jabatan perikanan sarawak
Transcription
jabatan perikanan sarawak
ASSESSMENT OF RECREATIONAL FISHING AREAS OF SARAWAK, MALAYSIA Albert,C.G. 1994. Asst:ssment of recreational Proc. Fish. Res. fishing areas of Sarawak, Malaysia. Calif., DOF. Mal., IV: 173-189. The objectives available of the present study are to assess tht: pott:ntial areas, fishing grounds and species for recreational K.K.MANCHONG. line fishing. Fishing was carried out using the research vessel, Gears used included the spool and line and fishing rod and reel using two to three hooks per line. The overall average catch rate was 34 tails per station with individual station ranging from 0 to 263 tails per station. The highest catch and most productive grounds were located in subarea III and IV. Dorminant families sharks, Tachysuridae, Serranidae, Spyraenidae, included the Lu~anidae. Plectoryncidae, Lethrinidae, Carangidae. and Sparida •. The average size recorded was 48 cm or 1.4 kg. Active bites were mainly at dawn and dusk. Squids were considered the bt:st baits. When looking for fishing grounds. some of the features to look for are the coral and rocky areas, sea mounts, islands, tyre reefs, sunken vessels and floating buoys or logs. Considering the vast suitable recreational physical features of Sarawak coast, there is a tremendous potential for line fishing. Kajian ini bertujuan mentaksir ka,,:,asan berpotensi penangkapan yang ada. Kajian dijalankan menguna kapal penyelidikan, ikan secara rekreasi dan jenis ikan K.K.MANCHONG. Alat penangkapan ikan yang digunakal1 adalah ' spool and line' dan - fishing rod and reels' dengan dua hingga tiga mata kail satu tali. Keselumhan kadar tangkapan adalah 34 ekorlstesen stesen adalah diantara 0 hingga 263 ekorlstesen. terdapat di subkawasan Lethrinidae. Sparidae. Carangidae. dan tangkapan untuk satu-satu Tangkapan terbanyak dan kawasan yang III dan IV. Kumpulan jenis ikan yang terbanyak termasuk ikan yu, Serranidae. Spyraenidae. Tachysuridae, Purata saiz ikan yang ditangkap adalah 48 cm atau 1.4 kg beratnya. produktif Lutjanidae, Plectoryncidae dan Waktu makan yang terhaik adalah pada awal malam dan pagi. Umpan yang paling haik adalah sotong. Kawasan yang s"sllai lIntuk lIl"man~ing lennasuk halll karang. kawasan h"rhatu. hukit di dasar laut, pulau-pulau, tuklln tiruan, kapal t"nggelalll dan p"nanda hUlly atall kayu t"rapl1ng. 1\'1"mandangkan kawasan dasar lalll yang s"suai amatlah hlas di Sarawak. pot"nsi dan p"rkemhangan hagi penangkapan ikan secara r"kreasi adalah h"sar. Sarawak has one of the most extensive coastline in Malaysia covering a distance of approximately 1,000 km. The main coastline however, extends from Tanjong Datu in the SOllthwest to Kuala Baram in the northeast. A smaller section of the coastline lies between Brunei and Sabah. The seas off Sarawak has a great potential for recreational fishing. Between Tanjong Datu and Tanjong Po, there are several islands which are already familiar to recreational fishermen. Some paljts of the coastal zone has . extensive undersea coral reefs and rocky bottom especially off Mukah, Bintulu and Miri. There are several offshore reef areas, such as the groups of reefs known as the Beting Patinggi Ali and Beting Raja Jarom located about 110 nautical miles north of Bintulu. Located 160 nautical miles northwest of Labuan there is the LayangLayang reef islands. Most of Sarawak continental shelf extends to 200 nautical miles offshore. Such geographical features provide a variety of fish resources for anglers, handliners and other recreational fishing activities. Fish groups available CQuid be the highly sort-after Aron (Sciaenidae) of the coastal area; reef fishes such as snappers and groupers; the mobile pelagic fish such as the Spanish mackerel and barracudas; and the deep water fish such as the large yellow fin tuna. Recreational fishing as the name implies is fishing for recreational purpose, and for sport fishing instead of wholly catching fish for profitable purpose as in commercial fishing. The Recreational Fishing Advisory Committee, Western Australia (1990) has defined recreational fishing as "To aim to catch a feed for oneself and family and for a: variety of personal reasons to enjoy the experience along the way". There are many factors which attract people to recreational fishing such as fishing for. food, relaxation, solitude, companionship, sport, 'adventure, escape from modern pressures, competition, enjoyment of environment and the chance to develop skill with tackle and an affinity with particular species. Patrick Pomer (1992) pointed out that for many recreational anglers (or handliners) the actual benefit derived from catching an additional fish is relatively small in comparison with the total benefits of the recreational experience such as relaxation, challenge, peace and quiet. Recreational fishing is probably not well known before 1973 in Sarawak. Hook and line fishing for food must have been in existence for a long time, since hook and line fishing is one of the simplest form of catching fish. In 1969, fish landing from hook and line fishing was 21 tons, while in the early 1970's, landings were around 40 tons (Jabatan Perikanan Laut Sarawak, 1969 and 1973). From 1987 to 1991, hook and line fishing (included both handlines and longlines) had an average landing of 1,500 tons, about 2 percent of the total fish landing in Sarawak. The main centres for hook and line fishing are Lawas, Miri, Bintulu, Mukah and Belawai. Fish landings consisted of several groups (Appendix 1) and the most dorrninant groups were the lutjanids, tunas, serranids, rays, sharks, and carangids. A compilation of articles for Marine Sport Fishing by Dr. Su,C.K. (1985) provides a comprehensive record on the development of recreational fishing in Sarawak. The Sarawak Boat Club based at Kuching is probably the . only registered sport club that is involved with recreational fishing. The club caters to the needs of boat-lovers in Kuching as well as for sports fisherman, shooters, scuba-divers or those who simply love the sea (Su, C.K., 1985). At present the club has more than 300 members and the number is expected to increase in the future (Pers. comm.). Itowever, there are many more individuals not only in Kuching Division, but also in other Divisions such as Bintulu and Miri, who are involved in recreational fishing. During weekends, there are always groups of 4 to 10 people renting a small trawler or fishing 'kotak' going out for a night fishing (Personnel Observation). The cost could be around MR$200 to MR$600 per night to rent a boat from the fishing village like Gobil, Muara Tebas, Santubong, Lundu and Sematan. The popular fishing grounds for anglers in Kuching Division include Pulau Lakei, Pulau Satang, Cruiser Rock off Tanjong Sipang, the SUnkened Wreck (Sunkened World War II Japanese Vessel), Pulau Sempadi, Pulau TalangTalang and the coastal rocks extending from Tanjong Datu to Tanjong Po. The fish groups caught were the snapper, grouper, parrotfish, catfish, emperor, aron, stingray, shovelnose shark (ray group), trevally, spanish mackerel, shark, barracuda and tuna. The Sarawak Boat Club boasts of landing a black marlin weighing 70 kg at the sunkened wreck in 1985. The objectives of the present study are to assess the potential areas, fishing grounds and species available for recreational fishing. The information obtained is useful in the development of recreational fishing industry in Sarawak. bites during the first 30 minutes, the boat would heaved anchore and moved to the next site. When there were good bites, the boat would only leave the site until there were no more bites. Fishing was carried out using KK Manchong, a research vessel of the Department of Fisheries Malaysia based at the Fisheries Research Centre Bintawa, Sarawak. The vessel has a displacement of 150 GRT, a length of 27.5 metres, a 900 Hp Yanmar diesel engine and a maximum speed of 12 knots. The open deck and space around the wheel house provide suitable place for line fishing. Two main types of line fishing were used: (i) Spool and line; (ii) fishing rod and reel. The spool and line type used a PE monofilament which can stand a breaking load ranging from 80 lb to 150 lb. This is the most suitable range because smaller than 80 Ib, the line get entangled easily, and less convenient to haul manually by hand. Whereas bigger than 150 Ib, the line needs a bigger weight to sink to the bottom against water current. A larger line also needs a bigger spool to accomodate. The fishing rod and reel type used 40 to 60 lb line. Each line had two to three hooks ranging from size 3 to size 7. Lead weight used ranged from 200 to 400 gm depending on the current condition and depth of water. At each station fishing was carried out by 6 to 12 persons with an average of 8 persons per station. Three fishing rods and reels were normally used per station, while the rest used the simple spools and lines. Fishing was carried out both at night and day time. From experience, daytime bites Were relatively poor compare to night time. Usually fishing time were from 1800 to 2400 hours and from 0400 to 0800 hours. However, it Was also common that fishing was carried o~t throughout the night especially when the bites Were good. At each anchored first sp~nt fishing actIVeness of site or station, the boat was before fishing started. The time on each station depended on the the bites. When there were no The area surveyed is divided into 5 subareas (Fig. 1). Fishing sites were generally decided based on the following features: undulating or jagged bottom, hard or rock bottom, untrawlable ground, presence of good echo traces as shown in the echo sounder, reef areas as shown on the chart, sunken vessels, edge of a valley and sea mounts. These features, when not marked on the chart, is located using the echo sounder. The area and sites covered are shown in Fig. 1. The most common bait used was squid, either frozen or fresh. Depending on size, the smaller squid was used whole, while the larger squid was cut into suitable sizes. The second common bait used was fish which was also cut into suitable sizes. Sometimes, though prawns were used as baits. For each station fish caught were recorded in terms of number of tails for each group/species. Individual fish were measured for length and