BAYER, BASF, Hoechst and other chemical

Transcription

Educational Material Series about the ‘Brussels EU’ for Teachers and Students
1925:
BAYER, BASF, Hoechst and other
chemical/pharmaceutical multinationals
formed IG Farben Industrie AG
Company Value: 11 Billion Reichsmark
Number of Employees: More than 80,000
Exposed from government archives: 50,000 authentic historical documents from the Nuremberg
War Crimes Tribunal against the Oil and Drug Cartel IG Farben www.profit-over-life.org
Prevent the take-over of Europe by the oil and drug cartel: www.eu-facts.org
29 November 1929:
IG-Farben and Standard Oil (Rockefeller)
divide the world into two “claims”
Oil Claim:
Standard Oil
(Rockefeller)
Chemical / Drug Claim:
IG Farben
(BASF, BAYER,
Hoechst)
Key Business:
Pharma-Investment Business
with Disease
► Define the human body as a global market place
► Exploit diseases as markets for patented drugs
► Establish a monopoly for patented chemical drugs
in medicine on a global scale
► Eliminate any and all competition from
non-patentable natural therapies
1933:
From 1933 IG-Farben “invests”
in the Nazis as part of their plans
for world conquest
► Define the human body as
a global market place
► Exploit diseases as
markets for patented drugs
► Establish a monopoly for
patented chemical drugs in
medicine on a global scale
► Eliminate any and all
competition from
non-patentable natural
therapies
IG Farben Industrie
corporate headquarters in Frankfurt
Aerial view on IG Farben in Frankfurt
1933:
Precondition for the military conquest
of the world on behalf of IG Farben
Abolition of democracy and Build-up
of a dictatorship
► Just like the oil and drug cartel today within the
‘Brussels EU’, so did the IG-Farben cartel in 1933
organize its direct access to the political executive,
i.e. the German government.
► And just like the ‘Lisbon
Treaty’ today, the IG Farben cartel then needed an
“enabling act” to establish
its dictatorship.
► And just like the economic crisis and the ‘war
on terror’ today serve as
pretexts for the ‘Brussels
EU’, the activation of the
1933 “enabling act” had
its pretext: The arson of
the German Parliament.
The “Reichstagsbrand” February 27, 1933
1933:
IG Farben pays the Nazis for incinerating their
own Parliament, blaming the opposition and
using it as a pretext for its enabling act.
On the morning
following the arson
of the German
parliament, the
IG Farben cartel
transfers 400,000
Reichsmark to the
trust account
of the Nazis.
Document: Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal
against IG Farben
www.profit-over-life.org/incinerating.html
1933:
Only three weeks later, on March 24, 1933:
The IG Farben
cartel receives
the “enabling act”
– allowing the Nazis
to rule on their
behalf – without
any control by
Parliament.
This act was the
legal foundation for
the Nazi dictatorship
and the precondition
for the military
conquest of the
world on behalf
of the IG Farben
cartel.
The “Ermächtigungs-Gesetz” (enabling law) of the
IG Farben Nazi coalition of March 24, 1933
www.profit-over-life.org/enabling.html
1933:
October 1933: Public parade by the
leaders of the IG Farben/Nazi coalition
Munich:
Half a year after
the coup d'état, the
cartel/Nazi coalition
celebrates its takeover of power in
public.
IG-Farben Director Schmitz (right), the financier of the
coup d'état, meets his political stakeholder (left)
1933 to 1944:
“Berlin NW7” – IG Farben’s politburo
and liaison office to the Nazi/government
in Berlin
From here, seven decades ago the conquest of Europe
was being prepared
► economically
► technically and
► logistically
1933 to 1944:
The political stakeholder of the
IG Farben/Nazi coalition announces
his plans about the future of Europe
“The people of Europe are
representing one family in
the world.
It is not conceivable that in
the long run, a community
of people with different
legal system and values can
coexist on such a confined
space.“
Hitler in front of the German
Parliament on March 7,1936, half a
year before the IG Farben/Nazi
coalition launched WWII.
1933 to 1944:
IG Farben finances the Nazi party before
and during WWII as an ‘investment’ towards
a cartel-controlled ‘European market’
Document from Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against the IG Farben cartel
More information: www.profit-over-life.org/donations.html
1936:
IG Farben director Krauch relocates
to Berlin to help coordinate
the “4 Year Plan” preparation for WWII
► Carl Krauch, director and
chairman of the Board of
IG Farben
► 1936 Krauch moved to
Berlin and became
“plenipotentiary” within
the infamous “Four Year
Plan” administration.
