Feasibility Study TABIGUE-BALOCAWEHAY

Transcription

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Agriculture
PHILIPPINE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Feasibility Study
CONCRETING OF
TABIGUE-BALOCAWEHAY
FARM TO MARKET ROAD
Proponent:
Municipality of Abuyog
Province of Leyte
June 20154
Province of Leyte
MUNICIPALITY OF ABUYOG
-o0o-
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR
04 June 2015
ENGR. ALMA LANDIA
Component Head
I-BUILD, Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP)
Department of Agriculture (D.A.)
Regional Office No. 8
Kanhuraw Hill, Tacloban City
Dear Engr. Landia:
Mabuhay!
I am pleased to submit herewith the attached Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Engineering Design
(DED) and other supporting documents for the Rehabilitation/Concreting of the Tabigue –
Balocawehay Farm to Market Road (FMR) which the LGU of Abuyog, Leyte is proposing for
funding under the I-BUILD Component of the Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) this year.
The sub-project is a critical component of our strategic focus on Rice and Coconut as the principal
agricultural commodities from which to anchor the economic development of our municipality. The
sub-project will effectively link the rice and coconut producing beneficiary barangays to the open
markets in Leyte province and is expected to further enhance the development of these industries of our
municipality.
The municipality’s focus in promoting rice and coconut is directly in harmony and aligned to the
priorities and development direction of the Provincial Government of Leyte which likewise identified
rice and coconut as the main crops to promote in the province.
Lastly, the LGU of Abuyog has already allocated a counterpart funding for said sub-project equivalent
to ten percnt (10%) of the total project cost.
We fervently hope for the most favorable I-BUILD/PRDP action and approval of our sub-project
proposal. Thank you and God bless.
Truly yours,
Hon. OCTAVIO J. TRAYA, JR.
Municipal Mayor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Transmittal Letter
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Exhibits
Annexes
Executive Summary
Page
i
ii
iii
vi
vii
vii
1
I.
Project Profile
Municipal Profile of Abuyog, Leyte
1.1 Brief Historical Background
1.2 Barangays
1.3 Location
1.3.1 Geographic Boundaries
1.3.2 Relative Distance to Growth and Commercial Center
1.3.3 Existing Road Transport Network and Physical Condition
1.3.4. Availability of Public Transport
1.4 Total Land Area
1.4.1 General Land Use Classification
1.4.2 Agricultural Land Use Classification
1.4.3 Abuyog Land Area Relative to that of Leyte Province & Region 8
1.5 Topography
1.6 Soils and Suitability
1.7 Climate and Water Sources
1.8 Municipal Population
1.8.1 Total Population, Gender and Average Growth Rate
1.8.2 Number of Households and Average Household Size
1.9 Economic Activities and Sources of Income
1.9.1 On-Farm: Crops Production
1.9.2 On-Farm: Livestock and Poultry
1.9.3 Inland Fisheries
1.9.4 Off-Farm and Non-Farm Economic Sectors
1.9.4.1 Secondary Sub-Sector: Industry
1.9.4.2 Tertiary Sub-Sector
1.9.5 Employment and Income Sources
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
7
7
9
9
9
9
11
11
11
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
16
16
16
17
II.
Project Background and Rationale
18
2.1.
2.2
Statement of the Problem and Opportunities
Strategic Direction of the Municipality of Abuyog
2.2.1 Development Vision of the Municipality of Abuyog
2.2.2 Mission Statement
2.2.3 Goal
2.2.4 Objectives
18
18
18
18
18
18
2.3
2.4
Sub-Project Objectives
19
Brief Presentation of Socio-Economic Indicators
2.4.1 Location of the Tabigue-Balocawehay Road Project
2.4.2 Population Characteristics of Direct Road Influenced Area (RIA)
2.4.3 Main Agricultural Crops in the RIA Barangays
Description of the Priority Value Chain to be Served by the FMR
19
19
20
20
20
2.5
iii | P a g e
Page
III. Project Description and Analyses
A.
21
Market / Demand-Supply Situation
3.1 Existing Roads, Bridges and Transport System in the Area
3.2 Analysis of Road & Transport System (without & with road improvement)
3.2.1 Present road network condition
3.2.2 Availability of public transport vehicles
3.2.3 Seasonal Impassibility of Road Site
3.2.4 Alternate Route/s Within the Project Area
3.2.5 Availability of other Modes of Transport
3.2.6 Existing Modes of Transportation and Hauling of
Passenger and Cargo
3.2.7 Current Trip Volumes, Destinations, Travel times,
Volume/Capacity Ratios
3.2.8 Analysis of How the Proposed Road Facility Will Close
the Gap in Infrastructure Development Within the Area
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
22
B.
Technical Analysis
4.1 Horizontal Road Alignment
4.2 Vertical Road Alignment
4.3 Drainage Analysis/Hydraulic
4.4 Geotechnical- Soil and Foundation Analysis
4.5 Structural Analysis- Pavement Thickness
4.6 Location of Quarries, Borrow Pits and Construction Materials
4.7 Items of Work and Cost
4.8 Implementation Schedule
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
C.
Operational Analysis
5.1 Project Organization, Critical Activities and Project Outputs
5.1.1 Pre-Investment Phase
5.1.2 Project Execution/Implementation Phase
5.1.3 Post Project Implementation Phase
5.2 Plan for Management during Construction, Key Roles and
Responsibilities and Implementation Arrangements
5.3 Collection of Road Users Fees and Other Policies
5.4 Project Implementation Schedule
5.5 Project Monitoring and Supervision
5.6 Operation and Maintenance Scheme
25
25
26
26
26
Social Analysis
32
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
32
32
32
33
33
33
D.
Project Beneficiaries
Indigenous Cultural Community/Indigenous Peoples (ICC/IP)
Site and Right-of-Way acquisition
Damage to Standing Crops, Houses and/or Properties
Physical Displacement of Persons
Economic Displacement of Persons
22
22
22
26
30
30
30
31
Page
iv | P a g e
E.
Environmental Assessment
33
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
7.6
F.
Financial Analysis
35
8.1
8.2
35
35
35
36
36
8.3
G.
36
9.1
36
36
37
37
38
38
38
39
39
39
39
39
40
40
40
41
41
42
42
42
42
42
43
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.7
Annexes
Total Project Cost by Financing Source and Cost Sharing
Total Project Cost Breakdown
8.2.1 Direct Costs
8.2.2 Indirect Costs
Status of LGU Equity Availability and LFC Certification
Economic Analysis and Evaluation
9.2
H.
Natural Habitat
Physical Cultural Resources
Terrain, Soil Types and Rainfall
Drainage Situations and Flooding Potential
Impacts During Construction
7.5.1 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control
7.5.2 Construction Noise Mitigation
7.5.3 Proper Handling of Construction Wastes
7.5.4 Public and Worker’s Safety
Status of Environmental Clearances
The Project Influence Area
9.1.1 Agricultural Production in the Road Influence Area
9.1.2 Population within the Direct Road Influence Area
9.1.3 Existing Vehicular Traffic Based on Traffic Survey Results
9.1.4 Transportation Costs by Animal/Human Haulers
9.1.5 Commuter Time Savings
9.1.6 Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
Economic Benefits
9.2.1 Vehicle Operating Cost Savings (VOCS)
9.2.2 Transport Cost Savings in Hauling Outputs and Inputs
9.2.3 Reduction in Travel Times from Farm to Market
9.2.4 Incremental benefits attributed to newly opened croplands
9.2.5 Other Benefits
Economic Costs
9.3.1 Capital Cost and O & M Cost Breakdown
Direct Jobs from Construction
Adjustment of Financial Values to Economic Terms
Results of the Economic Analysis
9.6.1. Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR)
9.6.2. Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR)
9.6.3 Economic Net Present Value (ENPV)
Economic Sensitivity Analysis Results
List of Attached Models/Detailed Tables of EFA Templates
Conclusions and Recommendations
43
44
v|Page
List of Tables
Table
Page
1
Name, Areas, and Population of Barangays. Abuyog, Leyte.
3
2
Summary of Road Transport Network, Abuyog, Leyte
7
3
General Land Use Classification
9
4
Agricultural Land Utilization by Crops
9
5
Land Area of Abuyog vis-a-vis Provincial and Regional Total
9
6
Types of Soil in the Municipality of Abuyog, Leyte
11
7
Population Characteristics. Abuyog & Leyte (2010)
14
8
Agricultural Crops, Area Planted and Production Volume. Abuyog, Leyte
14
9
Livestock & Poultry, Production Volume/Value. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010.
15
10
Fishing Grounds, Fisheries Production Volume & Value. Abuyog, Leyte. 2011
15
11
List of Registered Businesses by Industry Sub-sectors. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010
16
12
List of Registered Businesses in Trade Sub-sector. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010
16
13
List of Registered Businesses, Personal Services Sub-sector. Abuyog, 2010
17
14
Employment & Revenues by Classification of Business & Trade. Abuyog, 2010
17
15
Population Characteristics of the RIA Barangays
20
16
Total Annual Production Volume and Value of Major Crops, RIA Barangays
20
17
Existing Roads and Transport System, RIA Barangays
21
18
Transport Data Taken from Traffic Survey. November 2014
19
19
Items of Work and Cost
24
20
Implementation Timetable
24
21
Duties and Responsibilities of Offices/Persons Involved in the Project
27
22
Annual Maintenance Cost, PCCP
31
23
Total Project Cost by Financing Source and Cost Sharing
35
24
Total Project Cost Breakdown
35
25
Production Areas, Volumes and Values of Crop in RIA Brgys., 2014
36
26
Population within the Road Influence Area (RIA), 2008.
37
27
Annual Ave. Daily Traffic, Canmarating-Can-aporong FMR, Nov. 2014
37
28
Prevailing Fares by Type of Vehicle, Travel Times & Distances, RIA, Nov. 2014
38
29
Average Travel Time of Commuters, RIA Barangays. Nov. 2014
38
30
Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
39
31
Total Investment and Operating & Maintenance Costs of Sub-project
40
32
Investment Costs of Sub-project (Financial & Economic)
41
33
Sensitivity Analysis, 20-Year Period
42
34
Economic Analysis
44
35
Sensitivity Analysis on Costs, Benefits and Delays
45
36
Investment and Maintenance Costs
47
37
Annual Road Maintenance Cost
47
vi | P a g e
Table
Page
38
Transport Data by Vehicle Type
48
39
Projected Number of Vehicles per Day
48
40
Projected Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
48
41
Standard Vehicle Operating Cost Savings (Php)
49
42
Total Annual Vehicle Operating Cost Savings by Vehicle Type
49
43
Benefits – Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC) Savings
50
44
Benefits – Savings in Output Hauling
52
45
Benefits – Savings in Input Hauling
54
46
Benefits – Savings in Travel Time for Commuters
56
47
Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land (Coconut, Rice)
58
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
Page
1
Location Map of Abuyog, Leyte
5
2
Map of Abuyog Showing Its Barangays
6
3
Road Network Map of Abuyog, Leyte
8
4
Land Use Map of Abuyog, Leyte
10
5
Soil Map of Abuyog, Leyte
12
6
Mean Annual Rainfall. Abuyog, Leyte
13
7
Project Organization, Critical Activities and Project Output Chart
25
Annexes
Annex
Page
1
Models/Detailed Tables of EFA Templates
45
2
Social Environmental Safeguards (SES) Compliance Documents
61
A. Abuyog Sanggunian Bayan (SB) Resolution No. 30-A, S. 2015
61
B. Abuyog Sanggunian Bayan (SB) Resolution No. 30-B, S. 2015
63
C. Local Finance Committee (LFC) Certification on Availability of Funds
66
D. Abuyog Sanggunian Bayan (SB) Resolution No. 29-A, S. 2015
65
E. Abuyog Municipal Development Council (MDC) Resolution No. 01, S. 2015
68
F.
72
Certification of Non-Coverage (CNC), from EMB-DENR
G. Letter-Request for Certification that Odiongan & Layug Rivers are
Approved Sources of Aggregate Materials
73
H. Letter-Request for Certification that No Indigenous People/Community
Exists in Abuyog, Leyte
74
I.
Minutes of Barangay Balocawehay Assembly/Consultative Meeting
75
J.
Minutes of Barangay Tabigue Assembly/Consultative Meeting
82
K. Certification on Evidence of Road Right-of-Way Acquisition
83
L.
84
Parcellary Map of PAP/List of Affected Property Owners within the Area
M. Waste Disposal and Dumping Site Certification
85
N. Certification Mayor’s Consent to Cut Trees Along the FMR Project
86
vii | P a g e
A Feasibility Study: Rehabilitation/Concreting of Tabigue - Balocawehay FMR
FEASIBILITY STUDY ON REHABILITATION/CONCRETING OF
TABIGUE - BALOCAWEHAY FARM TO MARKET ROAD, ABUYOG, LEYTE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Project Title
:
Concreting of of Tabigue - Balocawehay
Farm to Market Road
B. Project Location
:
Brgys. Tabigue and Balocawehay,
Municipality of Abuyog, Province of Leyte
C. Project Category
:
Rural Access
D. Project Scale/Dimension
:
2.0237 kilometers
E. Project Proponent
:
Local Government Unit (LGU) of Abuyog, Leyte
F. Implementing Unit
:
Local Government Unit (LGU) of Abuyog, Leyte
G. Income Classification
:
1st Class Municipality
H. Total No. of Barangays
:
63
I. Mode of Implementation :
J. Road Influenced Areas
Contract
:
Barangay
Total
Area
(has.)
Total Area
Planted
(has.)
Balocawehay
615.03
571.40
Tabigue
322.63
296.66
Total
937.66
868.06
Major Crops
Rice, Coconut, Corn,
Abaca, Banana
Rice, Coconut, Corn,
Banana, Rootcrops
K. Project Beneficiaries within
the Road Influence Area :
Total Population= 4,767; Male= 2,454; Female= 2,313
Number of Households = 1,046
L. Total Project Cost
TPC
WB Loan
DA/GOP
LGU Equity
=
=
=
=
Php 15,102,142.39
Php 12,081,713.91
Php 1,510,214.24
Php 1,510,214.24
ENPV
EIRR
BCR
=
=
=
Php 19,957,413.00
37.32 %
2.42
and Cost Sharing
:
M. Economic Viability
Indicators
:
N. Conclusion and
Recommendations
:
(100%)
( 80%)
( 10%)
( 10%)
The proposed sub-project is found to be feasible in
all aspects. Overall economic benefits far outweigh
economic costs as revealed by the economic viability
indicators evaluated at a discount rate of 15%. Project
implementation is shown to be technically and
operationally feasible. The proposed sub-project is
therefore highly recommended for approval.
1|P age
I. Project Profile
Municipal Profile of Abuyog, Leyte
1.1 Brief Historical Background
When the Spaniards landed at Homonhon Island in Samar, they found no potable water.
Some of the crews sailed westward to look for water and landed on the shores covered
by a swarm of bees. Surprisingly, the headman accompanied by his tribesmen met the
Spaniards cordially. When the Spaniards asked the natives about the name of the place,
the natives replied: “Ah, Buyog!”- thinking they were asked about the swarm of bees on
the seashore. From then on, the Spaniards called the place “Abuyog”.
Abuyog became a Spanish “encomienda” as early as 1591. Encomiendas are large
estates, assigned to “encomenderos” (Spaniards) for their care and administration and as
a reward for their services to the Spanish crown. After the abolition of encomiendas, local
governments called alcaldias (provinces) and pueblos (towns) were established. In 1885,
Abuyog became a pueblo when the Presidencia building was complete. Abuyog was
finally incorporated into a municipality of the Province of Leyte, Philippines by virtue of RA
No. 2565 enacted by Congress without executive approval on June 21, 1959.
Abuyog became a 1st class municipality in 2002. It has a total budget of Php175.5 million
in 2014. It is comprised of 63 barangays of which 22 are coastal and 41 are upland
barangays. In the 2012 Regional Social & Economic Trends (RSET)-Eastern Visayas, a
publication of the National Statistics Coordination Board (NSCB), Abuyog has a total
population of 55,509 living in 12,431 households and with an average household size of 4.5
persons. It is one of the most progressive and rapidly developing municipalities in Leyte
province in spite of the generally poor conditions of its hinterland barangays.
Abuyog is located at the eastern part of Leyte along the seacoast of Leyte Gulf and the
Pacific Ocean. It is 61.62 kilometers to Tacloban City, the regional center, along the
Philippine-Japan Friendship (Maharlika) Highway. See Exhibit 1.
1.2 Barangays
Abuyog is politically and administratively subdivided into 63 barangays, nine of which are
classified as urban barangays and mostly located within the poblacion area, while the
other 54 are generally rural barangays located in the outlying areas of the municipality.
(See Exhibit 2.)
Table 1 shows the names, classification and population characteristics of each of the
barangays of Abuyog.
Balocawehay is the biggest barangay in terms of population with 3,490 residents living in
766 households and the smallest is Mahayahay with only 160 residents in 40 households. In
terms of land area, Pinamanagan is the largest with 2,985 hectares while the smallest is
Nalibunan located in the Poblacion with only a little over 10 hectares.
The barangays covered in this sub-project are Brgy. Canmarating with 1,021 inhabitants in
243 households and Brgy. Can-aporong with 490 residents in 92 households.