weight. The other information recorded were time fishing, water depQ?, and position of fishing site. All fishing data from 1987 to 1992 were combined and analysed together. Between 1987 to 1991, line fishing was carried out together (on a parttime basis) with the other surveys such as the demersal and pelagic fish resource surveys. Only in October, 1992, line fishing was carried out on a systematic basis for two weeks but covered only subarea I. The data analysis was carried out to obtain the catch rate (tails per station) for the overall area and by subareas, species composition and size composition. Fish behaviour in relation to fishing time and baits were also analysed. group was present in almost equal abundant in all types of environment. The distribution and abundance of the most common groups were a<; follows:The overall average catch per station was 34 tails. For individual station the highest catch was at station 40 in subarea III with 263 tails. The catch within the surveyed area ranged from 0 to 263 tails per station. The highest average catch rate was recorded in subarea III with 72 tails per station, followed by subarea IV with 41 tails per station and subarea I & II with 21 tails per station. The range and average catch rate is shown in Table 1. Productive areas seemed to be concentrated in only one spot in subarea I (between Tanjong Po and Tanjong Datu), but more widespread in subarea III and IV (between Tanjung Sirik and Bintulu) (Fig. 2). There were four stations in subarea III and IV, where the catch was more than lUO tails per station compared to only one station in subarea I. Overall, subarea III and IV seemed to be the most productive areas. Most stations in subarea I had a catch of less than 5 tails per station. SPECIES COMPOSITION DISTRIBUTION In the surveyed area, 18 main groups were recorded (Table 2). Out of these, the nine most abundant groups were the following families: Lutjanidae, Lethrinidae, Carangidae; sharks, Serranidae, Spyraenidae, Tachysuridae, Plectoryncidae and Sparidae (Table 3). They occupied from 5 to 23 percent of the total catch. The catch rate of the groups ranged from 2 tails per station to 8 tails per station. The most abundant group was the lutjanids with a catch rate of 8 tails per station followed by lethrinids (5 tails per station), carangids (4 tails per station) and sharks (4 tails per station) (Table 2). The most common groups present in each subarea is shown in Fig. 3. It seemed that almost the same groups were present in abundance in each subarea. However, the abundance of groups such as the carangids and tachysurids seemed to be associated with mud substrates in subarea I and II. In subarea 1II, IV and V,the substrates consisted of rocks, corals and reefs. The groups associated with this type of substrates were the lutjanids, serranids, lethrinids, spyraenids and sparids. The shark Most abundant group with catch rate of 8 tails/station and occupied 23 percent of the total catch. Fairly widespread over all the subareas. The group was concentrated in one spot in subarea I, but more widespread and abundant in subarea III and IV. Second most abundant group with catch rate of 5 tails per station and occupied 14 percent of the total catch. Concentrated in one spot in subarea I, but more widespread and abundance in subarea III and IV. Third most abundant group with catch rate of 4 tails per station. Also concentrated in one spot in subarea I, but most abundant and widespread in subarea III and IV. The next most abundant group after the carangids with catch rate of 4 tails per station and occupied I! percent of the total catch. Most widespread and found in all subareas. This rock grouper group is the fifth most abundant with catch rate of 3 tails per station. Concentrated in one spot in subarea I, but widespread and most abundant in subarea III and IV. This group had a catch rate of 2 tails per stations. Abundant in subarea II, III, IV and V with catch rate ranging from 2 tails to 29 tails per station. Distribution was more inclined towards deeper water. This catfish group with catch rate of 2 tails per station, is most abundant in subarea I and II being associated with mud substrate. Less abundance in subarea III and IV. Catch rate was about 2 tails per station. Concentrated in one spot in subarea I, but widespread in subarea III and IV. This group is common in subarea III and IV only. Catch rate was also about 2 tails per station. The mean length and weight for each species and their range of sizes are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. The largest fish caught in terms of length was the barracuda, Spyraena jello, having a size of 124 cm, followed by the barred spanish mackerel, Lybium commersoni, with total length of 105 cm. In terms of weight the largest fish caught was the shark (Family: Carcharhinidae) weighing 19 kg followed by snapper (Lutjanus sp.) weighing 12.5 kg. The overall mean length was 48 cm and overall mean weight was 1.4 kg. In terms of length the tachysurids and shark on average were larger than the rest of the groups with overall mean length of 73-75 cm. In terms of weight, the snappers and serranids