4 HOPKINS STREET, FOOTSCRAY (TP171/2013)
Transcription
4 HOPKINS STREET, FOOTSCRAY (TP171/2013)
Page 1 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 4 HOPKINS STREET, FOOTSCRAY (TP171/2013) Director: Nigel Higgins Director Sustainable Development Manager: Steven Lionakis Manager Urban Planning PURPOSE To present for consideration revised plans to a planning application at 4 Hopkins Street, Footscray. The application has been referred to Council by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) as the Minister for Planning is the Responsible Authority. APPLICATION RECEIVED: APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT: SITE ADDRESS: PROPOSAL: ZONING: OVERLAYS: INTERNAL REFERRALS: EXTERNAL REFERRALS: COST OF DEVELOPMENT: WARD: ADVERTISED: NUMBER OF OBJECTIONS: DATE OF PLANNING FORUM: REASON FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 21 May 2015 TP171/2013 Urbis Pty Ltd 4 Hopkins Street, Footscray Construction of a multi storey mixed use development and reduction in carparking. Activity Centre Zone Schedule 1 (ACZ1) Parking Overlay Schedule 2 (PO2) Environmental Audit Overlay (EAO) Development Contributions Plan Overlay Schedule 6 (DCPO6) Civil Design and Transport (Development Approvals and Transport); City Design and Fleet and Waste Services Not applicable Unknown Yarraville Exempt from advertising Not applicable Not applicable An application referred to Council by the Minister for Planning ATTACHMENT 1. Revised Plans (see attached). ISSUES SUMMARY Places Victoria have sold the site to Golden Asset Pty Ltd who have submitted revised plans to the Minister for Planning. The revised plans consist of six buildings with heights ranging between 10-24 storeys with ground level retail tenancies and 939 dwellings. The site is within the Activity Centre Zone approved under Amendment C125 and forms part of the Joseph Road precent. Page 2 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 The proposal lacks dwelling diversity (typology and size) and does not meet the minimum parking requirements outlined in the Parking Overlay Schedule 2. The revised proposal shows little regard to Better Apartments Discussion Paper May 2015 as released by the Minister for Planning. It displays many flaws and issues affecting residential amenity and also fails the objectives of the Activity Centre Zone. The proposal appears to be solely driven by yield and is an overdevelopment of the site. It is recommended that Council writes to the Minister for Planning advising it does not support the revised scheme. OFFICER RECOMMENDATION That the City Development Special Committee advises the Minister for Planning that it does not support (objects to) the planning application at 4 Hopkins Street, Footscray on the following grounds: 1. The proposal fails to respond to the vision and intent of the Activity Centre Zone Schedule 1 failing to provide high quality design outcomes and producing poor internal and external amenity for future residents. 2. The proposal does not provide an adequate mix of uses, in particular employment generating uses and does not contribute to housing diversity, failing to meet the relevant objectives of the Activity Centre Zone Schedule 1. 3. The proposal fails to provide adequate parking on site for visitors and patrons failing to meet the minimum requirements of the Parking Overlay – Schedule 2. 4. The proposal has no regard to the Better Apartment Discussion Paper May 2015 released by Minister for Planning which seeks to achieve, “sustainable, high quality apartment living opportunities. Page 3 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 BACKGROUND 1. History The application was first referred to Council in 2013 by the Minister for Planning which at the time was lodged by Places Victoria. The application proposed eight mixed use buildings with heights ranging between 6 and 24 storeys. It also sought approval for a masterplan where no detail about the form, appearance or layout of the building was provided. Council at the 22 October 2013, City Development Special Committee resolved to write to the Minister objecting to the application and no decision was made on the application. Since that time, Golden Asset Pty Ltd are the new owners of the site and Amendment C125 was approved rezoning the land from a Priority Development Zone to the Activity Centre Zone. It also introduced a Parking Overlay over the entire Footscray Metropolitan Activity Centre. 2. Proposal Revised plans have been submitted by the new owners which seeks approval to construct six buildings over three stages. The proposal can be summarised as follows: 939 dwellings (568 x one bedroom and 371 x two bedrooms) 17 commercial tenancies comprising an overall area of 3,592.5 square metres 690 car spaces 320 bicycle spaces 53 motorcycle spaces Building heights as follows: Tower 1 - 11 storeys (35.8 metres) Tower 2 - 10 storeys (33.4 metres) Tower 3 - 24 storeys (64.9 metres) Tower 4 - 23 storeys (58.9 metres) Tower 5 - 14 storeys (44.2 metres) Tower 6 - 14 storeys (46.1 metres) Dwelling are provided with balconies starting at 3.6 square metres. Communal recreational areas including a gymnasium, pool, running track and podium top terrace is provided on the fourth and fifth storeys. Vehicle access points including loading bays would be accessed from Moreland Street, Maribyrnong Street and Neilson Place. The building would be constructed of a mix of building materials including coloured glass, coloured concrete slab, tiles and feature steel fins. Refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the revised plans. Page 4 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 3. 