2|P age
Table 1. Name, Total Area, Cultivated Area, Number of Households and Population of
Barangays in Abuyog, Leyte.
Population
No. of
Households
0.44
1.00
0.83
1,036
1,791
1,516
1,190
964
776
1,856
2,333
2,475
221
411
334
287
217
171
426
500
560
721.10
1,636.43
1,801.19
308.85
1,850.81
358.94
615.03
417.85
834.45
923.97
205.67
1,400.81
283.46
382.03
242.51
639.65
304.71
227.50
243.29
40.85
695.05
331.07
571.40
389.21
621.35
79.53
163.20
269.62
255.20
209.42
191.76
297.82
318
286
472
310
2,259
1,511
3,490
1,304
776
691
660
315
1,500
639
373
454
80
80
113
70
494
326
766
297
169
188
158
77
353
144
90
112
Can-aporong
177.01
139.72
430
92
Canmarating
363.54
337.22
1,021
243
Capilian
399.48
380.48
766
173
Combis
909.55
153.94
376
92
488.13
1,713.57
1,259.92
944.53
278.93
234.27
961.42
266.51
363.03
371.20
79.41
255.59
85.41
291.89
582
1,331
1,131
543
252
386
1,030
123
324
234
131
57
77
239
Mag-atubang
149.96
132.41
265
67
Mahagna
817.48
130.93
479
109
Mahayahay
423.73
34.84
160
40
Maitum
393.07
361.25
558
118
Malaguicay
790.02
58.39
908
237
Matagnao
438.68
203.60
439
106
Barangay
Urban
Bito
Buntay
Can-uguib
Guintagbucan
Loyonsawang
Nalibunan
Santa Fe
Santo Niño
Victory
Rural
Alangilan
Anibongon
Bagacay
Bahay
Balinsasayao
Balocawe
Balocawehay
Barayong
Bayabas
Buaya
Buenavista
Bulak
Bunga
Burubud-an
Cadac-an
Cagbolo
Dingle
Hampipila
Katipunan
Kikilo
Laray
Lawa-an
Libertad
Total Area
(Has.)
Cultivated
Area (Has.)
41.99
21.01
24.88
65.12
15.24
10.11
12.92
41.37
13.63
17.25
2.97
10.10
44.29
0.60
3|P age
Barangay
Nebga
New Taligue
Odiongan
Old Taligue
Pagsang-an
Paguite
Parasanon
Picas Sur
Pilar
Pinamanagan
Salvacion
San Francisco
San Isidro
San Roque
Santa Lucia
Tabigue
Tadoc
Tib-o
Tinalian
Tinocolan
Tuy-a
Total
Total Area
(Has.)
660.37
1,918.36
290.78
956.24
237.32
323.68
1,003.47
271.58
205.66
2,985.10
181.64
382.85
255.92
909.22
771.58
322.63
181.26
520.35
400.23
997.93
942.08
38,331
Cultivated
Area (Has.)
107.53
620.33
272.35
227.48
202.98
307.92
244.18
240.07
13.70
4.68
81.83
90.87
236.59
90.50
55.22
296.66
151.92
77.76
122.37
94.32
286.54
12,440
Population
489
362
677
355
932
765
509
554
468
516
625
326
652
908
305
1,277
364
671
411
308
718
52,144
No. of
Households
112
85
156
77
218
163
113
127
107
129
155
81
136
206
71
280
86
141
84
79
174
11,886
Source: CBMS Survey, DILG-Abuyog (2014)
1.3 Location
1.3.1 Geographic Characteristics and Location
Abuyog is located at the eastern part of Leyte along the seacoast of Leyte Gulf and
the Pacific Ocean. It is situated at 1250 01’ 00" east latitude, 100 45’ 00" north longitude.
It is bounded on the north by the Municipality of MacArthur, Leyte, on the northwest by
the Municipality of Javier, Leyte, on the south by the Municipality of Silago, Southern
Leyte, on the west by the Municipality of Mahaplag, Leyte and on the east by Leyte
Gulf and the Pacific Ocean.
1.3.2
Relative Distance to Major Growth and Commercial Centers
Abuyog is 61.62 kilometers to Tacloban City, the regional center of commerce and
trade, governance and education, along the Philippine-Japan Friendship Highway. It
is 24.98 kilometers to the town of Dulag, 27.18 kilometers to the town of Mahaplag, 41.44
kilometers to the interior town of Burauen, 46.19 kilometers to the town of Baybay and
2.5 hours by motorboat to the town of Silago, Southern Leyte.
.
4|P age
Exhibit 1. Location Map of Abuyog, Leyte
PROVINCE
OF LEYTE
ABUYOG
5|P age
Exhibit 2. Project Location: Brgys. Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR
6|P age
1.3.3
Existing Road Transport Network and Physical Condition
As shown in Table 2, the total road network of the municipality is roughly 683 kilometers.
Exhibit 3 displays the road network map of Abuyog. By classification, barangay roads
comprise the longest road network totalling 579.7 kms. or 85 % of total, while national
roads total 44.8 kms. or 6.5 %. On the other hand, municipal roads total 33.6 kms. or 4.92
% of total road network while provincial roads comprise 22.5 kms. The table also depicts
the general physical conditions of the roads and corresponding recommendations.
Table 2. Summary of Road Transport Network, Abuyog, Leyte
Classification
Length
(km.)
% to
Total
Area
(has.)
Physical
Condition
* Lacks maintenance
National
44.8
6.50 %
134.4
Provincial
22.5
3.30 %
45
Municipal
33.6
4.92 %
50.4
Barangay
579.69
84.91%
347.81
2.1
0.31 %
1.26
682.69
100 %
399.47
Access Road
Total
Recommendation
* Needs Asphalting
* Additional FMR
* Needs Asphalting
* Lacks maintenance
* Additional FMR
* Lacks maintenance * Needs Asphalting
* Some street are in
sand and gravel
* Concrete
pavement
* Sand and gravel
* Concrete
pavement
Source: MPDO in Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). Abuyog, Leyte.
1.3.4. Availability of Public Transport
The Abuyog road along the Maharlika Highway is 61.62 kilometers to Tacloban City. It
is interconnected on the north by the town of MacArthur, on the northwest by the town
of Javier, on the south by the town of Silago, Southern Leyte and on the west by the
town of Mahaplag.
There are two means of transportation in the municipality: by land and by sea. Land
transportation facilities include buses, van, motor cabs, pedicabs and trucks. In areas
or barangays along rivers and seas, motorboats and bangcas are available.
Daily trips to Tacloban City depart every 30 minutes. Passenger jeeps leave Abuyog
bound for Baybay every morning and the last trip from Baybay is around 3:00 PM. Buses
and vans pass by Abuyog daily from Tacloban City en route to Baybay and Southern
Leyte and vice versa. Motorcabs and pedicabs serve passengers within the town
proper and neighboring barangays. For people in the hinterlands and rural barangays,
the popular “Habal-habal” or single motorcycle for hire, which can carry up to eight
persons including the driver, is the preferred mode of transportation.
For sea transportation, Abuyog has two wharves located at Tab-ok, Brgy. Nalibunan
and Brgy. Sto. Nino. There are seven mini seaports which are located at Brgys.
Bagacay, Buaya, Kikilo, Sta. Lucia, Malaguicay, and San Francisco. These mini seaports
however need improvements of its facilities which are only waiting sheds that can
accommodate 40 persons only and one service trip in a day. Some motorboats serve
the coastal barangays and reach the towns of Silago and Hinunangan, Southern Leyte.
Small motorboats serve the interior barangays along the Higasaan River.
7|P age
Exhibit 3. Road Network Map of Abuyog, Leyte
8|P age
1.4 Total Land Area
1.4.1 General Land Use Classification
Table 3 shows the general land use of the municipality of Abuyog, Leyte. Urban uses,
and Agro-Industrial & Industrial uses cover 1.49 %, and 0.02%, respectively.
Characteristically rural, Abuyog is generally more agricultural (32.45%) and forested
(63.59%). Exhibit 4 depicts the general land use of Abuyog.
Table 3. General Land Use Classification
Category (Areas)
Urban Uses
Agro-Industrial and Industrial
Agricultural
Forest
Grassland/Pastures
Other Uses (Cemeteries; Sanitary Landfill; etc.)
Water Uses (Nipa Swamps; Mangroves; etc.)
Total
Area (has.)
531.91
9.51
12,440.08
24,376.29
57.54
62.89
852.34
38,330.56
% Total
1.49 %
0.02 %
32.45 %
63.59 %
0.15 %
0.16 %
2.22 %
100.00 %
Source: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). Abuyog, Leyte.
1.4.2 Agricultural Land Use Classification
Abuyog is basically an agricultural municipality with a big majority of its total population
highly dependent on agriculture for livelihood and sustenance. Principal agricultural
products of the municipality include coconut, rice, corn, rootcrops, vegetables and
abaca, among others. Table 4 shows the number of hectares devoted to each crop.
Coconut and rice are the top farm products in terms of total area planted.
Table 4. Agricultural Land Utilization by Crops
Crops
Coconut
Rice
Corn
Rootcrops
Vegetables
Abaca
Area Utilized (has.)
9,409.93
4,233.32
710.53
518.63
293.81
257.69
Crops
Banana
Pineapple
Mango
Jackfruit
Cacao
Coffee
Total
Area Utilized (has.)
159.98
147.53
142.58
53.52
9.82
5.58
15,942.90
Source: Municipal Agriculture Office, Abuyog, Leyte .
1.4.3 Abuyog Land Area Relative to that of Leyte Province and Region 8
Table 5 shows the relative size of the land area of municiplaity of Abuyog to Leyte
Province, Leyte Island and Eastern Visayas Region.
Table 5. Land Area of Abuyog vis-a-vis Provincial and Regional Total (in has.)
Abuyog
38,331
Relative Size in Percent
Leyte Province
651,510
5.88 %
Leyte Island
831,230
4.61 %
Region 8
2,323,000
1.65 %
Source: Regional Social and Economic Trends (RSET) 2012, a publication of the NSCB-8.
9|P age
Exhibit 4. Land Use Map of Abuyog
10 | P a g e
1.5 Topography
The municipality of Abuyog has mix topographic reliefs. The mountainous area is located
in the southern portion of the municipality and along the boundary with the municipality
of Mahaplag and a little portion at the western part of the municipality. Along the seacoast
are flatlands where densely populated barangays are located. The municipality has many
rivers and creeks distributed evenly in the whole area, notably the Cadac-an River which
serves as the major drainage outlet into the sea.
The total land area of Abuyog is 38,330 hectares which includes forest land area of 24,809
hectares and alienable and disposable land area of 13,087 hectares. Its coastal/sea area
is estimated to be 42,809 hectares.
1.6 Soils and Suitability
Abuyog has five soil types distributed in the different barangays at varying volumes and
degrees. Table 6 shows the soil types with areas in hectares in decreasing order. Exhibit 5
depicts the Soil Map of Abuyog.
An analysis of the different soil types prevailing in the municipality of Abuyog is basic to the
determination of the suitable agricultural production expected. Soil fertility is relatively high
considering that silts and other fertile soil colloids from the upland areas are carried and
deposited by the various river systems into the low lying areas especially during rainy
seasons and seasonal flooding.
Table 6. Types of Soil in the Municipality of Abuyog, Leyte
Soil Type
Rocky Mountainous
Rough Mountainous
Hydrosol Fine Sand
Tacloban Clay Loam
Obando Fine Sand
Total
Area (has.)
29,531.35
2,585.49
3,919.27
2,132.65
161.74
38,330.50
% to Total Area
77.04 %
6.75 %
10.23 %
5.56 %
0.42 %
100.00 %
Source: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). Abuyog, Leyte.
1.7 Climate and Water Sources
Exhibit 6 on page 13 shows that the municipality of Abuyog belongs to the range of
171.47mm. to 201.93mm. mean annual rainfall and 2,500 mm estimated rainfall. Abuyog
experiences high rainfall during the months of January to February and also during the
months of September to December.
But during the summer months from March to July, Abuyog receives low rainfall. This
information is based from the 35-year statistics on climatological normal from PAGASA for
the years 1965 to 2000 gathered from different weather substations throughout the
Philippine archipelago and analysis maps processed by NAMRIA for the Bureau of
Agricultural Research-Spatial Analysis and Information Laboratory (BAR-SAIL).
11 | P a g e
Exhibit 5. Soil Map of Abuyog
12 | P a g e
ABUYOG
Exhibit 6. Mean Annual Rainfall. Abuyog, Leyte
13 | P a g e
1.8 Municipal Population
Abuyog is a 1st class municipality in the Province of Leyte, Philippines. In the 2012 RSETEastern Visayas published by NSCB-8, the town has 55,509 inhabitants and the
municipality’s population density is 83 persons per square kilometer per census in 2010.
Table 7. Population, Gender, Number of Households, Average Household Size, Average
Population Growth Rate. Abuyog & Leyte (2010).
Town/
Province
Total
Population
Abuyog
55,509
26,849
28,660
1,563,364
758,583
804,781
Leyte
1
Women
Men
Average
Household
Size
Average Annual
Rate of Increase1
12,431
4.5
0.60
346,346
4.5
1.04
No. of
Households
Average annual rate of increase for Census Years 2000 and 2010
Source: RSET-2012, NSCB-8
1.8.1 Total Population, Gender and Average Growth Rate
Table 7 shows that Abuyog has 55,509 inhabitants. By gender, men outnumber women
both in Abuyog population (1.07 : 1) and Leyte population (1.06 : 1). The average
population rate of increase of Abuyog is far lower at 0.60 compared to the provincial
average of 1.04.
1.8.2 Number of Households and Average Household Size
Table 7 also shows that the 55,509 inhabitants of Abuyog are in 12,431 households and
that the average household size of the municipality is identical to that of the province
of Leyte at 4.5, per census year 2010.
1.9 Economic Activities and Sources of Income
1.9.1 On-Farm: Crops Production
Abuyog is primarily agricultural with almost 16,000 hectares of its total land area of
38,331 hectares devoted to agriculture. Table 8 depicts the major crops produced in
the municipality. Coconut is the dominant crop with around 9,410 hectares planted
while rice follows with 4,725 hectares. High value crops and fruit trees are also planted.
Table 8 shows total annual production per crop in metric tons and estimated value.
Table 8. Agricultural Crops, Area Planted (in has.) and Production Volume (in metric
tons). Abuyog, Leyte. 2010.
Major Crops
Coconut
Rice, irrigated
Rice, rainfed
Banana
High Value Crops
Rootcrops
Vegetables
Fruit Trees
Area
(has.)
9,410
3,114
1,611
445
195
230
156
194
Production
Value(Php)
Volume (in metric tons)
18,819
249,864,000
12,174
182,584,250
4,484
66,349,290
14,978
14,670,702
2,915
No data available
4,900
No data available
2,502
No data available
No data vailable
No data available
Source: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP); Municipal Agriculture Office. Abuyog, Leyte.
14 | P a g e
1.9.2 On-Farm: Livestock and Poultry
Livestock and poultry are another sources of livelihood and income for the people of
the municipality. Some are engaged in this kind of aconomic activity in commercial
scale, as a family business or a family’s way of living. But most of the time, livestock
raising is at backyard level production, or for family domestic consumption only.
The Municipality of Abuyog produces not only crops but also livestock and poultry
products. Table 9 shows the various livestock and poultry being raised either in
backyard or commercial scale with corresponding estimated total value.
Table 9. Livestock & Poultry, Scale of Operation, Production Volume/Value. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010.
Production
Volume (heads)
Value(Php)
Carabao (meat; breeders) Backyard/Commercial
1,644
41,100,000
Livestock (Purposes)
Scale
Cattle (breeders)
Backyard
20
700,000
Swine (meat; breeders)
Backyard/Commercial
4,343
15,200,500
Goat (meat; breeders)
Backyard
60
500,000
Horse (breeders)
Backyard
25
75,000
Chicken (meat, eggs)
Commercial
100,000
65,000,000
Duck (meat, eggs)
Backyard/Commercial
3,070
340,000
Turkey (meat, eggs)
Backyard
15
22,500
1.9.3 Fisheries and Aquaculture
Since Abuyog is along the Pacific and surrounded by rivers and swamps, it is abundant
in marine and fresh water products like fish, lobsters, shrimps, crabs and other products.
Table 10 shows that there are 39 barangays engage in fishing both in marine and
freshwater fisheries. Total production is 61 metric tons per day valued at Php 5,200,000
marketed locally. However, although the municipality produces marine and
aquaculture products in abundance, it has no processing and storage facilities.
Table 10. Fishing Grounds, Fisheries Production Volume & Value. Abuyog, Leyte. 2011.
Fishing Grounds
No. of Barangays
Volume
Value (Php)
Marine Fisheries
- Municipal Territorial Waters
22 (coastal)
31 tons/day
3,100,000
- Aquaculture
-
-
- Brackish Water Fishponds
7
15 tons/day
1,200,000
10
15 tons/day
900,000
-
Inland Fisheries
- Tilapia Fishponds
15 | P a g e
1.9.4 Off-Farm and Non-Farm Economic Sectors
The off-farm and non-farm economic sectors in the municipality are composed of
secondary and tertiary sub-sectors that are the main sources of employment and
income for the people of Abuyog outside of the agriculture sector.
1.9.4.1 Secondary Sub-Sector: Industry
Table 11 shows the list of registered businesses in the manufacturing/processing (25)
and in the construction (22) industries in Abuyog, Leyte. These sub-sectors support
the local processing and building industries.
Table 11. List of Registered Businesses by Industry Sub-sectors. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010.
Commercial / Business
Manufacturing/Processing Industry
Bakery / Bakeshop
Engineering & Construction
Welding Shop/Pedicab Assembler
Rice & Corn Mill
Furniture Shop
Woodcraft, Handicraft, Weaving
& Fashion Accessories
Internet Shop and PC Accessories
Total
No.
11
1
10
6
1
1
1
25
Construction Industry
Construction Firms
Hardware Supplies
Hollow Blocks Maker
Contractor
Construction Supplies
Construction & Concrete
Products
Sand & Gravel
Total
No.
2
3
4
3
4
2
4
22
Source: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), Abuyog, Leyte.
1.9.4.2 Tertiary Sub-Sector

