design products +
Transcription
design products +
Thomas Dolby talks tech at Design West 7 EE Times THE NEWS SOURCE FOR THE CREATORS OF TECHNOLOGY What’s your embedded strategy? 24 ISSUE 1619 MONDAY, APRIL 2, 2012 WWW.EETIMES.COM CONTENTS APRIL 2 , 2012 35 An UBM Electronics Publication® (516) 562-5000; Fax: (516) 562-5325 Online: www.eetimes.com Vice President, UBM Electronics PUBLISHER David Blaza (415) 947-6929 [email protected] EDITOR IN CHIEF Junko Yoshida (516) 232-7835 [email protected] NEWS DIRECTOR George Leopold (516) 562-5090 [email protected] EXECUTIVE EDITOR Nicolas Mokhoff (516) 562-5625 [email protected] ART DIRECTOR Debee Rommel (516) 562-5280 [email protected] COMPUTING, MEDICAL DEVICES EDITOR Rick Merritt (408) 930-7372 [email protected] EDITOR, www.eetimes.com Dylan McGrath (415) 738-6428 [email protected] WEST COAST ONLINE EDITOR Sylvie Barak (415) 947-6317 [email protected] EDITORIAL DIRECTOR, EE LIFE Brian Fuller (415) 947-6244 [email protected] EUROPE Peter Clarke, LONDON; EUROPEAN NEWS DIRECTOR (011) 44 7767 865593 [email protected] Anne-Françoise Pelé, PARIS EDITOR (011)33 6 87 16 87 52 [email protected] Colin Holland, LONDON EDITOR (011) 44 20 8319 1324 [email protected] INTELLIGENCE OPINION 4 50 Commentary: How ST could lose its MEMS mojo 32 DESIGN + PRODUCTS Last Word: Why machines need to smarten up Global Feature: Embedded INDIA K.C. Krishnadas, EDITOR TECHONLINE [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS R. Colin Johnson, TECHNOLOGY (503) 490-7626 [email protected] Bill Schweber, ANALOG DESIGN (781) 839-1248 [email protected] Ismini Scouras, NEW PRODUCTS (347) 312-3162 [email protected] COPY DESK Diana Scheben, CHIEF COPY EDITOR [email protected] Susan Rambo, COPY EDITOR (415) 947-6675 [email protected] NEWS OF THE TIMES 7 8 9 14 16 Dolby plays Design West General Clark defends solar MEMS sensor fusion goes hardware-agnostic Globalfoundries still betting on AMD’s business EE Times fetes ACE winners 35 37 38 42 SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES (800) 577-5356; Fax (847) 763-9606, www.subscribeeetimes.com CUSTOMER SERVICE PO Box # 3609 Northbrook IL 60065- 3257 Postage Due account number - 95562-000. [email protected] (847) 559-7597 Integrating functional safety Planet Analog: Challenges of USB battery charging EE LIFE Build your own crack POTS 48 Mentoring: Two perspectives Beer: It’s what’s for work GLOBAL WATCH 20 22 The software side of the story VCN safeguards devices 47 ART/PRODUCTION Mara Cruz, ART DIRECTOR, ONLINE [email protected] Vision for the next-gen UI ST narrows TI’s MEMS lead Silicon set for role in MEMS market boom COVER STORY 24 Embedded: Got a strategy? UBM llc Pat Nohilly, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Marie Myers, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, MANUFACTURING Copyright® 2012 All Rights Reserved Printed in the USA UBM plc, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, N.Y. 11030 EE Times (ISSN#0192-1541) is published 20 times a year (once in JAN, JULY, AUG, DEC; twice in FEB, MAR, APR, MAY, JUNE, SEPT, OCT, NOV) by UBM llc, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 and is free to qualified engineers and managers involved in engineering decisions. One year subscription rates for others: United States $280; and Canada $324. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to APC Postal Logistics, LLC, P.O. Box 503 RPO W Beaver Cre, Rich-Hill ON L4B 4R6. Registered for GST as UBM llc. GST#R13288078, Customer Number 2116057, Agreement Number 40011901. Annual air mail rates to Europe/Mexico, Central/South America, Africa $449; Asia, Australia and New Zealand $518. Mail subscription with check or money order in US Dollars to EE Times, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 Circulation Dept. Periodicals postage paid at Manhasset, N.Y. and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER Send address changes to EE Times, P.O. Box 2164, Skokie, IL 60076. Please address subscription, inquiries, editorial copy and advertising to EE Times, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, N.Y. 11030. Copyright 2012 by UBM llc. All rights reserved. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 3 COMMENTARY ST riding high on the MEMS tide, but facing a downside It seems STMicroelectronics has really found its mojo when it comes to MEMS. Indeed, market watcher Yole Développement emphasizes just how well ST and many other companies are doing in its ranking of the microelectromechanical systems market’s top 30 companies for 2011. ST is both an IDM, with products under its own brand, and a MEMS foundry supplier to Hewlett-Packard and others. Its total MEMS sales leapt to $907 million in 2011 from about $600 million in 2010, according to Yole. But ST’s fast growth curve in MEMS, and the design slots it is believed to hold (hint: Think of a round fruit that’s so tasty, someone’s stolen a bite), could mean it’s running out of upside and facing some potential downside if it should get designed out. Then again, it’s possible to get designed out of any product, and most companies would rather be the incumbent in a winning platform than be on the outside looking in. Either way, the top 30 ranking (see story, page 20) underscores what exciting, dynamic times we live in. In 2011, generally considered a difficult year, the IC market was essentially flat and stalled at $300 billion in value. But the MEMS market grew 17 percent, to $10 billion in sales revenues, according to Yole. In the last issue of EE Times, I described ST’s mobile-handset chip joint venture as an achor weighing down its financial results, and suggested ST might do well to try selling ST-Ericsson to a suitor or suitors from China. I noted such a move would leave ST free to focus on the things it does well, including MEMS. According to IHS iSuppli, ST was the seventh-largest chip company in the world in 2011, with revenue of $9.792 billion—which puts its MEMS revenue at about 9 percent of its total semiconductor sales for the year. There is every sign that MEMS as a percentage of total chip sales will continue to grow rapidly, both for ST and for the industry as a whole, given that the MEMS market faces almost perfect growing conditions. The speed of the rise is phenomenal. ST has shown, courtesy of a slide presentation from senior executive vice president Carmelo Papa, that its sales of MEMS devices, excluding foundry work done for HP, went from $30 million in 2006 to $650 million in 2011—more than a twentyfold increase in five years. But the Yole ranking shows that others are also doing well in MEMS. Knowles Electronics, a maker of silicon microphones, jumped to fifth place as In 2011, a difficult year, ICs finished flat; MEMS sales grew 17 percent 4 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 its sales went from $140 million in 2010 to $362 million in 2011, a remarkable increase. What’s behind the runaway growth is no secret: The smartphones and tablets that have been selling like hotcakes are packed with MEMS sensors. Of particular significance are design wins with Apple, which continues to dominate the mobile consumer device market and outperform its Android rivals. But there’s the rub. According to IHS iSuppli, ST is the sole supplier of MEMS gyroscopes and accelerometers for the iPhone and iPad, and Apple accounted for half of ST’s MEMS business in 2011. That puts ST at risk of becoming overly dependent on the success of one customer. And if that sounds familiar, it’s because ST’s dependence on a faltering Nokia, once the undisputed leader in mobile phones, is believed to have been one of the reasons for the industry realignment that led to the creation of ST-Ericsson. Nonetheless, the MEMS market’s fertile growth conditions should help ST and others to diversify their customer base for some time to come. Consumer electronics developers’ love affair with MEMS shows no signs of cooling, and more sensor and actuator functions are being rendered as MEMS. The high volumes and lower prices are washing back to support sales in traditional markets such as industrial and automotive electronics. And MEMS components are making inroads into sports, personal-health and even clinical medical electronics applications. Sometime soon, there might even be a MEMS device to measure mojo. p By Peter Clarke ([email protected]), European news director of EE Times. .REPORT EE Times Confidential’s MEMS Sector Profile and Database analyzes the current MEMS market and examines where it is headed. The study’s database offers vital statistics for more than 200 MEMS market players. http://bit.ly/GD4kgm .MORE ONLINE “Apple bought half of ST’s MEMS in 2011, says IHS,” http://bit.ly/xtQvG5 ARE YOU FIVE YEARS OUT? Most people live in the present. The world of now. But a handful of us work in a unique world that doesn’t quite exist yet – the world of Five Years Out. Five Years Out is the tangible future. And the people who live and work there know that new technologies, new materials, new ideas and new electronics will make life not only different, but better. Not just cheaper, but smarter. Not just easier, but more inspired. Five Years Out is an exciting place to be. So exciting that, once you’ve been there, it’s hard to get excited about the present. Because we know what’s coming is going to be so much better. Five Years Out is a community of builders, designers, engineers and imaginers who navigate the path between possibility and practicality. Creating the future of everything from cars to coffeemakers. Are you one of them? Then you’re probably working with us. arrow.com From extreme value to extreme performance. Infiniium 9000 Series • 600 MHz- 4 GHz • MSO and DSO models • 20 GSa/s sample rate • 40 Mpts memory std. (optional to 1 Gpt) • >30 protocol, compliance and analysis options Whether you need the fastest real-time oscilloscope on earth with the highest measurement accuracy anywhere, or something a little more basic, from 20 MHz to 90 GHz Agilent oscilloscopes outperform in every category. That’s why discerning engineers have made Agilent the fastest growing oscilloscope company in the world since 1997. Like you, we’re working on what’s next. That’s thinking ahead. That’s Agilent. Scan code or visit http://goo.gl/NR3Xm for 9000 Series demo video © 2011 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Explore the Infiniium 9000 Series. Read our app note for scope-based protocol analysis tips. www.agilent.com/find/9000seriesscopes u.s. 1-800-829-4444 canada 1-877-894-4414 News OF THE TIMES PHOTO: TRISH TUNNEY In his ’80s hit he was ‘blinded with science,’ but in fact innovator Thomas Dolby has a keen eye for disruptive technology DESIGN WEST Dolby sings of twists and turns in digital music By Rick Merritt SAN JOSE, CALIF. — Thomas Dolby held several hundred engineers in thrall here last week with stories about his journey in and out and back into the music industry. In a detour along the way, he helped create—and destroy—a billion-dollar business in polyphonic ringtones. The lesson engineers should draw from it all? “S--t happens,” the musician said in a Design West keynote. Technology has opened up amazing opportunities—and created more than a few problems—for the music industry, said Dolby, best known for his 1980s hit “She Blinded Me with Science,” one of three songs he performed during his Design West address. “You used to have to spend millions just to get out in front of fans,” Dolby said. “When I started out at 17, [you] had to get a cassette tape to an A&R man, then get the radio stations to play it, and all these other things had to fall in place.” Now the Web can create instant stars and targeted audiences. “The music industry will be like day trading, with a music manager behind a screen” building a fan base through social networking tools that identify “qualified listeners with a laser focus,” the musician said in a Q&A with press here. Dolby created a Web-based mystery game, the Floating City, as a companion for his latest album. It became a forum for 11,000 of his fans as they tried to unravel the clues. “I was in the forums lurking around, reading their conspiracy theories. If I saw something I liked, the Floating City Gazette would publish it, and it became true,” he said. Dolby is on tour promoting the new album, his first in 20 years. He travels with a trailer “that looks like it was April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 7 NEWS OF THETIMES designed by Jules Verne and H.G. Wells.” It acts as a portable studio, recording 30-second video clips from fans as part of a time capsule for the Floating City. The electronic-music era had a rocky start. Back when Dolby was embarking on his career, “electronic instruments were quite bulky, they didn’t stay in tune and they were quite expensive,” he said, noting that one of his first synthesizers was the size of a refrigerator and cost twice as much as his first London flat. About the time the commercial Internet was born, Dolby snagged a oneyear grant from Paul Allen’s Interval Research group to explore some concepts at the nexus of music and technology. That led to the formation of Headspace, creator of the Beatnik audio engine. Dolby described Beatnik as “a SoundBlaster card in software.” In 1994, Dolby met Marc Andreessen and Jim Clark, co-founders of Netscape, and subsequently convinced them to support audio in their browser. “But companies said if audio took an extra second to load their front page, that was too long,” Dolby recalled. The resistance pushed Headspace to make its code as tight and efficient as possible, an effort that paid off after Sun Microsystems licensed the technology for use in Java. Nokia heard the news and contacted Headspace for help getting the code to run on its phones. The handset giant wanted to compete with Japanese phones that used an audio chip to deliver polyphonic ringtones. Headspace suddenly had a vibrant market. “By 2005, most phone makers licensed Beatnik, and ringtones were a billiondollar business” that didn’t involve the big record companies, Dolby said. That changed when Headspace developed the rich media format for embedding song samples in ringtones. “We inadvertently brought the large recording companies into the game,” Dolby said. “They would sit down with the carriers and do deals that cut out all the cottage ringtone publishers. Within a few years, the window for polyphonic ringtones ended because the wireless networks were good enough to handle the whole song.” In 2008, Dolby retired from the tech business, moved back to England and resumed his music career. After his one-day stop in Silicon Valley last week, Dolby headed back to the East Coast to resume the U.S. tour that will bring him back to the Bay Area for a San Francisco concert on April 13.p lMORE Design West coverage http://bit.ly/rRr4ye The Floating City http://bit.ly/kZqDsn CLEANTECH General Clark issues call to arms on solar By Rick Merritt SAN JOSE, CALIF. — Just a few miles from the shuttered Solyndra plants where 1,100 workers were laid off in August, retired four-star general and former U.S. presidential candidate Wesley Clark called for putting the fledgling solar industry at the front of a new U.S. national economic strategy that focuses on being a world leader in production of low-cost clean energy. “This is an industry central to America’s future,” Clark said in his keynote address at PV America West last month, adding that it would require government support beyond 2016 “for the technology to mature and stand on its own feet.” His remarks drew a standing ovation at the solar conference here. The U.S. solar industry now employs slightly more than 100,000 people, more than twice the level it employed 8 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 ‘We need an X Prize for solar efficiency,’ retired general and onetime presidential candidate Wesley Clark told PV America West Here’s why joining ACEC could be the healthiest decision you make all year. Membership in ACEC comes with many benefits — including health benefits through the ACEC Life/Health Trust insured by UnitedHealthcare. Members enjoy the privilege of working with experts who provide solutions that can lead to healthier employees and a healthier bottom line. Here are a few more “healthy” reasons to become an ACEC member: · Preferred pricing: As an ACEC member, your firm may be eligible for favorable rates. · Satisfied employees: Chances are, employees’ doctors are in UnitedHealthcare’s provider network — 98% of the U.S. population has local access.1 · Easier administration through one-stop shopping: No need to look further than the ACEC Life/Health Trust for medical, dental, vision, life and disability. · No need to switch brokers: Our Designated Installation Team will work with the agent of your choice to make the move to the ACEC Life/Health Trust fast and painless. Insured and serviced by: Learn why thousands of engineering firms have made the decision – for health reasons – to join, and stay, with the ACEC Life/Health Trust. Call 877-263-3613 or visit uhctogether.com/acec2 for more information. The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the ACEC Life/Health Insurance Trust and Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company are three separate legal operating entities and, as such, the organizations are governed and function independently. UnitedHealthcare’s services are provided with the authorization of the ACEC Life/Health Trust. Questions related to health benefits offered through the Life/Health Trust should be directed to 1-800-573-0415. 