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 Site and Surrounds Subject Site The subject site is located on the northern side of Hopkins Street and is bounded by Maribyrnong street to the east, Moreland Street to the west and Neilson Place to the north. The site is currently vacant however was previously occupied by Le Man Toyota car dealership. The site has a site area of 13,100 square metres. The site has a significant downwards slope from west to east. A number of vehicle access points are currently available from Moreland Street, Maribyrnong Street and Nielson Place. Surrounds The Joseph Road Precinct is a significant focus for urban renewal in the Footscray Metropolitan Activity Centre (MAC) and was traditionally occupied by large warehouses and industries, most of which have now been cleared. The Maribyrnong River is located 100 metres east of the site and acts as an important recreational destination for locals. The Heavenly Queen Temple is located north-east of the site at 20 Joseph Road and a planning permit was granted in 2005 for its construction. Planning permits have been granted by the Minister for Planning for the following: 18-24 Hopkins Street (to the west) for five buildings with a maximum height of 32 storeys. 10 Moreland Street (to the north-west) for a 25 storey building. 2 Hopkins Street (directly east) for four buildings with a maximum height of 26 storeys. 4 Neilson Place (directly north) for a 16 storey building. 4. Policy Context The subject site is located within Schedule 1 to the Activity Centre Zone (ACZ1) and is affected by the Environmental Audit Overlay (EAO), Parking Overlay Schedule 2 (PO2) and the Development Contributions Plan Overlay Schedule 6 (DCPO6). Permit Triggers The application requires a planning permit for the following: Use of the land for shops (ACZ1) Construct a building (ACZ1) Reduce the minimum number of carparking spaces associated with shops (PO2). A contribution of $422,550 is required pursuant to DCPO6. Human Rights Consideration The report and its content do not impede the human rights listed in the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006. Page 5 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 Conflicts of Interest No officer responsible for, or contributing to, this report has declared a direct or indirect interest in relation to this report. 5. Notification Pursuant to Clause 7.0 of the ACZ1, the application is exempt from all notice and appeals rights as the proposed heights do not exceed the preferred maximum building heights in Clause 5 of the zone. 6. Referrals The application was referred internally to: Civil Design and Transport (Development Approvals and Transport) City Design Fleet and Waste Services. In summary the referral comments are as follows: Proposal is yield driven and widow dressed with superficial activation to disguise the shortcomings of a mass overdevelopment. Architectural rendering is a mismatch that has little to do with context or public and private amenity. Dwelling density is too high (720 dwellings per hectare), All dwelling are too small and 25 per cent of dwellings are south facing. Building massing is poor, bulky podiums, blank frontages, landscaped podiums will suffer from induced winds. Current dwelling layout, scheme and sizes are directly contrary to the Minister’s discussion paper on Better Apartments. Insufficient parking is provided on site for the size of the development. Dispensation of 31 spaces (being the minimum rate) is not supported. Visitor spaces are proposed to be shared by the retail spaces and will place further pressure on on-street parking demands. Surveys of parking in the vicinity are of no use. There is very limited on street parking available adjacent to the site once the precinct is developed. Parking restrictions will apply (including paid parking) in the surrounding street network once the precinct is fully developed. Bicycle parking and motorcycle spaces are satisfactory. Waste Management Plan is satisfactory and private collection is supported. Existing street assets are in poor condition. Road pavements, kerb and channel, footpaths, underground stormwater drains and pits, associated infrastructure and undergrounding of assets/utilities is to be reconstructed generally in accordance with the Joseph Road Public Realm and Infrastructure Masterplan (currently being developed by Council’s City Strategy Department). Submit hydraulic modelling and computations to demonstrate adequate conveyance of overland stormwater flows from Warde Street to Maribyrnong Street, without adverse impact on either the development or neighbouring properties. Traffic Assessment amended to provide meaningful assessment of the internal carpark layout including proposed parking space dimensions, car stackers, aisle Page 6 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 and ramp widths, internal ramp profiles, vertical clearances, and general functionality of the internal circulation. Detailed drawings