Doing things better, doing bett
Transcription
Doing things better, doing bett
Doing Things Better, Doing Better Things MerthyrValleys H O M E S Self Assessment 2012 If you would like this document explained, translated or provided in another format Contacts such as large print, audio or Braille, please There are lots of ways you can contact us: contact 0800 085 7843 E-mail: [email protected] Call us: 01685 727878 or freephone 0800 Os hoffech gael yr wybodaeth hon mewn 085 7843. (Calls made to 0800 numbers print bras, Braille, ar dâp neu mewn iaith from a mobile may cost more than the arall, cysylltwch â ni ar 0800 048 8531 standard rate.) You can call in or write to us. Jeżeli chcą Państwo uzyskać wyjaśnienie Merthyr Valleys Homes Ltd lub tłumaczenie niniejszego dokumenty, lub Martin Evans House otrzymać jego kopię w innym formacie, np. Riverside Court dużą czcionką, w formacie audio lub Avenue De Clichy alfabetem Braille’a, prosimy o kontakt z: Abermorlais 0800 048 8589 Se pretender uma explicação ou tradução deste documento ou que o mesmo seja fornecido noutro formato, como letras grandes, áudio ou Braille, por favor contacte: 0800 048 8595 x Merthyr Tydfil CF47 8LD Contents Page Message from MVH 2 1 Our Community 4 2 Merthyr Valleys Homes 6 3 In our assessment we asked ourselves 11 3.1 Do we put citizens first? 11 3.2 Are we good at governance? 21 3.3 Do we know what to do and when to do it? 27 3.4 Are we financially sound? 32 3.5 Do we work with others to improve our community? 40 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? 45 3.7 Do we have a fair process for letting homes? 55 3.8 Are we a good manager of housing? 60 3.9 Are we good at repairing homes? 67 4 3.10 Do we have a good housing service for owners? 72 Our approach to assessing outcomes 76 Methodology 76 Major projects in progress at September 1 2012 82 Completed projects since the December 2011 Self assessment 85 1 A Message from MVH Message from Merthyr Valleys Homes In March 2011 we produced our first assessment of our performance assessed against a framework designed by the Welsh Government. Since this initial report we produced ‘doing things better, doing better things’ in December 2011, and this comprehensive assessment has been the subject of continuous review. This report is the latest review and takes us up to September 2012. The headline from this self assessment is that Merthyr Valleys Homes continues to drive forward and we believe we are now doing many things better and we are making a difference in our community by doing better things. In 2008 tenants voted to transfer to Merthyr Valleys Homes, and we promised to: 2 • improve the housing stock by spending £69.5 million on investment in repairs; • make improvements to the housing service; • invest in the local economy; and • retain rents at the same level as the former Local Authority. We are now moving closer to meeting these important promises and from our first assessment in March 2011 we have made significant progress in every area. We have: • made improvements in over 70% of homes and we are now confident that we can deliver the WHQS improvements by 2014; • a stronger business plan which now includes a significant new investment stream for non traditional properties, it has revised covenants and has been approved by our funders; • completed a 50% stock survey that we have incorporated into our 30 year business plan; A Message from MVH • moved efficiency savings into the tenant priority of responsive repairs; • passed the 60% point in delivering promises to made our tenants at transfer on property improvments; • carried out a STATUS survey and tenant satisfaction is improving, and in some important areas (such as customer contact and responsive repairs), it is high; • carried out a comprehensive doorstep survey of over 1100 tenants and the results have influenced our direction; • a new five year Corporate Strategy that reflects our community’s aspirations, our local heritage and our values; • targeted our spending in our local economy and in the last financial year we spent over £11m in the local area; • received the CIH Welsh Housing Award 2011 for our work in ‘developing and regenerating communities’, in conjunction with British Gas. Our external insulation programme in Trelewis provided community and environmental gains with tenants benefitting from improved aesthetics and reduced energy costs; • achieved recognition when our work in three areas of involving tenants was commended at the TPAS Wales awards; • continued to invest in training and supporting people in the community, with a further eight FutureJobs Fund placements this year, four of which are now working for MVH. In addition we currently have seven apprentices, and in conjunction with local colleges, have two work experience placements; • continued to support local organisations and last year we gave grants of over £44,000 to local organisations; • worked with the Fire and Rescue service and invested in fire safety improvements across our housing stock; and • reduced the number of homes without a landlord gas safety certificate to only those properties where we are in the process of taking legal action. And on several occasions we had no homes without a current certificate. At the start of every section we provide a graphic assessment of the impact on our tenants of the decisions and actions we have made. This demonstrates that we have become an organisation focusing on the things that matter to our tenants. Self assessment Merthyr Valleys Homes made a detailed self assessment submission to the Welsh Government on the 31 December 2011 and this report provides an update. It allows the reader to follow progress and for financial information the report uses the yearend audit account figures 2011/2 approved by the external auditors and the Board in September 2012. Other information has been collated until September 2012. We are aware that there are many improvements yet to be made both in our organisation and in our community. Merthyr remains one of the most deprived communities in the UK and our new Corporate Strategy sets out how we are going to play our part in making positive changes. We have improved our governance arrangements and we have changed our organisational structure. We now believe that we will finish delivering the promises made to tenants at transfer, and we will play our part in making Merthyr a better place to live and work. 3 1. Our Community 1.Our Community Merthyr as a place to work and live The Borough of Merthyr Tydfil has much in common with its neighbouring towns, but is proud to be quite different. Merthyr Tydfil was one of the most significant towns of the Industrial Revolution, and is steeped in history. Since the 1980’s, the area has suffered as a result of the decline of steel industry and coal mining and other traditional heavy industries. Many, who no longer work in these industries, are still suffering from diseases linked to their former employment. Merthyr Tydfil is an area which faces significant social and economic issues. The Borough extends from Dowlais in the north, to Bedlinog in the south, and is approximately ten miles in distance. At just 4 over 11,000 hectares, it is one of the most compact authorities in Wales. The Borough has a population of 55,699 people (ONS 2006);less than 2% of the Welsh population of approximately 3 million and it is one of the smallest populations of any local authority in Wales. The 2001 Census tells us that over 90% of Merthyr Tydfil’s population was born in Wales (compared with around 75% nationally), and one in ten people aged three or more can speak Welsh, compared with one in five nationally. The current population of Merthyr Tydfil is 55,699. Over the 30 year period 2001 to 2030 the population is projected to increase by just 0.3%, 55,900, compared to the Wales projected increase of nearly 14% over the same period. 2.6% of the population is from a non-white ethnic background (population estimates 2009). Most are from a Polish or Portuguese background. Demand for social housing has increased. 1. Our Community The latest figures from the Local Authority show that by October 2011 there had been 45 families in bed and breakfast accommodation - this is already higher than the figure for the whole of 2010. The number of households on the waiting list is the highest it has ever been at 2,051 households. The Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2011 identified a mixed picture of Merthyr Tydfil. It showed a Borough with good services and investment in housing, combined with intense poverty and deprivation. Merthyr Valleys Homes operates in the most deprived wards, including the ward of Penydarren which is ranked as the fourth most deprived super output areas in Wales. In 2011 Merthyr is ranked as: occupied accommodation, and 27% more of its population living in social housing, than the rest of Wales. In Wales, the house type that has the highest rate of poor quality of ‘unfitness’ is ter¬raced housing. Merthyr Tydfil has 59% of terraced housing compared to the Welsh average of 34%. During 2011, Savills have carried out a further stock condition survey of 2,175 properties, meaning that we now have survey data on 2,895 properties (68% of our stock). This information has allowed us to set out our remaining WHQS predictions, providing comfort to our stakeholders that our 2014 target will be met, and improving the condition of our stock in the Borough. • the most deprived Local Authority; • the Local Authority with the poorest level of health; • the second most deprived area in terms of income; and • the second most deprived area for community safety, including recorded crime, youth and adult offending, and fire safety. This contrasted with the evidence in the deprivation index which found that the Borough was one of the least deprived areas for services. This is reflected by the expanding commercial growth in Merthyr – with the recent announcement of the plan to invest £30m to extend the Cyfarthfa Retail Park, including a flagship Marks and Spencer store, making Merthyr Tydfil the ‘premier shopping area for the Heads of the Valleys’. In 2009, 4.9% of private housing stock was estimated to be unfit for human habitation compared to 8% in 2004. Merthyr Tydfil has 6% fewer households living in owner “Merthyr is ranked as the most deprived Local Authority.” 1 Statistics for Wales – Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2011 5 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes About us Merthyr Valleys Homes is a registered social landlord providing affordable homes for 4,237properties in Merthyr Tydfil and the surrounding area. Merthyr Valleys Homes came into being after tenants voted to transfer their homes from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (MTCBC) to a new not-forprofit housing association. Prior to transfer, a number of key promises were agreed with tenants – these are detailed in the formal offer document to tenants. Merthyr Valleys Homes have committed to invest £69.5 million in a programme of property improvements and neighbourhood regeneration in the first five years. On 30 March 2009, the housing stock from MTCBC was transferred to Merthyr Valleys Homes. The type of homes we provide We manage homes within eleven wards across the County Borough, with the biggest single concentration of our stock being in the Gurnos ward. A small number of our properties are designated as sheltered housing, with approximately 200 sheltered homes clustered within six schemes. We also offer a small amount of temporary accommodation, and properties where we provide supported living. 6 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes Our new visions During the summer of 2012 the Board adopted a new vision for MVH following the extensive door knocking survey “stepping out”. This new vision identified the priority as being providing excellent housing and repair services, and identified a central role for Merthyr Valleys Homes in regenerating our neighbourhoods. Themes Strategic goals Live with us Creating a housing service that is excellent Putting tenants at the heart of our organisation Creating a fairer community Work with us Having a proud and productive workforce Working with social enterprises Supporting local democracy Improve with us Creating quality homes Improving our neighbourhoods Improving economic inequality Our Corporate Strategy is submitted as part of our self assessment and demonstrates the new vision and confidence of Merthyr Valleys Homes. Our Board of Management The Board has responsibility for everything Merthyr Valleys Homes does. The role of the Board is to lead, direct, control, scrutinise and challenge the organisation’s work. Our Board members have to ensure that they act in the best interests of the organisation, exercising independent judgement, acting in good faith, using reasonable care and acting within their powers. We are governed by a Board of four tenant members elected through a ballot, four independent members appointed by the Board, and four Local Authority members appointed by the Local Authority (Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council). To meet the challenges ahead, a number of co-opted Board members have been appointed to strengthen the Board, bringing a range of skills and expertise between them. As of 1 September 2012 the Board are: Tenant members Avril Richards Fran Bevan Jacqueline Sullivan Vacancy Independent members David Lewis Martin Jones Stephanie Howarth Nicola Evans Local Authority members Cllr Bill Smith Cllr Chris Barry Cllr Tom Lewis Cllr Howard Barrett Co-opted members John Chown Stephen Cook 7 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes Governance Following an externally facilitated governance review in 2010, we have developed our governance framework to ensure that our governance arrangements are fit for purpose. To meet the challenges ahead the Board have reviewed the committee structure. In addition to the Audit Committee, a Policy Committee was established in 2011 to review and scrutinise strategies and policies, and recommendations will be made to the Board. In addition to Board members and officers a tenant from our Residents Participation Forum sits on the Policy Committee. The work of this Committee has seen 41 new policies recommended to the Board for adoption The Audit Committee manage and review progress in meeting all Internal Audit recommendations and they have taken a very proactive responsibility for risk management. The Committee make quarterly reports to the Board on strategic risk and they review the departmental risk registers. 8 long standing councillors Bill Smith and Howard Barrett returning to the Board, a coopted tenant Board member Tom Lewis who was elected as a Councillor was also nominated to the Board. The remaining Council place was filled by Councillor Chris Barrie, the Cabinet Member who has housing in his portfolio. Management and Staff Elections for three places on the Board took place during summer of 2012 and the results will be announced at the AGM in September 2012. This was the second year when elections for the Board have been contested. In an attempt to widen the appeal MVH posted the election address of each prospective candidate on YouTube and linked these to the election notices sent to every tenant. In April 2011 a new Chief Executive, Michael Owen, joined Merthyr Valleys Homes. By June 2011 the new Directors of Housing and Finance, Victoria Slade and Lorraine Oates were appointed. Paul Allen joined the organisation as Director of Asset Management in September. This team are supported by an operational senior management team, many of whom have been with Merthyr Valleys Homes since incorporation, giving a nice balance of new and ideas and local knowledge. The local elections in May 2012 were originally a significant strategic risk for MVH if the Council changed control and replaced supportive Board members. The new administration had confidence in the progress at MVH and the changes of Council nominations have been positive with two We have recently reviewed our organisation in order to get the right staff structure to support the Board in delivering the business plan. We are focusing more on those services that impact directly on tenants, and are confident that the structure will allow us to meet our objectives. 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes Merthyr Valleys Homes Management Structure Chief Executive Mike Owen Chief Executive Claire Payne Corporate Services Manager Allison Soroko, Myra Jones (Maternity Cover) Director of Finance & Resources Director of Housing Lorraine Oates Head of ICT Sharif Biharie Head of Finance Marisa Cass Regeneration Manager Sally Richards Housing Policy & Research Manager Nicola Aubrey Victoria Slade Director of Asset Management Paul Allen Head of Housing Maria Lewis Divisional Manager Mark Sawyer Health & Safety Manager Sarah Roberts HR Manager Ruth Llewellyn We are committed to the development of our staff and we provide a range of training and support. Since transfer our staff have focused on delivering the best possible service to our tenants, and have received training in a number of key areas: • achieving the disability symbol, committing to employing, keeping and developing the abilities of disabled staff; • equality and diversity; • starting to work towards Investors in People which demonstrates a commitment to developing all staff and creating an engaged workforce. • health and safety; and • Information Technology. In addition, staff have received and will continue to have training in specialist services and areas of skill relative to their role. We have a highly committed workforce, and over the past year we have responded positively to our staff by: • Iitroducing an Employee Assistance Programme – allowing staff and their families to access counselling and advice services; • developing a Well@Work group, committed to improving the health of the workforce; and An example of the collaborative approach to organisation development and management was the star chamber budget setting process adopted for 2012/3. Six staff from across the organisation joined the Chief Executive and the Finance Director to consider each team’s bids for the 2012/3 budget. Budget submissions were challenged and corporate goals received priority. 9 2. Merthyr Valleys Homes “We are aware that many of our objectives will only be realised through building on our successful partnerships with other organisations in the public, voluntary and private sectors.” enterprise strategy and special standing orders to help empower these organisations when it comes to the award of contracts. 3G’s Development Trust ArAgor Photographic Canolfan Soar Chairin Welfare Reform T&F Grp CHC Financial Inclusion Network Our Partners Communities First We work in partnership with our tenants and leaseholders. Our Resident Participation Forum (RPF) is a strategic forum with an overview of all tenant participation opportunities. The RPF links with the Board to make sure that we are a customer focused and customer led organisation. Our Quality and Design Forum (QDF) consists of tenants and leaseholders, and it is influential and instrumental in the development and review of our planned improvement programme and responsive repairs services. In addition to these forums, we have a number of tenant led forums and panels looking at other areas of the business. Credit Action We are aware that many of our objectives will only be realised through building on our successful partnerships with other organisations in the public, voluntary and private sectors. We work in partnership with the Merthyr Tydfil Local Services Board (LSB). The LSB consists of leaders of organisations that deliver key services to the community, and has an independent Chair. The LSB is responsible for ensuring that the Community Plan for Merthyr Tydfil is delivered. We also have improved our partnership working with Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (MTCBC), We have supported many of these organisations and we have adopted a social 10 Credit Union Gellideg Foundation Group Green Horizons Hafal Merthyr Citizens Advice bureau Merthyr Financial Inclusion Group Merthyr People First Merthyr Tydfil Institute for the Blind Powys Financial Inclusion Forum South East Wales Job Centre Plus South Wales Rent Forum Trefechan Community Association Tydfil Training Voluntary Action Merthyr Tydfil Welsh Financial Capability Forum 3 In our assessment we asked ourselves 3.1 Do we put citizens first? In answering this question we have identified that tenants told us they wanted more face to face contact in service delivery and we now visit all people in financial difficulty - this has resulted in no evictions since March 2012 over 140 staff visited over 1100 homes in June to listen and consult with tenants, and this extensive consultation has influenced our Corporate Strategy and all cascading strategies and policies we involved tenants in decision making on rent setting – they voted on the rent increase for 2011/2012 tenants were fully involved in setting the capital budget and switched £3m of resources from external improvements to energy saving works we involved tenants in deciding the discount rate for direct debit rent payers we changed our contractors and our approach to contracting after a review about how they dealt with vulnerable tenants tenants told us we need to be clearer with our policies and last year tenants were involved in creating 41 new policies and published standards Delivery Outcome GF1 We place the people who want to use our services at the heart of our work – putting the citizen first 11 3.1 Do we put citizens first? The progress up to January 2012 The Board and Executive Management Team recognised that we had limited data on our tenants at point of transfer, and needed to better understand who our tenants are, and what their requirements are in order to tailor our services and activities accordingly. Earlier this year we completed an information gathering and analysis exercise with Experian. The socio-demographic characteristics of our tenants was analysed, and patterns in this data allowed us to identify characteristics and behaviours, allowing us to better understand our tenants and the communities in which they live. In addition, we commissioned MVH’s first STATUS survey – the survey was undertaken on our behalf in May 2011. The purpose of the survey was to find the views of our tenants on our current service levels and opportunities for improved services. We had a good response rate - 43% of households completed and returned the survey, and 79% of respondents agreed that we can use their profile data. Overall satisfaction was shown as 82%. We have started to use the data gained from these exercises to drive service improvements, and will use the data to compare satisfaction levels and trends with other similar Housing Associations. Some examples of how we are using this information are set out below: • Experian data, along with STATUS survey results and in-house arrears monitoring, has helped us to decide where to target floating money and debt advice surgeries across the Borough. It has also re-shaped our financial inclusion strategy, as it tested assumptions we had previously made, for example, about the numbers of tenants who pay more for fuel because of the use 12 of pre-payment meters, and how people prefer to be contacted with information. • Both Experian and STATUS information are being used to develop neighbourhood profiles to help us to understand and work towards local priorities in distinct neighbourhood