Commerce – mainly concentrated in the central business district of Abuyog.
There are about 200 registered business establishments engaged in wholesale
& retail as of end of 2010 as shown in Table 12.
Table 12. List of Registered Businesses in Trade Sub-sector. Abuyog, Leyte. 2010.
Wholesale & Retail Trade
Fruits & Vegetables Vendors
Copra, Palay & Abaca Buyer
Rice & Corn Retailer
Meat Dealer
Dressed Chicken
Chicken Dealer
Lechon Manok
Fish Broker
Fish Vendor
Salted & Dried Fish Dealer/Vendor
Agrivet, Animal Feeds Retailer
Agriculture Supplies
Glass/Kitchen-ware/Plastic Center
Glass & Aluminum Supply
Electronics Supplies & Services
Pharmacy
No.
4
21
7
9
3
1
3
1
4
2
7
1
2
4
2
8
Wholesale & Retail Trade
Dry Goods
Natasha Store
Used Clothing/Ukay-ukay
RTW Direct Selling
School & Office Supplies
Sari-sari Store
LPG Retailer
Gasoline Station
Water Station
Scrap Buyer
Coco Lumber Dealer
Multi Enterprises
Grocery
Gen. Merchandise
Appliances/Furniture Store
Total
No.
15
1
1
2
3
63
1
4
3
3
2
3
6
3
1
200
Source: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), Abuyog, Leyte.
16 | P a g e

Transportation – There are many transport operators of mini buses, public utility
jeepneys, tricycles, “habal-habal” (single motorcycles for hire), pedicabs
(bicycles with side car), cargo trucks and vans for hire.

Telecommunications – There are two (2) cell sites, a postal services office, a
telephone company and cable TV operators in the municipality.

Personal Services: There are about 35 registered businesses providing personal
services like beauty parlors, shops, photo studios, funeral parlors, etc.
Table 13. List of Registered Businesses, Personal Services Sub-sector. Abuyog, 2010.
Personal Services
Photo Studio Center & Supplies
Xerox Copier
Gift Shop
Funeral Parlor
Beauty & Refreshment Parlor
Barber Shop
Pawnshop & Jewelry
Catering Services
Cable TV Services
Express Padala
Money Trasfer/Money Changer
Electronic Services
Computer Services
Allied Services
Cycle Center
Surveying Office
Total
No.
4
1
1
4
2
2
6
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
35
Educational Institution
Kindergarten
Realty Lesson
College Institution
Total
No.
1
1
1
3
Agro-Industrial
Farm & Poultry Farm
Farmer Center
Farmers & Fishermen Asso.
Total
4
1
1
6
Transpo. & Communication
Bicycle/Motor Parts/Services
Motorcycle/Bicycle Dealer
Internet Cafe
Cell Phone Enterprises
Total
8
4
13
2
27
1.9.5 Employment and Income Sources
As an agricultural town, most of the employed persons are engaged in farm crop
production, livestock & poultry raising and marine & inland fisheries. While on-farm
economic activities are the principal sources of employment and income of the
people in Abuyog, off-farm and non-farm economic activities are good contributors
to the local economy. As shown in Table 14, these sub-sectors employed 5,407 and
provided an aggregate income of almost Php 17.5 million in 2010.
Table 14. Employment & Revenues by Classification of Business & Trade. Abuyog, 2010.
Classification of Business and Trade
Wholesale and Retail Trade
Banking and Finance
Real Estate & Construction
Services
Others (Communication & Transportation)
Total
No. of
Employment
3,674
64
216
1,204
249
5,407
Revenues
(in Pesos)
8,851,200
700,000
2,950,000
3,054,400
1,940,000
17,495,600
17 | P a g e
II. Project Background and Rationale
2.1. Statement of the Problem and Opportunities
The current state of barangay roads of the municipality of Abuyog can be generally
described as follows: there is lack, inadequate and poorly maintained barangay road
networks, including farm to market roads, that connect barangay crop production centers
to Abuyog town proper and markets. This is due to inadequate funds of the local
government of Abuyog to properly maintain these roads.
The following are the dire consequences:
a)
b)
c)
d)
High cost of transporting production inputs like seeds and fertilizers into farms;
High cost of hauling agricultural outputs from the farms to markets;
High cost of operating transport vehicles due to frequent maintenance
Longer travel times and unsafe, inconvenient trips
These consequences serve as disincentives to farmers (and investors) to produce and
invest more due to transportation problems and high costs in bringing their produce to the
market. The proposed project would greatly enhance crop production and movement of
goods and services within and outside of the target areas.
2.2 Strategic Direction of the Municipality of Abuyog
All the programs and projects of the municipality of Abuyog are grounded on its vision and
mission. Quoted hereunder are its Vision and Mission Statements, as well as its Goal and
Objectives, as reflected in its 2014-2016 Executive and Legislative Development Agenda:
2.2.1 Development Vision of the Municipality of Abuyog:
“Peaceful, agro-industrialized and self-reliant Abuyog with disaster-resilient, healthy
and empowered citizenry living in a developed eco-tourist destination and
environment-friendly community.”
2.2.2 Mission Statement
“Promote peace and order, develop infrastructure and agro-industrial technologies,
provide employment opportunties and deliver quality socio-economic services
through active participation of politically matured leaders and constituents who shall
be disaster-resilient and endeavor to protect and maintain a well-balanced
environment.”
2.2.3 Goal
“To transform into a climate-proofed eco-tourist destination and business-friendly
municipality and convert its barangays into high value crop and food producers
thereby creating livelihood opportunities to every Abuyognon.”
2.2.4 Objectives
a)
b)
c)
d)
To increase investments for domestic tourism, commerce and trade;
To provide efficient infrastructure facilities and utilities so as to attract investments;
To generate employment and livelihood opportunities;
To increase productivity levels of major food, high-value fruits and crops;
18 | P a g e
e) To develop, protect and regenerate the coastal and forest resources;
f) To provide incentives to individuals/corporations who shall be exemplars in disaster
risk reduction and climate change adaptation best practices;
g) To improve the delivery of basic services to alleviate or reduce poverty.
2.3 Sub-Project Objectives
The LGU’s Objectives (b) and (d), which articulate advancing infrastructure development
to support the growth of its agriculture sector, find congruence and support from “the
Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP), a 6-year program designed to establish the
government platform for a modern, climate-smart and market-oriented agri-fishery sector.
In partnership with the LGUs and the private sector, PRDP will provide key infrastructure,
facilities, technology, and information that will raise incomes, productivity, and
competitiveness in the countryside.” (PRDP Brief, 05 June 2014).
In 6 years the program intervention would have achieved the following general objectives:
 Increased annual real farm incomes of PRDP household beneficiaries by at least 5%;
 Increased income of targeted beneficiaries of enterprise development by at least 30%;
 Increased value of annual marketed output by at least 7%;
 Increased number of farmers and fishers with improved access to DA services by 20%.
This sub-project, concreting of the Can-aporong-Canmarating FMR, is primarily intended
to contribute to achieving a robust and sustained agro-industrial development and selfsufficiency in major agricultural crops like rice, corn, vegetables, poultry and livestock
being enjoyed by healthy, strong and GOD-fearing Abuyognons. It is directly aligned to
the development priorities of the Provincial Government of Leyte which identified coconut
and rice as principal crops to propel the economic development of the province. The subproject area is mostly planted to coconuts and rice. The proposed FMR will therefore
directly benefit the coconut and rice farmers, as well as barangay residents by way of
providing convenient, cost-effective and safe access to said areas.
With the rehabilitation and concreting of the road network linking the two barangays to
the poblacion of Abuyog, the following specific objectives shall be achieved:
a. Reduced vehicle operating costs of transport operators and road users by at least 50%;
b. Reduced hauling costs for passengers and agricultural in/outputs by as much as 30%;
c. Reduced hauling costs for passengers and agricultural in/outputs by as much as 30%;
d. Reduced travel time of the target road section from the current 10 minutes to 4 minutes;
e. Promote cultivation and use of new farmlands of at least 10 hectares per crop (rice
and coconut) thereby further increasing production volume and farm income;
2.4 Brief Presentation of Socio-Economic Indicators
2.4.1 Location of the Tabigue-Balocawehay Road Project
The proposed FMR sub-project is located in Sitio San Vicente, Brgy. Tabigue to Sitio
Canario & Sitio Danao, Brgy. Balocawehay, Abuyog, Leyte. The said road section is an
existing 2.0237-kilometer road that connects the two barangays to the AbuyogMahaplag section of the national highway. (See Exhibit 2, page 6).
19 | P a g e
2.4.2 Population Characteristics of the Direct Road Influenced Area (RIA)
Table 15. Population Characteristics of the RIA Barangays
Barangay
Balocawehay
Tabigue
Total
Male
Female
Population
3,490
1,277
4,767
2,454
2,313
No. of
Households
766
280
1,046
Est. Economically
Active Population1
Unemployed2
Employed3
1,221
447
1,668
159
58
217
1,062
389
1,451
Average Household Size = 4.56
15 years old & above; 35% of total population
13% & 87% of the total economically active population, respectively
Source of Population Data : 2008 Abuyog DILG-CBMS Survey
1
2&3
As shown in Table 15, the two barangays have total population of 4,767 persons of
which 2,454 are males and 2,313 are females, living in 1,046 households. The estimated
economically active population is 1,668 of which 1,451 are assumed to be employed.
2.4.3 Main Agricultural Crops in the RIA Barangays
Barangays Tabigue and Balocawehay of Abuyog are basically agricultural
communities with majority of the inhabitants engaged in agricultural crop production.
Data obtained from the Municipal Agriculturist Office (MAO) show the beneficiary
barangays are main producers of rice, coconuts and corn. (See table below).
Table 16. Total Annual Production Volume and Value of Major Crops, RIA Barangays.
Crop
Rice/palay
Coconut/copra
Corn
Abaca
Banana
Total
Area
(in has.)
461.69
Annual Production
Volume (kgs.)
3,970,534.00
107,204,418.00
353.25
23.00
678,240.00
16,956,000.00
34,500.00
690,000.00
20.00
10.13
22,500.00
22,792.50
1,260,000.00
455,850.00
868.07
4,728,566.50
126,566,268.00
Total Annual Production
Value (Php)
Source: Abuyog Municipal Agriculturist Office (MAO)
2.5 Description of the Priority Value Chain to be Served by the FMR
The proposed road sub-project is a critical component of LGU-Abuyog’s strategic focus on
coconut and rice as the principal agricultural commodities from which to anchor its
economic development. The sub-project will effectively link the coconut and rice
producing beneficiary barangays to the open markets in Leyte province and is expected
to further enhance the development of the coconut industry of Abuyog. The municipality’s
focus in promoting coconut and rice is directly in harmony and aligned to the priorities and
development direction of the Provincial Government of Leyte which likewise identified
coconut and rice as the main crops to promote in the province.
20 | P a g e
III. Project Description and Analyses
A. Market Analysis/Demand-Supply Analysis
3.1 Existing Roads, Bridges and Transport System in the Area
Table 17. Existing Roads and Transport System (in kms.), RIA Barangays, Abuyog, Leyte.
Road
Type
Brgy/Farmto-Market
Roads
Municipal
Provincial
National
Gravel
Passa- Not Pasble
sable
Earth
Passable
Not
Passable
Concrete
Passa- Not Pas- Passable
sable
ble
-
-
-
a. 2.023700
b. 2.240322
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
* Tabigue-Balocawehay
** Can-aporong-Canmarating
Total
Not Passable
a. 2.240322
b. 2.023700
-
Source: Municipal Engineer’s Office, Abuyog, Leyte
3.2 Analysis of Road and Transport System (without and with road improvement)
3.2.1 Present road network condition
The Tabigue-Balocawehay road section is an existing 2.0237-kilometer road that
connects the two barangays to the Abuyog-Mahaplag portion of the national
highway. It is a Barangay Road/Farm-to-Market Road (FMR) classified as “earth road,
not passable.” There is no existing bridge along the said road.
The road is in a very sorry state, and over time has slowly deterioted into a trail because
of vegetation covering most of the road. This is due to neglect because of inadequate
funds of the local government to properly maintain the road section. The road is also
repeatedly damaged due to heavy rains. It is hardly passable to 4-wheel drive type
vehicles. It is passable to single type motor vehicles during dry season only.
Despite the bad shape of the road, it connects the two barangays’ crop production
areas to the town proper which is the market center/trading point.
3.2.2 Availability of public transport vehicles
The transport system consists mainly of single motorcycles for hire (“habal-habal”) and
tricycles. There are only occassional cargo trucks and jeepneys because most of the
road is impassable year-round.
3.2.3 Seasonal Impassibility of Road Site
The road segment is generally passable to “habal-habal” and other vehicles yearround but the said road section is slippery and dangerous to motorists on rainy days
and very dusty during hot days.
3.2.4 Alternate route/s used within the project area and their condition
There is no alternate route being used in the area.
21 | P a g e
3.2.5 Availability of Other Modes of Transport which Tend to Compete with the Project
There are no railways or new road infrastructure projects currently on-going within the
RIAs that may compete with the proposed sub-project. The proposed FMR will not
compete but rather will complement other sub-project FMRs that might be pursued in
advancing the total socio-economic development initiatives of Abuyog.
3.2.6 Existing modes of transport and hauling of passenger and cargo
The table below summarizes the results of a traffic survey conducted on November
2014. It shows that the most popular mode of transport between the two barangays is
“habal-habal” or single motorcycle for hire because of its flexibility and serviceability.
This validates the information that habal-habal constitutes the principal mode of
transportation going to and from the two beneficiary barangays. Occasionally, a few
trucks and jeepneys come to the barangays to haul agricultural products primarily
coconuts, rice and corn as well as farm inputs and other items. There are also nonmotorized vehicles being utilized by farmers and barangay residents like animal
(carabao)-drawn carts and bicycles.
Table 18. Transport/Traffic Survey Data, Brgys. Tabigue & Balocawehay, Abuyog, Leyte.
November 2014.
Vehicle Type
Motorcycle
("Habal-habal")
Tricycle
Car/Van
Jeepney
Truck
Ave. Loading Observed Transport
Capacity
Fares per Passenger/
(sacks)
Cargo (P)
No. of
Units
No. of
Trips/Day
Operating
Days/Year
39
43
260
8
P30 / P30
15
4
2
6
35
4
3
8
260
156
156
104
15
50
100
P30 / P30
P30 /
P30 / P30
/ P30
Note: 1. Average Distance travelled = 2.0237 kms.
2. Travel times: 10 minutes (w/out project); 4 minutes (with project).
3.2.7 Current trip volumes, destinations, travel times, volume /capacity ratios
To determine the current volume of vehicular traffic going through Brgys. Tabigue Balocawehay, an actual traffic flow survey was conducted for seven (7) days from
November 24 to 30, 2014 starting at 4 am up to 10 pm daily. The above table also
summarizes the results of the survey.
3.2.8 Analysis of how the proposed road facility will close in the gap in Infrastructure
Development within the area in terms of generated, induced and diverted traffic
The proposed road sub-project connects the two barangays to the national highway.
Concreting the road will significantly cut travel distance (and time) to the town proper.
Once the sub-project is completed, farmers and residents of the two barangays will
greatly benefit from it. Consequently, significant reduction in travel times by more than
50% (from 10 minutes to 4 minutes) and savings in transportation/ hauling costs will be
realized. On the other hand, with the improved road, transport operators will realize
substantial savings due to less frequent maintenance of their vehicles. Moreover, the
improved road would induce more transport vehicles to ply the said route.
22 | P a g e
B. Technical Analysis
4.1 Horizontal Road Alignment
The proposed road will have a right of way of 8 meters wide, consisting of a 5-meter
concrete paved carriageway and 1.5 meters shoulders on both sides. It will start from Brgy.
Tabigue to Brgy. Balocawehay where it will be connected to an existing concrete paved
road that links the barangay to the town proper of Abuyog. There will be no curve widening
and side cuts to be done as there are no sharp curves exist.
4.2 Vertical Road Alignment
The proposed project starts from a generally flat terrain with some rolling areas to hilly
portion having a maximum 1.0 percent gradient and these will be downgraded to the
required grade elevation. There will be some minor side cuttings to be done in other areas
to bring the road to its correct grade level.
4.3 Drainage Analysis/Hydraulic
Some portions of the existing foot-trail path in Brgy. Tabigue and Brgy. Balocawehay is
flooded during heavy and continuous downpour, particularly the lowland which serves as
the catchment of the run-off water from the hillside. The flooding, however, subsides in a
few hours after the heavy downpour stops. To mitigate the flooding of the road, Reinforced
Concrete Pipe Culverts (RCPCs) will be installed/constructed at waterways road crossings.
4.4 Geotechnical- Soil and Foundation Analysis
The soil classification map of the province indicates that the Leyte Clay Type of soil is
prevalent in the project area with an American Association of the State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) soil classification rating of A-7 which means that the soil
has a liquid limit of 41 min and a plasticity index of 11 min. It is clayey type of soil with a
general subgrade rating of fair to poor.
4.5 Structural Analysis- Pavement Thickness
With a recorded average daily traffic (ADT), a 0.15-meter thick, 5-meter wide carriageway
is the recommended program standard. And the construction of the pipe culverts will
adhere to Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Standards.
4.6 Location of Quarries, Borrow Pits and Construction Materials
The proposed construction of the existing and deteriorated gravel road will use base
course and aggregates that will be sourced from the municipality of Abuyog in Leyte
which is just within the locality. The materials will be hauled from the source site at Leyte
and delivered to the project site using 10 cubic meter capacity dump trucks. Adequate
supply of these aggregates is guaranteed as Leyte is the main supplier of these resources
all over the region, with existing quarries. Base course that will be used for subgrade
preparation will also be sourced from Abuyog area.
4.7 Items of Work and Cost
The total project cost for the 2.0237-kilometer road is Php 15,102,142 or a unit cost of
Php7,462,639 per kilometer. Table 19 shows the cost per item of work of the project.
23 | P a g e
Table 19. Items of Work and Cost
Item
No.
Scope of Work
Percent
Weight
Quantity
Unit
0.76%
1.47%
4.08%
0.21%
0.81%
2.26%
1
14,289.60
2,002.75
86.40
294.86
16,189.60
21.77%
67.21%
A.
Earthworks
Spl 1
100
102 (2)
103 (6)
104 (1)
105
Mobilizaton/ Demobilization
Clearing and Grubbing
Surplus Common Excavation
Pipe Culvert & Drain Excavation
Embankment from Excavation
Subgrade Preparation
B.
Base Course
201
C.
311
Aggregate Base Course
Surface Course
PCCP
D.
Drainage & Slope Protection Structure
500 (3)
506
Spcl 1
RCPC, 910mm Ø
Stone Masonry
Project Signboard
Total Project Cost
0.73%
0.57%
0.14%
Unit Cost
Total
l.s.
sq.m.
cu.m.
cu.m.
cu.m.
sq.m.
114,375.51
15.52
307.37
371.94
417.08
21.05
114,375.51
221,801.03
615,578.96
32,135.62
122,978.84
340,740.06
4,644.39
cu.m.
707.89
3,287,726.51
10,118.50
sq.m.
1,003.08
10,149,708.76
16.00
21.30
1.00
lin.m.
cu.m.
lot
6,855.34
4,042.49
21,322.83
109,685.46
86,088.82
21,322.83
100.00%
15,102,142.39
4.8 Implementation Schedule
The total project duration is 80 calendar days with the expected start of the project on the
1st week of August 2015. Expected completion date is on the 2nd week of October 2015
(See Table 20).
Table 20. Implementation Timetable
ACTIVITIES
2015
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
I. Preparation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FS/Preliminary Engineering Studies Preparation
Preparation of Detailed Engineering Design
Supporting Documents Submission
Subproject Approval and Implementation
Management Agreement Signing
Capability Training
II. Procurement Process
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Publication
Pre-Bid Conference
Conduct of Public Bidding
Post-Qualification Evaluation
Awarding and Approval Contract
III. Implementation Stage
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Project Billboard
Clearing and Grubbing
Surplus Common Excavation
Pipe Culvert & Drain Excavation
Embankment from Excavation
Subgrade Preparation
Aggregate Base Course
RCPC, 910mm Ø
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
Stone Masonry
24 | P a g e
C. Operational Analysis
This section depicts the management and operational requirements of the project from
Pre-investment, Project Implementation, and Post Project Implementation stages.
Essentially, these stages in the project cycle requires the setting-up of three different
operating structures to properly address the critical tasks at each point of the project cycle
to achieve the project goals and objectives.
5.1 Project Organization, Critical Activities and Project Outputs
World Bank
Sanggunian Bayan
DA-PRDP
Municipal Mayor
Municipal Project
Management and
Implementation Unit
Project Manager
Persons/Offices
Responsible
Critical
Activities
Outputs
Phase 1:
Pre-Investment
Phase 2:
Implementation
 Municipal Planning &
Development Officer
 Municipal Engineer
 Municipal Agriculturist
 Municipal Treasurer
 Municipal Accountant
 Municipal Budget
Officer
 Municipal Assessor
 Bids & Awards
Committee
 Municipal Planning &
Development Officer
 Municipal Engineer
 Municipal Budget
Officer
 Municipal Treasurer
 Municipal Accountant
 Contractor
 Feasibility Study
Preparation
 Detailed
Engineering Design
Preparation
 Project Mobilization
 Social Preparation
 Public Bidding
 Awarding of
Contract
 Project Execution
 Monitoring
/Evaluation
 Fund Releases /
Liquidation
 Feasibility Study
 Detailed Engineering
Design
 Project Approval
 Road Section
Rehabilitated
 As-Built Plan
 Project Acceptance
Phase 3:
Post-Investment
Municipal Engineer
Operation and
Maintenance Unit
Barangay
Chairmen
 Beneficiaries