were larger with an overall mean weight of 1.7 - 1.8 kg per tail. Most of the fishing were carried out at night. This was because the frequency of bites were better at night than day time. Normally the best time for fishing was early evening (dusk) between 6.00 pm to 10.00 pm and early morning (dawn) between 4.00 am to 8.00 am. It was observed that large piscivorous predators like the lutjanids, lethrinids, pomasdasyidae, carangidae, serranidae, plectorynchidae seemed to be particularly active at dusk and dawn period. Bites Were particularly active around 6.00 pm to 9.00 pm and tapered off toward midnight and active again at dawn around 4.00 to 8.00 am. Towards midnight, the larger predators like the sharks and spyraenidae (barracuda) were very active. The present study 'l1so observed that when the larger piscivorous fish like the sharks and barracuda came, there would be less bites and less activity from other smaller fish. Good bites normally did not last for long lasting from a few minutes to probably 1 hour depending on the types of fishing ground and the availability of fish school. Sometimes you might fish for one hour or throughout the night and day with a few bites only or none at all. Good fishing took place when the water was 'right'. That is, when the current was not too fast. The fast current was encountered during the incoming high or low tide. When the current was too fast, the line would 'fly' and needed a heavier lead weight. Even then. the bite were normally very poor when the current was very fast. Squids could be considered a universal baits since the majority of fish would prefer squid. Fish meat was also relatively good especially when the fishing ground is new. Generally, whole squid of the right size would be better than chopped squid. When using fish meat, the shape was also important in order to attract fish. Generally, baits chopped in the' long-shape' or resemble a small fish was better than just a squared or rounded shape. The shape of baits was important especially in popular fishing grounds when competing with several fishing lines. Fresh baits were always better than frozen or rotten-baits. In certain situation or for certain group of fish, fresh prawn was used as bait, but sometime prawn broke off the hook easily. The overall average catch per station was 34 tails. The catch for individual station, however, ranged from 0 to 263 tails per station. Comparing the subareas. the highest catch rate was at subarea III (72 tails per station), followed by subarea IV (40 tails per station). while subarea I and 11had a relatively low catch rate (21 tails per station). The distribution pattern of catch rate can be used as a guide to the potential areas and productive grounds for the development of recreational fishing (Fig. 2). Productive fishing grounds as shown by the distribution of catch rate are more widespread in subarea III and IV (Fig. 2). These two subareas extends from Tanjong Sirik to Miri. The majority of the stations had a catch rate of more than 20 tails per station. The highest overall catch rate is located here with 72 tails per station. Infact, the highest catch for individual station (263 tails) was also recorded in these two subareas. The demersal trawl surveys showed that a large part of the area between Tanjong Sirik and Miri is untrawlable due to the presence of hard rock, corals and sea mounts (Albert, 1986). These physical features such as hard rock, corals, sea mounts and under sea valleys and cliffs are known for their high productivity (e.g. Alevizon. er al .. 1989. Relini, er ai .. 1989). The area between Bintuiu and Mlri, is dotted with undersea reefs. The presence of these undersea physical features explains why this area provides productive fishing grounds for hook and line fishing. The physical features like reefs and coral not only attract fish normally associated with corals such as the lutjanids, lethrinids, serranids. balistids and Plectoryncidae but also attract the mobile pelagic fish such as the barracudas, the trevallys, sharks and tunas. In subarea L between Tanjong Po and Tanjong Datu, the productive ground. is concentrated in one s'mall area, where the seabed consisted of rocks and probably old corals. The majority of the area in subarea I, however. is not as productive where most stations have a catch of less than 5 tails per station. For most of the area, the substrate consisted of mud. This is the area where the largest rivers like the Sarawak river, Batang Lupar and Rejang river discharged their load of mud. However, north of Sematan, the sea area sometimes consisted of sand. Generally, because of the bottom physical features, subarea I is less productive than subarea III and IV for hook and Iine fishing. The dominant families such as the Lutjanidae, Lethrinidae, Carangidae, Serranidae, Spyraenidae, Plectoryncidae and Sparidae are those groups that are normally associated with coral reefs or hard rock bottoms. As such, they are relatively abundant in areas between Tanjong Sirik to Miri (Subal\:a III and IV) where a large part of the area has undersea coral reefs and hard-rock bottom. In areas where the seabed consisted