Handouts - Plan Kaua`i
Transcription
Handouts - Plan Kaua`i
Integrating the Goals & Programs of the Multimodal Land Transportation Plan into the General Plan Update For CAC Meeting #12 Discussion, May 9, 2016 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Transportation Goals & Objectives Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments on these Goals and Objectives? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Comments on these Goals and Objectives? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Transit Program Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Bicycle Program Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Pedestrian Program Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY County Roads Program Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Land Use Program Proposal = INCORPORATE Comments? Is anything missing? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Ag Transportation Program Proposal = DO NOT INCORPORATE Do you agree with the proposal to not incorporate Agricultural Transportation as a topic within the Transportation section of General Plan Update, and instead address the MLTP’s Ag Transportation recommendations in other relevant GP sections (Agriculture, Economic Development, Bicycles, Transit, etc.)? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Policies Proposed to be ADDED to the General Plan Update • • • • • • Encourage coordination and collaboration between the County and State Department of Transportation in land transportation planning. Establish priorities for transportation projects across modes and across jurisdictions. Create partnerships for transportation funding. Further refine performance measures for transportation projects. Incorporate context-sensitive design into transportation projects. Identify transportation components to be included in Community Plans. Are there other Transportation-related policies or issues that you think should be considered for inclusion in the GP Update? FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Chapter 5: Implementation The systems analysis included two different scenarios: Group A projects (potential projects that can be implemented within 5 years) and Group B projects (potential projects that will be implemented beyond 5 years). The analysis considered both fiscally constrained and unconstrained scenarios. Projects for both groups were selected based on their collective benefits and being most beneficial to meeting the project purpose, goals, and objectives. Group A projects include the following: »» Widening the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road north of Olohena Road – By providing one travel lane in the northbound direction, drivers will have an alternate northbound connection from downtown Kapaa to the north. (Project 6) »» Widening Kuhio Highway between the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road (southern terminus) and Kuamoo Road – This project would improve capacity by adding one southbound lane to the highway, and would improve intersection operations at Haleilio Road and Kuamoo Road. (Project 27) »» Extending the right-turn lane from Kuamoo Road – By lengthening this lane to at least 650 feet, more right-turning vehicles would be able to move through the intersection without being blocked by left-turns. (Project 33) »» Optimizing traffic signals on Kuhio Highway – Traffic signals at Kukui Street, Haleilio Road, and Kuamoo Road should be optimized to more efficiently serve northbound and southbound traffic on Kuhio Highway. (Project 17, 31, and 34) The fiscally constrained Group B scenario includes: »» Widening Kuhio Highway between Kuamoo Road and Kapule Highway – This project extends the 4-lane cross section of Kuhio Highway from the Wailua Bridge to Hanamaulu by adding one southbound lane. This project provides nearly 3 miles of capacity and eliminates the need for daily operations of the contraflow lane (an annual cost of $1,165,000/year). (Project 38) 5-2 Additional projects included in an unconstrained Group B scenario are: »» Terminate Hauaala Road at Kuhio Highway – This project takes advantage of the proposed fully two-way Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road. It reduces the volume of left-turns to and from Kuhio Highway, which improves traffic flow northbound and southbound, by creating a new direct bridge connection to the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road. (Project 3) »» Intersection improvements in downtown/ historic Kapaa Town – Improving the Niu Street intersection with Kuhio Highway would relieve traffic at Lehua Street and at Kukui Street by giving vehicles another option to access the highway. Closing the east leg of Kukui Street would allow the intersection to shrink, making it easier for pedestrians to cross. (Projects 16 and 20) »» Kapaa New Park – A new direct access from the park to the new Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road would