areas, rather than applying broad priorities across the Borough. For example, we now know that tenants in Gurnos want their neighbourhood to feel cleaner and safer, so we will include these priorities in a neighbourhood management plan, supported by a budget bid in the current budget setting round, for 2012. We encourage and support tenant involvement, and the number of tenants interested in becoming involved in shaping our services is steadily increasing. We have made some changes to the way we support tenant involvement, including the development of a Residents Participation Forum (RPF). This is a strategic overarching forum of tenants and leaseholders who have a clear and influential role within the organisation, with an overview of all tenant participation opportunities. The RPF meet on a bi-monthly basis, to discuss matters of policy and priority, to work with the Board and Executive Management Team in decision-making, and to assess and scrutinise Merthyr Valleys Homes’ performance and services. An example of this joint working was that the Board and RPF held a joint meeting to consider the implications of the Welsh Government's proposals on changes to the mechanism for setting rents. Out of this joint working session the tenants wrote directly to the First Minister and encouraged the Board to honour the promises made to tenants at transfer on rent levels. Assurances from civil 3.1 Do we put citizens first? servants and the Housing Minister continued to be monitored by RPF as rent increases and the delivery of future promises are an area of great importance for the panel. The RPF have been involved in the self assessment process. We consulted with them at the beginning of the year when establishing our approach, and involved a sub-group of the RPF in scrutinising key areas of our initial assessment. Members of the RPF also sit on other committees and forums, for example, we have co-opted one of the RPF members on to our Policy Committee, thus strengthening tenants’ influence and involvement in the development and review of strategies and policies. In addition to our other tenant forums, including our Quality and Design Forum, Communications Forum and Environment Panel, we have expanded tenant participation to include ‘mystery shoppers’ to test our services, and ‘tenant enquirers’ from our established Quality and Design Forum, to carry out satisfaction surveys directly with other tenants who have had work carried out to their homes as part of the WHQS programme. We are accurately capturing our tenant contribution in accordance with the Wales Council for Voluntary Action’s guidance, and year to date (up to November 2011) tenants have contributed 850 hours, or in monetary terms £8,650. We held tenant Board member elections in the summer, seeking expressions of interest from tenants who were interested in standing. We received ten expressions of interest from tenants who were not already engaging with us. Following the tenant elections, we gained a three tenant Board members, and for those tenants who were not successful, the majority of them are “The review highlighted that 82% of the action plan has been completed with the remaining actions planned for subsequent years.” engaging with us on other forums. To support succession planning, we are introducing the Chartered Institute for Housing’s (CIH) ‘Active Learning for Residents’ programme, offering all tenants the opportunity to develop their skills (and gain a qualification) in Governance, and other key areas. The Tenant Participation Strategy and action plan 2010 – 2013 was reviewed in January 2011, in line with our commitment to annually review it. This highlighted that 82% of the action plan has been completed with the remaining actions planned for subsequent years. The review highlighted a number of key advancements, and these have formed the focus for 2011/12. The next scheduled review is January 2012, and during the financial year 2012/13, the next three year strategy will be developed in conjunction with our stakeholders. In looking at the 2012/13 budget setting process and the future business plan we have involved tenants from the outset. A training session on stock condition surveys and the link to budgets was carried out and the tenants joined representatives from Savills and officers to look at the results of the stock condition survey and the projections on key expenditure areas. This joint working influenced the Board report setting the business plan and all tenants are being consulted on the key areas of expenditure and capital programmes for the next two years. 13 3.1 Do we put citizens first? We have developed a range of communication channels through which tenants and service users can contact us and access our services. We have reviewed our reception area. We maintain a very busy town centre reception and following feedback received from tenants who have visited us, we introduced an electronic notice board, detailing key information on the organisation, including properties available and details of how we are performing. This has proved popular with tenants visiting our Head Office. We have access to language line services, so tenants may communicate with us in their chosen language. In addition, we promote the availability of the translation services that we provide on all of our corporate literature. We have recently translated documents into Polish following tenants’ requests. Our main communication documents are of course available in alternative formats, including audio, larger text and Braille. We are now reviewing our tenant profiling data in more detail to provide the right format of documents for households automatically. We have built on the feedback that we have received on communications to date by holding a focus group with a group of tenants in one of our Sheltered Schemes. The data from the Experian exercise provided us with an overview of communication preferences. Older people were identified as a ‘harder to reach’ group in the data gathered via Experian, so we targeted this group to review our communication methods. We provide tenants with up to date information on service delivery, how we are performing, news articles etc, via our quarterly newsletter ‘Hometalk’. Tenants have a say in the content and the look of the newsletter, via our Communications Forum. We received a 14 lot of positive feedback from tenants, including comments like, ‘Like content of the newsletter it is easy to read’, and ‘good information, is understandable’. We have a public facing website, available in both Welsh and English. Although this tenant focus group where not major users of the website, we feel it needs further improvements as identified in our communications strategy. “We received a lot of positive feedback from tenants, including comments like, ‘Like content of the newsletter it is easy to read’, and ‘good information, is understandable’.” Following feedback received from the RPF focus group and feedback from tenants who have used the complaints process, we decided to change our complaints policy. We involved staff and tenants in the development of our new policy, adopted by the Board in November 2011, and the adopted policy now meets the ‘Complaints Model Wales’ best practice guidance published by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales in July 2011. We have refined and now provide better communication on our complaints policy and procedure. We are currently putting together a training program for staff, providing guidance in handling and resolving disputes, and are communicating out to tenants and service users in the form of an article in ‘Hometalk’ in December 2011, and the development of a new service leaflet and website section early 2012. We will review the take up and effectiveness of the service in 2012. 3.1 Do we put citizens first? We have also improved our performance in this important area by introducing a dedicated complaints administrator – a single point of contact for tenants and service users to submit a formal complaint. We have published a direct telephone number and e-mail address to ensure a speedy route to the right person. This has assisted our performance by acknowledging complaints within a short timeframe (two days) and meeting our response targets. We have introduced a complaints satisfaction survey to identify how tenants rated their experience of the service, and to identify areas for improvement. We are aiming to improve the response rate by introducing a telephone survey early next year. Progress since January 2012 Listening to our tenants ‘Stepping Out’ Door Knocking Exercise During June, Merthyr Valleys Homes’ staff conducted a door knocking exercise across the Borough, conducting a survey on the doorstep. We visited over 1,100 homes during the week and the survey team included staff from across the organisation (including our Property Services Team), joined by Board members. We purposely sought responses from some of our harder to reach areas of the Borough, where we don’t have a great amount of tenant involvement and/or feedback. The aim of the exercise was to find out what our tenants think of our services, and to find out what tenants think our focus should be for the future. The exercise also provided us with an opportunity to be visible in the communities in which we operate, and to take the opportunity to address ongoing issues that tenants may have. In addition, staff encouraged tenants to complete a tenant profiling questionnaire where we were missing key profile data. This was a postal questionnaire with freepost return. The response received from both tenants and staff was extremely positive. Staff, and in particular back office staff, enjoyed visiting our customers, and the team building between staff from different departments helped to improve working relationships. This exercise allowed staff to focus their attention on issues that are important to tenants. A report entitled “stepping out” was published and the key messages were sent out to tenants in our recent Hometalk newsletter. The key messages were: • tenants are proud of their neighbourhoods and want to keep it peaceful; • tenants want us to complete our WHQS work; and • tenants rate the repairs service provided by MVH as good and enjoy Hometalk, our newsletter. One of the most pleasing aspects of the survey was the very positive messages people had about their communities. Using a statistical package word cloud (this software highlights with larger text the most frequently used expressions) and it gives a very good snapshot of the key tenant issues. The data from “stepping out” informed the Corporate Strategy and helped set many of the targets in this new strategy. 15 3.1 Do we put citizens first? Tenant Participation Impact Report We encourage and support tenant involvement, and the number of tenants becoming involved with us is steadily increasing. We have accurately captured our tenant contribution in the form of our Tenant Participation Impact Report. The aim of the report is to record the difference tenants, 16 leaseholders and residents have made to our services, homes and communities. The report conclusively proves that tenants have been involved not just in the management of their homes, but in everything that we do – from specifying and monitoring improvement and repairs contracts, to the award of grants and sponsorship, to checking services. 3.1 Do we put citizens first? TPAS Cymru Participation Awards In May 2012, Merthyr Valleys Homes won three awards at the TPAS Cymru Awards: The report concludes that the involvement of tenants covers every part of the business. During 2011/12, over 1,400 voluntary hours have been given by tenants and leaseholders. Each opportunity is graded using a ‘Commitment Scale’, according to the amount of time and influence (agreed in conjunction with each of the forums/panels). The report demonstrates that tenants are shaping our services, reviewing our performance and assisting us in developing our plans for the future. TPAS review of MVH’s Local Tenant Participation Strategy The National Tenant Participation Strategy aims to improve theoverall standard of tenant participation in Wales. In order to achieve this, MVH is required to submit a Local Tenant Participation Strategy for assessment by TPAS Cymru as required by the Welsh Government. Overall the strategy has scored well in the assessment, with six areas assessed as being ‘Good’, four areas assessed as ‘Satisfactory’ and only two areas recommended as ‘scope for Improvement’. The conclusion was that ‘the strategy is clear and well structured and is particularly good in its frank analysis and discussion of current activities and improvements needed’. 1. The first award was a ‘third place’ award, and was presented to the Resident Participation Forum for all the work that they have carried out within such a small space of time. The category was ‘Empowering People to Improve Services’ – this award celebrates the benefits of tenant involvement in bringing about improvements in housing services. Projects that empower and involve people to: • influence improvements to landlord services;and • build skills, capacity and knowledge (through training / support). 2. The next winning award was a ‘third place’ award to Merthyr Valleys Homes for all the work that has been carried out with the Residents Participation Forum and by the Tenant Participation Champions. The category was ‘The Roy Parry Mainstreaming Tenant Participation’ Award – this is awarded to a landlord who can evidence that tenant participation is at the heart of their organisation. In this category judges expected to see initiatives which clearly demonstrate progress being made towards mainstreaming tenant participation with staff and / or tenants. 3. The final winning award was a ‘third place’ award to Nancy Little for all of her hard work in carrying out tenant participation over a number of years. The category was ‘Inspirational Colleague’, which is awarded to any member of staff who has demonstrated diligence and dedication to participation values and activities. Nancy was nominated by the tenants themselves which is a fantastic recognition. 17 3.1 Do we put citizens first? Active Learning for Residents We have recently introduced the Chartered Institute for Housing (CIH) ‘Active Learning for Residents’ programme, offering tenants the opportunity to develop their skills, and gain a qualification in a number of key areas. We are currently engaging with four tenants who are active in their communities, and all are studying towards the Level 2 Award in Community Action. The qualification is a vocationally related qualification for the housing sector (equivalent to GCSE level). Learners will have the opportunity to progress on to Level 3 awards in the areas of Governance and Resident Scrutiny if they choose to. Three residents are currently enrolled on the course. A number of staff from across the business (including Senior Managers and Tenant Participation Champions), have been trained up as ‘Recognisers’, providing support to learners for the duration of the programme. Reviewing Communication Methods We are in the process of reviewing the effectiveness of our current communication methods, and whether tenants are interested in other methods of communication, such as texting services, email and social media (Facebook and/or twitter). We are aiming to make it easy for tenants to contact us, using a range of methods, and will look at whether there are additional ways that tenants would like us to use for us to communicate information and advice to them. A section on communication was included in the ‘Stepping Out’ questionnaire, and the feedback gathered will inform what we do in this area. We have expanded our communications in alternative languages out across the 18 “Recently key staff have received some basic language skills training in both Polish and Portuguese.” Borough, targeting Polish, Portuguese and Welsh outlets, and by providing editions of our Hometalk newsletter to tenants who have listed Polish as their preferred first language. We are striving towards further developing our verbal communication skills in order to deal with our tenants as effectively as possible. Recently key staff have received some basic language skills training in both Polish and Portuguese via funded training through a Glamorgan Gates initiative. Complaints Following the development of our new Complaints Policy (approved by Board in November 2011), we have rolled out a training programme for key staff, informing them of the key changes to the policy and making them aware of the complaints process. We have issued staff with the new complaints leaflet and also have issued frontline staff with a complaints card which shows the telephone number and e-mail address for signposting tenants to the dedicated complaints administrator. We have distributed the complaints leaflet in our lettings packs, reception area, sheltered scheme communal areas etc. In addition, we included a detailed article on complaints in the December 2011 version of Hometalk, advising tenants how they can complain, and the process that will be followed. We followed this up with an article in the April 2012 edition of Hometalk, providing tenants with a summary of complaints received during 2011/12. We are reviewing the take up of the complaints process (along with a 3.1 Do we put citizens first? “The focus of these environmental grants will be to improve the look and feel of our neighbourhoods and they are themed around safer, cleaner and greener goals.” Recruitment performance measure) on a quarterly basis, and will be introducing a complaints satisfaction telephone survey in the second quarter of 2013. Community Environmental Programme We have also worked with our Community Environmental Panel and will launch the new £1m community environmental grant programme at the AGM in September. The focus of these environmental grants will be to improve the look and feel of our neighbourhoods and they are themed around safer, cleaner and greener goals. The funding for this programme was identified as part of the stock condition survey and will be used to complete our WHQS environmental commitments. We are allowing tenants to bid and award the key improvements in this important area of expenditure. The Chair of RPF has been instrumental in helping to appoint the new Community Development Officer and the Trainee Tenant Participation Officer, by being involved in shortlisting and interviewing candidates. This year we have been able to extend the number of RPF members that can assist us with recruitment and selection, by providing bespoke training. This helps us to make sure that recruitment and selection processes reflect a tenant’s perspective. Tenant profiling We have continued to obtain profiling information on every tenant to allow us to provide a housing service designed for each tenant. We are currently following up non returned surveys and using telephone interviews to increase the number of returns. We currently have profiled information on 40% of tenants. 19 3.1 Do we put citizens first? Delivery outcome summary GF1 In Place 3 Consulted with all tenants on the capital expenditure in the 2012/13 business plan. 3 Better understanding of our potential and current tenants via Experian and STATUS survey, and by increasing the collection of tenant profiling data via Housing Officers and ‘Stepping Out’ exercise. 3 Conducted the ‘Stepping Out’ exercise asking tenants what they think of our services – reviewing the data collected to inform our business planning processes. 3 Improved tenant consultation and involvement through our Residents Participation Forum. 3 Development a Tenant Participation Impact Report, demonstrating the level of tenant involvement for 2011/12. 3 Increased our range of communication methods, to include an electronic notice board and dedicated e-mail addresses and telephone numbers. 3 Updated our Complaints Policy in line with the Complaints Model Wales. 3 Promoted the Complaints Policy (both internally and externally), and implemented training program on complaints handling for staff within the organisation. 20 3 Introduced the active learning for Residents programme for tenants. 3 Launching our Community Environmental Programme. Putting in Place < Using tenant profiling data to better inform our decision making in order to improve existing services and to identify new services. < Implementing our Welsh Language Scheme. Developing a training program for staff who want to learn to speak Welsh. < Reviewing our external website. < Increasing the number of tenants who are shareholding members, and attending AGM. < Review of our tenant handbook. < Developing a new Tenant Partnership Strategy. To Do 8 Review our Communications Strategy including website and personnal media. 8 Develop a new Tenant Partnership strategy. 