1 Network statistic based on GeoAccess information and UnitedHealthcare standard network access mileage criteria, 2010 NEWS OF THETIMES in 2009, thanks to deployments that jumped nearly a gigawatt to 1,889 megawatts last year, said Rhone Resch, chief executive of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). The industry’s employment rolls could rise to as many as 250,000 people over the next five years, he added. Eight utilities plan to invest $2.5 billion in various solar programs, said Julia Hamm, chief executive of the Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA), which counts about 400 utilities among its members. “We’ve often heard it said utilities hate solar, but that’s not true,” Hamm said. But while “utility skepticism has diminished dramatically, it has not vanished altogether,” she said. What’s more, big challenges loom. According to some reports, photovoltaic panel prices plunged as much as 50 percent in the past year. The decline is widely attributed to the billions in export subsidies that the Chinese government has given to domestic manufacturers since 2010. High-profile U.S. panel startup Solyndra got caught in the dynamics. In March, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it would impose a tariff of 2.9 to 4.73 percent on import- ed Chinese solar panels, citing the illegality of the export subsidies. The penalty could increase next month, when the Commerce Department is expected to rule on whether Chinese panel makers are selling the products for less than their cost to manufacture. In the wake of Solyndra’s failure, various critics have declared the game over for U.S. PV panel manufacturing. Nonetheless, trade groups such as SEIA and advocates such as Clark continue to promote a role for PV and other solar technologies in the States. “The energy sector has been seen as declining, but we should make it instead a bigger pie, not a smaller pie,” said Clark. “We have to talk about a new vision for distributed energy, captured close to where it’s produced and made cheaper. “We need an X Prize for solar efficiency and get it into classrooms in America to publicize it,” Clark said, calling for greater academic and industry involvement in solar technology. “We’re not going to be energy independent in the near term on solar, so don’t wrap energy independence and solar together in the near term,” Clark warned, noting that the shift to electric and hybrid cars is “going slowly.” On the other hand, “we are dealing with climate change; we have got to move away from carbon-based fuels, and the center of that program is solar energy,” he said. “That’s the national security argument we need.” Clark did not directly answer the question of whether he would run for president again. “I’ve been there and have a couple of T-shirts,” he joked. The solar industry faces other immediate challenges, said SEIA’s Resch. A 30 percent tax credit on solar installations that Resch called “the backbone of solar” is under fire by legislators. Some utilities want to cap the amount of solar energy that residential users can sell back to them. In addition, some new smart meters don’t support selling back energy from rooftop solar panels. And the government’s Section 1603 Treasury Program, supporting use of solar in small installations, is set to expire. “Changes in meters could shut down the entire industry in California, the largest solar-market state in the nation,” Resch warned. He added that pressure is building in Washington for fundamental tax reforms. “Without the right policy, your company could go out of business.” p SENSOR FUSION Hardware-agnostic sensor data integration: MEMS’ next frontier? By Junko Yoshida AS MORE microelectromechanical system sensors show up in mobile devices, the focus of MEMS design has begun shifting from discrete MEMS components to MEMS sensor data integration. How raw data from multiple sensors is “fused” and “interpreted” makes a noticeable difference in a system’s power consumption and application performance, said Ian Chen, executive vice 10 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 president of startup Sensor Platforms Inc. With that premise as its mission, Sensor Platforms has rolled a library of software algorithms and middleware that a company statement says are designed “to interpret users’ contexts and intents” using data accumulated by mobile devices’ complement of sensors. The MEMS sensors most often found in today’s smartphones and tablets include accelerometers, magnetometers, gyroscopes and barometers. In its new MEMS Sector Profile and Database (http://bit.ly/GD4kgm), EE Times Confidential cites “the rise of the sensor fusion revolution” and asks an attendant question: “Who will determine the sensor architecture, where the processing will reside and the motherboard-level sensor fusion architecture?” 650V CoolMOS™ CFDA Automotive CoolMOS™ Technology in Pole Position With the new 650V CoolMOS™ CFDA Infineon releases an outstanding Automotive qualified technology, the first one with an integrated Fast Body Diode on the market. The new generation combines all benefits of fast switching Superjunction MOSFETs such as better light load efficiency, reduced gate charge, lower switching losses, easy implementation and outstanding reliability. The Fast Body Diode is key for addressing resonant switching topologies used in such applications as battery charging and DC/DC converters. Key features and benefits of 650V CoolMOS™ CFDA First 650V Automotive qualified technology with integrated Fast Body Diode Lowest switching losses High efficiency and power density Self limiting di/dt and dv/dt Limited voltage overshoot during hard commutation Low gate charge value Qg Easy to use For further information please visit our website: [ www.infineon.com/cfda ] NEWS OF THETIMES Though sensor fusion might mean physical integration of diverse sensors in a single, monolithic device, Sensor Platforms offers sensor fusion in software that is hardware agnostic. The company says the single-codebase software can run in its entirety on an applications processor or on a sensor hub, or can be spread over the system. “Our software allows system designers to pick and choose different supply sources for each sensor,” Chen said. “The flexibility in sourcing is critical, since these sensors come at different price and performance points.” Another advantage that Sensor Platforms claims is conservation of sensor power. Chen noted that “up to 10 milliwatts is added in power consumption when sensors are in use.” The startup’s FreeMotion Library, he said, includes a proprietary algorithm that can “turn off power-hungry sensors, like the gyroscope, and emulate their function with lower-power sensors when user movements are slow,” to cut sensor power consumption by up to 90 percent. Reliability is another issue. Though the fact is not broadly advertised, compass calibration on some smartphones can be off by 90°, Chen said. “All sensors require frequent calibration to maintain their data quality,” he added. The FreeMotion Library architecture supports reliable sampling and continual cross-sensor calibration to ensure reli- 12 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 able sensor information, both for application developers and end users. Packing a system with MEMS sensors is just a first step toward improved system power consumption, design flexibility, data reliability and applications performance, said Tony Massimini, chief of technology at Semico Research. “How do the system designers fully utilize [the available sensor data?] We may be just scratching the surface,” he said. “System designers, many new to MEMS, need software development tools.” Indeed, the need for software development kits extends to applications developers looking to alchemize mobile device sensors’ divergent motion data into information their apps can exploit. “Apps need information and context about the user, not just the user’s location or changes in his motion or direction,” Chen said. He said Sensor Platforms is releasing the FreeMotion Library’s application programming interface so that its sensor calibration and sensor fusion can provide robust data with better accuracy. Sensor Platforms claims the FreeMotion SDK offers “a foundation to extend the type of information that applications can gain from sensor data.” MEMS-sensor suppliers are developing their own sensor fusion software. Earlier this year, for example, Freescale Semiconductor rolled its Xtrinsic sensor fusion algorithms for electronic com- pass applications, which combine magnetometer-provided headings with corrections from inertial sensors that compensate for stray magnetic fields. Freescale is offering its sensor fusion algorithms as a free download for its MEMS sensor users. Last fall, STMicroelectronics unveiled its iNEMO Engine Sensor Fusion Suite of algorithms. ST said the suite can be combined with its iNEMO Inertial Modules to create complete and customizable hardware/software multi-axis MEMS sensor solutions for enhanced motion and accurate heading recognition. Asked about the competition, Chen said MEMS sensor vendors use proprietary libraries to lock customers into their products, whereas his company’s solution is hardware independent. Semico’s Massimini mentioned Movea as another potential competitor to Sensor Platforms. Movea offers motion-responsive software, firmware and semiconductor IP for markets such as mobile devices and tablets, interactive TV and sports, and electronic health care systems. “Movea has been delivering solutions for several years,” Massimini noted, adding that the company “has developed a system that allows system developers to implement their algorithms using Movea IP blocks.” Massimini said Movea “is working with a CAD vendor so the output of this tool can be used to design an ASIC.” p The World’s Largest Selection OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR IMMEDIATE SHIPMENT! 1.800.344.4539 DIGIKEY.COM 2 MILLION PARTS ONLINE | 500+ INDUSTRY-LEADING SUPPLIERS | NEW PRODUCTS ADDED DAILY Digi-Key is an authorized distributor for all supplier partners. New products added daily. © 2012 Digi-Key Corporation, 701 Brooks Ave. South, Thief River Falls, MN 56701, USA NEWS OF THETIMES FOUNDRIES Globalfoundries expects increased sales to AMD in new agreement’s wake By Dylan McGrath SANTA CLARA, CALIF. — Globalfoundries expects more business from Advanced Micro Devices in 2012, despite an amended wafer-supply agreement that gives AMD the right to use other wafer foundries for 28-nanometer accelerated processing units (APUs). Last month, AMD and Globalfoundries announced the foundry provider had waived a requirement that AMD’s 28-nm APUs be manufactured only at Globalfoundries. In exchange, AMD agreed to give Globalfoundries a cash payment of $425 million and transfer its remaining Globalfoundries stake to the foundry provider. AMD said it would take a $278 million charge associated with the equity transfer. Many industry pundits saw the change as the beginning of the end of the relationship between AMD and its former manufacturing unit, spun out in 2009. But in a conference call with analysts following the announcement, Thomas Seifert, AMD’s chief financial officer, said AMD planned to spend about $1.5 billion with Globalfoundries in 2012 and to have 28-nm products manufactured at both Globalfoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. AMD spent about $900 million on wafers processed by Globalfoundries in 2011, Michael Noonen, senior vice president of sales, market and quality at Globalfoundries, said in an interview here at the recent Common Platform Alliance Technology Forum. Noonen, who joined Globalfoundries in January after more than three years with NXP Semiconductors, said it had always been the foundry’s goal to separate itself completely from AMD, though he acknowledged that the deal’s structure might not have been as originally envisioned. Noonen said new management at both companies—the appointment of Ajit Manocha as CEO of Globalfoundries and Rory Read as CEO of AMD—had set the tone for a healthier relationship between the partners after poor 32-nm yields at Globalfoundries cut into AMD’s sales last year. The amended wafer-supply agreement and AMD’s divestiture of its equity stake in Globalfoundries further improve the working relationship, he said. “I want to compete for [AMD’s] business as opposed to it being contractually obligated,” Noonen said. “That’s always a stressful situation.” Seifert also painted a picture of an improving relationship, calling the amended wafer pact “not less but also not more than putting a mutually beneficial agreement in place that allows us to better balance risk moving forward, but also gives Globalfoundries the ability to further diversify their customer base.” No. 2 pure-play? According to Noonen, Globalfoundries surpassed United Microelectronics Corp. in the fourth quarter and is now the second-largest pure-play foundry in the world, behind TSMC. The claim is difficult to verify because Globalfoundries is a privately held company that doesn’t report quarterly financials. For all of 2011, market-research firm IC Insights Inc. ranked Globalfoundries third, with estimated sales of $3.58 billion, trailing UMC’s $3.76 billion and TSMC’s $14.6 billion. On the March analyst conference call, Seifert said Globalfoundries’ yield performance at 28 nm had improved significantly since the issue came to a head last summer. That gave AMD the confidence to enter the amended supply agreement, which is structured as a fixed-price, “take or pay” arrangement, whereas previously AMD had paid only for good dice. “We both believe that yields have progressed to a degree and maturity that we can make this transition,” Seifert said. Noonen said Globalfoundries expects to have its 28-nm process in volume production later this year, adding that the company already had processed about 40 customer test chips. The 28-nm transition didn’t involve “nearly the same degree of difficulty” as the shift to 32 nm, he said. “Going from 32 to 28 nm, there are a lot more process steps in common.” p 14 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 6 GHz Signal Generators ... the choice is yours ! Choosing the right signal generator is now easy — the SG386 RF Signal Generator from SRS performs like the Agilent N5181A, but sells for a fraction of the price! The SG386 is loaded with features including a rich suite of modulation functions, computer interfaces, and optional square wave clock outputs and analog I/Q inputs. It comes with a standard OCXO timebase that has very low aging characteristics and excellent frequency stability. And the SG386 has extremely low phase noise making it ideal in the most challenging applications. Agilent N5181A-506 SRS SG386 • • • DC to 6 GHz range ±0.002 ppm stability –116 dBc/Hz phase noise • • • 100 kHz to 6 GHz range ±1 ppm stability –118 dBc/Hz phase noise (1 GHz, 20 kHz offset) (1 GHz, 20 kHz offset) $16,373 $5,900 • 2 GHz, 4 GHz & 6 GHz models • AM, FM, ΦM, PM & sweeps • Excellent phase noise • Standard OCXO timebase • Rubidium timebase (opt.) • Square wave clock outputs (opt.) • I/Q modulation inputs (opt.) • GPIB, Ethernet & RS-232 DemoDirect SG386 ... DC to 6 GHz Free 30 day evaluation Call (408)744-9040 $5,900 Stanford Research Systems Tel: 408-744-9040 www.thinkSRS.com NEWS OF THETIMES EE Times, EDN honor 2012 ACE Award winners By Dylan McGrath SAN JOSE, CALIF. — UBM Electronics, a division of UBM plc and the publisher of EE Times and EDN, honored companies, teams and individuals for achievements over the past year by presenting the 2012 UBM Electronics ACE Awards here last week. The award program this year combined the EE Times ACE (Annual Creativity in Electronics) Awards and the EDN Innovation Awards. It was conducted in conjunction with Design West, a new conference and expo built around the rich foundation of training, education and products established by ESC, combined for the first time with popular summits and new event launches in one venue. The UBM Electronics ACE Awards recognize and honor the people and companies behind the technologies and new products that are transforming the global electronics industry. A panel of EE Times editors narrowed down the entries to five finalists in each category, based on the criteria set forth in an online submission form. Winners were determined from among the finalists by a panel of independent judges. Judging took place from Nov. 1, 2011, to Jan. 6, 2012. “It was a challenge for our judges to select one winner in each category from all of the creative and innovative technologies represented by the finalists,” said Junko Yoshida, editor in chief of EE Times. “The winners have proved that they are pioneers in developing and implementing breakthroughs in electronics. We hope this awards program gives companies worldwide the impetus to stretch their imaginations and their resources for even more progress in the coming year.” 16 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 vDan Novak (left), vice president of global marketing, public relations and communications at Qualcomm Inc., accepts the 2012 ACE Company of the Year Award from EE Times editor in chief Junko Yoshida. vRobert Nalesnik, vice president of marketing at mCube (left), accepts the ACE Startup of the Year Award from Patrick Mannion, director of content for EDN and Test & Measurement World. vACE Executive of the Year Award winner Rich Beyer (left), chairman and CEO of Freescale Semiconductor Inc., with Patrick Mannion. 