ITC End Point marked as `+` (a) First image of eye with closed angle
Transcription
ITC End Point marked as `+` (a) First image of eye with closed angle
Comparison Of Diagnostic Performance Of Iris-trabecular Contact Index With Multiple Slices On Swept Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Super Speciality Eye Hospital & Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology Imaging - Glaucoma Sujatha Kadambi, Rajesh SasiKumar, Jayasree Venugopal, Sathi Devi, Ramgopal Balu, Dhanraj Rao, Narendra Puttiah Glaucoma Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India Background WGCSUB-1670 ITC Analysis Screen in an Open Angle Time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices currently allow only limited cross sectional imaging which is not representative of the circumferential anterior chamber angle configuration. The swept source OCT (SSOCT) allows 128 cross sections, there by providing a ‘gonioscopic’ view. In built software in the SSOCT (Casia 1000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) provides the extent of iris-trabecular contact as an index (ITC index). Purpose To determine diagnostic performance of iris-trabecular contact index (ITC) using multiple slices (4, 8, 16, and 32) on the SSOCT. To compare the results with gonioscopy. Materials and Methods Prospective Observational Study Results Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria • 30-80 years • Corneal pathology • Phakic patients • Uveitis • Narrow angle without PAS or open • Ocular procedures except angle peripheral iridotomy 56 eyes (56 subjects) were enrolled, one was excluded due to poor image quality. On gonioscopy 41 subjects had angle closure; none had peripheral anterior synechiae. ITC index with 4, 8, 16, and 32 slices were comparable [66.28%, 66.56%, 67.16%, and 66.51%] (p>0.05). All patients underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluation including gonioscopy and angle imaging with SSOCT. A single observer masked to gonioscopic findings marked 4, 8, 16 and 32 slices for determining the ITC index with the built-in software. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was done for detecting closed angles using ITC index in comparison with gonioscopy. The AUC for detection of angle closure using ITC index was highest with 32 slices [0.82 (95% C.I., 0.69-0.91)]. ITC index >50% has a sensitivity of 90.2% and specificity of 78.5% for angle closure. No statistical difference using lesser number of scans. ITC index N Open:Closed (Gonioscopy) AUC (95%CI) Youden’s index ITC4 45 12:33 0.777 (0.628,0.887) >60 75.8 83.3 ITC8 55 14:41 0.675 (0.675,0.899) >56 82.9 78.6 ITC16 55 14:41 0.814 (0.686,0.906) >51 90.2 78.6 ITC32 55 14:41 0.820 (0.693,0.960) >48 90.2 78.6 Comparision of closed and open angle Sensitivity Specificity (%) (%) Closed SS - Scleral Spur marked as ‘x’ EP - ITC End Point marked as ‘+’ Open Discussion ITC index was comparable across the different slice numbers analysed. Higher number of slices gives better ‘gonioscopic’ picture of angle configuration. In clinically closed angles, average ITC index was more than 73.5%. In open angles, average ITC index was less than 46.33% which decreased with the increase in number of slices analysed. A cut off ITC index of 50% to categorize angles as either closed or open showed good sensitivity of more than 90% and reasonable specificity of 78%. (a) First image of eye with closed angle, SS is posterior to EP (b) Second image of eye with open angle, SS is anterior to EP This disparity could be because of the difference in definition of ‘closed angles’ between gonioscopy and ASOCT; gonioscopy takes pigmented trabecular meshwork as the landmark where as it is the scleral spur in ASOCT images. ASOCT tends to overestimate ‘closed angles’ and hence might have a high sensitivity and average specificity. ITC Analysis Screen in Closed Angle Limitations of our study Small sample size Closed angles are oversampled ,thereby sensitivity is overestimated Invisible range was not considered Conclusion The ITC index showed good diagnostic performance across different frame rates. Analyzing more slices might provide a gonioscopic view of the angle. Analysis of 16 slices appears to be as effective as analyzing 32 slices References Bhaskaran M et al. Assessment of circumferential angle-closure by the iristrabecular contact index with swept source optical coherence tomography, Ophthalmology 2013;120:2226-31. The red oval on left upper end denotes the number of slices included in calculating ITC index. Blue square shows the ITC chart. The blue shaded portion represents iris-trabecular contact in extent and distribution. The red box is the ITC Result table; ITC Index and Invisible Range are given. The dotted red box shows the ITC graph; y axis- ITC, x-axis- degree of angle. Financial interest - Nil Mishima K et al. Iridotrabecular Contact Observed Using Anterior Segment ThreeDimensional OCT in Eyes With a Shallow Peripheral Anterior Chamber. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 2013;54:4628–35. Radhakrishnan S et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of the Anterior Chamber Angle. Ophthalmol Clin north Am 2005;18:375-81. Sakata et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology 2008;115:769-74. Conflict of interest - Nil Support - Nil