improve circulation and relieve pressure from Kahau Road by providing an alternative access option. (Project 8) »» Extend Pouli Road – This project improves and extends the existing Pouli Road from Waipouli Town Center to the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road. This new connection allows local trips to move between Kapaa and Waipouli Town Center without having to use Kuhio Highway. (Project #23) »» Extend Eggerking Road – Extending Eggerking Road to the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road would improve access between Wailua and Kapaa. When combined with the Pouli Road extension, this project would operate as an alternative to Kuhio Highway and increase travel options between Wailua and Waipouli. (Project #24) Performance Criteria The Group A and Group B packages were evaluated based on the following two performance criteria, consistent with the purpose, goals, and objectives of the project: 1. Travel time – The time it takes a vehicle to travel from one end of the study area to the other. In the AM peak, travel times are most Chapter 5: Implementation EXHIBIT 5-4. Priority Project Recommendations Project Number 6 (Group A) 27 (Group A) 33 (Group A) 17, 31, 34 (Group A) 38 (Group B constrained) 8 (Group B) 16, 20 (Group B) 3 (Group B) Project Type Project Location Kapaa Commuter Temporary Bypass Road, north of Local Olohena Road Project Description Add one lane in the northbound direction, including pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Improve the intersection at Kuhio Highway and the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road (northern terminus). Kuhio Highway between Commuter Temporary Kapaa Add one southbound lane along Kuhio Highway with Local Bypass Road and improvements at major intersections. Kuamoo Road Provide shared left/right and right-only turn movements Commuter Kuhio Highway at from Kuamoo Road approach during contraflow Local Kuamoo Road operations to improve queue/delay. Provide adequate right turn storage length. Local Modify existing signal timing to optimize signal Kuhio Highway – Traffic operation and reduce queueing length along Kuhio Signal Optimization Highway at Kukui Street, Haleilio Road, and Kuamoo Road. Kuhio Highway between Commuter Kuamoo Road and Add one southbound lane. Kapule Highway Cost Estimate $22,560,000 $30,000,000* $613,000 $1,124,000 $43,458,000 SUBTOTAL COST (fiscally constrained): $67,750,000 $4,102,000 Local Kapaa New Park Create a direct access from Kapaa New Park to the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road, including bicycle/ pedestrian access between the existing park and proposed soccer park. Business Intersection improvements in downtown/historic Kapaa Town Improving the Niu Street intersection with Kuhio Highway would relieve traffic at Lehua Street and at Kukui Street by giving vehicles another option to access the highway. Closing the east leg of Kukui Street would allow the intersection to shrink, making it easier for pedestrians to cross. $642,000 Terminate the eastern end of Hauaala Road with a cul-de-sac. Create a new connection from Hauaala Commuter Hauaala Road at Kuhio Road to the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road. Local Highway (This project should be complete after (or with) the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road is widened for twoway travel – Project 6). $3,924,000 24 (Group B) Business Local Eggerking Road Extension Extend Eggerking Road to connect with the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road (combine with Project 23, if feasible). 23 (Group B) Business Local Pouli Road Extension Improve Pouli Road and extend mauka to connect with the Temporary Kapaa Bypass Road (combined with Project 24, if feasible). $6,453,000 $24,406,000 * The funds for this project have already been obligated and are not included in the subtotal and total costs. 5-7 Exhibit 4-4. Potential Long-Range Capacity Solutions Route Number Jurisdiction Project Title Estimated Cost FY 2011 ($) Project Description 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Anonui Street to Additional 2 travel lanes to allow for safe Kipu Road (Phase 1B) passage of vehicles $22,324,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Kipu Road to Vicinity of Haiku Airstrip (West of Humane Society, M.P. 3.47. Phase 1C) $22,324,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Vicinity of Haiku Highway improvements Airstrip (West of Humane Society, M.P. 3.47) to Huleia Bridge (Phase 2) $58,487,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Huleia Bridge to Highway improvements West of Kahili Mountain Park Road (Approx. 