 Proper Road
Maintenance
 Routine
Maintenance
 Periodic
Maintenance
 Road Section
Properly Maintained
and Operational
Exhibit 7- Project Organization, Critical Activities and Project Output Chart
25 | P a g e
5.1.1 Pre-Investment Phase
The Pre-Investment Phase requires the conduct of in-depth studies and analysis of the
feasibility of the proposed project from the economic and engineering perspective. It
involves preparation and formulation of the necessary project feasibility study (PFS) and
detailed engineering designs (DED) leading to eventual approval of the project by the
DA-PRDP and by the funding agency the World Bank (WB). The critical units and
persons involve in this phase are the Municipal Planning and Development Office
(MPDO) as the lead unit, Municipal Engineers’ Office (MEO), Municipal Agriculturist
Office (MAO), Municipal Treasurer’s Office (MTO), Municipal Accountant (MA),
Municipal Budget Office (MBO) and Municipal Assessor’s Office (MAO).
5.1.2 Project Execution/Implementation Phase
This Phase involves conduct of public bidding by the Bids and Awards Committee
(BAC), awarding of contract to the winning contractor, project execution and
implementation, monitoring and evaluation and fund releases and liquidation among
other necessary and critical activities leading to project completion and acceptance.
BAC is the lead unit during the bidding and awarding process while the MEO takes over
project management during actual project implementation.
5.1.3 Post Project Implementation Phase
The last Phase basically involves proper use and maintenance of the road network after
project completion and acceptance. This requires the conduct of routine and periodic
maintenance activities. Routine maintenance work entails routine cutting and clearing
of vegetation and debris, repair of road shoulders, culverts, side ditches and canals,
filling of potholes and other minor road and maintenance repair jobs. This is highly labor
intensive work and should fall under the direct responsibility of the Brgy. Chairmen and
the host Barangays.
On the other hand, periodic maintenance entail more extensive work and require the
use of equipment and machineries not available within the Barangays as well as
substantial budget to carry out the task. Thus, the LGU of Abuyog must assume this
responsibility alone or in cooperation and partnership with the Provincial or National
Government.
5.2. Plan for Management during Construction, Key Roles and Responsibilities and
Implementation Arrangements
A Municipal Project Management and Implementation Unit (MPMIU) shall be created by
the Municipal Mayor through an Executive Order to carry out the project activities and
accomplish the corresponding outputs during the pre-investment, project implementation
and post-implementation stages of the project as shown in the Project Organization,
Critical Activities and Project Output Chart (Exhibit 7).
The MPMIU shall be under the direct supervision of the Municipal Mayor with proper
authority and policy direction support from the Sangguniang Bayan (SB). The MPMIU shall
be headed by a Project Manager who shall be tasked with the day-to-day operations
management of the Project. The unit shall be supported by the different critical operating
units/officers of the LGU such as the Municipal Planning Office, Municipal Engineer’s
26 | P a g e
Office, Municipal Agriculturist, Municipal Treasurer, Budget Officer, Municipal Accountant
and Physical Office and Maintenance Office among others. The different roles and
responsibilities of the key offices/officers to be involved in the project are depicted in Table
21 as follows:
Table 21. Duties and Responsibilities of Offices/Persons Involved in the Project
Office/
Person
Pre-Investment
Phase
Implementation
Phase
Post
Implementation
Phase
Sanggunian
Bayan
(SB)
- Provide the necessary
budgetary allocation,
policy direction/ authority
to the Municipal Mayor to
enter into contract/
agreement with DA-PRDP,
contractors and other
groups/individuals
pursuant to the project.
- Monitor the execution and
implementation of the project.
- Monitor the
operation and
maintenance
of the FMR
Municipal
Mayor/
Local Chief
Executive
(MM/LCE)
- Secure the necessary SB
authority/ budget
allocation;
- Take overall responsibility
in project planning and
mobilization;
- Create the PRDP-MPMIU
through Executive Order;
- Negotiate with DA-PRDP
for project approval;
- Initiate/hold consultation
meetings/dialogues with
Brgy. officials and project
beneficiaries with the
support and assistance of
the PRDP-MPMIU
personnel and the
attached units and
departments.
- Create/organize the BAC that will
be responsible for the conduct of
public Bidding for the project;
- Sign contracts with winning
bidders upon the recommendation of the BAC;
- Provide overall direction and
supervision in project
implementation
- authorize release and liquidation
of project funds;
- conduct regular site inspection
and meetings with contractors
and personnel of PRDP-MPMIU to
asses/evaluate project progress,
and;
- Undertake other necessary
measures needed to ensure
timely completion of the project
in accordance with the
approved plans and budget.
- Monitor the
operation and
maintenance
of the FMR.
Municipal
Project
Management and
Implementation Unit
(MPMIU)
- Serve as technical,
executive and
administrative arm of the
Mayor during the project
planning, mobilization and
social preparation/preinvestment stage of the
project;
- Conduct and/or facilitate
the preparation of the
necessary Project
Feasibility Study (FS) and
Detailed Engineering
Designs (DED) for
submission to DA-PRDP
with the support and
assistance of the different
LGU support units,
- Take overall responsibility for all
project activities, issues and
concerns during project
execution and implementation;
- Conduct progress monitoring and
evaluation of physical and
financial accomplishments;
- Submit the required
progress/liquidation reports to the
Mayor, DA-PRDP and the funding
agency;
- Procure the needed supplies,
equipment, personnel, logistics
and other support requirements
to ensure timely project
completion;
- Conduct post
project and
impact
evaluation;
- Prepare and
submit as built
plan to DAPRDP and
funding
agency;
- Responsible for
routine
maintenance
of the FMR.
27 | P a g e
Office/
Person
Pre-Investment
Phase
Implementation
Phase
Post
Implementation
Phase
departments and officers
and staff;
- Comply with all the
required technical,
- Take action on any
documentary and legal
issues/concerns that may affect
requirements necessary for
project implementation upon
project approval by the
prior consultation and approval
DA-PRDP;
by the Mayor;
- Conduct consultation/
dialogues with Brgy.
Officials and beneficiaries.
- Formulate Pre-Bidding/ Bidding
Rules & Regulations in
accordance with Philippine
government and World Bank
Procurement Guidelines;
- Conduct Pre-Bidding
Conferences and actual public
bidding for the project;
- Submit pre/post bidding reports to
the Mayor;
- Recommend to the Mayor the
winner of the public bidding.
Bids &
Awards
Committee
(BAC)
Project
Manager
(PM)
- Initiate/lead/coordinate
the preparation and
conduct of preinvestment/preparatory
activities such as the
conduct of geodetic
surveys, packaging of the
FS,DED, project proposals
and other documentary,
administrative and legal
requirements of the
project;
- Assist the Mayor in
negotiations with DAPRDP, World Bank and
other pertinent
government and private
agencies;
- Take the lead in project
mobilization and
preparation upon project
approval.
- Conduct post
- Responsible for the day-to-day
project impact
operation, implement-tation and
evaluation with
management of the project
the support
including supervision and mgt. of
and assistance
the MPMIU, its attached units and
of the other
personnel;
members of the
- Prepare and submit the necessary
MPMIU;
progress and liquidation reports
- Assist the MEO
to the Mayor, DA-PRDP and the
and MPDO in
funding agency with the
the preparation
assistance of the other members
and formulation
and staff of the PRDP-MPMIU;
of the As Built
- Procure the necessary personnel,
Plan DED;
materials, equipment and
- Prepare and
logistics needed in actual project
submit the
implementation;
Project
- Conduct regular site inspections
Terminal/Compl
and meetings with contractors,
etion Report,
Barangay Officials, beneficiaries
and;
to discuss and solve operatio-nal
- Supervise the
problems that may surface in the
prompt
course of project execution and
liquidation of
implementation, and;
project
- Represent the Mayor in meetings
funds/docume
and conferences with DA-PRDP,
nts to the DAWorld Bank and other groups and
PRDP and
institutions relative to the project
World Bank to
when the Mayor cannot attend
formally close
or join such meetings and
the project.
conferences.
28 | P a g e
Office/
Person
Municipal
Planning &
Development Office
(MPDO)
Municipal
Engineer’s
Office
(MEO)
Municipal
Agriculture
Office
(MAO)
Municipal
Budget
Office
(MBO)
Pre-Investment
Phase
Post
Implementation
Phase
Implementation
Phase
- Take the lead in the
formulation and packaging
of the project Feasibility Study
with the support and
assistance of the members of
- Assist the PM in
the MPMIU;
- Undertake periodic progress
the conduct of
- Conduct the necessary social
monitoring and evaluation on
post-project
preparation and validation
the physical and financial
impact
activities such as inventory of
accomplishments of the
evaluation and
affected persons, IPs, homes
project together with the PM
preparation of
and properties among others;
and MEO;
the Project
- Conduct the necessary
Terminal/Compl
consultations and dialogues
etion Report.
with the beneficiaries,
affected persons, IPs and
other stakeholders, and;
- Secure the necessary
CNC/ECC form DENR.
- Manage/supervise the
- Take the lead in the conduct
rehabilitation and concreting
of geodetic surveys to
of the FMR;
determine the direct path
- Tendering/procurement of
and location of the FMR;
civil works, materials, services
- Prepare and package the
and logistics
Detailed Engineering Design
- Assist the PM and MPDO in
(DED) of the project with the
the conduct of progress
support of the PM, MPDO,
monitoring and evaluation of
MAO, BO and other members
the physical and financial
of the MPMIU;
accomplishments of the
project
- Provide accurate, realistic
and updated data and
statistics on the past and
current situation of the
agriculture sector of the
municipality and the
beneficiary Barangays;
- Assist the MPDO in the
inventory of affected crops
and trees and preparation of
the FS
- Take principal responsibility in
the procurement/availability
of counterpart fund for the
project.
- Secure funding for the
conduct of geodetic surveys,
FS, DED and other
preparatory activities for the
project.
- Assist farmer beneficiaries in
marketing their agricultural
products
-
- Assist in the
operation and
maintenance
of the FMR
most
particularly in
the conduct of
periodic
maintenance
work of the
FMR.
- Provide training,
logistics and
material support
to farmer
beneficiaries to
expand
production
volume and
income.
-
29 | P a g e
Office/
Person
Pre-Investment
Phase
Municipal
Treasurer’s
Office/
Municipal
Accountant’s
Office
(MTO/MAO)
-
Barangay
Chairmen/
Beneficiaries (BC/B)
- Ensure participation of Brgy.
residents/beneficiaries
during public hearings and
consultations
Implementation
Phase
Post
Implementation
Phase
- Manage the financial
aspect of the project;
- Ensure the appropriate and
timely disbursement and
liquidation of project funds;
- Take the lead in preparing
the regular
financial/liquidation reports
of the project in
coordination with the PM
and MBO.
- Prepare and
submit the
Terminal
Financial/Liquid
ation reports of
the project
- Provide manpower/labor
services to the project
- Responsible for
the conduct of
routine
maintenance
work/activities
of the FMR
5.3 Collection of Road Users Fees and Other Policies
The Local Government Code of the Philippines empowers the Barangays to collect fees
from vehicles plying the route regularly such as delivery trucks that collect coconuts and
other agricultural products from the barangays and nearby areas and deliver basic goods
to the households. Thus, Barangays Suba, Kanangkaan, San Vicente and San Juan may
pass Barangay Road Users’ Ordinances to generate additional income for the barangays
that they may use for the repair and maintenance of the FMR.
5.4 Project Implementation Schedule
The proposed project shall be awarded and contracted to the lowest winning bidder as a
result of a Public Bidding conducted by the BAC in accordance with the Philippines and
World Bank Procurement Guidelines.
Project implementation shall commence seven (7) days after issuance and receipt of the
Notice to Proceed (NTP) by the winning Contractor up to the estimated project completion
period of 80 calendar days.
5.5 Project Monitoring and Supervision
Project Monitoring and Supervision shall be the responsibility of the Municipal Project
Management and Implementation Unit (MPMIU). Specifically, the Project Manager,
Municipal Planning and Development Officer (MPDO) and the Municipal Engineer/ Officer
(ME/O) who are key members of the MPMIU shall comprise the Project Monitoring and
Supervision Team (PMST) for the project. The PMST will be complemented by the Mayor
who shall be doing her own monitoring on the progress of the project being the Local Chief
Executive (LCE) of Abuyog LGU, the principal project proponent. The Sangguniang Bayan
(SB) shall also monitor the progress of the project on account of the authority it shall give
to the Mayor and for its own legislative agenda.
30 | P a g e
5.6 Operation and Maintenance Scheme
Operation and maintenance work on the FMR shall be the joint responsibilities of the
Abuyog LGU and the beneficiary Barangays. As such, both local government units shall
allocate its own yearly budget for the operation and maintenance of the FMR to ensure its
long term usability and sustainability. Table 22 depicts the annual maintenance budget
matrix.
Road maintenance works are categorized as Routine and Periodic Maintenance. Routine
Maintenance is done every quarter and is normally labor-intensive. Works involve
vegetation control, cleaning and repair of culverts, reshaping of side ditches and canals,
filling of ruts and holes among others. With this kind and magnitude of maintenance works,
the barangay beneficiaries would be the logical holder of this responsibility. It would even
strengthen their chance to pass a Barangay Ordinance to collect road users’ fees from
motorists that use the FMR regularly.
Periodic Maintenance on the other hand, requires more extensive work and use of
equipment that are not normally or readily available in the barangays. Thus, the LGU of
Abuyog on account of its financial and management capability must assume total
responsibility for this kind of maintenance work.
Table 22. Annual Maintenance Cost, Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP)
Costs
Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
Road length
= 2.02370
km
Annual (Routine)
Maintenance cost
PhP
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
Capital (Periodic)
Maintenance Cost,
every 6th year 1/
PhP
0
0
0
0
0
46,468
Total Annual
Maintenance Cost
PhP
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
1/
Approximately +60% of annual maintenance cost
31 | P a g e
D. Social Analysis
6.1 Project Beneficiaries
The project will directly benefit Barangays Tabigue and Balocawehay. The two barangays
have a combined population of 4,767 of which 2,454 (51.5 %) are males and 2,313 (48.5 %)
are females living in 1,046 households. (Please refer to Table 26 on page 37 on population
within the Road Influence Area Barangays). Majority of the beneficiaries are farmers
engaged in the cultivation of rice, coconuts, corn, vegetables and root crops. The
beneficiaries are eagerly awaiting the implementation of the project considering that the
road segment has been in a sorry state of disrepair for a long time.
The constituents of Brgys. Balocawehay and Tabigue were consulted on March 23, 2015 to
generate opinions, comments, views, endorsement and approval by the barangay
officials and residents relative to the project. Those were joint consultations per barangay,
namely, Barangay Council Consultation and Barangay Residents Consultation, attended
by barangay officials and residents including women. A team from the LGU-Abuyog
conducted the consultations and briefing.
During the open forum, questions raised by the attendees mainly centered on where is the
start and end (or length) of the road project and when will the project construction start.
They also expressed their anxiety that the 2-km. road project might end up into only a 200meter finished road, hinting of corruption in project implementation. The LGU team ably
answered all queries and gave assurance that the road project will have desired results.
After a thorough and exhaustive discussions on the matter, the Brgy. officials and residents
unanimously approved and endorsed the project. The Resolutions of the Sangguniang
Barangays and the Minutes of Barangay Assemblies and consultations are found in
Annexes 2-I and 2-J.
6.2 Indigenous Cultural Community/Indigenous Peoples (ICC/IP)
The sub-project will not infringe or disturb any indigenous cultural community since there
are no cultural minorities living within the area. Likewise, the sub-project will not encroach
or traverse in any ancestral domain considering that there are no ancestral domains in the
whole of Region 8.
Nevertheless, the Abuyog LGU has requested for a Certificate of Non-Overlap (CNO) from
the National Commission for Indigenous Peoples (NCIP). Likewise, the Municipal Mayor
issued a certification that the re is no existing indigenous cultural community or settlement
