PDF: 1439 KB
Transcription
PDF: 1439 KB
Serious injury of vulnerable road users Professor James Harrison Research Centre for Injury Studies Flinders University 22 September 2014 Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia Serious transport injury data (1) Two main data sources • Police/road safety agency crash data (road) • Hospital records (road and other) (2) Hospital record data • Administrative system; almost all hospitals • Data abstracted from records & coded in hospitals • Aggregated to State/Territory level, then national level (3) Properties of hospital data • • • • • National file about 1 year after reference period (AIHW NHMD) Demographics, diagnoses; also external causes (e.g. crash) Limited to what is been documented in hospital records ‘In traffic’ is similar to ‘Road’ but not exactly the same Higher coverage of vulnerable users than crash data Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia Today: hospital data (1) Users • Vulnerable: motor cyclists; pedal cyclists; pedestrians • Protected: occupants of cars, ATVs and goods vehicles (2) Inclusions & methods • • • • Australia Injury as main diagnosis Cases estimated from episodes of care (‘separations’) Severity (threat to life) (3) Period • Financial years 1999-00 to 2012-13 Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia All cases by user type: number 25,000 20,000 Cases 15,000 Motorcyclists Pedalcyclists 10,000 Pedestrians Protected users 5,000 0 Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia Traffic cases by user type: number 20,000 Cases 15,000 Motorcyclists 10,000 Pedalcyclists Pedestrians Protected users 5,000 0 Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia HTTL traffic cases by user type: number 6,000 5,000 Cases 4,000 Motorcyclists 3,000 Pedalcyclists Pedestrians 2,000 Protected users 1,000 0 Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia HTTL traffic cases by user type: change 250% Percentage (of 1990-00 count) 200% 150% Motorcyclists Pedalcyclists Pedestrians 100% Protected users Total 50% 0% Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia Proportion of cases that are motorcyclists or pedal cyclists 1999-00 2012-13 41 30 23 31 33 24 77 49 41 38 47 46 50 14 14 (%) All serious injury cases In traffic In traffic, high threat to life Males Males 18-44y Males 45y+ Females (%) Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia Summary (1) Vulnerable road users account for rise in serious injury (2) Mainly pedal cyclists and motorcyclists… • Pedestrians show little change (3) …especially • Males, especially middle aged • Major city residents (pedal cyclists) (4) Pedal/motor cyclists are rising as a proportion of cases (5) More to it… • Exposure measures (NB cyclists, pedestrians) • Case severity (NB disability outcomes) • Data linkage to better select ‘road’ cases in hospital data and draw on strengths of hospital, crash and deaths data • Settle on sources and methods for measuring serious injury Research Centre for Injury Studies • Flinders University • Australia