showing crossover design, profiles and kerb levels submitted and endorsed prior to the commencement of construction. Detailed swept paths demonstrating functionality of waste collection areas submitted and endorsed prior to the commencement of construction. Detailed drainage plans to be submitted and endorsed prior to the commencement of construction. DISCUSSION It is considered that the key issues for the proposed development are: Is there an appropriate mix of dwellings and uses? Does the development provide appropriate internal amenity? Is sufficient parking provided? Is there an appropriate mix of dwellings and uses? The Footscray CAA Structure Plan 2013 and the ACZ1 designates the site as being within Precinct 5: Joseph Road Precinct which seeks to create a diverse range of dwellings and a viable mix of commercial, retail, community, entertainment and recreational land uses. As like the other approvals granted by the previous Minister for Planning, the proposal fails to provide a diverse range of dwelling sizes having only one and two bedroom dwellings. The limited mix of bedroom sizes and dwelling typologies results in families and larger household types being excluded. Furthermore, as like the four other approvals already granted: there is no provision of public, social or affordable housing there is no office space and limited meaningful employment generating uses given the size of the commercial spaces allocated, it is unlikely to cater to any entertainment, recreational or community facilities. A development of this size and scale has the opportunity to contribute towards community facilities and meaningful entertainment service spaces for the use by future occupants and visitors to this precinct. It is considered that the revised proposal goes ‘backwards’ in dwelling diversity. The previous masterplan concept provided a range of studio, 1, 2 and 3 bedroom dwellings as well as SOHO (small office home office) typologies. The previous plan also provided a better mix of uses having commercial space allocated to hospitality, recreation, showrooms, work studios and community spaces. Does the development provide appropriate internal amenity? The proposed scheme shows little regard for the internal amenity or the enhancement of enjoyable living spaces for future occupants as follows: There is a significantly large proportion of south facing dwellings (25 per cent or over 200 dwellings). Dwelling sizes are considerably small with some being only 39.7 square metres Page 7 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 Many of the balconies are extremely small and unattractive for use with the smallest being only 3.6 square metres. There are 79 dwellings which have balconies that are 6 square metres or less. A high number of saddle-back bedrooms with narrow light corridor and poor daylight. Long and narrow internal corridors. A number of dwellings have bedrooms and balconies located directly adjacent to loading bays and carpark entrances. The communal open space at podium level will be overshadowed by Towers 3 and 4 (being 24 and 23 storey buildings) at most times of the day thereby having little sunlight. The current Minister for Planning has released the Better Apartments Discussion Paper May 2015 and is calling on public submissions regarding matters such as apartment size, adaptability, sunlight, daylight, space, outlook, universal design and more. It is considered that the proposal has little regard to the matters raised in the discussion paper and displays many signs of what the discussion paper acknowledges as flaws and issues affecting residential amenity. The proposal also fails one of the key objectives outlined in the ACZ1 by encouraging high quality design outcomes that will provide high internal and external amenity for future residents. Given the many flaws with this development and lack of dwelling diversity, the proposal is solely a yield driven exercise and an overdevelopment of the site Is sufficient parking provided Based on the recently introduced PO2, the proposal generates a statutory parking range of 721 spaces (minimum) and 1,080 spaces (maximum). The proposal provides 690 spaces on site. A break down of the carparking requirements is as follows: MINIMUM MAXIMUM 568 x one bedroom 284 568 371 x two bedrooms 296 371 Residential visitors 93 93 Shop 48 48 STATUTORY REQUIREMENT 721 1080 SHORTFALL 31 390 PROPOSAL PROVIDES 673 17 Page 8 of 60 CITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT 28 JULY 2015 AGENDA ITEM 6.2 The proposal has a shortfall of 31 spaces which are all associated with the commercial tenancies. Council’s Engineers have reviewed the application and does not support the reduction in the minimum parking rate. The Traffic Report submitted shows ample on street parking to justify the 31 space shortfall. This survey is considered flawed being based on existing conditions rather than considering the four planning permits already approved by the previous Minister. Further, the report does not consider the cumulative impact of the reduction in parking already granted as part of the other approvals in the precinct. The Report recommends the sharing of the residential visitor spaces with the commercial tenancies. It is considered that this will place further pressures on the on-street parking demand and further