New President installed at Waitangi
Transcription
New President installed at Waitangi
Justices’ Page 1 QUARTERLY FIAT JUSTITIA RUAT CAELUM Autumn 2014 Volume 83 Number 1 New President installed at Waitangi Page 2 PRESIDENT’S PAGE Making history again Whakataka te hau ki te uru. Cease the winds from the west. Whakataka te hau ki te tonga. Cease the winds from the south. Kia makinakina ki uta. Let the breeze blow over the land. Kia mataratara ki tai. Let the breeze blow over the ocean. E hi ake ana te ata kura He tio, he huka, he hauhunga. Let the red-tipped dawn come with a sharpened air, a touch of frost, promise of a glorious day. W ith these words spoken on Te Tii Marae early on Friday February 28 2014, kaumatua Wiremu Wiremu launched the Federation’s 86th Conference on its journey. As he spoke we looked across the water where numerous canoes were moored to Kororareka. History was about to be made again over three glorious days where much of the history of our nation began. From comments made throughout the Conference, I doubt there was anyone who left without having acquired more knowledge and appreciation of both the history of New Zealand and the continuing practice of tikanga Maori. Ko tenei te mihi aroha ki nga iwi me nga hapu o Te Tai Tokerau, ki te hau kainga o Te Tii/Waitangi hoki. For all at the Conference, I salute the tribes and sub-tribes of the north and the guardians of the area where we gathered for all they did to welcome, guide, assist, support and provide hospitality for the record number of people to attend such a Conference. The aim was to have 200 JPs gather at Waitangi to celebrate 200 years of service by JPs to New Zealand. This target was “over-subscribed”. Justices, their partners and our guests numbered over 300. This put pressure on both the facilities and the organising team from the Far North association (assisted by Northland). We salute them for their planning and preparation and for the way they managed the logistics of the Conference. Throughout nothing was any problem. Our late Past Federation President Ian Knox, who promoted this particular Conference venue, would have been delighted with the result. The powhiri on the Treaty grounds, handled in an inclusive way by tangata whenua, was a first for many in attendance. The presence of kaumatua and kuia Federation President Graeme Kitto accorded the Conference due recognition. The guidance of Tamati and Maaki Howard ensured that the manuhiri met their obligations during the ritual encounter. Tena rawa atu korua. The report of the Conference in the pages that follow will highlight the decisions of the AGM and the contributions of the invited speakers who honoured us with their presence. “Thomas Kendall” may not have had much to say, but by sharing her personal thoughts “Jane Kendall” captured all of us and heightened our appreciation of the circumstances under which the first JP in New Zealand lived and worked. And to conclude the conference, Bishop Te Kitohi Pikaahu led worship which included the guidance of the prophet Micah (6:8) which starts with the words: “Do what is fair and just to your neighbour…”. They have a certain ring about them for JPs recalling the Judicial Oath they took. Attending this Conference meant considerable expense for associations and individuals. Thank you all for your significant support. It did not go unnoticed. Three other groups which deserve our thanks too are patrons whose presence, experience and wisdom honour our associations, partners/family who are so often the ones who take the messages and accommodate arrangements made with clients, and employers who recognise that sometimes JPs need to provide their service during work hours. We are grateful to all of them. Immediately following Conference the Board met to commence the year’s work. Each member has assumed leadership of different areas of responsibility. • Denise Hutchins: strategic planning and funding bid 2015-2018 1 • Rachael O’Grady: all matters judicial • Wallis Walker: Emerging Leaders Project • Kath Blair: Year of the JP, communications and Ministerial education • Gavin Evans: Finance • Greg Weake: Board manuals, webmaster • Graeme Kitto: Justices’ Quarterly. Registrar Alan Hart is monitoring the introduction and passage of legislation which could impact on the work of JPs. On March 13, Rachael, Greg, Alan and I made an oral presentation to the Judicial and Electoral Select Committee in support of the Board’s written submission on the Judicature Modernisation Bill. The Federation was commended for the clarity and coverage of its written submission. We thank Rachael for her considerable work in preparing this paper. Work has begun on following up the decisions of the AGM at Waitangi. We have had the opportunity to flag informally to the Minister and the ministry some of the topics that we will seek to discuss further in the months ahead. Since Conference, some association councils have arranged for local publicity promoting the 200th year of service to New Zealand by JPs, and others are firming up arrangements to bring this message to the public and celebrate this Year of the JP. This publicity is both achievable and effective in reaching the communities that we serve. Association councils are presently working through their own processes to identify suitable nominees for the Emerging Leaders Project. We acknowledge the financial support of the Gallagher Charitable Trust which has enabled the JP Education Trust to launch this project in 2014. In conclusion, I place on record our thanks for the contributions made by those who have now left the Board – Past Federation President Kevin Geddes, Auckland Regional Representative Pat Samson and Southern Regional Representative Bill Saxton. Their input, service and leadership is acknowledged and appreciated. And I welcome Wallis Walker, Kath Blair and Gavin Evans to the Board for 20142015. Collectively we undertake to promote and advance the role and recognition of JPs in New Zealand as we conclude two centuries of service. Naaku i runga aku mihi ki a koutou. Graeme Kitto NEWS1 Page 1 EDITOR: GEOFF DAVIES JP Email: [email protected] Phone: 04-472-5566 Telephone 04-918-8447 Fax 04-918-8034 Email: [email protected] Website: www.jpfed.org.nz Successful crime-fighting pilot to be expanded A successful Justice sector frontline pilot which saw a dramatic drop in total crime in the Hutt Valley will benefit three other areas, Justice Minister Judith Collins announced this month. “I’m pleased to announce that a ‘Flagship Programme’ to reduce crime and re-offending has been rolled out to Papakura, Hamilton and the East Coast,” Ms Collins said. The Flagship Programme is based on the successful Hutt Valley Innovation Project. Autumn 2014 VOL 83 No: ONE Conference 2014 2-6, 11-12 Education 7-10 Celebrating diversity 13 Chair in Restorative Justice 14 Salvo 15 Crossword Hubbard Appointments 16 inside back cover outside back cover Patron: His Excellency Lt Gen The Rt Hon Sir Jerry Mateparae GNZM QSO Governor-General of New Zealand President: Graeme Kitto JP Immediate Past President: Greg Weake JP Vice-President: Denise Hutchins JP Northern Regional Representative: Rachael O’Grady JP Auckland Regional Representative: Wallis Walker JP Central Regional Representative: Kath Blair JP Southern Regional Representative: Gavin Evans JP Honorary Solicitors: Buddle Findlay Registrar: Alan Hart JP National Education Officer: Sarah Loftus Editor, NZ Justices’ Quarterly: Geoff Davies JP “From June 2011 to September 2013 in the Hutt Valley total crime is down 23%, violent crime is down 21% and youth crime is down 36%. Prison sentences are decreasing and fewer new cases are being managed by the District Court,” she said. “The Hutt Valley Innovation Project ran between September 2012 and December 2013 with frontline service providers in the Hutt Valley formally collaborating on 10 initiatives to provide better services for the community. “As a result they have found better ways to target the causes of crime and support high risk families.” Ms Collins says the key to