► With the help of thousands of technocrats,
Krauch coordinated the
logistical preparation for
WWII and for the industrial takeover of conquered Europe on behalf
of the cartel.
► 1948 in Nuremberg Tribunal found guiltyof "enslavement"
and condemned to six years in prison. Released 1950.
► 1955 board member of Huels GmbH
1940:
The 1940 IG Farben patent strategy
for the “European Reich”
► Europe under leadership of Nazi/IG Farben
► Common currency
► Common patent law
► One EU appeal court
under control
of the German Cartel
Find English translation at:
www.profit-over-life.org/patent_strategy.html
IG Auschwitz:
100% subsidiary of IG Farben industries
In 1942, IG Farben chose
Auschwitz to build the
largest industrial complex
in Europe of that time,
IG Auschwitz, in order to
produce the chemicals for
the conquest war of the
Nazi/IG Farben coalition
IG Auschwitz, 1943
IG Auschwitz
KZ Auschwitz
KZ Auschwitz
Aerial view of IG Auschwitz and KZs Auschwitz
With IG Farben’s support:
The KZ Auschwitz turns from forced labor
camp to extermination factory
Tens of thousands of
inmates of the KZ
Auschwitz are forced
to slave labor at the
construction site of
IG Auschwitz.
Once they were
physically broken the
slave laborers were
gassed in the nearby
Auschwitz concentration camp and
burned in its ovens.
Patented BAYER-Drug Be 1034:
BAYER and HOECHST pharmaceutical
divisions of IG Farben tested their
“chemo” drugs on thousands of KZ inmates
Tens of thousands
of innocent KZ inmates
were murdered in the
profit interest of BAYER
and other pharmaceutical multinationals
More information:
www.profit-over-life.org/pharma_experiments.html
1947/48:
24 IG Farben Managers were tried
in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal,
including its CEO Fritz Ter Meer and
Chairman Carl Krauch
US Chief Prosecutor Telford Taylor:
“Without IG Farben the Second World
War would not have been possible!”
Read the official 1945
report of US Senate
about the role of
IG Farben behind WWII
www.profit-over-life.org/
senate_report.html
www. profit-over-life.org
More than 40,000 records from the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against IG Farben
all online for the first time
after 6 decades of silence
In case the ‘Brussels EU’ decides to ban this
information about its dark roots from the internet, schools and educational institutes can
order a dvd for free at
www. profit-over-life.org/school_dvd/
After World War II – Preparing the ‘Brussels EU’ (I)
From Zyklon B manufacturer
to the position of CEO of BASF
► Carl Wurster, IG Farben
director, chairman of
Zyklon B manufacturer
and IG Farben subsidiary
DeGeSch
► 1947 accused as a war
criminal
► 1952 back as CEO of
BASF for 13 years
After World War II – Preparing the ‘Brussels EU’ (II)
From convicted war criminal to the
position of chairman of BAYER
► Fritz Ter Meer, CEO of
BAYER and director
of IG Farben
► July 29, 1948, sentenced
in Nuremberg for genocide, slavery and other
crimes against humanity
► 1956, after being released
from prison, becomes
chairman of BAYER for
more than a decade – the
founding decade of what
became the Brussels EU
After World War II – Preparing the ‘Brussels EU’ (III)
From the “most wanted list”
of war criminals to the architect of
postwar Germany
► Hans Globke
► Co-Author of the
Nuremberg racial laws
► Accomplice of Stuckart,
member of the WannseeConference
► Nr. 101 on the Allied list
of “most wanted war
criminals”
► Escaped sentencing in
Nuremberg, because he
cooperated as “crown
witness”
After World War II – Preparing the ‘Brussels EU’ (IV)
Globke becomes the “grey eminence”
behind first German Chancellor
Adenauer in post war Germany
From 1949 to 1963 – during the decisive construction years
of the Brussels EU – Globke is Minister of Adenauer’s
Chancellery
Political
Parties
Government
Foreign
Relations
Secret Service
Cartel-Liaison
Defence
Liaison
Financing and constructing the ‘Brussels EU’
The founding father of the ‘Brussels EU’ (I)
Professor Dr. jur. W. Hallstein
“One of the most
important laws is the
Protection Law for
German Blood
and Honor …”
Hallstein in a speech given on
January 23, 1939 – seven
months before the launch of
WWII – on the topic of common European law under German leadership (“Rechtseinheit
Großdeutschlands”).
The founding father of the ‘Brussels EU’ (II)
The “Blood and Honor” Nazi lawyer Hallstein becomes
the architect of the EU-Commission – the cartel‘s new
politburo – and its first president.