of mud, the family Tachysuridae (large catfish) is abundant. Tachysurids are found in abundance mostly in subarea I, especially north of Tanjong Sipang and Tanjong Po. Another common group, the shark is found in all the subareas which show that they are more mobile. Another mobile pelagic fish, the Spyraenidae (barracudas) seemed to be more associated with coral or reef area. Most of the fish cl!'lght has an average size of 48 cm and an average weight of 1.4 kg. Occassionally, however, an exceptionally large fish is caught. For example, although most sharks caught were around 1.7 kg, there is one tail which weighed 19 kg. The largest snapper (Lutjanidae) caught weighed 12.5 kg, the largest barracuda (Spyraenidae) caught weighed 10 kg and the largest rock grouper (Serranidae) caught weighed 7.5 kg. Suitable fishing time is related to the behaviour of fish such as the swimming and feeding activity. Boulenger (1927) through Woodhead (1966) observed that most e1asmobranch (e.g. sharks) and teleosts (bony fish) were more active at night. Some teleost species like the seabream. PaKella centrodontus were more active at night. The present study showed that active bites were at dusk (6.00pm to 1O.00pm) and at dawn 4.00 am to 8.00am) especially for those groups that stay at the bottom such as the lutjanids, lethrinids, Serranidae and the Plectorynchidae group. The sharks and till: spyraenids were more active later at night when most other groups were not active anyinore. Most of the abundant families were caught in coral reef, hard bottom, and sea mount area and therefore suitable fishing time would be related to the behaviour of fish in these type of seabed. The activity pattern of the vast diversity of coral reef fishes have been well described (Hobson, 1975; McFarland, 1986). The freeswimming groups like the Scaridae, Ancanthuridae, Balistidae, Chaetodontidae and Labridae are active during the day, while the bottom dwellers like the Lutjanidae, Pomadasysidae, Holocentridae and Sciaenidae are active at night but settle down during the day. Hobson (1965) also described that most of the free swimmers which were usually herbivorous or omnivorous feed during day ,. - . ,,'- { • I .~ time, while the bottom dwellers which were mostly piscivorous predators feed at night time. In those group associated with mud substrate, such as Tachysuridae and Sciaenidae, in subarea I, active bites are mostly at night time. Those pelagic group like the Scomberomeridae (Spanish mackerel) and tuna being a visual feeders are active during the day time when they are usually caught by trolling. The effectiveness of baits depends on the type of fishing ground (rocky, muddy, sandy or coral-reef areas). The best bait is squids especially when fresh. Squid could be considered a universal bait as most piscivorous and omnivorous fish would take it. Fish like sharks, barracudas, spanish mackerel, lethrinids, serranids, sciaenids, lutjanids, scarids and balistids would take squid. Infact the whole 18 groups of fish recorded in Table 2 and 3 prefer squids. Fresh whole squids of medium size is best especially for coral fish. Bigger group such as the sharks and serranids prefer single whole large-size squid. For other medium size fish, chopped squid is equally good. In new areas, most demersal fish would take even the non-fresh squid as baits. Fresh fish, whole or chopped as meat chunk, is also good for baits especially for coral fish and those groups that are associated with mud substrate such as the tachysurids (cat fish) and the freeswimming group such as the shark and barracudas. 'When cutting squid or fish for baits the shape of the cut is important. Fish is more attracted to the shape that resembles a small fish. Something" long and oblong" is better than just a chunk or square-shaped. Some local anglers found that fresh prawn was a good bait especially for Aron (Sciaenidae) (Su,C.K., 1985). However, prawn baits when not properly hook, get off the hook easily. When looking for fishing grounds it is advisable to look for undersea features that normally attract fish. Natural features such as coral reefs, rock bottom, sea mounts, edge of undersea cliff, edge of continental shelves, valleys and small islands normally have Upwelling current rich in nutrients and are usually productive areas. Subarea III and IV (from Tanjong Sirik to Miri) have plenty of coral ~eefs, rock bottom, and sea mounts and are Ideal place for anglers and handline fishing. Artificial features such as artifical reefs ) ••• -",.... made from tyres, buoys, sunken vessels and oil rig are some of the features that act as fish attracting devices (FADs), both for demersal and freeswimming pelagic fish. In subarea I between Tanjong Datu and Tanjong Po, there are two artifical reef sites made by the Department of Fisheries Sarawak and a World War II sunken vessel. These sites have become a popular area for anglers. Generally, there is a tremendous potential for recreational fishing considering the vast sea areas and the suitable seabed features (such as rocks, corals, sea mounts and valleys) that are home to several species of fish suitable for line fishing. There