Global Plasticizer Update
Transcription
Global Plasticizer Update
Global Plasticizer Update SPI Flexible Vinyl Products Conference July 2012 Dr Steve Cullen Business Director, Plasticizers Eastman Chemical Company Agenda Recent Global and Regional market trends for plasticizers Phthalates in the news Update on regulatory situation in EU Update on regulatory situation in US London 2012 - Flexible PVC in the news A personal view of phthalates and flexible PVC Conclusions – Key Take-aways The flexible vinyl industry is alive and well! Critics of PVC continue to attack flexible vinyl Plasticizers (in particular phthalate plasticizers), continue to be the focus of this attention Regulatory bodies continue to scrutinize the use of phthalate plasticizers Demand for non-phthalate plasticizers is increasing significantly Flexible vinyl products offer tremendous social benefits We need to continue to defend and advocate for our industry Regional Demand for Plasticizers - 2011 World Plasticizer Consumption 2011 ~ 6.4MT / 14 B lbs ~95% of plasticizers used in flexible PVC Overall trend: steady global growth driven by emerging economies ROW 11% North America 0.8MT / 1.5Blbs Europe (EU) 1.0MT / 2.0Blbs ROW 0.8MT / 1.5Blbs Latin America 0.3MT / 0.7Blbs Asia 52% Latin America 6% North America 13% West & Eastern Europe 18% Asia Pacific 3.5MT / 7.0Blbs Phthalates 87% NonPhthalates 13% Sources: Plasticizer and PVC consultant reports, Eastman estimates Plasticizer Market Trends 2009 - 2011 North America Good demand recovery from 2008/9 recession Mid term plasticizer historical demand trend is down: B&C spending decline, but recovery appears to be starting Supply consolidation has continued Phthalate scare stories are still ‘news’ Regulatory scrutiny of phthalates ongoing Accelerating “Technology Shift” from phthalates to alternatives in general purpose and specialty segments Sources: Plasticizer and PVC consultant reports, Eastman estimates Plasticizer Market Trends 2009 - 2011 Europe Good demand recovery from 2008/9 recession in 2010 and H1 2011. Sovereign debt crises having impact Mid term plasticizer historic demand trend in WE is ~ flat High rates of plasticizer demand growth in certain segments in CEE Further supply consolidation has occurred Phthalate scare stories still ‘news’ Regulatory scrutiny of phthalates is ongoing under REACH Accelerating “Technology Shift” from phthalates to alternatives. Modest investments in alternatives supply announced Sources: Plasticizer and PVC consultant reports, Eastman estimates Plasticizer Market Trends 2009 - 2011 Asia Pacific 2008/9 recession slowed growth, but quickly resumed Mid term plasticizer historical demand trend is strong growth, but typically < GDP Increasing domestic consumption, tempered by slower growth in exports from China Japan: historical slow decline in plasticizer consumption China moving towards self-sufficiency in plasticizer manufacture, but highly fragmented Substantial regional investments announced in oxoalcohol capacity – particularly in China DEHP remains the largest product, but DINP now growing faster. Significant and rapid growth in demand for non-phthalates for exported articles First national regulations and phthalate press stories are beginning to appear Sources: Plasticizer and PVC consultant reports, Eastman estimates Phthalates are still ‘news’…. ….PVC is still the real issue 2009 - Link to Children’s Health Scientific Studies Raise Concerns Low burden of proof, Spread to adjacent applications The scientists were surprised by their finding, calling it "far from conclusive." Because their research was not designed to focus on autism, they recommend further study of larger numbers of children to see whether the link can be confirmed. (March 2009) Bernard Weiss, a professor of environmental medicine at University of Rochester and a co-author of the study, said the connection between vinyl flooring and autism “turned up virtually by accident.” He called it “intriguing and baffling at the same time.” http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/autism-and-vinyl-flooring 