RBSP-THEMIS Working Group Status
Transcription
RBSP-THEMIS Working Group Status
RBSP-THEMIS Working Group Status October 2012 Leverage complementary nature of the RBSP & THEMIS missions to achieve our goals in radiation belt and ring current studies. Develop observational campaign as function of mission phase to solve outstanding mysteries in the radiation belt and ring current physics. Wednesday, November 2, 11 THEMIS Instruments & Modes Four Modes: (1) Slow Survey; (2) Fast Survey; (3) Particle Burst; (4) Wave Burst Fast survey mode intervals are set in advance; Particle and Wave bursts can be either set or triggered during fast survey intervals Instrument Slow Fast FGM Fluxgate Magnetometer FIT 0.25s 0.008s SCM SearchCoil Magnetometer FBK FWS FCW EFI Electric Field Instrument Particle Burst FIT/FGK 0.12s/WF/FWS Wave Burst FCW ESA Electrostatic Analyzer MOM RDF Full Cadence FDF SST Solid State Telescope Spectra RDF/IFDF Full Cadence FDF FIT: 3s spin period fit, MOM: 2s onboard moments, RDF: 3s reduced angular particle distribution function, FDF: Full angular particle distribution function, 3s IFDF ion full distribution function, FCW: Full cadence waveforms, FBK: 4s filterbank wave spectra, FWS: Fourier wave spectra, WF: waveforms. Wednesday, November 2, 11 Science Planning Tasks Outline joint RBSP and THEMIS science campaigns as a function of the RBSP mission phase; For each campaign specify three THEMIS parameters can be tailored to support RBSP science studies: (1) the distances separating spacecraft along their common orbit; (2) the portion(s) of the THEMIS orbit where fast survey should be taken; (3) the phenomena that can be used to trigger burst modes; Wednesday, November 2, 11 8 Science Campaigns Dawn-Dusk Differences (Fall 2012) Magnetopause Losses (Winter 2012-2013) Dawnside Waves & Electron Drift (Spring 2013) Ion Injection & Energization (Summer 2013) Duskside EMIC Waves (Fall 2013) Effects of SW Pressure Variations (Winter 2013-2014) ULF Waves (Spring 2014) Electron Injections (Summer 2014) Wednesday, November 2, 11 Local Loss Mechanisms ⇥ kk v k = e On the course of their drift motion around Earth radiation belt electrons can resonantly interact with various plasma waves which can locally energize as well as scatter particles into the loss cone leading to permanent loss of particles from the belt via precipitation into the atmosphere. Two leading candidates for local loss mechanisms outside of the plasmasphere are EMIC waves at duskside and whistler chorus waves at dawnside. Wednesday, November 2, 11 EMIC Waves Minimum Resonance Energy EMIC Waves @ AMPTE/CCE Spatial Distribution Global impact of EMIC waves on losses across the outer radiation belt depends on spatial extent and spectral properties of the waves. [Anderson et al., 1992a] Wednesday, November 2, 11 Whistler Chorus [Cattell et al., 2008] Whistler chorus waves (including large amplitude events) can potentially contribute to both rapid energization and atmospheric loss of particles from the belt. Wednesday, November 2, 11 Dawn-Dusk Differences (Fall 2012) Recommendations to THEMIS: 1) Small interspacecraft separation distances to separate spatial and temporal effects in particle and wave populations. 2) Fast survey mode from geosynchronous through perigee to study ion flux levels and pitch angle distributions along with EMIC mode waves. 3) Burst modes triggered by EMIC wave activity. Wednesday, November 2, 11 Magnetopause Losses Initial conditions: 105 electrons K=2 MeV @ L=6.7 µ=2.3⋅103 MeV/G f (L, t=0): B&A2000 L ≡(B0/B)1/3 Rapid ring-current intensification during storm main phase produces outward expansion of electron drift shells. Electrons previously drifting around Earth are transferred onto trajectories intersecting the magnetopause and are permanently lost from the belt in about 2.5 hr after the storm onset from L > 5. Wednesday, November 2, 11 Magnetopause Losses (Winter 2012-2013) Recommendations to THEMIS: 1) Large interspacecraft separation (4-8-12) simultaneous measurements on the inbound and outbound legs for continuous monitoring of losses. 2) Fast mode operations in the post-noon sector for simultaneous monitoring EMIC waves. 3) Burst modes triggered by large-amplitude waves and and interplanetary shocks. Wednesday, November 2, 11 What are the Mechanisms of RC & Seed Population Energization and Transport? Steady-state convection Impulsive transport, DF [Grocott and Yeoman, 2006] [Runov et al., 2009] Wednesday, November 2, 11 LFM-RSM Simulations Wednesday, November 2, 11 Impulsive Transport Propagation of DF to the Inner Mangetosphere Energization and Transport of O+ by DF - How deep can injection propagate into the inner magnetosphere? - Are the events distributed continuously by size and magnitude? - Can we identify their solar wind/geomagnetic control parameters? - Are the events at RBSP different from the events in the outer magnetosphere (x<-10RE)? Wednesday, November 2, 11 Ion Injection & Energization (Summer 2013) Recommendations to THEMIS: 1) Wide spacecraft separation to ensure continual monitoring of the particle source population in the plasma sheet. 2) Fast survey mode on the outbound leg near the apogee. 3) Burst modes triggered by DFs. Wednesday, November 2, 11 Next Steps 1) Expansion of scope: Resonance, ERG.... 2) Real work needs to be done..... Wednesday, November 2, 11