UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW
Transcription
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW
Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 856 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DELITA JACOBS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and DESMOND POUNCIE, individually, Plaintiffs, 12-CV-04842(FB)(SMG) vs. MAJOR ENERY SERVICES LLC; RESPOND POWER LLC; MAJOR ENERGY ELECTRIC SERVICES LLC; DIRECT SALES SOLUTIONS LLC; ASHER FRIED; SAUL HOROWITZ; MARK WIEDERMAN; and SHAI FISHMAN in their individual and professional capacities, Defendants. DECLARATION OF ANDREW B. STOLL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF DELITA JACOBS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS, ADMINISTRATOR FEES, AND INCENTIVE PAY Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 857 ANDREW B. STOLL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746(2), declares: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice before the courts of the State of New York and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. I am a partner in the law firm of Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP (“SGB”), plaintiffs’ counsel and counsel for the class in the above-captioned matter. As such, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances stated here. 2. I make this declaration in support of Plaintiff Delita Jacobs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, Administrator Fees, and Incentive Pay. 3. I incorporate here my Declaration in Support of Plaintiff Delita Jacobs’ Unopposed Motion for Certification of the Settlement Class, Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement, and Approval of the FLSA Settlement. 4. Attached as Exhibit A is the retainer agreement between SGB and Plaintiff Delita Jacobs (“Jacobs”), which provides for a contingency fee of 33.3% of the total recovered in any settlement or judgment. 5. Attached as Exhibit B are the contemporaneous billing records of the attorneys at 6. Attached as Exhibit C is the Declaration of William W. Wickersham, of RG/2, the SGB. Class Administrator in this matter, 7. Attached as Exhibit D is an invoice documenting SGB’s disbursements in this 8. Attached as Exhibit E are sample class notices in this matter. matter. 2 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 858 9. Attached as Exhibit F is the Settlement Agreement, or Stipulation of Settlement, in this matter, which provides for SGB to apply to the Court, unopposed, for 33.3% of the total settlement for attorney’s fees, as well as up to $30,000.00 for Class Administrator fees and up to $20,000.00 service award for Delita Jacobs. 10. On August 13, 2012, Plaintiff Delita Jacobs became a client of this firm. Ex. A, retainer agreement between Delita Jacobs and SGB. 11. Delita Jacobs assisted in persuading Desmond Pouncie (“Pouncie”) to opt in to the litigation as a plaintiff. Qualifications and Participation of Class Counsel- Christopher Q. Davis 12. This case was staffed by four attorneys at SGB: Christopher Davis, a non-equity partner at the firm, Andrew B. Stoll, a named partner at the firm, and Rachel Haskell and Saranicole Duaban, two associates at the firm. 13. At the time of the filing of the complaint, Davis had been practicing law for 12 years with a primary focus on litigation of labor and employment law cases. He is a member of the bar of the State of New York and is also admitted to practice before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern, Southern and Northern Districts of New York. 14. In 2001, Davis received a Juris Doctor from the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. 15. From 2001 to 2006, Davis was employed as an Assistant District Attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, where he tried approximately 20 felony and misdemeanor cases to verdict. 3 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 859 16. Following his tenure as an Assistant District Attorney, Davis entered private practice as an Associate with the employment law firm Thompson Wigdor LLP (“TW”), assuming responsibility over several plaintiffs and management-side lawsuits. 17. After leaving TW in 2009, Davis gained employment with The Ottinger Firm, P.C., and served as the firm’s Managing Attorney. 18. While with The Ottinger Firm, Davis was responsible for all aspects of the firm’s operations, including managing and serving as lead attorney on numerous nationwide class and collective actions under the FLSA. 19. At TW, Davis was the lead associate on a collective action overtime lawsuit brought against one of the private universities in the State of New York (Summa v. Hofstra University, 07-CV-3307 (EDNY)). During the case, he managed all aspects of litigation, including discovery, drafted and filed a winning FLSA class certification brief and wrote a successful appellate brief opposing the university’s challenge of the district court’s decision to grant certification. 20. Davis has taken and defended numerous depositions in FLSA/Rule 23 collective and class action cases, and has conducted and defended approximately 75 depositions. 21. Since entering private practice, Davis has settled or participated in settlement negotiations of more than 10 collective and/or class actions. 22. While with The Ottinger Firm, Davis was lead counsel in the matter of Martinez v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. et al, 10-CV-06032 (SDNY), in which preliminary certification on an FLSA class was granted by Judge William H. Pauley on June 2, 2011. 23. While with The Ottinger Firm, Davis served as lead counsel in the matter of Landin et al. v. UBS et al, 10-CV-711 (SDNY) and Bardouille v. Goldman Sachs & Co., 10-cv- 4 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 860 4285 (SDNY), both hybrid class and collective action which settled upon beneficial terms for the respective classes. 24. While with The Ottinger Firm, Davis also served as lead counsel handling all aspects of discovery, motion briefing, and settlement discussions on the following overtime class actions in which The Ottinger Firm was appointed class counsel and which settled on favorable terms for the respective plaintiffs: Fouathia v. Gurwich Products, 10-CV-5411 (SDNY); Gomez v. Gravitas Technology, Inc., 10-CV-6412 (SDNY); McKenzie v. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 11-CV-3991 (SDNY); Butt v. Megabus Northeast, LLC, 11-CV-3993 (SDNY). 25. Immediately prior to leaving The Ottinger Firm, as lead counsel, Davis took and defended all of the depositions, reviewed all of defendants’ document production, drafted the summary judgment and class action briefs, argued summary judgment and class action motions, and supervised junior lawyers in the matter of Orgill v Ingersoll-Rand Co., NY County Index No. 101142/10. Summary Judgment was denied and plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class was granted. Defendants’ subsequent appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department was denied in a published opinion that has received trade press attention. 26. SGB was appointed Class Counsel in Bryan, et al. v. Urban Telecommunications, Inc., et al., 12-CV-2186 (SDNY), an overtime class and collective action in which Davis served as lead attorney. The litigation settled upon favorable terms for the class and was approved by Judge P. Kevin Castel. 5 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 861 27. Davis and SGB were appointed Class Counsel in Oleniak v. Time Warner, 12- CV-3971 (SDNY), a hybrid overtime class and collective action which settled upon favorable terms and was approved by Judge Katherine P. Failla on December 17, 2013. 28. SGB is respectfully suggesting the Court adopt a rate $450.00 hourly rate for Mr. Davis’ services in this FLSA class and collective action, for the purposes of cross-checking the reasonableness of a one third contingency fee in this matte Qualifications and Participation of Class Counsel- Andrew Stoll 29. I (Andrew B. Stoll) was admitted to practice in New York State in 1998, and have been admitted to practice before all four federal districts of New York and the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. I have tried over thirty jury trials, including in Courts in New York City, Albany, and Rochester. I have also tried cases before the New York State Court of Claims. I am an adjunct professor of law at Seton Hall University School of Law, where I teach “Persuasion and Advocacy”, their trial advocacy course. 30. I graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 1997, and worked as a Staff Attorney at the Criminal Defense Division of the Legal Aid Society from 1997-2002, before opening my own law practice in 2002, which grew into SGB. 31. SGB focused predominantly on criminal defense, civil rights litigation, and campaign finance consulting until August, 2012. In that practice, I have represented hundreds of civil rights plaintiffs in the federal courts, in cases alleging police and correction officer misconduct. I am a member of the Bar Association of the City of New York, where I have served on the Corrections and Reentry Committee, the New York State Defenders Association, and the National Police Accountability Project. 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 862 32. As an additional practice at SGB, since 2009, I have represented over 700 hundred New York City teachers, on behalf of the United Federation of Teachers, 33. In 2011, I filed my first federal employment action in the Southern District of New York, Taylor v. the New York City Department of Education, 11-CV-7833 (AJN), which resulted in a favorable summary judgment decision and subsequent settlement. I also filed, in August of 2012, a Qui Tam action in the Southern District of New York. 34. In August, 2012, Christopher Davis joined SGB. I worked with Mr. Davis on several collective and class action overtime matters at SGB. I participated in the litigation and mediation of Oleniak v. Time Warner, 12-CV-3971 (KPF) (SDNY), a class/ collective action which was certified as a class as settled on favorable terms. I was also named as lead counsel in court-ordered notices that issued in Oleniak when SGB was appointed Class Counsel in a supplemental settlement in the case. 35. I also participated with Mr. Davis in the litigation and mediation of Hibbert v. Central Parking Systems, 12-CV-7970 (VSB) (SDNY), a hybrid collective and class action that has settled in principle. 36. My firm, SGB, was appointed Class Counsel in Bryan et al v. Urban Telecommunications, Inc., et al., 12-CV-2816 (KPF) (SDNY), an approved overtime class and collective action. 37. I represented Ranti Ojo in an individual FLSA claim in the cases of Ojo v. Wellness Health, 13-CV-4942 (ERK)(RLM) and Ojo v. Educerus, Inc.,13-CV-4943 (ERK)(RLM), the settlement of which was approved as fair and reasonable by the Court on May 2, 2014. 7 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 863 38. When Mr. Davis left SGB in July, 2014, I took over the employment practice at SGB, and we have maintained the robust employment practice, with the assistance of associate Saranicole Duaban, and Rita Sethi, of counsel. 39. SGB is respectfully suggesting the Court adopt a rate $350.00 hourly rate for my services in this FLSA class and collective action, for the purposes of cross-checking the reasonableness of a one third contingency fee in this matter. Qualifications and Participation of Class Counsel- Rachel Haskell 40. Rachel Haskell was an associate working at SGB exclusively in the Labor and Employment practice. She was a member of the New York and Massachusetts bar, and was admitted to practice in the Eastern and Southern districts of New York. She earned her Bachelor’s degree from the University of Wisconsin- Madison in 2006, and her J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law in 2012. She has focused her practice exclusively on employment law matters, and had experience working for a private practitioner prior to joining SGB, as well as interning at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 41. SGB is respectfully suggesting the Court adopt a rate $250.00 hourly rate for Ms. Haskell, for the purposes of cross-checking the reasonableness of a one third contingency fee in this matter. Qualifications and Participation of Class Counsel- Saranicole Duaban 42. Saranicole Duaban is an associate at SGB who received her bachelor’s degree from George Washington University, where she graduated cum laude with Special Honors in History, and a minor in Art History. She then attended the George Washington University Law School, where she was a member of the Moot Court Board and a Thurgood Marshall Scholar. At GW Law, Duaban worked for the Public Justice Advocacy Clinic, representing low-income 8 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 864 workers in unpaid wage cases at the D.C. Superior Court and in their unemployment hearings. Prior to joining SGB Duaban was a fellow in the Workplace Justice Practice at MFY Legal Services, where she managed a heavy caseload of wage and hour, employment discrimination, and re-entry cases. She has experience representing clients at the EEOC, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and in administrative hearings. Duaban is a member of the New York City Bar Association, the Federal Bar Association Labor and Employment Section, and the National Employment Law Association, New York Chapter, where she is a member of the New Lawyers Committee. 43. SGB is respectfully suggesting the Court adopt a rate $250.00 hourly rate for Ms. Duaban, for the purposes of cross checking the reasonableness of a one third contingency fee in this matter. Class Administrator Fees 44. The Class Administrator has submitted a bill to SGB for $34,519.00, however, SGB has agreed to pay the administrator the excess over the $30,000.00 provided for in the Settlement Agreement, with the exception of expenses for notice pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act. 45. The Class Administrator has served the Class reliably and responsively. 46. In addition, the Class Administrator provided additional services by performing extensive data calculations and extrapolations, including working with complete data sets that defendants were not comfortable sharing with plaintiffs in an informal discovery setting. This added an additional level of comfort to SGB that we were obtaining reliable results from our calculations, ensuring the fairness of the settlement. CLASS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARD 9 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 865 47. Plaintiff Delita Jacobs served the class zealously, at her own expense. 48. Ms. Jacobs brought the case to SGB, obtained an additional opt-in plaintiff to avoid a “pick off” offer, reviewed discovery and samples provided, and advised SGB on the detailed operations of defendants’ business model. 49. Ms. Jacobs attended a day long mediation session. 50. Ms. Jacobs flew at her own expense to New York from Texas, where she had moved, to review data and discovery and discuss settlement in person with SGB attorneys. 51. Ms. Jacobs filed a New York State retaliation claim in Kings County Supreme Court, index # 19518/2012, arising from the same employment at issue in this case. However, she agreed to stay prosecution of that matter until provisional approval of the class and collective action, to avoid the appearance that she had a conflict in any settlement discussions of this matter. 52. Ms. Jacobs originally signed up as a client with Christopher Davis while he was at another firm, very shortly before Davis left and joined SGB. She then changed law firms with Mr. Davis, to SGB, and then stayed with SGB when Davis left SGB. The entire time, she diligently worked with attorneys, and actively participated in settlement discussions and reviewing the fairness of the settlement. 10 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77 Filed 04/03/15 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 866 ANDREW B. STOLL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746(2), declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Brooklyn, NY April 2, 2015 ______________________ Andrew B. Stoll (AS8808) 11 EXHIBIT A Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 867 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 868 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 869 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 870 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 871 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 872 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-1 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 873 EXHIBIT B Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 63 PageID #: 874 Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP Christopher Davis's Time Entry Report for Selected File: Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy Client ID: Matter ID: 12CV4842 Date Task/Activity Code Task/Activity Description Fri. Sep 14, 2012 Time (hrs) 4.50 Conducted legal research for complaint drafting; drafted complaint. Mon. Sep 17, 2012 2.00 Email communication with client re drafting of complaint; reviewed case law re FLSA claims. Tue. Sep 18, 2012 6.50 Conducted legal research on OT claims; conducted fact research on OT claims; conducted fact research on corp and individual entities; long fact interview w. Delita jacobs re OT and deduction claims; drafted overtime complaint. Wed. Sep 19, 2012 5.00 Reviewed documents from client and corporate information re entities and individual defendants in preparation for drafting complaint; conducted legal research; drafted complaint. Thu. Sep 20, 2012 5.50 Conducted factual and legal research on overtime claims; telephone conference with desmond pouncie re facts for complaint and lawsuit; drafted complaint; email communication with delita jacobs re factual allegations in lawsuit. Fri. Sep 21, 2012 3.40 Conducted research on individual defendants background and residence; conducted legal research; drafted complaint. Mon. Sep 24, 2012 0.40 Conducted research on entities and drafted complaint. Tue. Sep 25, 2012 5.50 Drafted OT complaint; conducted legal research; finalized complaint for filing; office conference with paralegal re filing. Wed. Oct 10, 2012 0.50 Office conference with paralegal re service of individual defendants; telephone communication with client re case status. Wed. Oct 31, 2012 0.40 Telephone communication with opposing counsel re answer extension and plaintiffs' claims; email communication re same. Thu. Nov 1, 2012 0.20 Email communication with opposing counsel for DSS re extension on answer. Tue. Dec 18, 2012 Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 6.50 Page 1 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 63 PageID #: 875 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Time (hrs) Provided instruction to paralegal on binder preparation; selected materials for pre-meeting review and provided to paralegal; email communication with paralegal re same; prepared for meeting with counsel for DSS and Major Energy by reviewing all prep. Material; office conference with A. Stoll re meeting with opposing counsel; attended conference and discussed structure for settlement talk; drafted notes of meeting; one way travel. Thu. Dec 20, 2012 1.50 Email communication with opposing counsel re discovery matters, scheduling, settlement and proposed terms of tolling agreement; drafted proposed tolling agreement and emailed to counsel; reviewed proposed stipulation re answer filing and initial conference scheduling. Thu. Dec 27, 2012 0.80 Telephone and office conference with D. Jacobs re updates on recent meetings with opposing counsel; drafted notes re meeting and informed plaintiff of class representative obligations. Tue. Feb 26, 2013 1.50 Reviewed notes of prior conversations with call in prep for status call with opposing counsel; reviewed client docs re discovery needs in case mediation discovery is addressed in call; telephone conference with opposing counsel re mediation scheduling and mediation discovery. Fri. Mar 22, 2013 1.30 Reviewed mediator candidates credentials; email communication with opposing counsel re mediator selection; telephone communication with opposing counsel re mediator selections and seeking adjournment of scheduling deadlines. Tue. Mar 26, 2013 0.20 Emailed opposing counsel confirming mediator selection. Fri. Mar 29, 2013 0.30 Email communication with opposing counsel re selection of mediator and communication with the court. Mon. Apr 1, 2013 1.20 Email communication with mediator, opposing counsel and A. Stoll re dates for mediation; email communication with mediator re location of mediation; reviewed and signed mediator stipulation; conducted additional open-source research on mediator and qualifications. Tue. Apr 2, 2013 0.40 Email communication with mediator re scheduling mediation and logistics; email with opposing counsel re same; email and office communication with paralegal re contacting plaintiff Delita Jacobs re attendance at mediation. Fri. May 3, 2013 1.00 Email and telephone communication with opposing counsel re defendants' proposed discovery sample; reviewed case law re appropriate scope of discovery sample. Mon. May 6, 2013 0.20 Email communication with opposing counsel re scheduling a discovery telephone conference. Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 2 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 63 PageID #: 876 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. May 8, 2013 Time (hrs) 0.20 Email and telephone communication with G. Salka re discovery matters. Thu. May 9, 2013 1.50 Prepared for telephone conference with opposing counsel re discovery sample; reviewed case law re same; email communication with opposing counsel; conducted telephone conference with opposing counsel; reviewed and revised settlement confidentiality stip. Fri. May 10, 2013 0.20 Email communication with opposing counsel. Mon. May 20, 2013 0.40 Telephone communication with client re cancellation of mediation, rescheduling and update on potential other opt ins; reviewed emails between lawyers and mediator re scheduling mediation. Thu. May 30, 2013 2.00 Conducted legal research in anticipation of drafting position statement and upcoming mediation. Fri. May 31, 2013 3.50 Email communication with opposing counsel re amended complaint; continued research on outside sales exemption and cases involving analagous positions. Thu. Jun 6, 2013 0.40 Email communication with opposing counsel re amending complaint; office communication with R. Haskell re research assignments and progress. Fri. Jun 7, 2013 1.40 Reviewed labor ready deductions case and other legal research in preparation for meeting with R. Haskell re research assignment update; office conference with R. Haskell re research; drafted amended complaint; email communication with opposing counsel re same. Mon. Jun 10, 2013 1.30 Email communication with opposing counsel re edits to amended complaint; reviewed proposed edits to confidentiality stipulation; reviewed and revised amended complaint following receipt of edits from counsel. Tue. Jun 11, 2013 1.50 Email communication with opposing counsel re edits to confidentiality stipulation and document production arrangements; multiple office conferences with R. Haskell re results of research and progress with mediation preparation; reviewed cases re overtime claims (outside sales exemption and administrative exemption). Thu. Jun 13, 2013 1.30 Reviewed and signed confidentiality stipulation; office conferences with Rachel Haskell re results of research; reviewed cases re outside sales exemption applicable to P's overtime class claims. Sun. Jun 23, 2013 Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 0.20 Page 3 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 63 PageID #: 877 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Time (hrs) Reviewed court scheduling order in anticipation of mediation preparation. Tue. Jun 25, 2013 4.50 Conducted legal research in preparation for drafting mediation statement. Wed. Jun 26, 2013 3.90 Telephone communication with client re mediation planning and other matters relating to mediation; email communication re same.; Conducted research for mediation statement. Thu. Jun 27, 2013 0.20 Office conference with R. Haskell re assignments and updates on legal research. Fri. Jun 28, 2013 6.50 Email communication with opposing counsel re postponing filing deadline for mediation statements; office conferences with R. Haskell re same; assigned status letter to intern to draft; reviewed and revised status letter; supervised junior lawyer in filing status letter; conducted research for mediation statement. Mon. Jul 1, 2013 4.80 Office conference with R. Haskell re guidance on document review; reviewed Orgill written decision re unlawful deductions; reviewed research key drafted by R. Haskell and conducted research for mediation statement and mediation. Wed. Jul 3, 2013 6.20 Reviewed documents produced to counsel by plaintiffs in preparation for mediation; multiple office conferences with Andrew Stoll and Rachel Haskell re mediation preparation; email communication with client Delita Jacobs re possible additional documents in her possession and other matters; reviewed research in preparation for drafting mediation statement; reviewed documents while drafting mediation statement; drafted mediation statement. Mon. Jul 8, 2013 4.60 Reviewed documents produced by opposing counsel in preparation for mediation; conducted legal research in preparation for mediation; multiple office conferences with R. Haskell re mediation. Tue. Jul 9, 2013 13.80 Conducted legal research for mediation statement; finished drafting 15-page mediation statement; reviewed and revised mediation statement including cite check, etc; reviewed defendants document production for relevant references and exhibits; multiple office conferences with R. Haskell re preparation for mediation; office conferences with A. Stoll re same. Wed. Jul 10, 2013 10.50 Telephone communication with mediator re mediation statement and anticipated legal arguments; prepared for mediation (supervised junior lawyer and paralegals, reviewed documents produced by opposing counsel, multiple office conferences with R. Haskell and A. Stoll re strategy and research; met with plaintiff delita jacobs to prepare her for mediation session, reviewed damages calculations and directed interns and paralegals in large drafting excel spreadsheets and other damages calculation efforts). Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 4 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 63 PageID #: 878 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Jul 11, 2013 Time (hrs) 14.20 Drafted opening statement, reviewed cases and mediation in preparation for mediation; participated in mediation; multiple office conferences with A. Stoll and R. Haskell re strategy; conducted damages calculations for settlement position; one way travel to garden city mediation location; post-mediation research re comparable wage claim settlements which were approved by the court; consulted with client re outcome of mediation (failed). Fri. Jul 12, 2013 4.50 Continued research into other wage settlements in SDNY and EDNY post comcast with respect to settlement position analysis and whether or not to mediate for a second day; email communication with mediator re mediating a second day; office conferences with A. Stoll re same and re strategy. Mon. Jul 15, 2013 4.30 Finished research on prior settlements involving similar facts for litigation risk and settlement fairness assessment; drafted proposed correspondence to the court with mediation status update; email communication with opposing counsel re same; reviewed, revised and finalized letter; filed via ECF. Tue. Jul 16, 2013 0.30 Reviewed court's order scheduling initial conference; reviewed court's individual rules re prep for initial conf. Wed. Jul 17, 2013 0.80 Office conference and status/strategy meeting with A. Stoll re litigation. Mon. Jul 22, 2013 0.30 Reviewed premotion conference letter filed by opposing counsel seeking dismissal; office conference with A. Stoll re same. Thu. Jul 25, 2013 4.50 Conducted legal research re response to premotion conference letter to dismiss; drafted response to premotion conference letter to dismiss. Fri. Jul 26, 2013 8.50 Conducted legal research in for response to defendants' premotion conference letter; office conferences with A. Stoll re same; reviewed defendants correspondence seeking premotion conferences; reviewed prior stipulations re extension of time to answer and timeliness of D's letter motion; drafted letter. Thu. Aug 1, 2013 1.10 Office conference with R. Haskell in preparation for rule 26 meet and confer with opposing counsel; prepared for conference (reviewed discovery checklist, vendor ESI needs, ESI checklists); took notes re conference; participated in conference call; drafted post call to-do list. Tue. Aug 6, 2013 Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 4.30 Page 5 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 63 PageID #: 879 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Time (hrs) Office conference with r. Haskell re preparation for initial conference; email communication with opposing counsel re same; email communication with a. Stoll re same; prepared for initial conference (conducted research re defending D's application for a stay, reviewed case law on outside sales exemption, reviewed case law used in support of P's opposition to D's anticipated MTD, office conference w R. Haskell re proposed scheduling order); attended and appeared before judge gold for conference; pre and post appearance conference with opposing counsel. Wed. Aug 7, 2013 0.30 Email and office communication with A. Stoll re legal research assignments and factual investigation. Fri. Aug 16, 2013 0.40 Email and telephone communication with R. Haskell re problems with data produced by defense counsel for damages calculations. Mon. Aug 26, 2013 3.10 Reviewed spreadsheets produced by opposing counsel re damages in anticipation of meeting with R. Haskell to discuss D's need to supplement data and our anticipated deposition notices; office conference with R. Haskell re same; reviewed D counsel's pre motion conference letter in anticipation of drafting response; conducted legal research. Thu. Aug 29, 2013 0.50 Telephone conference with client re client's relocation to texas and logistics; status of case and other matters. Fri. Aug 30, 2013 4.80 Office conference with A. Stoll re status of case and updates.; Conducted research in preparation for drafting response to premotion conference letter response; reviewed defendants letter; drafted response; email and office communication with R. Haskell re same. Mon. Sep 23, 2013 0.20 Office conference with R. Haskell re damages calculations and assignments. Tue. Sep 24, 2013 0.20 Office conference with R. Haskell re damages calculations. Wed. Sep 25, 2013 0.20 Office communication with R. Haskell re damages assignment. Mon. Sep 30, 2013 0.20 Email communication with opposing counsel re discovery matters and setting second mediation date. Tue. Oct 1, 2013 0.40 Email communication with opposing counsel re discovey and mediation planning; office conference with R. Haskell re status of new damages calculation. Mon. Oct 14, 2013 0.20 Office conferences with R. Haskell re discovery assignments and progress with new damages calculations. Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 6 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 63 PageID #: 880 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Oct 18, 2013 Time (hrs) 7.40 Prepared for premotion conference (reviewed premotion conference letters and supporting caselaw) and post-court office settlement meeting; office conference with R Haskell prior to premotion conference re strategy with opposing counsel; one way travel to court; conference with opposing counsel prior to conference; attended court conference before judge block re motion; office conference with opposing counsel in SGB offices re damages calculations assumptions and revision of settlement demand; discussed theories of different damages calculations and appropriate settlement demand range; reviewed previously saved case law and provided copies to opposing counsel re minimum wage overtime provision in NYLL and relevant first and second circuit precedent re exemptions; office conference with R Haskell re updating damages calculations per discussions with opposing counsel. Tue. Oct 22, 2013 0.20 Office conference with Rachel Haskell to confer about damages calculations. Wed. Oct 23, 2013 1.70 Office conference with Rachel Haskell to confer about damages calculations.; Conducted legal research in ABA and NYSBA ethical opinions re representation of plaintiffs with multiple or aggregate claims in class action matters. Fri. Oct 25, 2013 2.00 Office conference with Rachel Haskell re damages calculations; reviewed spreadsheets and attempted to determine minimum wage and gap time damages calculations methodology; email communication with opposing counsel re damages calculations and settlement negotiations; reviewed oleniak settlement agreement and proposed order to determine if can serve as appropriate template in the instant matter; office conference with R. Haskell re same. Tue. Oct 29, 2013 0.80 Listened to vm from client; telephone call with client re settlement, mediation and fact investigation updates; office conference with R. Haskell re damages calculation updates; email communication with R. Haskell re same; reviewed updated damages calculations performed by R. Haskell. Fri. Nov 1, 2013 0.40 Office conference with R. Haskell re final steps in revised damages calculation and methodology for a global demand. Mon. Nov 4, 2013 0.50 Office conference with Rachel Haskell re renewed damages calculations; reviewed spreadsheets re same. Wed. Dec 4, 2013 0.20 Email communication with R. Haskell re mediation preparation and arrangements. Fri. Dec 13, 2013 4.80 Prepared for and attended mediation session with opposing counsel; office conferences with R. Haskell after mediation re assignments and strategy in final settlement push. Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 7 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 8 of 63 PageID #: 881 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Dec 16, 2013 Time (hrs) 2.00 Office conference with Rachel Haskell re responding to Ds settlement offer; conducted legal research on viability of Pennsylvania gap time and deductions claims under Pa state law; emailed results to Rachel Haskell and discussed relevant cases and statutes with her. Tue. Dec 17, 2013 0.90 Reviewed recent Metro PCS decision re similar employees in OT matter; email communication with Rachel Haskell re same; Office conference with R. Haskell re case law research from Pa and assignments prior to sending demand; office conference with R. Haskell re structuring and wording final demand communication; reviewed research pulled by R. Haskell re deductions claims in Pa. Tue. Dec 24, 2013 0.40 Drafted and sent email to opposing counsel re settlement position and their newly filed motion to dismiss. Mon. Dec 30, 2013 1.00 Reviewed D's newly filed motion to dismiss and supporting paperwork; office conference and email communication with R. Haskell re discovery scheduling. Tue. Dec 31, 2013 0.20 Email communication with Rachel Haskell re scheduling matters. Tue. Jan 7, 2014 2.00 Email communication with R. Haskell re call with opposing counsel and call with the court later in the day; telephone communication re same; reviewed court's scheduling orders re upcoming deadlines in prep for conf call advice for R Haskell; reviewed R Haskell damages calculations in anticipation of providing advice to R Haskell on appropriate settlement position to take during call; reviewed and revised proposed letter to the court re new schedule in light of continuing settlement discussions. Tue. Jan 14, 2014 0.30 Office conferences with Rachel Haskell re settlement progress. Wed. Jan 29, 2014 0.40 Email communication with opposing counsel re settlement; office conferences and email communication with Rachel Haskell re same; left VM for client re settlement. Thu. Jan 30, 2014 0.50 Reviewed email from opposing counsel and proposed term sheet; office conference with Rachel Haskell re response to term sheet and settlement. Mon. Feb 3, 2014 0.30 Office conference with Rachel Haskell re deadline extension; reviewed draft correspondence to court re same; office conference with Rachel Haskell re settlement updates. Wed. Feb 5, 2014 0.20 Office and email communication with R. Haskell re telephone conference call. Thu. Mar 6, 2014 5.00 Reviewed and revise reply. Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 8 of 9 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 9 of 63 PageID #: 882 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. May 1, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.40 Email and telephone communciation with Delita Jacobs re finalizing and signing term sheet; office conference with R. haskell re same. Tue. May 20, 2014 1.30 Telephone conference with opposing counsel re settlement agreement terms; multiple office conferences with Rachel Haskel re settlement terms and finalizing settlement paperwork; email with opposing counsel re same. Wed. May 21, 2014 0.50 Multiple office conferences with Rachel Haskel re settlement terms and finalizing settlement paperwork; email with opposing counsel re same. Thu. May 22, 2014 0.50 Multiple office conferences with Rachel Haskell re settlement agreement term negotiations & need for extension of deadline to file brief; email communication re same. Fri. May 30, 2014 0.20 Email communication with opposing counsel re settlement of class claims. Tue. Jun 3, 2014 1.30 Multiple meetings with Rachel Haskell re responding to email from opposing counsel re setttlement and drafting letter to the court; reviewed and and revised emailed to opposing counsel drafted by rachel haskel re backing out of settlement. Fri. Jun 6, 2014 0.20 Telephone communication with Rachel Haskell re updates. Tue. Jun 17, 2014 0.70 Office conference with R. Haskell re latest damages calculation; telephone conference with opposing counsel re same (and re need for additional documents and damages information). Tue. Jun 17, 2014 2.50 Conducted extensive research on minimum needed for representative proof for settlement of class claims; reviewed bloomberg and reich cases; discussed both with Rachel H. Fri. Jun 27, 2014 0.30 Telephone call with client re updates in case. Tue. Jul 1, 2014 6.50 Prepared for and attended informal mediation session at herrick with r. haskell; one way travel. Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.50 Conference call. Total Time: Printed by Christopher Davis on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 217.10 Hrs Page 9 of 9 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 10 of 63 PageID #: 883 Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP Andrew Stoll's Time Entry Report for Selected File: Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy Client ID: Matter ID: 12CV4842 Date Task/Activity Code Task/Activity Description Wed. Sep 19, 2012 Time (hrs) 0.50 Review CD research Fri. Dec 14, 2012 0.20 Reveiw Emails Tue. Jul 9, 2013 1.10 Prep for Mediation Wed. Jul 10, 2013 9.20 Prep for Mediation Fri. Jul 12, 2013 9.70 Andrew at Mediation incorporate company one way travel; Emails after conference concerning judges, status; Conference with CD; Research Class Contact Wed. Jul 17, 2013 CL Class Litigation 2.00 Class Litigation Research whether court supervision is mandatory for notifying potnetial class members (gulf Oil and progeny) Conference with CD RE: likely participation rates Mon. Jul 22, 2013 0.60 Review letter from Avery Mehlman Conference with CD Fri. Jul 26, 2013 CL Class Litigation 0.50 Review Response to Letter Request for Motion Schedule; Class Litigation Tue. Aug 6, 2013 2.20 Init conf, prep, and review of new 2d Circuit case, Dejesus Wed. Aug 7, 2013 1.20 Reveiw proposed amended complaint Wed. Aug 7, 2013 0.40 Email to Riverkeeper Thu. Aug 8, 2013 1.30 Research post Christopher cases w emphasis on 2d circuit and Judge Block Conference with CD Sat. Aug 31, 2013 0.20 Reveiw Letter opposition to motion to dismiss Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 1 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 11 of 63 PageID #: 884 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Sep 6, 2013 Time (hrs) 0.30 REveiw Reply to our answer to motion to dismiss Fri. Oct 18, 2013 0.50 Conference with CD Mon. Jul 28, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Rachel Haskell - left message Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.10 Reveiw File, docket Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.30 Email to Delita Jacobs Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Tue. Jul 29, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Jul 30, 2014 0.10 Letter to the Court Wed. Jul 30, 2014 0.40 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Jul 30, 2014 0.60 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Jul 30, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Jul 30, 2014 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Thu. Jul 31, 2014 1.20 Reveiw Settlement Agreement; Teleconference with Court Sat. Aug 2, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Sun. Aug 3, 2014 0.30 Reveiw Settlement Sun. Aug 3, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 2 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 12 of 63 PageID #: 885 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Sun. Aug 3, 2014 Time (hrs) 1.50 Client Office Visit Mon. Aug 4, 2014 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Mon. Aug 4, 2014 0.60 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Tue. Aug 5, 2014 0.10 Email to Scott Korenbaum Tue. Aug 5, 2014 0.10 Review file for number of class members. Sat. Aug 9, 2014 0.60 Letter to Court Mon. Aug 11, 2014 0.30 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Tue. Aug 12, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Tue. Aug 12, 2014 0.10 Reveiw Final Settlement Agreement Tue. Aug 12, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Tue. Aug 12, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Wed. Aug 13, 2014 4.30 Reveiw Settleent Agreement Wed. Aug 13, 2014 0.20 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Aug 13, 2014 0.20 Email to Bill Wickersham Wed. Aug 13, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Wed. Aug 13, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Wed. Aug 13, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.10 Email to rachel Haskell Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.20 Email to Desmond Pouncie Letter to Desmond Pouncie Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 3 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 13 of 63 PageID #: 886 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Aug 14, 2014 Time (hrs) 1.80 Reveiw Setltment Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - left message Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Thu. Aug 14, 2014 1.00 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.30 Draft consent to magistrate Thu. Aug 14, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Fri. Aug 15, 2014 0.30 Email to Bill Wickersham Fri. Aug 15, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Fri. Aug 15, 2014 0.20 Reveiw Dedeuctions Sat. Aug 16, 2014 0.20 REveiw and amend settlement Sat. Aug 16, 2014 0.50 Email to Jonathan Adler Sat. Aug 16, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Aug 18, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Tue. Aug 19, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Thu. Aug 21, 2014 0.30 Email to [email protected] Thu. Aug 21, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected] Thu. Aug 21, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 4 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 14 of 63 PageID #: 887 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Aug 22, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to [email protected] Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.80 Work on final settlement Stip Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.40 Email to Delita Jacobs Fri. Aug 22, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected] Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.90 Check class Formulas and allocations Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.70 Email to Bill Wickersham Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.70 Email to Delita Jacobs Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Sat. Aug 23, 2014 7.80 Review Proposed Class Notice, Proposed Order, Motion for settlement Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Sat. Aug 23, 2014 0.30 Email to Bill Wickersham Sun. Aug 24, 2014 1.30 Prepare Settlement Motion Sun. Aug 24, 2014 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Sun. Aug 24, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 5 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 15 of 63 PageID #: 888 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Sun. Aug 24, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.40 Email to Kathy Caminiti Mon. Aug 25, 2014 2.30 Motion for Settlement approval Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.10 Declaration ins spport of motion Consent to Magistrate Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.20 Email to Kathy Caminiti Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Tue. Aug 26, 2014 2.00 Continued Damages Calculations Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - left message Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Tue. Aug 26, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected] Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.80 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.70 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.50 Letter to Court Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.30 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Wed. Aug 27, 2014 0.30 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Thu. Aug 28, 2014 0.30 Letter to Court Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 6 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 16 of 63 PageID #: 889 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Aug 29, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.10 Email to Desmond Pouncie Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.50 Damages Calculation Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.10 Email to Rachel Haskell Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.70 Reveiw File Communications Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Fri. Aug 29, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Wed. Sep 3, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Wed. Sep 3, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Sep 3, 2014 0.60 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Fri. Sep 5, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Sep 9, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Fri. Sep 12, 2014 0.40 Work on settlement Mon. Sep 15, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Tue. Sep 16, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Tue. Sep 16, 2014 0.10 Review Previously Supplied DIscovery Thu. Sep 18, 2014 2.30 Review Discovery and prepare settlement Thu. Sep 18, 2014 0.80 Email to Jonathan Adler Thu. Sep 18, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 7 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 17 of 63 PageID #: 890 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Sep 18, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to [email protected] Fri. Sep 19, 2014 0.20 Email to Kathy Caminiti Fri. Sep 19, 2014 0.30 Reveiw Damages Fri. Sep 19, 2014 0.20 Email to Bill Wickersham Fri. Sep 19, 2014 1.40 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Sun. Sep 21, 2014 6.10 Email to [email protected] Mon. Sep 22, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Mon. Sep 22, 2014 4.30 Damages Calculations Tue. Sep 23, 2014 6.00 Reveiw damages- conference at Herrick firm with Jonathan Adler and Kathy Caminetti Tue. Sep 23, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Wed. Sep 24, 2014 0.10 Redraft Settlement Papers. Wed. Sep 24, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Sep 24, 2014 2.20 Email to Bill Wickersham Wed. Sep 24, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Wed. Sep 24, 2014 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Wed. Sep 24, 2014 .10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Thu. Sep 25, 2014 1.50 Finalize Settlement Paperwork- Rquet for Exclusion Form, Fri. Sep 26, 2014 2.60 Prepare settlement papers Fri. Sep 26, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 8 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 18 of 63 PageID #: 891 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Sep 26, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Sep 26, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Fri. Sep 26, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - left message Fri. Sep 26, 2014 0.30 Email to Delita Jacobs Fri. Sep 26, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Sep 30, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawyer s.com Tue. Sep 30, 2014 0.80 Reveiw Adler and Caminetti comemnts Tue. Sep 30, 2014 0.30 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Tue. Sep 30, 2014 3.70 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Sep 30, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Wed. Oct 1, 2014 0.20 Amend Settlement Agreement Wed. Oct 1, 2014 0.30 Email to Bill Wickersham Wed. Oct 1, 2014 2.90 Email to [email protected] Wed. Oct 1, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Oct 1, 2014 1.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected];astoll @stollglickman.com Wed. Oct 1, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.90 Calculate Damages Specifically for Delita Jacobs and compare to estimated payout Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.20 Email to Jonathan Adler Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 9 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 19 of 63 PageID #: 892 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Oct 2, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.50 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.50 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.70 Email to Jonathan Adler Thu. Oct 2, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Fri. Oct 3, 2014 2.00 Email to Kathy Caminiti Work on Settlement Papers Fri. Oct 3, 2014 1.90 Email to Kathy Caminiti Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - left message Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.90 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Oct 6, 2014 1.00 Motion for settlement approval Mon. Oct 6, 2014 2.00 Email to Kathy Caminiti Mon. Oct 6, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Mon. Oct 6, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - left message Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 10 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 20 of 63 PageID #: 893 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Oct 7, 2014 Time (hrs) 2.80 Settlement Review Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.70 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.70 Email to Bill Wickersham Tue. Oct 7, 2014 1.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Tue. Oct 7, 2014 1.50 Email to [email protected] Amended Complaint Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.30 Email to [email protected] Tue. Oct 7, 2014 1.00 Email to [email protected] Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.30 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Tue. Oct 7, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Wed. Oct 8, 2014 2.60 Email to Delita Jacobs Memo in spupport of settlement Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Kathy Caminiti Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 11 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 21 of 63 PageID #: 894 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Oct 8, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.70 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawyer s.com;[email protected] Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawyer s.com;[email protected] Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.60 Email to [email protected];[email protected];astoll@stollglickma n.com;[email protected] Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.40 Email to [email protected] Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.30 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.40 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Research individualized damage notices Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Wed. Oct 8, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Thu. Oct 9, 2014 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Thu. Oct 9, 2014 0.20 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Oct 17, 2014 5.30 Preliminary Settlement Motion Fri. Oct 17, 2014 1.30 Email to Delita Jacobs Fri. Oct 17, 2014 2.40 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - left message Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.30 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 12 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 22 of 63 PageID #: 895 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Oct 17, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to [email protected] Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.20 Email to Jonathan Adler Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.70 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Fri. Oct 17, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected] Sat. Oct 18, 2014 0.80 Delcaration and motion work Sun. Oct 19, 2014 1.90 Declaration and Motion Sun. Oct 19, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Oct 20, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Oct 20, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected];jadler@herric k.com Mon. Oct 20, 2014 1.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Oct 20, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold - left message Mon. Oct 20, 2014 0.10 Telephone call from Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold - spoke Mon. Oct 20, 2014 1.90 Email to Jonathan Adler Final Drafts of setlement agreement and declaration Mon. Oct 20, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Tue. Oct 21, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Tue. Oct 21, 2014 0.20 Email to [email protected] Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 13 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 23 of 63 PageID #: 896 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Oct 29, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Wed. Nov 5, 2014 .10 Email to Thu. Nov 6, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Mon. Nov 10, 2014 0.10 Conference with SD Tue. Nov 18, 2014 0.10 Email to Tue. Nov 18, 2014 0.50 Prepare for conference with Court Tue. Nov 18, 2014 0.90 Telephone call to Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold and continued conferenec with Jonathan Adler - spoke Tue. Nov 18, 2014 0.20 Prepare additional letter to Court Tue. Nov 18, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Wed. Nov 19, 2014 .10 Email to A. Jonathan Trafinmow Wed. Nov 19, 2014 0.20 Teleconference with Jonathan Trafimow Sun. Nov 23, 2014 1.40 Correspondence to Court- Amended Class Notices Sun. Nov 23, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Nov 24, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Sun. Nov 30, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Dec 1, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected] Fri. Dec 5, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 14 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 24 of 63 PageID #: 897 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Dec 8, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Conference Rescheduling Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.60 Telephone call to Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold - spoke Prepare for conference Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.30 Email to Avery Mehlman Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.20 Email to Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.30 Telephone call to Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold - spoke Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.70 Email to Kathy Caminiti Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.10 Amend Notices Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Mon. Dec 8, 2014 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Dec 9, 2014 1.00 Amended Notices and correspondence with counsel Thu. Dec 11, 2014 0.10 Email to Thu. Dec 11, 2014 0.20 Create Website Thu. Dec 11, 2014 0.10 Email to David DiNatale Thu. Dec 11, 2014 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Tue. Dec 16, 2014 0.40 Email to Bill Wickersham Thu. Dec 18, 2014 0.30 Email to Jonathan Adler Review timing for final hearing and disbursements Cehck Documents for online filing Fri. Dec 19, 2014 0.10 Email to David DiNatale Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 15 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 25 of 63 PageID #: 898 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Sat. Dec 20, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.70 Email to [email protected] Fri. Jan 9, 2015 0.90 Reveiw email from Bill Wickersham/ notices to go out Wed. Jan 14, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Bill Wickersham - spoke Wed. Jan 14, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Wed. Jan 14, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Wed. Jan 14, 2015 1.00 Email to Bill Wickersham Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.20 Reveiw Emails from Melissa Baldwin Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Melissa Baldwin - left message Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawye rs.com Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Melissa Baldwin - spoke Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawye rs.com Thu. Jan 15, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected];[email protected] om;[email protected] Tue. Jan 20, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jahlil Jabello - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 16 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 26 of 63 PageID #: 899 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Jan 21, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Email to Alan Hanson Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Alan Hanson - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Email to Tiara Williams Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tiara Williams - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Hakeem Chappelle - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Email to Samuel Parker Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Email to Samuel Parker Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Samuel Parker - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Email to Edouard Vilnea Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Edouard Vilnea - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Email to Tayonne Gaines Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.50 Email to [email protected];[email protected] Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.10 Review timing for fairness hearing Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.10 Email to Bill Wickersham Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.10 Email to Takia Hill Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Takia Hill - spoke Thu. Jan 29, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Raynesha Davis - spoke Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 17 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 27 of 63 PageID #: 900 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Jan 29, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Eric Topping - no answer Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Email to Olanrewaju Majekodunmi Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Foulishia Jean - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected] Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.20 Research other settlements and average number of opt outs Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.30 Review Class members claiming incorrect data Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected]; Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.40 Email to [email protected];;[email protected];;MBaldwin@rg2clai ms.com Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected] Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected] Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.50 Telephone call to Melissa Baldwin - spoke Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.30 Reveiw Determination Letters Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected];[email protected];kcaminiti@laborlawye rs.com;; Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.70 Letter to Court Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.20 Email to Jonathan Adler Tue. Mar 3, 2015 1.60 Email to [email protected];;[email protected] Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.20 Email to Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 18 