Summary of Submissions by Submitter
Transcription
Summary of Submissions by Submitter
Introduction This is a Summary of Submissions by Submitter for Hamilton City’s Proposed District Plan. This document presents a summary of the submissions received on the Proposed District Plan. It is organised by Submitter number. An alphabetical list of submitters has also been included. Within this list is the submitters submission number, along with a link to their hardcopy submission that is available on Councils website. From here you can open or download a copy of the full submission. To search the summary of submissions online you can select ‘Ctrl f’ and type a name or submission number into the box so as to find your way around within the document. Proposed District Plan Summary of Submissions by Submitter - Introduction May 2013 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 1002 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 844 1258 223 804 789 1269 554 609 52 639 956 1061 1005 808 321 1270 252 1036 247 1054 80 719 736 578 1100 259 1066 861 Company/Organisation Name A & A King Family Trust A Jannine Rhodes Aaron Aaron Aaron Shaun Adele Dixon Atkinson Jack Wirepa A W Burns AgResearch Ltd Mr Mr Ms Ailsa Betty Aimee Airini Alan Francis Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Alan Gordon Alan Russell Alana Kim Alastair Philip Alby Alexander Smith Carlile-Clark Forbes Thomson Julian Alexandra Alexandra Lee Alexandra Alfa Blondy Dee Simmons Randell Kepu Alfreda Olive Alice Marshall Brown-Haenga Sharp Bishop Savage Calder Tate Elliott N.C. Engineering GD Hamilton Ltd The Lost Tribe Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups Youth Justice North-Korowai & Manaaki, CYFS Align Surveyors Willis Wan 529 109 596 683 946 1074 Alisha Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzuling Ally Alma Ruth Paewai Alton & Rebekah Alysha Ann Amanda Amanda Gayle 363 564 429 Amanda Kaye Amanda Amanda Sue Young Smiler Ruiz Turner Kohe Taylor Reti Burney Watts Page 1 of 30 Auckland Central Facilities Management Tracvity Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 655 520 312 901 1289 508 867 296 202 104 951 371 Pearse Rose 74 1058 1243 331 45 695 1105 532 583 1142 36 75 1215 857 930 1043 878 589 587 1287 1062 621 787 555 203 44 119 570 1184 1047 524 Amelia Edith Ammon Kerry Shaun Preiss Company/Organisation Name AMP Capital Property Portfolio Mr Mr Andrea Andrew Andrew Kelvin Andrew Paul Andrew Andrew Andy ANG & SL Graves Bydder James Knox Summerville Yeoman Lee Clarke Laras Holdings Ltd Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd Anmark Limited Ann Bella Ann Joyce Anne & David Anne & David Anne Annetta Margaret Annitta Anthea Anthea Ruth Wiripina Prof Anthony Mr Anthony Lloyd James Anthony Anthony Paul Anthony Shaun Anton Antonia Whilhelmina Apihei Apikara Johnson Pennell Platts Smyth Ferrier-Watson Peihopa Nin Kingi Kingi Endres Fisher Parker Smart Wilson Osborne Haronga Hemi Hemi APN Outdoor Limited Ariana Murphy Ariane Emma & Stephen Keola Josephs Mr Mr Ariel Piripi Arnold David Art Arthur Arthur Tupou Ashley Ashley Rangitane Hiki Ashton Audrey Metekingi Stoneley Gage-Brown Giffney Hettig Nikora Haeata Frew Pere Page 2 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 918 - 607 214 185 775 602 741 1146 870 350 917 888 1242 168 837 1004 659 419 474 604 966 60 730 989 26 138 1247 204 30 32 53 76 1007 340 874 965 225 48 335 765 58 566 382 41 226 B & E.M Williams Family Trust Company/Organisation Name B.W & I.V Parsons B/C 355972 Banda Trust Barbara Barbara Susan Barry Dean Barry Barry James Barry Laurence Barry Lionel Barry Reneti Campbell Clark Harris Crawshaw Flay Pennell McNair Hamilton City Council Barry Pohio Trust Baz Baz Bee Chiew Belinda R Benjamin Benjamin Dean Bernard Bernard & Shanette Mrs Beth Ellen Bethanie Jane Bethenee Ms Betty Janine (known as Jan) Billy Paama Paama Phee Albulet Danlon Bryers Ransley Fulton Germaine Smith Witt Elliott Grey Blagojevic Family Trust Mr Blair Thorpe Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd Bo & Meggie Han & Wang Body Corporate 550337 Borman Parkside LP Mr Mr Boyd Bradley Clive Bradley Sarkovich Kells Friar Brandon Brenda Eileen Brenda Brent Noel Brent Brent Kepa McNamara Price Hunt Turrell Wilson Braemar Hospital Limited Ms Mr Mr Page 3 of 30 McKibbin Properties Ltd Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 1266 Hopkins Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd Mr Brett 1149 1251 Brett Erceg Brett Thomas & Maria Elizabeth Coates & Crawford 497 892 1120 1095 1108 222 1202 718 944 277 483 868 731 910 968 959 890 361 33 700 232 619 991 546 77 785 611 299 752 1182 13 373 28 846 883 11 509 1057 957 961 2 Brian D Brian Brian James Brian Brian Trevor Brian Mr Joyce Haskell Hollis Smith Pryor Walker Bridges Insurance Services Mr Britani Bruce Alafoki Bruce Bruce Bruce Maxwell Bruce William Bryce & Natasha Watene-Zelezniak Kaufana Davidson Gordon Winders Arkins Carmichael Bunnings Ltd Bupa Care Services CMVP Cameron Graham Ms Cara Sarah Carl Miss Carla Josephine Carly Carol Carol Anne Mrs Carole Carolyn Carolyn Suzan Samarawickrema Murray Carter Ormsby Schneebeli Gauthern Turahui Allan McMinn Lundquist Nin PFS Engineering Ltd Casa Capital Casey Casey Mania Clarke Haeata Castle Argh LTD Catherine Helen Mrs Catherine Meg Murray Battersby CBNZ Ltd CCS Disability Action Waikato CDL Land New Zealand Cedric T Kingi Celeste Sarah Judith Celia Karen Ngarotata Mulipola Hope Chad Payne Central Hamilton Gospel Trust Mr Page 4 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 758 173 174 1213 507 430 926 624 1236 1102 678 355 1171 613 392 542 548 1237 962 744 1147 477 766 1154 437 210 1282 Yean McPherson McPherson Ruwhiu Sunnex Wallace Jr Friedlander Cammock Ferris Timu Walker-Eketone 897 65 726 1126 278 1042 460 155 1239 Mr Mr Channeary Charles Joseph Peter Charles Joseph Peter Charles Lowe Hyde Charles Charles Charles William Charlotte Charlotte Esther Charlotte W Charmaine Company/Organisation Name Retired Chartwell Investments Ltd Chedworth Properties Ltd Cherie Cherry Clark Wainer Chesterman Family Trust Cheyanne Alys Chick Chris Christine Christine Christine L Christopher Murray Christopher Mrs Cindy Southon Tarawa-Rameka Kershaw Training Enterprises Chorus New Zealand Limited Thompson Makata Bradley Forbes Earl Simmerman Borrie City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust CKC Holdings Ltd Claire Clarissa Charlotte Millington Arkins Claudelands Property Trust Miss Claudia Anne Rebecca Colby Colene Colin John Colin Jones 478 558 974 Colin Leslie Colleen 625 663 55 Conway Tarawhiti Corey Mason Osborne Herbert Jowles INwork NZ Commercial and Industrial Consultants Ltd Bradley Taylor College Old Boys Rugby League Club Bradley Dunham Council of Elders Page 5 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 746 348 169 488 773 1169 1027 616 417 581 241 261 1001 550 528 783 1063 995 712 1240 Courtney Skinner Craig Martin Craig Cyril Cyrus Robert Dale & Vicki Dale Dale Pateriki Dan & Jean Dan Dan Daniel Daniel Rei Daphne Daphne Lois Darnie Eden Darren Darren Darryl Leslie & Suzanne Winifred Dave Hurae David Anthony David David Charles David Edward David Evan & Karlene David Francis David David David Graeme David John David John David John David Murray & Karen Lee David Robert Dean Alexander Dean Dean Marshall & Lynn Cheryl Tomlinson Ormond Gudeeon Nicholls McLunie & Martin Clark Anderson Bourke Fenwick McDaid Parker Nin Parsons Bell Paraha Siteine Siteine Smith Dean Deane Deanna - Rose Deanne Debbie Lorraine Debbie Westerlund Pinny Alexander Freemantle Neilson Solomon 1068 638 308 330 952 1278 51 216 7 59 310 251 1261 1280 510 1203 618 1148 409 521 979 69 734 1065 Company/Organisation Name CR & S Hammerton Trust Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Moeke Pazi-Cope Bennett Taylor Ferguson Coromandel Chibnall Morgan Gonzalez Gottschalk McCall Campbell Rushbrooke Thomson Young Searle Crafar Gauthern Hutchinson Page 6 of 30 Attic Home's Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd Landform Surveys Ltd Blackout Electrical David Gottschalk Trust Equlation Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 782 282 1091 934 492 595 819 67 317 184 303 584 937 1272 56 1110 29 835 1107 985 1021 422 245 866 1020 1022 1024 427 433 629 723 544 1186 91 993 372 40 Attard-Manche Fisher Brunton Hansen Phillip Karioi Osteopaths Ltd 1132 314 834 1227 1087 1103 1124 273 Deborah Mrs Deborah June Deborah Leigh Debra Jane Debra Deecan Holdings Ltd Delaine & Cyril Delma Gudgeon Murray-Macgregor Delta Property Group Dr Ms Denis Richard Denise Denise Denise Margaret Dennis Dennis Roy Lauren Clark Howell Frost Harris McLeod Silverdale Residents Group Department of Conservation Department of Corrections Ms Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Desiree Joyce Desmond Hetiri DI & CA Diana Dianne Marsters Park Te Tuhi Bourke Shurtz Leathwick DNZ Property Fund Limited DNZ Property Fund Limited DNZ Property Fund Limited DNZ Property Fund Limited Mr Dolores Don Donald Jeffrey Waugh Dora Dorothy Betty Douglas Kanuela Duane Duane Barnhill Childers Burns Ballantyne Belbin Strother Skyes Sykes Eamonn Munster C.O.B. Rugby League DV Bryant Trust Board Infinity Property Management Ltd Eastside Apostolic Foundation Ecostream Irrigation Mr Eddie Edmund Edna Mabel Edna Rivers Edna Rivers Edward William Willison Wilson Johnson Poulava Poulava Makin Page 7 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 134 1137 444 994 436 889 963 1010 1012 1165 83 300 127 318 552 1071 1008 Skinner Phillips Brown Tuitama Costanzo de Jong de Jong de Jong de Jong Witehira Weller Makin Hettig Edwin Eileen Elbert Eleni Elizabeth Elizabeth Elizabeth Elizabeth Elizabeth Elizabeth Patricia Elizabeth Miss Ella Pax Elletta Rachel Elroy & Kate Thomson Emma Emmeline Company/Organisation Name C.O.B. Rugby League Watene Sunnex Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 809 829 1000 605 Erana Eric Erina Dee & Tony Ernest George & Georgina Anne Roa Oler Osborne Morris 490 398 562 1234 428 939 942 1180 405 1181 344 390 403 950 70 796 600 147 571 1200 Ernie Ernie Errin Jay Esta Vernice Esteban Estonie Jean E'stonie Jean Evan H Evangeline Eve Le Heron Ritz Nin Metekingi Tirado Funaki Petersen Smith Donlon McAnnalley Everton Trust Ewen Fannie Fay Ataarahiora Fiona Fiona Maxine Fiona Natalie Flu Folau Paea Tukanua Macdonald Ritz Coromandel Green Greenwood Bell Waikai Ngaw Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd 899 Forlongs Furnishings Limited Page 8 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 307 407 506 793 396 608 Letford Fitzpatrick Adams Maxwell Hughes 213 96 761 229 620 1075 941 969 632 224 135 641 1284 1134 12 370 379 319 816 1078 559 840 306 896 1018 875 1208 411 240 368 1155 176 302 181 183 180 Frances Dene Francis Francis Peri Fraser Christopher Fred H Company/Organisation Name Riverlea Environment Society Future Proof Implementation Committee G A Hughes and ass 2005 ltd Gabrielle Gabrielle Mrs Gaenor Gardiner James Gordon Garrick Wayne Gary Richard Gavin Gavin Roland Graham Mr Gavin Gavin Talmage Joseph Gaylynn Leigh Wilson Wilson Smith Palmer Parr Wiseman Sarkovich Wallace Smith Scirkovich Tunstall Generation Zero Waikato Mr Mr Genevieve Geoff Geoffrey Charles Geoffrey Noel Van Eden C Spooner Felton George Eugene George Hape George George George William Gerard Francis Lusty Chase Kaka Tenwolde Holland Kelly Behalf of owners of 19 & 21 Clifton Road and Corner Rostrevor St & Clifton Rd Gilbass Developments Ltd Gillian Anne Gillian Denny James Glaisdale Property Partnership Limited (GPPL) Glenn Burgess Glenview Community Centre Glenview Medical Centre Googie Pirika Whatu Mr Gordon Mrs Grace Mr Graeme Ernest Graeme Ernest Graeme Ernest Goodwin Apiti Chesterman McCarthy Goodwin Goodwin Goodwin Page 9 of 30 Hamilton Council McPherson & Goodwin Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 882 Graeme Errol & Maureen Gladys Graham Graham Graham & Phillipa Grant Greg Matthews Matthews Bed and Breakfast Mckelvey Singelton Cox & Wright Hamilton Gimblett PFS Engineering PFS Engineering 393 345 Greg Harmeling 830 61 933 117 293 1115 Gretchen Cume Guy Anthony Gwen Gwyneth Ann Perrett Kipa Verkerk 903 365 1025 375 630 Mr Church Road Developments Ltd Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited Group of Alandale Residents Dr 894 47 Hamilton Central Business Association Hamilton Christian Nightshelter Trust Hamilton Citizens and Ratepayers Association Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club Hamilton East Community Trust 1013 Hamilton East Community Trust 955 Hamilton Golf Club Incorporated 885 1117 Hamilton Grey Power Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group Hamilton JV Investment Company Ltd Hamilton Rowing Club Inc Hamilton Youth Council 253 1248 1170 235 871 580 1232 1070 895 413 73 1098 1176 Hamish Paul Hana Mariea Harrisson Balabat Harry & Lloyd Harry Peter McArthur Haeata Jull Hoebergen & Seeney, et al Gaastra Hata Hata Puriri Tipoki Page 10 of 30 Taranaki District Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd Temple View Heritage Society Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 660 275 38 947 468 124 1052 1133 479 1260 1252 500 148 1111 539 472 1191 805 1246 973 1123 87 931 1104 209 902 911 333 496 199 192 577 598 231 37 949 954 64 715 172 457 39 Heather Mrs Heather Joan Ms Heather Karen Heather Margaret Heidi-Anna Ruth Heinrich Helen Judith Helena Hemi Hene Hennie Herani Herawini Hine Makin de Groen Kaufana Gordon Hettig Thomson Maddison Arthur Chase van Kooten Ware Rangi Tracvity Hillary Hineawe Hinemoa Hira Te Rangipumanmao Holly Holly Miss Hope Daniels Hapuku Peke-Manawaiti Selwyn Lin Snape Allum Mr Ian Johnston Goodman & Mayes Van in Watene Curtice MacDonald Murphy Townsend Bridge Taylor Brownlee Wu Yen Ormsby Kazenbroot Kilburn Howard Hugh & Katie Hugo Huiariki Mr Iain Alistair Dr Iain Thomas Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Ian Harold & Jean Marie Mr Ian Kenneth Mr Ian Roderick Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann IFan Mrs I-fang Grace Chou Ike Ihaka Mrs Imelda Ina Margaret Thorong La Limited Hopper Developments Ltd Hounsell Holdings Ltd House of Montrose Limited Infinity Property Management Ltd 1253 27 Taniwharau Rugby League Club Highview Properties Limited Hill Laboratories Limited Inghams Enterprises (NZ) Pty Ltd Ms Irene Catharine Mary van der Beek Page 11 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 972 658 315 879 Iris & Fred Isaac Roland Isobel & Harold Isobel Anne Bryant Hamon Nielsen Bennett 1129 635 1222 519 754 153 1263 Ivory Tangaroa 334 165 648 755 560 832 594 24 79 1183 920 833 585 257 465 447 1140 186 854 1079 99 653 948 1220 408 654 823 551 1017 386 328 Company/Organisation Name YWCA (Young Womans' Christian Association) of Hamilton Inc J.C Johnson Family Trust Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth Jackie Jackie Noki Jackson Robin Jacob Marinus & June Elizabeth Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Jaden Jaimee Jake Jamaal James & Heather James Enoka Mr James Henry Mr James Neil Scott James James Jamey Jamie Mrs Jan Jane Jane Janelle Moana Miss Janice Ann Janice Ann Janie Janine Mere Janna June Margaret Jared Edward Jared Ezra Jared Vaughan Jared Worth Jarom Jasmine Jason Jason Mr Jason Daniels Macdonald Tainui Takiari Mans Te Iti Rearea RLC Peters Paekan Davies Wheki Tuia Hely & Montgomerie Tapsell Riley Chalmers Ratana Whetu Etika Hemi Stewart Griffin Macdonald Nikora O'Leary Verran Edwards Siteine Fesolai Coromandel Hemi Ormsby Pease Gudgeon Tunstall Lin Brown Hennessey Page 12 of 30 Genesis Energy Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 980 1229 425 412 1231 1035 909 338 824 722 25 89 1093 297 586 612 733 735 498 1249 1205 68 298 415 1037 1286 Illsley Katene Bartholomew Nikoia Burgess Walmsley West Bothwell Jenkins Atkinson Stone Atkinson Tuau Milne Hemi-Nicholson Forret Forret Vowles Gush Ponga Ponga Ponga Belbin Walters Hay Gallagher 530 615 1029 706 1175 131 285 435 18 445 100 459 190 122 669 316 242 337 1228 Jay R Jeanette Jeff Jeff Jenna Maria Jenna Jennifer & John Jennifer Rita Jenny Jeremy Mr Jesse Jill Jill Patricia Mr Jim Jo Leah Takuna Joan & Michael Joan B & (A) Michael Joanne Jocelyn Jodhi & Uki Jodhi Jodhi Vanessa Mrs Jodi N. Jody Joe John Mr Mr Dr John John & Susan John A John John Charles John John Douglas John Edward John Elliott John G John Herangi John Jordan John Joseph John Kieran John Neil John John Ralph John Vianney Joihn Hoani Uru Transfield Chaloner Kendall Barnard Paki Devonshire Bennion Garza Stevenson Hughes Searancke Herbert Graat Hettig Westerlund Jr Nielsen Leathwick Conroy Katene Page 13 of 30 Company/Organisation Name Fairview Downs Residents Hay Family J & G Gallagher Management Trust Ltd Gallagher Group Hillcrest Auto Services Te Wharekura O Rakaumanga Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 1254 Jon Francis & Elizabeth Howie Jarvis 727 143 471 455 784 1194 767 662 289 665 336 381 426 188 703 446 78 1055 636 798 103 1255 1177 115 116 975 88 111 290 491 569 1139 661 118 178 6 1179 378 818 470 Jonathon William Jonelle Jordan Jordan Arkins Henry Dennis Kiro Jordyn D H Joseph Hans Joshua Josina Wilhelmina Maria Joy Joy Olive Joyce Joyce Judith Clare Julia Kim Juliah Julie Marie Julie Nicole Julienne Elizabeth Justin Justin KD Kahuwaero Kara Ivy Kare Eva Karen Hoki Karen Kareve Harata Karyn Marcia Kasey Kasmin Joy Kasmin Joy Katanna Katarina Katherine Mary Kathleen Heather Kathleen Joyce Katie Kay Keaohiwahiwaofaluanui Kelsey Smith Hartog Montomery Ellis Jackson Tristram Brooks Brock McDonald Endres Albulet O'Carroll Morley Duncan Greenwood Sonnenberg Silva Katene Witehira Pompey Parker Stevenson Witehira Hayward McCarty Nikora Nikora Green Koroheke Luketina McCaughtrie Tipoki See Warrender Daniels Kel Kellie Kelly Ormsby Brown Littlewood 699 475 206 Company/Organisation Name Jordanielle Trust Mrs Mrs Mrs Mrs Mrs Ms Mr Page 14 of 30 Dollar Flash Dollar Flash Toncliff Limited Living Streets Hamilton Tracvity Seeks Investment 2012 Ltd Mitre 10 Mega Hamilton Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 523 1092 827 1044 82 1151 384 668 576 1257 34 737 16 279 643 504 667 601 139 421 593 557 157 281 284 286 464 120 1099 Pere Williams Shang & Wang Graham Whittaker Arkley Alexander Rasor Newman Willmott Ryan Etika Hall Collins Tunstall Tamahou Wenz Fitzpatrick Major Shurtz Beets Tahere Rose Mr Mr Kelly Ken Ken & Hong Kendall Kenneth & Joyce Kenneth Kenneth F Kenneth Kerianne Moana Kerry & Donna Kerry Francis & Lynda May Kerryn Kevin Brian Kevin Kevin Harold Kevin Kewena Kevin Matthew Kevin Patrick Khan Kim Kimberley Kimberley Ruth Kimberly Company/Organisation Name King Family Trust King Family Trust King Family Trust Kingi Kiritahi Dennis Koroheke Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd Kiwi Income Property Trust & Kiwi Property Holdings Limited 1198 927 976 Kiwi Property Management Limited Kiwi Property Management Ltd 978 Kiwi Property Management Ltd 366 1090 565 831 458 1049 112 KiwiRail Holdings Limited Kristen Kristen Kung-Yao Kylie Kylie Michelle Lady Hartley Smith Lin Hohaia Birks King Page 15 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 125 152 1119 1023 1233 842 1212 680 288 1094 998 717 964 748 385 549 161 250 451 1189 915 807 1197 774 1235 228 1082 847 647 423 651 803 673 545 1281 628 777 327 1174 721 694 561 443 649 1080 Moeke Kama Elkington Lahaina Laisa Laitohi Lana Charrell Lance Edward Lance Lani Awhimai Michele Miss Lauren Jay Laurence John Lavinia Maria Lee-anne Lei Leilani Lenna Maria Lennox James Leonard Mr Les Lesley Leslie R Lester Levi-Che Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa Lillian Lillian Winifred Mr Lincoln Lincoln Ivan Linda Linda Linda Lindsay Hixon Lisa Jayne Lisa Lisa-Marie Dr Liz Lloyd Elder Kershaw-Ryan Kendrick Harvey Emery McDonald Denny Taitoko Paama Sarkovich Uili Alexander Southon Reid Wooldridge Lomas Newman Clarke Ngawaka Kershaw-Smiler Singers Kershaw Archer Reid Fell Ormsby Shurtz Hamon Bust Wilson Watene Halsey Duncan Company/Organisation Name Lambert International Ltd Kershaw Training Enterprises COB League NZRL Longtail Pet Motel Lori Luana Wikitoria Lucinda Lucy Anne & Andrew Owen Lucy Luis Luke Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Silsbee Paki Atkinson McKergow & Hughes Tuia Garcia Ormsby Briggs Page 16 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 272 1168 450 1145 1050 999 397 815 1011 739 810 716 Lynda Marie Lynden Lynette Ann Lynette Lynette Joyce Lynette Ramari Lynn Lynnette M.P & R.G Maari Rose Malaea Malakai Findlay Earl McCheyne Cassidy Williams Kauluwehi Shomers Vincent Upsdell Thompson Cossey Watene-Zelezniak College Old Boys Rugby League 1112 193 1125 395 1040 Malcolm Malcolm George Manaoterangi Ernest Mandy Williams Porteous Forbes Bishop 391 536 579 1096 1019 Manu Maraea Marama Karen Leslie Marama Maree Virginia 434 23 196 505 645 113 1089 339 770 794 670 476 1188 414 357 786 304 905 Ms Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group Margaret Corina Mrs Margaret Jane Margaret Joyce Margaret Margaret Mr Mr Maria Marie Pere Marie Theresa Marilyn Marilyn Cecil Marina Jane Mark Mark Brian Mark Mark Mark Mark Mark Waa Mita Marshall Mete Pene Sosa Prenter Davidson Kahui Watene Koroheke Joseph Conroy Bigland Hayward Westerlund Bramley Hague Green McLennan Metekingi Priscott Sullivan Page 17 of 30 Te Kotuku Whenua Environmental Agency for NgatiWairere College Old Boys Rugby League Charitable Trust Barry and Sullivan Electrical Ltd Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 1267 709 681 410 1067 262 54 57 1276 486 1039 Mark Thomson Mark Thomson Maroea Gaylene Maroni John Marsden Boyd Martin O'Neill Martin Martin Mary Elizabeth Mary Matai Christian Parata Family Mitchell Mitchell Harris Westerlund Gaabdora Kirkby Toop Toop Hamon Jefferson Baruchel Developments Ltd Matthew Lester Matthew Shane Matthew Maurice Conway Mavis Ruth Max Walker Maxime Maxine Roberta Maxwell George May Simon Watene Taylor Clarke Duncan Verran Rouast Fraser Horsford Tan Mr Mr Mr 768 90 266 914 627 855 195 825 1225 872 175 702 1206 1195 McConnell Property Ltd McConnell Property Ltd McCracken Surveys Limited McDonald's Restaurants (NZ) Ltd 1204 484 1031 582 1226 792 230 958 274 664 1178 676 110 633 322 329 9 McPherson Goodwin Surveyors Limited Mectildah Megan Megan Rona Meiana Jenelle Melanie Miss Melanie Jane Melanie Jane Miss Melanie Mellissa Mere Marnie Mr Meri Merieanna Merran Michael Cecil Michael Kenneth Michael Chikwiri Kendall Kaho Gray Ballantyne Rouse Wiseman Rouse Castello Edwards Blakey Graham Powell Paddy Hall Ler Page 18 of 30 The NZ Labour Missionary Assn Charitable Trust Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname Company/Organisation Name 14 389 126 756 201 438 212 287 Hull Rose Wilson Powell Le Prou Lyon Missiha Jasper Ltd 877 1069 743 1156 574 764 456 1207 404 150 1060 323 101 512 349 387 575 467 93 828 105 749 219 1127 218 400 354 194 295 136 711 656 591 43 95 Michael Robert Michael Seth Michael Michaela Mrs Michelle Michelle Michelle Midlands Health Network Limited Mighty River Power Limited Mikala T Mike Milford Rogers Watene Burton Hamon Milwood Trust Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Miriama Mischele Missy Misty Moana Adalene Malissa Moses Christopher Murdoch Jason Murray James Murray Keith Tang Kingi Rhodes Shurtz Kama Rarere Armstrong Tahere Johnstone McDonald Modern Transport Limited CCNZ Alumni Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 Mylee Myles Aidan Tipene Myles Aidan Myles Myles Myra Myra Nagarajah Nakeya Mrs Nancy Nandan & Shweta Miss Natalie Natalie Renee Nathalie Nathan Graeme Nathaniel Mr Neal Geoffrey Neesha Gordon Watene Watene Watene Watene Evans-McLeod Wineera Manoharan Quezada Cooper Modak Jordan McNamara Lordemans Hamon Beets Utting Pahuru Page 19 of 30 Ez-Pawn Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 742 932 149 1283 Pahuru Brumblecomble Rose Neesha Neil Neil T Company/Organisation Name New Zealand Fire Service Comission New Zealand Heavy Haulage Association Inc New Zealand Institute of Architects 1290 42 1157 New Zealand Police Information and Technology Group 924 New Zealand Transport Agency 740 1221 1158 46 603 236 514 788 1128 672 499 342 617 1077 541 540 264 813 858 543 501 108 4 503 590 217 1076 1160 537 1048 62 747 Mr Mr Ms Ngamhe Ngawati Niall Nicholas Nick Nicola Anne Nicola Nigel Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka Nihe Matilda Nikeita Nitinchandra M Noel Henry & Joan Noeleen Blanche Noeline & Mike Te Amo Smiler Baker Smit Murphy Carroll Hamon Ballantyne Warwick Warwick Campbell Parulekar Breed Forbes Bourke Northview Partnership Ltd NZ Horse Recreation Inc O. Raihania Timu Oaklands Group Holdings Ltd Opoia Trustees LTD Mr Ora Going Ora Neill Orion Salman Ota Otis J Owen & Robyn Owen Pahemata Kay Pamela Joy Pamela Mabel Pamela May Pamela Richardson Kohe Edwards Tuaen Fruean Renton Purcell Apiti McLanachan Heremaia Brown Umuhozu Page 20 of 30 Te Wananga Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 531 141 977 606 Pania Lee Pania Nin Waikai 887 724 1121 997 970 171 431 248 677 494 936 140 215 Pat Patrice Marama Patricia Helen Patrick Patsy Paul Paul Raymond Paul Robert Paulette Pauline Pauline Norma Pawhaure Pearce Andrew McNair Arkins Going Taitoko Karene Morrison Clever Kennel Leef Gaudin O'Brien Brown Watson Peihana Penelope Jane Peni Rachel Penni-Marie Penny Penrhyn Margaret (Penny) Pera Pera Percy Owen Arkins Golder Harris Allen Allen Paeka Ratana Te Hira Peter Peter & Barbara Peter & Margaret Peter & Rinske Peter Peter George Peter H Peter John Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd Dornauf Ryan Fairhead Harris Clarke McCheyne Bos Paviour-Smith Peter Marere Kaio Peter Mete-Smith Mete-Smith 1086 732 817 684 246 227 151 137 1162 862 876 1006 324 772 759 449 346 19 912 1081 1118 Company/Organisation Name Parkwood Gateway Limited Parkwood Trade Centre Limited Mr Mr Mr Ms Ms Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited Perry Group Limited Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd Page 21 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 485 207 1214 8 81 86 646 1113 779 326 790 904 Peter Peter Richard Peter S Peter Peter William Peter William Peti Hinewetea Petra Philip & Kelly Philip & Patricia Philip Philip Edward & Frances Dene O'Donnell Clarke Thomson Singleton Bennett Bennett Transfield Reiter Evans Oh Ballantyne Letford Philip Philippa Jane Phillip David Siteine Gerard King Phillip Shane Ikunui Pierce Isaac Te Ngakau Pirihi Te Ohaki (Bill) Pita Pita Rose Te Moni Ruwhiu Witehira Witehira 760 249 1250 Mr Mr Mr Mr Dr 522 992 1210 839 1166 925 Company/Organisation Name Hamilton Amateur Radio Club (Inc) PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 1273 Population Health, Waikato DHB 1153 1164 984 1135 Porter Developments Ltd Porter Properties Ltd Portland Park Limited Progressive Enterprises Limited 938 929 269 132 1193 142 1088 1016 687 568 1064 751 682 63 898 Property Council New Zealand PRS Planning Services Limited Pumice Food Group Mr Quintin Glenford Quntin A R R Andrew R.E. Ra Rachael Rachel Elizabeth Raechel Anne Rakaipaka Rakaipaka Rakaipaka Hapuku Hapuku Henry Joseph Mason-Riseborough Harris Nonoa Thomson Popping Harris Puriri Puriri Page 22 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 650 757 696 145 1217 1223 720 159 864 362 869 873 Hamon Kite Coutolleau Anthony Hemi Hemi King Bourne Cowie & Spriggs Dong Bird Bird Ralph Roland Randall Tannea Raphael Rave Rawiri Rawiri Russell Rawiri Wayne Ray Raylene & Saul Raymond Raymond John Raymond John 1114 374 129 133 402 1053 567 205 1034 778 1172 686 130 144 341 469 Raymond Russell Rebecca Rebecca Rebecca Rebecca Rebecca Rebecca Mrs Rebekah Rei Reihana Patrick Reihana Patrick Renaira Gaylene Renata Immanuel Renata Park Hamilton Cutler Hapuku Harris Hippolite Nonoa Kenny Kendall Nuku Nuku Harris Kahuroa Whitley Rewa Pahemata Ruthina Tipu Dewes 922 935 440 325 462 836 592 675 728 394 685 1101 588 1192 85 493 Rex Graeme Rex Rhonda Richard Richard Grant Richard Grant Richard Richard Richard Thomas Ricky Rinaira Gaylene Ringihia Te Aroha Ripeka C Ripeka Edge Hannam O'Hearon Ward Herewini Herewini Grey-Edwards Herbig Arkins Shurtz Horsford Watene Fruean Hapuku Rob Jacobs Company/Organisation Name Le Gastronome t/a La Cave Waikato Referees Association Birds Plant & Equipment Trust Birds Plant and Equipment Trust Kendall Family Revell Properties No.9 Limited Mr River Road Trust Page 23 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 177 657 1106 Robert Edmund Robert Robert & Anna Simms Gordon Moore & Cox Robert & Lauryl Robert Alan Robert Andrew Robert Robert E Robert Gordon Robert James Robert James Robert W. Roberta Lee Robin Robyn & Graham Robyn & Rodney Rod Roena Roger Roger Roimata Hazel Roland & Wendy Roland Olliver Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton Romana Ron Ronald David Ronald David Rosemary Rosemary Eleanor Rosie Rosina Aliana Ross & Leonie Crump Mills Joseph Christmas Rihehert Bell Davies-Colley Davies-Colley Belbin Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS Holdsworth McBride Dallin Bowman McCarthy Hennebry Hennebry Hall Spirig Cooper 599 187 1187 424 495 1268 260 265 291 270 1262 943 388 221 1097 254 255 463 1279 347 704 1045 987 49 50 98 84 441 527 1265 1015 1032 309 369 886 923 283 1275 179 1277 Dr Dr Dr Dr Mr Dr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Company/Organisation Name Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato M&R Silverdale Residents Group Catholic Diocese of Hamilton Graham Phillips Ford Ford Gordon Stucki Ibarra Nin Hopkins Rotokauri Developments Ltd Rototuna Holdings Ltd Rototuna Ventures Ltd Dr Mr Rowan Rowena Roy & Dayl Roy McIver Rudolf Johann Russell Bishop Kaleopa Carson Daniel FRSNZ Dudli Cooper Page 24 of 30 Ruakura Residents Group and William Roy Cowie Dudli Properties Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 3 690 797 1073 826 516 679 256 753 729 692 693 17 399 71 167 Mr Knutson Knaap Knaap Hamon Robinson Southon Harris 170 1030 1109 1230 688 614 1152 154 640 556 689 1219 10 674 92 452 705 812 1141 652 820 713 197 1224 198 1085 884 597 1159 Mrs Saskia Maria Russell Russelle Russelle Ruth Lynne Ruth Rutha Lucy Ryan Stacey Company/Organisation Name Nemesys Ltd Safekids New Zealand Samuel Samuel Whiteford Sandra Jean Sandra Jean Sandra Joan Sarah Sarah Sash Nowacki Arkins Talbett Talbett Fraser-Ball Shurtz Nichol Stosic Ashton Developments Ltd. Fraser-Ball Ltd Upper Central Zone of NZRL Inc. Tomlinson Schramm Property Trust Scott Scott Sean Seanna Bready McAnnalley Harris Carlile-Clark Sekta Properties Limited Senae Shane Shannon Asalele Sharen Sharianne Hinemoa Shaun Baishang Shaun Shawney mei Atarangi Shea Margaret Sheena Alice Sheree Sheree Mere Sherrill Macdonald Sherry Te Amohaere Sherry Mrs Sheryl Margaret Shing-long Mrs Shirley May Gwynneth Shirley T Shona Betty Shona Catherine Anne Shona Mary Mitchell Carlile Ta'ala Reti Hemi Shen Eketona Kahi Lawrence Maclean Fryer Nikora Hamon Watene Watene Curtice Lee Caspari QSM Rago Shaw Duggan McClinchy Page 25 of 30 Riverlea Environment Society Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 189 534 35 1245 364 294 1009 900 983 356 Parulekar Li Graafhuis Mrs Shubhangi Shui Simon Arend Simon Dyke Farms Ltd Mr Simon Irvine Simon Puttick Young Friar Sink or Swim SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd Soleil McDonald Southern Cross Hospitals Limited 258 271 106 806 182 745 996 367 906 776 243 1 439 22 244 1190 691 156 1138 738 814 Company/Organisation Name St Francis Cooperating Parish St Paul's Collegiate School- Rowing Club Stacey Scirkovich Starship Childrens Health Starship Trauma Service Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Stella Neale Stephanie Stephen Stephen George Stephen Stephen Steve Barry Steve Steven Steven Strantz Dalton Stuart Stuart Sue Summer Kenyon Phillips Cox Bigwood Reneti Tunnicliffe Culhane Easley Richardson Gale Wihongi Dillon Poulava Nikora Kershaw Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd 380 637 1041 237 Susan Susan Susan Elizabeth Mrs Susan Oldridge Cribb Thomson Hopkins 1264 94 821 453 211 517 526 Mrs Susan Susan Suzanne Suzanne Hopkins Pahuru Ings Kyd Cruise Investments Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd Switched On Electrical Sydney Taka Tahir Loy Smith Nin Page 26 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 986 128 1199 913 515 432 1173 780 626 208 795 725 697 547 623 123 97 160 1130 990 1144 1038 960 121 525 320 781 102 166 482 1201 Minhinnick Watene 1033 Tahuata Nelson Tainan Evarn Company/Organisation Name Tainui Group Holdings Limited Tainui Group Holdings Ltd Takiri Zan Talbot T Talmadge Temuera Tania Tania Rangirangi Mariana Miss Tanya Tanya Lisa Tara Elissa Tara Vanessa Tashena Marie Tasi Ann Tau Te Aroha Te Awa Te Naera Te Reremoana Te Rina Noelani Te Waata R Southon Snow Harris Hennebry Enoka Jack Whitehead Arkins Hills Waru Cammock Moeke Pahuru Anderson Tangaroa Nelson Ngawaka Greening Telecom New Zealand Limited Terekia Rewiki James Terina Lee Terry Martyn Terry Tessa TeUranga Koroheke Nin Hume Snipler Siteine Waikou The Adare Company Ltd The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board (The Trust Board) The Errol John Kendall Family 1167 The House Movers Section of New Zealand Heavy Haulage Association (Inc), Prestige Building Removals Ltd, Willcox Building Removals Ltd and The House Movers (Rotorua) Ltd (together referred to as "House Movers") 838 1256 The Ministry of Education The National Trading Company of NZ Ltd Page 27 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 1196 The New Zealand Historic Places Trust The Riverlea Environment Society 1209 953 The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton The Suit Shop Limited The Trust Company Limited for AETNZ Education Trust The University of Waikato The Waikato Tree Trust 1241 1122 1059 305 644 1238 332 311 518 553 146 945 1259 263 191 891 1285 416 988 401 220 849 572 267 1028 487 72 1163 1083 454 5 15 1084 343 280 114 982 66 Company/Organisation Name Theresa Thomas Tamai Tim Timothy Daniel Tina Ann Tipare Tirohia Albert Kershaw Stokes Hunt Rose-Dutton Wharepapa Smith Titanium Park Joint Venture Mr Mr Ms Tiwini Tobias Todd & Heather Tom (Alan Douglas) Tom Toni Toni Tony Tony Tony & Christine Tony & Frances Tony Tony Tracey Tracey Laraine Hemi Braun Hamilton MacRae Roa Elkington Swney Matthews Priscott Lennon Schramm Begbie Elkington Bell Sherman Tracvity WCA Trust Tram Lease Limited Transpower New Zealand Ltd Mr Trevor- Charles Te Metera Trevor Francis Trevor James & Lucy Gay Tripoli Daniel Kohu McKee Hancock Tuau Mckee Trust Trust Waikato Tui 2000 Tuini Tyrone Jade Ukinga Koroheke Kareitiana AkaitiPonga Page 28 of 30 Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 1288 - 642 107 502 1056 1185 442 1046 420 448 710 622 1291 313 360 811 1116 791 698 Urlich Properties Limited / Z.I & T Urlich Valerie Vanessa Vatia Velroy Crystal Verdon Anthony Veronica Vicki Vicky Vilma Vincent Matthew Vivienne Shona Evelyn Clark Armstrong Toetagata Matthews Bartlett Gaiza Wihongi Shurtz McCreadie Heke Cammock Auckland Council Vodafone New Zealand Limited W.J. & M.R. W.R & J.M Waihanea Katarina Waikaraka Emily Laverty Falconer Timu Ruwhiu Waikato Biodiversity Forum Waikato Chamber of Commerce 1003 Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group Waikato District Council Waikato District Health Board Waikato Federated Farmers Charitable Society Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1211 708 701 1051 276 Waikato Property Investors Association Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376 359 714 610 Waikato Regional Airport Ltd Waikato Regional Council Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771 163 631 563 1143 666 1271 Company/Organisation Name Waimarie Hare Wallace Raiti Peter Wallace Raiti Peter Walter Kevin Warren Reihana Reihana Ware Stace Page 29 of 30 Tigers Waitomo Properties Ltd Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013 User Title Full Given Name(s) Submission Number Surname 489 31 916 Salon Bowker - 1216 919 763 822 511 971 750 466 573 418 21 Mr Warren Waylon Wayne Maurice & Melanie Jane Clarke Family Trust Wayne Rikki Douglas Wayne Wei Company/Organisation Name Te Kira Rogers Lee WEL Networks Limited Wendy Joy Wero Westly Te haki Whare Sales Karena Howard Dewes Wi Te Kawepo William Arthur Ormsby Featherstone 1072 928 762 William Kent William Roy William Roy & Raewyn Mary Money Cowie Cowie 352 William Wie & Patricia Tekore Moana 164 1244 1218 707 239 Willy Wilson David Winifred Rose Beazley Jolly Hemi Wiremu Taylor Puke 461 538 533 1131 480 158 1292 1026 Yana Leah Yi Yi Yongchao Yorana Yvette K Hemi Li Li Lin Arthur Rose 513 535 162 Zan Te Wakaiti Zhuoying Zoram Whittle Family Trust Mr Mr Nawton Community Presbyterian Church Envision Team Wintec Namtok Consultancy Ltd Ngati Wairere Z Energy Limited Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd Southon Shi Watene Page 30 of 30 Supplement 17th June 2013 This page is an updated summary of submissions which adds the following summaries City Wide – 25.13 Three Waters Sub Name Nagarajah Manoharan Sub Point Plan Provision 218.002 Summary Of Submissions 25.13 Three Waters Sub Type Summary Oppose Submission relates to Rule 25.13.4.4 (General Standards - Water). The submitter states that meters are not required and seeks that spending on water meters be stopped. City Wide – 25.15 Urban Design Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.149 25.15.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 25.15.2.1c Porter Developments Ltd 1153.028 25.15.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policy 25.15.2.1c regarding internal and external amenity for occupants of residential, commercial and community buildings. Appendix 8 – Schedule 8A Built Heritage (structures buildings and associated sites) Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Frances Dene Letford 307.001 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Oppose Include the Rukuhia Soil Research Station, located within the Stage 1 of the Peacocke Structure Plan, in Schedule 8A: Built Heritage (Structures, Buildings and Associated Sites). Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.007 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Oppose Oppose Schedule 8A Built Heritage - structures, buildings and associated sites which has upgraded the Notre Dames des Missions to an A ranked item. Develop additional criteria relating to the assessment of buildings that include state of repair and earthquake risk as factors. Peter Dornauf 876.001 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support in Amend Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites by including additional items. part SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.001 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and Oppose Amend the Heritage Ranking for H39 Central Post Office. Page 1 of 3 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary associated sites Sink or Swim 1009.012 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support Retain the listing of the Municipal Baths as a ‘B’ ranking heritage item. Hamilton East Community Trust 1013.002 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support in Supports the a Ranking for the Notre Dames de Missions building at 47 Clyde Street and requests that the Hamilton part Municipal Pools and Steele Park be given Category A heritage rankings. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.015 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support in Undertake a systematic survey of the city in order to identify additional heritage structures, buildings and associated part sites and cultural and archaeological sites. Include the following heritage items and areas in Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites. · 309 River Road · 1 Victoria St · 68 Pembroke St / Lake Domain · Innes Memorial Arch, corner Victoria & Bridge Street · 24 Anglesea Street · 150 Te Rapa Road · 136 Pembroke St · 371 Grey Street · 23 Ruakiwi Road · Ruakura Homestead · Rukuhia Soil Research Station buildings · A block + Registry building, University of Waikato · 58A Lake Crescent · Caro Street Telephone Exchange · Girl Guide Camp Fire, Parana Park · Annie McPherson Memorial Bridge, Parana Park · Former Parr house / caretaker’s residence, Parana Park · 62 Alexandra Street · 15-17 Vialou Street · 106 Forest Lake Road · 1335 Victoria Street, Hamilton · Fairfield Primary School · Hamilton West School – original school building · 379-381 Grey Street · 250 Grey Street · 490 Grey Street Page 2 of 3 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary · · · · · · · · · · 120 Sandwich Road & 2 Marnane Terrace 21 Rostrevor Street 12 Little London Lane 7 Queen’s Ave, Frankton Wooden piles associated with 1864 jetty Piles of the Union Bridge, built 1879. The remains of Roose Shipping Co.’s wharf Richmond Estate Heritage Area -parts of Pembroke and Selwyn Streets Church College Campus 33 Naylor St Niall Baker 1158.018 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support in Review Schedule 8A Built Heritage Structures Buildings and Associated Sites of the plan to consider the potential part heritage significance of other structures, buildings and associated sites within the city. The New Zealand Historic Places Trust 1196.031 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support in Amend the current content of Schedule 8A: Built Heritage to include additional items. part House, 32 Albert Street Workers Dwelling, 84 Forest lake Road Rukuhia soil Research station (former), at 3019 Ohaupo Road Z Energy Limited 1292.004 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Oppose Delete Historic Heritage B Ranking on the building located at 116 Grey Street Or Rezone 116 Grey Street to provide a suitable zoning for 116 Grey Street that provides restricted discretionary status for the service station activity, as well as for alterations and additions to the existing service station, and to signage. Page 3 of 3 Summary Of Submissions Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Steve Barry Culhane 1.001 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 15 Patricia Avenue. Upgrade stormwater infrastructure on Patricia Avenue. Chad Payne 2.002 Features Map 18B Oppose Undertake more precise flood hazard modelling and investigation for 9 Glenwarrick Court. Confirmation of measures to protect the 9 Glenwarrick Court and other properties from flooding. Russell Knutson 3.001 Zoning Map 36A Oppose Map 36A-Rezone from Residential to Central City zone to reach the natural boundaries represented by Willoughby park, Beetham park, Edgecumbe park and the river. Orion Salman Edwards 4.001 Zoning Map 17A Oppose The vacant land between Flagstaff Park and Endeavour Avenue not be rezoned to General Residential but be retained as Community Facilities Zone or be rezoned to be included into Flagstaff Park. Trevor Francis McKee (Mckee Trust) 5.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7. Opposes the interface rule in the Residential zone regarding the placement of garages. Kathleen Heather McCaughtrie 6.001 Zoning Map 10A Support in Ensure Transport Corridor hierarchy recognises increased traffic on Tuhikaramea Road. part Ensure speed limits/controls for Tuhikaramea Rd are appropriate for a built up residential environment and are enforced. David Gottschalk (David Gottschalk Trust) 7.001 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Peter Singleton 8.001 Zoning Maps Michael Ler 9.001 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 22 Roderick Place. Shaun Baishang Shen 10.001 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose Oppose Designation I58: Hamilton Microwave Station (Newcastle Road) seeks its relocation. CDL Land New Zealand Ltd 11.001 Figure 15-6c Support in Amend Figure 15-6c of Volume 2 by: part - extending the "Proposed Road Stopping" to the northern boundary of Lot 1 DPS 89636. - correcting the road name "Sylvester Road" to "Brywood Rise" Geoff C 12.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose No extension, increase in size or height to the Electricity Transmission Corridor within existing residential land in Silverdale. Seek Council purchase of affected properties if no alternative is available. Removal of section 25.7.3. Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 18 Te Aroha St. part Change the zoning between the Railway and O'Neil Street to encourage better use. Page 1 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Castle Argh LTD 13.001 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose – Electricity Transmission Corridors Removal of section 25.7.4 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors in its entirety. Michael Robert Hull (Jasper Ltd) 14.001 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 118/120 Greenwood Street. Trevor James & Lucy Gay Hancock 15.001 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Oppose restrictions in Clause 23.7.3 relating to Large Lot Residential (Ruakura Structure Plan, SH26) as unrealistic in relation to lot sizes under Clause 4.4.1 (2,500m2). A separate table for 'Large Lot Residential' zones under Clause 23.7.3 is sought with changes made to the following clauses: a) 40m (from 15m) d) 12 (from 5)- allotments served by a single right of way h) 300m (from 50m) - private way length i) 500m (from 75m) - maximum cul-de sac length j) 1 (from 0) - private way accessing directly on to a cul-de-sac Kevin Brian Hall 16.001 3.7.1 Structure Plan Components Support in Assurance that no flooding will occur due to Ruakura Structure Plan at the rear of 61A Nevada Rd part Sandra Joan Fraser-Ball (Fraser-Ball Ltd) 17.001 11.1 Purpose Oppose Sandra Joan Fraser-Ball (Fraser-Ball Ltd) 17.002 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Objective 11.2.3 and Policy 11.2.3a to include a statement on legal implications resulting from adverse impacts Sandra Joan Fraser-Ball (Fraser-Ball Ltd) 17.003 11.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Opposes an Industrial Park being set up so close to residential John Elliott Stevenson 18.001 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface. John Elliott Stevenson 18.002 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6 a), b) and d) so garages and carports have no setback from a transport corridor or Right-of-way. part John Elliott Stevenson 18.003 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b), c), d) and e) that relates to the design of dwellings and accessory buildings John Elliott Stevenson 18.004 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.8 to read "Boundary fences and walls shall have a maximum height of 1.8m", and delete remainder of rule. Amend 11.1c) by increasing the 40m setback to 70m from existing residential development to the south-east of the Ruakura Structure Plan. Page 2 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary John Elliott Stevenson 18.005 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Support in Remove Rule 4.4.10 b) iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas. part John Elliott Stevenson 18.006 5.4.2 Site Coverage Support in Change site coverage for the Special Residential Zone, Clause 5.4.2 from 35% to 40%. part John Elliott Stevenson 18.007 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose Planting John Elliott Stevenson 18.008 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 5.4.6 a) to be the same as for the building setbacks rule in the General Residential zone (Rule 4.4.6); and part Amend Rule 5.4.6c) to allow garages and carports facing a transport corridor to have a 0m setback. John Elliott Stevenson 18.009 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose John Elliott Stevenson 18.010 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area Support in Remove Rule 5.4.11. b) iv in relation to the location of outdoor living areas part Peter John and Nancy Margaret Paviour-Smith 19.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 4 Sycamore Place. Peter John and Nancy Margaret Paviour-Smith 19.002 Features Map 17B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 4 Sycamore Place. William Arthur Featherstone (Nawton Community Presbyterian Church) 21.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 61 Livingstone Avenue. part Steven Richardson 22.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Margaret Jane Prenter 23.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 9 Kelvin Place. part James Henry Riley 24.001 22.1 Purpose Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 43 Gordon Davies Lane. part Council to ensure hazard area plans are kept up to date and reflect any changes that are made to the land (e.g. as part of a resource consent) Jesse Stone 25.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting. Remove Rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 19 Somerset Street. Oppose flood hazards being identified on LIMS Page 3 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 10 Vine Street. Upgrade the storm water system to cope with a 100 year storm event. Jesse Stone 25.002 13.1 Purpose Support Supports allowing more restaurants and shops within the Rototuna Town Centre Betty Janine (known as Jan) Elliott 26.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 22B Hazelwood Avenue. Irene Catharine Mary van der Beek 27.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Oppose Remove the Residential Intensification Zoning from the properties bound by Short Street, Pearson Ave and Daisy Street. Catherine Meg Battersby 28.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 9 Vine Street. Department of Corrections 29.001 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend definition of 'Offices' to include 'Premises for Corrections purposes (non-custodial facility), including part Community Work sites and Probation Centres' or to the like effect. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.002 1.4.1.6 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Remove rule 1.4.1.6(a) and (b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.003 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.7(b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.004 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Support Rule 25.2.3 (a) and (i) and retain the permitted activity status (earthworks ancillary and not ancillary to an activity in the plan). Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.005 25.2.4.1 Earthworks in All Zones Retain the controls specified in Rule 25.2.4.1 a) to d) - Earthworks Standards Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.006 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Delete 25.2.5.1 Specific Standards For Earthworks Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.007 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Oppose Delete the average & maximum site areas for subdivision of Rule 23.7.1 b), j) and n) Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.008 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Oppose Delete Rule 23.7.3c), i) & j) in relation to subdivision Support Page 4 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Character Zones Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 30.009 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities -Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria for Earthworks & vegetation Removal Waylon Bowker 31.001 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Oppose Remove 19.2.3h and allow landscaping on the site on which a heritage building is located to be undertaken without any controls. Waylon Bowker 31.002 19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Remove 126 Forest Lake Road from Schedule 8A: Built Heritage Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 32.001 3.4.5.1 Proposed Staging of Residential Development Oppose Delete Rule 3.4.5.1 b) and c) ii as it relates to staging of residential development for Peacockes Structure Plan Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 32.002 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 by removing "Net" from the table heading "Net Site Area" and include provisions to allow for comprehensive development. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 32.003 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Provide for Comprehensive Residential Development within the General Residential Zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Cara Sarah Carter 33.001 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose Designation H51 (Chorus Brymer Road exchange) all units should comply with noise limits, not just new equipment. Remove any reference to 'new' from section 3 (noise conditions). Oppose any antennae being built on this and other sites adjacent to residential property. Emergency electricity generating equipment should have a maximum duration of use. Kerry Francis & Lynda May Ryan 34.001 Features Map 62B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 14 Lorraine Place. Simon Arend Graafhuis 35.001 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Flood Hazard Area from 21 Oldfield Court. Simon Arend Graafhuis 35.002 22 Natural Hazards Remove Flood Hazard Area from 21 Oldfield Court. Oppose Page 5 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Anthony Endres 36.001 20.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Environments Support in Amend Appendix 9: Natural Environments Assessment Valuation Method & Criteria to provide more weight to part indigenous trees that meet the Objectives in 20.2. Anthony Endres 36.003 9-1.1 The RNZIH Standard Method of Evaluation Support in Amend Appendix 9: Natural Environments Assessment Valuation Method & Criteria to provide more weight to part indigenous trees that meet the Purpose of 20.1 and Objectives in 20.2. Ian Roderick Taylor 37.001 22 Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 17 Mabian Crescent. Heather Karen de Groen 38.001 Features Map 18B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 13 Glen Cree Avenue. Heather Karen de Groen 38.002 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 13 Glen Cree Avenue. Infinity Property Management Ltd 39.001 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Rule 6.3 aa) & bb) cafe, restaurants and licensed premises should be a permitted activity in the suburbs Eamonn Munster (Infinity Property Management Ltd) 40.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Include 18 London Street within the Central City Downtown Precinct rather than the City Living Precinct. Brent Turrell 41.001 Zoning Map 54A Oppose On Zoning Maps 54A & 55A 32-36 Kahikatea Drive, remove Community Facilities Zone and rezone General Residential. New Zealand Institute of Architects 42.001 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Reword objectives and policies in 2.2 to use the words "should" and "reduce" in lieu of "shall" and "minimise" part New Zealand Institute of Architects 42.002 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support in Generally supportive of the aims and content of the Plan, but would prefer to see aspects of the Plan changed to part remove ambiguity and contradictions with regard to design issues. Neal Geoffrey Utting 43.001 20.1 Purpose Support in Remove Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area from 54a Urlich Avenue. part Neal Geoffrey Utting 43.002 20 Natural Environments Support in Amend Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area relating to the Mangakotukutuku Stream catchment upstream of 54a Urlich part Avenue. Arthur Giffney 44.001 Locality Plan Oppose Locality plan-Use traditional suburb names on all maps in the District Plan. Anne & David Smyth 45.001 Figure 15-5e Transport corridor hierarchy plan Support Retain the proposed classification of Lake Domain Drive to local transport corridor within the transport hierarchy. Nicholas Smit 46.001 Features Map 38B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 5 Finchley Place. Page 6 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hamilton East Community Trust 47.001 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones Oppose Oppose B5 zoning of Waikato Regional Council site in Hamilton East. Rezone to Business Zone 1. Hamilton East Community Trust 47.002 Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites Support The Notre Dame des Missions building (H50) at 47 Clyde Street is identified as a Category A heritage building Hamilton East Community Trust 47.003 Appendix 8 Heritage Support in The Hamilton Municipal Baths (H88) is identified as a Category A heritage building or structure part Bradley Friar 48.001 23.1 Purpose Support in Set minimum standards for subdivision with flexibility in decision making process. part Ronald David Ford 49.001 Features Map 34B Oppose Amend Flood Hazard Area for 21 Karaka Street to be the same as 19 Karaka Street. Ronald David Ford 50.001 22 Natural Hazards Oppose Amend Flood Hazard Area for 21 Karaka Street to be the same as 19 Karaka Street. David Francis Morgan 51.001 22 Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 97A Fitzroy Avenue. Ailsa Betty Smith 52.001 22 Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 97B Fitzroy Avenue. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 53.001 Zoning Map 52A Support in That the land owned by Freelance Lands at 89 Amanda Ave be zoned Residential part Martin Toop 54.001 20 Natural Environments Oppose Amend the Plan to allow exotic shrubs and trees to be planted while retaining native vegetation as the dominant choice Martin Toop 54.002 20.1 Purpose Oppose Amend the Plan to recognise the benefits of providing for exotic vegetation. Council of Elders 55.001 25.6.3 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend 25.6.3 by inserting text on the type and design of lighting as set out in the submission to provide for new part technologies. Council of Elders 55.002 24.4.1 Reserves Level of Service Support in Amend 24.4.1 to require development within the Industrial Zone to include minimum open space requirements part Council of Elders 55.003 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Support in Supports the required level of Development Contributions in 24.3.3 part Council of Elders 55.004 Key Features Support in The development work promised for Rototuna such as the swimming pool promised 25 years ago has not eventuated. part Council of Elders 55.005 4 Residential Zones Support in Concerned with the use of prescriptive rules such as location of garages that add to the cost of development. part Page 7 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Council of Elders 55.006 25.13.4.4 Water Support in Amend 25.13.4.4 to include a policy to reduce the leakage of water from the reticulated system to less than 10%, over part 3 years. Council of Elders 55.007 1.1.6 How to Use this District Support in Plan is overly complex and timing of notification was not ideal. Plan part Dennis Roy McLeod 56.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Opposes the concept of an Inland Port. Dennis Roy McLeod 56.002 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone Oppose Opposes the concept of an Inland Port. Dennis Roy McLeod 56.003 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Insufficient green belt identified adjoining dwellings on the Ruakura Structure Plan - landuse plan Dennis Roy McLeod 56.004 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Oppose Identification of a greenbelt for the mitigation of noise and lighting on the Ruakura Structure Plan - Transport Network Plan Dennis Roy McLeod 56.005 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Inland Port Oppose Concerned at noise levels from trains and other activities associated with an Inland Port. Martin Toop 57.001 25.7.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Addition of "v. promote carbon sequestration" to policy 25.7.2.3d for network utilities & Electricity Transmission Corridors Brenda Eileen McNamara 58.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rules 4.4.7 b), c) & d) from the Interface rule for residential zones David Graeme McCall 59.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 13 Keddell Street and 52 Lake Road via its joined title. Beth Ellen Germaine 60.001 Features Map 18B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 1011 River Road and remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report. Group of Alandale Residents 61.001 Features Map 17B Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for Alandale Lifestyle Village at 1199 River Road as these should be part recorded on the Land Title of the Body Corporates and not on the Title of individual houses that are unaffected. Pamela May Brown 62.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Rezone 737 Grey Street from Residential to Business Zone. Rakaipaka Puriri 63.001 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Oppose All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area should be declined based on the treatment of their own church members and the shift from a school that benefits tens of thousands to a development that will only benefits the wealthy. Rakaipaka Puriri 63.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Oppose All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area be declined. Page 8 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Temple View Zone I-fang Grace Chou Yen 64.001 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose Oppose the proposed conditions allowing any new mast(s) to be built at the Flagstaff Exchange (Commodore Ave) (designation number H59). Do not allow any new mast(s) to be built. Ensure no additional noise is generated. That noise from activity on the site shall not exceed the standards set out in Rule 5.1.1 b) of the District Plan when measured at or within the boundary of any site in the Residential Zone. That any radio frequency transmission exposures associated with the radio transmission to or from the site shall comply with the limits in NZS2772.1:1999 Radio Frequency Fields Part 1: Maximum exposure levels 3 kHz-300 GHz. If new facilities are built using the upper limits of the modified conditions, or taller, or bigger than the current building that impact the nearby property, landowners would like to be reimbursed for loss of property values. Alternatively residents can move out if Chorus /Telecom buy 4 Halcione Close. Chorus/Telecom should consider other options such as additional designations and/or replacing parts within current architecture and without generating extra noise. Claire Millington 65.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ukinga AkaitiPonga 66.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Delma MurrayMacgregor 67.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jodhi Vanessa Ponga 68.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Deanne Freemantle 69.001 Features Map 43B Remove Flood Hazard Area from 39 Winning Terrace. Oppose Page 9 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Fiona Green 70.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Do not change the zoning to Residential Intensification in the area between Daisy Street and Short Street. Hamilton needs suburbs that are pleasant to live in and close to town and other amenities and that are suitable for families. Sarah Nichol 71.001 25.5.3.3 Permeable Fences Oppose Amend Rule 25.5.3.3 Permeable Fences to allow fences built to 1.8m to be built with 100% non see-through materials. Tracey Laraine Sherman 72.001 Features Map 39B Oppose Ensure LIM reports reflect the proposed effects of the 1 in 100 year flood for each property and not a general flood alert. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.001 Zoning Map 15A Support Map 15A-Retain Business 4 zoning of Harvey Norman site. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.002 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Support Retain Rule 6.4.3(c) 5m minimum distance building setback within Business Zone 4 Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.003 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Support Retain Table 15-2a(cc) that relates to minimum parking rates for bulky good retailers. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.004 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.1a) to increase the maximum height limit in the Business 4 zone to 20m. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) 73.005 6.4.5 Building Intensity Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.5 so that the maximum intensity ratio in the Business Zone 4 is 1.5 :1. Page 10 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Ltd Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.006 25.10.5.7 Central City, Oppose Business 1 to 7 and Industrial Zones 25.10.5.7 Central City, Business 1 to 7 and Industrial Zones - Requests existing signage rule in Operative District plan be retained or alternative solutions. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.007 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support in Any alternative, consequential, or further relief that may be required to give effect to a revision of the building height, part intensity and signage rules sought above. Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ) Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Ltd 73.008 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones Support in Supports (in relevant part) all other relevant provisions in the Plan. part Anmark Limited 74.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 122 Old Farm Road and 80A Cameron Road. Anthony Lloyd James Fisher 75.001 Features Map 34B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 30 Karaka Street. Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd 76.001 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.6 a) and b) to allow for the required 3m and 5m setbacks to be reduced to nil where a covered (but not enclosed) veranda with a minimum width of 1.2m and a minimum length of 4m is provided along the transport corridor frontage. The veranda should have an access door connected directly to the dwelling. Any steps from the veranda to the transport corridor must terminate within the property boundary. Carole Mc Minn 77.001 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.1 to allow residential lots within the Large Lot Residential Zone (Rototuna) +/- 500 square metres on the flat areas while larger section of 1000 square meters on steeper slopes. Julie Marie O'Carroll 78.001 Features Map 18B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 9 Glen Cree Avenue. Page 11 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Julie Marie O'Carroll 78.001 Features Map 18B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 9 Glen Cree Avenue. Julie Marie O'Carroll 78.003 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 9 Glen Cree Avenue. James Neil Scott Chalmers 79.001 22.1 Purpose Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 1 Bell St and 67 Te Aroha St. part Council to prepare a Flood Hazard Report based on actual historical (including actual 1 in 100 yr) flood data, showing the differences that could be expected if the Climate Change model is correct. Remove the barrier at the end of Bell St that prevents drainage of potential flooding to the East Coast Railway line drains. Alexandra Lee Simmons 80.001 Features Map 20B Oppose Amend the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area in Planning Map 20B to show the actual risk based on the landscape features of 22 Stoneleigh Drive. Amend the Flood Hazard Area in Planning Map 20B to show the real risk at 22 Stoneleigh Drive. Alexandra Lee Simmons 80.003 3.7.1.9 Stormwater Oppose Amend Rule 3.7.19 to ensure no use of streams for stormwater drainage associated with the Ruakura Structure Plan. Alexandra Lee Simmons 80.004 25.13.4.2 Stormwater Support in Discontinue the use of the ephemeral stream located at the south end of 22 Stoneleigh Drive as a stormwater collector part Alexandra Lee Simmons 80.005 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Amendments to ensure that new construction will not put existing properties under increased risk from culvert part blockage and flooding. Alexandra Lee Simmons 80.006 3.7.1.6 Residential Zones Oppose Amend Rule 3.7.1.6. Remove Medium Residential Density zoning and replace with low density residential with the closure of Greenhill Road onto Tramway/Gordonton Roads; and ensure stormwater systems do not utilise local streams as open drains. Peter William Bennett 81.001 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zones as part of 4.3.1 Activity Status Table (Refer also to Rule 25.7.3 Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors). Peter William Bennett 81.002 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for Amateur Radio Service within the Central City Zone Peter William Bennett 81.003 14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 14.3 to provide for Amateur Radio Service. Peter William Bennett 81.004 4.4.4 Building Height Oppose Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.4 Building Height. Page 12 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Peter William Bennett 81.005 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Seeks relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary. Peter William Bennett 81.006 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Seeks relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.6 Building Setbacks. Peter William Bennett 81.007 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose Medium-Density Residential Zone Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.5.3 Activity Status Medium-Density Residential Zone. Peter William Bennett 81.008 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses to support Amateur Radio Services. Peter William Bennett 81.009 7.4.6 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.6 Height in Relation to Boundary to support Amateur Radio Services. Peter William Bennett 81.010 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks to support Amateur Radio Services. Peter William Bennett 81.011 14.4.3 Building Height Oppose Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.3 Building Height to provide for Amateur Radio Service. Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service. Peter William Bennett 81.012 14.4.4 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.4 Height in Relation to Boundary to provide for Amateur Radio Service. Peter William Bennett 81.013 14.4.5 Building Setback Oppose Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.5 - Building Setback to provide for Amateur Radio Service. Peter William Bennett 81.014 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Oppose Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service and amateur radio configurations being permitted within all living zones up to 20 meters. Kenneth & Joyce Whittaker 82.001 Zoning Map 62A Oppose Map 62A-Oppose expansion of Glenview Suburban Centre. Elizabeth Weller 83.001 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Remove the Residential Intensification Zoning from the area between Short Street and Daisy Street and return it to a General Residential Zoning. Rosemary Eleanor Stucki 84.001 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Oppose Seek removal of the Residential Intensification zone from the area between Short Street and Daisy Street and replace with General Residential zone. Page 13 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Residential Zone River Road Trust 85.001 Features Map 27B Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 667 River Road; or part Apply an alternative category of hazard notification for 667 River Road of "no to low risk". Peter William Bennett 86.001 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Remove references to amateur radio service within 25.7.3 Network Utilities rules. Insert specific rules for amateur service and an activity table or zone based rules for all living zones. Insert a definition of amateur service and amateur radio configuration as per the Tauranga District Plan. HOPE ALLUM (THORONG LA LIMITED) 87.001 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Flood Hazard Area from 34D Campbell Street and 53 Grandview Road. Karen Stevenson 88.001 Features Map 45B Remove Flood Hazard Area from 3 and 3A Rothbrook Street. Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 3 and 3A Rothbrook Street. Jill Atkinson 89.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Matthew Shane Watene 90.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Duane Skyes 91.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Shawney mei Atarangi Kahi 92.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Myles Aidan Tipene Watene 93.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Susan Pahuru 94.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Oppose Page 14 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Neesha Pahuru 95.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Gabrielle Wilson 96.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Te Aroha Pahuru 97.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rosemary Gordon 98.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Janine Mere Siteine 99.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Herangi Searancke 100.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Moses Christopher Armstrong (CCNZ Alumni President) 101.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tessa Siteine 102.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 15 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Justin Sonnenberg 103.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Andy Lee 104.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Myles Watene 105.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Stacey Scirkovich 106.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Vanessa Armstrong 107.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ora Neill Kohe 108.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Alma Ruth Paewai Kohe 109.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Merieanna Graham 110.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kareve Harata Witehira 111.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 16 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Lady King 112.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Maria Koroheke 113.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tuini Koroheke 114.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kara Ivy Witehira 115.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kare Eva Pompey 116.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Gwen Kepa 117.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Katarina Koroheke 118.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Arthur Tupou Hettig 119.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 17 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Kiritahi Koroheke 120.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Terekia Rewiki James Koroheke 121.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Kieran Hettig 122.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tau Moeke 123.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Heinrich Hettig 124.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lahaina Moeke 125.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Michael Wilson 126.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Elletta Rachel Hettig 127.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tainan Evarn Watene 128.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 18 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Rebecca Cutler 129.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Renata Immanuel Kahuroa 130.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Devonshire (Te Wharekura Rakaumanga) 131.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Quintin Glenford Hapuku 132.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rebecca Hapuku 133.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Edwin Skinner 134.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Gavin Talmage Joseph Scirkovich 135.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Natalie Renee McNamara 136.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 19 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Pera Ratana 137.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Billy Grey 138.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Khan Major 139.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pawhaure Brown 140.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pania Waikai 141.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. R Henry 142.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jonelle Henry 143.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Renata Whitley 144.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rave Anthony 145.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 20 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Tirohia Smith 146.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Flu Waikai 147.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Herawini Rangi (Taniwharau Rugby League Club) 148.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Neil T Rose 149.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Misty Kama 150.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pera Paeka 151.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Laisa Kama 152.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jackson Robin Takiari (Te Iti Rearea RLC) 153.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 21 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Senae Mitchell 154.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Colin John Jowles (INwork NZ) 155.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Stuart Poulava 156.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kimberly Rose 157.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Yvette K Rose 158.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ray Bourne (Waikato Referees Association) 159.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Te Awa Anderson 160.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Leonard Reid (NZRL) 161.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Zoram Watene 162.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 22 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Waimarie Hare (Tigers) 163.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Willy Beazley 164.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jaden Paekan 165.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. TeUranga Waikou 166.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sash Stosic (Upper Central Zone of NZRL Inc.) 167.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Baz Paama 168.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Craig Martin Tomlinson 169.001 Locality Plan Oppose Locality Plan-retain suburb names. Saskia Maria Tomlinson 170.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose the change in the name of the suburb Hillcrest to Hillcrest West and the inclusion of the suburb name Riverlea. Paul Morrison 171.001 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Flood Hazard Area from 27 Oldfield Court Page 23 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Imelda Kazenbroot 172.001 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose In relation to designation H51 (Brymer Exchange) and the proposed changes to conditions on the designation, the submitter seeks that no conditions on H51 allow for masts and antenna to be erected. Additionally the submitter seeks that no conditions applying to H51 allow for the increase of noise in terms of noise levels (dB) and/or duration (hours) and/or time of day/week from what is currently permitted. Charles Joseph Peter McPherson 173.001 Zoning Maps Support Map 33A-Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 DP 425315 (Corner of Baverstock Road and Rotokauri Road) as part of the Lake Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Part as shown on Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan. Charles Joseph Peter McPherson 174.001 Zoning Maps Support Map 33A-Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. McConnell Property Ltd 175.001 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 19.3. Activity Status Table needs to reflect the balance between protecting important heritage buildings with safety, economic use and overall support for the CBD development and revitalisation. McConnell Property Ltd 175.002 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Oppose A new policy should be added to allow for a balance between heritage protection and safety, economic use and overall support for CBD Development. A new Heritage Assessment Criteria be added to Volume 2 section 8-1.2 to assess the "usefulness" of buildings. Gordon Chesterman 176.001 4 Residential Zones Oppose Deleted Rule 4.4.7 b) regarding the siting of garages. Robert Edmund Simms 177.001 Zoning Map 16A Support in Map 16A-Formalise accessway on Oakfield Crescent, and purchase land to continue the walkway through to The Base part over industrial land linking Karewa Place to Te Rapa Road. Katherine Mary Luketina 178.001 25.11.3 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Rule 25.11.3 to prevent outdoor burning of green waste or any other waste in suburban areas. part Rudolf Johann Dudli (Dudli Properties) 179.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private. Graeme Ernest Goodwin Goodwin 180.001 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Requests Ruakura industrial and logistics zone and Inland Port be rezoned to knowledge and rural residential zones or residential Graeme Ernest Goodwin (McPherson & Goodwin) 181.001 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 to be consistent with the zoning map No 36A which shows all the properties on the west side of Hardley Street within the Central City Zone. Starship Trauma Service 182.001 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support in Retain 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach with amendments to reference to safety and wellbeing of part children Starship Trauma 182.003 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Policy 2.2.13 should include reference to measures to promote child safety and wellbeing eg: locating playgrounds Page 24 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Service Sub Type Summary Integrated Land Use, part Transport and Infrastructure safely in relation to transport amenities, intersections, pedestrian crossings, footpaths, major roads and bus stops. Starship Trauma Service 182.004 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend policy 3.3.1c to ensure passenger transport is not only efficient by safe by inserting the word 'safe' into the part policy text. Starship Trauma Service 182.005 3.4.2.1 Community and Recreation Facilities Support in Amend 3.4.2.1 i) i, and j) by inserting references to child safety and safe pedestrian access principles into the criteria part for the location of neighbourhood parks within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Starship Trauma Service 182.007 3.4 Vision Support in Amend the first paragraph of 3.4 to read as follows "The vision for the Peacocke area is that it will become a high part quality and safe urban environment that is based on urban design best practice, social well-being, and environmental responsibility." Starship Trauma Service 182.008 3.4.1 Structure Plan Components Support in Amend Figure 3-4a, #6 in the key by adding the following text "that are clearly defined as vehicular access and clearly part separated from child play areas (public and private)" as set out in the submission. Starship Trauma Service 182.009 3.2 Principles Support in Submitter seeks an additional Key Principle in Section 3.2 (Principles for Structure Plans) as follows: "Safety: The part layout of any future residential development considers the physical safety of children. This design will include vehicular access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality from causes such as child driveway run overs". Starship Trauma Service 182.011 3.4.3 Transport Network Support in Amend 3.4.3e) to include "The designated arterial routes should not sever safe access to public recreational spaces." part Starship Trauma Service 182.013 3.4.4 Interim Subdivision Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having consideration to maximise child safety. part Starship Trauma Service 182.015 Peacocke Social Wellbeing Support in Amend 3.4.6 to include child safety Principles and the text as set out in the submission. part Starship Trauma Service 182.017 3.4.6 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend the Objectives and Policies in 3.4.6 to include child safety principles as set out in the submission. part Starship Trauma Service 182.019 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Rule 4.4.6 Building Setbacks - The minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport be 6m. Starship Trauma Service 182.020 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.6 a) and b) (Building Setbacks) so that the minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport be 6m (to accommodate one vehicle). Starship Trauma Service 182.021 1.4.3.3 Building Orientation and Siting Oppose Rule 1.4.3.3. e) be amended to read as follows "The minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport be 6m (to accommodate one vehicle)." Starship Trauma Service 182.022 1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and Parking Oppose Amend Design Guide and Design Assessment Criteria 1.4.3.4 Access, Garage and Parking. Page 25 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Graeme Ernest Goodwin 183.001 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones Denis Richard Lauren 184.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone Denis Richard Lauren 184.003 10.1 Purpose Oppose Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone Denis Richard Lauren 184.005 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Requests logistics hub be relocated to Rotokauri or adjacent areas part Denis Richard Lauren 184.006 10.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone part Denis Richard Lauren 184.008 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Requests the rejection of the Ruakura Logistics zone and/or establish appropriate standards within the Ruakura part Logistics Zone to minimise adverse effects. Denis Richard Lauren 184.010 10.4.3 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 10.4.3 by reducing the site coverage for Ruakura Logistics Zone Denis Richard Lauren 184.011 10.4.4 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 10.4.4 by increasing the permeable surface for the Ruakura Logistics Zone. Denis Richard Lauren 184.012 10.4.5 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 10.4.5 by reducing height allowances within the Ruakura Logistics Zone. Denis Richard Lauren 184.013 10.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 10.4.6 by increasing the setback to the Large Lot Residential area bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads. part Denis Richard Lauren 184.014 10.4.7 Landscape Screening Support in Amend Rule 10.4.7 by increasing the landscaping requirements for the Ruakura Logistics zone without giving up part Council land to meet landscaping and setback provisions. Denis Richard Lauren 184.015 10.4.8 Interface Standards Support in Supports Rule 10.4.8b) regarding the exclusion of the Percival and Ryburn Road road reserve from calculating the part setback requirements. Denis Richard Lauren 184.016 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Delete the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone or modify to provide for high wealth industries supportive of the Research and Development hub rather than low-end freight forwarding activities. Denis Richard Lauren 184.017 11.1 Purpose Oppose Reconsider purpose of the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Amend set back provisions to increase the setback to the south-east and heavily plant around the Mangaonua Gully system. Denis Richard Lauren 184.018 11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 11.2.1 by removing low-end freight-related industries from the vision and initiate a true future-based vision of part high-tech industry. Denis Richard 184.019 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Amend 11.2.3 to provide more effective buffers for residential, educational and the Knowledge Zone. Page 26 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lauren Denis Richard Lauren 184.020 11.4.3 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 11.4.3 d) and f) to ensure the minimum setback is 40m from residential, educational, Special Character part Zones and Knowledge Zone, and 200m to protect the Mangaonua gulley to the south-east within the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Denis Richard Lauren 184.021 11.4.6 Site Coverage Oppose Denis Richard Lauren 184.022 11.4.7 Site Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 to require 20% landscaping in addition to any parking requirements. part Banda Trust 185.001 Features Map 58B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 16 Balfour Crescent and any associated LIM Report. Janice Ann O'Leary 186.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 17 Saxbys Road OR Reroute stormwater away from the Mangakotukutu Stream Robert Alan Mills 187.001 10.1 Purpose Oppose Amend 10.1c) to accurately describe where the Inland Port is to be located and what existing activities it will be next to, especially to recognise the proximity of the Inland Port to the University of Waikato and Waikato Expressway. Robert Alan Mills 187.002 11.1 Purpose Oppose Amend 11.1 Purpose to require a 200m setback from existing residential development to the south-east of the Ruakura Structure Plan. Robert Alan Mills 187.003 Zoning Map 48A Support in Retain large lot residential zoning to the south of the Ruakura Structure Plan part Living Streets Hamilton 188.001 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Support in Supports Policies 25.14.2.1a i), iv) and 25.14.2.1b. part Requests remedial action on existing transport corridors to address safety issues to make cycling, walking and public transport. Living Streets Hamilton 188.003 25.15.1 Purpose Support in Amend Rule 25.15.1 to include older inner city suburbs and the CBD to provide safe, accessible routes for cycling and part walking, and public transport services with a frequency and reliability that makes them a viable alternative to the private car. In particular Section d items ii, iii and iv. Shubhangi Parulekar 189.001 22.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Remove Flood Hazard Area from 36A Greensboro Street. Shubhangi Parulekar 189.002 Transport Corridor Network Oppose Opposes 40 km/hour speed limits on suburban roads. Road design should protect properties from traffic noise and vibration. John Joseph Graat 190.001 Features Map 61B Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 14 Deanwell Avenue. part Amend Rule 11.4.6 to reduce site coverage to make the total allowed non-permeable area, including parking and vehicle areas, to be no more than 75%. Page 27 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Todd & Heather Hamilton 191.001 Features Map 18B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 7 Strathconnan Court. Iain Thomas MacDonald 192.001 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose Prohibit Chorus/Telecom from erecting mast/antennas at the Flagstaff Exchange site (designation number H59) and increasing the noise levels at the Flagstaff Exchange site. Malcolm George Porteous 193.001 Features Map 45B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 17 Masons Avenue. Nandan & Shweta Modak 194.001 22.1 Purpose Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 7 Locksley Lane. part Nandan & Shweta Modak 194.002 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Maxime Rouast 195.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Margaret Joyce Davidson 196.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 1 Balloch Street. Sheryl Margaret Curtice 197.001 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network. Shirley May Gwynneth Caspari QSM 198.001 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network. Iain Alistair Curtice 199.001 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network. Michelle Le Prou 201.001 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network - Confirm Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. Andrew Yeoman 202.001 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Support Retain Rule 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Andrew Yeoman 202.002 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Rule 4.4.6 Building Setbacks - delete the 1.5m setback from right-of-ways and introduce provisions that establish no setback requirements in the residential intensification zone. Andrew Yeoman 202.003 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support Retain Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Andrew Yeoman 202.004 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.9 Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy to allow for a reduction in setback of upper floor where opaque or obscure glazing is used or window height is 1.7m above floor level. Andrew Yeoman 202.005 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas. Rule 22.3 Rules - Activity Status Table - Seeks clarity as to how to apply the Activity Status Table. Page 28 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Andrew Yeoman 202.006 4.4.11 Service Areas Support in Amend Rule 4.4.11 to include a provision to allow for communal service areas for apartments. part Andrew Yeoman 202.007 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Delete Rule 4.4.12 b). Andrew Yeoman 202.008 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Amend Zoning Map 44A to make Frankton a Mixed Use Zone. Art Gage-Brown 203.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 91 Lake Domain Drive. Blair Thorpe 204.001 7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank Precinct Support in Amend the Plan to allow office development in the Ferrybank Precinct. part Blair Thorpe 204.002 7 Central City Zone Support Blair Thorpe 204.003 2.2.7 Objective and Policies The Waikato River Support in Support in part. Make building lines and setbacks greater and more open for sites that have been identified as vistas, part particularly the Waikato River. Council should compulsory purchase land if necessary to ensure public access and vistas are achieved. Blair Thorpe 204.004 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Make alternative transport modes a lot more attractive by requiring greater consideration and part planning for bus lanes and wider shoulders for cyclist's city wide. Blair Thorpe 204.005 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend the Plan to remove the precinct approach and instead provide for a mix of all sorts of retail/entertainment/ service, art facilities within the Central City Blair Thorpe 204.007 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Oppose Object to Policies 6.2.1a to c. Central City should be rejuvenated first with free public transport and free parking to central city destinations. Rebekah Kenny 205.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Change the proposed Frankton industrial zoning to a mixed use zone. Rebekah Kenny 205.002 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. kelly littlewood (Mitre 10 MEGA Hamilton) 206.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Peter Richard Clarke 207.001 Zoning Map 44A Amend Zoning Map 44A to change the Industrial Zoning In Frankton to Mixed Use. Peter Richard Clarke 207.006 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Oppose Retain Policy 7.2.2.a 7.2.2.b. Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Page 29 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tanya Jack 208.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. House of Montrose Limited 209.001 7 Central City Zone Cindy Borrie 210.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Switched On Electrical 211.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use. Michelle Missiha 212.001 4.4 Rules – General Standards – General Residential, Residential Intensification Zones and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for apartments. G A Hughes and ass 2005 ltd 213.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. G A Hughes and ass 2005 ltd 213.004 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A- rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use. B/C 355972 214.001 22.1 Purpose Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from The Sanctuary, Thomas Road. part Pearce Andrew Watson (Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited) 215.001 25.8.3.2 Construction Noise Oppose Pearce Andrew Watson (Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited) 215.002 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones Section 25.8.3.7 (Noise Performance Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones) provides for maximum noise levels. Aldona Place has existing residential amenity and requests the best practicable solution is put in place. Pearce Andrew Watson 215.003 25.6.2 Objectives and Policies Lighting and Glare 25.6.2 Objectives and Policies Lighting and Glare. Amend the policy to also acknowledge managing the effects on people’s health and the disturbance of sleep is also important to consider. Support in Amend the Plan so that Brothels and R 18 Stores be restricted to Industrial and special Entertainment zones only. part Oppose 25.8.3.2 Construction Noise - Seeks certainty around the impact on noise and vibration from the Ruakura Industrial Park that changes will have on their property at Aldona Place. Page 30 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary (Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited) Pearce Andrew Watson (Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited) 215.004 15.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Policy 15.2.7a to provide greater guidance on how neighbourhood open space should act as a buffer between potentially incompatible activities. Include a requirement to engage with adjoining property owners. Pearce Andrew Watson (Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited) 215.005 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Requests assurance that adverse effects will be avoided, remedied and mitigated from the Ruakura Industrial Park. David Gonzalez 216.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A- rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use. Owen & Robyn Renton 217.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Owen & Robyn Renton 217.002 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Nagarajah Manoharan 218.001 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Inland Port Support in Amend 3.7.1.1 to ensure the Greenbelt for the Inland Port is 200m. part Nagarajah Manoharan 218.003 1 Plan Overview Oppose Do not upgrade Founders Theatre. Myra EvansMcLeod 219.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A-Obtrusive to outlook. Tony Priscott 220.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing "Net Site Area", with "Average Site Area" . Rod Bowman 221.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 434 Kahikatea Drive and any associated LIM report. Brian Walker 222.001 11.1 Purpose Oppose Restrict development of the Ruakura Logistics Zone until existing industrial areas are fully occupied. A W Burns 223.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private A W Burns 223.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of permeable surfaces. A W Burns 223.004 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b)iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas. Gavin Smith 224.001 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose That Lot: 1 DP: S68406 at Te Rapa East Road be included within Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network. Page 31 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Bradley Clive Kells 225.001 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for apartments. Brent Wilson 226.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Brent Wilson 226.002 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Seeks a review of the intended outcomes of controlling the height of fences and wall under Rule 4.4.8. Penrhyn Margaret (Penny) Allen 227.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Amend Planning Map 38A to Remove Residential Intensification from area bounded by Short/Pearsons/Daisy Streets and retain current General Residential Zoning. Lincoln Archer 228.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A- rezone around the rugby and cricket grounds, the lake domain and other key recreational areas to mixed use zone. Lincoln Archer 228.003 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Gaenor Smith 229.001 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Support Retain figures 2-8 in Appendix 2 (Structure Plans - Rotokauri) in so far as it identifies an industrial land use for Lot 1: DP: S68406 (Te Kowhai East Road). Gaenor Smith 229.002 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-Lot 1 DP: S68406 at Te Kowhai East Road (and neighbouring properties that are subject to the same request) be zoned Industrial. Melanie Jane Rouse 230.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use. Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.001 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Oppose The Plan fails to achieve the purpose outlined in section 1.1.1 and the implementation of the Plan will result in increased rates for residents. Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.002 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Oppose Opposes 2.2.4b and any further intensification of the CBD, instead focus on satellite areas such as Peacockes, Tamahere. Lack of free parking in the CBD. Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.004 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Oppose Poorly planned industrial development (particularly Ruakura Inland Port) is an anomaly in the Plan given its proximity to residential neighbourhoods and the city centre. Better suited to Te Rapa Industrial Zone next to the existing rail corridor. Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.005 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.8 c) Fences and Walls. Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.006 Fences of a minimum height of 1.8m should be the rule for all open spaces adjacent to residences, schools, playcentres etc. 25.13.4.4 Water Oppose Delete 25.13.4.4 b) i (General Standards - Water - b Where any subdivision or development results in additional allotments or buildings to be used for urban purposes, provision shall be made for: i. Water metering infrastructure, and either). Instead, levy a special rate on high water users. Page 32 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary carla josephine schneebeli 232.001 22 Natural Hazards Oppose Council to review the data, methodology and potential impacts of flooding on 9 Glenwarrick Court Brett Hopkins (Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd) 234.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan and undertake consultation with the community to develop innovation precinct and residential areas. Hamilton Rowing Club Inc 235.001 Zoning Map 45A Oppose MAP 45a-Rezone Ferrybank and the Hamilton Rowing Club from Neighbourhood Open Space to Destination Open Space. Hamilton Rowing Club Inc 235.003 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the activities provided for in the Destination Open Space Zone. Nicola Anne Carroll 236.001 Features Map 36B Oppose Remove Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area from 17 Beerescourt Road. Susan Hopkins (Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd) 237.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the status quo for the Riverlea Road area which caters for both light and heavy industry. Wiremu Taylor Puke (Namtok Consultancy Ltd Ngati Wairere) 239.001 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Support in Amend Policy 19.2.4a to include a requirement for land to be set aside for public reserves at the earliest stages of part subdivision; and amend policy 19.2.4d to add a reference to the terms of Section 6 (e) and the Historic Places Trust Act 1991. Support 19.2.4e. Wiremu Taylor Puke (Namtok Consultancy Ltd Ngati Wairere) 239.012 2.2.8 Objective and Policies Tangata Whenua Waikato Tainui Oppose Glenview Community Centre 240.001 Zoning Map 62A Oppose Map 62A-rezone the Glenview Community Centre (Corner of Tomin Rd and Glenview Terrace) from 'Residential' to 'Community Facilities' Dan Fenwick (Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd) 241.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Dan Fenwick (Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd) 241.005 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways. Oppose. Amend this section to include the 1.4 tangata whenua section pages 1.0 .20 - 1.0.24 from the Operative District Plan 2012 in its entirety into the proposed District Plan. The inclusion of this section will better explain the rationale behind policies 2.2.8a to 2.2.8d. Additionally, an advisory note is included that developers and consent applicants seek consultation with the local hapu or its representatives before lodging consents with the council. Page 33 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Dan Fenwick (Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd) 241.007 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of permeable surfaces. Dan Fenwick (Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd) 241.009 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan John Ralph Leathwick 242.001 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 10.2.1 by adding staging information, such as maps to identify the areas to be developed during the specified part time periods within the Ruakura Logistics Zone. Amend the Plan so that the areas furtherest from existing residential activities are developed first. John Ralph Leathwick 242.003 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Request the addition of provisions into the Ruakura Logistics Zone that provide mitigation from the activities occurring part on the Ruakura Logistics Zone land in proximity to the University of Waikato and Ruakura campus. John Ralph Leathwick 242.005 11.1 Purpose Oppose Requests greater buffers between industrial landuse and residential areas, research and education establishments within the Ruakura Structure Plan. Stephen Tunnicliffe 243.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 to change the minimum lot size in the Large Lot Residential zone in the Rototuna area from 1000m2 to 800m2. Stephen Tunnicliffe 243.007 4.4.2 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase the maximum site coverage in the Large Lot Residential zone from 20% to 40%. Stephen Tunnicliffe 243.009 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to reduce the 70% minimum permeable surface for the Large Lot Residential zone to 50%. Stephen Tunnicliffe 243.016 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) and d) regarding the siting of garages and primary entrances facing the road. Stephen Tunnicliffe 243.017 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Oppose The requirements in 25.13.4.5 (Water Efficiency Measures) should be removed or substantially reduced and apply to new houses only. Steven Gale 244.001 20.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Significant Natural Area Feature from 25 Tanekaha Place Dianne Leathwick 245.001 10.1 Purpose Oppose Requests Ruakura Structure Plan is not approved until more clean green industrial, economic and business options have been investigated to include detailed consultation with concerned parties. Dianne Leathwick 245.005 11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Amend Policy 11.2.1b to clarify what noxious or offensive activities are to be avoided and whether that includes chemicals associated with the Inland Port. Amend 11.2.1 to ensure the Ruakura Structure Plan does not undermine the viability, vitality and vibrancy of the local community. Dianne Leathwick 245.006 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Seeks more detailed information on how adverse effects from the Ruakura Structure Plan will minimise effects on residents in Silverdale Road. Amend rule 25.2.5.1 (Earthworks Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan) to enable earthworks up to 120m3 in any 12 month period as a permitted activity and to enable a cut height of 800mm and a fill depth of 1000mm. Page 34 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Dianne Leathwick 245.008 11.1 Purpose Support in The Ruakura Structure Plan does not proceed before other cleaner greener options have been investigated. part Dianne Leathwick 245.010 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Amend 11.2.2. to ensure a high level of landscaping for residents from Silverdale Road within the Ruakura Structure Plan. Dianne Leathwick 245.012 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Requests more detail how adverse effects from the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone would be mitigated for the affected part of Silverdale Road. Dianne Leathwick 245.014 10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Requests clarification on what the positive environmental effects of the Ruakura Structure Plan are; and Information on Hamilton's pattern of development as stated within the objective and policies. Penny Allen 246.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Amend Zoning Map 38A by removing the Residential Intensification zoning from the area bounded by Short/Persons/Daisy Streets. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.001 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West Support in Amend 5.1.1.1 b) to include reference to low-density and medium-density development and historical infilling and part construction of apartments to better acknowledge the current moderate housing density (not low density as stated in the plan). Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.004 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Support in Amend 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones relating to Claudelands Residential, Special Heritage part West as follows: and Special Natural Zones 5.3.1 a - Accessory buildings on the front of properties in Claudelands West should be restricted discretionary activities. Include Claudelands West in the Dwelling Control Area in Appendix 4. Change section c, in relation to Claudelands West, so all new buildings and alterations on front-facing aspects be RD. Make Apartments NC in Claudelands West, as proposed. Make duplex dwellings NC in Claudelands West, as proposed. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.005 5.4.1 Density Support in Amend 5.4.1 Density Table 5.4.1a by increasing site area for detached dwellings on rear lots in Claudelands West to part 600m2. Retain other provisions restricting density in the Claudelands West area. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood 247.006 Table 23.3a Support Retain section 5.4.6a (Building setbacks – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones - in relation to the Claudelands West area). Page 35 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Support Groups) Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.007 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Support Retain 5.4.6a (Building setbacks) in relation to Claudelands West. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.010 5.4.4 Building Height Support in Support 7m maximum building height in Claudelands West Special Residential Zone in Table 5.4.4. a. part Amend Table 5.4.4b (Building height – Temple View and Peacocke Character Zones) so that it refers to 5.4.4a to correct an error. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.011 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Planning Map 37A by changing the zoning north of 797 Heaphy Terrace from Business Zone 2 to Claudelands part West Residential Zone. Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups) 247.013 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Paul Robert Kennel 248.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Philippa Jane Gerard 249.001 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Reject the development of the Ruakura Logistics Zone or if it proceeds add to the policy to provide for criteria in relation to biosecurity surveillance, buffer zones & quarantine systems. Philippa Jane Gerard 249.003 10.4.7 Landscape Screening Philippa Jane Gerard 249.004 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Amend the Plan to ensure a 100m landscaped parkland between southern residential areas and the Industrial Park and wetland zones. Philippa Jane Gerard 249.005 11.4.3 Building Setbacks Amend Rule 11.4.3 to provide a building setback of 100m for boundaries adjacent to a residential zone for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Les Wooldridge 250.001 1.1.6 How to Use this District Oppose Plan Les Wooldridge 250.004 25 Citywide Amend 6.3 the activity status for light industry, offices, retail, licensed premises, restaurants and cafes for remainder of Business Zone 2 for Claudelands Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.1 to reduce the maximum height of buildings in Business Zone 2 (Claudelands) to 10m. Support in Requests a greater planting strip between inland port and the expressway. Plantings of at least 5m high be required to part screen the facility from University of Waikato. Oppose The Plan is complex, hard to use and is too long. The interface standards will add additional costs for housing construction. Support in Request not to impose statutory requirements and allow solutions to be worked out in a harmonious manner. Provide Page 36 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary part underground holding tanks eg in designated park areas within the subdivision so the household rainwater is captured and then pumped back to each household on a timer system so they can water there lawns/gardens when there is no rainfall. David John Rushbrooke 251.001 25.14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose 25.14.3 Rules - Removal of the Arterial Transport Corridor Protection area from the Proposed District Plan. David John Rushbrooke 251.004 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network: Delete the Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area from the Proposed District Plan. David John Rushbrooke 251.005 25.14.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Remove criteria B3 referred to in section 25.14.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria (Transportation). Alastair Philip Calder 252.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Reject zoning for Ruakura Logistics Zone Hamilton Christian Nightshelter Trust 253.001 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Support Retain Rule 4.2.6d that allows for community facilities and community support activities (including managed care facilities and residential centres). Roger Hennebry 254.001 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or wall is 1.8m. Roger Hennebry 255.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.7 so that the garage set back, primary entrance, and habitable room sight line rules are as per the Operative District Plan. Safekids New Zealand 256.001 4.1.5 All Residential Zones Support in Amend the Plan to add driveway safety information, including within the residential design guidelines. part Jan Stewart 257.001 16 Community Facilities Zone Oppose St Francis Cooperating Parish 258.001 16.5.1 Ancillary Retail Activity Support in Amend Rule 16.5.1(b) to allow greater ancillary retail floor area as follows: part "A maximum floor area (retail activity only) of the greater of 50m2 or 12.5% of the total floor area of the buildings on the site" Align Surveyors 259.001 23.6.5 Boundary Adjustments Support in Generally support Rule 23.6.5 (Boundary Adjustments) but with regards to (c) which states that "any allotment subject part to a boundary adjustment shall comply with all relevant development and performance standards", provide for boundary adjustments that improve an area of non-compliance that may not fully comply with District Plan standards. Retain 34 Saxbys Road (Stan Heather Park)as Community Facilities Zone or rezone as a greenfields area for community use and enjoyment with special rules for the site. Page 37 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Align Surveyors 259.003 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend the definition for 'duplex' to provide flexibility to ensure two dwellings, split by a party wall between two part garages are also deemed to be duplex units. Align Surveyors 259.004 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support in Supports the intent of Rule 4.3.1bb) to allow small offices, other than home based offices in the residential zones; part Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a definition for 'small office' which may identify maximum limits of both workers and vehicle movements per day per site. Align Surveyors 259.005 Table 23.3a Support in Retain Rule 23.3 a) ii and iii. Amend Rule 23.3a) v to allow simple subdivisions to be controlled activities. Amend part 23.3a) v (subdivision in hazard areas) to allow an assessment system for land containing hazard whereby subdivision for land with only a small portion of land consisting of hazard (e.g. gully) does not automatically fall into the discretionary category. Align Surveyors 259.007 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Align Surveyors 259.008 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.9 a) regarding the requirement for a 3m separation between dwellings. Align Surveyors 259.009 4.7.5 Home-based Businesses Support in Amend Rule 4.7.5 to allow for an additional employee other than person(s) residing on the site for Home-based part Business. Align Surveyors 259.010 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Oppose 23.7.3 (d) (Subdivision standards - Maximum number of allotments served by a single private way) being 5. Retain at 10. This will have a flow on effect to change (h) (Maximum private way length) which will need to be longer e.g. 100m rather than 50m Robert James Davies-Colley 260.001 10.1 Purpose Oppose Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from the structure plan as Ruakura is not an appropriate location for an Inland Port. Robert James Davies-Colley 260.002 11.1 Purpose Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to part 200 m width and planted with native trees. Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as central stormwater management) Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.001 23.6.2 Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision Oppose Amend Rule 23.6.2 regarding standards for Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision so that minor variations are permitted as for 223 certificates. Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.002 23.6.4 Cross-lease to Freehold Subdivision Oppose Rule 23.6.4 (Cross-lease to Freehold Subdivision) section a) Allow minor variations to the cross lease plan where it can be shown a better design outcome is achieved. Page 38 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.003 Table 23.3a Oppose In table 23.3a (Subdivision Activity Status) section (v) (Fee simple subdivision), request as a controlled activity. Subdivision in EPO areas should conform to the existing provisions. Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.006 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.1 a) so that the minimum lot size for semi detached dwellings in the Residential Zone is to be determined by the design of the dwelling. Delete Rule 23.7.1 h) regarding lot sizes within the Large Lot Residential Zone - Rototuna Structure Plan and rely instead on 23.7.1b) and noise protection for new buildings to address noise issues with the proposed expressway. Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.007 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.3 e) regarding minimum private way widths serving 1-4 allotments - to allow for a reduction in width to 2.8m - 3m when ROW is serving one allotment. Amend Rule 23.7.3 f) Minimum private way width serving 5 allotments so it provides instead for 10 allotments. Amend Rule 23.7.3h) to extend the maximum private way length from 50m to 75m. Amend Rule 23.7.3 i) as right of ways are more suitable than building roads or extending cul-de-sac. Dan McDaid (Landform Surveys Ltd) 261.008 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private Martin O'Neill Kirkby 262.001 4.9 Rules – Specific Standards – Large Lot Residential Zone Support Retain the Large Lot Residential Zoning between Nevada Road and Morrinsville Road. Tobias Braun 263.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use. NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.001 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.2 to include a reference to the Regional Road Safety Strategy and the Regional Walking and part Cycling Strategy. NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.003 15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 15.2.2a to read: A representative mix of activities shall be accommodated. part NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.004 15.2.3 Objective and Policies Support NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.007 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Amend Policy 15.2.3e provide clarity of the level of accessibility expected, for those with disabilities, to open space areas. Support in Amend the definitions for Informal recreation to include horse riding. part Insert a new definition for Greenways meaning shared paths for all non-motorised users which may include both offroad and on-road sections. Insert a new definition for Bridleways meaning shared rights of way (paths, trails) for all non-motorised users – Walkers, cyclists, horses, including disability devices and low speed motorised vehicles as permitted on footpaths or Page 39 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary cycle-ways. NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.009 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Include horses and the equestrian population in considering concept plans and subdivision. part NZ Horse Recreation Inc 264.010 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Either amend Policy 2.2.13e or add an additional policy to integrate cycle and pedestrian networks Integrated Land Use, part with recreational networks to encourage uptake of commuting and improve recreational use. Transport and Infrastructure Robert James Davies-Colley (Silverdale Residents Group) 265.001 10.1 Purpose Oppose Robert James Davies-Colley (Silverdale Residents Group) 265.002 11.1 Purpose Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to part 200 m width and planted with native trees. Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as central stormwater management) Matthew Taylor 266.001 4.1.5 All Residential Zones Support in To ensure greater emphasis be made on keeping the community safe. part Matthew Taylor 266.003 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 4.2.3 to include specific reference to driveway location and safety. part Matthew Taylor 266.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Add a new Policy 4.2.5vii) to "enhance the safety values of the Hamilton East Area". part Matthew Taylor 266.005 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone Support in Amend Rule 5.2.8 Objectives and Policies Peacocke Character Zone to include new policy relating to separate part pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access. Matthew Taylor 266.007 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Support in 25.14.4.2 Amend so that manoeuvring areas and other vehicle parking and access is separate to pedestrian and cycle part access. Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.001 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support in Support in Part. Amend Policies to change 'shall' to 'should have regard to'. part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.004 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Support in Part. Replace 'shall' with 'should have regard to'. part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.005 2.2.6 Objective and Policies Residential Development Support in Support in part. Change the wording of the policies from 'shall' to "should have regard to". part Tony Begbie 267.006 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from the structure plan as Ruakura is not an appropriate location for an Inland Port. Support. Retain some of Hamilton's character and heritage via the character zones. Page 40 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision (WCA Trust) Sub Type Summary Hamilton’s Identity, Character and Heritage Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.007 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Replace reference to “shall” with “should”. Resource Efficiency part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.008 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend the Policies in 4.2.3 to replace the word 'shall' with "should ideally". part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.009 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend the Policies in 4.2.4 to replace the word 'shall' with "should ideally". part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.010 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'. part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.011 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.012 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. Amend Rule 4.4.8a) to provide general guidelines for the types of construction, materials and landscaping to be used. Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.013 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.9b) by reducing the required balcony, deck and upper level window boundary setbacks to 3m. Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.014 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10b) iv to provide more flexibility as to the location of the outdoor living area. part Tony Begbie (WCA Trust) 267.015 4.7.1 Ancillary Residential Unit Support Supports Rule 4.7.1 Ancillary Residential Units Pumice Food Group 269.001 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-Rezone the Hamilton Rowing Club and Ferrybank from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Destination Open Space Zone. Pumice Food Group 269.003 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the activities provided for within Rule 15.3 for the Destination Open Space zone. Pumice Food Group 269.004 Planning Maps Oppose Rezone the space containing the Hamilton Rowing Club and Ferrybank identified as Neighbourhood Open Space Zone on Map 45A to Destination Open Space Zone. Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.001 8.1 Purpose Support Retain the Knowledge Zone but oppose the Inland Port and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone which are not in keeping with innovation and research functions. Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM 270.003 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Support Amend 8.9 to remove the assessment criteria as it relates to the Knowledge Zone. Page 41 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision FRSNZ FIAWS Sub Type Summary Discretion and Assessment Criteria Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.004 10.1 Purpose Oppose Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.005 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete the Inland Port, Ruakura Logistics and Industrial Park Zones from the Ruakura Structure Plan and amend 10.2.1 to provide for the protection of the Knowledge Zone, schools, significant natural areas and the Mangaonua Gully. Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.006 10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 10.2.2b to ensure that activities within the Ruakura Logistics Zone are consistent with and sensitive to the education and environmental character of the area. Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.007 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from its present location and relocate elsewhere outside of Ruakura. part Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.008 11.1 Purpose Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.009 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Roberta Lee Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS 270.010 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Oppose development of the Inland Port and Logistics hub as there are other uses of the land consistent with the area, part including either an environmental reserve or a research park. St Paul's Collegiate SchoolRowing Club 271.001 15 Open Space Zones Oppose Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone St Paul's Collegiate SchoolRowing Club 271.006 15.1 Purpose Oppose Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone St Paul's Collegiate SchoolRowing Club 271.010 Locality Plan Oppose Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Oppose Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone (which includes the Inland Port) in its existing location and relocate away from the Knowledge Zone. Delete Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Where any use allowed provide a minimum buffer of 200m. Oppose the establishment of the Inland Port and Logistics hub. Amend the Plan to recognise the space as being of high environmental, research and knowledge-value interest. Page 42 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lynda Marie Findlay 272.001 4 Residential Zones Oppose Rezone the area between Short and Daisy Streets, Claudelands to General Residential. Edward William Makin 273.001 Features Map 42B Oppose Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Edward William Makin 273.004 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Edward William Makin 273.005 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety. Edward William Makin 273.007 22.5.5 Fences and Walls Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Edward William Makin 273.009 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Melanie Rouse 274.001 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. Heather Joan Makin 275.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety. Heather Joan Makin 275.003 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety. Heather Joan Makin 275.004 22.5.5 Fences and Walls Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Heather Joan Makin 275.005 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Page 43 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Heather Joan Makin 275.006 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety. Heather Joan Makin 275.007 Features Map 42B Oppose Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area' for the General Residential zone. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.002 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 4.2.6 regarding the restriction of commercial areas to dedicated areas. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.004 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rules b), c), d), and e) Interface Between Public and Private. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.006 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Support Residential Intensification Zone Retain Rule 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size - Residential Intensification Zone Waikato Property Investors Association 276.007 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose Objective and policies 4.2.4 as being too vague and unclear. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.008 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete 7.1.4 regarding Opoia Precinct and keep the focus on the CBD. Waikato Property Investors Association 276.009 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Oppose Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures. Bruce Davidson 277.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'. Bruce Davidson 277.003 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Oppose Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 Water efficiency measures. Bruce Davidson 277.005 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Claudia Anne 278.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Page 44 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Rebecca Mason Sub Type Summary Character Area Area. Allow the demolition of current buildings owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Allow for new buildings that retain the distinctive character of Temple View. Claudia Anne Rebecca Mason 278.003 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Support Retain 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone. Allow for the demolition of current buildings. New buildings and landscapes to have regard to the special character of the area. Kevin Collins 279.001 Zoning Map 58A Oppose Amend Planning Map 58A by rezoning the Industrial area to "Riverlea Industrial Area". Tui 2000 280.001 20.1 Purpose Support Retain the 20.1h) regarding trees and undertake planting project in the Mill Street area. King Family Trust 281.001 Zoning Map 43A Oppose Amend Zoning Map 43A by rezoning lots fronting Greenwood Street between Killarney Road and Massey Street Business Zone 6 - Suburban Centre Fringe. King Family Trust 281.006 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from the properties on the north western corner of Hall and Kent Street adjacent to the Massey Street overbridge. Deborah June Fisher 282.001 3.1 Purpose Oppose Prior to a Structure Plan being included in the District Plan require the following: 1. Structure Plans to publicly provide an Environmental Impact Report prior to their inclusion in the District Plan. 2. Details of proposed adverse environment effects and the level of those effects. 3. Evidence of Open Consultation with anyone potentially affected by a Structure Plan. 4. Removal of current structure plans from the Proposed District Plan that have not met these conditions. 5. Require Industrial Structure Plans to provide a "Noise Management Plan" similar to that of Appendix 1-5-21 prior to inclusion. Deborah June Fisher 282.002 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Remove Ruakura SP until more details are available, an environmental impact report available and the full and future effects on the surrounding environment have been considered. Deborah June Fisher 282.003 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Inland Port Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the full impacts have been fully investigated. Deborah June Fisher 282.004 3.7.1.2 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Logistics Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding environments have been fully investigated. Deborah June Fisher 282.005 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding environments have been fully investigated. Deborah June Fisher 282.006 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone Support Retain the Knowledge Zone Deborah June Fisher 282.007 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose Amend 3.7.2 by inserting additional objectives and policies to protect the environment and amenity values of existing residents. Deborah June Fisher 282.009 3.7.3.1 Ruakura Structure Plan Area Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until further investigation into its impacts on surrounding areas has been conducted. b) Amend Map 2-15 to reflect the correct status of the Spine Road as a major arterial. Oppose Page 45 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Deborah June Fisher 282.010 3.7.4 Provisions in Other Chapters Support in Delete Discretionary Assessment Criteria A2 - general criteria. part Deborah June Fisher 282.012 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Support in Amend Section 1.1.1. of the Plan to include reference to Section 7 of the Resource Management Act 1991. part Deborah June Fisher 282.014 1.1.2.1 The Resource Management Act 1991 Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.1 to include a specific reference to Section 7 of the Resource Management Act 1991. part Deborah June Fisher 282.016 1.1.3 Plan Structure Support in Amend section 1.1.3 of the Plan to include specific references to amenity values and the environment. Remove part Appendix 1.2 - Restricted Discretionary Activity - Matters for Discretion and Assessment. Deborah June Fisher 282.018 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Deborah June Fisher 282.020 3.2 Principles Support in Require structure plans to identify potential effects, positive and negative on the surrounding environment and how part these will be mitigated or managed. Deborah June Fisher 282.021 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support in Objective 3-3-5 to be amended to provide for any positive effect or adverse effects. part Deborah June Fisher 282.022 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Deborah June Fisher 282.023 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Support in Add policy to recognise "adjoining land uses" part Deborah June Fisher 282.024 9.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend the Plan to include a Definition, Objectives and Policies regarding Amenity Protection Area, what it is, where it part applies and what additional standards will be applied. Deborah June Fisher 282.025 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Deborah June Fisher 282.026 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Objective 10.2.3 to ensure the Ruakura Logistics Zone meets the same standards as in Chapter 9 Industrial Zones that protect surrounding residential areas (Silverdale and Fairview Downs) from adverse amenity effects. Deborah June Fisher 282.027 10.4.7 Landscape Screening Amend Rule 10.4.7 by requiring at least 3m by 8m wide with sufficient setback to allow adequate lighting for adjoining properties. Deborah June Fisher 282.028 10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete Ruakura Structure Plan until further consideration of the effects on the surrounding area have been investigated and publicly notified. b) ensure a "Noise Management Plan" is completed prior to inclusion of the Structure Plan. Policies 3.3.5a) and b) to be amended to "avoid" adverse effects Delete Chapter 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone, until further investigation into the effects and impacts of on the surrounding environment have been completed and publicly notified and a Noise Management Plan completed Delete Discretionary Criteria A2 - general criteria. Page 46 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Deborah June Fisher 282.029 10.6 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 10.6 as it is unacceptable to remove the right to not notify affected persons. Deborah June Fisher 282.030 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Delete Chapter 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone until an environmental impact report is publicly available and a Noise Management Plan is in place Deborah June Fisher 282.031 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend 11.2.3 to ensure more detail on adverse effects and their management is required to protect the amenity of surrounding areas. Deborah June Fisher 282.032 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Delete criteria A2 from Rule 11.6. Deborah June Fisher 282.033 11.7 Notification Rule Amend Rule 11.7 to ensure all affected persons are notified prior to consent being given. Deborah June Fisher 282.034 17.6.6 Claudelands Events Oppose Centre and Claudelands Park Amend Rule 17.6.6.2a) regarding Claudelands Events Centre and Park to remove the maximum 5 displays per year in favour of more consultation with local residents. Deborah June Fisher 282.035 17.9 Notification Rule Delete Rule 17.9 to ensure that if rules or standards are not met then notification and approval of affected persons is required. Deborah June Fisher 282.036 25.3.5.4 Events at Parana Oppose Park, Memorial Park, Destination Open Space Zone (excluding Garden Place), Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone (apart from those covered in 25.3.5.2 and 25.3.5.3) Deborah June Fisher 282.037 25.3.5.6 Events in the Rest of Support in Delete Rule 25.3.5.6b) regarding the maximum number of events per calendar year. the City part Deborah June Fisher 282.038 25.3.7 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 25.3.7 as affected people should retain the right to be notified. Deborah June Fisher 282.039 25.4.8 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 25.4.8 Notification Rule. Deborah June Fisher 282.040 25.4.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Oppose Delete Criteria A2 from 25.4.7 a) i. Oppose Oppose Delete Rule 25.3.5.4b) regarding the maximum number of events per calendar year. Page 47 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Deborah June Fisher 282.041 Consent Status Matrix Support in Amend 25.4.5.1 Consent Status Matrix by changing (y) Industrial Zone (Amenity Protection Area only) from ≤0.2 to part ≤0.02 for Permitted and from >0.2 to >0.02 for Discretionary. Amend 25.4.5.1 Consent Status Matrix by changing the exception for bb), cc), dd), ee) and ff), when within 30m of any zone specified in a) to i), from ≤0.2 to ≤0.02 for Permitted and from >0.2 to >0.02 for Discretionary. Deborah June Fisher 282.042 25.5.3.1 Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 25.5.3.1 (v)-Landscaping-Activities in the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone to "A 1.8m high close-boarded or part similar solid fence or wall, a 5m wide buffer strip and a 1.8m permeable fence--" Deborah June Fisher 282.043 25.5.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose 25.5.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Remove Criteria A2 (Appendix 1.2). Deborah June Fisher 282.044 25.5.5 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 25.5.5 Notification Rule (Landscaping and Screening). Deborah June Fisher 282.045 25.6.5 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose 25.6.5 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Remove Criteria A2 (Appendix 1.2). Deborah June Fisher 282.046 25.6.6 Notification Rule Oppose Remove 25.6.6 Notification Rule (Lighting and Glare). Deborah June Fisher 282.047 25.8.3 Rules – Specific Standards Oppose Oppose 25.8.3 Rules – Specific Standards Deborah June Fisher 282.048 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Support in 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Standards for Activities in all part Zones. Requests Future Urban Zones to have same noise levels and time periods as current residential areas. Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones Deborah June Fisher 282.049 25.8.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose 25.8.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria (Noise and Vibration). Remove Criteria A2 Deborah June 282.050 25.8.5 Notification Rule Oppose Remove 25.8.5 Notification Rule (Noise and Vibration). Page 48 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Fisher Deborah June Fisher 282.051 25.11.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete 25.11.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria A2. Deborah June Fisher 282.052 25.11.5 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 25.11.5 as affected people should retain the right to be notified. Deborah June Fisher 282.053 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Delete general restricted discretionary criteria A2(b) part Deborah June Fisher 282.054 25.8.3.2 Construction Noise Oppose 25.8.3.2 Construction Noise (Specific Standards). Provide the numerical limit for construction noise and require construction sites to stipulate construction time frame and the cumulative effects of multiple construction sites in close proximity. Deborah June Fisher 282.055 25.8.3.3 Construction Vibration Oppose 25.8.3.3 Construction Vibration (Specific Standards). Specify what German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 Structural vibration - Effects of vibration on Structures is, how it is measured and how it will be applied. Request construction sites to specify anticipated construction timeframes and cumulative effects of multiple construction sites. Deborah June Fisher 282.056 1.5.21 Ruakura Structure Plan (Noise – Inland Port) Support in Request reference to Noise Management plan for Inland port in Chapter 3 and Ruakura logistics zone. part Deborah June Fisher 282.057 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Add definition of "Amenity Value" as per RMA section 2 Add definition of "Natural and Physical Resources" as part contained in Chapter 1. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.001 8.1 Purpose Support Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks activities similar to existing - research and innovation. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.003 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support Amend 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to remove exemptions. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.004 10.1 Purpose Oppose Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone near schools and residential development. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.005 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Opposes Inland Port and Ruakura logistics and Industrial Park Zones. Roy McIver Daniel 283.006 10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend 10.2.2 to ensure that activities within the Ruakura Logistics Zone are consistent with and sensitive to the Page 49 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary FRSNZ education and environmental character of the area. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.007 11.1 Purpose Oppose Delete Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Where any use allowed provide a minimum buffer of 200m. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.008 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose the establishment of the Inland Port and Logistics hub. Amend the Plan to recognise the space as being of high environmental, research and knowledge-value interest. Roy McIver Daniel FRSNZ 283.009 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks uses more consistent with the area, including either an environmental reserve or research park. King Family Trust 284.001 Zoning Map 43A Oppose Amend the Amenity Protection Area on Zoning Map 43A covering land on the western side of Greenwood Street, between Killarney Road and Bandon Street to 20m. King Family Trust 284.002 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from properties on north western corner of Hall and Kent Street adjacent to the Massey Street overbridge. John Douglas Bennion 285.001 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Support the planning provisions that affect Whyte Street King Family Trust 286.001 Zoning Map 43A Oppose Amend Zoning Map 43A by zoning the land on the north western corner of Hall and Kent Street to Business 6. Midlands Health Network Limited 287.001 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support in Amend the Plan to recognise and provide for the expansion of primary care infrastructure. part Midlands Health Network Limited 287.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Review activity status for health care services in business zones and request more permissive rules across the city. part Midlands Health Network Limited 287.005 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Midlands Health Network Limited 287.006 9.1 Purpose Support in Amend the Plan to make Healthcare Services a permitted activity in the Industrial Zone. Change the way health care is part viewed within the purpose, objective and policy of the Industrial zone. Midlands Health Network Limited 287.007 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the status of healthcare services listed in Rule 9.3 ee) to Restricted Discretionary, and the expansion of existing medical centres up to 1000 sq m be Permitted and over 1000 sq m be Restricted Discretionary. Midlands Health Network Limited 287.008 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Supports the removal of healthcare from the Community Facilities Zone Midlands Health Network Limited 287.009 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 for 1031 Heaphy Terrace; 6 Howden Road; 3 Winter Street. Midlands Health Network Limited 287.010 Zoning Map 55A Oppose Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 at 3and 5 Urlich Ave. Amend Rule 7.3 so that health care services greater than 250m2 are Permitted Activities. Page 50 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Midlands Health Network Limited 287.011 Zoning Map 47A Oppose Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 at 5, 5A, 7 & 9 Masters Ave. Midlands Health Network Limited 287.012 6.1 Purpose Support in The expansion of existing healthcare services should be more permissive in all zones, especially neighbourhood and part suburban centres. Lauren Jay McDonald 288.001 Features Map 42B Oppose Lauren Jay McDonald 288.004 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A, part and 32B Hazelwood Avenue). Lauren Jay McDonald 288.006 22.8 Non-Complying Activities in a Flood Hazard Area Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A, part and 32B Hazelwood Avenue). Josina Wilhelmina Maria Ellis 289.001 3.7 Ruakura Support in Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks residential zoning. part Josina Wilhelmina Maria Ellis 289.002 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Inland Port Oppose Delete the Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone. Karyn Marcia Hayward 290.001 9 Industrial Zone Oppose Amend Chapter 9 to leave the Industrial Zone rules as they are in the Operative District Plan, not to impose further restrictions. Robert W. Belbin 291.001 Structure Plans Locality Guide Support in Include a Temple View Structure Plan within Appendix 2: Structure Plans. part Robert W. Belbin 291.003 3.1 Purpose Support in Include a section for Temple View within Rule 3.0 Structure Plans part Robert W. Belbin 291.006 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Robert W. Belbin 291.010 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Retain Rule 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Robert W. Belbin 291.012 5.5.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.3a) (Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship) by increasing gross floor area of all buildings. Robert W. Belbin 291.014 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 Home-based Business to include home -based professional services as Permitted. Robert W. Belbin 291.015 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Amend Rule 5.7 Notification Rule by making notification of and approval from affected persons a requirement. Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A, and 32B Hazelwood Avenue). Page 51 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Robert W. Belbin 291.016 19.1 Purpose Support Retain protection of Historic Heritage through Rule 19.1. Robert W. Belbin 291.018 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Support Retain 19.3 Rules - Activity Status Table. Robert W. Belbin 291.020 25.2.1 Purpose Support Retain Rule 25.2.1 Purpose. Robert W. Belbin 291.022 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Robert W. Belbin 291.024 8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support Amend Rule 8-1.1 Ranking of Significance with regards to building rankings within Temple View. Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.001 3.7.1.6 Residential Zones Oppose Rule 3.7.1.6, setting the staging of residential development within the Ruakura Structure Plan. A full structure plan should be developed. Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.006 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network Support in Amend Rule 3.7.1.8 to include the southern gully areas, cycleways and provide opportunity within the transmission part corridors for community gardens. Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.007 3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for Oppose General Residential Zone and Medium Density Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Review staging rules 3.7.3.5 for the large lot residential zone within the Ruakura Structure Plan Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.008 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose That the large lot residential area, between Morrinsville Road and the transmission line corridors be reviewed to permit light commercial activities. Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.009 3.7.1.9 Stormwater Support 3.7.1.9 Stormwater - request Council work with landowners to develop comprehensive plan for gully's ecological amenity. Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.010 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Review 23.7.3 regarding the number of lots served by private ways and the restrictions on the length on private ways under Subdivision Design Standards. Table 23.3a Oppose Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.012 Oppose Carry out detailed planning in conjunction with landowners in the Large Lot Residential area of the Ruakura Structure Plan. Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3a. Ensure restrictions placed on transmission line corridors are based on current specifications and any extensions are not adopted. Page 52 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Gwyneth Ann Verkerk 293.013 23.6.6 Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B Support in 23.6.6 Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B (Specific Standards). Request the zone standards part adopted by Council are consistent with current standards, and that Council does not adopt the extended zone corridors. Simon Puttick Friar 294.001 25.15.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend the wording of policy 25.15.2.3a to confine CPTED assessment to public spaces and layout aspects of part subdivision and development proposals. Simon Puttick Friar 294.002 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks to make the setback for building facing a transport corridor 5m. Simon Puttick Friar 294.003 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private clause b). Simon Puttick Friar 294.004 15.5.6 Fences and Walls Oppose Seek changes to Rule 15.5.6 Fences and Walls for rear yards Natalie Jordan 295.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit. Natalie Jordan 295.002 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose That the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the net area. Natalie Jordan 295.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for traction from Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface. Natalie Jordan 295.004 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units. Andrew Summerville 296.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit. Andrew Summerville 296.002 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend the Plan so the site coverage rule in the residential zones applies to the gross lot area rather than the net area. Andrew Summerville 296.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for traction. Andrew Summerville 296.004 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units. Jim Milne 297.001 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.5 a) regarding the measurement of the Height in Relation to Boundary controls, and Delete Rule 4.4.5a)ii. Jim Milne 297.003 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or wall is 1.8m. Jim Milne 297.004 Features Map 16B Oppose Remove Waikato River and Gully Hazard Area and the Waikato River Bank Stability Area from 13 River Oaks Place. Page 53 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Jim Milne 297.005 1.4.3 Residential Design Assessment Criteria (Residential and Special Character Zones) Oppose Delete Figures 1.4.3f Building design that creates visual interest incorporating a range of features and 1.4.3.5g Garage door forward of the front face of the building. Clarify the status of the Design Guide and Assessment Criteria in 1.4.5.3. Jodi N. Belbin 298.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jodi N. Belbin 298.005 8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support Retain the ranking in schedule 8A Built Heritage given to heritage buildings within Temple View as notified and include the Matthew Cowley Administration Building. Casa Capital 299.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit. Casa Capital 299.002 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Rule 4.2.1 a) so that the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the net area. Casa Capital 299.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for traction. Casa Capital 299.004 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units. Casa Capital 299.005 1.1.1 Purpose of the District Plan Oppose Ensure the rules contained in the Operative District Plan continue to apply. Ella Pax Makin 300.001 Features Map 42B Oppose Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Ella Pax Makin 300.005 11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose Flood Hazard Area Categories Descriptions Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety. Ella Pax Makin 300.007 22.1 Purpose Oppose Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Ella Pax Makin 300.008 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road. Ella Pax Makin 300.009 22.5.5 Fences and Walls Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Ella Pax Makin 300.011 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Oppose Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas. Page 54 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Existing Buildings Grace McCarthy 302.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Grace McCarthy 302.002 8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support Strongly in favour of giving all buildings on former CCNZ Campus in Temple View the highest possible heritage rankings as set out in 8-1.1 Rankings of Significance. Denise Clark (Silverdale Residents Group) 303.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Opposes an Inland Port at Ruakura Denise Clark (Silverdale Residents Group) 303.003 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to part 200 m width and planted with native trees. Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as central stormwater management) Mark Priscott 304.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit. Mark Priscott 304.002 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units. Mark Priscott 304.003 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Rule 4.2.1 a) so that the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the net area. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.001 20.1 Purpose Support in Specifically identify the long tailed bat roosting within Significant Natural Areas part The Waikato Tree Trust 305.002 Significant Natural Areas Support in Supports Objectives and Policies in 20.2.1 regarding the protection, maintenance, restoration and enhancement of 20.2.1 Objective and Policies part Significant Natural Areas. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.004 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 20.3 to replace 'trimming' with 'pruning' and require arborist reports to be carried out for significant part trees. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.005 20.4.1 Trimming and Maintenance Support The Waikato Tree Trust 305.007 20.4.2 Emergency Works to, Support in Retain Rule 20.4.2 Emergency Works to, or Removal of, an Indigenous Tree in a Significant Natural Area or a Scheduled or Removal of, an Indigenous part Tree with amendments to define a qualified arborist and to protect roosting sites for long tailed bats. Tree in a Significant Natural Area or a Scheduled Tree1 The Waikato Tree 305.008 20.6 Notification Rule Support Retain Rule 20.4.1 Trimming and Maintenance with amendments to replace 'Trimming' with 'pruning' Retain 20.6 Notification Rule Page 55 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Trust The Waikato Tree Trust 305.009 9-1.16 Method of Applying a Support in Amend Appendix 9-1.16 Method of Applying a Monetary Value for significant trees by increasing the cost to $45 per Monetary Value part unit The Waikato Tree Trust 305.010 Schedule 9C Significant Natural Areas The Waikato Tree Trust 305.011 Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support Amend Schedule 9D Significant Trees with amendments to correct Botanical Names of Trees The Waikato Tree Trust 305.012 13-1 Areas with Historic Heritage Values or Visual Amenity Values Support Retain Appendix 13-1 Areas with Historic Heritage Values or Visual Amenity Values. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.014 24.2 Objectives and Policies Financial Contributions Support Amend Policy 24.2.1 to correct a typographical error. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.015 24.3.1 Purpose of Financial Contribution Support Retain the schedule in 24.3.1 The Waikato Tree Trust 305.017 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Support Supports 24.3.3 regarding levels of contribution. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.019 24.3.4 Credits Support Retain the schedule in 24.3.4 The Waikato Tree Trust 305.020 24.4.1 Reserves Level of Service Support in Increase the amount of reserves level of service from part 'A minimum of 4ha per 1000 population ---" to ' A minimum of 10ha per 1000 population --" The Waikato Tree Trust 305.021 25.2.1 Purpose Support Supports 25.2.1 Purpose regarding the importance of trees. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.022 25.13.1 Purpose Support Supports 25.13.1 (Three Waters Purpose) as this is required to achieve a sustainable city. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.023 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Change all references in Rule 15.3 to 'Trimming' in the text to 'Pruning' part The Waikato Tree Trust 305.024 15.6.3 Organised Recreation Support in the Natural and Neighbourhood Open Space Zone Support Include Whatukoruru Reserve - Fitzroy (Peacocks Rd area) - Long tailed bat roosting sites as a Significant Natural Area Retain Rule 15.6.3 protecting and providing for the use of Open Space Zones Page 56 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary The Waikato Tree Trust 305.025 9.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Need to assess planting of trees to offset carbon emissions and sequenting of carbon in each Industrial Zone, and to connect vegetated linkages between Industrial Zones and open space landscapes/Waikato River. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.026 9.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Need to assess planting of trees to offset carbon emissions and sequenting of carbon in each Industrial Zone, and to connect vegetated linkages between Industrial Zones and open space landscapes/Waikato River. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.028 9.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 9.2.4 and the explanation to set limits on the future development of the Crawford Street Freight part Village and where soils are identified for horticulture or agriculture use. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.029 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part The Waikato Tree Trust 305.030 11.1 Purpose Support in Amend Chapter 11 to ensure provisions that require that development adjoining residential or Significant Natural part Areas is offset by landscape formation planted with indigenous ecologically sourced plants to connect areas such as streams, gullies and 'Significant Natural Areas'. The Waikato Tree Trust 305.031 21.1 Purpose Support The Waikato Tree Trust 305.033 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Gerard Francis Kelly 306.001 9.3.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part David Bennett Taylor 308.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.001 Zoning Map 10A Oppose Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.002 2.2.6 Objective and Policies Residential Development Support in Support in part. Retain Policy 2.2.6(a) but amend to encourage mixed use development outcomes. part Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.003 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support in Amend the Objective and Policies 6.2.2 to support establishment of residential activities above ground floor level in part Suburban Centres. Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.004 6.2.3 Objective and Policies Neighbourhood Centres Support in Amend Objective and Policies 6.2.3 to support the establishment of residential activities above ground floor level in part Neighbourhood Centres. Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.005 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Support the purpose of the Waikato River and Gully Systems Chapter Support the Waikato River and Gully Systems Objective and Policies under 21.2.1 Oppose Zoning Map 10A - Request that the land located at 16 Horsham Downs Road and 109 Thomas Road be rezoned from Residential to "Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core" to reflect current land use consent for mixed use development. Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d), request they be changed to a Permitted Activity across all Business Zones. Amend Rule 6.3 l), m) and n) regarding offices to replace the words "per site" with "per tenancy". Page 57 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rule 6.3hh) so parking lots and parking buildings within the Suburban Centre Core are a Permitted Activity. Amend Rule 6.3ll) so health-care services (250m2 - 1000m2) located at ground floor within the Suburban Centre Core are a Permitted Activity. Amend Rule 6.3xx) so residential apartments above ground floor in Suburban and Neighbourhood Centres are a Controlled Activity. Amend Rule 6.3zz) so that residential centres above ground floor level in Suburban Centres are a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.006 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.3 a) to require a 5m building setback only in relation to major arterial roads. Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.007 6.4.9 Residential Development Oppose Amend the Plan to add standards for residential apartments (i.e. density, outdoor living and service areas etc.) in the Business Zones. Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.008 6.4.10 Development Flexibility Support in Amend Rule 6.4.10a) Development Flexibility as the cross reference to Rule 6.4.7 is incorrect and should be Rule 6.4.6. part Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.009 25.14.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity - Delete the text "or altered" Rototuna Ventures Ltd 309.010 Integrated Transport Assessment Oppose Delete Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria V7 (network efficiency performance expectations) for Integrated Transport Assessments. David John Campbell 310.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Timothy Daniel Hunt 311.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.001 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the total floor area. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.002 Zoning Map 15A Support Map 15A-Retain Business Zone 4-Large Format Retail for the area known as The Boulevard. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.003 6.1 Purpose Support Retain Lots 15-17 DP 456477, Lot 2 DP 321305, Lots 37 & 38 DPS 73160, Pt Lots 1-5 DPS 73160, Sec 6 SO 416905 The Boulevard within the "Te Rapa North Sub-regional Centre". Page 58 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.004 6.2 Objectives and Policies Business 1 to 7 Zones Support in Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Policies for Business Zone 4 - Large Format Retail that recognises the role of this part zone in providing a range of wide range of moderate to low intensity commercial (retail and office), community, and service activities. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.005 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and c) so that new buildings, alterations and additions and minor works are Permitted Activities part across all Business Zones. Amend Rule 6.3 e) by replacing the word "industry" with "Industrial activity", and amend the definition of "industrial activity" so that it is clear that warehouse and bulk storage are deemed light industry. Amend Rule 6.3 l), m) and n) so that Offices up to 500m2 are a Permitted Activity and Offices greater than 500m2 are a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Business 4 Zone. Retain Rule 6.3 p) and k) but amend the definition of ancillary retail to allow for it to occupy up to 25% Retain Rule 6.3 s), t) and w). Amend Rule 6.3 and 6.3 d) aa), bb), cc), ee), jj), kk), ll), mm), oo), qq), rr) and ss) so that Wholesale and Trade Retail, accessory buildings, licensed premises, cafes, restaurants, Commercial places of assembly (cinemas and bowling alleys only), health-care services, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities are Permitted Activities in the Business 4 Zone. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.006 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.3a) so the 5m setback only applies to major arterial roads Delete Rule 6.4.3c) as it is ambiguous and unclear what "any internal zone boundary" means and what setback distance would apply. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.008 6.4.4 Minimum Floor Area Oppose Delete Rule 6.4.4a) as any retail activity less than 400m2 in Business Zone 4 is a Discretionary Activity. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.009 6.4.5 Building Intensity Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.5 a)(ii) in relation to Business Zone 4 so a maximum floor area to net site area ratio of 1.5 :1 applies. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.010 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review Rule 6.6 in its entirety and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 to ensure maters of discretion and assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sought. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.011 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 9.3f) & g) to provide for ancillary retail up to 25% gfa. Amend Rule 9.3j) to remove segregation strips, and part make rules 9.3u) & v) permitted activities. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.012 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1a) so road setbacks only apply to major arterial roads. Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Delete Rule 9.4.1 (d) in so far as it relates to Lots 20 & 21 DP 456477. Page 59 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Employment Area) AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.013 9.4.3 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.3 to delete the requirement for a height in relation to boundary plane in so far as it relates to Lots 20 & 21 DP 456477 and the adjoining Open Space Zone. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.014 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Oppose Amend Rule 9.5.2(a) to allow for Ancillary Retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of any principal activity on the site (i.e. delete reference to industrial). Amend Rule 9.5.3(a) to allow for Ancillary Offices to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of any principal activity on the site (i.e. delete reference to industrial). AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.015 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.016 25.14.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that no Permitted Activity is required to prepare an Integrated Transport Assessment. AMP Capital Property Portfolio 312.017 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.1a) Business Zone 4 - Large Format Retail to increase the maximum height limit to 20m. W.J. & M.R. Laverty 313.001 3 Structure Plans Support in Include a Structure Plan for Temple View in Section 3- Structure Plans as set out in the submission. part W.J. & M.R. Laverty 313.002 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Support in Include a Structure Plan for Temple View within Appendix 2 - Structure Plans. part Ecostream Irrigation 314.001 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend policies to provide for yard-based retail and non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Ecostream Irrigation 314.001 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A- rezone 791-797 Te Rapa Road to an appropriate business zone. Ecostream Irrigation 314.004 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Ecostream Irrigation 314.005 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend 9.3(f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3(g) to provide for any retail activity part occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3(l) to provide for office activities existing at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3 (u) & (v) to be a Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle movements. Ecostream 314.008 9.4.6 Site Layout Oppose Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary. Page 60 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Irrigation Ecostream Irrigation 314.008 9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only. Ecostream Irrigation 314.010 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te Rapa Road which should be able to continue. Ecostream Irrigation 314.012 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.2 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary retail. Ecostream Irrigation 314.014 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor space and or/yard based retail area. Isobel & Harold Nielsen 315.001 Zoning Map 21A Support in Support 1000sq m. sections within the steeper areas, with smaller lots (-/+ 500sq m.) on flatter land within the Large part Lot Residential Area within Rototuna. John Nielsen 316.001 Zoning Map 21A Support in Support 1000sq m. sections within the steeper areas, with smaller lots (-/+ 500sq m.) on flatter land within the Large part Lot Residential Area within Rototuna. Delta Property Group 317.001 Zoning Map 26A Oppose Map 26A-rezone 449-455 Te Rapa Road and others as necessary to an appropriate business zone. Delta Property Group 317.002 9.2 Objectives and Policies Industrial Zone Oppose Add a further policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Delta Property Group 317.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain rules 9.3 h), j), k), x). Amend Rules 9.3 (u) & (v) to be a Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle part movements. Amend Rule 9.3y) & z) to make provision for existing office and childcare facilities as permitted activities. Delta Property Group 317.004 9.5.1 Retail (Except Wholesale Retail and Trade Supplies) Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of part Plan notification. Delta Property Group 317.005 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Support in Amend Rule 9.5.2 (b) to allow for ancillary retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity part on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Delta Property Group 317.006 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Support in Amend Rule 9.5.3 (a) to allow for ancillary office to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity part on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Delta Property Group 317.007 17.2 Objectives and Policies Major Facilities Zone Support Delta Property Group 317.008 17.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain Rule 17.3 a) regarding a Restricted Discretionary Activity status for the approval or update of a Concept Plan. part Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding definitions for intensive and non-intensive horse grazing. Retain Policy 17.2.1c regarding adverse effects generated from Major Facilities. Page 61 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rule 17.3a) jj) so that intensive horse grazing within 100m of any boundary is a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Delta Property Group 317.009 Y Major Facility Concept Plans Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 Y1 (b); Amend Appendix 1.2 Y3 to include consideration to adverse effects from intensive horse part grazing on adjoining activities. Delta Property Group 317.010 1.5.15 Concept Plan for Major Facilities Support in Retain Appendix 1.5.15 (e)(iv) requiring buffer areas to be shown on concept plans part Delta Property Group 317.011 17.5.3 Provisions in Other Chapters Support Retain Rule 17.5.3 regarding compliance with City Wide standards. Delta Property Group 317.012 25.11.3 Rules – General Standards Support Retain Rule 25.11.3 a). Delta Property Group 317.013 25.11.2 Objectives and Policies Smoke, Fumes, Odour and Dust Support Retain Policy 25.11.2.1a. Delta Property Group 317.014 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Support Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Elroy & Kate Thomson 318.001 Zoning Map 45A Support in Map 45A-Insufficient consultation with key stakeholders of Opoia Precinct. Propose Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other part methods of implementation) to include a commitment to work with key stakeholders in developing a master plan for the Opoia Precinct. Elroy & Kate Thomson 318.003 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other methods of implementation) to include a commitment to provide information to key part stakeholders, to facilitate and coordinate discussion groups and to work with key stakeholders in developing a master plan for the Opoia Precinct. Elroy & Kate Thomson 318.005 1.8.4 Collaboration and Partnership Support in Insufficient consultation with key stakeholders of Opoia Precinct. Propose Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other methods of part implementation) to include a commitment to provide information to key stakeholders, to facilitate and coordinate discussion groups and work with key stakeholders in developing a master plan for the Opoia Precinct. George Eugene Lusty 319.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Terry Martyn Hume 320.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Alan Russell 321.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. Retain the ability to consider a Concept Plan as a publicly notified application in Rule 17.8 a) i. Page 62 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Bishop Sub Type Summary Table part Michael Cecil Paddy 322.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Modern Transport Limited 323.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-rezone Lot 2 DPS 15248 at Te Kowhai Road to Industrial. Modern Transport Limited 323.002 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Support Supports land described as Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Road being identified for industrial land uses in the Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan - Land Use. Modern Transport Limited 323.003 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Requests that Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Road be included within Stage 1 of the Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan – Staging and Transport Network. Peter & Margaret Fairhead 324.001 Zoning Map 18A Oppose Map 18A-rezone 144 Rototuna Road to Business Zone 5. Richard Ward 325.001 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Revert back to the location of the "Eastern Link" Major Arterial Transport Corridors as shown in the Peacocke Structure Plan within the Operative District Plan and use the existing designation for the minor arterial roads. Richard Ward 325.002 3.4.3 Transport Network Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to align with the "Eastern Link" within Variation 14. Philip & Patricia Oh 326.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Lori Silsbee 327.001 11.4.3 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 11.4.3d) and f) to increase the minimum building setbacks within Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. part Lori Silsbee 327.003 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 a) iv air discharge permits to be restricted to nil (non-complying) under 100m and criteria applied to Activities Matters of part 100m and further Discretion and Assessment Criteria Jason Hennessey 328.001 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Remove the 'future reserve' land use from property Lot 2 312185 (217 Peacocke Road) as shown on Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use. Michael Kenneth Hall 329.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Seeks that NZTA: erect suitable noise and visual barriers to enable 400m2 lot sizes adjoining the Waikato Expressway; purchase 35/40m barrier zone at residential lot value; and purchase Land between expressway and Horsham Downs Road. David Charles Ferguson 330.001 Zoning Map 30A Oppose Opposes land being zoned neighbourhood open space through the development of the Ruakura Structure Plan and requests a residential zoning or purchase of land. Page 63 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Anne & David Platts 331.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Tim Stokes 332.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Hugo Van in 333.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Peters 334.001 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1 so within the Large Lot Residential area in Rototuna a 1000m2 minimum site area is applied to part elevated areas; and 500-600m2 minimum site area is applied to the flat contoured areas. Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Peters 334.002 4.4.2 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase the maximum site coverage in the Large Lot Residential zone to 25 - 30%. Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Peters 334.004 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Support Retain Rule 4.4.6 c) regarding the setbacks from the Waikato Expressway. Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Peters 334.005 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support 3.5.1 Rototuna Structure Plan Objectives and Policies. Supports Policy 3.5.1a; Seeks a pedestrian/cycle path at a midway point between where Kay Road and Horsham Downs Road cross the Expressway. Jacqueline, Steward Charles Jeffery Peters 334.005 4.2.8 Objective and Policies Support Amend Objective and policies 4.2.8 to require all new dwellings in Large Lot Residential zones to have a rainwater collection tank; and be required to have double-glazed windows. Braemar Hospital Limited 335.001 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 16.3 to specifically allow for Hospitals and Health Care Services to occur on the Braemar Hospital Site. Joy Olive Tristram 336.001 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area and do not include on any associated LIM report for Unit 1, 4 Krippner Place. John Vianney Conroy 337.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Jennifer Rita Bothwell (Fairview Downs Residents) 338.001 Figure 15-5c Transport corridor hierarchy plan Oppose Jennifer Rita 338.002 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Support in Relocate residential and commercial areas within the Ruakura Structure Plan to avoid industrial views and noise for Retain Fifth Avenue unchanged and delete the proposed interchange at the extension of Fifth Avenue; Delete the proposed North-South Arterial Transport Corridor to the East of Fairview downs or move it closer to the planned position of the Waikato Expressway (SH1). Page 64 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Bothwell (Fairview Downs Residents) Sub Type Summary Structure Plan-Land Use part existing homes. Retain natural stormwater drainage. Submitter wants to speak to their submission at any hearing but states that proposed hearing times are inconvenient for people who work, and would prefer that hearings are scheduled to account for working people. Jennifer Rita Bothwell (Fairview Downs Residents) 338.004 1 Plan Overview Oppose Marie Theresa Conroy 339.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Body Corporate 550337 340.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-Rezone Lot 2 DPS 46742 from Industrial to a Business Zone, or amend the provisions in the Industrial Zone to allow for office activity. Body Corporate 550337 340.002 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Add a further policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Body Corporate 550337 340.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain rules 9.3 h), i), j), k). Amend Rules 9.3 l) to make provision for existing offices, amend rule 9.3 (u) & v) to be a part Permitted Activities, and delete reference to vehicle movements. Body Corporate 550337 340.004 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Body Corporate 550337 340.005 9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only. Body Corporate 550337 340.006 9.4.6 Site Layout Oppose Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary. Body Corporate 550337 340.007 9.5.1 Retail (Except Wholesale Retail and Trade Supplies) Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of part Plan notification. Body Corporate 550337 340.008 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Support in Amend Rule 9.5.2 (b) to allow for ancillary retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity part on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Make consequential amendments to the definition of Ancillary Retailing and Offices in Section 1.7 Body Corporate 550337 340.009 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Support in Amend Rule 9.5.3 a) to allow for ancillary office to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity part on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Make consequential amendments to the definition of Ancillary Offices in Section 1.7 Body Corporate 340.010 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and Page 65 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision 550337 Sub Type Summary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort. Revell Properties No.9 Limited 341.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3ee) and w) so that Parking Lots & Yard based Retail >400sqm are Restricted Discretionary Activities with subsequential changes to assessment criteria so that parking lots are designed to fit with or enhance the existing streetscape through careful treatment of pedestrian interface and can enhance pedestrian amenity through creative and imaginative planting, screening and provision of public facilities. Nitinchandra M Parulekar 342.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Trust Waikato 343.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37a-rezone the Trust Waikato site from Residential Intensification to "Central City (City Living Precinct, Height Overlay 2)" or another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office activity. Everton Trust 344.001 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-Amend the zoning of the southern lot of the Wintec site Lot 1 DP 450285 from Major Facilities to Residential. Everton Trust 344.002 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A-Amend the zoning of the southern lot of the Wintec site recognised as Lot 1 DP 450285 from Major Facilities to Residential. Everton Trust 344.003 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Amend Figure 2-8 to provide for the intended future use of the property recognised as Lot 1 DP 450285 for Residential purposes. Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.001 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description. part Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission. Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.002 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Retain Rule 1.1.8.1 unaltered but with changes made to Rule 1.1.7 sought above in regard to discretionary activity part status description. Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.005 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Oppose Oppose. Delete Rule 2.2 as it sets a higher threshold that RMA s.104D for non-complying activities. Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.007 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Oppose Oppose. Amend Policy 2.2.4a and Policy 2.2.5b by replacing 'shall' with 'should' and enable location of business and development out of zone where appropriate. Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.008 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 9.2.1b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. part Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.009 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for offices and retail activities in the Industrial Zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Page 66 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Greig Family Trust Holdings Limited 345.010 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Reformat Appendix 1.2 to relate specifically to identified Restricted Discretionary Activities in the Activity Status Tables with defined matters of discretion. Peter H Bos 346.001 Table 15-2b Number of Support parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b: Number of parking and loading spaces required - Central City Zone. Peter H Bos 346.004 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Oppose Lower the minimum car parking requirements in Table 15-2a Peter H Bos 346.005 4.6.4 Residential Unit Size Support in Amend Rule 4.6.4 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units. part Roland Olliver Cooper 347.001 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Support in Subdivision Design Standards - 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape (h) Large Lot Residential - Rototuna Structure Plan. part Requests where properties severed by the Expressway, be allowed to subdivide down to 400m2. CR & S Hammerton Trust 348.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A- rezone 56 The Boulevard and others as necessary around The Boulevard to an appropriate business zone. CR & S Hammerton Trust 348.002 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Add a further Policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. CR & S Hammerton Trust 348.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for offices existing at the time of Plan notification as a Permitted Activity. Retain Rule 9.3h) part Permitted Activity status for trade and industry training facilities. CR & S Hammerton Trust 348.004 9.5.1 Retail (Except Wholesale Retail and Trade Supplies) Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of part Plan notification. Murray James Johnstone 349.002 Features Map 45B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area from 646 Grey Street. Barry Laurence Flay 350.001 Zoning Maps Support Retain Zoning Maps Barry Laurence Flay 350.003 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone Support Retain Rule 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone Barry Laurence Flay 350.004 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan -Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. Barry Laurence 350.005 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Support Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 D P 425316 as part of the Future Reserves namely the Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Page 67 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Flay Sub Type Summary Structure Plan-Land Use Park. William Wie & Patricia Tekore Moana 352.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose houses being built in the area as it will adversely affect the environment. William Wie & Patricia Tekore Moana 352.003 Zoning Maps Support in Supports in part Zoning Maps. part William Wie & Patricia Tekore Moana 352.004 Zoning Map 33A Support in Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. part Nancy Cooper 354.001 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Support in Subdivision Design Standards - 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape (h) Large Lot Residential - Rototuna Structure Plan. part Requests where properties severed by the Expressway, be allowed to subdivide down to 400m2. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.001 6.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Fig 6.1b so that Lot 1 DP 321305 (84991) 6 Parkinson Road is included within the zoning for Te Rapa North subregional centre. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.002 6.2 Objectives and Policies Business 1 to 7 Zones Oppose Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Polices that relate to land zoned Business 1 - Commercial Fringe that is located outside of a sub-regional centre. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and c) so that new buildings, alterations and additions, and accessory buildings are Permitted Activities. Amend Rule 6.3n) so that the existing office activities undertaken on Lot 1 DP 321305 and Lot 2 DPS 39890 are a Permitted Activities. Amend Rules 6.3 s) and t) to allow retail activities greater than 400m2 as a Permitted Activity on Lot 1 DPS 84445 and Lot 2 DPS 26655. Amend the inconsistency with Rule 6.4.6 which provides for maximum tenancy sizes in excess of 400m2. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.004 6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.6a) (i) to provide a maximum gfa of 4,000m2 on Lot 1 DPS 84445 and Lot 2 DPS 26655 (at Dinsdale Suburban Centre). Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.005 6.4.10 Development Flexibility Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.10a) Development Flexibility as the cross reference to Rule 6.4.7 is incorrect and should be Rule 6.4.6. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.006 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-Request ACC Offices at Lot 1 DP 321305 - 6 Parkinson Road be rezoned from Industrial to “Business Zone 1 – Commercial Fringe”, or another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office activity. Page 68 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.007 Zoning Map 26A Oppose Map 26A-Request 11 Ken Brown Drive be rezoned from Industrial to “Business Zone 1 - Commercial Fringe”, or another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office activity. Chartwell Investments Ltd 355.008 Zoning Map 42A Support Map 42A-support zoning of Lot 1 DPS 84445 and Lot 2 DPS 26655 and remain as “Business Zone 5 – Suburban Centre Core”. Southern Cross Hospitals Limited (Bloxam Burnett and Olliver Ltd) 356.001 6.1 Purpose Support in Amend 6.1 (d)(iii) to recognise that that a suburban centre can also comprise Business 1 Zoning. part Southern Cross Hospitals Limited (Bloxam Burnett and Olliver Ltd) 356.002 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support in The definition of Health Care Services currently excludes Hospitals so amend Policy 6.2.2g so it specifically refers to part hospital activities in Hamilton East. Southern Cross Hospitals Limited (Bloxam Burnett and Olliver Ltd) 356.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the list of ‘Community’ activities within Rule 6.3 to enable hospitals as a Permitted Activity within the Business 1 Zone or on all sites owned by Southern Cross Hospitals Ltd in the (Hamilton East) Business 1 Zone. Southern Cross Hospitals Limited (Bloxam Burnett and Olliver Ltd) 356.004 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-rezone Lot 11 DP 3278 and Part Lot 15 DP 3278 from ‘Residential Intensification Zone’ to ‘Business 1 Zone’ Southern Cross Hospitals Limited (Bloxam Burnett and Olliver Ltd) 356.005 Features Map 45B Oppose Remove reference to archaeological site A113 from Lot 2 DP 17455 located on Planning Map 45B. Mark McLennan 357.001 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'; and reintroducing 'average site area'. Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.001 25.14.1 Purpose Oppose Amend 25.14.1 c) to include specific reference to Regionally Significant Infrastructure as being a key component of the wider transport network. Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.003 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Oppose Amend the explanation which follows Policy 25.14.2.1g by adding the following: "Buildings, structures and trees in certain parts of the city could protrude into the flight path of planes departing and approaching Hamilton Airport. This increases the risks to public safety both on the ground and in the air." Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.005 25.14.4.5 Height of Structures – Horizontal and Conical Obstacle Limitation Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.5 a) to clarify that no building, mast, tree or other object shall penetrate any of the horizontal and conical obstacle limitation surfaces surrounding Hamilton Airport; Amend Note 2 in Rule 25.14.4.5 to clarify that the Conical Obstacle Limitation Surface slopes upward and outwards from the periphery of the Horizontal Surface at a Page 69 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Surfaces gradient of 1 vertical to 20 horizontal to an elevation of 207m above Moturiki Datum. Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.006 25.14.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.6 a) v by adding a new assessment matter: V21 Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.007 1 Plan Overview Support in Seeks any consequential amendments that would have the same effect in relation to the specific submissions made by part Waikato Regional Airport. Waikato Regional Airport Ltd 359.008 V Transportation Oppose Insert a new assessment criterion in Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 (V Transportation) as follows: Obstacle Limitation Surface for Hamilton Airport "V21 The extent to which any building, mast, tree or other object creates a potential hazard to the flight paths of aircraft or any other operations associated with Hamilton Airport." W.R & J.M Falconer 360.001 3 Structure Plans Support in A Structure Plan for Temple View be developed for inclusion in Section 3 - Structure Plans. part W.R & J.M Falconer 360.003 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Support in Amend Volume 2: Appendix 2 - Structure Plans by including a Temple View Structure Plan and make any subsequential part changes to other diagrams. Cameron Graham Murray (PFS Engineering Ltd) 361.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain Rules 9.3 as notified. Raymond Dong 362.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-Re-zone the south-western side of Clifton Road from Residential Intensification to City Centre – Precinct 2. Raymond Dong 362.002 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Amanda Kaye Young 363.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Simon Irvine Young 364.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Graham Singelton (PFS Engineering) 365.001 Zoning Map 18A Support Map 18A-Retain the zoning of the Riverlea area. Graham Singelton (PFS 365.002 Zoning Map 58A Support Map 58A-Retain the Industrial Zoning at Riverlea Page 70 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Engineering) KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.001 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Support. Retain Policy 2.2.13e) KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.002 3.6.2.6 Passenger Transport Facility Support KiwiRail supports the provision of PT facilities in the Structure Planning for Rotokauri. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.003 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports Ruakura Structure Plan KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.005 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 4.2.2b and 4.2.2c to include references to rail corridors as being a significant infrastructure; along with part wording to encourage the avoidance of locating too close to such infrastructure; and the management of reverse sensitivities. Delete policy 4.2.2d. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.006 8.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 8.2.2 and Policy 8.2.2c KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.007 9.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Supports the development of the freight village facility at Crawford Street identified in 9.2.4. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.009 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support Supports the retention of Policy 22.2.1h that states new regionally significant infrastructure can only be located in a Flood Hazard area when it is not practicable to locate that infrastructure elsewhere and if flood event impacts are minimised. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.010 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 22.3 h) to m) to specifically include 'structures'. part KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.011 25.2.2 Objectives and Policies Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Support KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.012 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.2.3(d) to clarify that trimming and pruning of vegetation to protect all overhead electric and Table part telecommunication lines is a Permitted Activity. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.013 25.8.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Support Objective 25.8.2.2 and Policy 25.8.2.2b for Noise and Vibration KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.015 25.8.2.3 Objective and Policy Support Support Objective 25.8.2.3 and Policy 25.8.2.3a for Noise and Vibration KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.016 25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive Activities – Activities in all Supports Objective 25.2.2.1 and Policy 25.2.2.1(a)(v) as earthworks and vegetation removal are both necessary in the rail corridor for the safe and efficient operation of the network. Support in Amend 25.8.3.9a and with amendments for correct cross referencing and inclusion of Designation F1a. part Page 71 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Zones KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.017 25.8.3.10 Operational Vibration from Rail Lines – Activities in All Zones Support in Amend 25.8.3.10 Operational Vibration from Rail Lines with the addition of a note that explains the factors that need part to be taken into account when assessing potential vibration from passing trains. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.018 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Support 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - support KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.019 25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings and Internal Vehicle Access Support Retain Rule 25.14.4.1 b) which states that new vehicle crossings should be at least 30m from any railway level crossing. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.020 25.14.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Add 25.14.6 a) viii. "Any vehicle crossing near a railway level crossing that does not comply with the standards of Rule part 25.14.4.1b)*" and Kiwirail may be notified; Retain the requirement that activities not complying with Rule 25.14.6 a) iv. are a Restricted Discretionary Activity, AND that Kiwirail may be notified. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.021 25.14.4.4 Minimum Sight Distances at Railway Level Crossings Support in Retain Rule 25.14.4.4 Minimum Sight Distances at Railway Level Crossings OR replace it with simplified standards. part KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.022 25.14.7 Notification Rule Support in Amend Rule 25.14.7 a) Notification Rule to clarify notification requirements and ensure that Kiwirail may be notified part with respect to proposals that do not comply with Rule 25.14.4.1 b) Minimum distance between any vehicle crossing and a railway level crossing. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.023 26.1 Purpose Support KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.024 26.2 Use of Designated Land Support KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.025 26.3 Schedule of Designations Support in Amend the two references to "NZRC" in the Schedule of Designations (section 26.3) to "KiwiRail". part KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.026 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition for Regionally Significant Infrastructure to include all KiwiRail managed railway lines that extend part through the City Support 26.1 as it is important the Plan clearly indicates the use to which the designated land might be put to if a designation is removed. Retain 26.2(c) detailing instances where Council may waive the requirement for an Outline Plan. Insert a new definition for Vibration Sensitive Activities which means residential activities, marae, hospitals and educational establishments. Amend the definition for Transport depot to include transit by rail. Page 72 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.027 Zoning Maps Support Maps 6A, 14A, 15A, 24A, 25A, 34A, 35A, 37A, 38A, 39A, 40A, 43A, 44A, 45A, and 54A. KiwiRail supports the underlying zoning of the designations F1 and F1a. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.028 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3 to include Logistics and freighthandling infrastructure as a permitted activity in the Industrial Zone. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.029 12.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Seeks Logistics and Freighthandling Infrastructure to be provided for as a Permitted Activity within 12.3 Te Rapa North Industrial Zone Activity Status. KiwiRail Holdings Limited 366.030 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Support Retain Policy 25.14.2.1e regarding adverse effects on the transport network. Stephen Cox 367.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Glenview Medical Centre 368.001 6.2.3 Objective and Policies Neighbourhood Centres Support in Amend Objective 6.2.3 to include provision for Health Care facilities within neighbourhood centres (Business Zone 7). part Glenview Medical Centre 368.002 Zoning Map 55A Oppose Rowan Bishop 369.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Geoffrey Charles Spooner 370.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.002 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support Retain Rule 7.4.2 - Building Intensity regarding the increase in the permitted floor area ratio Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.003 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support Retain Rule 7.4.4 which increases the maximum building height from the Operative District Plan. Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.004 Table 15-2b Number of Support parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone Map 55A-rezone the sites at 3 and 5 Urlich Avenue from Residential to Business 7 Zone to allow for future expansion. Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings and alterations or additions are a Controlled Activity. Amend Rule 7.3 l), m) n), hh), t), ii), jj), kk), ll), mm) and tt) to allow for offices, retail greater than 250m2, health care services, community centres, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities and visitor accommodation as Permitted Activities. Amend 7.3(x) to delete reference to “on sites fronting Victoria Street” Delete 7.3(y) in its entirety. Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b Number of parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone. Page 73 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.005 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 so that the side and rear boundary setback requirements are 0m except when adjoining a Residential or Special Character Zone for Precinct 2, 3 and 4 where it should be 3m Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.006 7.4.16 Active Frontages Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages so that restrictions only apply to buildings containing ground floor retail activities. Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.009 7.4.17 Awning Cover Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.17 so the awning requirement does not apply to Secondary Active Frontages. Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd 371.010 7.5.4 Residential Oppose Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.001 7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre DV Bryant Trust Board 372.002 7.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre DV Bryant Trust Board 372.003 7.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre DV Bryant Trust Board 372.004 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre DV Bryant Trust Board 372.005 7.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre DV Bryant Trust Board 372.007 7.2.6 Objective and Policies Downtown Precinct Support in Amend Policy 7.2.6a to the effect that pedestrian orientated activities are ‘encouraged’, rather than ‘required’ at part ground floor level. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.008 7.2.7 Objective and Policies City Living Precinct Support in Amend Objective 7.2.7 to include ‘medium scaled’ offices. Sufficient distinction is still maintained between offices in part the City Living and those in the Downtown Precinct. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.009 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3(n) so that offices greater than 500m2 gfa and less than 1000m2 gfa are Controlled Activities within the City Living Precinct, with matters of Control limited to ‘design’, ‘amenity’ and ‘traffic’ (or similar effect); Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for offices greater than 1000m2 gfa as a Discretionary Activity Amend Rule 7.3 a) and b) so that ‘new buildings’ & 'alterations' are a Controlled Activity. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.011 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-5 to include 50, 52 and 54 Collingwood Street within the Parking Buildings Overlay. DV Bryant Trust 372.012 7.4.7 Street Wall Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.7. Amend Rule 7.4.4 and Table 7.4.4g to make provision for a single ‘height control bonus’ for Page 74 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Board developments which are ‘set-back’ 4m or more above a 13m wall height. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.013 7.4.11 Service Areas Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.11a) (i) - Service Areas so there is a maximum service area requirement of 50m2. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages Oppose Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5-7 to exclude the submitters Collingwood Street property from the Primary Active Frontage and extend the Primary Active Frontage northwards along Alexandra Street for the submitters property. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.015 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-7 to exclude the DV Bryant Trust’s Collingwood Street property as a Primary Active Frontage and extend the Primary Active Frontage northwards along Alexandra Street for all Trust Board property. DV Bryant Trust Board 372.016 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan DV Bryant Trust Board 372.017 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 for earthworks so that it does not apply when an approved erosion and sediment control plan is implemented for the duration of the earthworks activity. Support in Amend the scope and nature of the ‘bonus amenities’ in Table 7.4.4(g) to broaden their scope and enable practical use part including greater use required for 'off-site' provision of amenities Amend reference to Table 7.4.4g (m) and 7.4.4g (vi) appears to be an error. Amend Table 7.4.4g (i) and (ii) so that the amenities may be provided either on site or off-site (in a location approved by Council) Amend Rule 7.4.4(f) to so that it applies to 7.4.4g iv - Through Site Links. Catherine Helen Murray 373.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Rebecca Hamilton 374.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Grant Hamilton 375.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.001 1.5.15 Concept Plan for Major Facilities Oppose Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.002 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Insert a new definition for Business activities associated with the racing industry. part Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.003 17.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Delete reference to Chapter 16: Community Facilities Zone within Rule 1.5.15(b). Amend Rule 17.3 to provide for additional Permitted activities within the Thoroughbred Business Park at the Te Rapa Racecourse. Page 75 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.004 17.4.1 Provision of Concept Plans Oppose Amend Rule 17.4.1 a) so that the concept plan for Te Rapa Racecourse does not need to cover the Thoroughbred Business Park. Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.005 17.6.7.1 Building Standards Oppose Amend Rule 17.6.7.1 a) so there is no maximum for site coverage within the Thoroughbred Business Park. Amend Rule 17.6.7.1 c) ii so that the height in relation to boundary rule applies to the Residential Zone as opposed to the Community Facilities Zone. Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.006 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.007 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Support in Retain 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in the Major Facilities Zone, Knowledge Zone and Open Standards for Activities in the part Space Zones with amendments to reference the correct legal description of those properties the standard does not Major Facilities Zone, apply to. Knowledge Zone and Open Space Zones Waikato Racing Club Incorporated 376.008 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 f) by deleting the requirement for an Integrated Transport Assessment for new vehicle accesses from any site within the Major Facilities Zone. Katie See (Seeks Investment 2012 Ltd) 378.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Katie See (Seeks Investment 2012 Ltd) 378.003 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Geoffrey Noel Felton (Behalf of owners of 19 & 21 Clifton Road and Corner Rostrevor St & Clifton Rd) 379.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Geoffrey Noel Felton (Behalf of owners of 19 & 21 Clifton Road and Corner Rostrevor 379.002 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. Page 76 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary St & Clifton Rd) Geoffrey Noel Felton (Behalf of owners of 19 & 21 Clifton Road and Corner Rostrevor St & Clifton Rd) 379.003 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Susan Oldridge (Cruise Investments) 380.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Susan Oldridge (Cruise Investments) 380.002 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Joyce Brooks (Toncliff Limited) 381.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Joyce Brooks (Toncliff Limited) 381.002 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Joyce Brooks (Toncliff Limited) 381.003 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Brent Noel Hunt (McKibbin Properties Ltd) 382.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Brent Noel Hunt (McKibbin Properties Ltd) 382.002 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2. Brent Noel Hunt (McKibbin Properties Ltd) 382.003 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct. Kenneth F Alexander 384.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts A directive be issued for all building demolition in Temple View be halted until the Ngapuhi heritage submission is fully investigated. Page 77 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lenna Maria Alexander 385.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jason Brown 386.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Murray Keith McDonald 387.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Robyn & Rodney Dallin 388.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Michael Seth Rose 389.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ewen Macdonald 390.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Manu Waa 391.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Cherry Wainer 392.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Greg Harmeling 393.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 78 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Ricky Shurtz 394.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mandy Bishop 395.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Fred H Hughes 396.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lynn Shomers 397.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ernie Ritz 398.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sarah Shurtz 399.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nakeya Quezada (Ez-Pawn) 400.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tony Matthews (Tracvity) 401.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 79 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Rebecca Harris 402.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Fannie Ritz 403.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Missy Shurtz 404.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Evangeline Donlon 405.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Francis Fitzpatrick 407.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Francis Fitzpatrick 407.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Francis Fitzpatrick 407.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Francis Fitzpatrick 407.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jared Vaughan Ormsby 408.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Jared Vaughan Ormsby 408.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Jared Vaughan Ormsby 408.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Jared Vaughan Ormsby 408.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 80 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Dean Westerlund 409.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Dean Westerlund 409.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Dean Westerlund 409.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Dean Westerlund 409.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Maroni John Westerlund 410.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Maroni John Westerlund 410.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Maroni John Westerlund 410.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Maroni John Westerlund 410.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Glenn Burgess 411.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Glenn Burgess 411.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Glenn Burgess 411.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Glenn Burgess 411.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jeff Nikoia 412.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Jeff Nikoia 412.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Jeff Nikoia 412.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Page 81 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Character Area Area. Jeff Nikoia 412.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District) 413.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District) 413.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District) 413.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District) 413.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Mark Green 414.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Mark Green 414.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Mark Green 414.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Mark Green 414.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jody Walters 415.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Jody Walters 415.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Jody Walters 415.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Jody Walters 415.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 82 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Toni Elkington 416.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Toni Elkington 416.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Toni Elkington 416.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Toni Elkington 416.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Dale Pateriki Anderson 417.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Dale Pateriki Anderson 417.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Dale Pateriki Anderson 417.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Dale Pateriki Anderson 417.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby 418.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby 418.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby 418.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Vicky Shurtz 420.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kim Shurtz 421.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 83 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Diana Shurtz 422.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Linda Shurtz 423.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Robert Christmas (M&R) 424.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jeff Bartholomew 425.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joyce Brock 426.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Dolores Barnhill 427.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Esteban Tirado 428.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Amanda Sue Ruiz (Tracvity) 429.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 84 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Charles Wallace Jr 430.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Paul Raymond Clever 431.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Talbot T Snow 432.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Don Childers 433.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Margaret Corina Sosa 434.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Edward Garza 435.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Elizabeth Costanzo 436.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Christopher Simmerman 437.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Michelle Lyon 438.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 85 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Steve Easley 439.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rhonda O'Hearon 440.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rosie Ibarra 441.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Veronica Gaiza 442.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Luis Garcia 443.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Elbert Brown 444.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John G Hughes 445.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Juliah Albulet 446.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 86 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Jane Macdonald 447.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Vilma McCreadie 448.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Peter George McCheyne 449.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lynette Ann McCheyne 450.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lesley Lomas 451.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Shea Margaret Lawrence 452.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Suzanne Kyd 453.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Trevor- Charles Te Metera Kohu 454.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jordan Kiro 455.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 87 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Miriama Kingi 456.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ina Margaret Kilburn 457.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kylie Hohaia 458.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Jordan Herbert 459.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Colene Herbert 460.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Yana Leah Hemi 461.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Richard Grant Herewini 462.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Roimata Hazel Hall 463.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 88 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Kingi Dennis 464.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jane Griffin 465.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Whare Dewes 466.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mylee Gordon 467.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Heidi-Anna Ruth Gordon 468.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rewa Pahemata Ruthina Tipu Dewes 469.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Keaohiwahiwaofaluanui Kelsey Daniels 470.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jordan Dennis 471.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Hillary Daniels 472.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 89 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Benjamin Dean Bryers 474.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kellie Brown 475.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mark Bramley 476.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Christine Bradley 477.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Colin Leslie Bradley 478.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Hemi Arthur 479.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Yorana Arthur 480.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. The Adare Company Ltd 482.001 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use while providing the opportunity for changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 part to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment. The Adare 482.002 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network while providing the opportunity for Page 90 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Company Ltd Sub Type Summary Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network part changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment. The Adare Company Ltd 482.003 Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods Support in Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods while providing the opportunity for part changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment. The Adare Company Ltd 482.004 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Remove Policy 3.3.1(b) (Structure Plans - Housing densities) as it relates to greenfield development of the Peacocke area and rely on the Master Plan exercise and minimum net site area subdivision provisions for the Peacocke Character Areas to determine the appropriate density. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.005 3.4.1.1 Natural Character Areas Support in Renumber Figures 3.4a and 3.4b to reflect the section within which they are located (Section 3.4.1). part The Adare Company Ltd 482.006 3.4.2.3 Commercial Community Nodes Support in Amend 3.4.2.3 to provide flexibility in the number of community nodes within the Peacocke Area. part The Adare Company Ltd 482.007 3.4.6 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend 3.4.6 by adding Objectives and Policies for the Peacocke Natural Systems, as set out in the submission and part derived from the objectives and policies in Parts 9.2.3a, b and c of the Operative District Plan. The Adare Company Ltd 482.008 5.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 5.2.1a as set out in the submission to address development in the Peacocke Structure Plan area, and part include a new policy under Objective 5.2.1 as set out in the submission, along with an additional statement in the Explanation section. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. Alternatively the Peacocke area should have its own chapter rather than trying to apply objectives and policies that are genuinely design for ‘special character areas’. The Adare Company Ltd 482.009 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone Support in Amend Policy 5.2.8d (Objective and Policies - Peacocke Character Zone) to include reference to the Master Plan part Process and amend explanation of Objective 5.2.8. Peacocke Character Zone to refer to infrastructure capacity limitations. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.010 5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process Support in Add new clause to Rule 5.3.2.1 Master Plan - Process within the Peacocke Character Area - as follows: within the Peacocke part Character Zone d) Land use consents required under Rule 5.4.13 shall be incorporated into the consent process for the Master Plan as Discretionary Activities. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.011 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Support in Amend Rule 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities by: amending clause a) as part set out in the submission to set up a 3-part rule where separate approval for development is only required where Page 91 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan – Status of Activities The Adare Company Ltd 482.012 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones development is inconsistent with an approved Master Plan; deleting clause b); amending clause c) for clarification purposes as set out in the submission, and deleting clause f). Support in Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones. Label each column A, B, C. Amend part the headings for the Peacocke Character Area to read follows: - In the absence of a Master Plan; - Forming part of the Master Plan process and approval; - Not provided for in, or inconsistent with, an approved Master Plan. Amend the category status for all activities in the Column B (the second column) from RD or NC to D. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.013 5.4.1 Density Oppose Remove Table 5.4.1b (Density – Peacocke Character Area) and remove cross-reference to Table 5.4.1b in Table 5.4.1a. and add new provision to 5.4.1. (Density) such that in the Peacocke Character Area the residential unit net site area shall be consistent with the thresholds set out in an approved Master Plan. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.014 5.4.2 Site Coverage Support in Amend the tables for Rule 5.4.2 (Site Coverage) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke part Character Zone to read as follows: "Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns (Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area). Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.015 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Support in Amend the table in Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Planting part Peacocke Character Zone to read as follows: "Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns (Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area) Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.016 5.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend the table in Rule 5.4.4 (Building Height) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke part Character Zone. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. Page 92 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary The Adare Company Ltd 482.017 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 5.4.6 (Building Setbacks) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone. part Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.018 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.7 (Interface Between Public and Private) as well as associated Figures. The Adare Company Ltd 482.019 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.8 (Fences and Walls) including associated figures. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.020 5.5.11 Retail activities within Oppose the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone Amend Rule (b) of 5.5.11 (Retail Activities within the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone) to only reference Business Zones 5 and 7. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. The Adare Company Ltd 482.021 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule a) (xxxvii) in 5.6 (Restricted Discretionary Activities: Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria) to delete I24 and re-number it ZA9 (to reflect renumbering requested under separate submission point to remove Peacocke area from the Heritage heading umbrella), and to delete point F3 (relating to a Centre Vitality Assessment Report). The Adare Company Ltd 482.022 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. The Adare Company Ltd 482.023 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 25.7.3 by adding fa) 'The installation of any network utilities listed in g-ss in association with an approved subdivision or land use consent'. The Adare Company Ltd 482.024 23.6.10 Subdivision in the Peacocke Character Zone Oppose Amend 23.6.10 Subdivision in the Peacocke Character Zone to include provisions that allow interim solutions to meet standards. The Adare Company Ltd 482.025 Peacocke Special Character Zone Support in Amend 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment by renumber and relocate I16 to part I24 relating to Peacocke Special Character Zone. The Adare Company Ltd 482.026 Design Element 2 Public Interfaces Oppose Delete 1.4.2.1 Design Element 2-Public Interface d) The Adare Company Ltd 482.027 Design Element 5 Transport Network Layout Oppose Amend Appendix 1, 1.4.2.1, Design Element 5-Transport Network, (a) (x) to reflect situations where topography and natural features may mean cul-de-sac are the only efficient and effective means of providing access. The Adare Company Ltd 482.028 1.4.3.2 Interface Between Public and Private Land Oppose Delete 1.4.3.2 Interface Between Public and Private Land. The Adare Company Ltd 482.029 1.4.3.3 Building Orientation and Siting Oppose Delete 1.4.3.3(e) assessment criteria for Building Orientation and Siting and Note 4 The Adare 482.030 1.5.19 Master Plan for Support in Amend Paragraph 3 of Appendix 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone. Oppose Page 93 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Company Ltd Sub Type Summary Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods part Support in Provide a mechanism to amend the Peacocke Structure Plan Fig 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the Southern Links designation part when confirmed. The Adare Company Ltd 482.031 Figure 15-5e Transport corridor hierarchy plan Bruce Gordon 483.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Figure 4.5:Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts - as set out in the submission: Seeks the recognition of the significant historical, religious, educational, social, and cultural values of the Temple View community as a whole; Delete reference to Temple View Character Area and replace with a Heritage precinct; Recognise that there has been and still is an implicit social contract between the Church and the community in Temple View; The Envision Team/developers need to repurpose all of the current Campus buildings and housing as part of a Heritage precinct. Mectildah Chikwiri 484.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Peter O'Donnell 485.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mary Jefferson 486.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tracey Bell 487.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Craig Ormond 488.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Warren Salon 489.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 94 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Ernie Le Heron 490.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kasey McCarty 491.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Debra Phillip 492.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rob Jacobs 493.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pauline Gaudin 494.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Robert E Rihehert 495.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Huiariki Watene 496.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Brian D Joyce 497.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 95 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Jocelyn Gush 498.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nikeita Campbell 499.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Herani Ware 500.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ora Going Richardson 501.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Vatia Toetagata (Auckland Council) 502.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ota Tuaen (Te Wananga) 503.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kevin Kewena Tamahou 504.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Margaret Kahui 505.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Francis Peri Adams 506.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 96 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Charles Sunnex 507.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Andrew Kelvin James 508.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Cedric T Kingi Ngarotata 509.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. David Robert Searle 510.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Wendy Joy Sales 511.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Murdoch Jason Tahere 512.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Zan Te Wakaiti Southon 513.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nicola Hamon 514.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 97 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Takiri Zan Southon 515.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rutha Lucy Southon 516.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sydney Taka Smith 517.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tina Ann RoseDutton 518.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jackie Macdonald 519.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ammon Kerry Shaun Preiss Rose 520.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Deane Pinny 521.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Phillip Shane Ikunui Rose 522.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kelly Pere 523.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 98 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Audrey Pere 524.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Terina Lee Nin 525.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tahir Loy Nin 526.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rosina Aliana Nin 527.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Daphne Parsons 528.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ally Turner 529.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Transfield 530.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pania Lee Nin 531.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 99 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Annitta Nin 532.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Yi Li 533.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Shui Li 534.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Zhuoying Shi 535.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Maraea Mita 536.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Pamela Joy McLanachan 537.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Yi Li 538.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts; Do not allow any more shops in Temple View. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.001 6.1 Purpose Amend 6.1d) to provide a purpose for the Business 1 zones which reflects and supports the mixed use nature of these areas and their location within easy walking distance of the City Centre. Oppose Amend 6.1g) to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.002 6.2 Objectives and Policies Business 1 to 7 Zones Oppose Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Policies for the Business 1 zone recognising the close proximity of these areas being within easy walking distance to the city centre; the established mix and scale of office and healthcare services, Page 100 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary residential use; re-development potential as an employment area for a mix of land uses and higher density living to support the viability and vitality of the City Centre. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 a), b), d), m), ww) and xx) so that in the Business 1 Zone, ‘New Buildings’ are a Controlled Activity and ‘Accessory Buildings’, ‘Alterations and Additions’, ‘offices with a gross floor area of up to 500m2‘ and ‘apartments’ are a Permitted Activity. Amend the definition of ‘Industrial Activity’ in Appendix 1.7 by deleting ‘b) Laboratories and research facilities’ and include in the definition of ‘Service Industry’ or Amend Rule 6.3 Activity Status Table to provide for ‘Laboratories and Research Facilities’ as a Permitted Activity in the Business 1 Zone. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.004 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.1a) Business Zone 1 to increase the maximum height limit to 20m. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.005 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 6.6a) i, vi and x matters of discretion and assessment criteria for new buildings, alterations and additions to buildings, and accessory buildings, offices and apartment buildings as they are overly excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary. Oppose Review Appendix 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed in 6.6a) i, vi and x are considered. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.006 Features Map 45B Amend Planning Map 45B by removing H100 on Lot 1 DPS 86312 and show on Lot 2 DPS 86312. Hill Laboratories Limited 539.007 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent. Northview Partnership Ltd 540.001 3.4.3 Transport Network Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to indicate that the roading layout within Stage 1 may change as a result of the Southern Links Designation process. Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.002 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.003 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Page 101 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.005 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.018 Design Guides Oppose Noeline & Mike 541.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Support in Amend 1.4.7.1 b) to read "The existing open space along the river's edge, surrounding the rowing Club provides a Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Inclusion of Opoia Precinct within Central City has potential to dilute the vitality and viability of the Downtown Precinct. Rezone Opoia to Residential Intensification. Delete Rules 1.2 B1 g) Opoia Design Guidance. Page 102 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Bourke Situation Sub Type Summary part green 'book end' framing the river...” Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend diagrams 1.4.7.4 for Opoia- remove notations and references to “proposed mixed use” and “new connections part to/along the river” on the area between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Noeline & Mike Bourke 541.030 Zoning Map 45A Support in Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and part the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Chesterman Family Trust 542.001 Zoning Map 46A Oppose Amend Map 46A to rezone the land on the corner of Grey and Wellington Streets (refer to submission) to Business 5 Zone or Business 6 Zone. Opoia Trustees LTD 543.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Opoia Trustees LTD 543.002 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Opoia Trustees 543.003 4.1.2 Residential Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' Delete 1.4.8 - Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Page 103 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision LTD Sub Type Summary Intensification Zone part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Opoia Trustees LTD 543.005 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Opoia Trustees LTD 543.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.018 Design Guides Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Page 104 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Opoia Trustees LTD 543.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Opoia Trustees LTD 543.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Opoia Trustees LTD 543.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Opoia Trustees LTD 543.030 Zoning Map 45A Dorothy Betty Belbin 544.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lisa-Marie Watene 545.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 105 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Carol Anne Allan 546.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tashena Marie Waru 547.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Cheyanne Alys Southon 548.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lennox James Southon 549.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Daniel Rei Nin 550.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jasmine Tunstall 551.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Emma Watene 552.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tipare Wharepapa 553.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 106 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Adele Wirepa 554.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Arnold David Stoneley 555.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Shannon Asalele Ta'ala 556.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kimberley Ruth Tahere 557.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Colleen Taylor 558.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. George Tenwolde 559.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jamaal Tuia 560.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lucy Tuia 561.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Errin Jay Nin 562.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 107 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Wallace Raiti Peter Reihana 563.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Amanda Smiler 564.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kristen Smith 565.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Brenda Price 566.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rebecca Nonoa 567.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rachael Nonoa 568.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kasmin Joy Nikora 569.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ashley Nikora 570.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 108 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Folau Paea Tukanua Ngaw 571.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tony & Frances Schramm 572.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Tony & Frances Schramm 572.002 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Tony & Frances Schramm 572.003 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Tony & Frances Schramm 572.005 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Tony & Frances Schramm 572.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Tony & Frances 572.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 109 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Schramm Sub Type Summary part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.018 Design Guides Oppose Tony & Frances Schramm 572.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Tony & Frances Schramm 572.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Tony & Frances Schramm 572.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Tony & Frances 572.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Page 110 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Schramm Sub Type Summary Site Locations part Tony & Frances Schramm 572.030 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Whittle Family Trust 573.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Whittle Family Trust 573.002 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Whittle Family Trust 573.003 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Whittle Family Trust 573.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Whittle Family Trust 573.005 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Whittle Family Trust 573.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Whittle Family Trust 573.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Whittle Family Trust 573.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Whittle Family Trust 573.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Whittle Family Trust 573.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Whittle Family Trust 573.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Whittle Family Trust 573.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Whittle Family Trust 573.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Whittle Family Trust 573.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 111 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Whittle Family Trust 573.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Whittle Family Trust 573.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Whittle Family Trust 573.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Whittle Family Trust 573.018 Design Guides Oppose Whittle Family Trust 573.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Whittle Family Trust 573.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Whittle Family Trust 573.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Whittle Family Trust 573.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Whittle Family Trust 573.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Whittle Family Trust 573.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Page 112 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Whittle Family Trust 573.030 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Milwood Trust 574.001 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Milwood Trust 574.002 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Milwood Trust 574.002 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Milwood Trust 574.003 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Milwood Trust 574.004 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Milwood Trust 574.005 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Milwood Trust 574.006 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Milwood Trust 574.007 Design Guides Oppose Milwood Trust 574.008 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Milwood Trust 574.009 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Milwood Trust 574.010 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Milwood Trust 574.011 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Milwood Trust 574.012 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Milwood Trust 574.013 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Milwood Trust 574.014 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Page 113 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Milwood Trust 574.015 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Milwood Trust 574.016 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Milwood Trust 574.017 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Milwood Trust 574.018 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Milwood Trust 574.019 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Milwood Trust 574.020 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Milwood Trust 574.021 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Milwood Trust 574.022 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Milwood Trust 574.023 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Milwood Trust 574.024 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Milwood Trust 574.025 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Milwood Trust 574.026 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Milwood Trust 574.027 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Milwood Trust 574.028 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Milwood Trust 574.029 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy 575.001 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Delete the Opoia Precinct. Page 114 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Family Trust No2 Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.002 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.003 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.004 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.005 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Muthuku- 575.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 115 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision maraswamy Family Trust No2 Sub Type Summary part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.018 Design Guides Oppose Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Page 116 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust No2 575.030 Zoning Map 45A Kerianne Moana Newman 576.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.001 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.002 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Oppose Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 117 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.003 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.004 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.005 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Ian Colin & Judy 577.018 Design Guides Oppose Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Page 118 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Elaine Murphy Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Ian Colin & Judy Elaine Murphy 577.030 Zoning Map 45A Alfreda Olive Marshall 578.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Marama Karen 579.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Oppose Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 119 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Leslie Marshall Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Hamish Paul McArthur 580.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Dan & Jean Bourke 581.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Dan & Jean Bourke 581.002 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.003 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Dan & Jean Bourke 581.004 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.005 1.4.7 Riverfront Development Design Guide Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Dan & Jean Bourke 581.006 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Dan & Jean Bourke 581.007 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Policy 4.2.5a Dan & Jean Bourke 581.008 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.009 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Dan & Jean Bourke 581.010 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.011 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Dan & Jean 581.012 7.4.4 Maximum Height Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) Delete 1.2B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance. Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Page 120 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Bourke Sub Type Summary Control and Bonuses part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.013 Design Guides Oppose Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Dan & Jean Bourke 581.014 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.015 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Dan & Jean Bourke 581.016 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Dan & Jean Bourke 581.017 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.018 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.019 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.020 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.021 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.022 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.023 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.024 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.025 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Dan & Jean Bourke 581.026 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Dan & Jean 581.027 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 121 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Bourke Sub Type Summary part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.028 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.029 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.030 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Dan & Jean Bourke 581.031 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.032 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.033 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Dan & Jean Bourke 581.034 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Megan Rona Kaho 582.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Anthea Kingi 583.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Denise Howell 584.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jamie Hemi 585.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jo Leah Takuna 586.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 122 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Hemi-Nicholson Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Apikara Hemi 587.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ripeka C Fruean 588.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Apihei Hemi 589.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Otis J Fruean 590.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nathaniel Beets 591.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Richard GreyEdwards 592.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kimberley Beets 593.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. James Enoka Tapsell 594.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 123 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.002 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.003 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.004 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.005 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.006 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.007 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.008 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.009 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.010 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.011 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.012 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.013 Design Guides Oppose Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.014 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.015 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 124 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.016 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.017 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.018 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.019 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.020 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.021 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.022 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.023 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.024 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.025 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.026 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.027 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.028 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.029 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.030 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 125 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Deecan Holdings Ltd 595.031 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Alton & Rebekah Taylor 596.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Base Flood Hazard Areas on accurate maps and not old data; Separate risk areas; Identify what residents can be done so it doesn't appear on LIM reports. Shona Catherine Anne Duggan 597.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove Flood Hazard Area for 13 Rhonda Avenue. Ian Harold & Jean Marie Townsend 598.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 15 Rhonda Avenue. Robert & Lauryl Crump 599.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Amend to identify LIM "low" rather than "low/medium/high" for 14 Rhonda Ave Fiona Natalie Bell 600.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Amend to identify LIM "low" rather than "low/medium/high" for 12 Rhonda Ave Kevin Patrick Fitzpatrick 601.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 6 Rhonda Avenue. Barbara Susan Campbell 602.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 2 Rhonda Avenue. Nick Murphy 603.001 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Nick Murphy 603.002 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Nick Murphy 603.003 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Nick Murphy 603.004 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a Nick Murphy 603.005 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Nick Murphy 603.006 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Nick Murphy 603.007 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Nick Murphy 603.008 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 126 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Nick Murphy 603.009 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Nick Murphy 603.010 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Nick Murphy 603.011 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Nick Murphy 603.012 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Nick Murphy 603.013 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Nick Murphy 603.014 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Nick Murphy 603.015 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Nick Murphy 603.016 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Nick Murphy 603.017 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Nick Murphy 603.018 Design Guides Oppose Nick Murphy 603.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Nick Murphy 603.020 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Nick Murphy 603.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Nick Murphy 603.022 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.023 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.024 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Page 127 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Nick Murphy 603.025 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.026 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.027 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.028 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Nick Murphy 603.029 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Nick Murphy 603.030 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Bernard Ransley 604.001 Features Map 62B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area and do not include on any associated LIM report for 2 MacDonald Road and 11A Saxbys Road. Ernest George & Georgina Anne Morris 605.001 Features Map 42B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 172 Rifle Range Road. Ernest George & Georgina Anne Morris 605.002 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 172 Rifle Range Road. Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-8A Maui Street be rezoned to Business 7 - Neighbourhood Centre and 8B Maui Street be rezoned to Business 4 – Large Format Retail and both be incorporated into the Te Rapa North Sub-Regional Centre area as identified in Figure 6.1b of the Proposed District Plan. Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.002 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description. part Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission. Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.003 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification. part Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.004 6.1 Purpose Support in Amend Figure 6.1b to include 8A and 8B Maui Street into the Te Rapa North Sub-Regional Centre. part Parkwood Trade 606.005 6.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 6.2.1 Sub Regional Centres with an additional Objective to recognise existing large Page 128 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Centre Limited Sub Type Summary Business 1 to 7 Zones part format retail, office and commercial activities. Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.006 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for Licensed Premises / Restaurant on Lot 1 DP 332074, Offices on Lot 2 DP 444949, and Childcare Facilities on Lot 2 DP 401042, as a Permitted Activities. Parkwood Trade Centre Limited 606.007 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied. B.W & I.V Parsons 607.001 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose That Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use) be amended to delete reference to a Transport Corridor crossing Lot 2 DPS 79420 and any other land that is outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. B.W & I.V Parsons 607.002 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose That Figure 2-9 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network) be amended to delete reference to a Collector Transport Corridor crossing Lot 2 DPS 79420 and any other land (including those identified as containing a Major Arterial Transport Corridor) that is outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.001 1 Plan Overview Support Retain the map in the Foreword to the Plan but also add this to Chapter 2 – Strategic Framework. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.002 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.2(c) by adding additional wording relating to the Future Proof Strategy settlement pattern. part Amend Section 1.1.2.2(d) by adding additional wording relating to the proposed RPS and the Future Proof urban limits. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.003 2.1 Purpose Support in Retain section 2.1 Purpose but add text to section 2.1 (c) as outlined in the submission to link this section between the part urban limits as outlined in Future Proof and the Proposed RPS, and the Proposed Plan. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.004 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Support in Retain the objectives and policies as outlined in the Strategic Framework chapter as they align with the Future Proof part guiding principles. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.005 3.1 Purpose Support Future Proof supports 3.1 Purpose and 3.2 Principles set out in the Structure Plan chapter and seeks the retention of those sections as notified. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.006 3.2 Principles Support Supports the retention of the purpose and principles set out in the Structure Plan chapter. Future Proof 608.007 3.3 Objectives and Policies Support Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3 Structure Plans Page 129 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Implementation Committee Sub Type Summary Structure Plans Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.008 3.4 Peacocke Support Retain 3.4 Peacocke. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.009 3.5 Rototuna Support Future Proof supports the retention as notified of the provisions relating to the Rototuna and Rotokauri Structure Plan. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.010 3.6 Rotokauri Support Retain section 3.6 Rotokauri Structure Plan Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.011 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan and requests it be retained. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.012 4.1 Purpose Support Supports the purpose of the residential zones, creating a compact city and providing opportunities for higher-density living in the Central City; and the statements around the use of land more efficiently. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.013 4.1.4 Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Rezone the Large Lot Residential zone for the Percival and Ryburn road area in the Ruakura Structure Plan to Ruakura Logistics zone. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.014 4.2 Objectives and Policies Residential Zones Support Retain the objectives and policies in 4.2 Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.015 6.1 Purpose Support Retain the Purpose of the Business 1-7 Zones Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.016 7.1 Purpose Support Retain the Purpose of the Central City Zone Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.017 7.2 Objectives and Policies Central City Zone Support Retain Objectives and Policies in 7.2 which are consistent with Future Proof Strategy principles to make the Metropolitan Hamilton CityHeart as a vibrant retail, business, arts and social heart of the sub-region. Page 130 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.018 9.1 Purpose Support Supports the purpose of the Industrial Zone. Important this land is used in the most efficient and effective manner and that it is not consumed by non-industrial uses which could locate elsewhere. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.019 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain the Objective 9.2.1 and Policies 9.1.2a to 9.2.1c which ensure the limited Industrial Zoned land within the District is used for industrial purposes. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.020 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Support and retain Rule 9.3f) & g) as notified. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.021 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Support Retain Chapter 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.022 11.1 Purpose Support Retain 11.1 the Purpose of the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.023 11.2 Objectives and Policies Support Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Retain 11.2 objectives and policies for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.024 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain 11.5.1-11.5.3 to restrict activities in the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone to ancillary offices and retail. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.025 11.4.1 Permitted Activities Support Retain Rule 11.4.1 linking with the Ruakura structure plan staging in 3.7.3 Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.026 11.4.2 All Other Activities Support Retain Rule 11.4.1 linking with the Ruakura structure plan staging in 3.7.3 Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.027 18.1 Purpose Support Retain 18.1 Purpose for the Transport Corridor Zone. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.028 Transport Corridor Network Support Retain the objectives and supporting policies in 18.2.1 for the Transport Corridor Zone. Page 131 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.029 25.1.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Development Suitability objective 25.1.2.1 and supporting policies. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.030 25.1.4.1 All Development Support Retain rule 25.1.4.1 General standards for all development. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.031 25.13 Three Waters Support Retain the purpose, objectives, policies and rules in 25.13 relating to Three Waters. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.032 25.14 Transportation Support Retain the purpose, objectives, policies and rules in 25.14 relating to Transportation. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.033 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Support Retain Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.034 V Transportation Support Retain Appendix 1.2, Assessment Criteria V - Transportation, under Integrated Transport Assessments. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.035 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the part Waikato Expressway and indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Roads are being severed and a new underpass to be undertaken at Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be undertaken. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.036 15-3 Integrated Transport Support Assessment Requirements – Tables Retain Appendix 15-3 Integrated Transport Assessments. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.037 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions Support Retain Appendix 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions. Future Proof Implementation Committee 608.038 Zoning Map 40A Support in Rezone the large lot residential zone to Ruakura Logistics Zone for Percival and Ryburn Roads on map 40A part AgResearch Ltd 609.001 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Oppose. Amend Rule 1.1.8.1 'Activity Not Listed' default from non complying to "discretionary". part Page 132 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary AgResearch Ltd 609.002 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend 3.7b by rewriting to ensure that it is not viewed as compromising the CBD. Delete 3.7h and associated staging part rules in Rule 3.7.3.6 as it affects the development of future innovation & research activities and the development of supporting retail & commercial activities. AgResearch Ltd 609.003 3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area AgResearch Ltd 609.004 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone Support in Amend Rule 3.7.4.1 to remove the inference that the knowledge zone will compromise the central city. part AgResearch Ltd 609.005 3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood Centre Support in Amend Rule 3.7.1.5 to provide for a Suburban Centre rather than a neighbourhood centre. part AgResearch Ltd 609.006 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network Support in Amend 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network to indicate the indicative nature of both the spine road & open space corridor. part AgResearch Ltd 609.007 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Delete Objective 3.7.2.2 and policy 3.7.2.2(a) and amend objective 3.7.2.4 in relation to the Ruakura Structure Plan and part ensure there is no inference it would compromise the Central City. AgResearch Ltd 609.008 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Support in Ruakura Logistics Zone and part Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area AgResearch Ltd 609.009 8.1 Purpose Support in Amend 8.1(f) to provide for a Suburban Centre rather than a neighbourhood centre part AgResearch Ltd 609.010 8.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete last sentence of the explanation to 8.2.3 that relates to the staging of development in the Knowledge Zone AgResearch Ltd 609.011 8.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policy 8.2.1f as it is considered that future development within the Knowledge Zone is beneficial to the City and should not be restricted. AgResearch Ltd 609.012 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain Rule 8.3 a) the permitted activity status for farming. Amend 8.3 b) to include external maintenance and amend part Rule 8.3c) to remove GFA requirement. Delete 8.3 d) as it is overly prescriptive. Amend Rule 8.3 e), g), h), j), K) & q) to alter text and/or amend status of these activities. Add new permitted activity for specific work to buildings at AgResearch & Waikato Innovation Park. Add new permitted activity for commercial and industrial activities that are incidental to research & innovation activities. Delete staging rule for the Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone 3.7.3.6 and 3.7(h) Amend 3.7.3.4 b)i by rewording to require the Waikato Expressway to be completed and connected to the logistics zone or other suitable means without compromising the transportation network. Delete 3.7.3.4 b) ii and Amend 3.7.3.4 b) iii to ensure the management of development between 2021 & 2041 aligns with the RPS. Page 133 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary AgResearch Ltd 609.013 8.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Rule 8.4 so that General Standards do not apply to Ag Research Ruakura Research Centre. part AgResearch Ltd 609.014 8.4.2 Site Coverage Support in As an alternative to amending Rule 8.4 b) to ensure the rule does not apply to Ruakura Research Centre, Amend Rule part 8.4.2 to increase site coverage rule to 70% coverage. AgResearch Ltd 609.015 8.4.8 Building Design Oppose As an alternative to amending Rule 8.4 b) to ensure the rule does not apply to Ruakura Research Centre, Delete Rule 8.4.8 in relation to building design. AgResearch Ltd 609.016 8.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete rule 8.5.3 as it relates to ancillary offices within the Knowledge Zone AgResearch Ltd 609.017 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 earthwork standards so that they do not apply to activities identified as Permitted Activities or if to Any Activity in This Plan part otherwise authorised by a resource consent and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan AgResearch Ltd 609.018 25.3.5.3 Events at Innes Common, Hamilton Lake Domain, Wintec (City and Rotokauri), and Within the Knowledge Zone AgResearch Ltd 609.019 25.4.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.4.3 g) relating to Permitted Activities involving radioactive materials so that it also applies to research Table part and innovation activities in the Knowledge Zone. Delete Rules 25.4.3 j) and l) relating to activities involving High BOD5 substances. AgResearch Ltd 609.020 Consent Status Matrix Support in Amend the Consent Status Matrix for Hazardous Facilities in Rule 25.4.5.1 so that the Knowledge Zone is included in part the same category as the Industrial Zone. AgResearch Ltd 609.021 25.5.3.1 Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 25.5.3.1 (iii) so that it does not refer to the Knowledge Zone for landscaping adjoining any Residential, part Special Character or Open Space Zone. AgResearch Ltd 609.022 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) to exclude specific Ruakura Research Centre activities from requiring resource consent and part Integrated Transport Assessment. AgResearch Ltd 609.023 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Retain definition of "Research and Innovation Activities". Amend the definition of "Events". part AgResearch Ltd 609.024 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - retain interchanges at Greenhill Road and Ruakura Road and delete all other options; delete part "Transport Corridors" within Ruakura Research Centre. AgResearch Ltd 609.025 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Oppose Support in Retain permitted activity status of events in Rule 25.3.3a). part Amend Rule 25.3.5.3(e) so the provision does not apply to a field day or open day for education of the public on the research activities undertaken at the Ruakura Research centre. Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 Delete the “Possible Passenger Transport Route” and delete the "Local Transport Corridor Roads" within AgResearch Centre. Page 134 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Network AgResearch Ltd 609.026 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Oppose Delete the Transport Corridors within the AgResearch Centre on the Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-16 AgResearch Ltd 609.027 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Oppose Structure Plan-Waste Water Infrastructure Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-17 - Delete the Transport Corridors within the AgResearch Centre. AgResearch Ltd 609.028 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Oppose Figure 2-18: delete the “Transport Corridors” located within the Ruakura Research Centre. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.002 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete the controls on the location of permeable surfaces on site. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.004 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.005 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards. part Waikato Registered Master Builders 610.006 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.9 regarding Residential Building Separation and Privacy to allow for the reduction in the separation distances, as set out in the submission. Page 135 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Association Inc Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.007 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or part wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.008 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii. and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to the location of outdoor living areas. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.009 4.11 Notification Rule Oppose Amend Rule 4.11 so that activities not complying with residential housing standards are considered on a non-notified basis and without the need for affected party approval. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.010 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d regarding residential sites adjacent to public spaces and building designs conforming part to natural topography. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.011 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4e and 4.2.4f to enable the needs of the landowners to be met first before considering the need for part development to produce good off-site residential amenity (Objective 4.2.4). Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.012 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting criteria B1 relating to design guides from consideration for Activities not complying with Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 (Permeable surface), Rule 4.4.7 (Interface between public and private), and Rule 4.4.8 (Fences and walls) Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.013 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted volume of earthworks to 120m3 and to exclude the standards from applying when in accordance with directions from a suitably qualified engineer. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.014 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Review Appendix 1.2 to ensure only matters relevant to the reason for consent are considered. Opposes the criteria R3, R4, R8 and T1 in rule 25.2.6 as it applies to earthworks less than 120m3. Oppose Page 136 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.015 25.2.7 Notification Rule Support in Amend Rule 25.2.7 so that resource consents required for earthworks on sites with slopes less than 20 degrees are part non-notified. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.016 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.2.3 so that resource consents required for earthworks and vegetation removal on sites with slopes less Table part than 20 degrees are non-notified. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.017 25.15.1 Purpose Support in Amend 25.15.1 so that it only relates to developments that do not meet specific standards for the various zones. part Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.018 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 19.3 h) and i) Activity Status Table to make the demolition of heritage structures or buildings ranked A or B a Discretionary Activity. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.019 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Oppose Amend Policy 19.2.3a to include specific provisions for the management of buildings that have a poor earthquake rating and may pose a safety risk. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.020 1.4.1.6 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.021 1.4.1.7 Fences Oppose Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a height limit of 1.8m. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.022 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with those in the Operative District Plan. Waikato Registered Master 610.023 C General Oppose Replace Appendix 1.1 C-General with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Page 137 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Builders Association Inc Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.024 E Safe Environments Oppose Replace Appendix 1.1 E-Safe Environments - with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.025 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone Oppose Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.026 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3u) to make new buildings and alterations in the Industrial Zone a permitted activity. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.027 9.6 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Oppose Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.028 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Delete Rule 4.4.12a) or reduce the minimum gross floor area for the different forms of residential units. Waikato Registered Master Builders Association Inc 610.029 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria Delete references to the Appendix 1.4 - Design Guides Carolyn Suzan Nin 611.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joan & Michael Forret 612.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Joan & Michael 612.002 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of Page 138 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Forret permeable surfaces. Joan & Michael Forret 612.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Joan & Michael Forret 612.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards. part Joan & Michael Forret 612.005 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or part wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule. Joan & Michael Forret 612.006 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Joan & Michael Forret 612.007 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d part Joan & Michael Forret 612.008 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Delete policies 4.2.4 e) and 4.2.4 f) from Objective 4.2.4 as these policies are unreasonably balanced in favour of public part amenity instead of private property rights. Joan & Michael Forret 612.009 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting criteria B1 relating to design guides from consideration for Activities not complying with Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 (Permeable surface), Rule 4.4.7 (Interface between public and private), and Rule 4.4.8 (Fences and walls) Joan & Michael Forret 612.010 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria Delete Section 1.4 - Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria Joan & Michael Forret 612.011 1.4.1.6 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'. Joan & Michael Forret 612.012 1.4.1.7 Fences Oppose Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a height limit of 1.8m. Joan & Michael Forret 612.013 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with the limits in the Operative District Plan. Joan & Michael Forret 612.014 C General Oppose C-General replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Joan & Michael Forret 612.015 E Safe Environments Oppose E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Joan & Michael Forret 612.016 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone Oppose Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii. and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to the location of outdoor living areas. Page 139 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Joan & Michael Forret 612.017 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3u) to make new buildings and alterations in the Industrial Zone a permitted activity. Joan & Michael Forret 612.018 9.6 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Oppose Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings. Cherie Clark 613.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Seanna CarlileClark 614.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John & Susan Chaloner (Hillcrest Auto Services) 615.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Dale Clark 616.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Noel Henry & Joan Breed 617.001 5 Special Character Zones Oppose Amend Provisions in Rule 5 Special Character Zones relating density, building height and earthworks for development in the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area. Amend the design guide for the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Area. Amend the zoning of the area to General Residential Zone. Noel Henry & Joan Breed 617.002 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Amend Map 33A by rezoning 173 Rotokauri Road (Lot 2 DP 425316) to Residential Zone. Dean Gauthern 618.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Carly Gauthern 619.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Page 140 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Gardiner James Gordon Palmer 620.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Ariane Emma & Stephen Keola Josephs 621.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Vivienne Shona Evelyn Cammock 622.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tasi Ann Cammock 623.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Charlotte Cammock 624.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Conway Tarawhiti Bradley 625.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tania Rangirangi Mariana Enoka 626.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mavis Ruth Duncan 627.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lloyd Elder Duncan 628.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 141 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Donald Jeffrey Waugh Burns 629.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Greg Gimblett (Church Road Developments Ltd) 630.001 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Support in Retain Objectives and Policies for the Business 1-7 Zones with amendments to specifically include the sub regional part centre fringe. Greg Gimblett (Church Road Developments Ltd) 630.002 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Amend Rule 6.3 Offices in the Business 1 zone to provide for multiple office activity within each site. Amend 6.3 to include "Integrated Business Park Development" in the Business 1 zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rule 6.3 so that Licensed premises, restaurants and cafe’s are permitted activities within the Business 1 zone. Greg Gimblett (Church Road Developments Ltd) 630.003 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Support Retain Rule 6.4.1a) regarding the maximum building height of 15m within the Business 1 zone and remove the Amenity Protection Area applied to the Business 1 Zone. Greg Gimblett (Church Road Developments Ltd) 630.004 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Support Retain Rule 6.4.3 regarding the building setback of 5m in the Business 1 zone. Greg Gimblett (Church Road Developments Ltd) 630.005 24.3 Rules – General Standards Oppose 24.3. Amend to provide greater certainty as to the amount of any financial contribution that maybe imposed through a conditions. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings, alterations and additions are Permitted Activities subject to compliance with performance standards for the zone, except on the 6 key development sites in Figure 5-9 of Appendix 5. Amend the Plan to clarify that alterations and additions do not include changes to colour or the addition of signage to buildings. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.002 7.4.10 Building Entrance Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.10 Building Entrance in Central City Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.003 7.4.16 Active Frontages Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages Page 142 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.004 7.5.5 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 7.5.5 regarding having the primary entrance facing the street. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.005 7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving Delete Rule 7.5.6 regarding Retail, Commercial and Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.006 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 7.6 to simplify and reduce the number of assessment criteria by making more activities Permitted subject to compliance with performance standards. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.007 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 19.3 h) and i) Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of heritage buildings a Discretionary Activity where there are safety concerns. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.008 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Support in Amend Policy 19.2.3a to include an exception for demolition of heritage buildings where a building poses a safety part hazard to people or property. Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.009 25.10.5.7 Central City, Oppose Business 1 to 7 and Industrial Zones Waitomo Properties Ltd 631.010 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition of "alterations and additions" in Appendix 1.7 to exclude changes to building appearance by part means of painting or signage. Gavin Roland Graham Wallace 632.001 7.5.2 Carparking Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.2 to remove the requirement to have underground parking in the Riverfront overlay area Gavin Roland Graham Wallace 632.002 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 to reduce the setback in the Riverfront Overlay table from 5 metres to 3 metres and reduce the boundary of the Riverfront Overlay by 30m towards the Waikato River Merran Powell 633.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part J.C Johnson Family Trust 635.001 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone Oppose Amend Policy 5.2.8d of the Peacocke Character Zone Objective 5.2.8 to include reference to the Master Plan process. J.C Johnson Family Trust 635.002 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Support Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use as notified. J.C Johnson Family Trust 635.003 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network as notified. part J.C Johnson 635.004 Figure 2-3 Peacocke Support Amend Rule 25.10.5.7 regarding maximum signage controls within the Central City Zone to reflect the Operative District Plan signage rules. Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods as notified. Page 143 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Family Trust Sub Type Summary Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods J.C Johnson Family Trust 635.005 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities Support in That Council provides an undertaking to guarantee that the provisions of Rule 5.3.2.3 (Master Plan and Comprehensive part Development Plan – Status of Activities) when applied will operate in a manner consistent with that agreed and settled via previous Environment Court mediation and the consent order entered into. J.C Johnson Family Trust 635.006 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones Oppose Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones. That Council initiates a variation to the Proposed District Plan after undertaking full and meaningful consultation with stakeholders to ensure that the provisions relevant to the Peacocke Character Zone reflect the true intent and spirit of the mediated settlement embodied in the Environment Court Consent Order, or in the alternative That all activities identified in the “with a approved master plan” column be provided for as controlled activities provided that they were approved as part of the master plan process. Julienne Elizabeth Duncan 636.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Susan Cribb 637.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. David Anthony Pazi-Cope (Blackout Electrical) 638.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Aimee CarlileClark 639.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Shane Carlile 640.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 144 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Gaylynn Leigh Tunstall 641.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Valerie Clark 642.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kevin Harold Tunstall 643.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Theresa Albert (Granddaughter of labour missionary) 644.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Margaret Watene (College Old Bous Rugby League Charitable Trust) 645.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Peti Hinewetea Transfield 646.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Linda Ormsby 647.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jaimee Davies 648.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Luke Ormsby 649.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 145 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Ralph Roland Hamon 650.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lindsay Hixon Hamon 651.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sherrill Macdonald Hamon 652.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Janna June Margaret Fesolai 653.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jared Worth Pease 654.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Amelia Edith Pearse 655.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nathan Graeme Hamon 656.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Robert Gordon 657.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 146 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Isaac Roland Hamon 658.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Belinda R Albulet 659.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Heather Hine (Tracvity) 660.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Katanna Green (Tracvity) 661.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joshua Montomery (Dollar Flash) 662.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Corey Dunham 663.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Mellissa Castello 664.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joy Jackson (Dollar Flash) 665.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Walter Kevin Ware 666.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 147 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Kevin Matthew Wenz 667.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kenneth Rasor 668.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. John Neil Westerlund Jr 669.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Marina Jane Westerlund 670.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nihe Matilda Warwick 672.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lisa Wilson 673.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Shaun Eketona 674.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Richard Herbig 675.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 148 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Meri Blakey 676.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Paulette Leef 677.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Charmaine Walker-Eketone 678.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ryan Stacey Harris 679.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lani Awhimai Michele Emery 680.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Maroea Gaylene Harris 681.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rakaipaka Harris 682.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Alysha Ann Reti 683.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Penni-Marie Harris 684.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 149 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Rinaira Gaylene Horsford 685.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Renaira Gaylene Harris 686.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ra Harris 687.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sean Harris 688.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sharen Reti 689.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Russelle Knaap 690.002 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West Oppose Delete 5.1.1.1 Purpose statement - Special Residential Zone - Claudelands West Russelle Knaap 690.003 5.1.1.2 Hamilton East Oppose Delete Purpose Statement 5.1.1.2 (Hamilton East). Russelle Knaap 690.004 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete 5.4.8 Fences and Walls and retain provisions within Operative District Plan. Russelle Knaap 690.005 Significant Trees Oppose Does not support the scheduling process for significant trees. Russelle Knaap 690.006 1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and Parking Oppose Delete 1.4.3.4 a),b) and c) Access, Garages and Parking. Russelle Knaap 690.007 Design Speed Environment Oppose Opposes controls on the design of transport corridors regarding design speed environments. Russelle Knaap 690.008 2.1 Purpose Oppose Concern over ongoing lack of parking in CBD which continues to detract from maintaining the primacy of the central city as a viable and vibrant centre. Russelle Knaap 690.009 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 7.2.2a) by replacing the words 'controlling the distribution, scale, character' with the word 'encourage'. Page 150 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary part Amend Policy 7.2.2b) so that the Central City is not identified as the 'preferred' location for major retail, office, cultural and entertainment activities. Amend Policy 7.2.2 d) to remove the 'recognition and managed' direction for Heritage Resources within the Central City. Amend Policy 7.2.2 e) by removing reference to sporting and entertainment facilities and environmental features. Russelle Knaap 690.010 7.4.9 Car Parking Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.9a) regarding car parking on the front of a site. Russelle Knaap 690.011 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose. The CBD has insufficient parking. Russelle Knaap 690.012 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Opposes the promotion of and public investment in passenger transport and active transport across the city. Russelle Knaap 690.013 3.4.3 Transport Network Oppose Amend 3.4.4 to give priority to motorists in the development of the Peacocke Transport Network. Russelle Knaap 690.014 7.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policy 7.2.1d as attractive, efficient and safe passenger transport and pedestrian and cycle links is not core business. Russelle Knaap 690.015 7.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete 7.2.5 - A Pedestrian Orientated Central City as people should be allowed to use their car to work in the city. Russelle Knaap 690.016 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Oppose Opposes Policies 25.14.2.1 a)iv, d)v, and e)v regarding the encouragement of walking, cycling and passenger transport modes. Russelle Knaap 690.017 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Opposes Rules 25.14.4.2 regarding the provision of cycle spaces and end of journey facilities. Russelle Knaap 690.018 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone Oppose Do not adopt 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone. Russelle Knaap 690.019 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 c) Interface Between Public and Private Stuart Dillon 691.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Sandra Jean Talbett 692.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential rather than Residential Intensification. Sandra Jean Talbett 692.002 Features Map 38B Support Support Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B Page 151 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Sandra Jean Talbett (Ashton Developments Ltd.) 693.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential rather than Residential Intensification. Sandra Jean Talbett (Ashton Developments Ltd.) 693.002 Features Map 38B Support Support the inclusion of bush located on Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B Lucy Anne & Andrew Owen McKergow & Hughes 694.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Anne FerrierWatson 695.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Raphael Coutolleau (Le Gastronome t/a La Cave) 696.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Tara Vanessa Hills 697.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.001 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in That the introductory sentence to Rule 2.2 be amended to … part "a non-complying or discretionary activity should not contradict the objectives and the policies below." Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.002 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Support in Support in Part. Replace all reference to "shall' with 'must have regard to' across all policies in section 2, except policy part 2.2.5 which should be retained. Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.003 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Support in 3.3.2 Objectives and Policies part Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c and 3.3.2e by deleting the word 'shall' and replacing with 'must have regard to'. Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.004 4.2 Objectives and Policies Residential Zones Support in Amend Policies in 4.2.1 to 4.2.9 to replace the word "shall" with "must have regard to" part Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.005 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Support Supports Rule 4.3.1(bb) Offices being discouraged in residential areas Page 152 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Residential Zone Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.006 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones Support in Amend 5.2 Objectives and Policies 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6 and 5.2.7 - Special Character Zones - by part replacing the word "shall" with "must have regard to". Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.007 6.1 Purpose Support in Amend the purpose of the Business 1-7 Zones to be less prescriptive part Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.008 6.2 Objectives and Policies Business 1 to 7 Zones Support in Replace the word 'shall' with 'must have regard to' in the Objectives and Policies of the Business 1-7 Zones. part Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.009 7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank Precinct Support Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.010 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Support in Supports Policy 7.1.4 Opoia in principle but should not be an immediate priority, thus keeping regeneration and repart development focus on the existing CBD Precincts. Extend Opoia Precinct North to Te Aroha Street and East to Memorial Drive. Link Opoia to the CBD with a walkway bridge. Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.011 7.2 Objectives and Policies Central City Zone Support in Amend Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.8d by replacing the word "shall" with "must have regard to". part Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.012 8.1 Purpose Support Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.013 9.2 Objectives and Policies Industrial Zone Support in Amend Policies 9.2.1a and 9.2.4b to replace use of the word 'shall' with 'must have regard to', to enable more part discretion for industrial development. Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.014 11.1 Purpose Support Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.015 11.2 Objectives and Policies Support Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Supports objectives and location of Ruakura Industrial (and logistics) Park. Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.016 7.1.2 Precinct 2 – City Living Precinct Supports 7.1.2 Precinct 2 - City Living Precinct Waikato Chamber of Commerce 698.017 7.1.1 Precinct 1 – Downtown Support Precinct Supports 7.1.1 Precinct 1 - Downtown Precinct. Kel Ormsby 699.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Carl Ormsby 700.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Support Oppose Support 7.1.3 Precinct 3 - Ferrybank Precinct. Supports the purpose and location of the Knowledge Zone Supports the purpose, objectives and location of the Ruakura Industrial (and logistics) Park Page 153 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Waikato Federated Farmers Charitable Society 701.001 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5.4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan to include 159/169 London St. part Waikato Federated Farmers Charitable Society 701.002 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay to cover 159-169 London Street. part Waikato Federated Farmers Charitable Society 701.003 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support Site Locations McConnell Property Ltd 702.001 7.2.6 Objective and Policies Downtown Precinct Retain Figure 5-9. Request further collaboration with adjacent landowners for Key Development Site 4. Support in Amend Policy 7.2.6(a) to recognise that commercial office space is appropriate at ground floor where they do not part compromise active building frontages. Amend Policy 7.2.6f) so offices would be suitable in ground-floor locations away from active building frontages within the riverfront overlay. McConnell Property Ltd 702.002 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3a) and bb) so that ‘New Buildings’ and ‘Alterations and additions’ are Permitted Activities. McConnell Property Ltd 702.003 7.4.2 Building Intensity Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity from Central City Zone McConnell Property Ltd 702.004 7.4.7 Street Wall Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall so that it only applies to buildings that do not already have a setback from the road frontage. McConnell Property Ltd 702.005 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks to exclude structures that are part of the riverfront pedestrian promenade and setbacks associated with pedestrian arcades, plazas or through site linkages from setback requirements. McConnell Property Ltd 702.006 7.4.11 Service Areas Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.11 Service Areas so that the maximum service area required is 30m2 McConnell Property Ltd 702.007 7.5.2 Carparking Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.2 to remove the requirement for carparking to be located underground in the Riverfront Overlay area and precinct 4 Amend Rule 7.3s) in the Downtown Precinct by changing the status of retail >250m2 gfa to Restricted Discretionary. Page 154 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary McConnell Property Ltd 702.008 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve Oppose Amend 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve to provide for the construction of a pedestrian promenade. McConnell Property Ltd 702.009 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rules 7.6a) i and xxi to remove reference to L3 for New buildings, including alterations and additions* and L3 and Z19 for New buildings, including alterations and additions within Key Development Site 3* McConnell Property Ltd 702.010 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Amend Policy 22.2.1l to acknowledge that in some cases 'vulnerable' activities may be appropriate rather than being 'avoided'. McConnell Property Ltd 702.011 23 Subdivision Support in Replace reference to 'allotments' with 'certificates of title' throughout the subdivision chapter. part McConnell Property Ltd 702.012 23.6.2 Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision Oppose McConnell Property Ltd 702.013 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan McConnell Property Ltd 702.014 25.10.4 Rules – General Standards McConnell Property Ltd 702.015 25.10.5.7 Central City, Oppose Business 1 to 7 and Industrial Zones Amend Rule 25.10.5.7(a)ii) to add to the maximum sign area to provide for rear sites. McConnell Property Ltd 702.016 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas Delete Rule 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas McConnell Property Ltd 702.017 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site Oppose 3 – Victoria on the River Amend 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site 3 – Victoria on the River to align with proposed development on the site, amending Concept figures accordingly; broaden the range of uses provided for to include small offices; acknowledge the future potential of including a pedestrian bridge across the river from this site and remove the proposed mix of uses on the site. McConnell Property Ltd 702.018 1.4.7 Riverfront Development Design Guide Oppose Amend Figure 1.4.7a to show the correct location of the heritage buildings listed as H91 and H74; Amend Figures 1.4.7b and 1.4.7c to show an amended conceptual layout for ‘new built form’. McConnell Property Ltd 702.019 1.5.13 Integrated Transport Assessment Oppose Amend Appendix 1.5.13 a) so that resource consent applications for Discretionary and Non-complying Activities only require an Integrated Transport Assessment if there are adverse traffic affects that require consideration. McConnell 702.020 Table 15-2a Number of Oppose Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a to reduce cycle parking requirements. Amend 23.6.2(f) Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision to reference the Resource Management Act 1991 rather than the Building Act 2004 Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. Support in Amend rule 25.10.4(b) to clarify that signs are permitted over a transport corridor where compliance with Rule part 25.10.5.10(verandah signs) is achieved. Oppose Page 155 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Property Ltd Sub Type Summary parking loading and cycle spaces McConnell Property Ltd 702.021 Table 15-2e Number of spaces required for less mobile users – All Zones Oppose Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2e so that the requirement for car parking for less mobile users (Rule 25.14.4.2 c) ii.) does not apply to offices. McConnell Property Ltd 702.022 Table 15-2g Number of Oppose bicycle end-of-journey facilities required – Central City Zone and Business Zones 1 to 7 Julia Kim Endres 703.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.001 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain 16.3(g) Ancillary residential units (e.g. clergy, caregiver, caretaker) as a permitted activity Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.002 16.4.7 Hours of Operation Oppose Extend hours of operation under 16.4.7 to start from 0500 Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.003 16.5.2 Ancillary Residential Unit Oppose Amend Rule 16.5.2 a) by adding a clause excluding clergy accommodation from the maximum of one ancillary residential unit for places of assembly or community centres Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.004 19.2 Objectives and Policies Historic Heritage Oppose Amend the Objectives and Policies for Historic Heritage to recognise: - that many of the City’s heritage items have been confirmed as ‘earthquake prone buildings’, and that regard will be given to the risks posed to human health and safety when managing the City’s heritage resources; - that demolition of or effects to historical heritage may be appropriate in some circumstances; - the financial viability of protecting features; - incentives; and - alignment with the RMA. Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to clarify that end of journey bicycle facilities are required based only on the number of staff bicycle spaces required. Page 156 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.005 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Support in Amend 19.3 b) to give importance to the internal state of heritage items. part Amend 19.3 c) to make accessory buildings or new buildings on the same site as an A ranked item as a Controlled Activity. Support in part 19.3 k), but amend the activity status to a controlled activity. Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.006 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures Support in Amend 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures to include state of repair and earthquake risk as factors part that are considered when assessing the importance of a heritage item. Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.008 13.6 Rules – Activity Status Table for Comprehensive Development Plans Oppose Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.009 13.7 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Table for Activities Proposed Within an Area with an Implemented Comprehensive Development Plan 13.7 Rules – Activity Status Table for Activities Proposed Within an Area with an Implemented Comprehensive Development Plan Insert new activity: ee) Ancillary Residential Unit as a Permitted Activity in the Community Precinct column. Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.010 Figure 7-2 Comprehensive Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre Figure 7-2 Comprehensive Development Plan Areas-Rototuna Town Centre: Oppose 13.6 Rules – Activity Status Table for Comprehensive Development Plans (Rototuna Town Centre). Insert new activity: ggg) Ancillary Residential Unit as a Discretionary Activity in the Community Precinct column. The Submitters/current owners have recently subdivided to separate area CDP H from CDP I. Area CDP H has an area of 6.18ha. Area CDP I has an area of 3.3ha AMEND: Figure 7-2 Legend to reflect the correct areas within each CDP. Roman Catholic Bishop of Hamilton (Catholic Diocese of Hamilton) 704.011 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend the zoning of 51 Grey Street, Hamilton East to support the existing office activities that occur at that site. Amend Rule 4.3.1 by adding a new activity specifically for that property as follows 'Bbb) Office on Lot 1 DPS 23474 (51 Grey Street) = P (General Residential column only).' Page 157 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Sheena Alice Maclean (Riverlea Environment Society) 705.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part John Barnard 706.001 Features Map 54B Oppose John Barnard 706.002 Schedule 9D Significant Trees Oppose Remove tree T13 from Schedule 9D Significant Trees and Map 54B John Barnard 706.003 1.3.2.9 Non-emergency Oppose Works to, Removal or Transplanting of, a Scheduled Tree Amend Rule 1.3.2.9 Non-emergency works where removing or transplanting a scheduled tree by adding a provision that takes into account amenity and risk to human life. Wintec 707.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Amend Rule 7.3 cc) and dd) so that Parking Buildings are a Restricted Discretionary Activity in Precinct 1 - Downtown of the Central City Zone. Oppose Remove tree T13 from Schedule 9D Significant and Map 54B Amend Rule 7.3 ll) and mm) so that Tertiary education and specialised training facilities are Permitted Activities in Precinct 1 - Downtown of the Central City Zone irrespective of gross floor area. Wintec 707.002 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-remove the Industrial Amenity Protection Area between Gilchrist Street and Avalon Drive whilst retaining the underlying Industrial Zone. Wintec 707.003 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A-remove the Industrial Amenity Protection Area between Gilchrist Street and Avalon Drive whilst retaining the underlying Industrial Zone. Wintec 707.004 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rules 9.3c), e), u), v), x) from Controlled to Permitted Activities. Wintec 707.005 9.6 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Oppose If not deleted (as applicable to the Rotokauri Employment Area) Rule 9.6 be amended to only relate to the following criteria: i. B.(a)i, ii ii. B.(a)i, ii iii. B.(a)i, ii iv. B.(a)i, ii, iii Wintec 707.006 17.2 Objectives and Policies Major Facilities Zone Oppose Amend Policies 17.2.1a to 17.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Delete Policy 17.2.1e and relevant explanation. Wintec 707.007 17.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 17.3 f) to make new buildings or relocated buildings not identified on an approved Concept Plan a restricted discretionary activity. Delete Rule 17.3g). Amend Rule 17.3h) to remove reference to the interface area. Amend Rule 17.7 so that it does not apply to the Waikato Hospital. Amend Rule 17.3 ll) to clarify the activity status of activities within the Wintec City Campus. Page 158 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Wintec 707.008 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 17.8a) i, vii, viii, xvii, xviii by deleting various matters and assessment criteria. Amend Appendix 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to streamline and simplify provisions, ensure only relevant matters are considered, and that criteria are not prescriptive. Wintec 707.009 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent. Wintec 707.010 25.13.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rules 25.13.4.1 c) Integrated Catchment Management Plan, 25.13.4.2 d) Stormwater, 25.13.4.5 a) Water Efficiency Measures, and 25.13.4.6 b) Water Impact Assessments so that they do not apply to development required to operate under an approved Concept Plan as provided for in this plan. Wintec 707.011 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity to clarify that parking levels set out in an approved Concept Plan apply instead. Wintec 707.012 Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre Oppose Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre. That figure 2-11 be amended as per Appendix 2 attached to the submission. Figure 2-11 shows the “triangle” (Pt Lot 1 DPS 16911) as part of Wintec. This site has been zoned Industrial within the proposed plan and is within the Rotokauri Employment Area. Therefore Figure 2-11 should be amended to reflect this. Wintec 707.013 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Oppose Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces, to reduce the rate of car parking, and cycle spaces required for Tertiary education and specialised training facilities within the Major Facilities Zone. Waikato District Health Board 708.001 17.2 Objectives and Policies Major Facilities Zone Oppose Amend Policies 17.2.1a to 17.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Delete Policy 17.2.1e and relevant explanation. Waikato District Health Board 708.002 17.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Delete Rule 17.3g). Amend Rule 17.3h) to remove reference to the interface area. Amend Rule 17.7 so that it does not apply to the Waikato Hospital. Waikato District Health Board 708.003 17.6.3.1 Building Standards Oppose Amend Rule 17.6.3.1 b) ii) Height Control Plane to correct two typographical errors. Waikato District Health Board 708.004 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 17.8a) i, vii, viii, xvi by deleting various matters and assessment criteria. Amend Appendix 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to streamline and simplify provisions, ensure only relevant matters are considered, and that criteria are not prescriptive. Waikato District Health Board 708.005 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent. Page 159 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Waikato District Health Board 708.006 25.10.5.4 Major Facilities Zone Oppose Amend Rule 25.10.5.4 e) to improve the clarity of this rule as it relates to signs. Waikato District Health Board 708.007 25.13.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rules 25.13.4.1 c) Integrated Catchment Management Plan, 25.13.4.2 d) Stormwater, 25.13.4.5 a) Water Efficiency Measures, and 25.13.4.6 b) Water Impact Assessments so that they do not apply to development required to operate under an approved Concept Plan as provided for in this plan. Waikato District Health Board 708.008 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity to clarify that parking levels set out in an approved Concept Plan apply instead. Mark Thomson Mitchell 709.001 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - housing densities) Mark Thomson Mitchell 709.002 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policies 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b Mark Thomson Mitchell 709.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Mark Thomson Mitchell 709.004 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Vincent Matthew Heke 710.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Nathalie Lordemans 711.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Darren Siteine 712.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sherry Watene 713.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 160 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Waikato Regional Council 714.001 1 Plan Overview Support in a) In general, Waikato Regional Council supports the provisions of the PHDP. This submission is seeking some part amendments to the PHDP to further improve consistency with the above documents. b) Ensure that the PHDP is consistent with the provisions of the Proposed Waikato Regional Policy Statement (Decisions version, November 2012). c) Include introductory paragraphs (or similar) in each chapter of the PHDP which provides linkages and describes the relationship with the strategic framework provisions in Chapter 2. Waikato Regional Council 714.002 2.2.11 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Amend Objective 2.2.11 and policies 2.2.11a) and b) as suggested in the submission, to strengthen the Natural Environments part wording and recognise that sometimes avoidance of development can provide better protection to the natural environment. Waikato Regional Council 714.003 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Retain objective 2.2.13 and policies 2.2.13a-2.2.13f. Add a new policy regarding optimising existing Integrated Land Use, part transport networks and infrastructure before new infrastructure is provided. Transport and Infrastructure Waikato Regional Council 714.004 3.1 Purpose Support in 3.1 Purpose (Structure Plans) part Amend the diagram in 3.1a) to include reference to Strategic Framework objectives and policies. Waikato Regional Council 714.005 3.2 Principles Support in a) Add an introductory paragraph explaining how the principles are to be taken account of and implemented. part b) Add a principle to 3.2(a) as follows: 'How existing values, and valued features of the area (including amenity, landscape, natural character, ecological and heritage values, water bodies, high class soils and view catchments), will be managed' Waikato Regional Council 714.006 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3.1 Structure Plans Waikato Regional Council 714.007 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 3.3.2 under Structure Plans with amendment to Policy 3.3.2c to ensure connection of transport part modes, connectivity of industrial areas to the transport network, integration of transport networks over district boundaries and to ensure development does not hinder future infrastructure requirements. Waikato Regional Council 714.008 3.3.3 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.3 Structure Plans with amendments to include the safeguarding and part enhancement of freshwater bodies and additions to the list of matters under policy 3.3.3b for Integrated Catchment Management Plans. Page 161 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Regional Council 714.009 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.4 Structure Plans with amendments, as set out in the submission, to include part the improvement of safety of the transportation network under policy 3.3.4g and to clarify that adverse effects from building new transport infrastructure need to be avoided, as well as minimised in 3.3.4f Waikato Regional Council 714.010 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Support in a) Amend Policy 3.3.6a so that loss of SNAs is avoided, and opportunities for restoration and enhancement of part indigenous vegetation are sought wherever possible. b) Amend Policy 3.3.6c to delete the words 'where practicable'. c) Add a new policy 3.3.6e that recognises the importance of, and provides for, well connected and ecologically functioning natural systems, based around the core ecological framework of the Waikato River and gully system. d) Add a policy on biodiversity restoration and enhancement through structure plans as follows: “Develop constructed wetlands and other green infrastructure in new growth areas to deal with urban stormwater issues and to provide for increased habitat and ecosystems.” Waikato Regional Council 714.011 3.3.7 Objective and Policies Support in 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans). Amend Policy 3.3.7b iv. by deleting the words 'Significant Natural Areas' part and replacing with the words: "areas where recreation use is compatible with conservation values". Waikato Regional Council 714.012 Peacocke Natural System Support in Replace Objective 3.4.6.1 with an objective that provides for the protection and enhancement of all remnant natural part areas within the growth cell, as well as ecosystem functions and processes (including connectivity), indigenous habitats and species requirements, and natural character. Amend Policy 3.4.6.1a by removing reference to stormwater functions of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins, and adding references to ecological functions, indigenous biodiversity and habitats. Amend Policy 3.4.6.1b by adding reference to opportunities for ecological and habitat enhancement and for restoration of natural character Amend Policy 3.4.6.1c to provide for the ecological restoration and enhancement (including revegetation with appropriate native species) of gullies and river margins. Amend Policy 3.4.6.1e to enhance riparian and aquatic habitat and control adverse effects on stream water quality and habitat. Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that preserve the natural character of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins and protect it from inappropriate development and where natural character has already been compromised utilise opportunities to restore and enhance it. Page 162 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that provides for a specific ecological restoration fund from financial or development contributions from development adjacent to the river and gully edges. Amend Objective 3.4.6.2 to Maintain and enhance the ecological and open space links to the river provided by the Mangakotukutuku Gully. Amend Policy 3.4.6.2a to Maintain the extent and enhance the quality of ecological (green) corridors of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins. Amend Policy 3.4.6.2b to ensure the alignment of the roading network maintains and enhances the ecological, physical and visual connections of the Mangakotukutuku Gully system and its connection to the Waikato River. Amend Policy 3.4.6.2c to maintain and enhance the green corridor along the Waikato River to provide for natural character, ecological functions, riparian and aquatic habitat and for public access and amenity. Retain Objective 3.4.6.3 and Policies 3.4.6.3a and 3.4.6.3b Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.3 to protect gully landform, natural feature and landscape elements from modification. Waikato Regional Council 714.013 Peacocke Built Environment Oppose Amend Objective 3.4.6.4, as set out in the submission, to include reference to maintains or enhances ecological connectivity. Amend Policy 3.4.6.4d to support changes to Objective 3.4.6.4 by avoiding or reducing the impact of movement routes on the ecological functions and connectivity of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and the Waikato River. Waikato Regional Council 714.014 Peacocke Social Wellbeing Support in Amend Policy 3.4.6.13a by inserting the following text into the policy "for enhancement or re-creation of habitats, part ecological and physical" as set out in the submission. Waikato Regional Council 714.015 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies (Rototuna Structure Plan) part Retain objective 3.5.1.3 and policy 3.5.1.3a in relation to ensuring the transport network is managed and developed in a way that provides for all modes of transport in an integrated manner. Add new objective and policies to address landscape features and natural features, ecological corridors, ecological enhancement, retention of existing indigenous vegetation and habitat required to contribute to the viability of ecological fragments. Waikato Regional Council 714.016 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan). part a) Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 by referencing protection and enhancement of the ecological functioning of key natural areas. Page 163 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary b) Add new Policy 3.6.1.1c as follows: 'Subdivision and development provide for the protection and enhancement of ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke'. Waikato Regional Council 714.017 3.7 Ruakura Support in Move the Industrial Land Allocation table 3.7f to Chapter 2 Strategic Framework part Waikato Regional Council 714.018 3.7.1.2 Ruakura Logistics Zone – Logistics Support Waikato Regional Council 714.019 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Retain Policy 3.7.21b, Amend Policy 3.7.2.1e to include reference to ecological corridors. Amend objective 3.7.2.3 to part include " that is supported by the effective and efficient transport links" Add new policy to 3.7.2.3c to read: "A well functioning and efficient transport network is developed to support logistics and freight handling activities". Waikato Regional Council 714.020 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Support Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Retain staging rules for the Ruakura Structure Plan 3.7.3.4a to 3.7.3.4c Waikato Regional Council 714.021 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policies 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b Waikato Regional Council 714.022 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.2b to strengthen the text to give effect to Policy 6 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement to part reflect the effectiveness and efficiency of existing and planned regionally significant infrastructure is protected; Relocate the newly worded policy to Chapter 2 'Strategic Framework'. Waikato Regional Council 714.023 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.6a to be consistent with Policy 6.15 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. part Waikato Regional Council 714.024 5.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 5.2.1e to delete the words 'wherever possible', and include new policy 5.2.1f under Objective 5.2.1 part (Special Character Zones) regarding the protection and enhancement of Lake Waiwhakareke. Waikato Regional Council 714.025 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone Support in Amend Objective 5.2.5 Special Natural Zone to delete the words 'where possible', and amend associated Policy 5.2.5a) part to provide wording as set out in the submission relating to protecting and enhancing ecological connections to Lake Waiwhakareke. Waikato Regional Council 714.026 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Retain 3.7.1.2.b Structure Plan component of Ruakura Logistics Zone Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to the special natural zone to enable assessment of subdivision and development impacts on ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by triggering assessment against the design guide in section 1.4.4 OR rezone the ecological stream connection (and an appropriate buffer width) into Lake Waiwhakareke to Natural Open Space Zone. Page 164 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Regional Council 714.027 5.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 to enable assessment of subdivision and development impacts on ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by triggering assessment against the design guide in section 1.4.4, or rezone the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone. Waikato Regional Council 714.028 6.1 Purpose Support in Amend 6.1(j) to recognise the interaction between Hamilton East and Central City. part Waikato Regional Council 714.029 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Support in Retain Objective 6.2.1and Policy 6.2.1c under Sub-Regional Centres. Amend Policy 6.2.1a to refer to 'development', not part 'expansion'. Amend 6.2.1b to recognise that the range of activities should be predominantly retail. Waikato Regional Council 714.030 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support Retain Policy 6.2.2f and the explanation that recognises Hamilton East under Suburban Centres Waikato Regional Council 714.031 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 for the Suburban Centre Core - Business Zone 5 by adding Offices greater than 500m² gross floor area per site in Hamilton East as a discretionary activity. Waikato Regional Council 714.032 7 Central City Zone Support in Add a new policy under Objective 7.2.1 regarding recognising, protecting and maintaining the strategic transport part function of the Hamilton Public Transport Centre. Amend Appendix 15, Figure 15-5F to include reference to the Hamilton Public Transport Centre. Amend Appendix 15 so that a Strategic PT network is incorporated in Figure 15-5F with further explanation included in 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definition. Include appropriate bus priority and infrastructure measures in the Central City Local Area Plan to improve the journey time reliability for public transport. Provide full consideration with regards to improving journey time reliability and reducing public transport travel times. Waikato Regional Council 714.033 7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 7.2.1 and Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.1g Waikato Regional Council 714.034 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 7.2.2.. Amend Policy 7.2.2b to include the words "civic" and "administration" to increase consistency part with Policy 6.15 of the RPS. Waikato Regional Council 714.035 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Support in Add a new policy and amend Policy 7.2.9a to ensure development and activities in Opoia precinct are not of a nature part and scale that may affect the vitality and viability of the existing city centre on the western side of the Waikato River, and other existing commercial centres. Waikato Regional Council 714.036 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3 to encourage public transport facilities in the Central City Zone by making passenger transport facilities a Permitted Activity in the Downtown and City Living Precincts and Discretionary Activities in the Ferrybank Page 165 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary and Opoia Precincts. Waikato Regional Council 714.037 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 7.6a) i and ii so that new and relocated buildings are subject to matters and assessment criteria Q1-Q5. part Waikato Regional Council 714.038 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 9.2.1a to reflect the intended provision for limited non-industrial uses where they are relevant to the part Industrial Zone. Waikato Regional Council 714.039 9.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Waikato Regional Council 714.040 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 10.2.1a to make it clear it relates to the zone, move Policy 10.2.1a i to iii to the Structure Plan Chapter, part convert Policy 10.2.1a iv and v into rules or assessment criteria. Waikato Regional Council 714.041 10.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 10.2.2 and Policies 10.2.2a to 10.2.2d. Waikato Regional Council 714.042 10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Retain Rule 10.3 for Ruakura Logistics Zone in particular the Non-complying Activity status for general industrial activities. Waikato Regional Council 714.043 11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 11.2.1a to make it clear it relates to the zone and supports the Ruakura Inland Port and Logistics Zone. part Relocate Policy 11.2.1a i, ii and iii to 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan. Amend Policy 11.2.1a iv and v to read as a rule or assessment criteria. Waikato Regional Council 714.044 12.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 12.2.3 and Policies 12.2.3a to 12.2.3g Waikato Regional Council 714.045 12.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 12.2.4 and Policies 12.2.4a to 12.2.4c Waikato Regional Council 714.046 Natural Open Space Zone Support in Retain Objectives and Policies in relation to Natural Open Space (15.2.5 and 15.2.6) with amendments to include part provisions relating to ecological values, indigenous vegetation and habitats, and riparian and aquatic habitat quality. Waikato Regional Council 714.047 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain Rule 15.3 ab) relating to the Removal of vegetation or trees Waikato Regional Council 714.048 Transport Corridor Network Support Retain Objective 18.2.1 and Policies 18.2.1a and 18.2.1b for the Transport Corridor Network. Waikato Regional Council 714.049 19.2.1 All Historic Heritage Support in Retain Objective 19.2.1 and amend Policy 19.2.1 a) with regards to the considerations for effects subdivision, use and part development will have on built heritage. Waikato Regional 714.050 19.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Support Retain Objective 9.2.4 and Policies 9.2.4a and 9.2.4b, as they are consistent with Policy 6.6 of the PRPS. Retain Objective 19.2.2. All Historic Heritage and retain the associated policies a) to c). Page 166 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Council Waikato Regional Council 714.051 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Support Waikato Regional Council 714.052 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Support in Amend Objective 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites to provide a greater level of clarity that such sites 'are' part protected from damage and destruction. Amend policy 19.2.4 a) to ensure that subdivision, use and development should 'avoid' damage to sites. Retain policy 19.2.4 d). Waikato Regional Council 714.053 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Waikato Regional Council 714.054 19.4 Rules Specific Standards Oppose Add a new Rule 19.4.3 to control the effects of earthworks on Group 1 archaeological and cultural sites. Waikato Regional Council 714.055 20.1 Purpose Support Retain 20.1 d), h), Schedule 9D, and the approach of identifying and mapping Significant Natural Areas. Amend 20.1 f) ii) to refer to the creation and enhancement of ecological buffers around, and corridors between, SNA's. Waikato Regional Council 714.056 Schedule 9C Significant Natural Areas Support Retain the identification and mapping of Significant Natural Areas Waikato Regional Council 714.057 Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support Waikato Regional Council 714.058 Significant Natural Areas Support in Retain Objective 20.2.1, Policies 20.2.1a, b, and d to n. Insert a new Objective regarding the maintenance and 20.2.1 Objective and Policies part enhancement of indigenous biodiversity and the creation and enhancement of ecological buffers around, and corridors between, SNA's. Amend Policy 20.2.1c by deleting i to ix. Amend Policy 20.2.1o to also refer to indigenous biodiversity and habitats. Waikato Regional Council 714.059 Significant Trees Support in Retain Objective 20.2.3 and Policies 20.2.3b to 20.2.3f. Amend Policy 20.2.3a by deleting parts i to vi. part Waikato Regional Council 714.060 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 20.3 a) and b) so that trimming, maintenance and removal of indigenous vegetation in Significant Natural part Areas are a Controlled Activity with appropriate matters of control. Waikato Regional Council 714.061 20.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Retain Rule 20.5a) ii) and ii) with amendments to add new assessment criterion to J5 Natural Character and Open Activities Matters of part Space. Discretion and Assessment Criteria Waikato Regional Council 714.062 21.1 Purpose Oppose Retain Objective 19.2.3. Buildings and Structures and associated policy 19.2.3 a. Amend Rule 19.3 b) Activity Status Table to make internal alterations of buildings a controlled activity OR introduce a new rule under 19.4.2 Rules - Specific Standards for controlling effects of internal alterations of buildings. Retain the tree schedule and criteria around ecological value within Schedule 9D Add new rules within Chapter 21 Waikato River and Gully Systems that control earthworks, impervious surfaces, buildings and structures, and removal of indigenous vegetation. Page 167 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Add new assessment criteria in appendix 1.2 that relate to ecological assessment. Waikato Regional Council 714.063 21 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Support in Amend Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems chapter to highlight the ecological importance of the Waikato River part and Gullies Waikato Regional Council 714.064 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain the Objective 21.2.1 and Policy 21.2.1a, and 21.2.1c to g. Amend Policy 21.2.1b to recognise adverse effects on part ecological values. Waikato Regional Council 714.065 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 by referring to ecological and natural character. Amend these provisions to emphasize part sensitive use and primacy to ecological, natural character, landscape and cultural values of the River and Gully System. Waikato Regional Council 714.066 21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Waikato Regional Council 714.067 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Retain Objective 22.2.1, Policies 22.2.1b to 22.2.1e and 22.2.1g to 22.2.1m regarding Natural Hazards. part Amend Policy 22.2.1a to improve consistency with the Proposed Regional Policy Statement regarding 'likely effects' and 'tolerable or acceptable levels' of risk. Amend Policy 22.2.1f to reduce the permissiveness of the wording. Waikato Regional Council 714.068 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Waikato Regional Council 714.069 22.5.4 Removal of Trees and Oppose Other Vegetation Waikato Regional Council 714.070 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective and Policy under 23.2.2 subdivision with amendments. part Waikato Regional Council 714.071 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Retain 23.2.5 Objective and Policies for Subdivision with amendments to Policy 23.2.5a to include gullies and their part banks and 23.2.5b to refer to indigenous vegetation. Retain Objective 21.2.4 and Policies 21.2.4a to 21.2.4c of the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Amend Rule 22.3 a) so that tree removal in the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area requires resource consent as a Restricted Discretionary Activity and include assessment criteria regarding bank instability and increased risk. The standards in Rules 22.5.4(b)(i) and (ii) regarding the removal of Trees require assessment and therefore resource consent must be required. Amend Rule 23.8 by adding the matters and assessment and criteria sought by the submitter in its submission on 21.1d) Waikato River and Gullies. Waikato Regional Council 714.072 23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 23.8 by adding the matters and assessment and criteria sought by the submitter in its submission on Activities Matters of part 21.1d) Waikato River and Gullies. Discretion and Assessment Criteria Waikato Regional Council 714.073 23.3 Rules – Activity Status Tables Support in Retain the activity status for subdivision in 23.3 Rules – Activity Status Tables with the addition of a discretionary part activity status for subdivision in the Special Natural Zone. Waikato Regional Council 714.074 24 Financial Contributions Support in 24.2 Requests add a policy that identifies specific financial contributions to be taken from development alongside the part river and gully system for ecological restoration of those locations; add river and gully ecological restoration to Table Page 168 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary 24.3.3 d) and add in reasoning. Waikato Regional Council 714.075 25.2.1 Purpose Support in Seeks amendments to 25.2.1 Purpose to add reference to the Waikato Regional Pest Management Plan and the need part for earthworks applicants to refer to rules within it. Waikato Regional Council 714.076 25.2.2 Objectives and Policies Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Support in Seeks amendments to: part - Policy 25.2.2.1a i) to include the retention of existing ecological corridors and buffers. - Policy 25.2.2.1a ii) to include restoration of natural processes and features. - 25.2.1 to explain to district plan users that there will be situations where more stringent tests will be applied to vegetation removal and earthworks (e.g. in Significant Natural Areas). Waikato Regional Council 714.077 25.7.2 Objectives and Support in Amend 25.7.2 to include reference to the Regional Policy Statement. Policies Network Utilities and part Electricity Transmission Corridors Waikato Regional Council 714.078 25.7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1a to 25.7.2.1j Waikato Regional Council 714.079 25.7.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 25.7.2.3 and Policies 25.7.2.3a to 25.7.2.3e Waikato Regional Council 714.080 25.13.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.13.2.1. Amend Policies 25.13.2.1a and 25.13.2.1b as set out in the submission regarding the part protection of riparian margins and enhancement of aquatic habitats. Waikato Regional Council 714.081 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Support Retain Objective 25.14.2 and Policies 25.14.2a to 25.14.2g regarding the transport system. Waikato Regional Council 714.082 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Support Retain Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments. Waikato Regional Council 714.083 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Support in Retain requirement for water sensitive techniques in Rule 25.13.4.5 (Water Efficiency Measures) with amendments to part refer to the broader range of techniques in the Plan's definitions, and encourage inclusion of these techniques in new development. Waikato Regional Council 714.084 25.15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Add a policy under 25.15.2.2 to retain natural topography when development is occurring, and increase or maintain part green spaces in these areas. Waikato Regional Council 714.085 A General Criteria Support in Include a new clause in A2 which cross references Chapter 2 (strategic framework). part Waikato Regional Council 714.086 F Vitality of Centres Support in Amend 1.2 by adding the following to criteria F3; A Centre Viability Assessment report is not required for office part developments on Business 1 or Business 5 zoned land in Hamilton East. Page 169 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Regional Council 714.087 H Sites Adjoining the Riverbank Support in Requests additional assessment criteria regarding risk from natural hazards for development adjoining the riverbank. part Waikato Regional Council 714.088 1.3.2.4 Retail, Commercial Oppose and Office Activities – Central City and Business 1 to 7 Zones Waikato Regional Council 714.089 1.4.3.10 Water Efficiency Support in Clarify 1.4.3.10g) regarding Regional consent requirements for the discharge of untreated greywater. part Waikato Regional Council 714.090 1.4.4 Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area Design Guide Support in Amend Section 1.4.4.3 c) to provide additional reference to protection and enhancement of continuous stream and part riparian corridors for Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area. Waikato Regional Council 714.091 1.5 Information Requirements Support in Amend the information requirements for earthworks consent applications to require details of sediment control part measures. Waikato Regional Council 714.092 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Ruakura Structure Plan- Retain possible interchanges until certainty is provided on the locations. part Waikato Regional Council 714.093 Table 15-2b Number of Support in Supports the no-minimum car parking rule for the Central City Zone provided Council ensures the overall parking parking and loading spaces part needs of the CBD are managed appropriately. required – Central City Zone Waikato Regional Council 714.094 15-3 Integrated Transport Support Assessment Requirements – Tables Waikato Regional Council 714.095 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions Waikato Regional Council 714.096 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Support in Supports the inclusion of bus priority measures for transport corridors in the Central City Land Use Environment with Transport Corridors part amendments so that bus priority measures are considered along the whole corridor and not just at intersections. Waikato Regional Council 714.097 Zoning Map 46A Support in Map 46A-Retain the Business 1 zoning for Regional Council Offices at both 319 and 401 Grey Street. part Waikato Regional Council 714.098 Features Maps Oppose Amend the name of the ‘gully hazard area’ to "Gully Ecological Area" or similar Waikato Regional Council 714.099 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Support Support. Retain Objective 2.2.5 and Policies 2.2.5a and 2.2.5b which ensures there is appropriate integration of land use and infrastructure, consistent with Policy 6.13 of the PRPS. Amend Rule 1.3.2.4(a) and (d) – Retail, Commercial and Office Activities – Central City and Business 1 to 7 Zones to expressly exclude sites in Hamilton East. Retain Tables 15-3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements. Support in Amend 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions and Figures 15-5E and 15-5F to address issues around part consistency with corridors identified in the Regional Land Transport Strategy (Peachgrove Road and Bridge Street), the function of Anglesea and Tristram Streets, and providing for the public transport network. Page 170 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Regional Council 714.100 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Support Support. Retain Objective 2.2.4 and Policies 2.2.4a and 2.2.4b as the use of a commercial hierarchy manages demand of commercial development in the city, while protecting and enhancing the economic and social functions of existing commercial centres, as anticipated by Policy 6.15a of the PRPS. Waikato Regional Council 714.101 2.2.7 Objective and Policies The Waikato River Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 2.2.7 The Waikato River with amendments to Objective 2.2.7, and policies 2.2.7a part and 2.2.7d, and insert a new policy 2.2.7f. Waikato Regional Council 714.102 2.2.9 Objective and Policies Waikato River Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 2.2.9 Waikato River but consider rationalising with the Objective and Policies part under the Waikato River 2.2.7. Reference the full text of the Vision and Strategy in Appendix 10 within the explanation to this Objective and Policies. Waikato Regional Council 714.103 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents Support in Amend 1.1.2.2(e) - Integration with other Plans and Documents, by adding additional wording which describes the role part of the PRPS plays where there is an overlap of responsibilities. Waikato Regional Council 714.104 1.1.11 Local Authority Cross- Support in Amend 1.1.11 b) by adding wording that refers to the Waikato River Vision and Strategy. boundary Issues part Add a new point to 1.1.11 which requires consultation with the Regional Council for resource consents with effects that fall within the functions of the Regional Council. Waikato Regional Council 714.105 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Support. Retain Objective 2.2.1 and Policies 2.2.1a & 2.2.1b as they support the Future Proof Growth Strategy principles also reflected in the Proposed RPS. Waikato Regional Council 714.106 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy. Waikato Regional Council 714.107 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy. Waikato Regional Council 714.108 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy. Waikato Regional Council 714.109 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support Retain Objective 2.2.3 and Policies 2.2.3a to 2.2.3c Urban Design Approach Waikato Regional Council 714.110 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support Retain Objective 2.2.3 and Policies 2.2.3a to 2.2.3c Urban Design Approach Ike Ihaka Ormsby 715.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 171 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Malakai WateneZelezniak (College Old Boys Rugby League) 716.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lee-anne Paama (COB League) 717.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Britani WateneZelezniak 718.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Alexandra Randell 719.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Rawiri Wayne King 720.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lucinda Atkinson 721.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jeremy Atkinson 722.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Dora Ballantyne 723.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Patrice Marama Arkins 724.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 172 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Tara Elissa Arkins 725.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Clarissa Charlotte Arkins 726.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jonathon William Arkins 727.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Richard Thomas Arkins 728.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Samuel Whiteford Arkins 729.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Bethanie Jane Smith 730.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Bruce William Arkins 731.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Penelope Jane Arkins 732.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 173 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.001 Zoning Map 58A Oppose Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.002 9.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 9.2.3a in order to extend protection to Significant Natural Areas part Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 9.3- Activity Status Table to include an additional column and specific provision for the 'Riverlea Industrial part Area'- (refer to the attachment to the submission) Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.004 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 9.7a) to include an additional activity for "Any industrial activity within the Riverlea Industrial Area" and part associated matters of discretion. Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.005 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Restricted Discretionary Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria relating to Significant Natural Areas and part ecologically sensitive environments under C Site Development, Design and Layout and J Natural Character and Open Space Joan B & (A) Michael Forret 733.006 9.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 9.1(c) to support ongoing mixed use within Riverlea Industrial Area, particularly ancillary residential part development. Debbie Lorraine Neilson 734.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joanne Vowles 735.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Alfa Blondy Kepu (Youth Justice North-Korowai & Manaaki, CYFS) 736.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kerryn Etika 737.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Summer Kershaw 738.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Map 58A-replace the Industrial Zone with 'Riverlea Industrial Area' Page 174 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Maari Rose Thompson 739.001 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Support in Prohibit the following activities within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, part alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products. Ngamhe Te Amo 740.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Barry Dean Clark 741.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Neesha Pahuru 742.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Mike Burton 743.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Chris Thompson 744.001 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Chris Thompson 744.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support in Comprehensive part Development Plan Areas and Precincts Stella Neale Kenyon 745.001 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Support in Prohibit the following activities within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, part alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products. Figure 4-5: Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Seek controls over certain retail and recreational activities occurring on the former CCNZ campus through the introduction of specific planning provisions/overlays by : - prohibiting the sale of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; - prohibiting all Sunday Trading and Sunday Play (organised sports practices and games on Sunday); - prohibiting all gambling including housie, lotto, raffles, pokies, scratches etc and the building of casinos; - restrict Sunday Activities on the former CCNZ campus area to quiet family-type activities (which is in keeping with the current special character of the area where Sunday is treated as a day of rest, for families to spend time together while engaging in quiet family time). Support in Prohibit the following activities, within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, part alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products. Page 175 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Courtney Skinner 746.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Pamela Umuhozu 747.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Leilani Uili 748.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Myles Watene 749.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Westly Te haki Howard 750.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Raechel Anne Popping 751.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Casey Clarke 752.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Samuel Nowacki 753.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jackie Noki Tainui 754.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Oppose Page 176 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Jake Wheki 755.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Michaela Powell 756.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Randall Tannea Kite 757.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Channeary Yean 758.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Peter Clarke 759.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Philip Siteine 760.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. William Roy & Raewyn Mary Cowie 762.001 9 Industrial Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to retain the current Commercial Service zoning for Seddon Road William Roy & Raewyn Mary Cowie 762.002 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-Rezone Seddon Road Industrial to Commercial Service zoning (current commercial zone). Wei Lee 763.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a Page 177 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Wei Lee 763.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.002 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Page 178 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.003 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.004 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu (Anna) Tang 764.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the properties Brandon Kipa 765.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Christine L Forbes 766.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Joseph Hans Hartog 767.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Matthew Lester Simon 768.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Marilyn Bigland 770.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 179 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.001 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents Support in 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents - After the third paragraph, insert the following text: part "The Vision and Strategy is to be interpreted in a manner that best furthers the Overarching Purpose of the Waikato River Settlement; To Restore and Protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River for future generations". Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.002 1.8.4 Collaboration and Partnership Support Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.003 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Support in Support in part. Amend Objective 2.2.5 and Policy 2.2.5a) to also include 'cultural' wellbeing as suggested in part submission, as this is a key strategic driver for the identity of Hamilton and the wider Waikato region. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.004 2.2.7 Objective and Policies The Waikato River Support in Amend the Policies under Objective 2.2.7 The Waikato River to refer to enhancement. part Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.005 2.2.8 Objective and Policies Tangata Whenua Waikato Tainui Support in Support in part. Amend policy 2.2.8a) as Tangata Whenua have an intergenerational multi-faceted relationship with part the city that goes beyond a cultural and historic relationship as suggested. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.006 2.2.9 Objective and Policies Waikato River Support in Amend Policy under 2.2.9 Waikato River to provide for programmes of action to improve the health and wellbeing of part the Waikato River Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.007 2.2.11 Objective and Policies Support Natural Environments Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.008 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support in Oppose. Add a new policy that identifies the important role that location and access to infrastructure has in terms of Resource Efficiency part the efficient development of natural and physical resources as suggested in the submission. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.009 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.010 3.1 Purpose Support in Amendments are sought, as set out in the submission, to the provisions in 3.1 (d) (Structure Plans Purpose) relating to part the purpose of a Structure Plan in order to strengthen the policy in respect of the landuse pattern and recognise the need to provide for staging but in a way that recognises the uncertainties associated with long term growth. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.011 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support Support the Structure Planning Objective 3.3.1 “Optimised, long-term, positive, environmental, economic social and cultural effects of Greenfield development”. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.012 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports the Ruakura Structure Plan and landuse identified. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.013 4.3 Rules – General Residential, Residential Support Supports the Restricted Discretionary activity status for Rule 4.3.1 (l) Papakainga Retain 1.8.4 Collaboration and Partnership provisions a), b) and c) Support. Retain Objective 2.2.11 and policies. Support Objectives and policies to enable a strategic planning approach and reduce environmental impacts of activities. Page 180 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Intensification and Large Lot Residential Zones Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.014 4.4 Rules – General Standards – General Residential, Residential Intensification Zones and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.4 to exclude Papakainga. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.015 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend the activity status for Papakainga in Rule 4.5.3 i) from discretionary to restricted discretionary activity. Medium-Density Residential part Zone Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.016 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Add new Rule 4.10a that sets out the relevant matters of control for controlled activities. Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.017 19.2.1 All Historic Heritage Support in Amend Chapter 19 to increase scheduling of historic sites and places of significance to Waikato-Tainui in particular part those of an intangible nature i.e. wahi tapu/wahi taonga. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.018 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Support Amend Objective 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites to include a generic accidental discovery protocol for permitted activities in areas recognised as being of cultural significance. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.019 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 19.3 t) Rules Activity Status Table, to make earthworks involving less than 40m3 a Restricted Discretionary Activity for Group 1 archaeological sites. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.020 Significant Natural Areas Support 20.2.1 Objective and Policies Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.021 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objectives and Policies of 21.2.1 of the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Chapter part Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.022 25.3 Events and Temporary Activities Support in Exclude events on Marae from Rule 25.3.5.6 Events and Temporary Activities part Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.023 25.13.2 Objectives and Policies Three Waters Support Supports the protection of water resources from the adverse effects of subdivision and development. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.024 Schedule 8B Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Support Supports the Schedule 8B Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites. Support the protection, restoration and enhancement of Significant Natural Areas Page 181 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.025 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Ruakura Structure Plan identifies the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th part Avenue and State highway 26. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.026 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as part “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.027 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as part “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.028 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - supports the infrastructure and staging in Figures 2.15 – 2-19. Structure Plan-Waste Water part Infrastructure Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.029 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove part 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.030 Figure 2-19 Ruakura Residential Staging Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging. part Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.031 Appendix 10 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Support Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.032 10-1.2 The Vision and Strategy and the Hamilton District Plan Support in Include specific reference to interpreting the vision and strategy within Appendix 10 1.2 The Vision and Strategy and part the Hamilton District Plan in a manner that achieves the Overarching Purpose of the Waikato Rivers Settlement Act Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.033 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support Retain B5-Waikato-Tainui Environmental Management Plan or Hapu Management Plan. Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc 771.034 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria Support Retain 1.3 reference to 1.2 B5 Waikato-Tainui Environmental Management Plan or Hapu Management Plan. Peter & Rinske Harris 772.001 Features Map 42B Support in Requests the Flood Hazard Areas not be noted on LIM's until all the city has been investigated and results better part understood. Support the inclusion of the Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River within the appendices of the District Plan Page 182 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Cyril Gudeeon 773.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lillian Singers 774.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Barbara Reneti 775.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Stephen Reneti 776.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Longtail Pet Motel 777.001 12.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in 12.3 Te Rapa North Industrial activity status table - seeks reconsideration of the activity status in light of the 30 year part timeframe before the area is developed so to support existing activities on-going viability and/or expansion during that period. Longtail Pet Motel 777.002 14.1 Purpose Support in Amend 14.1 - Purpose by adding a new clause e) to recognise that the Future Urban Zone provisions apply to the Te part Rapa North Deferred Industrial Zone until the area is zoned Industrial, and any consequential or similar amendments to have the same effect. Longtail Pet Motel 777.003 14.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 14.2.1e to provide for the continued operation and expansion of established activities. part Longtail Pet Motel 777.004 14.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in The explanation of Objective 14.2.2 should recognise the on-going status of existing commercial uses in the Future part Urban Zone. Amend 3rd paragraph of 14.2.2: "Nevertheless, rural-residential development, non-farming related industry and NEW commercial activities are discouraged in the zone". Any consequential or similar amendments to have the same effect. Longtail Pet Motel 777.005 14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 14.3 by adding a new provision r) which provides for establishments for boarding domestic/pets as a Discretionary activity. Longtail Pet Motel 777.006 14.4.5 Building Setback Oppose Amend Rule 14.4.5 c) - Building Setback, to exclude buildings associated with establishments for boarding domestic pets. Longtail Pet Motel 777.007 Table 23.3b Oppose Amend Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3b Medium Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones, and Te Page 183 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Rapa North Industrial Zone. Longtail Pet Motel 777.008 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Add a definition for "Establishment for boarding domestic pets" part Reihana Patrick Nuku 778.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Philip & Kelly Evans 779.001 Features Map 62B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 36 Sunnyside Road, seeks more detailed assessment of Flood Hazard Areas, compensation and infrastructure improvements. Tania Hennebry 780.001 4.2.8 Objective and Policies Support in Support the intent of Objective 4.2.8 to encourage new residential dwellings to use water and energy efficient part technologies. Suggests an 'Other Method" to create partnerships with EECA (Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority) and other service providers within the region for affordable solar, electricity, water storage tanks etc at plan stage, would be a meaningful step towards sustainable living and future proof living. Tania Hennebry 780.002 25.13 Three Waters Oppose Seeks the encouragement of water storage tanks to collect stormwater/grey water. Opposes changes that would allow for water metering. Tania Hennebry 780.003 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Terry Snipler 781.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Deborah AttardManche (Karioi Osteopaths Ltd) 782.001 Zoning Map 44A Map 44A-No's 1a to 7 Somerset St area are all residential, offices, cafes and childcare centre. Rezone to allow mixed use. Daphne Lois Bell 783.001 4.7.6 Managed Care Facilities Oppose Delete Rule 4.7.6 b) and f) regarding Managed Care Facilities. Jordanielle Trust 784.001 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A-Rezone 712 Te Rapa Road to Business Zone from industrial. Jordanielle Trust 784.002 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Add policy to provide for non-industrial and retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Jordanielle Trust 784.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule Amend 9.3f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3g) to provide for any retail part activity occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, retain 9.3k) amend 9.3l) to provide for office activities existing at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3u) & v) to be a Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 as these provisions impinge on personal privacy and safety. Page 184 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle movements. Jordanielle Trust 784.004 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Jordanielle Trust 784.005 9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only. Jordanielle Trust 784.006 9.4.6 Site Layout Oppose Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary. Jordanielle Trust 784.007 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.2 that limits retail to ancillary only as it is too restrictive Jordanielle Trust 784.008 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te Rapa Road which should be able to continue. Jordanielle Trust 784.009 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor space and/or yard-based retail area. Carolyn Lundquist 785.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Mark Metekingi 786.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ariel Piripi Metekingi 787.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Nigel Ballantyne 788.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Aaron Atkinson 789.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Philip Ballantyne 790.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 185 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.001 20.1 Purpose Support Retain 20.1 d), h), Schedule 9D, and the approach of identifying and mapping Significant Natural Areas. Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.002 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 20.3 a) and b) so that trimming, maintenance and removal of indigenous vegetation in Significant Natural part Areas are a Controlled Activity. Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.003 Significant Natural Areas Support 20.2.2 Objective and Policies Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.004 20.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend the assessment criteria under Rule 20.5 to include noise and physical disturbance to the habitat of threatened Activities Matters of part species Discretion and Assessment Criteria Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.005 20.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Environments Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.006 Significant Natural Areas Support 20.2.1 Objective and Policies Retain Policy 20.2.1o and add new objectives and policies that to meet the 10% threshold for habitat stability the reconstruction and restoration of habitats outside the present Significant Natural Areas shall be promoted. Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.007 1.8.5 Economic Instruments Support Retain 1.8.5 Economic Instruments with amendments to include incentives for proposals to retain, plant or covenant wetlands Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.008 21.1 Purpose Support in Amend 21.1 e) to recognise the role as ecological corridors have in the City linking Significant Natural Areas. part Amend 21.2 to include new policies regarding development impact on ecological aspects of the River and Gully System Waikato Biodiversity Forum 791.009 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 and its policies to include ecological values and promote ecological restoration and part enhancement of the River and Gully system. Melanie Ballantyne 792.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Objective 20.2.2 to raise public awareness and appreciation of Significant Natural Areas Support in Amend to include an objective and policies to protect biodiversity outside of a Significant Natural Area part Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 186 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Fraser Chistopher Maxwell (Riverlea Environment Society) 793.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Marilyn Cecil Hayward 794.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Tanya Lisa Whitehead 795.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Fiona Maxine Greenwood 796.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Russelle Knaap 797.001 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or wall is 1.8m Russelle Knaap 797.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Russelle Knaap 797.003 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) and e) Interface Between Public and Private Justin Greenwood 798.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Lisa Jayne Bust 803.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Aaron Dixon 804.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 187 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hinemoa PekeManawaiti 805.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Starship Childrens Health 806.001 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.6 b) Building Setbacks from Transport Corridor boundary - arterial transport corridors from 8m to 6m Starship Childrens Health 806.001 25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings and Internal Vehicle Access Oppose Amend property design (setbacks, the design of driveways, vehicle manoeuvring areas and the provision of separate play areas) to improve child safety. Levi-Che Ngawaka 807.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.001 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A-Rezone 716 Te Rapa Road from Industrial Zone to a business zone to provide for non-industrial activities. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.002 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Add a policy to provide for non-industrial and retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.003 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule Amend 9.3f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3g) to provide for any retail activity occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, retain 9.3k) amend 9.3l) to provide for office activities existing at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3u) & v) to be a Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle movements. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.004 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.005 9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.006 9.4.6 Site Layout Oppose Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. 808.007 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.2 that limits retail to ancillary only as it is too restrictive Page 188 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Engineering) Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.008 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te Rapa Road which should be able to continue. Alan Gordon Sharp (N.C. Engineering) 808.009 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor space and/or yard-based retail area. Erana Roa 809.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Malaea Cossey 810.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Waihanea Katarina Timu 811.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sheree Fryer 812.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. O. Raihania Timu 813.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd 814.001 3.4 Peacocke Support in Amend the Peacocke Structure Plan to relocate the collector road away from the submitters site or provide flexibility part to allow structure plan features to be located in different areas or in modified form from that shown in the structure plan. Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd 814.002 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use to relocate indicative collector road in Stage 1 of Peacocke as set part out in the submission. Page 189 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd 814.003 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Support in Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network to relocate indicative collector road in part Stage 1 of Peacocke as set out in the submission. Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd 814.004 Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods Support in Amend Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods to relocate indicative collector road part in Stage 1 of Peacocke as set out in the submission. Lynnette Vincent 815.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. George Hape Chase 816.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Peni Rachel Golder 817.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Kay Warrender 818.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Delaine & Cyril Gudgeon 819.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Sherry Te Amohaere Watene 820.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Suzanne Ings 821.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Page 190 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary WEL Networks Limited 822.001 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Seeks the retention of Objective 2.2.13 and Policies 2.2.13a, 2.2.13b and 2.2.13d regarding Integrated Land Use, Integrated Land Use, part Transport and Infrastructure and the amendment of Policy 2.2.13c to refer to infrastructure instead of development. Transport and Infrastructure WEL Networks Limited 822.002 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 4.2.2 and Policies 4.2.2a, 4.2.2b, and 4.2.2d part WEL Networks Limited 822.003 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support WEL Networks Limited 822.004 4.2.8 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 4.2.8. Amend Policy 4.2.8a o refer to energy efficient technologies, instead of a reduction of part reticulated electricity. WEL Networks Limited 822.005 Network Utilities Infrastructure Support in Retain Objective 18.2.3 regarding providing for network utilities to be accommodated within transport corridors and part amend Policies 18.2.3a and 18.2.3b to clarify intent and remove reference to compromising the amenity of the transport network. WEL Networks Limited 822.006 Other Activities and Structures Support Retain Objective 18.2.4 and Policy 18.2.4a regarding other structures located in transport corridors. WEL Networks Limited 822.007 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain Rules 20.3 a) ii, b) ii, e) i, h) i and i) that allows for the trimming, maintenance and removal of Trees to ensure the continuing operation of Network Utilities WEL Networks Limited 822.008 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Seeks the amendment of Policy 22.2.1h regarding new regionally significant infrastructure in Flood Hazard Areas to part replace the word ‘minimised’ with ‘mitigated’. WEL Networks Limited 822.009 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Subdivision - Retain Policies 23.2.2a (v)(x)(xi) WEL Networks Limited 822.010 23.2.4 Objective and Policy Support Subdivision - Retain Objective 23.2.4 and Policy 23.2.4a WEL Networks Limited 822.011 Table 23.3a Support Retain Rule iv) in Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3a General Residential, Residential Intensification, Large Lot Residential, Central City, Business 1 to 7, Industrial, Knowledge, Ruakura Logistics, Ruakura Industrial Park, Future Urban, All Open Space, Major Facilities, Community Facilities and Transport Corridor Zones and All Hazard Areas. WEL Networks Limited 822.012 Table 23.3b Oppose Amend Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3b Medium Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones, and Te Rapa North Industrial Zone WEL Networks Limited 822.013 23.6 Rules – Specific Standards Support in Subdivision - Add a new rule to 23.6 Rules - Specific Standards, to exclude subdivision for accommodating a network part utility. WEL Networks Limited 822.014 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards Support Retain Policy 4.2.3a vi. Retain 23.7a Subdivision Design Standards for network utility services Page 191 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary WEL Networks Limited 822.015 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Support in 24.3.3 Add a new rule that requests any financial contribution imposed on new utility allotments reflects that of the part Council services required by the allotment. WEL Networks Limited 822.016 25.1.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Development Suitability-retain Objective 25.1.2.1 and 25.1.2.1a; Amend policy 25.1.2.1b to include part telecommunications and electricity; amend policy 25.1.2.1c to remove reference to 'Council's' planned infrastructure. WEL Networks Limited 822.017 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(b) which provides for earthworks and vegetation removal involving trenching for infrastructure and network utilities as a permitted activity and small scale earthworks required for day to day network utility activities. Seeks a new rule in 25.3.3 to clarify activity status should a standard in Rule 25.2.4.1 not be complied with. Seeks a new rule to provide for increased earthworks cut depths for infrastructure and network utilities. WEL Networks Limited 822.018 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in to Any Activity in This Plan part and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(b) which provides for earthworks and vegetation removal involving trenching for infrastructure and network utilities as a permitted activity and small scale earthworks required for day to day network utility activities. Seeks a new rule in 25.3.3 to clarify activity status should a standard in Rule 25.2.4.1 not be complied with. Seeks a new rule to provide for increased earthworks cut depths for infrastructure and network utilities. WEL Networks Limited 822.019 25.7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1f, 25.7.2.1g, 25.7.2.1h, 25.7.2.1i and 25.7.2.1j. part Amend Policies 25.7.2.1a, 25.7.2.1b and 25.1.2.1d to correct errors and specifically refer to the upgrading of network utilities. WEL Networks Limited 822.020 25.7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.2 and Policies 25.7.2.1c and 25.6.2.1d. part Amend Policies 25.7.2.2a and 25.7.2.2e to recognise that network utilities should only be required to minimise 'adverse' effects and that in some cases minimisation may not be possible. Replace Policy 25.7.2.2b with a new policy about network utilities complying with the International Commission on Non-ionising Radiation Protection guidelines. WEL Networks Limited 822.021 25.7.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.3 and Policies 25.7.2.3a, 25.7.2.3b, 25.7.2.3c and 25.7.2.3d. part Amend Policy 25.7.2.3e, by removing iii relating to assured standards of long-term maintenance. WEL Networks Limited 822.022 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain Rules 25.7.3 a), b), c), d), e), k), m), l), p), q), r) and qq). part Amend Rules 25.7.3 f), o), t), s), u), w), x), y), bb), pp) and ss) to alter or clarify the activity status of various network Page 192 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary utilities. Insert new Rules regarding non compliance of general standards and switching stations compliance with general standards. WEL Networks Limited 822.023 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Support – Electricity Transmission Corridors Retain Notes 5, 6 and 8 within 25.7.4 Activity Status - Electricity Transmission Corridors. WEL Networks Limited 822.024 25.7.5.1 Height WEL Networks Limited 822.025 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, provided that amendments requested by the of Antenna, Poles and Masts part submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted. WEL Networks Limited 822.026 25.7.5.3 Separation Distance Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.3 Separation Distance, provided that amendments requested by submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are part accepted. WEL Networks Limited 822.027 25.7.5.4 Size of Panels and Dishes Oppose WEL Networks Limited 822.028 25.7.5.5 Cabinets and Other Structures Support in Amend Rule 25.7.5.5(a) Cabinets and Other Structures to refer to 'equipment'. Retain Rules 25.7.5.5 a) to e) provided part amendments requested by the submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted. WEL Networks Limited 822.029 25.7.5 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend 25.7.5 Rules - General Standards, to include a new standard in relation to Temporary Diesel-Fuelled Generation part Activities. WEL Networks Limited 822.030 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend definitions for; ‘building’, ‘buildings housing network utility equipment’, ‘electricity distribution’, ‘minor part upgrading’, ‘regionally significant infrastructure’ and ‘small and community-scale energy generation’ Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.1 Height, provided amendments requested by the submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted. part Delete Rule 25.7.5.4 a) and b) regarding the Size of Panels and Dishes and seeks inclusion of new note to 24.7.5.4 about the installation of distribution generation equipment. Retain definitions for; 'cabinet', 'hazardous facility', 'line', 'network utility', 'notional boundary' and 'structures associated with the generation, storage, transmission or distribution of any network utility’ WEL Networks Limited 822.031 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use to provide for a network utilities corridor from Silverdale Road to the Waikato part Expressway designation; request provisions to enable network utility connections to transportation networks. Jarom Gudgeon 823.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Jenny Jenkins 824.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Page 193 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Maxine Roberta Fraser 825.001 25.14.1 Purpose Support Ruth Robinson (Nemesys Ltd) 826.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Ken & Hong Shang & Wang 827.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads Myles Aidan Watene 828.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Eric Oler 829.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Gretchen Cume 830.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct. Oppose Supports 25.14.1 Transportation if older suburbs are retrofitted with safe pedestrian crossing points. Page 194 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Kung-Yao Lin 831.001 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.002 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.005 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.006 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Kung-Yao Lin 831.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt. Page 195 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary James & Heather Hely & Montgomerie 832.001 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend Rules 23.7.3 d),e), f), i), j), k), h) to enable subdivision at 2500m2 in the Large Lot Residential Zone as a part Permitted Activity. James & Heather Hely & Montgomerie 832.002 4.1.4 Large Lot Residential Zone Support in Amend Rules 23.7.3 (d),(e), (f), (i), (j), (k), (h) regarding access standards to enable development of the Large Lot part Residential Zone as a Permitted Activity and enable the early development of the residential land in the north of the Ruakura Structure Plan. James & Heather Hely & Montgomerie 832.003 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Support in Retain Subdivision Design Standards 23.7.3 d, e, f, i, j, k, and h General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and part All Special Character Zones with amendments. Jamey Etika 833.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Eddie Willison 834.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Page 196 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary Marsters 835.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt. Richard Grant Herewini 836.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Baz Paama 837.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. The Ministry of Education 838.001 3.4.2.3 Commercial Community Nodes Oppose Amend 3.4.2.3 to remove references and identification of a secondary school site in Peacocke Area. The Ministry of Education 838.002 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Replace the definitions for 'schools', 'childcare facilities' and 'tertiary education institutions' with an all-encompassing definition of "Education and Training Facilities" as contained in the Operative District Plan The Ministry of Education 838.003 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Oppose Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces to reduce the car and bus parking requirements for Childcare Facilities, Schools, Trade and Industry Training Facilities and Tertiary education and specialised training facilities. Pita Witehira 839.001 Appendix 8 Heritage Oppose Amend 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures to ensure meaningful consultation with Iwi/Maori to ensure structures of Significance to Maori and of National Importance are protected. George William Holland 840.001 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support Support, but seek amendments to ensure future development in Hamilton strongly places Tangata Whenua values and appropriate cultural images and New Zealand natural heritage in the centre of these developments allowing for a New Zealand landscape and native flora and fauna being observed in our neighbourhoods. George William Holland 840.002 2.2.8 Objective and Policies Tangata Whenua Waikato Support Strongly support policy 2.2.8a) given its accordance with the Treaty of Waitangi, however it needs amendment to ensure cultural icons are identified and developed (including Waikato flora and fauna) providing a strong ecological Page 197 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui base for Tangata Whenua cultural development. George William Holland 840.003 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Add a new policy 2.2.10e to ensure Development shall be sensitive to and enhance the Natural Hamilton’s Identity, part Landscape. Character and Heritage George William Holland 840.004 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone Support Amend 5.1.3 Special Natural Area to ensure that development around Lake Waiwhakareke does not impact on the Lake with particular attention given to drainage, plantings and animals. George William Holland 840.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Support Amend Policy 7.2.9 so that more native, eco-sourced trees are planted. George William Holland 840.006 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support George William Holland 840.007 25.3.5.5 Events or Activities Support in Amend Rule 25.3.5.5 to exclude motorised events on Lake Waiwhakareke. Associated with Events on part the Waikato River, Lake Rotokaeo (Forest Lake), Lake Rotoroa (Lake Hamilton) or Lake Waiwhakareke (Horseshoe Lake) – Motorised or Non-motorised George William Holland 840.008 25.5.2 Objectives and Policies Landscaping and Screening Support Amend Policy 25.5.2.1b to require the planting of native species around The Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Park. George William Holland 840.009 Schedule 9C Significant Natural Areas Support Add Crawshaw Park and Te Kooti Park to the Significant Natural Areas Schedule George William Holland 840.010 Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support Lance Edward Kendrick 842.002 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a by reducing the 20ha ratio. Amend Rule 3.7.3.4b stage 2 to reinstate the connections at Greenhill Ruakura Logistics Zone and part Road and Ruakura Rd. Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Lance Edward Kendrick 842.003 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Include additional provisions that relate to run off of pollutants into streams, particularly those that feed Lake Waiwhakareke. Add 7 trees in Hamilton East (21 Mooney Street, Bishops Lane & Odlin Crescent, Crawshaw Park, 103 and 103a Avalon Drive) to the Schedule 9D Significant Trees Supports Policy 11.2.3a Page 198 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lance Edward Kendrick 842.004 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain the non-complying status for activities in Rule 11.3 f) to j). Amend Appendix 1.7 to clarify what is meant by part 'noxious or offensive activities' Lance Edward Kendrick 842.005 25.8.3.5 Helicopter Landing Area Noise Oppose Lance Edward Kendrick 842.006 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Support in Amend 3.7.1.3 to provide very wide buffer strips between the proposed Industrial areas and existing Residential areas. part A & A King Family Trust 844.001 9.1 Purpose Support in Amend 9.1 to recognise and provide for office/retail development in the industrial zone where it complements the City part Centre. A & A King Family Trust 844.002 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 9.2 to allow for service type retailing on Industrial Land where such land fronts major arterials, and provide part consistency in the use of Industrial Uses and Industrial Activities. A & A King Family Trust 844.003 9.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 9.2.2a. Industrial developments should follow the principal that ‘form follows function’ especially in part the absence of true design guidelines for industrial development. A & A King Family Trust 844.004 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 9.3 to include activity status for Retail Activities (where providing a service for the local community). part Amend 9.3u) from Controlled to Permitted where the standards within Rules 9.4 and 9.5 are complied with and which generate less than 100 vehicle movements per day. Oppose 25.8.3.5 Helicopter Landing Area Noise limits. Amend Rule 9.3(ff) to clarify which standards within either Rule 9.4 and/or 9.5 need to be met and then add a link to assessment criteria for standards which are not met as part of the Restricted Discretionary Assessment criteria. Remove any requirement for Urban Design assessment where no Urban Design Guidelines for Industrial and or Commercial development have been prepared. CBNZ Ltd 846.001 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.3.1(bb) to exclude the block of land bounded by Dillicar Street, Victoria Street and Boundary Road and instead allow offices in this area as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rules 4.3.1 c), e) and f) so that ancillary residential units and detached dwellings (first and subsequent) are Permitted Activities. Linda Fell 847.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Tony & Christine Lennon 849.001 22.1 Purpose Oppose Seeks that LIM's only note the relevant Flood Hazard Area. Tony & Christine Lennon 849.002 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Seeks that LIM's only note the relevant Flood Hazard Area. Page 199 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tony & Christine Lennon 849.003 Features Map 46B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 44 Cook Street. Janice Ann Verran 854.001 5.4.1 Density Oppose Amend 5.4.1 Density within the Special Character Zones by increasing the minimum area for all building activities to 600m2. Janice Ann Verran 854.002 T Earthworks Oppose Amend to reduce the restrictiveness of earthworks criteria and be consistent with recommendations of Variation 18. Janice Ann Verran 854.003 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria The design guide does not reflect Councils decisions made at Variation 18 Hearing report 3.7.131. The Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area should be deleted from the Operative District Plan and the Residential Rules (4.1) apply. Janice Ann Verran 854.004 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential. Janice Ann Verran 854.005 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4 Building Height to minimum of 1 storey. Max Walker Verran 855.001 5.4.1 Density Oppose Amend 5.4.1 Density by increasing the minimum area required for all building activity to 600m2. Max Walker Verran 855.002 T Earthworks Oppose Amend to reduce the restrictiveness of earthworks criteria and be consistent with recommendations of Variation 18. Max Walker Verran 855.003 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria The design guide does not reflect Councils decisions made at Variation 18 Hearing report 3.7.131. The Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area should be deleted from the Operative District Plan and the Residential Rules (4.1) apply. Max Walker Verran 855.004 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4. Building Height be amended to minimum of 1 storey. Max Walker Verran 855.005 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential. Anthony Paul Smart 857.001 Figure 15-5f Transport corridor hierarchy plan Oppose Retain current corridor - Opposes Tristram Street being identified as a Major Arterial Transport Corridor in the Transport corridor hierarchy plan. Anthony Paul Smart 857.002 Zoning Map 36A Oppose Map 36A-retain current zoning on the Corner of Mill Street and Willoughby Street. Oaklands Group Holdings Ltd 858.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Page 200 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzu-ling Wan 861.