3 In our assessment we asked ourselves 3.2 Are we good at governance? In answering this question we have identified that all our board papers and meetings are in the public arena we have changed our Finance Regulations to allow social enterprises to contract easily with us and we already awarded contracts to the Gellideg Foundation Group we have changed our Finance Regulations to allow social enterprises to contract easily with us and we already awarded contracts to the Gellideg Foundation Group we have held open Board meetings throughout the borough we have tracked hate crimes and changed our approach. We have become a hate crime reporting centre, identified hate crime hot spots and placed more resources into tackling hate crime Delivery Outcome GF2 We live public sector values, by conducting our affairs with honesty and integrity, and demonstrate good governance 21 3.2 Are we good at governance? The progress up to January 2012 We are open about what we do as an organisation. Prior to transfer, a number of promises were made to tenants in an offer document – a copy of the promises that were made is available to view on our website. Earlier this year we reviewed our Corporate Plan, setting out six strategic priorities for the next five years. The priorities link into the promises made to tenants prior to transfer. We reviewed the Corporate Plan with our Board, staff and tenants (through original input into the transfer promises), and the Corporate Plan is available to view via our website, and performance against the six strategic priorities is outlined in our 2011 Annual Report. The six strategic priorities are the themes that we work to within the organisation, and all policies, strategies and reports are linked to these themes. We are in the process of reviewing our vision and values for the organisation, and to date have involved the Board (during a Board away day) and staff (during a recent staff away day) in developing them. This will be our focus for 2012. The Board publishes an Annual Report, outlining our annual performance against our key priority areas, information about the Board and our financial accounts. The report is made available for staff, tenants, service users and third parties to view. Feedback received from stakeholders earlier in the year indicated that we were not as open an informing as we could be. As a result, we have embraced the principle of openness, and have introduced an ‘Openness and Sharing Information Policy’. Our ideas, knowledge and information are openly shared, and there are transparent and honest decision making processes. All nonconfidential board agendas, minutes and 22 “We want to be an organisation that recognises that responds appropriately and is accessible to the different needs of all our community.” papers (including supporting documentation) are available to staff and tenants and third parties. We want to be an organisation that recognises that responds appropriately and is accessible to the different needs of all our community. Working with MTCBC, we found that hate crime incidents related to race were being reported, and affecting some of the emerging communities on our estates. We anticipated that with a squeeze on public sector resources, as well as scarcity of housing and proposed changes to welfare benefits, that this could become a significant area of risk. We commissioned an independent assessment of our approach to community cohesion, which was presented to the Board in November 2011. The assessment used interviews and focus groups with involved tenants, partners, board members and front-line staff. It has highlighted a community leadership role for MVH as a landlord, and we are now working to deliver an improvement plan which focuses on promoting fairness and equality both within the organisation and out in communities. This will be a key theme for the refresh of our vision and values. Equality and Diversity training has been provided to Board, staff and tenant panels and forums. Equality Impact Assessment training has been delivered to key members of staff, and we are in the process of conducting impact assessments on all of our 3.1 3.2 Are Do we we put good citizens at governance? first? existing policies and procedures to ensure that we are not unfairly discriminating against any service users. The completion of this work will ensure that we are committed to improving our decision making. We have developed a draft Welsh Language Scheme to ensure that will fulfil our statutory obligations towards engaging with our Welsh tenants who prefer to deal with us through the medium of Welsh. We are currently putting together a training plan for staff who have expressed an interest in learning to speak Welsh, and at our recent staff away day we engaged with ‘Canolfan a Menter Gymraeg Merthyr Tudful’ in providing staff with an overview on promoting the use of Welsh on a community level. We currently offer to translate all corporate documents into Welsh. We have committed to making key documents available in Welsh for those tenants who prefer to use Welsh as their chosen language, and will strive to identify tenants’ chosen first language through on going tenant profiling. “As part of the promises made to tenants, and in line with our ‘Communities’ corporate priority, we are committed to creating opportunities for local people and local businesses.” As part of the promises made to tenants, and in line with our ‘Communities’ corporate priority, we are committed to creating opportunities for local people and local businesses. Our WHQS contractors R&M Williams and Bullock Cymruare utilising local labour in line with the PPC 2000 contracts (with the i 2 i investment requirements on training and local contractors). Although our additional WHQS contractors FHM and Apollo are not contracted using PPC contracts, they have adopted a more proactive response than is required in their contracts. Both have delivered community benefits, providing free local facility improvements. For example, FHM honoured its commitment to the community by installing a new kitchen in a nursery in Aberfan. Both organisations employ a substantial majority of staff from the local area. We are looking to extend this further, and are in discussions with FHM to develop a programme of full time staff and apprentices recruited from the local area. One of the largest local employers in Merthyr Tydfil is Remploy, the UK’s leading employer of disabled people. Remploy have manufactured the majority of the UPVC doors and windows for our WHQS works carried out by our in-house team. We have experienced some quality control issues, but are working closely with the management team at Remploy and are hopeful that our investment of £1.3m in UPVC works over the next two years will be spent with Remploy. Over the past year we have offered placements for unemployed people through the Future Jobs Fund (FJF) scheme. We have offered both fixed term contracts and permanent positions to four former FJF staff members. The FJF programme has come to a close, however, we are continuing to support young people in the area, and are currently offering a number of work experience placements for college students. We also run an apprentice program, and currently have seven apprentices. We are further maximising our corporate social opportunities by linking with a number of organisations. We have grant and sponsorship schemes, and have supported a number of local organisations. Year to date we 23 3.2 Are we good at governance? have awarded more than £22,000 in grants and sponsorship to 18 organisations. We are in the process of establishing a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) database, and are holding an event in January (in conjunction with Voluntary Action Merthyr Tydfil) to promote our grant and sponsorship schemes, and to launch our ‘Time to Help’ scheme. The aim of the scheme is to provide one-off project support in staff time to groups. We have a number of highly skilled staff in a number of key business areas that could provide guidance and support, for example, in terms of HR, ICT or communications support. In addition, staff that have vocational qualifications, such as coaching or youth work, could also provide assistance. take up, we target a floating surgery service based on data about arrears and the profile of our tenants, but also offer an appointment service based in the advisor’s offices, and a drop in service in our office. From the data we have about the service, we know that more than 60% of the tenants we refer to the service attend their appointment. We have also committed a significant level of investment to Moneyline Cymru to enable them to open a shop in Merthyr Tydfil – which will serve the Borough and other deprived areas in South Wales. We recognise that we have a duty to assist our tenants in maximising their income and supporting value for money initiatives within the community and have employed a dedicated Income Maximisation Officer. As a result we have drafted a Financial Inclusion Strategy. The original aim of the strategy has shifted in conjunction with the introduction of the welfare reform bill. The strategy will aim to implement actions to enable tenants to be able to understand, prepare and respond to the proposed changes. We have provided awareness training to all of our staff and stakeholders in all areas relating to Welfare Reform. Vision / Corporate Strategy We have a central role by proactively assisting tenants by informing them early of any arrears and signposting them to financial and benefits advice. We have also secured low cost insurance options and provide tenants with a MVH budget planner and regular money saving tips. We actively support the referral to and use a number of debt advisory bodies, the main providers being a local credit union and the Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB). To try to maximise 24 Progress since January 2012 Following Board and Staff away days last autumn, the organisation agreed that a fresh new vision was needed, and that our corporate strategy should be revised. The start of this process was the self assessment in December 2011 and the budget setting against a series of corporate priorities. The new Corporate Strategy has now been approved and is published along with this self assessment. The new strategy is based around three themes and a number of strategic goals: Live with us Work with us Improve with us Linked to each of these are a series of strong statements setting out very clearly what we want to do and what Merthyr Valleys Homes believes in. The statements have been influenced by stepping out, by previous reports and statements of the Board, issues and statements identified at the away days and existing values that already underpin the organisation. The 3.1 3.2 Are Do we we put good citizens at governance? first? Corporate Strategy links to the ambitions in the Housing White Paper Homes for Wales and has been shared by our local Council and contains a number of targets and goals. However the strategy recognises that we are working in new economic times and that the Welfare Benefit Reforms proposed by the UK Government will change the communities we work with beyond recognition. Our work on income recovery and ameliorating the impact of welfare benefit reform will be our biggest priority in the next few years. Equality and Diversity Working in conjunction with MTCBC, we found that hate crime incidents related to race were being reported and affecting some of the communities on our estates. Board members, staff, and some key stakeholders have been working with Harris Beider, a Professor of Community Cohesion, to develop and implement an improvement plan. A working group, with representation from Board, the Resident Participation Forum and staff, has been established to deliver the improvement plan. To date, we have: • signed up to become a third party reporting centre for hate crime. We will be working with community groups and networks to publicise this; existing social enterprises in the Borough, in order to achieve our corporate social responsibilities and to achieve maximum economic benefit. We now have a new strategy and financial standing orders to support existing social enterprises. The first example of this has been the awarding of a new style of grounds maintenance contract to the Gellideg Foundation Group. We have set ambitious targets for working with other local social enterprises over the next three years. We are continuing to support local organisations through our Grant and Sponsorship schemes. During 2011/12, we awarded over £40,000 in grants and sponsorship to local organisations working in the Borough. We are continuing to support young people in the area by offering work experience placements for college students. In addition, we are looking at ways in which we can support the ‘Jobs Growth Wales’ scheme by offering employment experience opportunities. Board development We have continued the governance project to increase the capacity of the Board. An external financial consultant has delivered a range of training courses to the Board, Audit Committee and staff. These are as follows: • arranged monthly housing advice sessions with the Polish communities; and • budget setting; • we are in the process of delivering ‘development sessions’ for our staff. • fraud and bribery; and Strengthening the economic base in our communities As part of the promises made to tenants at point of transfer, we are committed to creating opportunities for local people and local businesses. We are looking to work with • role of the Audit Committee; • financial regulations and contract standing orders. In addition the Board have been keen to strengthen its financial capacity further and have recruited an accountant to join the Board. As part of the more intensive scrutiny of expenditure the Audit Committee reviewed in detail the final accounts. 25 3.2 Are we good at governance? Delivery outcome summary GF2 In Place Putting in Place 3 We have a new Corporate Strategy, which has been informed by tenants < Implementing our Welsh Language Scheme, and developing a training program for staff. 3 We publish balanced information about the organisation. 3 We have embraced the principle of ‘openness’ and have implemented an ‘Openness and Sharing Information Policy’. 3 We are working towards improving the economic, social and environmental circumstances in the local community through various means. 3 Our principle contractors are committed to creating opportunities for local people and local businesses. 3 We have a better understanding of diversity and equality. 3 Developing our Financial Inclusion Strategy to reflect the Welfare Reform Bill. 26 < An approach to equality and diversity that is focused on service delivery and fairness. < Developing our ‘Time to Help’ scheme in order to assist local groups in key business and vocational areas. < Adopt the Value Wales Community benefit calculator in order to capture the community benefit delivered by our contractors. To Do 8 Improve our website in order to improve how we publish information about the organisation. 3.1 3 InDo ourwe assessment put citizens wefirst? asked ourselves 3.3 Do we have clear plans and do we deliver them? In answering this question we have identified that we have a new Corporate Strategy sets clear goals and ambitions for MVH and is supported by the Board and the staff the Board and elected tenants have collaborated on setting capital budgets our budget has shifted over £1m of expenditure from central services to front line tenant services we have improved our management of risk and finance with board member training and have recruited an accountant and solicitor to join our Board Delivery Outcome GF3 We make sure our purpose is clear and we achieve what we set out to do – knowing who does what and why 27 3.3 Do we have clear plans and do we deliver them? The progress up to January 2012 MVH is an independent Registered Social Landlord (RSL), a Large Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) organisation registered as an Industrial & Provident Society with charitable status. The Board composition is an equal representation of tenants, local authority and independent members. Currently, we have 12 Board members, with three co-optees. At the end of 2010, we had an externally facilitated governance review. This led to an action plan that has been overseen by our Governance Working Group – a task and finish group (consisting of Board members and key officers) established by the Board to take forward the governance issues arising directly and indirectly from the review.. The group has reviewed the Board’s Terms of Reference and Code of Conduct, ensuring that the Board are clear about their role and responsibilities. A number of policies have and introduced and others have been updated to strengthen our governance framework. All of our policies have been developed in line with Community Housing Cymru’s ‘Charter for Good Governance’ and National Housing Federation models for best practice. We have engaged with an external consultant to assist in us reviewing our financial management framework including our Financial Regulations, Contract Standing Orders and Treasury Management Policies. We are in the process of developing a user guide to the updated financial framework/standing orders, and training will be rolled out to staff in 2012. We have reviewed our Board recruitment processes in order to ensure that our Board reflects the community in which we operate, and to facilitate a skills based selection process for Board membership. As a result, 28 “The Board have identified training and development needs, and this will inform the Board training and development plan for the next year.” we have recruited new members that have the necessary skills and experience that we require. We have introduced a formal induction process to ensure a consistent approach. A competency framework has been developed to provide the Board with a tool to help them ensure that they have, between them, the right skills and expertise to effectively lead the organisation. At our externally facilitated Board away day in September, Board members reviewed the effectiveness of the Board and the organisation against our business priorities. The Board have identified training and development needs, and this will inform the Board training and development plan for the next year. In 2012 we will use the 'Excellence in Governance’ compliance checklist to carry 3.3 Do we put havecitizens clear plans 3.1 first?and do we deliver them? out a further assessment of our governance arrangements in 2012. Merthyr Valleys Homes has a vision and set of values that were determined prior to transfer. Following the governance review, the Board have decided to review and consult on a new overall message, moving towards a more Merthyr appropriate value statement. This is an objective for 2012. However the proposed new vision will sit over the current corporate plan strategic priorities of Finance; People; Deliver; Tenants; Homes and Communities - as detailed in our message house. Fairness, equality and diversity will be the themes which underpin our priorities. We are committed to being an open, transparent and accountable organisation in the way we operate our business. In June we introduced an ‘Openness and Sharing Information Policy’ - our meetings are open to staff and the public (with the exception of confidential matters), and meeting agendas, minutes and reports are available to view. The benefit of this is that the organisation is making future decisions in an open environment and we can be questioned about our decisions. This has been further developed by holding Board meetings in venues throughout the Borough to encourage tenants to attend. We are currently working to develop our tenant scrutiny function. We have attended TPAS events to learn about best practice in this respect. We see this as being critical to providing constructive challenge to the way we do things, and a key element of our performance management framework. Although this is still developing, a number of tenant scrutiny mechanisms already exist, such as mystery shoppers and tenant inquirers, but the scrutiny function will be key to pulling all of that work together across the organisation. “We are committed to being open, transparent and accountable organisation in the way we operate our business.” Board reviews performance in relation to service delivery and financial performance on a quarterly basis. We have a rolling programme of Board agenda items, and this has been developed to include regular updates and reviews of our planning framework. Earlier in the year, we reviewed our Key Performance Indicator (KPI) reporting system, in response to a Board request for core service indicators to be reviewed and data to be presented in a more accessible way. Our performance reports use the ‘Red, Amber, Green’ (RAG) system, along with a trend indicator and commentary. As a result, Board members can better monitor and challenge the organisations’ performance. Linked to this performance agenda we have staff one to ones and appraisals are linked back to our key priorities, via departmental and individual objectives. We have recently reviewed our organisational structure to ensure that we have the right arrangements in place in order to deliver our objectives. For example, the Housing Directorate has been restructured to allow stronger joint working on financial inclusion between the area housing and income teams, supported by revised job descriptions. In assets we reduced the client contractor dual operation but have strengthened the financial knowledge of cost of operation with the PST team now having a trading account. We are actively involving our staff in planning and development activities. At our staff away 29 3.3 Do we have clear plans and do we deliver them? day in October, we held a session ‘How Good Are We?’ where we asked staff to vote as to how they think we are performing in key areas of the business. The results were compared to performance data, and tenants’ feedback. Following this session, we held a number of staff focus groups to explore our performance further, reviewing and actively seeking suggestions as to how we can improve. This feedback will assist us in developing our priorities Progress since January 2012 Changes to the Board The Board composition is an equal representation of tenants, local authority and independent members. At the 1 September we have 11 Board members plus two cooptees, and we have until the AGM one tenant Board member vacancy, The Board appointed Nicola Evans in March 2012 as an independent member to fill a mid-term vacancy. Nicola applied for an independent position in 2011, and although not successful at that time, was co-opted to sit on our Policy Committee as a form of succession planning – this has proved to be extremely effective. Following the local elections in May 2012, Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (MTCBC) appointed two new Councillors to sit on our Board. Following discussions between our Chief Executive and MTCBC regarding continuity, skills and experience, we retained two Local Authority nominated Councillors, and retained a former tenant Board co-opted member, who was elected as a Councillor. This demonstrates the positive relationship between MVH and MTCBC. 30 “We are continuing to develop our tenant scrutiny function.” Governance The Governance Working Group is a task and finish group originally established by the Board to oversee the actions arising out of the externally facilitated governance review in 2010/11. A number of policies and governance documents have been introduced / reviewed in recent months in order to strengthen and continuously improve our governance framework. We have also reviewed our financial management framework. We updated our budget setting processes, and provided staff with training as appropriate. A number of staff from our Staff Consultative Group were involved in the ‘Star Chamber’ budget setting process, providing an independent viewpoint and assisted in the decision making process. We have re-written our Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders, and are in the process of reviewing existing / developing new financial policies over the next few months, including Treasury Management and Fraud and Bribery. Tenant Scrutiny We are continuing to develop our tenant scrutiny function. In addition to mystery shoppers and tenant enquirers, it has been agreed that the members of the Resident Participation Forum (RPF) will carry out a scrutiny function – this has been written into the RPF Terms of Reference. In March 2012 we held a training session ‘Introduction to Performance Information’ which was facilitated by TPAS. During 2012, the RPF will start with the scrutiny of performance information. 3.3 Do we put havecitizens clear plans 3.1 first?and do we deliver them? Delivery outcome summary GF3 In Place 3 We have addressed the actions identified during the externally facilitated governance review. 3 Internal assessment of our governance arrangements. 3 We have reviewed our organisational structure to ensure that we have the right arrangements in place in order to deliver our objectives. 3 We have introduced an ‘Openness and Sharing Information’ policy, and hold open Board meetings. 3 We have reviewed our Key Performance Indicators (KPI) reporting system to include a RAG system, a trend indicator and commentary. 3 Reviewed our vision and values • Reviewed our financial management framework with an associated training program for staff. • Developed a Board training and development plan. Putting in Place < Working to develop our tenant scrutiny function. To Do 8 Review the model rules to ensure they meet changing needs of organisations. 31 3.4 Are we financially sound? 