2012 - Link to Children’s Health Scientific Studies Raise Concerns Phthalates: PVC is the real issue • Environmental NGO’s have been targeting PVC since 1980’s Pyramid of Plastics • Initial push was on chlorine content, then dioxins and lack of recyclability. Focus then switched to additives, in particular to phthalate plasticizers • Linking child safety to phthalates and the precautionary principle led first to voluntary, then temporary bans and later to regulation in toys in Europe, then US, Brazil, Canada, Korea, Japan etc. Continued, effective advocacy for flexible PVC is a critical industry issue The Flexible Vinyl Alliance The Flexible Vinyl Alliance (FVA) was launched in the fall of 2009 as an independent, dedicated, proactive, integrated and informal advocacy network to rapidly respond at both the state and local levels to de-selection threats which affect the continued business interests of the flexible vinyl industry. The FVA, through its future broad base of participants, intends to provide information, messaging and guidance for its members, in order for them to effectively advocate for the proven safety, economy and utility of flexible vinyl products, which are used in a wide range of practical, therapeutic, military and life-saving applications, among many others. http://www.flexiblevinylalliance.com/ FVA currently consists of a core group of trade associations and interested industry concerns, to include raw materials suppliers, compounders, manufacturers, processors and other constituencies. The FVA is led by its own autonomous Steering Committee, established in October of 2009, reflecting the complete flexible vinyl value chain. Regulatory Update US and EU Plasticizer Regulatory Timeline EPA Chemical Action Plan REACH DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP, DIDP, DINP, DnPP, DnOP EPA DfE TSCA Chemicals of Concern list Add to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) EPA EDSP 1 REACH (Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program) DEHP, DEP, DBP DMP, BBP DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP+ SVHC Authorization Applications open `10 DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP, DIDP, DINP, DnPP, DnOP DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP+ Non-authorized SVHC “Sunset” Priority List Reviews 2013 Diallyl Phthalate DTDA REACH California Prop 65 Design for the Environment Alternatives Assessment 2012 2012 2011 DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP+ SVHC Authorization Applications Deadline REACH CoRAP Reviews 2014 2015 2014 EPA Chemical Action Plan OSHA HCP DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP, DIDP, DINP, DnPP, DnOP Ruling on whether to ban: “late 2012” Introduction of GHS “Reprotox” classifications FDA Phthalates Review “in all applications under jurisdiction” REACH CoRAP Reviews EPA EDSP 2 DOA, DOP REACH CoRAP Reviews DEP Benzyl C7C8C9 Phthalate 9-11 Phthalate DUP DTDP TOTM Health Canada Phthalates in Toys DOA “Challenge” CPSC DINP, DIDP, DnOP Interim ban decision based on CHAP OSHA HCP Deadline for GHS Classification & Labeling Europe Regulatory Update REACH Update REACH: Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of CHemicals in the EU Effective 1st June 2007 • • • Pre-registration deadline was end Nov 2008 1000+ mtpa band Registration deadline was end Nov 2010 100-1000 mtpa Registration deadline is end May 2013 REACH Currently has identified 84 Chemicals as Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC’s) and so are Candidates for Authorization under Annex XIV of REACH 7 of these chemicals are phthalates. One additional phthalate is to have a dossier presented, nominating it as an SVHC Authorization application deadline for DBP, BBP & DEHP is July 2013. “Sunset” date for non-authorized applications is January 2015. EU’s stated target is to identify 136 SVHC’s by end 2012 REACH – View of Phthalate Plasticizers Phthalate Esters: Alkyl Group Carbon Chain Length C1 DMP C2 DEP C3 DMeOEP C4 DBP DiBP BBP C5 DPP C6 DHP C7 DiHP C8 DEHP C9 DINP