German chancellor Adenauer and Hallstein (right) signing the first EU treaty,
Rome, March 25th, 1957
The founding father of the ‘Brussels EU’ (III)
Walter Hallstein becomes the first president of the EU-commission, a prominent attorney of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition.
From 1957 to 1967 he ruled over an army of more than 10,000
paid bureaucrats who – under his instruction – laid the foundation for the undemocratic construct of the ‘Brussels EU’.
Hallstein can be considered the “founding father”
of the ‘Brussels EU’.
From behind the
walls of this colossal
building Hallstein
prepares Europe for
the next take-over
of the oil and drug
cartel via the
‘Brussels EU’.
The founding father of the ‘Brussels EU’ (IV)
“The Commission is entrusted with what virtually amounts to a monopoly in
taking the initiative in all matters affecting the Community. There are a few
exceptions to this general rule, but these ought to be removed at the earliest
opportunity.”
“As I see it, the Commission should eventually be empowered to take all
measures necessary for the implementation of the Treaty on its own authority,
without having to rely on special and specific approval by the Council of
Ministers.”
“Furthermore, the big and small policy decisions, by which the Commission,
and the Commission alone, must at present exercise its executive authority,
will in some way have to be relaxed. This could be done by giving the different departments of the Commission under their Directors-General greater reISBN o-393-o5246-X
sponsibility, or by setting up separate agencies. The departments or the
agencies would of course continue to act under the general supervision of the Commission for approval in every case.”
“Since 1962, therefore, there has been an effort to unify patent law. After long stagnation, this task was
taken up again in 1969. A new series of preliminary draft proposals for an agreement on general European patent-sharing procedures and for an agreement on a “European patent” for the Common Market
were made by the experts in April and June 1971; conclusions are expected in 1973, and it is thought
that a European Patent Office could begin work in, say, 1976. Nineteen European states are negotiating
about the former agreement. This should make it possible to demand protection for an invention by
one procedure in all the signatory states, although by means of a series of national patents. The aim is
one of rationalization. The purpose of the second agreement is integration-to establish an independent
Common Market patent system, making it no longer necessary to accumulate national patents in order
to ensure protection throughout the Community. On this task, only the member-states of the Community are engaged. But both projects would share the same European patent office, with a registry and a
complaints department. Meanwhile the conditions for obtaining patents, which at present differ in
strictness from one country to another, need to be made uniform.
British membership of Euratom will be very important indeed. For it will remain no more than a pious
wish to expect the enlargement of the Community naturally and by itself-as it were-to lead enterprises
to act in accordance with the terms of a common policy for research and development. Further, such a
common policy could have the beneficial effect of speeding up many Community projects which have
been delayed, such as patent law, company law, fiscal harmonization, and technical standardization.”
The founding father of the ‘Brussels EU’ (V)
“A common European defence system would contribute to European security in the best possible
way and would contribute to European security in the best possible way and would at the same time
enable the alliance with the Americans to be organized as a partnership.
One can probably envisage a “Defence Community” only at a later stage, when the fusion of all the
Communities has brought us close to the establishment of a full federation.
An “armaments community” could also profit from the experience the European Economic Community has gained in the sphere of civil technology. This is a further argument in favour of identical
composition for the economic and the “political” community. The more costs rise, the more pressing
is the case for standardizing and mass-producing weapons. If individual states are not prepared to
give up producing their own arms because of the damage to their own economy and because they
fear to lose their political independence, then the only solution is Community arms production. This
development, no doubt, would have to keep in step with the integration of armed forces. The last
stage would be a definitive decision on atomic defence – although this is made infinitely more difficult by the Nuclear Non – Proliferation Treaty.”
The founding fathers of the Brussels EU (I)
Nazi/IG Farben men design and
implement the “European Commission”
as the political executive of the cartel’s
post war rule over Europe
Chemical, Drug and Oil Cartel
appoints
EU-Commission
- Political Executive decides
}
► Laws
► Regulations
► Rules
For 500 Million
People in Europe
Today
The founding fathers of the Brussels EU (II)
In 1969 prominent representatives of the IG Farben/Nazi Walter Hallstein
and Karl Wurster (head of the IG Farben successor HOECHST) promote
the “United States of Europe”
Action Committee for the “United States of Europe”
July 15/16, 1969
The Goals of the Pharma/Oil Cartel
then and now (I)
The tricks of the cartel to secure
its power – and launch its next attempt
to conquer Europe
Public
Hidden
Hidden
► The political and military stakeholders of the
IG Farben/Nazi coalition are being sentenced to death or
long-term prison.
► In the wake of the
beginning East-West
conflict, the directors
of Bayer, BASF,
HOECHST/ IG Farben
receive relatively
mild sentences.
