International Remittances in Honduras
Transcription
International Remittances in Honduras
INTERNATIONAL REMITTANCES IN HONDURAS REMITTANCES PROGRAMME INTERNATIONAL REMITTANCES IN HONDURAS CENTRE FOR LATIN AMERICAN MONETARY STUDIES MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT FUND INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK First English Edition, 2008 Also Published in Spanish All rights reserved © Centro de Estudios Monetarios Latinoamericanos, 2008 Durango 54, Mexico, D.F. 06700 ISBN 978-968-5696-32-6 Printed and made in Mexico Impreso y hecho en México The opinions and views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Centre for Latin American Monetary Studies (CEMLA) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). The authors are solely responsible for any errors of omission or commission. Foreword International remittances are increasingly important to the region’s economies, both in terms of macroeconomic stability brought about by the receipt of large capital inflows, and in terms of development through financial inclusion and poverty alleviation. The Centre for Latin American Monetary Studies (CEMLA), through its close relationship with its regional central bank members, has become increasingly active in the field of remittances. It has organized several events in the context of its multiyear capacity-building and technical assistance programs that have clearly shown that central banks believe remittances merit differentiated treatment to achieve better reporting on their magnitude and characteristics. There is a need to obtain more reliable data, to understand the rationale of the agents involved and to analyze the structure of remittance markets, in order to promote regulatory policies that will help to reduce the cost of sending money home, contribute to greater security and transparency in these transactions and avoid inappropriate rules that could hinder their efficient development. In this context, in mid-2004 CEMLA and the Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF) began designing a project aimed at improving the statistical measurement of international remittance flows. MIF’s financial contribution was approved by its Donors Committee in February 2005 under the title of “Improvement of Central Bank Information and Procedures in the Area of Remittances’’ (RG-M1059) while in April of the same year CEMLA’s Board of Governors, meeting in Cartagena, Colombia, formally approved the Centre’s participation as Executing Agency for the project. The institutional arrangements for the Statistical Measurement Project (as it became known) also comprise a Working Group on Remittances (WGR) formed by experts from central banks in the region and a Remittances International Steering Committee (RISC) comprising experts from extraregional central banks and international stakeholder organizations that support the Project. 23 of 30 CEMLA central bank members from the LAC region signed up to participate in the Project. The first stage of the Project identified certain limitations with respect to the availability and quality of information on remittances markets and flows that served as the starting point for the design of the work program. These were: (i) a lack of agreement on basic BOP definitions; (ii) the lack of precision in measuring flows; (iii) insufficient statistical information compiled on remittances through direct reporting; (iv) an information deficit on the structure of international remittance operators, and (v) the need to clarify regulatory and jurisdictional issues covering remittance service providers. There are other general aspects that could be addressed indirectly through the project, such as encouraging remittance senders and recipients to join formal systems through financial literacy campaigns, urging regulators in both sending and receiving countries to promote cost transparency, understanding the underlying microeconomic dynamics of remittances and disseminating best practices and lessons learned from the studies conducted in the LAC region. The work program seeks to attain its objectives by sending country missions to study the statistical measurement of flows and the workings of remittance markets. The project deliverables include confidential reports to the authorities with recommendations for improvements, as well as public reports describing central bank procedures and the relevant aspects of the market. The organization of sensitization events, training courses and technical assistance is also planned. Country missions will benefit from the technical collaboration of RISC and GTR experts. The current report, “International Remittances in Honduras” one of the public reports in the series, and was prepared with the active participation of Banco Central de Honduras. Kenneth Coates Director General CEMLA Fernando Jiménez-Ontiveros General Manager a.i. MIF/IADB About the Authors This report is based on the findings made by the CEMLA Mission visiting Honduras in May 2007, which was made up of two teams working in a coordinated manner in the international remittances area. The Remittances Measurement international team directed by René Maldonado from the Centre for Latin American Monetary Studies also included Enrique Montes from Banco de la República (Colombia), Paloma Monroy and John Wilson (Consultants for the Remittances Programme). The second international team for Compliance Measurement of the General Principles for Remittance Services was directed by José Antonio García (World Bank) and included Carlo Corazza (World Bank) and Gregory Watson (Multilateral Investment Fund, Inter-American Development Bank). These two teams worked in a coordinated manner with the local team headed up by José Leonel Valladares and América Buitrago, officers at the Central Bank of Honduras. This report was drafted by René Maldonado and Irma Pérez with support of the Central Bank of Honduras team, made up by José Leonel Valladares and América Buitrago and was complemented with observations made by Sandra Patricia Gonzalez Serna (CEMLA), Nelly Zuñiga from BCH and the mission international team members. Honduras Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ECONOMIC BACKGROUND AND THE REMITTANCES CONTEXT .....................................1 1.1. The Macroeconomy......................................................................................................1 1.2. Labor Environment and the Migratory Process ..............................................................6 1.2.1. Labor Environment ........................................................................................................ 6 1.2.2. Migratory Process .......................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Evolution and Importance of Remittances .....................................................................8 1.4. Trends in the Measurement and Provision of Remittances Services .............................11 2. INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS..................................................................................................13 2.1. General Legal Framework ...........................................................................................13 2.2. Regulatory, Supervisory and Oversight Authorities .....................................................19 2.2.1. Role of the Central Bank ............................................................................................... 19 2.2.2. National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies (CNBS) ................................. 20 2.2.3. Financial Supervisor in Honduras .................................................................................. 21 2.2.4. Financial Information Unit ............................................................................................ 21 2.3. Role of Other Relevant Organizations.........................................................................22 2.3.1. Honduran Association of Banking Institutions (AHIBA)................................................... 22 2.3.2. Inter-Bank Processing Center (CEPROBAN) ..................................................................... 22 2.3.3. Statistics National Institute (INE)..................................................................................... 23 2.3.4. International Organization for Migration, IOM ............................................................... 23 2.3.5. General Direction of Migration and Migration Policy .................................................... 23 2.3.6. Sustainable Development Network ............................................................................... 24 3. DESCRIPTION OF REMITTANCES ......................................................................................25 3.1. Definition and Concept of Remittances.......................................................................25 3.2. Sender Profiles............................................................................................................25 3.3. Beneficiary Profiles .....................................................................................................28 3.4. Remittance Indicators .................................................................................................29 4. INTERNATIONAL REMITTANCES SERVICE PROVIDERS ....................................................31 4.1. Institutional Providers .................................................................................................32 4.2. Registered Institutional Providers ................................................................................33 4.3. Non-Registered Institutional Providers ........................................................................35 December 2007 iii Remittances Programme 4.4. Non-Institutional Providers .........................................................................................38 5. MEANS OF PAYMENT FOR REMITTANCES ........................................................................40 5.1. Cash ...........................................................................................................................41 5.2. Checks .......................................................................................................................42 5.3. Account Deposits .......................................................................................................43 5.4. Postal Instruments.......................................................................................................44 5.5. Cards ..........................................................................................................................44 5.6. Electronic Money .......................................................................................................44 6. SYSTEMS AND CHANNELS FOR THE TRANSFER AND PAYMENT OF REMITTANCES ..............................................................................................................45 6.1. Information Transfer Systems ......................................................................................46 6.2. Systems Abroad ..........................................................................................................47 6.3. Cross-Border Systems..................................................................................................48 6.4. Local Systems .............................................................................................................50 6.5. Large Value Payment System ......................................................................................50 6.6. Low Value Payment System ........................................................................................50 6.7. Other Systems and Channels ......................................................................................53 7. COSTS, TIME AND ACCESS ................................................................................................54 7.1. The Cost of Remittances .............................................................................................54 7.2. Commission Charges ..................................................................................................54 7.3. Exchange Rate Differential ..........................................................................................55 7.4. Tax Costs ....................................................................................................................56 7.5. Access Costs ...............................................................................................................56 7.6. Cost, Time and Access to Non-Institutional Channels .................................................58 8. MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................59 8.1. Responsibility and Coordination .................................................................................59 8.2. Measurement by Channels .........................................................................................59 8.3. Registered Institutional ...............................................................................................61 8.4. Non-Registered Institutional........................................................................................65 8.5. Non Institutional.........................................................................................................67 8.6. Validation and Contrasting .........................................................................................68 8.7. Trends, Progress and Challenges.................................................................................68 9. TRANSPARENCY AND THE PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION .......................................69 9.1. Official Information ....................................................................................................69 9.2. Information Provided by the ACs ................................................................................70 iv December 2007 Honduras Report GLOSSARY...............................................................................................................................71 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... vii List of Graphs Graph 1. GDP at Constant 2000 Prices .................................................................................1 Graph 2. Annual Inflation Rate and Variation thereof In % ...................................................2 Graph 3. Devaluation Rate Lempira vs. US Dollar ................................................................3 Graph 4. Current Account Deficit 2000-2006 ......................................................................4 Graph 5. Current Account Deficit ........................................................................................4 Graph 6. Trade Balance: General Merchandises...................................................................4 Graph 7. Financial Account .................................................................................................5 Graph 8. International Reserves Balance ..............................................................................5 Graph 9. Open Unemployment ...........................................................................................7 Graph 10. Open Unemployment and Disguised Under-employment ....................................7 Graph 11. Worker’s Remittances. ..........................................................................................9 Graph 12. Receipts from Remittances, FOB Exports, In-Bond Industry and FDI .....................10 Graph 13. Remittance Service Providers ..............................................................................12 Graph 14. CNBS Organization Chart ....................................................................................20 Graph 15. Distribution of Senders per Country of Residence................................................25 Graph 16. Distribution of Urban-Rural Migration and per Gender........................................26 Graph 17. Distribution of Migration by Age Groups.............................................................26 Graph 18. Remittance Senders by Education Level...............................................................27 Graph 19. Migrants by Time of Residence Abroad ...............................................................27 Graph 20. Distribution of Senders by Migration Condition...................................................28 Graph 21. Distribution of Beneficiaries per Level of Education as of 2006 ...........................28 Graph 22. Usage of Remittances as of 2006 .........................................................................29 Graph 23. Ranges of Amounts Received as Remittances as of 2006 .....................................29 Graph 24. Frequency of Reception of Remittances as of 2006 ..............................................30 Graph 25. International Remittances Service Providers as of 2006 .......................................31 Graph 26. Share of Institutional Suppliers Registered in the Remittance Market ...................31 Graph 27. Participation of Registered and Non-Registered Agents in the Market ..................33 Graph 28. Western Union Share in the Remittance Market ..................................................36 Graph 29. Distribution of the Remittance Market by Type of Instrument ..............................40 Graph 30. Distribution of Remittances by Currency .............................................................41 Graph 31. Cash Payment of Remittances by Paying Agent ...................................................42 Graph 32. Means of Payment of Cooperative Association FACACH ......................................43 December 2007 v Remittances Programme Graph 33. Evolution of the Usage of Postal Instruments .......................................................44 Graph 34. Evolution of the Monthly Exchange Rate US Dollar-Lempiras ..............................56 List of Charts Chart 1. Macroeconomic Indicators .....................................................................................6 Chart 2. Main Destinations Abroad for Honduran Migrants ..................................................8 Chart 3. Balance of Payments: Foreign Currency Receipts from Remittances ........................9 Chart 4. Remittances in the Main Countries of Latin America and The Caribbean ..............10 Chart 5. General Legal Framework .....................................................................................13 Chart 6. Structure of the Remittance Market in Honduras ...................................................33 Chart 7. Composition and Structure of Commercial Banks .................................................34 Chart 8. Remittance Recipient Banks..................................................................................35 Chart 9. Exchange Bureaus Paying Remittances as of 2006 ................................................35 Chart 10. Remittance Payment in Honduras per Type of Intermediary of Relative Importance. ..........................................................................................................40 Chart 11. Evolution of Commissions Collected by Remittance Issuers ..................................55 Chart 12. Access Points for Reception of Remittances in Honduras ......................................57 Chart 13. Western Union: Access Points by Type of Institution ............................................58 Chart 14. Transmission and Payment of Remittances in Honduras, per Channel...................60 Chart 15. Measurement of Remittances Conducted by Means of International......................66 List of Figures Figure 1. Operation of Remittances within the Payment System .........................................45 Figure 2. Information Transfer Scheme ...............................................................................46 Figure 3. Remittance Transfer as Cash Deposits to Collection Agents .................................47 Figure 4. Transfer of Remittances with Instruments other than Cash at the Collection Points .......................................................................................48 Figure 5. Structure of Remittances per Border System .........................................................49 Figure 6. Large Value Payment System ...............................................................................51 Figure 7. Usage of Cards to Send Remittances ....................................................................53 Figure 8. Foreign Currency Sale Form ................................................................................62 Figure 9. Foreign Currency Buy Form ................................................................................63 vi December 2007 Honduras Report LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AC Authorized Exchange Agents ACH PRONTO Clearinghouse for Payment Electronic Transfers ACH Automated Clearing House AHIBA Honduran Association of Banking Institutions ATI International Card Administrators ATM Automated Teller Machine BCH Central Bank of Honduras BPM Balance of Payments Manual CAMR Centre for Returned Migrants CCEH Honduran Electronic Clearinghouse CEPAL Economic Commission for Latin America and The Caribbean CEPROBAN Inter-Bank Processing Center CNBS Banking and Insurance Companies National Commission CPI Consumer Price Index COHDESSE Honduran Council of the Social Sector in the Economy. DR-CAFTA Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement EAP Economically Active Population ETD Money Transfer Operators (MTO) FACACH Federation of Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit FICOHSA Financiera Comercial Hondureña Sociedad Anónima FIU Financial Information Unit FONAMIH Honduran Migration National Forum FOSEDE Deposit Insurance Fund GDDS General Data Dissemination Standards GDP Gross Domestic Product December 2007 vii Remittances Programme HIPC Heavily Indebted Poor Countries ICADE Institute for Cooperation and Self-Development IMF International Monetary Fund INE Statistics National Institute IOM International Organization for Migration MPR Monetary Policy Rate NGO Non-Governmental Organization NSS National Statistics System PAN Primary Account Number POS Point of Sale PRAMEU Regional Programme to Assist Migrants to the United States RER Reference Exchange Rate RSP Remittance Service Providers RTN National Taxpayer’s ID SAPDI Foreign Currency Public Auction System SDN - HN Sustainable Development Network - Honduras SWIFT Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication TPS Temporary Protected Status UNISA Support Services Unit viii December 2007 Honduras Report 1. ECONOMIC BACKGROUND AND THE REMITTANCES CONTEXT 1.1. THE MACROECONOMY In 1998 Honduras was hit by hurricane Mitch, causing damages amounting to USD3 billion. The economy in Honduras shrank by 3% and the fiscal and current account deficits increased. However, the country was able to comply with most of its macroeconomic objectives and was relieved from its foreign debt by USD 4.4 billion under the IMF/World Bank initiative known as Highly Indebted Poor Countries, HIPC debt relief. As of 2000 the Honduran economy showed significant recovery with a growth rate of 4.8%, higher than Latin America’s average of 4.0%. After that and as of 2003, economic activity experienced a significant reactivation, showing real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) annual growth rate of 4.6% for 2003-2006, a period of time where several economic sectors have been fostered, particularly the construction sector. This improvement took place after two years of growth rates barely equal to the demographic increase (2.5%) derived from the economic crisis of 1999. Likewise, the decreasing trends of inflation and greater exchange stability have contributed to an improved economic framework over the last five years. Graph 1. GDP at Constant 2000 Prices Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). In connection with the inflation rate, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) methodology was updated in 2000, thus allowing a change in the base year. In 2001, the CPI had an annual growth rate of 8.8%, the lowest since 1993. By 2006, the Honduran inflation rate declined to 5.3%, the lowest in the last 19 years. This effect was due to the substantial impulse given to the private sector total expenditures, particularly consumption and investment in real estate, as well as the aggregate supply derived from the good December 2007 1 Remittances Programme performance of the agricultural, in-bond industry and communication economic sectors. Such objectives were attained despite adverse conditions resulting from high international oil prices during the first nine months of the year. Additionally, a decline in interest rates in the financial market allowed the expansion of credit towards the productive sectors. Graph 2. Annual Inflation Rate and Variation thereof in % Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). With regards to interest rates, within the financial market, Central Bank of Honduras ( BCH) has maintained as policy the performance of government securities auctions pursuant to the securities maturity dates specified per auction, by making agents compete for the amounts awarded by means of a reduction of the interest rates. During 2006, BCH reinforced this strategy through three reductions in the Monetary Policy Rate (TPM), thus influencing the reduction of short-term interest rates. This decrease in interest rates, combined with the reduction of the additional reserve in foreign currency, required of the banks permitted the expansion of credit granted to productive sectors by the financial system, thus encouraging the economic growth, especially within the agricultural, construction, in-bond and communication industries. Derived from the foregoing, there resulted a higher demand for labor, improving the employment indicators. The economic growth effect reached the population in the lowest stratum, helping reduce the poverty indicators. After the introduction of the Currency Public Auction System (SAPDI)1,in 1994 the country reached reasonable exchange stability level in 2001. Owing to the high availability of international reserves held by the Central Bank and the exchange measures applied, the Lempira’s depreciation versus the US dollar has diminished in the last few years. Therefore, the annual depreciation rate in 2007 dropped to 0.0%, compared to 5.6% at the end of 2001. 