3.4 Are we financially sound? In answering this question we have identified that we have a fully funded business approved by our lenders there is greater financial control at all levels of the organisation we have used our management of risk to change the provisions for bad debts in our new business plan as a result of welfare benefit reform we managed our capital programme very tightly and used the maximum amount of resources available in funders covenants meaning more properties were improved than ever before Delivery Outcome GF4 32 We are a financially sound and viable business our business plan includes over £23m of additional responsive repair expenditure to meet this key tenant expectations 3.4 Are we put financially 3.1 Do we citizenssound? first? The progress up to January 2012 We have a fully funded 30 year Financial Business Plan, backed by our funders (RBS and Principality) -this was a pre-requisite for the transfer to proceed in March 2009. The financial business plan was approved by and signed off by the Board, in the presence of the funding advisers in March 2009, prior to the transfer proceeding. To complement this, in accordance with the requirements of the funding agreement, MVH entered into three forward fix rate loan agreements on the day of transfer, to effectively control future mortgage costs within budget. MVH secured a maximum loan facility of £40million, together with the Welsh Government (WG) dowry amounting to £87million, spread over the 28 year term. The WG have committed a five year dowry payment to MVH, beyond which it will be subject to review and completion of our business plan achievements, notably the completion of the WHQS programme. “We acknowledge that we were slow to recognise that the early WHQS programme was not being spent according to the projected profile.” We acknowledge that we were slow to recognise that the early WHQS programme was not being spent according to the projected profile. We have developed, and are further refining, monitoring and reporting mechanisms to ensure that any deviation from the profile can be quickly identified and remedied. We have taken steps to catch up with our expenditure profile, by bringing in new contractors for some works, and switching other works to be done by our direct labour force. In both 2009/10 and 2010/11 spending on the WHQS programme fell behind the assumptions in the original business plan and we have revised our 30 year Financial Business Plan accordingly to reflect this and the additional spend required to catch up the programme. The 2011/12 Business Plan has been reconciled back to the Transfer Plan and steps have been taken to bring it back into line with what was originally anticipated for example, reductions in the establishment with fixed term contract posts ceasing and savings in running costs agreed by the Board. These actions have created headroom in the Business Plan thus enabling increased budgets for Responsive and Void repairs in future years, creating a more sustainable Property Services Team. The revised plan was approved by our Board in June 2011 and received funders’ approval in September 2011. Revised loan covenants have been issued by our lenders based on the new Financial Business Plan. A new Stock Condition Survey by Savills is in line with the 2011/12 Business Plan assumptions. We have also engaged with an external consultant to assist in us reviewing our financial management framework including our Financial Regulations, Contract Standing Orders and Treasury Management Policy. A revised Treasury Management Policy will give more flexibility to the organisation whilst being mindful of risk. A recent investment strategy has secured an additional £41k for MVH in 2011/12 We are in the process of developing a user 33 3.4 Are we financially sound? guide to the updated financial framework/standing orders, and training will be rolled out to key staff in quarter 4 of 2011/12. This will ensure that staff are aware of the financial regulations of the organisation. We have strengthened the annual budget setting process over the financial year by providing budget training and monthly one to one budget review meetings for budget holders. The regular review meetings have led to greater control of over and under spend, and budget holders have the opportunity to identify issues with their respective budget areas. The revised budget proforma (one budget = one expense code) will enable managers to set budgets more easily. Growth and savings are easily identifiable as is the overall impact on the bottom line. All budget requests will be signed off by the relevant Director. This new approach will lend itself to the creation of a budget book.The introduction of a budget virement procedure allows recycling of under spent budgets, leading to more accurate financial re-forecasting. The quarterly management accounts format was reviewed in the last financial year in response to the Board’s desire to receive a more strategic overview of business developments and this now means the Board now have real financial control. The format has been further improved, by providing a tabulated report with supporting details in the appendices. This has resulted in a simpler, reader friendly, high level report. Following feedback from Board members, more focus has been placed on WHQS performance and cost, with detailed narrative to support the reports. This programme is monitored monthly on performance and quarterly on costs and cash flow. Cash flow forecasts are now 34 provided by the cost consultants and are used on year end forecasts and treasury management. This has enabled Board to decide priorities of capital spending,for example postponing some work at St Tydfil’s Court in favour of progressing with the WHQS programme, introducing more flexibility into the programme of work. “Following feedback from Board members, more focus has been placed on WHQS performance and cost, with detailed narrative to support the reports.” In November 2011 a trading account for the Property Services Team was presented to Board. This shows the value of works done by the department compared to the costs to run the department. This report will be submitted to Board on a quarterly basis. Further work will be carried out on this as the year progresses. 3.4 Are we put financially 3.1 Do we citizenssound? first? The Audit Committee is meeting quarterly and has good attendance basis. This Committee is responsible for receiving and considering external and internal audit reports, and for reviewing risk for the organisation. The Audit Committee have met with the external auditors without the Executive Management Team in order to ensure that the Audit Committee and the auditors can be open and honest with each other and not overly influenced by the Executive Management Team. The Audit Committee are actively reviewing internal audit reports and recommendations, and are working with the Executive Management Team to ensure that corrective measures are taken and effective controls are in place. Audit Committee review the annual Internal Audit Plan at each meeting to monitor progress. Audit Committee training has been offered to all Board members and the majority undertook the training. This has had a noticable effect on the level of questions now being asked at meetings. Outstanding internal audit recommendations have been monitored since March 2011. Since introducing a simple monitoring process the number of overdue recommendations has halved from 36% to 18%. Managers are now setting realistic timescales and the influence of reporting to the Audit Committee has raised the importance of implementation. Audit Committee now play an active role in monitoring risk by reviewing MVH’s overarching risk map on a quarterly basis and commending it to the Board for discussion bi-annually. The Internal Audit Service is now led by MVH. We review the plan proposed by Orbit and decide which areas of work require auditing, adding or reducing days and areas of work. Instead of auditing areas of strength we have switched resources to areas of “The Executive Management Team score the over-arching risks and Audit Committee monitor the over-arching risk map and make recommendations to Board bi-annually.” concern, for example moving audit time from participation and estate management to health and safety compliance. In line with our Risk Management Policy, we have developed departmental risk maps, which feed into an overarching risk map for the organisation. The Executive Management Team score the over-arching risks and Audit Committee monitor the over-arching risk map and make recommendations to Board biannually. Risk management needs further embedding in the organisation but this is proposed to be done through Directorate meetings and the Health and Safety Committee. At our July 2011 Board meeting, our Board and Residents Participation Forum took part in a joint presentation and discussion about the new rent policy consultation. The report included options we may consider and the effect on our future rental income and the effects of the policy on the Business Plan in the future.This consultation exercise proved invaluable as we identified how tenants felt about the proposal and formed the basis of our response to the Welsh Government on the new policy as well as generating a letter from the tenants direct to the First Minister. The outcome for the risk map was a reduction in the risk score for this area since a subsequent annoucement has delayed the implementation following response from organisations and tenants. 35 3.4 Are we financially sound? Following on from the formulation of a Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) for ICT services, with the assistance of an external consultant, we have developed and tested a Business Continuity Plan for the organisation. We have identified the critical functions within the business, assessed the associated risks and formulated a business recovery team to ensure that, should a major incident occur, we can maintain and deliver the critical services that we provide to our customers. This has been tested both theoretically and “for real” when the water supply was shut off for the day. Both tests proved that the DRP works. We have a comprehensive insurance programme in place to cover all of our business activities. We are currently working in conjunction with our insurance broker (Acumus) to strengthen our insurance policies and procedures in order to minimise risk. We have employed a dedicated insurance administrator, so we have a central point for dealing with insurance cases in the organsiation. This has resulted in a more timely response in reporting and dealing with claims, and provides tenants and third parties with a central point of contact. We are paying particular attention to further developing two key areas with regards to insurance - fleet management and slips, trips and falls, in order to minimise risk to the business, and in turn, reduce our insurance premiums. An example of this is our approach to driver risk in our fleet of vehicles and all drivers are due to undertake on-line risk assessments. Improvements in the internal processing of insurance claims have started to identify the true costs to the organisation, and significantly increased the value of claims. This will make us more aware of the impact of incidents and enable us to consider our “risk appetite” with excess levels. 36 Progress since January 2012 Business Plan A revised business plan including an additional £3m investment in our non traditional properties has been agreed with our Funders. This business plan is prudent, with an increased provision for voids and bad debts. Delivering Services within Budget Service expenditure was monitored throughout the year by the Board. We maximised the cash available to us during the year, within £16,000 of a deficit cash flow covenant of £9.631m. The Statutory accounts for 2011/12 have been audited and signed off by the Board. The auditors issued an unqualified audit opinion and all covenants were complied with. Financial Management Framework We are continuing to work with an external consultant in reviewing and updating our financial management framework. We have recently revised our Financial Regulations, Contract Standing Orders and Treasury Management Policy and Strategy. This has resulted in more flexibility, whilst being mindful of risk. Training on the changes to the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders has been provided to the Senior Management Team and Executive Management Team with further training for key staff planned for October 2012. This will ensure that our tenants’ money is being spent appropriately and with probity. To further strengthen the framework a considerable amount of time has been spent developing a range of fraud related policies 3.4 Are we put financially 3.1 Do we citizenssound? first? including Bribery (which includes Gifts and Hospitality) and Money Laundering. This work has been reviewed by our internal auditors and recommendations incorporated into the final approved versions. Many other policies are cross referenced to ensure that our staff act in the appropriate manner and are aware of different types of fraud to escalate potential breaches. The financial stewardship of tenants’ monies is of paramount importance to us. Service Matters (Orbit Group) to carry out some fundamental reviews in the intervening period between the expiration of their contract and the new service commencing. This will put us in a good position to begin with the internal audit service. The audits conducted between April and October 2012 have been:- We have appointed an external provider ‘Sector’ to provide MVH with on-going advice and support on our treasury operations. Sector have recently carried out a review of MVH’s loan facility and fixed rate agreements to provide advice on how best for the organisation to proceed. Their recommendations were that the current loan facility should be retained and the fixed rate agreements should be reviewed periodically to ensure that they remain suitable for MVH. This has given the Board comfort. Sector will provide advice and support for a 3 year period. • Creditors Audit - Green Audit Committee / Internal Audit The Audit Committee are continuing to meet on a quarterly basis. Recently, the Audit Committee Terms of Reference have been reviewed, clearly detailing the authority given to the Audit Committee by the Board, and the parameters within which it shall operate. The terms of reference will allow the members of the Audit Committee to better understand its functions and their responsibilities. Merthyr Valleys Homes are partnering with three other LSVTs in order to provide our own internal audit services. This is due to be set up in October 2012. The aim is that we will have a service that is better value for money, and will be sharing best practice between the partnering organisations. We have used our former Internal Auditors - • Sinking Fund Review - Amber • Anti-Fraud - Amber • Payroll Audit – Green • Land Audit - Amber Whilst there is no direct benefit to tenants from this, the Audit Committee contains 2 Tenant Board members who can review the audits; meet with the auditors (both internal and external) independently and monitor the implementation of recommendations as well as influence the audit work plan. The indirect benefit to tenants is the scrutiny function that this committee carries out on the internal controls of the organisation. Employment Tax and VAT Health check We appointed KPMG to carry out both health checks. The Employment Tax health check went well and has identified areas where we should strengthen some internal controls but reassured us that our core processes are sound. The VAT health check was commissioned to ensure that we are maximising our VAT recovery. It revealed that we were operating our system of recovery well. The outcome of both of these reviews means that tenants’ money is being protected through minimising risk of fines and maximising income. MVH is focussing on continuous improvement in the way we run our services. 37 3.4 Are we financially sound? Insurance We are continuing to work with our insurance provider Acumus to strengthen our insurance processes in order to minimise risk and reduce costs. Both the number of claims and associated values have reduced year on year (as indicated in the table below). This is very positive for MVH and has contributed to the modest increase in premium costs for 2012/13. Insurance Type Number of Claims 2010/11 Number of Claims 2011/12 Value of Claims 2010/11 Value of Claims 2011/12 Increase/ (Decrease) 21 44 £175,449 £109,884 (£65,565) Combined Liability 3 1 £30,519 0 (£30,519) Personal Accident 0 0 0 0 0 Motor 9 3 £46,982 £10,575 (£36,407) 33 48 £252,950 £120,459 (£132,491) Property Stock TOTAL Our agreement with Acumus ceases in March 2013, and the service needs to be re-tendered during 2012/13. Board have approved the use of external advisors to conduct the OJEU tendering process on our behalf, and to act as independent advisors for a three year period thereafter. This will assist us in achieving value for money, and will allow us to improve our insurance arrangements through added value for our tenants which will be a requirement of the tender. 38 3.4 Are we put financially 3.1 Do we citizenssound? first? Delivery outcome summary GF4 In Place Putting in Place 3 Revised 30 year Financial Business Plan and loan covenants, including scenario planning approved by Board and backed by our funders. 3 Dowry gap funding – 5 year payment guarantee from point of transfer. 3 Revised Quarterly Management Accounts reports focussing on strategic overview of business developments and particularly capital expenditure and monitoring. 3 Improved annual budget setting procedures. 3 External auditor approved our Financial Statements. 3 We are leading our Internal Audit programme focusing on the areas the business feels should be prioritised. 3 Disaster recovery plan in place for the organisation. 3 Comprehensive tailored insurance programme in order to cover all aspects of the business. 3 Property Services Team trading account to monitor performance presented to Board. 3 Separate Capital Programme reports whenever a Board decision is required to alter the works programme. 3 Create a budget book for 2012/13. 3 Driver risk assessments. 3 Updated financial management framework and policies. < Embedding risk management in the organisation through Directorate meetings and the Health and Safety Committee. To Do 8 Monitor and report productivity increases and efficiency gains secured within the Property Services Team. 8 Value for money monitoring and performance. Establish budget review committee to manage budget changes from October 2013 after first six months of benefit reform becomes apparent. 39 3 In our assessment we asked ourselves 3.5 Do we work with others to improve our community? In answering this question we have identified that We have adjusted our Tenancy Conditions to tackle the problem of unlicensed motor bikes following a joint operation with the police We gave over £40,000 in grants and sponsor ship to community we have funded Moneyline Cymru to open in Merthyr town centre We’ve been working closely and successfully with the police to tackle the theft of metal from properties worked closely with the council to house and support vulnerable people improved fire safety in the award winning Forsythia Youth Project we have financially supported key financial advice organisations CAB Merthyr and Credit Action we have awarded new social enterprises contracts for grounds maintenance Delivery Outcome GF5 40 We engage with others to enhance and maximise outcomes for our service users and the community 3.5 Do we we put work with others 3.1 Do citizens first?to improve our community? The progress up to January 2012 We have established a number of successful partnerships with organisations in order to achieve our objectives. We support the Local Authority in the delivery of its strategic housing role, and as identified below, we attend a range of forums and partnerships, including the Local Services Board, and we will be attending the new strategic housing forum following the Council’s restructure of its partnership arrangements. We participate in the Borough’s Common Housing Register (CHR), which is governed by a common allocations policy. This means that new and existing tenants are able to apply for a home owned by, or receive housing advice from, any of the participating partners in the Borough – and so have to only make one application or approach regardless of the housing provider. All applications are assessed on the same basis and this partnership approach provides consistency for people in housing need. The CHR also gives an indication of housing need, which in conjunction with the Local Housing Market Assessment enables the Local Authority to strategically plan for future housing provision. We are contributing to the Council’s review of its allocations policy. In response to feedback from new and existing tenants, and Board members, that the Borough-wide choice based lettings scheme is sometimes hard to understand, we have worked to promote a better understanding of the scheme to benefit the Borough. Examples include developing an editorial for the local media, training session for Board members, and more recently, we have held outreach surgeries with young people and with the Polish community to ensure that people understand the scheme and how to access it. We are active members of the Managing Access to Adapted and Supported Housing scheme (MAASH), which was developed by MTCBC and a range of other housing providers and support agencies. The aim of the scheme is to facilitate effective partnership working across the Borough, to ensure the needs of the most vulnerable members of our community are met effectively and efficiently, enabling them to access housing and support services that adequately meet their needs. This scheme not only aims to ensure that adapted properties are utilised to the best effect, but also ensures that we receive referrals that are most suited to the service we provide, and that schemes are used to their maximum capacity. The outcome for tenants and prospective tenants is that better use is made of existing adaptations within general needs housing stock, and that tenants who need support to sustain their tenancy receive it in a co-ordinated and timely way. We assist the Local Authority to meet its statutory homeless duty through the direct provision of accommodation Last year we increased our provision of temporary accommodation in to nine units, which assisted the Local Authority to meet the relevant target in its Housing Strategy Action Plan. This year we have secured additional revenue grant funding for the remainder of the financial year from the Council to increase the amount of hours of housing related support we provide to tenants of temporary accommodation. Part of the successful bid for this was being able to demonstrate tangible improvements in the quality of life of service users – please see case studies1 and 2. 