1000 ft, Phase 3) $55,807,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Kahili Mountain Highway improvements Park Road to Koloa Road $71,435,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Kalaheo Town to Koloa Road $33,485,000 50 State Kaumualii Highway - Hanapepe Road Additional 2 travel lanes to Eleele Road 51 State Kapule Highway Additional 2 travel lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks $98,116,000 56 State Kuhio Highway - Kapule Highway to Mailihuna Road Additional 2 travel lanes $128,029,000 520 County Poipu Road - Lawai Road to Ala Kinoiki Road Improve existing roadway to include bike lanes, sidewalks, and intersection improvements. $6,725,000 570 State Ahukini Road - Kuhio Highway to Kapule Highway Improve airport access including realignment $41,696,000 and illumination. Additional 2 travel lanes with sidewalks and bike lanes or a bicycle path 580 State Kuamoo Road - Kuhio Highway to Kamalu Road Improve existing roadway to include bike lanes and sidewalks $30,344,000 581 County Kamalu Road - Kuamoo Road to Olohena Road Improve existing roadway to include bike lanes and sidewalks $14,958,000 5860 County Kawaihau Road - Kuhio Highway to Mailihuna Road Improve existing roadway to include bike lanes and sidewalks $10,116,000 N/A County Lihue-Hanamaulu Bypass Road Construct a new 2-lane Lihue-Hanamaulu Bypass Road along existing agriculture road alignment $115,415,000 N/A State N/A County Additional 2 travel lanes to allow for safe passage of vehicles Additional 2 travel lanes to allow for safe passage of vehicles $12,873,000 Kapaa Relief Route - Kapule Highway Construct the Kapaa Relief Route between to Kapaa Stream Kapule Highway and Kapaa Stream Northern Leg of the Western Access Road $600,000,000 Construct a new 2-lane, signed shared $20,000,000 roadway from Koloa Road and the completed section of the Ala Kalanikaumaka intersection to Maluhia Road and Ala Kinoiki intersection Note: This list is organized by State Route number and not by priority. Although not listed here, capacity solutions also include safety improvements and multimodal facilities. This list is not fiscally constrained and these solutions would have to be compared against those of other necessary programs, such as system preservation and safety, when decisionmakers make funding recommendations. Page 4-10 Chapter IV. Potential Solutions Kaua‘i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan Executive Summary This page is intentionally left blank Executive Summary Overview The Multimodal Land Transportation Plan (MLTP) outlines steps the County of Kaua‘i will take to achieve a balanced multimodal transportation system through the planning horizon year of 2035. This is the County’s first Multimodal Land Transportation Plan (MLTP) and will serve as the plan for county roads and streets, public transit, bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, agricultural needs, and as a means to integrate land use planning with transportation system development. The preparation of this plan was guided by the most recent County General Plan and was designed to serve as the transportation section of the next General Plan Update. It will be used to guide policies, ordinances, the allocation of transportation funding, the prioritization of transportation projects, and future transportation plans throughout the County. Transportation Challenges There are a number of challenges the County will face in maintaining and improving its land transportation system to serve residents, visitors and agricultural needs through 2035. The most pressing will be accommodating a growing population while preserving the rural character and high quality of life that is so important to the people of Kaua‘i. Other transportation challenges identified by residents and community leaders include: Scenario Analysis A future scenario analysis was used to guide development of programs and action items described in this plan. Using multiple performance indicators, two potential future scenarios were described. The Baseline Scenario shows where Kaua‘i would be in 2035 given current trends, while the Preferred Scenario identifies the interventions that would be required to implement the County General Plan. The Baseline Scenario assumes no intervention in travel behavior which would result in a 19% increase in traffic levels island-wide as well as a 15% increase in the average cost of transportation per household by 2035. Under the Preferred Scenario traffic levels would remain the same through 2035 (see chart below) and household transportation costs would be reduced by 6% by 2035. Comparison of island-wide annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) through 2035 under the Baseline and Preferred Scenarios. ¾¾ The existing and forecast increasing cost of a transportation system mostly reliant on imported petroleum fuel; ¾¾ Meeting the increasing demand for public transit; ¾¾ The high percentage (85-90%) of foods imported from out of state combined with limited access for households to affordable, local, healthy foods; ¾¾ The limited choice to travel within and between towns by modes other than driving; ¾¾ The lack of safe places to walk and bicycle, particularly for children; and ¾¾ Public health issues related to transportation