1 Exchange market policy in Honduras is based on the Currency Public Auction System (Sistema de Adjudicación Pública de Divisas,SAPDI) by means of which a daily foreign currency auction process takes place within a 7% band over or under the Basis Price determined for the auction. 2 December 2007 Honduras Report Resulting from the exchange stability at the end of 2005, the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies approved new “Regulations to be observed by Institutions within the Financial System for the granting of Loans in Foreign Currencies” with the aim to widen the credit market and provide borrowers with other sources of financing. Graph 3. Devaluation Rate Lempira vs. US Dollar Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). Another factor explaining the dynamic environment of the Honduran economy within the last five years is the higher external demand, derived from better conditions of the commercial treaties and the strong growth in Honduras’ commercial partners, particularly the United States over 2003-2005. This becomes evident in the annual average growth of goods exports amounting to 16.0% and the increase of the in-bond industry’s added value by 14.8% in the last year. The main facts encouraging the evolution of the external sector are reflected in the Balance of Payments. The Honduran Trade Balance has traditionally shown deficits due to structural weaknesses of the export-import pattern: the high concentration of export products with little added value, highly sensitive to natural phenomena (e.g. coffee and bananas) and strong dependency on oil and capital goods imports. An important in-bond industry has developed over the last several decades, mainly textile and clothes manufacture: these sectors employ over 130,000 Hondurans, 5% of the active population. This important increase of the manufacturing sector has been reflected in the GDP, rising from 9% in 2001 to 11% in 2006. The balance of payment’s current account showed deficit results in 2000, reaching 7.3% of GDP within the last two years, (2005-2006), however, the deficit was offset by higher income received from current transfers, specially workers’ remittances which reached (according to the latest information) up to 20.8% of the GDP. On the other hand, from 2000-2006, the capital and financial account recorded a positive balance every year, mainly due to inbound foreign direct investment and portfolio inflows. December 2007 3 Remittances Programme Graph 4. Current Account Deficit 2000-2006 (In USD Million) Graph 5. Current Account Deficit (As GDP percentage) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). Graph 6. Trade Balance: General Merchandises (In USD millions) 4 December 2007 Honduras Report Graph 7. Financial Account (In USD millions) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). Foreign Direct Investment in Honduras over the last five years has shown a growing trend, likely associated with greater macro-economic stability, the legislation favoring foreign investment, the development of free zones and higher commercial openness. In the last two years, the Honduran economy has increased international reserves by 22.2%, promoting a higher income of foreign currencies, the performance of exports, family remittances, the in-bond activity and higher capital income, which reached US $2,507.5 billion in 2007. This level of reserves allows the Honduran economy to afford 3.5 months of imports without registering income derived from exports. Graph 8. International Reserves Balance (In USD millions) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). December 2007 5 Remittances Programme Chart 1. Macroeconomic Indicators 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(a) 2007(a) 3.75 4.55 6.23 6.05 6.28 6.30 Imports of goods and services (In million USD) 5,113.5 5,527.3 6,676.1 7,473.4 8,301.0 9,593.6 Exports of goods and services (In million USD) 4,286.8 4,345.2 5,178.6 5,747.6 5,880.8 6,344.3 Current Account Balance (as % of GDP) -3.6 -6.7 -7.6 -3.0 -4.7 -9.9 National Consumer Price Index 7.7 7.7 8.2 8.8 5.6 6.9 Annual Average Unemployment Rate (%) 3.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 3.1 3.1 Public Sector Deficit (as % of nominal GDP) 3.3 3.4 3.4 2.8 1.3 n.a. 8.40 9.19 7.89 7.23 5.38 n.a. 16.43 17.35 18.21 18.89 18.89 18.89 GDP (Real Annual Growth Rate) Inter-banking interest rate, end of period (Lempiras per US Dollar) Nominal exchange rate, end of period Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). (a) Preliminary. 1.2. LABOR ENVIRONMENT AND THE MIGRATORY PROCESS 1.2.1. Labor Environment The unemployment rate in Honduras has decreased in recent years, dropping from 5.9% in 2004 to 3.1% in 2006. The Honduran economy is characterized by a large part of the labor force in the informal sector. Around 3.9 million Hondurans depend on the informal economy. The country’s rate in this connection is higher than the average in Latin America and it is only lower than that of Nicaragua. Likewise, according to CEPAL more than 60% of the active population receives a salary lower than the minimum salary of US $128 per month). In connection with families with fixed incomes, the most common scenario is that of precarious labor, that is, salaries derived from such jobs do not even cover their basic needs. Within the inbond industry, which creates direct jobs for approximately 130,000 people, the average monthly income is US $200. However, at least two million people are estimated to survive with less than US $2 per day. Within this framework and in addition to open unemployment, it is important to consider the degree of disguised under-employment that does not allow the labor to be fully employed in the economy. This phenomenon is most pronounced within the rural framework, where most of the Hondurans work only at survival levels. 6 December 2007 Honduras Report Graph 9. Open Unemployment(a) (Percentage per year) Source: INE Statistics National Institute. Open Unemployment: Refers to people with a job who lost it, and looks for a new job trying to establish a business of their own and those looking for a job for the first time. (a) Graph 10. Open Unemployment and Disguised Under-employment(a) (Per Geographic Zone as of 2006 in Percentage of Economically Active Population) Source: INE Statistics National Institute. Disguised Under-employment: Embraces people that after working 36 hours a week or more, obtained monthly income lower than the monthly minimum salary. (a) 1.2.2. Migratory Process The low average per capita income, together with the lack of employment, under-employment and the precariousness of the latter are without doubt, the main causes of Honduran emigration. Migration from Honduras is a recent phenomenon that accelerated during the last decade due to the effects of Hurricane Mitch. Therefore, out of the total of households with international December 2007 7 Remittances Programme migrating relatives, 86.6% departed during the last 10 years compared to 13.4% that migrated before. Within the last decade, the gap between the emigrants coming from the urban area and from the rural area has narrowed considerably. Based on information from the Statistics National Institute (INE) out of the total households with emigrants leaving within the last decade, 50.9% are from urban areas and 49.1% from a rural area. The migration flows prior to the last ten years were different: 66.8% came from an urban area and 33.2% came from rural ones. On the other hand, according to INE results, the United States is the main destination of Honduran emigrants, as 91.4% of the migrating population live there, followed by Mexico with 2.2%, Spain with 2.1% and Central America 1.9%. The Honduran population in the United States is concentrated mainly in New York, Washington D.C. and Florida. Chart 2. Main Destinations Abroad for Honduran Migrants (In %) United States Canada 2006 2007 91.4 95.0 2.2 1.3 Spain 2.1 1.1 Central America 1.9 n.a. Others 2.4 2.6 Source: INE. Honduran migration is mostly made up by male emigrants, with an age range from 20 to 54 years, but more predominantly between 25 and 34 years of age. The main occupations of emigrants in the countries where they find a job are: construction, cleaning, clothes manufacturing, sale of fast food and agriculture among others. 1.3. EVOLUTION AND IMPORTANCE OF REMITTANCES The importance of remittances in Honduras has been steadily increasing from a macro-economic perspective, as they represented 7.5% of GDP in 2001, 12.8% in 2004 and up to 20.8% in 2007. It could be considered that, as from 1990, they have been continually growing, especially after hurricane “Mitch” and makes up the second fastest growth rate in the region. The Central Bank of Honduras reported that remittance figures recorded in the Balance of Payments rose from US $320 million in 1999 to US $2,561.4 billion in 2007. This represents 97.7% of all current transfers in 2005, compared to 43.3% recorded for 1999. From another perspective, remittances represented 39% of current income in the Balance of Payments in 2007 compared to 11% in 2000. Today, workers´ remittances are considered as the main source of foreign currency in the country, even greater than receipts from the in-bond industry, tourism, export of shrimp and agricultural 8 December 2007 Honduras Report traditional products, also higher than the Foreign Direct Investment figures. In 2000 remittance credits reached US $409.6 million but by 2007 the total flows amounted to US $2,561.4 billion, reflecting a growth rate of 10%2 compared to the previous year. Graph 11. Worker’s Remittances (Flows and Growth Rate as % of GDP) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). Chart 3. Balance of Payments: Foreign Currency Receipts from Remittances 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 6.10 7.50 9.70 10.20 12.80 18.20 21.50 20.80 As % Current Income – BOP 11.00 14.20 17.50 19.10 21.60 30.10 38.30 39.00 As % good exports 13.20 16.80 20.40 22.40 25.10 35.20 44.80 45.80 115.00 188.70 278.10 209.10 208.20 296.10 345.40 313.90 GDP % of Income from FDI Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). In comparison with the Foreign Direct Investment remittances in 2007 represented 313.9% of such flows of resources compared to 115.4% in 2000, showing the great contribution these flows represent to the country. The Foreign Direct Investment flows have significantly increased over the last few years, mainly encouraged by Honduras´ improved macro-economic stability and the current legislation applicable to foreign capital companies. In 2007, the figure amounted to USD $815.9 million, reaching the second highest level over the entire period 1993-2007. Some sectors that were fostered by such increase were transport, storage and communications, which grew by 92.0%, particularly due to the reinvestment of profits and the usage of loans by a cell-phone company. Those following in importance were the manufacturing industry that grew by 29.0% and the financial sector by 13.5% due to investments in the banking and insurance sectors. It is important to mention that in 2005, the BCH introduced modifications in the methodology to measure remittances. 2 December 2007 9 Remittances Programme However, the Foreign Direct Investment flows into Honduras are still influenced to a great extent by the economic openness of the Peoples Republic of China in periods prior to 2005, as well as the inclusion of Honduras to the DR-CAFTA3. Graph 12. Receipts from Remittances, FOB Exports, In-bond Industry and FDI (In USD millions) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2003, Honduras was among the main remittance recipient countries at world-wide level. Within the Latin American and the Caribbean region, in 2005 Honduras was the eighth largest remittances receiver based on the total flow value. However, with regard to their importance within the economy as percentage of GDP, Honduras is among the first positions, higher even than Mexico and the Dominican Republic. Chart 4. Remittances in the Main Countries of Latin America and The Caribbean In million of USD Year Mexico GDP % 2003 2004 2005 2006 13,396 16,613 20,035 23,053 2003 2004 2005 2006 2.2 2.5 2.6 3.0 Colombia 3,060 3,170 3,314 4,200 3.8 3.3 2.7 2.0 Guatemala 2,107 2,551 2,993 3,610 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.0 El Salvador 2,105 2,548 2,830 3,316 14.3 16.1 16.7 18.0 Brazil 2,018 2,459 2,480 2,600 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 Dominican Republic 2,061 2,200 2,411 2,900 9.9 7.6 8.2 11.0 Ecuador 1,539 1,604 2,031 2,900 6.7 6.3 5.6 7.0 860 1,135 1,788 2,359 10.4 12.9 18.3 21.8 Honduras Source: Drafted by the Mission based on data from Central Banks. Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement among the Dominican Republic, Central America and the United Status, treaty looking for the creation of a free-trade area among signatories. 3 10 December 2007 Honduras Report In Honduras the remittances receipts make up the third largest income source of households and they are mostly used to support their current expenditure. Based on information from the INE, salaries represent 42% of household income in Honduras, income derived from own activities 36% and remittances up to 11%. The remittances receipts are used by 70% of households for outlays to improve the quality of life of families left behind, increasing the monthly expenditure in food, clothing and domestic appliances, 12% is used to cover medical expenses, 9% goes to education, 5% to households and only a small percentage, 4% is channeled to savings and investment. 1.4. TRENDS IN THE MEASUREMENT AND PROVISION OF REMITTANCES SERVICES As of 2002, the main channels used for payment of remittances in Honduras are Banks, Exchange Bureaus and post-office orders representing 46.2%. Couriers, including Gigante Express and Urgente Express among others represent 36.8% cash deliveries by travelers 6.2%, post-office means 1.4% and other means 9.6%. At the beginning of 2004, the structure of the market for the provision of remittance services was made up by institutions in the financial system, mainly Western Union and Money Gram as paying agents, whose share of the market came to approximately 75%. However, the same agents suffered modifications the following year since based on surveys conducted by the BCH, the banking institutions and Exchange Bureaus were used by 75%, while couriers 7%. Travelers increased their participation to 13.8%, the mail again was used by 6% and other channels reached only 3.8%. Graph 13. Remittance Service Providers Source: Data for 2008 come from the survey conducted in February by the BCH. December 2007 11 Remittances Programme Likewise, a modification in the denomination of financial institutions and Exchange Bureaus was introduced within the survey, considering them as electronic means, obtaining a participation of 81.7% followed by 9.3% of travelers, 8% of courier or messenger service companies and 1% of post-office services. In 2006, a higher increase in the usage of electronic means took place, going from 96.8% of participation, 2% of travelers, 0.9% of courier or messenger service companies and 0.3% of postoffice services. It is important to mention that as of this survey, additional information is provided in connection with the sending costs determined per company. In the last survey, which was conducted in February 2007, the trend towards electronic means represents 91.4%, 5.6% by means of travelers, 2.6% by courier or messenger service companies and 0.4% with post-office services. The evolution of market share for several Remittance Service Providers (RSPs) in the payment of remittances market and the increased growth of institutional RSPs shows a great institutionalization of the market, where the electronic means for the transfer of remittances prevail, thus reducing the relevance of non-banking institutions for the payment of remittances. 12 December 2007 Honduras Report 2. INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS 2.1. GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK Honduras has no specific regulation whether limiting or regulating international remittance transactions. However, the authorities have strengthened their management and control capacity with the enactment and issuance of laws and regulations that govern and supervise the transactions conducted by market agents, particularly those in the financial system, therefore indirectly affecting the remittances. Within the context of remittances, there are several related laws covering the process of sending money and in connection with the payment system. There is also a regulation affecting public trading of foreign currencies in the exchange market, the law regulating foreign currency income from exports and others related to the payment and exchange into Lempiras of remittances. The official entities in charge of regulating and supervising the financial system in Honduras are the Central Bank of Honduras (BCH) and the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies (CNBS). Chart 5. General Legal Framework (By the end of 2006) Legislation Subject Date Decree No. 53 - 1950 Law of the Central Bank of Honduras 1950 Decree No. 65-87 Law of cooperative associations of Honduras 1987 Decree 41-89, General Regulation for the Consumer’s Law 1989 Decree No. 108-90 Law of Foreign Currency Income from Exports 1990 Decree No. 16-92 Law regulating Exchange Bureaus Regulates the authorization of entities dealing with the purchase and sale of foreign currencies out from the banking market that, for purposes of this law, will be considered as Exchange Bureaus. 1992 Decree No. 170-95 Financial Institutions Law 1995 Decree No. 155-95 Law of the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies (CNBS) 1995 Decree No. 228-96 Reforms to the Law of the Central Bank of Honduras 1996 Decree No. 53-97 Law regulating the National Fund for Production and Housing 1997 Resolution 337-6/94 of BCH reformed by Resolution 139-4/2005 and Agreement 02/11/2007 Regulation for the Public Negotiation of Foreign Currencies within the Exchange Market. Includes provisions applicable to currency exchange transactions conducted in the domestic territory by the exchange brokers regulated by the SAPDI. (Foreign exchange public auctions) 1994 (continue on next page) December 2007 13 Remittances Programme Chart 5. (continue) Legislation Subject Date Decree No. 229-2000 Law regulating the Development Private entities Conducting Financial Activities. 2000 Decree 188-2000 Reforms to sections 6, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and 34 of the CNBS Law.2000 2000 Decree No. 22-2001 Law of Insurance and Re-insurance Institutions 2001 Decree No. 53-2001 Law of Insurance over Deposits made in Institutions within the Financial System. 2001 Decree No.8-2001 Approval of the Securities Market Law. 2001 Decree No. 53-2001 Approval of the Law of Deposit Insurance Funds (FOSEDE), in institutions within the Financial System with the aim to protect savings and guarantee the restitution of deposits in cash. 2001 Decree 194 - 2002 Law of the Financial Balance and Social Protection. 2002 Decree No. 319-2002 Law of the Complementary Optional Regime for the Administration of Private Pension Funds. 2002 Resolution No.869/2910-2002 of the CNBS Regulation for the Prevention and Detection of Illegal usage of Financial Services and Products in Money Laundering (Communication CNBS No.052/2002). 2002 Resol.204-6/2003, Resolution 73-2/2006 and Resolution No 470 -12/2006 reforms to the Regulation Regulation for the management of Deposit Accounts in Foreign Currencies of Immediate Availability and their Reforms. Regulates the deposits in foreign currency that any individual or business entity may hold in the National Financial System. These accounts may be deposits checking accounts, cash deposits made outside of an account, savings deposits and term deposits. 2006 Decree No. 45-2002 Anti-money Laundering Law. It was approved with the aim to improve transparency in the management of resources. 2002 Decree 51 - 2003 Law of Fiscal Equity. 2003 Decree 2008-2003 Immigration Law. 2003 Resolution No. 325-9/2003 Complementary resolution to the Anti-money Laundering Law. 2003 Decree No. 129-2004 Reforms to the Financial System Law. 2004 Decrees No. 106-2004 and No. 129-2004 Approval of the reforms over the Banks and Insurance Companies National Commission Law and the new Financial System Law, as well as the reforms to the Law of the Central Bank of Honduras (Decree No. 111-2004), making up the current legal framework of the financial system. 2004 Decree No. 157-2005 Re-evaluation of Assets Law. 2005 Resolution No. 220-6/2006 Eliminates the requirement of previous approval by the BCH for credits abroad for the aquisition of land, construction, purchase or improvement of housing in the domestic territory. 2006 Resolution No.686-29-2004 Regulation for the Adjustment of Bank’s capital, Savings and Credit Associations and Financial Corporations. (continue on next page) 14 December 2007 Honduras Report Chart 5. (conclude) Legislation Subject Date 1438/27-12-2005 Regulations to be observed by the financial system institutions in order to grant loans in foreign currencies.Approval of the prudential regulation for the granting of loans in foreign currency. The Directory of the BCH eliminated the 15% limit of collection of funds in foreign currency for the granting of loans to borrowers who do not generate foreign currencies. Decree No. 14 Registration of Non-banking lenders. Decree No. 51 Monetary Law. Res.413-11/2007 Minimum and maximum amounts, commissions for transactions conducted by SAPDI. 