the Flagship Programme is increased collaboration between Police, Justice, Corrections and other service providers to focus on the specific needs of communities and vulnerable families. “The Flagship Programme is about bringing agencies together to identify local solutions to local problems such as alcohol in Papakura; reintegration of youth offenders in Hamilton; and family violence Justice Minister Judith Collins on the East Coast,” Ms Collins said. “In addition to localised initiatives, the three areas will focus on joint case management, better service delivery, driver licensing, youth violence and local causes of crime. “The programme’s potential to reduce crime and re-offending has been proven in the Hutt Valley and it’s fantastic the Justice sector will be tailoring it to fit the local needs of a further three communities. “The initiatives in Hamilton, Papakura and the East Coast are now under way and we expect to see impacts on the ground in the coming months.” Moving with the times Readers have the option of receiving the Quarterly as a PDF rather than a hard copy. To take up this offer please advise the editor by email at [email protected]. Telephone requests will not be processed. ON THE COVER: New Federation President Graeme Kitto and his wife Lalita Hari after his installation at Conference 2014 in Waitangi … the korowai he is wearing was made by Lalita for their family use. Story P12 CONFERENCE 2014 Page 2 Fulfilling ‘a promise of two peoples’ By Northern Regional Representative RACHAEL O’GRADY Pictures: NOEL LOWE T his year’s Federation Conference was a particularly noteworthy occasion as we celebrated the 200th year since Justices started work in New Zealand. A hundred years ago, the centenary of JPs in New Zealand was not marked by any celebration, lending extra significance to the 2014 event. The Conference was held under one roof at the Copthorne Hotel and Resort Bay of Islands at Waitangi over February 28-March 2. With the sun shining down on us for the duration of the Conference, the 300metre scenic walk from the hotel to the Treaty Grounds on Friday morning provided a wonderful opportunity to take in the scenery, enjoy the company of fellow JPs and revel in the wonderment of the occasion. The message of two groups coming together at the powhiri on the National Marae was a symbolic part of this Conference. On behalf of our large group, President Greg Weake accepted the rautapu (symbolic offering) as part of the wero (challenge) before the karanga (call) onto the marae. The kai-korero (speakers) for the tangata whenua (local hosts) were gracious in the warmth and depth of their welcome to our group and in their tribute to Thomas Kendall’s pioneering efforts in preserving te reo Maori. Speakers for the manuhiri (visitors) acknowledged the honour extended to us in this welcome. The hongi, singing of waiata and the giving of koha all completed the joining together of tangata whenua and manuhiri. Delegates and guests then had the opportunity to walk around the different areas of the Treaty site in groups as the tangata whenua explained these areas, finishing at the shelter where the waka is stored. Back at the hotel, delegates were able to mix and mingle while also taking time to indulge in this year’s “sandpit”- a display of new police technology. The police are now equipped with a technological arsenal that helps them and the community by providing quicker and more effective communication. It’s very impressive! The Conference officially began after lunch, with opening speeches, Conference business and regional meetings. A BBQ dinner concluded the first day’s events. Saturday commenced with presidents and registrars meetings and a short business session followed by a series of speakers covering the Past and the Present. The formal dinner was held on Saturday night, before the final day of Conference. Sunday’s programme included a final business session before the speakers on the Future. Invitations, valedictories and the Presidential handover were carried out before Bishop Te Kitohi Pikaahu led delegates in worship as the Conference came to a conclusion. CONFERENCE 2014 Page 3 W CONFERENCE OPENING e were very lucky to have a Master of Ceremonies who effortlessly had all delegates and guests wearing a smile. That takes a special someone, and that someone was Pio Terei. Not only did Pio keep the Conference programme running to schedule, he also delighted us with many witty anecdotes and engaged with speakers and delegates in such a way as to make everyone feel part of the Conference. He managed introductions superbly, and included his own impromptu comments on some speakers’ content as he made a seamless transition between one speaker and the next. The line-up of Conference opening speakers began with the president of the Far North association, Roger Barnard, welcoming everyone to the area and inviting us to share in the hospitality that his association had to offer. Far North Deputy Mayor Tania McInnes extended her own welcome to the Far North district. Roger and Tania were thanked by Federation President Greg Weake, who went on to welcome all delegates and guests on behalf of the Federation. Officially opening the 86th Conference was the Chief Justice, Dame Sian Elias, who talked about “law mindedness” as the strong social glue of our society - that we all have responsibility for law and order, and JPs are a measure of the rule of law in our country. She emphasised the importance of lay participation in the administration of justice throughout New Zealand, and acknowledged the role of Justices of the Peace in that. Immediate Past President Kevin Geddes, in thanking Dame Sian, reminded us that the work which JPs do is about justice by the community, within the community and for the community. The historical scene for the Conference was set by Rev Amanda Neil, who is also a Justice of the Peace and a fourthgeneration descendant of our first Justice, Thomas Kendall. Aware that there have been historical accounts of Kendall’s life that paint him in an unfavourable light, Rev Neil provided some balance to those accounts by presenting an outline of the difficult conditions for the first missionaries and the relationships which developed between the missionaries and Maori, and reminding us that Kendall should be commended for his work in interpreting and writing the first phonetic rendition of the Maori language. The historical scene was brought more to life through the sketch presented by Anton Norman and Laurel Gregory, two young people dressed in period outfits representing Thomas and Jane Kendall. Laurel is Rev Neil’s niece and thus also a descendant of Thomas Kendall. For a BBQ, it was a very sophisticated affair, but also a wonderful opportunity for delegates to relax and enjoy good food, good company and excellent entertainment. With Pio to introduce performers and speakers the night flowed smoothly. The Kaikohe Intermediate School choir (below left) sang beautifully before local MP Mike Sabin made a brief appearance prior to our speaker for the evening, Judge Greg Davis. Judge Davis concluded with a waiata with his own ukulele accompaniment (above). The Hatea Kapa Haka Group (below right) entertained us as we continued to dine and socialise. CONFERENCE 2014 Page 4 THE PAST Dame Claudia Orange D Dr Philip Harkness JP elegates were treated to quite an account of the judicial history of New Zealand, beginning with Dame Claudia Orange. Dame Claudia is a New Zealand historian best known for her 1987 book The Treaty of Waitangi, the first comprehensive study of the Treaty. Covering our country’s history up to 1840, Dame Claudia gave us a more technical presentation of the legal aspects and timing of various events involving Thomas Kendall and the community of early settlers. She pointed out that Kendall had the authority of a JP magistrate, but lacked a police/military presence to support him, plus no lock-up, leg irons or food for prisoners, which meant his ability to provide justice and peace was limited, and at times very difficult. Possibly, these