including the limited access to "active transportation" (walking and bicycling) The goals and objectives of this plan were formulated to address these and other challenges to achieve the vision in the County General Plan. Kaua‘i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan September 2012 The basic idea behind the Preferred Scenario is to prevent growth in island-wide vehicle miles of travel above the 2010 level despite an anticipated increase in the resident and visitor populations. ES-1 Executive Summary Implementation of the Preferred Scenario would result in far reaching outcomes that support many of the goals of this plan (see table below). These include reduced energy consumption, no increase in traffic levels (reducing the need to widen roads), reduced household transportation costs, increased levels of physical activity, and an increase in the use of the non-driving modes of transportation. The 2020 and 2035 Preferred Scenario indicators will serve as policy targets for the County to implement this plan. Indicator Difference between 2010 and 2035 2010 Level Baseline Preferred 771.5 million 19% 0% 9,496 3% 18% 29.7 million 13% 27% 365 29% 40% 274 million 13% 27% SOV* Mode Share 54.4% 0% 28% MOA* Mode Share 38.7% 0% 2% Transit Mode Share 0.4% 32% 839% Walk Mode Share 4.5% 0% 156% Annual VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) Annual VMT per Capita Annual Gallons of Motor Fuel Consumed Annual Gallons of Motor Fuel Consumption per Capita Annual GHG Emissions from Ground Transport (kg) Bike Mode Share 2.0% 0% Fatalities from Motor Vehicle Collisions per 100 Million VMT 1.30 0% 15% 1,641 71% 1,002% 57% 0% 32% $ 14,860 15% 6% Weekday Transit Ridership % of Adults Meeting the Minimum Levels of Physical Activity** Average Annual Household Transportation Costs 274% *SOV - Single Occupant Vehicle, MOA - Multiple Occupant Auto ** The CDC recommends adults get 30 minutes of moderate exercise 5 days a week to maintain a healthy lifestyle In 2010 the average household VMT in Kaua‘i was 25,000 compared to 20,000 nationwide. Kaua‘i Households also spent an estimated average of $2,400 more on transportation than the nationwide average Kaua‘i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan September 2012 In 2010 0.4% of all trips in Kaua‘i were made by transit and 4.5% of all trips were made by walking. In comparison, across the- All U.S.,Trips transit trips accounted for 1.9% of all Baseline Mode Share trips and walk trips accounted for 10.4% of all trips 2010 2020 Walk Bicycle Transit 4.5% 2.0% 0.4% 2035 Walk Bicycle Transit 4.5% 2.0% 0.5% Walk Bicycle Transit 4.5% 2.0% 0.5% Accomplishing the Preferred Scenario will require a gradual shift in some of the drive-alone trips that dominate island travel today to other modes of transportation such as walking, bikMOA MOA MOA SOV below). The SOV SOV ing, and38.7% transit (see charts programs, elements, and implementation actions de38.7% 38.7% 54.4% 54.3% 54.3% scribed in this plan include strategies that the County, the State and other agencies will deploy between now and 2035 to make this happen. The Preferred Scenario mode share of all person trips for 2020 and 2035 (shown here) will Preferred Mode Share All Trips serve as policy targets for the-County to implement this plan. 2010 2020 Walk Bicycle Transit 4.5% 2.0% 0.4% MOA 38.7% SOV 54.4% Transit 1.3% 2035 Walk Bicycle 7.6% 3.6% Bicycle 7.6% Transit 3.6% MOA 38.3% SOV 49.2% Walk 11.5% MOA 37.9% SOV 39.4% * SOV = Single-Occupant Vehicle, MOA = Multiple-Occupant Auto ES-2 Executive Summary Programs This plan includes six programs as part of implementing an island-wide multimodal transportation network: a transit program, a bicycle program, a pedestrian program, a county roads program, an agriculture transportation program, and a land use program. Transit Program The transit program includes a mix of strategies intended to continue the recent growth in transit ridership. These strategies include increasing operating revenue, increasing external funding, increasing county transit appropriations, and using savings and increased funding to ramp up transit services. The 2035 transit mode share policy target is to achieve a transit mode share of nearly 4% of daily trips, which is equivalent to 18,000 weekday riders (up from 1,600 in 2010). Bicycle Program The bicycle program is intended to achieve the County’s policy target of an 8% bicycle mode share of all resident and visitor trips by 2035 (up from 2% today). This program recognizes four concepts about bicycle facility development: 1.Regular investment in bicycle infrastructure will benefit both residents and visitors 2.A bicycle system requires a well-connected bicycle network 3.The bicycle program is tightly integrated with the county roads program (particularly in managing safe vehicular traffic speeds) 4.Development of a bicycle network will bring economic benefits to Kaua‘i. Pedestrian Program The transit program includes strategies