is a need to develop the recreational fishing industry to cater to the growing interest in this type of fishing. The overall average catch was 34 tails per station, while the catch for individual station ranged from 0 to 263 tails per station. The highest catch rate was in subarea ill and IV, while the lowest catch rate was in subarea I and II. Productive fishing grounds were more widespread in subarea III and IV. In subarea I and II, there was less productive ground and mainly concentrated in one spot. Productive grounds were related to seabed type such as hard rocks, corals, sea-mounts and other undersea physical features such as sunkened vessels. In subarea I and II, where the seabed consisted of mud, the area is less productive. Dorminant families were the Lutjanidae, Lethrinidae, Carangidae, sharks, Serranidae, Sphyraenidae, Tachysuridae, Plectorynchidae, and Sparidae. Except for Tachysuridae and sharks, most of the dorminant groups are those normally associated with corals, reefs and rock seabed. Fish caught had an average size of 48 em and average weight of 1.4 kg. The largest fish caught was a shark weighing 19 kg. Suitable fishing time is related to the behaviour of fish. Active bites were at dusk (6.00-10.00 pm) and at dawn (4.00-8.00 am) especially for bottom dwellers. The large predators like the sharks and barracudas, were more active later at night. The best bait was squids either cut or whole. Squids were taken by all the piscivorous and omnivorous fish. Fresh fish meat was also a good bait. When looking for fishing ground for line and recreational fishing, it is advisable to look for undersea features such as corals, reefs, rocks, sea mounts, edge of undersea cliffs and continental shelves, valleys and islands. Artificial features such as reef tyres, sunken vessels and oil rigs act as fish attracting devices (FADs). There is a tremendous potential for recreational line fishing in Sarawak and the need to develop this type of fishing industry. Hobson, E.S., McFarland, W.N. 1986. Light in the sea. Correlations behaviour of fishes and invertebrates. Waters. of Fisheries, Alevizon, artificial Ninth trawl survey August - 18th October, Ministry of Agriculture, W.S. and Gorhaun, reefs deployment off the Coast of 1983). Department Malaysia. J.C. 1989. Effects of on nearby resident fishes. Bull. Mar. Science, 44(2): 646-661 Jabatan Perikanan Kementerian Jabatan Perikanan Kementerian Laut Sarawak, Pertanian 1969. Laporan Tahunan. 1973. Laporan Tahunan. Malaysia. Laut Sarawak, Pertanian, Malaysia. August, 1992 Recreational Fishing 1990. Advisory The of issues Department, Sarawak (l6th with Zoology, Patrick Power, 1992. Australian Fisheries, 51 No.8 Summary Malaysian American 26:389-401 Australia, I wish to convey my gratitude to the Director General of Fisheries Malaysia, Dato' Haji Shahrom Hj. Majid, and the Director of Fisheries Research Institute Penang, Mr. Ong Kah Sin. I am indebted to the Head of Research Centre, Fisheries Research Centre Bintawa, Mr. Henry Opang Luhat for his invaluable advice, help and encouragement to carry out the project. My thanks also go to all the technical staff, Mr. Foo Ngan Shoon (gear), Mr. Chung Ted Jin (fish identification), Kapten Abdullah Montol (KK MAN CHONG) and all crew of KK MANCHONG for their hard work and excellence cooperation. I am also grateful to Annie PK Lim for typing this paper and her expertise in using -the computer. 1975. Feeding patterns among tropical reef fishes. American Science, 63: 382-392 Committee, for for community Western recreational discussion. fishing. Fisheries 108 Adelaide Terrace, East Perth 6004, 23pp Relini, G., and Relini, Liqurian future Sea L.O. (Northwestern 1989. Artificial Mediterranean): reefs in the Aims and Results. Bull. Mar. Science 44(2):743-751 Su, S.K. (Dr) 1985. Bye and thanks for all the fish. A collection of articles relating to boating, fishing and scuba diving in Sarawak Waters. Sarawak Boat Club, 63 pp Woodhead, P.M.J. 1966. The behaviour of fish in relation to light in the sea. Oceanog. Ma .. BioI. Ann. Rev., 4:337-403 PROPOSAL FOR A RECREATIONAL FISHING AREA Comparing the five subareas the suitability for recreational fishing depends on the distance from the main base or town centre. Subarea II and V is too far offshore and only suitable for deepsea going boat. Subarea II and IV (between Tanjong Sirik and Miri) has plenty of natural coral reefs and rocky bottom and provide potetial area for anglers and handline fishing for those people from Miri, Bintulu, Mukan and probably Sibu. The vast area and natural seabed features already provide suitable area for recreational fishing and need no enhancement of fish popUlation within the area. Subarea I (between Tanjong Po and Tanjong Datu) is a suitable area to be developed into a recreational fishing zone. Geographically, the area is suited nearest to the Kuching Division where the interest in recreational fishing is spreading fast over the population. The boat club in Kuching boast of more than 300 members and probably the only ~ .. ., - ..