difficulties were part of the reason he traded in muskets. Sir Grant Hammond Law Commission President Philip Harkness, who has researched the history of JPs widely and written a thesis on the lay magistracy, provided an insight into the role of the JP over the years, from Norman times through to today. Philip had with him an original copy of the JP manual from 1864, a book containing some 800 pages of script written in old English. JPs with the powers of magistrates were appointed to virtually every active settlement and town throughout New Zealand and were expected to deal with many situations including a need to “read the Riot Act” should a major disturbance of the peace occur. Failure to do so could result in imprisonment for up to two years. This act was only repealed in 1961. Sir Grant Hammond, the president of the Law Commission, while reminding us that there has been 1000 years of judicial authority, reflected on more THE PRESENT Minister for Courts and Associate Justice Minister Chester Borrows S Chief District Court Judge Jan-Marie Doogue aturday afternoon’s programme concluded with a number of officials who spoke of the present in reference to the justice system and JPs. They were our Minister, Chester Borrows, Associate Minister of Justice and Minister for Courts; Tony Fisher, General Manager District Courts at the ministry; Chief District Court Judge Jan-Marie Doogue; and Police Assis- Assistant Commissioner Upper North Allan Boreham recent JP activities. His references to Hansard and comments made by MPs in the 1950s indicated that the Federation was not performing in a relevant manner, and Parliament moved to drastically reduce the role and powers of JPs. It has taken 50 years of hard work by successive Federation leadership groups to rebuild the trust and sincerity of commitment from our organisation with the appropriate officials and Governments. With more relevance to the present, Sir Grant made specific mention to cyberbullying and that it is a major concern for everyone involved in the administration of the law. Michael Cheshire and John Carstairs, representatives from the Australasian Council of Justices’ Associations, joined us for this Conference. They completed the line-up of speakers on the past. General Manager District Courts Tony Fisher tant Commissioner Upper North, Allan Boreham. Each of these speakers provided a clear and consistent message. They sincerely appreciate the role of the Federation and the work of JPs. Reference was made to the huge amount of work that has been done right across the justice sector reforming legislation and systems. As Mr Borrows pointed out, changes to court systems have moved from focusing on courthouses to a focus on people. Michael Cheshire ACJA representative Labour Party Justice spokesperson Andrew Little Most notably for the police and the courts, statistics are showing that the new procedures have drastically reduced the numbers of offences being heard in District Courts and accelerated the speed with which justice is dispensed. Justices of the Peace were commended for the “common sense” role they play in dealing with many of the lower end cases, freeing Judges to hear the more serious ones. CONFERENCE 2014 Page 5 SATURDAY DINNER rd rd t D inner Delegates at Erima left) with ((fourth N aumatua Far orth O rganising CNommittee at Dinner rima Henare 3 gapuhi from lKeft) ith Ngapuhi KNaumatua Far orth Organising Delegates dinnerH enare (3 fErom Far North organising committee Erima Henare from left)w with T he Saturday evening dinner included entertainment from the Hatea Kapa Haka Group, including their choral section and male vocal group. The eloquent and humorous speaker for the evening was Erima Henare, chairman of the Maori Language Commission. Earlier in the evening Police Minister Ngapuhi Kaumatua Anne Tolley was presented with a bouquet of flowers and a cake in recognition of her birthday that day. Following the installation of new Federation President Graeme Kitto, who was presented with a beautiful korowai made by his wife Lalita (see P12), thanks were warmly extended to the Far North organising committee, and photo opportunities Flowers and a birthday cake for Anne Tolley – from left, Mrs Tolley, Gisborne association president Karen Johansen and Far North organising committee chair Joy Quigley taken with Past Federation Presidents. Special mention was made of late Past President Ian Knox who had initiated the Far North move to host the Bicentennial Conference. Ian’s widow Beren was present at the Conference and delegates had an opportunity to thank her for the Conference satchels that she had kindly sponsored. Greg Weake and Graeme Kitto Graeme Kitto and Beren Knox (far right) with Past Federation Presidents CONFERENCE 2014 Page 6 THE FUTURE O ur speakers on the Future were two of the five MPs who are also JPs. Anne Tolley, the Minister of Police and of Corrections was the first of the invited guests to speak about the future. She spoke with a great deal of pride about the initiatives that are being put in place to provide the police with the resources they need, the prison construction work that is in progress and the schemes that are being established to overcome the problems that are often Remits overwhelming for those that populate New Zealand’s prisons. Scott Simpson MP really did take us into the future when he reminded us that the internet only began to be commercial and freely accessible in the mid-1990s. It is frightening to consider that “emailing is for oldies”! Anyone now under the age of 25 or so has absolutely no knowledge or experience of a life lived without access to the internet – they are known as “digital natives”. Scott made a point of advising that JPs do have to change to meet the changed world, not expect the world to change to suit us or our traditional methodologies. CONFERENCE BUSINESS Remit 1: The Rotorua and Districts association moved: That the Royal Federation Board implement the Accreditation process for JPs as adopted at its November 2013 meeting with effect from 1st January 2014. – Lost Remit 2: The Auckland association moved: (i) Accreditation: That the policy re Accreditation be withdrawn until such time as it is presented to the member associations at the Annual General Meeting of the Royal Federation of Justices of the Peace. – Withdrawn (ii) Justices’ Quarterly: That the Justices’ Quarterly magazine be discontinued and that the Education and Registrar’s sections be disseminated electronically to all associations so each association can forward them to their members in the most appropriate manner and that this method, as outlined, be trialled by associations in the 2015 calendar year. Withdrawn on the grounds that a full review of the Justices’ Quarterly magazine is undertaken by the Royal Federation Board (iii) Service desks: That if the Royal Federation Board decides that a policy is necessary for Service Desks then such a policy be discussed with associations before the policy is promulgated and that such policy is debated at the Annual Conference of the Royal Federation. – Carried (iv) Policy by stealth: That the Royal Federation be reminded that all proposed policies must be debated by all associations and decided on by vote by all associations at Conference level. – Carried (v) Competence through training: That the Royal Federation be encouraged to seek change to the Justices of the Peace Act to the effect that Justices of the Peace shall be required to attend ongoing training in order to maintain and update their knowledge and therefore perform Justice of the Peace duties effectively. Justices of the Peace who maintain membership of a JP association and undergo required training as determined by Federation at least once every two years would be issued with a renewable “right to practice”. If an appointed Justices of the Peace is unable or unwilling to regularly update as required then they should be moved to the category of Justice of the Peace (Retired) and be so designated. Motion to amend: That the Royal Federation be encouraged