► The shares of the IG
Farben companies are
distributed as booty
among the financial
groups controlling the
oil and drug business
in the Allied countries,
namely the US (Rockefeller group), France
and the UK (Rothschild group).
► Less than ten years
later they are back on
strategic corporate
positions in these
companies – planning
for the next attempt to
control Europe via the
“Brussels EU.”
then and now (II)
Economic and Political Control
from “Lisbon to Sofia”
WWII Plans
of IG-Farben
EU-Program
► Patented PharmaPreparations
► The same
► Patented Chemical
Products
► The same
(IG-Farben Successors)
► Patents on Life
► GMO-Food
IG Farben NW7 in Berlin
EU in Brussels
then and now (III)
Promising Health – Expanding Diseases
The Number of Victims of the Pharmaceutical Business
with Disease Surpasses Those of All the Wars in History
Largely Preventable
Diseases:
► Cardiovascular Disease
► Cancer
► AIDS
► Other Diseases
then and now (IV)
Desperate Measures of Control
New EU-Directive:
The Storage of
► All Phone Numbers
► All Fax Connections
► All Email Addresses
of 500 million Europeans
George Orwell’s ‘1984’
then and now (V)
Replacing democracy with a
corporate-controlled dictatorship
The graphic on the left shows the structure of the “New Europe” as designed by the Cartel/Nazi Coalition for a post-WWII Europe under their control. The national parliaments serve as fig leaves for the
dictatorship on behalf of the chemical/drug and oil Cartel.
The graphic on the right shows the basis of the “Brussels EU” as specified in the “Lisbon Treaty”. The
parallels of a dictatorial executive and the “fig leaf function” of the parliaments is immediately evident.
Then and now democracy is abolished and replaced by a dictatorship on behalf of the chemical/drug
and oil Cartel. Now, after the publication of these basic facts, it is impossible for the blatantly undemocratic construct of the “Brussels EU“ to survive!
Plan for Post-War Europe under the IG-Farben/Nazi control
(Sources: Nuremberg Tribunal No. VI Against IG Farben Cartel (1947/48)1 “The Greater Sphere Cartel” Soelter (1941)2
Chemical-Drug-Oil-Cartel
IG Farben (BAYER, BASF, HOECHST)
Nazi-Government
(Executive)
STOP
The European Cartel Organization
(The Greater Sphere Cartel)
STOP
National Parliaments
in European Countries
500 Million People of Europe
To compare: Planned Structure of the “Brussels EU” today
Chemical-Drug-Oil-Cartel
in Main Export Countries
France, Germany, Great Britain
STOP
‘EU-Commission’ of ‘Brussels EU’
As Executive Body in Europe
STOP
So-called
‘EU-Parliament’
National
Parliament
of European
Countries
then and now (VI)
Establishing global patent laws to achieve
world conquest
Patents for pharmaceutical and chemical products are not only a financial incentive but also a powerful legal instrument to control multi-trillion Euro/Dollar global investment markets of high-tech and
consumer products. Whoever controls this market in a country inevitably controls society. WWI and
WWII were efforts aimed at conquering Europe and the world in the interest of the largest
chemical/drug cartel of its time, Bayer, BASF, Hoechst (IG Farben).
The goal of both World Wars was to secure the monopoly of the emerging global markets for patented
chemical and pharmaceutical products via the establishment of European and global dictatorships.
Without the “tool” of patents these World Wars could not have happened. Without the “principle of
patents” neither the “Brussels EU” nor Sarkozy’s plan for a “world government” or his threat of a
Third World War would exist.
The various attempts of the chemical/drug and oil cartel to achieve
a global monopoly for their patented products
1890’s
Patent laws :
1914 - 1918
From then on,
WW 1
the scope of
Breach of the
control of
Contractors:
patent is defined
global chemical,
BAYER, BASF,
as a “criminal
drug and oil
HOECHST
offence” after
markets was
pressure from
only dependent
the German
on the number
Executors:
Chemical/Pharmaof countries
Emperor
ceutical Cartel
subjected by
Wilhelm II
military force
Reichswehr
under these
(Imperial Army)
laws.
1939 - 1945
WW II
Contractors:
BAYER, BASF,
HOECHST
(IG-Farben AG)
Executors:
Adolf Hitler,
NSDAP, SS,
Wehrmacht
(Nazi Army)
Today:
III. Attempt of
world conquest
Planned:
WW III
(Nuclear War)
Contractors:
Contractors:
BAYER, BASF, (D),
Pharma and
SANOFI-AVENTIS (F),
chemical cartel
GSK (UK) and
others
Executors:
Executors:
“Brussels EU,”
“Brussels EU” as
the newly estab“Politburo” of the
lished “EU Army”
Chemical/Drug and
with French nuOil Cartel
clear weapons
Number of casualties of military
15 – 20
60 – 70
millions
conquest in the world on behalf million victims million victims
of the Cartel
Number of casualties of the
“pharmaceutical business with
30-50,000,000 people every year
disease”
Profits of the Chemical/Pharmaceutical Cartel from the patent
Over 2,000,000,000,000 Euros (Almost three trillion US Dollar) each year.
business (approx.)