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 28 of 63 PageID #: 901 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Mar 6, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to D'andre Hobbins - spoke Mon. Mar 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Melissa Baldwin - spoke Mon. Mar 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Mon. Mar 9, 2015 0.80 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Mon. Mar 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kathy Caminiti - spoke Wed. Mar 11, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected] Wed. Mar 11, 2015 0.20 Email to Jonathan Adler Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Email to [email protected]; Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.10 Email to [email protected]; Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.10 Email to Alena Zimbovich, Olisha Wright, Jakera Wright Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.10 Email to David DiNatale Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.60 Email to David DiNatale Thu. Mar 19, 2015 0.30 Email to [email protected] Thu. Mar 19, 2015 1.80 Final Certification Motion Sat. Mar 21, 2015 0.10 Email to Jonathan Adler Wed. Mar 25, 2015 0.20 Work on proposed Court Order Mon. Mar 30, 2015 1.70 Prepare Proposed Court Order Approving Settlement Tue. Mar 31, 2015 4.40 Draft Proposed Court Order, Declaration, Motion Tue. Mar 31, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 19 of 20 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 29 of 63 PageID #: 902 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Time (hrs) 4.00 Proposed court order, memorandum of law, motion for fees, administrator fees, and incentive pay Wed. Apr 1, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Wed. Apr 1, 2015 0.30 Email to A. Jonathan Trafinmow Total Time: Printed by Andrew Stoll on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 201.30 Hrs Page 20 of 20 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 30 of 63 PageID #: 903 Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP Rachel Haskell's Time Entry Report for Selected File: Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy Client ID: Matter ID: 12CV4842 Date Task/Activity Code Task/Activity Description Thu. Jun 6, 2013 Time (hrs) 3.90 Research re: misclassification of outside sales exemption and illegal deductions. Fri. Jun 7, 2013 2.20 Research on illegal deductions and misclassification Mon. Jun 10, 2013 2.60 Reserach Tue. Jun 11, 2013 6.60 Met with C.Davis to discuss our arguments for the overtime claims and what research we needed to do to support the arguments. Conducted research on illegal deductions, salary basis test, and outside sales exemption. Wed. Jun 12, 2013 5.00 Research on Outside Sales exemption; illegal deductions; salary basis test; Thu. Jun 13, 2013 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Thu. Jun 13, 2013 0.10 Telephone call to Desmond Pouncie - spoke Thu. Jun 13, 2013 3.40 Drafted cover letter for production of documents; put together all client documents to be produced in the pre-mediation exchange of documents. Mon. Jun 17, 2013 2.80 Meeting with D.Jacobs. Went through all of Defendants document production. Thu. Jun 20, 2013 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Thu. Jun 20, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Thu. Jun 27, 2013 2.80 miscellaneous Fri. Jun 28, 2013 5.60 miscellaneous; Research Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 1 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 31 of 63 PageID #: 904 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Jun 28, 2013 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Fri. Jun 28, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with Salka, Gregg Fri. Jun 28, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with Salka, Gregg Mon. Jul 1, 2013 0.20 Conference with C.Davis re: research for mediation. Mon. Jul 1, 2013 5.90 Research re: Illegal Deductions Mon. Jul 1, 2013 0.90 Reviewing documents Tue. Jul 2, 2013 4.90 Document Review in prep for mediation. Tue. Jul 2, 2013 0.20 Office conference with C.Davis regarding evidence for mediation statement Wed. Jul 3, 2013 4.10 Document Review Wed. Jul 3, 2013 0.20 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan Wed. Jul 3, 2013 0.30 Confer with C.Davis re: what needs to be done in the Jacobs case. Wed. Jul 3, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with Salka, Gregg Mon. Jul 8, 2013 0.10 Email to Delita Jacobs Mon. Jul 8, 2013 11.20 Drafting Affidavit for Delita Jacobs for mediation including reviewing Documents/potential exhibits for the mediation. Mon. Jul 8, 2013 0.50 Confer with Delita regarding text messages and emails she may have and any other loose ended questions Mon. Jul 8, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Tue. Jul 9, 2013 12.80 Affidavit for Delita; Research for Mediation Statement; Drafting section of Mediations Statement; Document review for affidavit and mediations statement Tue. Jul 9, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 2 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 32 of 63 PageID #: 905 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Jul 10, 2013 Time (hrs) 14.10 Mediations preperation Thu. Jul 11, 2013 10.50 At all-day mediation in Garden City. Thu. Jul 25, 2013 0.50 miscellaneous Fri. Jul 26, 2013 6.90 Discovery Requests Mon. Jul 29, 2013 5.20 ESI Letter; Drafting Discovery requests; research for discovery requests. Tue. Jul 30, 2013 5.20 Drafting document requests Tue. Jul 30, 2013 1.00 Research regarding discovery stay pending motion to dismiss. Wed. Jul 31, 2013 0.20 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan Thu. Aug 1, 2013 1.20 Meet and Confer conference call with defendants; conference with C.Davis prior to and afterwards regarding the call and discovery issues. Mon. Aug 5, 2013 4.80 miscellaneous Tue. Aug 6, 2013 2.50 Draft proposed discovery plan for initial conference; attend initial conference; research regarding exemption being decided at 12(b)(6) and DeJesus. Fri. Aug 9, 2013 1.10 Phone call with J.Adler re: Defendants edit to amended complaint. Made final edits on amended complaint, ECF Amended Complaint. Fri. Aug 9, 2013 0.30 Phone call to Judge Block and Judge Gold's chambers regarding redlined copies Tue. Aug 13, 2013 0.70 Email discovery requests to Defendants in Jacobs; Put together all hard copies for snail mail. Tue. Aug 13, 2013 1.10 Review of Sales call-in data to determine best way to sort through data. Wed. Aug 14, 2013 4.00 Reviewing call in dates/times to determine periods that people are working Thu. Aug 15, 2013 2.90 Reviewing call in data Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 3 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 33 of 63 PageID #: 906 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Aug 15, 2013 Time (hrs) 1.00 Research into the default "work week" Fri. Aug 16, 2013 0.20 Emails with C.Davis regarding issues with data Fri. Aug 16, 2013 0.50 Phone call with J. Adler Fri. Aug 16, 2013 2.80 Review of call-in data Tue. Aug 20, 2013 0.10 Phone call with J.Adler Wed. Aug 21, 2013 0.70 Telephone call to John Adler - spoke about damages calculations and assumptions. Wed. Aug 21, 2013 0.50 Review of documents that state hours worked calculations. Mon. Sep 23, 2013 1.50 Damages calculations Tue. Sep 24, 2013 5.60 Review of TPV calls for purpose of determining damages Wed. Sep 25, 2013 4.30 Damages calculations; office conference about damages calculations; extrapolate time worked and weeks worked Thu. Sep 26, 2013 0.10 Emails with J.Adler regarding damages documents/TPV call ins Fri. Sep 27, 2013 0.30 Phone call with J.Adler to review data. Tue. Oct 1, 2013 0.30 Damages calculations Fri. Oct 4, 2013 4.60 Damages calculations Mon. Oct 7, 2013 1.20 Damages Calculations Tue. Oct 8, 2013 3.20 Damages calculations Tue. Oct 8, 2013 0.20 Phone call with J.Adler; email with J. Adler Wed. Oct 9, 2013 4.90 Damages calculations Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 4 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 34 of 63 PageID #: 907 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Oct 9, 2013 Time (hrs) 0.10 Office conference with C.Davis Mon. Oct 14, 2013 4.20 Damages calculations; office conference with C.Davis regarding assumptions; email to J.Adler regarding meeting with defense counsel after Fridays court conference Tue. Oct 15, 2013 5.20 Damages Calculations Wed. Oct 16, 2013 6.80 Damages Calculations Wed. Oct 16, 2013 0.20 Arrangements for meeting on Friday after court. Fri. Oct 18, 2013 5.10 Court appearance for premotion conference, meet and confer with opposing counsel re: assumptions and damages calculations. Fri. Oct 18, 2013 2.10 Determination of the average hours that TPV class are made for 2010 and 2011. Mon. Oct 21, 2013 3.20 Damages calculation--earliest time knocking on doors miscellaneous Tue. Oct 22, 2013 5.90 Damages calculations for deductions and minimum wages Wed. Oct 23, 2013 4.30 miscellaneous Fri. Oct 25, 2013 5.80 Emails with J.Adler re example of stip; office conference with C.Davis regarding planning and reviewing damages calculations for Min. Wage Violations; Damages calculations for minimum wage violations Mon. Oct 28, 2013 3.20 Damages calculations for minimum wage issue Mon. Nov 4, 2013 3.60 Damages calculations Tue. Nov 5, 2013 2.20 Email to John Adler; finalize damages calculations Wed. Nov 6, 2013 0.60 Email to John Adler Wed. Nov 6, 2013 1.50 Finalize demand and recheck all calculations Fri. Nov 8, 2013 0.20 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 5 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 35 of 63 PageID #: 908 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Nov 8, 2013 Time (hrs) 1.00 Office conference with C.Davis; review of letters from J. Adler; edits to letter; phone call with Adler re: edits Tue. Nov 19, 2013 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - left message Mon. Nov 25, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Wed. Nov 27, 2013 0.10 Email correspondence with 'DELITA JACOBS', Chris Davis ([email protected]) Thu. Dec 12, 2013 1.90 Putting together damages, putting together binder of documents for negotiations Fri. Dec 13, 2013 4.10 Settlement negotiations Mon. Dec 16, 2013 0.90 Office Conference with C.Davis re: next steps and position on the issues. Tue. Dec 17, 2013 2.30 Research on Penn Deduction laws and gap time laws Tue. Dec 17, 2013 0.60 Office conference with C.Davis re: research findings and what we want to get across to Defendants. Tue. Dec 17, 2013 0.40 Email to opposing counsel re: next moves in settlement demand Mon. Jan 6, 2014 0.20 Phone call with J.Adler re continued settlement negotiations; court conference; setting up a call with K.Caminiti Tue. Jan 7, 2014 1.20 Conference Call with Judge Gold; Phone call with Adler and Caminiti prior to phone call to discuss settlement structure questions. Tue. Jan 7, 2014 0.40 Phone call and emails with C.Davis regarding prep for phone call with J.Adler and K.Caminiti and subsequent call with J.Gold Tue. Jan 7, 2014 0.90 Prep for phone call with J.Adler; review of settlement demand and structure; review of case law for Penn wage deductions; review of possible settlement structures. Mon. Jan 13, 2014 0.20 Phone call with W.Wickersham re: fraud prevention when sending out settlement checks. Tue. Jan 14, 2014 0.60 Email to Jon and Kathy, email with W.Wickersham; office conference with C.Davis re settlmeent Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 6 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 36 of 63 PageID #: 909 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Jan 21, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - message Thu. Jan 30, 2014 0.10 Telephone call from Jonathan Adler - spoke Thu. Jan 30, 2014 0.40 Office conference with C.Davis re: phone call with J.Adler, terms sheet, and settlement possibilities Fri. Jan 31, 2014 0.60 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Fri. Jan 31, 2014 0.40 Email exchange with J.Adler re settlement and terms sheet Mon. Feb 3, 2014 0.10 Office conference with C.Davis re settlement Mon. Feb 3, 2014 0.30 Office conference with C.Davis regarding settlement discussions; Mon. Feb 3, 2014 0.50 Drafting letter to court re status of settlement Mon. Feb 3, 2014 0.10 Emails with J. Adler re settlement negotiations Tue. Feb 11, 2014 0.70 Emails with J.Adlar re letter to the court; review letter to the court; ECF letter to the court; Tue. Feb 11, 2014 0.50 Phone call with J.Adlar and K.Caminiti re settlement and "shake hands" agreement over the phone for $700,000. Wed. Feb 12, 2014 0.20 Review C.Davis edits to the terms sheet Fri. Feb 21, 2014 0.10 Email with J.Adler and K.Caminiti re phone calls and terms sheet Fri. Feb 21, 2014 0.50 Review terms sheet; office conference with C.Davis re same Mon. Feb 24, 2014 0.60 Phone call with J.Adler and K.Caminiti re terms sheet; office conference with C.Davis re same. Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.10 Email to A. Jonathan Trafinmow Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.20 Office conference with C.Davis re settlement negotiations; conversations with mediator; etc. Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.50 Phone call with A.Jonathan Tarfinmow re case and settlement and certain issues we have run up against. Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 7 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 37 of 63 PageID #: 910 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Mar 5, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Wed. Mar 5, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.20 Email to Delita Jacobs Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 10, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Mon. Mar 17, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Tue. Mar 18, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Tue. Mar 18, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Tue. Mar 18, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Mon. Mar 24, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Mon. Mar 24, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 8 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 38 of 63 PageID #: 911 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Mar 25, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Tue. Mar 25, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Tue. Mar 25, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Tue. Mar 25, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with '[email protected]' Wed. Mar 26, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Wed. Mar 26, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Wed. Mar 26, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with A. Jonathan Trafimow Fri. Apr 4, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with DELITA JACOBS Fri. Apr 4, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with DELITA JACOBS Fri. Apr 4, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with 'DELITA JACOBS' Fri. Apr 4, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Mon. Apr 7, 2014 0.20 E-mail correspondence with 'DELITA JACOBS' Wed. Apr 9, 2014 0.20 Draft letter to the court re extension Wed. Apr 9, 2014 0.20 Phone call with J.Adler Wed. Apr 9, 2014 0.10 Office conference with C.Davis re: Jacobs settlement Wed. Apr 9, 2014 0.10 Email to opposing counsel re letter for extension Tue. Apr 15, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected] Thu. Apr 17, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected], Chris Davis ([email protected]) Tue. Apr 22, 2014 Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 0.10 Page 9 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 39 of 63 PageID #: 912 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Time (hrs) Email correspondence with [email protected], Chris Davis ([email protected]) Wed. Apr 23, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected] Tue. Apr 29, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected], Chris Davis ([email protected]) Wed. Apr 30, 2014 0.10 Email to Desmond Pouncie Fri. May 2, 2014 3.80 Drafting of stip of settlement Mon. May 5, 2014 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - left message Mon. May 5, 2014 7.90 Drafting Preliminary approval motion; stip of settlement; declaration; notices; request for exclusion; Proposed Order Tue. May 6, 2014 2.60 Drafting memorandum of law Tue. May 6, 2014 1.30 Research for D.Jacobs preliminary approval motion; review of Orgill; review of Patcher; research 3rd circuits approval of Rule 23 class actions with FLSA collective actions Wed. May 7, 2014 0.10 Phone call to D.Jacobs -- left message Wed. May 7, 2014 3.80 Memo of law and declaration. Wed. May 7, 2014 0.10 Email to J.Adler and K.Caminiti re settlement agreement. Fri. May 9, 2014 0.10 Review of emails from J.Adler and K.Caminiti Fri. May 9, 2014 0.20 Phone call with J.Adler Mon. May 12, 2014 0.40 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' -- reviewed letter to court he sent, edits to letter to court, emailed edited version, set new date in AMICUS Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Wickersham, William W. Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.' Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 10 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 40 of 63 PageID #: 913 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. May 19, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.80 Review settlement agreement mark up Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen';'Adler, Jonathan' Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Mon. May 19, 2014 0.10 Email correspondence with [email protected], Chris Davis ([email protected]) Tue. May 20, 2014 0.20 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Tue. May 20, 2014 0.50 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.'; Phone call with Wickersham re damages calculations Tue. May 20, 2014 0.30 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.'; phone call with Wickersham re damages calculations for settlement agreement. Tue. May 20, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Tue. May 20, 2014 4.40 Review of settlement agreement/damages methodology. Review of NYLL and Penn Wage Law re: deductions to better understand the March 2012 and Oct. 9, 2013 date put into settlement agreement; review data provided by D's for mediation to figure out how Bill could possible calculate the costs to determine damages. Wed. May 21, 2014 4.10 Reviewing issues surround settlement stipulation; class size being almost 30% larger than anticipated based on the 7% sample provided; discussions with C.Davis and W.Wickersham regarding issues of data and methodology. Wed. May 21, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.' Wed. May 21, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Wed. May 21, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen' Thu. May 22, 2014 0.50 Phone call with Jon Adler Thu. May 22, 2014 0.50 Finalize letter and ECF letter for extension Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 11 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 41 of 63 PageID #: 914 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. May 22, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.60 Office conference with C.Davis about phone call with Alder, and the possibility of the settlement blowing up Thu. May 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'A. Jonathan Trafimow' Thu. May 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Tue. May 27, 2014 3.10 Office conference with C.Davis re settlement possibly blowing up, actual size of class, review of emails and other correspondence regarding sampling protocol Tue. May 27, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]) Wed. May 28, 2014 0.40 Office conference with C.Davis re email sent last night about class size; office conference with C.Davis re discovery v. Motion to dismiss and not staying discovery pending the MTD Mon. Jun 2, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'Chris Davis' Tue. Jun 3, 2014 0.70 Office conference with C.Davis re: next steps; i.e. How long do we give Defendants, correspondence to the court, and case law on sampling issues. Tue. Jun 3, 2014 2.20 Research case law on rejections of settlements based on improper sampling and plaintiffs not getting a good deal Tue. Jun 3, 2014 1.90 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Wed. Jun 4, 2014 0.70 Telephone call from Kathleen Caminiti - spoke Wed. Jun 4, 2014 0.50 Office conference with Cdavis re conversation