from BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise
Transcription
from BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise
HELSINKI COMMISSION HELCOM HOD 20/2006 Heads of Delegation 20th Meeting Helsinki, Finland, 14-15 December 2006 Agenda Item 3 Matters arising from the HELCOM Groups Document code: 3/1/Add1 Date: 24.11.2006 Submitted by: Executive Secretary THE REPORT OF THE EXERCISE EVALUATION TEAM (EET) FROM BALEX DELTA 2006 EXERCISE Referring to the outcome of HELCOM RESPONSE 7/2006 (cf. document 3/1, Paragraphs 17-18), the Meeting is invited to take note of the EET report on the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise conducted on 5-7 September 2006 in Gdynia, Poland. Note by Secretariat: FOR REASONS OF ECONOMY, THE DELEGATES ARE KINDLY REQUESTED TO BRING THEIR OWN COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS TO THE MEETING 1 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 The EET Report from BALEX DELTA 2006 EXERCISE 1. Preface According to the decision of the Sixth Meeting of HELCOM Response and its exercise plan Poland was arranged and hosted the annual HELSINKI CONVENTION Operational Exercise BALEX DELTA in September 2006. In the name of the Ministry of Maritime Economy, the organiser of the BALEX DELTA 2006 was the Maritime Search and Rescue Service in Gdynia. The aim of the exercise was to test the HELCOM Response system, its command and communication system and the co-operation between response units (including the response equipment) of the Contracting Parties. The scope of the exercise was oil spill response. The equipment part of BALEX DELTA 2006 took place outside Gdynia on September 6, 2006. Poland has started as a national table top exercise already on September 5. The communication part of the exercise BALEX BRAVO has been executed as on September 5 as well. This report is divided into two parts; the Report from BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise and BALEX BRAVO 2006 Exercise, which is presented in Attachment 1. Additionally during the exercise the film in English and Polish versions has been produced. 2. BALEX BRAVO 2006 EXERCISE The exercise was executed by MRCC Gdynia in cooperation with the monitoring centre of the Director of maritime Office in Gdynia – the VTMS Gulf of Gdansk. All notification tasks and procedures are harmonized with the HELCOM Manual, Volume 1 and adopted to Polish low. Additionally, this was the task of VTMS Gulf of Gdansk, the procedure of the use of SAFE-SEA-NET as the notification platform has been tested. During the test, there was no response for SSN alerts, so the conclusions are as follow: 1. The use of SSN as a platform for oil spill accidents notification and POLREP sending should be discussed with EMSA and the wider application of SSN should be discussed further during Response Group Meeting. 2. The next test should be prepared better and preceded by relevant information. The report from BALEX BRAVO 2006 Exercise is presented in Attachment 1. 3. BALEX DELTA 2006 EXERCISE 3.1. Command control and coordination. The exercise was coordinated by the following staff from the SAR Service: • Capt. Janusz Maziarz – Exercise Coordinator • Wojciech Rolbiecki – SOSC • Jerzy Kiszczak – member of SOSC staff • Capt. Wojciech Kowalczyk – member of SOSC staff The Exercise Evaluation Team consists of: • Marek Reszko – Poland • Hans Hjelm – Sweden • Olev Luhtein – Estonia 2 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.2. Scenario and Exercise Area On September 5 at 08.00, in the area of the Gulf of Gdansk, a general cargo vessel collided with an oil tanker having a cargo of around 30 000 tons of light crude oil. Besides cargo, the oil tanker has some 1.200 tons of heavy fuel oil (IFO 180) and 120 tons of marine diesel oil as bunker. There is an immediate discharge of around 6 000 tons drifting towards the Polish and Russian coasts. Additionally, the continuous release of 2000 tons raises potential threat to the marine environment. 3.3. Exercise area & HELCOM Grid. BALEX DELTA 2006 took place at the vicinity of the Gdynia Harbour. There were two reserved places and because of weather conditions, the spare area has been used. For both areas the HELCOM Grid has been prepared and used successfully during the exercise The decision about which area should be taken was made during the captain’s meeting. The vessel “WIATR” from the SAR Service has made an early morning survey of the region and reported about the wind force and the sea state. 