Writers’ Workshop K-8 and Adolescent Literacy Model 6-12 Integrate STEM using inquiry methods into all content areas Classroom Organization Implement standards-based assessment using Pike’s Guiding Principles and Grading Practices Identifies learning objectives/goals that are aligned to standards and student needs Create classroom expectations and effective procedures with students Post and review daily class schedule or agenda along with learning goals Communicate with parents through a variety of means in their first language when possible Provide clear oral and written instructions for assignments and classroom activities Utilize effective classroom management strategies to support learning Implement grade level/school wide procedures and Board of Education policies Conduct transitions that maximize instructional time Utilize appropriate technology for planning, instruction and assessment Establish routines and predictable structures Learning Environment Build positive relationships with students Establish a positive learning environment for ALL students Use appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication Use anchor charts and other class displays linked to learning Create a supportive learning community within the classroom environment Conducts class meetings or community circles Encourage positive home-school connections Implement district life lines Recognize that technology is an essential part of the students’ culture and create an environment that fosters its use Build collaborative structures to support student learning Utilize Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS) Actively participate in Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) Use a variety of media and technology resources to access, organize, and analyze information Collaborate with building and district support personnel to enhance student achievement Participate in professional development to improve instructional practice and increase student achievement Instruction Respect the uniqueness of ALL students Display representative samples of student work Implement balanced mathematics curriculum integrating the Process Standards for Mathematics using these components: Teaching the lesson (guided & independent practice); Daily spiral review; Problem solving/reasoning; Integrated writing Demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the core curriculum outlined in Scope & Sequence documents Encourage student autonomy and selfdirection Implement a variety of strategies/ interventions in core curriculum Use best research-based instructional practices: Balanced literacy and math Brain-compatible learning Conferring/instructional conversations Content integration Cooperative learning Critical/Higher order thinking skills Culturally responsive Developmentally appropriate Inquiry-based learning Differentiated instruction based on individual student data Direct, explicit teaching during mini lesson, conferring, & in small groups Flexible grouping Problem or Project- based learning Real life connections Student engagement Student-centered STEM integration Assessment Set ambitious, realistic learning goals with students to improve achievement based on student data Adapt instruction based on formative assessment results discussed in PLC’s Use frequent formal and informal checks for understanding Implement Guiding Principles and Grading Practices: Ensure that grades represent only individual student achievement Practice effective and consistent use of criterion-referenced learning goals for grade Practice appropriate design and use of formative assessments Involve students in the learning and assessment process Practice appropriate design of summative assessments Use appropriate grading calculations Communicate effectively information regarding grading practices and student achievement Use most consistent level of achievement and most recent information The Goal: Increased K-12 Academic Success This tool was compiled to support the best practices in the MSD of Pike Township and to serve as a reminder of what good instruction looks like. It clearly defines the ineffective practices that consume valuable and precious educator time and are not researched based. Therefore, if educators eliminate ineffective practices and focus their time on best practices, student engagement and achievement increases. Ineffective Practice Literacy Practices: Ineffective Practices vs. Best Practices Best Practice Exclusive whole group instruction Educator selects all reading and writing materials Only the basal or textbook is used to teach reading or content areas Educator not revealing their interests in reading and writing Using materials that do not represent the various cultures and ethnic groups in Pike Teaching skills in isolation Teaching isolated skills in workbooks, worksheets or drills. Teaching reading as a single one-step act Teaching the textbook from cover to cover Students participate in solitary seat work for the majority of the day Students are grouped by reading level for all instruction. Differentiated instruction – less whole group and more small group to meet varying needs of students Students are given an opportunity to select materials that interest them Using a variety of materials appropriate to the students’ reading level to teach reading and all content areas Educator shares personal interest in reading and writing with students Integrates the