with K.Caminiti. Wed. Jun 4, 2014 0.20 Email to K.Caminiti Mon. Jun 9, 2014 0.20 Email correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen', 'Adler, Jonathan', 'Cossrow, Brent', 'Veron, Beth', Chris Davis ([email protected]) re sending us the class list and dates worked and setting up a meeting; Office conference with C.Davis re same Tue. Jun 17, 2014 0.50 Phone call with K.Caminiti and J.Adler Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 12 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 42 of 63 PageID #: 915 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Jun 17, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.30 Office conference with C.Davis regarding sample size and altering the sample to create something that is representative Tue. Jun 17, 2014 1.10 Review of the full class list and figuring out whether it is representative Tue. Jun 17, 2014 0.90 Altering the sample I have to create something which is actually representative of the whole class Wed. Jun 18, 2014 5.00 Generating new sample and conducting calculations based off of a 2.5 representative sample Wed. Jun 18, 2014 1.10 Email to J.Adler and K.Caminiti regarding the generated sample and the calculations based off of such Fri. Jun 20, 2014 0.50 Review email from J.Adler regarding his requested information and reply email with as much information as I could provide Mon. Jun 23, 2014 0.20 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen' and create list on the Reps left out. Wed. Jun 25, 2014 0.10 Email to K.Caminiti and J.Adler re setting up a date to meet Mon. Jun 30, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Mon. Jun 30, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'[email protected]' Tue. Jul 1, 2014 0.20 Telephone call from Jonathan Adler - spoke Tue. Jul 1, 2014 1.50 Prep for meeting Tue. Jul 1, 2014 6.00 Jacobs meeting at Herrick - Tue. Jul 1, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Mehlman, Avery';'Adler, Jonathan' Tue. Jul 1, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Mehlman, Avery Tue. Jul 1, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Tue. Jul 1, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen';'Adler, Jonathan' Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 13 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 43 of 63 PageID #: 916 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Jul 1, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'[email protected]' Wed. Jul 2, 2014 0.30 Email to D.Jacobs regarding the breakdown. Wed. Jul 2, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected] Mon. Jul 7, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'Wickersham, William W.';'[email protected]' Mon. Jul 7, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.';'Adler, Jonathan';'[email protected]' Wed. Jul 9, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen';'Wickersham, William W.';'Adler, Jonathan' Wed. Jul 9, 2014 0.20 Set up conference dial in for call with all counsel and bill wickersham Thu. Jul 10, 2014 0.70 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Thu. Jul 10, 2014 1.20 Settlement agreement round 2 Thu. Jul 10, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Wickersham, William W.' Fri. Jul 11, 2014 3.10 Drafting round 2 settlement agreement Fri. Jul 11, 2014 0.20 Phone call with W.Wickersham re administration fees Fri. Jul 11, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected] Wed. Jul 16, 2014 0.20 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'[email protected]' Wed. Jul 16, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected];Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]) Mon. Jul 21, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Wickersham, William W. Mon. Jul 21, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan';'[email protected]' Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 Page 14 of 15 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 44 of 63 PageID #: 917 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Jul 22, 2014 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Delita Jacobs - spoke Tue. Jul 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen';'Adler, Jonathan' Tue. Jul 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected] Tue. Jul 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Caminiti, Kathleen';'Adler, Jonathan' Tue. Jul 22, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Wed. Jul 23, 2014 1.00 Drafting settlement agreement. Wed. Jul 23, 2014 4.40 Preliminary motions; notices; settlement agreement/stip; proposed order Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected] with draft of settlement agreement Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.20 Telephone call from Bill Wickersham - spoke Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.20 Telephone call from Jonathan Adler, Bill Wickersham - spoke Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]);[email protected];Wickersham, William W.;Baldwin, Melissa E ([email protected]) Wed. Jul 23, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with [email protected];Adler, Jonathan ([email protected]) Thu. Jul 24, 2014 4.20 Drafting brief Sun. Jul 27, 2014 0.60 Review of K.Caminiti's edits to the settlement agreement Mon. Jul 28, 2014 1.10 Review of edits to the notices and settlement agreement Mon. Jul 28, 2014 0.10 E-mail correspondence with 'Adler, Jonathan' Total Time: Printed by Rachel Haskell on Thu. Mar 19, 2015 332.20 Hrs Page 15 of 15 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 45 of 63 PageID #: 918 Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP Saranicole Duaban's Time Entry Report for Selected File: Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy Client ID: Matter ID: 12CV4842 Date Task/Activity Code Task/Activity Description Fri. Oct 3, 2014 Time (hrs) 1.50 Drafted second amended complaint Fri. Oct 3, 2014 0.90 Edited second amended complaint Mon. Oct 6, 2014 0.90 Edited PA causes of action in second amended complaint Tue. Jan 20, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Danielle Todd - spoke Tue. Jan 20, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Denise Willis - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jenulle Haynes - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Rondell Holder - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Lloyd Winkfield - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Dirian Martinez - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Latoya Payton - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Michael Gilyard - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Zamere Howard - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kathy Williams - spoke; Telephone call to Kiera Alexander - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Brittney Smith - spoke; Telephone call to Jessica DeJesus - left message Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to William Hopkins - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 1 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 46 of 63 PageID #: 919 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Jan 21, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Linda Taylor - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Steven May - spoke; Telephone call to Erick Spady spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Luis Reyes - spoke; Telephone call to Andrew Davis - left message Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Kristal Sanders - spoke; Telephone call to Munajj Bishop - spoke; Telephone call to Brittney Smith - left message Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Tia Mccandless - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jessica DeJesus - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Joseph Kennedy - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Degila Grissin - spoke; Telephone call to Antonette Earle - spoke; Telephone call to Tiffany Lee - left message; Telephone call to Patricia Smith - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Tiffany Lee - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Danijah Latimore - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kathleen Chandler - spoke Wed. Jan 21, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Donnell Wiggin - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Princess Williams - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Rodney Pearson - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Christina Byard - spoke; Telephone call to Tamara Rodgers - spoke; Telephone call to Tyra Williams - left message; Telephone call to Ashley Benson - left message Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kia Boynes - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Shazzmina Byard - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 2 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 47 of 63 PageID #: 920 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Jan 22, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Meeting with one of the class action plaintiffs Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tamika Bolden - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Tamerra Wood - spoke; Telephone call to Shazzmina Byard - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Orlando acevedo - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Douglass Morales - spoke Telephone call to Shadera Harrod - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Keilana Mungin - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to natalie Jordan - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to cleon mcinthosh - spoke; Telephone call to Jerome Alexander - left message Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tiffany Lee - left message Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Micheal Phillips - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to ideeya sample - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tevin Adams - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Juan Lopez - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Marion Slockbower - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jalene Navarre - spoke; Telephone call to Raven Howard - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Akindayo Oladapo - spoke; Telephone call to michelle brown - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kesha Wilson McCowl - spoke; Telephone call to D. Brown - left message Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jasmine Pierce - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 3 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 48 of 63 PageID #: 921 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Thu. Jan 22, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Tysisha Glassgow - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to D. Brown - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Marion Slockbower - spoke Thu. Jan 22, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Pearl Sampson - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jessica Saab - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jessica Saab - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Krystle Semidey - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Phong Chung - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Antanaya Mazzccua - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Vadim Abdrakhmanov - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to George Gilmore - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Shantelle Parker - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tyrria Williams - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Laniece Mercer - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Matthew Bowen - spoke; Telephone call to Leo Sampson - spoke; Telephone call to Sahar Ismail - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Taenisha Smith - spoke; Telephone call to Donovan Wesley - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to joseph cawley - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Mariah Green - spoke; Telephone call to Cindy Livingston - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 4 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 49 of 63 PageID #: 922 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Jan 23, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.30 Telephone call to Alena Zimbovich - spoke; Telephone call to Shanyda Hammond - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to latik Short - spoke; Telephone call to Andrew Davis - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Yolanda Novoa - spoke; Telephone call to Corey Atias - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Pearl Sampson - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Elijah Davis - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Olanrewaju Majekodunmi - spoke; Telephone call to Nishiara Legister - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Linda Miranda - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Leo Sampson - spoke Fri. Jan 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tanganyika Rice - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Narcissus Dutton - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Antoine Waldron - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Tawana Andrews - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Matanael Negron - spoke; Telephone call to Vladamir Abreu - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Ronnie Banks - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Verleria Thomas - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Joseph Cawley - spoke; Telephone call to Abgail Wiltz - spoke; Telephone call to Lance Molina - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Devon Slippen - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Dmytro Trykoza - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 5 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 50 of 63 PageID #: 923 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Jan 26, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Mark Schroeder - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Travis Prawl - spoke; Telephone call to Jeffrey Dawson - left message; Telephone call to Nathanial Childs - left message Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Jeffrey Dawson - spoke; Telephone call to Daniel Kennon - spoke; Telephone call to Nathanial Childs - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Sol Loucette Jules - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Charles Phillips - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Sabrina Blackman - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jason Shakesphere - spoke; Telephone call with Olanrewaju Majekodunmi - Spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Ashaley Etienne - spoke; Telephone call to Samuel Parker - spoke; Telephone call to Alana Brissett - left message Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Bashir Edwards - spoke; Telephone call to Eric Carving - left message; Telephone call to Darnell Jones - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Calvin Sharpe - spoke Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kiana Davidson - no answer Mon. Jan 26, 2015 0.50 Emailed new addresses to claims adminstrator Tue. Jan 27, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Eric Carving - spoke Tue. Jan 27, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Drew Alexander - spoke Tue. Jan 27, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Phillip Hanack - spoke Tue. Jan 27, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Elizabeth Miranda-Pastrana - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Scott Duncan - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 6 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 51 of 63 PageID #: 924 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Jan 28, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Cory Reeves - left message; Telephone call to Jesy Pierre - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Meshe Miller - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kaseem Reese - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Zakia Jackson Cosby - spoke; Telephone call to Kory alexander Reese - spoke; Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke; Telephone call to Robert Clark - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Tanario Sanders - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to James Robinson - spoke; Telephone call to Tiffany Murry - left message; Telephone call to Yvonne Jones - spoke Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.20 E-mailed settlement adminstrator Wed. Jan 28, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Lakisha Arlington - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call with Patricia Saunders, Patricia Saunders - Spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Gary Mines - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Glendale Lawson - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Darnell Jones - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Brian Tillman - spoke; Telephone call to Lance Jenkins - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Odari Birthwright - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Lance Jenkins - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Edna King - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Alonzo Dario - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 7 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 52 of 63 PageID #: 925 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Feb 2, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Edna King - spoke; Telephone call to Yashanna Davis - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Eric Tomkin Jr. - left message Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Daniel Bustamante - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Maurice Foster - spoke; Telephone call to Alexander Montijo - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Latoya Lewis - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Anthony Ginyard - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Quintin Wesley - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Ifrain Berrios - spoke Mon. Feb 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Vadim Abdrakhmanov - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Quintin Wesley - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.40 Corresponded with client Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Vincent Dukes - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Bernadette Perkins - spoke; Telephone call to Dominic Smith - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Mark Schroeder - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Timothy Moore - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Meleila McClary - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Nasser Mouane - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 8 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 53 of 63 PageID #: 926 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Feb 3, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Jobanie Diaz - spoke; Telephone call to Angelica Martinez - spoke Tue. Feb 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Sabrina Blackman - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Gendle Lawson - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Stanley Wells - spoke; Telephone call to Eric Topping - spoke; Telephone call to Franchesca Myrthil - no answer Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Gloria Thomas - left message Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kenda Maybank - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kashonda Wellman - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Anthony Garner - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Darrius Core - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Chassidy Williams - spoke; Telephone call to Wakabwe Kabwe - spoke Wed. Feb 4, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Kory Reese - spoke; Telephone call to Steven Nichloas - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Christina Jones - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Richard Perez - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Patrick Nutt - spoke; Telephone call to Yasmine Smalley - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Timothy Moore - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Zariar