restrictions will be in place once the precinct is fully developed. Whilst it is acknowledged that the site is located in proximity to public transport options, given the shortfall and the cumulative impact of the reductions in parking already granted as part of previous Ministerial approvals, it is considered that the reduction sought is not appropriate and will place further burden on the road network. The PO2 also requires 37 motorcycle parking spaces and the proposal exceeds this by providing 57 spaces. Bicycle parking for 320 bikes has also been provided on site in accordance with the statutory parking requirements. CONCLUSION It is considered that the proposal does not meet the overall intent and objectives of the State and Local Planning Policy Frameworks, including the recently approved Activity Centre Zone and Parking Overlay. Further, the Minister for Planning has called for Better Apartments, this proposal represents the antithesis of what the discussion paper seeks to achieve, “sustainable, high quality apartment living opportunities”. It is therefore considered that the application should not be supported and a letter of objection be forwarded to the Minister for Planning. Page 9 of 60 illi' lin. fah !"!fit imu Attachment 1 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT nIHt 'llUali41.• cenwigla J. 10PKINS STREET, FOOTSCRAY, VIC 3011 ItIV 21 TOWN PLI:k?.1qINC:', Page 10 of 60 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 8 HOPKINS STREET, FOOTSCRAY, VIC 3011 PROJECT TEAM CLIENT Gorden Aml Lime! 11.000 SI NA,vIc Ns. Tor 03 MN WA ARCHITECT &CUD .111[1%11101 11.e...11•4•111.11nn Thel 1, MTH 0001. SI...ACIAADoro. ye 3/2i TO. 339.1294M CONSULTANTS Land.c.p..111[1111.1 H PAN3IPPIY LII Lam 0, .1 30 EAlibidurr 5001,VIC 3300 10- 03 li054 RAN .TTen 03 PIN Mb - PleAnkm, 338.1.1001 ▪ Prtipmly Pry LAI l01n, 13, 120 il,111111. 1090 1.1111.1..1110.10C ALO Ter 03.3 1.1 urbis 911331115014(0.18.99 PLP TruiliTIng Sunny... 717 01 LeviTI .1. 33 711.1.111,1 Signe, Mob r nc , 144: 0430 TO 03 90537973 F,A 035E00 70,,Q LP milA•mone 3000 feuLorwel .1, no TO 03 01•51771 RiA: 330407135 E09174.0 EmOrA. FlAbortOrel. Ply. LA. 5, 333 Am 37e0; 139Aune, 000 4010 Tel 07 33'9 27T7 car 07 3319 0793 • ADP 1.1. ICU 111.111431 sAAtot &on./ ADP Calsul.p: EnOntorIng Go AA. I ApA1. SoullrrAALAurrAAc. Nos T4.1- 11.1 9601 1 1135 09.1.0098.10001 18451, 05s1911 Pry LAI O010 3599. 011 044vselvr.34: 3140 Ter 1/1904.301.3 1/1.111 Cans.. 141 CansurisAts Pry LAI KInps'on 53901, E04311101.11304: 31,5 T,A. 03650 95110 04. 00 TAT MI DRAWING LIST TP 00Cover Page TP 35Proposod Streetscapos -01 TP Cl Archllects Statement TP 36Proposed Streetscapes -02 TP 02 Diagrams -01 TP 37Proposed Streetscapes -05 TP 03 Dlag rarnS -02 TP 38Proposed StreeLICAIXIS - 04 TP 04 Dr ag rams - 03 TP 39Proposed Elevations - 01 TP 05Dragrams -04 TP 40Proposed Elevations -02 TP 06Floor Plans • LG1 TP 41Proposed Elevations -03 TP 07Floor Plans -12 IF 42Proposed Elevations -04 TP beFloor Plans - LO TP 43Proposed Sections -01 TP 00Floor Plans - L1 IF 44Proposed Sectkins -02 TP 10Floor Plans - L2 TP 45Proposed Sections - 03 TP 11 Floor Plans • L3 TP 46Proposed SectIons - 04 TP 12Floor Plans - L4 TP 47Proposed Sections - 05 TP 13Floor Plans - L5 TP 48Proposed Sections -06 TP 14Floor Plans • LiS 1P49-Proposed SectIons - LIT TP 15Floor Plans -L7 TP 50Proposed Sections - 08 TP 16Floor Plans - Lrti TP 51 Proposed Sections - OE TP 17Floor Piens • L9 TP 52Materiel Schedule TP 18Floor Plans -L10 1P53 Ares Schedule - 01 TP 19Floor Plans -L11 TP 54 Area Schedule - 02 TP 20Floor Plans • L12 IF 21 Floor Plans - L13 TP 22Floor Plans • L14 TP 23Floor Plans • L15 TP 24Floor Plans -L16 TP 25Floor P1010 .117 TP 26Floor Plans-LIP TP 27Floor Plans - L19 TP 28Floor Plans - 120 IPSOFloor Piens -L21 IPSOFloor Plans - L22 TP 31 Floor Plans -L23 TP 32Floor Plans - Level Plant TP 33Fro°. Plans - Roof TP 34Shadow Diagrams iaEL;Evfzu Mn reiaTlIWtelFri. 66 armr PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT !1:1-4-004 Fr±r R.I. • o 17030015 Weer, f Partcray Odd** Asset Group PTY .1.16 I 04.05.0019 _15;157_ Page 11 of 60 44 -4 =41 -I -41 -III AidgfiL 1. PODIUM 2 PROFILE AND HEIGHT 3. STAGGER 4 PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLE ACCESS • 2. PROFILE AND HEIGHT 3, STAGGER 4. PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLE ACCESS 7. SEPARATION 6. GREENERY 7:15 i p1-7tudar ... :TS 777— 114-004 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT iEram. - SD • HairkIns slat, FwaiseNly 6;411-.1 Alp.t CY.P PEE U 4Via Page 12 of 60 P7)):41 awn BuILD1NG RAMAND comEcTryrry — RESIDENTIAL ACTIVATION VEHICLE ENTRIES PEDESTRIAN ENTRIES MAJOR PEDESTRIAN LINK LANDSCAPED THOROUGHFARE (THE FOOTSCRAY STEPS) MAJOR VEHICULAR LINK COMMERCIAL ACTIVATION C-7 HOPKINS STREET eaEggraBLURE_MASSING DEVELOPMENTS APPROVED OR UNDER CONSIDERATION BY MINISTER FOR PLANNING 10 MORELAND STREET 26 STOREYS 210 APARTMENTS 4 NEILSON PLACE 15 STOREYS 135 APARTMENTS 1 WARD STREET 17 -24 STOREYS 305 APARTMENTS 2 HOPKINS STREET 16 -25 STOREYS 751 APARTMENTS 16- 24 HOPKINS STREET 17 -32 STOREYS 960 APARTMENTS — 8 HOPKINS STREET (PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT) 0-23 STOREYS 938 APARTMENTS 41 111 HOPKINS STREET 2 WINGFIELD STREET ST MONICA CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL s I_.1 , --11" )_*-4).1 -r.).1 11 A- T —" 1 - f '' ENURE 67112 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT :g110001:2:31. learillarM1...: T S!!'iiii:?! 