Landsburg Mine Site, Ravensdale
Transcription
Landsburg Mine Site, Ravensdale
Landsburg Mine Site, Ravensdale Brief Overview of the Site and Status Update Since 2008 May 2011 Landsburg Mine Site This Presentation will include: • Site Background and History • Update from the Last Meeting in 2008 • Hydrogeology of the Site • Proposed Cleanup Action • What’s Next? Site Background and History Site Location and Background Landsburg Rd North portal Tahoma Middle School Clark Springs Facility South portal Kent Kangley Rd 3‐D View of Mine Site From May 1991 Site Hazard Assessment Report, Ecology and Environment, Inc. Coal seam Drums Landsburg Mine Original Potentially Liable Parties (PLPs) • Browning-Ferris Industries/Allied Waste • Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Company • PACCAR Inc. • Plum Creek Timberland Company, L.P. • Time Oil • Palmer Coking Coal Company • Burlington Environmental Inc.* * subsidiary of Philip Services Corporation or PSC; PSC bankruptcy settlement Some Chemicals of Concern from Wastes Sampled in Subsidence Trench Soil: •Chromium, lead •PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) •Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate •Methylene Chloride •TCE (trichloroethene) •TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons) 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1993 – EPA referred site to state authority; MTCA Agreed Order established Early Timeline of Events 2010 1999, 2002, 2011 Draft Cleanup Action Plans Key Points about Landsburg Mine site • Groundwater monitoring has never detected any contamination which could be associated with the wastes. • Wastes were disposed in the northern trench area. • No contaminants are migrating off of the waste area in surface water or groundwater. Similarly, nothing was detected in soils outside of the north trench area. • We know the hydrogeology and contamination sufficiently to select a remedy (Draft Cleanup Action Plan or DCAP) Update from the Last Meeting in 2008 Landsburg Mine Recent Events • Continued groundwater monitoring twice a year. • Summer 2008 – Construction of Infrastructure for Contingent Groundwater Treatment System • October 2008 to January 2009 – Hypothetical Travel Time modeling using BIOSCREEN to derive long term monitoring frequency • Draft Cleanup Action Plan submitted to Ecology March 2011. Contingent Treatment System Infrastructure Treatment Infrastructure Hydrogeology of the Site Aerial view of site Cross Section of Mines Groundwater Movement in Rogers Coal Mine Proposed Cleanup Action Cleanup Approach • Conservative stance that wastes are still there and remediation will proceed. • Preferred cleanup approach: • fill in trench and low permeability soil cap, • surface water diversion, • institutional controls on land & groundwater use, • contingent groundwater capture and treatment should contamination be detected at site wells • groundwater monitoring in perpetuity Proposed Cap Design Hypothetical travel time modeling and Long term Monitoring Frequency BIOSCREEN simulations were used to compute hypothetical travel times of contaminants in the possible event of a release within the mine Combining simulated travel times with sentinel wells make the frequency of long‐term monitoring protective and practical Long term groundwater monitoring frequency based on modeling What’s next? We are at the Draft Cleanup Action stage What’s Next? Finalize the Draft Cleanup Action Plan. We have recently concluded: • Long-term groundwater monitoring frequency – based on BIOSCREEN modeling of the time it takes a potential contaminant to travel a certain distance. • Some infrastructure for contingent groundwater treatment at south portal based on City of Kent’s request. • Contingency Plan and Response Times – in revised DCAP Follow Timetable (last slide) Landsburg Mine Site Remediation Timetable • Revised Cleanup Action Plan (CAP) to Ecology for re-evaluation (presently undergoing Ecology review) • Draft CAP for public review • Public Comment on Draft CAP and Consent Decree • Engineer Design Report (2-6 months estimated by PLP Group); • Permit Requirements (2-9 months estimated by PLP Group) • Contractor Bid and Selection (2 months estimated by PLP Group) • Remedial Action Construction (two years) • Compliance Monitoring (in perpetuity) Comments or Questions?