Diggs - spoke Thu. Feb 5, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tyrek Taylor - spoke Fri. Feb 6, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Shaheed Morris - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 9 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 54 of 63 PageID #: 927 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Feb 6, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Masrudin Ahmed - spoke Fri. Feb 6, 2015 0.30 Telephone call from Erasmo Ramos - spoke Fri. Feb 6, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Sheldon Harper - spoke Fri. Feb 6, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jackie Lambert - spoke Fri. Feb 6, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Milira Shaw - spoke; Telephone call to Brandon Young - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Datari Peterson - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Nector Caro - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Javier Lopez - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Charles Avitable - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Unique Johnson - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Dmytro Trykoza - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Barbari Peterson - left message Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Datari Peterson - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Susan Janitsch - spoke Mon. Feb 9, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Akilah Morgan - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jeremy Collazo - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Lucius Steagall - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Timothy Moore - spoke; Telephone call to Melene Phillip - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 10 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 55 of 63 PageID #: 928 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Feb 10, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Tanganyika Rice - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Felicia Edwards - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Mark Schroeder - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Taseen Esfar - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Frank Thomas - spoke Tue. Feb 10, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Serge Machurin - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jerome Browne - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Ilear Wilcox - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Unique Johnson - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Sabrina Smith - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Dominica Cherry - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kashonda Wellman - spoke Wed. Feb 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Shanikqua Brazil - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Bryant Valentine - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Tendai Derice - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Angelo Glemaud - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jakera Wright - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Wendella Afrani - spoke Thu. Feb 12, 2015 0.20 Emailed oppposing counsel Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 11 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 56 of 63 PageID #: 929 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Fri. Feb 13, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to McGary Laster - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Daury Tavarez - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Matthew Bowen - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to DeeDee Stephens - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Rosie Rodriguez - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Marza Redzepagic - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Donovon Louison - spoke; Telephone call to Eric Sosa - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Brahiem Horne - spoke Fri. Feb 13, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Matthew Henry - spoke; Telephone call to Vidyanand Pirmal - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Terry Green - spoke; Telephone call to Terry Green - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Darrin Purcell - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Ramel Harrison - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Errol Oldacre - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tanganyika Rice - spoke Tue. Feb 17, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Masrudin Ahmed - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Mohammed Ceeesay - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Timothy Moore - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 12 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 57 of 63 PageID #: 930 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Wed. Feb 18, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Lance Jenkins - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tamika Bolden - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.40 Organized class information for call with opposing counsel Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke; Telephone call to Rasheen Walker - spoke Wed. Feb 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Maileny Franco - spoke Thu. Feb 19, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Angelo Glemaud - spoke Thu. Feb 19, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jeffery Desalu - spoke Thu. Feb 19, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Mariah Green - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Monica Anderson - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Valecia Lee Colon - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Daniel Castello - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Brian Tillman - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to - spoke Mon. Feb 23, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jenny Werner - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Walton Johnson - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Sophia Williams - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Yharivette Rivera - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Richard Clinkscales - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Hakeem Chappelle - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 13 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 58 of 63 PageID #: 931 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Tue. Feb 24, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.10 Telephone call to Anthony Ginyard - spoke Tue. Feb 24, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Mark Schroeder - spoke Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Oneil Palmer - spoke; Telephone call to Oneil Palmer - spoke Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Nacedra Miller - spoke Wed. Feb 25, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Warren Hawkins - left message; Telephone call to Talicia Ferguson - left message Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Talicia Ferguson - spoke Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Warren Hawkins - spoke Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Kareem Townsend - spoke Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Naomi Nelson - spoke Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Barry Johnson - spoke Thu. Feb 26, 2015 0.20 Set up conference call Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.60 Telephone call to Jonathan Adler - spoke Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Eduard Vilnea - spoke Fri. Feb 27, 2015 0.20 Reviewed notices sent out to them Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Sabrina Stephenson - spoke Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Olisha Wright - spoke Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.50 Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Olanrewaju Majekodunmi - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 14 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 59 of 63 PageID #: 932 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Mar 2, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Alfonso Powell - spoke Mon. Mar 2, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Krystle Crocker - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Douglas Gonzalez - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Kathleen Moroore - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Bryan Mentore - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kathleen Moroore - spoke Tue. Mar 3, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Karl Orelien - spoke Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tiffany Murray - spoke Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Bryan Mentore - spoke Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Yvonne Jones - spoke Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Eric Topping - spoke Wed. Mar 4, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jean Paul - spoke Thu. Mar 5, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Stanley Wells - spoke Thu. Mar 5, 2015 0.20 emailed settlement administrators for updates Thu. Mar 5, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jeffery Desalu - spoke Thu. Mar 5, 2015 0.50 Meeting with major energy plaintiff Fri. Mar 6, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Darlene Green - spoke Fri. Mar 6, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Lance Kennedy - spoke Fri. Mar 6, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Kory Reese - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 15 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 60 of 63 PageID #: 933 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Mar 9, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.30 Telephone call to Rodger Hodges - spoke Tue. Mar 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Leon Jones - spoke Tue. Mar 10, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Charles Phillips - spoke Tue. Mar 10, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Maryta Fields - spoke Wed. Mar 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Barry Fenner - spoke Wed. Mar 11, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Donte Gifts - spoke Wed. Mar 11, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Akeem Rattray - spoke Thu. Mar 12, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Christina Jones - spoke Thu. Mar 12, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Lashonda Kelley - spoke Thu. Mar 12, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Jordan Nevers - spoke Thu. Mar 12, 2015 0.40 Telephone call to David Drew - spoke; Telephone call to Sheldon Harper - spoke Thu. Mar 12, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to David Drew - spoke Fri. Mar 13, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Timothy Moore - spoke Fri. Mar 13, 2015 0.10 Emailed settlement administrator Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Emailed class about new conference date Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Narcissus Dutton - spoke Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Lesley Foster - left message; Telephone call to Francesca Merrsel - left message Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Francesca Merrsel - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 16 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 61 of 63 PageID #: 934 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Mar 16, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Frank Thomas - spoke Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Frank Thomas - spoke Mon. Mar 16, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Keilana Mungin - spoke Tue. Mar 17, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Datari Peterson - spoke Tue. Mar 17, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Steven Edler - spoke Tue. Mar 17, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Tyreese Sheppard - spoke Tue. Mar 17, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Shaheed Morris - spoke Tue. Mar 17, 2015 0.30 Began researching class action final approval Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Alfonso Powell - spoke Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Sol Jules - spoke Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Aisha Mosley - left message Wed. Mar 18, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to David Drew - spoke Thu. Mar 19, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Nathaniel Childs - spoke Thu. Mar 19, 2015 0.30 Telephone call to Lesley Foster - spoke Fri. Mar 20, 2015 0.50 miscellaneous Fri. Mar 20, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Luis Matos - spoke Sat. Mar 21, 2015 0.40 Began compiling list of class action members and amounts Sun. Mar 22, 2015 0.80 Continued imputting names onto spreadsheet Sun. Mar 22, 2015 2.40 Drafted proposed order for class action settlement Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 17 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 62 of 63 PageID #: 935 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Mar 23, 2015 Time (hrs) 1.00 Worked on the proposed order for final settlement Mon. Mar 23, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Jeffery Desalu - spoke Mon. Mar 23, 2015 0.50 Began researching incentive pay and attys fees in the class action Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.30 Worked on spreadsheet of names Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to AnnaMaria Augusto - spoke Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Radwan Washington - spoke Tue. Mar 24, 2015 1.50 worked on proposed order for class action settlement Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Susette Whittingham - spoke Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Christina Jones - spoke Tue. Mar 24, 2015 0.20 Reviewed cases on attorney fee application Wed. Mar 25, 2015 0.30 Edited first draft of proposed order of settlement Wed. Mar 25, 2015 0.20 Finished spreadsheet of class member amounts Wed. Mar 25, 2015 1.20 Researched attorney's fees, read case law, began drafting attorney's fees motion Thu. Mar 26, 2015 0.20 Telephone call to Charles Brandon - spoke Thu. Mar 26, 2015 1.10 Worked on attorney's fees motion Thu. Mar 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Danielle Todd - spoke Thu. Mar 26, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Sabrina Smith - spoke Fri. Mar 27, 2015 0.60 worked on attorney's fees motion Fri. Mar 27, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Domencio Brown - spoke Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 Page 18 of 19 Time for Selected File Date Jacobs, Delita v. Direct Sales Solutions & Major Energy OVERTIME Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG 77-2 Filed 04/03/15 Page 63 of 63 PageID #: 936 Task/Activity Code Document Task/Activity Description Mon. Mar 30, 2015 Time (hrs) 0.20 Telephone call to Alfonso Powell - spoke Mon. Mar 30, 2015 0.40 Worked on attorney's fees motion Mon. Mar 30, 2015 0.10 emailed settlement adminstrator Mon. Mar 30, 2015 0.30 Researched Judge Gold decisions Mon. Mar 30, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Rabbian Harris - left message Tue. Mar 31, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Abgail Wiltz - spoke Wed. Apr 1, 2015 0.10 Telephone call to Rabbian Harris - spoke Total Time: Printed by Saranicole Duaban on Wed. Apr 1, 2015 70.00 Hrs Page 19 of 19 EXHIBIT C Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 35 PageID #: 937 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 35 PageID #: 938 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 35 PageID #: 939 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 35 PageID #: 940 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 35 PageID #: 941 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 35 PageID #: 942 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 35 PageID #: 943 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 8 of 35 PageID #: 944 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 9 of 35 PageID #: 945 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 10 of 35 PageID #: 946 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 11 of 35 PageID #: 947 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 12 of 35 PageID #: 948 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 13 of 35 PageID #: 949 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 14 of 35 PageID #: 950 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 15 of 35 PageID #: 951 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 16 of 35 PageID #: 952 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 17 of 35 PageID #: 953 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 18 of 35 PageID #: 954 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 19 of 35 PageID #: 955 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 20 of 35 PageID #: 956 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 21 of 35 PageID #: 957 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 22 of 35 PageID #: 958 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 23 of 35 PageID #: 959 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 24 of 35 PageID #: 960 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 25 of 35 PageID #: 961 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 26 of 35 PageID #: 962 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 27 of 35 PageID #: 963 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 28 of 35 PageID #: 964 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 29 of 35 PageID #: 965 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 30 of 35 PageID #: 966 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 31 of 35 PageID #: 967 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 32 of 35 PageID #: 968 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 33 of 35 PageID #: 969 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 34 of 35 PageID #: 970 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-3 Filed 04/03/15 Page 35 of 35 PageID #: 971 EXHIBIT D Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-4 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 972 Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP Invoice 475 Atlantic Avenue, 3rd Floor Brooklyn, NY 11217 Invoice Date: Invoice #: 8/23/2014 1466 Bill To: Case # Date 11/15/2012 8/1/2013 8/12/2013 9/17/2013 6/24/2014 9/26/2012 3/11/2014 12/22/14 1/9/15 1/29/15 Description Rate Amount Process serving: Misc case related costs:legal research Courier fee:RJI Misc case related costs:research Mediation Filing & Court Fees: Expert Fees:mediation 572.50 449.65 25.00 261.30 187.50 350.00 1,745.10 Mediator Go Daddy Website Hosting Website Set up and Hosting 100.00 392.04 750.00 572.50 449.65 25.00 261.30 187.50 350.00 1,745.10 100.00 392.04 750.00 Note: Some charges added by hand as accounting software currently with accountant and changes cannot be made- This is the reason for the formatting oddities. Total Payments applied Balance Due $4833.09 $3,591.05 $0.00 $4833.09 $3,591.05 EXHIBIT E Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 973 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL DELITA JACOBS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and DESMOND POUNCIE, individually, 12-CV-04842(FB)(SMG) Plaintiffs, vs. MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES LLC/RESPOND POWER LLC; MAJOR ENERGY ELECTRIC SERVICES LLC; DIRECT SALES SOLUTIONS LLC; ASHER FRIED; SAUL HOROWITZ; MARK WIEDERMAN; and SHAI FISHMAN in their individual and professional capacities, Defendants. TO: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER FIELD REPRESENTATIVES AND TEAM LEADERS EMPLOYED BY DEFENDANTS, BASED OUT OF THEIR PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 27, 2009 AND DECEMBER 12, 2014. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. SPANISH VERSION AVAILABLE: UNA VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL DE ESTE AVISO Y FORMAS ESTÁ DISPONIBLE POR PONERSE EN CONTACTO CON EL ADMINISTRADOR DE RECLAMOS FIGURAN AL FINAL DE ESTE AVISO. INTRODUCTION This Notice describes a proposed Settlement (the “Settlement”) of the class action lawsuit Delita Jacobs and Desmond Pouncie v. Major Energy Services LLC/Respond Power LLC; Major Energy Electric Services LLC; Direct Sales Solutions LLC; Asher Fried; Saul Horowitz; Mark Wiederman; and Shai Fishman, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. 