to meet the County's policy target of growing transit ridership to 6,000 weekday trips by 2020, and 18,000 weekday trips by 2035 The County has set a 2035 policy target for pedestrian mode share at 12% all person trips, up from 5% in 2010. To encourage more pedestrian trips, this plan describes short and long term pedestrian program components. Each of these components addresses planning and infrastructure improvements that would alleviate the primary deterrents to walking expressed by the public, including the lack of safety, connectivity, and attractiveness of the pedestrian infrastructure. County Roads Program The county roads program is driven by several key principles: limit road widening, accommodate all modes of transportation, protect scenic road corridors, support freight transport, reduce excessive speeding, improve the safety of streets for all users, and prevent future traffic growth. Kaua‘i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan September 2012 ES-3 Executive Summary Agriculture Transportation Program Implementation The agriculture transportation program is designed to support Kaua‘i’s effort to achieve food This plan takes an action-based approach to meeting Kaua‘i’s mobility, circulation, and access independence and increased sustainable agriculture. The County will focus its transportation needs. Given the likelihood of limited funding opportunities and resources available to the efforts toward this by taking the following approach: County for the foreseeable future, the County will utilize the following strategies to implement this plan: ¾¾ Reducing the cost of transporting and processing locallygrown farm products; 1) Invest resources in the most important things first; ¾¾ Protecting against disruption of on-island transportation networks during storms or other emergency events; 2) Avoid programs, projects, and actions that are unnecessary and lead to unintended consequences: and ¾¾ Improving access by residents and visitors to healthy foods; and 3) Initiate a performance monitoring and reporting system that tracks progress over time. ¾¾ Ensuring agriculture workers have affordable and reliable access to their jobs. Land Use Program Land use and transportation are inextricably linked. The land use program recognizes this by addressing critically important design criteria and development guidelines, without which, much of the transportation components of this plan would be difficult to implement. The land use program is guided by the three principle requirements for sustainable development: compactness, completeness and connectedness. By following these principles the County will set forth a path to “keeping Kaua‘i rural,” a core vision of the County General Plan. To achieve the greatest possible integration of funding and investment, a permanent Transportation Coordinating Committee (TCC) will be established to oversee development of this plan (see diagram below). The TCC will consist of representatives from various local and state agencies, and the community. Also included in this plan are a list of the highest priority projects from each of the six programs, a funding strategy to aide in implementation, and a three year action plan. KAUA'I MULTIMODAL LAND TRANSPORTATION PLAN Transportation Coordinating Committee (TCC) CIP prioritization and implementation Project scheduling Funding allocation Public agency coordination Liaison for transportation related efforts By enacting this plan the County sets the stage for developing a balanced multimodal transportation system that is integrated with land development patterns and that protects and enhances public health, quality of life, economic vitality and the unique character and heritage *The TCC willof consist of the following the Garden Isle. representatives: County Planning Department, County Public Works Department, County Executive on Transportation, Hawai’i DOT, Kaua’I County Office of Economic Development, citizen active in promoting transportation programs Kaua‘i Multimodal Land Transportation Plan September 2012 ES-4 KAUA‘I COUNTY COUNCIL February 2016 1 2 3 4 What is the Problem? What is Happening Now on Kaua‘i? What Could Transit Look Like on Kaua‘i? Where Are We in the Process? 