C10 DIDP DPHP C11 DUP C13 DTDP REACH – View of Phthalate Plasticizers Phthalate Esters: Alkyl Group Carbon Chain Length C1 DMP C2 DEP C3 C4 DMeOEP DBP DiBP BBP SVHC SVHC’s C5 C6 C7 C8 DPP DHP DiHP DEHP SVHC CLP CMR SVHC SVHC Candidate C9 DINP C10 C11 DIDP DPHP Di C7-11 Phthalate (DHNUP) SVHC DUP C13 DTDP REACH Community Rolling Action Plans (CoRAP) CoRAP is a list of chemicals that have been proposed by EU Member States for Evaluation as to whether classification as an SVHC is justified or no action is needed First list published in October 2011 List of 90 Chemical Substances, including 9 plasticizers (of which 6 are phthalates) Evaluations will be performed over period 2012-2014 Chemicals proposed where there is “Suspicion that use poses a risk to human health or the environment” Specific focus areas: CMR, PBT or Endocrine Disruptors REACH Community Rolling Action Plans (CoRAP Reviews) Evaluation Year Product Reviewing Country Justification 2012 TOTM Austria Suspected PBT 2013 DiAllyl Phthalate Spain Suspected CMR 2013 DTDA (Di Tridecyl Adipate) Spain Suspected PBT 2014 Benzyl C7-9-branched and linear alkyl Phthalate Denmark Suspected CMR 2014 Di-C9-11-branched and linear alkyl Phthalate Denmark Suspected CMR 2014 DUP (branched and linear ) Denmark Suspected CMR 2014 Di-C11-14 (C13-rich) branched alkyl Phthalate Denmark Suspected CMR 2014 DEP Germany / Portugal Suspected Endocrine Disruptor 2014 DIDZ (Di Isodecyl Azelate) Italy Suspected PBT REACH – View of Phthalate Plasticizers Phthalate Esters: Alkyl Group Carbon Chain Length C1 DMP C2 DEP C3 C4 DMeOEP DBP DiBP BBP SVHC SVHC’s C5 C6 C7 C8 DPP DHP DiHP DEHP SVHC CLP CMR SVHC SVHC Candidate C9 DINP C10 C11 DIDP DPHP Di C7-11 Phthalate (DHNUP) SVHC DUP C13 DTDP REACH – View of Phthalate Plasticizers Phthalate Esters: Alkyl Group Carbon Chain Length C1 DMP C2 C3 C4 DEP DMeOEP DBP DiBP BBP CoRAP Review SVHC SVHC’s C5 C7 C8 DPP DHP DiHP DEHP SVHC CLP CMR SVHC SVHC Candidate DiAllyl C6 C9 C10 DINP DIDP DPHP C11 DUP DTDP CoRAP Review CoRAP Review Di 7-11 Phthalate (DHNUP) Phthalate CoRAP Review C13 SVHC Benzyl C7-9 Phthalate CoRAP Review Di 9-11 Phthalate CoRAP Review Denmark Proposed further restrictions to REACH In May 2011 Denmark On June 15th 2012, Notified EU of intention and ECHA’s Committee for proposed a national ban on the use of DEHP, BBP, DBP and DiBP in consumer articles for indoor use or which came into contact with mucous membranes proposed that this become an EU wide restriction ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) concluded that the additional restriction was not justified Socioeconomic Analysis (SEAC) plans to take no action ECHA Review of DINP and DIDP DINP and DIDP subject to restriction in mouthable toys in EU, since 2007 ECHA has reviewed risks from DINP and DIDP – at request of European Commission Considered REACH dossiers and recent literature May 2012 Draft report concludes that “existing restriction is justified” but “no further risk reduction measures are needed” Comments period open until end July, including for submission of additional scientific data http://echa.europa.eu/en/addressing-chemicals-ofconcern/restriction/consultations-draft-review-report//substance/1403/search/+/term European Producers of DEHP will pursue Authorization ECPI / CEFIC consortium of 3 European DEHP producers is preparing risk assessment dossier for Authorization Specific applications for which Authorization is being requested not yet publicized - likely to include medical Each Authorization likely to be for a finite period and may have conditions attached. Sunset date for non-Authorized applications is Jan 15th 2015 REACH not fast enough for some… “Substitute It Now “NGO driven project” Sin List 2.0 – May 2011. List of 378 chemicals proposed for SVHC status 14 plasticizers 10 are already SVHC or Candidates 4 additional products: DEP, DHP, DCHP, DINP http://www.chemsec.org/list US Regulatory Update EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program 5 Phthalates (DMP, DEP, DBP, BBP, DEHP) identified in EDSP 1 list, due to FIFRA registered