to seek change to the Justices of the Peace Act to the effect that Justices of the Peace shall be required to attend ongoing training in order to maintain and update their knowledge and therefore perform Justice of the Peace duties effectively. Amended remit carried Remit 3: The Hutt Valley and Districts association moved: That Royal Federation makes strong representations to the Minister of the Crown in charge of Justices of the Peace requesting the Government introduce the necessary legislation that would ensure that all persons nominated to become Justices of the Peace are required to be New Zealand citizens. – Lost Remit 4: The Marlborough association moved: That the Royal Federation explore expeditiously with the Ministry of Justice and other relevant agencies e g the police the diminishing case load of judicial Justices with a view to ensuring that they deal with all cases falling within their jurisdiction, and the extension of that jurisdiction where possible. – Carried Presidents meeting Graeme Kitto convened the usual presidents’ session, which covered a range of topics from constitutional, policy and legislative matters, through contracts for courthouse services, the funding bid for 2015-2018, the Emerging Leaders Programme and the Judicial Studies course. Associations were encouraged to work on their historical records in preparation for the 2024 Conference. Mention was made of the Judicature Modernisation Bill submission. Graeme finished by stressing the importance of maintaining good communication systems both nationally and locally. Registrars meeting The meeting of 23 association registrars was chaired by Federation Registrar Alan Hart. Five new registrars were introduced. The meeting covered many items ranging from Accreditation, court procedure for driving while forbidden, court management agreements, and advices of membership changes, training claims and other returns, communications, complaints and discipline and the Best Practice Manual in relation to new members. • CONFERENCE 2014 continued P11 Page 7 EDUCATION By SARAH LOFTUS: [email protected] 04-918-8445 Page 7 AUTUMN 2014 ‘Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.’ - Winston Churchill From the National Education Officer G reetings to all Justices of the Peace. I hope the year has begun positively and I’m sure it will bring challenges, not the least of which will be the new requests from people coming to you for JP services. Do send in your anecdotes, especially where there is a question or point that you think would be valuable for other Justices. Take a minute to laugh Caption competition “My fake plants died because ... I forgot to pretend to water them.” “I always wanted to be somebody ... but maybe I should have been more specific!” “I was taught to respect my elders ... but it’s getting harder and harder to find one!” Congratulations to Barbara Redfern of the Waikato association who submitted the caption below for the photo of me patting an elephant. Thanks to all the Justices who entered. Your entries were enjoyed and judged by two independent visitors to the Federation office. Barbara has received a book voucher prize. “Aaah, that’s better, thank you madam. Just a little higher up, under the ear please – that spot’s always itchy.” Other finalists: “And I worry about MY wrinkles!” Russell Atkinson, Otago “So now I know what they mean by ‘the elephant in the room’!” – Cathy Cooney, Rotorua Thesaurus challenge How many words of the same or similar meaning (and in different contexts) do you know for each word? Aim for at least 10 before referring to sources outside your own memory! For example, white: pale, icy, ivory, cream, off-white, snowy, silvery ... Dangerous Harmful, Safe Secure, Page 8 EDUCATION Page 8 AUTUMN 2014 JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ROLE Quick guide to acceptable document for marriage/civil union dissolution applications At right you will see the titles of the three possible documents that people bring to accompany their application for dissolution. The two titles highlighted in green are acceptable to the Family Court. The title highlighted in red is not acceptable and the application will be rejected. (certified copy, certificate), and the unacceptable document does not. You may find it helpful to note that the acceptable documents contain a word starting with “cert” – Copy of Particulars of Marriage Certified Copy of Marriage Entry Marriage Certificate Certified copies scenarios Always keep in mind that the basis of certifying a copy is that the agency simply wants someone they trust to look at an original document because they can’t see it themselves. It is the agency’s prerogative to require copies to be certified, as well as to state who is acceptable to them as a certifier. Justices are nearly always acceptable. In the past, having the letters JP after your name was enough, but nowadays, many agencies ask more of you, such as your printed name, JP number, phone number and so on. It is a courtesy to your client to provide these when requested. After all, your details are publicly available already, but this saves anyone looking you up. In every case your obligations are: • to do your truthful best for the agency • to find a pragmatic solution if the task requested is unusual or onerous on you. ‘But what is an original?’ In general terms: It is the version that originated at an agency, institution or other official body or business: • made or printed by the agency or institution •issued, emailed or sent out by the agency or institution •accessible via log-in access on the website of the agency, institution or business. What if the original is very long – say 200 pages? In some cases you can skim through such a document without having to certify every page separately, but in other cases you must do so. The client may have some knowledge of how rigidly the agency requesting the copies enforces the need to certify every page. In this case you are looking for a pragmatic solution (especially if you are working in a busy JP service centre, or have some other pressure on your time). Your options include: • Stamping and certifying each page separately as per usual. (Many Justices do this for many hundreds of pages per year.) • Explaining to the client that it will not be possible to certify each page separately right now but if they could come back shortly, or another time, or wait until fewer people are in the queue, or make a new appointment with you, you will complete the task then. • Writing on the copy (for example): “… true copy of [document] containing pages numbered 1-200 with 16 pages of appendices …”. • Having the client make a statutory declaration as to the number of pages and that the copy is a true copy. What if the ‘original’ is a copy of a photocopy? You should discuss this with the client and whether there is any point to certifying the document, and if they are adamant they want the copy certified you can write “… copy of a photocopied document sighted today …”. (Do not write “original sighted”). This is clearly not ideal but in some situations the client is quite content that the agency will accept it. The client might be better to add a statutory declaration about why the original is not available. What if the original is a typed-out voice message from a cellphone? What do you think? Many Justices would find this was going too far in the way of certifying a “copy”. Surely a statutory declaration (or affidavit if the message is part of legal proceedings) is the answer for this one. However, if the client is sure – or adamant – that this typed-out message will suffice in their situation, there is no harm in writing “…a true transcript of the words of a message I heard on the cellphone of [name]…”. Page 9 EDUCATION What if the original is two separate pages, but the copy is double-sided? Page 9 AUTUMN 2014 Provided the content of the two pages is exactly the same, most Justices would simply certify the double-sided copy. If you are particularly concerned you could write “... true copy of document sighted