• , ~ ~.' ~ . , , .r- ~. recreational fishing club in Sarawak. Although there is census on the number of recreational fishermen, the increase in weekend fishing activity by amteurs anglers and handliners showed that there are many more recreational fishermen in Kuching Division. Kuching, Gobil/Muara Tebas, Santubong and Sematan could be a base for recreational fishermen to go to the sea and shelter from the rough weather. Near the fishing area there are already several seaside resorts, like Damai Beach Resorts, Santin Resort and other resort centres such as Bako, Karangan and probably future resorts at Sematan, recreational fishing could be attractive activity for both local and foreign tourists. The proposed recreational area already have popUlar sites and features for recreational fishermen. Such sites include a World War II sunken vessel, a rocky bottom at Cruiser Rocks, 4 main islands with their coral reefs and rocky, coral reef bottom at Tanjong Datu. All these sites are located closed to the shore (within 12 miles) and accessible even by small speed boat in good weather. The area also have two existing artificial reefs made of tyres build by the Marine Fisheries Department of Sarawak. Further offshore about 30 miles from the coast, there is a rocky area probably dying coral rock which could be reached only by bigger baots. To the north of Tanjong Sipang about 20 miles from the coast there is an undersea rift valley with depth from 70 to more than 100 metres and a potential for deep sea anglers. Unfortunately, the proposed recreational fishing area is already under heavy fishing pressure especially from the commercial trawlers and drift net fishermen and from the survey conducted, there is a decline in fish resource within the area. There is going to be a conflict between recreational and commercial fishermen. For example, a speed boat at anchore at night would disturb the drift nets of the kotak fishermen. However, considering the tremendous interest of recreational fishermen and downstream advantage of recreational fishing for local fishing villages. and tourish industry within the area, the return from developing the the area into recreational fishing area would probably be greater. Furthermore. the size of proposed area is relatively small compared to the other area where the • - : - commercial trawlers and driftnetters can go. There are several practical measures to enhance and attract fish to the area. Several artificial reefs could be build around the area. Permanent and semi-permanent anchored fish attracting device (FADs) would attract the freeswimming pelagic fish. Foreign fishing vessel confisticated by the Marine Fisheries Department could be sUnked within the area. The artificial features by itself would provide an obstacles to trawlers and driftnetters. Given the above scenerio, tb~ area could provide an attractive recreational fishing for relaxation, develop skill in chasing and catching fish, for adventure and probably an alternative to gold during the weekends. Table 1: Range of Catch and Average Each Subarea. Catch Rate Number of Station Subarea I II III IV v* Range of Catch 27 1 7 2 8 3 5 14 (tails per station) - for Average Catch Rate 113 81 263 119 80 1 Table 2: Average Catch Rate (tails per station) of Fish Groups by Subarea Overall SUBAREA No. of Stations: I II III IV V Catch Rate 27 7 8 14 1 57 GROUPS: BALISTIDAE 0.11 2.57 0.75 0.14 · 0.51 CARANGIDAE 4.19 0.14 9.25 4.36 - 4.37 - 0.36 · 0.09 7.63 4.64 1.00 3.84 Elagatis sp. LAMNIFORMES I 2.63 LETHRINIDAE 2.15 LUTJANIDAE 3.44 MURAENOSIDAE 0.26 NEMIPTERIDAE 1.30 Ray - PLECTORYNCHIDAE 1.59 RACHYCENTRIDAE 0.04 SPYRAENIDAE 0.07 SCOMBEROMORIDAE - SERRANIDAE 0.89 SCARIDAE 0.04 SPARIDAE . TACHYSURIDAE Tuna 2.07 - 3.00 - 8.13 9.86 13.00 4.81 25.38 5.14 32.00 7.79 - 0.13 0.07 - 0.16 - - 0.29 - 0.68 6.29 1.00 4.86 1.29 4.29 - 0.14 1.43 1.00 0.05 4.13 · 1.81 - 0.14 - 0.05 3.00 2.00 29.00 2.05 . 0.14 - 0.04 10.25 4.50 4.00 3.19 0.13 0.07 · 0.05 1.25 6.50 - 1.77 1.38 0.71 - 1.88 . 0.36 - 0.09 · 1.12 Others 1.85 0.14 1.00 0.36 TOTAL 20.63 23.57 72.38 41.21 80 34.35 -- SUBAREA I SUBAREA II SUBAREA III 27 stations 7 stations 9 stations GROUPS: (%) GROUPS: (%) GROUPS: SUBAREA IV SUBAREA V 13 stations (%) GROUPS: OVERALL 1 sllltion (%) GROUPS (%) GROUPS: (%) CARANGIDAE 20.29 LUTJANIDAE 26.67 LUTJANIDAE 35.06 LETHRINIDAE 23.92 L.UTJANIIlAr 40.00 LUTJANIDAE 22.M LUTJANIDAE 16.70 SPYRAENIDAE 20.61 SERRANIDAE 14.16 SPARIDAE 15.77 SPYRAENIDAt 36.25 LETHRINIDAE 13.99 LAMNIFORMES 12.75 TACHYSURIOAE 18.18 CARANGIDAE 12.7~ LUTJANIDAE 12.48 LETHRINIDAE 16.25 CAAANGIOAE 12.72 LETHRINIDAE 1041 LAMNIFORMES 12.73 LETHRINIDAE 11.23 LAMNIFORMES 11.2,7 SERRANIDAI: 5.00 LAMNIFORMES 11.18 TACHYSURIDAE 10.05 BALlSTIDAE 10.91 LAMNIFORMES 10.54 SERRANIDAE 10.92 LAMNIFORMES 1.25 SERRANIDAE 9.30 Others " 9/\ SERRANIDAE 5.45 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 5.70 CARANGIDAE 10.57 Ray 1.25 SPYRAENIDAE 5.96 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 'r 72 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 4.24 SPYRAENIDAE 4.15 SPYRAENIDAE 4.85 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 0.00 TACHYSURIDAE SA!! NEMIPTERIDAE 628 CARANGIDAE 0.61 TACHYSURIDAE 1.90 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 