The ‘Brussels EU’ today
The EU is not
a democratic structure!
The definition of democracy and its very basis is the fact
that all power derives from the people.
If the political executive is no longer controlled by the will
of the people – if political rule cannot be terminated in
case of abuse – that is the definition of a dictatorship.
The Brussels EU today:
Dictatorship hand in hand with corruption (I)
It requires a certain type of politicians to help construct an undemocratic
body like the ‘Brussels EU’. Not surprisingly, the list of commissioners over
the years reads like a ‘who-is-who’ of political corruption. Here are just a
few examples:
François-Xavier Ortoli
Étienne Davignon
EU Commission President from 1973 to 1977 /
EU Commissioner from 1977 to 1984, Head of
French petrochemical company Total
François-Xavier Ortoli was president of the EU Commission from
1973 to 1977 and from 1977 to
1984 he was EU Commission for
Economic and Financial Affairs.
In 1984, directly after his last
term as EU Commissioner, he
was appointed to be chairman of
the French petrochemical company Total. In 1983 he attended the first meeting
of the “European Round Table of Industrialists”,
an influential interest group in the European
Union among high ranking representatives of
petrochemical (Shell) and chemical/ pharmaceutical (Ciba-Geigy, today Novartis) company and
companies of other industrial sectors.
EU Commissioner from 1977 to 1985
Chairman of the Bilderberg Conference and
board member of a pharmaceutical company
Étienne Davignon was EU Commissioner for Industrial Markets, Customs Union and Industrial
Affairs during the Jenkins Commission from 1977 to 1981 and
from 1981 to 1985 he was EU
Commissioner for Industrial Affairs and Energy during the Thorn
Commission. As Gustav Thorn,
he is a member of the Trilateral
Commission. From 1989 to 2001
he was chairman of the Belgian
company Société Générale de
Belgique. In 2005 became chairman of the Rockefeller financed Bilderberg conference and is on
the board of directors of the pharmaceutical company Gilead.
Peter Sutherland
EU Commissioner from 1985 to 1989, Board member of petrochemical company
Peter Sutherland joined the EU Commision in 1985 as a Commissioner for Competition
Policy. As his term ended, he joined the board of directors of petrochemical company
BP. While on the board, he became chairman of a EU Commission Committee on the
functioning of the Internal Market in 1992. In 1995 he became director-general of the
World Trade Organisation and in 1997 he was appointed to be chairman of the board
of directors of BP. In 2007 – at a time, where he still is chairman of the board of BP – he
became advisor of EU Commission President Barroso on energy and climate issues. He
is on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group and a chairman of the Rockefeller-financed Trilateral Commission.
The Brussels EU today
Dictatorship hand in hand with corruption (II)
Martin Bangemann
Karel van Miert
Martin Bangemann was EU Commissioner for Industrial Affairs, Information and Telecommunications Technologies during the Santer
Commision. After the collective resignation of the
Santer Commission in March 1999 due to the
fraud-scandal, he was appointed to the Board of
Directors of the Spanish telecommunication company Telefonica just weeks later.
The EU filed a lawsuit in 1999
because of possible conflicts of
interests. The lawsuit was later
dropped after Bangemann
agreed to start working for Telefonica not before 2001.
Board member of pharmaceutical companies
Karel van Miert was EU Commissioner for Transport and Consumer Protection from 1989 to
1992 and EU Commissioner for
Competition from 1992 to 1999.
Already in 1968 he worked for
EU Commission Sicco Mansholt,
the latter EU Commission President. After leaving the EU Commission, he became member of the board of
director of Belgian pharmaceutical and chemical
company Solvay. He also has been on the board
of directors of American pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly. In 2005 he was appointed from the
current Barroso Commision to facilitator for the
European satellite project “Galileo”.
Édith Cresson
Fraud and breach of her obligations as a European commissioner
Édith Cresson was one of the EU
commissioners working in the
fraudulent Santer Commission
that was forced to resign in 1999
after a whistle-blower report.