2 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? CONGESTION… CONGESTION… CONGESTION… Source: The Garden Island 4 Source: Honolulu Star-Bulletin TRANSIT IS PART OF A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY TO ADDRESS CONGESTION • We need to have an “all of the above” strategy to address congestion • Comprehensive strategy includes: – – – – Improving auto capacity Improving roadway network Improving transit Improving pedestrian and bicycle options • Provide transportation options for residents and visitors 5 OVERALL TRANSIT STRATEGY Goal: Develop a plan for transit on Kaua‘i to work more effectively and efficiently Transit Feasibility Study Shuttle Recommendations for North Sh Shore, South Shore, and East Side Sh Mainline Coordination M Operations Plan Financial Plan Action Plan Partnership Opportunities Draft Complete: 2016 Short-Range Transit Plan Systemwide Recommendations Including LƯ huދe and West Side Paratransit Operations Plan Including Capital Improvements Financial Plan Phasing Plan Metrics for Evaluation Draft Complete: TBD 10-YEAR TRANSIT PLAN 6 OVERALL TRANSIT STRATEGY • Transit Program 2035 goals: – Continue to accelerate recent growth in transit ridership – Transform trip making from less than 1% on transit today to almost 4% of trip making by 2035, a nine-fold increase – Improve facilities at and near bus stops – Update fare structure and fare collection technology – Improve transit information – Improve service planning – Convert the fleet to sustainable energy sources 7 WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW ON KAUA‘I? TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGE • Kaua‘i is growing • Accommodate growing population while preserving rural character and high quality of life on Kaua‘i 9 /Ʈ+8 (ދIS A PRIMARY FOCUS OF TRAVEL DEMAND 10 RESIDENTS WITH GREATER TRANSIT NEEDS ARE DISPERSED 11 EXISTING RIDERSHIP IS STRONGEST IN /Ʈ+8 (ދAND KAPA‘A 12 WHEN SERVICE INCREASES, RIDERSHIP RESPONDS 70,000 900,000 800,000 60,000 50,000 600,000 500,000 40,000 400,000 30,000 300,000 Revenue Hours Passenger Trips 700,000 20,000 200,000 10,000 100,000 0 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 Passenger Trips 2012 2013 2014 Revenue Hours Source: The Kaua‘i Bus 13 A VARIETY OF OUTREACH ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED • Stakeholder interviews: – – – – – – • Resort associations and groups Community associations Kaua‘i Visitors Bureau Transit Advisory Committee .ĩODXHD Point National W ildlife Refuge HDOT Three open houses: – 43 sign-ins, estimated 80 participants • Online survey (508 respondents) – – – – – 412 full-time residents (6+ months/year) 39 part-time residents (2-6 months/year) 57 visitors 33 regular transit riders (3+ times/month) 403 non-regular/non-transit riders 14 OUTREACH INFORMS THE STRATEGY • There is collective interest in an alternative visitor model to reduce rental car use • There is latent demand for improved bus service for residents • The Kaua‘i Bus can’t do it all—partnerships supporting a common vision are key • Transit is not for everyone 15 VISITOR ATTITUDES ABOUT CARS AND TRANSIT ARE CHANGING • Majority (89%) of visitors rent a car because there are few other viable options • Some visitors choose a hotel because shuttle service is available – Examples include: Kaua‘i Beach Resort, Kaua‘i Marriott Resort, Hanalei Colony Resort • Kaua‘i needs to remain competitive in a global market 16 SURVEY SUMMARY • The primary transportation concern among residents and visitors is increasing traffic levels – “Too many cars on the road” is the number one concern (40%) – Over 80% of non-frequent transit users drive alone • Visitors would consider using transit – 40% of visitors would “definitely” use transit – 44% would “perhaps” use transit for certain trips • For residents who do not currently ride the bus, routing and frequency are important considerations – “If the bus went where I needed to go” (40%) – Improved frequency (20%) • For those that currently use transit, the primary purpose is to commute to work or school – 55% of current riders use transit to commute to work or school 17 WHAT COULD TRANSIT LOOK LIKE ON KAUA‘I? INITIAL SHUTTLE CONCEPT 19 SHUTTLE CONCEPT THEMES • South Shore: – Connect .ŇORD to .DOĆKHR and /ĩKXދe – Connect PoދLSş to .ŇORD 20 SHUTTLE CONCEPT THEMES • North Shore: – Implement North Shore Shuttle (.ĩODXHD to .ēދē Beach) 21 SHUTTLE CONCEPT THEMES • East Side: – Connect Kapahi and Wailua to Kapa‘a and mainline transit service 22 OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTNERSHIP AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP • Opportunities for partnership – .ĩODXHD Point National Wildlife Refuge Access Management Plan – +Ćދena State Park Master Plan/ .ēދē Beach – Resort industry • Opportunity to expand entrepreneurship – – – – – Airport services South Shore Shuttle Resorts to Port Allen South Shore to North Shore North Shore Shuttle 23 SHUTTLE CONCEPT STRATEGIES • Provide frequent and direct service • Strive to serve residents first – North Shore will be about equally focused on residents and visitors • Resorts provide connections to County’s mainline and shuttles • Work with visitor industry to improve attractiveness and visibility of airport shuttle service • Provide enhanced information and joint promotion of alternative travel methods to visitors 24 WHERE ARE WE IN THE PROCESS? WHERE ARE WE IN THE PROCESS? • Working on operations plan, infrastructure plan, financial plan, recommendations, and an action plan for implementation • Creating recommendations to better integrate mainline and shuttle service 26 Tim Payne (206) 357-7524 [email protected] Cristina Barone (206) 428-1928 [email protected]