within the municipality of Abuyog. (See Annex 2-H).
6.3 Site and Right-of-Way Acquisition
The proposed site is an existing 2.02370 kms. barangay road. The right-of-way has been
acquired during construction of the road opening under the previous InFRES program. The
LGU-Abuyog was able to secure 10 meters of right-of-way through donation and/or
acquisition and the owners were properly compensated, so there is no need to secure
another right-of-way since the proposed sub-project will only have a maximum of 8 meters
width inclusive of 1.5 meters shoulder on each side of the road. (The RROW Certification,
Tax Declaration showing MLGU ownership on the acquired RROW and Parcellary Map are
shown in Annexes _______________.)
32 | P a g e
6.4 Damage to Standing Crops, Houses and/or Properties
There are a few new growth coconut trees in the shouder of the barangay road as well as
shrubs and grasses. These need to be removed. There are minor structures like waiting shed
along the road shouder but such is made of temporary and light materials that can be
easily removed. All the safeguards necessary for the removal of the impediments shall be
complied with accordingly by using Form 1 & 2 for SES.
6.5 Physical Displacement of Persons
There are no houses that will be affected or relocated during the project so no persons will
be displaced during and after project completion.
6.6 Economic Displacement of Persons
Being an existing road, no persons will be economically displaced or alienated from their
traditional livelihoods during construction. On the contrary, local residents may find direct
or indirect opportunities as laborers, workers and vendors among others during the road
project implementation.
33 | P a g e
E. Environmental Assessment
7.1 Natural Habitat
The proposed project is not within any protected area or wild life sanctuary nor will it entail
cutting of trees therefore, the natural environment will not be disturbed or affected in any
manner.
7.2 Physical Cultural Resources
There are no historical, cultural, monuments and other physical structures of national
cultural value within the project area that will be affected by the rehabilitation and
concreting works.
7.3 Terrain, Soil Types and Rainfall
The terrain in the project area is basically flat and sprawling fertile plains with no hills nor
mountainous. The whole land area is within the 5% slope limit which is generally flat.
There are five types of soils within the sub-project area. Soil fertility is relatively high
considering that silts and other fertile soil colloids from the upland areas are carried and
deposited by the various river systems into the low lying areas especially during rainy
seasons and seasonal flooding.
The area has no pronounced wet and dry season. Rainfall is almost evenly distributed
throughout the year with an average rainfall of 167.4 mm with maximum rainfall usually
recorded in the months of November to February. Minimum rainfall (100mm/month) usually
occurs in the months of April to May and August to September. There is no single dry month
in these areas. The cool months are October to December each year.
7.4 Drainage Situations and Flooding Potential
With rains evenly distributed throughout the year, the road surface areas and road
shoulders are always under threat of rain water and flooding. These will be mitigated by
introducing road cambers leading the water runoff immediately outside of the roadway
into the intercepting canals and drainage outlets and own to the receiving rivers and
streams. Likewise, trees shall be planted at the edges of the road shoulders to mitigate the
flow of rain water to the road surface and shoulders.
7.5 Impacts During Construction
7.5.1 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control
Erosion and sediment control in construction areas will prevent sediment discharge to
nearby streams and rivers. Areas cleared of vegetation for construction and roadway
development would be minimized and slopes would be stabilized. Overland drainage
would be controlled to prevent channelling and sediment transport by diverting flows
from areas where soils are exposed, and/or by providing filter barriers or settling basins
to remove sediment before the runoff is discharged to surface waters.
34 | P a g e
7.5.2 Construction Noise Mitigation
There are houses and establishments along and nearby the construction site especially
along the built-up areas. The construction involves the operation of heavy equipment
and will undoubtedly generate loud noises. As a mitigating measure, work activities
should be avoided during quiet periods of the day.
7.5.3 Proper Handling of Construction Wastes
The sub-project will generate surplus common excavation materials and debris.
Disposal sites have been identified to haul these surpluses outside the limits of the road
right of way. This will minimize the amount of site litters and will prevent the
indiscriminate dumping of surpluses along the roadsides. Assurances is made by the
LGU that these wastes will be collected and properly disposed of in accordance with
government regulations.
7.5.4 Public and Worker’s Safety
Safety of workers and the public is a must and shall be given utmost priority. Standard
construction safety protocols shall be observed and enforced at all times, such as
posting of road signs, among others.
7.6 Status of Environmental Clearances
The LGU-Abuyog has been issued a Certificate of Non-Coverage (CNC) by the EMBDENR (see Annex 2-D). Likewise, it has pending applications for Environmental
Clearance Certificate (ECC), Quarry Permit (QP) and other government regulatory
clearances required for this project. It is expected that all these clearances will be
obtained by the LGU before actual project implementation.
35 | P a g e
F. Financial Analysis
8.1 Total Project Cost by Financing Source and Cost Sharing
The Total Project Cost (TPC) was computed and derived based on the following:
(a) Field survey results;
(b) Detailed Engineering Design (DED);
(c) prevailing prices of construction materials;
(d) prevailing labor cost in the municipality (but not below the official minimum wage);
(e) prevailing rental cost of equipment in the municipality; and
(f) other relevant information.
Table 23. Total Project Cost by Financing Source and Cost Sharing
Source
Loan / Grant (WB)
GOP counterpart
Equity: LGU counterpart
Amount
12,081,713.91
1,510,214.24
1,510,214.24
% Sharing
80%
10%
10%
Total Project Cost (TPC)
15,102,142.39
100%
Source: EFA_Tabigue-BalocawehayFMR_Tab1_Econ. Cost Revised
As shown in Table 23, the total investment requirement is Php 15,102,142. Per PRDP
guidelines, 90% of TPC will be financed by the Government of the Philippines (GOP) in the
form of a grant, composed of 80% loan proceeds from the World Bank (WB) and 10% GOP
counterpart. The LGU of Abuyog will provide the remaining 10% as counterpart funding in
the form of cash in the amount of Php 1,510,214.
8.2 Total Project Cost Breakdown
Table 24. Total Project Cost Breakdown
Particular
Amount
A. Direct Cost (DC)
11,539,672.03
1. Materials Cost
8,573,593.60
2. Labor Cost
3. Equipment Expenses
294,843.26
2,671,235.18
B. Indirect Cost
1. Overhead, Contigencies and
Miscellaneous Expenses (OCM) – 9% of DC
2. Contractor’s Profit (CP) – 8% of DC
3,562,470.36
3. VAT Component (12% of DC+OCM+CP)
1,618,086.68
Estimated Project Cost (EPC)
Percent
76.4 %
56.8 %
2.0 %
17.7 %
23.6%
1,029,379.59
6.8 %
915,004.08
6.1 %
10.7 %
15,102,142.39
100%
Source: EFA_Tabigue-BalocawehayFMR_Tab1_Econ. Cost Revised
36 | P a g e
8.2.1 Direct Costs
Direct costs amounted to Php 11,539,672 or 76.4 % of TPC. It is composed of cost of
materials (56.8 %), equipment expenses (17.7 %) and cost of labor (2.0 %).
8.2.2 Indirect Costs
On the other hand, indirect costs totaled to Php 3,562,470 or 23.6 % of TPC. It includes
expenses on overhead, contingencies & miscellaneous (6.8 %) and contractor’s profit
(6.1 %). Value-added tax (VAT) is 10.7 % of TPC.
8.3 Status of LGU Equity availability and LFC Certification
The LGU of Abuyog has set aside a budget equivalent to the required cash counterpart of
Php 2,021,938.65 or 10% of TPC. This amount will be sourced from local funds of Abuyog
LGU. Likewise, there is a standby credit line with Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) in case
of a need for funding augmentation. A certification from the Local Finance Committee
(LFC) evidencing the availability of funds is in Annex 2-C.
37 | P a g e
G. Economic Analysis and Evaluation
9.1 The Project Influence Area
9.1.1 Agricultural Production in the Project Influence Area
Barangays Tabigue and Balocawehay are the direct road influence areas of the subproject. They are part of the identified economic growth zones in the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan (CLUP) of the municipality.
Table 25 shows the major agricultural crops of the two barangays. Rice (palay) is widely
produced with a combined area of 462 hectares devoted to it. The next major crop
cultivated is coconut (copra) with 353 hectares. Total area cultivated for the top 5 crops
(including corn, abaca and banana) is around 868 hectares.
Table 25. Agricultural Production Areas (has.), Production Volumes (kgs.) and Values
(Php) of Crops in the Road Influenced Area, 2014.
No. of
turnover/
cropping
seasons/yr.
Current Farm
Gate
Price/Kg.
(Php)
Area
Planted
(in has.)
Average
yield/ha./
cycle (kgs.)
Rice
461.69
4,300
2
3,970,620
27.00
107,206,740.00
Coconut
Crop
Annual
Production
Volume (kgs.)
Total Annual
Production
Value (Php)
353.25
480
4
678,202
25.00
16,955,040.00
Corn
23.00
750
2
34,500
25.00
862,500.00
Abaca
20.00
375
2
15,000
50.00
750,000.00
4
30,390
15.00
455,850.00
Banana
Total
10.13
750
868.07
4,728,712
126,230,130.00
Source: Abuyog Municipal Agriculturist Office (MAO)
It can be observed from the table that rice ranks as the top source of income of the
farmers. Total annual rice production reached 3.97 million kgs. valued at around
Php107.2 million. Coconut/copra production contributes almost Php17.0 million while
corn with Php 0.863 million. Abaca adds Php 0.75 million and banana with Php 0.456
million. Total value of all crops combined is over Php 126.23 million.
9.1.2 Population within the Direct Road Influence Area to Benefit from the Road Project.
The RIA of the proposed sub-project covers the entire geographical and administrative
boundaries of Brgys. Balocawehay and Tabigue.
The two barangays have a combined population of 4,767 of which 2,454 are males and
2,313 are females. There are 1,046 households with average household size of 4.56 as per
DILG-Abuyog’s CBMS Statistics Simulator in 2008. The annual population growth rate of
1.01% which is average for the whole municipality of Abuyog is nearly identical to that of
the whole Leyte province of 1.04%. Economically active population, which is 35% of total
population and are 15 years old and above, is 1,668 persons. Please refer to Table 26 on
the next page.
38 | P a g e
Table 26. Population within the Road Influence Area (RIA), 2008.
Barangay
Population
Balocawehay
Tabigue
Total
Male
Female
3,490
1,277
4,767
2,454
2,313
Economically Active
Population, 15 y.o. & above
(35%)
1,221
447
1,668
No. of
Households
766
280
1,046
Average Household Size = 4.56
Average annual population growth rate = 1.01%
Source: 2008 Abuyog DILG-CBMS Survey
9.1.3 Existing vehicular traffic based on Traffic Survey Results, indicating representative
vehicles, operating days per year, average daily trips, and travelled distance.
To establish vehicular traffic of the road sub-project, a rapid appraisal (actual survey) on
traffic flow was conducted in November 2014. Results are summarized below.
Table 27. Annual Average Daily Traffic, Brgys. Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR, 2014.
Number
of
Vehicle
units
Average
Operating
Days/
Year
Average
Number
of Daily
Trips
Average
Loading
Capacity
(sacks)
Observed
Transport Fares
for Passenger/
Cargo
Average
Travelled
Distance
(kms.)
Motorcycle/
Habal-habal
39
260
43
8
P30 / P30
2.0237
Tricycle
15
260
35
15
P30 / P30
2.0237
Car / Van
4
156
4
-
Jeepney
2
156
3
50
P30 /
P30 / P30
2.0237
2.0237
Truck
6
104
8
100
/ P30
2.0237
Existing Mode of
Transportation
in the Area
Note: Rapid appraisal (actual survey) on traffic flow conducted on November 24-30, 2014.
Several modes of transportation are present in the area. Among these, the most
common is “habal-habal” or single motorcycle with 39 units in operation. There are 15
tricycles, six trucks and two jeepneys in operation. There are also four private vehicles
cars. These vehicles are expected to increase in number over the years when the
concreting of the road will be finished.
9.1.4 Transport Fares, Distances Travelled, Travel Times, by Motorized Vehicles
With improved road conditions, farmers and other residents will be able to transport their
farm products, farm inputs and other commodities faster, cheaper and easier. Results of
a rapid appraisal (actual survey) on traffic flow conducted in November 2014 were
summarized in Table 28.
The transport fare for cargo (per sack) and passenger (per head) are not differentiated
for all types of vehicle at Php 30.00. It is expected that transport fares will be reduced
once the rehabilitation and concreting of the sub-project is completed.
39 | P a g e
Differences in travel times in minutes, without and with project, was also determined. It
takes an average of 10 minutes to traverse the road section with the current/existing
conditions (“without project”) using “habal-habal” as vehicle. On the other hand, it is
expected that with the project, travel time will be reduced to only four (4) minutes.
Table 28. Prevailing Transport Fares by Type of Vehicle, Travel Times and Distances,
Poblacion to RIA Barangays, June 2014.
Prevailing Transport Fare (Php)
Travel Time (one way, in mins.)
Distance
(kms.)
w/out Project
w/ Project
Passenger (per head)
Cargo (per sack)
2.0237
10
4
Php 30.00
Php 30.00
Source: Rapid appraisal (actual survey) on traffic flow conducted on November 24-30, 2014
9.1.5 Commuter Time Savings
With improved road condition, commuters within the influence area will be able to
benefit from the reduction in their travel times. As shown in Table 29, the savings in travel
times to traverse the road section (one way) were converted as percent share of saved
time for work.
The table also shows average of two (2) trips per person per day, a 240-day work year
and average daily wage rate of Php 257. Commuter time savings expectedly could
translate into benefits to the economically active residents.
Table 29. Average Travel Time of Commuters, Poblacion to RIA Barangays, Nov. 2014
Distance
(kms.)
2.0237
Travel Time
(one way, in mins.)
w/out Project
with Project
10
4
Ave. No. of
Trips per
Person/Day
No. of
Working
Days/Year
2
240
% Share of Average Daily
Saved Time for Wage Rate
Work
(Php)
53%
257.00
Source: Rapid appraisal (actual survey) on traffic flow conducted on November 24-30, 2014
9.1.6 Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
The rehabilitation and concreting of the road will stimulate the cultivation of potential
land areas for agriculture. Considering the top two (2) profitable crops of the two
barangays, at least 5 additional hectares can be developed for rice cultivation and at
least 2 hectares per year for the next 5 years, or a total of 10 hectares for coconut.
Considering all relevant costs (land development, production and marketing), these new
cultivated lands have the potential to generate additional revenues/benefits to the
locality and the municipality as a whole.
Table 30. Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
Area
(Has.)
Potential Land
for Cultivation
(Has.)
Farm Gate
Price/Sack
(Php)
Land Dev’t.
Cost per Ha.
(Php)
Production
Cost per Ha.
(Php)
Rice
462
5
25.00
25,000
15,000
15.00
Coconut
353
10
27.00
33,500
13,500
15.00
Total
815
15
Crop
Marketing
Cost per
Sack (Php)
40 | P a g e
9.2 Economic Benefits
The road concreting sub-project when completed will certainly bring tangible and intangible
socio-economic benefits to Barangays Balocawehay and Tabigue and the municipality of
Abuyog as a whole.
The quantifiable benefits ensuing from the project completion are the following:
9.2.1 Vehicle Operating Cost Savings (VOCS)
This was calculated from the projected average annual daily traffic data multiplied by the
vehicle operating cost difference (changes in VOC with and without project scenarios)
and the actual road length.
9.2.2 Transport Cost Savings In Hauling Agricultural Outputs And Inputs
For the purpose of estimating this benefit, only the top three agricultural commodities of
the area (rice, coconut and corn) were considered. The benefit was computed based on
the difference in hauling cost under current and improved (concrete) road conditions
multiplied by quantity of produce that is to be marketed. Likewise, savings in hauling costs
of inputs of production to the farm was also computed using the changes in transport costs
with and without the road project multiplied by the estimated quantity of required inputs,
primarily fertilizers and seeds.
9.2.3 Reduction In Travel Times From Farm To Market In Subproject Areas
The savings in travel time is derived by using the assumption that commuters will benefit
from the changes (reduction) in their travel time, which would translate to increase in
productive time per capita.
9.2.4 Incremental Increase In Crops Production Attributed To Newly Opened Croplands.
Benefits that can be derived from potential agricultural areas that can be cultivated and
used for additonal crop productions (primarily coconut and rice) because of the subproject were also included.
9.2.5 Other benefits
Other benefits that may happen once the road section is fully rehabilitated and concreted
under the proposed project are the following:

Increase in volume of commerce and trade for local products, basic commodities and
manufactured goods;

Increase in the number of passenger motorcycles, cargo trucks and private vehicles
plying the area;

Increased traffic volume of people, goods and services traversing the road section

Government services delivery will be more efficient and accessible for and by the
people living in the area;

Pre- and post-harvest facilities and extension services will be improved;

More primary, secondary and tertiary employment will be generated;

School participation rate among pre-elementary, primary and secondary school
children will increase.
41 | P a g e
9.3 Economic Costs
9.3.1 Capital Cost and O & M Cost Breakdown
Table 31 shows in economic terms, the total amount of investment for the sub-project,
which is Php 13,526,994 and annual operating and maintenance cost amounting to Php
77,446. It must be noted that capital (periodic) maintenance is undertaken every six years
and is approximately 60% higher than regular annual maintenance cost at Php 123,914.
Table 31. Total Investment and Operating & Maintenance Costs of Sub-project
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total Investment
Cost
13,526,994
Operating &
Maintenance Cost
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
Year
Operating &
Maintenance Cost
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab2_InvestCost
9.4 Direct Jobs from Construction
The LGU of Abuyog will see to it that residents of the RIA barangays and/or nearby barangays
will have priority for employment as laborers in the road sub-project implementation. The subproject would need skilled laborers (66% of total labor cost) and unskilled workers (34% of total)
for a total economic cost of labor at Php 240,809.
Unskilled laborers will be assigned as helpers in road concreting, installation of drainage
facilities, and as helpers to heavy equipment operators. Skilled laborers will be hired as team
leaders for various works and as operators of heavy equipment.
9.5. Adjustment of Financial Values to Economic Terms
The total financial cost amounts to Php 16,256,109.60 which comprises the materials,
equipment and labor costs, as well as overhead, contingencies & miscellaneous expenses,
contractor’s profit, and 12% value-added tax. The cost of feasibility study, detailed enginnering
design preparation and engineering supervision is also included, although it is to the account
of LGU-Abuyog. Using the necessary conversion factors provided by PRDP, financial cost is now
adjusted to total economic cost of Php 13,526,993.88. Please refer to Table 32.
42 | P a g e
Table 32. Investment Costs of Sub-project (Financial & Economic)
Cost Item
Financial Cost
(current prices)
Materials
8,573,593.60
Equipment
2,671,235.18
Labor:
Skilled
Unskilled
Subtotal Labor
Total Base/Direct Cost
Overhead, Contingencies and
Miscellaneous (OCM)
Conversion
factors
159,758.17
135,085.09
294,843.26
0.12
0.60
11,539,672.03
1,029,379.59
Economic Cost
7,750,528.61
2,671,235.18
159,758.17
81,051.05
240,809.22
10,662,573.01
0.12
919,088.92
915,004.08
915,004.08
13,484,055.71
12,496,666.02
Taxes (12% on DC+OCM+CP)
1,618,086.68
0.00
FS & DED Preparation + Engineering
Supervision (10% of DC) *
1,153,967.20
Contractor’s Profit
Total (Base/Direct Cost + OCM + CP)
Total Cost
16,256,109.60
0.12
1,030,327.86
13,526,993.88
* - Cost incurred will be shouldered by the proponent LGU.
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab1_Econ. Cost Revised
9.6
Results of the Economic Analysis
The results of the economic analysis are very encouraging.
9.6.1 Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) = 37.32 %
The EIRR equates the present values of the net incremental benefits with the
amount of the initial investment; that is, it is that rate which makes the net present
value (NPV) equal to zero. The computed EIRR of the proposed sub-project is
37.32% which is more than double the required 15%.
9.6.2 Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) = 2.42
BCR is the ratio of the present value of gross benefits to the present value of its cost.
It should be >1 for a project to be considered favorably. The BCR of the proposed
sub-project is 2.42 evaluated using 15% discount rate. In simple terms, for every
Php1.00 of cost, the benefit is equivalent to Php 2.42.
9.6.3 Economic Net Present Value (ENPV) = Php 19,957,413.00
ENPV is the difference between the present worth of the benefits that the project
is expected to yield and the present worth of the construction and maintenance
cost incurred. The ENPV evaluated at 15% discount rate is Php 19,957,413.
9.7 Economic Sensitivity Analysis Results
Sensitivity analysis is being done to test the susceptibility of the proposed project to changes
in variables that directly affect its economic viability. The resulting EIRR, ENPV and BCR are then
evaluated as to the required rates or amounts. These are also compared to that of a base
scenario (no increases nor decreases).
43 | P a g e
Table 33 shows that in all test case scenarios, the EIRR, ENPV and BCR results remain at
acceptable levels. Even with a delay of benefits for 2 years and no benefits accruing from new
agricultural areas cultivated, the indicators are way above the required rates. Hence, the
project proved to be generally robust and unwavering to changes.
Table 33. Sensitivity Analysis, 20-Year Period
Measures
Base
scenario
37%
EIRR
ENPV
(PhP’000)
19,957
2.42
BCR
Costs Increase
Increase of Benefits
Decrease of Benefits
Delay of
Benefits
No
Bene1 year 2 years fits *
+10%
+20%
+50%
+10%
+20%
+30%
-10%
-20%
-30%
34%
31%
25%
41%
45%
48%
34%
30%
26%
24%
18%
31%
9,757
11,597
4,058
13,457
1.69
1.83
1.29
1.96
18,553 17,149 12,935 23,358 26,758 30,158 16,557 13,157
2.20
2.02
1.61
2.66
2.91
3.15
2.18
1.94
* No benefits deriving from new agricultural land
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab10_Sensitivity Analysis
9.8
List of Attached Models /Detailed Tables of EFA Templates (Please see Annex)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
Table 34.
Table 35.
Table 36.
Table 37.
Table 38.
Table 39.
Table 40.
Table 41.
Table 42.
Table 43.
Table 44.
Table 45.
Table 46.
Table 47.
Economic Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis
Investment and Maintenance Costs
Annual Road Maintenance Cost
Transport Data by Vehicles Type
Projected No. of Vehicles per Day
Projected Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Standard Vehicle Operating Cost Savings
Total Annual Vehicle Operating Cost Savings by Vehicle Type
Benefits - Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC) Savings
Benefits - Savings in Output Hauling
Benefits - Savings in Input Hauling
Benefits - Savings in Travel Time for Commuters
Benefits of Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
H. Conclusions and Recommendations
10.1 Conclusions
The findings of this study are very conclusive and serve to reinforce the initial stand that the
proposed sub-project is feasible in all aspects of marketing, technical, operational, social and
environmental dimensions. Moreover, the results of the financial and economic analysis all the
more support this contention.
10.2 Recommendations
With the aforementioned conclusion, the municiplaity of Abuyog, Leyte is highly
recommending for the approval of this feasibility study and implementation of the proposed
road project since it is highly regarded to contribute largely to the social and economic wellbeing of the farmers and other residents within the influence areas, as well as the surrounding
barangays, to the municipality of Abuyog and to the province of Leyte as a whole.
44 | P a g e
ANNEX 1: Models/Detailed Tables of EFA Templates
Table 34. Economic Analysis
Inputs (Php'000)
Total Investment (Economic Value)
Total Operating (Maintenance) Cost
Total Inputs
Incremental Benefits (Php'000)
0
1
2
13,527
13,527
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
124
124
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
2,829
618
198
410
791
2,858
618
198
434
916
2,887
618
198
461
916
2,916
618
198
489
916
2,946
618
198
518
916
2,976
618
198
550
983
3,006
618
198
583
1,058
3,037
618
198
618
1,133
3,068
618
198
656
1,208
3,099
618
198
696
1,283
0
4,846
5,024
5,080
5,137
5,196
5,325
5,463
5,604
5,748
5,894
Net Incremental Benefits (Php'000)
(13,527)
4,768
4,947
5,002
5,060
5,119
5,201
5,386
5,527
5,670
5,816
Inputs (Php'000)
Total Investment (Economic Value)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
VOC Savings
Savings in Output Hauling Costs
Savings in Input Hauling Costs
Savings in Travel Time for Commuters
Earnings fr. New Cultivated Agri. Land
Total Incremental Benefits
77
77
124
124
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
124
124
77
77
77
77
3,130
618
3,162
618
3,194
618
3,227
618
3,260
618
3,293
618
3,326
618
3,360
618
3,394
618
3,429
618
Savings in Input Hauling Costs
198
198
198
198
198
198
198
198
198
198
Savings in Travel Time for Commuters
738
782
830
880
934
990
1,050
1,114
1,181
1,253
1,359
6,043
5,965
1,359
6,119
5,995
1,359
6,199
6,121
1,359
6,282
6,204
1,359
6,368
6,290
1,359
6,457
6,380
1,359
6,551
6,474
1,359
6,648
6,525
1,359
6,750
6,673
1,359
6,856
6,779
Total Operating Cost (Maintenance)
Total Inputs (Php'000)
Incremental Benefits (Php'000)
VOC Savings
Savings in Output Hauling Costs
Earnings fr. New Cultivated Agri. Land
Total Incremental Benefits (Php'000)
Net Incremental Benefits (Php'000)
Economic NPV @15% (Php ’000)
EIRR
BCR
19,957.41
37.32%
2.42
Total Present Value of Project Benefits (Php ’000)
Total Present Value of Project Costs (Php ’000)
Net Present Value (NPV) (Php ’000)
34,001.70
14,044.29
19,957.41
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab9_EconAnalysis
45 | P a g e
Table 35. Sensitivity Analysis on Costs, Benefits and Delays (Php‘000)
Scenarios
Year 
0
1
2
Note: Discount rate= 15%
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Incremental Benefits
base scenario
0
4,846
5,024
5,080
5,137
5,196
5,325
5,463
5,604
5,748
5,894
benefits +10%
benefits +20%
benefits +30%
benefits -10%
benefits -20%
benefits -30%
benefits delayed 1 year
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,330
5,815
6,299
4,361
3,877
3,392
-4,846
5,527
6,029
6,532
4,522
4,020
3,517
5,024
5,588
6,096
6,604
4,572
4,064
3,556
5,080
5,651
6,164
6,678
4,623
4,110
3,596
5,137
5,716
6,235
6,755
4,677
4,157
3,637
5,196
5,857
6,389
6,922
4,792
4,260
3,727
5,325
6,010
6,556
7,102
4,917
4,371
3,824
5,463
6,165
6,725
7,286
5,044
4,483
3,923
5,604
6,323
6,897
7,472
5,173
4,598
4,023
5,748
6,483
7,073
7,662
5,305
4,715
4,126
5,894
benefit delayed 2 years
0
-4,846
-5,024
5,080
5,137
5,196
5,325
5,463
5,604
5,748
5,894
no benefit from new agri. land
0
4,055
4,109
4,164
4,221
4,280
4,342
4,405
4,471
4,540
4,611
base scenario
13,527
77
77
77
77
77
124
77
77
77
77
costs +10%
costs +20%
costs +50%
costs delayed 1 year
14,880
16,232
20,290
13,527
85
93
116
0
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
136
149
186
124
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
costs delayed 2 years
13,527
0
0
77
77
77
124
77
77
77
77
base scenario
-13,527
4,768
4,947
5,002
5,060
5,119
5,201
5,386
5,527
5,670
5,816
costs +10%
-14,880
4,761
4,939
4,994
5,052
5,111
5,188
5,378
5,519
5,663
5,809
costs +20%
-16,232
4,753
4,932
4,987
5,044
5,103
5,176
5,370
5,511
5,655
5,801
costs +50%
-20,290
4,730
4,908
4,964
5,021
5,080
5,139
5,347
5,488
5,632
5,778
benefits +10%
-13,527
5,253
5,449
5,510
5,573
5,638
5,733
5,932
6,087
6,245
6,406
benefits +20%
-13,527
5,737
5,952
6,018
6,087
6,158
6,266
6,478
6,648
6,820
6,995
benefits + 30%
-13,527
6,222
6,454
6,526
6,601
6,678
6,798
7,025
7,208
7,395
7,585
benefits -10%
-13,527
4,284
4,445
4,494
4,546
4,599
4,668
4,840
4,966
5,096
5,227
benefits -20%
-13,527
3,799
3,942
3,986
4,032
4,080
4,136
4,293
4,406
4,521
4,638
benefits -30%
-13,527
3,315
3,440
3,478
3,518
3,560
3,603
3,747
3,846
3,946
4,048
-13,527
-4,846
4,947
5,002
5,060
5,119
5,201
5,386
5,527
5,670
5,816
benefits delayed 2 years
-13,527
-13,527
-4,846
3,977
-5,024
4,031
5,002
4,086
5,060
4,144
5,119
4,203
5,201
4,218
5,386
4,328
5,527
4,394
5,670
4,462
5,816
4,533
Project Costs
Net Incremental Benefits
46 | P a g e
Table 35. Sensitivity Analysis on Costs, Benefits and Delays (Php‘000)
Scenarios
Year 
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PV a/
Base Scenario
6,043
6,119
6,199
6,282
6,368
6,457
6,551
6,648
6,750
6,856
34,002
benefits +10%