3.4. Participating vessels There were present 24 vessels and 3 aircrafts during the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise. They represent 7 countries: Denmark, Finland, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Russian Federation and Sweden. Additionally, the European Commission was present actively, through two vessels chartered by European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), in the frame of technical support of European maritime regions. Those commercial vessels, the pool of five small tankers and bunkers are equipped with oil spill combating equipment could be taken from two stocks located in Danish Strait (Copenhagen) and the Gulf of Finland (Poorvo). This gives the great additional value to third tier of the Baltic response system, both in recovery rate and especially in storage capacity. 3 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.5. Oil spill combating capacity to be used on scene: Name MHV 903 Hjortoe MHV 901 Enoe Hylje Bottsand Scharhoern Call Sign Owner OVLC OVLA OIMG DRNR DGOQ Vilm Sakiai Balkhan KBV 202 Otilia Breeze DFGH LYKP UBXL SMLA OVIP2 LASV5 Kapitan Poinc Zodiak Vivero St. Barbara Planeta Sztorm 2 Wiatr Powiew Bryza R-14 H-7 SG-311 SG-211 SQRU SQLX J8B2559 J8B2227 SOMG SQFY SPLT SPG2461 SPLW R-14 H-7 SQSO SQSA Boom Home Guard Home Guard Finnish Navy Navy Ministry of Transport Umweltministerium Mecklenburg Vorpommeren Klaipeda State Port Authority Lukoil-Kaliningradmorneft Swedish Coast Guard Vessel chartered by EMSA Vessel chartered by EMSA 320 320 800 SAR Service Maritime Office Gdynia PETROBALTIC PETROBALTIC Maritime Office Szczecin SAR Service SAR Service SAR Service SAR Service Polish Navy Polish Navy Polish Border Guard Polish Border Guard Total oil spill combating capacity 1200 Recovery rate Storage capacity 96 320 640 800 790 430 320 200 320 228 160 280 280 104,00 8828 2992,00 512,00 72 500 280 160 40 3640 2776 15076 500 Most of all vessels came on scene with its standard equipment. A quick assessment of the response capacity could be used during the accident leads to the conclusion: • The length of oil booms: 3640 m • The recovery rate: 2776 m3/h • The storage capacity: 15.076 m3/h. A significant increase of the storage capacity was possible mainly because of presence of EMSA vessels. Calculated capacity, in the opinion of the EET was sufficient for needs of the response to accident simulated in the scenario. 3.6. Meteorological conditions. Date 05.09.2006 06.09.2006 Wind NNW 7 W-SW 4-5 Sea state 4 2-3 Water temp. Air temp. 18 C 18 C 18 C 18 C Visibility Good Good Following the survey made in the morning on both planned areas of the exercise by the Polish patrol vessel “WIATR”, the decision was taken at the captain’s meeting: Because of safety reason, the spare area of exercise should be used. 4 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.7. Oil spill modeling As the oil drift and behaviour forecasting the SEATRACK WEB, a model from the Swedish Hydrological and Meteorological Institute has been run twice. First time on 5 September, as a support tool for the national table top exercise and BALEX ECHO Exercise, to make hypothetical situation much more real. Second time on 6 September to calculate the drift of the oil simulant, to determine the best place and time for its application. Models were run for different areas, first one for the main area of exercise, second for the spare one. Both forecasts are presented below. 5 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.7. Command and control The command and control for BALEX DELTA 2006 is presented on scheme below VTMS GULF OF GDANSK MONITORING CENTRE SANTA BARBARA SIMULANT AERIAL SURVEILANCE MRCC GDYNIA COMMAND CENTRE KAPITAN POINC SOSC YELLOW TEAM BOOM 1 SZTORM 2 H-7 BLUE TEAM BOOM 2 POWIEW PLANETA KBV 2002 NOSC MHV 903 HJORTOE RESPONSE TEAM ALFA MHV 901ENOE BOTTSAND SCHARHOERN NOSC VILM RESPONSE TEAM BRAVO OTILIA SAIKIAI GREEN TEAM BOOM 3 WIATR R-14 ZODIAK RESPONSE TEAM CHARLIE BREEZE RED TEAM BOOM 4 SG-211 SG-311 VIVERO NOSC KAPITAN POINC NOSC Information lines Command lines during boom deployment operation Command lines during recovery operation 6 HYLIE RESPONSE TEAM DELTA HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.9. Tactics The response tactics was based on the concept that Polish units deploy oil booms, configure them and work on appointed sectors of the exercise area and determined by the HELCOM Grid. Then appearing foreign response units are formed into task forces, turned towards particular sectors, where cooperate with boom teams. Elements of change command and control as also included. The scheme of command is presented in paragraph 3.8. Exercise communication plan was agreed during the captain’s meeting. The whole exercise from the beginning was monitored by the VTMS Gulf of Gdansk, where AIS and radar systems were used. The VTMS terminals were installed at MRCC Gdynia and on 6 of September onboard vessels KAPITAN POINC (SOSC) and ZODIAK (for testing). Additionally the application “Small Harbours” was run to facilitate coming to and leaving the Gdynia Harbour as well as proper order of berthing and unberthing for safety reason. The whole monitoring is recorded and gives additional possibility for exercise assessment. Pictures below present the situation and maneuvering during the exercise. 