2012 ACE Award winners: STARTUP OF THE YEAR mCube COMPANY OF THE YEAR Qualcomm Inc. EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR Rich Beyer, Freescale Semiconductor DESIGN TEAM OF THE YEAR Tilera Corp. INNOVATOR OF THE YEAR Michael McCorquodale Integrated Device Technology ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AWARD Maxim Integrated Products hACE Innovator of the Year Award winner Michael McCorquodale, general manager of the Silicon Frequency Control business at Integrated Device Technology. ULTIMATE PRODUCTS SoCs Zynq-7000 EPP (Extensible Processing Platform), Xilinx Analog ICs 3LG family of CrystalFree CMOS oscillators, Integrated Device Technology Digital ICs (MCUs, FPGAs, microprocessors) LPC11U00 microcontrollers, NXP Semiconductors Power LTC6803 multicell battery stack monitor, Linear Technology Human-Machine Interface Technology Xtrinsic capacitive and resistive touch sensing platform, Freescale Semiconductor Software Virtual System Platform, Cadence Design Systems hIhab Bishara (right), director of server solutions at Tilera Corp., accepts the Design Team of the Year Award from Junko Yoshida. hACE Mentor of the Year Stewart Christie of Intel. Passive Components, Sensors, Indicators and Interconnects TMP006 temperature sensor, Texas Instruments Development Kits, Reference Designs & SBCs Home Health Hub reference platform, Freescale Semiconductor Test & Measurement Systems & Boards MDO4000 mixed-domain oscilloscope, Tektronix MOST ENGAGED COMMUNITY MEMBER Jonathan Chan BEST STUDENT DESIGN/DESIGN CHALLENGE WITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS Oak Canyon Junior High team, Lindon, Utah: Pipe Dreams Christmas Tree, Ted Hansen, teacher; Wayne Rust, team mentor CONTRIBUTOR OF THE YEAR Jim Williams hJonathan hIan Basey (left), vice president of marketing at Avnet Electronics Marketing, accepts the ACE Integrated Program of the Year Award from Brian Fuller, editorial director of EE Life. Chan (right) accepts the Most Engaged Community Member ACE Award from Junko Yoshida. MENTOR OF THE YEAR Stewart Christie, product marketing engineer, Intelligent Systems Group, Intel LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD James Truchard, National Instruments Jeff Kodosky, National Instruments IEEE SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY IN THE SERVICE OF SOCIETY AWARD Ekso Bionics IEEE SPECTRUM EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AWARD SuVolta PHOTOS: TRISH TUNNEY STUDENT OF THE YEAR Aaron Goldstein, Arizona State University New: ¸VTS – the AV expert for manufacturing NEWS OF THETIMES The new compact video tester from Rohde & Schwarz is ideal for measuring mobile high-definition link (MHL) interface conformity – including media content transmitted during the manufacturing of mobile devices and their components. A test platform with much to offer: Ɗ Economical analyzer and generator platform for MHL 1.2 Ɗ Combination of protocol testing and AV content measurements Ɗ Power-saving, standalone operation without PC Ɗ Easy operation via remote control hACE Lifetime Achievement Award winners James Truchard (far left), CEO of National Instruments, and Jeff Kodosky (second from right), business and technology fellow at National Instruments, with Junko Yoshida and Patrick Mannion. Truchard and Kodosky co-founded National Instruments in 1986. vBob Dobkin (left), co-founder of Linear Technology, and Siu Williams, wife of the late Jim Williams, accept the Contributor of the Year Award from Planet Analog editor Bill Schweber on behalf of Jim Williams, the renowned analog circuit designer and EDN contributor who died in June 2011. A measurable edge in analyzing AV signals. Test and measurement solutions from Rohde & Schwarz. For more information visit: www.the-av-experts.com For more information: www.the-av-experts.com hAaron 18 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 hTekla Perry (left), senior editor of IEEE Spectrum, presents the IEEE Spectrum Technology in the Service of Society Award to Eythor Bender, CEO of Ekso Bionics. The company won for its Ekso exoskeleton, a set of wearable robotic legs that let paraplegics stand and walk. PHOTOS: TRISH TUNNEY Goldstein (right), a senior engineering student at Arizona State University, accepts the ACE Student of the Year Award from Junko Yoshida. Goldstein formed a satellite laboratory at ASU and has interned at NASA. He plans to launch his own aerospace and electrical engineering design firm after graduation. Global WATCH Top 30 worldwide MEMS companies by 2011 revenue $ millions MARKETS Texas Instruments STMicroelectronics 762 738 Hewlett-Packard Robert Bosch Knowles Electronics Panasonic Canon AKM Seiko Epson Analog Devices Avago Technologies 362 336 284 279 261 255 251 174 153 Sensata Honeywell 237 250 Infineon Technologies 150 Boehringer Ingelheim Microparts Invensense 144 136 VTI Technologies 121 Lexmark 110 Triquint 102 FLIR Systems 90 Sony 77 Kionix 76 Ulis 75 144 GE Sensing Measurement Specialties Omron 56 62 Memsic 55 Murata 51 Source: Yole Développement The top 30 players accounted for almost 80 percent of total MEMS packaged device sales worldwide 20 ST closes in on TI in MEMS top 30 ranking By Peter Clarke Freescale Semiconductor Denso 913 907 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS and STMicroelectronics finished neck and neck atop market watcher Yole Développement’s 2011 global ranking of microelectromechanical system component manufacturers. ST moved from fourth to second among MEMS device makers last year, in a global market that totaled $10.2 billion, up 17 percent from 2010, Yole reported. The MEMS sector’s double-digit rise compares with a virtually flat 2011 market for semiconductor ICs. The latter market inched up just 0.4 percent last year, to $299.5 billion, according to World Semiconductor Trade Statistics figures. ST capitalized on exploding demand for motion processing in mobile devices to expand its MEMS device sales by 42 percent over 2010’s tally, to $907 million. Yole (Lyon, France) estimates TI’s 2011 MEMS sales at a market-leading $913 million. But TI’s more mature micromirror MEMS business saw single-digit growth, slower than that for ST’s inertial sensor business for consumer applications. ST is also a leading foundry supplier of MEMS components. As was the case in 2010, the top four finishers last year claimed a commanding presence in the MEMS device market (see table). Thirdranked Hewlett-Packard remains a force in MEMS production for inkjet printing. Robert Bosch, a leading provider of MEMS for automotive applications, moved into the fourthplace slot vacated by ST. The top four vendors collectively sold $3.3 billion of MEMS products, Yole said, and the top 30 companies accounted for almost 80 percent of total MEMS packaged device sales worldwide. The mobile device market drove a broad range of sensor suppliers to 40 percent or better growth last year, according to Yole. Silicon microphone maker Knowles Electronics The right connection for your app Whatever your application need, FCI offers innovative connectors and cable assemblies for high speed, power, board-to-board, wire-to-board, input/output, flexible circuit, or storage connections – whether in communications, data, industrial, or consumer electronics. Quickly find the right interconnect solution for your app at www.fciconnect.com/electronics www.fciconnect.com GLOBAL WATCH jumped from 18th place in the 2010 ranking to fifth last year as it grew its sales of MEMS microphones by 40 percent, to $362 million. Magnetometer supplier AKM grew sales 46 percent, to $279 million, to record an eighth-place finish. The industry’s leading fabless MEMS device supplier, InvenSense, saw its sales soar 67 percent, to $144 million, as demand rose for its multi-axis gyroscope and motion sensing chips. And Memsic Inc. entered the top 30 with a whopping 80 percent jump in its magnetometer and accelerometer sales. “Growth is now coming from combos of accelerometers and magnetometers and from combos of accelerometers and gyros, which started to ship in volume last year,” Laurent Robin, inertial MEMS analyst at Yole, said in a statement. p EE TIMES CONFIDENTIAL RELEASES MEMS SECTOR PROFILE AND DATABASE The MEMS Sector Profile and Database, compiled by the editors of EE Times Confidential, analyzes a highly dynamic and increasingly critical market to assess where it stands and where it is headed. The report, with its database of more than 200 MEMS market players, is an intelligence resource for engineers, engineering managers and senior management across the electronics industry who increasingly must take a systems-level approach to product and market development. To obtain your copy, go to http://bit.ly/GD4kgm. 22 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 MEMS CONGRESS Panel predicts MEMS market boom; silicon to win slots By Peter Clarke ZURICH, SWITZERLAND — Consumer electronics will continue to drive rapid expansion in microelectromechanical system volume shipments, as updates of established platforms are loaded with MEMS sensors and actuators, and as new classes of equipment come onto the scene. That was the consensus of a panel at the MEMS Executive Congress Europe. In mobile phones and tablets, expect to see silicon MEMS devices being used for camera autofocus mechanisms, tunable RF circuits, audio speakers and chemical sensors, said panelist JeanChristophe Eloy, founder and president of market research organization Yole Développement (Lyon, France). Tehro Lahtinen, innovation manager at sports watchmaker Suunto, cited opportunities for MEMS devices of many types in sports equipment, clothing, wireless sensor nets and various other elements of the Internet of Things. Andre van Geelen, general manager at Epcos Netherlands, said his company would look to offer MEMS-based RF and timing circuits to maximize bandwidth in mobile phones. Just about any mechanical device that conceivably can be rendered in silicon eventually will be, said Eloy, who predicted the imminent takeoff of RF MEMS devices, MEMS for cameras and MEMS-based audio speakers. The “big bang” in MEMS consumer applications has generated a wave that is resonating in automotive infotainment and sports gear, as well as in personal-health applications that have similarities to medical apps but not the latter products’ strict requirements for clinical testing. Even in the medical electronics sector, with its notoriously arduous qualification cycles, MEMS apps are surfacing. But Sauli Palo, principal specialist for component quality and technology at Nokia, pointed out that as MEMS volumes go up, prices will come down. “MEMS have become commoditized,” Palo said. “The key is to find the good applications. It is up to the apps developers to sort out what can be done.” Fabless outlook A second topic picked up by the panel was whether fabless companies can succeed in the MEMS sector, given its fragmented technology base. “Helping the fabless to success [in MEMS] is the most important thing we can do,” said Eloy. Toward that end, Eloy believes two classes of MEMS foundry will coexist. Higher-volume demand will be met by the traditional IC foundries, such as TSMC, UMC and Globalfoundries, while the traditional MEMS specialist foundries, such as Dalsa and Micralyne, will act as development partners and support lower volumes. The two classes, he said, “are different supply chains that are not competing. You could start with one before moving to another one.” From the floor, an observer remarked that startup companies cannot afford to invest in fabs and that foundry services are clearly in demand. But it remains unclear how many MEMS companies have acquired the discipline to work within strictly delineated process limitations, the observer added. Epcos’ van Geelen acknowledged that MEMS processes vary by application, a hurdle for multiproject wafer runs. Palo, asked how Nokia felt about using fabless suppliers, said the company had “gone to fabless [providers] in other areas” apart from MEMS but added that going the fabless route for MEMS requirements “does raise questions.” p Your Global Distribution Company RS Components and Allied Electronics, trading brands of Electrocomponents plc, distribute over 550,000 electronics and maintenance products with operations in 32 countries across five continents. mers • 1.6 million custo ing suppliers • 2,500+ lead shipped daily ls e rc pa 0 0 ,0 6 •4 With business being conducted all over the world through catalogs, sales teams and the Internet, we do business your way. F in d U s : ca N or th A m e ri Allied Electronics: www.alliedelec.com W or ld R e s t of th e RS Components: www.rs-components.com RICA AME OUTH S I CA | | A FRIC E |A P O EUR IA | AS | IA LAS TRA S U A | E DLE MID AST | AM RTH NO CA ERI |S T OU A RI C ME A H | R EU E OP | A R IC AF |A SIA | L RA ST U A IA AS | LE DD MI ST EA | H RT NO #1 Global Distributor rs-componentscom © Allied Electronics, Inc 2012. ‘Allied Electronics’ and the Allied Electronics logo are trademarks of Allied Electronics, Inc.An Electrocomponents Company. ER AM COVER STORY What is your embedded strategy? By Nicolas Mokhoff CHIP VENDORS KNOW they can cater to the huge embedded market with many more divergent chips than might be pitched to, say, the mobile markets for iPods, iPads and notebook computers. There has been an explosion of embedded applications in the automotive, industrial and medical markets, and even in consumer white goods such as refrigerators, washers and microwave ovens. Not only does embedded system design offer a wealth of possibilities, but many embedded designs can forgo the added expense of leading-edge microcontrollers or microprocessors. The sheer volumes of chips used in embedded systems make an embedded-market strategy a must for silicon vendors. Designers of embedded systems have their own requirements. UBM Electronics’ just-released 2012 Embedded Market Survey sheds light on designers’ requirements for chips, tools and support. Five points stand out: • The top five areas of interest to embedded designers are chip technology, time-to-market, design/ 24 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 development process, global markets and outsourcing (both domestically and overseas). • Current embedded projects contain a single microprocessor/microcontroller (cited by 53 percent of respondents); two processors/microcontrollers (25 percent); or three to five MPUs/MCUs (16 percent). • The average processor clock rate was 425 MHz in the 2012 survey, up from 291 MHz in 2011. • There is an almost even split between those respondents who used the same processor on their last project (45 percent, of whom 59 percent were happy with their current supplier) and those who switched to a new processor (55 percent, of whom 46 percent did so for better features). • Respondents believe the ecosystem surrounding the chip (software, tools and support) is twice as important as the chip itself. In order, the ecosystems from Texas Instruments, Freescale, Microchip, ARM, Atmel and Intel command the highest grades. In the 2012 survey, however, STMicroelectronics was ranked fifth, on par with Atmel, among the providers of the processors that respondents considered using on their next project. As in 2011, the most important factors in choosing a processor are the software development tools available and the chip’s performance. Among the industry’s embedded advocacy groups, the Embedded Vision Alliance (EVA) stands out for taking on the task of using powerful, low-cost, energy-efficient processors. Members Advanced Micro Devices, Analog Devices, CEVA, Freescale Semiconductor, Intel, Maxim, Nvidia, TI and Xilinx are addressing embedded vision applications as platforms consisting of devices and design tools. “Processor Survey respondents indicate their preferences among chip vendors’ support ecosystems 19% 2012 (N= 665) Unaided 17% 2011 (N= 669) Unaided 2010 (N= 529) Unaided 14% 11% 12% 10% 10%10% 9% 11% 9% 8% 8% 8% 8% 6% 6% 6% 4% 2% 2% Texas Instruments Freescale Microchip ARM Atmel Intel NXP 3% 2% 1% Renesas 2% 2% 2% STMicroelectronics Source: UBM Electronics’ 2012 Embedded Market Survey vendors are beginning to focus on embedded vision applications,” said Jeff Bier, founder of EVA and president of Berkeley Design Technology Inc. On the more traditional embedded system design path are real-time-operating-system (RTOS) vendors such as QNX, which “has focused on creating a real-time software platform that can scale from the low end to the high end and that customers can easily extend for specific requirements,” said Grant Courville, the company’s director of product management. For RTOS vendors, working with chip vendors means reaching as many application levels as possible. Machine-to-machine devices—which connect everything, everywhere—have huge ramifications for safety, security and dependability, Courville said; as a result, “M2M devices will need to be built on proven platforms.” Courville said QNX is “working closely with our ecosystem partners to deliver a full M2M solution, including automated over-the-air updates and dramatically expanded wireless capabilities.” EE Times asked six semiconductor vendors to define their embedded strategies. Their replies, which are largely based on their current embedded offerings, start on page 26. p The next killer app: Machines that see Do embedded processors shape applications, or is it the other way around? A few years ago, after nearly two decades of evaluating and using embedded processors for DSP-intensive applications, my colleagues and I at Berkeley Design Technology Inc. realized that embedded computer vision applications were poised to benefit from the same type of virtuous circle that had previously enabled the proliferation of