6,647
6,731
6,819
6,910
7,005
7,103
7,206
7,313
7,425
7,542
37,402
benefits +20%
7,251
7,343
7,439
7,538
7,641
7,749
7,861
7,978
8,100
8,228
40,802
benefits +30%
benefits -10%
benefits -20%
7,856
5,438
4,834
7,955
5,507
4,895
8,058
5,579
4,959
8,166
5,653
5,025
8,278
5,731
5,094
8,395
5,812
5,166
8,516
5,896
5,241
8,643
5,984
5,319
8,775
6,075
5,400
8,913
6,171
5,485
44,202
30,602
27,201
benefits -30%
4,230
4,283
4,339
4,397
4,457
4,520
4,586
4,654
4,725
4,799
23,801
6,043
6,119
6,199
6,282
6,368
6,457
6,551
6,648
6,750
6,856
25,574
6,043
6,119
6,199
6,282
6,368
6,457
6,551
6,648
6,750
6,856
17,976
4,684
4,761
4,840
4,923
5,009
5,099
5,192
5,290
5,392
5,498
27,501
Incremental Benefits
Project Costs
77
124
77
77
77
77
77
124
77
77
14,044
costs +10%
costs +20%
costs +50%
85
93
116
77
136
149
186
124
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
136
149
186
124
85
93
116
77
85
93
116
77
15,449
16,853
21,066
13,977
77
124
77
77
77
77
77
124
77
77
Base Scenario
13,918
EIRR
ENPV a/
BCR
Base Scenario
5,965
5,995
6,121
6,204
6,290
6,380
6,474
6,525
6,673
6,779
37.3%
19,957
2.42
costs +10%
5,958
5,983
6,114
6,196
6,283
6,372
6,466
6,512
6,665
6,771
34.0%
18,553
2.20
costs +20%
5,950
5,971
6,106
6,189
6,275
6,365
6,458
6,500
6,657
6,763
31.2%
17,149
2.02
costs +50%
5,927
5,933
6,083
6,165
6,252
6,341
6,435
6,463
6,634
6,740
25.0%
12,935
1.61
benefits +10%
6,570
6,607
6,741
6,832
6,927
7,026
7,129
7,189
7,348
7,464
41.0%
23,358
2.66
benefits +20%
benefits + 30%
benefits -10%
benefits -20%
benefits -30%
benefits delayed 2 years
7,174
7,778
5,361
4,757
4,152
5,965
5,965
4,607
7,219
7,831
5,383
4,771
4,160
5,995
5,995
4,637
7,361
7,981
5,501
4,882
4,262
6,121
6,121
4,763
7,460
8,089
5,576
4,948
4,320
6,204
6,204
4,846
7,564
8,201
5,654
5,017
4,380
6,290
6,290
4,932
7,672
8,317
5,734
5,089
4,443
6,380
6,380
5,022
7,784
8,439
5,818
5,163
4,508
6,474
6,474
5,115
7,854
8,519
5,860
5,195
4,530
6,525
6,525
5,166
8,023
8,698
5,998
5,323
4,648
6,673
6,673
5,314
8,150
8,836
6,093
5,408
4,722
6,779
6,779
5,420
44.6%
48.2%
33.7%
30.0%
26.3%
24.1%
17.6%
30.6%
26,758
30,158
16,557
13,157
9,757
11,597
4,058
13,457
2.91
3.15
2.18
1.94
1.69
1.83
1.29
1.96
Net Incremental Benefits
a/ - Discount rate= 15%
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab10_SensitivityAnalysis
47 | P a g e
Table 36. Investment and Maintenance Costs
Costs
Year 
Total Investment (Economic value)
Total Operating (Maintenance) Cost
Total Inputs
Costs
Year 
Total Operating
(Maintenance) Cost
Total Inputs
0
13,526,994
13,526,994
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
12
13
14
15
16
17
11
123,914
123,914
9
-
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
18
19
20
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
123,914
77,446
77,446
Note: Total operating (maintenance) cost is approx. +60% of annual operating cost every six years.
Table 37. Annual Road Maintenance Cost
Costs
Year 
Road length (kms.) Portland Cement
Concrete Pavement (PCCP)
Unit Maintenance cost
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2.02370
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
1. Subtotal Annual Maintenance cost
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
2. Capital maintenance every 6th year a/
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
46,468
123,914
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
Annual Maintenance cost
Total Annual Maintenance cost
Costs
Year 
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP)
Unit Maintenance cost
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
38,270
1. Subtotal Annual Maintenance cost
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
77,446
2. Capital maintenance every 6th year a/
0
77,446
46,468
123,914
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
0
77,446
46,468
123,914
0
77,446
0
77,446
Annual Maintenance cost
Total Annual Maintenance cost
a/ Approximately 60% of annual maintenance cost
48 | P a g e
Table 38. Transport Data by Vehicles Type (Source: InFRES 2006)
Vehicles
Car/ Van
Jeepney
Motorcycles
Elasticities
Traffic Growth rate
1.80
1.50
1.10
1.0360 %
1.0300 %
1.0220 %
Total Road Length= 2.02370 kms.
Vehicles
Tricycle
Trucks
Per capita income growth rate= 2.00
Elasticities
Traffic Growth rate
1.10
1.00
1.0220 %
1.0200 %
Ave. population growth rate = 1.01
Table 39. Projected No. of Vehicles per Day = No. of units X Traffic Growth Rate
Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Car / Van
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Jeepney
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Motorcycle
39
39
40
40
41
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
Tricycle
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
Truck
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Table 40. Projected Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) = (# Vehicles) X (# Trips/day) X (# days/year)
Year
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Trips/ day
Days/ year
Car / Van
2,522
2,548
2,574
2,601
2,628
2,655
2,683
2,711
2,739
2,767
2,796
2,825
2,854
2,883
2,913
2,943
2,974
3,005
3,036
3,067
4
156
Jeepney
946
955
965
975
985
995
1,006
1,016
1,026
1,037
1,048
1,058
1,069
1,080
1,092
1,103
1,114
1,126
1,137
1,149
3
156
Motorcycle
440,476
444,978
449,525
454,120
458,761
463,449
468,186
472,971
477,804
482,687
487,621
492,604
497,638
502,724
507,862
513,052
518,296
523,593
528,944
534,350
43
260
Tricycle
137,895
139,304
140,728
142,166
143,619
145,087
146,570
148,068
149,581
151,110
152,654
154,214
155,790
157,382
158,991
160,616
162,257
163,915
165,591
167,283
35
260
Truck
5,043
5,094
5,146
5,199
5,252
5,305
5,360
5,414
5,469
5,525
5,582
5,638
5,696
5,754
5,813
5,872
5,932
5,992
6,054
6,115
8
104
49 | P a g e
Table 41. Standard Vehicle Operating Cost Savings (PhP)
Surface Condition
Vehicle Type
Car/ Van
Jeepney
Motorcycle
Tricycle
Truck
Paved
Good (A)
Very Bad (B)
7.807
12.670
6.483
11.199
1.034
4.372
2.705
8.048
13.182
26.253
9.010
15.385
7.588
14.934
1.093
2.148
2.879
8.395
16.609
34.990
Gravel
Good (C)
Very Bad (D)
Vehicle Operating Cost
Difference
Vehicle Type
Car/ Van
Jeepney
Motorcycle
Tricycle
Truck
Gravel (D-C)
4.863
6.375
4.716
7.346
3.338
1.055
5.343
5.516
13.071
18.381
Gravel-Paved (D-A)
7.578
8.451
1.114
5.690
21.808
Paved (B-A)
Total Road Length (kms.) = 2.02370
Table 42. Total Annual Vehicle Operating Cost Savings* by Vehicle Type (PhP)
Year
Car / Van
Jeepney
Motorcycle
Tricycle
Truck
2015
38,674
2016
39,075
2017
Total
16,173
993,010
1,587,841
222,558
2,858,256
16,339
1,003,159
1,604,069
224,828
2,887,470
39,480
16,507
1,013,411
1,620,462
227,122
2,916,982
2018
39,889
16,678
1,023,768
1,637,023
229,438
2,946,796
2019
40,302
16,849
1,034,231
1,653,754
231,779
2,976,915
2020
40,719
17,023
1,044,801
1,670,655
234,143
3,007,341
2021
41,141
17,198
1,055,479
1,687,729
236,531
3,038,078
2022
41,568
17,375
1,066,266
1,704,978
238,944
3,069,130
2023
41,998
17,554
1,077,163
1,722,403
241,381
3,100,499
2024
42,433
17,735
1,088,172
1,740,006
243,843
3,132,189
2025
42,873
17,918
1,099,293
1,757,789
246,330
3,164,202
2026
43,317
18,102
1,110,527
1,775,753
248,843
3,196,543
2027
43,766
18,289
1,121,877
1,793,901
251,381
3,229,214
2028
44,219
18,477
1,133,343
1,812,235
253,945
3,262,219
2029
44,677
18,667
1,144,925
1,830,756
256,535
3,295,561
2030
45,140
18,860
1,156,626
1,849,466
259,152
3,329,245
2031
45,608
19,054
1,168,447
1,868,368
261,795
3,363,272
2032
46,080
19,250
1,180,389
1,887,463
264,466
3,397,648
2033
46,558
19,449
1,192,452
1,906,753
267,163
3,432,374
2034
47,040
19,649
1,204,639
1,926,240
269,888
3,467,456
* VOC Savings for particular year= (the difference in VOCs for the surface type with and without
project) X (projected annual average daily traffic per vehicle type) X (actual road length).
Source of Tables 31, 32, 33, 34, & 35: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab4a Vehicle Data.
50 | P a g e
Table 43. Benefits - Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC) Savings
Benefits
Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Motorcycle/"Habal-habal"
Total number
Number of trips per day
Number of days in operation
Subtotal
unit
trip/day
day/year
Php
39
43
260
982,964
39
43
260
993,010
40
43
260
1,003,159
40
43
260
1,013,411
41
43
260
1,023,768
41
43
260
1,034,231
41
43
260
1,044,801
42
43
260
1,055,479
42
43
260
1,066,266
43
43
260
1,077,163
unit
trip/day
15
35
15
35
15
35
15
35
16
35
16
35
16
35
16
35
16
35
16
35
Tricycle
Total number
Subtotal
Cars/Vans
Total number
Subtotal
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
1,571,777
1,587,841
1,604,069
1,620,462
1,637,023
1,653,754
1,670,655
1,687,729
1,704,978
1,722,403
unit
trip/day
day
Php
4
4
156
38,278
4
4
156
38,674
4
4
156
39,075
4
4
156
39,480
4
4
156
39,889
4
4
156
40,302
4
4
156
40,719
4
4
156
41,141
4
4
156
41,568
4
4
156
41,998
unit
trip/day
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
16,008
16,173
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
6
8
104
220,311
7,132,504
6
8
104
222,558
7,205,385
6
8
104
224,828
7,279,011
6
8
104
227,122
7,353,389
6
8
104
229,438
7,428,527
6
8
104
231,779
7,504,433
6
8
104
234,143
7,581,115
6
8
104
236,531
7,658,580
7
8
104
238,944
7,736,836
7
8
104
241,381
7,815,893
day/year
Php
Jeepney
Total number
day
Subtotal
Truck
Total number
Subtotal
Total Benefits
unit
trip/day
day
PhP
Notes: 1. VOC Difference per Vehicle Type, (see Table 41. Standard VOCS - DPWH standard):
(a) Motorcycle = 1.114 (c) Car/Van = 7.578 (e) Truck = 21.81
(b) Tricycle
= 5.690 (d) Jeepney = 8.451
2. Road length = 2.02370 kms.
3. Total VOCS per Vehicle Type= No. of Vehicles X No. of Trips/Day X No. of Days
Operation/Year X VOC Difference X Road Length
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab4_VOC Saving
51 | P a g e
Table 43. Benefits - Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC) Savings
Benefits
Unit
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
unit
trip/day
day/year
Php
43
43
260
1,088,172
44
43
260
1,099,293
44
43
260
1,110,527
45
43
260
1,121,877
45
43
260
1,133,343
45
43
260
1,144,925
46
43
260
1,156,626
46
43
260
1,168,447
47
43
260
1,180,389
47
43
260
1,192,452
unit
trip/day
17
35
17
35
17
35
17
35
17
35
17
35
18
35
18
35
18
35
18
35
day/year
260
1,740,006
260
1,757,789
260
1,775,753
260
1,793,901
260
1,812,235
260
1,830,756
260
1,849,466
260
1,868,368
260
1,887,463
260
1,906,753
unit
trip/day
day
Php
4
4
156
42,433
4
4
156
42,873
5
4
156
43,317
5
4
156
43,766
5
4
156
44,219
5
4
156
44,677
5
4
156
45,140
5
4
156
45,608
5
4
156
46,080
5
4
156
46,558
unit
trip/day
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
156
16,008
7
8
104
243,843
3,130,461
7
8
104
246,330
3,162,292
7
8
104
248,843
3,194,448
7
8
104
251,381
3,226,933
7
8
104
253,945
3,259,750
7
8
104
256,535
3,292,902
7
8
104
259,152
3,326,393
7
8
104
261,795
3,360,226
7
8
104
264,466
3,394,405
7
8
104
267,163
3,428,933
Motorcycle/"Habal-habal"
Total number
Subtotal
Tricycle
Total number
Subtotal
Cars/Vans
Total number
Subtotal
Php
Jeepney
Total number
day
Subtotal
Truck
Total number
unit
trip/day
day
Subtotal
Total Benefits
PhP
Notes: 1. VOC Difference per Vehicle Type, (see Table 41. Standard VOCS - DPWH standard):
(a) Motorcycle = 1.114 (c) Car/Van = 7.578 (e) Truck = 21.81
(b) Tricycle
= 5.690 (d) Jeepney = 8.451
2. Road length = 2.02370 kms.
3. Total VOCS per Vehicle Type= No. of Vehicles X No. of Trips/Day X No. of Days
Operation/Year X VOC Difference X Road Length
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab4_VOC Saving
52 | P a g e
Table 44. Benefits - Savings in Output Hauling Costs a/
Benefits
Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Hauling cost
Current hauling cost b/
Estimated hauling cost
Php/sack
Php/sack
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
30.00
20
Hauling cost saving
Php/sack
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Rice
Average production/ha. per year c/
Area planted
Total output
sack
ha
sack
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
172
462
79,412
% of harvest brought to poblacion
Total volume of harvest marketed
%
sack
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
60%
47,647
Sub-total savings in hauling cost
Php
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
Area planted
sack
ha
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
38.4
353
Total output
sack
%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
13,564
99%
sack
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