7 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.10. Observers, public relations, etc. There were 81 observers officially registered, from all Baltic countries and the Netherlands, Slovenia and UK. This number includes a dozen representatives of media. All observers, during the exercise, stayed onboard the vessel “AGAT”, where the lunch was served. There were planned two press conferences, during the brief preliminary meeting on 5 September and after the debriefing on 6 September. Besides HELCOM representatives, representatives of the SAR Service and Polish maritime administration were available during the voyage of the vessel of observers. During the briefing on 5 September all new participants to the BALEX DELTA 2006 have receive HELCOM Flags. There were established rules for HELCOM Fleet membership. Permanent member is a ship which fulfils pollution combating requirements (recovery possibility onboard plus storage capacity). Any other ship can be a temporary member, during the exercise. The total number of participants including crew members, observers, guests and engaged staff of the SAR Service were close to 400. As usual the social meeting of all participants took place and the rowing competition was organized. This time the HELCOM Trophy, a diving helmet went to Finland. Congratulations. 3.11. Oil simulation During the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise in Gdynia there was applied the new type of oil simulating substance. The concept has been developed in cooperation between the Chemistry Faculty of the Technical University in Gdansk and the SAR Service. The expanded “perlite” is the mineral substance several times lighter then water, white coloured and well visible on the water service. The main advantage of it is that such type of simulant is absolutely non harmful to the environment. Perlite is the volcano rock appearing in many places in the world. After crumbling and short thermal treatment in the temperature between 900 – 1000 C, the substance gets the density less then 1 kg/m3 and the porous and semi-porous structure. Photo. Expanded perlite with grains of different diameter. From the right side grains less then 1 mm to be used as an oil simulating substance. 8 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 Chemical and physical properties are as follow: Chemical composition [%] SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO + MgO K2O + Na2O TiO2 pH of water suspension Apparent density [kg/m3] Parts sinking [%] Average grain diameter [mm] Specific surface estimated [m2/g] 53 – 60 21 – 31 4–7 1–3 1–4 <1 6,5 – 7,5 ca.400 ca.5 0,175 0,9 Taking account its properties, washing ashore perlite does not differ from the beach sand and is not visible. During the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise at least a little bit over 12 cubic meters of “perlite” have been applied. The substance was “spilled” from the vessel SANTA BARBARA, on the eastern and north-eastern part of the exercise area in two portions. The idea was to cover the whole area of the exercise and let all combating teams to follow the slick and then try to “response” without the use of a real recovery. Unfortunately, because of to heavy wind the simulating substance has drifted to fast and left the exercise area. So, to strong dependence from the wind, is the disadvantage of the method. Anyway this relationship is no so important as in popcorn use. The presented picture above shows that the perlite is quite good material for oil slick visualization. 9 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.12. Comments and evaluation General comments 1. Visiting big harbour by the HELCOM FLEET is becoming entirely difficult logistic operation. In case of BALEX DELTA 2006 it was done perfectly. 