use of culturally diverse materials to support relevance, bridge connections, and enhance student learning. Imbed skills in a context with emphasis on comprehension Teaching skills in the context of whole or meaningful literature and using math games Teaching reading as a process Teaching using the curriculum maps to ensure an integrated, meaningful instructional practice Students participate in social collaborative activities with much discussion and interaction Students are grouped by interest, book choice or reading level 53 Round Robin oral reading Students are given little or no chance to write Writing assignments read only by Educator Writing taught only in language arts Not allowing pre-conventional spelling in students’ early writing. Segregation of reading to reading time Evaluation focused on individual low-level sub-skills Measuring the effectiveness of a reading program only by test scores Teaching spelling through memorization and spelling tests Excessive homework is assigned which leads to excessive grading Educator completes all grading and focuses on errors only not growth Activities are planned that are fun or cute but do not enhance learning. Primary Educators teach letter and sound recognition through the letter of the week. Lessons are planned without using any student or classroom data. Lesson are planned without referring to student learning goals Use various methods of reading aloud (choral, echo, popcorn reading etc.) or silent reading followed by discussion. Please note that read aloud would take place most frequently in primary grades and less after that. Students are given time to write throughout the day in all content areas Writing for real audiences, publishing for the class and for wider communities Writing across the curriculum as a tool for learning Encouraging invented spelling in students’ early writing Integrating reading in content areas (example: historical novels in Social Studies.) Evaluation that focuses on holistic, higher order thinking processes Measuring effectiveness of reading program by students’ reading habits, attitudes, comprehension, and test scores Teaching students about how words work through word study and writing The amount of homework is limited to only meaningful tasks which reduces grading Educator uses a constructive and efficient method of grading writing (grade a few selected pieces, view growth and encourage risk taking and honest expression) Activities are planned that have rich curricular connections that enhance learning and related to standards Educators teach all letters every day through shared writing, interactive writing, writer’s workshop etc. Lessons are planned to address the varying student needs based on data (observations, student work, classroom assessments, standardized assessments etc) Lessons are planned using data and student learning goals to guide differentiated instruction 54 Educator focused environment where the Educator is responsible for all organizational tasks (handing out materials, tracking student progress, room set-up etc.) Teaching in isolation without the support of colleagues. Not maximizing instructional time or using professional judgment (sending or reading emails during instructional time, using phone, talking to other adults, etc.) Create classroom environment with all store purchased materials. A classroom environment where students are not respected (sarcasm, humiliation) Student focused environment where the students share responsibility for organizational tasks and are empowered to take an active role in their learning Collaborating with colleagues to share ideas, lessons, interventions and solutions to challenges Maximizing instructional time by continuous Educator engagement (asking questions that promote higher order thinking, taking anecdotal notes, listening to students to increase understanding of student needs, teaching in small groups, building relationships etc.) Create classroom environment with students using their work exercising caution to avoid clutter Classroom environment where students are respected, supported, and valued Sources: Best Practice New Standards for Teaching and Learning in America’s Schools by Zemelman, Daniels, Hyde MSD of Pike Township Model for Effective Instruction: Guide to Best Practices MSD of Pike Township Implementation Guideline 55 Fishback Creek Public Academy Title I School-Parent Compact 2014-2015 Fishback Creek Public Academy, and the families of the students participating in activities, services, and programs funded by Title 1 for No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, agree that this compact outlines how the entire school staff, students and families will partner in the responsibilities to support student success in school and in life. Staff Responsibilities Do the Right Thing: Treat People Right: * Provide a safe and supportive learning * Set high expectations and help every child be environment. successful in meeting the College-and-Career Ready * Teach classes with an interesting and challenging Indiana Academic Standards. curriculum that promotes student achievement. * Communicate frequently and meet annually with * Motivate students to learn. families about student progress and the school- parent * Actively participate in collaborative decision compact. making with parents and school colleagues to make our * Provide opportunities for parents to volunteer, school accessible and welcoming for all community participate, and observe in the classroom. partners. * Participate in professional development * Respect the school, students, staff and families. opportunities that improve teaching and learning and support the formation of partnerships with families and the community. Student Responsibilities Do the Right Thing: Treat People Right: * Come to school ready to learn and work hard. * Know and follow school and class rules. * Bring necessary materials, completed assignments * Communicate regularly with my parents and and homework. teachers about school experiences so that they can help me * Limit my TV watching, video game playing, and to be successful in school. internet usage. * Respect the school, classmates, staff and families. * Read and write at home daily. 