2007 Resol.412-11/2007 Determines limits of Foreign Currency Holdings to Exchange Agents. 2007 Source: Drafted based on the information related to the Honduran Legislation. A summary description of the main legal and current provisions in Honduras per sector or type of institution regulated thereof is as follows: Payments System: Decree 111-2004. The Central Bank of Honduras in coordination with the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies organizes and regulates the operation of the payment system based on the current legal provisions in such a manner that they protect the interest of financial and banking service users by means of general, transparent and neutral rules regulating the credit, transfer, settlement and liquidation of checks and securities. Negotiation of Foreign Currencies: Decree 111-2004. Only the Central Bank of Honduras and the institutions authorized by it to act as exchange brokers may trade foreign currencies in the domestic territory pursuant to the prevailing legislation and rules determined by the BCH Directorate. Individuals may maintain assets in foreign currencies but may only trade them with the Central Bank of Honduras or with the Exchange Agents legally authorized for such purposes. Exceptions to the foregoing are transactions and amounts that, due to monetary and exchange policies may be expressly authorized by the Directorate and the minor exchange transactions conducted by tourists and other travelers. Exchange Bureaus: Decree No. 16-92. Exchange Bureaus may purchase foreign currencies that the private sector may receive from any source, except those that by legal provision or resolution of the BCH Directorate should be traded at the National Financial System. Likewise, the Bureaus may sell foreign currency to conduct any type of payments abroad. For such purposes, they may deal with deposit accounts abroad, as the corresponding rules may determine. Under no circumstances may the Exchange Bureaus establish agencies or branches within the domestic territory. Exchange Rate: Decree 228-96. The exchange rate between the Lempira and foreign currencies may be determined based on supply and demand pursuant to the rules established by the Central Bank of Honduras Directorate. The deposit accounts at the Central Bank of the institutions participating December 2007 15 Remittances Programme in the payment system may work as a basis for the operation thereof based on the rules issued by the Directorate. The institutions taking part in the payments system may be subject to supervision of the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies. Regulation of the Exchange Bureaus Law: Agreement number 251. For purchase and sale of foreign currencies, the Exchange Bureaus are required to provide their clients a document evidencing the transaction, containing at least, the following information: • Name of the bureau of exchange and its national taxpayer’s registry number. • Name of purchaser or seller. • Type of currency, amount and instrument of payment. • Exchange rate and date of transaction. Different formats may be used for foreign currency purchase and sale transactions. The Exchange Bureaus may report as regularly as determined by the Central Bank of Honduras about the transactions conducted, but including the following information: • Initial balance of foreign currency holdings per type. • The total value of transactions conducted, indicating prices. • The final balance, per type of currency. This information and any other that may be required, should be delivered to the BCH using the formats created for such purpose, within the term established by the BCH. The Central Bank may publish the information it may consider of interest to the public. The Monetary Law. This law determines that the payment obligations of any type or nature taking place in Honduras may be settled and paid in Lempiras. Financial System Law and Exchange Bureaus Law. These laws determine that the banks, savings and credit associations and exchange bureaus are authorized to conduct foreign currencies purchase and sale operations. Anti-money Laundering Law. This determines that multiple transactions in cash, the total of which surpasses the limit amount established by the BCH (US $10,000) may be considered as a single transaction and should be reported to the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies, CNBS. Likewise, the Directorate of the BCH, pursuant to Resolution No. 325-9/2003 has determined the following: 16 December 2007 Honduras Report • US $10,000 is the threshold amount to be notified about based on section 48 of the law mentioned above. • US $2,000 or its equivalent in other currencies or domestic currency is the amount above which the remittance companies should register and notify the CNBS. • Three (3) consecutive days of operations make up the term for multiple transactions in cash to be considered as a single transaction when they are not conducted during the same day. It also establishes that the provisions referring to the institutions under CNBS supervision and related to money laundering will be applicable to individuals or business entities, whether regular or irregular and unsupervised by the Commission if they conduct savings and loan operations systematically in a manual or electronic manner. Regulation for the Public Negotiation of Public Currencies within the Exchange Marke. Includes provisions applicable to foreign currency exchange transactions conducted in the domestic territory by the exchange brokers regulated by the Currency Public Auction System (SAPDI). This specifies that the exchange agents may acquire foreign currency from the public at the current reference exchange rate (TCR) and should transfer them totally to the BCH at least, the following working day after purchase. The BCH will buy these currencies at TCR, plus the exchange commission that may correspond. Regulation for the Management of Foreign Currency Deposit Accounts with Immediate Availability. Regulates the deposits in foreign currency that any individual or business entity may hold in the National Financial System. These accounts may be deposits checking accounts, cash deposits made outside of an account, savings deposits and term deposits BCH resolution encouraging the investment of Honduran nationals residing abroad. On June 15, 2006 it was decided to eliminate the requirement for prior approval by the BCH for loans granted to Hondurans abroad for the acquisition of land, construction, purchase or improvement of housing in the domestic territory. International actions. The International Rules and Practices adopted by Honduras in the last few years are the following: • Basic Principles for Effective Banking Supervision – Basel Principles. • Methodology for the Evaluation of the Basel Principles. • Principles applicable to Insurance Companies. • Methodology for the Evaluation of Insurance Companies Principles. • Principles Related to the Securities Market. December 2007 17 Remittances Programme Service Programs to Emigrants Temporary Protection Status: The United States favors with the temporary protection status regime, (TPS)4 illegal immigrants coming from countries suffering natural disasters or armed conflicts. Honduras is in this category of countries, as it was severely affected by Hurricane Mitch in October 1998. The TPS allows immigrants to become part of the U.S. labor market, but once their term is up, they revert to their status as illegal immigrants. Centre for Returned Migrants: CAMR was created due to the steady increase of migrants returning to Honduras as of 1996, when the US enacted a new Immigration Law which increased the number of categories of people that may be subject to deportation. In Honduras the project was implemented by Caritas Honduras as of the year 2000 and it was managed by the International Organization for Migration (OIM). The main objective is to offer help to those Hondurans who have come back from the United States whether voluntary or involuntarily, stressing assistance to vulnerable groups by means of economic support as in the educational and social adaptation processes and establishes two stages of assistance. Regional Program to Assist Migrants to the United States (PRAMEU): The program started in June, 2000, as a contribution to the solution of problems experienced by thousands Central Americans going to Consulate offices in the United States with the aim to obtain the necessary documentation to migrate to that country in a legal manner. Usually, the applicants have relatives in the United States as citizens or residents, so the intention of migrating is to reunite the family. It is estimated that the number of these applications in Honduras reaches 7,000 per year. In parallel, PRAMEU contributes to reducing the illegal trips towards the United States, as these make emigrants highly vulnerable and imply the possibility of being deported. The statistics suggest that only 15% of applicants obtain their visa, but OIM intends to increase the percentage up to 90%. OIM activities are to provide assistance but do not guarantee the visa will be obtained. The cost of this service is US $120 for adults and US $60 for minors. Information and Awareness Campaign about the Risks and Consequences of Irregular Migration: In 2006 an information and awareness campaign was launched at the domestic level, addressed to potential Honduran emigrants, about the risks and consequences of illegal migration. In particular, information was included for potential emigrants to get acquainted with feasible and real alternatives to migrate in a legal manner, helping them to make decisions about their future and to dissuade them from looking for illegal people traffickers and means. In July 2001, the US Government extended the Temporary Protection Status (TPS program) for another year to Hondurans living in the US but lacking of legal work documents. This was the fourth consecutive time that Hondurans enjoyed such measures. 85,000 Hondurans benefited from the extension of the program. This group of people makes up the 160,000 families of Honduran origin that live in the US today, adding up to 600,000 people, based on data reported by the Honduran Government. (The Population Census in the US in 2000 reported no more than 300,000 immigrants of Honduran origin living in the country). 4 18 December 2007 Honduras Report The campaign is being executed by the OIM in Honduras, in close cooperation with the governmental authorities by means of the Foreign Affairs Ministry and the Direction of Population and Migration Policy, as well as the civil association directed by the National Forum for Migrations in Honduras (FONAMIH). 2.2. REGULATORY, SUPERVISORY AND OVERSIGHT AUTHORITIES 2.2.1. Role of the Central Bank The BCH was created on February 3, 1950, by means of Legal Decree No. 53. This provision defined the basis for the BCH to become one of the pillars of the Honduran economy. 46 years after, on December 17, 1996, the National Congress, by means of Decree No. 228-96 approved a group of reforms to existing law with the aim to harmonize the activities of the BCH with current conditions and demands of the financial market. The latest reforms to the BCH Law intend to strengthen the autonomy and independence of the Central Bank as the maximum monetary authority. The bank’s main role is to govern and oversee the maintenance of the internal and external value of the domestic currency, as well as to foster the regular operation of the payment system. With such objectives, it should draft, develop and enforce the monetary, credit and exchange policy of the country. The BCH is subject to its Law and the regulations issued by its Directorate. The Directorate’s functions are as follows: i) draft and direct the monetary, credit and exchange policy of the country based on provisions stated in this law; ii) preserve the internal and external value of the domestic currency; iii) promote the good operation and stability of financial and payment systems in the country; iv) approve the annual monetary program, review it and assess it at least every three months; v) authorize temporary credits for lack of liquidity to institutions within the national financial system; vi) issue the regulations, general conditions and limits to conduct the operations of the BCH; and, vii) produce estimations on foreign currencies income and outflows, as well as calculations of the Balance of Payments, including the figures for remittances, based on information provided by Exchange Agents. The BCH is the regulator of the Honduran foreign exchange market, and it is the official authority responsible for establishing operating conditions for national financial system institutions authorized to operate as Exchange Agents, including the range of their operations. These institutions are obliged to sell to the Central Bank all or part of their foreign currency assets they may acquire, based on the rules determined by the Directorate. Individuals may maintain assets in foreign currencies and trade them with BCH or the financial institutions authorized to make foreign currency exchanges. Exchange Agents that do not comply with the provisions mentioned above are subject to sanctions imposed by the Finance Ministry with fines going as high as ten times the amount of the negotiation, depending on the severity of the infraction. Small scale exchange transactions conducted by tourists and travelers in general are excluded from the foregoing, as they may act based on the regulation issued by the BCH Directorate. December 2007 19 Remittances Programme The financial system institutions authorized as exchange agents are commercial banks, savings and credit associations and the Exchange Bureaus. All of them should provide daily information on their foreign currency transactions in the “Electronic Bulletin on purchase and sale of foreign currency” and should report it to the BCH International Department on a regular basis. 2.2.2. National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies (CNBS) The Commission is a decentralized entity of the Presidency of the Republic, independent from it in regards to functionality and budget, and that has sufficient administrative faculties to guarantee the technical and financial management required to comply their objectives. While enforcing its functions as determined by the Financial System Law (Decree 129-2004), and the amendments thereof, the Commission regulates, supervises and authorizes financial system entities with the aim to promote transparency, efficiency, prudence, honesty, responsibility, safety, trust and protection of the interests of savers, investors and clients of the financial system. Its main objectives are: i) to review, verify, control, oversee and supervise the institutions subject to surveillance, ii) issue the regulations required for compliance with the foregoing; iii) supervise compliance of the regulations issued by the BCH with regard to monetary, credit and exchange policies by the institutions subject to surveillance; iv) supervise the proper incorporation, extension Graph 14. CNBS Organization Chart National Comission of Banks and Insurance Verification and Control Unit Internal Audit Department Secretariat Communications and Protocol Unit Superintendency of Insurance Companies and Pension Funds Direction of Legal Counseling Superintendency of Securities and other Institutions Superintendency of Banks, Financial Institutions and AAP’s Inspection Unit Division of Securities Inspection Unit Risk Control Unit Follow-up Division Inspection Unit Follow-up Division Financial Information Unit Follow-up Division Source: National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies. 20 December 2007 Honduras Report of operations, mergers, transformation and closing of the institutions subject to surveillance as well as the extension of activities abroad; and, v) review activities conducted by the representatives or agents of any institution subject to surveillance. The supervision conducted by the Commission covers all financial entities, except cooperative associations and entities in charge of remittances, which are supervised by the Commission only for purposes of control in cases of illegal usage of financial services. In turn, the institutions authorized by the Commission to act as intermediaries in the financial system include: private and public banking institutions, savings and credit associations, financial corporations, exchange bureaus, insurance companies and pension fund institutions among others. 2.2.3. Financial Supervisor in Honduras At present, there is no institution specifically in charge of protecting the consumer. However, based on the stated in sections 24 and 26 of the Consumer Law General Regulation (Decree 4189, April 7, 1989) determines as follows “… any business providing services may determine the costs thereof in an area visible to the consumer … any service provider, providing services of any nature must indemnify the consumer for damages derived from services provided inappropriately or in a deficient manner”. Likewise, beneficiaries of remittances who may want to submit a claim and/or complaint for services received from an exchange agent may file the claim with the Commission in the event such entity is subject to the Commission’s supervision or before the Consumer Protection Office of the Public Prosecutors Office for all financial entities. Judgments over such claims and complaints are issued by the competent entities. 2.2.4. Financial Information Unit Decree 45-2002 enacted the law against Money Laundering with the aim to repress and punish such illegal activities, establish cautionary measures and apply the provisions contained in the international conventions underwritten and ratified by Honduras. The Financial Information Unit is a Division attached to the Superintendence of Banks within the Intendancy of Banks, where the Public Prosecutors Office has a permanent representative. Its main objectives are the reception, analysis and consolidation of information contained in the reports received from the institutions subject to the Commission’s supervision and from non-supervised entities that are required to comply with provisions in the Anti-money Laundering Law. Likewise, it should be one means for the Public Prosecutors Office or the competent legal entity to obtain the information that may be considered necessary for the investigation of felonies listed in Decree 45-2002. By executing its duties, the FIU binds both, the supervised and non-supervised entities to the following: i) report data about all atypical and multiple operations, ii) report any amount surpassing the limit established by the BCH: for exchange bureaus being US $10,000 and up and for remittance December 2007 21 Remittances Programme institutions, US $2.000 iii) ensure that policies and strategies against money laundering activities are complied with, such as “Know your Client” and the Manual to prevent illegal usage of financial services, and iv) maintain updated records of clients for five years, among others. 2.3. ROLE OF OTHER RELEVANT ORGANIZATIONS 2.3.1. Honduran Association of Banking Institutions (AHIBA) The Honduran Association of Banking Institutions is a non-profit organization that currently comprises 16 commercial banks operating in Honduras. AHIBA was incorporated on September 24, 1956, by: Banco de La Propiedad S.A., El Ahorro Hondureño, S.A., Banco La Capitalizadora Hondureña and Aseguradora Hondureña S.A. as founding members. AHIBA´s objective has been to direct and promote the development of the private sector banking system within the free enterprise and sound competition framework. For such purposes, AHIBA develops activities such as: • Support and encourage the viability of a legal, economic and financial system that guarantees the stability and development of private banking activity of the country. • Study and discuss economic policy, specifically monetary, credit and exchange policies proposing amendments that may be considered as desirable, trying to coordinate the relationship among the Private Banking Institutions, the Monetary authorities and the Banking and Financial entities in the countries for such purposes. • Maintain permanent and smooth communication with other entities representing the private sector, those linked to the economic and financial activity of the country and look for joint actions. • Maintain an updated record of all laws, decrees and resolutions related to the banking, economic and financial activities. • Represent the Member Banks before the relevant Banking and Monetary National authorities and organizations, as well as domestic and foreign entities in any procedure related to the banking operations. 2.3.2. Inter-Bank Processing Center (CEPROBAN) The Inter-Bank Processing Center attached to the Honduran Association of Banking Institutions, AHIBA, is responsible for the management of the funds electronic transfer system for companies, by means of which it is possible to issue payments in favor of suppliers, payroll and make collection from clients, independently from the financial institution. It is a network of financial services created in March 2001 deriving from the interest of all banks in the system to work in a joint manner in order to improve the financial services of the country. 22 December 2007 Honduras Report The first service provided was to establish the Checks Electronic Clearing House at domestic level, providing services to several governmental institutions to operate online with the financial system. At present, they are about to start providing electronic transfers of credits and debits at the national level. 2.3.3. Statistics National Institute (INE) INE is a technical and autonomous entity, with legal identity and resources of its own created by Decree No. 86-2000, with the aim to improve and modernize the statistical information systems of the institutions. In this context, INE, by mandate of law, aims to coordinate the National Statistical System ensuring that official statistic activities are conducted in a coordinated and rational manner, subject to common regulations. INE is a technical and non-political institution that bases its information on research conducted in fields such as census and surveys. INE’s formal objectives are: i) to provide timely and reliable statistics; ii) to organize the National Statistics System: and, iii) to promote and develop the country’s statistics culture. Its role is performed by compiling statistics based on research work conducted in the field, such as censuses and surveys that provide the measurement and provision of micro and macro-economic, social and demographic variables, as well as monitoring of the social and economic evolution of the country and the comparison thereof with the international scope. 2.3.4. International Organization for Migration, IOM The IOM is an international inter-governmental organization that aims to work with migrants and governments to provide human responses to the challenges that migration represents. The IOM, with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, has 98 member states and 34 observing members. IOM works with its associates in the international community to: help to face the growing challenges represented by managing migration at operational levels. IOM’s main action principles are: to foster understanding of migration issues, promote social and economic development by means of migration, work for respect the human dignity and the well-being of migrants. Since its creation, the IOM has supported more than eleven million people around the world. 