04 - 95 I Hosaltint &real, Foetsclay iaelon Amt Gte.p MIS LT 07.05.7913 113#3.9 North Page 13 of 60 FEATyRE LANDSCAPED VERTICAL GrIDEN J. fg) FEATURE LANDSCAPED VERTICAL GARDEN PLAN PARKING — MESH SCREEN RECREATIONAL TRACK AT PODIUM LEVEL OF STAGE 2 FEATURE VERTICAL LAND PARKING ' PLANTER BOX — RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS COMMERCIAL TENNANCY CANOPY FOOTSCRAYTS COMMERCIAL TENNANCY FINS EEATURE LANDSCAPED VERTICAL GARDEN SECTION FOOTS-CRAY STEPS DIAGRAM AD •.• • •1, •i FEATURE LANDSCAPED VERTICAL GARDEN TO PARKING 44.41 ' 4,4,0 rEk76,4,004, COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE BOTH SIDES LANDSCAPING AREAS ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN LINK PEDESTRIAN LINK COMMERCIAL ACTIVATION BOTH SIDES nis Towntn0 21 APR TiaivaYINTaBI:. gic 'aunt PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 10CLJ1=1 Djm.r4rna -04 a Haphlas 504st,Feetmorn. 11,71.1•• Amt Grow, PTY LTD Rosmas grIOA T1915 Page 14 of 60 NEILSON PLACE : 11414 1.1111 :TR EET MENT BY :TON 2 I PRO +PI WARD STREET EXTENSIO ET I Cu 41 • O 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS O Cu . 1I S -J L,_ II• HOPKINS STREET —.= 051.01.1.155114 " I— .0045 00.1 21 APR 2015 TOWN PLANNING Envar. • —— PROPOSED MIXED.USE DEVELOPMENT • R'4.,004 locums .„. mans • S.0.1 ..,744145 54.1, Foot.F. 1,5. 1-T/3 _iii.mtakti_ isle& t. iooteLtrsS 1 7--)r —I— I I North Page 15 of 60 NEILSON PLACE B ' .1 iTREET MENT BY ;TON 2 • PRO , PI L. ET L „ ' O1 X V411: 0 4 HOP PROPOSE •PLUS II ". I 0 MOM WM --- Lb . •- re 4 r- • I11 —J..— - • : 1 -f 6 40,, • •MONI • =0 .11) ME, 0 7 • 11— HOPKINS STREET 00.1111111MG. \ ? I AR 2015 TOWN PLANNING RIC legaMedIE PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 1141.10 77:777" 74:o04 Flaw rims LG irri;pkIna 1••••1, Faelscr•y a aLT'' .....=.•• Wad. Amot Org.. LTO North Page 16 of 60 71' — NEILSON PLACE 111%, .._./CliTg*SI TIVCFa:swig *Nur •....f.ggq„,„,.NERA.,,gtN,m,,. I al+. I 40 iTREET NEXT BY :TON ET -I 1 2 HOP PROPOSE *PLUS et 1:t I 1 4 , I IIIIuflII IIu -111- ,... TT L _ _, _ _, . , — •--TT - -- -a 1 i 1 L _ _ I—— J—I• £. HOPKINS STREET Kcail ti& ricernmc 3;:004 ' ..7r PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT F KKK Phew -LO S Napkins Street, Poolscray 07 6710.0 Asog OrwapLTO 05.2015 .1511106_ ViOCHI•MI 1 North TP_ Page 17 of 60 NEILSON PLACE 9 Mk," VAINZif rj,ipear: ;cistizar Ulk44 °;i61113kNiatIlifEla i YEWU 11: 11 7-211KE • mik-r- - ;TREET MENT BY T 0 N — T_ RP STREET ET 77-1 _ -.711777g.N j ___ IBYRNON G DAEN. 2 2 HOP PROPOSE + F L US 2 gen. dow : nhIrIiPiTi jrririrJlitiirrr I -111- I/ HOPKINS STREET k:_7- -•- - • 21 APR .6.0x9.1E 7 PROPOSED MIXED.USE DEVELOPMENT TOWN PLANNING mjcp , Mae Plena - LI rHipkInm Saw, Fa:111..0y 6.111•.1 Amt.! 07up PTY LTD aLl_t o °is I11100 Ii2DtDU - J. -4- North IT _ Page 18 of 60 NEILSON PLAGE thrA: kii D P 0 I/ tiNa • • 1,7 0 1 4 - 2 HOP PROPOSE • PLUS V. lii I IrprIc Mi a • 3:111111 LI Tit[.1 _L t 6 rrik IOLL;' LL 4 co J. HOPKINS STREET WINK. Van.. 12D15 ";Orlatit -- T.41 aimattc -.•li\!;- • N1NG PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT LICUI:r.77-74' Fier Partecray &tam MI. Ocp PTY LTD North Page 19 of 60 • .1_ • et- - 2 PRO - P - ET ,, ..- - - . NE.mt...... ..............t -... i i 1 jI.J___I. .., • .11.•.1 - •`--- "king= 1 r 11 i la OA, 1 7=7 ._ _..., ::-. 1 1 - III --• 7 :AO .-,. PION ' WV] — IIII, '' ,_, = , 0 it 0 , ..... 1011111404 MILICIiii He , , me , , _ ..„„ ' ''' q:1 4 illeM, 0 t?-' • - - -- - .1111111 11 .., . _ riL., _ *. 'w 1[ 1 I ' :7 _ ---7— -..z _--... FO • ... .4: ' 6 gl_ . „ & Its .r. U. .',-;- ., r= I r= .. i----. '• ,--• '.'"i 01 II • , r ----4,1 1I'i,..,11ii , , --- -. . _ hi . 1it• ...-L._ AO ' • k.: JR 0 -I • ! . NI 1 I lift! g a ' a • 1 --El N S — .r..-7-Ar —.... vim •- r.. \ i \....... .::::?-..., 6.JL1 .4..4. iiili iith+1,... ....b... ,..„.7 .1 .: 1 1 1 1,. ' Lir 6 V ........ --.-<EE •, -.I m:-. _ s . •.,' 1 • N: _ . v..-- donikly, •- 00-----'. ..-,---,. 1 • .• --- .-r-• 0,011.4.00,s4P. 0 :Foam -a...1•=iri^aNi•01300.1' ilane. hettlIIIMOMMOMINISINIONFIrMa - - - - U . IIII meta‘r me" t • L io HOPKINS .4 ... 1011111111• -! STREET LIZVIS ir17/ • • 27,x3 PLANNING EtT.' &mar PROPOSED MIXEINUSE DEVELOPMENT Kum.775.1,7004 Frerr Plans - L3 111,111n• SO.!, Footsormy altkm /tarot Grow PTT LTD 07 MaCiD_JiiiiDA.NO4L,P" 1• Kerlh Page 20 of 60 NELSON PLACE 1 ITREET WENT BY ;TON 2 1 PRO +11 WARD STREET EXTEN ,S ION ST 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS MI IMEN ,,.., fEEI ----IEEI •- MEN MEMIEE1:: . 1.11•11 k.2 tEE1 VMEEI 11E. V=1E1 MEE :,.“. ,.. J.7:41k.. § rani 6i-e;ismni gil I am 60 11 1 II I MI 1111111 if ti ,7 1 1 . 4 1! 11: ..1 PT IN. , , Z l i i III 1 mown Ilmni MMI IMI hillM :I : / 'EN !EU II , , I i.- 7 • HOPKINS STREET Si 02.11DOWL ' won. 1 •Ace \_ , -I — ; • pt,pr\l'NING PROPOSED MIXED•USE DEVELOPMENT uci Floor Plano -1.4 rif7.10.• Ste.% Feat. my &Noon "mot Oro. PT/ LTD V.04.1,110 t._ :11.:4 ,./ North Page 21 of 60 NEILSONPLACE ITRE ET MEET SY :TON ET WARD STREET EXTENSION rt--- 2 HOP zPROPOSE • PLUS LF 0 -• • HOPKINS STREET gat="li I! WAMM•10.