Mrs Cresson was accused to
have committed serious and repeated fraud, subordination of
falsified contract, forging over people’s handwriting and embezzling of EU funds for her personal
gain. During her time as a Commissioner she
hired one of her close acquaintances, René
Berthelot, a dental surgeon, as a highly paid EU
adviser on HIV/Aids. Berthelot was later judged
to be unqualified, he produced 24 pages of notes
of little or no value in over two years of work for
Mrs Cresson. In 2006, the European Court of Justice declared that Mrs Cresson acted in breach of
her obligations as a European commissioner.
Frits Bolkestein
Worked for petrochemical and pharmaceutical
companies
Frits Bolkestein worked for
the petrochemical company Royal Dutch Shell
from 1960 to 1975. From
1978 to 1999 he was a
member of the Dutch parliament. In 1996 he tried to persuade Dutch
health minister Els Borst in a personal letter to
have a cholesterol-lowering drug taken into services covered by the Dutch medical insurancecompanies. The drug was marketed by Merck,
Sharp & Dome, were Bolkestein was member of
the board of commissioners.
The EU parliament has no control
over the EU executive
Martin Schulz, head of the Social Democratic
faction in the EU Parliament, and therefore representing more than a quarter of EU parliamentarians, recently publicly exposed the dictatorial
modus operandi of the “Brussels EU” – and the
role of the EU parliament as a fig leaf. On June 4,
2009, on the eve of the recent elections to the ‘EU
parliament,’ Schulz was asked on national German
Television (ZDF) what the EU would look like in 5
years. His revealing answer was:
“I hope that the EU will have changed in five
years, because the radical corporate approach
represented by, for example, Mrs. Kroes [EU Commissioner for competition since 2004], is wrong.
Mrs. Kroes is one of the most radical promoters
of corporate interests there is. We did not want
her. She has spent her entire life as a representative of corporate interests, as a member of the
boards and executive levels of large corporations.
She sees Europe exclusively from the perspective
of financial interests. Employment of the people
does not interest her at all. And whenever Mr.
Sarkozy appears in Brussels and hits his fist on the
table, he receives from her everything he wants.”
This confession by one of the figure-heads of the
EU Parliament confirms in a dramatic way:
► the modus operandi of the Brussels EU: corporate interests dominate and dictate;
► the fig leaf role of the EU-Parliament, whose
members are confined to the role of helpless
bystanders;
► some of the names of the political stakeholders
of the oil and drug cartel within the ‘Brussels
EU’ – to which the names of political representatives of other oil and drug exporting nations must be added, such as Germany’s
Angela Merkel.
The irony is, however, that Schulz was apparently
oblivious to the fact that he cannot really expect
people to vote for the undemocratic construct he
just described – to do so would basically mean his
advocating that people make fools of themselves.
Nevertheless, the people of Germany and Europe
apparently understand the problem: Only 40 %
of them were willing to participate in the vote for
the ‘fig leaf’ EU parliament in the 2009 elections.
The cartel’s dictatorial powers are
masked with pseudo-democratic
“EU-elections”
The Political Attempt Today
International Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartel
The shares and patents of the IG Farben cartel – the main economic bounty of
WWII – are transferred to the international oil and drug cartel
Today’s Political Stakeholders of the Cartel:
Representatives of the leading export nations of oil, patented drugs and chemicals
– France, Germany and Britain
EU-Commission
The EU’s executive body
► Operates without any demo cratic control by the parliament
► Prepares Legislation and
‘Directives’ affecting the lives
of 500 million Europeans
No Control !
THE ‘BRUSSELS EU’ CONSTRUCT TO CONTROL EUROPE
EU-Parliament
► No right to prepare legislation
► No control over EU Executive
Without control of the executivebody EU elections become farce!
The people of Europe
Attempting the takeover of Europe via
the control of multi-trillion euro markets
in nutrition, health and energy
The financial groups behind the oil and drug cartel
are interested in controlling giant global markets
that affect literally every human life. Prominent examples of this are the areas of food, health and energy. Over the past century, the oil and drug cartel
has expanded its markets in these three areas into
multi-trillion euro investment businesses. By now,
every person in Europe pays about forty per cent
of his or her disposable income as “tributes” to this
cartel. However, all three of these markets are
being threatened by new technologies that could
easily replace these antiquated technologies –
thereby threatening the cartel’s survival.
Every Person in
Europe Today spends
From His/Her Disposable
Income on Average
In this situation, the oil and drug cartel can no
longer survive in a democracy. This is why the decisions taken in Brussels are not being made by
parliamentarians but by hand-picked executors of
this cartel – the EU Commission. These executors
design the laws, regulations and directives for the
people of Europe behind the walls of this collosal
building in Brussels, shown above, with the help
of an army of tens of thousands of technocrats. Just
like the “Four Year Plan” office in Berlin seven
decades ago, this building serves as the strategic
office for the planning and implementation of the
takeover of Europe by the cartel.