uses as pesticide inerts Test orders sent out September 2009 US producers elected to ‘opt-out’ of testing as they did not and/or would not sell into these applications DOA identified in EDSP 2 list as an HPV chemical New test orders to be issued for DEHP, using the Safe Drinking Water Act. Further action will not be taken until responses to List 2 orders are received. EPA Phthalates Chemical Action Plan Published December 20th 2009 Identified 8 specific phthalates (DBP, DiBP, BBP, DnPP, DEHP, DnOP, DINP, DIDP) Chemical Action Plan stated intention to: 1. Use TSCA 5(b)(4) to designate the products as “Chemicals of Concern” in late 2010 and perform cumulative risk assessments 2. Initiate rulemaking to add remaining 6 phthalates (to DEHP and DBP) on the TRI in late 2010 3. Consider initiating rulemaking in 2012 under TSCA 6(a) in cooperation with CPSC and FDA, including “….a ban of all or several of these chemicals” 4. Consider rulemaking under TSCA 5(a)(2) on DnPP in late 2010 or early 2011 5. Conduct a DfE and Green Chemistry alternatives assessment by 2012 to “…encourage industry to move away….in a non-regulatory setting” EPA Phthalates Chemical Action Plan - Update Chemical Action Plan stated intention to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Use TSCA 5(b)(4) to designate the products as “Chemicals of Concern” in late 2010 and perform cumulative risk assessments Blocked at OMB. August 2011 Discussion Forum on “prioritization factors…to identify priority chemicals for review and assessment” . “identification…as priority chemical…would not constitute a finding ....(of) risk” Initiate rulemaking to add remaining 6 phthalates to DEHP and DBP on the TRI in late 2010 Blocked at OMB Consider initiating rulemaking in 2012 under TSCA 6(a) in cooperation with CPSC and FDA, including “….a ban of all or several of these chemicals” No Action to date Consider rulemaking under TSCA 5(a)(2) on DnPP in late 2010 or early 2011 SNUR proposed for DnPP in March 2012 5. Conduct a DfE and Green Chemistry alternatives assessment by 2012 to “…encourage industry to move away….in a non-regulatory setting” DfE Project commenced August 2011 CPSIA Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) Mandated by Congress under the 2008 Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act CPSIA imposed a permanent restriction on the use (above 0.1%) of DEHP, DBP and BBP and a temporary ban on the use of DnOP, DINP and DIDP in children’s toys. CHAP to be formed from NAS identified scientists and tasked to review the temporary restrictions on use in children’s toys of the 3 phthalates CHAP also tasked to risk assess alternatives to the 3 permanently restricted and 3 temporarily restricted phthalates. CPSC interpreted this to include all potential useful plasticizers. CHAP was to provide final, peer reviewed report by end April 2012. CPSC to consider what action to take by end October 2012 Process is delayed: report now expected to be published in “Fall 2012” Flexible PVC in the news London 2012 Olympics and PVC Early discussions that London 2012 would be designated “PVC Free” After industry intervention, a 2009 policy on PVC use was established 142,500 m2 (1.5 M sq ft) of flexible PVC has been installed. 68% of this is plasticized by non-phthalate plasticizers. Some material will be reused for the 2014 World Cup in Brazil “For some products, alternatives to PVC are not available for the performance requirements…” “The whole life cycle of the products needs to be considered. Some PVC based components are more suitable for installation than nonpvc.” Conclusions – Key Take Aways The flexible vinyl industry is alive and well! Critics of PVC continue to attack flexible vinyl Plasticizers (in particular phthalate plasticizers), continue to be the focus of this attention Regulatory bodies continue to scrutinize the use of phthalate plasticizers Demand for non-phthalate plasticizers is increasing significantly Flexible vinyl products offer tremendous social benefits We need to continue to defend and advocate for our industry Thank You!