56 Family/Parent Responsibilities Treat People Right: * Communicate the importance of education and Do the Right Thing: learning to my child. * Read to my child or encourage my child to read every * Respect the school, staff, students and families. day. * Regularly monitor my child's progress in school * Ensure that my child attends school every day and * Provide a quiet time and place for homework and gets adequate sleep, regular medical attention, proper monitor TV viewing. nutrition and exercise. * Communicate through conversations/questions * Participate, as appropriate, in decisions about my about my child’s school day. child’s education. * Attend parent-teacher conferences. ___________________________ Teacher ___________________________ Student ___________________________ Parent/Guardian 57 Fishback Creek Public Academy strives to build relationships with all families, students and community members. We are committed to engaging all partnerships in a positive and encouraging manner that increases learning in all students. Fishback Creek Public Academy will provide: Engage parents in multiple opportunities to jointly develop and discuss: o Parent Engagement Policy o School Improvement Plan o Home and School Compact All families with a timely description of Fishback Creek Public Academy’s Title I programs o Annual Title I meeting within the first month of school o Back-to-school night (August 2013) o Read Write Explore Nights (3 total- 1 per trimester) Offer flexible times for parents to meet and discuss student progress Opportunities for feedback from all partnerships during and after all meetings or events Engagement opportunities for all families, students and community members in communication through multiple means Parent Engagement Opportunities: Active involvement: o Volunteer in the classroom or school o Chaperone study trips o Attend school-wide meetings Consistent communication: o Fishbowl Newsletter (electronic and hard copy) o Fishback Creek Public Academy website o E-dialer o Parent conferences o Back to school night o o Gallery nights All events hosted by the school 58 Student support: o Parent resource room within the media center that all partnerships have access to. o Assistance in understanding Indiana Academic Standards o Access to materials on how to help support and improve student achievement Participate on policy and decision-making committees o Provide feedback and input on school wide events and initiatives MSD of Pike Township Professional Development Plan 2014-2015 Professional Development 2014-2015 Dates Topic New Teacher Orientation 7/21/14 – 7/24/14 7/31/14, 8/4/14 Orientation, literacy practices, mathematical practices, content area literacy, classroom management, student engagement, and student information systems School-Based Professional Development Professional development sessions during teacher contract time held before or after school at elementary, middle school, high school Based on Strategies for Improving Student Achievement and Areas of Focus listed on last page of this document Annual District Best Practice Institute & Workshops ElevatED Conference– July 2014 Professional educators & authors as well as teacher prepared workshops offer best practices as choice to colleagues. Topics based on Strategies for Improving Student Achievement and Best Practices that are aligned with the Areas of Focus listed on p.4. Sample topics:, Neuroscience and Education, Strategies on Teaching and Assessing, Goals, Rubrics, & Objectives, Differentiation & Data-Based Instruction, Reader’s & Writer’s Workshop, Thinking Maps, Technology Integration, Science On-going Before and After-School Sessions Utilizing Data to Plan Lessons, Setting Ambitious and Measureable Goals, Standards-Based Unit Plans and Assessments, Objective-Driven Lesson Plans, Student Progress Monitoring, Student Learning Objectives, Student Engagement, Checking for Understanding, Modify Instruction as Needed, Higher Level Instruction Strategies, Maximize Instruction Time, Classroom Culture & Community, Setting High Expectations for Academic Success District and school based monthly after school optional meetings Teachers network and problem solve with specialty groups (counselors, exceptional learners, art, music, P.E., media, high ability, or K-8 grade level teams or RISE Review After School/Saturday Workshops 60 Professional Development 2014-2015 Dates Topic departments) Sample topics: Technology Tools, Inquiry, Thinking Maps, IAS, RISE Competencies, Six Standards for Effective Pedagogy (ELL), classroom management, student engagement, Crisis Prevention Intervention, Sheltered