The Cartel‘s
Protectionist Independent
Multi-billion €
Tools Used Technologies
Global Markets by Cartel in Available
All Areas
10%
for Nutrition
• Food
• Others
GMO
20%
for Health
• Insurance
• Private expenses
• Others
Pharma
for Energy
• Driving cars
• Utilities
• Others
Oil
10%
• Potatoes
• Produce
• Corn, Rape
• Others
• Patented Drugs
• Business with
Disease
• Gasoline
• Petrochemical
Products
1. Patents
Organic
2. Illiteracy about • Food
alternatives
• Other
3. Political
Products
instruments
to enforce
the above
Natural
Health
Key Role of
‘Brussels EU’:
Protection of
outdated
global cartel
markets
• Prevention
• Therapy
Renewable
Energy
• Hydrogen
• Solar
• Others
Patents as key legal and economic instruments
to control the societies of Europe
Over the past half century the German government has spent hundreds
of billions of euros to finance the artificial construction of the Brussels EU.
These enormous amounts of money
were taken from the German tax payers and abused to bribe and coerce
the majority of smaller EU countries
to sign over their independence to
the Brussels EU – and the control of
oil and drug cartel.
The financial “contributions” of Germany for the construction of the
Financial contributions of the Brussels EU (2005)
Brussels EU were so enormous that
they surpassed the contributions of
three quarters of the smaller member
countries.
It would be naive to think that these
enormous amounts of money were
paid as a “gift” to the rest of Europe.
The real intention of this heinous
plan become clear when looking at
the bottom picture. German corporations own almost as many patents as
the rest of Europe combined. Under
the Lisbon treaty these patents become the legal and economic instruments to control key areas of society
and every life across Europe.
Number of European patents per country
Deception and Reality: How the EU
is portrayed to the people of Ireland ahead
of the referendum
Claim 1: This referendum is just about Ireland. The ‘Brussels EU’ wants to make the Irish people believe
that the referendum on October 2 is just about Ireland.
The facts are: In light of the fact that the rest of Europe has been deprived of its right to vote on this treaty,
the referendum in Ireland is of significance for the entire continent. The Irish people are representing the
hopes of all Europeans for a democratic future.
Claim 2: Democracy. The ‘Brussels EU’ is being portrayed to the people of Ireland as a beacon of democracy that would guarantee comprehensive democratic rights to the Irish people for generations to come.
The facts are: The ‘Brussels EU’ is a fundamentally undemocratic construct. Its democratically elected
organ – the EU parliament – has little or no control over its executive, the EU Commission. This Commission – a would-be “European government” – is selected on behalf of special interest groups: namely
the petrochemical/pharmaceutical industry, otherwise known as the oil and drug cartel. Nobody in Ireland, or in the rest of Europe, will ever be able to vote for or against it.
Claim 3: A modern association of sovereign states. The ‘Brussels EU’ is being portrayed to the people of
Ireland and Europe as an association of independent states that have voluntarily chosen to relinquish
their borders to create a joint future for centuries to come.
The facts are: The roots of the ‘Brussels EU’ derive from the unholy coalition between the German oil and
drug cartel – IG Farben – and the Nazis, for a post-WWII Europe under their control. In fact, the ‘Brussels
EU’ construct is an almost exact copy
The only thing that can prevent Europe from
of the blueprint drawn up by this coalibeing turned into an Orwellian dictatorship on
tion. (See: www.eu-facts.org)
behalf of the oil and drug cartel is your ‘No’ vote!
Claim 4: Prosperity. Millions of people in Ireland – workers, farmers and small businesses – are being told that if they vote ‘No’ then Ireland
would face economic isolation or even total collapse. They are being pressured into a ‘Yes’ vote with the
promise of economic prosperity.
The facts are: The ‘Brussels EU’ construct has been drawn up by the leading industrial powers – namely,
Germany and France - to create a European superstate that they could impose their economic, political,
social and judicial control over via bureaucratic apparatus under their command. This control is being
maintained by forcing patented hi-tech products into all strategic areas of society, including nutrition
(GMOs), health (patented drugs) and energy (oil). The national industries of Ireland – and all other smaller
European countries – would be marginalised, inevitably resulting in economic crises and widespread
poverty.
ctd.
Claim 5: Better health. Serving the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, the ‘Brussels EU’ parades its
ambition to become the “pharmacy of the world” and promotes the patented drugs of its sponsors.
The facts are: The pharmaceutical industry is a multi-billion euro investment business that thrives on the
continuation and expansion of diseases as markets for its patented drugs.