wireless communications and video compression algorithms. With that vision starting to appear in volume applications, processor vendors are beginning to focus on embedded vision applications and to tune their processors for such apps, often by incorporating specialized co-processors designed for vision processing. By reducing the number and severity of auto collisions, vision-based safety systems may be able to save many thousands of lives. Embedded vision also promises more-intuitive human-machine interaction—long the grail of consumer electronics. Imagine turning on your TV just by staring in its directiion for a few seconds; it then offers you a personalized menu of options, from which you choose using basic gestures. Market research company IMS Research estimates that by 2015, vision-enabled devices will be shipping at a rate of more than 3 billion units per year. (Read about many more embedded vision applications on page 32 and at http://bit.ly/la6LGk.) In some applications, vision functions will be simple and will be able to fit into existing processors (perhaps with a modest boost in clock rate or an additional core). But many of the most compelling embedded vision applications use very performance-hungry algorithms. Implementing those algorithms at low cost and low power consumption will require specialized processors. As a result, BDTI expects to see processor suppliers introducing more processors that are optimized for vision applications, and providing more application development support (such as optimized software libraries) for those apps. — Jeff Bier, founder of the Embedded Vision Alliance and president of BDTI April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 25 COVER STORY The key challenges for embedded designers ‘Customers across a range of applications are looking for more tightly integrated digital signal processing devices’ By Colin Holland Analog Devices: Embedded as part of a complete signal chain By Daniel Leibholz OUR APPROACH TO EMBEDDED processing reflects our customers’ need to implement a complete signal chain. We define a complete signal chain either as the processing pathway from signal acquisition through conditioning, conversion and digital signal processing, or as the creation pathway in the opposite direction. Among the many trends that influence signal chain design, we are seeing that customers across a range of applications are looking for more tightly integrated digital signal processing components that improve throughput, accuracy, latency and power efficiency while reducing the burden on downstream host controllers and application processors. These components must do more than address specific signal processing challenges; they also must have sufficient performance and functional headroom so that customers can implement unique algorithms and differentiated platforms. Given that integrated signal processing chips combine multiple functions with embedded intelligence, we also place a premium on ease of use, programmability and configurability. Analog Devices’ embedded strategy demands a deep understanding of the 26 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 requirements of emerging applications in key end markets. In the automotive sector, for instance, there is growing interest in improving driver and pedestrian safety, and a key technology enabler is embedded vision systems. Our work with carmakers on driver-assistance systems led us to develop the dual-core Blackfin ADSP-BF609. Designed for multiple vehicle-safety functions, such as lane departure warning and collision detection, the new DSP features an accelerator that handles real-time video analysis. This allows a video stream to be preprocessed at high-definition rates, with features extracted and forwarded to a dual-core programmable DSP. Our newest Blackfin processors also allow Analog Devices to support embedded vision applications in other markets, such as industrial and security systems. Such application areas have a growing need to integrate recognition features, such as license-plate detection and people-counting capability, into surveillance cameras or to support HD video processing in industrial imaging equipment. Another example of our approach to embedded design is the ADF7023, a To get more of their projects completed by deadline, more embedded systems developers are looking to increase the skill levels of their engineering teams. This is just one of the results highlighted by the latest UBM Electronics Embedded Market Survey, in which 1,704 respondents provided details on their tools and work environment, applications, methods and processes, operating systems and chips currently in use or being considered. The results were presented at Design West last week. The 2012 survey shows that 42 percent of all projects were finished on or ahead of schedule—leaving 58 percent of all projects late or canceled, which is about the same as in 2011 and 2010. In a new question this year, respondents were asked to think about the next year and the areas they expect will present the greatest challenges. Not surprisingly, given the lateness of projects, 21 percent put hitting schedules at the top of their list; 19 percent said that integrating new technology or tools would be most problematic, and 16 percent cited managing code size and complexity. At the bottom of the challenge list was connecting to the cloud; only 3 percent saw it as a major issue. What one improvement would developers make to boost their embedded design activities? The leading improvement, debugging tools, was cited by 22 percent of respondents, down 7 percentage points; engineering team skill level jumped to 16 percent from 9 percent. One of the new questions added to this year’s survey was, “What are the most important factors in choosing an mouser.com Distributing semiconductors and electronic components for design engineers. Authorized Distributor GO mouser.com Find It Here. Faster. ™ Fastest Part Search. Best Selection. Immediate Delivery. The Newest Products for Your Newest Designs® Mouser and Mouser Electronics are registered trademarks of Mouser Electronics, Inc. Other products, logos, and company names mentioned herein, may be trademarks of their respective owners. COVER STORY low-power transceiver system-on-chip for the industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band that supports a wide range of applications, such as smart metering and wireless sensor networks. To provide the necessary flexibility for these applications, the SoC embeds a microcontroller with customized, digital communications functions and a high-performance RF transceiver. p operating system?” Availability of full source code was the top reply, cited by 41 percent of respondents. Real-time performance and no royalties came in at 31 percent. At the bottom of the pile was the supplier’s reputation, which garnered only 3 percent. When it came to the operating systems being used, in a dramatic jump, in-house/custom OSes claimed a surveytopping 22 percent of responses, up from 8 percent, while relative newcomers Android and Ubuntu took second and third place, respectively, with 13 percent and 12 percent. Android’s dramatic impact was highlighted when engineers revealed what they are considering using in the next 12 months. Android outstripped the rest, with 34 percent; in-house/custom Daniel Leibholz is vice president of Analog Devices’ Processors and Digital Signal Processing Products and Technology Group, responsible for development and implementation of processor strategy. He began his career as a CPU architect with Digital Equipment Corp. and is the holder of 17 computer architecture and microprocessor patents. Leibholz earned his BSEE and MSEE from Brown University. more than doubled, to 17 percent from 7 percent. Sixty percent of respondents said they were not worried about the recent acquisitions of operating-system vendors by microprocessor vendors. As to processors, there is a slow but steady rise in the use of 32-bitters, though 8- and 16-bit devices are maintaining their market share. There was a marked change in what engineers said was most important when choosing a microprocessor: The chip itself dropped to 30 percent, while the ecosystem surrounding the chip jumped to 61 percent. p Editor’s note: UBM Electronics’ Embedded Market Survey can be obtained by e-mailing embedded content director Colin Holland ([email protected]). Freescale Semiconductor: Four apps define embedded direction By Brad Johnson OUR MISSION IS LESS ABOUT being the leader in embedded than about being the leading supplier of products, tools and system solutions—semiconductors, sensors, controllers, software and ecosystem—that will enable tomorrow’s leaders in the embedded segment. We are a global leader in embedded processing solutions, providing products that advance the markets we serve with a world-class engineering force and a legacy of billions invested in R&D. Our priorities center on the growing embedded markets; our technologies are the foundation for the innovations that make our world greener, safer, healthier and more connected. We direct our efforts within four major areas: automotive, networking, industrial and consumer. We have stayed ‘Our embedded technologies are the foundation for the innovations that make our world greener, safer, healthier and more connected’ 28 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 away from areas that are not truly embedded, such as PCs and memory. The four focus markets are undergoing changes in which embedded technology has a direct and foundational impact. Our value-added is at the juncture of diverse technologies that are collectively powering the growth of embedded processing: intelligent devices that are low power, cost-effective, multicore, networked, display based, touch enabled, secure, scalable and programmable; that include sensing capabilities; and that cover a full range of embedded architectures. In automotive, for example, we are working toward the shared goal of zero fatalities and zero emissions by providing passive and active safety technologies to help make driving safer and cleaner, with more fuel-efficient vehicles. In networking, dramatic increases in mobile and video traffic are driving fundamental changes to network topologies and enabling our investment priorities in next-generation wireless Microchip: Expanding core competency By Steve Sanghi MICROCONTROLLERS HAVE COME a long way in terms of their applications, processing capabilities, architectures and fusion with other semiconductor products, such as ASICs and SoCs. The shrinking cost of microcontrollers is causing the number of applications to explode, with new ways emerging to make products more intelligent. Microchip’s embedded strategy is to address the needs of those applications by expanding on its core strengths in microcontrollers, analog, memory and infrastructures that enhance such areas as cloud computing and smaller basestations. In the industrial market, energy efficiency demands are continuing to push the expansion and adoption of smart energy technologies and portable medical devices, driven by embedded hardware, software and M2M connectivity. Tablet-like functionality, enabled by Freescale’s embedded technology, is expanding beyond consumer smart devices into vehicles, appliances and other markets, making the world more connected. Freescale combines a broad, scalable and core-agnostic portfolio of embedded processors, complementary semiconductor devices and software to offer highly integrated platform-level solutions that create customer value, simplify customer development cycles and shorten time-to-market. p Brad Johnson is the senior vice president of strategy and business transformation at Freescale Semiconductor, which he joined in February 2011. Johnson spent 14 years at McKinsey and Co., becoming a partner in 2006. He received a bachelor’s degree in quantitative economics with distinction from Stanford University. ‘We’re building on our core strengths in MCUs, analog, memory and wireless, along with our development environment, migration path and support’ wireless devices, along with our development environment, migration path and support. We are building on that foundation by focusing on several growth areas and design imperatives within the embedded market. To help embedded designers speed their time-to-market, Microchip provides not just silicon but also a full development tool ecosystem, including compilers, integrated development environments (IDEs), debuggers, realtime operating systems, graphics tools, reference designs and code libraries. There is an increasing trend toward space-constrained applications with the thin styling that consumers love. Microchip enables this with minuscule quad flat no-lead (QFN) packages as well as chip-scale options, which allow our MCUs to squeeze into today’s smallest and thinnest form factors. User interfaces are rapidly transitioning from knobs and pushbuttons to touch sensing, which is more aesthetically pleasing, durable and easier to clean. Microchip has built a rich portfolio of touch-sensing solutions— many of which use our microcontrollers’ existing capabilities—to enable this transition. Likewise, embedded displays have evolved from LEDs to dot matrices to LCDs. The challenge for designers is to cost-effectively implement the desired display brightness, contrast, size and segments. Microchip’s MCUs integrate easy interfaces to large displays via built-in graphics controllers and accelerators. To handle the relentless drive toward longer battery life, our MCUs have low-power modes that go down to nanoamperes of current, maximizing battery life and enabling energy harvesting. In addition, there is a great focus on all aspects of energy: measurement, conservation and efficiency. Microchip’s MCUs and digital signal controllers (DSCs) digitally control motors, power supplies and lighting, substantially increasing efficiencies. We offer many mixed-signal and analog devices to facilitate energy monitoring and metering. Embedded designs are increasingly connecting to other systems via such wired- and wireless-connectivity protocols as USB, Ethernet, controller-area network, local-interconnect network, infrared and various flavors of RF, such as ZigBee, Wi-Fi and the unlicensed sub-GHz bands. Microchip provides radios, agency-certified modules, integrated MCUs and standalone controllers that offer designers solid options for adding this connectivity. Many users are migrating toward higher voltages for greater efficiency in markets such as automotive and industrial. Microchip provides MCUs that work at 40 volts, 60 V and higher for transients. p Steve Sanghi was named president of Microchip in August 1990, chief executive officer in October 1991 and chairman in October 1993. He holds an MS in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts and a BS in electronics and communication from Punjab University in India. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 29 COVER STORY Tensilica: Renesas: ‘Smart’ end-to-end quality control By Peter Carbone The definition of embedded drives us By Chris Rowen FOR MANY COMPANIES, a typical embedded MCU strategy is about touting the hardware and software with statements about the merits of the CPU core, local customer support, third parties, and integration of frequently used digital and analog peripherals. The Renesas embedded strategy is different. Our strategy is about making a society where people are safer, healthier, more productive and more efficient with their time, resources and the environment. Today, 30 percent of the world’s MCUs are manufactured by Renesas, and our embedded electronics solutions touch many parts of our social infrastructure and lives, including such major industrial segments as automotive, medical, home/building/factory automation, white goods, metering, enterprise/cloud/personal computing and networking. Our products are developed to deliver quality, low power, continuity and longevity of supply, real-time performance, and integration. We are among the largest vertically integrated semiconductor manufacturers, with products that are internally designed (including semiconductor CMOS process, IP and chip design), manufactured and supported. We can support a complete network of redundant and long-term production factories with end-to-end quality control. We continuously achieve single-digit parts-per-million reliability with an average production life of more than 15 years. The Renesas embedded design approach starts with quality and innovation. By interlocking the CPU, highspeed memories and digital/analog functions to our internal semiconduc- tor process, we can achieve ultralow power (leakage, operation and standby). With internally developed high-speed embedded flash and CPU core (+100 MHz), we can achieve high performance and functionality, delivering realtime predictable and low-latency response. We then use these technologies to create platforms that ease design and include different embedded memo- ‘Our strategy is about making a society where people are safer, healthier, more productive and more efficient’ 30 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 THE QUESTION “WHAT IS YOUR embedded strategy?” assumes that embedded strategies are fundamentally separate from other electronic system strategies, but that assumption is wrong, and getting wronger every day. How do we separate a smartphone from a tablet from an ultramobile? How do we define applications that are split between the phone and the cloud? So I would define “embedded” in a more useful way: as