• ; 71 APR 2015 ; TOWN PLANNING Ono t*polirs. :rilgut. PROPOSED MIXED.USE DEVELOPMENT Flew Nom . LE 11601.....Y., F./away 14-004 igglon AN•wl Damp PTY LTD aosasis 01 V.:ZaixtmTP13 Page 22 of 60 NEILSON PLACE :TREE"( RENT BY :TON 2 I PRO •P 1 ET WARD STREET EXTENSION ff • GB -t-Z.:;4111,M : . MMWINU 41 HOPKINS EEEEEE L•17._ t 21 APR 2G3 -•.1.•lb .1 tirmEWRWIN &maw TOWN PLANNING PROPOSED MIXED.USE oevaopmENT Nen% Wridon As sot Gr oup Frf LTD Measat 1P14TP • Page 23 of 60 NEILSON PLACE ;TREET MENT BY 1TON 17 - WARD STREET EXTENSION ET A a HOP PROPOSE .PLUS a .oterit ' e- • ,e", •_1_, 41- •411.4Z1/4., 4 4Str• .Ar • 111,01.1, HOPKINS STREET SASALINAN ONO 7 1 APR 2315 •- . -- "•/:\l„. PL,ONNING 7-- PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 'CUM (14-004 ."1 —P re. Finns • 1.7 riFiNsIns. Sb.I, F.nerey 591•1 Group PT! L110 North 1 Page 24 of 60 NEILSON PLACE . —•••1-, -.--' , -1 - 1,11,-MS 41.20 :TRENT hIENT BY :TON L WARD STREET EXTENSION ET 1 2 HOP PROPOSE -PLUS ..2 :-,.."---777 soLtgi!.:4kit. . --.:. t. NER kW:TX .1. .._iIA1 IS !PL.-a ffil .• 9, HOPKINS STREET 01.118.1.1JAPE AR ROL 11[0.1 21 APR 205 — Tem., PIANt*ii_ PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT .-......—.. .......r ,..0 EU _ . ti4.........ri....d.w.ancr. ICLID TOWN PLANJII it FlerTf Mem .. Li Repk$n• Streot, Forstscray 6.11.11in As 2.1 04.14ip FTY WM Rocaoic amp,Moortoo - North igic Page 25 of 60 ' NEILSON PLACE 111,0.1. iTREET INENT BY ;TON 2 I PRO +PI ET WARD STREET EXTENSION B 2 Apr 0 0 21•10.1!1 HOPKINS STREET Mt: Ribi.1104 ram 21 APR 25 TOWN PLANNING IYEEPLEEmMus_ _ .... [...[[... Et. .. [1:--[-[",•-• PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVP_LOPAIENT -:1',. :Avg.,.. „........r............ .... ". I'CLJ — -1 --1.- FFer Plano • LI 8 14opirlra seem, Peatscray 6.87clen A•set Group PTY LTD -DT 05-28174 -44. -..1.81 • 11 , North 1.L Page 26 of 60 NEILSON PLACE ITREET MENT BY :TON a I PRO +PI 1 I i • Or I ET WARD STREET EXTENSION CC 4("I' - 0 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS t_ , I. WO riga .•• Ea ft E EP L AMMO. I vlun• V 'C. 21 Ai)iZ 2315 .77f;:zir PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT loCUI=1 1.07Z:\ip 14004_J Wier Flaw - Ll i:E4mmon taut, Tamura,. lalu Mut Gaup FTY LTD 117,11 04-11:TaigAD—r----T-Fi! Hort', Page 27 of 60 6,1 NE3LSON PLACE ( 2 1 PRO +PI Li \ oV4 WARD STREET EXTENSION - 2 HOP PROPOSE pLus llY1.1.1. IN 16 HOPKINS STREET ;,.eoles 111.1.1. \--...niL—..t..rt.i.' 2 1 APR 2Cil5 TO PLANNING ...e. ma . 15.,••• 1 km.elma. .-• . r,;:• •;:4., •,.....,„,...... — . _ nun.. n •”........m......n..... PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT :7:—.1-7:!r.. ••••—•;-••' ICU= .77 -•;',' .. 2=14-001._ Floor Plan.- •L11 Erg... Dummy Peolscray gelelea *mot Group Inrf LTD ie7m-s1,13_iiesm_1PDPEE,.._T_Elt. OE, ..4....-' North ,0 _Jr= _ Page 28 of 60 7 NEILSON PLACE rrmgr min iTREET BENT BY :10 N 2 I PRO 4P 1 WARP STREET EXTENSION El , 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLIES 014 HOP .KINS STREET __..— V r 21 pR 2ii15 \ -.-,\ni LANNING . 174-oihopoirox -- — —0*-- PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT . • .,:.. ...—, ......_....'....-_...A.Aml 8 Hopk{n• 5124.1, Fwetscraw 0010. Pam aroup PTV LTO iitao P20 --I- I North 1 TP Page 29 of 60 —C":" .• NEILSON PLACE -4 :TREET MEPIT ST :TON , _- ET WARD STREET EXTENSION ,17—• 0 Z 2 HOP PROPOSE •PLUS 7 2 • -71-- ( rI 14 Mr. PA • . .14 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT -J Lin '<UM : ._ Footscra, ifelmien alma cbteup rorY LID -7fror Pin. • L13 North Page 30 of 60 NEILSON PLACE ric ITNEET KENT SY :TON I T.71 PRO — e T WARD STREET EXTENSION I 2 HOP PROPOSE T -, r Lion ."1 xplemar 14 HOPKINS STREET OPE" v1EI- _4l " 2 1 A?IZ 2C15 .0)2.1 PLANNING rchrx.'41, PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT "'CUD".7: .114004 riOr-1-14 tipldnaFootscray E ridden Hoot OToOP ITT 1.11) North I Page 31 of 60 NEILSON PLACE 1 - iTREET MENT ST :TON 21 PRO API WARD STREET EXTENSION E a 0 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS 4 IA aa 0 1 cc <I zo..00r 1/.3N HOPKINS STREET EGIALILINE 21 V.011.1P461-irira 37 314 OW: PROPOSED MIXEMSE DEVELOPMENT r,rif Pions - L15 5 ,14.004 a Hoodoo Uwe., rooncroy F UN., Paso! Group PTT LTD j I North Page 32 of 60 NEILSON PLACE —r MENT EY T ON 2 I PRO .PI •--1, ET WARD STREET EXTENSION 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS _Mos414! wen 1 \k, -:-.1.f.--- -----_____,-----_____-" -- --- mg • "!MMMWW •:..,.. " •-•,- ... .14 HOPKINS STREET SZOGILIZILLL ; AN% SA . ..011.01,4E tic :••• PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT LJD 4004 • ji Pusowns Strout, &mesa, / I Wolelon Moot Group PTY LTD ;NoVthI iimisug_mm_mmw Page 33 of 60 8 NEILSON PLACE 276 AM' 61,1 • Pi! NENT SY :TON PRO +PI re--1 ET WARD STREET EXTENSION 0 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS 6 )- t_ .4I 161,6rlirX. HOPKINS STREET OILIALLOILDI [ DKR P.M LvEi 71 APR 2015 TOWN PLANNING ,'46.6.01,766Ki. kr .- ExtEmx PROPOSED MixED.LISE DEVELOPMENT 100.10 4104 rfLex- LIT 14;61q166 5D661. F66.166h6 •..="-" " ......7.6.6 '" i26.76.611.66, rre LTD 117.03.2.11_151 Ihie4r; Page 34 of 60 NEILSON PLACE ITREET MENT BY :TON 2 PRO • p ! J— ET - WARD STREET EXTENSION 72 cc 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS 0 0 14 HOPKINS EEEEEE GGIGIL191112 eon] 21 APR 25 TOWN PLANNiNG — r.= _Kias:sco PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT Rear Min.