today except that the original was two separate pages”. Even if you use a stamp that says ‘Original sighted; certified true copy”, or similar, there is no reason you can’t add a note underneath if there is something you want to clarify. What if the original is in another place and you are asked to look at it on a live video-phone connection (e g Skype) on the person’s cellphone? We believe in this situation you should have the person make a statutory declaration about the copy rather than certifying it. What if you have once seen the original, but it is not before you today? Say it is a colleague’s degree. It is currently being framed but she needs the copies certified to send away for a scholarship application. You saw the degree six weeks ago when she graduated. Some JPs would answer “absolutely not”; others might say “well, I might on that occasion but not usually”. Remember, you are looking to do your truthful best for the agency and to find a pragmatic solution for the client. If you can honestly say “original sighted” – that is, you can clearly remember that you saw it, when you saw it and what it was – then you can prob- ably go ahead in good conscience. If the person was a client you had seen some time last year (among the hundreds) who says that you saw her certificates but you can’t remember, then no, we do not think you can certify that you sighted the original. Of course best practice is and always will be that you have the original before you every time. A situation such as the one outlined above should be very rare, and if one occurs it will be up to your own conscience as to whether or not to accept the copy for certification. The truth is . . . It’s a truism to say that Justices of the Peace have a strong interest in the truth – pun intended! Affidavits, statutory declarations and agencies’ forms all require a person to tell the truth, and Justices are keenly aware that in administering these forms of truth-telling, they have a vested interest in the legitimacy of the person’s statement. However, you are not responsible for the person’s truth, or lack of it – how could you be? Nor can you know if it is “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. Unless you have actual personal knowledge of the matter and you know the client is telling or not telling the truth, there is no obligation on you with regard to the content of the other person’s statement. The JP’s obligation is to administer the formalising of the statement according to the law (affidavits and statutory declarations) or the requirements of the agency (forms). However, many Justices remind the person that there are penalties for making a false declaration or filing a false affidavit: sections 110 and 111 of the Crimes Act 1961. There are penalties for making false declarations in other statutes as well, including s342 of the Immigration Act 2009: providing false or misleading information to an immigration officer, which carries a possible penalty of a term not exceeding seven years, a fine not exceeding $100,000, or both. Between now and the next issue of the Quarterly (when there will be a further article on the point) you may be interested to think about the following questions: Do you feel the methods of telling the truth listed below should be in any order (for any reason)? If so, why? a Saying something to someone b Filling in a form which contains a statement that is a declaration (or verification) under an Act of Parliament which provides for an offence of making a false declaration c Giving oral evidence in court having sworn (or affirmed) that you will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth d Writing it down and signing it e Filling in a form which includes a statement called a “declaration” but is not made under a legislative provision (e g for a new library card) f Making a statutory declaration under the Oaths and Declarations Act 1957 g Writing it down on a piece of paper h Swearing (or affirming) an affidavit Page 10 10 Page EDUCATION AUTUMN 2014 An unbiased judicial role By Dame DAWN LAMB H istorically Justices of the Peace visited prisons for a variety of functions under the Penal Institutions Act. In 2004 that legislation was replaced by the Corrections Act which set up a system whereby senior prison staff act as hearing adjudicators for minor internal misdemeanors, leaving appeals against sentence/conviction and the more serious transgressions to the Visiting Justice (VJ). Those appointed as VJs must either be lawyers or Justices of the Peace. Currently the majority of the 26 VJs appointed by the GovernorGeneral to deal with offences against discipline and who hold investigative powers regarding the “treatment and conduct of prisoners” are lawyers. However hearings are robust (not trials per se) and the skills I find most useful as a VJ are those honed by practice in the hearings we administer as judicial Justices in the District Court. Lawyers do not have that advantage, having always acted on one side or the other. The VJ appointment process is lengthy, with an interview panel headed by a District Court judge considering those who are shortlisted. There is a two-day training session run by the Federation (as well as annual seminar days), but as there is no formal mentoring or professional assessment structure it is fairly much sink or swim. And, of course, the VJ sits alone. The Corrections Act 2004, unlike the Land Transport Act 1998 and its myriad of regulations, is fairly straightforward and offences are mostly strict liability. There are 13 offences listed under s128. Possession of an illegal item such as a cellphone counts for 10% of hearings and offences against good order another 12%. Section 129 relates to drug-related offences, which are endemic. Smoking-related offences remain high on the list and have led to other concerns when wires have been stripped back and placed in electrical sockets to generate a spark to light a makeshift cigarette which may be made of a nicotine patch and a page from the Old Testament. The investigative role is really limited to one of inquiry about individual cases, as there are no enforcement provisions, and the Act also established a separate Prison Inspectors’ office which prisoners can access via a free telephone link. Hearings proceed as they did in the days of depositions and prisoners/defendants are entitled to all common law rights and the same courtesies as anyone appearing in court. An interpreter is available and prisoners are entitled to ask for legal representation. When it comes to penalty the “mitigating circumstances” can be interesting. One gentleman, currently residing in Paremoremo, claimed he was upset by the death of his mother, forgetting that he had used that excuse twice before. I have sat in seven of our 19 prisons. The biggest problem for the prisoner is boredom, and for the administrators gang strictures would be high on the list. There are some great educational and rehabilitative programmes available for those who qualify, but with 7000 new entrants a year they cater for the tip of the iceberg. The VJ role is a challenging one. I always feel nervous but never unsafe which is testimony to the Corrections staff involved. Now that Corrections prosecutors are trained the hearing process has become increasingly streamlined, though there are some anomalies like the archaic Punishment Book which simply records the offence details, the penalty and nothing in between! As a system, however, I think it works. A prison is a closed community and good order is essential for both prisoners and officers. To maintain that, when issues arise, an unbiased judicial role has to be played and that is the role of the VJ. CONFERENCE 2014 Page 11 • Continued from page 6 New Board The Federation Board for 2014-2015: back row, from left, Gavin Evans (Southern Regional Representative), Wallis Walker (Auckland), Kath Blair (Central), Greg Weake (Immediate Past President); front row, Rachael O’Grady (Northern), Graeme Kitto (President), and Denise Hutchins (Vice-President). T A SPECIAL HISTORICAL