2.3.5. General Direction of Migration and Migration Policy The General Directorate for Migration and Migration Policy was created in 1970 by means of Decree No. 34 with the aim to i) regulate the transit of nationals and foreigners in and out the country, as well as the residence of the latter in it and ii) keep records of people entering and leaving the country, broken down per border and record instruments. This Directorate issues annual publications and keeps statistical records on the deported population. The GDM’s main duties are: 1. To ensure the requirements stated by law and its regulations are complied with, both for the entrance and exit of nationals and foreigners, as well as for the continued residence of the latter in the national territory. December 2007 23 Remittances Programme 2. Adopt and apply the necessary measures to prevent and control clandestine migration. 3. Compile and organize migration statistics and regulate immigration based on the quotas established by the State Ministry in the Secretariat of Home Office and Justice. 4. Resolve issues related to the entry, residence and exit of foreigners based on the provisions stated in the Law and regulations thereof. 5. Apply the sanctions determined by the Law and regulations thereof, without prejudice to the provisions contained in the current criminal legislation. 6. Comply with those orders hindering people from leaving the country. 2.3.6. Sustainable Development Network. This is an NGO created in 1994 as a project of the United Nations. It is a non-profit organization duly incorporated in 1998. The network has developed human and technological resources, achieving international recognition. Since November 2001, the network opened the Electronic List of Migration and Remittances, with the aim to exchange information. Participants are: researchers, independent consultants, executive and technical personnel of governmental institutions, NGO’s and officials from cooperation agencies. As part of the exchange process, the information available RDS members has been gathered and centralized. The “Remittance Group” was organized within this framework, an alliance of five NonGovernmental Organizations. Institute for Cooperation and Self-development (ICADE), Sustainable Development Network (RDS - HN), Andar Association, Support Services Unit (UNISA) and an entity representing organizations within the civil society: Honduran Council of the Social Sector in the Economy]. Such group aims at managing and drafting proposals trying to promote that remittances become an instrument to help the development of the country, within the framework of national proposals for development as part of the Strategy to Reduce Poverty. 24 December 2007 Honduras Report 3. DESCRIPTION OF REMITTANCES 3.1. DEFINITION AND CONCEPT OF REMITTANCES In order to measure income from remittances, the Central Bank of Honduras follows definitions set out in the Balance of Payments Manual issued by the International Monetary Fund, which define family remittances in paragraph 302 as follows: Current transfers conducted by emigrants working in another economy different from the national one. Emigrant is any person traveling to another economy and staying over there, or being foreseeable that will remain in such other economy for a year or more. 3.2. SENDER PROFILES The United States is the main destination for Honduran migration as 91.4% of the total migrating population lives there, followed by Mexico where 2.2% of migrants reside, Spain hosting 2.1% and Central America where 1.9% of migrants remain5. The Honduran population in the United States is mainly concentrated in New York, Washington D.C., New Orleans and Florida. Graph 15. Distribution of Senders per Country of Residence (By the end of 2006) Source: INE. Notwithstanding that the United States is still the main destination for Honduran emigrants Spain has gained importance as destination for migrants over the last five years due to the immigration policy in place. Out of the recent migrating population6 4% went to Spain. Out of the non-recent migrating population7 2.2% are in Spain those living abroad for more than five years amount to 1%. Source: Last survey conducted by INE in 2007. Recent emigration refers to migrants who left the country less than a year ago. 7 Those living abroad for 1 to 4 years. 5 6 December 2007 25 Remittances Programme Over the last decade, the gap between the migrants coming from urban areas and from rural areas has narrowed considerably. According to information from INE, out of the total number of households with migrants within the last decade, 50.9% comes from urban areas and 49.1% come from rural areas. Migration flows before the last ten years were different: 66.8% came from an urban area and 33.2% came from rural ones. What regard to gender profile of these migration flows, 70% are male and 30% are female. Graph 16. Distribution of Urban-Rural Migration and per Gender (At year-end 2006) Source: INE. The structure of the migrating Honduran population reflects a young profile and it is concentrated in the economically active segment. Based on surveys conducted by the INE for 2006, most of the remittance senders took part of the Honduran labor market before migrating: 18.7% of migrants were between 15 and 19 years old when migrating, 58.8% were between 20 and 34, 14.5% were between 35 and 49 and 1.5% was between 50 and 64 years old. Graph 17. Distribution of Migration by Age Groups (At year-end 2006) Source: INE. 26 December 2007 Honduras Report With regard to education level, most migrants have studies above the national average. Based on information provided by INE 32% of Honduran migrants had 9 years of studies at the time of departure, compared to 59% with elementary education, this is, about 6 years of studies, and 3% with higher-level studies and 4% with no level of education whatsoever. Graph 18. Remittance Senders by Education Level (At year-end 2006) Source: INE. Additionally, 64.5% of migrants have been living abroad for over a year and 35.5% less than that. Within the migrating population living abroad for over one year, 42% have been abroad between 1 to 4 years, 29% between 5 and 9 years and 30% for 10 or more. Graph 19. Migrants by Time of Residence Abroad (At year-end 2006) 5 years or more 30% Less than 1 year 11% 1 year 14% 4 years 28% 2 years 10% 3 years 7% Source: INE. With regards to the current legal status of Hondurans abroad, 60.5% have no papers or visa, and 35.8% are legal residents out of which, 12% are covered by the TPS, 12% are residents, 2.4% have work visas and 1% tourist visas. 2% of the total is naturalized. December 2007 27 Remittances Programme Graph 20. Distribution of Senders by Migration Condition (At year-end 2006) Without Documents 62% Refugee 5% Resident 12% TPS Work Visa 2% Student Visa 1% 12% Tourist Visa 3% Other 1% Nationalized 2% Source: INE. 3.3. BENEFICIARY PROFILES In connection with remittances recipients, out of the total households in Honduras receiving remittances, 56% are located in urban areas and 44% in rural ones. Regarding gender, 54% of households receiving remittances have male heads of family, and 46% are households headed by a woman. In connection with level of education, 56% of heads of household receiving remittances have elementary education, 6% have further education and 17% have no studies whatsoever. Graph 21. Distribution of Beneficiaries per Level of Education as of 2006 Source: INE. In Honduras, remittances make up the third most important income source of households and they are mostly used to improve their current expenditure. Based on information from INE, the 28 December 2007 Honduras Report remittances represent 11% of household income, income derived from salaries 42% and selfemployment activities amount to 36%. The remittances receipts are used by 70% to improve the quality of life of families left behind, increasing the monthly expenditure on food, clothing and domestic appliances, 12% is used towards medical expenses, 9% for housing, 5% for education and only 4% is channeled to savings and investment. Graph 22. Usage of Remittances as of 2006 Source: INE. 3.4. REMITTANCE INDICATORS The average monthly remittance reported by BCH and INE through surveys and market figures ranges from US $202 to %286. At the upper end, BCH by means of the surveys conducted every six months reports an average monthly remittance received of US $286. More in the middle, INE surveys find about US $264, whereas one of the most important remittance operators in the markets reports the average monthly remittance to be about US $202. Graph 23. Ranges of Amounts Received as Remittances as of 2006 $US 200 to <300 16% $US 100 to <200 35% $US 300 to <400 7% $US 400 to <500 4% $US 500 to <1.000 5% More $US 1.000 3% $US 50 to < 100 20% nk/na 1% < $US 50 9% Source: INE. December 2007 29 Remittances Programme Another important aspect defining remittances and their flows is the frequency with which such funds come into the country. Graph 24. Frequency of Reception of Remittances as of 2006 Source: INE. As shown in this graph, most of the remittances (44.7%) are sent on a monthly basis, followed by 14.2% on an annual basis. The same percentage is received every two months and a frequency less than a month represents 8.1%. About 7% are reported to be received every quarter, 6% over one year and from 4 to 6 months with 5%, similar to the period of time of 6 to 11 months. Finally, only 1% does not have a defined range, so it is possible to say that remittances are most commonly sent once a month. This is similar to results from other countries which have endeavored to measure remittance frequency. 30 December 2007 Honduras Report 4. INTERNATIONAL REMITTANCES SERVICE PROVIDERS In Honduras, according to the Financial System Law and the Exchange Bureaus Law, only the Authorized Exchange Agents (ACs) including commercial banks, the savings and credit associations and Exchange Bureaus are authorized to conduct purchase and sale of foreign currency transactions. In this framework, within the ACs, only banks and Exchange Bureaus provide reception and payment remittance services in the country. Besides Banks and Exchange Bureaus as ACs other institutions also conducting payment of remittances. Those companies fully focused in sending and receiving remittances are the ones enjoying the largest market share. Completing the group of service providers in connection with institutional remittances, the Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit also settle remittances. Their participation and relevance in the market has been increasing in the last few years. On the other hand, apart from institutional suppliers of remittance services, there are other participants in the market settling remittances that usually provide the service in a personal manner, including individual travelers, messengers and other mechanisms that do not involve financial institutions in the final stage of payment. Graph 25. International Remittances Service Providers as of 2006 Institutionals 94% Non-Institutionals 6% Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). Based on official statistics, 94% of total of family remittances received in Honduras are sent through institutional channels. The AC’s providing remittance services consider Western Union and MoneyGram to be the only international remittance institutions with physical presence in the country. Once the remittances arrive in Honduras, delivery to the recipient is mainly conducted by means of the Financial System, generally through banks with the largest number of branches in the country that have more presence in small cities in the interior regions. December 2007 31 Remittances Programme Graph 26. Share of Institutional Suppliers Registered in the Remittance Market (At year-end 2006) Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). The non-institutional channels occupy a smaller share of the market, only 6.4% and among those, the main remittance service providers are messengers, although their participation is becoming smaller over time, favoring the institutional channels that provide the service in a safer and cheaper manner, besides the fact of being more efficient. 4.1. INSTITUTIONAL PROVIDERS Remittance services institutional providers may be divided in two groups: institutions registered and authorized to conduct remittance operations and the non-registered institutions or those with no specific authorization to conduct such transactions. In connection with non-registered entities, these conduct operations in the remittance field included in the authorization and control levels of authorities within the payments and surveillance systems. In Honduras, the institutions recorded as providing remittance services correspond to Authorized Exchange Agents, including Banks and Exchange Bureaus. This category is registered and conducts operations as an exchange market agent, as there is no special registry for the authorization of payers/collectors of remittances in particular, as opposed to other kinds of transactions. On the other hand, there are also institutions, such as cooperative associations, that also settle remittances and are registered with the Superintendence of Banks as financial intermediaries. Therefore, these are enabled to conduct transactions to settle remittances. However, they are not considered as ACs and are neither bound nor controlled by the exchange regulations and in this case they are considered as part of the non-registered institutional remittance intermediaries. Finally, there are other institutional actors that have no registration at all as remittance agencies acting through their own offices in the country. In Honduras, the most representative remittance entity is Western Union. Besides making payment through other entities, such as banks, with which it has contractual relationships, Western Union has its own offices where remittances be disbursed 32 December 2007 Honduras Report as well. These institutions do not have formal authorizations to operate as such nor authorization for their transactions. They are only regulated by the rules, laws and control enforced against money laundering. Graph 27. Participation of Registered and Non-Registered Agents in the Market Source: Own elaboration with information of BCH. Data for Honduras show that over half the institutions providing remittance services are formally registered and submit reports on their activities and operations to one of the control entities. The foregoing goes along the distribution of the remittance market in the country, as most of the remittances are conducted by ACs, which are bound to report their transactions in detail. It is also important to highlight that 37% of the remittances sent via institutions (35% of the market) are conducted beyond control of the authorities, although, as it will be seen after, there are mechanisms preventing suspicious transactions and that gather information in an indirect manner about these types of institutions. 4.2. REGISTERED INSTITUTIONAL PROVIDERS Out of the institutions making up the National Financial System Honduran law only authorizes commercial banks, savings and credit associations and Exchange Bureaus to conduct foreign currency purchase and sale operations by means of their participation in the daily auctions of US dollars performed by the Central Bank. These participants in the foreign currency purchase and sale system with the BCH are called Authorized Exchange Agents ACs8. Among which, there are 16 banks and six Exchange Bureaus that currently take part in the remittance market. Chart 6. Structure of the Remittance Market in Honduras (At year-end 2006) Entities Commercials Banks Exchange Bureaus Participation in Percentage 16 89% 6 11% Source: Own elaboration with information of BCH. As of December 31, 2006, the institutions making up the Honduran National Financial System include: commercial banks, savings and loan associations, financial corporations, state banks, second-floor banks, insurance companies, prevision institutes, stock markets, Exchange Bureaus, deposit general storehouses and representation offices. 8 December 2007 33 Remittances Programme Among ACs, banks have a market share of 89% that, in terms of the total remittance market, reaches 51.5%. Such market share has continuously increased in the last few years. Whereas Exchange Bureaus only conduct 11% of the transactions involving remittances of the ACs, as to say, only 7.1% of the total amount of remittances arriving to Honduras. Commercial Banks Next chart shows the commercial banks that participate in Honduran remittances market. One of this banks have opened agencies in Miami and Florida (FICOHSA Express), combining the services of sending and reception of remittances with a window for loans and another one receiving payment of loans and credit card. Chart 7. Composition and Structure of Commercial Banks (At year-end 2006) Institution Banco Atlantida, S.A. Reference name Headquarters Bancatlan Tegucigalpa Bac Honduras Tegucigalpa Banco de Occidente, S.A. Bancocci Sta. Rosa de C. Banco del País, S.A. Banpais San Pedro Sula Banco Financiera Comercial Hondureña, S.A. Ficohsa Tegucigalpa BGA Tegucigalpa Bamer Tegucigalpa Banco de América Central, S.A. Banco Grupo del Ahorro Hondureño, S.A. Banco Mercantil, S.A. Banco Continental, S.A. Bancon San Pedro Sula Banco Uno Tegucigalpa Banhcafe Tegucigalpa Ficensa Tegucigalpa Banco Promerica, S.A. Promerica San Pedro Sula Banco de los Trabajadores, S.A. Bancotrab Tegucigalpa Lafise Tegucigalpa Banco Cuscatlan Tegucigalpa Honduras Tegucigalpa Banco Uno, S.A. Banco Hondureño del Café, S.A. Banco Financiera Centroaméricana, S.A. Banco Lafise, Honduras, S.A. Banco Cuscatlan de Honduras, S.A. Banco Honduras, S.A. Source: Banking and Insurance Companies National Commission. Out of the 16 commercial banks taking part of the remittance market, 93% of the volume traded by the banking sector is concentrated in five entities. In this connection, in 2006, one bank had the largest market share with 32.1%, the three largest payers owns 62.1% of the total remittances paid. The relative participation of banks in the remittance market has increased during recent years. However, the distribution within the banking sector has been maintained, showing that these actors as a whole are gaining ground in the remittance payment market, without competing among 34 December 2007 Honduras Report themselves due to the conditions of agreements made with the remittance companies abroad and the uses and fidelity that these type of services generate among those receiving the remittances. Chart 8. Remittance Recipient Banks (In percent of total remittances) Market Share Banks 2004 % 2005 % 2006 % 1st payer bank 32.5 31.8 32.1 2nd payer bank 18.4 14.6 18.8 3rd payer bank 9.1 10.9 11.2 4th payer bank 8.2 10.7 10.8 5th payer bank 11.0 11.6 10.1 6th payer bank 13.8 11.8 9.9 Source: Own elaboration based in BCH. Exchange Bureaus There are 8 Exchange Bureaus registered with the National Commission of Banks CNBS and Insurance Companies] in Honduras. Out of this number, only three of them control 94% of the total volume of operations within this sector, showing the degree of concentration among this type of providers. Chart 9. Exchange Bureaus Paying Remittances as of 2006 Exchange Bureaus Divisas Corporativas, S.A. Headquarters Tegucigalpa Roble Viejo, S.A. Tegucigalpa Corporación de Inversiones Nacionales, S.A. Tegucigalpa La Confianza, S.A. Las Manos Promerica, S.A. San Pedro Sula Del Centro, S.A. Tegucigalpa Servigiros, S.A. Tegucigalpa La Preferida, S.A. El Paraiso Source: National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies. Despite the fact that Honduras has at least 8 Exchange Bureaus, only six of them take direct part in the remittance business. The other two do not make remittance payments, but rather serve other market agents as a means to exchange remittances received in dollars into Lempiras, as they are ACs and have access to the BCH Exchange system, thus becoming supporting participants. 4.3. NON-REGISTERED INSTITUTIONAL PROVIDERS Among institutional providers, there are some which are not registered or controlled by the authorities in a specific manner in regard to international remittance services. It is common December 2007 35 Remittances Programme to find the international remittance agencies among these types of actors, also some kinds of non-bank financial intermediation entities, post offices and others that, despite having or not some generic authorization to provide some services have no specific authorization to realize remittances. In Honduras, the international remittance agencies neither have a specific authorization nor are considered as ACs. Just as it happens with the Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit that have authorization to realize remittances but are not considered as ACs. Therefore, for purposes of this report, they are considered as non-registered entities. Finally, as regards post offices, they are also not considered as ACs nor have a specific authorization to realize remittances. However, and due to their transnational character, the payment of remittances is a natural continuation of the type of services provided, although the usage of post offices is decreasing due to the speed of market financial institutions. Money Transfer Operators, MTO Pursuant to the current legislation in Honduras, the international MTOs face no legal hindrance to provide international remittance services at local level. However, as they have non-registered financial institutions, they are not controlled by the CNBS and only report information about some operations to the FIU in connection with any unusual transactions detected. Only one International MTO, operates independently as local remittance agency. Another agencies act by means of formal entities that employ as agents to provide their services. The largest MTO has 11 proprietary branches at national level. Graph 28. Largest MTO Share in the Remittance Market (At year-end 2006) Other Alliances 17.15% Direct 42.85% Through Banco de Occidente 40.0% Source: Own elaboration based in BCH. In addition, The largest MTO participates in the Honduran remittance market by means of three banks with which it has exclusive agreements and by means of independent allies such as supermarkets, 36 December 2007 Honduras Report hardware stores and others with timetables more flexible than those of banks9 especially during the weekend. Likewise, this MTO has non-exclusive agreements with few banks for the Roatan Department that, due to its location and lack of infrastructure, is of difficult access and the cost of transportation is very high. These attributes give a large network of 250 agencies and locations to pay remittances at the national level. 98% of the largest MTO transactions originate from abroad, where the operation cost is determined. The remittance is not directed, but may be disbursed in any bank or company associated, including both the offices of agents with which it has business relationships or its own offices. This MTO, controls about 35% of the total remittance market in the country, 57% are paid out through their agents and the remaining 43% is paid at its own offices in the country. This international remittance agency maintains service agreements with its agents, including exclusive service agreements. This is the reason why their transactions through their agents are highly concentrated. For example, one bank associated pays 40% of their transactions. Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit Honduran Cooperative Associations are not acknowledged as authorized exchange agents. Therefore, they do not participate in the central bank’s foreign currency auctions. They pay remittances anyway, due to agreements with international MTOs and other cooperative union organizations focused on collecting remittances abroad. Since they are not ACs, the Cooperative Associations receiving foreign currency to pay Lempiras in Honduras must exchange the currency with ACs in the market, that is, by means of a bank or Exchange Bureau. This may influence the operating costs of the associations in transacting remittances. However, since most of them carry out the collection of remittances in foreign cooperation agencies abroad, their commission costs tend to be lower. The Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit operate in rural areas (52%) and in urban ones, and disburse around 20% of the remittances in the country: these totaled about 18,000 transactions conducted in 2006. The data on remittances paid by Cooperative Associations are added to data of the commercial banks since these non-banking institutions do not report directly to the BCH. Postal Services Within the last five years, the use of postal services as a mechanism to remit money has had important changes. As of 2002, the usage of this means to send remittances was not higher than 1.4% of the total market, reaching in 2003 up to 0.6%, and 0.8% in 2004, respectively. 2005 showed an increase in the usage of this means reaching 3.2% of the total market. However, as from that date, there has been a continuous decrease, derived from the use of wire transfers carried out through traditional financial institutions. Based on information provided by the MTO, Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays are the most active days for remittance payments. 9 December 2007 37 Remittances Programme 4.4. NON-INSTITUTIONAL PROVIDERS Among the remittances entering Honduras by means of informal suppliers, such as remittances in kind and pocket remittances10, are those delivered by means of couriers or messengers and those delivered through travelers. As noted before, this amount of remittances is estimated from results obtained from the Survey on Expenses and Remittances conducted over Relatives of Hondurans Living Abroad (EGRFH) conducted by BCH on a semi-annual basis. In 2006 and based on the information gathered from the Central Bank and the survey conducted with international travelers, remittances channeled through formal entities accounted for 94% of total transactions, while the remaining 6% were conducted by means of informal intermediation sources. Hand-carried Cash Visitors and Honduran abroad residents that entering the country may carry pocket remittances or bring them for a relative, a friend or an acquaintance. These types of remittances are estimated based on surveys conducted by the BCH in the main airports in the country and pursuant to such information it is possible to see that they represent 3.7% of the total remittances paid in the market. Sending these remittances cannot be programmed as it can only be done when there is somebody traveling from one country to another and carrying them along. Therefore, it is not a practical manner to send family remittances, the characteristics of which include the constant and regular flow of funds. For this reason, it is unlikely that in the future, the market share of this type of channel will increase. Transport of cash by couriers and messengers A second means of transportation of cash or kind are remittances sent by means of couriers or messengers. These people transfer funds in a regular and periodical manner. In the last few years they had great importance and a significant market share, particularly cash remittances. Despite the foregoing, messengers and couriers have not stopped participating in similar activities, such as the transportation of goods between countries, carrying nostalgic products abroad and carrying back other goods that emigrants send to their relatives in Honduras. In this sense, the transfer of these products is considered as part of the remittances in kind, but these are still not quantified by the statistics organizations in the country. Other transportation means and payment of remittances Finally, there are other means different from transportation of money since, besides remittances in cash, emigrants may send a credit, debit or pre-paid card to their relatives in Honduras that may be used in any ATM or POS to withdraw money or pay for goods or services. 10 “Pocket remittances” are cash delivered in person by the visitor and is not part of the travel expenses. 38 December 2007 Honduras Report Payments and cash withdrawals made with international cards are made using the means within the financial system, but quantification and identification thereof as remittances is very complex and it is currently impossible in practice. Due to the foregoing, these types of remittances are estimated from the BCH surveys, calculating that approximately 1.4% of the market uses these means. December 2007 39 Remittances Programme 5. MEANS OF PAYMENT FOR REMITTANCES The instruments used to pay remittances may vary according to the characteristics of the market and the deeper analysis of each country. In Honduras, remittance service providers may disburse remittances in cash, by checks, through deposits in bank accounts or by means of cards. However, the most common scenario is the final disbursement of remittances in cash, representing 88.8% against 11.2% paid by means of credit to bank accounts, used to amortize loans or other means. Graph 29. Distribution of the Remittance Market by Type of Instrument (At the beginning of 2007) Source: Own elaboration. In general, within the group of authorized agents in the Honduran exchange market, only banks report payment of remittances by means of credit into bank accounts or for payment of loans. They have also designed new products that allow the remittance senders and their beneficiaries, a wider use of financial services, looking for a larger “inclusion” of their clients. In turn, although some market participants make remittance payments in instruments other than cash, for example, by direct deposit into bank accounts or by checks, these are currently exceptional cases: almost all payments are made in cash. Chart 10. Remittance Payment in Honduras per Type of Intermediary of Relative Importance (By year-end 2006) Cash Deposit in bank account and payment loans Others Total 71.1 9.8 n.a. 80.9 Exchange Bureaus 7.1 n.a. n.a. 7.1 MTOs 5.6 n.a. n.a. 5.6 Others 5.0 n.a. 1.4 6.4 88.8 9.8 1.4 100 Banks Total Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH).. 40 December 2007 Honduras Report An important aspect of the Honduran remittance market is the possibility of paying remittances in Lempiras or in US dollars. The bi-currency nature of the Honduran economy makes it difficult to reconcile data from the Exchange Balance with the data corresponding to remittances. However, due to the fact that, in general the use of US dollars in the economy is not widely spread in retail transactions, the remittances received in foreign currency must be exchanged into Lempiras to be used in the country. Therefore, sooner or later remittance receipts should pass through the authorized exchange agents and get recorded in the Exchange Balance records. In this connection and pursuant to the data reported by the agents interviewed during the mission, 30% to 40% of remittances are paid in US dollars, those paid in cash and those paid by means of deposit into a bank account. Graph 30. Distribution of Remittances by Currency (At the beginning of 2007) US Dollars 35% Lempiras 65% Source: Own elaboration. The remittances payers and beneficiaries need to change the US dollars received into Lempiras. Therefore, they must go to an authorized agent within the exchange market to obtain the domestic currency. 5.1. CASH As mentioned above, most remittances are paid out in cash. The Exchange Bureaus make all their payments in cash. Banks pay cash 87.9% of cases and MTOs pay cash 89.8% of the time. In this case, we should consider that, out of payments made by MTOs in their own offices, the total is paid in cash. However, when disbursement is made through an agent, in this case a financial institution, a bank or a cooperative association, one part of it may be deposited into an account or to pay a loan, especially in cases for payments made by cooperative associations. The following chart shows payments conducted by MTOs using the financial entities for payment in cash or deposit into bank accounts added to the total amounts of banks, showing preference of cash, particularly in clients of non-banking institutions. The manner of remittances payment in Honduras per type of intermediary depends on the faculties regulations permit to each one of them. In keeping with the foregoing, banks may combine different December 2007 41 Remittances Programme ways of payment, as they are authorized to offer current or savings accounts, whereas Exchange Bureaus mainly conduct payments in cash, because the legal framework prevents them from offering other types of services in a direct manner. Graph 31. Cash Payment of Remittances by Paying Agent (At the beginning of 2007) Source: Own elaboration. Cash payment of remittances has several advantages derived from the simplicity of the process. However, the need to have at hand enough money11 to settle all of them implies an additional cost to paying entities that have to acquire the cash from one of the agents authorized within the exchange market. In this connection, the participation of Exchange Bureaus as remittance payers is of paramount importance, just as that of banks, as they are acknowledged as authorized agents that can participate in the exchange market and even serve as a channel for other paying agents in the market, such as Cooperative Associations and MTOs. Cash payment allows the beneficiaries to allocate the funds to consumption. In turn, higher levels of bancarization regarding payment of remittances offers the additional advantage of having access to financial services such as loans, savings and insurance policies. 5.2. CHECKS In general, payment of remittances by means of checks is not widely used due to the limited use of such instruments in the country at all: In the few cases when this instrument is used for settling remittances, payments are made in banks. Other entities such as Exchange Bureaus, MTOs or the Cooperative Associations paying remittances use checks only to make up for the deficiency when they cannot make inter-bank payments or when they are forced to, due to their client’s needs. In these cases, when a client requests payment of the remittance charged to another entity’s account, the non-bank payers issue a check against an account of their own and deposit it in the destination account or deliver it to the beneficiary for the latter to deposit in an account of his/her own. This process implies that checks should also go through the Electronic Checks Clearing House, with the inherent delay in settlement. Therefore, 11 Total amount of bills and coins in circulation. 42 December 2007 Honduras Report these transactions are not common and clients of these entities prefer cash payment or direct deposit to their accounts, or to use the money to pay for loans in the same entity where remittances are received, as is the case with the Cooperative Associations. 5.3. ACCOUNT DEPOSITS Direct deposits in bank accounts have been an innovation within the last few years: remittances are paid directly to the beneficiary’s account, who may dispose of the funds as if they were cash. This instrument is an exclusive service for those already having some type of account in the financial system. This is the reason why the modality is not yet in general use. Only 12% of payments of remittances in 2006 were settled by these means, which is mainly used by banks. It is important to mention that these types of instruments also include payments made to amortize loans. Due to the strong participation of banks in the remittance payment business, they are encouraging the usage of new instruments and financial services among beneficiaries and remittance senders. Among these instruments, one under special development is the loans granted to purchase or improve households. The payments of remittances received in Cooperative Associations are mainly used to pay loans. Based on data provided one of the Honduran Federation of Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit, out of the total remittances received by its associates and clients, 46% is received to be deposited into an account, 35% to pay-off loans and only 15% is withdrawn to pay for domestic expenses. Graph 32. Means of Payment of Cooperative Association FACACH (At the beginning of 2007) Source: Data provided by the federation during the mission. Based on data provided by the federation mentioned above and the study made on activities conducted by some banks with an important market share in the remittance business, it is possible to note that these entities are currently working with the aim to widen the financial services offered among their clients-remittance recipients, offering, not only loans, but also credit and debit cards that may allow a broader scope of use and consumption to their clients. December 2007 43 Remittances Programme 5.4. POSTAL INSTRUMENTS In the past, the use of postal instruments as a means to realize remittances was very important in Honduras. At present, this instrument lost almost all of its market share and in 2006 it represented only 1.1% of the total remittances received in the country. Graph 33. Evolution of the Usage of Postal Instruments Source: Annual survey conducted by the Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). A mechanism related to the payment of remittances using post-office channels is the distribution and payment of remittances using instruments as credit, debit or pre-paid cards that may be acquired abroad by the remittance issuers and sent to the beneficiaries by mail, for usage thereof in the country of destination. 5.5. CARDS With the information currently available regarding the remittance market in Honduras, it is not possible to determine the percentage of payment of remittances conducted by means of credit, debit and pre-paid cards. However, there is a wide perspective of the usage of these types of instruments in the future. Therefore, the authorities in the country will define the best and more accessible mechanisms to control and provide follow-up to the remittances paid by these means. 5.6. ELECTRONIC MONEY Usage thereof is still not significant in Honduras. 44 December 2007 Honduras Report 6. SYSTEMS AND CHANNELS FOR THE TRANSFER AND PAYMENT OF REMITTANCES As outlined, most of the remittance operations in Honduras are conducted through Banks, Exchange Bureaus and MTOs. Although MTOs are not formally Authorized Exchange Agents, they participate in the business in two ways: paying out remittances in Honduras directly at their main local offices and paying them by means of agreements with other payers in the country, including banks, Exchange Bureaus and other entities such as cooperative associations. Just as it happens in most of the cases within the region, the relationship between MTOs and payers in the local segment correspond to negotiated arrangements where payment to the beneficiary is conducted a few minutes or hours after beginning the transaction abroad, based on the information received from the MTO. However, the MTO will reimburse the resources paid by the local agent afterwards, when the agent requests payment for a batch of remittances, usually in T+1 or T+2. Figure 1. Operation of Remittances within the Payment System Source: Own elaboration. In this connection, payers usually make disbursements to beneficiaries between 24 to 72 hours before receiving the disbursement of funds from the MTO. Therefore, local payers are exposed to exchange and credit risks that are usually addressed by means of a guarantee fund and policies mitigating the impact of a delay or default of payment of the funds delivered to the remittance beneficiaries in an anticipated manner. December 2007 45 Remittances Programme Almost all payers of local remittances maintain agreements with some MTOs abroad to collect the remittances in the place of origin. Some banks in Honduras have agreements with more than one MTO. Only in those cases where the remittance payment agreement is conducted by means of Western Union, there is some degree of exclusiveness from the remittance local payer. This scheme for payment of remittances also requires the operation of other systems allowing the transfer of both information and funds towards the final beneficiary. Those systems are local, foreign and trans-border ones. Despite the possibility of envisaging many alternatives to collect remittances, the reality is that agents conduct these transactions for MTOs abroad. Likewise, although it may be possible to conceive many options for payment of remittances in Honduras at different types of institutions, supermarkets, drugstores etc., in general, they only work as agents of the remittancepaying companies. In order to simplify the description of the remittance collection, transfer and payment process, the agents both, from the collection and the payment side, are included within the structure of MTOs abroad or the local payers. Therefore, it is possible to summarize the process, considering that the sender of a remittance may send it through an MTO agent or by means of a financial entity (usually a bank) and receive it through one of the authorized agents or a local window of the MTO. 6.1. INFORMATION TRANSFER SYSTEMS In general terms, the information transmission is almost immediate, once the remittance issuer is at the bank’s cashier or that of an MTO agent abroad; the sender provides information about himself, the beneficiary and the amount to be delivered, etc. The basic information about the transaction is processed by the communication means, or through SWIFT12 (remittances among banks) or proprietary networks of other MTOs and reaches the counterpart in Honduras, that may be a bank, exchange bureau or the MTO’s own agency. This information is indeed processed very fast, and once received by the payer, the beneficiary may collect the funds at any time. However, it is important to mention that the speed of the means is directly proportional to its cost, and that most MTOs offer different products at different costs, depending on the speed of the process that may be required. Figure 2. Information Transfer Scheme TRADUCIR Source: Own elaboration. 12 Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. 46 December 2007 Honduras Report Some MTOs offer within their range of services, some type of communication to the beneficiary upon reception of the funds, as sending a fax, an e-mail or even in some cases, the remittances may include a phone call to the issuer abroad to inform his relative of the money sent. 6.2. SYSTEMS ABROAD In general terms, the following graphs summarize the remittance collection and transfer general schemes from RSPs abroad to the local payers in Honduras. The issuer may begin the remittancesending process by means of different instruments, such as cash. Figure 3. Remittance Transfer as Cash Deposits to Collection Agents Source: Own elaboration. In the event the issuer sends the money by means of a bank, once the cash is deposited at the counter, the transaction is done. On the other hand, if the money is deposited at an agency, there may be different series of mechanisms by means of which, the agency may convey the money to the MTO: it may be sent in cash through a wire transfer or a check. In case the transfer or check belongs to the same bank of the MTO, this part of the process ends right there. On the other hand, if the transfer or agent’s check is not directed to the same financial entity where the MTO keeps its accounts, these instruments may go through a clearing house before being received and settled in the MTO´s account. In other situations, the remittance issuer may begin sending the remittance by means of instruments different from cash, for example, a check, a wire transfer, a debit or credit card or through postoffice instruments sent to the MTO, as described in the figure below. In this case, if these instruments are received at the same bank where they were issued, they may hit directly the MTO or bank account. Otherwise, if the instruments are issued by other financial institutions, they may pass through some of the clearing houses before being available at the MTO or Bank´s account to, in turn, be sent. December 2007 47 Remittances Programme Figure 4. Transfer of remittances with Instruments other than cash at the collection points Source: Own elaboration. These types of transfers may be processed in batch instead of on an individual basis as they are received, depending on the system and operation framework of every bank and MTO with their corresponding agents, branches and other counters collecting remittances. 6.3. CROSS-BORDER SYSTEMS Cross-border systems allow the transfer of monetary funds from abroad into the country and viceversa. In Honduras, remittances may be paid either in foreign currency or Lempiras, depending on the issuer and recipient’s instructions. In this connection, if payment is made in Lempiras, they may be exchanged through one of the ACs, independently from the place where the remittance was originated or who the final payer is in Honduras. Such agents include Banks and Exchange Bureaus that, in turn, are remittance payers themselves. Other payers such as MTOs and Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit, should deal with one of the ACs to exchange the foreign currency received into Lempiras in order to pay the remittances in local currency or can, if so requested by the issuers, pay the remittances in foreign currency. When one of the ACs needs to exchange the foreign currency into Lempiras, they should send and sell the currency to the Central Bank of Honduras. Foreign Currency Public Auction System (SAPDI) SAPDI is a system operated by the BCH to perform daily foreign currency auctions. Although ACs are considered as direct participants, they do not have access online to make offers to purchase foreign currencies. Offers are submitted by sealed envelope. As of present date, the design and implementation of a system that will make it possible to electronically send and award foreign currency purchase and sale offers to BCH from different market participants through electronic means is still in development. This is a net liquidation system in deferred time that basically performs high-value transactions where ACs can participate. The applicable regulation determines that the ACs can participate on behalf of their clients in amounts ranging from USD 10,000 to USD 300,000 per day for an 48 December 2007 Honduras Report individual and from USD 10,000 up to USD 1,200.000 per day for a business entity. In turn, the Authorized Exchange Agents in the market may also obtain additional foreign currency amounts on a daily basis (banks up to USD 300,000 and Exchange Bureaus and savings and credit associations up to USD 100,000) to fulfill requirements of their clients in amounts lower than USD 10,000. Amounts that are not sold to the public become part of their foreign currency daily holdings as long as their balances in foreign currencies do not exceed the maximum limits authorized by the BCH. The amounts exceeding such limits may be brought back to the BCH at the reference exchange rate prevailing in the inter-banking market. On the other hand, ACs are authorized to maintain deposit accounts abroad, where they can keep funds in foreign currencies collected in the country or receive payments for the remittances collected at origin from RSPs abroad. But since such collections are delivered to the beneficiaries in domestic currency, they are considered as a purchase of foreign currency and the law determines that such currency must be transferred or sold to the BCH. In this connection, if an Exchange Agent receives foreign currency from abroad as remittance, it should exchange it into Lempiras to pay the designated beneficiaries. The exchange will be conducted upon selling the currency to the BCH, transferring the funds of the Exchange Agent accounts abroad to the BCH accounts in foreign territory. BCH will immediately credit Lempiras into the accounts the ACs keep in this bank in domestic currency. For remittances that do not need to be exchanged into Lempiras as they come with an instruction to be credited in foreign currency accounts, the banks only conduct the relevant transfers to the remittance beneficiary’s accounts. Figure 5. Structure of Remittances per Border System Source: Own elaboration. Those agents paying remittances within the country that are not classified as ACs conduct the procedure described above, using the accounts abroad of ACs in the BCH to receive the remittances paid locally, both in foreign currency and Lempiras. December 2007 49 Remittances Programme 6.4. LOCAL SYSTEMS Within the local systems used to process remittances in Honduras, it is possible to distinguish between high-value and retail payment systems. The high-value systems allow settlement of crossborder operations and domestic transactions of high value or urgency, whereas retail payment systems usually settle local transactions, although in some cases they may generate transnational obligations. For instance, in those cases, where participants or entities represent institutions abroad: credit, debit and pre-paid cards, used in local ATMs and POSs. 6.5. LARGE VALUE PAYMENT SYSTEM The large value payment system allows ACs in the remittance market to settle their operations and transactions by means stated in the regulation for public trading of foreign currencies in the exchange market. Moreover, it allows them to acquire the notes and coins necessary to pay out remittances in Lempiras and to settle their positions in the clearing houses, in which the ACs participate. At the present time, large value transactions conducted via the BCH are carried out with written payment orders that are settled by means of the accounting procedures of the Issuing Agent. Here it is important to note that the current system allows operations in foreign currency (US dollars) and Lempiras, by keeping, the financial institutions’ bank accounts in both currencies at BCH. At present, BCH working on modernization of the high-value payment systems and anticipates upgrading its operations to a more developed system by incorporating technological elements that will allow it to operate in real time gross settlement processes. 