- LIS rigekrna !lbw!, Footsore, Golden Ans.! Ocoee Pry LTD Page 35 of 60 NEILSON PLACE 14. • , ;TREE? MEN? BY ;TON 1 2 1 PRO 11 I , -1-4 f. WARD STREET ET EXTENSION 111 —' •I, ' 0 2HOP PROPOSE .PLUS 0 cc co cc if 4 <I* PI *PRINS STREET WEICIWAXIA •aUs _tH co is hcc.... .L111.1". 21 t1 ,-J. GE.,29.1/_ , PROPOSED MiXED•USE DEVELOPMENT rrx m.o. • uis 1.4spIdn2 Shook, Foo4scray airldea Upset Group PT? LTD 4 I ' Ne011 Page 36 of 60 — PLACE 1 1 10 I, I i•TREET N1ENT BY ;TON I 2 I PRO +PI WARP STREET EXTENSION ST 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS ' N 1111111I 2ri,Nat ICC. 1-• HOPKINS STREET wonwate •• PR eal ULp34j5. PROPOSED MIXED•USE OEVELOPNENT 22.2"" ....2—• •• i] 11_ ICIAJCP _ 11:15-0± . ," ,•17rtrr .ra E/T ccaet r teac Plant-LID 1.171pkIn. Solmot. Faetacrmy Gablen As..1 wo, rry LTD 0791.2015 EISA 1tDAO : Page 37 of 60 NEILSON PLACE STREET RENT EIT IT ON I PRO 4 1. 1 t--- WARD STREET EXTENSION ET a I2 HOP PROPOSE *PLUS O 4 0 6 tr —7' CC• • • 2 - - HP , • IIif 111011 orofir IN* HOPKINS STREET 1 ! t,,•••-•mc \ 15T63L1 .4412W. R117 miff 71 4,1--, L,.) 14-004 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT FlO6, Flans - L21 1 11L i 14,64Irts Street, RN:4mm North 4. 611*n Asset deep PTV' LTD TP Page 38 of 60 ITREET MINT IT 0 ti :r 2 HOP PROPOSE +PLUS acsic PROPOSED MMED-USE DEVELOPMENT 2.4• ..• . • , . tLag Plats L22 11201,11 Street. Footscray GeNen /Wel Gorsup PTV LID _02 9L2.1112—figi'DA___Si10169 Page 39 of 60 {TREE? MENT BY T 0 N 2 HOP PROPOS! P L 5 Ca:MURK rts oaer PROPOSED MIXED•USE DEVELOPMENT i LoCLID.: 4.004 • Daeiln Shoal. Fag. cray Am. I Gm* rrr LTD gioj,ZOID_DWOD 1ROIDA4IP3IIDI 1.2"rth Page 40 of 60 NEILSON PLACE STREET MENT sy IT ON WARD STREET EXTENSION HOP PROPOSE +PLUS HOPKINS STREET Page 41 of 60 NEILSON PLACE :TRIM MEET OT T 0 1 I PRO •P I HOP PROPOSE .PLUS PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT rod rin-trRad ., r..,sc„, Zion As•el Croup Irt LTD WAS313-AgVA--1 29900 Page 42 of 60 7 1 APR 2015 PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT • .„ IOCUDIMPOrtt°1 Cl•prznis F.tservi IWO. Asset SW., fly Lin --- 12WTP14 alSA.20.15 K.% .,1 North I Page 43 of 60 VIVEI 12121.1. ... arc" t um/ 3 : :17 ara. kohl.4; 33. == 144.14444.1.4{,£.40 TIE-rTL I 2 OR 2015 TOIryiN PLANNING Proposed Mrxed-use Development 141-11=1 14-004 WA.rrsmrel02 Napkin, Abe., Fulateray dicrldan AB.4.4134-4.4 PTV LTD LIDS-201S WWI '1100CA0TAOTi• Page 44 of 60 a as` ekela ma* Lenn.kr hi 0- LEM. 'I 1 1 Lh[hl_ art, en a ••• ePri** a ar I LEA LLealLM IMPRIII 1 1 1 1 III! Mil 1 I RI I 'MI MI5 II 'maw% I I e - - -elate AI 1.11.1[Nal I ifene FirlaelaNa.[91111.a-Cata Maseeel CEr al 911 _i ncowzralsr KM1 *SA ael..allt Y•erbalf-111 Tfl 21 TOWN PUIi\!': - i"L" ithourem -7 Proposed Mixed-use Deyeiopcnent FL:7 r KU= 14-004 Prep...ad E...,-03 * no **eat, Faatacee, al,•.* **SOL 11r-oup Inv LTD ITIS'IDA '110000 Page 45 of 60 - ; „ ; .M. 4111911111MINMINP 1 '1 EISSIM11111.10 LEV& SI .. , m m m E4Mmilela-m MN, ; ;I .Crelf. LLY¢1.4 :1 _ 9 ' 1,111181111,1111. tat.. I --- LIM. /I m EPPEL id e 411111111111111., ._ 114111111111m111Mit tWrIl• -61 ” ,LAMP11111E111! APA1111111111111111i• -.!J. 111111MLIM111. , IutIu • -I" = a ounnumill Ismunguir p. Al 1M111111r -9 ! IL 151111161301 MINI 11 niiiiii1111111111 L -13 Lrer.t urn, .0.2. - -- - • 11 III IONIPPIIIIM" tIMAIMiliiiii = -= ; _AtuR punt ei Leen, D i F -0'4W E H-7111- F Errr". E 1VED fl APR 203 : 7 Proposed Mixed-use Development TOWN PLANNfNc:: "0 _004 .4 KUM 7-47.:z.---77--04 *.: * raw., fiumat deup rry LTD 6-4`.0s..N.os Vii/en iloogao-5142 TS .444. Page 46 of 60 1 IlVatC .1114. —1 tiva• Lied". - .11 LIVIE141.11K.10 rW WILSIMSZIR L1 ..-rama-le5 ,on LIMIrt,0.1.1. Mt LT 63414 21 APR 27,5 Tnvoi .117.:03.1013 114,004 Proposed Mixed-use Development 1,1..olswol s--al p Napkins Mr.", Feel:sr-ray &lion Amt. Ommap rrr !LTD 05 .2 0 15 RICIOAno5D Page 47 of 60 EN I -- = = Pspo pm = PM. MI = II IP 1F' :10141011006;:i mimunnimiktik, 1.01.141.R.11 1.11 - - 'Mar I 0111111111111111P111,11111i LYYtt 1.11 Lenz.. LOD. IlTpr 12..1 LEVU., 1 "m111111111: 1•11111t11 in ...... Lee.. = UN =lir a02iva Lee S tar a It S al a 44 ta Sedelnetal IMIVIMI I F4010 Irecueg. F71M rFr : EN --- 1 - -- 'E H .L. L. • •_:- 2 1 /N 2015 Proposed Mixed-use Development OVIM 71 I'• • 142.11:1 .7,:t;J,•----2:::-.77-rE.tlepicine Street. reater.rey . ; ..r.4.05-1015111111041:2004ble- 7P44 ae. Page 48 of 60 ••••• lEhIS 6 LLatl 6 101,1 !Av.. 11,11.1 1.2.2.. OvELt ate.: = = = = . Maf Itk.reLic 4F0.113 FM •...11.114 arm. IPLae.S. 21 APR 2015 Proposed Mixed-use Development 14-004 !repeat. Section - 03 D' oidian Asa, Odeup PTV LTD aois WDA ViDOCAD -0.15 Page 49 of 60 5 R LD-Lk 14/1•4141 ... 1.11E111 Janlk IlLt1.11 kusir 11.1K11. 1I IdIHINH174 4 ' ' Ill W.,MIIIIIMENith,i I. ! .1_11- ml1111111Miliiiip, limit .I.Mir' miiinli: 1 1 1.III"IIVF- •4 1 -11INNIIkt. MI IN 'lir" MillneF 4 M M IIII..L . 144tIr' 4 ..1 M 11111111- "ll .L =lull == iidiiiiiql. g '• 'r:614.4111111 VA"44,..411c 11LVD. IIII 1111 11111 111 r_1.9.,C1101,0. FMNI1 LOLORLED.1) Fu 1111•Kta,Lrn I_L1 L 114.11, 17_1R 1.1 ,Ort glfrt Iv 411 PIN 2 1 Aa 2.,15 TOWN PLANN!Nf-Proposed Mixed-use Devekpment 'CLAD 114-no4 0.7.proirti &Wien a North. Etre., Footesny FIT LTD eWos..Tols IZ11.70.% 1, 7i.00.0” TMDii•—"'"*"" Page 50 of 60 - • • &Re. IV, 'I L I! mIL • • ••011 111•11111 . ' IL" ii NIli L: AN L •• .