3.47 CARANGIDAE 0.00 PLECTORYNCHIDAE 5.26 SERRANIDAE 431 Others 0.61 SPARIDAE 1.73 TACHYSURIDAE 1.73 NEMIPTERIDAE 0.00 SPARIDAE 5.16 MURAENOSIDAE 1.26 EI696tis sp. 0.00 Others 1.38 Ela9atis .p. 0.87 SCARIDAE 0.00 Others 3.27 BALiSTIDAE 0.54 SCARIDAE 0.00 BALISTIDAE 1.04 Others 0.87 BALlSTIDAE 0.00 NEMIPTERIDAE 1.99 SPYRAENIDAE 036 SPARIDAE 0.00 SCARIDAE 0.17 Tuna 0.87 SPARIOAE 0.00 BALISTIDAE 1.48 SCARIDAE 0.18 LETHRINIDAE 0.00 MURAENOSIDAE 0.17 NEMIPTERIDAE 0.69 Ela9atis sp. 0.00 MURAENOSIDAE 0.48 RACHYCENTRIDAE 018 MURAENOSIOAE 0.00 SCOMBEROMORIDAE 0.00 Ray 0.35 TACHYSU RIt>AE 0.00 Ela9atis sp. 0.26 Ray 000 NEMIPTERIOAE 0.00 Ray 0.00 SCOMBEROMORIOAE 0.35 MURAENOSIDAE 0.00 Tuna 0.26 SPARIDAE 0.00 SCOMBEROMORIDAE 0.00 RACHYCENTRIDAE 0.00 RACHYCENTRIDAE 0.35 SCOMBEROMORIDAE 0.00 Ray 0.15 SCOMBEROMORIDAE 0.00 RACHYCENTRIDAE 0.00 Ela9atis sp. 0.00 BALlSTIDAE 0.35 RACHYCENl RIDAE 0.00 SCARIDAE 0.15 Tuna 0.00 Tuna 0.00 Tuna 0.00 MURAENOSIDAE 0.17 Tuna 0.00 RACHYCENTRIDAE 0.15 E1a9ati•• p. 0.00 R6Y 0.00 NEMIPTERIDAE 0.00 SCARIDAE 0.17 Others 0.00 SCOMBEROMORIDAE 0.10 Total 100 Total 100 Total 100 Total 100 Total 100 Total 100 Table 4: Length (em) and Weight (kg) Values of Fish Species Caught Welght(kg} Length(cm} No. Mean Range No. Mean Range CaranxSp. 19 34.8 28.0-41.0 4 1.1 0.3-3.5 Carangoides melampygus 7 36.6 28.0-37.0 - . AJectis indieus 1 32.5 - - - - 82 73.3 60.0-77.0 7 1.7 - - - - 19.0 28 34.7 Species/Groups 1. 2. CARANGIDAE CARRHYfOAE {Sharks} Shark 3. Sweettip 5. 1.2-2.0 - - - 30 0.94 0.4-1.8 - 3 0.5 0.5 27.0~1.0 LUTJANIDAE Lutjanus sp 23 36.3 20.0·77.0 36 1.6 0.3-12.5 Lutjanus sabae 4 38.0-53.0 3 2.3 0.8-4.2 Lutjanus vittae 8 44.7 26.4 22.0-30.0 Lutjanus erythroplerus 2 40.5 36.0-45.0 - - Lutjanus bohar Lutjanus johnl 5 43.7 29.0-34.0 5 1.4 - - - 1 2.0 - 16 47.1 36.0-57.0 14 1.5 0.6-2.0 33 51.2 41.0-74.0 29 1.0 0.4-1.8 8 29.0-83.0 9 1.8 0.5-7.5 - - - - 2.0 1.5-3.0 0.3-8.6 PLECTORYNCIDAE Plectoryn sp. 6. I LETHRINIDAE Lethrinus sp 4. I SPYRAENIDAE. Spyraena sp. 7. SERRANIDAE Epinephelus sexfaciatus 8 37.4 29.4 Epinephelus tauvina 1 80.0 Cephalopflolis sp. 1 35.0 - Plectropomus sp. 2 - 39.0-80.0 - 4 31.8 28.0-34.0 . 1 105.0 - 7 74.8 52.0-75.0 Epinephelus sp. 8. 7.3 SPARIDAE Argyrops sp. 9. 27.0-35.0 SCOMBEROMORIDAE Cybium commersoni 10. TACHYSURIDAE 4 Groups CARANGIDAE SHARK IUJTJA~AE Mean Mean Length Weight Length Weight 34.6 1.1 41 3.5 73 1.7 i j 38.3 I Largest Size Caught - 19.0 , 1.8 97 I i I ~2.5 1.8 LETHRINIDAE 34 0.91 61 PLECTORYNCIDAE 47 1.5 57 7.5 33.4 1.8 83 3.0 T ACHYSURIDAE 75 1.5 75 10.0 SPYRAENIDAE Spyraena jello 51 1.0 124 - - 105 - SERRANIDAE SCOMBEROMORIDA (Tenggiri) - . L AUT CHINA SELATAN J ,~', N t It A .",-- ~, " +7 I I 7~ ~. --f I 39 SUBAREA II • S~ + 74 ·•· . I I + 71 ,. II • .•. '....• + S4 I I. ,Ii I "49 •. 31 '. ,••63 ,>-::,+. t\ . -, - " ,.Ii 6 , , 'q."Q.lu~ • 1'.- •.•. ",76 .• I \ I 43 . I , , " ,: ' SIBU KI'Y + Fishing 6. Hard. un('vpn Nill.uril1 R Artificiill sLcltion holtom n'l'f rl'f'f ! ,,,i~.. LAUT CHINA SELATAN ,,0 J t l~ 1 "// N t oc • 0 ;,_J ):( t ~~_- --€i SUBAREA II 8 i -.J e e )0 4 b 4 8//< . 0 ~ __ ":,.-.•... • : • ~ t 1 '" " fP "..•. . ,-0 I / 11'''' _/~ A ,,_-.J> ...• -- - I 1 G I I SARAWAK I I / 1,/ /1 / ~ I ( ,.S18U 0 0 e 5 - 20 Q 20 - 50 @ 50 - 100 • t::. 5 100 flilrd. uneven NATURAL REEFS bottom Subarea Y Lutjanidae Spyraenidae Lethrinidae Serranidae Shark 40.0% 36.31 16.31 5.0% 1.0% LAU T CHINA SELATAN Subarea III Lutjanidae 5erranidae Carang1dae Lethr1n1dae Sharks Plectorynch1dae Spyraenidae Subarea II Lutjan1dae Spyraen1dae Tachysuri dae Sharks Bal1stidae Serran1dae PIectorync1dae 26.71 20.61 18.21 12.71 10.~ 5.41 4.21 u area Carangidae Lutjan1dae Sharks Lethrinidae Tachysuridae Plectorynichidae Hemipteridae Serranidae 20.3~ 16.70% 12.8~ 10.41~ 10.0% 9.0~ 6.3~ 4.3~ - 35.11 - 14.21 - 12.7~ - 11.21 - 10.51 - 5.71 4.11 Subarea IV Lethrinidae Sparidae Lutjanidae Sharks 5erranidae Carangidae P1ectorynch1 dae 23.~ 15.81 12.51 11.31 10.~ 10.81 3.51 ¥.UC\lll(~ --1' Table 6: Landings (ton) of Fish Group from Hooks and Lines Fishing in Sarawak (Source: Marine Fisheries Sarawak Annual Report 1987-1991) 1987 Group 1989 1988 Landing Group Landing Group 1990 Landing Group 1991 Landing Group Landing Shark 414 Ray 433 Tuna 291 Tuna 430 Lutjanldae 925 Tuna 141 Trichiuridae 273 Lutjanidae 287 Lutjanidae 253 Tuna 437 126 Serranldae 104 Nemll)terldae 168 145 Tachysuridae 67 Tachysuridae 214 Ray Lutjanidae 54 Polynemidae 199 Serrllnldlle 63 Ray 75 Serranldae Scombridae 41 Lutjllnidlle 147 Carangidae 49 Scomberomoridlle 41 Ray 97 Scomberomoridae 41 Tuna 117 Lobotidae 49 Nemipteridae 40 TIlhcysurldae 55 Plutosidae 41 Serranidae 99 Lethrinidlle 40 Sphyraenidae 37 Scomberomoridlle 31 Carangidae 40 Pomadasyidae 91 Shark 36 Tllchysuridae 33 Carangldae 22 Drepanidae 27 Lobotidae 68 Nemipterldae 16 Carangidae 25 Shark 20 Serranidae 12 Scomberomorid 67 Plectorynchidae 14 Lethrinidae 18 Plutosldae 18 Carangidae 25 Tachysuridae 14 Plutosidae 11 Pomadllsydlle 6 Nemipteridae 25 Spyraenidlle 6 Shark 9 Plec1olynohldae 2 Lethrinidlle 11 Sclaenldae 6 Pomadasydae 4 Sphyrllllnldllll 1 Sphyraenidae 7 Plectorynchldae 7 Stromatldae 3 Plutosidae 3 Plectorynchldae 1