6.6. LOW VALUE PAYMENT SYSTEM The low value payment systems in Honduras allow the transfer of funds from collecting entities to transferring agencies of remittances abroad. In the local part, low value payment systems permit transfers of funds from collecting companies to payment locations or the beneficiaries themselves when using no cash instruments that should be paid off in accounts different from those of the collecting entities. With regard to the retail payment systems, up to December 2006 the Check Clearing House existed, but then it converted to ACH to enlarge operations to settlement and liquidation of electronic transactions besides checks. Likewise, BCH although the Resolution No. 374 10/2006, approved the Regulation for Settlement and Payment of Electronic Transactions with the aim to regulate transactions and the performance of the payment systems and participants thereof. The legal and operational framework follows the banking and computing safety standards that were assessed and authorized by the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies. In Honduras the institutional payers may disburse remittances in cash or by means of deposit into an account. When remittances are deposited in an account to be settled, it is also possible to use other instruments, mechanisms and financial services such as checks, credit cards, debit cards, wire transfers, etc. 50 December 2007 Honduras Report Figure 6. Large Value Payment System Source: Own elaboration. Deposit into an account, in turn, requires the usage of different channels and systems depending on the location of the beneficiary’s account and that of the payer’s RSPs. When the remittance is paid by a bank, deposit into an account may be conducted directly at the beneficiary’s account, so long as he/she has an account in the same entity, which is the most common scenario for remittances received with deposit instructions in Honduras. On the other hand, if the account is with another financial entity, it will be necessary to use other systems to enable the transfer, including checks (less frequently) or inter-bank transfers (that should go through the ACH to become effective). When the payer is not a bank, for instance an Exchange Bureau or an MTO paying at its own offices, the deposit into an account may be effected through an inter-bank transfer, depositing a check or the cash itself directly into the beneficiary’s account. In the event the beneficiary has an account in an entity that is different from the paying one, this transaction (whether by check or transfer) should also go through a clearing house before becoming effective. On the other hand, due to the recent development of ACH, electronic transfers are still not widely used for such purposes, although Cooperative Associations receiving remittances do use the internal systems of their federations to carry out the transfers to entities taking part of their systems This enables them to use their payment counters to settle remittances received, making it possible for the beneficiary to collect remittance funds at any counter in any cooperative affiliated with their Federation. Clearinghouses for checks and other Payment Instruments The Honduran Electronic Clearing House (CCEH) has been in operation since 2000 and is managed and operated by Interbank Processing Center (CEPROBAN). Since inception, CCEH only settles and pays checks in domestic currency for its 18 participants, BCH included. Surveillance thereof is responsibility of the issuing entity. Check settlement is a service provided at national level and is conducted only by CCEH. Since CEPROBAN belongs to the banks association, its participants only include banks, and no other market agents have access to this system. December 2007 51 Remittances Programme At present, the Check Clearing House conducts transactions with 45,000 checks a day on average, amounting to 1.5 billion Lempiras. The processing and exchange of paper checks is expensive and inefficient for the participating institutions as it does not allow the appropriate usage of automatic processing systems. Therefore, in December 2006, CEPROBAN decided to open a new system for settlement and payment of wire transfers, transforming the CCEH, into ACH PRONTO, capable of settling not only checks but also wire transfers, and thus decreasing the use of checks in favor of a gradual transition to wire transfers as a means to conduct inter-bank funds transfers. Clearinghouses for Electronic Transfers (ACH-PRONTO) BCH made official the operations of the Clearinghouse of Electronic Transfers Settlements,(ACH PRONTO) in February 2007 by means of Resolution No.461 12/2006 dated December 7, 2006, which authorized CEPROBAN to manage and operate this Clearing House. The ACH PRONTO system has been used by the public and private banks as an alternative to the issuance of checks, diminishing their usage as those entities participating at ACH PRONTO have encouraged the use of wire transfers, causing the number of checks settled to decrease. The initiation of ACH PRONTO operations requires CEPROBAN to not only settle checks but also to settle and pay wire transfers. Surveillance of operations conducted by ACH PRONTO is the responsibility of the Audit Department of the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies. The rule specifies that transactions sent through ACH be delivered to beneficiaries at the latest by the following bank working day. Credit transfers and direct debit are among the products offered. By June 2007, ACH PRONTO conducted more than 6,000 transactions daily. Wire transfer operations by means of ACH PRONTO are easy for consumers to access. The client only needs to maintain a business account, register it on the Internet, sign the agreement for electronic payments and provide the bank with the list of clients to be paid, including the name, ID number or RTN and the format to accept payments. Clearinghouses for Automatic Teller Machine, International Credit, ebit and Prepaid Card Networks The use of alternative new or innovative instruments within the remittance market is increasing, especially those cross-border ones that allow permanent contact among the fund sources and remittance beneficiaries. Credit, debit and prepaid cards are the instruments developed the most and with more generalized usage. The use of cards in the remittance market begins with the issuance of the debit or credit card ordered by the sender (generally linked to an account at the bank of origin), or with the purchase of a prepaid card. Credit and debit cards need the senders to have legal status. Therefore, they are out of reach for senders who have not legalized their residency at the host country. In turn, prepaid cards have the advantage of needing less formality in the purchase and loading process. Therefore, they will become the most widely used instruments by emigrants that have no legal residency abroad. 52 December 2007 Honduras Report Once the sender buys the card, it (or a copy, which is sometimes provided) needs to be physically sent to the beneficiary for the latter to use it in ATMs to withdraw money in local currency or at POS to purchase goods and services. In Honduras, the sending and delivery of cards in the future will be conducted by mail after the introduction of the Post-Cash system. Figure 7. Usage of Cards to Send Remittances Source: Own elaboration. Once the cards are used at the POS or ATM, the values of purchases and withdrawals made goes to the clearing house for credit and debit cards, generating a liability to the country’s International Cards Administrator. This position is settled by means of the ACs in SAPDI with the issuing bank or the international card seller. The issuer may increase the funds in the debit card account, pay the funds spent with the credit card or reload the prepaid card, periodically, in such a way that the beneficiary maintains access to the funds balances. 6.7. OTHER SYSTEMS AND CHANNELS Besides the channels typically used by the institutions rendering international remittance services, there are other mechanisms that allow the emigrants to transfer funds towards their home countries, such as the messengers or sending the funds through relatives or friends, or even the act of carrying the remittances personally during the visits migrants make to their countries during the holidays. Almost all mechanisms are based on the use of cash as a basis for remittances. The market and mechanisms to transport cash described above are expensive, especially due to the costs inherent to the exchange of currencies and transportation itself, making this channel to be considered as of little usage. In all cases, the issuer delivers the money to another person that may be a messenger, a relative or friend. Likewise, the sender could carry it himself to his country of origin. Once the currencies enter the country, they are delivered to the beneficiaries who should exchange them into local currency. This exchange of currency can only be conducted by means of the ACs, that exchange the currency at BCH based on the stated in the Regulation for the Public Trading of Foreign Currencies in the Exchange Market. December 2007 53 Remittances Programme 7. COSTS, TIME AND ACCESS In general, remittances represent an important source of funds for developing countries, and become a multiplying factor in the economy as they encourage internal demand extending the purchasing power of the families benefited from them. Therefore, it is important to encourage the wider acceptance of net funds, a fact that necessarily leads to the analysis of costs structures. Additionally, aspects such as access and timing necessary for the beneficiaries to dispose of their remittances are factors of hidden costs that should also be assessed and taken into consideration. 7.1. THE COST OF REMITTANCES Transaction costs of remittances are related to the number of agents involved in the transfer chain and the eventual payment of the wire transfer. The total cost to the consumer is compound by an explicit cost: commissions and other implicit costs related to the exchange differential. The explicit cost per remittance commissions are imposed by the remittance issuing entities abroad (MTOs and their agents) and, only in some cases, the paying entities, especially when they have receiving offices abroad. In the Honduran scenario, remittances may be paid in Lempiras or foreign currency. For the latter, there is no exchange differential, since the remittance is paid in the currency of origin and, therefore, their costs include only the commission. In this connection, the commission charged in the place of origin may be shared with the remittance payer, depending on the agreement between them. Usually, the lowest percentage corresponds to payers at the remittance destination, accounting for 8% to 30% of the total commission paid. In connection with remittances paid in Lempiras, disbursing institutions make payment at the reference exchange rate determined by BCH applicable on the day when the transaction is conducted. Therefore, possible costs for the exchange differential were not detected, even more so considering that the stability of the exchange rate in Honduras in the last few years does not allow or costs in this connection, even in those cases when the remittance is paid several days after it was sent. 7.2. COMMISSION CHARGES In the Honduran case, the level of commissions collected depends on factors such as the remittance country of origin, its value and the type of transmission agents participating in the reception, transmission and payment chain. In general, based on the information from the remittance companies, the costs for sending remittances from US $1 to US $100 vary from 8% to 14%. For amounts up to US $300, commissions charged range from 3.3% to 6.0%, and for higher amounts, the commission diminishes from 2.4% to 6.9%. In general, the higher costs are registered for remittances conducted by means of MTOs when they are paid in proprietary offices in Honduras, such cost reaching an average of 11.66% for a typical 54 December 2007 Honduras Report remittance in the amount of US $300. On the other hand, commissions for remittances paid by banks vary between 8.00% and 11.66% depending on their origin. It is important to mention that when the bank has agreements negotiated with MTOs, costs are higher than in those cases when the bank has correspondent agreements with other banks, or when it uses its own offices abroad to collect the remittances. On the other hand, Exchange Bureaus paying remittances in Honduras register costs varying from 5% to 9%13, commission that also depends on the agent collecting the remittances abroad. Finally, Cooperative Associations paying remittances affiliated with one of their federation networks, would have lower costs, since the collection abroad is conducted through entities related to the Cooperative movement, with costs ranging from 3.33% to 11.66%, in this last case when their agreements include MTOs as collectors of remittances abroad. Chart 11. Evolution of Commissions Collected by Remittance Issuers Agent Minimum Maximum MTOs 11.99% 12.95% Commercial Banks 8.0% 11.66% Exchange Bureaus 5.0% 9.0% 3.33% 11.66% Cooperative Associations Source: Own Elaboration. In general, the commission is determined at the point of origin. Therefore, in regards to domestic payers, costs are similar if working with the same collectors. Derived from the foregoing, from the perspective of local payers, costs of remittances will depend on the type of agreements and the entities with which they conduct their business abroad to collect the remittances. 7.3. EXCHANGE RATE DIFFERENTIAL The exchange rate differential is the difference between the exchange rate received by the agents where the remittance transaction is conducted and the one that would be received by other alternative exchange agents. In the Honduran case, this is the difference between the official exchange rate of the authorized exchange agents and the rate offered in the non-official market or by agents that are not subject to supervision. As mentioned above, the bi-monetary character of the Honduran economy, as well as the stability of the exchange rate, make the exchange rate differential to be insignificant in the total cost of remittances. Indeed, the nominal exchange rate grew by an average rate of 16.4% over the period 1991-96 and by 4.7% in 1997-2004, but with depreciation of only 1.4% in 2005 and experiencing no further changes up to mid-2006. The foregoing evidences little change of this index, mostly due to the extraordinary income of remittances that has allowed a relative stability of the Lempira within the last few years. 13 Information published on the Internet. December 2007 55 Remittances Programme According to the BCH, the stability in the last two years in the nominal exchange rate has promoted a reduction in the margin between the official exchange rate and that of the non-official one. To such an extent that for some months of 2007, the rate in the non-official market was lower than the official market level. Graph 34. Evolution of the Monthly Exchange Rate US Dollar-Lempiras Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). The stability of the exchange rate and the practice of institutional paying agents of always using the BCH-s reference rate for remittance payments allow one to conclude that, at least at present, the exchange differential is not relevant to remittance receivers in Honduras. Therefore, the trading for remittance payments between local payers and collectors abroad are focused on the distribution of commissions, which is the same for each collector abroad, independently from the paying entity in Honduras. The determination of this is thus out of the reach of local payers, who must adhere to the commissions imposed by their partners abroad. The stability of the exchange rate and the lack of control over commissions by Honduran paying agents also force market participants to constantly look for alliances with remittance entities with lower cost abroad, as a way to improve their position in the local market. 7.4. TAX COSTS There are no specific taxes levied over remittances arriving or leaving Honduras. 7.5. ACCESS COSTS An important cost for remittance receivers, and one that is not always acknowledged, is generated from deficiencies in the access locations where these funds are settled. In the Honduran case, due to the great participation by different institutions in remittance payments, beneficiaries have many locations to pick up their remittances. 56 December 2007 Honduras Report The Honduran financial sector includes banks, savings and credit associations and Exchange Bureaus, these have infrastructure and coverage all over the country. This allows RSPs to offer access points in more than 561 offices and a shared ATMs network representing in total 1,338 points of immediate access to remittance beneficiaries. In this connection, the number of offices and agencies of commercial banks afford access for many remittance receivers, for them not only to enjoy payment of the remittances received, but also to access more financial services in these bank branches. This wide access offered by the system has encouraged reduction in remittance reception costs, because beneficiaries do not need to travel to distant locations to collect the funds sent by their relatives in other countries. Chart 12. Access Points for Reception of Remittances in Honduras Number of Offices and ATMs per Type of Institution Institution Branches Agencies No. of total offices ATMs(a) Commercial Banks Banco Atlántida, S.A. 16 87 103 101 Banco de Occidente, S.A. 8 96 104 102 Banco de Los Trabajadores, S.A. 7 17 24 8 Banco Mercantil, S.A. BAMER 1 46 47 90 Banco Hondureño del Café, S.A. BANHCAFE 1 33 34 300 Banco del País, S.A. BANPAIS 2 49 51 132 Banco Financiera Comercial Hondureña, S.A. FICOHSA 1 32 33 300 Banco de América Central Honduras, S.A. BAC/CREDOMATIC 1 27 28 106 HSBC (Antes Banco Grupo el Ahorro Hondureño, S.A. BGA) 2 44 46 151 2 24 26 48 41 455 496 1338 21 n.a. Roble Viejo, S.A. 1 n.a. Corporación de Inversiones Nacionales, S.A. COIN S.A. 2 n.a. 41 n.a. 65 n.a. 561 1338 FICENSA Total Access Points in Banks Exchange Bureaus Divisas Corporativas, S.A. DICORP Servigiros, S.A. Total Access Points of Exchange Bureaus Total Institutions, Offices Source: Own elaboration based on entities public information. Note: The number of ATMs includes Drive-through Teller Machines, the number of offices includes local and external agencies as well as counters. (a) “Others” mainly include Drive-through Teller Machines and ATMs. In connection with the ATM network, there are more than 1,300 access points around the country supported by the network of BANET, the network of ATMs in Honduras, made up by: Red Interactiva, Banred24, Unibanc and Red Total. Therefore, access for remittances beneficiaries in Honduras is favored by this connection between networks, which is also used by commercial banks acting as access points for the agencies sending remittances as Western Union. December 2007 57 Remittances Programme Chart 13. MTOs: Access Points by Type of Institution Type of Institution Number of Acces Points Commercial Banks 71 Exchange Bureaus 6 Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit 13 Proprietary 11 Source: Own Elaboration. The RSPs abroad have not only taken advantage of the infrastructure of commercial banks and, to a lesser extent, Exchange Bureaus, but have also used the Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit as a channel to reach remittance beneficiaries, institutions with a broad presence in Honduras. In this connection, the existence of one of the federation made up by more than 90 Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit has facilitated remittance payments in locations where no commercial banks exist, improving even more the costs related to the access of remittance reception points and the cross-sale of other financial products that may be of interest to remittance beneficiaries. For example, the Federation of Cooperative Associations has developed a product called “UniRemesas” that allows remittance beneficiaries not only to have access to the funds received but also enables access to other products such as housing and consumer credit. Notwithstanding that the participation in the market of this type of entities is even smaller than commercial banks or Exchange Bureaus, a sustainable growth is forecasted in the future, since the profile of remittance receivers is similar to that one of the Cooperative Association partners. 7.6. COST, TIME AND ACCESS TO NON-INSTITUTIONAL CHANNELS The remittance market by means of non-institutional channels such as messengers and cash transportation of travelers imply different costs related mainly with the time it takes for them to pay the remittance and the risk associated to these kinds of channels. These kinds of channels are very limited since they can not be found anywhere and depend on the communication networks among the emigrant’s community. The usage cost of the messengers to transport remittances in cash is higher than costs in the formal market making it less attractive to the user and it is translated into a mainly formal market where remittances sent by means of banks, Exchange Bureaus and MTOs reach 96% of the total. In general, these informal channels, due to the dominance of the formal channels and their failure to diminish costs, are opting to change their business, traditionally oriented to send remittances in cash toward the transport of remittances in kind, by carrying goods and merchandise from Honduras to emigrants abroad. 