Instruction, New Comer/ELL Principals & Assistant Principals Professional Development Principals: 9/16/14, 10/7/14, 11/11/14, 12/2/14, 4/21/15 Assistant Principals: 9/23/14, 10/14/14,11/18/14, 12/9/14 Topics determined through needs assessment to enhance instructional leadership capacity of administrators. Primary focus on student achievement and growth, teacher evaluation process, and school improvement efforts (i.e. professional learning communities, quality assurance reviews) Instructional Coaching & Technology Training, Data Coaches, Technology Integration Specialists, Department Chairs, Vertical Team Leaders School- Based, Ongoing Format includes coaching, model teaching, lesson planning, workshops, and oneon-one support as needed in teacher classrooms. Topics related to literacy, math, ELL, RTI, data-driven instruction, culturally responsive teaching, technology integration, standards-based education, Indiana Academic Standards, curriculum mapping, common assessments, & reading and writing across curriculum, Effective Pedagogy for ELL Learners, Sheltered Instruction IUPUI Federal Grant Partnership 2012-2015 Instructional Coaching Strategies for school-based coaches and administrators Response to Instruction & Positive Behavior Support Collaborative Team Meetings Elementary & Middle School Team Meetings TBD High School Team Meetings TBD Strengthening core curriculum, student interventions, evidence based practices, positive behavior support strategies, core team protocols, data-based decision making, documentation, problem solving, assessments Response to Intervention Made Easy On-line course consists of 12 modules – Pat Quinn On-line Learning Open to all educators On Demand Service Orientation Sessions Response to Instruction Made Easy On-line course consists of 12 modules – Pat Quinn School Improvement Network: PD360 - Middle School Only 61 Professional Development 2014-2015 Dates Flipped Classrooms, One-to-One computing, Classroom environment with a Technology Focus, Critical Thinking, Engaged learners Youth CareerConnect Grant 21st Century Community Learning Centers Math & Science Cohort (MSP) NMSI Grant IUPUI/ELL Training & Coaching IDOE STEM Training Hoosier Writing Project Title Grants After- School Book Studies K-2, 3-5, MS, HS Topic TEACH Butler Summer Institute Math Study Group Pre-AP & AP Training IB Training Media Specialist Workshops State, Regional and National Conferences Ongoing optional book studies - book selection determined by group Algebra readiness, math content training, & mathematical practices Reader’s & Writer’s Workshop, Units of Study, Math Workshop Thinking Maps, inquiry, critical thinking, technology integration, professional learning communities, college going culture, Six Standards of Effective Pedagogy (ELL), Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP), behavior management, The Culturally Responsive Teacher: How Understanding Culture Positively Impacts Instruction and Student Achievement, WIDA Standards Implementation (ELL) Possible School Selections Growing Readers by Kathy Collins, About Authors by Katie Wood Ray The Inside Guide to the Reading-Writing Classroom by Leslie Blauman, Study Driven by Katie Wood Ray, When Kids Can’t Read by Kyleen Beers, Time for Reading in Social Studies, Science and Math by Laura Robb, Readicide by Kelly Gallagher, Number Sense Routines by Jessica Shumway, Comprehension & Collaboration by Stephanie Harvey & Harvey Daniels, Writing Workshop by Ralph Fetcher and JoAnn Portalupi, Good Questions for Math Teaching by Peter Sullivan & Pat Lilburn, The Reading Workshop by Frank Serafini, Teaching Essentials by Reggie Routman, Subjects Matter: Every Teacher’s Guide to Content-Area Reading by Harvey Daniels and Steven Zemelman, The Words Came Down (ELL) by Emilie Parker, Educating Everybody’s Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners by Robert Cole, Book Love by Penny Kittle, Teach Like a Champion by Doug Lemov Possible District Selections K-2 Teaching with Intention by Debbie Diller, 3-8 The Inside Guide to ReadingWriting Classrooms by Leslie Blauman, HS Inquiry Circles by Harvey Daniels and Stephen Harvey, K-12 Choice Words by Peter Johnston, & Tess Pardini, Making Sense by James Hiebert, The Literacy Principal by David Booth and Jennifer Rowsel, Pathways to the Common Core by Lucy Calkins and Mary Ehrenworth, Leaders of Learning by Richard Dufour and Robert Marzano, Maximizing Learning for English Language Learners by the Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development 62 Professional Development 2014-2015 Dates Classified Staff Skills Training Ongoing depending on group Topic Instructional Assistants – Literacy, classroom behavior management School Secretaries – Invitational Practices, technology, business practices Transportation – Positive Behavior Support, behavior management, technology Custodians – Pest Management, use of chemicals, maintenance, technology 63 MSD of Pike Township Professional Development Focus for 2014-2015 The areas of focus for district professional development have been identified through: o Analysis of student achievement data o District Strategic Planning Committee o RISE Teacher Evaluation Competencies (Domain 2) o School Improvement, Title I School-wide Planning, Indiana Flexibility Waiver o Input from cabinet, principals, assistant principals and teachers o Implementation of 2014 Indiana Academic Standards (IAS) District and