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt. Perry Group Limited 862.001 7.1.2 Precinct 2 – City Living Precinct Oppose Amend 7.1.2 so that there is additional focus on commercial activities as part of the mixed use City Living Precinct. Perry Group Limited 862.002 7.2 Objectives and Policies Central City Zone Oppose Amend Policies in 7.2.1 to 7.2.7 by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Perry Group Limited 862.003 7.2.7 Objective and Policies City Living Precinct Oppose Oppose the residential focus of the City living precinct. Perry Group Limited 862.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Objective 7.2.7 to include Commercial mixed use development and remove reference to small scale offices. Amend Rule 7.3 a) and b) by providing for new buildings and alterations in the City Living Precinct as a Controlled Activity. Amend 7.3n) by making offices > 500m2 gfa a Permitted Activity status in the City Living Precinct. Perry Group Limited 862.005 7.4.1 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.1a) by replacing the 60% maximum site coverage standard for the City Living Precinct with 80%. Perry Group Limited 862.006 7.4.9 Car Parking Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.9 a) so that it only applies to sites with a Primary Active Frontage. Perry Group Limited 862.007 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.4 g Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus to include Toilets available for public use and to be used by the disabled and Provision of Riverbank Pedestrian Promenade in the development. Page 201 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of the through site. Perry Group Limited 862.008 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve replacing the pedestrian promenades width of 5m with a minimum of 3m and; Add an advice note to Appendix 1.4.7.3 Riverfront Development Design Principles outlining Council responsibility Perry Group Limited 862.009 1.4.7.3 Design Principles Oppose i) Amend Rule 7.5.3 and Appendix 1.4.7.3b) by deleting the 5m minimum width for the Pedestrian Promenade and substituting a 3m minimum width; Add an additional 'advice note' to the Design Principles that outlines Council responsibilities for the promenade. Perry Group Limited 862.010 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 7.6a i and ii regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, and relocated buildings by removing consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12. Oppose Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor read like a rule. Perry Group Limited 862.011 Building Separation Amend Assessment Criteria for Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add in a definition for internal boundaries. Perry Group Limited 862.012 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site Oppose 3 – Victoria on the River Perry Group Limited 862.013 1.4 Design Guides and Design Support in Add advice Note in Section 1.1.2.2. n) that any development requiring a land use consent including regard to urban Assessment Criteria part design will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel and the role of the Urban Design Panel be amended to exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent. Perry Group Limited 862.014 9.2 Objectives and Policies Industrial Zone Oppose Replace the use of 'shall' in Policies 9.2 with 'should', to reduce the rigidity of a policy being applied like a rule. Perry Group Limited 862.015 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rules 9.3u) & 9.3v) by replacing the Controlled Activity status with Permitted Activity status for ‘New Buildings’ and ‘Alterations and Additions’ as provided, and delete Rule 9.3ff). Add a new note to Rule 9.3 u) & v) & w). Perry Group Limited 862.016 Zoning Map 1A Oppose Map 1A -reduce the width of the Natural Open Space Zone over the land adjacent to the Waikato River bank north of Hutchinson Road. Perry Group Limited 862.017 Zoning Map 2A Oppose Map 2A-reduce the width of the Natural Open Space Zone over the land adjacent to the Waikato River bank north of Hutchinson Road. Retain 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site 3 – Victoria on the River with amendments to broaden the possible mix of uses; amend Figures 1.6.4 v – x to remove building footprints and delete the cross-sections. Page 202 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Perry Group Limited 862.018 Features Map 1B Oppose Amend the designation for the Waikato Expressway (E99a) to remove the designation from the redundant ‘dog leg area’ as identified. Perry Group Limited 862.019 12.1 Purpose Oppose Seeks an amendment to 12.1a) Purpose, with the deletion of the word ‘limited’ in regard to providing for industrial activity to develop. Perry Group Limited 862.020 12.2 Objectives and Policies Te Rapa North Industrial Zone Oppose Seeks replacement of 'shall' with 'should' in Policies 12.2.1a; 12.2.1b; 12.2.1c; 12.2.2a; 12.2.3a; 12.2.3c; 12.2.3d; 12.2.3f. Perry Group Limited 862.021 12.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Seeks amendment to the explanation for 12.2.4 Objective and Policies, with the addition of 'coupled with the flexibility' in regard to infrastructure and enabling development. Perry Group Limited 862.022 12.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Seeks amendments to Rules 12.3h) and 12.3n) Activity Status Table; and the insertion of a Note referencing that only NZTA would be deemed an affected person for the purposes of notification. Perry Group Limited 862.023 12.4.1 Building Setbacks Oppose Seeks amendment to 12.4.1c) vi Building Setbacks to remove reference to Open Space Zone. Perry Group Limited 862.024 12.4.8 Transportation Oppose Seeks amendment to activity status for Rule 12.4.8a)ii) Transportation from Discretionary to Restricted Discretionary. Perry Group Limited 862.025 12.7 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Seeks deletion of Rule 12.7a) i and v, Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Perry Group Limited 862.026 b Concept Development Plan Oppose for Stage 1B Delete Appendix 1.1 D b) xiii in relation to requiring compliance with 25.13- Three Waters Perry Group Limited 862.027 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent. Perry Group Limited 862.028 25.13.4.6 Water Impact Assessments Oppose Amend 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) to exclude activities and development in accordance with an approved Concept Development Plan for Stage 1B Te Rapa North Industrial Zone from requiring a Water Impact Assessment. Perry Group Limited 862.029 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) ii) to exclude new activities in the Te Rapa North Industrial Zone where in accordance with an approved Concept Development Plan from requiring an Integrated Transport Assessment. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the Seeks amendment to Rule 12.7a) iv, Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Page 203 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary property. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.004 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.005 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.006 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt. Raylene & Saul Cowie & Spriggs 864.007 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. DNZ Property Fund Limited 866.001 Zoning Map 26A Support Map 26A-Support the zoning of 446 Te Rapa Road as Business 4. Andrew Paul Knox (Laras Holdings Ltd) 867.001 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-Oppose rezoning of land within Seddon, Somerset, Lake and Hall sts/rds from commercial service to industrial. Rezone this land to Central City Zone (City Living Precinct). Bruce Maxwell Winders 868.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Raymond John Bird (Birds Plant & Equipment Trust) 869.001 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-delete Key Development site 1 criteria and replace with Central City Zone. Raymond John Bird (Birds Plant & Equipment Trust) 869.002 Key Development Site 1 Cobham Drive Oppose Remove Key Development Site 1 Cobham Drive and rezone Central City Zone. Barry James 870.001 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Confirm future reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. Page 204 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Crawshaw Hamilton Youth Council 871.001 19 Historic Heritage Support That HCC consider targeted educational programmes to familiarise young people with the history and heritage of their city to raise their understanding of the city's rich history and heritage. Hamilton Youth Council 871.002 7 Central City Zone Support Supports the planned mixed-use precinct developments as they further economic growth within the city, and promote a centralized hub of social and commercial activity. Hamilton Youth Council 871.003 Appendix 15 Transportation Support Supports the Transportation provisions emphasizing pedestrian, cycle and passenger transport and the integration of land use and transport networks. Hamilton Youth Council 871.004 4 Residential Zones Support Supports the provisions to ensure diverse and well designed residential accommodation options within the central city and high density areas for young people, particularly students. Hamilton Youth Council 871.005 2 Strategic Framework Support Supports the use of growth management strategies to make the city more sustainable in the future (particularly affordability of infrastructure). Seek more dedicated consultation with Youth Groups to capture their views on these strategic themes going forward. May Tan 872.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Retain Rule 4.4.7c) noting that Council should consider how trees in the roads could block light and visibility and Figure 1.4.2e) regarding surveillance towards walkway links. Amend the Objectives and Policies to clearly articulate the rationale for Rule 4.4.7. Undertake a review of the relationship between the provisions of Rule 4.4.7 and building design, section size, shape or orientation and require garaging forward of the dwelling to have two clear glazed windows facing the road. Raymond John Bird (Birds Plant and Equipment Trust) 873.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-Rezone 5, 9, 11 and 13 Fifth Avenue Business 6 not Residential Intensification. Borman Parkside LP 874.001 Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use Seeks the deletion of 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4 and 'The Local Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-5. Borman Parkside LP 874.002 Figure 2-5 Rototuna Structure Plan-Transport Network Support in Figure 2-5 Rototuna Structure Plan-Transport Network - Seeks the deletion of 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4 part and 'The Local Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-5. Borman Parkside LP 874.003 Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network Support Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network In the submitter's view, Figure 2-6 indicates a cycling and walking network path(s) along the north side of Future Reserve. Should these objections not be upheld in their submission, Council as the future owner of the reserve will be expected to provide the major funding for the corridors. Gillian James 875.001 3.4.3 Transport Network Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to re-route the Arterial Route shown on the western side of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in the submission. Page 205 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Gillian James 875.002 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network to re-route the Major Arterial Transport Corridor Route shown on the western side of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in the submission. Peter Dornauf 876.002 Schedule 8B Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Oppose That archaeological / cultural sites that are list in Schedule 8C Group Archaeological and Cultural Sites 'for information purposes', seems entirely inadequate. Mighty River Power Limited 877.001 15.2 Objectives and Policies Open Space Zones Support in Retain Objectives 15.2.1 to 15.2.6 and insert a new Objective and Policy regarding renewable electricity generation part and the Waikato Hydro Scheme. Mighty River Power Limited 877.002 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the activity status table in Rule 15.3v) to include boat ramps. Amend Rule 15.3.ad) and add new activities to part rule 15.3 to recognise the operating range of the Waikato Hydro System. Mighty River Power Limited 877.003 15.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend the Matters of Discretionary and Assessment Criteria for Pontoon/Jetty in Rule 15.7 a) iv) to include new Activities Matters of part assessment criteria. Add in a new controlled activity for discharge or intake structures and any ancillary structures. Discretion and Assessment Criteria Mighty River Power Limited 877.004 1.1 Controlled Activities – Matters of Control Support in Add a further provision to the Controlled Activities Assessment Criteria for the Open Space Zones for Discharge or part Intake Structures and ancillary structures. Mighty River Power Limited 877.005 W Surface of Water Support in Amend Assessment Criteria 1.2W Surface of Water to include reference to the Waikato Hydro Scheme Operating part Range. Mighty River Power Limited 877.006 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria Support in Amend 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria by adding reference to the Waikato Hydro System Operating part Range. Mighty River Power Limited 877.007 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Seeks the retention of policies 22.2.1a, 22.2.1b, 22.2.1c, 22.2.1d, 22.2.1h, 22.2.1i, 22.2.1j and 22.2.1k; amend part Objective 22.2.1, policies 22.2.1e, 22.2.1f and 22.2.1l regarding natural hazards to improve consistency with the Proposed Regional Policy Statement terminology and improve clarity. Mighty River Power Limited 877.008 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Seeks the retention of Rule 22.3; part Add new activity to Rule 22.3 that new water infrastructure within the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area is a Discretionary Activity. Mighty River Power Limited 877.009 22.5 Rules – Specific Standards Support in Seeks the retention of Rules 22.5.6, 22.5.7, 22.5.8 and 22.8 as notified. part Mighty River Power Limited 877.010 1.5.8 Flood Risk Assessment Report Support Mighty River Power Limited 877.011 1.5.9 Site Management Plan Support Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.8 regarding a Flood Risk Assessment Report. Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.9 regarding a Site Management Plan. Page 206 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Mighty River Power Limited 877.012 1.5.10 Stormwater Disposal Report Support Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.10 regarding a Stormwater Disposal Report. Mighty River Power Limited 877.013 25.7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 25.7.2.2 Objective and corresponding explanation to exclude renewable electricity generation activities. part Add a new objective in relation to the Waikato Hydro Scheme and the associated policy and explanation. Mighty River Power Limited 877.014 25.7.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.3, Policies 25.7.2.3a, 25.7.2.3b, 25.7.2.3c, 25.7.2.3e, and Rule 25.7.3. part Amend Policy 25.7.2.3d iv. by deleting 'or compensation'. Mighty River Power Limited 877.015 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Retain Rules 25.7.3 nn) to ss). Mighty River Power Limited 877.016 25.13.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objectives 25.13.2.2 (Three Waters) and Policy 25.13.2.2a regarding promotion of water efficiency. Mighty River Power Limited 877.017 25.13.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 25.13.2.3 (Three Waters) and Policies 25.13.2.3a, 25.13.2.3b, 25.13.2.3c and 25.13.2.3d regarding promotion of water efficiency measures and the efficient staging of subdivision and development. Antonia Whilhelmina Haronga 878.001 Features Map 43B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 64 Massey Street. Isobel Anne Bennett (YWCA (Young Womans' Christian Association) of Hamilton Inc) 879.001 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 19.3 i) of Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of a structure or building ranked B a Discretionary Activity. Graeme Errol & Maureen Gladys Matthews (Matthews Bed and Breakfast) 882.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential rather than Residential Intensification. Graeme Errol & Maureen Gladys Matthews (Matthews Bed and Breakfast) 882.002 Features Map 38B Support Support Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B Page 207 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary CCS Disability Action Waikato 883.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: A Visionary District Plan, The Disabled Community, Ability levels, Contrasting planning controls, Dwelling density, Older housing stock, Future population demographics, Inner city development, Transport routes, Older persons villages, Restaurants and commercial properties, Provision for the visually impaired, Consultation with the Disabled Community, An Accessible Environment. Refer submission for full details. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.002 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.003 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of permeable surfaces. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.004 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.005 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards. part Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.006 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.007 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or part wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.008 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to location of Outdoor Living Areas. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.009 4.11 Notification Rule Oppose Amend Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule to ensure certainty as to how a development will be managed through the resource consent process. Delete or amend Rule 4.4.9 Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy as the 5m separation distance is too large. Page 208 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.010 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d as it unreasonable to restrict privacy of landowners. part Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.011 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4 e) and f) as these policies unreasonably favour public amenity over private property rights.. part Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.012 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Delete the assessment criteria for Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 Permeable surface; Rule 4.4.7 Interface between public and private; Rule 4.4.8 Fences and walls; Rule 4.4.9 Separation and privacy. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.013 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.014 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Seeks the deletion of assessment criteria in Rule 25.2.6 regarding earthworks. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.015 25.2.7 Notification Rule Support in Seeks amendments so that resource consents for earthworks on sites with slopes less than 20 degrees are nonpart notified. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.016 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Seeks amendments so that resource consents for earthworks and vegetation removal on sites with slopes less than 20 Table part degrees are non-notified. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.017 25.15.1 Purpose Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.15 Urban Design to ensure design guidance applies only to developments that do not part meet specific performance standards. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.018 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 19.3 h) and i) of Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of structures or buildings ranked A or B a Discretionary Activity. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.019 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Oppose Amend Policy 19.2.3a Buildings and Structures to provide an exception to deal with buildings which have a poor earthquake rating and may pose a safety risk. Page 209 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.020 1 Plan Overview Oppose Delete references to design guides. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.021 1.4.1.6 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.022 1.4.1.7 Fences Oppose Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a height limit of 1.8m. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.023 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with the limits in the Operative District Plan. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.024 C General Oppose E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.025 E Safe Environments Oppose E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.026 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone Oppose Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.027 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Replace Rule 9.3u) with permitted activity status. Shona Betty Shaw (Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd) 884.028 9.6 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Oppose Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings. Hamilton Grey Power 885.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose This submission refers to the following themes: Purpose is to comply with Resource Management Act 1991, Primacy of Central City is overall aim, Council discourages private motor vehicle use, Unnecessary restrictions, Increases to building costs, Increased urban sprawl. Refer to the full submission for details. Rowena Kaleopa 886.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Loss of property rights, Unnecessary restrictions on design of homes and conformity to a rigid set of rules, Loss of private motor vehicle use in favour of walking, cycling and Page 210 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary passenger transport, Human settlements where people will be brought in to the cities and off of rural lands. Refer to the full submission for details. Pat McNair 887.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom, Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business development. Refer to the full submission for details. Barry McNair 888.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom, Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business development. Refer to the full submission for details. Elizabeth de Jong 889.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom, Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business development. Refer to the full submission for details. CMVP Samarawickrema 890.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom, Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business development. Refer to the full submission for details. Tom (Alan Douglas) MacRae 891.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom, Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business development. Refer to the full submission for details. Brian Haskell 892.001 1 Plan Overview Oppose Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Purpose of District Plan, Primacy of Central City is overall aim, Council is anti-private motor vehicle use, Unnecessary restrictions, Increased development and building costs, Rate increases from more Council costs, Future residential developments, Increased building costs. Refer to the full submission for details. Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club 894.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-Rezone the Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club with Residential Intensification Zone and a Visitor Facilities Overlay. Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club 894.002 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-Rezone the Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club with Residential Intensification Zone and a Visitor Facilities Overlay. Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club 894.003 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Oppose Amend Rule 4.3.1 to provide for 'Licensed Premises' as a Discretionary Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone. Page 211 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Residential Zone Harry & Lloyd Hoebergen & Seeney, et al 895.001 14 Future Urban Zone Support in Seeks an expansion of the City's Boundary to include land from the current boundary to the west to Wallace Road. part Submitter would like their previous submission April 2010, 10/0106 to be considered in tandem with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust board submission. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.001 Zoning Map 54A Oppose Map 54A-Rezone the vacant industrial land south of Gilbass Avenue from Industrial to General Residential. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.002 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend definition of "Comprehensive Residential Development" Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.003 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.3.1 to provide for Comprehensive Residential Development as a Restricted Discretionary Activity in General Residential Zone only. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.004 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1a) by adding new standards for Comprehensive Residential Development, at 300m2 per residential unit in the General Residential Zone. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.005 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 by adding Comprehensive Residential Development as a non notified activity. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.006 23.6 Rules – Specific Standards Oppose Amend Specific Standards 23.6.11 Comprehensive Residential Development Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.007 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards Oppose Amend 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards to exclude Lot 3 DPS 20152 (CT:19B/1282), Allot 468 Te Rapa Parish (CT:3A/132) and Lot 2 being a proposed subdivision of Pt Lot 2 DPS 19840 and Part Lot 1 DP 33638 Te Rapa Parish Allot 469 Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.008 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend Chapter 4 to make provision for Comprehensive Residential Development as provided for in the Operative District Plan. Gilbass Developments Ltd 896.009 4.7 Rules – Specific Standards – All Residential Zones Support in Amend Rule 4.7 by inserting a new provision for Comprehensive Residential Development as follows: part 'Minimum site area to undertake a Comprehensive Residential Development is 2000m2' CKC Holdings Ltd 897.001 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose CKC Holdings Ltd 897.002 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend Rule 4.3.1 to change: Delete Policy 4.2.4e as it is in conflict with Policy 4.2.1a i. Page 212 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone part Apartments in the General Residential Zone from Discretionary to Restricted Discretionary; Apartments in the Residential Intensification zone from Restricted Discretionary to Controlled; Duplex dwellings in the Large Lot Residential Zone to be Discretionary; Retain Duplex dwellings in the General Residential Zone as Restricted Discretionary; Insert new activity - Comprehensive Residential Development activity as provided for in the Operative District Plan. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.003 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend 4.4.1a) by inserting the activity Comprehensive Residential Development with an average minimum net site part area of 300m2; Amend 4.4.1a)i. by deleting text "400m2 per residential unit" for General Residential Zone and replace with "minimum lot area of 350m2"; Amend 4.4.1a)iii. in the Residential Intensification zone by inserting the word 'average' immediately after the words 'minimum' and 'maximum'; Do not apply Net site Area to apartments in any residential zone. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.004 4.4.2 Site Coverage Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase site coverage in General Residential and Residential Intensification Zone (except part Hamilton East Character Area). CKC Holdings Ltd 897.005 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Support in Amend Rules 4.4.3a), 4.4.3b) and Figure 4.4.3d. to enable alternative options to meet permeability requirements; part exclude access paths and driveways; the permeable surface for Residential Intensification Zone be 10%. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.006 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8 to express that "Close paling" for fencing over 1.2m high shall not use timber palings forward of a part house. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.007 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Support in Amend Rule 4.4.9 a) ii and 4b) by amending existing or inserting further text to clarify other screening techniques and part options to be achieve the intent of the rule to ensure separation and privacy. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.008 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10b)iv by inserting text 'where possible'; part Amend 4.4.1.c)i. by reducing the outdoor living area from 60m2 to 40m2, and deleting "6m diameter circle. No dimension less than 2.5m" and replace with '5m diameter circle, minimum dimension 2.5m'; Amend 4.4.1e by deleting text "and additional to " and replacing with 'but cannot contribute more than 50%'. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.009 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential Intensification zone. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.010 4.6.4 Residential Unit Size Oppose Amend Rule 4.6.4 to reduce the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and insert an additional point iv. to provide a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms". CKC Holdings Ltd 897.011 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private CKC Holdings Ltd 897.012 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Oppose Transport Corridors Replace 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Transport Corridors with reference to NZS4404 to provide for greater design flexibility for transport corridors. If retained, seeks various amendments. Page 213 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary CKC Holdings Ltd 897.013 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Support in Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - so that a Comprehensive Development Plan in the part Medium-density residential zone is not subject to notification; and the activity status changed to either 'Permitted' or 'Controlled'. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.014 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend Rule 4.5.3 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - so that a CDP in the Medium-density residential zone is Medium-Density Residential part not subject to notification; and change the activity status. Zone CKC Holdings Ltd 897.015 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan CKC Holdings Ltd 897.016 1.4 Design Guides and Design Support in Simplify 1.4 Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria and reference "Vista". Assessment Criteria part CKC Holdings Ltd 897.017 Zoning Map 62A Support Map 62A-Retain zoning of Stan Heather Park as General Residential Zone. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.018 Zoning Map 37A Support Map 37A-Retain proposed zoning on corner of Brooklyn and Heaphy Tce. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.019 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 6.3 ww) and xx) so that Apartments in Business 2 Zone are a restricted discretionary activity. Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. Amend 6.3 f) so that Light industry in Business 2 Zone are a restricted discretionary activity. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.020 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule in 6.6a) ii so that the non-notification Rule (6.7) applies to light industrial activities. part CKC Holdings Ltd 897.021 Table 23.3a Oppose CKC Holdings Ltd 897.022 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards Support in Amend 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards to exclude minimum/maximum areas from subdivision areas with an part approved land use consent. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.023 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Support in Amend 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape to include a minimum average size of 300m2 for Comprehensive Residential part Development. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.024 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Support in Delete all clauses within 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones part except private way widths and retain current standards. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.025 23.7.4 Residential Support in Delete all clauses within 23.7.4 Residential Intensification Zone except private way widths and retain current Retain Rule 23.3a) iii. Amend the activity status for subdivision covered by Rule 23.3a) vi, v and viii to a less restrictive status. Page 214 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Intensification Zone part standards. CKC Holdings Ltd 897.026 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-Oppose re-zoning of land in the general Frankton area to industrial. Retain existing zoning with an introduction of mixed use residential. Rakaipaka Puriri 898.001 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Oppose Include posts on blog www.saveccnz.wordpress.com as independent submissions against 5.1.4 Temple View Zone. Forlongs Furnishings Limited 899.001 25.3.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 25.3.1(b) to include the potential adverse effects on the efficiency and convenience of pedestrian part facilities and vehicle parking. Forlongs Furnishings Limited 899.002 25.3.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 25.3.2.2a (iii) so consideration is given to matters of efficiency and convenience of pedestrian facilities part and vehicle parking. Forlongs Furnishings Limited 899.003 25.3.2 Objectives and Policies Events and Temporary Activities Support in Amend Policy 25.3.2 - Explanation by adding the words 'limited scale' to first sentence of the explanation. part Forlongs Furnishings Limited 899.004 25.3.5 Rules – Specific Standards Support in Add new Rules to 25.3.5 for 'Temporary Activities in a public place' to control temporary markets, stalls and retail part activities in public spaces. Forlongs Furnishings Limited 899.005 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the Definition of 'Temporary activities in a public place' to specify a maximum of 20 days or part days operation part per calendar year where a market can operate as a permitted activity. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.002 Features Map 45B Oppose Amend Planning Map 45B by including the Central Post Office as a Built Heritage B Ranking. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.003 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Delete 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria which relates to Internal Alterations of buildings ranked A. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.004 19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Delete 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities, Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria in its entirety. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.005 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition of "High Intensity Sign" SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.006 25.10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Delete Rule 25.10.3(f) in its entirety in relation to low intensity signs on heritage buildings. Amend Policy 25.3.2.2b to refer to effects on surrounding activities, pedestrian facilities and vehicle parking. Page 215 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.007 7 Central City Zone Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.3 and Appendix 1.4.7.3 by deleting the 5m minimum width for the Pedestrian Promenade and substituting a 3m minimum width. Amend Appendix 1.4.7.3 Riverfront Development Design Guide - Promenade and Open Space by adding an Advice Note about Council purchasing or taking as reserve contribution, any land on the riverbank side of the promenade for vesting and developing as a recreation reserve. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.008 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rules 7.3 ee) & ff) to make Parking Lots operating for up to 2 years a Restricted Discretionary activities and longer than 2 years a Discretionary Activity. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.009 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.4 g) Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus - to include Toilets available for public use and to be used by the disabled and Provision of Riverbank Pedestrian Promenade in the development. . Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of the through site. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.010 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 7.6a i and ii regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, and relocated buildings by removing consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12. Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor read like a rule. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.011 Building Separation Oppose Amend Assessment Criteria for Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add in a definition for internal boundaries. SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd 900.012 25.15 Urban Design Support in Rule 25.15 Urban Design - Seeks clarity on the role of the Urban Design Panel and VISTA in light of the urban design part focus of the Proposed District Plan. Inclusion of an advice note in section 1.1.2.2. n) to make it clear that any development which requires a land use consent including regard to urban design aspects will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel; Clarity of the role of the Urban Design Panel to exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent including consideration of urban design aspects. Andrea Graves 901.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Andrea Graves 901.002 9.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Give the Significant Natural Areas more protection from the effects of industrial activity - for example with respect to part distances between the activity and the Significant Natural Area. Howard Ian Johnston 902.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Page 216 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Graham Mckelvey (PFS Engineering) 903.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Supports provisions that protect the ability of Industrial companies to continue to provide heavy engineering services to the market in the greater Waikato by retaining the Industrial zoning. Amend the plan to increase the Environmental protection area and heavy planting of native trees around the industrial area to provide a buffer from residential property. Philip Edward & Frances Dene Letford 904.001 Figure 15-5e Transport corridor hierarchy plan Support in Opposes the location of the proposed arterial transport corridor on Stage 2 of the Peacocke Structure Plan in relation part to 144 Hall Road. Mark Sullivan (Barry and Sullivan Electrical Ltd) 905.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Stephen George Bigwood 906.001 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Ruakura Structure Plan amend connections to be consistent with designations; include staging on the map from part staging rules; include 20m reserve along Wairere Dr. Stephen George Bigwood 906.002 Zoning Map 38A Support in Map 38A-include a 20m wide ‘Future Reserve’ along the full length of Wairere Drive. part Stephen George Bigwood 906.003 11.4.7 Site Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 to require landscaping of the industrial park zone prior to development. part Stephen George Bigwood 906.004 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Support Stephen George Bigwood 906.005 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support Supports objective 3.7.2.5 and policies 3.7.2.5a and b for the creation of high quality industrial park zone. Stephen George Bigwood 906.006 11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 11.2.2, 11.2.3 and Policies 11.2.1b, 11.2.2a and 11.2.3a to create a high quality industrial park with no adverse amenity impacts. Stephen George Bigwood 906.007 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Support in Ruakura Structure Plan Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend connections to be consistent with designations; part Stephen George Bigwood 906.008 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove possible interchanges which are inconsistent with part designations. Stephen George Bigwood 906.009 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Support in Ruakura Structure Plan -amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove interchange connections inconsistent with designations. Structure Plan-Waste Water part Infrastructure Supports 3.7.1.3 as it indicates outcomes which enable the creation of high quality amenity industrial park zone. Page 217 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Stephen George Bigwood 906.010 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Support in Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to remove the possible interchange connections to the Waikato Expressway which are part inconsistent with the Waikato Expressway Designation. Stephen George Bigwood 906.011 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging part provides for as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Stephen George Bigwood 906.012 3.7.3 Rules Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging part provides for as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Stephen George Bigwood 906.013 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging part provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Stephen George Bigwood 906.014 11.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging part provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Stephen George Bigwood 906.015 11.5 Rules – Specific Standards Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging part provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Stephen George Bigwood 906.016 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v with the removal of the words "or the industrial park area immediately north of the knowledge Ruakura Logistics Zone and part zone (ie west of the north-south spine road)" or amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v by adding a proviso that the Fifth Avenue, Five Cross Roads and Boundary Road transport Corridor has been upgraded to four lanes prior to development’ Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Jennifer & John West 909.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Opposes the Ruakura Structure Plan containing an Inland Port and the land alongside Silverdale and Ruakura Roads being designated as "Industrial". If progressed, amend the plan to require mitigation measures to ensure effects do not impact on either residents or places of education, including, hours of operation, glare, noise, dust, height restrictions, visual amenity, recreation and ecological corridors, shading, biological security, noxious industry, nature of secondary support and transportation activities. Jennifer & John West 909.002 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Opposes the Ruakura Structure Plan containing an Inland Port and the land alongside Silverdale and Ruakura Roads being designated as "Industrial". If progressed, amend the plan to require mitigation measures to ensure effects do not impact on either residents or places of education, including, hours of operation, glare, noise, dust, height restrictions, visual amenity, recreation and ecological corridors, shading, biological security, noxious industry, nature of secondary support and transportation activities. Page 218 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. Bryce & Natasha Carmichael 910.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.001 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose It is important that the extensive city wide infrastructure improvements are utilised before opening up new areas for development, particularly at Ruakura. A new policy should be included in the District Plan to require at least 70% uptake of existing industrial land before new industrial land is made available, including for logistics activities. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.002 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose It is important that the extensive city wide infrastructure improvements are utilised before opening up new areas for development, particularly at Ruakura. A new policy should be included in the District Plan to require at least 70% uptake of existing industrial land before new industrial land is made available, including for logistics activities. Hugh and Katie 911.003 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete Ruakura Structure Plan and requests consultation occurs with the community. Page 219 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Goodman and Mayes Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.004 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Oppose Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has made a decision on the location and style of interchange on the Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of land in Ruakura prior to 2021. Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on completion of the Hamilton Waikato Expressway. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.005 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose Policy 10.2.1a and 3.7.3.4 with the release of 80 ha within the Ruakura Structure Plan prior to 2021 without the completion of the Waikato Expressway. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.006 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 10.2.3a(iv) to ensure adverse effects from logistics and industrial activities are appropriately minimised part when assessed from all existing residential properties. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.007 10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain general industrial activities and commercial activities in the logistics zone as non-complying and retain logistics part and freight-handling as restricted discretionary. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.008 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition of "Logistics and freight-handling infrastructure" part Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.009 10.4.5 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5 so that “Provision and use of artificial lighting, producing an illuminance in excess of 150 lux, part measured at any point on the site containing the light source, in a horizontal or vertical plane at ground level” is a Discretionary Activity. Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.010 10.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Rule 10.4 to add a standard to the Ruakura Logistics Zone that restricts glare. part Hugh and Katie Goodman and Mayes 911.011 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Support Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones Retain noise standards in 25.8.3.7 Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, 912.001 4.3 Rules – General Oppose Residential, Residential Intensification and Large Lot The Residential Intensification Zoning ascribed to the landowners and/or areas referred to in the submission is opposed. Page 220 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Residential Zones Sub Type Summary Adoption of the amendments outlined in the submission to the Residential Intensification Zone Activities and rules in section 4.3.1 and the subsections of 4.3.1, or The application of the amendments sought to the Residential Intensification Zone Activities and rules outlined in these submissions to 4.3, 4.3.1 and the subsections of 4.3.1, to the area from Gwynne Place (also known as Gwynne St) to 1150 Victoria St, or to properties in Residential Intensification Zone that are currently used for Non-Residential Purposes or are adjacent to properties that are currently used for Non-Residential purposes, or For the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St to be included in the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2 (as per Appendix 5, Figure 5), or For the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St to be included in the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2 to have the attributes, provisions and the features of the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2 incorporated in the activities, provisions and rules that apply to the Residential Intensification Zone and the area specifically outlined, and Incorporate a rule similar to Appendix 15, Table 15-2b that does not require on site parking in area from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St. Any consequential or similar amendments that would have the same or a similar effect, or that serve to satisfy the intent and content of the submission points. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.002 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support in Retain the Permitted Activity status for the activities in Rules a), d), h), i), j), m), v), y), z), ee), jj), mm), rr), ss), and tt). part Amend Rule 4.3.1b) and f) to be a Permitted Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1c) to be a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1e) to be a Permitted Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone. Amend Rule 4.3.1g) to allow for duplex dwellings in the Residential Intensification Zone as a Permitted Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1s) to be a Permitted Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone, or confine the application of the amendment of 4.3.1s) to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street. Amend Rule 4.3.1t) to a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone, or confine the application of the amendment of 4.3.1t) to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street. Page 221 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rule 4.3.1u) to be a Permitted Activity where it is included in or adjoins a non-residential activity, and if a stand alone facility as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1x) to be a Permitted or Controlled Activity, or confine the less onerous Permitted or Controlled Activity status amendment to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street. Amend Rule 4.3.1bb) to be a Permitted or Controlled activity and apply all of the Residential Intensification Zone Area or to properties that are currently used for Non-Residential Purposes or are adjacent to properties that are currently used for Non-Residential Purposes, Or To the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St. Amend Rule 4.3.1dd) to a Controlled Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1gg) to be a Permitted Activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1hh) to be a Permitted or Controlled Activity, or confine the less onerous Permitted or Controlled Activity status amendment to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street Amend Rule 4.3.1 ii) to a Permitted Activity. Include Comprehensive Development rules that facilitates development where the alternative is for an Activity Status other than a Permitted Activity is considered to apply. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & 912.003 7 Central City Zone Support in Amend Plan to enable the area from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria Street to be zoned as Central City Zone and part of part the City Living Precinct. Page 222 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Associates Ltd) Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings and alterations or additions are a Controlled Activity. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.005 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support Retain 7.4.2 Building Intensity regarding the increase in permitted floor area ratio. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside 912.006 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support Retain 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control. Amend 7.3 l), m) n), hh), t), ii), jj), kk), ll), mm) and tt) to allow for offices, retail greater than 250m2, health care services, community centres, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities and visitor accommodation as Permitted Activities. Amend 7.3(x) to delete reference to “on sites fronting Victoria Street” Delete 7.3(y) in its entirety. Page 223 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.007 7.5.4 Residential Oppose Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.008 Table 15-2b Number of Support parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b regarding no minimum car parking requirements in the Central City Zone. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay 912.009 Zoning Map 36A Map 36A-Rezone 1 Gwynne St, 1140 Victoria St, and the areas that include 1 Gwynne St and 1130 Victoria St to 1150 Victoria St from Residential Intensification to Central City-Living Oppose Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units. Page 224 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.010 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A -rezone 1 Gwynne St, 1140 Victoria St and the areas that include 1 Gwynne St and from 1130 to 1150 Victoria St, to an appropriate mixed use zone (i.e. Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2). Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.011 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Precinct 2 to include Gwynne Place and 1130-1150 Victoria Street. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, 912.012 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Plan to enable the area from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria Street to be zoned as Central City Zone and part of part the City Living Precinct. Page 225 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.013 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i. so no maximum is included, or the maximum is 1,350m2 for the Residential Intensification Zone. part Amend Rule 4.4.1a)iv. so no maximum is included, or the maximum is 2,000m2 for the Residential Intensification Zone. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.014 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks, so that side and rear boundary setbacks are 0m unless adjoining a Residential or Special Character Zone when it should be 3m. Page 226 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.015 Features Map 36B Oppose Amend Feature Map 36B and make reference to Chapter 22 so that the submitters Gwynne St and 1140 Victoria Street properties are not affected by rules related to land instability. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) 912.016 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Seeks deletion of policy 22.2.1l; amendments to Feature Map 36B or Chapter 22 so that the submitters Gwynne St and 1140 Victoria Street properties are not affected by rules related to land instability; amendments to clarify land instability and ensure that development can occur within the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area. Peter John Findlay, Donna Margaret Findlay, Peter John Findlay & Donna Margaret Findlay as trustees of the Findlay Family Trust, Riverside Oak Estate Ltd 912.017 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Seeks that Rules 22.3(h), 22.3(j), 22.3(p) relating to new buildings, alterations and additions, and earthworks in the part Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area are Permitted Activities for Gwynne Street and 1140 Victoria Street. Page 227 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.001 1.1.3 Plan Structure Support in Amend 1.1.3 (Plan Structure) to allow a level of flexibility in relation to objectives and policies relating to Structure part Plans. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.002 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Oppose Amend Rule 1.1.8.1 'Activity Not Listed' default from non complying to "discretionary". Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.003 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Supports the objective of an increasingly sustainable urban form for Hamilton. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.004 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Oppose Delete Rule 2.2 as it sets a higher threshold that RMA s.104D for non-complying activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.005 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 2.2.2b and 2.2.2c to allow flexibility for future landuse and market changes, and give effect to Method part 6.13.3 of the Proposed RPS. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.006 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose Resource Efficiency Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.007 3.1 Purpose Support in Retain the Purpose of the Structure Plan Chapter with amendments to include reference to future land use patterns, part staging of development and fiscal/financial/commercial feasibility, as set out in the submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.008 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans Support in Amend the introduction for 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans by deleting the word 'must' and replace with part 'shall' and add the word 'general' as set out in the submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.009 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Structure 3.3.1 Objective and Policies with amendments to recognise that housing density targets will be part achieved over time and will exclude roads and open space zoned land. Include an explanation of achieving higher densities (as set out in the submission). Add a new policy to 2.2.12 that identifies the important role that location and access to infrastructure has in terms of the efficient development of natural and physical resources as set out in the submission. Make amendments to policy for interim land use to allow low density residential development and to focus on future land use patterns rather than the long term vision. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.010 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2a and delete Policy 3.3.2d to regarding infrastructure requirements for development. Amend Policy part 3.3.2e so that the staging and sequencing of development only has to be in general accordance with staging indicated on the relevant structure plan. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.011 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.012 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend 3.7b to update land area; reword 3.7d to relate to strengthening the CBD. Amend 3.7f footnote provides part flexibility if Waikato Expressway not completed; delete 3.7h and associated staging rules in 3.7.3.6. Delete Policy 3.3.4b Page 228 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.013 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone Oppose Amend 3.7.1.4b by deleting "in a manner that does not compromise the Central City" Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.014 3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood Centre Oppose Amend 3.7.1.5 to change the Knowledge Zone Neighbourhood Centre to a Suburban Centre. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.015 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network Support in Amend 3.7.1.7 to create flexibility for the alignment of the transportation network and open space corridor. part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.016 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose Delete objective 3.7.2.2 and policies 3.7.2.2a, 3.7.2.7a. Amend Objectives and Policies 3.7.2.4, 3.7.2.7 and 3.7.2.7b to remove reference to compromising the Central City, and to replace the Neighbourhood Centre in the Knowledge Zone with a Suburban Centre. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.017 3.7.3.3 Infrastructure Delete 3.7.3.3 in relation to infrastructure Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.018 3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a to provide flexibility in relation to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement. Delete 3.7.3.4(a)(ii) to Ruakura Logistics Zone and part (iv). Amend Rule 3.7.3.4b amend to provide flexibility for development in relation to the completion of the Waikato Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Expressway. in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.019 3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for Oppose General Residential Zone and Medium Density Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Delete Rules 3.7.3.5(a) and 3.7.3.5(b) and replace with amended wording to align with the recent decision on the E1 to Cobham Drive, or impacts of the location of connections to the Waikato Expressway. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.020 3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Delete Rule 3.7.3.6 Staging rule for Innovation Park Precinct for the Knowledge Zone. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.021 4.1.4 Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.1.4a)i and ii. to remove Large Lot Residential zone areas in the Ruakura Structure Plan. These areas should be rezoned as either Ruakura Logistics or Ruakura Industrial Park zone. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.022 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a ii. regarding minimum residential density targets by replacing the words 'achieving, as a part minimum' with 'seeking to achieve over time'. Amend 4.2.1a to exclude roads and Open Space zoned land from the calculation of density targets. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.023 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Oppose Oppose The zoning of the Ryburn Road / Percival Road area as Large Lot Residential is opposed and the substitution of a Ruakura Logistics or Industrial Park zoning is supported. If this area were zoned Large Lot Residential any new development should be constructed in a manner that reflects its location near regionally significant infrastructure Page 229 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone including the Expressway, the main trunk railway line, and the IMT. Amend Rule 4.3.1 (c) to make ancillary residential units in the Percival/Ryburn Road Area a restricted discretionary activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1(e) to make detached dwellings in the Percival/Ryburn Road Area a restricted discretionary activity. Amend Rule 4.3.1(b) and (g) to make apartment buildings and duplex dwellings in the Large Lot Residential Area noncomplying activities. Amend 4.3.1(p) to make farming activities a permitted activity in the General Residential Zone. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.024 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a) regarding density to exclude duplex, detached and relocated dwellings on large lot residential sites part in Percival/Ryburn Roads (Ruakura Structure Plan area). Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.025 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary, specifically Rule 4.4.5a), and deletion of Rule 4.4.5a)ii. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.026 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.9b) Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy, so the setbacks do not apply to windows of habitable rooms. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.027 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Oppose Amend Rule 4.5.1 d) so the default activity status for a Comprehensive Development Plan is Restricted Discretionary. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.028 4.5.2 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Once Consent Has Been Granted Oppose Delete Rule 4.5.2 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Once Consent Has Been Granted. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.029 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amending Rule 4.5.3 a), by deleting "and changes in the use once consent has been granted Note: See Rule 4.5.2(a) for Medium-Density Residential part once consent granted"; Zone Amend Rules 4.5.3 a), b), c), d), e), f), h), i), k), l), n), dd) and ee) so that all forms of residential buildings, managed care facilities, papakainga, residential centres, rest homes, childcare facilities (six or more children), marae, and places of worship, are Restricted Discretionary Activities, and considered on a non-notified, without affected party approval basis. Amend Rules 4.5.3 m), o), z), aa) and hh) so that childcare facilities (up to five children), dairies, integrated retail developments (Ruakura Comprehensive Development Plan Area A), community centres and relocated buildings, are Controlled Activities. Page 230 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rules 4.5.3 q), v), y), bb), ff) and ii) so that health care services, places of assembly, visitor accommodation, general recreation, schools, and emergency service facilities, are Restricted Discretionary Activities. Amend Rules 4.5.3 r) and s) so that home based business and homestay accommodation are Permitted Activities. Amend Rule 4.5.3 by adding service stations as a new Restricted Discretionary Activity. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.030 4.6.2 Development Yield Support in Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.031 4.6.3 Height in Relation to Boundary Oppose Amend Rule 4.6.3 a) i. and delete Rule 4.6.3 a) ii. regarding height in relation to boundary. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.032 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.7 b) and delete Rule 4.4.7 c) regarding the interface between public and private realm. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.033 4.9 Rules – Specific Standards – Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Add a new rule regarding noise mitigation measures for new dwellings within the Percival/Ryburn Road area. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.034 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Add new Rule 4.10a that sets out the relevant matters of control for controlled activities. Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.035 4.11 Notification Rule Support Retain Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.036 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support Retain the Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2g for Suburban Centres Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.037 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 by combining the Suburban Centre Core and Suburban Centre Fringe zones as a single zone. Delete the floor area restrictions in Rule 6.3. Amend Rule 6.3 hh) to make parking lots permitted activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.038 6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.039 8.1 Purpose Delete Rule 6.4.6 regarding Maximum Tenancy Size. Support in Amend 8.1 to provide for a Suburban Centre instead of a Neighbourhood Centre in the Knowledge Zone. Amend 8.1e) part to remove reference to development staging. Delete 8.1g) regarding adverse effects on the Central City. Page 231 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.040 8.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Objective 8.2.3 Explanation - remove reference to staging Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.041 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend the Knowledge Zone to provide for more Controlled Activities. Amend Rule 8.3 so that it applies to the whole Knowledge Zone. Amend the zoning of the mainstreet area to a Business Zone. Amend Rule 8.3 d), e), j) and q) regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, commercialisation of activity ancillary to research, innovation, education and laboratory activities and parking lots, to Permitted Activities Amend Rule 8.3b) from Internal alterations to Minor works. Amend Rule 8.3q) to remove Parking Buildings. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.042 8.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 8.5.3a) regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.043 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 8.9 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.044 8.10 Notification Rule Support Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.045 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 10.2.1. part Amend Policy 10.2.1a to provide some staging flexibility for logistics and industrial development. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.046 10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rules 10.3 a) and h) so that logistics and freight-handling activities, food and beverage outlets and dairies not exceeding 100m2 floor area, are Permitted Activities. Amend Rules 10.3 c) and e) so that new buildings, accessory buildings, alterations and additions, are Permitted Activities outside of the Interface Design Control Area. Amend Rule 10.3 d) so that new buildings, accessory buildings and alterations and additions, are Controlled Activities within the Interface Design Control Area. Amend Rules 10.3 l) and m) so that short-stay worker accommodation and ancillary residential units are Controlled Activities. Amend Rule 10.3n) so that Permitted Activities that fail to meet Rule 10.4.1 become Restricted Discretionary Activities. Amend Rule 10.3o) so that all other activities that do not meet Rules 10.4.2 to 10.4.9 are Discretionary Activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.047 10.4.1 Permitted Activities Oppose Delete Rule 10.4.1c) regarding additional demands on Three Waters and Transportation infrastructure. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.048 10.4.5 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5 to reduce the height of loading ramps, link spans, machinery rooms, cranes and other lifting and part stacking equipment outside the inland port. Amend Rule 10.4.5e to increase the maximum height of container stacking Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 8.10 - Notification Rule. Retain Rule 8.10 notification rule as notified. Page 232 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary outside of the inland port to 12m. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.049 10.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete rule 10.4.6 (iv) and (vii) Large lot residential building setback within the logistics zone Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.050 10.4.8 Interface Standards Oppose Delete 10.4.8 (b) and (c) regarding interface standard restrictions on inland port related activities within 40m of the Large Lot Residential Area (Ruakura) and the Waikato Expressway. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.051 10.4.9 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 10.4.9 a) regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.052 10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 10.5 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.053 10.6 Notification Rule Support Retain 10.6 Notification Rule Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.054 11.1 Purpose Support Retain 11.1 Purpose of Ruakura Industrial Park regarding the 40m setback from existing residential development to the south east. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.055 11.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Retain Objective 11.2.1. Ruakura Industrial Park Zone part Amend Policy 11.2.1a to provide some staging flexibility for logistics and industrial development. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.056 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.057 11.4.1 Permitted Activities Support in Delete Rule 11.4.1c) regarding additional demands on Three Waters and Transportation infrastructure. part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.058 11.5.2 Ancillary Offices Oppose Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.059 11.5.3 Transportation Service Support Centres Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.060 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Activities Matters of part Discretion and Assessment Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 11.7 - Notification Rule. Criteria Amend Rule 11.3 a), c), e), y), and bb) so that new buildings, industrial activities (excluding 11.3 f) to i)), logistics and freight-handling activities, parking lots and parking buildings, and alterations and additions are Permitted Activities Amend Rule 11.3 b) so that new buildings, alterations and additions within an Interface Design Control Area (other than minor works) are Controlled Activities. Delete Rule 11.5.2 regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices. Retain Rule 11.5.3 regarding Transportation Service Centres Page 233 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.061 11.7 Notification Rule Support Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.062 15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 15.2.2b of All Open Space Zones Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.063 18.1 Purpose Amend Purpose of the Transport Corridor Zone 18.1 to adequately recognise the importance of property access and facilitating commerce and business. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.064 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 23.2.1 and Policy 23.2.2a for Subdivision part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.065 23.2.3 Objective and Policy Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.066 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 23.2.5a to 23.2.5c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.067 Table 23.3a Oppose Amend Rule 23.3a) v, vii, and viii so that fee simple, cross lease and unit title subdivision are Controlled Activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.068 Table 23.3b Oppose Amend Rules 23.3b) iv, v, vii, viii and ix so they are Controlled Activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.069 23.6.1 Subdivision in the Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan Area Delete Rule 23.6.1 regarding Subdivision in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.070 23.6.7 Subdivision in the Oppose Medium-Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones Delete Rule 23.6.7 regarding Subdivision in the Medium-Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.071 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Amend Rule 23.7.1u) to reduce the minimum site area from 3500m2 to 500m2 within the Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Replace Rule 23.7.1x) and Figure 23.1.7a with a 15 metre shape factor (diameter control) Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.072 23.7.2 Subdivision Suitability Oppose Delete Rule 23.7.2(a) regarding Subdivision Suitability Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.073 23.7.5 Business 1 to 7 Zones, Oppose Central City Zone, Te Rapa North Industrial Zone, Ruakura Industrial Park Zone, Ruakura Logistics Zone and Industrial Zone Delete Rule 23.7.5 c), e), f), g), h) regarding access and private way widths. Oppose Oppose Oppose Retain 11.7 Notification rule Delete Objective 23.2.3 and Policy 23.2.3a regarding subdivision not occurring in the Rototuna Town Centre Zone or Medium Density Residential Zone without a Comprehensive Development Plan. Page 234 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.074 24 Financial Contributions Support in Amend Chapter 24 to ensure consistency and clarity between the development contribution policy and financial part contribution provisions Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.075 24.4.1 Reserves Level of Service Support in Amend 24.4.1 to clarify that where reserves are acquired in accordance with a Structure Plan, this will satisfy the part reserve requirement in the Proposed Plan; Amend 24.3.3 to clarify how the population rate would apply for a specific development. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.076 25.1.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 25.1.2.1c regarding the servicing of land to refine its intent and give effect to method 6.13.3 of the part proposed regional policy statement. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.077 25.2.5 Rules – Specific Standards Oppose Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted earthworks volume to 250m3. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.078 25.3.5.3 Events at Innes Common, Hamilton Lake Domain, Wintec (City and Rotokauri), and Within the Knowledge Zone Oppose Amend 25.3.5.3 by deleting a) and b) regarding the number of people attending and the number of events per calendar year. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.079 25.5.2 Objectives and Policies Landscaping and Screening Oppose Amend Policy 25.5.2.1a to recognise that screening and planting may not be the most appropriate method to achieve good urban design outcomes. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.080 25.5.3.1 Landscaping Oppose Amend Rule 25.5.3.1a ix to specify external ground level parking spaces and require the planting of 1 tree per 5 parking spaces for 20 or more parking spaces. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.081 25.5.3.7 Internal Planting Oppose Delete Rule 25.5.3.7 regarding internal planting so it does not apply to the Ruakura Logistics or Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.082 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose – Electricity Transmission Corridors Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.083 25.8.2.1 Objective and Policies Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.084 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones Amend Rule 25.7.4 to add a new activity 'New buildings, yard areas or additions to the building envelope of existing buildings not associated with sensitive land uses' as a Permitted Activity in Electricity Corridor B, Discretionary in Electricity Corridor A (Urban Areas), and Restricted Discretionary in Electricity Corridor A (Greenfield). Support in Amend Policies 25.8.2.1a and 25.8.2.1d so that it focuses on the protection from unreasonable adverse noise effects as part opposed to protecting the existing residential ambient noise environment. Amend Rule 25.8.3.7 by increasing the maximum noise levels permitted. Page 235 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.085 25.13.2 Objectives and Policies Three Waters Support in Amend Policy 25.13.2.1a regarding subdivision and development avoiding adverse effects on water resources to part include "---remedy or mitigate--". Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.086 25.13.4.6 Water Impact Assessments Oppose Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 so that the exclusion for a Water Impact Assessment applies to Integrated Catchment Management Plans that have been approved prior to the Plan becoming operative irrespective of whether they are in accordance with the information requirements of Volume 2, Appendix 1.5.5. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.087 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Oppose Amend Policy 25.14.2.1f so that Integrated Transport Assessments may be required for discretionary or non-complying activities. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.088 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.089 25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings and Internal Vehicle Access Oppose Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing Major Arterial or Strategic Transport Corridors, roads with more than 20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.090 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) to clarify when an assessment of compliance parking and end of journey facilities requirements is triggered. Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 by adding a new rule that the minimum parking space requirements detailed in Table 15-2a, 152d, 15-2e, 15-2f and 15-2g should become maximums for the Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.091 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 matters and assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.092 C Site Development, Design and Layout Oppose Delete Appendix 1.1.2 C2(b) regarding stud heights. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.093 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria Amend Appendix 1.4 - Design Guides and assessment criteria so they assist in achieving good urban design outcomes, but are less prescriptive and focus on the key areas of concern. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.094 1.5.21 Ruakura Structure Plan (Noise – Inland Port) Support Retain 1.5.21 requiring a Noise Management Plan for the Inland Port Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.095 1.5 Information Requirements Oppose Amend Appendix 1.5 Information Requirements to address the matters raised in this submission. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.096 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition of "Interface Design Control Area". Insert a definition of "Greenfield Development". Amend the part definition of "Transport Corridor Zone" in a manner to allow stormwater management/linear wetland/landscaped swales within the transport corridor setbacks. Tainui Group 913.097 1.8.4 Collaboration and Support Retain 1.8.4 a), b) and c) Other Methods regarding Collaboration and Partnership. Page 236 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Holdings Ltd Sub Type Summary Partnership Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.098 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” part interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.099 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” part interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.100 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” part interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.101 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Structure Plan-Waste Water part Infrastructure Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.102 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.103 Figure 2-19 Ruakura Residential Staging Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. part Tainui Group Holdings Ltd 913.104 Zoning Map 39A Oppose Amend Map 39A to include a Suburban Centre as identified within the submission. Maurice Conway Clarke 914.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A- the eastern portion of Pt Lot 1 DP S17176 at Te Kowhai East Road and other properties in the same position be zoned Industrial. Maurice Conway Clarke 914.002 Zoning Map 14A Oppose Map 14A-The eastern portion of Pt Lot 1 DP S17176 at Te Kowhai East Road and other properties in the same position be zoned Industrial. Lester Clarke 915.001 Features Map 34B Oppose Amend Flood Hazard Area so that the crown of the road is not showing as the deepest part of flooding (Olive Road) Wayne Maurice & Melanie Jane Clarke Family Trust - 916.001 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-Rezone land described as SEC 2 SO: 442251 at Te Kowhai East Road from Future Urban Zone to Industrial Zone. Wayne Maurice & Melanie Jane Clarke Family Trust - 916.002 Zoning Map 14A Oppose Map 14A-Rezone land described as SEC 2 SO: 442251 at Te Kowhai East Road from Future Urban to Industrial. Page 237 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Barry Lionel Pennell 917.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. B & E.M Williams Family Trust - 918.001 Features Map 38B Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for the submitters property. Wayne Rogers 919.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Wayne Rogers 919.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Wayne Rogers 919.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Wayne Rogers 919.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts James Whetu 920.001 4.1.5 All Residential Zones Support in Amend Rule 4.1.5a) by deleting reference to 'high quality urban design' as there is more to achieving a quality urban part environment than those solely. James Whetu 920.002 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 4.2.3 by deleting the word 'good'; part Amend Policy 4.2.3a by deleting the word 'quality'; Amend Policy 4.2.3a v. by deleting the last eight words of the policy so that it reads: "Parking and manoeuvring areas on-site"; Remove Policy 4.2.3b in its entirety. James Whetu 920.003 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4 by inserting the words 'over time'. part James Whetu 920.004 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Support in 4.2.6 Objective and Policies part Policy 4.2.6(a): Supports the intent of the policy but seeks a wording change as outlined in the submission to provide clarity. Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Policy 4.2.6(c)(ii): Amend to delete the word 'avoid' and instead use the term "minor or less than minor". Subsequent amendment to other policies and rules in the District Plan should be considered. James Whetu 920.005 25.1.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Remove or reword policy 25.1.2.2a ii to take into consideration the "avoidance" of adverse effects on water quality & quantity is unreasonable; Remove the word enhance from 25.2.2.1 a i and add "wherever possible" to the end of the sentence. James Whetu 920.006 25.5.2 Objectives and Support in Amend policy 25.5.2.1 to remove the "cultural connection" which is considered more suited in development of reserve Page 238 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Policies Landscaping and Screening part management plans. James Whetu 920.007 25.15 Urban Design Oppose Remove Chapter 25.15 in its entirety. Rex Graeme Edge 922.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove the flood hazard from 11 Rhonda Ave. Roy & Dayl Carson 923.001 Features Map 61B Oppose Remove flood hazard from 9 Rhonda Ave and any reference to a LIM. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.001 1 Plan Overview Support in Amend the activity status table for all zones by adding a note that clarifies that the activity status is subject to part compliance with the city wide provisions in the plan. Amend all Notification Rules by adding wording stating the NZ Transport Agency will be notified as an affected party where an activity is likely to affect the state highway network. Any consequential amendments required to reflect changes made to the LTMA. Simplify the structure of the plan to avoid the need to refer to multiple sections. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.002 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Support in Amend the Plan to clarify the relationship between the zone section objectives and policies and the strategic part objectives and policies and when to apply these. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.003 2.1 Purpose Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.004 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 2.2.1 and Policy 2.2.1a as notified. Amend 2.2.1b to include 'minimising energy use and carbon part dioxide production'. Amend the explanation to include 'Access Hamilton'. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.005 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 2.2.2, however, amend the Explanation to refer to infrastructure providers other than Council as part provided in their submission, and amend policy 2.2.2c. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.006 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support Retain Objective and policies in 2.2.3 as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.007 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Support Retain Objective and policies in 2.2.4 as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.008 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 2.2.13 to include reference to 'Investment' in infrastructure, and amend the explanation to reflect Integrated Land Use, part the need for coordination of investment across a number of parties to align infrastructure and development as Transport and Infrastructure suggested in the submission. Retain Policies 2.2.13a to 2.2.13f. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.009 3.1 Purpose Support in principle to the City’s strategy of encouraging a compact and sustainable city by increasing development densities within identified urban areas. Supports linking the non-statutory strategies into the District Plan. Support in Amend 3.1 d)v. to read as follows "Identifying the financial feasibility of the development from a Council, part infrastructure provider and landowner perspective". Page 239 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.010 3.2 Principles Support Retain 3.2 Principles as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.011 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1a to remove the word ‘general’ so that it reads 'in accordance with the relevant structure plan'. This part should apply throughout the Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.012 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2(a) (Structure Plans) and associated Explanation to ensure they apply to a broader range of part infrastructure than that for which Council is responsible by making amendments as set out in the submission. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.013 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 3.3.4 by deleting the word "Council". part Amend Policy 3.3.4a: as set out in the submission to also refer to the defined range of considerations included in a ‘Broad Integrated Transport Assessment’ as set out in the definitions in Part 2. The Explanation will also require amending to reflect this requested change. Amend Policy 3.3.4b: to also refer to the defined range of considerations included in a ‘Broad Integrated Transport Assessment’ as set out in the definitions in Part 2. The Explanation will also require amending to reflect this requested change. Amend this policy as requested to promote clarity and ensure that the policy is consistent with the subsequent Explanation. Insert a new policy as set out in the submission, to ensure that financial impacts are minimised alongside environmental considerations. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.014 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.5b by deleting the word 'Sensitive' so that it reads as follows: "Land uses shall avoid effects on and part from regionally significant infrastructure". New Zealand Transport Agency 924.015 3.3.7 Objective and Policies Support Retain 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.016 3.4 Peacocke Support Retain the Peacocke Structure Plan subject to specific amendments requested in the submission. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.017 3.4.3 Transport Network Support Retain 3.4.3e) Transport Network as notified New Zealand Transport Agency 924.018 3.4.5 Indicative Support Infrastructural Development Programme Retain Rule 3.4.5 Indicative Infrastructural Development Programme as notified. Page 240 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.019 3.4.5.1 Proposed Staging of Residential Development Support in Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 to ensure that the Proposed Staging of Residential Development provisions have the status of a part rule. Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 b) ii to clarify that the 80% dwelling trigger for Stage 1b development relates to consented dwellings (not occupied dwellings). Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 c) ii to recognise that the solution for the transport effects on the Dixon Road / State Highway 3 intersection may require works elsewhere. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.020 3.5 Rototuna Support in Amend 3.5 to strengthen the weight given to the provisions (Rototuna Structure Plan). part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.021 3.5 Vision Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.022 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support Retain Objective 3.5.1.4 (Rototuna Structure Plan) and policies 3.5.1.4b and 3.5.1.4c as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.023 3.5.2.4 Transportation Network Support Retain 2.5.2.4 a), c), d), e), f) and g). New Zealand Transport Agency 924.024 3.6 Rotokauri Support in Review and amend the Plan to recognise that the Te Rapa section of the Waikato Expressway has already been part constructed and is in operation. These provisions include (but may not be limited to): Policy 3.6.1.2a, sub-sections: 3.6.2.9a) - ‘Staging’, 3.6.3.2 and – ‘Roading’. The NZTA also notes that the function of the roads has changed since the Expressway has opened, which should be reflected in the Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.025 3.6.3.2 Roading Support in Amend 3.6.3.2 d) as set out in the submission to remove reference to the 4-laning on Avalon Drive as this is now part complete. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.026 3.7 Ruakura Support in Retain staging for Ruakura in 3.7 as notified part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.027 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network Support in Amend Ruakura structure plan once the location and number of interchanges to the Waikato Expressway are part confirmed. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.028 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support Amend Policy 3.7.2.1b to "optimise" rather than 'maximise' the use of existing infrastructure. Retain Policy 3.7.2.6a as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.029 4 Residential Zones Support Supports the intention of the residential section as it is largely consistent with the Built Environment section of the Proposed Waikato Regional Policy Statement. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.030 4.1.4 Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.1.4a)ii. to remove Large Lot Residential zone covering the Percival and Ryburn road area in the Ruakura Structure Plan and rezone to the Ruakura Logistics zone. New Zealand 924.031 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a i. by adding additional wording '...and the function of transportation corridors consistent with the Retain ‘Vision’ for Rototuna in section 3.5 as notified. Amend the Plan to recognise that a blanket approach to mitigation will not be appropriate for development to the north-east of the Waikato Expressway Designation (aligned with our specific submission points on Chapter 13) and that 3.5.2.4 b) is amended to ensure this is made clear. Page 241 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary part roading hierarchy' to emphasize that it is the function, not the capacity, or a road that is the relevant consideration for the integration of land use and transportation. Retain Policy 4.2.1b as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.032 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 4.2.2.b and 4.2.2c to refer to both existing and planned regionally significant infrastructure and part strengthen the approach to manage reverse sensitivity matters. Delete Policy 4.2.2d. Amend the Explanation to refer to 'planned' infrastructure rather than 'proposed' for consistency. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.033 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3a iv to broaden its scope to include effects of noise generated from roads. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.034 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4d by adding wording to clarify the environmental outcomes to be achieved. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.035 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.036 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support in Add a column into activity status table 4.3.1 to show all residential activities in the large-lot Residential Zone (Rototuna part SP area) are non-complying until there is an approved Comprehensive Development Plan developed in consultation with the NZTA. The Comprehensive Development Plan should be assessed as a discretionary activity. Retain Policy 4.2.6c as notified. Amend Rule 4.3.1 to show that all residential activities in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential Zone are non-complying until there is an approved Comprehensive Development Plan. Make CDP's a Discretionary Activity and require consultation with NZTA. Add a provision to promote the safe and efficient functioning of major arterial roads. Amend to ensure cross-referencing is made to this rule in all zone sections, preferably as part of the activity status tables. This rule should over-ride all other activity classifications in all zones. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.037 4.4.1 Density Oppose Opposes any residential development in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone. However if to proceed, should be subject to a Comprehensive Development Plan conditional on the final design of the Waikato Expressway - Hamilton Section. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.038 4.4.2 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.2 by deleting the 20% site coverage in Rototuna Large Lot Residential and rely on the Comprehensive Development Plan to determine the appropriate site coverage on physical constraints, characteristics of land and surrounding land uses. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.039 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6 c) Building Setback from Waikato Expressway by deleting Rule 4.4.6 c)ii.1. and 4.4.6 c)ii.2. and part inserting new Rule 4.4.6 c)ii.1. that states "written approval has been provided from the Requiring Authority (the NZ Transport Agency)" Page 242 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.040 4.5.2 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Once Consent Has Been Granted Support in Amend Rule 4.5.2 a) by deleting the text 'materially different effects' to ensure alignment with existing use rights part under s10 of the Resource Management Act 1991. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.041 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend Rule 4.5.3 to include all Comprehensive Development Plans in the District Plan; or include a reference to Rule Medium-Density Residential part 13.9.1 Zone New Zealand Transport Agency 924.042 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 4.10 a) xvii, xxvi to xxx and xxxiii to xxxiv by including additional matters of discretion relating to Activities Matters of part Transportation, specifically V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9,V10,V11,V12, V14, V17 and V18. Discretion and Assessment Criteria New Zealand Transport Agency 924.043 5.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 5.2.2a)iv) of Objective 5.2.2 All Special Character Zones to broaden the scope to include the effect of part noise generated from roads. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.044 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend matters of discretion in Rule 5.6 (Special Character Zones) relating to any sensitive activity to include reverse part sensitivity assessment criteria, and amend the following activities xx, xxvi, xxvii – xxxii, xxxv – xxxvii within Rule 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to include transportation assessment criteria. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.045 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.046 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Support in Retain Policy 6.2.1a. Amend Policy 6.2.1c to provide greater protection to regionally significant roading infrastructure part and recognise the roading hierarchy. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.047 6.2.3 Objective and Policies Neighbourhood Centres Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.048 6.2.4 Objective and Policies Major Event Facilities Support in Amend Policy 6.2.4b and its associated explanation regarding Major Event Facilities to recognise potential effects on part the transport network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.049 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 6.6a) by including restricted discretionary matter and assessment criteria D4-D7 regarding reverse part sensitivity for all sensitive activities. Amend Rule 6.6a) xiv by including all restricted discretionary matters and assessment criteria under V - Transportation. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.050 7 Central City Zone Support in Retain Chapter 7 with the exception of amendments requested in the submission. part Provide further justification to support the changes to the function of roads in the hierarchy in the Central City and consider providing an appropriate issue statement to demonstrate the linkages between the direction of the Plan and Retain the Business 1-7 Zones as notified with the exception of specifically requested amendments in other submission points Retain Policy 6.2.3b for neighbourhood centres Page 243 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary an environmental issue. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.051 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend 7.1 c) Purpose by including Hamilton's six City Strategies (Access Hamilton, Active Communities, Economic part Development, Environmental Sustainability, Hamilton Urban Growth and Social Wellbeing). New Zealand Transport Agency 924.052 7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Policy 7.2.1g regarding housing densities. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.053 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 7.6 to include matters of Reverse Sensitivity for any sensitive activities. part Amend Rule 7.6 a) to include all assessment criteria in Appendix 1.2 V: Transportation for activities not complying with the relevant standards. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.054 8.1 Purpose Support Retain 8.1 Purpose of the knowledge zone as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.055 8.2 Objectives and Policies Knowledge Zone Support Retain 8.2 Objectives and Policies Knowledge Zone as notified New Zealand Transport Agency 924.056 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 8.9 by including the following wording for the assessment criteria for any sensitive activity. part "..and all provisions under Vol. 2, Appendix 1.2 D4 - D7 (‘Reverse Sensitivity’)." Amend Rule 8.9a) xii and xiii by adding V1-V2, V4-V17, and V17-V18. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.057 9 Industrial Zone Support Retain the Industrial Zone section and preserving Industrial Land for Industrial activities. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.058 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the activity status in Rule 9.3 i), u), w), x) & y) for flood and beverage outlets, new buildings, drive through part services, ancillary residential units, and childcare facilities, to Discretionary Activities. Delete Rule 9.3k) and include yard based retailing (along specified transport corridors) as restricted discretionary activities. Delete Rule 9.3l) regarding Retail activity. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.059 9.3.2 Effect of the Comprehensive Development Plan Support in Amend reference in 9.3.2a) from "vehicular" to "transport" part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.060 9.3.3 Te Kowhai Road Comprehensive Development Plan Support in Amend 9.3.3b) iv) to seek a minimum 15m (not 5m) setback. Review and amend the relevant provisions in the Te part Kowhai Comprehensive Development Plan (9.3.3 and 9.3.4) to recognise that the Te Rapa section of the Waikato Expressway has already been constructed and is in operation. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.061 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Support Support Rule 9.4.1 as notified. Page 244 of 541 Sub Name New Zealand Transport Agency Sub Point Plan Provision 924.062 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Sub Type Summary Support in Amend Rule 9.7 by including the following wording for the assessment criteria for any sensitive activity. part "..and all provisions under Vol. 2, Appendix 1.2 D4 - D7 (‘Reverse Sensitivity’)." Retain Rule 9.7a) vi. as notified, particularly criteria V1-V18. Amend Rule 9.7a) xi. by including criteria V1-V2. Amend Rule 9.7a) xii. by including criteria V1-V2. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.063 10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 10.2.1a regarding staging provisions for the Ruakura Logistics Zone. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.064 10.4.5 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5a) and b) to ensure the height of buildings/containers adjoining the Waikato Expressway within the part logistics zone be reduced to mitigate adverse affects. Amend the Plan to clarify the application of rules 10.4.6ii to rule 10.4.5e) and Section 25.6 to 10.4.5e). If the provisions of 25.6 and 10.4.6ii do not apply then his rule should be amended to ensure no light spill or visual distractions from these structures will affect the Waikato Expressway. Amend numbering in Rule 10.4.5 to refer to e) rather than c). New Zealand Transport Agency 924.065 10.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Retain Rule 10.4.6 regarding building setbacks in relation to the Waikato Expressway. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.066 10.4.7 Landscape Screening Support in Amend Rule 10.4.7 to add a new provision for the Ruakura Logistics zone to be screened from the Waikato part Expressway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.067 10.4.8 Interface Standards Support in Retain Rule 10.4.8 subject to the proposed amendment to Rule 10.4.7 and demonstration that container stacking will part not create any shading or icing hazards for the Waikato Expressway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.068 10.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Rule 10.4 to ensure no advertising signage is visible from the Waikato Expressway. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.069 11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.070 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 11.2.2a to relate to Transport Corridors. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.071 11.4.4 Building Height Support in Ensure the height of buildings / containers adjoining the Waikato Expressway within the Industrial Park does not part generate adverse effects, amend Rule 11.4.4a) to reduce building heights and/or increase building setbacks to ensure such effects do not occur. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.072 11.4.7 Site Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 by adding a new provision for the industrial park zone to be screened from the Waikato part Expressway. Retain the staging provisions within Policy 11.2.1a as notified. Page 245 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.073 11.5.3 Transportation Service Oppose Centres Amend Rule 11.5.3 a) by removing reference to direct access to a state highway and add as a matter to which discretion has been restricted. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.074 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 so that all restricted discretionary activities are assessed against the relevant criteria, in particular Activities Matters of part transport related criteria under V. Also clarify which activities are to be assessed under V19. Discretion and Assessment Criteria New Zealand Transport Agency 924.075 11.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend Rule 11.4 to add a new rule for the industrial park zone to ensure no advertising signage is visible from the part Waikato Expressway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.076 12 Te Rapa North Industrial Zone Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.077 12.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 12.2.2a, to include reference to interface between the zone and the Waikato Expressway. part Also seeks the relevant explanation to add reference to ensuring entrances to Hamilton are attractive and contribute to the experience of Hamilton as a tourist destination. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.078 12.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 12.2.4c to include reference to the state highway in relation to reverse sensitivity. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.079 12.4.3 Height in Relation to Boundary Support in Amend Rule 12.4.3a) Height in Relation to Boundary with addition of 'state highway' reference. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.080 12.4.7 Landscaping Support in Amend Rule 12.4.7c) Landscaping, to delete the exception to the rule for service stations within Stage 1B. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.081 12.4.8 Transportation Support in Amend Rule 12.4.8a) and e) Transportation, including no direct property access to Te Rapa Road or Waikato part Expressway as part of 12.4.8a) i Stage 1A; amend the note to a rule; and amend the name "Te Rapa Interchange" to 'Horotiu Interchange'. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.082 13.1 Purpose Support in Amend 13.1 (b) Purpose (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) to delete the word 'general' or similar amendments to achieve part the same outcome. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.083 13.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 13.2.2 (Rototuna Town Centre) as notified; amend Policy 13.2.2 (b) to include the text "and other part infrastructure providers". New Zealand Transport Agency 924.084 13.2.4 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.085 13.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 13.2.5 (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) as notified. part Amend Policy 13.2.5f to insert the word "Waikato" prior to 'Expressway' to remove any ambiguity and align this Retain all provisions in Chapter 12 Te Rapa North Industrial Zone, with the exception of the requested amendments by NZTA. Retain 13.2.4 Objective and Policies (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) as notified. Page 246 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary wording with the wider Proposed District Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.086 13.2.6 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.087 13.2.7 Objective and Policies Support in Include a new policy 13.2.7d (Rototuna Town Centre) and amend the explanation to include the transportation part network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.088 14 Future Urban Zone New Zealand Transport Agency 924.089 14.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 14.2.2 and Policy 14.2.2g as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.090 14.4.5 Building Setback Amend Rule 14.4.5 - to require a 25m building setback from arterial transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.091 14.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 14.7 - (Matter of Discretion and Assessment Criteria) to include consideration of reverse sensitivity effects Activities Matters of part for standards iv - building setbacks and vi - building standards. Discretion and Assessment Criteria New Zealand Transport Agency 924.092 15.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 15.2.4a to include traffic as a potential adverse effect part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.093 Natural Open Space Zone Support in Amend Policy 15.2.6b to include the safe and efficient operation of the transportation network for activities on the part surface of water. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.094 Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Support in Amend Policy 15.2.8a under Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone to include the transportation network as an area part to be considered for adverse effects from development and use of sites within this zone. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.095 15.4 Rules – Definition of the Support in Amend Rule 15.4 to become an appendix or explanation and ensure that the NZTA is a party to defining the Neighbourhood Open Space part Neighbourhood Open Space Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area. Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area New Zealand Transport Agency 924.096 15.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Include all provisions under Volume 2, Appendix 1.2 V (Transportation) for Rule 15.7 a) i, x, xii and xv. Activities Matters of part Discretion and Assessment Criteria New Zealand Transport Agency 924.097 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support New Zealand 924.098 16.4.4 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 16.4.4 a) to increase the required building setback in the Community Facilities Zone from 5m to 15m Support Oppose Retain Policy 13.2.6c (Rototuna Town Centre Zone - residential densities) as notified. Retain the Future Urban zone provisions subject to specific submission points by NZTA. NZTA support the protection of these areas from interim development. Retain Rule 16.3b) new community facilities buildings, relocated buildings which interface with a public place as a restricted discretionary activity if discretion includes effects on major arterial roads and the opinion of NZTA Page 247 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.099 16.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria for new buildings, relocated buildings, alterations and additions Activities Matters of part interfacing with a public place and schools to include a reference to Vol.2, Appendix 1.2 V1 - V18 (Transportation). Discretion and Assessment Criteria Include reverse sensitivity considerations to any activities that do not comply with the building set back rule; in particular D4, D5, D6 and D7. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.100 17.4.1 Provision of Concept Plans Support in Amend Rule17.4.1 to include parking lots as part of the Concept Plan requirement. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.101 17.5.1 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 17.5.1b) Building Setbacks to differentiate between minor and major arterial transport corridors. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.102 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria in relation to 17.8)i, Activities Matters of part with an inclusion of references V1-V18 in Appendix 1.2. Discretion and Assessment Criteria New Zealand Transport Agency 924.103 18.1 Purpose Support in Amend 18.1 to reference permission being required from the relevant road controlling authorities for the use of part transport corridors for non-transport related purposes. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.104 18.2 Objectives and Policies Transport Corridor Zone Support in Amend 18.2 to add an additional objective and policy to specifically provide for the safe and efficient operation of part regionally significant infrastructure, to improve consistency with the Operative and Proposed Regional Policy Statement. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.105 Transport Corridor Network Support in Amend Objectives, Policies and Explanations in 18.2 to improve consistency with the Transport Management Act 2003 part and Proposed Regional Policy Statement, and to clarify terminology and intent of policies and explanations. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.106 Network Utilities Infrastructure Support Retain Policy 18.2.3b regarding network utilities locating in roading corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.107 Other Activities and Structures Support Retain 18.2.4a recognising that safe and efficient roads form an important part in a good urban design. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.108 18.4 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain Rule 18.4 a) to c) regarding the activity status of maintenance and new transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.109 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Amend 22.2 to ensure the maintenance and operation of existing infrastructure in natural hazard areas is a permitted part activity. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.110 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 23.2.1 or 23.2.2 by adding a new policy regarding reverse sensitivity measures for subdivision close to part transport corridors. New Zealand 924.111 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Policies 23.2.2a iv, viii to xiv. Amend 23.2.2 by adding a new policy regarding facilitatin good amenity and urban Page 248 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary part design outcomes. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.112 23.2.4 Objective and Policy Support Retain Objective 23.2.4 and Policies 23.2.4a i to iv. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.113 23.6.8 Subdivision in the Te Rapa North Industrial Zone Support Retain Policy 23.6.8a) i and ii New Zealand Transport Agency 924.114 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Support in Retain Rule 23.7.1c) regarding Allotment Size and Shape. Delete Rule 23.7.1h) as the submitter opposes residential part development in this location, alternatively this area should be subject to a Comprehensive Development Plan addressing the concerns of the submitter. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.115 23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Activities Matters of part Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 23.8 so that additional Transportation and road controlling authority matters of discretion and assessment criteria apply to subdivision dependent on access to or potentially affecting major arterial roads, and amendments so that such subdivision is a Restricted Discretionary Activity with consequential amendments to clarify that this over rides a more permissive status. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.116 24 Financial Contributions Support Retain Chapter 24 Financial Contributions New Zealand Transport Agency 924.117 24.3.2 Nature of Contributions Support in Amend Rule 24.3.2 d) iv and e) by providing for other infrastructure providers. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.118 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Support Retain Rule 24.3.3 a) New Zealand Transport Agency 924.119 24.3.4 Credits Support Retain Rule 24.3.4 d) New Zealand Transport Agency 924.120 25.1.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain objective 25.1.2.1, Policies 25.1.2.1.a and 25.1.2.1.b. Amend Policy 25.1.2.1c to recognise the need to protect part planned infrastructure of other infrastructure providers and additional or alternative design requirements may be required by NZTA for infrastructure that affects a state highway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.121 25.1.4.5 Transportation Support Retain Rule 25.1.4.5 a) requiring compliance with transportation related rules and standards. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.122 25.2.2 Objectives and Policies Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Support Retain Policy 25.2.2.1a regarding earthworks and vegetation removal occurring in a way that ensures the safe, efficient use of land and infrastructure New Zealand Transport Agency 924.123 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain Rule 25.2.3 to ensure earthworks in relation to the repair, sealing or resealing of a transport corridor as a Table part Permitted Activity is exempt from Rule 25.2.5.1. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.124 25.2.4.2 Earthworks Within all Transmission Corridors Support in Retain Rules 25.2.4.2d) and e) regarding exemptions from controls applying to earthworks within transmission part corridors. Page 249 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.125 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to ensure earthworks associated with road operations and maintenance are exempted from having to comply with Rule 25.2.5.1. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.126 25.3.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 25.3.2.1b regarding the effects of events and temporary activities on the transportation network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.127 25.3.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Add new Rule 25.3.4c) requiring a transport management plan to be submitted and approved by Council prior to the part event. Details of any consultation and approval by NZTA should be included. Include a threshold for the number of people to clarify what constitutes an event. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.128 25.3.5.1 Information to be Provided with Resource Consent Applications for Events Support in Add a new note to Rule 25.3.5.1 a) to clarify when an event is likely to impact on the state highway network NZTA will part assess the adequacy of the Transport Management Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.129 25.3.5.2 Events at Hamilton Support in Add new Rule 25.3.5.2 c) v. E. requiring parking and transport options for the event to be included in the information Gardens, Central City Zone – part provided to the public prior to the event. Downtown Precinct (including Garden Place, Civic Square and Hood St) and Central City Zone – Ferrybank Precinct New Zealand Transport Agency 924.130 25.5.3.1 Landscaping Support in Amend the Plan to clarify that Rules 25.5.3.1 a) i, v, viii, xii and xiii regarding landscape planting adjacent to transport part corridors apply to structure plan and zone areas and that in the case of conflict the most onerous provision applies. Retain Rule 25.5.3.1 b), c) and d) regarding the use of planting areas and frangible species. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.131 25.5.3.5 Planting Strips Support Retain Rule 25.3.5 i) as it relates to landscaping along major transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.132 25.6.2 Objectives and Policies Lighting and Glare Support Retain Policy 25.6.2.1a for Lighting and Glare New Zealand Transport Agency 924.133 25.6.3 Rules – General Standards Support in Clarify that the rules contained in City Wide - Lighting and Glare apply to all activities and take precedence over any part other plan provisions. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.134 25.8.2.2 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand 924.135 25.8.2.3 Objective and Policy Support in Amend Objective 25.8.2.3, Policy 25.8.2.3a and the associated explanation regarding reverse sensitivity measures to Retain Objective 25.8.2.2 ii and Policies and 25.8.2.2b Page 250 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary part include major arterial roads. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.136 25.8.3.2 Construction Noise Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.2a) to exempt construction noise from state highways. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.137 25.8.3.3 Construction Vibration Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.3a) to exempt construction noise from state highways. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.138 25.8.3.4 Design and Construction of New and Altered Roads Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.139 25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive Activities – Activities in all Zones Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.9 b) and c) so that noise insulation is applied to ‘protected premises and facilities’ within 100m of part an arterial road and delete the final sentence of Rule 25.8.3.9 c) regarding the completion of the Waikato Expressway. Amend Rule 25.8.3.9 e) to use the internal sound levels set out in the AS/NZS 2107:2000 which will provide a more appropriate effects based control. Amend rule 25.8.3.9 g) regarding ventilation to ensure all habitable spaces are captured and to use ‘air changes per hour’ as a measure which can be subject to design and checking. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.140 25.9.2 Objectives and Policies Public Art Support in Add Policy 25.9.2.1e to ensure public art does not distract motorists, create confusion and interrupt sightlines, all of part which can potentially affect traffic safety. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.141 25.10.2 Objectives and Policies Signs Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.142 25.10.4 Rules – General Standards Support in Add a new Rule 25.10.4i) to require minimum lettering height of signs on roads with speeds greater than 60kmph; part Amend Rule 25.10.2.1 d) to require comments from NZTA adjoining a State Highway with greater speed than 60kmph. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.143 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas Support in Amend Rule 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas to include safe access for waste collection part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.144 25.14 Transportation Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.145 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Support in Seeks amendments to: part - Policy 25.14.2.1a to clarify the meaning of Spatial Framework. - Policy 25.14.2.1d ii regarding the undersupply of parking for activities along major arterials and financial contributions. - Policy 25.14.2.1e regarding the remediation as an appropriate means of addressing adverse effects, cumulative effects of development, connectivity and safe and efficient functioning of the transport network. - Policy 25.14.2.1f regarding consultation with the NZTA for activities generating adverse effects on the state highway network. Retain Rule 25.8.3.4 regarding Noise and the Design and Construction of New and Altered Roads. Retain Policy 25.10.2.1c for signs. Retain Chapter 25.14 - Transportation, subject to the specific amendments sought. Page 251 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.146 25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings and Internal Vehicle Access Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.1 g) iii to discourage direct vehicle access to a strategic network or arterial transport corridor. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.147 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 a) to alter the Integrated Transport Assessment requirements for activities on the Sensitive part Transport networks and require consultation with the NZTA where there are potential impacts on the state highway network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.148 25.15.1 Purpose Support in Amend 25.15.1 d) to include reference to movement and accessibility of people around and through urban part environments. Retain 25.15.1 e) as notified. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.150 25.15.2.4 Objective and Policies Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.151 25.15.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 25.15.2.5 to replace the word 'behaviour' with 'networks'. part Amend Policy 25.15.2.5b to include the text 'and accessibility'. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.152 26.2 Use of Designated Land Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.153 26.3 Schedule of Designations Retain Policy 25.15.2.4b as notified. Retain 26.2 c) regarding waiver of outline plan in specific circumstances Support in Amend 26.3 - Schedule of Designations to include map references for all designations listed. part Delete part of Designation E99 (Te Rapa Bypass) from the Schedule in 26.3 and Planning Map 14B. Delete part of Designation E99a (Te Rapa Bypass/Waikato Expressway) from the Schedule in 26.3 and Planning Map 1B. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.154 A Hazardous Facilities Support Retain Appendix 1.1 A iii regarding hazardous facilities and the safety of transport routes. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.155 Ba Building Design External Appearance and Configuration Support Retain Appendix 1.1B a Building Design External Appearance and Configuration regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.156 b Site Layout Support Retain Appendix 1.1B b Site Layout regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.157 c Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Support Retain Appendix 1.1B c Vehicular and Pedestrian Access regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.158 d Landscaping Support Retain Appendix 1.1B d Landscaping regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand 924.159 Ca Building Design External Support Retain Appendix 1.1C a i to vi Building Design External Appearance and Configuration regarding designing to ensure Page 252 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary Appearance and Configuration the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.160 b Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Support Retain Appendix 1.1C b Vehicular and Pedestrian Access regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.161 c Landscaping Support Retain Appendix 1.1C c Landscaping regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors New Zealand Transport Agency 924.162 a Concept Development Plan Support for Stage 1A Retain Appendix 1.1D a Concept Development Plan for Stage 1A (Te Rapa North Industrial Zone) regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.163 b Concept Development Plan Support for Stage 1B Retain Appendix 1.1D b Concept Development Plan for Stage 1B (Te Rapa North Industrial Zone) regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.164 A General Criteria Retain Appendix 1.2 A1-A4 regarding recognition of cumulative effects to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.165 Structure Plans and Concept Support Plans Retain Appendix 1.2 B2 to B4 regarding structure planning and the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.166 C General Support Retain Appendix 1.2 C4 b) to f), C5 g), h) and j) regarding the design of activities in residential developments to ensure the safe and efficient function of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.167 Reverse Sensitivity Support Retain Appendix 1.2 D4 and D5 regarding need to assess the reverse sensitivity effects of development on the safe and efficient function of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.168 F Vitality of Centres Support Retain Appendix 1.2 F4 and F5 regarding landscape and screening design that promotes the safety, efficiency and amenity of transport corridors. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.169 G Landscaping and Screening Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 G1 a), b), d), e), g), G2, G3 regarding landscape and screening design that promotes the safety, part efficiency and amenity of transport corridors with an amendment to clarify the term 'sympathetic'. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.170 Peacocke Special Character Zone Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 I18 and I19 Peacocke Special Character Zone regarding landscape taking into account the effects part of development on the proposed arterial transport corridors with an amendment to clarify whether ‘Peacocke Special Character Zone’ should come under ‘Heritage Values’. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.171 N Events and Temporary Activities Support in Add a new assessment criteria in Appendix 1.2 N Events and Temporary Activities regarding Temporary Management part Plans from relevant road controlling authorities. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.172 P Nuisance and Health Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 P4 to recognise the temporary nature and importance of road works and maintenance. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.173 U General Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 U1 regarding consultation with the NZTA for boundary adjustment subdivisions and the safe and part efficient function of the state highway network. Support Page 253 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Transport Agency 924.174 V Transportation Support Retain Appendix 1.2 V Transportation subject to specific amendments. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.175 V General Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 V3 b) regarding property access and the function of major arterial roads and state highways. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.176 Parking Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 V Transportation, V8 and V9 regarding sufficient on-site vehicle manoeuvring areas and impacts part of allowing lesser amounts of parking. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.177 Z10 General Support Retain Appendix Z, Key Development Sites -Z10e regarding the promotion of alternative modes of transport. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.178 1.3.2.1 Hazardous Facilities Support Retain Appendix 1.3.2.1 c) regarding hazardous facilities and the safety of the transportation network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.179 1.3.2.12 Schools on the Rototuna Secondary School Site Support in Amend Appendix 1.3.2.12 a) Schools on the Rototuna Secondary School Site to ensure the safe and efficient function part of the Waikato Expressway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.180 1.4.1 Medium-Density Support in Amend 1.4.1 Medium-Density Residential Design Guidelines to clarify the status and application of the guidelines as Residential Design Guidelines part standards or assessment criteria. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.181 1.4.1.4 Building Setbacks Support in Amend 1.4.1.4 c) Building Setbacks, to simplify and ensure that NZTA is able to manage any activity affecting the part Waikato Expressway designation. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.182 Design Element 5 Transport Network Layout Support Retain Appendix 1.4.2.1, Subdivision Design Assessment Criteria, Design Element 5 - Transport Network Layout. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.183 1.4.3.8 Acoustic Amenity Support Retain Appendix 1.4.3.8 Acoustic Amenity regarding residential units being designed with appropriate acoustic insulation. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.184 1.4.6 Key Development Site Design Guidance Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.6 Key Development Site Design Guidance to require development to consider potential impacts part on the safe, efficient and effective function of the transportation network. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.185 1.4.6.1 Key Development Site Oppose 1 – Cobham Drive New Zealand Transport Agency 924.186 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site 4 – Warehouse Kmart Transport Centre referring to protect the public 4 – Warehouse Kmart part transport function of the Transport Centre. Transport Centre Site New Zealand Transport Agency 924.187 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre to include larger setbacks for development part adjoining the Waikato Expressway Designation. New Zealand 924.188 1.4.9.3 Part 3 General Support Amend Appendix 1.4.6.1 Key Development Site 1 – Cobham Drive to address concerns about potential adverse effects on the wider transportation network from future development on this site. Retain Appendix 1.4.9.3c) Part 3 General Principles for Comprehensive Development Plans, regarding consideration of Page 254 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary Principles for Comprehensive Development Plans the design and layout of transport corridors in Comprehensive Development Plans New Zealand Transport Agency 924.189 k Transport Network Support Retain Appendix 1.4.9.4 Part 4: Principles and Assessment Criteria for Precincts, k Transport Network, for the transportation network for all precincts in the Rototuna Town Centre. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.190 1.5.2 Additional Information Support in Retain the consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.2 a) i and 1.5.2 d). Amend 1.5.2 e) vii to Requirements part specifically include assessment of effects and proposed mitigation on the road to be accessed as part of a 'site analysis'. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.191 1.5.12 Harvesting of Forestry Support in Review Appendix 1.5.12 Harvesting of Forestry and forestry related provisions. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.192 1.5.13 Integrated Transport Assessment Support in Amend Appendix 1.5.13 Integrated Transport Assessment to ensure restricted discretionary activities it applies where part access is proposed to state highways and other major arterial roads. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.193 1.5.14.2 Transport Management Plan Support Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.14.2 Transport Management Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.194 1.5.18.1 Context Analysis Plan Support Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.18.1a) and b) Context Analysis Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.195 1.5.18.3 Concept Plan Support Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.18.3 a) i) Concept Plan. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.196 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods Support Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.19 a) to g) - Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.197 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Seeks various relief to retain, delete or amend the following definitions: Accessory Buildings, Access Way, Ancillary part Retailing, Comprehensive Development Plan, Community Facilities, Development Agreement, Drive-through Services, Effect, Expressway, Frontage, Green Corridors, Home-based Business, Incidental, Industrial Activity, Infrastructure, Integrated Transport Assessment, Interface Design Control Area (Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone), Local Movement System, Logistics and Freight Handling Activities, Motorway, Network Utility, Permeability (transport), Planned Infrastructure, Public Place, Regionally Significant Infrastructure, Retail - Bulky Goods, Road Controlling Authority, Service Station (within the Rototuna Town Centre Zone), Structure Plan, Temporary Activities, Traffic Management Plan, Transport Corridor, Transport Depot, Transport Infrastructure, Transport Network, Warehouse, Wholesale Retail and Trade Supplier, Yard-based Retailing. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.198 Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use Support New Zealand 924.199 Figure 2-5 Rototuna Support in Amend Figure 2-5 to include proposed/indicative Pubic Transport networks in the Rototuna Structure Plan area Retain Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use as notified, subject to changes requested in the wider submission. Page 255 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Transport Agency Sub Type Summary Structure Plan-Transport Network part transport plan as per the maps in Variation 12 (Plan Change 1, Operative District Plan). Support in Amend Figures 2-4 (Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use), 2-5 (Rototuna Structure Plan - Transport Network), and 2-6 part (Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network) to correctly show consistent walking and cycling networks. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.200 Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network New Zealand Transport Agency 924.201 Appendix 3 Residential Zones Support in Retain Figures 3-1 to 3.3 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.202 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Retain Figures 5-1 to 5-9 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.203 Appendix 6 Industrial Zone Support in Retain Figures 6-1 to 6-2 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points. part New Zealand Transport Agency 924.204 Appendix 7 Rototuna Town Centre Support New Zealand Transport Agency 924.205 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Figure 2-14 upon identification of the preferred location and number of connections to the Waikato part Expressway. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.206 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions Support in Amend Appendix 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions to ensure the correct roading hierarchy is part shown and ensure that all state highways are identified as major arterials. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.207 Figure 15-5b Transport corridor hierarchy plan Support in Amend Figure 15-5b Transport corridor hierarchy plan, to include all land inside the ‘envelope’ created by the part Expressway to the North of Hamilton. New Zealand Transport Agency 924.208 Zoning Map 40A Oppose New Zealand Transport Agency 924.209 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support Resource Efficiency Retain the Objective and Policies in 2.2.12 relating to efficient use of existing infrastructure. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.002 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface to replace the minimum permeable limits with maximum impermeable limits and delete controls on the location of permeable surfaces PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Retain Figures 7-1 to 7-4 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points. Map 40A-rezone the large lot Residential Zone for Percival and Ryburn Roads in the Ruakura Structure Plan area to the Ruakura Logistics Zone. Page 256 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards. part PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.005 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8a) Fences and Walls by deleting the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to part ensure the maximum height of any fence or wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.006 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.007 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d as it favours public rights over land owners privacy. part PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.008 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4e and 4.2.4f as they are unreasonably in favour of public amenity and against private property part rights. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.009 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting the assessment criteria for Restricted Discretionary Activities not complying with Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 Permeable surface; Rule 4.4.7 Interface between public and private; Rule 4.4.8 Fences and walls. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.010 1 Plan Overview Oppose Delete references to design guides. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.011 1.4.1.6 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.012 1.4.1.7 Fences Oppose Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a height limit of 1.8m. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.013 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with those in the Operative District Plan. PL & LJ Middlemiss 925.014 C General Oppose C-General - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b) iv relating to Outdoor Living Areas Page 257 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Family Trust PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.015 E Safe Environments Oppose E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.016 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone Oppose Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.017 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3u) with permitted activity status. PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust 925.018 9.6 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Oppose Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings. Charles William Friedlander 926.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.001 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to reduce the areas of Active Frontages. part Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.002 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Amend Rule 7.4.16 by reducing the amount of required clear glazing to at least 5 m or 75% (rather than 80%) of the part active frontage (whichever is the greater). Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.003 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses by deleting the height controls for Height Overlay 1 Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.004 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-2 by deleting the height controls for Height Overlay 1. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.005 7.4.7 Street Wall Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall and Appendix 5, Figure 5.3 Street Wall Height Overlay. Page 258 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.006 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Oppose Overlay Plan Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall and remove Figure 5.3 Street Wall Height Overlay Plan. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.007 7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving Amend Rule 7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving, deleting the requirement to sleeve ground floor retail units greater than 2000m2. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.008 25.10.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rule 25.10.4 b) to clarify that it does not preclude canopy signage; Delete Rule 25.10.4 d) regarding signs not creating a distraction to motorists. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.009 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Oppose Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces, to use the Operative District Plan minimum car parking requirements for the Central City. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.010 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Amend Rules 25.14.4.2(a)(ii) and (iii) and (b) to remove or lessen the cycle parking requirements. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.011 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that Integrated Transport Assessments are not triggered for any further development at Centre Place. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.012 1.1 Controlled Activities – Matters of Control Oppose Delete Volume 2 assessment criteria 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 and replace with provisions that minimises the extent of criteria, avoids duplication, focus exclusively on matters of concern, avoid direct reference to compliance with objectives and policies, references relevant design guide and assessment criteria and requires adequate and focused assessment of effects on the CBD that might arise from developments outside of the CBD. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.013 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 and amend section 1.2 in a manner that minimises the extent of the criteria whilst maximising their effectiveness, and provide that the design guides and design assessment criteria in Volume 2 Appendix 1.4 are relevant only to the extent that they illustrate methods which are deemed to comply with relevant Criteria. Kiwi Property Management Limited 927.014 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete 1.3 and replace to minimise the extent of the Criteria whilst maximising their effectiveness, avoid unnecessary duplication, focus exclusively on matters identified as being of concern in the objectives and policies; avoid direct reference to compliance with the objectives and policies. Kiwi Property Management 927.015 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Oppose Amend Rule 7.6a) l for any activity not complying with car parking sleeving requirements in Rule 7.5.6 are able to be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Amend Rule 7.6a) l for any activity not complying with car parking sleeving requirements in Rule 7.5.6 are able to be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Page 259 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Limited Sub Type Summary Discretion and Assessment Criteria William Roy Cowie 928.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. William Roy Cowie 928.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Remove the deferred Logistics Zone from the area bound by Ryburn and Percival Roads; Retain the Large Lot Residential Zoning and provide a buffer between residential and industrial activity. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.001 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description. part Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.002 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification. part PRS Planning Services Limited 929.003 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Oppose PRS Planning Services Limited 929.004 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Support in Part. Amend Policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b as per submission. part PRS Planning Services Limited 929.005 2.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose a) That Objective 2.2.2, Policy 2.2.2a and Policy 2.2.2c are amended to specifically relate to Greenfield Development in new Growth Areas, and allow flexibility by being 'generally' in accordance with the approved structure plans. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.006 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Oppose Oppose. Amend the text of the policies to apply only when development does not meet standards for permitted activities, remove the application of CPTED principles where development is not intended to be used by members of the public as suggested in submission. PRS Planning 929.007 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Oppose. Amend Policy 2.2.4a by replacing 'shall' with 'should' and enable location of business and development out of Oppose. Amend rule 2.2 to reflect that discretionary or non complying resource consents 'should not be contrary to the achievement' of the objectives and policies below. Page 260 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Services Limited Sub Type Summary Central City, Business and Industry zone where appropriate. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.008 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Oppose Oppose. Amend policy 2.2.5b to 'should' and allow business and industrial development to occur out of zone where appropriate. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.009 2.2.8 Objective and Policies Tangata Whenua Waikato Tainui Oppose Oppose. Policy 2.2.8d be deleted, as it is presumed any relevant Iwi Management Plans have been considered at the District Plan development stage, and it is unreasonable to be referenced in a policy when the implications of this document are unknown. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.010 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose Resource Efficiency Oppose. Replace reference to “shall” with “should”. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.011 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Oppose. Replace 'shall' with 'should' in all policies. Amend 2.2.13b) to suggest "Development 'should not compromise' future infrastructure needs..." as provided for in the submission. Delete Policy 2.2.13c). PRS Planning Services Limited 929.012 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans Oppose Amend the introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 (Objectives and Policies, Structure Plans) to be consistent with that used in Rule 2.2 (as sought to be amended by this submission). PRS Planning Services Limited 929.013 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.1Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans: Amend Policy 3.3.1bi. to reflect the intention that densities per hectare are to be achieved exclusive of roads by rewording (new text in brackets) as follows: '16 dwellings per hectare (excluding land to be vested as roads and reserve) for greenfield development.' Delete Policy 3.3.1b ii) in its entirety. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.014 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Oppose That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.2a, 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, 3.3.2e (Structure Plans) be replaced with the word "should". PRS Planning Services Limited 929.015 3.3.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.3b: (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) to clearly identify when Integrated Catchment Management Plans are required. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.016 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.4 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans): That Policies 3.3.4a and 3.3.4b be deleted; That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.4c, 3.3.4d, 3.3.4e, 3.3.4f, 3.3.4g be replaced with the word "should". PRS Planning Services Limited 929.017 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.5 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans): That the word "shall" in Policies3.3.5a, 3.3.5b be replaced with the word "should". Page 261 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary PRS Planning Services Limited 929.018 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.6 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans): That the word 'shall' in Policies 3.3.6a, 3.3.6b, 3.3.6c, 3.3.6d be replaced with the word 'should'. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.019 3.3.7 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) to clarify the status of the referenced Open Space Plan/Strategy. If this is unavailable then the Policy should be deleted or replaced with one that references the future reserves identified on the relevant structure plan. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.020 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.1a 1. and 2. include wording to clarify that land vested as roads and reserves is excluded from the density calculation. Amend Policy 4.2.1a 2. by deleting the word 'Areas' and using the terminology 'Residential Intensification Zones' used in other parts of the plan. Delete Policy 4.2.1a 3. Amend Policy 4.2.1c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' PRS Planning Services Limited 929.021 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 4.2.2a and 4.2.2b by replacing the word "shall" with "should"; and delete Policy 4.2.2c. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.022 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend the Policies in 4.2.3 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'; Amend Policy 4.2.3a(iii) by deleting the text 'storage space and'; Delete Policies 4.2.3a iv. and 4.2.3a vi; Delete Policy 4.2.3b. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.023 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend the Policies in 4.2.4 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'; Delete Policy 4.2.4c. Amend Policy 4.2.4d to include the text ' and also to meet the needs and convenience of residents'; Amend 4.2.4e to include the words 'not detract from or degrade'. Delete Policy 4.2.4f. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.024 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 4.2.6a to replace reference to 'less than minor' with the test of whether the effects can be 'avoided, remedied or mitigated'. Amend Policy 4.2.6c to ensure alignment with objective 4.2.6 and so it is not so prescriptive and rule based. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.025 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.3.1 by changing the activity status for Apartment Buildings and Detached Dwellings in the Residential Intensification Zone; 4.4.1 Density Oppose PRS Planning Services Limited 929.026 Amend Rule 4.3.1 by changing the activity status for Second and Subsequent Detached Dwellings in the General Residential and Large Lot Residential zones. Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i) to reduce the minimum net site area for detached dwellings to 350m2. Amend Rule 4.4.1a)ii) to read 150m2 average site area per unit. Page 262 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary PRS Planning Services Limited 929.027 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to refer to 'front yard setback' rather than 'forward of the front building line of the dwelling' and increase the minimum areas to 100% excluding areas required for vehicle access purposes; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and 4.4.3d PRS Planning Services Limited 929.028 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.029 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 c) as people should be able to provide for their privacy as they see fit. Delete Rule 4.4.7 d) or amend to indicate that the entrance are of a dwelling is to be visible from the transport corridor. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.030 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support Retain Rule 4.4.8a). PRS Planning Services Limited 929.031 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area PRS Planning Services Limited 929.032 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose Medium-Density Residential Zone Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.033 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) Oppose Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a retail development. Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.034 4.7.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship Oppose That Rule 4.7.3(d) (Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship) be amended to delete the requirement for no exterior indication of the activity. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.035 4.7.5 Home-based Businesses Oppose Amend Rule 4.7.5 a) (Home-based Businesses), 4.7.5 a)(i) and 4.7.5 a)(ii) to read as follows: Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a new definition of Boundary Fence/Wall to clarify that it means a fence or wall located on the legal boundary of a site only. Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) ii) and 4.4.10 b) iv relating to Outdoor Living Areas "a) Rule 4.7.5 a) Home based businesses shall: b) Rule 4.7.5 a)(i) Employ no more than 4 people, one of whom must reside on the site on a permanent basis. c) Rule 4.7.5 a)(ii) Not exceed 30% of the total coverage of buildings permitted to be erected on the site." PRS Planning 929.036 4.7.8 Show Homes Oppose Delete Rule 4.7.8 c) as no timeframe for the duration of a show home is necessary. Page 263 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Services Limited PRS Planning Services Limited 929.037 4.7.10 Visitor Accommodation Oppose That the Heading to Rule 4.7.10 be amended to read: PRS Planning Services Limited 929.038 4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend 4.10a)i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, ix, x, xi, xii by removing any assessment criteria that are not directly relevant to the nature of the land use under consideration. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.039 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 6.6a)(i) - (xi) so that reference to any criteria that are not directly relevant to the nature of the land use under consideration are deleted. 'Visitor Accommodation (Outside Visitor Facilities Area)' Amend the Plan so that Public Art is a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Business 1 to 7 Zones. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.040 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend 7.6a) i to xiii to remove reference to any criteria not directly relevant to the nature of land use under consideration. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.041 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3. so that Public Art in the Central City Zone is a Restricted Discretionary Activity. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.042 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 9.7(a)(i)-(x) so that reference to any criteria that are not directly relevant to the nature of the land use under consideration are deleted. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.043 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3u), v) & x) to remove reference to Rules 9.4 and 9.5 and vehicle movements. Amend Rule 9.3ff) to remove reference to rule 9.3u) & x). PRS Planning Services Limited 929.044 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Subdivision - Amend 23.2.2 Objective and Policies by replacing 'shall' with 'should' PRS Planning Services Limited 929.045 23.2.4 Objective and Policy Oppose Retain Subdivision 23.2.4 Objective and Policies with amendments replacing 'shall' with 'should' PRS Planning Services Limited 929.046 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Retain Subdivision 23.2.5 Objective and Policies with amendments replacing 'shall' with 'should' PRS Planning Services Limited 929.047 Table 23.3a Amend Subdivision Table 23.3a to include boundary relocations Oppose Page 264 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary PRS Planning Services Limited 929.048 Table 23.3b Oppose Amend Subdivision Table 23.3b to include boundary relocations PRS Planning Services Limited 929.049 Table 23.3c Oppose Amend Subdivision Table 23.3c to include boundary relocations PRS Planning Services Limited 929.050 23.6.5 Boundary Adjustments Oppose Amend Subdivision 23.6.5 Boundary Adjustments to include boundary relocations PRS Planning Services Limited 929.051 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Oppose Amend Subdivision 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape to minimum net site area to 350m2 PRS Planning Services Limited 929.052 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Subdivision - Remove rules 23.7.3i and j for General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones PRS Planning Services Limited 929.053 24.3.2 Nature of Contributions Support in Rule 24.3.2(b) amend to make it clear a financial contribution must not be imposed fro any purpose covered by a part development contribution. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.054 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Oppose Amend rule 24.3.3(d) to reword the preamble so the imposition of conditions be limited to the matters specifically listed in the table; add an additional matter for consideration that relates to where previous payments have been made; the reason for contributions under the heading reserves be amended to remove "money and/or"; the reason for Offset Effects be added to. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.055 25.1.4.1 All Development Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.1 General Standards for All Development. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.056 25.1.4.2 Site-specific Oppose Constraints on Development Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.057 25.1.4.3 Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Oppose Delete 25.1.4.3 General Standards Earthworks and Vegetation Removal. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.058 25.1.4.4 Three Waters Oppose Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.059 25.1.4.5 Transportation Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.060 25.1.4.6 Landscaping and Screening Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.6 General Standards Landscaping and Screening. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.061 25.1.4.7 Financial Contributions Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions. Page 265 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary PRS Planning Services Limited 929.062 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(a) regarding earthworks as a permitted activity. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.063 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii and iii. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.064 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will be considered. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.065 A General Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 1.2A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not complying with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted Discretionary Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone." Delete rules 1.2A2, 1.2A3 and rule 1.2A4. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.066 Design Guides Oppose Amend Rule 1.2B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.067 Structure Plans and Concept Oppose Plans Delete 1.2.B5 (Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria). PRS Planning Services Limited 929.068 C General Oppose Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria to focus the scope of assessment to areas of non compliance. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.069 Service and Storage Areas Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.070 Site Coverage and Impermeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2.C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term; Amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or mitigated. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.071 Height Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 C21 to narrow scope of assessment. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.072 D Location of the Development Oppose Delete Rule 1.2 D1. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.073 E Safe Environments Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 E1 and E2 to require CPTED principles to be applied only for buildings intended to attract or be used by the public. PRS Planning 929.074 G Landscaping and Screening Oppose Amend assessment criteria 1.2 G1-4 to ensure the imposition of landscaping conditions is not in excess of what is Page 266 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Services Limited required in Section 25.5. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.075 K Dairies Oppose Amend criteria 1.2 K1 and add a new K3 in relation to assessment of effects of Dairies on residential character. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.076 S Sustainable Use of Resources Oppose Delete assessment criteria 1.2 S1. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.077 Parking Oppose Delete Appendix 1.2 V12 regarding the restriction of car parks forward of a front building line and V13 regarding landscaping and design of parking in relation to surrounding architecture and public spaces. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.078 Ruakura Structure Plan Area Oppose Clarify the meaning and intent of V19 - Ruakura structure plan traffic modelling reports. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.079 X General Oppose Provide additional assessment criteria to 1.2 X for activities within the Knowledge Zone as the scale of potential development of this site could have adverse effects on neighbouring residential and commercial areas. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.080 Y General Oppose Opposes 1.2 Y1. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.081 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone Oppose Add explanatory text in 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone to exclude being applied to infill development creating 1-5 lots and where no new roads are created. PRS Planning Services Limited 929.082 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definitions of "Apartment Building" and "Duplex Dwellings" and a new definition for "Boundary part Fence/Wall". Anthony Shaun Wilson 930.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Anthony Shaun Wilson 930.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4. Anthony Shaun Wilson 930.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Anthony Shaun Wilson 930.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.001 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Amend Rule 7.3 pp) so that apartments at ground floor level in primary active frontage overlay areas are a NonComplying Activity in the Downtown Precinct and Restricted Discretionary Activities in other Precincts. Also amend the rule so that Ground floor level apartments are Restricted Discretionary Activities in secondary active frontage overlay areas, and Permitted Activities in the Central City Zone when not in any active frontage area. Oppose Page 267 of 541 Sub Name Hopper Developments Ltd Sub Point Plan Provision 931.002 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Sub Type Summary Oppose Amend Appendix 5 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan to include Sonning carpark in Height Overlay 1. Amend Maximum Height Controls to allow for a height of 24m with double bonus in Height Overlay 2 Amend Rule 7.4.4 g) Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus - to include Toilets available for public use and to be used by the disabled. Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of the through site. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.003 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan by showing the Sonning carpark site as being located in Height Overlay 1 or allow for a maximum height of 24m with Double Bonus in Height Overlay 2. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.004 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 7.6a) xxiv regarding new buildings, alterations and additions within Key Development Site 6 by removing consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12. Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor read like a rule. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.005 Building Separation Oppose Amend Assessment Criteria Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add a definition for internal boundaries. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.006 18.1 Purpose Oppose Amend 18.1 b) ii describing "place" to be consistent with NZS4404:2010. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.007 25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings and Internal Vehicle Access Oppose Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing Major Arterial or Strategic Transport Corridors, eg roads with more than 20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.008 Integrated Transport Assessment Oppose Delete Appendix 1.2 V7 Integrated Transport Assessments, regarding expectation levels for safe and efficient transport networks. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.009 1.4.6 Key Development Site Design Guidance Oppose Amend 1.4.6.6c) Key Development Site 6 – Sonning, with amendments to the mix of uses on site and indicative concept figures. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.010 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Oppose Delete the Secondary Active Frontage from Figure 5-7. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.011 25.15 Urban Design Support in Rule 25.15 Urban Design - Seeks clarity on the role of the Urban Design Panel and VISTA in light of the urban design part focus of the Proposed District Plan. Page 268 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Inclusion of an advice note in section 1.1.2.2. n) to make it clear that any development which requires a land use consent including regard to urban design aspects will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel; Clarity of the role of the Urban Design Panel to exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent including consideration of urban design aspects. Hopper Developments Ltd 931.012 24 Financial Contributions Support in 24 Financial Contributions -Request adoption of the “Developer Agreement” approach in regard to financial part contributions and development contributions for significant developments. Neil Brumblecomble 932.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 and reinstate the density provisions of the Operative District Plan. Neil Brumblecomble 932.002 4.4.1 Density Oppose Opposes Rule 4.4.1 Density Neil Brumblecomble 932.003 25.13.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Seeks that water meters be required for all residential and commercial properties. Guy Anthony Perrett 933.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Guy Anthony Perrett 933.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Guy Anthony Perrett 933.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Guy Anthony Perrett 933.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Debra Jane Hansen 934.001 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Support Support Rule 1.4.8b i) ii), iii) & iv) Opoia Design Guidance. Debra Jane Hansen 934.002 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support Support Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation and alcohol free zones in public/shared space outside of commercial/restaurant premises Debra Jane Hansen 934.003 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Support in Support 7.1.4 regarding Opoia Precinct subject to pedestrian bridge across river and vehicular access & parking being part addressed. Rex Hannam 935.001 3.4 Peacocke Support Retain provisions within the Plan (Parts 3.4, 5.2.8, 5.3-6, 23.3, 23.6 and Appendix 2.2) that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area and Peacocke Character Zone. Rex Hannam 935.002 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Support Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Page 269 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Peacocke Character Zone Structure Plan Area. Rex Hannam 935.003 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Rex Hannam 935.004 23.3 Rules – Activity Status Tables Support Retain provisions that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Rex Hannam 935.005 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Amend Appendices 2.1-3 Peacocke Structure Plan Maps by relocating the Proposed Southern Links Arterial Corridors and amending the neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission. Rex Hannam 935.006 25.14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Delete provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas (ATCPA) and amend Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace ATCPA with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors. Rex Hannam 935.007 25.14.5 Rules – Specific Standards Oppose Delete provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas (ATCPA) and amend Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace ATCPA with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors. Rex Hannam 935.008 Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Seeks the deletion of provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas and amend Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors. Rex Hannam 935.009 Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods Oppose Amend Appendices 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods by relocating the proposed Southern Links Arterial Corridors and amending the neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission. Rex Hannam 935.010 23.6 Rules – Specific Standards Support Retain provisions that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Pauline Norma O'Brien 936.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Pauline Norma O'Brien 936.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Pauline Norma O'Brien 936.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Pauline Norma O'Brien 936.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Denise Margaret Frost 937.001 Zoning Map 45A Map 45A-Rezone the entire Municipal Pools site Sport and Recreation zone; and provide for restaurants as a permitted activity. Oppose Page 270 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.001 2.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 2.2.1. Replace Policy 2.2.1a to provide opportunities and identify locations for urban intensification. part Amend Policy 2.2.1b by deleting reference to minimising energy and carbon use and to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.002 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Support Property Council New Zealand 938.003 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Support in Retain Objective 2.2.4. Amend Policies 2.2.4a and 2.2.4b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. part Property Council New Zealand 938.004 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Support in Retain Objective 2.2.5. Amend Policies 2.2.5a and 2.2.5b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. part Property Council New Zealand 938.005 2.2.6 Objective and Policies Residential Development Support Retain Objective 2.2.6. Amend Policies 2.2.6a and 2.2.6b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.006 2.2.7 Objective and Policies The Waikato River Support Retain Objective 2.2.7 regarding the Waikato River. Property Council New Zealand 938.007 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Amend Policy 2.2.13b so that development does not have to allow for future infrastructure needs over and above its own needs. Also, replace the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.008 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Oppose Hamilton’s Identity, Character and Heritage Amend Policies 2.2.10a to 2.2.10d by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.009 2.2.11 Objective and Policies Oppose Natural Environments Amend Policies 2.2.11a and 2.2.11b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.010 2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose Resource Efficiency Amend Policies 2.2.12a to 2.2.12c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.011 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans Oppose Amend 3.3 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) so that “Any discretionary or non-complying activity should not be contrary to the objectives and policies below” Property Council New Zealand 938.012 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.1b to read: “Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time a gross density excluding roads of 16 dwellings per hectare” Property Council New Zealand 938.013 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, and 3.3.2e by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council 938.014 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.4a to 3.3.4c and 3.3.4e, to 3.3.4g by replacing the word “shall” with “should”. Amend Policy 2.2.3b to apply only when development does not meet standards for permitted activities and remove the application of CPTED principles where development is not intended to be used by members of the public as suggested in submission. Also, replace with word 'shall' with 'should'. Page 271 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary New Zealand Property Council New Zealand 938.015 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.5a and 3.3.5b by replacing the word “shall” with “should”. Property Council New Zealand 938.016 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.6a to 3.3.6d by replacing the word “shall” with “should”. Property Council New Zealand 938.017 3.3.7 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.7a and 3.3.7b by replacing the word “shall” with “should”. Property Council New Zealand 938.018 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies in 4.2.1 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Amend Policy 4.2.1a)ii. by deleting #3; Insert additional policy '4.4.1a)iii. 150m2 minimum average site area per residential unit'; Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a new definition for 'average site area'. Property Council New Zealand 938.019 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.2b by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.020 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.3a to 4.2.3d by replacing the word “shall” with “should” Property Council New Zealand 938.021 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.4a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Amend Policy 4.2.4e to widen the scope to enable consideration of changes in character. Property Council New Zealand 938.022 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.5a by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.023 4.2.6 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 4.2.6c, 4.2.6d and 4.2.6e by replacing the word "shall" with "should"; Retain Objective 4.2.6 and Policy 4.2.6a. Property Council New Zealand 938.024 4.2.7 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.7a by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.025 4.2.9 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 4.2.9a and 4.2.9b by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.026 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.3.1 by providing for Comprehensive Residential Development as a Controlled Activity on sites in excess part of 2000m2 in the General Residential Zone. A Comprehensive Residential Development should achieve a minimum average site density 300 m2; Delete Policy 4.2.3a iv. Amend Rule 4.3.1 by providing for Town-house development on residential sites that are within 500m of any Business Zone as a Controlled Activity. A townhouse development in these areas should achieve a minimum average site Page 272 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary density of 250 m2; Amend Rule 4.3.1b) so that Apartment Buildings in the Residential Intensification Zone are a Controlled Activity; Amend Rule 4.3.1f) so that Detached Dwellings: second and subsequent detached dwellings per site in the General Residential Zone are a Controlled Activity; Retain Rule 4.3.1g) duplex dwellings; Amend Rules 4.3.1 h), i), j), k) - to ensure consistency and certainty with regard to Activity Status; Amend Rule 4.3.1n) so that Residential Centres in the Residential Intensification Zone are a Controlled Activity; Retain Rule 4.3.1bb) Office, other than as a home-based business. Property Council New Zealand 938.027 4.4.1 Density Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i) to require the density for residential unit in the General Residential Zone to be reduced to 375m2 Property Council New Zealand 938.028 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) be planted in grass, shrubs or trees; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and 4.4.3d Property Council New Zealand 938.029 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary Support Retain Rule 4.4.5 b) as this provision will ensure better design outcomes. Property Council New Zealand 938.030 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.6 d) to allow a minimum building setback of 0.5m from a right of way. Property Council New Zealand 938.031 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.7 b) to allow garages forward of the front building line where the wall facing the street consists of at least 20% glazed materials. Delete Rule 4.4.7 c) Property Council New Zealand 938.032 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8 regarding Fences and Walls by deleting reference to 'boundary' part Property Council New Zealand 938.033 4.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Property Council New Zealand 938.034 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 to reduce the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the residential intensification zone; Delete Rule 4.4.12 b). Property Council New Zealand 938.035 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - by changing the activity status to Controlled; and allow a Comprehensive Development Plans to be approved on a site by site basis. Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.9 regarding Residential Building Separation and Privacy to allow for the reduction in the separation distances, as set out in the submission. Page 273 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.036 4.6.2 Development Yield Oppose Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield and include residential development yields as a guideline in 1.4.1 MediumDensity Residential Design Guidelines. Property Council New Zealand 938.037 4.6.4 Residential Unit Size Oppose Amend Rule 4.6.4 a) by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; Delete Rule 4.6.4b). Property Council New Zealand 938.038 4.7.5 Home-based Businesses Oppose Amend Rule 4.7.5a)(i) (Home-based Businesses) to read as follows: Property Council New Zealand 938.039 4.7.8 Show Homes Oppose Delete Rule 4.7.8c) regarding show homes as placing a time duration serves no resource management purpose. Property Council New Zealand 938.040 4.7.9 Rest Homes Oppose 4.7.9 Rest Homes - seek amendment of Rule 4.7.9(c) to specify individual minimum outdoor living requirements. Property Council New Zealand 938.041 4.11 Notification Rule Oppose Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 - Assessment Criteria to ensure that only matters relevant to reason for the resource consent are considered. Property Council New Zealand 938.042 5.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.1a, b, d and e by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.043 5.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 5.2.2a by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.044 5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.3d, f, g and h by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.045 5.2.4 Objective and Policies Special Heritage Zone Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.4a, b, c and d by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.046 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.5a and 5.2.5b by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.047 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.6a to 5.2.6j by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.048 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.7a to 5.2.7j by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.049 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones Amend Rules 5.3.1 k)-n) to ensure consistency and certainty with regard to the Activity Status of Managed Care Facilities. Retain Rule 5.3.1z) regarding offices (other than home based business) Property Council 938.050 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.3a) to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) to 'Have at least one person, including the principal operator of the home-based business reside on the site.' Page 274 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision New Zealand Sub Type Summary Planting be planted in grass, shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures 5.4.3a and 4.4.3b. Property Council New Zealand 938.051 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.7b) to allow for garages to be located forward of the front building line where the wall facing the street consists of at least 20% glazed materials. Delete 4.4.7 c). Property Council New Zealand 938.052 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Support in Amend Rule 5.4.8 a) regarding Fences and Walls by deleting reference to "boundary". part Property Council New Zealand 938.053 5.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.9 Residential Building - Separation and Privacy - to allow for reduction in setback in certain circumstances as per the Operative District Plan. Property Council New Zealand 938.054 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.11 b) (iv) (Outdoor Living Area) and Figure 5.4.11e Property Council New Zealand 938.055 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 a) (i) relating to number of people allowed to be employed in a home-based business. Property Council New Zealand 938.056 5.5.8 Show Homes Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.8 c) as no timeframe for the duration of a show home is necessary. Property Council New Zealand 938.057 5.5.9 Rest Homes Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.9c) to specify what the individual minimum outdoor living requirements area is. Property Council New Zealand 938.058 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 (District Plan Administration) with a view of streamlining and simplifying. Property Council New Zealand 938.059 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Oppose Amend Policies 6.2.1a to 6.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Amend Policy 6.2.1f to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use. Property Council New Zealand 938.060 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Oppose Amend Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2g to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'. Amend 6.2.2 to add a new policy to generally encourage mixed use residential activity where appropriate. Property Council New Zealand 938.061 6.2.3 Objective and Policies Neighbourhood Centres Support in Amend Policies 6.2.3a and 6.2.3b by replacing the word "shall" with "should". part Amend 6.2.3 to add a new Policy to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use. Amend Rule 6.3r) Retail Activity 150-399m to be in line with the explanation of Neighbourhood Centres Property Council New Zealand 938.062 6.2.4 Objective and Policies Major Event Facilities Oppose Amend Policies 6.2.4a and 6.2.4b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.063 6.1 Purpose Oppose Combine Business 5 and 6 Zones with consequential amendments. Amend 6.1g) to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use. Page 275 of 541 Sub Name Property Council New Zealand Sub Point Plan Provision 938.064 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Sub Type Summary Oppose Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and xx) so that new buildings and Apartments above ground floor are Controlled Activities, and alterations and additions and accessory buildings are Permitted Activities. Amend Rule 6.3 e) by replacing the word "industry" with "Industrial activity", and amend the definition of "industrial activity" so that it is clear that warehouse and bulk storage are deemed light industry. Amend Rules 6.3 l), m) and n) so that Offices up to 500m2 are a Permitted Activity and Offices greater than 500m2 are a Discretionary Activity. Amend Rules 6.3 r), aa) and bb) so that Retail up to 399m2, licences premises up to 200m2, restaurants and cafes up to 200m2 are Permitted Activities in Neighbourhood Centres. Amend Rules 6.3 s) and t) so that retail activities greater than 399m2 are Permitted Activities in Suburban Centres. Amend Rules 6.3 and 6.3 f) so that Wholesale and Trade Retail and light industry are Permitted Activities in the Business 4 Zone. Property Council New Zealand 938.065 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.1a) to increase the maximum height limit for Business Zones 3 and 4 to 20m. Property Council New Zealand 938.066 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.3a) so the 5m setback only applies to major arterial roads and does not apply to signs. Delete Rule 6.4.3c) as it is ambiguous and unclear what "any internal zone boundary" means and what setback distance would apply. Amend Rule 6.4.3b) to clarify that signs do not need to comply with setbacks. Property Council New Zealand 938.067 6.4.5 Building Intensity Oppose Amend 6.4.5 a) to allow the Business 4 Zone a maximum ratio of floor area to of 2:1. Property Council New Zealand 938.068 6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose Delete Rule 6.4.6 regarding maximum Tenancy size or amend 6.3t) so that the activity status for retail activities in Suburban Centre and Neighbourhood Centre Zones correspond with those in Rule 6.4.6. Property Council New Zealand 938.069 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review of Volume 2, Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent is required are considered, and that criteria is not prescriptive or read like a rule. Property Council New Zealand 938.070 7.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.1e, and 7.2.1g by replacing the word "shall" with "should" Property Council New Zealand 938.071 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.2a to 7.2.2f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Page 276 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.072 7.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.3a to 7.2.3c by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.073 7.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 7.2.4a by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.074 7.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.5a to 7.2.5c by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.075 7.2.6 Objective and Policies Downtown Precinct Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.6a to 7.2.6g by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.076 7.2.7 Objective and Policies City Living Precinct Oppose Amend Policies 7.2.7a to 7.2.7h by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Amend Objective 7.2.7 to delete "small scale" in relation to offices to recognise there are existing large scale offices in the City Living Precinct. Property Council New Zealand 938.077 7.2.8 Objective and Policies Ferry Bank Precinct Oppose Amend Policies in 7.2.8a, b and d by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Property Council New Zealand 938.078 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives and Policies in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Property Council New Zealand 938.079 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend the numbering of Rule 7.3 as there are two a)’s Amend Rule 7. 3 a) and b) so 'new buildings' and 'alterations' are a Controlled Activity Amend Rule 7.3 to delete the Opoia Precinct. Amend Rules 7.3 m), n) o) s), u), x), y), a), ll, mm) hh), ii) tt) to allow for offices, retail activities in excess of 250m2 when it is sleeved with smaller retail units, tourism ventures and information centres, places of assembly, Restaurants, cafes and licensed premises, visitor accommodation, health care services , community centres, and Tertiary education and specialised training facilities, as Permitted Activities Amend Rule 7.3v) and w) so that Yard based retail is a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Delete the Parking Building Overlay and amend Rules 7.3 (cc) and (dd) to provide Parking Buildings as Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rules 7.3 ee) and ff) so that Parking Lots are a Restricted Discretionary Activity and delete the 6 month duration limit. Property Council New Zealand 938.080 7.4.1 Site Coverage Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.1 Site Coverage Property Council New Zealand 938.081 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Property Council New Zealand 938.082 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Oppose Amend maximum heights in Rule 7.4.4 to be consistent with the Operative District Plan and align the height control areas with the Precinct Areas. Page 277 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.083 7.4.7 Street Wall Oppose Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall Property Council New Zealand 938.084 7.4.9 Car Parking Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.9 a) so that it only applies to sites with a Primary Active Frontage. Property Council New Zealand 938.085 7.4.16 Active Frontages Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.16 a) by removing the requirement for buildings to contribute to retail appearance and function of the city and; amend vehicle access requirements across active frontages Property Council New Zealand 938.086 7.4.17 Awning Cover Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.17 so the awning requirement does not apply to Secondary Active Frontages. Property Council New Zealand 938.087 7.5.4 Residential Oppose Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units. Property Council New Zealand 938.088 7.5.5 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.5 to clarify that it applies to residential development (e.g. incorporate with Rule 7.5.4). Delete Rule 7.5.5 b) regarding fences, walls, landscaping and planting. Property Council New Zealand 938.089 7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving Amend Rule 7.5.6a) to provide an alternative option to sleeving of 70% minimum glazed frontage Property Council New Zealand 938.090 7.5.7 Yard-Based Retailing Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.7 regarding yard based retailing to clarify "rear of site" Property Council New Zealand 938.091 7.5.8 Office and Industry Oppose Amend Rule 7.5.8 by incorporating within Rule 7.4.16. Property Council New Zealand 938.092 7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor read like a rule. Property Council New Zealand 938.093 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies 9.2.1a to 9.2.1c to replace 'shall' with 'should', and add new policy to provide for non-industrial and retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification. Property Council New Zealand 938.094 9.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 9.2.2a to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.095 9.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 9.2.3a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'. Property Council New Zealand 938.096 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3l) to include existing retail and office activities as a Permitted Activity. Delete Rule 9.3f) & g). Add definition of Trade and Industry Training facilities in section 1.6. Retain rule 9.3j), amend rule 9.3k) to allow Page 278 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary establishment on any industrial site fronting an arterial road. Amend Rules 9.3u) & v) for non-gateway sites to be Permitted activities, and delete reference to vehicle movements. Property Council New Zealand 938.097 9.4.1 Building Setbacks (Except in Rotokauri Employment Area) Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.1a) so road setbacks only apply to major arterial roads. Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial. Property Council New Zealand 938.098 9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Rule 9.4.5a) to apply to greenfield locations only. Property Council New Zealand 938.099 9.4.6 Site Layout Oppose Delete Rule 9.4.6 and instead require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary. Property Council New Zealand 938.100 9.5.2 Ancillary Retail Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.2 regarding floor space limits for ancillary retail as it is too restrictive. Property Council New Zealand 938.101 9.7 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Appendix 1 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort. Property Council New Zealand 938.102 Transport Corridor Network Oppose Amend 18.2.1 by adding a new policy that relates to property access being a key function of the transport corridor. Property Council New Zealand 938.103 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 23.2.1a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' Property Council New Zealand 938.104 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 23.2.2a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' Property Council New Zealand 938.105 23.2.3 Objective and Policy Oppose Amend Policy 23.2.3a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' and amend Policy 23.2.2a ix to allow targets to be met over time. Property Council New Zealand 938.106 23.2.4 Objective and Policy Oppose Amend Policies in 23.2.4 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' Property Council New Zealand 938.107 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose Property Council New Zealand 938.108 Table 23.3a Amend Policies 23.2.5a to 23.2.5c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' Support in Amend Appendix 1.7 to define 'Boundary adjustment" and "Company Lease". Amend Rule 23.3a by adding boundary part relocation as a controlled activity. Retain Rule 23.3a iii and vi. Amend Rule 23.3a v and viii to provide for Fee simple and Unit Title subdivision as a controlled activity except in a Hazard Area where it should be a restricted discretionary activity. Amend Rule 23.3a vi, x and xi to provide for Cross lease subdivision and subdivision of an allotment containing a scheduled heritage site or a significant natural area as restricted discretionary activities. Page 279 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.109 Table 23.3c Oppose Amend Subdivision Table 23.3c to include all Special Character Zones Property Council New Zealand 938.110 23.5.1 Telecommunication, Electricity, Gas and Computer Media Support in Amend Rule 23.5.1 to allow for wireless telecommunication and computer media. part Property Council New Zealand 938.111 23.6.2 Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision Oppose Delete Rule 23.6.2d) and amend Rule 23.6.2 f) regarding Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision by referring to s224 of the Resource Management Act, not the Building Act. Property Council New Zealand 938.112 23.6.4 Cross-lease to Freehold Subdivision Oppose Amend Rule 23.6.4 regarding cross lease plans to recognise that not all plans have exclusive areas identified. Property Council New Zealand 938.113 23.6.5 Boundary Adjustments Oppose Amend Rule 23.6.5 regarding Boundary Adjustments by replacing additional "allotments" with additional "certificates of title". Property Council New Zealand 938.114 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.1 to allow for a density of 375m2 net site area per residential unit in the General Residential Zone and delete the average net site area requirement. Amend Rule 23.7.1 s) to provide for Industrial Zone sites to be a minimum of 500m2 and Rule 23.7.1x) to allow for Industrial Zone sites to only have a 15m diameter shape factor circle. Property Council New Zealand 938.115 23.7.2 Subdivision Suitability Oppose Delete Rule 23.7.2 regarding the suitability of the site for future development. Property Council New Zealand 938.116 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Delete Rules 23.7.3 a), c) and j). Amend Rule 23.7.3 d) to increase the number of allotments off a right of way. Amend Rule 23.7.3 f) regarding minimum private way widths to apply to 5 or more allotments. Amend Rule 23.7.3h) to increase the maximum length of a private way. Amend Rule 23.7.3i) to increase the maximum cul-de-sac length. Amend Rule 23.7.3k) to allow cul-de-sac to access other cul-de-sac. Property Council New Zealand 938.117 23.7.4 Residential Intensification Zone Oppose Delete Rule 23.7.4b) regarding a minimum rear boundary width of a front site. Property Council New Zealand 938.118 23.7.5 Business 1 to 7 Zones, Oppose Central City Zone, Te Rapa North Industrial Zone, Ruakura Industrial Park Zone, Ruakura Logistics Zone and Industrial Zone Amend Rule 23.7.5c) to reduce access widths to 7m. Delete Rule 23.7.5 e) regarding access widths onto an Arterial Road. Property Council New Zealand 938.119 23.