2. During the exercise there were different on 5th and 6th September meteorological conditions. On the area – rectangle 1.9 x 2.55 Nm there were 25 ships on scene. These make safety threats. Therefore areas for exercise including spare one should be prepared beforehand, taking account various meteorological and hydrological conditions. Chosen area should be cleaned from fishing nets and secured. 3. Regarding BALEX ECHO 2006 Exercise communication and information exchange with National Contact Points (except Estonia) was done satisfactory. 4. The use of SafeSeaNet as a platform for oil spill accidents notification and POLREP sending should be discussed with EMSA and the wider application of SSN should be discussed further during Response Group Meeting. 5. The use of oil simulation was very good but only from the visual point of view. During the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise the wind force was 10 – 15 m/s. In our opinion the use of “perlite” has limitation up to 6-8 m/s. 6. The use of HELCOM Grid confirmed its usefulness. But the grid should be treated rather flexibly as geographical coordinates for instance, because more and more ships use electronic charts. 7. The use of permanent monitoring during the exercise seems to be very hopeful. Both from the safety and when recorded educational points of view. So the idea should be developed. 8. The communication plan for the exercise was done during the captain’s meeting and worked quite well. 9. All teams worked very well, however the boom deployment part should be done a little bit earlier, to avoid awaiting other vessels. But the exercise brought the new experience – Polish vessel KAPITAN POINC is able to take and deploy 1,800 meters of boom within few hours. 10. Due to some delay of Russian vessel, the Response Team Delta work individually however according to the command order. But it did not break the concept as both KAPITAN POINC and HYLIE have huge recovery area coverage and could work as did. 11. Aerial surveillance work very well and they made quite good observations. Further comments (SOSC, NOSC, EET members, observers) 1. HELCOM Grid facilitates communication. Thanks to, communication was short, clear and understandable. 2. The level of knowledge and skills of ships crews was pretty high to execute and coordination of the whole operation. 3. The use of the patrol vessel “WIATR” for boom deployment support was very successful idea. 4. The large number of vessels on scene causes that the team formation should be kept nationally as much as possible. However because of presence of EMSA vessels, the multinational concept has to be considered. 5. During the Balex Delta exercise vessels stay at sea for s short period of time. Therefore both the scenario and particular tasks for teams should be simple. 6. The oil simulation was pretty good however because floating substance looks similar to the sea foam, the use of coloured perlite should be considered. 10 HELCOM HOD 20/2006, document 3/1/Add1 3.13. Thanks and congratulations Maritime Search and Rescue Service thanks all participating units for excellent cooperation and well done job. We would like to thank all supporting units and persons for their support and interest. Especially we would like to thank to: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HELCOM Secretariat HOD’s of HELCOM Response European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) European Commission DG Environment EUMAREX – Exchange of Experts in the Field of Marine Pollution Participants, observers & invited guests Ministry of Maritime Economy, Poland Polish Navy Polish Border Guard Maritime Boards: Gdynia, Slupsk & Szczecin City Hall - Gdynia Pomeranian Voivodship National & Regional Headquarters of the State Fire System Regional Police Authority Custom Office in Gdynia 11 BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO The Report from Communication Exercise POLREP BALTIC Introduction According to the decision of the Sixth Meeting of HELCOM Response and its exercise plan Poland has arranged and hosted the annual HELSINKI CONVENTION Operational Exercise BALEX DELTA on 5 - 7 September 2006. The aim of the exercise was to test the HELCOM Response system, its command and communication system and the co-operation between response units (including the response equipment) of the Contracting Parties. Following the preliminary time schedule and as usually, the BALEX DELTA 2006 Exercise has been initiated by the test of HELCOM reporting and communication procedures called POLREP BALTIC. All procedures accepted by the Contracting Parties are included in the HELCOM Response Manual, Volume 1, on Co-operation in Combating Marine Pollution. Chapter 3 of this Manual covers all