building professional development will focus on: o SIP Process/Title I School-wide and District Strategic Plan K-12 (including data analysis and review) o Developing a Positive Classroom Environment Procedures, routines, & expectations Relationships & Community Building Engagement & community building Culturally responsive Teaching Response to data o High Expectations for Academic Growth & Achievement Implement district best practices with fidelity Increased rigor across all content areas Reader’s & Writer’s Workshop (k-8) focus conferring/small group instruction/writing development Writing process o Increasing achievement of English Language Learners (ELL) Grades K-12 Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Six Standards of Effective Pedagogy by Stephanie Stoll Dalton o Response to Instruction (RTI) Academic and behavioral interventions Differentiated instruction and flexible grouping Positive Behavior Intervention Support (PBIS) Classroom management/Student engagement Assessment (Formative to guide instruction) Culturally Responsive Teaching WIDA Standards Implementation o Model for Effective Instruction: A Guide to Best Practices 64 o o Inquiry, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving STEM Integration Professional Learning Communities (PLT at PHS) Grant requirements STEM content and pedagogy School improvement/comprehensive improvement Youth CareerConnect Grant; STEM integration strategies 65 Timeline for Submission and Updating the Consolidated P.L. 221/Title I Schoolwide/School Improvement Plan September – July August Last week of August First Week in September Second week of September September 15 September School staff and parent/community representatives review plan and gather data; research best practices; for the annual revision of this three-year plan Invite parents to review the draft of the plan and offer feedback/suggestions for modifications at Backto-School Night/Annual Title I Meeting Submit draft of plan to the Academic Support Specialist and Director of Curriculum and Programs for review. Superintendent and District Staff will review and provide feedback. Pike Classroom Teachers Association (PCTA) will also review all school plans and provide district staff feedback. Final revisions to be completed and submit final draft to the Academic Support Specialist and Director of Curriculum and Programs. Superintendent and PCTA will sign SIP Assurance forms to be kept on file. Submit final plan to Indiana Department of Education. Submit to School Board Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ACCESS AYP C.L.A.S.S. CORE CRS DIBELS ELL Exceptional Learners HA Assessment that evaluates reading, writing, listening, speaking, and comprehension skills of English Language Learners. (Adequate Yearly Progress) Annual calculation to determine if students are improving their performance based on the established annual targets. (Connecting Learning Assures Successful Students) The CLASS philosophy embraces the eight components needed to create a brain compatible learning environment. A team of professionals who address the difficulties of a student’s behavioral, emotional and academic problems (Classroom Response System) Technology used to make the learning environment interactive and engaging, providing assessment of student comprehension, increased student performance, automatic grading, and increased classroom productivity. (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) Assessments that measure the five early literacy components: phonological awareness, alphabetic principle, vocabulary, comprehension, and fluency with connected text. (English Language Learners) Students with IEP under Article 7 (High Ability) ISTAR ( Indiana Standards Tool for Alternative Reporting) ISTEP+ (Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress - Plus) LEP (Limited English Proficiency) MAP (Measure of Academic Progress) NWEA (Northwestern Evaluation Association) Research-based assessments, professional training, and consulting services to improve teaching and learning. OASIS Intergenerational tutoring to improve students’ reading ability, academic performance and attitudes about learning 67 PBIS (Positive Behavior Intervention Supports) A set of strategies and systems to increase the capacity of schools to reduce disruption and educate all students on proper behavior. PLC (Professional Learning Community) Educators working collaboratively in teams PTO (Parent Teacher Organization) Running Record RIF Grant An assessment that shows the whole picture of a child as reader. Through this assessment, the teacher can assess miscues, fluency and comprehension. (Reading is Fundamental) Prepares and motivates children to read by delivering free books and literacy resources to children and families RIT The average score for all students who were tested at the same time RTI (Response to Instruction) A multi-step approach to providing services and interventions to students who struggle with learning SES (Socioeconomic Status) Title I Title III The purpose of this federally funded entitlement grant is to improve the academic achievement of the disadvantaged and to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a highquality education The purpose of this federally funded entitlement grant is to provided additional resources to schools to advance the achievement of students who are determined to be limited English proficient (LEP). 68