41 3.5 Do we work with others to improve our community? We are members of the Community Safety Partnership. The partnership meets regularly, with the aim of reducing Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) within Merthyr Tydfil. One of the benefits of the partnership approach is that complaints are dealt with in a consistent and structured way, with support from specialist agencies where it is needed. For example, decisions on remedies for complex or serious cases are made by an ASB Working Group – which ensures that local intelligence and expertise is used effectively. Through partnership working we have been able to make use of remedies such as Anti Social Behaviour Orders and injunctions. Merthyr Valleys Homes has been recognised by the Welsh Government as meeting the Wales Housing Management Standard for Anti Social Behaviour. In doing so we have made a visible commitment to tenants, service users and other parties to do all we reasonably can to provide excellent services to tackle anti-social behaviour through our housing management and community roles. So far in 2011/12 we have successfully applied for eight injunctions, one suspended possession order and secured two court undertakings in serious ASB cases. But we also take action where we can to support tenancies, and take enforcement action to tackle smaller issues, such as untidy gardens, because we know that this reduces the attractiveness of schemes and estates for other residents. We have also worked closely and successfully with the Police to secure a conviction, through surveillance provided by us, following a number of thefts from empty properties. Improved security and publicity about the case means we have not had any further thefts or attempted thefts from empty properties. The eventual prosecution included custodial sentences and a Criminal 42 “Merthyr Valleys Homes has been recognised by the Welsh Government as meeting the Wales Housing Management Standard for Anti Social Behaviour.” ASB Order baring the perpetrators from entering any of our homes. We are involved in a range of other partnerships within the Borough which include the Multi Agency Diversity Forum (MADF), including a sub-group where we task and review housing actions in the Borough’s Community Cohesion Strategy and Action Plan, the Heads of the Valleys Third Sector Contact Group, Voluntary Action Merthyr Tydfil Health and Social Care Forum and the Multi-Agency Play Strategy Group. All of these partnerships and groups contribute to both MTCBC’s and MVH’s strategic aims for the Borough’s residents. We also support a number of community based enterprises, for example, through the provision of premises for peppercorn rents, as we recognise the value that these organizations bring to our estates and communities. A positive example is the Forsythia Youth Project, which supports young people, and the Gellideg Foundation, which is working to socially and economically regenerate one of the most deprived estates in the Borough. We are active members of the Merthyr Tydfil Financial Inclusion Forum, which aims to reduce financial exclusion levels in Merthyr Tydfil. We have developed a draft Financial Inclusion Strategy and action plan with the aim being to assist our tenants in managing their money effectively and securely. This is very important to us given the demographics 3.5 Do Do we we put work with others 3.1 citizens first?to improve our community? of the Borough, and the real and increasing pressures on our tenants and their ability to sustain their tenancies. By working towards achieving the Welsh Housing Quality Standard (WHQS) we are ensuring the future provision of quality homes within the Borough. We have developed a planned improvement programme to carry out these works and our tenant led Quality and Design Forum was involved with the appointment of contractors as part of this programme. We support improvement in the housing sector and participate in conferences and seminars, we have joined the Chartered Institute in Housing (CIH) in Ireland for discussions on regulation in that country and we have provided speakers at a number of HouseMark events on good practice. We are active participants in CIH Cymru, Community Housing Cymru (CHC) and we have representatives on both CIH and CHC’s management boards. We are members of procurement consortiums (for example, Procurement for Housing, City West) with framework agreements for procurement of goods and services. The benefit of this is that the framework agreements bear the contract risk, and are competitively priced, which means that we can stretch our resources to deliver more for our tenants. Progress since January 2012 Creating safe communities The management of safe communities remains a tenant priority. We have continued to work closely with the police and PCSO surgeries take place each week in our office. We hold detailed case conferences with “Our housing team were found to be experienced, with an in-depth knowledge of the communities in which they operate.” partners in the police on complex cases and we have achieved the Wales Housing Management Standard for Anti Social Behaviour. To ensure that we continue to provide an excellent service, an independent desktop review was commissioned, and undertaken by CIH in May 2012. The conclusion was that we deal with ASB very well, and have adopted a victim centred approach. Supporting victims and witnesses is a particular strength for MVH and housing officers understand that this is a priority early staff intervention has avoided case escalation. Our housing team were found to be experienced, with an in-depth knowledge of the communities in which they operate. In addition, the report concluded that we demonstrate good partnership working with other agencies. 43 3.5 Do we work with others to improve our community? Delivery outcome summary GF5 In Place Putting in Place 3 We have established a number of successful partnerships with organisations. < We are continuing our financial inclusion work in order to assist our tenants in managing their money effectively and securely. 3 Promoted a better understanding of the choice based lettings scheme. 3 We have secured additional revenue grant funding to increase our housing related support. 3 Meeting the Wales Housing Management Standard for Anti Social Behaviour. 3 Supporting local community based enterprises. 44 To Do 8 Create neighbour management plans. 3.1 3.6 Do Do we we put improve citizens homes first?to a high standard? 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? In answering this question we have identified that consulted all tenants on the spending priorities in the plan and moved over £3m into energy efficiency measures we have a comprehensive stock condition survey a WHQS standard that has been set with tenants identified resources in our business plan to find long term solutions to problems associated with non traditional properties an on target programme to meet WHQS sufficient resources in our business plan to meet all future and back log repair requirements we have created a £1.1m programme of tenant led community improvement programme Delivery Outcome LS1 We build and renovate homes to a good quality 45 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? The progress up to January 2012 Building new homes is not a business priority for us at the moment. We are however working the council to identify land in our ownership that could be used to support the councils’ affordable housing programme. An Asset Management Strategy is being developed that will set out our long term investment plans, look at the best use of our assets including land and identify properties for refurbishment or replacement. We are now well on our way to providing good quality homes and Savills have confirmed that by the year end 63% of properties will meet the Welsh Housing Quality Standard (WHQS) and we have the resources and plans to deliver the remain 47% by our 2014 target date. The capital programme for 2010/11 was under spent by £4.915m or nearly 50% and this followed the poor performance in 2009 when nearly 70% of the programme was under spent. Despite the poor performance overall there were a few areas that need highlighting. The performance on gas boiler and central heating upgrades was good and this was delivered through our own workforce that achieved high satisfaction levels, local employment targets as all the staff are from the local area and included the recruitment of an apprentice. The external insulation programme carried out in conjunction with British Gas at Mandeg, Trelewis was an award winner at the Welsh Housing Awards and it provided huge benefits to tenants, the local community and the environment. During the year we successfully drew down £1m from the Heads of the Valleys ARBED fund. In anticipation of the poor year end 46 “Savills have confirmed that by the year end 63% of properties will meet the Welsh Housing Quality Standard (WHQS)” performance Merthyr Valleys Homes let two more additional kitchen, bathroom and electrical contracts to FHM and Apollo; these contractors were let following competitive tenders and the prices received by Merthyr Valleys Homes were very competitive and reflected the difficult building market. Both contactors required difficult post tender contract negotiations and considerable gearing up and were not running at full speed until October 2011. By the end of quarter two we had achieved a capital programme running that was predicted to use all the available resources within the financial year. 3.6 Do we we put improve homes 3.1 Do citizens first?to a high standard? Contract or Number of properties in contract Contract value £‘000’s Number of properties invoiced R&M Williams Phase 4 89 652 89 652 0 686 R&M Williams Phase 5 216 1,307 90 678 1,220 1,311 Apollo 366 1,965 72 378 1,529 1,414 FHM 830 4,634 111 664 2,725 2,663 PST 100 463 20 70 492 492 Bullock 62 350 0 0 350 350 TOTAL 1,663 9,371 382 2,442 6,308 6,916 0 809 6,308 7,725 R&M Williams Phase 6 GRAND TOTAL Paid Budget £‘000’s £‘000’s 100 1,763 10,180 382 2.442 Forecast £‘000’s Of the total revised programme of £10.154m, over 60%, £6.3m relates to the WHQS programme of kitchens, bathrooms and re-wiring. Four external contractors, together with our own Property Services Team, were expected to deliver 1,168 improved properties by 31 March 2012. The table above shows actual payments and predicted spend for 2011/12 of £7.725m. The non-WHQS element of the programme totals £3.846m which has now been allocated as detailed in the table below: Expenditure Budget £‘000’s PST £‘000’s External contract £‘000’s Roofing 451 310 141 Boundary walls & fences 340 250 Heating 500 0 UPVC Windows & Doors 1,093 1,093 Forsythia Close 60 Not Let £‘000’s 500 60 Actual spend £‘000’s Estimated spend £‘000’s 176 451 251 340 425 575 430 1,200 0 60 47 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? Expenditure Budget £‘000’s PST £‘000’s External contract £‘000’s Not Let £‘000’s Actual spend £‘000’s Estimated spend £‘000’s Mandeg 20 20 0 20 The Green – Car Park 65 65 0 65 100 100 0 100 30 30 0 0 External wall insulation 600 600 0 0 Triple glazed windows 260 260 0 0 Roof railings 50 50 0 0 Boilers 200 200 0 200 Lift renewal 196 196 0 0 Contingency 138 138 0 0 Grant income (257) (257) (45) (20) 1,552 1,251 2,992 Fire Safety Upgrades Non Traditional Properties TOTAL 3,846 1,653 641 Of the remaining capital works £1.653m has been committed with our own workforce and external contracts totalling £641k have been let, leaving only £1.552m to be let. Both the roofing programme and the external walls programme are forecast to be fully committed by the year end. The UPVC programme is slightly behind schedule, but is catching up. A commitment to purchase windows from Remploy is likely to result in an overspend of £107k on this budget by the year end. Total forecast capital for 2010/11 is shown below and includes the further acceleration of the WHQS programme with R and M Williams:MVH own workforce £‘000’s Contracts £‘000’s TOTAL £‘000’s 492 6,424 6,916 Other 1,653 1,339 2,992 Total 2,145 7,763 9,908 0 809 809 2.145 8,572 10,717 WHQS Accelerated WHQS Total 48 3.6 Do we we put improve homes 3.1 Do citizens first?to a high standard? During 2011/12 Savills have carried out a further stock condition survey of 2175 properties meaning in total we have survey data on 2895 properties. The data is validated by Savills and a full report can be provided on request. Merthyr Valleys Homes have been working with Greg Wheeler, a Director of Savills, to produce realistic financial projections and these have been modelled and inserted into the 30 year business plan approved by the funders for 2011/12 onwards. The process of reviewing the survey data and the future budget projections has been scrutinised by members of the tenants Quality Design Forum and a newsletter will be published to all tenants following Board consideration of the issues in December 2011. The table below shows our progress in meeting the WHQS targets Components Projections for completions by 2011/12 Projections for completions 2012/13 Projections for completions 2013/14 Roofs 95% 98% 100% Windows 90% 95% 100% External doors 90% 90% 100% Kitchens 63% 81% 100% Bathrooms 75% 87% 100% Central heating 92% 96% 100% Electrical systems 90% 94% 100% Smoke detectors 83% 91% 100% Energy rating 100% Note 1 External works 77% 83% 100% All components 63% 81% 100% Note 1 The data from the revised stock condition survey is still being cleansed and we will not have revised SAP rating figure until March 2012, however with continued investment in central heating and further investment in external insulation we are confident of reaching the SAP target. We are confident of the projections and have contracts in place for the two weakest areas of our planned kitchen and bathroom programme and believe a programme of delivering 775 kitchens is realistic and deliverable. By mid way through this year we had installed 427 kitchens after a slow start. The headline from the survey and business plan discussions with Savills is that we have the resources and time to deliver in full the WHQS target Welsh Government. 49 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? The stock survey changed a number of assumptions in our forward expenditure programme but the total cost of future repairs remains within the recent business plan approved by our funders. Annex 1 and 2 show the full elemental breakdown of the projected expenditure and the plan now includes a more realistic spend of future responsive and cyclical repairs. In addition to the WHQS programme at transfer Merthyr Valleys Homes committed to deliver a number of itemised promises on elements of improvement within the first five years. The table below shows the extent of these promises and identifies that we have the resources to deliver the majority of them and we are working with tenants to define some of the other elements. Element Transfer Promises 2010/11 Projected 2011/12 Position To Do by March 2014 Provision in first 5 years of SCS Kitchen 2500 950 1550 2400 Bathroom 2000 950 1050 1900 700 60 640 1036 Electrics 3000 1000 2000 2400 Windows 1400 1000 400 400 Doors 3000 Heating & Boilers 1500 1110 390 629 £400,000 £400,000 £500,000 Fencing/paths £1,300,000 £1,300,000 £180,000 Environmental Improvements £4,400,000 £4,350,000 £5,940,000 Roofs Common Areas £50,000 *The promises identified doors not properties and we are still calculating our commitment on doors. The two budgets where the promises to tenants were based on national averages rather than stock survey findings were paths and environment works budget lines of £1.3m and £4.4m respectively in the original plan. The Quality Design Forum will be recommending to the Board that the commitment on paths is reduced following survey data to a contingency sum of only £180,000 and the money switched to external insulation programmes and other 50 external environmental improvement programmes. In June 2011 the Board identified that the future cost of responsive, cyclical and voids repairs in the business plan reduced by 25% after the completion of the WHQS work. After identifying costs savings we stretched the current budget levels for three further years. However as part of reassessing our future repair need in our stock condition 3.6 Do we we put improve homes 3.1 Do citizens first?to a high standard? survey we have increased within the balanced a more realistic level of future revenue repairs. In future we will have a budget provision of £3.6m per annum. We did not maximise the opportunities for local procurement to date as pragmatism to deliver the capital programme took precedence over community and other benefits. After discussions the two main contractors FHM and Apollo have now adopted a more proactive response to the issue than is required in their contract and both have delivered community benefits including providing free of costs local facility improvements and both employ a substantial majority of staff from the local area. In discussions about how we can extend this relationship further, FHM are now developing a programme of full time staff and apprentices all recruited locally, as they are in the process of moving away from the sub contractor route. As stated earlier, the Trelewis energy efficiency works completed this year was a partnership between Merthyr Valleys Homes, British Gas and Joyners from Gwent. All employment and products were sourced within a 15 mile radius of Trelewis and it will be our model for future projects. One of the largest local employers in Merthyr is Remploy and our contract with this company to manufacture UPVC doors and windows ended due to quality control issues. However, the benefits to the local community of this company were extensive and we have worked closely with a new management team at Remploy and have recently completed a programme of new doors and windows with this company. We are now hoping that our investment in UPVC of £1.3m in the next two years will be spent with Remploy. Despite not driving procurement benefits we did spent over £10m in the local economy during 2010/11 sustaining jobs and local businesses. The procurement potential of our remaining investment is now being discussed with i2i and targeted recruitment and SME clauses will be included and managed in future programmes “A member of the Quality Design Forum sits on the strategic core group that oversees the progress and performance of each of the main contractors. ” There are currently four main contractors delivering the kitchen, bathroom, and electrical WHQS upgrades. Two are appointed on a PPC 2000 partnering framework and the others are appointed on an NEC3 framework. The qualitative criteria for the contracts included an evaluation based on the targeted recruitment and training tool kit. Members of the tenant Quality Design Forum have received training in contractor selection and had a presence on the selection panel that evaluated and scored the contractor PQQs and tender submissions. A member of the Quality Design Forum sits on the strategic core group that oversees the progress and performance of each of the main contractors. The key areas of performance that are monitored are customer satisfaction, progress against plan, average completion times, and component costs. The ‘Can Do Tool Kit’ has also been adopted in each of the contracts and community benefit is monitored through levels of local employment and level of work opportunities created. 51 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? Progress since January 2012 WHQS Progress Update The table below is the component breakdown up to the 31 March 2012 and we are now confident that all components will reach the WHQS standard by 2014. Since December 2011 we have reviewed in more detail the findings from Savills. For some component we have revised raw survey data with our own repair information giving us greater confidence. However revision has adjusted downwards completions in central heating, electrical and smoke detectors. We remain confident that WHQS will be achieved in all areas. Stock at 31 March 2012 Numbers Improved at 31 March 2012 Number of property already meeting standard Percentage fully compliant at 31 March 2012 Roofs and associated components 4,198 178 3,498 88% Windows 4,198 664 2,798 82% Energy rating (SAP ≥ 65) 4,198 2,610 0 62% Central heating systems 4,198 1,077 2,115 76% Mains powered smoke detectors 4,198 2,632 0 63% Gardens and external storage up and including the boundary of the property 4,198 1,060 0 25% Component The table below is an update figure to the 1 July 2012 for the key kitchen bathroom and electrical rewiring components of the WHQS programme. Stock at 31 March 2012 Numbers Improved at 1 July 2012 Number of property already meeting standard Percentage fully compliant at 1 July 2012 Kitchens 4,198 1581 1,698 78% Bathrooms 4,198 1429 2,198 86% Central heating systems 4,198 1,106 2,115 78% Doors 4,198 1717 1,995 88% Windows 4,198 723 2,798 83% Electrical systems 4,198 1872 1,198 73% Component 52 3.6 Do we we put improve homes 3.1 Do citizens first?to a high standard? We are continuing to progress with the Welsh Housing Quality Standard (WHQS) works. We have provided our tenants with an updated ‘Planned Improvement Programme’ – this was distributed in April 2012. This is an annual programme for the period 2012/13. Over this year, we are planning to upgrade a further 750 kitchens, bathrooms and electrical upgrades, and will be spending approximately £13m. In addition, we have introduced a 5 year cyclical painting programme. The biggest change in the profile of expenditure has been the tenants wanting an increase in expenditure on energy efficiency insulation measures at the expense of external works. This has resulted in a major shift in expenditure through the next five years. We have also set aside £1.1m for a tenant led community programme and this we believe will allow us to meet the WHQS target on external area improvements. St Tydfil’s Court A significant programme of improvement works is underway in one of our sheltered schemes, St Tydfil’s Court. We have completed the heating and fire door installation programmes, and external works are close to completion. We worked closely with the Council to ensure that the finished design details are in line with the proposed plans for the town centre regeneration development. Energy Improvements Following our consultation exercise with tenants in February 2012, we have listened to what our tenants want, and are carrying out a number of external wall insulation projects as a result. We have secured extended ARBED and CESP funding to continue with works across the Borough. We have external wall insulation projects on “A significant programme of improvement works is underway in one of our sheltered schemes, St Tydfil’s Court.” going at Caedraw, and Canonbie Crescent and over 180 non traditional properties in the Gurnos area. These energy efficiency measures have three main benefits: • improved homes are cheaper to heat and the savings will reduce fuel poverty and mitigate the impact of welfare benefit reform; • homes look clean and smart from the outside. The effect has been to transform the look and feel of neighbours improved like Mandeg; and • the impact on the environment is positive, with lower CO2 emissions. Procurement through local suppliers Following the self assessment in December 2011 the Remploy Factory in Merthyr has now closed. We are working to source alternative UPVC products from other suppliers working with disadvantaged communities. Reviewing the effective delivery of major contracts We carried out a major review of our management of major contracts and the effectiveness of contractors to deal with vulnerable tenants. This review identified a number of changes in our data management and training that have been addressed. It also identified that the type of delivery model employed by the contractor did seem to reflect on the quality of the contractor in dealing with vulnerable tenants. Those contractors that directly employed staff and those contractors 53 3.6 Do we improve homes to a high standard? that employed a single sub contractor to carry out their work, were the best at managing the impact of the work in peoples homes. As part of the review we will assess all future contractors to ensure we work with contractors directly employing staff, this provides continuity on site, builds better relationships between the contractor and tenants, allows us to better monitor CRB, training and our CDMM responsibilities. Finally contractors that employ local staff have a greater economic benefit for community and help us reach our goal of economic equality for our community. We have also been more effective in managing the capital programme expenditure within our lending covenants. The table below shows the cash flow covenant and the outturn expenditure. The primary reason for the low out turn in earlier year is the under spend on WHQS. 2009/10 £’000s 2010/11 £’000s 2011/12 £’000s (18,199) (8,939) (9,631) Outturn (6,425) (3,480) (9,615) Difference 11,774 5,459 16 Cash Flow Covenant Delivery Outcome LS1 Summary In Place Putting in Place 3 Detailed plans to deliver the remainder of the WHQS programme. < Procurement and regeneration opportunities for the remainder of the capital programme. 