EVENT of one another’.” Personally, his Conference was I was left with an enormous a special historisense of having been part of cal event for New something important where Zealand JPs as we unity prevailed. celebrated the introduction of law enforcement in New Special mention needs to be Zealand some 200 years earmade of the organising comlier and the interfacing of two Conference gift mittee from the Far North ascultures. sociation, with backup from Northland, who very capably combined As Gisborne association president Kaa huge celebration with a Conference in ren Johansen remarked: “This Confersuch a stimulating and interesting way, ence was a beautiful example of what Bishop Manu Bennett described the while also catering for a large group Treaty of Waitangi as ‘a promise of two of delegates, partners and guests, and peoples to take the best possible care providing opportunities for delegates The Presidential handover to renew old friendships and forge new ones. The parting gift of a specially engraved kauri tea-candle holder was a lovely gesture. We’ll leave the very last words to Joy Quigley (right), on behalf of the organising committee: “Thank you for coming to our 2014 celebration Conference. Our goal was to give you a memorable experience with a traditional Ngapuhi welcome and farewell, a fresh look at the work of our first Justice of the Peace Thomas Kendall, wonderful social events combining entertainment with learning and an opportunity to greet old friends and make new ones. “Thank you, farewell and come again soon. “Until we meet again in Auckland!” Due to space constraints part two of Philip Harkness’s article on the history of JPs in New Zealand will now be published in the Winter issue Page 12 CONFERENCE 2014 All eyes on korowai The korowai placed on the shoulders of new Federation President Graeme Kitto at his installation at Conference was a star of the show. It was made by his wife LALITA HARI for their family . . . I t all started in 2007 when my friend Tuaine Bailey and I were asked if we could make a korowai for a family to give their mother on her 50th birthday. Noting that it would be a first, we agreed to do so. Tuaine and I were attending raranga (weaving) classes together and this we saw as an extension and application of what we were learning. Our first korowai was duly completed and presented to a delighted and surprised 50-year-old. Tuaine has made many more since then. Her skill and experience proved very useful as I worked on my own first korowai for use by members of our family. These days there are a wide variety of resources available, meaning that many hours of work in preparing muka (flax fibre) can be short-circuited. However, there are no shortcuts to deciding on the design, involving mathematics and sheets of graph paper, or to collecting and preparing the feathers to decorate the cloak. The pattern I decided on was one that would recognise our ancestors – Maori, Indian and Pakeha - and specifically the individuals living now, including the two women who helped me undertake this task, my friend Tuaine and our tutor Tuahana Clark. Apart from Graeme and myself, the five children in our blended family and the five grandchildren we share are all represented in the pattern. By implication, future generations are provided for through descent from these individuals. The use of the black, white and red thread represents a tongi (prophetic saying) by a Maori king in response to Te Heuheu of Ngati Tuwharetoa: Kotahi ano te kohao o te ngira e kuhuna ai te miro ma, te miro whero, te miro pango. A muri I a au kia mau ki te ture, ki te whakapono, ki te aroha. Hei aha te aha. (There is but one eye of the needle through which the white, red and black threads must pass. After me, hold fast to the law, faith and love. Forsake all else.) In this instance, it illustrates the coming together of the strands of our family who first came to Aotearoa by waka, by sailing ship and as steerage passengers on cargo ships. Finishing it in time for Graeme to wear as he was installed as Federation President at Waitangi, where I have family connections on my mother’s side, provided the incentive to ensure it was completed – after a very long time in the making! NEWS Page 13 I Celebrating diversity n this year of celebration of 200 years of service in New Zealand, all JPs are invited to participate in a project that will highlight our diversity. To do this, we are asking that you send in a photograph of yourself: • dressed for work • dressed to participate in a community activity such as: – sporting – as a player or referee/ umpire or staunch supporter – cultural – festival/celebration or performance or practice – carrying out JP duties – in court or at a service desk or with a client elsewhere (but please do not show the client’s or anyone else’s face as we do not want to have to enter into agreements to use their photo) – taking part in the activities of another organisation such as church or service club or interest group • in the vicinity of a geographic or man-made feature recognisable to many from outside that location • enjoying your hobby – quilting, painting, photography, modelling trains/ aircraft, whatever. The photo should show head and shoul- The Bicentennial Series ders. If it is necessary or desirable to show more of the body to highlight your particular clothing, that’s fine. The intention is that these photos could be used for a display/displays and perhaps even photobooks to mark this Year of the JP. So in submitting your photograph, you are agreeing that it be used in this way. While this is not intended as a fundraiser, should any use of the photos generate any income, it will be donated to the JP Education Trust. Please submit your photos in .jpg format to [email protected], preferably by June 20 2014. Please provide your name and the association of which you are a member. If you are not sure about .jpg format, just ask around a bit – there are lots of others in your family, neighbourhood, or association and elsewhere who will be pleased to assist you. – Graeme Kitto for the JP Education Trust b bb b b b Baby Boy bb Br aby The Baby Brothe bb Boy Boy b b Baby Boy b st Toy bThe Lo Ten little books telling the true stories of eleven b Boy b little children: the first Maori and European The b Baby oy B y b a Band work Christmas bicultural and bilingual children to live Aotearoa New Zealand 1814–2014 Baby 1815 Aotearoa New Zealand The Bicentennial Series together in New Zealand, two hundred years ago. Cross Suitable as readers and history resource books for Year One to Year Four children For children, about children, from the children’s point of view Graduated vocabulary Additional notes for parents and teachers Ideal introduction to New Zealand’s historical and bicultural past Twenty-four page books in full colour Chronologically and historically accurate Illustrated with photographs, sketches, paintings and computer drawings 1814 Aotearoa New Zealand The Bicentennial Series 1816 Aotearoa New Zealand ISBN 978-0-473-24576-4 1814 - 2014 Book Four The Bicentennial Series 1814 – 2014 Book Ten ISBN 978-0-473-245 82-5 s Basil. captain,” say chief. He is a Thomas. Sydney,” says to k bac ng “He is goi of apples We had lots Sydney, too? William. “Can I go to apples,” says in Sydney. I like sadly. says Joseph, apples, now,” “We have no in our hut,” les app two e. I saw “Yes, we hav says Thomas. root. better than fern il. are s ple “Ap s Bas get one,” say I will go and “He is not a 1814 - 2014 Book Three ISBN 978-0-473 -24575-7 The Wet a nd Rangihoua (New Dawn), Bay of Islands 7 Hungry W inter 1815 Aotearoa New Zeal and The Bicenten nial Serie s 1814 – 2014 Book Nine ISBN 978- 0-473-24581- 8 $50.00 for each set of ten books. Chosen by the Hocken Library, Dunedin, for their historical section. PDF versions available for download. Contact: [email protected] Page 14 NEWS Regaining trust key to restorative justice I n his inaugural professorial lecture last month, Chris Marshall, Victoria University of Wellington’s first Professor of Restorative