issues related to this part of exercise. Pollution Reporting System POLREP BALTIC is for use between combating authorities to exchange information when pollution of the sea has occurred or when threat of such is present. The system facilitates notification, requesting and rendering of the international assistance as well as let assess preliminary costs of such assistance. According to the rules Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre in Gdynia (MRCC Gdynia) as the operational national point of contact has executed POLREP BALTIC Exercise, exchanging information between all Baltic States and European Commission as well. This was done on 5th of September between 9.00 and 15.00 (LOC). The POLREP BALTIC messages have been divided into three parts in the following order: 1. POLWARN – POLlution WARNing, started at 9.00 (LOC). 2. Combined POLINF and POLFAC - POLlution INFormation and POLlution FACilities, started at 11.00 (LOC). 3. POLREP End of Exercise - finishing this part of exercise and started at 13.00 (LOC). This report includes all information gathered during the exercise as: 1. Texts of messages sent and received 2. Response time analyse and relevant diagrams 3. Subjective assessment of the exercise together with comments Done in Gdynia 19. 09. 2006 Marek Reszko 12 BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO COUNTRY Denmark Estonia Admiral Danish Fleet Joint Rescue Coordination Centre (JRCC TALLINN) European Community Monitoring and Information Centre Finland Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC TURKU) Germany Latvia Lithuania Russian Federation Russian Federation Sweden 1 INSTITUTION Central Command for Maritime Emergencies Maritime Emergency and Reporting Centre Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC Riga) Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre of Lithuania Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC St. Petersburg) Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC Kaliningrad) Swedish Coast Guard Headquarters ADDRESS P.O. Box 483, DK8100 AARHUS C TELEPHONE +45 89 43 30 03 '+45 89 43 32 30 [email protected] Passed – positively Süsta 15, EE11712 TALLINN European Commission DG Environment, BU-9 2/177, B-1049 Brussels Archipelago Sea Coast Guard District, P.O. Box 16, FIN-20101 TURKU +372 692 2222 +372 692 2500 +372 692 2501 [email protected] Did not pass1 Am Alten Hafen 2, D-27472 CUXHAVEN +32 2 298 88 88 FAX E-MAIL +32 2 229 05 25 Communication test Passed – positively +358 204 1001 +358 204 1000 +358 2 250 0950 [email protected] +49 4721 567 485 +49 4721 567 744 [email protected] Passed – positively +371 7 320 100 +371 9270 690 [email protected] Passed – positively +370 46 499 677 [email protected] Passed – positively +7 812 327 4146 [email protected] Did not pass2 +7 (4012) 47 11 99 [email protected] Passed – positively Meldru 5a, LV-1015 RIGA +371 7 323 103 J. Janonio Str. 24, LT-92251 +370 46 499 669 KLAIPEDA +370 46 499 670 +7 812 327 4147 59, Portovaya str. Kaliningrad, 236003 Russia +7 (4012) 53 84 70 Stumholmen, S-371 23 KARLSKRONA +46 455 35 35 35 +46 455 812 75 Passed – positively Passed – positively Poland has received only a message sent by the Estonian Border Guard to the Polish Border Guard a day after the exercise. Geographical coordinates were changed which made a little confusion (see “POLFAC + POLINF” part of this report). 2 13 Communication was provided with MRCC Kaliningrad BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO POLWARN COUNTRY Sent END OF EXERCISE Average Response Sent Answered Response Sent Answered Response response DENMARK (DK) 09:03 10:49 01:46 11:03 12:03 01:00 13:25 14:11 00:46 01:10 ESTONIA (EE) 09:11 - - 11:06 *) - 13:26 - - - EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC) 09:24 09:55 00:31 11:08 12:07 00:59 13:28 - - 00:45 FINLAND (FI) 09:07 09:13 00:06 11:10 12:43 01:33 13:30 13:38 00:08 00:35 GERMANY (DE) 09:08 11:27 02:19 11:12 11:52 00:40 13:32 14:18 00:46 01:15 LATVIA (LV) 09:05 09:28 00:23 11:14 11:49 00:35 13:34 13:50 00:16 00:24 LITHUANIA (LT) 09:14 12:09 02:55 11:38 12:42 01:04 13:36 13:55 00:19 01:26 RUSSIA (MRCC St. Petersburg) RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad) SWEDEN (SE) 09:15 - - 11:19 - - 13:37 09:19 10:03 09:22 09:35 09:02 09:34 00:44 00:13 00:32 11:22 11:02 11:24 13:20 11:34 01:58 00:32 - 13:40 13:43 13:23 14:12 00:29 01:21 00:24 - - 00:32 (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA Answered POLINF + POLFAC - *) A strange POLREP report has been sent by email from Estonian Border Guard to Polish Border Guard, the day after exercise (see POLFAC + POLINF part of this report) Average response time POLWARN 01:03 Average response time POLINF 01:02 Average response time End of Exercise 00:27 General average response time 00:52 14 BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO POLREP Response Time Average response time - 00:52 (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA 00:32 00:00 00:00 SWEDEN (SE) 00:13 00:32 00:29 RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad) 00:44 01:58 00:00 LITHUANIA (LT) 02:55 01:04 00:19 LATVIA (LV) 00:23 00:35 00:16 GERMANY (DE) 02:19 00:40 00:46 FINLAND (FI) 00:06 01:33 00:08 EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC) 00:31 00:59 00:00 ESTONIA (EE) 00:00 00:00 00:00 DENMARK (DK) 01:46 01:00 00:46 00:00 Response POLWARN Response POLINF Response End of Exercise 00:14 00:28 00:43 00:57 01:12 01:26 01:40 Time (hh:mm) 15 01:55 02:09 02:24 02:38 02:52 03:07 00:57 00:28 01:26 Response POLWARN 16 Response POLINF Response End of Exercise (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA; 00:00 SWEDEN (SE); 00:29 RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad); 00:00 LITHUANIA (LT); 00:19 LATVIA (LV); 00:16 GERMANY (DE); 00:46 02:52 FINLAND (FI); 00:08 POLREP Response Time EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC); 00:00 ESTONIA (EE) DENMARK (DK); 00:46 (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA; 00:00 SWEDEN (SE); 00:32 RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad); 01:58 LITHUANIA (LT); 01:04 LATVIA (LV); 00:35 GERMANY (DE); 00:40 EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC); 00:59 ESTONIA (EE) 02:24 FINLAND (FI); 01:33 (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA; 00:32 SWEDEN (SE); 00:13 RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad); 00:44 DENMARK (DK); 01:00 01:55 LITHUANIA (LT); 02:55 LATVIA (LV); 00:23 GERMANY (DE); 02:19 FINLAND (FI); 00:06 EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC); 00:31 ESTONIA (EE) 00:00 DENMARK (DK); 01:46 Time BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO 03:21 DENMARK (DK) ESTONIA (EE) EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (EC) FINLAND (FI) GERMANY (DE) LATVIA (LV) LITHUANIA (LT) RUSSIA (MRCC Kaliningrad) SWEDEN (SE) (POLAND) VTS ZATOKA BALEX DELTA 2006 Gdynia, Poland 5 – 7 September 2006 Attachment 1. Report from Communication Exercise BALEX BRAVO COUNTRY Germany Response time Comments on messages context etc. Very clear format however different from POREP BALTIC standard. “POLINF + POLFAC” message Good acknowledged only, without any offer of assistance requested. Poland has received only a message sent by the Estonian Border Guard to the Polish Border Guard a day after the exercise. Geographical coordinates were changed which made a little confusion (see “POLFAC + POLINF” No response part of this report). Different to POLREP BALTIC standard however clear and understandable. Lack of response for the End of Exercise message. The procedure for rendering assistance, with the use of EMSA vessels should be evaluated, Good tested and trained. The simplest way of acknowledgment. Just to send back received and hand written document (MRCC Turku). Rendering of assistance is provided by the FEI duty officer via MRCC Turku. Classic POLREP BALTIC standard Very good achieved. Classic POLREP BALTIC standard achieved. Central Command for Maritime Emergencies and Maritime Emergency Reporting and Assessment Centre are the new German structures which are not noted in the HELCOM Manual, Volume 1. This is also connected to the different fax number. However message sent from Poland has been passed to the proper place. Good Latvia Excellent Proper, classic POLREP BALTIC standard achieved. Lithuania Good Poland - Messages different to POLREP BALTIC standard. Lack of offer of assistance requested. Poland has received a message from Germany about the change of address where the POLREP messages should be delivered. During the exercise it was not corrected. According to the HELCOM Manual, Volume 1, MRCC St. Petersburg is the only one national contact point for operational contacts. Information about the second operational contact point in Kaliningrad should be provided by Russian Federation, together with delimitated areas of responsibility. Denmark Estonia European Community Finland Russian Federation Russian Federation Sweden No response Good Excellent Proper, classic POLREP BALTIC standard achieved. Lack of response for the End of Exercise. Proper, classic POLREP BALTIC standard achieved. Sweden was the only one country informing about possible cost of assistance. 17