3 A 30 year validated stock data condition survey and report. 3 Realistic levels of investment in responsive, cyclical and voids repairs through the life of the business plan. < Contracts for the delivery of £4.8m of WHQS. To Do 3 Contracts to deliver nearly £9m of the remain WHQS programme. 8 Deliver the remainder of the WHQS programme of £4.8m. 3 Accurate street by street programme of improvements. 8 Maximise the training and recruitment opportunities through capital spend. 8 To procure future works through smaller contractors committed to Merthyr and who can deliver quality improvements to vulnerable tenants. 54 3.1 3.7 Do we have put citizens a fair process first? for letting homes? 3.7 Do we have a fair process for letting homes? In answering this question we have identified that 100% of allocations come through the Council’s Choice Based Lettings system tenants told us the Choice Based Lettings was complex and we worked with the Council to improve and simplify it increased resources to sustain tenancies we have reduced void levels to the lowest level ever we provide temporary housing units to help the council manage its homelessness duties we have incorporated OT assessments and adaptation improvements into WHQS programme allowing people to remain in their homes Delivery Outcome LS2 We let homes in a fair, transparent and effective way 55 3.6 Do Dowe wehave improve tofor a high standard? 3.7 a fairhomes process letting homes? The progress up to January 2012 We have adopted the common allocation policy of Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (MTCBC). This ensures that all applicants are assessed on the same basis, and can apply for any vacancies across the Borough at any of the participating four registered social landlords. The policy is based on a Choice Based Lettings (CBL) scheme, called the ‘Tai Dewis’ scheme – the administration of this scheme is the responsibility of MTCBC. Properties are advertised on a weekly basis,enabling people to bid for them in line with their assessed needs, through a variety of methods, in the areas of their choice. The adverts are circulated to a wide variety of organisations. The CBL scheme ensures that the allocations process is transparent and gives prospective tenants an indication of how long they may have to wait for a property in a particular area, which can help them to make informed choices about which properties to bid for. We operate a lettings plan which reflects reasonable preference as identified in the Code of Guidance distributed by the Welsh Government. An internal audit of our lettings and allocations identified that the allocations system is operating effectively, and we are supporting the Local Authority by meeting, and exceeding, the lettings targets that they have set for us. We are currently working with MTCBC in making improvements to the current Tai Dewis scheme, including our involvement in a review of the allocations policy. We drafted and shared an editorial with the other partners in response to a number of tenants having difficulty understanding the process. We regularly communicate the allocations 56 process to our tenants, including articles in our ‘Hometalk’ newsletter, and our website In September 2011, we introduced the national ‘Homeswapper’ scheme to our tenants – this scheme is the UK’s largest community of social housing tenants looking to swap homes. To date, we have 63 registered tenants. This will assist us in the future with the planned welfare reforms, as tenants who are under occupying homes will have a wider choice. We work with a range of partners and agencies to ensure that homelessness is prevented and reduced. We have nine units of temporary accommodation, and provide floating support to help tenants embed themselves into the community. Various support services are offered, including support in obtaining benefits, grants etc and help with social skills. The aim is to assist tenants in sustaining a tenancy long term. We work in partnership with other organisations to meet the needs of tenants. A Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) protocol has been developed between ourselves, MTCBC and Merthyr Care and Repair. The grants are awarded for essential adaptations to give a disabled person greater independence within their home or easier access and egress from their home. Under the protocol, we undertake minor adaptations up to the value of £5,000, which helps to speed up the adaptations process for our tenants. We carry out annual servicing of adaptations, such as stair lifts and ceiling track hoists As promised to tenants at point of transfer, we have increased the quality of improvements and choices to tenants moving into one of our properties. In conjunction with a sub-group of the tenant led Quality Design Forum (QDF), we have 3.1 Do we have put citizens first? for letting homes? 3.7 a fair process developed a ‘Void Property Re-let Standard’. Previously, we referred to the Local Authority lettings standard, but we found this to be too vague, and were having to return to properties to address snagging issues. Some improvements have been made following tenants’ contributions, for example, we now carry our external works including clearing gardens. The members of the QDF sub-group ‘spot inspect’ a random number of void properties both when they are returned, and again before they are re-let, to ensure that the standard is being maintained and is consistent. A checklist is used to ensure consistency, and the inspection is done independently of staff assessments. A void property report is submitted by the group, confirming their findings. To date, the subgroup have accepted all of the properties that they have inspected, thus confirming that the standard is being adhered to. By improving the standard, our ready to let homes are meeting our tenants’ expectations at the point when they move into the property. We have reduced the number of issues and minor repairs requested by tenants moving into a re-let property, and the Housing Officers have confirmed that there are fewer issues to deal with following the change. In addition to improving the letting standard, we have also reviewed our decorating scheme. Tenants, if they prefer to decorate themselves, are offered the opportunity to have an allowance in the form of an e-card (to use at B&Q) to decorate the property themselves, to a maximum of £300. This has led to tenants having more choice and has led to tenants feeling proud of their property, and has assisted in the time taken to re-let void properties, as well as a reduction in cost to the organisation. We have had a good take up from tenants – year to date, we have issued over £20,000 in e-cards to over 160 tenants. We have also focused on prevention methods. We request that tenants give us 28 days notice of their intention to give up their property and we have developed the process to clearly identify tenants’ responsibilities. Tenants from the Quality and Design Forum and staff have been involved in the development of an ‘exit standard’ – a checklist for tenants informing them of what they need to do when leaving a property. This is due to be communicated out to tenants early 2012, and will form part of the lettings pack. Although a lot of work has been done in this area, we need to make some further improvements. We need to improve our communications between departments to ensure that the whole process is a lean as possible. Progress since January 2012 Improving the ‘Tai Dewis’ Choice Based Lettings Scheme We recognise that the current economic climate is increasing the demand for our homes, and so it is increasingly important that people understand how homes are allocated. It is also important for people to know, particularly in times where there are more and more people bidding for a relatively small number of properties, that the allocations policy is fair, and applied consistently. We have been working closely with MTCBC to review the Tai Dewis scheme. This gave us the opportunity to provide feedback from some of our new tenants to MTCBC about their experience of using the scheme. This has helped to inform some key recommendations for change, which include: 57 3.6 Do Dowe wehave improve tofor a high standard? 3.7 a fairhomes process letting homes? • raising the equity limit that would prevent an applicant from being eligible to apply for a home – the limit had been in place for some time and did not take account of changing economic circumstances and the impact this had on the demand for affordable rented homes; and • a more flexible bidding process which will increase the pool of available properties that applicants are able to bid for. The previous restrictions were frequently raised by applicants as being confusing and limiting their choices. The review also highlighted the need for all partners within the scheme to work closely together to see how we can deal with the anticipated high demand for smaller properties as the result of changes to welfare benefits. This will help all of the partners to make sure we are making best use of existing stock. We intend to re-launch the scheme in November 2012. The changes will allow greater flexibility for tenants and potential tenants, and provide a simplified scheme that will be easier to understand. Publicising routes into housing In addition to regular features in our newsletter, and a newspaper advertorial, we have started to do more outreach work to make sure that prospective tenants understand how affordable rented homes are allocated in the Borough. This includes sessions at schools, as well as within emerging communities. One example is of a housing advice session with the Polish community at a preferred community venue – which is now followed up by regular attendance at Polish Forum meetings. Homelessness prevention We continue to provide floating support to 58 assist tenants in sustaining a long term tenancy, and have secured further funding for an additional support officer until March 2013. This has enabled us to expand our service and provide more support to more tenants who need it. There are a number of cases where support from MVH has successfully prevented homelessness, helping the local authority to make better use of its resources, and promoting more stable communities. Management of empty homes Changes to welfare benefits and increasing pressure on people to make ends meet means that we anticipate a potential increase in demand for our homes. We know that in tight knit communities like the ones we work in, the sight of empty homes is a cause for concern and sometimes friction in the community. We are continuing to improve the way we manage empty homes. Communication between different departments has been improved by co-locating the PST Void Supervisors and Housing Allocations team. This has resulted in better partnership working in terms of scheduling and managing the time taken to repair and re-let empty homes by having more efficient processes. During the summer the number of void properties dropped to 68 the lowest it has ever been at either MVH or the Council. We have reviewed our Voids Policy to include a ‘Re-let Standard’ that was developed with the tenant-led Quality and Design Forum. The standard is checked by staff and tenant inspectors to make sure that new homes meet an agreed specification, that new tenants know what to expect from their new home and that the number of repairs ordered by tenants after moving in is reduced. 3.1 Do we have put citizens first? for letting homes? 3.7 a fair process Delivery Outcome LS2 Summary In Place 3 Implemented the national ‘Homeswapper’ scheme, which means that tenants have a wider choice of housing options. 3 Provided floating support to help sustain tenancies; and manage nine units of temporary accommodation to help people make the transition to settled accommodation. We have secured extra funding for an additional support post so that we can provide more support to more people. 3 Implemented a new re-let standard for empty homes, and introduced inspections by tenant inspectors. This helps to make sure that empty homes meet an agreed standard, that new tenants know what to expect, and a reduction in the number of repairs that new tenants need to report after they have moved in. 3 Reviewed our decorating allowance scheme, with substantial take up by tenants, improving the level of choice they have about how to decorate their new home and keeping our assets in good order. 3 Extended our outreach work to help prospective tenants understand how housing is allocated within the Borough – and how to access advice and support. Worked with partners to review and improve the borough-wide choice based lettings scheme – improving the level of choice for tenants. Putting in Place < Communicating the ‘exit standard’ for tenants. To Do 8 Re-launch the improved choice based lettings scheme. 8 Regularly review feedback from new letting surveys to see what other changes and improvements we could make. 8 Work with the Council to develop a downsizing policy. 3 Co-located teams to improve communications between departments to ensure that the way we manage the repair and re-let of empty homes is as effective as possible. The number of empty homes is at its lowest for some time. 59 3.8 Are we a good manager of housing? 3.8 Are we a good manager of housing? In answering this question we have identified that we listened to our tenants about the importance of peaceful neighbourhoods we meet the Welsh ASB standard had an external validation of our ASB service that showed we used all the appropriate methods and know what we were doing we do more active pre tenancy management we have revised our approach to rent arrears and financial inclusion and have made no evictions since March 2012 we have prepared for the changes in welfare benefit and switched more resources into financial management Delivery Outcome LS3 60 We manage our homes effectively we have also resourced diversionary activities our tenants wanted a more outward reaching service and we now do more home visits and neighbourhood activity we have consulted on service charges and specifications and improved services including providing additional caretaking 3.8 Arewe weput a good manager 3.1 Do citizens first? of housing? The progress up to January 2012 We offer a range of tenancy agreements which are compatible with the purpose of the housing. Temporary tenancy agreements are used for tenants in temporary accommodation units (we currently have nine temporary units). For those tenants in temporary accommodation, regular support is provided for example, assisting the tenant to obtain benefits that they are entitled to. We provide tenants with an opportunity to sustain a short term tenancy, with the intention of transferring them into a property. This transition has proved to be successful, and here is an example of a tenant that we have assisted. Tenants who move out of temporary accommodation into a property, and all new tenants, are signed up to an assured short hold tenancy. This type of tenancy is a probationary tenancy. It is an opportunity for the tenant to have responsibility for a property, and to embed themselves into the community. After twelve months, providing there have been no breaches of the tenancy, the tenancy will become an assured tenancy. We make clear the rights and duties of the tenant and landlord from the start of a tenancy. Evictions are only used as a last resort and the numbers have been reducing year on year. In the first six months of 2011/12, there were two evictions, both for rent arrears. In comparison, over the previous two years there were 12 evictions (2009/10) and 10 evictions (2010/11). We use a range of methods and interventions to ensure that tenancies are sustained. Our tenancy agreements were updated in 2009/10 to make them easier to understand, and tenants were involved in this process. Our housing officers explain the terms of the tenancy on sign up, and provide the tenants with a ‘letting pack’, containing information about MVH and services from other organisations and agencies. In addition the newly appointed Income Maximisation Officer also attends Sign up to give additional advice, assess financial capacity, budgeting pre letting and pre tenancy training. The Housing Officers conduct three week and twelve week postlet visits to determine if the tenants need and additional support and/or guidance in order to ensure that the tenancy is sustained. Although tenancy turnover has remained static, the level of evictions is significantly reduced. The proportion of tenants who are not intending to move from their MVH property in the next three years is higher than average. We provide all tenants with a tenant handbook, outlining the obligations and responsibilities of both the tenant and MVH. Our Housing Officers hold a number of Housing Surgeries across the Borough, and we provide tenants with additional communications, such as leaflets and articles in Hometalk. MVH is an accredited support provider and receive a grant for the purpose of providing housing related support. We have a dedicated tenancy support officer, and are exploring further support opportunities. Tenant profiling is ongoing, and this will assist us in identifying the need for additional housing support. We are members of the Borough’s Managing Access to Adapted and Supported Housing (MAASH) partnership, and receive referrals via this scheme. We also get referrals from officers within the organisation. We offer a range of payment methods for 61 3.6 Are Do we improve homes toofa housing? high standard? 3.8 a good manager tenants and leaseholders, and these are communicated in various ways, including verbally advising tenants when they sign a tenancy agreement, via a service leaflet, in our tenant handbook and on our website. During 2011, we have improved our payment methods to include a monthly direct debit payment option and taking payments over the telephone, using ‘World Pay’. In addition, we have trained up our Contact Centre staff to take payments over the telephone, so tenants don’t have to be transferred to a member of the Income Department. We continue to review our payment methods to include chip and pin, and additional agreements with the Credit Union. The take up of these additional services have been good, and has assisted in the percentage of rents being collected, with an average of over 96 per cent being collected in the last quarter. We provide our tenants with information regarding budgetary and debt advice at the earliest opportunity – when they sign a tenancy agreement our Housing Officers inform tenants of the assistance that we can provide. We monitor rent arrears, and provide early notification to tenants who are in two weeks (or more) rent arrears. This has contributed to a reduction in rent arrears .For those tenants who are in longer term rent arrears, we provide them with debt advice referrals to third party organisations, including Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) and Credit Action. We have improved our support services to tenants by strengthening our relationship with Credit Union, and offer a floating surgery service, an appointments service, and a drop in service at our Head Office. We are promoting the services of Money Line Cymru, and are supporting the introduction of a high street shop in Merthyr Tydfil. We also assist tenants via the use of 62 “The information gathered from the STATUS survey has helped the group to refocus on key priority areas.” promotional schemes, such as assistance with white goods and furniture recycling schemes. We have an established Financial Inclusion Steering Group, consisting of a cross functional group of staff members. The focus of the group is not just on reducing debt, but also looking at wider preventative measures. Our Financial Inclusion Strategy mirrors the five core themes of the Welsh Government Strategy, and the original action plan (developed in 2010) has been worked through. Some of the actions implemented include the development of a budget planner and the implementation of a decorating allowance, using an ‘e-card’. The information gathered from the STATUS survey has helped the group to re-focus on key priority areas. The group are currently reviewing financial capability with supported tenants. Also representatives from the group are engaging with various financial inclusion groups and forums (including Community 3.1 3.8 Do Arewe weput a good citizens manager first? of housing? “We estimate that over 1000 households will see a reduction in their income, and over £600,000 of additional rent ” Housing Cymru’s financial inclusion network and the Merthyr Tydfil forum) in the collective development of a ‘Financial Health Check’ for tenants. The main aim for 2012 will be to consider the impacts of the forthcoming welfare reforms. Over 80 per cent of tenants are satisfied with their area as a place to live. This compares very favourably to a benchmark group of over 100 housing providers. However we recognise that within different neighbourhoods, tenants have different priorities for improvements, for example, in Gurnos they would like to see less litter, but in the town they see disruptive young people and teenagers being a problem in their area. We are using this information to develop neighbourhood management plans, so that we are focusing projects and resources on the local level issues which are important to our tenants. This will also enable us to make sure that we are pulling in the key partners who can support our work. We knew that development of neighbourhood plans was dependent on the results of the STATUS survey, but wanted to try to deal with local issues in the meantime. In April we dedicated £10,000 to Area Housing Officers and Sheltered Scheme Managers, to support the estate walkabout programme, enabling officers to decide with tenants and residents on small scale improvements .For example we have included planting schemes to improve the appearance of sheltered scheme entrances and gardens, additional security works, and fencing. STATUS 2011 tells us that tenant satisfaction with the service they receive from us when they report Anti Social Behaviour is above average, that is for ease of getting hold of the right person, and that that person is able to deal effectively with the case. Progress since January 2012 The reform of Welfare Benefits We have analysed and modelled the effects of the changes to welfare benefits on our tenants. We estimate that over 1000 households will see a reduction in their income, and over £600,000 of additional rent will have to be recovered from our tenants. This is top of our risk map, and has been factored into our business planning, and so we have spent a considerable amount of time and effort on trying to understand likely effects and impacts – and take action to mitigate them. This has included: • training for Board members, involved tenants and key front line staff to help them understand the changes and how it will affect MVH and our tenants. This is helping to ensure that we have a number of people who are well informed and can signpost, assist, and raise awareness amongst our tenants – as well as manage risk to the organisation; • developing and implementing a communications strategy. We knew from some tenant meetings that not everyone was aware of, or understood, the changes that are coming and that we needed to do more to help people prepare. We have focused more on face to face communication as a result, for 63 3.6 Are Do we improve homes toofa housing? high standard? 