energy-sensitive, cost-sensitive hardware/software systems. Then the question becomes, “What’s your strategy for energy- and Texas Instruments: Make the world By Brian Crutcher IF OUR CUSTOMERS conceptualize it, ries and packages without affecting the customer’s previous software investment. Given that more than 10 million MCUs are produced every day, lowering power consumption and providing greater integration and functionality can have far-reaching social benefits. The Renesas embedded strategy starts with the goal of making our lives better by using fewer resources, delivering the right mix of functions, and designing and manufacturing hardware and software solutions that allow quick adoption and long-term supply. In the end, our embedded solutions help put the “smart” into products that touch our everyday lives. p Peter Carbone is marketing vice president at Renesas Electronics America. Before joining Renesas, he was a sales application engineer and design engineer at Wang Laboratories. He holds a BSEE from Columbia University and completed the General Management Program at Harvard Business School. our technology can make it possible. In complex systems, the chip is very important, but it is just the beginning. As a result, our embedded processing strategy has three basic tenets: a broad processor portfolio; software development kits, which function as an ecosystem, and support to get customers to market quickly; and • complementary analog and connectivity products for optimized system solutions. • • Our embedded portfolio can meet any design need, while offering scalability up and down the portfolio of microcontrollers, ARM-based processors and DSPs. TI runs the gamut on varying levels of power and performance across a variety of proprietary and industry-standard cores. Design flexibility spans from the new Wolverine MSP430, a cost-sensitive hardware and software?” Tensilica’s approach has three parts. The first part is to make optimization and specialization of processors simple, inexpensive and complete. Historically, processor development has been so slow and expensive that one processor design was forced to serve a wide and divergent spectrum of application requirements. When generation of the processors is automated, each processor can be leaner and faster in the target applications. At Tensilica, we routinely provide efficiency improvements of ten- to twentyfold, with the most specialized processors achieving efficiency improvements of more than a hundredfold over conventional processors. The second part is to create rich soft- ‘[You should have asked], “What’s your strategy for energy- and cost-sensitive hardware and software?” ’ ware environments for every processor, so that software developers have all the compiler, debug, simulation, profiling and operating systems needed for fast, reliable development. Third, we design, verify and deliver hardware and software building blocks for the most important communications and multimedia functions, especially for wireless baseband, audio and video/imaging. We also have a broad ecosystem of partners that deliver additional software packages, systems know-how and subsystems, especially in baseband and multimedia. Tensilica now has almost 200 licensees and has shipped more than 1 billion processor cores. We focus on highvolume SoC applications in a range of end markets where our customers’ success hinges on world-beating energy efficiency, throughput and software sophistication. p Chris Rowen is founder, chief technology officer, board member and first president of Tensilica. He was a pioneer in the development of RISC architecture at Stanford in the early 1980s and helped start MIPS Computer Systems in 1984. Rowen received his BA in physics from Harvard University and his MS and PhD in electrical engineering from Stanford University. smarter, greener, safer, healthier and more fun microcontroller platform that uses only 100-microamps/MHz active power for wireless, battery-free, intelligent-sensing applications, up to our highest-performance (yet power-optimized) multicore processors based on the Keystone architecture, used in wireless basestations and supercomputing. Our OMAP application processors are well suited to fueling applications growth in mobile and connected computing, robotics and cloud computing. Our real-time signal processors are a perfect fit for serving the expanding demand for analytics in video and industrial apps. In 2012, TI marks its 30th anniversary of DSP innovation. Software has become an important part of our customers’ design process, and TI supports its broad portfolio with an extensive collection of software and a single IDE, Code Composer Studio (CCStudio), that spans TI’s entire embedded processing portfolio. The IDE provides a common interface for design- ers to scale their product line, dramatically reduce development time and eliminate the need to learn multiple interfaces. Based on the popular Eclipse opensource software framework, CCStudio takes developers through each step of development while providing debugging and foundational software libraries, demos and specific application codecs for each processor. TI also delivers low-cost development kits, evaluation modules and system-level reference designs, aimed at reducing development time by as much as 80 percent. If developers have a design requirement that cannot be found along the many TI avenues, the broad TI Design Network ecosystem provides everything from application-specific hardware modules to a variety of RTOSes. p ‘TI runs the gamut on power and performance across proprietary and industrystandard cores’ Brian Crutcher is senior vice president and general manager of the Texas Instruments Embedded Processing business, which includes TI’s microcontrollers and core embedded processors. He is also responsible for TI’s custom business. Crutcher earned a BSEE from the University of Central Florida and an MBA from the University of California, Irvine. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 31 Intelligence NEXT-GEN USER INTERFACES A shared vision for the UI beyond touch By Junko Yoshida IMS RESEARCH recently wondered whether Apple and the iPad were falling behind competitors in user-interface technology. In its commentary, the market watcher acknowledged Apple had changed the game by bringing touchscreen interaction to the masses. But then it asked: Is that all? As the industry debates where the next UI battle lines will be drawn, a growing number of FPGA, DSP and processor companies are betting on embedded vision. Supporters of this position point to two developments: the use of parallelism to increase the processing power of embedded systems, and the emergence of increasingly sophisticated machine-vision algorithms that let embedded systems not just “see,” but extract information to produce value-added intelligence. “Thanks to Microsoft’s Kinect [controller for the Xbox 360], we now have ‘existence proof’ for embedded vision,” noted Jeff Bier, president of Berkeley Design Technology Inc. “We know it works.” Consumers are becoming more familiar with gesture controls, and automotive manufacturers are integrating embedded vision applications in cars in the cause of driver safety. Jon Cropley, principal analyst at IMS Research, said the market for intelligent-automotive-camera modules alone was estimated at around $300 million in 2011 and is forecast to grow at an average annual rate of more than 30 percent through 2015. The market for intelligent-video surveillance devices (devices with embedded analytics), estimated at about $250 million in 2011, is forecast for annual growth of more than 20 percent over the same period, Cropley added. Biggest and perhaps best established is the market for industrial machine vision hardware (smart sensors, smart cameras, compact vision systems and machine vision cameras). Cropley estimates average annual growth of more than 10 percent over the period, from around $1.5 billion in 2011. Bier called embedded vision a “classic long-tail story,” explaining, “There are thousands of applications, and its market is extremely diverse.” But from the engineering community’s perspective, he said, “many design engineers, generally, just don’t think about vision, and they still don’t know what’s possible.” Bier founded the Embedded Vision Alliance to inspire and empower embedded system designers to use vision technology. EE Times worked with the industry group to put together this sampler of the latest embedded vision-enabled consumer products. 32 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 ‘Never miss a word’ That’s the marketing tagline used by Livescribe, developer of a platform consisting of a digital pen, digital paper and software apps. Livescribe’s pen, integrating an infrared camera and a digital audio recorder, can record a conversation while one participant takes notes on digital paper. Digital paper consists of numerous small black dots in patterns essentially invisible to the human eye but detectable by the pen’s camera. The user can replay portions of a recording by tapping on the notes. Not a single word is lost, no matter how messy the scribble. Sounds like a reporter’s dream—and a politician’s nightmare. Breathalyzer app BreathalEyes, an iPhone app available for 99 cents, determines a subject’s blood alcohol content. The technology uses the iPhone’s camera and the BreathalEyes app running on the phone to scan the user’s eyes and measure the presence of horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN)—an involuntary jerking or bouncing of the eyeball. Touch-free user interface Eye test by phone EyeNetra has come up with a quick and easy way for anyone, anywhere to take an eye test, get measured for eyeglasses and access eye care— all via smartphone. Snap a hardware adapter onto a smartphone loaded with EyeNetra’s software, Netra-G, then follow the simple instructions to get measurements for eyeglasses on the phone and send them to your care provider. Thanks to the success of Microsoft’s Kinect, gesture control has become one of the most popular embedded vision applications on the consumer market. Israel-based eyeSight has come up with advanced image processing and machine vision algorithms tailored for embedded platforms. The technology, independent of the underlying processor and camera, requires minimal CPU and power consumption. It can be embedded in computers, tablets and mobile devices. Aftermarket park assist camera CogniVue’s Image Cognition Processor and application software turn a small aftermarket rear-view camera into a smart parking assistant. The technology offers de-warping, perspective correction, object detection and distance estimation, and allows multiple viewing modes (panoramic, top-down view and left/right split views) and overlay. Vending machine sizes you up Intel, Okaya Electronics and Sanden have developed a concept vending machine featuring a vertically mounted, 65-inch, see-through, high-definition touchscreen display. The transparent display allows customers to see products inside the vending machine, while the screen can show overlaid text messages, graphics and animation. The vending machine comes with a camera and “audience-impression metric” features. Based on the image captured by the camera, the vending machine runs anonymous facial recognition algorithms. The machine can take a good guess at a customer’s gender and age so that it can show advertising content to match the customer’s demographics. But does it say “ouch” when you kick it? Vital Signs Camera Philips’ Vital Signs Camera app runs on an iPad 2 or iPhone 4S. With the device camera trained on the user, the app detects subtle changes in facial color to measure heart rate and tracks chest movements to gauge breathing rate. It’s not clear who’d want to post their vitals on Facebook or e-mail their heart rate to a love interest (as the Philips demo suggests). But you could. 42V, 2µA IQ Low Dropout Switcher 750mA Output Current Start-Up and Dropout Performance 9 8 VOUT LT3973 7 Voltage (V) VIN 6 5 4 VIN VOUT 530mV 3 2 1 0 Time (s) 530mV Maximum Dropout ® The LT 3973 is the newest member of our growing family of ultralow quiescent current high voltage monolithic buck regulators. It consumes only 1.8µA of quiescent current while regulating an output of 3.3V from a 12V input source. A high efficiency switch is included on-chip along with the catch diode, boost diode and all necessary control and logic circuitry. A minimum dropout voltage of 530mV is maintained when the input voltage drops below the programmed output voltage, ® providing a regulated output to the downstream load. Its low ripple Burst Mode operation maintains high efficiencies at low output currents while keeping output ripple below 10mVP-P. Features Efficiency Curve, VOUT = 5V • Ultralow Quiescent Current: 1.8µA IQ at 12VIN to 3.3VOUT 90 • Integrated Boost and Catch Diodes • Excellent Start-Up & Dropout Performance Efficiency (%) • Input Voltage Range: 4.2V to 42V www.linear.com/product/LT3973 VIN = 12V 1-800-4-LINEAR 80 • Low Ripple Burst Mode Operation Info & Free Samples VIN = 24V 70 VIN = 36V 60 50 • 750mA Output Current 40 • Adjustable Switching Frequency: 200kHz to 2.2MHz 30 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Load Current (A) 0.6 0.7 , LT, LTC, LTM, Linear Technology, the Linear logo and Burst Mode are registered trademarks of Linear Technology Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. DESIGN + PRODUCTS In space, every byte counts—there is no room for coding errors or vulnerabilities in such critical applications as deployment, security and mission control of vehicles GLOBAL FEATURE Trimming cost and size: The software side of the story By Benjamin M. Brosgol REDUCING COST AND SIZE for embedded hardware involves issues with circuit design, fabrication and similar topics. Software, however, raises a different set of concerns. Though development costs need to be taken into account, a much more significant expense comes from software errors, which can lead to delays, product recalls, possible lawsuits and damage to a company’s reputation. A key to cost reduction is to prevent errors from getting into the code in the first place or, if that fails, to detect and remove the errors before the software gets fielded. The size issue is a bit subtler. Some of the features that have been introduced into programming languages in the interest of reliability—for example, exception handling and highlevel concurrency support—require runtime libraries that might be too large for certain kinds of embedded systems. Developers need some way to tailor the run-time libraries to remove unneeded functionality—in effect to scale the size of the executable code based on the language features actually used. A new approach that couples a reliable language with customizable and specialized run-time libraries can reduce both cost and footprint size for embedded systems. ‘An ounce of prevention … ’ For several reasons, buggy software is especially acute in embedded applications. First, an embedded system typically monitors or controls some external device, so in critical applications an error or vulnerability could compromise safety, security or both; lives could be lost, and substantial assets could be at risk. Second, debugging embedded software is harder than debugging native software. For example, embedded systems generally involve concurrency and real-time constraints, which introduce opportunities for errors such as deadlock, missed deadlines and corrupted data. Because some of these bugs are timing dependent and not easily reproduced, they could go undetected until the software is fielded. With perhaps thousands or even millions of systems in use, even a bug with low probability of being triggered will occur eventually. Third, correcting a defect in an Benjamin Brosgol, a senior member of AdaCore’s technical staff, has worked with programming languages and technology for more than 30 years, concentrating on high-integrity systems. He holds a BA in mathematics from Amherst College and an MS and PhD in applied mathematics from Harvard University. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 35 DESIGN + PRODUCTS embedded product already in service is complex and expensive. Solutions that involve wireless uploads raise serious security issues that are just beginning to be addressed in equipment ranging from medical devices to automotive systems. Testing can catch some errors. For example, RTCA Inc. commercialavionics software safety standard DO-178C1 specifies extensive tests to demonstrate that software meets all requirements and that these tests fully cover the source-code structure. Though testing is an ongoing process for realworld systems, use of programming language and tool technologies that automate error detection can bolster confidence in code correctness as well as demonstrate the code’s safety and security properties. Ideally, the language can express the program’s intent so that automated error detection takes place at compile time. If that isn’t possible, then automated error detection can occur at runtime with a well-defined effect. This idea isn’t new; features such as strong type checking have been in some languages for decades. What is new, or at least becoming more widely adopted, is the ability to specify stronger program properties, or contracts, that can either be proved through formal methods or checked at run-time. The Spark language2 illustrates the first approach. Spark is an Ada subset augmented with contracts that specify intermodule data and information flow and that capture logical assertions concerning program state (subprogram preand postconditions, invariants). The Spark tools check that the source program conforms to its annotations and can automate the process of proving that the contracts are correct. Spark has been used in practice to demonstrate correctness properties (for example, the absence of run-time exceptions) on a range of safety-critical and high-security systems. Other language technologies treat contracts as run-time constructs. A recent example is Ada 20123, in which contracts take the form of Boolean conditions that are supplied in contexts such as invariants for types and preconditions and/or postconditions for subprograms. The programmer can control whether the software generates code to check these conditions at run-time; a 36 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 Figure 1. Contract-based programming in Ada 2012. failed check raises an exception. In this way, the specified contracts can be used either as formal comments that document the program’s intent or as runtime checks that are part of a testing regimen (Figure 1). The underlying methodology, sometimes known as correctness by construction4, design by contract5 or contract-based programming6, strengthens the concept of an interface to include a behavioral specification and can help detect many kinds of coding errors early and inexpensively. KISS for programmers: Keep it small and simple Despite the general advances in hardware capacity, limited processor power and memory space constrain many kinds of embedded systems; size does matter. That presents a dilemma. In the past several decades, many of the new high-level-language features that improve reliability and maintainability—input/output (I/O) libraries, memory management, exception handling, concurrency control—require run-timesupport libraries. For a rich-featured language, these libraries can add tens, perhaps hundreds, of kilobytes to the size of an executable code. This raises two issues: • The executable code containing these libraries may be too large to fit into the available memory. • When compliance with a safety or security standard is required, the complexity of the libraries makes it harder to meet the certification objectives. Embedded-systems developers sometimes address these issues by choosing a lower-level language such as C, with modest run-time-support requirements. But C is notorious for vulnerabilities such as buffer overflow, raising the risk of introducing bugs and their associated detection and removal expenses. An alternative approach is to start with a language that more directly supports the development of reliable software, and then to eliminate those features whose run-time-support libraries are too large and/or too complex. This can be accomplished in an ad hoc fashion—for example, with the programmer adhering to set stylistic restrictions and supplying linker directives to avoid linking in unwanted libraries. This approach, however, is indirect and nonportable. In contrast, one language that makes it possible to tailor run-time requirements in a standard way is Ada. It does so through a compiler directive known as pragma Restrictions. DESIGN + PRODUCTS With this pragma, the programmer can specify which features are not being used. Some common restrictions include no tasking, no exception propagation and no local allocators. The Ada compiler verifies that the program adheres to the specified restrictions; when the executable is built, the unneeded libraries can be omitted. Some vendors also supply several prepackaged run-time libraries, called profiles, corresponding to common sets of restrictions. An example is AdaCore’s GNAT Pro High-Integrity Edition development environment, which includes profiles for minimal or no run-time libraries (zero footprint), for simple libraries compliant with DO-178B certification guidance, for libraries augmented by the tasking features permitted by the Ravenscar7 restrictions (see Figure 2) and for the full Ada language. Using either the à la carte mechanism provided by pragma Restrictions or one of the preconfigured run-time libraries provided by the Ada vendor, the programmer can choose features that are expressive enough to do the job but simple enough to accommodate their run-time support in the available Figure 2. Ravenscar tasking profile. A VCN CAN SAFEGUARD EMBEDDED DEVICES With the growing number of embedded devices connected to the Internet, cellular networks and other networks via both wired and wireless protocols, hackers have a new target. A virtual closed network (VCN) can provide protection when a truly closed network is not an option. To create a VCN, the designer needs to define the communications requirements for the device to restrict communication to only what is required and block any communication that is not required. The defined communications policies need to be encoded as firewall rules, and the firewall needs to be integrated into the embedded device’s communications stack. If the device is running TCP/IP, then the firewall needs to be in the lower layers of the TCP/IP stack. If the device is using cell-phone text messages to communicate, as some vehicle antitheft systems use, the firewall needs to part of the cell-phone communication protocol. Alan Grau is president and co-founder of Icon Labs and architect of the company’s Floodgate Firewall. Before founding Icon Labs, he worked for AT&T Bell Labs and Motorola. Grau has an MS in computer science from Northwestern University. In each case, the firewall filters messages before the device processes them. The syntax of the firewall rules depends on the type of firewall. The rules define each user group in terms of the group’s Internet Protocol (IP) address as well as define the protocols and ports that are allowed for each group. Once the policies are configured into a set of rules, the firewall can enforce them. All packets received by the device are passed to the firewall for filtering and compared with the firewall rules. The device drops all packets that do not match the firewall rules. As a result, the device blocks attempts to hack into it before a connection is even established. Engineers can build a firewall from scratch or purchase a commercial embedded firewall. Some hardware products, such as ZGate from Zilog, include an integrated firewall, providing a low-cost solution. As a result of the growing acceptance of IPv6 and the Internet of Things, the number of embedded devices is growing rapidly and, in turn, expanding opportunities for hacking and serious Internet attacks. A VCN, enforced by an embedded firewall, provides a critical layer of protection for embedded devices. — Alan Grau April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 37 DESIGN + PRODUCTS memory (and, if applicable, comply with the relevant certification objectives). Making the software fit Two techniques can be used to make embedded development less expensive and more reliable, while meeting the hardware memory constraints: • First, eliminate or reduce the cost of tracking and correcting bugs. Make sure the program does what it is supposed to do and doesn’t do what it is not supposed to do. Modern language features can help; in particular, the ability to specify contracts that express behavioral properties for program entities encourages the developer to think about the program logic in advance and to build in quality. • Second, scale the program’s runtime functionality to fit in the available memory space. Configurable run-timesupport libraries that reflect the features actually used will meet this goal. Create these using appropriate language features (such as Ada’s pragma Restrictions) or specialized profiles supplied by the implementation.. p References 1. RTCA DO-178C—Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification. December 2011. 2. J.G.P. Barnes. High Integrity Software, The SPARK Approach to Safety and Security. Addison-Wesley, 2003. 3. SO/IEC SC22/JTC1/WG9. Ada Rapporteur Group. Ada 2012 Language Reference Manual. http://bit.ly/9imSYX 4. Altran Praxis. “Correctness by Construction.” http://bit.ly/GD1iqv 5. Eiffel Software. “The Power of Design by Contract.” http://bit.ly/16tBo7 6. C. Comar, J. Kanig and Y. Moy. “Integrating Formal Program Verification with Testing.” http://bit.ly/GBdnyZ 7. A. Burns, B. Dobbing and G. Romanski. “The Ravenscar Profile for High Integrity Real Time Programs,” in Reliable Software Technologies—Ada Europe ’98, Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1411. GLOBAL FEATURE Embedded safety trims system cost, size and development time By Anthony Vaughan INTEGRATING FUNCTIONAL safety into a complex electronic system can be daunting to designers. Recent advances in embedded-processor architecture, however, have made this task readily attainable and at lower cost. To understand why functional safety standards dictate numerous system aspects, it helps to know the types of failures to which embedded systems are susceptible. In general, failures fall into two main categories: systematic and random. Systematic failures usually result from problems with the chip design, software bugs or the manufacturing process. Continuous process improvements often repair them. An example of a systematic failure in an electronic system is a suboptimal solder reflow profile used in printed-circuit board assembly that results in circuit-continuity failures. Random failures may be more difficult to fix, because they often result from chance defects or events that are inherent to a process, a usage condition or the operating environment. An example of a random failure in an electronic system is an Anthony Vaughan is the North America marketing and business development manager for Texas Instruments’ Hercules safety microcontroller group. He joined TI as a product engineer in the imaging and audio group, then became an applications engineer with TI’s automotive and safety microcontroller group. Vaughan holds a BSEE from Texas A&M. 38 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 Figure 1. Compared with the 1oo1D system (shown), the 1oo2 system is usually implemented using two embedded processors with independent I/O in a configuration where both controllers must command an output for activation to occur. embedded-processor malfunction caused by an alpha or neutron particle bombarding a RAM bit, getting it to flip state. It is almost impossible to reduce the rate of random failures, but use of risk-mitigation measures can help detect them and respond appropriately when they occur. At the design stage, safety-critical architectures have helped electronic systems to withstand both systematic and random failures. The three architectures now used most often are the one-out-of-two system (1oo2), the two-out-of-two system (2oo2) and the two-out-of-three system (2oo3). The 1oo2 system is usually implemented using two Get in. Buckle up. Come Along for the Ride on the Ultimate Electronics Road Trip DRIVEFORINNOVATION 12 months. 10,000 miles. Many technology stops. Join us on the ultimate electronics road trip. Learn new technologies and supply chain options, access tools, industry icons and innovators along the way. Enter for your chance to win an electric car and other prizes. driveforinnovation.com DESIGN + PRODUCTS embedded processors with independent input/output (I/O) in a configuration where both controllers must command an output for activation to occur. In this architecture, it takes a failure in both systems for an inadvertent activation to occur. Like the 1oo2 system, the 2oo2 system has two embedded processors with independent I/O. In this configuration, however, the output circuit is configured in a manner in which a failure in both systems must occur for an inadvertent deactivation. Both of these systems are usually found in industrialcontrol environments, where inadvertent activation or deactivation of an actuator could be dangerous. The 2oo3 system is designed with three embedded processors and a complex output voting circuit. When a fault occurs in one of the three controllers, the output of the other two is used to control the system. A 2oo3 system is usually used in fail-operation applications, where the system must continue functioning despite a failure—most often, flightcritical aircraft systems and life-support medical devices. But using these safety-critical architectures takes a tremendous amount of development time and effort; not only does the entire embedded processor need to be duplicated, but sophisticated software-safety algorithms must be implemented. In addition, these architecures increase the systems’ sus- Figure 2. The 2oo3 system is designed with three embedded processors and a complex output voting circuit. 40 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 Integrated embedded-hardware diagnostics address a multitude of functional safety issues ceptibility to random failures. The amount of logic that is susceptible to alpha- and neutron-particle strikes increases significantly as the number of system processors grows. Enhancements to embedded processors have emerged to combat the shortcomings of traditional safety systems. Many embedded processors, such as the Hercules RM4x and TMS570 microcontroller families from Texas Instruments, are now available with integrated embedded-hardware diagnostics to address a multitude of functional safety concerns. These processors apply continuously operating hardwarebased safety mechanisms on such components as the CPU, flash memory, SRAM, power and clocks to ensure accurate software execution. The CPU’s complexity makes it a prime candidate for a dual-core lockstep safety mechanism. A compare module confirms that the outputs of the two cores are identical on a cycle-by-cycle basis. To address the integrity of both the embedded flash memory and the SRAM, many controllers incorporate error-correcting code (ECC) that detects corruption and corrects single-bit errors so system operation can continue uninterrupted. Embedded processors also have incorporated built-in self-test (BIST) engines that provide robust diagnostic testing on the CPU and memories even when the system is not running code. Combining integrated safety features into a single IC has led to streamlined safety architectures, including the one-outof-one-with-diagnostics (1oo1D) system. This type of safety architecture suits a wide variety of fail-safe systems where the failure rate must be extremely low. In addition, designers of fail-operational systems are working with safety-enabled processors and with the two-out-of-two-with-diagnostics (2oo2D) architecture, which is simpler and more cost efficient than the 2oo3. Because of their diagnostic capabilities and cost optimization, safety embedded processors are going into systems that don’t necessarily require functional safety but do require high levels of availability. Manufacturers of central-office communications and data-center equipment are taking advantage of safety embedded processors to mitigate the risk of downtime. Though a failure in one of these devices doesn’t usually pose an imminent danger to human life or the environment, they do need to be extremely robust and resistant to all types of failures: A failure in a major communications backbone can affect millions of people and lose significant revenue for the communications provider. The additional cost and time needed to develop a 1oo1D system is marginal compared with the cost of system downtime. The advent of safety embedded processors is helping to decrease the cost, complexity and development time of safetycritical systems. System designers who utilize integratedhardware safety features can substantially reduce safety software development time and the number of components needed for needed functional safety and reliability. p The most advanced search engine for Electronic Engineers & Buyers. For free. Compare Electronic Parts Get Pricing & Inventory NEW Discover New Electronic Parts Parametrically Search Parts DESIGN + PRODUCTS PLANET ANALOG USB battery charging: Harder than it looks By Mitch Polonsky AS THE USB PORT becomes ubiquitous, it is becoming accepted as a universal charging port. Achieving such universality, however, is easier said than done. This article examines the challenges designers commonly confront in creating this highly desirable, omnipresent USB charging port. Why is this taking so long? What does it mean to provide a “fast” charge? It depends on your definition of fast—and that usually boils down to customer expectations. The common example is, “I charge my phone, MP3 player or other device for x hours at home; but at work, with my laptop, with my monitor, with my new adapter, it takes all day to charge!” So we start with the “native” charger that comes with any device, since that charging experience is the baseline for customer satisfaction. The native wall charger for a device will very often have a special signature on the data pins to let a device know it is safe to charge with more current. In some cases, it also prevents the device from charging at all if the host is unknown. This signature may come in the form of a specific voltage placed on D+, D– or both. Figure 1 illustrates a common architecture for a wall charger using this methodology. Note that the configurations are implemented so the manufacturer can sell more accessories. Make no mistake, selling specialized accessories is definitely in the business plan for any portable product. For every chargeable product purchased, about 50 percent of us will go out and buy another charger. The reason is simple: We do not like carrying them around, so we leave a charger in each of the common places we frequent, such as in the office or in the car. What’s the ‘right’ charging current? Here’s a hint: There may be three. To begin an analysis of USB charging, you first need a system to help measure the current on Vbus and to measure and apply voltages on D+ and D–. This can be done by creating a board that both the peripheral and the host can plug into while exposing their D+, D– and Vbus lines for analysis. Jumping ahead, it is time to evaluate the charging current with a device connected via your interposer board. So let’s assume we are all smart enough to determine what voltage the native charge places on D+ and D–, and we re-create a discrete charging circuit to confirm our suspicions. We then apply the right voltages, just like the native charger on D+ and D–, but the charging current is not matching our previous results. It is time to check our power—not just whether things are plugged in, but the level of power. Battery power level plays a key role in charging. Many of us who have worked on cell phone designs know that a deeply discharged lithium-ion battery needs to be trickle charged before the real charging can start. This, too, complicates knowing whether you have an optimal charging current. The peripheral that gets Figure 1. Common architecture for a wall charger. 