Justice, has argued that the need to regain trust is at the core of restorative justice. Professor Marshall, who is internationally acclaimed for his pioneering work in the restorative justice arena, and is a qualified restorative justice facilitator and trainer, took up the new position at the beginning of this year. His inaugural lecture was entitled “Restoring what? The practice, promise, and perils of restorative justice in New Zealand”. He said that restorative justice provides the mechanisms to enable a victim to be able to regain trust in a person who has done them wrong - something the mainstream criminal justice system doesn’t always do. “Rebuilding trust requires such things as honest explanation, apology, accountability to others, making good the damage done in some way—the sorts of things you would do in any relationship.” Professor Marshall said that international research on the restorative justice approach often shows a reduction in reoffending rates. “However, its greatest success lies in the high satisfaction rates of victims who participate in it. The healing for victims this approach can deliver is hugely significant.” He said that while restorative justice has its roots in the youth jurisdiction, use of restorative justice “conferencing” is now well established throughout New Zealand’s criminal justice system and is increasingly employed elsewhere as well, including in schools, workplaces, the military, social work and human rights work. “This expansion of application is great, but it creates real problems for how we define the field. Some advocates emphasise the ‘justice’ part of the label, while others emphasise the ‘restorative’ part.” Restorative justice has received increased funding in recent budget rounds, signalling increasing government interest in the approach. “It still remains somewhat on the margins though. A major challenge for theorists is to explain how what takes place in a private encounter between the victim and the offender relates to the interests of the larger justice system.” The Chair in Restorative Justice, based in Victoria’s School of Government, provides a focus for collaborative research and teaching on restorative justice theories, policies and practices. Objectives include undertaking interdisciplinary research, contributing to public policy discussions, forging national and international collaborations, offering professional development opportunities for practitioners and professionals, and providing teaching and postgraduate supervision in restorative justice theory and practice at the university. Initial funding for the chair in Restorative Justice has come from a private family trust, the Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Social Development, Ministry of Education, Department of Corrections, the New Zealand Police and the New Zealand Defence Force, through the Victoria University Foundation. New Waikato Justices sworn in recently by Judge Phil Connell (with Graeme Kitto as the Waikato association induction trainer at far left and Janet Williams, association senior vice-president at far right) are, from left, Trevor Harris, Shirley Tuteao, Paula Southgate, and Banafsheh Ahmadi. Ms Southgate took the oaths as an ex officio JP in her capacity as chair of the Waikato Regional Council. OPINION Page 15 First, do no harm M edical practitioners are bound by what is colloquially referred to as the Hippocratic Oath and which, traditionally, is believed to begin with the phrase “First, do no harm …”. During my research for this article I discovered that those words do not actually appear in the Oath, but what does appear in another of Hippocrates’ associated writings (his Epidemics) is the phrase “… to do good or to do no harm …”. Hippocrates (460BC-370BC) was a Greek physician during the Age of Pericles who wrote many essays on medical care, and spent some 20 years in prison for his trouble. So what brings me, a person with no medical expertise or experience, save the occasional stint in hospital, to research the life of Hippocrates - the originator of the “First, do no harm” philosophy? Well, you’ll get an inkling from this headline in a recent edition of the New Zealand Herald: “Legal highs linked to psychosis”. The introductory paragraph reported that a Waikato dairy farmer who smoked synthetic (read “legal”) cannabis became so paranoid that he thought his cows were going to kill him, which sent me to the legislation website for a thorough perusal of the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013, which came into force on July 18 2013. The purpose of the Act, it says, is to “… regulate the availability of psychoactive substances in New Zealand to protect the health of, and minimise harm to, individuals who use psychoactive substances …”. Doesn’t it seem strange, to say the least, for a government to have to enact a law to protect its citizens from something, in this case psychoactive substances, which that same government, in passing the law, acknowledges are or have the potential to cause harm to the populace? What’s a psychoactive substance anyway? Generally speaking, it’s anything that can be, or is capable of, inducing a psychoactive effect, by any means, in an individual who Trevor cannabis, what is not widely uses it. As an aside, note that known is that it cannot be the Act only refers to the “in- Morley JP detected by any current drug dividuals who use psychoactests. As one US media report tive substances”, and not that said, back in November 2013, individual’s family, friends, “… harmful as it is, synthetic associates etc who might be cannabis is increasingly bejust as, or even more severecoming the hallucinogen of ly, affected by the use of the choice for many users – its psychoactive substance by ability to bypass urine drug that individual. tests likely a major factor …”. To be a little more precise, medically speaking, a “psyDespite the number of US choactive substance” is a chemical states which have made synthetic substance that crosses the bloodcannabis a psychoactive substance brain barrier and acts primarily upon and banned its manufacture, sale and the central nervous system, where it use, Associate Minister of Health affects brain function, resulting in Peter Dunne says that it is not posalterations in perception, mood, consible to enact a law in New Zealand sciousness, cognition and behaviour. which will cover any new psychoSuch substances can be deliberately active substances as they come on used to alter one’s consciousness, for to the market, as the distributors a variety of reasons and purposes. change the chemical composition of Thus, many psychoactive substanceach new batch of the drug to try and es are abused, i e used excessively, evade the law. or without medical intervention, e g But if they can do it in Puerto Rico by prescription or doctor’s direction. how come we cannot do it here? With sustained use a dependence – Surely it must be possible to draft a read “addiction” – can result and law which says, in effect, that if you develop. wish to be involved in the manuBut back to that Herald article, which facture, sale and distribution of any continued “… New Zealand is the psychoactive substance, before you only country in the world to adopt do so you must first guarantee that a pre-market clinical trial regime for you will “do no harm” by manufacrecreational drugs … other countries turing, selling or distributing your are still applying … a straight ban, psychoactive substance. At the moworded widely enough to cover all ment the Health Ministry just resynthetic cannabis …”. quires that the substance be of “low Additionally, other media reported risk” – whatever that means! that over 40 US states, plus Puerto How our politicians can believe that Rico, have banned all dealing in the legalising of psychoactive subsynthetic cannabis and totally outstances – of any type - was a good lawed all dealing in any number of idea baffles and confuses me. It was synthetic psychoactive substances. a decision that has had – and conSo why has New Zealand taken tinues