3.8 a good manager example, targeting door knocking at geographical areas which we know are likely to be hardest hit; • taking a new approach to rent collection and arrears recovery. New policies and procedures are much more focused on early stage intervention and support to prevent people from getting into debt and arrears in the first place, to help people out of difficulty at an early stage, and to sustain tenancies. The RPF and Policy Committee have approved the new approach. • we are the lead partner on a sub-group of the Borough’s strategic housing forum. The sub-group, which is made up of the Council and social landlords who operate in the Borough, is tasked with understanding and developing partnership approaches to mitigating the impact of welfare reforms. One example is working better together to make best use of existing stock; and • we have been instrumental in bringing Moneyline Cymru to Merthyr Tydfil town centre. We made a significant contribution but one which we felt would benefit both tenants and the business by extending the provision of independent financial advice and assistance into the Borough. Rent Setting We have recently responded to the Welsh Government’s second consultation on Rent Policy, outlining the organisation’s queries and concerns. The next stage is for MVH to assess our position and to consult with tenants. A process has been agreed involving tenants and Board members and we will be commencing a Borough-wide consultation exercise through the autumn. 64 “We worked with, and consulted, involved and non-involved tenants, particularly those in schemes which would be affected, to overhaul our approach to service charges. ” The new rent setting model creates anomalies for rent setting in Merthyr and tenants will be need to be consulted on a rent policy that is fairer but moves away from the rent promise at transfer. General Needs service charges We worked with, and consulted, involved and non-involved tenants, particularly those in schemes which would be affected, to overhaul our approach to service charges. We recognised that with pooled charges, tenants could not see that we were charging fairly for services, or that as a business, we were recovering the cost of services provided from the people who received them. We have introduced itemised service charging, and with the consent of tenants and Board, have started to charge for all of the services provided. The consultation around this was critical because the transfer promises included a commitment not to introduce new charges where services were already provided – but which were not being charged for at the time of transfer. Through the consultation, tenants were able to decide the scope, frequency and standard of the services they receive – and the cost. Some tenants chose to increase their costs by specifying an enhanced caretaking service, which is now in place. Sustaining Tenancies We are continuing to use a range of methods 3.1 3.8 Do Arewe weput a good citizens manager first? of housing? and interventions to ensure that tenancies are sustained. In addition to our Area Housing Officers providing a ‘lettings pack’ on signup, we have introduced the attendance of our Income Maximisation Officer in order to provide advice and guidance to tenants on how to maximise and manage their income. We are also working with Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council to explore the possibility of a Housing Benefits Officer attending tenancy sign-ups. We have changed the way we work to make sure that the working relationships between the Income Team and the Area Housing Officers have been strengthened. This has led to a reduction in duplication of tasks, providing a better, more efficient service for our tenants. Evictions are only used as a last resort, and numbers are continuing to reduce year on year: Period Number of Evictions 2009/10 12 2010/11 10 2011/12 8 Year to date Sept 2012 0 We are continuing to provide our tenants with budgetary and debt advice, and are continuing to work with third party organisations, including Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) and Credit Action. We have been promoting and supporting the services of Moneyline Cymru, and it is anticipated that a high street shop will be opening in Merthyr town centre in autumn 2012. “By achieving the accreditation, we can satisfy our residents and other key stakeholders that we are providing an excellent standard of service for our customers. ” Sheltered Schemes’. By achieving the accreditation, we can satisfy our residents and other key stakeholders that we are providing an excellent standard of service for our customers. We have set up a task and finish group, consisting of staff and residents, in order to review our services against a number of core standards, and have developed / refined a number of policies as a result. This has enabled us to provide an enhanced range of services. We have improved our communication by the introduction of a quarterly newsletter for our sheltered scheme residents, detailing the achievements to date, and focusing on topical areas of interest to our residents. This bespoke communication is something that we intend to continue with in the future. To date, we have received a positive response from the CHS advisor, and are on target for the submission of our application in November 2012. CHS Accreditation We are working towards the ‘Centre for Housing Studies (CHS) Accreditation for 65 3.6 Are Do we improve homes toofa housing? high standard? 3.8 a good manager Delivery outcome summary LS3 In Place Putting in Place 3 Using a wider range of methods and interventions to ensure that tenancies are sustained, reducing the number of evictions. < Rent setting consultation and communications strategy being developed. 3 Greater choice of payment methods, including monthly direct debit and telephone payments. 3 Early notification to tenants who are in arrears, with greater emphasis on personal contact and face to face communication. 3 Financial Inclusion Steering Group, and strategy, focusing on wider preventative measures and offering tangible benefits to tenants. 3 Modelling and responding to the likely impact of welfare benefit changes – including business planning and preparing tenants for change. 3 Extended financial support to independent money advice providers. 3 Fairer service charging for general needs tenants. 3 Enabled area officers, in conjunction with tenants, to decide on small scale area improvements by allocation of budgets. 66 < CHS Accreditation. To Do 8 Use Experian and STATUS survey data to develop neighbourhood -management plans. 3.1 3.9 Do Arewe weput good citizens at repairing first? homes? 3.9 Are we good at repairing homes? In answering this question we have identified that our tenants tells us in very large numbers our responsive repair service is good we are now in the second year of our painting programme we have programme of electrical upgrades meaning all properties will reach the latest electrical safety edition we have identified an additional £23m in the 30 years for responsive repairs from efficiencies in other budget areas we currently have 100% of homes with a valid gas safety certificate we worked with the fire and rescue service to improve fire safety in all our flat blocks Delivery Outcome LS4 We repair and maintain homes in an efficient, timely and cost effective way 67 3.6 Are Do we improve homes to ahomes? high standard? 3.9 good at repairing The progress up to January 2012 Tenants through our STATUS survey told us we have good repair service with 81% of people satisfied with the service. Our focus group and feed back from tenants was that delivering repairs through own workforce is their preferred way of delivering repairs works. At point of transfer we promised to deliver a faster repairs service and a programme of planned maintenance to keep properties up to standard. This included completing: • Emergency repairs within 24 hours • Urgent repairs within three days • Routine repairs within 15 working days All repairs are recorded on our housing management system, and we monitor how we are performing via monthly key indicators. This is how we are currently measuring up against the promises made: Indicator Aug Sept Oct % Emergency repairs completed within 24 hours 100.0 99.6 97.7 % Urgent repairs completed within 3 days 96.7 91.6 96.0 % Routine repairs completed within 15 days 91.4 96.9 92.8 We have improved our understanding of our tenants’ requirements through consultation, using a variety of methods, including satisfaction surveys and focus groups, to ensure that our tenants are satisfied with the service received. We are using the 68 information from Experian and profiling to help target our service to meet individual needs. Our call handling staff are experienced and knowledgeable extracting information from tenants and allocating appointments and making repair ordering easy for customers. Following consultation, we are confident that our tenants find it easy to report a repair. We offer tenants a variety of methods by which to report a repair, although the preferred methods remain via telephone and in person. Outside of normal office hours we offer an emergency repairs service, a service level agreement with Lifeline. We have recognised that our appointments system has some limitations, and that we need to improve our performance by working more flexibly. We are in the process of introducing Opti time – this will allow us to offer more flexible appointments, and will allow us to appoint jobs. In advance of going live we have agreed with our repairs teams a new multi skilled contract and training allowing meaning the new appointment and organisation system will further improve the service for our tenants. Gas safety remains an area of strength and we have developed aGas Servicing and Safety Policy, which ensures compliance with statutory duties and our performance is currently 99.04% of properties with a safety certificate. For the first time in a decade there has been a painting programme for our homes and feedback in the Galon Uchaf area has been very positive. Internal painting is underway in the Caedraw flat and plans and budgets have been identified for a 7 year cyclical programme of painting. To deliver the right repairs service we needed the right structure and we believe we have 3.1 3.9 Do Arewe weput good citizens at repairing first? homes? now got the right structure with financial rigidity across the spending areas and operational flexibility across the delivery. We have our own workforce the Property Services Team who deliver nearly £4.5m of our repairs and the team members have an in-depth knowledge of our stock, our estates and our tenants. This knowledge helps us deliver an effective repair service but also helps inform our future repair programmes. We have recently developed business units within this section to improve productivity and enable planned programmes of work to be defined. These include door and window replacement; roofing works, painting programmes and external environmental works (walls and fencing). We have developed a suitable assets structure to deliver our planned improvement works, comprising of Contracts Managers, Surveyors, Co-ordinators and Tenant Liaison Officers (TLO’s) with a particular focus on assisting tenants through the improvement programmes. Our TLO’s liaise with tenants to ensure the programmes run as smoothly as possible, and they collect tenant feedback forms which capture areas in which we can improve our delivery, helping us shape our services. We are serious about health and safety and we have a Health and Safety Manager, we are finalising our Asbestos Management Plan and we carry out surveys to identify any asbestos which may be present, ensuring that we work in line with current H&S regulations and guidance so that our tenants, employees and contractors are duly protected from exposure to asbestos. We have also carried out assessments and works across the borough to improve fire safety. We have installed fire safety measures in community use buildings such the Forsythia Youth centre and are in the “We have also carried out assessments and works across the borough to improve fire safety.” progress of carrying out works across the low rise flats We have invested in our asset management database ‘keystone’ and associated training to ensure we are utilising the system to its full potential. We have effective component accounting in place and this allows us to depreciate of different components within one property. We are currently liaising with our insurance partners to further enhance our processes in order to minimise risks and potential claims, including carrying out periodic site inspections We receive only a few complaints regarding our responsive repairs service. For the small number of complaints that we receive, the majority of these are regarding the time taken to complete routine repairs. This is an area that will improve further as a result of the Opti time project. Progress since January 2012 Repairs Service We are continuing to consult with our tenants in order to review our repairs service, and have recently undertaken our ‘Stepping Out’ exercise, where we included a section on repairs to improve our understanding of tenants’ requirements and their perception of our services through their experiences. This data will be available in due course. Tenant satisfaction levels for responsive repairs remain high. We are continuing to 69 3.6 Are Do we improve homes to ahomes? high standard? 3.9 good at repairing monitor our performance in this area via monthly key indicators We have re-introduced a diagnostic system for call handling in our Contact Centre to ensure a fair and consistent approach to repairs ordering, with the aim of more accurately capturing the number of ‘priority one’ repairs (i.e. repairs completed within 24 hours) Our target is to complete 99% routine repairs in 15 days. This is a stretching target compared to the Housemark benchmarking club for Welsh housing associations, whose targets in 2011/12 ranged from 8 days to 28 days. For Quarter 1 of 2012/13, we completed 94% of routine repairs within the 15 day target, despite working to clear a backlog. Clearing a backlog means that resources are being used to clear jobs which were reported some time ago, but which have not been completed – which will have a negative impact on both the average days taken to complete, and the % completed in target time. It should also be noted that although performance declined each quarter through 2011/12, the performance in the first quarter of 2012/13 represents an improvement, increasing from 90% in target time to 94% in target time. Our target is to keep 97% of all appointments made. Data on performance and targets has been submitted by only 2 other Welsh housing associations to Housemark. Using Housemark’s national dataset (UK), targets for this indicator range from 99% down to 95%. Lowest quartile performance in 2011/12 was 96%. The last two years quarterly data shows that our performance in this area is weak compared to others as despite missing only 119 appointments during the quarter, this equates to a percentage performance which is lower than the worst performers nationally 70 “100% of homes on the 1 September 2012 had a valid CP12 gas safety certificate.” last year. This is a weakness we have already identified and rather refine existing systems we are close to implementing the Opti time repairs appointment and management system. We are also reviewing how we deal with and follow up missed appointments. Opti-time We have made significant progress in the introduction of the opti-time system for repair ordering and management. We are now introducing and testing the new software we needed to run opti-time. Mobile devices have been purchased, and training and testing is completed and our go live date is October 2012. The implementation of the opti-time system will benefit tenants in that we will be able to offer them more flexible appointments, and will be able to better appoint jobs. Multi-skilling All trade operatives are now working as multi-skilled operatives, and a comprehensive programme is underway. The programme has been jointly funded by the trade unions and Merthyr Valleys Homes. This new flexible working has the support of the staff and will help lower costs and improve the quality of repairs for our customers. Gas safety Gas safety remains an area of strength, and we are ensuring compliance with statutory duties. Performance has continued to be maintained at an excellent level and currently 100% of homes on the 1 September 2012 had a valid CP12 gas safety certificate. 3.1 3.9 Do Arewe weput good citizens at repairing first? homes? Delivery outcome summary LS4 In Place Putting in Place 3 Good tenant satisfaction levels for responsive repairs and call handling. < An Asbestos Management Plan. 3 We have gas safety procedures and deliver high performance. 3 We have the right structure to deliver high quality repairs. 3 Component accounting and asset management information in a management system Keystone. 3 A growing culture on health and safety. 3 A knowledgeable and flexible workforce who have agreed multi skilled working along with new conditions of employment. < An Optitime system for repair ordering and management. < Fire safety plans and fire safety works in all risk areas. < Further develop the multi skill training programme for all Property Services Team. To Do 8 Create a profile of all our customers to ensure we can offer the right responsive repair service to each tenant. 3 A painting programme is now in place. 71 3.10 Do we have a good service for homeowners? 3.10 Do we have a good service for homeowners? In answering this question we have identified that We carried out leaseholder and right to buy audits and found everything to the standard expected we have a sinking fund for all leaseholder income we have consulted leaseholders to a greater degree than is required under Section 20 repair works Delivery Outcome LS5 72 we were applauded at the Leaseholder AGM this year for the improvements on fire safety and the better management of leaseholder works We provide fair and efficient services for owners 3.1 Do 3.10 Dowe weput have citizens a goodfirst? service for homeowners? The progress up to January 2012 We provide advice to anyone who is considering purchasing their property, and this can range from initial help with the completion of the application form through to advice throughout the process until completion of the purchase of the property.All applicants are provided with the Communities and Local Government booklet, ‘Your Right to Buy Your Home’. This booklet fully explains the Right to Buy (RTB) process and is also available as a download from the Communities and Local Government web site. The booklet identifies statutory timescales, which we are expected to comply with. Following feedback received from tenants, we are developing an in-house booklet to fully explain our RTB process – this will be published early next year. Each RTB application that we receive is logged onto a database enabling us to monitor the process and ensure that the statutory timescales are met.This year to date, we have sold ten properties within the predefined timescales. The conveyance process which enables completion of the sale of the property is carried out by Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council’s Legal Services Department. They are locally based, thereby enabling requests for completion of sales and any issues to be dealt with quickly. To ensure value for money, we carry out ad-hoc comparisons of the open market valuations against our third party valuations. At point of transfer, we had little information in terms of service charge breakdowns. We established a service charge working group, and as a result significant improvements have been made. We are now more open and transparent in the way service charges are calculated to ensure fair and even charges for tenants and leaseholders, and we ensure that a breakdown of the service charge is provided on invoices that we generate. For example, we identified a number of tenants in one of our blocks of flats that were not paying for a particular service being provided. We liaised with each tenant accordingly, and now have a consistent fair charge for all tenants. We have legally consulted with leaseholders (under the Common hold and Leaseholder Reform Act 2002) regarding a portion charge for provision of heating, resulting in a fair charge for all. We have increased our management opportunities by changing the financial year for service charges from October to September, bringing this in line with the usual financial year of April to March, and the Leaseholder Forum approved this change. At the beginning of the year we introduced a new financial system with the aim of improving arrears. We don’t have any comparable figures from last year to determine improvements made. However, we can distinguish between debt subject to a payment plan and monies owed, and have a breakdown of charges, so have experienced significant resource improvements in-house. Our finance staff have received debt management training, so we are now more effective in taking payments and collecting arrears. Communications have improved, with the introduction of a quarterly arrears meeting to discuss cases and relevant actions to be taken. We acknowledge that some work remains to fully breakdown the service charges in all areas, but are confident that we will improve in this area. The stock condition survey data that we are collecting will assist us in this exercise. 73 3.6 Do homes to a for highhomeowners? standard? 