13,428
Php
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
Corn
Area planted
Total output
sack
ha
sack
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
30
23
690
%
sack
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
99%
683
Php
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
Php
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
Coconut
Total Savings in Hauling Cost
a/ Influence area covering the barangay
b/ Brgy. Tabigue – Brgy. Balocawehay
c/ One sack = 50 kgs.
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab5a_Savings Output Hauling
53 | P a g e
Table 44. Benefits - Savings in Output Hauling Costs a/
Benefits
Unit
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Hauling cost
Php/sack
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Hauling cost saving
Php/sack
Php/sack
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
20
10
Area planted
sack
ha
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
172
462
Total output
sack
%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
79,412
60%
sack
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
47,647
Php
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474 476,474.40
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
476,474
Rice
Coconut
Sack
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
Area planted
Total output
ha
sack
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
353
13,564
%
sack
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
99%
13,428
Php
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
134,284
Area planted
Total output
sack
ha
sack
%
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
30
23
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
690
99%
sack
683
683
683
683
683
683
683
683
683
683
Php
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
6,831
Total Savings in Hauling Cost
Php
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
617,589
Corn
a/ Influence area covering the barangay
b/ Brgy. Abaca – Brgy. Panda
c/ One sack = 50 kgs.
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab5a_Savings Output Hauling
54 | P a g e
Table 45. Benefits - Savings in Input Hauling Costs a/
Benefits
Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Hauling cost
Php/sack
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Php/sack
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Hauling cost saving
Php/sack
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
16
4
20
462
9,234
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
16
4
20
23
460
6,900
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
Rice
Mineral fertilizer
Seeds d/
Total number of sacks
Area planted
Total fertilizer and seeds
Copra
Mineral fertilizer
Seeds d/
Area planted
sack/ha
sack/ha
sack/ha
ha
sack
Php
sack/ha
sack/ha
sack/ha
ha
sack
Corn
Mineral fertilizer c/
Seeds d/
Area planted
sack/ha
sack/ha
sack/ha
ha
sack
Php
Total savings in hauling cost
Php
a/
b/
c/
d/
Relevant or applicable only to the Road Influenced Area (RIA) Barangays
For the distance from Brgy. Abaca – Brgy. Panda
2 croping season per year. 8 sacks of mineral fertilizer per cropping season
Certified seeds: 2 sacks per hectare (1 sack=50 Kg), 2 croping seasons
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab5b_Savings Input Hauling
55 | P a g e
Table 45. Benefits - Savings in Input Hauling Costs a/
Benefits
Unit
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Php/sack
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Php/sack
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Php/sack
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
sack/ha
sack/ha
sack/ha
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
16
4
20
ha
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
sack
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
9,234
Php
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
138,510
sack/ha
sack/ha
sack/ha
ha
sack
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
10
10
353
3,532
Php
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
52,985
sack/ha
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
sack/ha
sack/ha
ha
sack
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
4
20
23
460
Hauling cost
Hauling cost saving
Rice
Seeds d/
Area planted
Copra
Mineral fertilizer
Seeds d/
Area planted
Corn
Seeds d/
Area planted
Php
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
6,900
Total savings in hauling cost
Php
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
198,395
a/ Relevant or applicable only to the Road Influenced Area (RIA) Barangays
b/ For the distance from Brgy. San Juan to Poblacion
c/ 2 croping season per year. 8 sacks of mineral fertilizer per cropping season
d/ Certified seeds: 2 sacks per hectare (1 sack=50 Kg), 2 croping seasons
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab5b_Savings Input Hauling
56 | P a g e
Table 46. Benefits - Savings in travel time for commuters
Benefits
Projected population a/
Unit
person
Est'd. % of econ. active population
35%
Estimated number of economically
active population
person
% of commuters in econ. active pop.
person
Number of one way trips per day
trip/day
Total number of trips, all commuters
Time saving for commuters b/
Total time saving in min
Total time saving in days c/
Share of saved time used for work
Net total time saving in days
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4,767
4,815
4,864
4,913
4,963
5,013
5,063
5,114
5,166
5,218
1,668
1,685
1,702
1,720
1,737
1,754
1,772
1,790
1,808
1,826
834
843
851
860
868
877
886
895
904
913
50%
Estimated number of commuters
Number of working days
1
w.day
trip
min/trip
min
w.day
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
400,428
404,472
408,557
412,684
416,852
421,062
425,315
429,611
433,950
438,333
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
2,402,568 2,426,834 2,451,345 2,476,104 2,501,112 2,526,373 2,551,890 2,577,664 2,603,698 2,629,996
5,005
5,056
5,107
5,159
5,211
5,263
5,316
5,370
5,424
5,479
2,653
2,679.63
2,706.69
2,734
2,762
2,790
2,818
2,846
2,875
2,904
53%
w.day
Average labor cost d/
PhP/w.day
257
270
284
298
313
328
345
362
380
399
Labor cost (economic)
PhP/w.day
154
162
170
179
188
197
207
217
228
240
409,608
434,433
460,762
488,686
518,303
549,715
583,030
618,365
655,840
695,588
Time saving value
PhP
a/ Population growth rate = 1.01%
b/ 10 min before and 4 min after subproject
c/ 60 min x 8 working hours = 480 min
d/ Assumed to increase by 5% annually
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab6_Travel Time Commuters
57 | P a g e
Table 46. Benefits - Savings in Travel Time for Commuters
Benefits
Projected population a/
Est'd. % of econ. active population
Estimated number of ec.active
population
Unit
person
person
50%
Estimated number of commuters
person
Number of one way trips per day
trip/day
Number of working days per year
Total number of trips for all
commuters
Time saving for commuters b/
w.day
Total time saving in days c/
Share of saved time used for work
Net total time saving in days
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5,271
5,324
5,378
5,432
5,487
5,543
5,599
5,655
5,712
5,770
1,845
1,863
1,882
1,901
1,921
1,940
1,959
1,979
1,999
2,019
922
932
941
951
960
970
980
990
1,000
1,010
35%
% commuters in econ.active pop.
Total time saving in min
11
trip
min/trip
min
w.day
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
442,760
447,232
451,749
456,311
460,920
465,575
470,278
475,027
479,825
484,672
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
2,765,521 2,793,452
2,821,666
2,850,165
2,878,952
2,908,029
2,656,559 2,683,390 2,710,492 2,737,868
5,534.50
5,590
5,647
5,704
5,762
5,820
5,878
5,938
5,998
6,058
2,933
2,962.91
2,993
3,023
3,054
3,084
3,116
3,147
3,179
3,211
40%
w.day
Average labor cost d/
PhP/w.day
419
440
462
485
510
535
562
590
619
650
Labor cost (economic)
PhP/w.day
252
264
277
291
306
321
337
354
372
390
737,744
782,455
829,875
880,170
933,513
990,088
1,050,093
1,113,733
1,181,231
1,252,820
Time saving value
PhP
a/ Population growth rate = 1.01%
b/ 10 min before and 4 min after subproject
c/ 60 min x 8 working hours = 480 min
d/ Assumed to increase by 5% annually
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab6_Travel Time Commuters
58 | P a g e
Table 47. Benefits of newly cultivated agricultural land (rice and coconut)
Benefits
Unit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rice
Newly Cultivated Agri. Land
Average Production/Ha./Year b/
Total Output
Output Price (farm gate) c/
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
sack
ha
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
sack
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
PhP/kg.
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
Output Value b/
PhP
1,075,000
Land Development Cost/Ha.
PhP
25,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Production Cost/Ha
PhP
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
PhP/sack
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
Php
217,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
Php
857,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
ha
2
2
2
2
2
-
Marketing cost
Total Cost
Net Benefit
Coconut
Newly Cultivated Agri. Land a/
Total Output
sack
2
4
6
8
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
sack
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
154
230
307
PhP/kg.
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
27
27
27
Output Value b/
PhP
-
-
-
-
-
-
103,680
207,360
311,040
414,720
PhP
33,500
33,500
33,500
33,500
33,500
-
-
-
-
-
Production Cost/Ha
PhP
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
Marketing cost
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,536
3,072
4,608
6,144
Php
67,000
67,000
67,000
67,000
67,000
-
28,536
57,072
85,608
114,144
Net Benefit
Php
(67,000)
(67,000)
(67,000)
(67,000)
(67,000)
-
75,144
150,288
225,432
300,576
TOTAL BENEFITS
Php
790,800
915,800
915,800
915,800
915,800
982,800
1,057,944
1,133,088
1,208,232
1,283,376
Total Cost
PhP/sack
a/ Potential new agri. land for coconut = 5 has., to be developed in increments of 1 hectares for the first 5 years.
b/ May vary according to Region
c/ 1 sack = 50kgs
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab7_New Agri. Area
59 | P a g e
Table 47. Benefits of newly cultivated agricultural land (rice and coconut)
Benefits
Unit
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Rice
Newly Cultivated Agri. Land
Total Output
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
sack
ha
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
172
sack
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
860
PhP/kg.
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
1,075,000
Output Value b/
PhP
PhP
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Production Cost/Ha
PhP
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
PhP/sack
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
17,200
Php
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
92,200
Php
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
982,800
ha
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
sack
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
38.40
sack
384
384
384
384
384
384
384
384
384
384
Marketing cost
Total Cost
Net Benefit
Coconut
Newly Cultivated Agri. Land a/
Total Output
PhP/kg.
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
518,400
Output Value b/
PhP
PhP
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PhP
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
PhP/sack
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
7,680
Php
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
142,680
Net Benefit
Php
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
375,720
TOTAL BENEFITS
Php
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
1,358,520
Production Cost/Ha
Marketing cost
Total Cost
a/ Potential new agri. land for coconut = 5 has., to be developed in increments of 1 hectares for the first 5 years.
b/ May vary according to Region
c/ 1 sack = 50kgs
Source: EFA_Tabigue-Balocawehay FMR_Tab7_New Agri. Area
60 | P a g e

Feasibility Study TABIGUE-BALOCAWEHAY

Transcription

Similar documents

HeRAMS - World Health Organization

studio unit Avida Tower Makati west - Phil

A Fat Sack

Rita Victor and Michael Davis Coldwell Banker Honig

Almond Olive and Citrus Committees Website

File Processing Using PHP on IBM i

Page Views

UP ISSI Website

happy boats project