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 23.8 and Appendix 1 to streamline and simplify provisions, ensure only relevant matters are considered, and that criteria are not prescriptive. Page 280 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.120 24.3.2 Nature of Contributions Support Retain 24.3.2 Nature of Contributions Property Council New Zealand 938.121 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Oppose Amend 24.3.3 Level of Contribution to "---shall be calculated in accordance with, the following matters ...” Property Council New Zealand 938.122 25.2.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend Rule 25.2.4.1 c) to ensure the provision does not restrict materials being removed off site (i.e. trucked away from the work site). Property Council New Zealand 938.123 25.2.5 Rules – Specific Standards Oppose Amend Rule 25.2.5 regarding earthworks to increase the permitted volume to 250m3. Property Council New Zealand 938.124 25.13.4.6 Water Impact Assessments Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) so that ICMPs that have been approved prior to the Plan becoming part operative do not have to be in accordance with the information requirements of Volume 2, Appendix 1.5.5. Property Council New Zealand 938.125 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) to clarify when an assessment for parking and end of journey facilities is triggered and that it does not apply to building alterations. Property Council New Zealand 938.126 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that Permitted Activities are not required to prepare an Integrated Transport Assessment. Property Council New Zealand 938.127 1.1 Controlled Activities – Matters of Control Oppose Review Appendix 1 to streamline and only require assessment of those matters relevant to the reason for the consent. Property Council New Zealand 938.128 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent is required are considered. Property Council New Zealand 938.129 V General Oppose Delete Appendix 1.2, Transportation, V7 regarding expectations for network performance. Property Council New Zealand 938.130 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria Oppose Review Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent is required are considered. Property Council New Zealand 938.131 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria Review Section 1.4 - Design Guides with a view to simplifying and streamlining, with no conflict between urban design and transport outcomes. Property Council New Zealand 938.132 1.5.20 Centre Viability Assessment Report Oppose Amend 1.5.20 to outline circumstances when a Centre Viability Assessment Report is required. Property Council New Zealand 938.133 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding new definitions for 'Household', 'Average Site Area', 'Gross Density excluding roads', part 'Boundary adjustment', 'Trade and Industry Training Facilities'. Clarify the definition of 'Industry' and 'Net Site Area'. Page 281 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend the definition of 'Ancillary Retailing and Offices' Property Council New Zealand 938.134 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. The area should instead be zoned Residential Intensification. Property Council New Zealand 938.135 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Oppose Amend Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan so that the Height Overlay Areas align with the Precinct Areas. Property Council New Zealand 938.136 Table 15-2b Number of Support parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone Property Council New Zealand 938.137 Table 15-2g Number of Support in Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to remove the requirement for lockers as part of the end of journey facilities for bicycle end-of-journey part cyclists. facilities required – Central City Zone and Business Zones 1 to 7 Property Council New Zealand 938.138 Table 15-1j Internal vehicle access widths Oppose Amend Appendix Table 15-1j Internal vehicle access widths to ensure consistency with the Subdivision Chapter. Property Council New Zealand 938.139 Planning Maps Oppose Amend Business 5 and 6 to create one zone; rezone Te Rapa Road to reflect the non-industrial uses; Rezone new areas for residential intensification; Rezone old Avalon Drive to enable regeneration; Rezone Frankton from industrial to a more enabling zone e.g. mixed-use; Remove Opoia from the Central City Zone; Reduce the extent of the Business 2 Zone at Claudelands. Property Council New Zealand 938.140 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Oppose Amend 2.2 to reflect that discretionary or non complying resource consents 'should not be contrary to' the objectives and policies below. Property Council New Zealand 938.141 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.10 b); Retain Table 15-2b Number of parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone. Amend Rule 4.4.10 c) iv. by deleting the text "where communal open space is provided"; Amend Rule 4.4.10 f) to allow for the reduction of individual outdoor living areas when a communal area is provided. Property Council New Zealand 938.142 6.2 Objectives and Policies Business 1 to 7 Zones Oppose Amend the Objectives and Policies within 6.2 to specifically mention land zoned Business 1 and 4 that is outside of a Sub-Regional Centre. Property Council New Zealand 938.143 6.4.9 Residential Development Oppose Amend Rule 6.4.9 to add standards for residential apartments (i.e. density, outdoor living and service areas etc.) for the Business Zones. Property Council New Zealand 938.144 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Page 282 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Property Council New Zealand 938.145 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks so that signs do not need to comply. Property Council New Zealand 938.146 9.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policies in 9.2.4 to replace the word 'shall' with 'should' Property Council New Zealand 938.147 9.5.3 Ancillary Offices Oppose Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive, and unclear if it only applies to industrial activities or the full range of activities anticipated by the Zone. Property Council New Zealand 938.148 25.14.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing roads with more than 20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes. Property Council New Zealand 938.149 4.7.10 Visitor Accommodation Oppose Amend the title of Rule 4.7.10 to read "Visitor Accommodation outside of the Visitor Facilities Area" Estonie Jean Funaki 939.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Estonie Jean Funaki 939.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Estonie Jean Funaki 939.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Estonie Jean Funaki 939.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Gary Richard Wiseman 941.001 5 Special Character Zones Oppose Amend the provisions within Section 5 (Special Character Zones) in relation to development within Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area by increasing the minimum area to 600m2 for all building activity, amending the minimum number of storeys from two to one, deleting the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape provisions and replacing them with normal residential provisions. Gary Richard Wiseman 941.002 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A-retain Lot 2 DP 425316 as residential and amend Lot 2 DP 425316 173 Rotokauri Rd from residential to residential reserve. E'stonie Jean Petersen 942.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose E'stonie Jean Petersen 942.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 E'stonie Jean Petersen 942.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Page 283 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary E'stonie Jean Petersen 942.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Robyn & Graham McBride 943.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Bruce Alafoki Kaufana 944.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Bruce Alafoki Kaufana 944.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Bruce Alafoki Kaufana 944.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Bruce Alafoki Kaufana 944.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Titanium Park Joint Venture 945.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Amend 3.7(f) to update the table 'Industrial Land Allocation in the Future Proof Area' to take account of the appeal by Titanium Park Joint Venture to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement. Amanda Burney 946.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Heather Margaret Kaufana 947.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Heather Margaret Kaufana 947.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Heather Margaret Kaufana 947.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Heather Margaret Kaufana 947.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jared Edward Coromandel 948.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 284 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Jared Edward Coromandel 948.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Jared Edward Coromandel 948.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Jared Edward Coromandel 948.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.001 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Support in Part. Amend Restricted Discretionary description in Table 1.1.7 by deleting text 'and the activity complies part with the relevant standards specified in rules,' as provided for in the submission. Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.002 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.003 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to incorporate Lots 1-5 DPS 16910, Allotment 69 Town of Hamilton West and Lots 5 part and 6 DPS 4473 from Residential to Central City Zone. Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.004 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1showing the location of the Ferrybank precinct to include Lots 1-5 DPS 16910. part Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.005 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend location of the height overlay 2 in Figure 5-2 to include Lots 1-5 DPS 16910. part Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.006 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Amend Rule 7.4.4g) i and ii regarding Maximum Height Control and Bonuses to allow amenities to be provided on or part off site to gain bonuses, add Home Star ratings and to reduce the required Certification for Green Star Design rating from 6 to 4 stars. Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann Brownlee 949.007 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes. Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel 950.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Map 45A-Rezone Lots 1-5 DPS 16910 located at 8-10 Bridge Street and 6 Tisdall Street from Residential Intensification Zone to Central City Zone – Ferrybank Precinct; Rezone Allotment 69 Town of Hamilton West and Lots 5 and 6 DPS 4473 to Central City Zone. Page 285 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel 950.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel 950.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel 950.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts ANG & SL Clarke 951.001 Zoning Map 48A Support in Map 48A-Retain Large Lot Residential Zone in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687 but reduce the extent of the Natural Open part Space Zone to match the extent of the Significant Natural Area. ANG & SL Clarke 951.002 Zoning Map 49A Support in Map 49A-Retain Large Lot Residential Zone in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687 but reduce the extent of the Natural Open part Space Zone to match the extent of the Significant Natural Area. ANG & SL Clarke 951.003 Features Map 49B Oppose ANG & SL Clarke 951.004 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential Zone. Delete the Open Space notation relating to the secondary stormwater flow path part in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687. ANG & SL Clarke 951.005 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Exclude the Large Lot Residential Zone from Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - housing density) ANG & SL Clarke 951.006 3.3.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Add new objectives and policies to 3.3.2 for Large Lot Residential and Future Urban zoned areas where reticulated infrastructure is not available as the current objectives and policies are more relevant to urban development with reticulated services. ANG & SL Clarke 951.007 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend 3.7a) to add the Large Lot Residential Zone to the Ruakura Structure Plan vision. part ANG & SL Clarke 951.008 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend 3.7.2 to add objective and policies for the Large Lot Residential zone that enable subdivision and development. part ANG & SL Clarke 951.009 3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for Oppose General Residential Zone and Medium Density Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area ANG & SL Clarke 951.010 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4f by deleting reference to Large Lot Residential Zone; and add a new policy regarding Large Lot part Residential zone development being sympathetic to the existing character of the area. ANG & SL Clarke 951.011 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Delete the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area from the front of 187A State Highway 26 (Lot 3 DP 379687) Amend Rule 3.7.3.5 to enable the immediate release of residential zoned land in the Ruakura Structure Plan areas. Retain Rule 4.4.6 c) regarding Building Setbacks from Waikato Expressway. Page 286 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rule 4.4.6 e) to increase the side and rear building setbacks to 5m in the Large Lot Residential Zone. ANG & SL Clarke 951.012 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private - to exclude the Large Lot Residential Zone ANG & SL Clarke 951.013 Table 23.3a Oppose Amend Rule 23.3a) v, ix, and xi regarding fee-simple subdivision in the Large Lot Residential Zone and containing Electricity Transmission Corridors A or B or a Significant Natural Areas by deleting the Discretionary Activity status and replacing with Controlled Activities. ANG & SL Clarke 951.014 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.3 d), e) and f) for the Large Lot Residential Zone to increase the number of allotments able to use a private way and increase minimum private way widths. Delete Rules 23.7.3 h) to l) for the Large Lot Residential Zone. ANG & SL Clarke 951.015 23.5.2 Provision of Esplanade Oppose Reserves and Strips Amend Rule 23.5.2 a) regarding the Provision of Esplanade Reserves and Strips to be consistent with s230 of the RMA 1991. ANG & SL Clarke 951.016 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose – Electricity Transmission Corridors Amend Rule 25.7.4 to clarify that a change in activity from rural to residential curtilage associated with but not including a residential unit is not a non-complying activity under Rule 25.7.4c) in the Large Lot Residential Zone. ANG & SL Clarke 951.017 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Amend the Plan to require a stormwater management plan preceding any development in the Ruakura Industrial Park zone with opportunity for community input. ANG & SL Clarke 951.018 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 11.6a) so that development does not occur on a non-notified basis without an approved stormwater management plan for the entire area. A stormwater management plan should precede any development in the Ruakura Industrial Park zone with opportunity for community input. ANG & SL Clarke 951.019 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Amend the Plan to require a stormwater management plan preceding any development in the Ruakura Logistics zone with opportunity for community input. ANG & SL Clarke 951.020 10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 10.5a) so that development does not occur on a non-notified basis without an approved stormwater management plan for the entire area. A stormwater management plan should precede any development in the Ruakura Industrial Park zone with opportunity for community input. David Edward Coromandel 952.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose David Edward Coromandel 952.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 David Edward 952.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Oppose Oppose Page 287 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Coromandel Sub Type Summary Character Area Area. Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. David Edward Coromandel 952.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.001 3.5.2.7 Schools Support in Retain 3.5.2.7 (a) (Schools in Rototuna Structure Plan area) with amendment to reference future plans of the Roman part Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton (RCBDH). The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.002 13.1 Purpose Support in 13.1 d): Sub clause (v) should amended to read ‘Community Precinct’ to align with the text set out in the applicable part rules (13.3 – 13.10). As a consequence the text set out in the legend for Figure 7 – 1: Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan should be amended to read ‘Community Precinct’ also. The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.003 13.2.1 Objective and Policies Support The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.004 13.7 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 13.7 to include Places of Worship as a permitted activity. Amend the footnote for Rule 13.7 (a) to include Table for Activities Proposed part reference to 'Schools'. Within an Area with an Implemented Comprehensive Development Plan The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.005 16.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 16.2.1, supporting policies 16.2.1a and 16.2.1b and explanation under Community Facilities Zone. The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.006 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the Rule 16.3 - Activity Status Table in the Community Facilities Zone to allow schools (excluding Rototuna Secondary School site) and new buildings, relocated buildings, alterations and additions interfacing a public place as permitted activities. Delete Rule 16.6 a) i and ii as a consequence. The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of 953.007 16.4.1 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 16.4.1a) to exclude places of worship and schools from maximum site coverage rule. Retain objective 13.2.1 for the town centre to become the focal point for the Rototuna Area. Page 288 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hamilton The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.008 16.4.6 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete Rule 16.4.6 regarding Fences and Walls from the Community Facilities Zone. The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.009 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support Provide a definition for ‘community facilities’ The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.010 Figure 7-2 Comprehensive Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre Support in Amend Figure 7-2: Comprehensive Development Plan Areas – Rototuna Town Centre to include text on the land part labelled ‘I’ as future primary school and parish church site. The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton 953.011 Planning Maps Support in Amend planning maps to label Feature Maps as A and Zoning Maps as B. part IFan Wu 954.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose IFan Wu 954.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 IFan Wu 954.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. IFan Wu 954.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hamilton Golf Club Incorporated 955.001 Zoning Map 26A Oppose Amend Planning Map 26A by rezoning 62 and 64 St Andrews Terrace to Residential Intensification. Airini Forbes 956.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Airini Forbes 956.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Airini Forbes 956.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Airini Forbes 956.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Retain definitions of ‘places of worship’ and ‘school’. Page 289 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Celia Karen Hope 957.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Melanie Jane Wiseman 958.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A- retain a residential zoning on Lot 2 DP 425316 and rezone Lot 2 DP 425316, 173 Rotokauri Road from Residential to Residential reserve. Melanie Jane Wiseman 958.002 5 Special Character Zones Oppose Amend the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area to increase the minimum area to 600m2 for all building activity, amend the minimum number of storeys from two to one, make amendments to the design guide, and delete the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Area so that the area is dealt with as General Residential. Bupa Care Services 959.001 17.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 17.3f) to clarify the status for new buildings and activities where there is no Concept Plan. part Amend the Plan to clarify the assessment criteria for resource consent applications for activities where there is no concept plan. Amend the Plan to clarify that the Major Facilities Zone provides for a full range of care and accommodation for the elderly. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.001 25.1.4.1 All Development Support in Amend 25.1.4.1 a) General Standard for all development to ensure that it does not have the effect of requiring part network utilities provided for in the network utilities section to also meet all zone standards. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.002 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1a) to exempt earthworks for pile foundations and excavations for concrete pad to Any Activity in This Plan part foundations for network utility poles/masts not exceeding 2m in depth from having to comply with these standards. and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.003 25.5.3 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend 25.5.3 Rules - General Standards to exclude small utility buildings/cabinets not exceeding 10m2/3m high, and part other equipment. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.004 25.7.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Objective 25.7.2.2 including addition of reference to design and balancing of objective with the benefit to the community. Delete Policies 25.7.2.2a ii, d and e. Delete Policy 25.7.2.2b or amend so it does not apply to telecommunications networks. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.005 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend the activity status in Rules 25.7.3 u), w) and x) to Permitted Activities. Delete Rule 25.7.3bb) relating to the installation of telecommunications facilities in Transport Corridor Zone adjoining Page 290 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary an area having historic heritage values or visual amenity values. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.006 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Oppose of Antenna, Poles and Masts Amend Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, at least in relation to antennas and any antenna support arms/mounts, to 5m in all Industrial, Business 1-6, Major Facilities, Central City and Knowledge Zones. Telecom New Zealand Limited 960.007 25.7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 25.7.6a) to include a specific set of assessment criteria within Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 that address the need to minimise adverse effects, but also recognise their functional and operational constraints and the benefits to the community. This should be a self-contained set of criteria for network utilities such that other criteria do not apply. Central Hamilton Gospel Trust 961.001 Zoning Map 38A Oppose Map 38A-rezone 164-166 Peachgrove Road from General Residential to Business 7. Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.001 25.1.4.1 All Development Support in Amend rule 25.1.4.1 a) General Standards for All Development to ensure it does not have the effect of requiring part network utilities provided for in the network utilities section to also meet all zone standards. Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.002 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1a) to exempt earthworks for pile foundations and excavations for concrete pad to Any Activity in This Plan part foundations for network utility poles/masts not exceeding 2m in depth from having to comply with these standards. and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.003 25.5.3 Rules – General Standards Support in Amend 25.5.3 Rules - General Standards to exclude small utility buildings/cabinets not exceeding 10m2/3m high, and part other equipment. Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.004 25.7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Delete Policies 25.7.2.2a ii, d and e or such relief that remedy the concerns outlined. part Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.005 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.006 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Oppose of Antenna, Poles and Masts Amend Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, at least in relation to antennas and any antenna support arms/mounts, to 5m in all Industrial, Business 1-6, Major Facilities, Central City and Knowledge Zones. Chorus New Zealand Limited 962.007 25.7.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Amend Rule 25.7.6a) to include a specific set of assessment criteria within Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 that address the need to minimise adverse effects, but also recognise their functional and operational constraints and the benefits to the community. This should be a self-contained set of criteria for network utilities such that other criteria do not apply. Elizabeth de Jong 963.001 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Oppose Transport Corridors Opposes Appendix 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Transport Corridors regarding design speeds for transport corridors. Lei Sarkovich 964.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Amend the activity status in Rules 25.7.3 u), w) and x) to Permitted Activities. Delete Rule 25.7.3bb) relating to the installation of telecommunications facilities in Transport Corridor Zone adjoining an area having historic heritage values or visual amenity values. Oppose Support Page 291 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lei Sarkovich 964.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Lei Sarkovich 964.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Lei Sarkovich 964.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Boyd Sarkovich 965.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Boyd Sarkovich 965.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Boyd Sarkovich 965.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Boyd Sarkovich 965.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive' part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.002 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.003 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.004 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.005 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.006 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.007 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & 966.008 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Delete the Opoia Precinct. Page 292 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Shanette Fulton Sub Type Summary Overlay Plan part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.009 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.010 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.011 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.012 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.013 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.014 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.015 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.016 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.017 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.018 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.019 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.020 Design Guides Oppose Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.021 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Delete 1.4.8 -Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification. Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.022 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a. Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.023 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Support Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidelines. Page 293 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.024 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.025 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.026 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.027 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.028 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.029 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.030 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.031 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Bernard & Shanette Fulton 966.032 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Bunnings Ltd 968.001 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for "building improvement centres" as a Permitted Activity in the Business 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 zones. Amend Rule 6.3 so that new buildings and additions and alterations to existing buildings in all Business zones, Central City zones and Industrial zones are Permitted Activities. Bunnings Ltd 968.002 Zoning Map 26A Support in Map 26A-Retain the Business 4 zoning for the Bunnings site at 446 Te Rapa Road. part Bunnings Ltd 968.003 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for “building improvement centres” as a permitted activity in Precinct 1, 2 and 3 of the Central City zone. Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings, additions and alterations to existing buildings as a permitted activity. Bunnings Ltd 968.004 Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces Support Retain the parking ratios for “building improvement centres” and “nurseries and garden centres" in Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces. Page 294 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Bunnings Ltd 968.005 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support Retain the definition for "Building Improvement Centre" Bunnings Ltd 968.006 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for "building improvement centres" as a permitted activity in the Industrial zone. Gavin Sarkovich 969.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Gavin Sarkovich 969.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Gavin Sarkovich 969.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Gavin Sarkovich 969.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Patsy Karene 970.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Patsy Karene 970.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Patsy Karene 970.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Patsy Karene 970.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Wero Karena 971.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Wero Karena 971.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Wero Karena 971.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Wero Karena 971.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Iris & Fred Bryant 972.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan-confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. Iris & Fred Bryant 972.002 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Seeks confirmation of the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke in its entirety as shown on the Rotokauri Structure Plan and on Zoning Map 33A Page 295 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Holly Lin 973.001 5.1 Purpose Support Holly Lin 973.002 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Support Area Support the Temple View Heritage Area set out in 5.1.4.1. Holly Lin 973.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Holly Lin 973.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. College Old Boys Rugby League Club 974.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Oppose Oppose map Figure 4-5 and all supporting clauses. Oppose Mixed Use CDP and the Community Facilities CDP as set out in 5.1.4.2. c), h) and i). Increase the heritage ranking of all heritage items within the Temple View Area and require the LDS Church to retain and re-purpose the listed heritage buildings. Undertake a long-term CDP for all of its landholdings in and around Temple View. College Old Boys Rugby League Club 974.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose the inclusion of the map Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts along with the activities being proposed within each of the Areas/Precincts; Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Seeks the creation of a 'Smoke Free, Alcohol Free, and No Sunday Trade/Play Precinct' over the entire Church College Campus and Temple grounds; Seeks the zoning of the current sports ground, grandstand and hilled area be recreational. College Old Boys Rugby League Club 974.003 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Support in Proposes to prohibit the sale on the former CCNZ campus area of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products, part prohibit the use of tobacco and alcohol, and prohibit all Sunday play, which are not in keeping with the current special character of the former CCNZ campus area. Karen Hoki Parker 975.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Karen Hoki Parker 975.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Karen Hoki Parker 975.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Karen Hoki Parker 975.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Kiwi Property 976.001 2.1 Purpose Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Support in Support in Part. Part 2 fails to acknowledge the history and current problems faced by the CBD or to express a Page 296 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Management Ltd Sub Type Summary part rationale for the proposed controls. In absence of this explanation, the objectives, polices and other provisions in this part of the Proposed Plan will not be effective. Suggested amendments to Part 2 are provided in Annexure 2 of their submission. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.001 Zoning Map 29A Oppose Map 29A-rezone Lot 1 DP 444645 – 4 Gordonton Road to Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core Zone and Lot 3 DP 444645 – 370 Tramway Road be rezoned to Business 6 -Suburban Centre Fringe Zone. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.002 Features Map 29B Oppose Remove the Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area on Lot 3 DP 444645 that is located outside of the Waikato River and Gully Hazard Area. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.003 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Support in Part. Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description. part Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.004 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification. part Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.005 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose Medium-Density Residential Zone Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.006 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) Oppose Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a retail development. Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.007 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support Retain Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2e for Suburban Centres Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.008 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted across all zones subject to compliance with standards. Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for apartments at ground floor on Lot 3 DP 444645 as restricted discretionary activities. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.009 6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Support in Amend Rule 6.4.6a)xii for maximum retail tenancy size for the following lots; part Ruakura - Lot 1 DP 444645 = 600m2 Ruakura - Lot 3 DP 444645 = 1500m2 Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.010 6.4.9 Residential Development Support in Amend Rule 6.4.9b) be exclude Lot 3 DP 444645. part Parkwood 977.011 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions Page 297 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Gateway Limited Sub Type Summary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.012 25.1.4.1 All Development Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.013 25.1.4.2 Site-specific Oppose Constraints on Development Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.014 25.1.4.3 Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Oppose Delete 25.1.4.3 General Standards Earthworks and Vegetation Removal. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.015 25.1.4.4 Three Waters Oppose Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.016 25.1.4.5 Transportation Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.017 25.1.4.6 Landscaping and Screening Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.6 General Standards Landscaping and Screening. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.018 25.1.4.7 Financial Contributions Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.019 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3 a) regarding earthworks as a Permitted Activity. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.020 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii, iii and iv. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.021 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(i) and (iii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.1 or 25.2.5.1 is is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, T1 – Earthworks. 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.022 Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.1 General Standard for All Development. Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(ii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.2 is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, M5 – Electricity Transmission. Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will be considered. Page 298 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.023 A General Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not complying with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted Discretionary Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone; delete rule 1.2 A2, 1.2 A3,and 1.2 A4. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.024 Design Guides Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.025 Structure Plans and Concept Oppose Plans Delete rule 1.2 B5. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.026 C General Oppose Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria within C to focus the scope of assessment to areas of non compliance. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.027 Service and Storage Areas Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.028 Site Coverage and Impermeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term and amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or mitigated. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.029 Height Oppose Amend criteria C21 to only assess extent of height non-compliance against the maximum height limit in the zone. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.030 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor Protection Area from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.031 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim water connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.032 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Oppose Structure Plan-Waste Water Infrastructure Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater connection points A & B from land located outside the Structure Plan Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Parkwood Gateway Limited 977.033 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Oppose Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Kiwi Property Management Ltd 978.001 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Add a definition for "Merchandising Area" part Kiwi Property Management Ltd 978.002 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Chapter 7 to identify the adverse effects that have been experienced by the CBD core and that explain the part causes of those changes and the need to address those causes. Page 299 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Rule 7.3 to distinguish between the nature and extent of activities (including in particular retail activities) that are to be enabled in the various precincts and explain the reasons for those distinctions. Add a definition of “Merchandising Area” Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase property. Deanna - Rose Alexander 979.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Provide a buffer zone between Large Lot Residential Zone and Logistics Zone for the area bound by Ryburn and Percival Roads. Jay R Illsley 980.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Tyrone Jade Kareitiana 982.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Soleil McDonald 983.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 300 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Portland Park Limited 984.001 Zoning Map 29A Oppose Map 29A- rezone Lot 1 DP 444645 – 4 Gordonton Road to Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core Zone and Lot 3 DP 444645 – 370 Tramway Road to Business 6 - Suburban Centre Fringe Zone. Portland Park Limited 984.002 Features Map 29B Oppose Remove the Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area on Lot 3 DP 444645 (370 Tramway Road) that is located outside of the Waikato River and Gully Hazard Area. Portland Park Limited 984.003 1.1.7 Explanation of Activity Classes Support in Support in part. Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description. part Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission. Portland Park Limited 984.004 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification. part Portland Park Limited 984.005 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose Medium-Density Residential Zone Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan. Portland Park Limited 984.006 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) Oppose Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a retail development. Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone. Portland Park Limited 984.007 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support Retain Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2e under Suburban Centres Portland Park Limited 984.008 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted across all zones subject to compliance with standards. Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for apartments at ground floor on Lot 3 DP 444645 as restricted discretionary activities. Portland Park Limited 984.009 6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Support in Amend Rule 6.4.6a)xii for maximum retail tenancy size for the following lots; part Ruakura - Lot 1 DP 444645 = 600m2 Ruakura - Lot 3 DP 444645 = 1500m2 Portland Park Limited 984.010 6.4.9 Residential Development Support in Amend Rule 6.4.9b) be exclude Lot 3 DP 444645. part Portland Park Limited 984.011 6.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied. Page 301 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Portland Park Limited 984.012 25.1.4.1 All Development Oppose Delete 25.1.4.1 General Standards for All Development. Portland Park Limited 984.013 25.1.4.2 Site-specific Oppose Constraints on Development Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development. Portland Park Limited 984.014 25.1.4.4 Three Waters Oppose Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters. Portland Park Limited 984.015 25.1.4.5 Transportation Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation. Portland Park Limited 984.016 25.1.4.7 Financial Contributions Oppose Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions. Portland Park Limited 984.017 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3 a) regarding earthworks as a Permitted Activity. Portland Park Limited 984.018 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii, iii and iv. Portland Park Limited 984.019 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(i) and (iii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.1 or 25.2.5.1 is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, T1 – Earthworks. Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(ii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.2 is is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, M5 – Electricity Transmission. Portland Park Limited 984.020 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will be considered. Portland Park Limited 984.021 A General Criteria Oppose Amend 1.2 A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not complying with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted Discretionary Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone"; delete rules 1.2 A2, 1.2 A3,1.2 A4. Portland Park Limited 984.022 Design Guides Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance. Page 302 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Portland Park Limited 984.023 Structure Plans and Concept Oppose Plans Delete 1.2 B5 (Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria). Portland Park Limited 984.024 C General Oppose Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria C to focus the scope of assessment to areas of non compliance. Portland Park Limited 984.025 Service and Storage Areas Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term. Portland Park Limited 984.026 Site Coverage and Impermeable Surfaces Oppose Amend Appendix 1.2 C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a standard or term and amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or mitigated. Portland Park Limited 984.027 Height Oppose Amend Rule 1.2 C21 to narrow scope of assessment. Portland Park Limited 984.028 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor Protection Area from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area. Portland Park Limited 984.029 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim water connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Portland Park Limited 984.030 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Oppose Structure Plan-Waste Water Infrastructure Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater connection points A & B from land located outside the Structure Plan Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Portland Park Limited 984.031 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Desmond Hetiri Te Tuhi 985.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Tahuata Nelson Minhinnick 986.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ron Phillips 987.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Oppose Oppose Page 303 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Toni Swney 988.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Bethenee Witt 989.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Te Reremoana Nelson 990.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Carol Turahui 991.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Pierce Isaac Te Ngakau Te Moni 992.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Duane Sykes (C.O.B. Rugby League) 993.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Eleni Tuitama (C.O.B. Rugby League) 994.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Darren Siteine 995.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 304 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Stephanie Phillips 996.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Patrick Taitoko 997.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Patrick Taitoko 997.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Patrick Taitoko 997.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Patrick Taitoko 997.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Lavinia Maria Taitoko 998.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Lavinia Maria Taitoko 998.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Lavinia Maria Taitoko 998.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Lavinia Maria Taitoko 998.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi 999.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi 999.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi 999.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi 999.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 305 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Erina Dee & Tony Osborne 1000.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Erina Dee & Tony Osborne 1000.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Erina Dee & Tony Osborne 1000.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Erina Dee & Tony Osborne 1000.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Daniel Parker 1001.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Daniel Parker 1001.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Daniel Parker 1001.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Daniel Parker 1001.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.001 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones Amend 7.1 a) by referring to Hamilton East north of Clyde Street (reflecting submitters request to change shown on planning maps 45A and 46A. Amend Rule 7.3 to remove all floor area limitations for offices within the Central City Zone precincts. Amend Rule 7.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment criteria. Oppose Or Amend 6.1 d) to replace the description of a hierarchy of centres with a statement that the city contains a range of business centres comprising one or more business zones, and insert reference to a new Hamilton East Business Zone. Amend 6.1 j) to replace the words “again don’t undermine” with “support” Amend Objective 6.2.2 to replace the words “not undermining the primacy, vitality or viability of the Central City” with “providing enhanced urban design outcomes” Amend Policy 6.2.2d by deleting the reference to control of size and scale. Page 306 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Amend Policy 6.2.2f by deleting the reference to including the Central City. Amend planning maps 45A and 46A by rezoning the Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River to one block east of Grey Street and south of Dawson Street to Wellington Street to a new “Hamilton East Business Zone”. Amend Rule 6.3 to include a Hamilton East Business Zone containing the same provisions as those for the Suburban Centre Core Zone but with all floor area limitations for offices removed, retail tenancies up to 500 m2 as a permitted activity and retail tenancies in excess of 500 m2 as a restricted discretionary activity Amend Rule 6.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment criteria. Delete matters and assessment criteria (C2–C23, D3-D5, E1-E3, F2-F6, G1, N1-N5, S1, V1-V18) from Rule 7.6.a) iv, 6.6.a) v. and vi: Delete Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria1.3.2.4 regarding Retail, Commercial and Office Activities in the Central City and Business 1 to 7 zones. Delete Information Requirement 1.5.20 regarding Centre Viability Assessment Report. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.002 7 Central City Zone Oppose Amend 7.1 a) by referring to Hamilton East north of Clyde Street (reflecting submitters request to change shown on planning maps 45A and 46A. Amend Rule 7.3 to remove all floor area limitations for offices within the Central City Zone precincts. Amend Rule 7.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment criteria. Or Amend 6.1 d) to replace the description of a hierarchy of centres with a statement that the city contains a range of business centres comprising one or more business zones, and insert reference to a new Hamilton East Business Zone. Amend 6.1 j) to replace the words “again don’t undermine” with “support” Amend Objective 6.2.2 to replace the words “not undermining the primacy, vitality or viability of the Central City” with “providing enhanced urban design outcomes” Amend Policy 6.2.2d by deleting the reference to control of size and scale. Amend Policy 6.2.2f by deleting the reference to including the Central City. Amend planning maps 45A and 46A by rezoning the Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River to one block east of Grey Street and south of Dawson Street to Wellington Street to a new “Hamilton East Business Zone”. Amend Rule 6.3 to include a Hamilton East Business Zone containing the same provisions as those for the Suburban Centre Core Zone but with all floor area limitations for offices removed, retail tenancies up to 500 m2 as a permitted activity and retail tenancies in excess of 500 m2 as a restricted discretionary activity Amend Rule 6.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment Page 307 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary criteria. Delete matters and assessment criteria (C2–C23, D3-D5, E1-E3, F2-F6, G1, N1-N5, S1, V1-V18) from Rule 7.6.a) iv, 6.6.a) v. and vi: Delete Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria1.3.2.4 regarding Retail, Commercial and Office Activities in the Central City and Business 1 to 7 zones. Delete Information Requirement 1.5.20 regarding Centre Viability Assessment Report. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.003 1.3.2.4 Retail, Commercial Oppose and Office Activities – Central City and Business 1 to 7 Zones Delete 1.3.2.4 the Discretionary Assessment Criteria for Retail, Commercial and Office Activities. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.004 1.5.20 Centre Viability Assessment Report Delete 1.5.20 Centre Viability Assessment Report 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.005 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Oppose Amend Figures in Appendix 5 so that the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove Road and north of Clyde Street is within the City Living Precinct. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for the Living Ltd 1002.006 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Maps 45A & 46A- Rezone Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove Road and north of Clyde Street to Central City Precinct 2. 490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust 1002.007 Zoning Map 46A Oppose Maps 45A & 46A-rezone Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove Road and north of Clyde Street to Central City Precinct 2. Oppose Page 308 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary and Homes for the Living Ltd Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.001 3.2 Principles Support in Amend 3.2 regarding Structure Plan Principles to insert a new principle regarding the design of development to part maximise child safety. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.002 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1c Structure Plans with amendments to include the maximisation of Child Safety and amend the part associated explanation to highlight that density targets will not compromise safety requirements. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.003 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3a v. to add the words "whilst minimising the risk to children through slow speed run overs" to the part end of the sentence. Amend 4.2.3a by inserting a new iv. as follows: "The design layout should consider all aspects of child safety including that garden play areas are physically separated from areas of vehicular access". Amend the Explanation as set out in the submission to make reference to safe outdoor living space (particularly for children). Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.004 3.3.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.3.4g as set out in the submission, to ensure that arterial routes do not sever safe access between part residential and recreational spaces. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.005 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 4.2.4b to 4.2.4d and the associated explanation to emphasise safety for the householders in all aspects part of design. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.006 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Support in 3.3.5 Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans: part Amend Policy 3.3.5a by adding a second sentence: "Any increased risk to safety that may result from these adjacent activities should be considered and mitigated against". Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.007 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.008 3.4 Peacocke Support in Amend 3.4 c) Concentration, to add at the end of the sentence: "that considers all aspects of child safety". part Amend 3.4 by adding an additional key principle as follows: Safety: The layout of any future residential development considers the physical safety of children. This design will include vehicular access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality, Amend Rule 4.4.7b) to provide for a 6m minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport (to accommodate one vehicle). Page 309 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary such as through slow driveway run over. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.009 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Subdivision Objectives and Policies 23.2.1 with amendments to address child safety. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.010 3.4 Vision Support in Amend 3.4 to include reference to "safe" urban environment. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.011 3.4.1 Structure Plan Components Support in Amend Figure 3.4a, #6 to define a separation between vehicle and pedestrian space. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.012 3.4.2.1 Community and Recreation Facilities Support in Amend 3.4.2.1b), d), and j) to ensure consideration of the need for pedestrian safety. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.013 3.4.2.2 Neighbourhoods Support in Amend 3.4.2.2 b) to ensure the safety of children. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.014 3.4.3 Transport Network Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to public recreational space. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.015 3.4.3 Transport Network Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to public recreational space. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.016 3.4.4 Interim Subdivision Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having consideration to maximise child safety. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.017 Peacocke Social Wellbeing Support in Amend the introduction to 3.4.6.11 Peacocke Social Wellbeing to insert text to ensure safety, with specific reference to part children is identified within the residential areas. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.018 3.5 Rototuna Support in Section 3.5 (Rototuna) part Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) as per submission to explicitly incorporate the aspect of safety into the plan. Waikato Child and 1003.019 3.5 Rototuna Support in 3.5 - Rototuna Page 310 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Youth Mortality Review Group Sub Type Summary part Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) to explicitly incorporate the aspect of safety into the plan, as set out in submission. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.020 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies part Add a new policy to 3.5.1.4 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) as follows: '3.5.1.4d Provide layout that minimises risk to children (such as slow speed run overs).' Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.021 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan) part Add a new sentence to the end of first paragraph under 3.6.1: "Subdivision for residential purposes should give full consideration to safety such as minimising risk of driveway run over". Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.022 3.6.2.2 Residential Support in 3.6.2.2 Residential - Rotokauri. part Amend 3.6.2.2a) to read: "residential development is indicated in four distinct residential environments where the layout will maximise safety to all householders while engendering a sense of community" Amend 3.6.2.2.a)i. by inserting the words 'and safe' Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.023 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.7.2.6.c to ensure the aspects of safety is explicitly incorporated. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.024 4.1 Purpose Support in Ensure that urban intensification does not jeopardise personal safety. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.025 4.1.1 General Residential Zone Support in Amend 4.1.1 General Residential Zone to incorporate safety as a key Principle. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.026 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone to include safety as a key principle part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.027 4.1.5 All Residential Zones Support in Amend 4.1.5 All Residential Zones to include explicit reference to 'safety'. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.028 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a by adding new policy point 'iii) safety requirements'; part Incorporate text, as set out in the submission to highlight that density targets should only be sought if there is no increased risk to householders. Page 311 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.029 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 4.2.5 so child safety is recognised in the explanation. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.030 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.6 b) Building Setback from transport corridor boundary - arterial transport corridors from 8m to 6m to improve the safety of children. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.031 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setback to reflect a minimum distance from transport corridor to front of garage or carport be 6m. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.032 13.2.6 Objective and Policies Support in Seeks amendments 13.2.6 Rototuna Town Centre Objectives and Policies to ensure safety, especially of children is part emphasised. Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.033 23.7.4 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 23.7.4 c) to f) to address design concerns regarding child safety from driveway accidents. part Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.034 1.4.3.3 Building Orientation and Siting Oppose Amend 1.4.3.3e) assessment criteria for Building Orientation and Siting to bring garage/carports further to the front of the property (6m from the road). Waikato Child and Youth Mortality Review Group 1003.035 1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and Parking Oppose Amend 1.4.3.4a) Access, Garages and Parking to bring garage/carports further to the front of the property (6m from the road); Amend 1.4.3.4c) to improve site and building design. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.001 4 Residential Zones Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.002 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.003 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.004 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Page 312 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Bee Chiew Phee 1004.005 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.006 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.007 3 Structure Plans Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones. Alan Frederick & Barbara Winifred Julian 1005.008 25.6 Lighting and Glare Oppose Put in place mitigation measures to screen residential areas in proximity to the Ruakura Logistics Zone from effects of lighting Page 313 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Peter & Barbara Ryan 1006.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.001 3 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.002 4 Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han 1007.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in Page 314 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary & Wang the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Bo & Meggie Han & Wang 1007.007 Zoning Map 40A Oppose Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones. Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.001 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Reinstate the Environmental Protection Overlay from the Operative District Plan or include similar provisions. part Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.002 21.2 Objectives and Policies Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.003 Significant Natural Areas Support in Amend Objective 20.2.1 to prohibit the disturbance or loss of Significant Natural Areas. Retain Policy 20.2.1m 20.2.1 Objective and Policies part regarding the eradication of non-native pest species. Amend Policy 20.2.1o to clarify the 10% threshold for habitat stability. Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.004 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 (Rotokauri Structure Plan) to include the protection and enhancement of the ecological part functioning of key natural areas. Support in Add a new plan provision that enables significant habitat or fauna outside of the Significant Natural Areas to be part recognised and considered. Page 315 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.005 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans Support in 3.3 Objectives and Policies Rotokauri Structure Plan part Add new Policy 3.6.1.1c 'Subdivision and development provide for the protection and enhancement of ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke'. Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.006 Natural Open Space Zone Support Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.007 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones Support in Amend Policy 5.2.5a i) and add a new policy 5.3.1f) protecting and enhancing Lake Waiwhakareke. part Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.008 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone, OR identify the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan. Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato 1008.009 5.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Amend rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone OR identify the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan. Sink or Swim 1009.001 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to “Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone” Sink or Swim 1009.002 Features Map 45B Support Retain Municipal Baths as a 'B' Heritage Ranked item Sink or Swim 1009.003 Neighbourhood Open Space Oppose Zone Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone which has more appropriate objectives and policies. Sink or Swim 1009.004 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone. Amend the Activity Status of Restaurants from a Discretionary Activity to a Permitted Activity within the Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone. Oppose Retain Objective 15.2.5 Natural Open Space Page 316 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Sink or Swim 1009.005 15.5.1 Site Coverage Oppose Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Sink or Swim 1009.006 15.5.2 Gross Floor Area Oppose Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Sink or Swim 1009.007 15.5.3 Number of Buildings Oppose Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Sink or Swim 1009.008 15.5.4 Building Height Oppose Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to “Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone” Amend Rule 15.5.4 Building Height so that it only applies to boundaries adjoining a Residential, Special Character or Future Urban Zone. Sink or Swim 1009.009 15.5.5 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 15.5.6 Fences and Walls so that the Municipal Pool site is specifically excluded from fence height limits. Sink or Swim 1009.010 15.5.7 Hours of Operation Oppose Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone Amend Rule 15.5.7 Hours of Operation to allow early morning usage from 5:30am Sink or Swim 1009.011 19 Historic Heritage Support in Support Policies 19.2.3e & g. part Support the non-complying activity status for demolition of both 'A' and 'B' ranked items. Support Rule 19.5.ii. Ensure that applications for alterations and additions to 'B' ranked heritage items will be publically notified. Elizabeth de Jong 1010.001 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Elizabeth de Jong 1010.002 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Remove b), e), and f) from rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Elizabeth de Jong 1010.003 5.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks, remove b). Elizabeth de Jong 1010.004 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Elizabeth de Jong 1010.005 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Remove b) and c) i) from rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls M.P & R.G Upsdell 1011.001 Zoning Map 36A Oppose Map 36A-rezone 444(a) and (b) Ulster Street, 448(b) Ulster Street, and the rear half of 452 Ulster Street from Residential to Business 5; Rezone the land at 1359 Victoria Street from Business 7 to Business 5. Elizabeth de Jong 1012.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Oppose Remove the Flood Hazard Area from and LIM report for 41 Pelorus Street Page 317 of 541 Sub Name Hamilton East Community Trust Sub Point Plan Provision 1013.001 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones Sub Type Summary Oppose Rezone the Regional Council Building and the site on the corner of Cook and Grey Streets from Business 6 Zone to Business 1 Zone. Undertake research on the effects of the loss of employees on Hamilton East. Hamilton East Community Trust 1013.003 Zoning Map 45A Support in Map 45A-requests that heritage building sites and places are not adversely affected by inappropriate high density part development and rezoned accordingly. Hamilton East Community Trust 1013.004 Zoning Map 46A Support in Map 46A-rezone the area surrounding Steele Park to a mixed use of commercial fringe and residential. part Hamilton East Community Trust 1013.005 15 Open Space Zones Support in Rezone Steele Park from Sport and Recreation Zone to Neighbourhood Open Space Zone part Hamilton East Community Trust 1013.006 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support Hamilton’s Identity, Character and Heritage Support, however important existing retail and commercial centres are given heritage recognition in the plan, particularly Hamilton East and Franklin villages, perhaps through structure planning. Streetscape plans for the Hamilton East Village should be included in the District Plan for future development. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.001 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Amend Policy 4.2.1a ii) so it is consistent with Future Proof by clarify that the target densities will be achieved over time and the average gross density targets exclude roads and Open Space zoned areas. Oppose Delete Policy 4.2.1a ii) 3. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.001 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.1b to recognise average gross density targets can be achieved over time: 'Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time an average gross density target, excluding roads and Open Space zoned land of 16 dwellings per hectare.' Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.002 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to require 50% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) be planted in grass, shrubs or trees; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and 4.4.3d Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.003 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) by reducing the minimum building setback from a right of way to 0.5m Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.004 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend Rule 4.4.7 b); delete Rule 4.4.7 c); and add a new Rule 4.4.7 ba) that permits garages forward of the front of the building if the wall facing the transport corridor consists of at least 20% glazed materials. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.005 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) Outdoor Living Area Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.006 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Oppose Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - by changing the activity status to Controlled; and allow a Comprehensive Development Plan to be approved on a site by site basis. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.007 4.6.2 Development Yield Oppose Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield as the yields should be a guide only. Page 318 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.008 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose Planting Amend Rule 5.4.3. Permeable Surface and Planting by increasing area of front setback required to be planted in grass, shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.009 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private Oppose Amend (b) of rule 5.4.7 to allow garages forwards of the dwelling and delete 5.4.7 (d). Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.010 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area Oppose Delete (b) (iv) from Rule 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area. Consequential amendment: Delete Figure 5.4.11e. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.011 Table 23.3c Oppose Amend Rule 23.3c to identify and provide for the other Special Character Zone areas. Amend Rule 23.3c to provide for fee simple subdivision in the Special Natural Zone as a controlled activity. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.012 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted earthworks volume to 250m3. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.013 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose Assessment Criteria Review Section 1.4 - Design Guides to simplify and streamline. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.014 1.4.4.2 Designing for Topography Oppose Amend Appendix 1.4.4.2 Designing for Topography to provide for earthworks necessary to achieve density and maximum lot size requirements of section 4. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.015 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network - Amend Figure 2-9 to include the entire suburban centre zone within Stage 1. Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.016 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Oppose 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Delete 3.6.2.3c Rotokauri Developments Ltd 1015.017 1.5.7 Comprehensive Development Plan Oppose Amend the information requirements for 1.5.7 Comprehensive Development Plans to focus on connectivity, legibility, open space and streetscape. R.E. MasonRiseborough 1016.001 22.1 Purpose Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 7 Guy Place. part R.E. MasonRiseborough 1016.002 Features Map 54B Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 7 Guy Place. part Jason Lin 1017.001 Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan part a) That the whole of the property legally described as Lot 1 DPS 48598 (49 North City Road, Rototuna) be zoned as Retail 2. Page 319 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary And b) Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Gillian Anne Denny 1018.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone Oppose Amend Chapter 10 as it is inconsistent with the guiding principles in the introduction of the Plan regarding high quality urban design, protection of character areas, restoration and protection of natural environments and heritage. An Inland port 100m away from a residential area is not high quality urban design and this character area is not being protected. The Ruakura Farm and its associated buildings should be recognised and protected for their heritage values. Gillian Anne Denny 1018.002 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone Oppose Amend Chapter 11 as it is inconsistent with the guiding principles in the introduction of the Plan regarding high quality urban design, protection of character areas, restoration and protection of natural environments and heritage. An Inland port 100m away from a residential area is not high quality urban design and this character area is not being protected. The Ruakura Farm and its associated buildings should be recognised and protected for their heritage values. Maree Virginia Pene (Te Kotuku Whenua Environmental Agency for NgatiWairere) 1019.001 1 Plan Overview Support Consultation with Ngati Wairere should be considered. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.001 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Amend Rule 7.4.1 Site Coverage to provide a new maximum site coverage in Precinct 2 of 100% that applies to Key part Development Site 5 as identified on Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.002 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Amend Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity to provide a new maximum building intensity in Precinct 2 of 4:1 that applies to part Key Development Site 5 in Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.003 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Amend Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces to provide a minimum permeable surface area in Precinct 2 of Nil that applies to part Key Development Site 5 in Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.004 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Oppose DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.005 1.4.6.5 Key Development Site Support in Delete 1.4.6.5 Key Development Site 5 – Countdown Site, Anglesea North or amend design guide Key Development 5 – Countdown Site, part Site 5 – Countdown Site, Anglesea North. Anglesea North DNZ Property Fund Limited 1020.006 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the preferred parking building location from Key part Development Site 5. DI & CA Bourke 1021.001 4.1.2 Residential Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'. Delete Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. Page 320 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Intensification Zone Sub Type Summary part DI & CA Bourke 1021.002 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part DI & CA Bourke 1021.003 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose DI & CA Bourke 1021.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.005 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.006 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.007 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.008 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part DI & CA Bourke 1021.009 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part DI & CA Bourke 1021.010 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.011 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.012 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.013 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.014 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.015 B Consistency with Plans and Oppose Design Guides DI & CA Bourke 1021.016 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Page 321 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary DI & CA Bourke 1021.017 1.4.7 Riverfront Development Design Guide Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. DI & CA Bourke 1021.018 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose DI & CA Bourke 1021.019 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.020 Zoning Map 45A Oppose DI & CA Bourke 1021.021 7.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.022 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.023 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part DI & CA Bourke 1021.024 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.025 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.026 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.027 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part DI & CA Bourke 1021.028 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part DI & CA Bourke 1021.029 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support DNZ Property Fund Limited 1022.001 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Amend Rule 7.4.16 so that it does not apply to “Secondary active frontage” part Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5.7 to delete the Primary Active Frontage and the Secondary Active Frontage on the block bounded by Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street; Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification. Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5.5 to delete the preferred parking building location from the submitters land Page 322 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Delete Design Guide 1.4.6.4 for Key Development Site 4 or amend to delete indicative concept plans and cross sections, Key Design Principle b) vii, and Medium to long term priority outcome d) ii. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1022.002 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5.7 to delete the Primary Active Frontage and the Secondary Active Frontage on the block bounded by part Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1022.003 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site Support in Amend the Central City Zone Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages to delete reference to “Secondary active frontage”;Amend 4 – Warehouse Kmart part Appendix 5:Central City Zone, Figure 5.7: Active Frontages and Overlay Plan to delete the Primary and Secondary Transport Centre Site Active Frontage on the block bounded by Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street; Amend Appendix 5: Central City Zone, Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the parking building location from the submitters land; Delete 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site 4 – Warehouse/Kmart/Transport Centre' Or make amendments. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1022.004 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the preferred parking building location from Key part Development Site 4. Lambert International Ltd 1023.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Lambert International Ltd 1023.003 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Lambert International Ltd 1023.004 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Lambert International Ltd 1023.005 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.006 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.007 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.008 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.009 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Lambert International Ltd 1023.010 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Page 323 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lambert International Ltd 1023.011 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.012 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.013 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.014 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.015 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.016 1.4.7 Riverfront Development Design Guide Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Lambert International Ltd 1023.017 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Lambert International Ltd 1023.018 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.019 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Lambert International Ltd 1023.020 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Lambert International Ltd 1023.021 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Lambert International Ltd 1023.022 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.023 Design Guides Oppose Lambert International Ltd 1023.024 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.025 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Lambert 1023.026 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification. Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Page 324 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary International Ltd Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan part Lambert International Ltd 1023.027 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.028 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.029 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Lambert International Ltd 1023.030 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.001 Zoning Map 25A Oppose Map 25A-Rezone all sites fronting Te Rapa Road between Vardon and Wairere Drive as Business 4 Zone OR amend the Industrial Zone to allow for retail activity. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.002 Zoning Map 26A Oppose Map 26A-Rezone all sites fronting Te Rapa Road between Vardon and Wairere Drive to Business 4 or retain industrial zone but amend Purpose, Policies and rules to recognise the existing commercial development along the Te Rapa corridor. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.003 9.1 Purpose Oppose Opposes the Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives, Policies, Rules to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.004 9.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Opposes Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives, Policies, and Explanations to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor. DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.005 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Oppose Amend the definition for Wholesale retail and trade supplies to separate into two discrete definitions DNZ Property Fund Limited 1024.006 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Opposes the Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives, Policies, Explanation and Rules to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor. Provide separate definitions for "Wholesale Retail" and "Trade Supplies". Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.003 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Graham & Phillipa 1025.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Oppose Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Delete the Opoia Precinct. Page 325 of 541 Sub Name Cox & Wright Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precinct Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.015 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.016 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.017 1.4.7 Riverfront Development Design Guide Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.018 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.019 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification. Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Page 326 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.020 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.021 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.022 Design Guides Oppose Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.023 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.024 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.025 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.026 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.027 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.028 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.029 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.030 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Graham & Phillipa Cox & Wright 1025.031 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.001 25.1.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.002 25.1.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend policies 25.1.2.3a and 25.1.2.3b to remove the reference to ‘potentially contaminated land’. part Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Development Suitability-Retain objective 25.1.2.3 and Policy 25.1.2.3c. Page 327 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.003 25.1.3 Rules – National Environmental Standards Support Retain Section 25.1.3 that relates to National Environmental Standards. Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.004 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Seeks the retention of note 4 to Rule 25.2.3 regarding National Environmental Standard on Assessing and Managing Table part Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health. Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.005 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.006 25.4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.4.2.1 and Policies 25.4.2.1a to 25.4.2.1d and 25.4.2.1f regarding hazardous facilities and amend part Policy 25.4.2.1e to recognise the role of design and installation of hazardous facilities in avoiding adverse effects of natural hazards. Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.007 25.4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.008 25.4.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rules 25.4.3d and 25.4.3e to remove the reference to ‘Occupational Health and Safety’, to provide for the Table part storage of LPG in multiple as well as single vessels and to remove the requirement for compliance with the performance standards in Rule 25.4.4. Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.009 25.4.4.5 Wash-Down Areas Support in Amend Rule 25.4.4.5 Wash-Down Areas to avoid the inclusion of controls and/or consent requirements relating to part discharges to land and water (regional council functions). Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.010 25.4.4.6 Spill Containment Systems Support in Amend Rule 25.4.4.6 Spill Containment Systems to avoid the inclusion of controls and/or consent requirements part relating to discharges to land and water (regional council functions) and to clarify the standards that relate to aboveground storage only. Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.011 A Hazardous Facilities Oppose Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.012 25.13.4.2 Stormwater Seeks amendments to either the definition of earthworks in Appendix 1.7 or Rule 25.2.3 to exempt the removal or replacement of fuel storage systems from the specific earthworks standards. Retain Objective 25.4.2.2 and Policy 25.4.2.2a regarding protection of existing hazardous facilities from reversesensitivity effects. Amend the matters of control set out in Appendix 1.1 A in relation to hazardous facilities to remove reference to transport routes and to identify updated HSNO standards applicable to below ground petroleum storage systems. Retain references in Appendix 1.1A to the MfE Guidelines for Water Discharges from Petroleum Industry Sites and the AS/NZS 1596: 2008 – Storage and Handling of Liquid Petroleum Gas. Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.2d) (Stormwater) to clarify the meaning of the term ‘level’ in relation to stormwater discharges, part by referring to the 'volume and rate' of stormwater discharge, instead of the word 'level'. Page 328 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.013 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Retain the definitions of Pre-development, Contaminated Land, Hazardous Substance and Spill containment system. part Delete the definitions of Storage and Use (in relation to hazardous substance facilities). Amend the definition of Hazardous Facility to clarify the type of vehicles intended to be captured by the term ‘hazardous facility’ Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and Mobil Oil NZ Ltd 1026.014 1.5.11 Hazardous Facilities Oppose Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.001 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.003 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Amend Appendix 1.5.11 by removing the requirement to provide information on transport routes in relation to applications for hazardous facilities; clarify that parts n), o) and p) apply only to activities that require discretionary activity consent under Chapter 25.4 Hazardous Facilities. Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Page 329 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.015 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.016 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.017 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.018 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.019 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.020 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.021 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.022 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.023 Design Guides Oppose Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.024 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.025 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.026 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Dale & Vicki 1027.027 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Delete 1.2 B1(g) - Opoia Design Guidance. Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification. Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Page 330 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary McLunie & Martin Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.028 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.029 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.030 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Dale & Vicki McLunie & Martin 1027.031 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Tony Elkington 1028.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Tony Elkington 1028.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Tony Elkington 1028.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Tony Elkington 1028.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. John A Kendall 1029.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose John A Kendall 1029.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 John A Kendall 1029.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. John A Kendall 1029.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Schramm Property Trust 1030.001 7.1 Purpose Oppose Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct. Schramm Property Trust 1030.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies Schramm 1030.003 4.4.4 Building Height Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road Page 331 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Property Trust Sub Type Summary part Schramm Property Trust 1030.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. Schramm Property Trust 1030.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Schramm Property Trust 1030.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4) part Schramm Property Trust 1030.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1 part Schramm Property Trust 1030.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.015 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.016 7.5.4 Residential Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.017 Design Guides Oppose Schramm Property Trust 1030.018 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing Situation Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club. part Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance Page 332 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Schramm Property Trust 1030.019 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections part to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Schramm Property Trust 1030.020 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose Schramm Property Trust 1030.021 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.022 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.023 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Overlay Plan part Schramm Property Trust 1030.024 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.025 Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.026 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.027 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages Overlay Plan Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct. part Schramm Property Trust 1030.028 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct. Site Locations part Schramm Property Trust 1030.029 Zoning Map 45A Oppose Schramm Property Trust 1030.030 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'. part Megan Kendall 1031.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Megan Kendall 1031.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Megan Kendall 1031.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Megan Kendall 1031.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification. Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street. Page 333 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.001 Zoning Map 3A Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on part Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation; Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.002 Zoning Map 4A Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on part Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation; Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.003 Zoning Map 5A Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on part Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation; Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.004 Zoning Map 11A Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on part Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation; Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna 1032.005 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Retain Objective 4.2.1 Page 334 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Holdings Ltd Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.006 4.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.2d to state that residential land uses should be managed to avoid or mitigate potential significant part adverse effects, such as noise, from transport corridors and state highways. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.007 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3d to add the words "as much as practicable" so that the policy reads as follows; part “Buildings should be designed to conform to natural topography as much as practicable.” Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.008 4.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4e by adding the following text to the end of the sentence: "except that Greenfield development part should be consistent with the character envisaged for the underlying zone.” Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.009 4.4.1 Density Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a) for Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone to enable density to be determined by final gradient as part provided for in the submission. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.010 4.4.2 Site Coverage Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2a) to enable sites between 500m2 - 750m2 in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone to have the part same maximum site coverage as that for General Residential Zone; Consequential amendments to clarify extent of rules that are applicable to the development (e.g. Policy 4.2.4e iv. verses Rule 4.4.6c) which may restrict the development potential of the Rototuna Large Lot Residential Zone area. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.011 4.4.3 Permeable Surface Support in Amend Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface so that lots (between 500m2 and 750m2) within the Large Lot Residential zone in part Rototuna have the same minimum permeable surface percentages as the General Residential Zone. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.012 4.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6c)ii.2, to exclude these setbacks applying to Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone where there is a part buffer as set out in the submission. Amend Rule 4.4.6e)iv. to exclude Large Lot Residential. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.013 Table 23.3a Support Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.014 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Support in Amend 23.7.1h) to provide for minimum net site areas based on final average gradient for the Large Lot Residential part Zone (Rototuna Structure Plan) and clarify the activity status for subdivision failing to comply with standards in Rule 23.7. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.015 25.8.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Noise and Vibration Policy 25.8.2.1a and amend 25.8.2.1b with amendment to include anticipated noise part sensitive activities. Retain the activity status table in Rule 23.3a Page 335 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.016 25.8.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Noise and Vibration Policy 25.8.2.2b for noise sensitive activities locating near transport corridors. Rototuna Holdings Ltd 1032.017 25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive Activities – Activities in all Zones Support Retain Rule 25.8.3.9 ‘Noise Sensitive Activities – Activities in all Zones’ The Errol John Kendall Family - 1033.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose The Errol John Kendall Family - 1033.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 The Errol John Kendall Family - 1033.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. The Errol John Kendall Family - 1033.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Rei Kendall (Kendall Family) 1034.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Rei Kendall (Kendall Family) 1034.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Rei Kendall (Kendall Family) 1034.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Rei Kendall (Kendall Family) 1034.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jenna Walmsley 1035.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Jenna Walmsley 1035.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Jenna Walmsley 1035.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Jenna Walmsley 1035.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 336 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Precincts Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe) 1036.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe) 1036.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe) 1036.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe) 1036.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Joe Hay (Hay Family) 1037.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Joe Hay (Hay Family) 1037.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Joe Hay (Hay Family) 1037.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Joe Hay (Hay Family) 1037.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Te Waata R Greening 1038.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Te Waata R Greening 1038.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Te Waata R Greening 1038.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Te Waata R Greening 1038.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Matai Christian 1039.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Support Page 337 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Parata Family Matai Christian Parata Family 1039.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Matai Christian Parata Family 1039.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Matai Christian Parata Family 1039.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.001 1 Plan Overview Reword the plan to ensure it provides for the protection, restoration and maintenance of stream, river and gully systems. Oppose Ensure the relevant provisions give effect to the proposed RPS and then review District Plan within 1 year of the RPS becoming operative to take account of any changes to RPS. Publically notify all technical specifications/development manual the plan refers/relies on for its implementation. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.002 Peacocke Natural System Support in Amend Objective 3.4.6.1 to maintain connectivity for movement of native animals, including passage for fish and bats" part Add a new policy to 3.4.6.1 to ensure unimpeded movement for native animals (e.g. fish and bats) through the stream and gull network, including road crossings; Amend policy 3.4.6.1a by inserting the word 'natural'; Amend policy 3.4.6.1e by inserting the word 'avoid'. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.003 20.1 Purpose Support in Amend the Plan to provide for the protection of in-stream Significant Natural Area values addressing both terrestrial part and aquatic biodiversity. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.004 Significant Natural Areas Support in Amend Objective 20.2.1 to clarify the link between maintenance and enhancement and to and to include the 20.2.1 Objective and Policies part protection of threatened species. Amend Objectives and Policies in 20.2.1 to provide for the protection and enhancement of areas of "non-significant' natural vegetation. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care 1040.005 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the Plan to provide for the establishment of native fish reserves at key sites where no fishing is allowed and to part protect and enhance areas of "non-significant' natural vegetation. Page 338 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Incorporated Group Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.006 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support Amend 21.2.1 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved and that the connectivity and buffering of indigenous ecosystems by the Waikato River Corridor and gully system is restored. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.007 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 21.2.2 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved and that the connectivity part and buffering of indigenous ecosystems by the Waikato River Corridor and gully system is restored. Amend Policy 21.2.2g to consider impacts of drainage on stream ecology where drainage is not necessary to protect life or property. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.008 21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.009 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Subdivision Objectives and Policies under 23.2.1 with amendments to address adverse effects on stream part hydrology and aquatic habitat. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.010 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 23.2.5a, b and c to provide for the protection and enhancement of the Waikato River and Gully part Systems Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.011 25.13.4.1 Integrated Catchment Management Plan Support in Seeks specific provisions in 25.13.4.1 (Integrated Catchment Management Plan) for the development of an Integrated part Catchment Management Plan for the Mangakotukutuku Stream catchment in accordance with section 1.5.5 (Information Requirements - Integrated Catchment Management Plans). Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.012 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Support in Amend design principles and requirements for stormwater treatment systems, including low impact design features. part Reference is also made to Auckland Council's TP124 and NZTA's Stormwater Treatment Standards. Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.013 1.8.4 Collaboration and Partnership Support in Add an additional explanation at 1.8.4 to collaborate and develop partnerships with groups already involved in Urban part ecological restoration. Amend 21.2.4 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved. Page 339 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.014 1.8.3 Council Projects and Initiatives (Subject to Long Term Plan and Annual Plan) Support in Add two more methods at 1.8.3 preamble for the development of ecological restoration plans. part Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Incorporated Group 1040.015 Appendix 10 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Oppose Amend Appendix 10 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems to include objectives and policies which will implement the Tainui Vision and Strategy provision to enhance the stream and stormwater systems draining into the Waikato River. Susan Elizabeth Thomson 1041.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Susan Elizabeth Thomson 1041.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Susan Elizabeth Thomson 1041.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Susan Elizabeth Thomson 1041.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Colby Osborne 1042.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Colby Osborne 1042.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Colby Osborne 1042.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Colby Osborne 1042.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Anton Osborne 1043.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Anton Osborne 1043.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Anton Osborne 1043.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Anton Osborne 1043.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 340 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Kendall Graham 1044.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Kendall Graham 1044.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Kendall Graham 1044.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Kendall Graham 1044.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Romana Graham 1045.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Romana Graham 1045.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Romana Graham 1045.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Romana Graham 1045.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Vicki Wihongi 1046.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Vicki Wihongi 1046.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Vicki Wihongi 1046.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Vicki Wihongi 1046.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ashton Frew 1047.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ashton Frew 1047.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ashton Frew 1047.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Page 341 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Ashton Frew 1047.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Pamela Mabel Heremaia 1048.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Pamela Mabel Heremaia 1048.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Pamela Mabel Heremaia 1048.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Pamela Mabel Heremaia 1048.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Kylie Michelle Birks 1049.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Kylie Michelle Birks 1049.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Kylie Michelle Birks 1049.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Kylie Michelle Birks 1049.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.001 3.1 Purpose Support Retain the flow chart in 3.1 Purpose of Structure Plans. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.002 3.2 Principles Support in Principles - Structure Plans - 3.2 a) i. - Replace ‘any land-use constraints and opportunities’ within this paragraph with part ‘any land-use considerations’. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.003 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Support in 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Insert an additional policy statement in regard to the recognition and part protection of heritage features. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.004 3.3.7 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Policy 3.3.7b - Review this section to ensure cultural heritage values are not to be sacrificed to open space requirements. Page 342 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.005 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support Hamilton’s Identity, Character and Heritage Support. Retain Objective 2.2.10 and policies. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.006 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table Oppose Amend 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table by: a) Including Subdivision. b) Adding rules to control alterations and additions to identified interior heritage features. c) Adding rules to control alterations and additions to identified interior heritage features. d) Establish a hierarchy of management for A and B buildings. A single, unitary built heritage schedule, in which demolition is non-complying for all scheduled items, is recommended. Alternatively review Schedule 8A and make demolition of less significant B ranked items a Discretionary activity. e) Maximum thresholds for earthworks specified in 25.2.5(a) should include an advisory note that a lower threshold has been set for Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites. f) 19.3 p) Retain. g) 19.3 w) is opposed as the rule statement is incomplete. Assuming that it refers to Group 2 Archaeological and Cultural Sites the activity status should be amended here to allow for information about the site to be shared with the owner and impacts upon potential heritage values to be appropriately managed. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.007 25.2.5 Rules – Specific Standards Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5 a) advising that a lower threshold for earthworks has been set for Group 1 part Archaeological and Cultural Sites. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.008 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 7.2.2 Policies to recognise heritage resources within the Central City. part Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.009 19.1 Purpose Support in Add a policy in section 19.2 that promotes the preparation of Conservation Management Plans for Archaeological and part Cultural Sites, as well as Buildings and Structures. Delete ‘historical validity’ and insert ‘heritage significance’. Add a reference to the statutory protection of archaeological sites as set out in the Historic Places Act. Delete the phrase ‘where practicable’ from the paragraph. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.010 19.2.3 Buildings and Structures Support in Amend Heritage Objectives, Policies and Rules in Chapter 19 to ensure consistency and the ability of council to achieve part outcomes inline with the Purpose, Objectives and Policies of the chapter. Support policy 19.2.3a. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.011 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites Support in Amend Policy 19.2.4e to ensure that destruction or damage to Archaeological and Cultural Sites is not being tacitly part encouraged. Amend Policies and Rules within Chapter 19 to ensure that explanatory notes are given effect to and ensure that they address the sharing of information and working relationships. Page 343 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.012 19.4 Rules Specific Standards Support in Amend Rule 19.4 Rules Specific Standards to include reference to the value of conservation plans as a guide to part undertaking maintenance and repairs. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.013 19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Clarify and amend 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria by aligning it with new rules for a Controlled Activity status for the protection of interior heritage features. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.014 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures Support Retain 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.016 5.1 Purpose Support in Support the inclusions of special character and heritage areas in the District Plan. But 5.1e) incorrectly characterises all part the city’s Special Character Areas as ‘primarily for residential purposes’ and this is not the case for the Temple View Character Area. Elsewhere in 5.1 the same inaccurate characterisation can also be found, either explicitly or implicitly e.g. 5.1c). Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Amend text to place a stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play within character areas and the importance given to their ongoing protection. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.017 5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Support in Amend Rule 5.1.1.3d) The Dwelling Control Area by either linking it to objectives, policies and rules OR delete. Confirm Area part if "Soldier Cottages" warrant scheduling as heritage items. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.018 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.019 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Oppose Area Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and instead develop a Structure Plan for Temple View. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.020 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and develop a Structure Plan for Temple View.5.1.4.2. Amend plan so the Temple View Character Area is elevated to a Heritage Area. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.021 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones Support in Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and part protected within the Plan. Provide stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.022 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Oppose Amend 5.2.6 Objectives and Policies -Temple View, so that it is consistent with other special character areas so it promotes special character and heritage value rather than development. Do not promote the development plan. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.023 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Oppose Amend 5.2.7 Objectives and Policies Temple View so that it is consistent with other special character areas so that it is focused on special character and heritage values not development. Do not promote the development plan. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.024 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected. Remove the Permitted activity status in 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones for demolition of non-residential buildings in Special Character and Heritage Areas. Oppose Relocate 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone to Chapter 19 Historic Heritage. Page 344 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.025 5.3.2 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones Oppose Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.026 5.4.1 Density Oppose 5.4.1 Density - Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.027 7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank Precinct Support in Amend 7.1.3 d) Precinct 3 - Ferrybank Precinct by deleting the word "existing" from the beginning of the paragraph part relating to heritage and character buildings. Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.028 Table 23.3a Support in Amend Rule 19.3 Historic Heritage Activity Status to include 'subdivision' and align with Rule 23.3a) x. part Lynette Joyce Williams 1050.029 19 Historic Heritage Support in Amend Chapter 19 Historic Heritage to ensure it is linked to the City's Heritage Strategy, including the framework for part financial incentives for property owners. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.001 3.7 Ruakura Support in Amend 3.7d to identify employment opportunities are centred on "innovation and research". Amend 3.7h to enable part development of a suburban centre. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.002 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone Oppose Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.003 3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Amend staging rules in 3.7.3.6 to enable earlier development of the suburban centre. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.004 3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood Centre Amend 3.7.1.5 to relate to a Suburban Centre Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.005 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose Amend objectives and policies to provide for in "general" accordance with the structure plan; Delete Objective 3.7.2.2 and its policy; amend 3.7.2.4 so as to remove reference to not compromising the Central City; amend objective 3.7.2.7, policy 3.7.2.4a and b; Delete Policy 3.7.2.7a; Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.006 8.1 Purpose Amend Purpose 8.1 to provide for a suburban centre and delete words in relation to compromising the Central City. Oppose Oppose Amend 3.7.1.4b to delete reference to "in a manner that does not compromise the Central City" Page 345 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.007 8.2 Objectives and Policies Knowledge Zone Oppose 8.2 Replace "shall' with "should" in the Objectives and Policies for the Knowledge Zone. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.008 8.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete Policy 8.2.1f. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.009 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose For AgResearch and Waikato Innovation Park amend Rules 8.3b) to e), and j) to make the following permitted activities - maintenance, alterations and additions to existing buildings, new buildings and Commercialisation of activity ancillary to research, innovation and education and laboratory activities. For Waikato Innovation Park amend Rule 8.3 to provide for permitted and discretionary activities as identified in Rules 25B.4 to 25B.10 of Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan, and include Schedule 25B in Chapter 8. Delete Rule 8.5.3 or amend to provide clarify that an ‘ancillary office activity’ does not include office related research and innovation activities and any associated administrative office space. Amend Rule 8.3 k) to clarify that the activities identified are an inclusive list. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.010 8.4 Rules – General Standards Oppose Delete or amend rules 8.4 to reflect the rules outlined in Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.011 8.4.8 Building Design Oppose Delete Rule 8.4.8a); Amend Rule 8.4.8b) to clarify the rule does not apply to internal private accessways within Waikato Innovation Park. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.012 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Delete Rule 8.9ai and 8.9 ii; amend Rule 8.9 to remove unnecessary and unjustified matters of discretion. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.013 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the Activity Status Table for the Open Spaces Zone to include Carparking, Stormwater Detention and Livestock Grazing at Waikato Innovation Park as Permitted Activities Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.014 15.5.3 Number of Buildings Oppose Amend Rule 15.5.3 for the Number of Buildings on a Park within the Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to ensure it is not unreasonably restricted. Or exclude the Waikato Innovation Park from this rule Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.015 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 20.3 k) Significant Trees so that Non-emergency works to, removal or, or transplanting of scheduled tree identified as T75 is changed from a Discretionary to a Controlled Activity, and include specific matters of control. Remove those trees within the Waikato Innovation Park with a score less than 1000 listed as Significant Trees from the Significant Tree Schedule. Page 346 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.016 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.017 25.5.3.1 Landscaping Amend Rule 25.5.3.1a)iii so as to remove the requirement for landscaping for the Knowledge Zone. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.018 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone Oppose and Knowledge Zone Amend 25.6.4.3b) under Major Facilities Zone and Knowledge Zone to correct cross referencing within the Plan. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.019 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) ii) to exclude new activities on the Waikato Innovation Park site in accordance with Schedule 25B (see section 8.12) of the Waikato District Plan from requiring an Integrated Transport Assessment. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.020 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan -Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to identify Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.021 Figure 2-15 Ruakura Structure Plan-Transport Network Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors; delete cycleways/walkways shown on Figure 2-15 within Waikato Innovation Park. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.022 Figure 2-16 Ruakura Structure Plan-Water Infrastructure Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.023 Figure 2-17 Ruakura Oppose Structure Plan-Waste Water Infrastructure Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.024 Figure 2-18 Ruakura Structure Plan-Storm Water Infrastructure Oppose Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors. Waikato Innovation Park Limited 1051.025 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose Amend Rules 8.3 b) – e) so requirements for alterations and additions to existing buildings are a permitted activity. Amend Chapter 8 by inserting Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan into the Knowledge Zone as 8.12. Amend Rule 8.3 f) to refer to Schedule 25B. Delete rule 8.5.3 or amend to provided certainty and clarity in relation to ‘ancillary office activity’; Amend Rule 8.3 j) as a permitted activity; amend Rule 8.3k) to add in the words "(but not limited to"). Helen Judith 1052.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Oppose Page 347 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Thomson Helen Judith Thomson 1052.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Helen Judith Thomson 1052.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Helen Judith Thomson 1052.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Rebecca Hippolite 1053.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Rebecca Hippolite 1053.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Rebecca Hippolite 1053.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Rebecca Hippolite 1053.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Alexandra Dee 1054.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Alexandra Dee 1054.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Alexandra Dee 1054.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Alexandra Dee 1054.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Julie Nicole Morley 1055.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Julie Nicole Morley 1055.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Julie Nicole Morley 1055.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Page 348 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Julie Nicole Morley 1055.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Velroy Crystal Matthews 1056.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Velroy Crystal Matthews 1056.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Velroy Crystal Matthews 1056.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Velroy Crystal Matthews 1056.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola 1057.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola 1057.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola 1057.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola 1057.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ann Bella Johnson 1058.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ann Bella Johnson 1058.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ann Bella Johnson 1058.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Ann Bella Johnson 1058.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 349 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary The University of Waikato 1059.001 8.1 Purpose Support in Amend Purpose 8.1 to recognise existing facilities in addition to future ones. part The University of Waikato 1059.002 8.2.5 Objective and Policies University of Waikato Support in Retain Objectives and Policies 8.2.5, 8.2.5a, 8.2.5b, 8.2.5c, 8.2.5d and 8.2.5e as notified. Amend the explanation to part 8.2.1 so it does not apply to the University. Amend 8.2.5f to enable the university to develop a long term plan for its campus. The University of Waikato 1059.003 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain rule 8.3 Activity Status v)– z), aa) and cc) – tt); part Delete reference to performance standard for 100 vehicle movements per day in 8.3 aa) and tt) as notified; Delete Rule 8.3bb);Delete Rule 8.3uu). The University of Waikato 1059.004 8.4 Rules – General Standards Support The University of Waikato 1059.005 8.6.1 Provision of Concept Plan Support in Delete the exclusion provisions in 8.6.1 a), b) and c); Retain Rules 8.6.1 d), e), f), g) and h);Amend Rule 8.6g) as it part relates to Concept Plans; Delete 8.6.1j). The University of Waikato 1059.006 8.6.2 Building Setbacks Support Retain Rule 8.6.2 Building Setback as notified. The University of Waikato 1059.007 8.6.3 Building Standards Support Retain Rule 8.6.3 Building Standards as notified. The University of Waikato 1059.008 8.6.4 Permeable Surfaces Support in Retain Rule 8.6.4 Permeable Surfaces subject to Council clarification on rationale for 20% net site permeability and part amend cross reference 8.6.3b) (height planes) to 8.6.2 (building). The University of Waikato 1059.009 8.7 Provisions in Other Chapters Support in Amend 8.7 Provisions in Other Chapters by removing reference to Chapter 21. part The University of Waikato 1059.010 8.8 Controlled Activities Matters of Control Support in Retain 8.8a) i as notified and delete 8.8a)ii. part The University of Waikato 1059.011 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Support in Amend Rule 8.9, heading for the Restricted Discretionary criteria; Transfer the RD criteria for any Concept Plan-Rule part 8.9viii to xxiii; Retain 8.9.xx , 8.9.xxi) and 8.9.xxii); Insert new Rule 8.9.xxiii)to provide Any Permitted Activity which does not comply with the performance standards in Rules 8.6 to 8.7. The University of Waikato 1059.012 8.10 Notification Rule Support in Amend Rule 8.9xxii so that it is non-notified part The University of Waikato 1059.013 8.11 Other Resource Consent Support in Retain 8.11 Other resource consent information as notified. Information part The University of Waikato 1059.014 10.1 Purpose Retain 8.4a) General Standards as notified. Support in Amend the Plan to ensure the correct balance is achieved between promoting Ruakura and maintaining the part environmental and social objectives of existing facilities and neighbourhoods. Page 350 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary The University of Waikato 1059.015 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective and Policies in 10.2.2 and 10.2.3 to provide additional emphasis on amenity and environmental part values of the surrounding neighbourhoods and facilities. The University of Waikato 1059.016 10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support The University of Waikato 1059.017 10.4.1 Permitted Activities Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. The University of Waikato 1059.018 10.4.2 All Other Activities Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. The University of Waikato 1059.019 10.4.3 Site Coverage Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. The University of Waikato 1059.020 10.4.4 Permeable Surfaces Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. The University of Waikato 1059.021 10.4.5 Building Height Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. The University of Waikato 1059.022 10.4.8 Interface Standards Support in Retain Rule 10.4.8 regarding interface standards for the Ruakura Logistics Zone. part The University of Waikato 1059.023 10.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 10.5 to review the efficiency and appropriateness of the matters of discretion and assessment criteria Activities Matters of part Discretion and Assessment Criteria The University of Waikato 1059.024 11.1 Purpose The University of Waikato 1059.025 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain 11.2.2, 11.2.2a, 11.2.3 and 11.2.3a for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone The University of Waikato 1059.026 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain 11.2.2, 11.2.2a, 11.2.3 and 11.2.3a for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone The University of Waikato 1059.027 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Retain the non-complying activity status in Rules 11.3 f) to j) attributed to heavy or 'dirty' industry. Amend Rule 11.3 part m) to enable limited retail activities for serving the local catchment. The University of Waikato 1059.028 11.4.1 Permitted Activities Support Retain Rules 11.4.1 The University of 1059.029 11.4.2 All Other Activities Support Retain Rules 11.4.2 Retain Activity Status Table 10.3 Support in Amend the Plan to ensure the correct balance is achieved between promoting Ruakura and maintaining the part environmental and social objectives of existing facilities and neighbourhoods. Page 351 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato The University of Waikato 1059.030 11.4.3 Building Setbacks Support in Retain Rules 11.4.3 with amendments to Rule 11.4.3 d) to provide a 15m setback. part The University of Waikato 1059.031 11.4.6 Site Coverage Support Retain 11.4.6 Site Coverage The University of Waikato 1059.032 11.4.7 Site Landscaping Support Retain 11.4.7 Site Landscaping The University of Waikato 1059.033 11.4.8 Site Layout Support Retain 11.4.8 Site layout The University of Waikato 1059.034 11.4.9 Interface Standards Support Retain 11.4.9 Interface Standards The University of Waikato 1059.035 11.4.10 Provisions in Other Chapters Support Retain 11.4.10 Provisions in Other Chapters The University of Waikato 1059.036 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Review the efficiency and appropriateness of the matters of discretion and assessment criteria to ensure the amenity Activities Matters of part values of the surrounding neighbourhoods and facilities are protected. Discretion and Assessment Criteria The University of Waikato 1059.037 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone Support and Knowledge Zone Retain Rule 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone and Knowledge Zone with correction to cross-referencing within the Plan. The University of Waikato 1059.038 25.8.2.1 Objective and Policies Noise and vibration -Retain the Objective 25.8.2.1 and all policies The University of Waikato 1059.039 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space Zones Requests reassess the provisions under 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Standards as they apply to the Ruakura logistics and Ruakura industrial Park Zone. The University of Waikato 1059.040 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Support Standards for Activities in the Major Facilities Zone, Knowledge Zone and Open Space Zones Retain 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in the Major Facilities Zone, Knowledge Zone and Open Space Zones The University of 1059.041 25.10.5.8 Knowledge Zone Retain Rule 25.10.5.8 signs for the Knowledge Zone. Support Support Page 352 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikato The University of Waikato 1059.042 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Support Retain Rule 25.14.4.2a) regarding parking requirements for the University of Waikato using parking standards in Appendix 15- 2 as a guide only. The University of Waikato 1059.043 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 a) to increase the Integrated Transport Assessments consent trigger thresholds for the University of Waikato and delete Rule 25.14.4.3 f) iv that requires consent and ITA for new vehicle access from the University. The University of Waikato 1059.044 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition of "Interface Area" part The University of Waikato 1059.045 Features Map 47B Support Support provisions in the plan that protect the heritage and ecological sites on the University Campus seen on Features Map 47B The University of Waikato 1059.046 Zoning Map 47A Support Map 47A-Support the provisions that protect the heritage and ecological sites on the University Campus (features map) The University of Waikato 1059.047 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review the format, content and nature of the Restricted Discretionary Assessment criteria to achieve a more efficient and effective framework for the assessment of applications. The University of Waikato 1059.048 10.4.6 Building Setbacks Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the part logistics zone outside the inland port. Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere 1060.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere 1060.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere 1060.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere 1060.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Alan Francis Thomson 1061.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Alan Francis 1061.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Page 353 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Thomson Alan Francis Thomson 1061.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Alan Francis Thomson 1061.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ariana Murphy 1062.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ariana Murphy 1062.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ariana Murphy 1062.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Ariana Murphy 1062.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Darnie Eden Paraha 1063.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Darnie Eden Paraha 1063.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Darnie Eden Paraha 1063.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Darnie Eden Paraha 1063.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Rachel Elizabeth Thomson 1064.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Rachel Elizabeth Thomson 1064.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Rachel Elizabeth Thomson 1064.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Page 354 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Rachel Elizabeth Thomson 1064.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Debbie Solomon 1065.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Debbie Solomon 1065.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Debbie Solomon 1065.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Debbie Solomon 1065.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Alisha Willis 1066.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Alisha Willis 1066.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Alisha Willis 1066.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Alisha Willis 1066.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Marsden Boyd Gaabdora 1067.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Marsden Boyd Gaabdora 1067.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Marsden Boyd Gaabdora 1067.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Marsden Boyd Gaabdora 1067.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Support Page 355 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Mikala T Watene 1069.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Mikala T Watene 1069.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Mikala T Watene 1069.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Mikala T Watene 1069.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Harrisson Balabat Jull 1070.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Harrisson Balabat Jull 1070.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Harrisson Balabat Jull 1070.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Harrisson Balabat Jull 1070.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Emmeline Sunnex 1071.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Emmeline Sunnex 1071.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Emmeline Sunnex 1071.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Emmeline Sunnex 1071.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 356 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts William Kent Money (Envision Team) 1072.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose William Kent Money (Envision Team) 1072.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 William Kent Money (Envision Team) 1072.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. William Kent Money (Envision Team) 1072.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management) 1074.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities 1074.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Page 357 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Management) Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management) 1074.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management) 1074.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Garrick Wayne Parr 1075.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Garrick Wayne Parr 1075.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Garrick Wayne Parr 1075.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Garrick Wayne Parr 1075.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Owen Purcell 1076.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Owen Purcell 1076.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Owen Purcell 1076.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Owen Purcell 1076.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Noeleen Blanche Forbes 1077.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Noeleen Blanche Forbes 1077.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Noeleen Blanche 1077.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Page 358 of 541 Sub Name Forbes Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Character Area Area. Noeleen Blanche Forbes 1077.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. George Kaka 1078.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose George Kaka 1078.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 George Kaka 1078.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. George Kaka 1078.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Janie Edwards 1079.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Janie Edwards 1079.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Janie Edwards 1079.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Janie Edwards 1079.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs 1080.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs 1080.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs 1080.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku 1080.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 359 of 541 Sub Name Briggs Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith 1081.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith 1081.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith 1081.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith 1081.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.001 1.1.2 Statutory Context of the District Plan and Relationships with Other Plans Retain Section 1.1.2 and Figure 1a. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.002 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support Integrated Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure Support. Retain Objective 2.2.13 and Policies 2.2.13a), b) and d) without modification. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.003 Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use a) Retain Figure 2-4: Rototuna Structure Plan – Land Use in Appendix 2 including the identification of Transpower’s existing electricity transmission lines and the electricity transmission corridor without modification. Support Retain the structure of the Proposed District Plan in relation to Rules relating to Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission are in the same chapter. Support b) Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission Page 360 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.004 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Support Ruakura Structure Plan – Retain Figure 2-14 Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.005 Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use Support in Amend Figure 2-1: Peacocke Structure Plan – Land Use to identify Transpower’s Hamilton Communications Centre and part remove the indicative transport corridor link from traversing the site. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.006 3.3.5 Objective and Policies Support in 3.3.5 Objective and Policies part Amend 3.3.5b by inserting the word 'adverse' as set out in the submission: 'Sensitive land uses shall avoid adverse effects on and from regionally significant infrastructure'. Insert a new Policy 3.3.5c 'Manage subdivision, use and development to avoid adverse effects on the safe, efficient and effective operation and use of existing or planned infrastructure'. Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.007 3.4.1.1 Natural Character Areas Support in Amend 3.4.1.1c) to make reference to the Transpower’s National Control Centre in Hall Road. part Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.008 Peacocke Built Environment Support in Insert new objectives and policies, as set out in the submission, into 3.4.6.4 Peacocke Built Environment to ensure that part existing regionally significant infrastructure is not compromised by the development of the structure plan area. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.009 3.7.1.9 Stormwater Support in Amend 3.7.1.9 to indicate that other land use could adversely affect transmission lines. part Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.010 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support Medium-Density Residential Zone Retain the Advice Note to the 4.5.3 Activity Status Table relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.011 8.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Retain Note to activity table that relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.012 10.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the advice note to the activity status Rule 10.3 as it relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.013 11.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the advice note to the activity status table 11.3 as it relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors as notified. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.014 14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain advice note 1 under the Rule 14.3 - Activity Status Table as notified. Page 361 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.015 15.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the advice note to the Activity Status Table for Open Space Zones. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.016 16.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the advice note to Rule 16.3 Activity Status Table for Community Facilities Zones. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.017 18.4 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Amend 18.4 to add an advice note for activities and buildings in the Electricity Transmission Corridors to see Chapter 25.7: City-wide – Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridor. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.018 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Retain the advice note below Rule 20.3 regarding activities and buildings in the Electricity Transmission Corridors. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.019 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support Retain the Advice Note Rule 4.3.1 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.020 22.2 Objectives and Policies Natural Hazards Support in Seeks the retention of Objective 22.2.1 and Policies 22.2.1a i) and iii) and Policy 22.2.1f; and amendments to Policy part 22.2.1h to clarify the extent to which the flood risk is managed. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.021 22.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.022 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 23.2.2 and Policies 23.2.2a x, xi, and xv. Amend Policy 23.2.2a xvi to reflect the new terminology part promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.023 Table 23.3a Support in Amend Rule 23.3a ix to reflect the new terminology promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach. part Insert an advice note following Table 23.3 regarding the need for consultation with Transpower when undertaking subdivision within and Electricity Transmission Corridor. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.024 23.6.6 Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B Support in Amend Rule 23.6.6 regarding Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B with amendments to reflect part the new terminology promoted by Transpower in its Corridor Management Approach. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.025 23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 23.8a) ii to refer to new Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria MXX sought by the submitter on Activities Matters of part Chapter 25.7 and reflect new terminology promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach. Discretion and Assessment Criteria Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.026 25.2.2 Objectives and Policies Earthworks and Vegetation Removal Support Seeks the retention of Rule 22.3rr regarding lifeline utilities (above ground level) as a Permitted Activity. Seeks the retention of Objective 25.2.2.1 regarding minimisation of adverse effects of earthworks and vegetation removal. Page 362 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.027 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support Table Seeks the retention of advice note 3 to 25.2.3 regarding the relationship between the National Environmental Standard for Electricity Transmission Activities and the Plan, and the cross reference from 25.2.3 d) to Chapter 25.7: Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors. Seeks a new rule to require Non-complying Activity consent for any earthworks within an Electricity Transmission Corridor that cannot comply with the permitted activity standards set out in Rule 25.2.4.2 Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.028 25.2.4.2 Earthworks Within all Transmission Corridors Support in Amend Rule 25.2.4.2 relating to earthworks within electricity transmission corridors to reflect the new terminology part within Transpowers Corridor Management Approach. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.029 25.7.1 Purpose Support in Retain 25.7.1 Purpose b), c), d) and f) without modification. part Amend 25.7.1e) to clarify the consenting implications of the Electricity Transmission Corridor. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.030 25.7.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1a to 25.7.2.1f. part Amend 25.7.2.1 explanation to acknowledge risks to people and property. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.031 25.7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.2. part Amend Policies 25.7.2.2a and 25.7.2.2e to provide for an appropriate balance between the potential adverse effects of network utilities and the constraints imposed on network utilities by their technical and operational characteristics Amend Policy 25.7.2.2e to clarify what locations it applies to. Delete Policy 25.7.2.2b as intent is unclear. Retain Policies 25.7.2.2c and 25.7.2.2d. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.032 25.7.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 25.7.2.4 to relate more specifically to new resources. part Retain Policies 25.7.2.4a to 25.7.2.4f and 25.7.2.4h. Amend Policy 25.7.2.4g to provide for an appropriate balance between the potential adverse effects of network utilities and the constraints imposed on network utilities by their technical and operational characteristics Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.033 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain the text under the heading for Table 25.7.3 Activity Status part Amend Rule 25.7.3 e) to clarify relationship with Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003. Retain Rules 25.7.3 g), i) and j). Insert a new activity into Rule 25.7.3 to provide for the minor upgrading of Electricity Transmission at and above 110kV Page 363 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary to be carried out as a permitted activity and other upgrading to be carried out as a restricted discretionary activity Retain the electricity transmission lines on the Planning Maps Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.034 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.7.4 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors in order to reflect Transpower’s refined Corridor – Electricity Transmission part Management Approach. Corridors Amend advice notes 1 and 2 to Rules 25.7.3 and 25.7.4 to include relevant references to the city wide rules as well as the zone rules Retain advice notes 3 to 9to Rules 25.7.3 and 25.7.4 without modification (other than correcting the reference to the NESETA and NZECP34) Add a new cross reference to the assessment criteria set out in Appendix 1.2, Volume 2, with respect to the restricted discretionary activity status of buildings or structures associated with non-sensitive land uses in the Electricity Transmission Yard in existing Urban Areas Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.035 M Electricity Transmission Support in Amend Appendix 1.2-M1 to M5 - Electricity Transmission in order to: part · Require consideration of the effect of subdivision and development on the ability to access transmission infrastructure for maintenance, inspections and upgrading; · Recognise that visual effects are a subset of reverse sensitivity effects, along with amenity and nuisance effects; · Draw attention to the fact that compliance with NZECP34:2001 is mandatory; · Provide further guidance (through amendments to M2 and M3) with respect to how the design and layout of subdivision can avoid adverse effects on transmission lines; · Include an additional assessment criteria to consider complying with safe separation distances required by NZECP34:2001. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.036 1.7 Definitions Used in the District Plan Support in Amend the definition of Electricity Transmission Corridors, building, Minor Upgrading, and Sensitive Land Use part Retain the definition of earthworks, electricity transmission network, Lifeline Utilities, and ‘regionally significant infrastructure’ to the extent that it includes the national grid. Delete the definition of ‘electricity transmission line’. Transpower New Zealand Ltd 1083.037 26.3 Schedule of Designations Support in Retain designation references J79 and J79a Ruakura Road substation or combine into a single listing as set out in the part submission. Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Page 364 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Shirley T Rago 1085.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Shirley T Rago 1085.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Shirley T Rago 1085.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Shirley T Rago 1085.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Peihana Owen 1086.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Peihana Owen 1086.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Peihana Owen 1086.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Peihana Owen 1086.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Edna Mabel Johnson 1087.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Edna Mabel Johnson 1087.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Edna Mabel Johnson 1087.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Edna Mabel Johnson 1087.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 365 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary R Andrew Joseph 1088.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose R Andrew Joseph 1088.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 R Andrew Joseph 1088.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. R Andrew Joseph 1088.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Marie Pere Joseph 1089.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Marie Pere Joseph 1089.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Marie Pere Joseph 1089.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Marie Pere Joseph 1089.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Kristen Hartley 1090.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Kristen Hartley 1090.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Kristen Hartley 1090.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Kristen Hartley 1090.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Deborah Leigh Brunton 1091.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Deborah Leigh Brunton 1091.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Deborah Leigh 1091.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Page 366 of 541 Sub Name Brunton Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Character Area Area. Deborah Leigh Brunton 1091.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ken Williams 1092.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ken Williams 1092.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ken Williams 1092.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Ken Williams 1092.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Laurence John Denny 1094.001 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network Oppose Amend 3.7.1.8 by adding a new paragraph to relate to the open space network near Silverdale being a high level of landscaping and screening. Laurence John Denny 1094.002 Figure 2-14 Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - add to 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network a new clause to recognise a high level of landscaping and screening. Brian Smith (Spotswood) 1095.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Brian Smith (Spotswood) 1095.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Brian Smith (Spotswood) 1095.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Page 367 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Brian Smith (Spotswood) 1095.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Marama Mete 1096.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Marama Mete 1096.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Marama Mete 1096.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Marama Mete 1096.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Roena McCarthy 1097.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Roena McCarthy 1097.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Roena McCarthy 1097.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Roena McCarthy 1097.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hata Puriri (Temple View Heritage Society) 1098.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Amend 5.1.4.2 to extend the Temple Heritage Precinct by including the Temple View Character Area. Oppose Amend Appendix 1.5 to add Historic heritage to the information requirements for preparing Comprehensive Development Plans to ensure the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources addressed. Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts. Council to ask the owners maintain the special character of the area by preserving the David O McKay building for use as a Stake Centre. Council to ensure the owners of the buildings and their representatives “take all reasonable and proper care to keep in a state of good order and repair all buildings and other permanent improvements forming part of the Board's property”. Page 368 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can be repurposed. Amend the Plan to rezone the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd from ‘future residential’ to residential. Council encourages the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community organisations regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds. Council does not approve changes to Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and additional landscaping Hata Puriri (Temple View Heritage Society) 1098.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Amend 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area by including the area into the Temple Heritage Precinct. Add Historic heritage to the list of information requirements for those parties preparing Comprehensive Development Plans in order to ensure that applicants are aware of the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources. Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts. Seeks Council to ask the owners to make the changes to the David O McKay building that will enable it to be repurposed as a Stake Centre. Seeks Council to ensure that the owners of the buildings and their representatives, “take all reasonable and proper care to keep in a state of good order and repair all buildings and other permanent improvements forming part of the Board's property”. Seeks Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can be repurposed. Seeks the rezoning of the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd that is currently zoned ‘future residential’ as residential. Seeks Council to encourage the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community organisations regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds. Opposes changes to Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and additional landscaping. Page 369 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd 1099.001 13.1 Purpose Support Supports 13.1 - Purpose - Rototuna Town Centre Zone. Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd 1099.002 1 Plan Overview Support Generally supportive of the provisions relating to the Rototuna Town Centre so long as they remain consistent with recent decisions related to Variation 12. Address submissions raised by the submitter appropriately and provide for any consequential amendments necessary to give effect to the submission and the RMA. Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd 1099.003 4.1 Purpose Support Amend the Plan to be consistent with the recent Variation 12 decision, including as amended in future through agreed resolutions of the Variation 12 appeals. Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd 1099.004 Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan: part The planning provisions need to be framed in such a way that there is flexibility to ensure desirable changes and refinements can be accommodated without introducing an unnecessarily complex legal process. Provision of clarity that the two main land uses to be accommodated within the Active Recreational Reserve Area (identified as Area "P" of the CDP Area Map, Appendix 7 Figure 7-2) are the sports fields and a stormwater detention system/drainage swale. Consequential amendments as a result upon areas "Q" & "R" and associated roading network. Clarification of the location and activity mix within area "A", the Town Square and associated roading network. Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae Farms Ltd 1099.005 Figure 7-2 Comprehensive Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan: part The planning provisions need to be framed in such a way that there is flexibility to ensure desirable changes and refinements can be accommodated without introducing an unnecessarily complex legal process. Provision of clarity that the two main land uses to be accommodated within the Active Recreational Reserve Area (identified as Area "P" of the CDP Area Map, Appendix 7 Figure 7-2) are the sports fields and a stormwater detention system/drainage swale. Consequential amendments as a result upon areas "Q" & "R" and associated roading network. Clarification of the location and activity mix within area "A", the Town Square and associated roading network. Kirkdale Investments Ltd and Kimbrae 1099.006 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre Support in 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre. The Design Guide may be compromised by the inclusion of part specific requirements which limit the range of design outcomes and inhibit innovative design. Request expressed in terms of broad principles. Page 370 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Farms Ltd Alice BrownHaenga 1100.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Alice BrownHaenga 1100.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Alice BrownHaenga 1100.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Alice BrownHaenga 1100.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Ringihia Te Aroha Watene 1101.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Ringihia Te Aroha Watene 1101.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Ringihia Te Aroha Watene 1101.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Ringihia Te Aroha Watene 1101.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Charlotte W Timu (Retired) 1102.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Charlotte W Timu (Retired) 1102.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Charlotte W Timu (Retired) 1102.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Charlotte W Timu (Retired) 1102.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Edna Rivers 1103.001 5.1 Purpose Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Support Page 371 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Poulava Edna Rivers Poulava 1103.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Edna Rivers Poulava 1103.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Edna Rivers Poulava 1103.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.001 2.2 Objectives and Policies Strategic Framework Oppose Oppose. Replace all reference to "shall' with 'should' across all policies in section 2. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.002 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach Oppose Policy 2.2.3a uses highly subjective language. Delete and replace with amended text as per submission. Delete Policy 2.2.3c. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.003 3 Structure Plans Oppose Figures relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan (Figure 3.6.2a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) should be included in the Appendix 2. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.004 Appendix 2 Structure Plans Oppose (Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan should be included in the Appendix 2. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.005 3.3.1 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.1 (b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Reword 3.3.1 (b) to include the word 'progressively' so that the first line reads "Housing densities should progressively achieve.." Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.006 3.3.6 Objective and Policies Oppose 3.3.6(b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Reword Policy 3.3.6(b) to include the wording "..retains features of the landscape identified on structure plans". Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.007 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Oppose 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan): 3.6.1.1b Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10 3.6.1.2a Delete second sentence in policy. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.008 3.6.2.1 Suburban Centres Concept Plan Oppose The notation of School on the submitter's land be deleted from Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) or is clearly shown as “indicative” in the text and maps. Specific provision be made for a school shown on a Structure Plan as a Permitted Activity. Hounsell Holdings 1104.009 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Oppose 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Page 372 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Ltd Hounsell Holdings Ltd Remove staging from Rotokauri Suburban Centre. 1104.010 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network Support in 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network (Rotokauri): part Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”. Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10 The reference to the 50m central green corridor requires review given that the stormwater system has proven to be impractical. Add as 3.6.2.5 v) “School sites – sports fields and other informal recreation space available for public use.” Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.011 3.6.2.7 Transportation Network Oppose 3.6.2.7 Transportation Network (Rotokauri Structure Plan): Enable use of designation process for protection and acquisition of any transport corridors in order to achieve network outcomes. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.012 3.6.2.9 Staging Oppose 3.6.2.9 Staging (Rotokauri Structure Plan) and Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g. For each Figure include reference to where the various cross sections apply. Delete second sentence in policy 3.6.2.9 Include additional areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of Stage 1. Include commentary that fully explains the rationale of staging: “The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate efficient development of infrastructure and provide necessary critical mass for the provision of local services. The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate completion of a road network with a desirable level of connectivity.” Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.013 3.6.2.8 Industrial Oppose 3.6.2.8 Industrial (Rotokauri Structure Plan). Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.014 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services Oppose Amend 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services (Rotokauri) to ensure up-to-date commentary that reflects work/studies undertaken to date (i.e. the extension of the wastewater interceptor/stormwater management recent modeling and catchment planning). Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.015 3.6 Rotokauri Oppose Provide Rules in all zones so that any activity that compromises the ability to give effect to a structure plan outcome requires consent as a Restricted Discretionary Activity Discretion would be restricted to matters relating to alternative Page 373 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary methods and locations that can avoid adverse effects on structure plan outcomes, and include conditions that limit consent duration. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.016 4.1.1 General Residential Zone Oppose Opposes 4.1.1 b) as it is inconsistent with Policy 4.2.1a Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.017 4.2 Objectives and Policies Residential Zones Oppose Amend the Policies in 4.2 to replace the word "shall" with "should". Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.018 4.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.1a so that the achievement of a residential density of 16 dwellings per hectare is a long term intention. . Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.019 4.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose Amend Policy 4.2.3a.elete the word 'quality' Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.020 4.4 Rules – General Standards – General Residential, Residential Intensification Zones and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend Rule 4.4 to ensure appropriate provisions that support residential intensification (e.g. comprehensive development plans where permitted standards are not met as a controlled activity on sites over 3000m2 and where the minimum net site area is 350m2). Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.021 4.4.8 Fences and Walls Oppose Delete Rule 4.4.8Fences and Walls Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.022 4.5 Rules – Medium-Density Oppose Residential Zone Amend Rule 4.5 so that Comprehensive Development Plans are a Controlled activity. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.023 5.4.1 Density Oppose 5.4.1 Density - Amend 5.4.1a)a) and 5.4.1a)b) relating to Ridgeline Character Area by reducing the minimum net site area from 800m2 to 600m2. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.024 6.2.2 Objective and Policies Suburban Centres Support in Amend the Plan to remove the distinction between core and fringe zoning and rules for suburban centres. part Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.025 23.2 Objectives and Policies Subdivision Oppose Amend Objectives and Policies in 23.2 -Subdivision to clarify how subdivision will contribute to residential yield requirements. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.026 23.5.1 Telecommunication, Electricity, Gas and Computer Media Oppose Delete Rule 23.5.1 a) regarding the provision of Telecommunication, Electricity, Gas and Computer Media services. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.027 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape Oppose Amend Rule 23.7.1 a) and k) by reducing the minimum net site area in the General Residential Zone from 400m2 to 350m2 and in the Special Natural Zone (Ridgeline Character Area) from 800m2 to 600m2 Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.028 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Oppose Amend Subdivision Design Standards in Rule 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones to support residential intensification Page 374 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Zone and All Special Character Zones Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.029 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Oppose 24.3.3 Level of Contribution - Amend to take into account the existing capacity that is available and add the following matters: forecast need; existing open spaces resources; shared use opportunities; and other local circumstances. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.030 24.4.1 Reserves Level of Service Oppose Reserves levels of service are based on outdated assumptions, and should be planned through structure planning ahead of development to take account of need; Delete Rules 24.4.1 a) and b) or refer to standards as maxima, not minima. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.031 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Seeks the deletion of matter R4 relating to water quality, water courses, land stability, erosion, sediment, and stormwater from consideration for any activity that does not comply with the earthworks standards in Rule 25.2.5.1. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.032 25.13.2 Objectives and Policies Three Waters Oppose Amend all policies in 25.13.2 (Objectives and Policies - Three Waters) to replace the word "shall" with "should". Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.033 25.13.4.2 Stormwater Oppose Delete Rule 25.13.4.2 regarding stormwater discharges. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.034 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Oppose Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 regarding Water Efficiency Measures. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.035 25.13.4.6 Water Impact Assessments Oppose Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) so that a Water Impact Assessment is not required where an approved Integrated Catchment Management Plan is in place. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.036 25.14.2 Objectives and Policies Transportation Oppose Amend all Policies in 25.14.2 by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.037 25.14.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the footnotes of 25.14.3 to cross reference transport related activities in zone chapters. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.038 25.14.4.3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements Oppose Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 to increase the general minimum threshold for an Integrated Transport Assessment to at least 250 vehicles per day and 1,500 vehicles per day for a structure planned area; delete Rule 25.14.4.3 e) relating to area specific traffic generation thresholds prior to the opening of the Te Rapa Bypass. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.039 25.15 Urban Design Oppose Delete the reference to 'high quality design' and refer to 'good quality'. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.040 25.15.2 Objectives and Policies Urban Design Oppose Replace the word “shall” with “should” in all policies under 25.15.2 Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.041 25.15.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose Delete policy 25.15.2.1.c Page 375 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.042 26.3 Schedule of Designations Oppose Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.043 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria Oppose Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent is required are considered. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.044 1.5.13 Integrated Transport Assessment Oppose Amend to increase the threshold for an Integrated Transport Assessment to 250 vehicles per day, remove the requirement for an ITA when in Structure Plan Areas (except for high traffic generating activities) and improve linkages to Appendices 1.5.13, 1.2V and 15-3. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.045 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Oppose Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Amend Figure 2-8 in accordance with the attached Figure set out in the submission to show Medium density residential development extending to the north of the Suburban Centre; and Include staging boundary on Figure 2-8. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.046 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network Oppose Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network to include additional areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of Stage 1 as shown on attachments set out in the submission. 1104.047 Figure 2-10 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Reserve Network Oppose Hounsell Holdings Ltd Add the Stormwater Channel at Rotokauri to Schedule of Designations. Add the Collector road link between Ruffell Road and Gilchrist Street that is not covered by an approved CDP to the Schedule of Designations (See submission attachment for details) Provide an alternative route for the central north south collector that avoids the need for a large cut and overpass. Amend Figure 2-10 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Reserve Network title to 'Open Space Network' to: Show specific location of central green corridor; Show the stormwater drainage pattern that has been developed as part of the Catchment Management Plan for Rotokauri; Show the “recreational nodes” on the Figure and include in the legend with separate symbol. Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. The green central corridor route should be designated. Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.048 Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre Oppose Amend Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre to show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including: • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre • Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Page 376 of 541 Sub Name Hounsell Holdings Ltd Sub Point Plan Provision 1104.049 Figure 2-12 Rotokauri Interface Areas Sub Type Summary Oppose Amend Figure 2-12 Rotokauri Interface Areas to show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including: • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre • Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.050 Figure 2-13 Rotokauri Suburban Centre Primary Frontages Oppose Amend Figure 2-13 Rotokauri Suburban Centre Primary Frontages to show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including: • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre • Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.051 Figure 3-2 Rotokauri Oppose Comprehensive Development Plan Areas – Medium Density Residential Zone Figure 3-2 Rotokauri Comprehensive Development Plan Areas – Medium Density Residential Zone. Show indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including: • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre • Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.052 Zoning Map 14A Oppose Amend Map 14A to add land to Stage 1 of Rotokauri Structure Plan. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.053 Zoning Map 23A Oppose Map 23A-increase the area of Stage 1 Rotokauri Structure Plan. The Special Natural Zone/Ridgeline Character Area extends too far down Lee Road. The residential Zone will provide an appropriate transition to medium density residential. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.054 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-increase the extent of Stage 1 to include additional residential areas to the north and west of the existing first stage. Medium density residential zoning to be shown extending to the north of the Suburban Centre. Any loss of employment land can be addressed through an extension to the north of Ruffell Road, which is currently shown outside the structure plan area. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.055 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Amend Map 15A to extend Stage 1 Rotokauri to include additional industrial land to the south of the Te Kowhai Road Extension. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.056 Features Map 14B Oppose Amend Features Map 14B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor. Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.057 Features Map 23B Oppose Amend Features Map 23B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor. Page 377 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hounsell Holdings Ltd 1104.058 Features Map 24B Oppose Amend Features Map 24B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor. Annetta Margaret Peihopa 1105.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Annetta Margaret Peihopa 1105.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Annetta Margaret Peihopa 1105.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Annetta Margaret Peihopa 1105.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Robert & Anna Moore & Cox (Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato) 1106.001 4.4.2 Site Coverage Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase site coverage in General Residential and Residential Intensification Zone (except part Hamilton East Character Area). Robert & Anna Moore & Cox (Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato) 1106.002 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10 b) iv text to add in 'where possible' as the rule as presently written is too restrictive in the part Residential Intensification zone. Robert & Anna Moore & Cox (Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato) 1106.003 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose Residential Intensification Zone Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and inserting an additional point iv. to provide for a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms". Robert & Anna Moore & Cox (Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato) 1106.004 4.6.4 Residential Unit Size Amend Rule 4.6.4 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and inserting an additional point iv. to provide for a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms". Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Amend Rule 4.4.10 c) i. to reduce the outdoor living areas requirements for detached and duplex dwellings. Amend Rule 4.4.10 e), as set out in the submission by deleting the text and replacing with "In the General Residential Zone, any communal open space shall be optional, but cannot contribute more than 50% of the above provisions". Oppose Page 378 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Robert & Anna Moore & Cox (Anglican Action / Poverty Action Waikato) 1106.005 Zoning Map 44A Oppose Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zone around Frankton to a mixed use residential zone. Desiree Joyce Park 1107.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Desiree Joyce Park 1107.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Desiree Joyce Park 1107.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Desiree Joyce Park 1107.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Brian Trevor Pryor 1108.001 12.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support Supports 12.3 Activity Status Table. Brian Trevor Pryor 1108.002 Zoning Map 1A Support Map 1A-Retain Te Rapa North Industrial Zone for Bern Road Scott Bready 1109.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-delete residential zoning and retain the existing commercial zoning for the west side of Clifton Road. Department of Conservation 1110.001 Peacocke Natural System Support Retain Objectives 3.4.6.1, 3.4.6.2 and 3.4.6.3 and related policies as notified Department of Conservation 1110.002 15 Open Space Zones Support in Retain the chapter provisions subject to amendments sought by the submitter. part Department of Conservation 1110.003 15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy for All Open Space Zones under 15.2.2c, so adverse effects on amenity, natural and heritage values of part those areas are avoided, remedied or mitigated rather than minimised. Department of Conservation 1110.004 20 Natural Environments Department of Conservation 1110.005 Significant Natural Areas Support in Retain Objective 20.2.1 and Policy 20.2.1o. Amend Policy 20.2.1c vi to align with the RMA regarding avoiding, 20.2.1 Objective and Policies part remedying or mitigating. Amend Policy 20.2.1m and 20.2.1n to clarify wording. Department of 1110.006 Significant Natural Areas Support in Amend existing objectives, policies and methods related to the maintenance of indigenous biological diversity. part Include implementation methods for management of Natural Environments, vegetation removal and protection of biodiversity values. Support in Retain Objective and Policies 20.2.2a and 20.2.2b. Amend the explanation to replace references to 'weed eradication' Page 379 of 541 Sub Name Conservation Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary 20.2.2 Objective and Policies part with 'pest control' Department of Conservation 1110.007 Significant Trees Support Retain Objective 20.2.3 and Policies 20.2.3a to 20.2.3f regarding Significant Trees Department of Conservation 1110.008 20.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rule 20.3 to recognise that habitats for indigenous species may be adversely affected by the removal of exotic part vegetation. Department of Conservation 1110.009 21.1 Purpose Support in Amend Chapter 21 to provide clear and robust implementation methods for the management of Waikato River and part Gullies values, vegetation removal and protection of biodiversity values. Department of Conservation 1110.010 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 21.2.1 and Policies 21.2.1a to 21.2.1g subject to further consideration of implementation methods. part Amend the explanation to clearly acknowledge potential conflict between values and use of the River and Gullies, and that not all activities will be appropriate in all areas. Department of Conservation 1110.011 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 to recognise natural values for the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems. part Department of Conservation 1110.012 21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 21.2.4 and Policies 21.2.4a to 21.2.4c for the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems. part Highview Properties Limited 1111.001 Zoning Map 8A Oppose Map 8A-Remove the Natural Open Space Zone from Lots 500 and 505 DP 419036 and rezone as General Residential, with those parts of Lot 505 falling outside proposed Lot 191 being rezoned Residential Medium Density; Amend the provisions of Natural Open Space and Medium Density Areas considering how they interact. Highview Properties Limited 1111.002 15 Open Space Zones Oppose Delete the Natural Open Space Zone from Lots 500 and 505 DP 419036 and rezone as General Residential, with those parts of Lot 505 falling outside proposed Lot 191 being rezoned Residential Medium Density. Highview Properties Limited 1111.003 4.1.3 Medium-Density Residential Zone Oppose Rezone land in the Eton Estate residential development (refer to plan in submission) from Natural Open Space to General Residential and Residential Medium Density. Highview Properties Limited 1111.004 24 Financial Contributions Oppose Review the provisions of section 24. Pre 223/224 payment of LTCCP fees should be held by Council as 'unit credits' against future development. Malcolm Williams 1112.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. Petra Reiter 1113.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area. part Amend the provisions of Natural Open Space and Medium Density Areas to clarify how they interact, affect density and existing approved resource consents. Page 380 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Raymond Russell Park 1114.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Raymond Russell Park 1114.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Raymond Russell Park 1114.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Raymond Russell Park 1114.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.001 2.2.4 Objective and Policies Central City, Business and Industry Support Support. Retain Objective 2.2.4 Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.002 2.2.5 Objective and Policies Business and Industry Support Support. Retain Objective 2.2.5 which recognises the role of industry and commercial activities have in supporting the economic wellbeing of the city. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.003 2.2.7 Objective and Policies The Waikato River Support Retain Objective 2.2.7 The Waikato River Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.004 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Support Retain Rule 4.3.1bb). Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.005 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 (a) to allow for the employment of people other than people residing on the site. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.006 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Support Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones Retain Rule 5.3.1 z) Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones as offices should be discouraged in residential areas. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.007 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia Precinct Delete the Opoia Precinct. Oppose Page 381 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.008 7.2 Objectives and Policies Central City Zone Oppose Amend 7.2 to include controls over strip clubs and strip bars so they are a non compliant activity in the CBD Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.009 7.2.9 Objective and Policies Opoia Precinct Oppose Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.010 7.2.3 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 7.2.3a) regarding increased residential accommodation within and close to the Central City. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.011 7.2.2 Objective and Policies Support Retain Policy 7.2.2b regarding the Central City as the preferred location for retail office, cultural and entertainment activities. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.012 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Oppose Delete the Opoia Precinct. The area should instead be zoned Residential Intensification. Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.013 Table 15-2b Number of Support parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.014 Table 15-2g Number of Support in Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to remove the requirement for lockers for cyclists. bicycle end-of-journey part facilities required – Central City Zone and Business Zones 1 to 7 Hamilton Central Business Association 1115.015 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A-reducing the Business 2 Zoning around Claudelands Events Centre. Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu 1116.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu 1116.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu 1116.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b regarding no minimum car parking requirements in the Central City Zone Page 382 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu 1116.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.001 Zoning Map 26A Support in Map 26A-Rezone Lot 1 DP 388507 (Land north of Ingham Motors Site) from Industrial to Business zone 1 and retain part Business 1 zone for Lot 1 and 2 DP 440887 and Lot 2 DP 388507. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.002 6.1 Purpose Support Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.003 6.2.1 Objective and Policies Sub-regional Centres Support in Amend 6.2.1 to make direct reference to the Business 1 (sub regional centre fringe) zone within the objectives and part policies of Chapter 6 Business 1-7 Zones. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.004 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. part Amend Rule 6.3 Offices in the Business 1 zone to provide for multiple office activity within each site. Amend 6.3 to include "Integrated Business Park Development" in the Business 1 zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. Amend Rule 6.3 so that Licensed premises, restaurants and cafe’s are permitted activities, up to 400m2 within the Business 1 zone. Amend Rules 6.3 p) to hh) to provide for an integrated or comprehensive retail activity across a site like Home Straight Park. Amend Rules 6.3 w) and x) to provide for yard based retail activities within the Business 1 zone. Amend Rule 6.3 to clarify that yard based retail activities include new vehicle sales yard activities and associated support activities. Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for commercial Places of Assembly as permitted activities within the Business 1 zone and amend the definition for Places of Assembly to include ‘commercial’. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.005 6.4.1 Maximum Building Height Support Retain Rule 6.4.1a) regarding the maximum building height of 15m within the Business 1 zone and remove the Amenity Protection Area applied to the Business 1 Zone. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham 1117.006 6.4.3 Building Setbacks Support Retain Rule 6.4.3 regarding the 5m building setback in residential and special character zones. Retain Section 6.1 i) of the purpose for the Business 1-7 Zones Page 383 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Group Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.007 24.3.3 Level of Contribution Oppose Amend 24.3.to provide greater certainty for plan users as to the amount of any financial contribution that maybe imposed through a condition of resource consent. Hamilton Homezone Ltd and Ingham Group 1117.008 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas Support Retain Rule 25.14.4.2 for shared parking provision in the Business 1 Zone Peter Mete-Smith 1118.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Peter Mete-Smith 1118.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Peter Mete-Smith 1118.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Peter Mete-Smith 1118.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Laitohi Elkington 1119.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Laitohi Elkington 1119.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Laitohi Elkington 1119.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Laitohi Elkington 1119.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Brian James Hollis 1120.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Brian James Hollis 1120.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Brian James Hollis 1120.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Brian James Hollis 1120.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Page 384 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Development Plan Areas and Precincts Patricia Helen Going 1121.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Patricia Helen Going 1121.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Patricia Helen Going 1121.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Patricia Helen Going 1121.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. The Trust Company Limited for AETNZ Education Trust 1122.001 4.7.2 Childcare Facility Oppose Delete Rule 4.7.2c) regarding maximum floor areas for childcare facilities. The Trust Company Limited for AETNZ Education Trust 1122.002 4.3.1 Activity Status Table – General Residential Zone, Residential Intensification Zone and Large Lot Residential Zone Oppose Amend 4.3.1s) so that "Childcare facility for up to five children" is Permitted (within the Residential Intensification Zone). Amend Rule 4.3.1t) so that "Childcare facility for six or more children" is Controlled (within the Residential Intensification Zone)". Add a new Rule before Rule 4.10 specifying matters of control for controlled activities for childcare centres of 10 or more children. Amend Rule 4.10 to delete the matters of discretion for childcare facilities for 6 or more children. The Trust Company Limited for AETNZ Education Trust 1122.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status Table Oppose Amend Rule 6.3 oo) so that Childcare facilities as a Permitted activity (within the Business 2 Zone) Holly Snape 1123.001 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.5 so that rainwater tanks for non-potable reuse systems (min 5,000L) and automated grey-water part reuse systems are mandatory for all new dwellings. Supports an incentives based approach to the promotion of water conservation as opposed to a disincentives based one. Replace Policy 6.2.4a with one that provides for the establishment of complementary community and service activities on the fringe of major events facilities Page 385 of 541 Sub Name Sub Point Plan Provision Sub Type Summary Edna Rivers Poulava 1124.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Edna Rivers Poulava 1124.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Edna Rivers Poulava 1124.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Edna Rivers Poulava 1124.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes 1125.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes 1125.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4 Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes 1125.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes 1125.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Support Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.001 2.1 Purpose Oppose 2.1. Provide for Early Childhood Centres throughout Hamilton, by providing consistent planning controls and zoning, particularly as permitted activities subject to meeting specific performance standards. Oppose Future proof ECE centres provisions to allow flexibility if changes to existing centres are required, to reflect changing industry standards and licence requirements. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.002 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A- rezone sites of City Limits childcare and the Casalinga café from Special Residential Zone to either Business zone 2 or 7; amend to change the area of the Special Residential Zone at Claudelands. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.003 Features Map 37B Oppose Amend Map 37B to exclude existing business and medium density residential development from Claudelands West Area. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.004 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed Oppose Oppose. Amend the default status for activities not listed, from a Non-complying to a Permitted Activity. Only list genuine activities as non - complying if warranted. Claudelands 1126.005 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Objective and policies uses ambiguous wording and need to reflect outcomes being sought. Add 'compact city' as an Page 386 of 541 Sub Name Property Trust Sub Point Plan Provision Urban Design Approach Sub Type Summary part objective with supporting policies to limit urban sprawl and increase building densities. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.006 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West Oppose Amend 5.1.1.1 b) the description of Claudelands West to include activities such as businesses, flats, railway line etc that affect the character of the area. Amend 5.1.1.1 c) by deleting reference to preserving existing character and allow for high density residential development. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.007 5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone Oppose 5.2.3 Objective and policies Amend objective 5.2.3 and its associated policies, so that they do not apply to Claudelands West; Add new Objective 5.2.3A specifically for Claudelands West; Delete policies 5.2.3e, 5.2.3f and 5.2.3g. Claudelands Property Trust 1126.008 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones 5.3.1 Activity Status Table – Amend the list of activities to promote development of Claudelands West as a future high density residential and mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City as set out in the submission. Cl