April - BioGeometry Project
Transcription
April - BioGeometry Project
BioGeometry NEWS April 2003 biogeometry.cs.duke.edu Announcements BioGeometry Meeting Annual Report The next ITR BioGeometry meeting will take place at Stanford University on Thursday-Friday, June 5-6, 2003. It’s being organized by Michael Levitt. The schedule and other details will be available soon at http:// biogeometry.cs.duke.edu/meetings/ ITR/03jun. Time is approaching to prepare the Year 3 annual report for submission to the NSF. Here’s the schedule: • May 8: An email announcement will be sent to PIs requesting submissions, and providing details on reporting requirements • May 22: Deadline for submitting information • Beginning May 22: Draft report will be prepared • June 5-6: At the ITR meeting at Stanford, PIs will review and edit the draft • Soon after June 6: Final editing, final review by PIs, submission to NSF The frequency of BioGeometry meetings is increasing from annual to biannual, and this is the first of the biannual meetings. Please begin thinking about material you might contribute for the report, including participants, publications, software, research projects and results, educational courses and materials, collegial and educational outreach, and outreach to under-represented groups. Also think about inter-disciplinary and inter-institutional collaborative accomplishments. Student Profile: Loren Looger L oren Looger is a fourth year PhD student at Duke University, working under the supervision of PI Homme Hellinga in the Department of Biochemistry. Loren did his undergraduate work at Stanford where he received his BS in Chemistry. He then obtained a Masters in Mathematics at Stanford. After a one-year stint in the PhD program in Mathematics at UC Berkeley, Loren decided that he did not want to leave experimental science and joined the Biochemistry program at Duke instead. He will graduate this summer. Loren has been working on a combined computational and experimental approach to the design of protein function. He has focused on developing and experimentally validating methods for the redesign of receptor proteins. This work has proven to be very successful and will be reported in a paper to appear in the May 8 issue of Nature. The essential idea of the receptor design algorithm is illustrated in Figure 1. We start with a receptor of known three-dimensional structure with a bound ligand (Fig. 1a). The amino acid residues that interact with the wild-type ligand are replaced with poly-alanine (red lines in Fig. 1b), thereby creating a cavity. Within this cavity, an ensemble of the new ligand is docked, representing the allowed rotations and translations within the cavity. This ensemble is constrained by a convex polytope that describes the approximate location of the original ligand. The algorithm then identifies the “best” docked ligand and amino acid sequence that binds that ligand (Fig. 1c), using a version of the Dead-end Elimination algorithm developed by Loren to solve the immense combinatorial complexity that arises in this minimization problem. Using this algorithm a series of bacterial receptors that normally bind sugars or amino acids was converted into receptors for the explosive TNT, an analog of the nerve agent soman, the ground water pollutant MTBE (an anti-knock gasoline additive), various neurotransmitters and metabolites. All of these were experimentally validated by Loren and his fellow graduate students and postdocs in the laboratory. Besides Loren’s ability to solve difficult computational problems, he is also a very good experimentalist who can build genes, and produce and study mutant proteins. It is this seamless integration of the worlds of computation and experimental biology that allows interesting and difficult problems to be solved. - Profile by Homme Hellinga Figure 1. Steps in the design of a receptor for serotonin. On the left we see the original binding site with a sugar bound by the wild-type protein (the serotonin is indicated as a ghostly image). On the right we see the redesigned site with serotonin bound (now the sugar is shown as a ghost). In the middle we see an intermediate step in which docking of serotonin is explored. BioGeometry News is the monthly newsletter of the BioGeometry project. For more information, please visit http://biogeometry.cs.duke.edu/newsletter. The project is funded by the National Science Foundation under grant CCR-00-86013.