- .111/1111I a • 1111E •Ini•INIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIII—e '1 -I '' , , 1.011.1 4 . • ••iiii . u 1Imo m! 111E !illi :Ili', ill INA nibs An —1--• Iiiii. ,1 1ililA .r^or ...... -a- 11 1/111111$1111111 11111111111 I 1111, tflusugmlir!! ,i--:1111r,-iWII ill 1 'Int 1--j==---- - milinuilmiliminulirl ii----1 ---, .1.5M k „ ..11111111311“111111y WI H '' ...... ...... ..... ¢ • ..... .. ,1111111111111M11111111111111 !! -._` m_11111111111111R1111111111111P-". " .. ' .1 1 1 i dtrojill r. ." - 11111111 G--- 11111111 111111 Y- Proposed Mixed-use Deveioproent • i Page 51 of 60 1 .7.. 10114 • 10.1.611 • -I Iiid!IIIrnuI!uhIU • -1 •11111111111MIIMMEL • -1 IIMIIIMUUMIIHEr • ' • 111111EIMINIP11111916N411 [AI , I ' i NW ,I :11 . i . i IiiI 7' ---: '81 _I ' D.TRALILTDP 121FIE" E 13+1 ,Y1,761i Is =sr 004.• 11§ 2 1 tPR 2015 Proposed Mixed-use Development /111Mmr, loCi.J1=1 as 4•41. X.e.lgin. Strimk, Frnscre, Rosso-is We.. lame. 'Said., An., treop ,Tv LTD Page 52 of 60 I OVR 21 LaY19-11 ure/L2-1 atal-e aI CIMIR ...le ...V,I tr•el.11 I 114E, avaire ./1.6 .. ...TA I 11-va• LaY1,1 I1 arnk LaVaIa " „. a 3 " LIATE.112,50-0 Ell..waslirki.s..,,nomngs amer.r3. VILl "%Malt CGIG,LF4FIS. 1— tcamo• EM---- Eitil=a--- 1 rn .. \ 'L L -2 .1...'4, Xc 7.= raiugus Proposed Mixed-use Deveiwnent Pcup S.ItnAi. Mee.. r.o.n....Y .13.31tlen /As. Dreup PT/ LTD 137.115.2015 MSDA IIDOCAD \ Page 53 of 60 ZINVISPI, *1111111111101111E Mill1111011111E " 1111111111111111111E • ••1 rim ME — I "' 21 111RININE AP:11111111E1.11910 ' IIIHIII• ' 1MillffillE • iii111111§1111 • Mill111111W-1101. • ' 2 MEM • 1 • la" • .imosto awilimilifitdri MMMMM Li -a `31-Z LCRI• I 144.1 II t..eft 2/PR 2D15 kW,Fr.-10 TT Ifirar." 1£711:12.211IE Proposed Mixed-use Development r TOWN PLA NFtt Tr!' Ei PEN loCul=T41-004 rrt:pc..sed-Oa S flew.. SI..., deld.d Meet 0..up Prf LTD 'Oa52a1silevou Page 54 of 60 -- MM11 I I hi I 11M ¢ P PIM P III mi 1 . 1 111 " 111"' • NIIIIII I- • MLA !:,.III L' 'Xiair,441t4 di'. • TOWNA 21 PI'U:' .11.t Ir a r.C.CA10,,, 4. -1 s.u.rn ...Er IMEEISIE Proposed Alixed-use Development H 111M.•11.,14211. INCL.N2 14-004 14;:pr4.41 Sachem Hopkins !beet, r : EOM:. Oremp PTY LTD 07.05.2015 MA ...MOW0'51 Page 55 of 60 HOPKINS STREET (SUBJECTSITE) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS BY RUE) ARCHITECTS 2 HOPKINS STREET PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS BY *PLUS ARCHITECTURE L— 1 L • 1 4IbW .II.. 1 L ii imenimialiluiliiilimumemnot • •..immuniumuniummoN11119119111111111111 lllr m 1.0 •111111111111111111111121111111111111111IIIWINENIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN • m --11111111111N111:1111111H INI , • i 4111F1 . II11110 !, • • M1111111111111 111111iII 1111 1411411011 11 IIIimpriimsligoM 111111I I 0111111111111111 -ammo. ill — &mg, 56,rollea. Proposed Mixed-use DeveSopment "CLAM .—'""•"" 14-004 , Drepos•tl Strew:scope DI Ilopcion Stra.L. FooI,crey - alden As',V LTD 07.05.2015 KDOA iTiooeks fka ir''"` Page 56 of 60 8 HOPKINS STREET (SUBJECT SITE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS BY KUD ARCHITECTS 2 HOPKINS STREET PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS BY *PLUS ARCHITECTURE 10 MORELAND STREET PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BY ARCHITECTON ii Ui I IN 111111111111[ 1011116,[m iiiuuiu .11111111111M MU IIHOW im al 0 ; 11111111 111111111111111111111IgIMINIIII 111•1111111110111 1ME a x III 41 ewe Plaagima 4) 1111: 1 ORM una 1 l. tilu UI Proposed Mixed-use Development ICL-4=1 ' Stroote.ope DE A 00.1n, 30..A, Far, D -ad., Aas., Dreup PTV LTD O7.2O1S 00)0* ..-zoocaoTAW Page 57 of 60 '.31111er•• II ARMEE •I •I 411111 111.0116:111 11111111111111111111111 • I 111111111111111111111 • I Ni 11111iNE • • 1911111111111111111E• I I PPP I 111111111P.1111111111,161 • • • 1111 •1 $ 1 11 1.111 I II 11 1 1 1 111AAILI 1111 • 111111iiMiligliniN• 1111111111MOMIEF • •I Ii U • Aillinliint; • I 9111Eiiiltir • I II rr Ti •• I WI. • 1 IPO gliNg II P lilli IIIIHIIIIIII I 11 Illir 101 III ' " I kr II ANL LI =CD=CD =1=1=1=1=1=1 =171717171 ' lid Ed IF :1:Ju -21 APR 2015 PIIMT Pi- pmNr...i., ••-Mt_ OCIOft Proposed Mixed-use Development akroptira e ape 14471,11sel . Mepltinei SW.; Fuotacmy i:101.411.1 ABTA! Group PT! LTD 07.05.2015 Er lid llTI ilOOCAO i467TP' Page 58 of 60 STP [ET 1 13330111.11•11•LL.101101110.111.323•000110100 I•III111I II III 1 1 1 1 0...4131322133.— . LjL 2 1 AFR2u:5 j TOWN PLANNING ; - Proposed Mixed-use Development LICL/CI 0.40001015040103•0•- 04 0.4wat. rowtsrasy la100414•104wwp 173 LTfl ilaosto 14-004 Page 59 of 60 L _ AL,M011- - 1 L , MPRR I. A MO222222 Ovra • , m.-141.• terts.f t' 7 •• gio, 1' 1 111 W Il111NN1 11i1u111m11 i 111111111111111" II!I III1 --- l 141111111111.1 N L 1 411 ,P11111.1111ENIENIM 11111111 111 W 111011 III 111 i --iimunis • wipliini,gt 11111111 • KlI fit I• • gip' Fag T: r r 11 1 4 I ill V L.-) 2 T APR 215 Tom. PLANNING roposed Mixed-use Development -11:31141o. 04 100 Page 60 of 60 MATERIAL SCHEDULE 4. 5. 7. 1 BLUE GLASS 2. CHARCOAL GLASS 3. SLACK STEEL RN 4. DARK GREY SLAB CONCRETE 5. DARK GREY ENTRY TILES 5. THICK WALL. ROPE CLADDING 7. DARK GREY PODIUM TILES 8. LIGHT GREY PLANTERS CONCRETE 9. TIMBER PLANTERS 9. 2 1 APR 2013 I TOWN PLANNING f•DTD_NTATMs. „ PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT l ocum--------------ID•mrlal DODDMID rd:pldre• Streat, cmy GM. Ass.t Droop ITTT LTD 93.01..1,310 KIM .7"