58 December 2007 Honduras Report 8. MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY 8.1. RESPONSIBILITY AND COORDINATION The Central Bank of Honduras is responsible for the measurement and disclosure of the information related to remittances. The Law confers on BCH the right to obtain information from the Authorized Exchange Agents, as well as from other public authorities. This information necessary to carry out the statistics compilations about remittance flows. In this case, BCH has full authority and strength to compile this data, and it can make any changes it considers as pertinent, based on its measurement methodologies. The Honduran authorities have reinforced their capacity to control and monitor the system with the enactment of new laws and regulations applicable to market agents, especially those belonging to the financial system. Decrees No. 106/2004, 129/2004, 45/2001 and 111/2004 approve the reforms to the Law on the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies, the Financial System, the Anti-money Laundering and the Banco Central de Honduras law, making up the new legal framework regulating the financial sector. These amendments determine the role of each one of the control, supervision and surveillance authorities, as well as the procedures and obligations of participants in the exchange market related, whether directly or indirectly, with the remittance market. Therefore, all transactions conducted in the Honduran exchange market, including the sending and reception of remittances, are subject to control and regulations of the BCH and other authorities, and bind all Authorized Exchange Agents to prepare and send reports in the formats and times defined by the authorities. Likewise, the legal framework determines that only ACs are authorized to purchase and sell foreign currencies in the country, both in cash and as checks or any other instrument that may exist in the country, and it obligates them to report all these operations to the BCH International Department where figures are compiled to determine the flow of remittances into the country. However, there are other participants in the remittance market that are not currently subject to this regulation, as they are not considered as Exchange Agents and therefore, have no access to the BCH system to conduct currency exchanges. These agents should exchange currencies by means of ACs, and it is then when their movements are recorded and added up to the figures related to remittances. Those “pocket remittances” paid in foreign currency that are not recorded by the currency exchange system are estimated based on the surveys conducted by BCH and the Statistics National Institute (INE), as well as the remittances in kind. In order to define remittances, BCH follows the IMF MBP5 recommendations: Remittances from workers consist of current transfers made by emigrants working in another economy where they are considered as residents. Therefore, an emigrant is someone traveling to another economy and who stays, or is estimated for him/her to be there, for a year or more. 8.2. MEASUREMENT BY CHANNELS In Honduras, most remittances flow through institutional channels (close to 96%). BCH has a wide coverage of the records registering these flows. Among the institutional channels, it is possible to December 2007 59 Remittances Programme distinguish those recorded, providing information in a formal manner within the terms and forms required by BCH and making up the ACs14, as well as those non-registered institutions, such as MTOs15 that submit a voluntary report. As they are not considered as ACs, BCH cannot force them to report information about their transactions on a regular basis. As can be noted in the following chart, it is possible to divide remittances in two big groups: Institutional and Non-Institutional, also called “Informal” in some cases. By definition, the former flow through registered financial institutional channels or outside the BCH exchange system, whereas the informal ones correspond to all other channels16. Only a small part of remittances flowing in formal channels are not easily measured, whereas remittances flowing by means of informal channels are impossible to measure in an accurate manner. Therefore, BCH uses indirect methods, such as surveys conducted by the Central Bank staff or INE to estimate these flows. Chart 14. Transmission and payment of remittances in Honduras, per channel Institutional Registered Banks and Associations of Savings and Credit Data Source Report Frequency Item Coverage*/Share in Total No registered CC Exchange Agents Exchange Agents Exchange Balance Daily ATM MTO’s Exchange Balance n.a. By means of Exchange Agentes Daily n.a. Daily 85.5% Cash Postal Instruments Others Surveys Surveys conducted at conducted at Household Household EPHPM (2006) EPHPM (2006) All their operationsare classified as Remittances Remittamces Remittances Remittances Remittances 100% Informal 100% 100% n.a. 9.5% Informal flows included Flows included in the AC’s reports n.a. n.a n.a n.a n.a 4% pursuant to the surveys conducted in Households by BCH and INE Source: Own Elaboration. As mentioned above, the results suggest that approximately 4% of family remittances arrive through different means than those offered by the institutional channels. Therefore, 4% approximately is added to the data of the Balance of Payments as informal flows which are not directly measurable. 14 Including banks, Associations of Savings and Credit and Exchange Bureaus remitting information on the purchase-sale foreign currency formats that make up the main source of information about remittances. 15 Transactions of MTOs, those that are not conducted by means of ACs as agents, are included in the ACs’ reports with which MTOs conduct their purchase-sale of foreign currencies transactions. 16 This distinction does not imply the existence of accurate methods to measure all flows, neither institutional nor informal ones. For instance, as discussed later, remittances passing through ATMs that clearly flow by means of institutional channels, are beyond measurement. On other hand, remittances sent by courier (not only postal checks but also money orders or in envelopes) are classified as informal since the postal service is not considered as an AC. 60 December 2007 Honduras Report The Honduran measurement system is based in the exchange control system for statistical compilation of remittances, which is complemented with data from surveys conducted by INE and BCH. 8.3. REGISTERED INSTITUTIONAL BCH keeps control over the exchange market, forcing all other agents that may want to purchase or sell foreign currencies to be registered and authorized by the Central Bank. Similarly, the regulation establishes limits for the holding of foreign currencies, any foreign currency that exchange agents may hold over those limits should be sold to BCH. Despite the foregoing, individuals and business entities may conduct transactions in foreign currencies in the country, and therefore, in many cases people keep foreign currencies in cash. However, if they want to change such funds into Lempiras, the only way for them to exchange them is to go to Exchange Agents authorized by the BCH, who are in turn bound to sell them to BCH only. Within this framework, remittances arriving in foreign currency and paid in Lempiras should necessarily be changed by one of these ACs through the BCH. Notwithstanding the channel through which foreign currency arrives, whether formal or informal, they must be changed into Lempiras to be used inside the country. Therefore, the exchange process chain will end up going through one of the ACs. Derived from the above, the remittance statistical compilation system in Honduras is based on the control and mechanisms developed for the follow-up provided to transactions conducted by ACs. Reports of Authorized Exchange Agents The measurement system of exchange operations conducted by ACs, including sending and reception of remittances, involves all authorized institutions such as exchange agents which participate in SAPDI, these include banks, associations of savings and credit and Exchange Bureaus. With regards to remittances, Exchange Bureaus and banks are the most relevant ones. The exchange operations measurement system is based on the “formats” (specific forms) to be filled in by the ACs per individual transaction of purchase or sale of currencies, including family remittances sent or received. Originally, those “formats” were created to record exchange transactions with the aim to estimate the Balance of Payments and record all transactions entailing income and outflow or foreign currency that take place in the country. To date, this is the only source to gather direct information about the flows of remittances conducted in a specific period, and 4% is added considering the remittances going through informal channels. For this reason, data in the Balance of Exchange and the Balance of Payments accounts show similar figures. December 2007 61 Remittances Programme Figure 8. Foreign Currency Sale Form %DQFR&HQWUDOGH+RQGXUDV 'HSDUWDPHQWR,QWHUQDFLRQDO 9(17$'(',9,6$6 $*(17(&$0%,$5,2BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB&2035$'25BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3$Ë6'('(67,12'(/$',9,6$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB /8*$5BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &255(2(/(&7521,&2BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 75$16)(5(1&,$ $&7,9,'$'(&21Ï0,&$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7,32'(3(5621$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 0(',26'(3$*2 ()(&7,92 571R&,R&5R3$6$3257(BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB )(&+$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 021('$ &+(48( 7,32'(&$0%,2 02172 9$/25(1/(03,5$6 27526 '(67,12'(/$',9,6$ ,03257$&,21(6 %,(1(6 5(75,%8&,Ï1$/$,19(56,Ï1 ,03'(0(5&$1325()(&78$5&217$'2 87,/,'$'(6<',9,'(1'26325,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$ 6(&725%$1&$5,2 ,03'(0(5&$1&,$6()(&78$'$6&5(',72 6(&72535,9$'2 %,(1(6*(1(5$/(6 0$48,1$5,$<(48,32 0$48,1$5,$<(48,32 ,168026 ,168026 352'8&7267(50,1$'26 6(&7253Ò%/,&2 %,(1(6*(1(5$/(6 352'8&7267(50,1$'26 ,17(5(6(662%5(%2126<3$*$5e6325,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ %$1&2&(175$/ *2%,(512&(175$/ 352&(6<0$48,/$'2 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 352&(6<0$48,/$'2 6(&725%$1&$5,2 0$48,1$5,$<(48,32 ,168026 0$48,1$5,$<(48,32 ,168026 352'8&7267(50,1$'26 352'8&7267(50,1$'26 6(&72535,9$'2 ,17(5(6(662%5(37026'(3Ï6,726<&5(',726&20(5&,$/(6275$,19(56,Ï1 %$1&2&(175$/ *2%,(512&(175$/ 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 6(&725%$1&$5,2 6(59,&,26 6(&72535,9$'2 75$163257( 75$16)(5(1&,$6&255,(17(6 $e5(2 0$5Ë7,02 7(55(675( 3$6$-(526 3$6$-(526 3$6$-(526 &$5*$ &$5*$ &$5*$ 27526 27526 27526 785,602 1(*2&,26 5(0(6$6)$0,/,$5(6 &$3,7$/6(&72535,9$'2 (678',26 6$/8' &2081,&$&,21(6 '(67,12,17(512 '(67,12(;7(512 ,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1(/(;7(5,25 '(6,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1+21'85$6 275$66$/,'$6'(&$3,7$/ $0257,=$&,Ï135e67$026 ,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ 7(/(&2081,&$&,21(6 '21$&,21(635,9$'$6 029,0,(1726'(&$3,7$/<),1$1&,(526 *$6726'(9,$-(52 3267$/(6<&255(26 '21$&,21(62),&,$/(6 &$3,7$/6(&725%$1&$5,2 6(59,&,26'(&216758&&,Ï1(,1*(1,(5Ë$ 6(*85265($6(*8526 6(*8526'(9,'$<)21'26'(3(16,21(6 62%5(0(5&$'(5Ë$6)/(7(6 5($6(*8526 6(59,&,26),1$1&,(526&20,6,21(6 6(59,&,26'(,1)250È7,&$(,1)250$&,Ï1 5(*$/,$6<'(5(&+26'(/,&(1&,$)5$148,&,$6 6(59,&,26(035(6$5,$/(6 ,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1(/(;7(5,25 '(6,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1+21'85$6 275$66$/,'$6'(&$3,7$/ $0257,=$&,Ï135e67$026 ,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ &$'' ,19(56,21(62%/,*$725,$6 &$3,7$/6(&7253Ò%/,&2 %$1&2&(175$/ *2%,(512&(175$/ 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 'HVWLQDGRDXVRVLQWHUQRV&XHQWD'yODU '(&2035$9(17$5(35(6(17$&,21(6 $55(1'$0,(172<(;3/27$&,Ï1 352)(6,21$/(6<7e&1,&26 9(17$6$/%$1&2&(175$/ 9(17$6$/6,67(0$),1$1&,(52 38%/,&,'$'(,19(67,*$&,Ï1'(0(5&$'2<(1&8(67$ 275266(59,&,26 9(17$6&255,(17(6 *,526 %,//(7(6 75$16)(5(1&,$6 6(59,&,263(5621$/(6&8/785$/(6<5(&5($7,926 $8',29,68$/(6<&21(;26 6$/8'(16(f$1=$<27526 75$16$&&,21(62),&,$/(6 (0%$-$'$6<&2168/$'26 25*$1,6026,17(51$&,21$/(6 *$67263(5621$/(6'(',3/20È7,&26 275266(59,&,26 5(17$ 75$6/$'2'((;&('(17(6 275$6',60,18&,21(6 $18/$&,Ï1*,526(;75$9,$'26 75$16)(5(1&,$6(175(68&856$/(6 &2175$3$57,'$6 75$16)(5(1&,$6(175(&255(63216$/(6 3$*2(1'(;7(512&21(;3257$&,21(6 3$*2$17,&,326&21(;3257$&,21(6 27526 5(7,526(1021('$(;75$1-(5$'(',6321,%,/,'$',10(',$7$ 5(081(5$&,Ï1'((03/($'26 ),50$'(/&2035$'25 5(3$75,$&,Ï1'(',9,6$325(;3257$&,Ï1'(0$48,/$ ,03257$&,Ï1'(%,(1(6*(1(5$/(6 ,03257$&,Ï1'(%,(1(6'(0$48,/$ 5(0(6$6)$0,/,$5(6 275268626 (1&$-(/(*$/ ),50$(03/($'2'(/$*(17(&$0%,$5,2 Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). 62 December 2007 Honduras Report Figure 9. Foreign Currency Buy Form %DQFR&HQWUDOGH+RQGXUDV 'HSDUWDPHQWR,QWHUQDFLRQDO &2035$'(',9,6$6 $*(17(&$0%,$5,2BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB9(1'('25BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 571R&,R&5R3$6$3257(BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3$Ë6'(352&('(1&,$'(/$',9,6$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB/8*$5BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &255(2(/(&7521,&2BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB )(&+$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB$&7,9,'$'(&21Ï0,&$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7,32'(3(5621$BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 0(',26'(3$*2 ()(&7,92 75$16)(5(1&,$ 021('$ &+(48( 7,32'(&$0%,2 02172 9$/25(1/(03,5$6 27526 25,*(1'(/$',9,6$ (;3257$&,21(6 %,(1(6 5(75,%8&,Ï1'(/$,19(56,Ï1 ([SRUWGH0HUFDQFtDV*HQHUDOHV $QWLFLSRVSRU([SRUWDFLyQ 87,/,'$'(6<',9,'(1'26325,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$ 6(&725%$1&$5,2 6(&72535,9$'2 &$)e &$)e %$1$126 %$1$126 0$'(5$ 0$'(5$ 0,1(5$/(6 0,1(5$/(6 0(/21<6$1',$ 0(/21<6$1',$ 3,f$ 3,f$ %$1&2&(175$/ &$0$521 &$0$521 *2%,(512&(175$/ /$1*267$ /$1*267$ 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 7,/$3,$ 7,/$3,$ 6(&725%$1&$5,2 $=Ò&$5 $=Ò&$5 7$%$&2 7$%$&2 $&(,7(69(*(7$/(6 $&(,7(69(*(7$/(6 27526$*5Ë&2/$6 27526$*5Ë&2/$6 27526352'8&726 27526352'8&726 3URFHVDPLHQWR\0DTXLODGR 6(&7253Ò%/,&2 ,17(5(6(662%5(%2126<3$*$5e6325,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ 6(&72535,9$'2 ,17(5(6(662%5(37026'(3Ï6,726<&5e',726&20(5&,$/(6275$,19(56,Ï1 %$1&2&(175$/ *2%,(512&(175$/ 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 5HH[SRUWDFLRQHV 6(&725%$1&$5,2 7(;7,/ 6(&72535,9$'2 $&8Ë&2/$ 7$%$&$/(5$ 75$16)(5(1&,$6&255,(17(6 0$18)$&785$6'(0$'(5$ (/(&7521,&$ $8720275,= '21$&,21(62),&,$/(6 275$60$18)$&785$6 '21$&,21(635,9$'$6 5(0(6$6)$0,/,$5(6 6(59,&,26 $e5(2 029,0,(1726'(&$3,7$/<),1$1&,(526 75$163257( 0$5Ë7,02 7(55(675( &$3,7$/6(&72535,9$'2 25,*(1,17(512 25,*(1(;7(512 3$6$-(526 3$6$-(526 3$6$-(526 &$5*$ &$5*$ &$5*$ '(6,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1(/(;7(5,25 27526 27526 27526 ,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1+21'85$6 275$6(175$'$6'(&$3,7$/ '(6(0%2/6235e67$026 ,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ *$6726'(9,$-(52 785,602 1(*2&,26 &$3,7$/6(&725%$1&$5,2 (678',26 6$/8' &2081,&$&,21(6 3267$/(6<&255(26 7(/(&2081,&$&,21(6 6(59,&,26'(&216758&&,Ï1(,1*(1,(5Ë$ 6(*85265($6(*8526 '(6,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1(/(;7(5,25 ,19(56,Ï1',5(&7$(1+21'85$6 275$6(175$'$6'(&$3,7$/ '(6(0%2/6235e67$026 ,19(56,Ï1'(&$57(5$ &$'' ,19(56,21(62%/,*$725,$6 &$3,7$/6(&7253Ò%/,&2 6(*8526'(9,'$<)21'26'(3(16,21(6 %$1&2&(175$/ 62%5(0(5&$'(5Ë$6)/(7(6 *2%,(512&(175$/ 27526(&7253Ò%/,&2 5($6(*8526 6(59,&,26),1$1&,(526&20,6,21(6 6(59,&,26'(,1)250È7,&$(,1)250$&,Ï1 5(*$/Ë$6<'(5(&+26'(/,&(1&,$)5$148,&,$6 3URYLHQHGHUHWLURGHODFXHQWD'HSyVLWRVHQ'yODUHVGH'LVSRQLELOLGDG,QPHGLDWD &2035$6$/6,67(0$),1$1&,(52 &2035$6$/%$1&2&(175$/ 6(59,&,26(035(6$5,$/(6 &2035$6&255,(17(6 '(&2035$9(17$5(35(6(17$&,21(6 $55(1'$0,(172<(;3/27$&,Ï1 &+(48(6 352)(6,21$/(6<7e&1,&26 %,//(7(6 38%/,&,'$'(,19(67,*$&,Ï1'(0(5&$'2<(1&8(67$ 75$16)(5(1&,$6 275266(59,&,26 27526$80(1726 6(59,&,263(5621$/(6&8/785$/(6<5(&5($7,926 $18/$&,Ï1*,526(;75$9,$'26 $8',29,68$/(6<&21(;26 75$16)(5(1&,$6(175(68&856$/(6 6$/8'(16(f$1=$<27526 &2175$3$57,'$6 75$16)(5(1&,$6(175(&255(63216$/(6 75$16$&&,21(62),&,$/(6 (;3257$&,21(63$*2$17,&,326 27526 (0%$-$'$6<&2168/$'26 (;3257$&,21(63$*2(1'(;7(512 25*$1,6026,17(51$&,21$/(6 *$67263(5621$/(6'(',3/20È7,&26 '(3Ï6,726(1021('$(;75$1-(5$'(',6321,%,/,'$',10(',$7$ 275266(59,&,26 5(&856261$&,21$/(62)21'26,17(5126 5(17$ 5(0(6$6)$0,/,$5(6 (1&$-(/(*$/ 5(081(5$&,Ï1'((03/($'26 ),50$'(/9(1'('25 (;3257$&,Ï1'(%,(1(6'(0$48,/$ 275$6)8(17(6(;7(51$6 ),50$(03/($'2'(/$*(17(&$0%,$5,2 Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). December 2007 63 Remittances Programme When an ACs receives a remittance order, upon paying it or making the deposit of the money into the beneficiary’s account in Lempiras, it fills in one of the “formats” with code 03-03. If the remittance is paid out or deposited in an account in US dollars, the AC must write code 08 03, thus creating the records to be sent over to the BCH. Entities paying remittances which are not ACs, should obtain US dollars from an AC when selling them. The AC then fills in a “format” accounting for the sale, and that is when the item for which a family remittance is sent abroad is defined. On the other hand, if an individual received a remittance in cash, for instance in US dollars, and wants to exchange them for Lempiras, he/she should go to an AC and, upon exchanging the money, the AC will fill in a “format” and will record the transaction under item 03-03, making sure the person conducting the transaction confirms that the origin of such foreign currency is a family remittance. In general, remittances that arrive in Honduras and are paid in Lempiras are registered by means of the foreign currency formats. Those transactions paid in foreign currency will be recorded upon being exchanged into Lempiras or when they are deposited in foreign currency accounts. Due to the low acceptance of foreign currency in every day transactions, and due to the fact that most of the remittances are used for consumption purposes, eventually all of them will be exchanged into Lempiras and therefore, recorded in the system. The reporting “forms” were designed with the aim to gather information about different types of transactions in the foreign currency market, among which remittances are only one fraction thereof, but are part of the statistical chart subject to tabulation and analysis. The form is to be filled with at least with the following data about the remittance: • Name of the Exchange Agent. • Foreign currency country of origin. • Department in Honduras. • Means of payment. • The original currency, exchange rate applied and the amount payable in Lempiras. • Origin or destination of the currency (specifying if they are remittances or another type of transaction). As mentioned above, the format identifies as family remittances those transactions entailing foreign currency that are recorded under code 03-03 and under code 02-01 for payment of employees, both in the form used to record foreign currency purchase or sale transactions. In the reports resulting from these figures originated from the foreign currency purchase or sale forms, it is possible to observe that many transactions correspond to typical remittances average amounts (USD 300 to USD 500). However, there are also much higher figures corresponding to consolidated remittance transactions conducted by some paying agents which are exchanged into Lempiras globally with 64 December 2007 Honduras Report the AC. In these cases, BCH conducts a thorough revision of these types of uncommon transactions, to make sure they are properly recorded as remittances. For such purposes, the Central Bank asks the remittance payers, besides filling in the report form to BCH, to also fill in individual receipts of the paid remittances, in order to prove that the aggregated data reported by ACs correspond to the sum of individual figures of each receipt paid by entities different from the ACs. There are not upper or lower thresholds for the filling in and submission of individual forms. Therefore, the system is structured to capture all remittance transactions passing through institutions (ACs), except for disbursements from ATMs and POSs networks. Other remittance payment forms apart from cash, such as deposits into accounts, are included in statistical records as well: the “form” is necessarily filled in for the remittances to be deposited. Therefore, the system records the remittances notwithstanding the means of payment. 8.4. NON-REGISTERED INSTITUTIONAL A certain portion of remittances is handled by MTOs. Most of these entities work under negotiated agreements with domestic agents in charge of disbursing these transactions. However, some part of the MTOs remittances is paid directly by a proprietary office of the MTO itself, which is not an AC. Therefore, these are institutional payments made by a non-registered entity. Similarly, the Cooperative Associations of Savings and Credit are institutional payers, as well as other institutions that also make payments based on agreements negotiated with other remittance collecting entities abroad. These entities, despite having a license to operate in Honduras, are not part of the Authorized Exchange Agents and therefore, could also be considered as non-registered remittance payment entities. In connection with disbursements made by means of ATMs or POS through foreign cards that to some extent constitute remittance transactions, these are conducted by means of International Card Administrators (ATI) that assume the responsibility over the positions and final settlement of transactions conducted by means of this type of cards. It is important to observe at this point that the sense of “registered” here refers to the registration as an entity authorized within the exchange market, since ATIs are registered and authorized to conduct their transactions. However, they are not included in the universe of entities registered with the Central Bank as ACs and therefore, are included in this report as non-registered entities. Reports of MTOs (Money Transmitting Operators) Since MTOs and other paying entities are not authorized as ACs by the BCH, these institutions are not required to fill in and submit the individual formats per foreign currency exchange transaction or remittance payment in local currency. However, when these entities need to exchange foreign currency into Lempiras, they should do it with an AC and when that happens, the AC fills in a “form” to register the operation. In this exchange transaction, neither the MTO nor the AC conduct transactions on an individual basis, but in a consolidated manner, as a group of remittance operations December 2007 65 Remittances Programme whether payable or receivable, and it is until such moment when the currency exchange actually takes place that the transaction is reported as a remittance. Therefore, the amount seems to be much larger than the typical remittance operation. For that reason, BCH requires that entities paying remittances record every transaction so the consolidated data reported by ACs can be matched ex-post with the information from remittance receipts, also sent to BCH. International Card Administrators The remittances received by means of prepaid cards 17 and others paid through ATMs or spent at POSs, which are part of the formal channels, are not identified by the recording system. Currently, family remittances transferred by means of prepaid cards (conceptually included in the household surveys as part of remittances received through informal means) do not seem to represent a big part of the total flows, but they will surely increase in years ahead. At present, however, data stored in such cards is not enough to distinguish among several types of transactions, among which, only a small part of them may be personal remittances. Other market innovations, such as remittances sent by means of cell phones abroad, which are another prepayment means going through known channels that are analytically similar, are also beyond recording. Chart 15. Measurement of Remittances Conducted by Means of International Cards in ATMs and POSs Even though the magnetic bands in debit, credit or prepayment cards would allow, the information therein does not distinguish if a withdrawal made from an ATM indicates a remittance or not. Based on the information obtained from most of the companies owning ATM networks, it is known that the stripes have space and capacity to store information that would allow to distinguish remittances from other types of usage (a). However, the data currently stored in tracks 1, 2 and 3 available to store data, does not provide a lot of information about the exact type of the account supporting such cards. The situation gets even more complicated as neither the ID of the card issuing bank nor the primary account number allocated to the card or the signs of a collective account with individual sub-accounts of purchasers of such cards are useful to distinguish one type of cash withdrawal from the other. Therefore, in connection with the remittances settled by means of prepaid cards, the only alternative today is to base the estimations on household surveys. On the other hand, it seems unlikely that the prepaid cards will reach great importance in the near future. Despite the speed and attractiveness of this mechanism from the technical point of view, the costs and charges in some cases are significant and may hinder the initial enthusiasm towards the usage of this method as a way to realize remittances. (b) Source: Own Elaboration. For example, it is probable that a prepaid card purchased in the US and used in a Latin American country corresponds to a family remittance and not to a withdrawal of Money from the account of a tourist or others. (a) Typically for example, there are charges to purchase one or two cards, also to “load” or “reload” the card’s value. Also, there are additional charges for the issuance of statements of account, withdrawals and other transactions. In some cases, there are even monthly fees. Currently, there may even be charges are made if the card is not used within certain periods of time. These costs are related to the different actors taking part of the payment chain of these means, including the company selling the cards, the IMC company sponsoring the network, the bank keeping the accounts resulting from prepayments and obviously, the automatic teller machine network owners and managers. (b) 17 Stored Value Cards (SVC). 