to have - momentous consesuch a drastic step in the opposite quences not just for the users but direction, by passing a law which, also for their families and friends, in effect, legalises the sale and use as numerous media reports have atof what can only be described as a tested. And if you missed some of psychoactive substance and which – them, and you found the notion of as you can see from the above – can the farmer who thought his cows have such a devastating effect on a were about to kill him was someuser and his/her family? what unique, consider these reports of people who had quite strange reIndeed, one of the effects of “legal” actions to their use of a psychoactive cannabis is that whilst in some aspects it mimics the effects of illegal • Continued next page SALVO OPINION and this might, in part, be blamed on the growth of the synthetic cannabis market, i e “if the use of real cannabis could get me a jail sentence why not use some of this legal synthetic stuff?” So by legalising genuine cannabis, which is what the users would prefer, the market for the more dangerous synthetic cannabis could wither and die. Another side-effect of the decision legalising the manufacture and use of psychoactive substances is that by legalising synthetic cannabis politicians have given the users the “excuse” that if it is legal then it must be safe – why would the Government have made it legal if it wasn’t? As shown above, it isn’t. Make no mistake, New Zealand’s strategy of legalising the psychoactive substance synthetic cannabis makes us a unique country. Outraged citizens have vented their an- 13 14 17 19 21 22 26 26 SOLUTION 16 18 20 23 24 25 P R E S C R I P T I O N O P R G P A R A S I T E S W A P I T C M A 12 9 L S 15 11 8 I S R A E L T R Y S T S U C L O B S P R Y I D E N T I F Y 10 7 A S O A H O N E H A R A W I R A 6 5 E M A I 3 E 4 2 21 Nimble 23 Put the finger on 26 Mana Party leader (4,8) DOWN: 2Kiwi 3 Health resort 4 Judicial decision that serves as a rule for similar cases 5 The (Maori) 6 South African Olympian charged with murdering his partner 7 Agitate 8 Radio DJ who upset listeners with derrogatory comments about Kiwi women 9 Person in the street 11 A false idea 12 Decorate 18 Fe 22 Expression of contempt or disgust 24 Draw 25 Distant I 1 Primed Cricket ground Bait ----- Abbott, man slain in unsolved Wellington Trades Hall bombing in 1984 19 West Asian country 20 Secret romantic meetings S E L F 14 15 16 17 • The opinions expressed in Salvo are those of Trevor Morley and do not represent those of the Federation or the editor. Mr Morley can be contacted at [email protected] L S L U R E E R ACROSS: 1 Written directions for medicine use 6 Organism living on another 8 Trade 10 Self portrait in digital photography 13 They are signing the death warrant for home-delivered post CROSSWORD ger in protests from North Cape to the Bluff. It is to be hoped that wiser heads will prevail before too long Perhaps we should introduce a Hippocratic Oath for members of Parliament to swear that, upon being elected, they “will do no harm”! Or we could, of course, adopt one of the philosophical adages of that great Scottish reformer William (Billy) Connolly, who once said that the expression of a desire by someone to be a politician should automatically exclude that individual from ever becoming one. I • From previous page substance, i e synthetic cannabis: • a 23-year-old male committed suicide in Tauranga after smoking synthetic cannabis • a teenager died after smoking K2 (a form of synthetic cannabis) – an inquest concluded the cause of death was his use/consumption of synthetic cannabis • a man trying to “surf” on top of a moving bus fell off and died - he was high on K2 at the time • in the US the number of emergency room admissions nationwide due to the use of psychoactive substances rose from just 13 in 2009 to a whopping 567 in the first six months of 2010. It is interesting to note that some US states are now decriminalising the growing, sale and use of cannabis, T A R M E D O V A L B E R L E R N Page 16 Page 17 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF A DOCUMENT PRESENTED TO ME AS AN ORIGINAL Signed EXHIBIT NOTE #1 Trodat 4911 (38mm x 14mm) Price: $24.75 Date This is the annexure marked “ “ referred to within the affidavit of Trodat 4926 (70mm x 35mm) and sworn/affirmed at this day of 20 Trodat 4922 (20mm) Max Smith Marriage Celebrant Price: $48.00 #6 Price: $29.20 Justice of the Peace for New Zealand before me Signature #2 M.S. Walker, JP #88888 WELLINGTON #5 Trodat 4922 (20mm) Price: $29.20 JP Number: #3 Trodat 4911 (38mm x 14mm) Certified true copy of a document presented to me as an original Price: $24.75 #7 Signed #4 Date Trodat 4911 (38mm x 14mm) Price: $24.75 Trodat 4926 (70mm x 35mm) M.S. Walker, JP #88888 WELLINGTON Justice of the Peace for New Zealand Wording for #3 / #4 /#7 Telephone 04 802 5471 Email [email protected] Mail your order with a cheque to Prestige Print, PO Box 9256, Wellington All prices include G.S.T. and the courier fees. Offers run runsfrom fromMarch July 1st 2013- May - September Offers 1 2014 31 2014 30th 2013 Delivery address Price: $48.00 Page 18 JUSTICES APPOINTED PURSUANT to section 3 (1) of the Justices of the Peace Act 1957, His Excellency the Governor-General has been pleased to appoint the following persons to be Justices of the Peace for New Zealand. Abbott, Alistair Roderick, Hawera Bredenbeck, Kim Maree, Huntly Christmas, Jeremy John Lusk, Rotorua Eagle, Casi Helen, Hokitika Ewers, Gayle Teresa, Richmond Gardiner, Ian Robert, Auckland Gardiner, Davey Henare, Rotoiti Harris, Leonard Phillip Wiremu, Kaiapoi Johns, Andrew Arthur, Blenheim Lanauze, Judith Ellowynne, Chatham Islands Larsen, Barbara Mary, Warkworth Lindsay, Mary Teresa, Southland Mason, Colin Bruce, Hamilton Rahr, Peter Viggo, Otaki Thelning, Carolyn Joyce, North Otago Unwin, Noel Robert, Wairoa Ure, Alison Veronica, Wyndham Virk, Rupinder Singh, Hamilton Waihi, Georgina Myrtle, Hastings Watson, Susan Linda, Opotiki Whaitiri, Dale Iona, Chatham Islands Whiteman-Thorne, Raewyn Gladys, Putaruru Wilson, Clare Campbell Sherry, Mount Maunganui Dated at Wellington this 20th day of February 2014 Hon Chester Borrows Associate Minister of Justice Above, led by President Greg Weake (front, nearest camera), Justices and partners attending Conference 2014 approach Te Whare Runanga (the House of Assembly) at the Waitangi Treaty Grounds for a powhiri (formal welcome) on February 28, the opening day of Conference 2014. Below left, Northern Regional Representative Rachael O’Grady shares a hongi and right, the visitors make themselves comfortable inside before the powhiri begins. THE NZ JUSTICES’ QUARTERLY Published in Autumn, Winter, Spring and Summer Opinions expressed in this journal, whether editorially or by contributors, do not necessarily represent the views of the Royal Federation of New Zealand Justices’ Association (Inc). Contributions on matters affecting Justices and their associations are particularly welcome, but all contributions are subject to the discretion of the Editor. Contributors are requested to forward matter to the Editor, Geoff Davies 81 Warwick St, Wilton, Wellington, 6012, Phone 04-472-5566, email [email protected], to reach him not later than January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31 to ensure publication in the next issue. Readers are requested to promptly inform the registrar of their local Justices of the Peace association of any change in their address. Numerous Quarterlies are returned marked “gone no address”, “Redirection order expired” “Deceased” or “Not a box holder on rural delivery”, etc. Published by the Royal Federation of New Zealand Justices’ Associations, typeset and designed by Word for Word, Titahi Bay, and printed by Beacon Print Hawke’s Bay.
Similar documents
quarterly - Royal Federation of New Zealand Justices` Associations
cloak she made herself. From left, Bill Fullerton (immediate past president of the branch), Daisy, and Janet Livingston (president). Picture: TIMOTHY SCOTT
More information