42 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 DESIGN + PRODUCTS plugged into a USB port may have several different points of charging before it is full. It most likely has a lowcharging mode for the aforementioned trickle charging. It also may have a different charging state for when the battery is nominally charged. Finally, it may have a charging state for a fully charged battery. As a result, you will need to observe what the charging current is when a given device’s battery is empty, when it is midway charged and when it is fully charged. Sound time-consuming? You bet it is—but it is a necessary evil for complete characterization. Can I have the kitchen sink, too? We now have a growing understanding of customer charger configurations and what we would like to see for charging current. For many apps (such as PC, monitor and docking station), you may want fast charging and the ability to transfer data at the same time. In this regard, there has been a lot of confusion as to what is possible. The reason goes back to the fact that many native chargers place a voltage on the D+ and D– pins of the USB port. Since traditional data communication on the USB is based on 3.3 V for USB 1.1 and 300 mV for USB 2.0, putting a different voltage on these lines eliminates the possibility for enumeration and communication. There are some exceptions to this rule. For instance, there are devices that require you to download device-specific software to your host when you first plug the device into the USB port. Some cell phones are like this for syncing purposes, and now some facilitate charging at a higher current while communicating. So for device communication and charging, we may be limited by what the device will allow given a specific software driver. But all is not lost; indeed, there is help on the way. A specification has been created to help with this data-pluscharging challenge: USB-IF Battery Charging Specification Revision 1.2 (BC 1.2). The full specification can be found at http://bit.ly/eLVPx. BC 1.2 was created to unify batterycharging attributes for USB 2.0 in the future. The idea is to minimize the number of cell phone chargers ending up in landfills, by converging on one USB-charging specification. The European Union has been an early adopter of waste reduction principles; specifically, it has committed to using the same Micro-USB connectors on data-enabled cell phones. But the EU has yet to fully adopt the BC 1.2 specification. The BC 1.2 spec includes a Charging Downstream Port (CDP) mode that allows for data and higher charging currents. If, for example, a voltage between 0.4 V and 0.8 V is sensed on D+ of a host or hub device, then D– should respond with 0.5 V to 0.7 V. More details on the timing associated with this provision can be found in the specification. Once CDP has been established, peripheral devices are allowed to draw up to 1.5 A and simultaneously communicate data. Devices with this technology, including cell phones, should begin arriving this year. The USB port has infiltrated our life for providing power, and we need to act intelligently if we want to be the providers of this power. It is hoped that this primer on USB charging will help you to avoid going down many of the dark alleys in which some of our colleagues have gotten stuck. p Mitch Polonsky is director of product marketing for analog products and technology at SMSC (Hauppauge, N.Y.). Before joining SMSC, he was in marketing at Motorola. He holds a BA in mathematics from Emory University, an MSEE from Georgia Institute of Technology and an MBA from Arizona State University’s W.P. Carey School of Business. Editor’s note: Liked this? Want more? If you’re interested in power components, efficiency, thermal issues, ac/dc and dc/dc supply topologies, batteries, supply ICs, complete supplies, single- and multirail management, and supply monitoring, check out our Power Management Designline (http://bit.ly/H5Ds8j) for the latest design and tech trends, products, and news. Plus, sign up for our weekly Power Management Designline Newsletter (http://bit.ly/9djibj). Delivering Real Power Compact, Powerful CCM PFC from 75 W to 4 kW+ μPFC™ CONTROL IC VIN VOUT PFC Control ICs Part Number Description IR1152 Fixed 66KHz switching frequency with brownout protection and dual OVP protection IR1153 Fixed 22KHz switching frequency with brownout protection and programmable OVP protection IR1155 Programmable switching frequency and programmable OVP protection Features • Small, easy, powerful solution • Fast time to market • Enables compliance with energy standards (1W, Blue Angel, Energy Star) • No AC line voltage sense required • 0.999 power factor • Switching frequency of 22kHz, 66kHz or programmable value available • Average current mode control • Cycle by cycle peak current limit system protection For more information call 1.800.981.8699 or visit www.irf.com THE POWER MANAGEMENT LEADER April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 43 DESIGN + PRODUCTS EETimes.com Products: Focus on sensors Sensor reads pressure and temperature American Sensor Technologies’ sensors provide both pressure and temperature outputs from a single process point. This dual-output configuration reduces process-penetration points and leaks, which are dangerous in critical systems such as hydrogen, oxygen, heavy-oil processing, hydraulics, analyzers, offshore pipelines and ammonia systems. The devices feature a microprocessorcontrolled design, along with a one-piece body construction. Both the Model AST20PT Sensor and Model AST46PT Transmitter offer high accuracy pressure and temperature measurements of ±0.1 percent and 1.0 percent BFSL, respectively. Both units come in various temperature ranges from –40° to 250°F (–40° to 125°C). Though the Model AST46PT is offered in pressure ranges up to 20,000 pounds per square inch (1,400 Bar), the Model AST20PT is available in pressure ranges up to 45,000 PSI (3,100 Bar). Full story: http://bit.ly/AjXGg8 www.astsensors.com Wi-Fi sensors connect directly to cloud servers/phone platforms Libelium’s Wi-Fi module for the Waspmote platform enables sensor nodes to send gathered data to cloud-based Web servers and to any smartphone without the need for a special gateway, easing the deployment of sensor networks. By allowing direct communication between the sensors and smartphones without an intermediate router, the Wi-Fi radio opens the Internet of Things to iPhone/Android application developers. Sensor nodes can connect directly to cloud servers using a standard protocol such as HTTP. The Wi-Fi sensors also can use secure HTTPS, ensuring the privacy of the information sent, a major concern when deploying wireless-sensor networks in cities. They also can create TCP and UDP connections, so that developers can design their own communications framework between the sensor nodes and the cloud servers. Full story: http://bit.ly/wjFGsM www.libelium.com Starter kit simplifies energy-harvested wireless sensors EnOcean GmbH said its ESK 300 starter kit simplifies the testing and development of energy-harvesting wireless solutions for OEM partners. The ESK 300 comes with electromechanical pushbutton generators for switches and a solar-powered temperatures sensor. Radio telegrams from the self-powered sensors are received via USB dongle and visualized via personal computer software. The starter kit comes as a developer tool without CE certification. It is available for 868-MHz (R&TTE) and 315-MHz (FCC) frequencies. The kit consists of a switch module (PTM 200) for building services, components for different switch applications (PTM 330, ECO 200), a temperature sensor module (STM 330), a USB gateway (USB 300), PC software for visualization (DolphinView Basic) and a sample case for industrial switching solutions. The starter kit is available for OEM partners at $106. Full story: http://bit.ly/x8RIqi www.enocean.com Transducers resist harsh environments Honeywell has expanded its heavy-duty pressure transducer portfolio with the PX2 series of stainless-steel pressure measurement products, which are engineered to be resistant to moderately harsh media such as refrigerants, brake and hydraulic fluids, engine oil, tap water and compressed air. The PX2 series use piezoresistive sensing technology with ASIC signal conditioning. Their compatibility with varied media, combined with up to IP69K protection and CE compliance, allow for reliable performance in tough environments. The fully calibrated PX2 series is compensated for transducer offset, sensitivity, temperature effects and nonlinearity using an onboard ASIC. The total error band of ±2 percent over the compensated temperature range of –40°F to 257°F (–40ºC to 125ºC) provides interchangeability, thanks to minimal part-to-part variation in accuracy; eliminates individual transducer testing and calibration; and supports customer system accuracy and warranty requirements. The transducers measure absolute or sealed gauge pressure. The absolute ver- 44 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 sions have an internal vacuum reference and an output value proportional to absolute pressure. Full story: http://bit.ly/wxDnEa www.sensing.honeywell.com Digital thermometers/thermostats feature SPI/three-wire interface Maxim Integrated Products’ MAX31722/ MAX31723 digital thermometers and thermostats provide local temperature readings over a user-selectable Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus or three-wire interface. Though most competitive devices require at least a 2.7-volt supply, these temperature sensors can operate from a supply as low as 1.7 V. This low supply voltage, along with a 2.4-microampere low-power standby mode, makes the products suitable for low-power or battery-operated systems. The MAX31722 and MAX31723 have an array of options to help the designer. An SPI or three-wire interface is available for reading and writing data. The user can adjust the readout resolution between 9 and 12 bits for applications that require greater temperature resolution. Both high- and lowaccuracy applications are satisfied with the MAX31723 (±0.5°C) or MAX31722 (±2.0°C). The parts are available in an eight-pin MAX package and are unit priced from 79 cents in quantities of 1,000 and up. Full story: http://bit.ly/zb0SW8 www.maxim-ic.com Micrel aims to eliminate dropped calls Micrel Inc.’s MIC94300 voltage-follower output and MIC94310 fixed-output low-dropout (LDO) IC use its latest Ripple Blocker activefilter technology, which removes noise from the power supply. The Ripple Blocker technology improves minimum-detectable-signal capturing for low-light image sensors by suppressing system power ripple for the image system processor. By eliminating the large LC filter that would typically be required to reduce ripple in a discrete solution, the MIC943XX devices provide more usable board space for space-constrained applications. Portable apps include smartphones, medical imaging, tablets/notebooks/ DESIGN + PRODUCTS Webcams, digital still and video cameras, barcode scanners, GPS and image-system processors for image sensors. The MIC94300 integrates a low-RDSon, current-limit switch and a low-pass filter that passes direct current (dc) and blocks the alternating-current (ac) component of the input voltage. The MIC94310 is a lowdropout regulator that Micrel says offers better power-supply-rejection-ratio (PSRR) performance from dc to 5 MHz than discrete solutions. Both chips feature an active-high enable pin for power sequencing. For quantities of 1,000 pieces or more, unit pricing starts at 24 cents for the MIC94300 and 27 cents for the MIC94310. Full story: http://bit.ly/An2jBX www.micrel.com 16-bit-sensor signal conditioner delivers high resistance, low power ZMD AG (ZMDI) has introduced a 16-bit-sensor signal-conditioning IC for calibrated resistive-sensor modules. The ZSSC3016 combines high-accuracy amplification, 16-bit precision analog-to-digital conversion, and an 18-bit digital signal processor for linearization and calibration functions. The high-resolution sensor-interface ASSP is suitable for use in battery-driven low-power devices, as it has an overall current consumption of less than 1 milliampere combined with a standby current of less than 250 nanoamperes. Full story: http://bit.ly/w2xdss www.zmdi.com PRODUCT OF THE TIMES Sensata Technologies has an opening for Process Engineer in Attleboro, MA to implement cost-effective solutions to facilitate economical manufacture of sensors at the quality level & cycle time required. Requires Master's or Bachelor's degree w/ exp. in Mechanical/ Manufacturing Eng. Email resumes to [email protected] & reference job code IR14501 in email subject line. Must have legal auth. to work permanently in the US. EOE Electronic Drafter, Montgomery, AL: Bachelor's degree in Computer Graphic Tech. or related field plus 1 yr exp req'd in electrical and electronic design for automotive electrical eng'g and network equipment construction. Resume to Sungwon Alabama Corp., 13365 Edna Brake Lucas Dr., Montgomery, AL 36117. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 45 PROUD SPONSOR: DOWNLOAD THE FREE FESTIVAL APP (STARTING APRIL10) .S. T MISS THE LAR ’ N O CE IN THE SCIEN U OF T CELEBRATION S E G D THE USA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FESTIVAL IS PROUD TO HOST THE 2012 “NATIONAL ROBOT FEST AND DIY EXPO - GRAND FINALE WHERE CREATIVITY & TECHNOLOGY MEET” EXPO & BOOK FAIR APRIL 28 & 29, 2012 USASCIENCEFESTIVAL.ORG WALTER E. WASHINGTON CONVENTION CENTER, WASHINGTON, D.C. OVER 3000 FUN HANDS-ON ACTIVITIES AND MORE THAN 100 STAGE SHOWS MEET AWARD-WINNING AUTHORS AND SCIENCE CELEBRITIES LIKE BILL NYE THE SCIENCE GUY AND ADAM SAVAGE & JAMIE HYNEMAN NEW THIS YEAR: CAREER PAVILION & BOOK FAIR | A FREE EVENT LOCKHEEDIUM / FESTIVAL HOST BOCKIUM NOBELIUM EINSTEINIUM KRYPTON LEGO Education, CrazyEngineers.com, The Kavli Foundation, Medimmune, Sigma Xi, Illumina Inc., American Scientist, Physics Today, Forbes/Wolfe, SchoolTube, Washington Family Magazine, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, The Planetary Society, PBS Kids, ABC7/WJLA-TV, WAMU 88.5 - American University Radio, The George Washington University - School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) PLATINUM K&L GATESIUM Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Celestron, Baxter International, American Nuclear Society, Association of Science-Technology Centers, Xconomy, You Can Do the Rubik's Cube, Amgen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Defense, Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals (SMRP), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Raytheon, Center for America, U.S. Army RDECOM and eCYBERMISSION, Purdue University, Project Lead The Way (PLTW), The Scripps Foundation for Science and the Environment, Northern Virginia Technology Council, 3M, Aldebaran Robotics Inc., Center for Biotechnology Education at Johns Hopkins University TAKE THE METROBUS OR METRORAIL TO THE USA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FESTIVAL EE LIFE DRIVE FOR INNOVATION ENGINEERING POP CULTURE Build your own crack POTS Beer: It’s what’s for work By Jon Gabay By Brian Fuller OUR VERY OWN DR. GIZMOLOGY challenges you to build a POTS line interface in this third installment of our Building Innovation contest. Share a video of your application with our Drive for Innovation audience, and if you act quickly you will get a $100 Amazon gift card and the satisfaction of knowing that you can keep up with the doctor. The project is excerpted here. Read the rules, view the full project and accept the challenge at http://bit.ly/GN2yK2. THE MOST SUCCESSFUL and widely deployed communications network the modern world has ever seen is the plain old telephone system (POTS). For generations, these household phone lines have provided basic voice and, later, data services to hundreds of millions of households, reliably, through all kinds of adverse conditions. Many homes still maintain a POTS line in some way, and the lines are ripe for use for remote home automation, energy savings and gizmology. The posted article describes a telephone line interface that you can build and connect to your household phone line so you can control things remotely. This month’s installment reviews the actual telephone line interface, how it works, and how to interface to it electronically in a safe and isolated way. Next month, we will review the twoto four-wire interface, filtering, dualtone multifrequency (DTMF) receivers, de-multiplexers and logic flow for security-code access, individual commands and tone feedback acknowledgements. Parts referenced in the online article are available at the Avnet Express Web site. Schematics, bills of materials, pc board layouts, and code listings as they apply are freely available and can be used as a starting point. p BUILDING INNOVATION RULES Dive into the technology, implement the design and share your innovations with us by following these steps: 1. Follow John Gabay’s article and build the board design. (Please take reasonable safety precautions and seek guidance if you are new to gizmology.) 