New Waste Heat Recovery System– challenges and solutions
Transcription
New Waste Heat Recovery System– challenges and solutions
Heimdal New Power Generator Project New Waste Heat Recovery System– challenges and solutions Petroleumstilsynet Seminar – exhaust stacks and waste heat recovery 2007-02-07 Prepared by: Hydro: Unn Orstein, Project manager Knuth Jahr, Mechanical Disipline Lead Reinertsen: Morten Kongelf, Mechanical Discipline Lead Introduction l New cantilevered module to be installed on Heimdal summer 2008 - l Gas turbine from GE: LM 1600 gas generator with PGT 16 power turbine and ABB generator - l Reinertsen AS is engineering and fabrication contractor Iso rating 14 MW, Design case 10 MW Exhaust data: - 40 kg/sec 492 oC (10 MW) - 33.7 kg/sec 523 oC ( 7 MW) – normal operating) - Max temp: 597 oC (3-4 MW) 11 MW hot oil waste heat recovery package (including silencer) - Letter of Intent to Kanfa-Tec mid January - Procurement direct to Kanfa–Tec and not via GE as planned l The system has been improved - ref Åsgard B fire in the exhaust stack 2005, and other experiences l The hot oil heat exchanger is located ”in the bypass” to avoid: - • Page: 2 • Hot oil leakage into the turbine Fire water inside the stack WHRU - hot oil systems - challenges l Leakage from tube bundle in traditional vertical exhaust stack - Accumulates in bellows – textile a special problem Tube rupture can result in > 3 M3 drainage to the turbine collector Fire - due to oxygen in the exhaust, air during rundown of turbine and the chimney effect l Detect the hydrocarbon in the exhaust before the fire starts l Drainage of hot oil l Fire fighting system l Damage to turbine and turbine casing due to fire and water l Leakage from flanges in the hot oil piping hitting warm surfaces • Page: 3 • Alternative configurations evaluated l Traditional configuration with WHRU above the turbine exhaust outlet l WHRU in the bypass stream Silencer not shown Silencer shown partly Drawings & photo from Kanfa-Tec Exhaust • Page: 4 • Exhaust Main issues in case of hot oil leakage l Sump to collect hot oil leakage - l Detect liquid in sump - l Separate tank not shown on figure, 3 m3 Drain test valve Level indication Bellows should avoid: - small hot oil leakage into the exhaust stream to collect in the textile and ignite In case of leakage: - Close the louver (shut off air flow) - Nitrogen to inert the volume? - Drain the bundle to recovery tank Fire water monitor on the LQ roof - Ideas: - • Page: 5 • Detection of hydrocarbon in exhaust? Separate the 2 exhaust stream to avoid bellows? Material selection l Ducting: - - l AISI 321 Max operating temperature is 597 0C at 25 oC ambient WHRU Supplier recommend design temperature of 593 oC - Ambient temperature is normally well below the 25 oC - Max operating temperature is a transient case and not a normal operating case - Due to cooling of the outside of the duct - Duct downstream the bundle is exposed to lower exhaust temperature AISI 321 is the standard material for GE Energy LM1600 Exhaust Collector. Heatexchanger tube bundle/fins: ASTM A 106 GrB • Page: 6 • Duct leakages l Design changes to reduce vibrations - - l avoid fatigue - Rounded corners - Minimum temperature gradients - Avoid lifting ears or other additional structures reduced swirls - LM 1600 has trippel diffusers in the Exhaust Collector Improved bolt design - • Page: 7 • Thermobolt has been specified Bolt does not loose pre-tension during turbine start cycle Lover loads on bolts Controlled compression loads on gasket Reduce potential for hot oil leakage from WHRU heat exchanger l Improved bundle support - Avoid U-clamps interfering with the tubes Possible tube contacts with screw, bolts etc is avoided l Inspection of support of tube bundle during assembly l The deck structure to be designed to reduce WHRU casing deflection • Page: 8 • Leakage from hot oil piping l The following has been specified: - l The hot oil/supply and return lines shall be welded to the WHRU Flanges are minimized and located away from hot surfaces • Page: 9 • Valve comparison Flap (new type used on Grane) Louver – selected Pro Pro l Improved sealing to avoid oveheating the oil/cracking - l l Leakage rate 0.02 % Grane experience is positive - l l Con l l l Hydraulic control is required due to high torque required More expensive Higher weight l Improved temperature control Improved flow distribution Lower torque and material stresses Pneumatic control system Con l l l • Page: 10 • Smoother regulation in almost closed position Leakage rate is 0.04 % Pressure loss is higher – not critcal More moving parts 2 separate exhaust outlets - idea Pro l l Avoid potential small hot oil leakage into the exhaust to collect in the textile in the bellow Reduce maintenance - l Remove 2 bellows Simplify removal of silencer and bundle Reduce weight Con l The reduced velocity in case of part load will have effect on dispersion • Page: 11 • Note: Turbine has excess power and a restriction in the outlet to increase flow is possible Early detection of hydrocarbon leakage - idea l Install suction probe downstream hot oil heatexchanger l Dual oven gas chromatographs to detect the hot oil - l Large differance between exhaust and hot oil fractions Plan to be issued for inquiry Februar 2007 • Page: 12 • • Page: 13 •