66 December 2007 Honduras Report 8.5. NON INSTITUTIONAL Remittances going through informal channels are estimated to be 6% out of the total: this has been determined based on the semi-annual surveys conducted by BCH in the Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula airports. These surveys include around 1000 participants per semester, many of whom have lived outside the country in the last few years and return during Christmas and other holidays to spend time with their families. On the other hand, the estimations based in household surveys conducted by INE were similar to those gathered by BCH staff, thus reinforcing the results found in studies conducted at the airports. Based on these surveys, the main non-institutional mechanisms to realize remittances are deliveries of cash, the post office, the usage of international cards and informal operators. Cash Remittances arriving in cash (usually US dollars) and exchanged into Lempiras through the ACs are added to the measurement of remittances when they are recorded by means of the foreign currency purchase and sale “forms” filled out by ACs. Depending on the place where the currency is exchanged, the report may not be accurate. For example, if the currency exchange is made directly by the beneficiary, the information gathered will be “first hand” and more reliable than if the beneficiary makes the exchange with another institution, different from an AC and then, this entity is the one conducting the aggregated exchange of currency for several transactions. In this last case, it could be difficult to define the exact origin of funds that are exchanged (remittances or others). Therefore, they will be allocated based on what the foreign currency seller defines, information that is not “first hand” and that could present some certainty issues. Some of these remittances may not be exchanged into Lempiras at all, at least upon receipt, and even if the exchange takes place afterwards, they escape the current recording method. Therefore, based on the evidence coming from households surveys conducted together with INE, BCH estimates this type of remittances and adds them up to the remittance general figure as an additional 6% to the total obtained from the surveys. Postal Instruments Although couriers were an important channel for the flow of remittances into Honduras in the past, their usage has diminished: remittances received by means of the postal office are very small, with no statistical relevance. As also happens in other countries, there are no mechanisms different from the surveys of remittance recipients that permit estimation of transactions conducted by means of checks or postal money orders included in the envelopes sent by mail. Information from the authorities suggests that the use of post-office orders, different from Money Orders is almost zero, but this does not mean that the use of the postal office with other means and instruments has disappeared entirely. However, the risk associated with this remittances transmission channel, compared to the efficiency, safety and diminishing costs of the formal mechanisms, explains the reasons why usage is less frequent. In any event, these remittances are estimated by means of the BCH surveys as part of the 6% mentioned above. December 2007 67 Remittances Programme 8.6. VALIDATION AND CONTRASTING In Honduras statistics about migration and the number of Honduran residents abroad is varied and the data reported by INE is sparse compared to the data available from other sources. This is why the statistics drafted based on this information are not reliable, neither for comparisons with figures gathered by other means, nor for the exchange system used by BCH. Today, the only comparison conducted from the information received is subject to verification of the information received by ACs documented by the “forms” that include the information received directly from MTOs and other institutions reporting the receipts of remittances paid. 8.7. TRENDS, PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES At present, BCH is analyzing the possibility of further improving the methodical arrangement of the data reports from the ACs and of including, as part of the universe of reporting entities, other agencies realizing remittances in the country, thus significantly improving the compilation methodology in regards to remittances. Likewise, the possibility of amending the formats used to document transactions is also under study, in order for them to broaden the information available and improve comprehension and analysis of the data related to remittances. 68 December 2007 Honduras Report 9. TRANSPARENCY AND THE PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION 9.1. OFFICIAL INFORMATION In Honduras, BCH is the official source of statistics on the Balance of Payments, of which international remittance flows are one component. In this connection, BCH staff publishes the information about current transfers in the Balance of Payments and the Balance of Exchange on a regular basis, as well as the results of the semi-annual survey conducted at the main airports. Likewise, BCH is the authority in charge of submitting public information to various international organizations, such as the IMF, for inclusion in the corresponding compilations and it is acknowledged as the only institution authorized to produce official information about remittance flows involving Honduras. BCH also makes public the methodology used in the gathering and estimation of the Balance of Payment data as part of its participation in the IMF’s General Data Dissemination Standards (GDDS18). BCH publishes a general description of the methodology in use and the sources of data used to calculate the information of the Balance of Payments and remittances. The information sent by BCH to IMF includes other types of credit and debit transfers which are even smaller, and this can be read in the detailed information published by the IMF. Methodological information is available in the GDDS section of the IMF website. Today, BCH and other entities such as INE and the Cancillería issue occasional and periodical publications about information related to remittances (costs, time, exchange rate and others), especially related to the airport surveys and surveys of households receiving remittances. This activity allows BCH staff to monitor the market on a constant basis, and to disseminate research results among the public and provides the necessary space to compare its findings and information with the rest of actors. However, this is consolidated information that does not allow consumers to assess the specific services of a particular actor. In this connection, there is neither a public nor private entity as of this date that offers information to the consumers that would allow them to select a particular remittance service. With regards to consumer protection, as mentioned in section 54 in BCH Law, the Central Bank, in coordination with the National Commission of Banks and Insurance Companies, are in charge of organizing and regulating the Payment Systems with the aim to protect the interests of financial and banking service users. In turn, the Consumer Protection Agency does not have a special unit or department specialized in receiving consumer complaints within the financial system or of any other type of remittance service providers. This role is performed by CNBS by means of the Client’s Defender, a unit in charge of investigating claims related to financial entities only. Additionally, some banks have created a specific position within their organizations that performs the informal role as Ombudsman in order to respond to the client’s claims. As of this day however, there is no dedicated service to hear the claims of clients who may be victims of non-supervised remittance services, and the only remedy for them is to file a claim with the Consumer Prosecutor Office. 18 General Data Dissemination Standards. December 2007 69 Remittances Programme 9.2. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE ACS As happens in other countries within the region, in Honduras transparency about the total cost of remittances being sent is not complete due to the practice of paying the beneficiary in local currency, Lempira, however, although remittances can be paid in foreign currency, the differences in applying the exchange rate are practically non-existent, and remittances paid in Lempiras are always paid using the reference exchange rate published by BCH. Exchange stability during the last few years allows neither frequent variations nor significant ones related to the reference exchange rate, which is applied to the payment of remittances and other types of payments nominated in foreign currencies. Therefore, there are no additional gains to payers related to a differential in the exchange rate. Nonetheless, there is no certainty if this exchange rate is disclosed to remittance senders abroad upon engaging remittance service providers to send funds into the country. The current legislation does not establish any obligation at all to RSPs to make transparent any information related to the remittances paid or collected, and it is not common practice among authorized exchange agents or other remittance payers in Honduras. The latter neither issues any type of publication on prices or commissions, nor discloses the characteristics of services provided, such as availability of locations to collect remittances or the time they take to settle payment. Some of the largest remittance service providers, such as the banks, have internal rules or similar practices to provide basic information to the consumers, about the transfer services, including the time that funds will take to reach Honduras and be made available. In most of cases, the agents act only as payment agents for other international MTOs or for other banks and no corresponding banks. Therefore, they are not acquainted with commissions collected at the origin or if the clients abroad know the exchange rate applied upon payment and other charges related to these remittance transfers. 70 December 2007 Honduras Report GLOSSARY The Information Improvement Program and Central Bank Procedures regarding Remittances, the objective of which is to improve and uniform the information and procedures of collection, gathering and presentation of remittance information from regional central banks has contributed with valuable technical documents for consultation in the remittance market field, within which, the “Glossary in Spanish and English” contains all the terminology related to such market. This glossary is available at: http://www.cemla-remesas.org There is a few terminology exclusive to the context of the Honduran remittance market and it is not included in the Glossary mentioned above. Authorized Exchange Agents – ACs Financial institutions authorized by the Central Bank of Honduras (BCH) to purchase and sell foreign currency. In Honduras, the financial institutions authorized to operate in the exchange market are commercial banks, Exchange Bureaus and associations of savings and credit which are enabled to deal in foreign currencies in the domestic territory. Authorized Exchange Agents can maintain a deposit account in foreign currency to conduct their transactions within the exchange market. Commercial Banks – CBs Financial institutions, whether domestic or foreign, supervised by the CNBS that act as financial intermediaries in a regular and systematic manner, thus conducting lending or investment transactions with funds obtained from the public as deposits, bonds, securities, loans and other obligations. Foreign Currency Purchase-Sale Form Document sent electronically to BCH where the Authorized Exchange Agent records foreign currency purchase or sale transactions, showing the origin or destination thereof, allowing to identify the type of transaction by means of a series of data required that classify the category per transaction. For instance, the purchase of foreign currency related to salaries is recorded in the item Income – Payment to Employees, and identifies income related to salaries received by residents derived from labor of a non-resident of the same country, including the income of seasonal workers in another country. Exchange Bureaus December 2007 Entities in the financial system, property of Honduran individuals with the sole purpose of purchase and sale foreign currencies in the non-bank market using notes, traveler checks, wire transfers and other payment instruments nominated in foreign currencies. 71 Remittances Programme Remittance Payment Receipts Form evidencing payment of remittances, issued by an entity which is not considered an Authorized Exchange Agent. Such format completes the process of reception of a remittance and shows the information related to the remittance issuer as well as its amount, payable only in Lempiras since this type of entities can not take part of the exchange market. RTN National Taxpayer’s ID FACACH Honduran Federation of Cooperative Savings and Loans Associations. 72 December 2007 Honduras Report ANNEX STATISTICAL TABLES A.1. Basic Statistics ............................................................................................................. 74 A.2. Population and Migration ............................................................................................ 75 A.3. Remittance Flows ........................................................................................................ 76 A.4. Remittance Characteristics ........................................................................................... 76 A.5. Remittance Recipients Characteristics .......................................................................... 77 A.6. Use of Remittances at Recipient Households ............................................................... 77 A.7. Remittance Service Providers ...................................................................................... 78 A.8. Remittance Payment Instruments ................................................................................. 78 A.9. Cost of Remittances Per Type of Issuer ........................................................................ 79 December 2007 73 Remittances Programme A.1. Basic Statistics (By the end of the year) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(a) 2007(b) GDP (USD millions) 7,861.7 8,255.4 8,869.1 9758.3 10,839.4 12,321.5 Net National Income (USD millions) 6,374.8 6,675.8 7,119.9 7,843.5 8,763.4 10,033.8 Final Household Consumption (USD millions) 5,727.7 6,041.5 6,517.7 7,314.0 8,285.3 9,620.0 National Consumer Price Index 125.1 134.7 145.7 158.5 167.4 179.0 End of year 16,923 17,748 18,632 18,895 18,895 18,895 Average 16,421 17,335 18,190 18,764 18,895 18,895 4,286.8 4,345.2 5,178.6 5,747.6 5,880.8 6,344.3 3,744.9 3,754.0 4,533.9 5,048.0 5,195.0 5,594.3 542.0 591.1 644.8 899.6 685.8 750.0 5,113.5 5,527.3 6,676.1 7,473.4 8,301.0 9,593.6 4,381.6 4,774.1 5,827.2 6,544.6 7,317.1 8,556.3 731.9 753.2 848.9 928.8 983.9 1,037.2 Total Net Current Transfers (USD millions) 846.3 991.2 1,265.3 1,895.1 2,450.3 2,821.8 Foreign Direct Investment (USD millions) 268.7 390.6 552.9 598.8 673.6 814.9 Reserve Claims (USD millions) -105.8 96.5 -51.4 -346.3 -310.0 108.6 Nominal Exchange Rate Exports (USD millions) Goods Services Imports (USD millions) Goods Services Source: National Accounts-Balance of Payments. Central Bank of Honduras. Reviewed according the results of the implementation of the Fifth Balance of Payment Manual and the System of National Accounts. (r) (a) Preliminary. (b) Estimated. 74 December 2007 Honduras Report A.2. Population and Migration (By the end of the year) 2002 2003 Total Population (thousands) 6,694,761 6,860,842 Economicaly Active Population (PEA) (thousands) 2,444,807 Working Age Population (PET) (thousands) Average Unemployment Rate Diary Minimun Salary by Ordinary Labour Day Minimun Salary Emigrants (thousands) Men women 2004 2005 2006(a) 2007(b) 7,028,389 7,197,303 7,367,021 7,537,952 2,556,484 2,592,187 2,851,283 2,811,812 2,860,866 4,806,513 4,985,045 5,126,456 5,382,995 5,551,251 5,680,998 3.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 3.1 3.1 63.8 69.9 76.7 84.2 92.0 100.8 1,913 2,098 2,302 2,525 2,760 3,025 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 730,000 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 513,920 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 216,080 n.a. United States of America n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 693,500 n.a. Canada n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 23,360 n.a. Spain n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8,760 n.a. Rest of the World n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 4,380 n.a. Inmigrants (thousands) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Source: Department of Labor and Social Security (Minimun Salary). Encuesta Permanente de Hogares de Propósitos Múltiples (INE). n.a.: not available. (a) Preliminary. (b) Estimated. December 2007 75 Remittances Programme A.3. Remittance Flows (By the end of the year) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(a) 2007(b) Total Remittance Income 765.3 842.3 1,138.0 1,775.8 2,328.6 2,561.4 Personal Remittances 765.3 842.3 1,138.0 1,775.8 2,328.6 2,561.4 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Net Employee’s Income Current Personal Transfers 711.3 842.3 1,138.0 1,775.8 2,328.6 2,561.4 Capital Transfers among Households n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Other Current Transfers n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Resident Employees Remittances Social Benefits Total Expenditure per Total Remittances n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Source: Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). (a) Preliminary. (b) Estimated. A.4. Remittance Characteristics (By the end ot the yeark, in %) 2004 2005 2006(a) 2007(b) Monthly 73.2 58.6 56.6 68.2 Quarterly 8.4 8.1 9.4 7.8 Frequency of Remittance Reception Semesterly 5.0 4.5 2.3 1.9 Occasionally 5.0 2.7 2.0 1.2 United States of America n.a. n.a. 91.4 95.0 Canada n.a. n.a. 2.2 1.3 Countries of Origin Spain n.a. n.a. 2.1 1.1 Rest of the World n.a. n.a. 2.4 2.6 Central America n.a. n.a. 1.9 n.a. Source: Central Bank of Honduras. 76 (a) Preliminary. (b) Estimated. December 2007 Honduras Report A.5. Remittance Recipients Characteristics (By the end of the year) 2006(a) Gender Male 48.5 Female 51.5 Age From 10 to 18 years 42.8 From 19 to 29 years 30.5 From 30 to 44 years 16.5 From 45 and more 10.1 Studies None 14.5 Elementary Education 55.8 Secondary Education 23.2 Higher Education 6.5 Income Level ? Low Income Level n.a. Medium Income Level n.a. High Income Level n.a. Source: Households Survey. INE. Remittances Section 2005. (a) Módulo de Remesas – 2006. A.6. Use of Remittances at Recipient Households (By the end of the year) 2006(a) 2007(b) 83.4 71.2 Non Revolving Expenses 5.9 8.6 Investment 1.3 5.8 Basic Expenses Housing (acquisition) 3.8 3.4 Business or Micro-Business n.a. n.a. Other Expenses (please describe) 5.6 11.0 Source: Semester Remittances Survey. Central Bank of Honduras (BCH). December 2007 (a) Preliminary. (b) Estimated. 77 Remittances Programme A.7. Remittance Service Providers (By the end of 2006) Number of Institutions/ Branches Categories Number of annual Transfers. Millions of Transfers Transfers Annual Value US million Average Value Direct institutional providers Registered 22 249,253 248,598,212 32,188.00 Banks 16 248,929 238,479,592 958.02 6 324 10,118,620 31,230.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Exchange Bureaus Non-registered Non-Institutional Providers Source: Central Bank of Honduras. A.8. Remittance Payment Instruments (By the end of the year) 2006 Number of Annual Transfers In % Transfers Annual Value* Cash n.a. 248,598,212 Deposits in bank accounts n.a. n.a. Órdenes de pago (cheques, giros, etc) n.a. n.a. Tarjetas de débito n.a. n.a. Tarjetas de crédito n.a. n.a. Other n.a. n.a. Categories Source: Central Bank of Honduras. 78 December 2007 Honduras Report A.9. Cost of Remittances per Type of Issuer (to Transfer Remittance Equivalent to 300 USD) (By the end of 2006) Commission % Issuer Recipient Fixed Rate (US$)(a) Issuer Recipient Time of Transfer (days)(b) Exchange Rate Differential(c) Other Costs % or fixed Registered Direct Institutional Providers Specialized (MTO) Banks Exchange Bureaus 11.66% From 1 to 2 days 8-11.66% Maximum 2 days 5-6% Less than 24 hours Source: Central Bank of Honduras. (a) Only if there is a fixed rate on top of the percentage commission. (b) Time taken by the remittance upon being sent by the sender until it is received or is available to be delivered to the receptor. (c) Difference between the exchange rate used to pay the receptor and the highest exchange rate in the market. December 2007 79
Similar documents
the impact of migrant remittances on the honduran economy thesis
miles (800 km²) or 29% of the country's arable land. The NCDC17 estimated the flooding
More information