2. Create a short, one- to two-minute video describing your application of the design. 3. Send the video file via e-mail to [email protected]. 4. We will send you back an online Amazon Gift card valued at $100. (Limit of one gift card per person and only to the first 50 participants who fulfill the guidelines. Offer ends April 30, 2012.) We are building a community that rekindles ingenuity, innovation and cleverness. Use this article and other Gizmo Blocks in the series to encourage students, inventors, engineers and hobbyists to devise gadgets that use energy efficiently and provide the next level of personalized control and safety. ENGINEERS WORK extraordinarily hard—harder, I’d argue, than almost anyone except the fishermen on “Deadliest Catch,” coal miners, Rush Limbaugh’s crisis-management consultants and Navy SEALs. One reliable fuel for maintaining a high level of engineering operational readiness is caffeine, administered through delivery mechanisms such as coffee or tea, Red Bull, DynaPep and disposable hypodermic needle (tell me you haven’t at least thought about it). But caffeine can be taken too far, as analog engineer and EE Lifer Chris Gammell recently pointed out. He wondered aloud on Twitter (@Chris_Gammell) whether his new incube coffee maker might be prompting him to partake in too much caffeine, get a little too energetic and jittery, and then wear down the carpet between his cube and the nearest caffeine-expulsion room. I helpfully suggested he add a beer keg to his cube to balance things out. That prompted embedded engineer and Drive for Innovation star Scott Wohler (@swohlereng) to raise a number of helpful design considerations. The usual Twitter hilarity followed. It all got me thinking: Because engineers and beer go together like, well, engineers and caffeine, beer needs to become more institutionalized in the workplace. After all, beer is a staple in many business segments already. Bigtime brewers usually offer free beer for their employees—and look at how successful they are! Bars make a killing off beer. And many of the innovations that came from Sun Microsystems are traceable to interactions that occurred during that workstation company’s famous beer bashes. Beer should be more highly integrated into engineering environments for many April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 47 EE LIFE reasons. Chief among them is that beer and scientists enjoy a collaborative relationship, despite a notorious, sincedebunked study that beer and science don’t mix (http://nyti.ms/HgZpz9). Beer is a well-known social lubricant. You’ve hit a wall with a prickly colleague over the right way to route a dense pc board? Revisit the topic after sharing a lunchtime brew. Your boss has set an asinine project deadline? Beer will relax him, and he will relax it. Finally what better team-building exercise than to conceive, design and implement a beer-delivery system? Join the maker movement! There’s no reason college kids should have all the fun. Consider the connections between your daily design trade-offs and the beer-delivery architecture: • Is it practical to devise a distributed scheme in which multiple kegs serve one or two engineers? Pro: You’d avoid lunchtime and “rush hour” pulls on the keg, to be sure (when the beer would slow to a trickle). Con: How do you manage a distributed refrigeration system’s power consequences when your CFO is trying to win carbon credits as part of his bonus plan? • Should you have a “cloud” system in which a single, huge keg serves the entire department via individual taps? Remember, the farther the tap from the keg, the more you need to carbonate your beer for optimal pours. Where do you store the CO2? It boggles the mind. Doubting Thomases I know what you’re thinking: HR will be reluctant (they always are, because “fun,” “creative” and “different” are not words found in HR Policies and Procedures, Vol. 975.2.12.9-a). But offer your HR VP a beer, sit him or her down and explain the salutary effects of the occasional barley pop. Observe that some of the greatest design engineers of the 1970s and 1980s were not shy around the suds. Close with a reminder that today’s work environment is all about self-esteem—indeed, ahem, high self-esteem scores are crucial metrics in the annual “satisfaction in the workplace” surveys that spell bonus or bust for HR folks—and there’s nothing that improves self-esteem like a couple of carbonated fermented beverages. 48 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 I could go on, but my mug just went dry. In any event, this should arm you to pitch the idea to your management. And those bleeding-edge EE Lifers who have already installed a beer-delivery and productivity-enhancement system in the workplace are invited to e-mail photos, design plans and experiences to [email protected] (subject: beer architecture system). We’ll share them with the group. p A DIALOGUE BREWS I’m from Cleveland. Look up "ten cent beer night" on Wikipedia, and then imagine the workplace. — forthprgmr The problem is the law. You need to get a liquor license, unless you’re having a party and you get rid of the alcohol at the end of it. — kumaranmani I’m not sure [a license is] required everywhere; is it? — phoenixdave Don’t forget that we voted beer the fourth greatest innovation of all time: http://bit.ly/ngTU6f. — David Ashton For years, I worked at a small company where beer was a part of the culture. On Fridays after 4 p.m., we would convene in someone’s office with a six pack. I usually had to buy the beer, but it was always something to look forward to. Engineers are typically introverts, and beer can correct that. However, everyone has a “slippery slope”: Three beers in, and you might not be so productive for idea generation any longer. ... For the adventurous, and those who prefer efficiency, Tröegs makes JavaHead Stout, a malty, chocolatey stout made with coffee. — swohler I believe we have evolved enough as a civilization to recognize the innumerable benefits that beer provides for engineering and many other professions as well. I predict that this blog will one day be recognized as a seminal work in influencing the course of human events. — Dylan McGrath I’ll drink to that! — phoenixdave SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCES AND CHECK OUT THE FUN http://bit.ly/GNnMF4 ENGINEERING POP CULTURE Paying it forward: Two perspectives By Robert W. Chesla and Melissa Boskocevic A mentor’s story My first manager, Jim, was a true teaching mentor. He patiently passed down engineering know-how that taught me to tackle problems from both textbook and practical, common-sense perspectives. He showed, by example, how to work methodically, accomplish goals and enjoy engineering as well as the company of our colleagues. I once asked Jim why he hired me, and his reply was, “Not for what I think you know, but for what I think you can learn.” Jim is long retired, but I see him occasionally, and we have a rock-solid bond that has stood the test of time. As a longtime employee of Rockwell Automation (once Allen-Bradley), I have built a rewarding career in engineering. I’ve worked in design engineering, quality, component engineering and engineering services. My contributions to company objectives have included stints as an ISO 9000 instructor, quality auditor and global project manager. Over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to visit and audit many component suppliers, a task that has afforded me the luxury to interact with some of the industry’s most knowledgeable people. Giving back to the profession by “paying it forward” has long been a goal. Teaching and learning moments arise throughout one’s career, but the full potential of seizing a mentoring opportunity happens only when you have the ideal mentor-mentee match. To create an effective and positive experience, you must have a two-way commitment to clear goals. Mentoring can go beyond the technical side of engineering and may include discussions of ethics, company politics and related career guidance. EE LIFE When Melissa was assigned to me, I’ll admit to having been unsure of how to balance my workload and mentoring duties. If I was going to put my reputation on the line with an intern, I wanted to make sure she was willing and able to add value toward department goals and objectives. Happily, we quickly realized that our personalities matched well. Melissa is enthusiastic, competent, organized and dedicated. She has assisted with my workload far more than I had anticipated; although I must verify her work, I am able put some trust in it. I have not considered the time spent a chore; rather, it has been a valuable and enjoyable experience. — B.C. A mentee’s view Electrical engineering is my major because I enjoy the challenge of understanding the inner workings of everyday electronic devices and their applications. I find satisfaction in solving complex problems and implementing a process to make a component function. I joined Rockwell Automation last summer as a component engineering intern. Throughout my education, I have been interested in control systems, and this exceptional opportunity has greatly enhanced my understanding of industrial processes and the engineering profession as a whole. Since beginning college, I’d heard Bob Chesla has tapped his own experience as a mentee in mentoring Melissa Boskocevic. only praise for Rockwell Automation, based on its excellent products, ethical business standards and continual improvement practices. During my first few weeks at the company, I was intimidated by the tasks that were placed before me. I had never worked for a large corporation, and I was unsure of what was expected of me. All apprehensions quickly abated, however, as the engineers at Rockwell Automation shared their knowledge with me. I grew confident that I was providing valuable assistance to my mentor and was contributing to Rockwell Automation. Bob has done a phenomenal mentoring job, guiding me through to numerous departments within the company while teaching me to balance the responsibilities, opportunities and hurdles that engineers face. He always finds time to answer questions and give career advice, and my enthusiasm for the profession has grown as a result. When a mentor-mentee program functions properly, it’s a win-win-win situation: The mentor gets the satisfaction of paying it forward, the mentee gains real-life engineering experience, and the company receives help in meeting its goals and objectives. No less important are the rewarding and enjoyable bonds that can develop between mentor and mentee. p Robert (Bob) W. Chesla is a senior project engineer with Rockwell Automation. He holds a BEET, and is a Certified PMP and a Certified ISO 9000 Quality Lead Assessor. Melissa Boskocevic is a component engineering intern at Rockwell Automation. She is a senior at Cleveland State University and will graduate in December with a BSEE. lJOIN THE CONVERSATION http://bit.ly/GGrf6G April caption contest: Deadline April 30 WHEN DINOSAURS ROAMED THE LAB ... Age may be relative, but isn’t this taking things a bit far? Go to http://bit.ly/GHIYAp and add your caption to the comments field to explain Tyranno’s presence in the engineers’ midst. At the end of April, we’ll put the entries to a vote, and the writer of the winning caption will receive a color cartoon from artist Daniel Guidera. April 2, 2012 Electronic Engineering Times 49 LAST WORD Why systems need to get smarter The amount of digital data around the world is doubling every two years, thanks in large part to innovative ways of creating and sharing information. By 2020, according to market watcher IDC, mobile devices, social networking and the Internet will contribute to a data glut of historic proportions—50 times greater than current levels. Are we ready for all that data? Better yet, are our systems equipped with the innovative technology to manage it? What’s needed is the technology to harness that data so that both businesses and consumers can make decisions based on quality analysis, rather than on experience and intuition. In doing so, we would take a more scientific approach to our businesses and lives, whether as a doctor diagnosing a patient, a homeowner choosing the most efficient time to do laundry or a meteorologist predicting a hurricane. To this end, we need to build information technology systems that can not only filter and store all this data but also make use of it. For more than 50 years, we’ve been operating with the same IT elements: processor, memory, storage, database and programs. We’ve designed IT systems to handle business-process automation, long business cycles and terabytes of largely structured data. But as data gets bigger, the only way for technology to keep up is for computing to get smarter. Systems designed for transaction processing and structured data can’t deliver the levels of performance that businesses and consumers are demanding and will require in the very near future. 50 Electronic Engineering Times April 2, 2012 We need to build IT systems that can not only filter and store data but also make use of it It’s time to shift the computing paradigm from computers that calculate to computers that learn from and adapt to all data, structured and unstructured, such as e-mails, presentations and videos. Last year, IBM’s Watson high-powered question/answer system showed the world what is possible when a finely tuned learning system tackles big data with advanced analytics: It competed with and bested two human contestants at “Jeopardy.” Today, IBM and partners are putting Watson to work in industries from health care to banking. Watson gives us a glimpse into the monumental shift in computing that will affect businesses in every industry and consumers around the world. But that’s just the beginning. Future generations of optimized systems will benefit enterprises across industries as they deal with common and complex data center issues. We are on the verge of expert integrated systems with built-in knowledge on how to perform intricate tasks, based on proven best practices—systems that not only recognize changes in the computing environment but also anticipate them. As workload demands spike, the systems will respond. When new applications or upgrades are needed, they will be deployed against best practices and integrated patterns. To deal with the explosive growth of data, data storage systems will have to get very efficient and smart. They will do so through deployment of advanced capabilities such as universal storage virtualization, compression and data deduplication, as well as through automated tiering to keep the data optimally balanced for cost, speed and access patterns. In addition, next-generation integration technologies will enable systems of integrated storage, networking and servers, making these capabilities easier to deploy. As we rush to the future—generating, storing and managing ever-higher mountains of digital information along the way—the time to start questioning the vitality of our systems is now. So if you’ve wondered whether systems could get any smarter, the answer is simple: Yes. p By Gururaj Rao, IBM fellow and vice president for IBM Systems and Technology Group development in India and Southeast Asia. More Flexibility Vicor gives power system architects the flexibility to choose from modular, plug-and-play components, ranging from bricks to semiconductor-centric solutions with seamless integration across all power distribution architectures. From the wall plug to the point of load. Don’t let inflexible power products slow you down. Choose from limitless power options to speed your competitive advantage. Flexibility. Density. Efficiency. Trust your product performance to Vicor vicorpower.com/rp/flexibility/eet RX200 MCUs for High-performance, Power-efficient Applications w Lo er w o age Volt Sa fe ty F u Su n io ct n Lo w P RX210 Flash MCUs bring new levels of capability and performance to ultralow-power, low-voltage embedded-system applications. Based on the fast 32-bit RX CPU core, they deliver more performance on far less power than other MCUs. p e ri o Low Power Architecture Ultra-low voltage operation 1.62V operation @ up to 20MHz, 31 DMIPS Low power consumption 130µA/DMIPS (run mode), 1.3µA with RTC on 0.45µA with RTC off High performance 1.56 DMIPS/MHz, 78 DMIPS @ 50MHz Wide range of voltage operation (1.62V to 5.5V) © 2012 Renesas Electronics America Inc. r A rc hi tec ture Advanced Features Try one out today! Zero wait-state Flash 2KB block size Programmable at 1.62V Data flash programmable while code is executed (BGO) Scalable 36-145 pins, QFP, LGA, QFN 32KB-1MB Multifunction pin controller Safety Complies with IEC60730 Standard Register to be eligible to receive a FREE RX210 Promotion Board am.renesas.com/RPBRX210/a