Claim 6: Human rights. The ‘Brussels EU’ claims that human rights are one of its core values.
The facts are: The Brussels bureaucracy has prepared directives and other legislation that are capable of
curtailing just about any human right and is gradually turning IreThe only things that can
land and the rest of Europe into a police state. In accordance with
stop this military build-up its plans to turn Europe into a superstate under its control, the ‘Brusin Europe are the Irish
sels EU’ is curtailing the basic human rights of 500 million people.
people and a ‘No’ vote on Toward this end, it has passed directives that allow it to spy on all
bank accounts, telephone calls, web sites visited and emails sent.
October 2!
Claim 7: Promise of neutrality. In light of the history of the Irish people and their striving for liberty and
neutrality, the ‘Brussels EU’ has promised to respect these values in return for a ‘Yes’ vote.
The facts are: The Lisbon Treaty – the enabling act for the rule of the oil and drug cartel over Europe –
contains an extensive section about the militarisation of Europe, including the establishment of a European
army. By voting ‘Yes’ to the Lisbon Treaty, the Irish people would exchange their centuries-long independence for the role of a junior partner in the planned militarisation of Europe.
Claim 8: Promise of peace.
The interest groups behind the
‘Brussels EU’ are trying to obtain a ‘Yes’ vote from the Irish
people by promising them a
peaceful future.
The facts are: The oil and drug
cartel is strategically militarising the European nations as a
military superpower to defend
its economic interests anywhere in the world with military means – including the
option of nuclear weapons.
Patents are the key for the economic
control over Europe
The multi-billion
Euro market with
human genes
Gen-Patents means
‚ownership‘ of
► Entire organs
of the human body
► Entire parts of the
human body
by multinational corporations
Patents are the key for the economic
control over Europe
The multi-billion
Euro market with
genetically-modified
organisms
GMO Key markets:
► Food for people
► Feed for Animals
► Production of drugs
Alternatives to the ‘Brussels EU’:
A Europe for the people
by the people
The ‘No’ vote to the ‘Brussels EU’ and to the planned
hegemony of corporate interests over Europe do not mean
a rejection of the idea of a united Europe, one that serves
the interests of the people.
In fact, the current crisis could be a historic opportunity.
Alternatives to the ‘Brussels EU’:
A Europe for the people
by the people
After the exposure of the fundamentally undemocratic nature of the “Brussels EU”, as defined in the
“Lisbon Enabling Act”, this quasi-dictatorial construct can no longer be supported by any democratic
person or politician. The basic structure of a future democratic Europe is self-evident: Just like in the
USA the people of Europe must have the right to vote for its government directly – both its President
(executive) and the Parliament (legislature).
In 2009, the people of Europe face a simple alternative: A “Cartel Europe” – cementing the rule of the
chemical, drug and oil cartel over Europe via the “Brussels EU” for generations to come – or a democratic Europe, where the decision takers represent the interests and the will of the people of Europe.
Basic Constitutional Structure of the Government
of the United States of America
President
directly elected
by the people
National Parliament
Congress / Legistature
appoints
cabinet
300 Million People of the USA
Basic Constitutional Structure of a Future Democratic Europe
“Europe for the people and by the people”
President
directly elected
by the people
European
Parliament
National
Parliament
Nat. Legistature
appoints
cabinet
The EU tomorrow:
The time for change is NOW!
The election of Barack Obama and “the end of the tyranny of the Bush administration” (New York Times)
was only possible through the democratic constitution of the USA. In contrast, the “Lisbon Enabling Act”
as the basis of the “Brussels EU” makes it impossible for all future generations to remove tyrants from
power. The founding fathers of the US more than 200 years ago in their wisdom foresaw the possibility
of a misuse of power as it happened under the Bush administration. We have to realise that in a Europe
governed by political puppets of the Cartel we, the people, must be the “founding fathers!”
After the publication of this educational material, there is only one way that the cartel can establish its
new “Thousand Year Rule” over Europe – if we, the people, stay silent. 2009 is the year to speak out –
while we still can – in our own name and in that of our children and generations of Europeans yet unborn.

BAYER, BASF, Hoechst and other chemical

Transcription

Similar documents

marketing/selling points: release date 11.16.04

Schrijven is een daad van vertrouwen Writing is an

Brussels, in search of counter-narratives

Paressa Plataki (Obelis)

The International Eco

Brussels, Belgium

Welcome to the IP Summit!

Gingerbread and Glühwein: Warming Winter Delights in Belgium

6 July – 14 Sept Every Sunday from 2 till midnight Forest Abbaye