3.10 Dowe weimprove have a good service We have a Leaseholder Forum that meets on a monthly basis. In partnership with the forum we are constantly striving to improve the information and services that are provided to our leaseholders and the forum members review and scrutinise our services. For example, we have acted on the leaseholders’ requests to hold estate walkabouts, and currently these are occurring on a bi-monthly basis. This has allowed us to identify repair and maintenance issues, and has allowed tenants and leaseholders to come together to identify common issues. The minutes of the leaseholder meetings are monitored to ensure that all the action points raised are carried out and completed. We actively encourage leaseholders to become involved in the forum, and ensure that copies of the minutes are sent out to all leaseholders to inform them of issues raised an actions taken. A number of leaseholders sit on other forums, (such as the Residents Participation Forum and the Quality and Design Forum) to ensure representation. We are striving to improve our relationship with our leaseholders. Earlier this year we offered leaseholders the opportunity to receive a free copy of their lease and to clarify issues about its content. Around 20% of leaseholders took up this opportunity. In addition’ in conjunction with the members of the forum, we are developing a Leaseholders’ Handbook. The purpose of this is to clearly set out the rights and responsibilities of leaseholders and to inform them of service standards and other useful information. All leaseholders will receive a copy early 2012. Right to Buy Following an internal audit on Right to Buy in December 2011, it was confirmed that, for the sample of sales reviewed, they had been 74 “We actively encourage leaseholders to become involved in the forum, and ensure that copies of the minutes are sent out to all leaseholders to inform them of issues raised an actions taken.” processed appropriately and in accordance with statutory timescales. However, our processes were ‘flat’, in terms of segregation of duties. A number of improvements have been made to our processes in line with the audit recommendations, including review and authorisation by the Head of Housing. A Right to Buy Policy has been drafted, and this will follow the appropriate review / authorisation procedures in July, including consultation with our tenants and leaseholders on the Residents Participation Forum. These improvements have led to a more efficient process, and will result in an effective process for our service users. Leasehold Management Following an internal audit on Leaseholder Management in December 2011, some further improvements have been made to our processes in order to improve the services that we provide to our leaseholders. A draft Leaseholder Management Policy has been developed, and will follow the appropriate review / authorisation procedures in July, including consultation with our tenants and leaseholders on the Residents Participation Forum. In addition, we are continuing to work on the development of a Leaseholder handbook – this should be distributed in Q3 2012/13. 3.10Do Dowe weput have a goodfirst? service for homeowners? 3.1 citizens Service Charges Sinking Fund We are continuing to work to improve the breakdown of our service charges, with the aim of being fair, open and transparent with our leaseholders, providing them with service charges that are clear to understand. The breakdown costs are based on actual costs incurred by MVH, and to date, approximately 90% of our charges have been fully broken down. This will result in cost savings for the organisation, and has reduced the number of complaints/queries raised by leaseholders regarding service charges. Previously in our accounts a provision was made for monies paid by leaseholders post transfer towards proposed capital works. We can now identify the actual fund held on a property by property basis and a Sinking Fund Certificate showing the balance for each tenant will be issued during the summer 2012, and annually thereafter. This will provide leaseholders with an accurate reflection of monies held in trust and works completed. Delivery outcome summary LS5 In Place Putting in Place 3 We have established a service charge working group, and have made significant improvements in determining service charge breakdowns. < Clearly setting out leaseholders’ rights and responsibilities in the form of a Leaseholder Handbook. 3 We have brought the service charges in line with our financial year. 3 We have introduced a new financial system to reduce arrears, and have provided training. < Our Leaseholder Forum is now in place and working closely with MVH. To Do 8 Resolve all outstanding sinking fund issues with MTCBC. 3 Sinking Fund by property basis, with annual statement to leaseholders. 3 Adopted a Right to Buy Policy and a Leasehold Management Policy – currently under consultation. 3 Consulted and review all services charges. 75 4. Assessing Outcomes 4. Our approach to assessing outcomes Methodology For the comprehensive assessment carried out in December 2011 we carried out an extensive review and involvement process set out below. This included extensive focus groups and analysis. This work has not been repeat for this update to the self assessment. However the update has been informed by • Stepping out – our major consultation exercise in June 2012 • Our Corporate Strategy • Analysis of year end performance and financial information • The resident Participation forum • The social enterprises we have worked with on our new strategy. 76 4. Assessing Outcomes Identifying our outcomes is part of our business planning process, and we have taken into account the promises made to our tenants at point of transfer, and the Welsh Government delivery outcomes. We have six corporate priorities, and have a number of outcomes under these six broad headings. We are continually assessing what we do, and have a number of agreed indicators and monitoring systems to validate our indicators. Many of our indicators are ‘quantitative’, where we count numbers of things that have happened. For example, we have a suite of key performance indicators, numerical measures against set performance targets. Also we have gathered a great deal of statistical information from the STATUS survey that was carried out. Our quantitative indicators demonstrate our performance, and the changes that have occurred. However, they don’t always assess tenants’ and service users’ views and experiences. ‘Qualitative methods’, on the other hand, provide a different form of information about our tenants’ and service users’ views and experiences. They provide us with stories of satisfaction, or dissatisfaction, tells us about their experiences, and what services they would like us to provide, or how we can better our existing services. We wanted to build on the results of the numerical performance measures, and selected a number of key business areas where we wanted to find out more about people’s experiences and perceptions. We held a number of focus groups with both tenants and staff, to gain their thoughts and perceptions, and reasons why they reached the conclusions that they had. Tenant Focus Groups Previously we have used a sub group of elected tenants and leaseholders from our Residents Participation Forum to review and critique some of our delivery outcomes. However, this time we wanted to gain the views of a larger cross section of our tenant base. We selected the focus groups based on four tenant types: a) Families (Gellideg) b) Singles and couples (Trelewis) c) Tenants > 50 years of age (Haven Close, Troedyrhiw) d) Younger people (aged 11 – 18) (Forsythia Project, Gurnos) The reason for this was to ensure representation, and to give a voice to groups of tenants that would not usually engage with us on a regular basis. We selected four key business areas: Repairs and maintenance (Gellideg) a) Planned improvement works (Trelewis) b) Communications (Haven Close) c) Green spaces and community (Forsythia Project) These business areas were reviewed previously, and we wanted to re-visit these areas to determine whether tenants felt that we have improved in these areas, and to identify areas where we can make improvements. Tenant Focus Groups Repairs and maintenance Tenants felt that it was easy to report a repair, with telephoning our Contact Centre and visiting reception proving the preferred methods of reporting a repair. Tenants rated our appointments system as ‘fair’ or ‘good’, although it was felt that waiting for a minor repair took too long, and that our 77 4. Assessing Outcomes appointments system is limited. Both of these factors will improve with the implementation of the opti-time system in 2012. There was a mixed perception when tenants were asked whether they felt that the repair was completed in a timely manner. It became apparent that tenants felt that our in-house repairs and maintenance team performed better than some of the external contractors that we engage with, and that there were clear inconsistencies between the two. Therefore, we need to ensure that our contractors’ performance is monitored more closely. Generally both our in house teams and contractors were perceived as being polite, courteous and clean. However, tenants felt that the tradesmen could be better informed to signpost them to other areas of the business on request. This is an area that we can address with better internal communications. Planned improvement works (WHQS) The group of tenants in the focus group had kitchens, bathrooms and electrical works, or had external wall insulation in 2010. We asked tenants to comment on the services received prior to the WHQS works commencing. Although generally tenants felt that the communications they received (letters, information packs etc) were easy to understand, they felt that the changes and/or delays to the programme rendered some of the information obsolete. Tenants felt that there were frequent delays between planned start dates and actual start dates, and that they could have been better informed and kept up to date regarding changes to the programme. There was a mixed view on the performance of the Tenant Liaison Officers, however, we have 78 increased our resources in this area in 2011 to address some issues that had been raised in 2010. The overall perception of the time taken to complete the works was rated as ‘poor’. The tenants who had the external wall insulation acknowledged that the weather was a factor in the time taken to complete the works. However, the time taken to complete the kitchens, bathrooms and electrical works was felt to be too long, and outside of the target time frame, leading to inconvenience for tenants. The general satisfaction with the planned improvement works in this area with one contractor was found to be poor. Several individual experiences or ‘stories’ were further reviewed and analysed as a result of the focus group. As an organisation, we have acknowledged that on site management and contractor performance was poor in 2010. This year we have developed a strategic core group (which includes tenant representation) to oversee the progress and performance of each of the four principle contractors, and on site management has improved. The feedback received during the session has informed some of the areas for improvement in this area. Communications Following the results of the Experian tenant profiling exercise, it was found that the ‘older people’had clear communication preferences – more traditional methods. We held a focus group with a number of tenants over 50 in one of our sheltered schemes to determine as to whether we are communicating with them effectively. The preferred methods of communication were mailed letters/leaflets, and our quarterly newsletter ‘Hometalk’, both being quoted as ‘easy to read’ and ‘easy to understand’. In 4. Assessing Outcomes addition, communications received from the Scheme Manager were noted. The group of tenants didn’t use our website as a method of communication, and rarely visited our Head Office. Tenants used a wide variety of more traditional communication methods to contact us, including letter, telephone, contacting the Area Housing Officer and visiting us. The methods of communication not used were via our website, e-mail and text. The communications received, and communication methods used by tenants were rated as ‘good’, and no members of the focus group gave any negative comments or raised any areas for improvement. As an organisation, we need to be mindful of the preferred communication methods to ensure effective communications are maintained. Green spaces and community The previous focus group that looked at this area felt that we have not yet made an impact on the environment within our estates and that we don’t utilise the ‘green spaces’ in our communities. We wanted to gain the perceptions of young people, as they potentially may be our tenants of the future, and this is an area that we felt they would have a strong opinion on. We asked the group to tell us what they liked best about the area in which the live. The strongest answer was the ‘Forsythia Project’, as the youth base is extremely popular with the teenagers in the area in terms of recreation. However, their ‘houses’ and their ‘neighbours’ were rated as being some of the things that they liked best, some quoting the level of planned improvement works that have already taken place to date. We asked the group what they disliked most about the area. The strongest answer by far “The lack of recreational activities in the area was discussed, with the conclusion that we could use the green spaces available in the community to develop more recreational and sporting opportunities” was the amount of drug dealing and abuse in the area, although generally this was not perceived as a threat, as the majority of the group felt safe in the community. This is an area that we have highlighted with the Local Services Board. Old, poor housing was noted, although the completion of the WHQS works and development of the voids processes will assist with this issue. The lack of recreational activities in the area was discussed, with the conclusion that we could use the green spaces available in the community to develop more recreational and sporting opportunities, including more football fields, a bike track, a skate park and sporting centre. We are putting additional resources 79 4. Assessing Outcomes into external environmental improvement programmes, and will consider the feedback in determining project priorities. “A lot of positive comments were received, particularly about front line staff, commenting on their professionalism and helpfulness.” Conclusion The focus group tenants were fully participative, and the sessions were extremely useful providing us with a different form of information and a depth of understanding about what drives tenants’ opinions. A lot of positive comments were received, particularly about front line staff, commenting on their professionalism and helpfulness. Many tenants were complimentary about the services provided in some key areas, but there was some criticism of some of the services that we provide (in particular, the planned improvement programme) and many suggestions as to how we could improve. The main areas of concern have been considered, and have informed our business improvements. Staff focus groups We gather staff perceptions and experiences in several ways. We have a well established Staff Consultative Group (SCG) that meet on a bi-monthly basis to discuss, review and critique policies, procedures and HR issues and organisational developments. The SCG provide a quality assurance function for all matters that affect staff within the organisation. We held a staff away day 80 recently, where we reviewed staff perceptions as to how we are performing as an organisation in terms of service areas (including housing management, planned improvement works and repairs and maintenance). The feedback received at the staff away day led us to select some key business areas where we wanted to explore staff views further. We took four main areas: a) Repairs and maintenance b) Voids c) Allocations, tenancies and supporting tenants d) Rents, service charges and leaseholder services A cross-functional panel of staff members were selected for the focus groups. All consisted of front line staff and support staff, no management representatives present – we wanted staff to honestly review and critique our assessment, and how they think we are performing in each of the respective areas, with suggestions for improvement. Below we have summarised the staff focus group feedback, focusing in particular, on the areas that were critiqued, and the required improvements highlighted by staff. Project Description Project Manager Corporate Theme Delivery Outcome Target Date % Complete Comments Develop tenant and leaseholder profiling strategy and process To obtain a complete profile of tenants and leaseholders, and ensure that all information is recorded and accessible Head of Housing Tenants GF1/GF2/LS2 LS3 March 2012 70% Development of a Customer Services Strategy Achieve some of the promises made to tenants by improving services and improving access to them. Improve the quality and speed of responses Head of Housing Tenants GF1/LS3 March 2013 0% Opti time and welfare reform have made us review this strategy and new date for March 2013 has been set Fully embed our Single Equality Scheme, and close down actions identified in the action plan To maintain excellent standards in all that we do by ensuring that there is equality of opportunity for all, fostered in an environment of mutual respect and dignity. HR Manager People / Tenants GF1/GF2 March 2012 80% This review has been superseded by the wider review conducted by Professor Harris Beider. An initial review has been completed and a follow up programme agreed, supported by a task and finish group which includes a member of RPF and the Board, which will commence in January 2012. The follow up programme includes support to revise the Single Equalities Scheme and associated policies, training and support for staff across the organisation, and delivery of a bespoke action plan designed to improve our approach to community cohesion. 4. Assessing Outcomes Major projects in progress at September 1 2012 81 82 Description Project Manager Corporate Theme Delivery Outcome Target Date % Complete Comments Publicise and fully embed our Welsh Language Scheme, and close down actions identified in Action Plan To enable people to communicate with us in Welsh if this is their preferred language. To promote the use of the Welsh language in the community and the workplace. To implement a training program for staff who want to learn to speak Welsh. Corporate Services Manager People / Tenants GF1/GF2 April 2012 60% The original target date was September 2011. Programme has been delayed due to other business priorities Develop Regeneration Strategy Develop approach to physical, social and economic regeneration for the benefits of tenants and wider communities Regeneration Manager Tenants / Community GF2/LS3 November 2012 50% This work has commenced through a follow up audit of procurement and delivery of recommendations – underway however due to sickness it has been delayed until 2013. Further develop our insurance processes to minimise risk with a view to driving down premium costs To minimise risks, drive down associated costs and premium costs. To ensure that roles and responsibilities are outlined, and processes are mapped. Corporate Services Manager Delivery GF4/LS1 March 2012 60% Original target was Sept 2011. Delay due to changes to staff structure. 4. Assessing Outcomes Project Description Project Manager WHQS Programme Year 3/4 Delivery To maintain progress against the WHQS programme. Completion of the scheduled works, identification of associated risks, and management of associated contracts Director of Assets Maximise external funding opportunities To capitalise on opportunities that exist to maximise our spending capacity Director of Assets Review specialist accommodation in line with MAASH Scheme and Supporting People Operational Plan and work with MTCBC to develop specialist and single person accommodation To future proof service and maximise income Head of Housing Achieve Sheltered Housing Accreditation and upgrade Lifeline Equipment Accreditation will improve services for tenants, will improve the working practices of scheme managers, and will secure funding for 'supporting people' posts. Equipment upgrade will improve services, allow flexible working and will reduce maintenance costs Housing Policy & Research Manager Corporate Theme Homes Homes / Communities Tenants / Homes Tenants Delivery Outcome Target Date % Complete Comments GF5/LS4 March 2014 63% Complete the remainder of the WHQS programme in line with Savills recommendations. LS1 On going 65% Expenditure in this year has maximised the grant income and we anticipate over £1.2m LS2 On going 80% Project work has been completed and the review is now with the Council for political adoption LS3 October 2012 80% The achievement date has been moved to October 2012 and remains on target 4. Assessing Outcomes Project 83 84 Description Project Manager Corporate Theme Delivery Outcome Target Date % Complete Comments Asbestos Management Plan Embed a comprehensive approach to the management of asbestos Director of Assets Tenants/ Homes/ People LS4 Feb 2012 90% Draft awaiting Board approval Improve responsive repairs Fully implement Opti-time and improve multi skill working Director of Assets Tenants/ People LS4 April 2012 50% On going Review Tenant and Leaseholder Handbooks The current handbook is out of date and we need a modern easy to use handbook for new tenants Director of Housing Tenants GF2/LS5 June 2012 50% Leaseholder handbook completed and has been consulted with leaseholder. Tenant handbook currently under review. Target for hand book is June 2013 Improve external website The current website is not interactive and has limited information and we need a website that is easy to use and allows a range of interactive services Corporate Services Manager Tenants GF1/GF2 June 2015 Increase productivity and financial control systems within PST To have a effective budget management in place with in all areas of PST operation Director of Finance Finance GF4 Jan 2012 Neighbourhood management plans To use Experian and STATUS returns to produce neighbourhood management plans Director of Housing Tenants LS3 Dec 2014 Delayed until Corporate Strategy completed Profiled repairs service Create a database of information from returns to allow us to be more responsive to individual needs in our repair service Director of Assets Tenants LS4 Dec 2014 This has been delayed as we continue to increase tenant profile information to over 60% Covered in Corporate strategy and new date of 2015 70% PST business plan will be returning to Board in January. 4. Assessing Outcomes Project 4. Assessing Outcomes Completed projects since the December 2011 self assessment Project Description Develop Financial Inclusion Strategy To increase tenant's ability to manage incomes and have access to mainstream financial products The development of a robust and effective Governance Framework To ensure that our Board is effective and can appropriately discharge its functions. To ensure that governance arrangements comply with regulatory requirements, and reflect our strategic objectives. To deliver a clear vision and set of values for the organisation that are at the heart of everyone's work. Development of a Performance Management Strategy and Framework To embed a performance management culture where all activities are contributing to the six strategic corporate objectives. Develop a Data Protection Strategy to ensure on going compliance To conduct a health check to ensure that MVH is fully compliant with DPA legislation. To develop a DPA Strategy, and outline areas for improvement Create a budget book Improve financial control across teams with the introduction of a budget books Review the vision and values The message and vision from the transfer needs refreshing Develop general needs and leaseholder service charges, and income maximisation Ensure that MVH complies with legal responsibilities in terms of service charges. To ensure that MVH has policies and processes in place to maximise income through the recovery of debt. To determine a consistent approach to rent charging Establish service standards for customer services To establish a suite of service standards for customer services against which we can measure our performance Produce street by street programme of repair works Tenants would like a realistic programme of modernisation and painting for each month going forward 85