12-CV-04842 (FB)(SMG) (the “litigation”). The Settlement will resolve all claims that were, or which could have been, asserted in this litigation on an individual, class, or representative basis, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law and the New York Labor Law. You have received this Notice because records indicate that you worked as a field representative and/or team leader based out of defendants’ Pennsylvania offices at any time from September 27, 2009 to December 12, 2014. This Notice informs you of how you can make a claim under the Settlement. The following table summarizes your options in responding to this Notice and the result of you exercising each option. These options are described in more detail below. Page 1 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 974 SUMMARY OF LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS OPTION RESULT Receive additional information concerning the proposed Settlement Contact Class Counsel Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP at (718) 852-3710. Submit an exclusion form Request to be excluded from the Settlement and retain your rights to bring your own lawsuit. Object Write to the Court and explain any concerns you have regarding the Settlement. Attend hearing Request to speak to the Court about the fairness of the Settlement. Do nothing Receive a payment from the proceeds of the Settlement. Give up your right to bring your own claim or lawsuit. CRITICAL DATES MARCH 6, 2015: The last date to sign, complete and mail the enclosed request for exclusion form to opt out of the Settlement and retain your rights to bring your own claim. MARCH 6, 2015: The last date to file any written objections to the Settlement. MARCH 25, 2015, 4:00 PM: The date of the Court hearing to determine whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved by the Court. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE Former field representatives and/or team leaders (“plaintiffs”) filed a proposed class action complaint (“the litigation”) against defendants on behalf of themselves and all persons alleged to be similarly situated. Plaintiffs allege in the litigation that since September 27, 2009, defendants failed to pay field representatives and team leaders all wages due, including regular or overtime wages for all hours worked, and were subjected to unlawful deductions from commissions. Defendants contend that the litigation lacks merit and that they properly paid field representatives and team leaders for all hours worked, including regular or overtime wages. Defendants deny that plaintiffs or field representatives or team leaders are entitled to any relief whatsoever under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law and the New York Labor Law. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Who is included in the Settlement? You are eligible for inclusion in the Settlement if you were employed by defendants as a field representative or team leader based out of defendants’ Pennsylvania offices between September 27, 2009, and December 12, 2014 (the “recovery period”). Defendants will make a Settlement payment, through an independent Settlement Administrator, to each Settlement Class Member who is eligible for payment, based on the formula set forth below. Page 2 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 975 What will I receive from the Settlement? According to defendants’ records, you were employed a total of __________ compensable workweeks. According to defendants’ records, your gross pay within the relevant period was $________________. The estimated amount of your individual settlement payment is $____________. The final amount, however, will not be known until the time has expired for the return of all Exclusion Forms (described above) and any adjustments are made to the calculation of Settlement payments. This amount was calculated using the pro rata formulas explained below. All Settlement payments are subject to taxation. Of each Settlement payment, fifty-percent (50%) will be considered wages, fifty-percent (50%) will be considered interest. Payments allocated to wages shall be subject to all applicable wage laws, including federal, state and local tax withholding and payroll taxes. Prior to mailing Settlement payments, the Settlement Administrator will calculate and deduct all required withholdings and employee and employer-side payroll taxes from each Settlement payment. However, Settlement Class Members bear full and sole responsibility for the payment of any personal income taxes arising from their Settlement payments. No representation is made by the Class Representative, Class Counsel, or defendants concerning the tax consequences of this Settlement or your election to participate in the Settlement. Tax issues for each Settlement Class Member is unique, and each Settlement Class Member is advised to obtain tax advice from his or her own tax advisor with respect to any payments resulting from this Settlement. The Settlement calls for a total maximum payment by defendants not to exceed $700,000.00. Class Counsel fees and costs, Settlement Administrator fees, and Class Representative Incentive payments, estimated to total approximately $288,000.00, will be paid out of that fund. The net Settlement amount of approximately $412,000.00 will be paid to participating Class Members based upon the following: i. Each individual Settlement payment will be calculated by summing the total amount each participating Class Member is entitled to from each of the below mentioned categories. The sums allocated to each category (“the net category allocation”), which currently total $700,000.00, will be reduced proportionally to the net aggregate Settlement amount.1 The categories are as follows: A. Minimum Wage and Overtime: Each participating NY minimum wage/OT Class Member and PA minimum wage/OT class member will receive a pro rata share of $127,445.00, based on weeks worked within the class period, compared to the total weeks worked by all Class Members in this category. B. NY Reserve: Each participating NY reserve Class Member who was hired prior to the end of the NY reserve class period will receive a pro rata share of $312,800.00, based on that Class Member’s gross pay within the NY reserve class period, compared to the total gross pay of the NY reserve class during the NY reserve class period. C. PA Reserve: Each participating PA reserve Class Member who was hired prior to the end of the PA reserve class period will receive a pro rata share of $65,700.00, based on the that Class Member’s gross pay within the PA reserve class period, compared to the total gross pay of the PA reserve class during the PA reserve class period. D. NY Deduction: Each participating NY deduction Class Member who worked within the NY class period will receive a pro rata share of $132,000.00, based on weeks worked within the NY class period, compared to total weeks worked by all Class Members in this category. 1 Thus the net category allocation can be determined as follows: (gross category allocation / $700,000) x net aggregate Settlement amount (which remains subject to final calculation). Page 3 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 976 E. PA Deduction: Each participating PA deduction Class Member who worked within the PA class period will receive a pro rata share of $62,055.00, based on weeks worked within the PA class period, compared to total weeks worked by all Class Members in this category. Irrespective of the formula set forth above, no Class Member will receive less than $25.00. In the event that a participating Class Member’s share, after the combination of the Class Member’s Settlement amounts from all applicable categories, is less than $25.00, he will receive additional compensation to bring his share up to $25.00 and all other participating Class Members’ benefit amounts will be reduced on a pro rata basis to account for the minimum threshold amount.2 When will I receive my Settlement payment? The Settlement payments will be paid approximately 28 days after final Court approval of the Settlement and after all rights to appeal or review are exhausted or any appeal or review has been resolved in favor of the Settlement. The earliest that the Settlement payment could occur is May 1, 2015. Reimbursement to class representatives: Subject to approval and order by the Court, and pursuant to applicable legal standards, there will be a payment to Plaintiff Delita Jacobs up to $20,000.00 (but no more). This payment is to reimburse Plaintiff for any lost pay or time attributable to her time spent assisting in the investigation, responding to informal discovery, attending mediation, and otherwise assisting Class Counsel. Defendants will not oppose this request. Attorneys' Fees and Costs: Subject to approval and order by the Court, and pursuant to applicable legal standards, Class Counsel will seek an award of attorneys’ fees in an amount up to $233,333.00. In addition, Class Counsel will ask to be reimbursed for costs in an amount up to $5,000.00 incurred in prosecuting this action. Class Counsel believes that the amounts for costs and attorneys’ fees requested is fair and reasonable. Defendants will not oppose Class Counsel’s request for these amounts. Claims Administrator: The Court has appointed RG2 Claims Administration, LLC to act as an independent Settlement Administrator to process this Settlement, to resolve any dispute concerning a Settlement Class Member’s eligibility to participate in the Settlement and his or her share of the Settlement proceeds and to make payments to participating Class Members. Subject to approval and order by the Court, the independent Settlement Administrator will be reimbursed for administering this Settlement in an amount estimated to be up to $30,000.00. YOUR LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Court has decided that the following attorneys are qualified to represent you and all other Settlement Class Members: Andrew B. Stoll Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP 475 Atlantic Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11217 [email protected] Tele: (718) 852-3710 These attorneys are called “Class Counsel.” You do not need to hire your own attorney because Class Counsel is working on your behalf. You do have the right to have your own attorney instead, but you would be required then to pay his or her fees. If you have questions or desire additional details, you may call, email or correspond with 2 Estimates of the total potential recovery for each of the categories above, in the event that the case did not settle and plaintiffs were to succeed with certifying a class and proving liability and damages with respect to each claim, can be found at www.ednyclasssettlement.com, and as docket entry 64. Page 4 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 977 Class Counsel. You may also view any of the documents on file with the Court in the litigation online at www.ednyclasssettlement.com. WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS AS A CLASS MEMBER? Excluding Yourself from the Settlement: If you do not wish to be bound by the Settlement and do not wish to receive a Settlement payment, you must complete the request for exclusion form and return it. The request for exclusion form must be signed, dated, and postmarked no later than March 6, 2015 and returned to: MAJOR ENERGY SETTLEMENT c/o RG2 Claims Administration, LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 Tele: (866) 742-4955 Any person who submits a complete and timely request for exclusion form shall, upon receipt, no longer be a Settlement Class Member, shall be barred from participating in any portion of the Settlement, and shall receive no benefits from the Settlement. Any such person may, at their own expense, pursue any claims he or she may have against defendants. Class Counsel would not represent any such person, and any such person would be responsible for his or her own attorneys’ fees. An incomplete or unsigned request for exclusion will be deemed invalid. Objecting to Settlement: You can object to the terms of the Settlement before final approval. However, if the Court rejects your objection, you will still be bound by the terms of the Settlement. To object, you must file a written objection and a notice of intention to appear at the Final Approval hearing currently set for March 25, 2015, at 4:00 PM, with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201, and send copies of your objection to the following: CLASS COUNSEL DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL Andrew B. Stoll Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP 475 Atlantic Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11217 [email protected] Avery S. Mehlman Jonathan Adler Herrick Feinstein, LLP 2 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 [email protected] Kathleen McLeod Caminiti Fisher & Phillips, LLP 430 Mountain Ave., Suite 303 Murray Hill, NJ 07974 [email protected] Any written objection shall state each specific reason in support of your objection and any legal support for each objection. Your objection must also state your full name, address, and the dates of your employment with defendants. To be valid and effective, any objection to approval of the Settlement must be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon each of the above-listed attorneys no later than March 6, 2015. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT. If you choose to hire an attorney to file an objection to the terms of this Settlement, you will be solely responsible for the fees and costs of your own attorney. EFFECT OF PARTICIPATING IN THE SETTLEMENT If the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, the lawsuit will be dismissed with prejudice, and you will fully and finally release and discharge defendants from any and all claims that are asserted in the lawsuit or that arise from or are related to the facts alleged in the lawsuit. When claims are “released,” that means that a person covered by the release cannot sue the released parties for any of the claims that are covered by the Release. The exact terms of the Release and the definition of released claims contained in the settlement agreement are as follows: Page 5 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 978 The settling class and each settling Class Member who has been identified on the class list submitted to the Settlement Administrator, who does not exclude him or herself, and without the need to manually sign a release document, shall in exchange for the consideration recited in this agreement, on behalf of himself or herself and on behalf of his or her current, former, and future heirs, executors, administrators, attorneys, representatives, agents, and assigns, fully release and discharge defendants and their past, present and future partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, servants, registered representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, parents, fiduciaries, trustees, assigns, attorneys, and agents (collectively the “releasees”) from all claims, causes of action, damages, liabilities, debts, penalties, obligations, and demands, whether known or unknown, which were or could have been asserted in the litigation, including, without limitation, all claims related to (a) defendants’ alleged failure to pay field representatives and team leaders all compensation due, including wages, regular or overtime compensation; (b) unlawful deductions; (c) reserve withholding, and/or (d) any other claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law and the New York Labor Law, or and any other state or local labor law, and including any and all claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, interest, and statutory penalties. If you choose to participate in this Settlement, please be advised that if you later initiate a lawsuit against defendants based on any claim that you have released above, and the Court invalidates the release, you must return to defendants all payments that you have received under this Settlement within five (5) days of defendants’ request. Furthermore, if you are a Class Member and do not elect to exclude yourself from the Settlement as provided for in this Notice, you will be deemed to have entered into this Release and to have released the above-described claims. If the Settlement is approved by the Court and becomes final, the Settlement will be consummated. If the Settlement is not approved by the Court or does not become final for some other reason, the litigation will continue. FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201 on March 25, 2015 at 4:00 PM, to determine whether the Settlement should be finally approved as fair, reasonable and adequate. The Court also will be asked to approve Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses. The hearing may be continued without further notice to the Settlement class. It is not necessary for you to appear at this hearing unless you have timely filed an objection with the Court. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The above is a summary of the basic terms of the Settlement. For the precise terms and conditions of the Settlement, you should consult the detailed “Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement and Release Between Plaintiffs and Defendants,” which is on file with the Clerk of the Court and available online at www.ednyclasssettlement.com. The pleadings and other records in the litigation, including that stipulation, may be examined at any time during regular business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201. If you are a current employee of defendants (or a successor, parent, subsidiary or affiliate of defendants), please know that you will not suffer any retaliation should you decide to participate in this Settlement. PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THIS SETTLEMENT OR THE CLAIM PROCESS. ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO CLASS COUNSEL (NOT DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL) OR THE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR HERE LISTED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. Page 6 of 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 979 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DELITA JACOBS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and DESMOND POUNCIE, individually, 12-CV-04842(FB)(SMG) Plaintiffs, vs. MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES LLC/RESPOND POWER LLC; MAJOR ENERGY ELECTRIC SERVICES LLC; DIRECT SALES SOLUTIONS LLC; ASHER FRIED; SAUL HOROWITZ; MARK WIEDERMAN; and SHAI FISHMAN in their individual and professional capacities, Defendants. REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FORM - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ONLY COMPLETE THIS FORM IF YOU WANT TO EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM, AND NOT PARTICIPATE IN, THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION. THE DETAILS OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ARE DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU WITH THIS FORM. IF YOU EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THIS SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNT BEING DISTRIBUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT FILL OUT THIS FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY THE DATE SET FORTH IN THE NOTICE THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU WITH THIS FORM, YOU WILL GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO BRING YOUR OWN CLAIM OR LAWSUIT. I do not wish to receive compensation under the terms of the proposed Settlement or to otherwise participate in the proposed Settlement. Therefore, I hereby exclude myself from the Settlement. __________________________________________________ Signature __________________________ Date __________________________________________________ Print Name __________________________ Social Security Number Address: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Daytime Telephone Number: ________________________ Evening Telephone Number: ________________________ Page 1 of 1 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-5 Filed 04/03/15 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 980 MAJOR ENERGY SETTLEMENT c/o RG2 Claims Administration, LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 PRESORTED FIRST-CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID LANSDALE, PA PERMIT NO. 491 IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENT IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENT EXHIBIT F Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 34 PageID #: 981 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DELITA JACOBS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and DESMOND POUNCIE, individually, 12-CV-04842 (FB)(SMG) Plaintiffs, vs. MAJOR ENERY SERVICES LLC/RESPOND POWER LLC; MAJOR ENERGY ELECTRIC SERVICES LLC; DIRECT SALES SOLUTIONS LLC; ASHER FRIED; SAUL HOROWITZ; MARK WIEDERMAN; and SHAI FISHMAN in their individual and professional capacities, JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE Defendants. This Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement and Release (hereinafter “settlement” or “agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Plaintiff Delita Jacobs, individually and on behalf of the class members, as defined below (collectively, “plaintiffs”), and defendants Major Energy Services LLC, Major Energy Electric Services LLC, Respond Power LLC, Asher Fried, Saul Horowitz, and Mark Wiederman (the “Major Energy Defendants”) and Direct Sales Solutions LLC and Shai Fishman (the “DSS Defendants,” and collectively with the Major Energy Defendants, “defendants”) in settlement of the above-captioned matter (the “litigation”). Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS In addition to the other terms defined in this agreement, the terms below have the following meanings: Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 34 PageID #: 982 1. “Class Counsel” means Andrew B. Stoll, of Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP. 2. “Class Counsel fees and costs payment” means the total amount of attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, and expenses awarded to Class Counsel by the Court to compensate them for their representation of the class in this litigation, including their pre-filing investigation, their filing of the litigation, all related litigation activities, this settlement, and all post-settlement compliance procedures. 3. “Class members” means all individuals who fit within the definitions set forth in subparagraphs (a) through (f) below. The “NY class” means all individuals who fit within any and all of the definitions set forth in subparagraphs (a), (c), and (e) below. The “PA class” means any and all individuals who fit within the definitions set forth in subparagraphs (b), (d), and (f) below. a. The “NY minimum wage/OT class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ New York based offices from September 27, 2006 through the date, if any, the Court approves the preliminary settlement (the “NY class period”); b. The “PA minimum wage/OT class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ Pennsylvania based offices from September 27, 2009 through the date, if any, the Court approves the preliminary settlement (the “PA class period”); c. The “NY reserve class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ New York based offices from September 27, 2006 through February 26, 2012. (the “NY reserve class period”); 2 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 34 PageID #: 983 d. The “PA reserve class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ Pennsylvania based offices from September 27, 2009 through February 26, 2012 (the “PA reserve class period”); e. The “NY deduction class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ New York based offices during the NY class period; f. The “PA deduction class” means all individuals who worked as field representatives and/or team leaders out of defendants’ Pennsylvania based offices during the PA class period; 4. “Class period” refers collectively to paragraphs 3 (a) through (f) above. 5. “Class Representative” refers to named Plaintiff Delita Jacobs. 6. “Class Representative payment” means any judicially approved incentive award made to the Class Representative in her individual capacity for her service as the class representative. 7. “Compensable workweek(s)” means, for each class member, every week in which the class member was engaged to perform work, for any period of time, on behalf of any of the defendants as a field representative and/or team leader during the class period. For purposes of this agreement only, compensable workweeks shall be determined for each class member by reference to the class member’s dates of employment, with each week between the class 3 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 34 PageID #: 984 member’s start and end date 1 to be considered a compensable workweek, excluding gaps 2 in employment. 8. “Court” means the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New 9. “Deductions” mean, for each class member, any amount deducted from his or her York. commissions for any purpose other than taxes and deductions required by law. Such purposes include Major Energy apparel, transportation costs, and lodging and hotel costs. 10. “Reserves” mean, for each class member employed during the NY reserve class period and/or the PA reserve class period, any amount withheld from his or her commissions to account for any possible or actual chargebacks or cancelled orders. 11. “Defendants’ counsel” means Avery S. Mehlman and Jonathan L. Adler, of Herrick Feinstein, LLP, and Kathleen McLeod Caminiti and Brent Cossrow, of Fisher & Phillips, LLP. 12. “Effective date” means the last date by which all of the following have occurred: a. All parties, Class Counsel and defendants’ counsel have executed this agreement; and b. The Court has entered judgment approving the final settlement on this matter and ruled on the motions for awards of Class Representative payments and Class Counsel fees and costs payment; and 1 The “end date” shall mean the last date that the class member performed services or worked for defendants. 2 For purposes of this definition, any extended of period of time, as determined by the Settlement Administrator, when plaintiff performed no services shall be considered a “gap in employment” and shall not be considered. 4 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 34 PageID #: 985 c. The judgment and the rulings on such motions have become final and the Court has dismissed the litigation with prejudice. 13. “Fairness hearing” shall mean the hearing on the motion for judgment and final approval. 14. “Final” means that the settlement has been finally approved by the Court without material modification and either: a. If no one has sought rehearing, reconsideration, or appellate review, thirtyfive (35) days after the Court has entered judgment, or b. If rehearing, reconsideration and appellate review is sought, the day after any and all avenues of rehearing, reconsideration and appellate review have been exhausted and no further rehearing, reconsideration or appellate review is permitted, and the time for seeking such review has expired and the judgment has not been subject to fundamental change (as that term is defined in Paragraph 61 below) as a result of rehearing, reconsideration or appellate review. 15. “Individual settlement payment” means the net payable to any class member pursuant to the terms of this stipulation, before deduction of the class member’s share of any federal, state and local income tax withholding and FICA tax. 16. “Judgment” means the Court’s order approving the final settlement of this matter after the fairness hearing. No judgment shall be entered as to liability or otherwise against any one or more of the defendants. 17. “Maximum settlement amount” means up to $700,000.00, payable by defendants or their designee(s) as provided by this agreement. The maximum settlement amount is inclusive 5 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 34 PageID #: 986 of all payments to participating class members, the Class Counsel fees and expenses payment, the Class Representative payments, the settlement administration fees and all state and federal payroll taxes imposed by applicable law for the wage allocation of the settlement payments made to participating class members under this settlement, including defendants’ share of said taxes and withholding (for example, without limitation, defendants’ share of FICA). In no event shall defendants be required to pay in excess of the maximum settlement amount, inclusive of all amounts set forth in this agreement or that may otherwise be required to consummate the agreement. 18. “Net aggregate settlement amount” means the remainder of the maximum settlement amount after deductions for (i) Class Counsel fees and costs payment; (ii) the Class Representative payment; (iii) the settlement administration fees and costs; and (iv) defendants’ share of all state and federal payroll taxes imposed by applicable law for the wage allocation of the individual settlement payments made to participating class members under this settlement. 19. “Non-participating class member” means a class member who timely submits a request for exclusion form in accordance with Section IV of this agreement. 20. “Participating class member” means a class member who does not submit a timely request for exclusion form, and who otherwise meets all of the conditions in accordance with Section IV of this agreement. 21. “Preliminary approval of the settlement” means the Court’s preliminary approval of the settlement without material change. 22. “Qualified settlement fund” means the account established by the settlement administrator into which defendants will deposit that portion of the maximum settlement amount necessary to pay: (1) the Settlement Administrator’s fees and costs; (2) Court-approved 6 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 7 of 34 PageID #: 987 attorneys’ fees and costs for Class Counsel; (3) the Court-approved Class Representative payment as specified herein; (4) defendants’ share of all state and federal payroll taxes imposed by applicable law for the wage allocation of the individual settlement payments made to participating class members under this settlement and (5) the net aggregate settlement amount. The qualified settlement fund will be controlled by the settlement administrator subject to the terms of this agreement and the Court’s orders for preliminary approval and final approval. 23. “Settlement Administrator” means the third-party administrator appointed by the Court to administer the settlement. RG/2 Claims Administration LLC, by William W. Wickersham, Esq., shall serve as the Settlement Administrator, subject to the Court’s approval. 24. “Settlement administration fees and costs” means any and all fees and costs owed to the Settlement Administrator in connection with administering the class settlement in this action. 25. “Settling class” means all participating class members and non-participating class members who do not request to be excluded from the settlement in accordance with Section IV of this Agreement. 3 II. THE LITIGATION 26. On September 27, 2012, plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, seeking to represent the class members. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged claims on behalf of the class members under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) for failure to pay straight time for all hours worked and an overtime premium rate for any hours over forty, and for unlawful deductions. 3 The settling class includes, without limitation, named Plaintiff Delita Jacobs. 7 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 8 of 34 PageID #: 988 27. Defendants deny any liability or wrongdoing of any kind associated with the claims alleged in the litigation, and further contend that, for any purpose other than settlement, this action is not appropriate for class treatment. Defendants assert, among other things, that they have complied at all times with the FLSA, NYLL and relevant Pennsylvania law, including without limitation, the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”) and the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law (“PWPCL”), including by properly paying field representatives and/or team leaders for all hours worked, and that, as outside sales representatives, plaintiffs and the class members are exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements. Defendants further assert that any deductions were properly made before plaintiffs earned their commissions in accordance with the compensation formulas expressly agreed to by plaintiffs and the class members in their employment agreement with defendants. 28. On February 28, 2013, the parties requested that the case be referred to mediation, and it was by order dated March 5, 2013. After an unsuccessful mediation, on July 22, 2013, defendants filed a letter with the Court requesting a pre-motion conference to address their anticipated motion to dismiss the complaint. An initial conference was held with Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on August 7, 2013. 29. On August 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Defendants again filed a letter motion with the Court requesting a pre-motion conference to address their anticipated motion to dismiss the amended complaint. A pre-motion conference was held before District Judge Frederic Block on October 18, 2013. 30. On December 20, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. In the meantime, the parties continued settlement discussions, which were ultimately successful. 8 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 9 of 34 PageID #: 989 31. As part of this settlement, the parties have stipulated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(2) to the filing of a second amended complaint, in the form attached here as Exhibit A, that includes Pennsylvania state law claims under the PMWA and PWPCL, which have been fully negotiated and settled as part of this settlement agreement. 32. As part of their settlement negotiations and in conjunction with the mediation, the parties engaged in extensive informal discovery, including the exchange of a significant amount of papers, documents and electronically stored information and data. The parties also each engaged in substantial investigation in connection with the litigation. 33. Throughout the mediation and settlement process the parties continued to exchange additional data and engaged in further meetings as necessary to achieve a fair and final settlement of all claims for all class members. 34. The settlement set forth in this agreement represents a compromise and settlement of highly disputed claims. Nothing in this agreement or the settlement is intended, or may be construed, as an admission by defendants that the settling class’s claims in the litigation have any merit, or that defendants bear any liability to the settling class or any other participating or nonparticipating class member with respect to those claims. In fact, defendants maintain that their field representatives and team leaders are exempt employees. 35. Plaintiffs and defendants agree to the certification of a Rule 23 class with respect to both the NY class and the PA class for purposes of this settlement only. If this settlement is not preliminarily approved by the Court for any reason, such agreed certification is void and the parties will litigate this issue, and this document shall not be admissible for any purpose in the litigation. 9 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 10 of 34 PageID #: 990 36. The Court’s final approval with respect to this agreement shall result in a full and complete settlement and release of the claims alleged in the litigation against defendants. The release includes, in its effect, defendants’ partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, servants, registered representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, fiduciaries, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, trustees, successors, assigns, attorneys, and agents, with respect to the settling class. The settlement releases those claims of the settling class that arose during the class period based on the facts that were asserted in the litigation, including all known or unknown claims which could have been asserted in the litigation based on those facts, except as set forth in paragraph 57, below. This release includes, without limitation, all claims related to defendants’ alleged failure to pay field representatives and team leaders wages, including regular or overtime compensation, unlawful deductions, reserve withholdings and/or any other claims arising under the FLSA, NYLL, PMWA or PWPCL based on the class members’ employment by defendants. 37. On or before October 8, 2014, plaintiffs will submit to the Court a motion for an order conditionally certifying the settling class and preliminarily approving the class action settlement, proposed notice of settlement of the class action lawsuit and fairness hearing, and a proposed order preliminarily approving the settlement. Plaintiffs will seek, and defendants will not oppose, conditional certification of the NY and PA classes in accordance with the terms set forth here pursuant to Rule 23 of the Fed. R. Civ. P., solely for purposes of settling this litigation. If the Court denies the motion for conditional certification of the settlement class and preliminary approval of the class action settlement, then the litigation will resume unless the parties jointly agree to seek reconsideration of the ruling or seek Court approval of a renegotiated settlement. If a mutually agreed class settlement is not approved, the case will proceed as if no settlement had 10 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 11 of 34 PageID #: 991 been attempted, and defendants retain the right to contest whether this case should be maintained as a class or collective action and to contest the merits of the claims being asserted by plaintiffs in this litigation. In such a case, the parties will negotiate and submit for court approval a case schedule which shall, among other things, propose deadlines for completion of briefing on defendants’ motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for conditional and class certification. 38. Class Counsel’s firm has investigated the facts of the case. Based on their own independent investigation and evaluation, Class Counsel is of the opinion that the settlement with defendants for the consideration and on the terms set forth in this agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and is in the best interest of the class in light of all known facts and circumstances, including the risk of significant costs and delay, risk of non-certification of the class, defenses asserted by defendants, and numerous potential appellate issues. Although defendants contend that they have no liability in this case, defendants’ counsel shares Class Counsel’s belief that the settlement represents a fair and adequate settlement given the risks associated with the litigation. 39. The parties will work together expeditiously to obtain preliminary and final approval of this agreement, and to dismiss this action with prejudice. III. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT 40. In consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and warranties here set forth, plaintiffs and defendants agree that the claims set forth in the litigation be settled and compromised between the settling class and defendants, subject to the Court’s approval, as set forth below. 41. The settlement embodied in this agreement, including all releases of claims against defendants by the settling class, except as set forth in paragraph 57, below, shall become effective upon the effective date. 11 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 12 of 34 PageID #: 992 42. Financial Terms of Settlement: a. In consideration for the settlement and release of the claims asserted in the litigation, defendants shall pay up to the maximum settlement amount which shall fully resolve and satisfy any and all amounts approved by the Court to be paid to participating class members (including all associated taxes), any Class Counsel fees and costs payment approved by the Court, any Court-approved Class Representative payment, and any settlement administration fees and costs. b. Defendants shall deliver the total qualified settlement fund amount to the Settlement Administrator within 14 business days of the effective date to be deposited into the qualified settlement fund. Under no circumstances shall the amount paid to the Settlement Administrator, plus the amount paid to Class Counsel and any other amounts to be paid by defendants exceed the maximum settlement amount. The Settlement Administrator will pay out of the qualified settlement fund the Class Representative service payment, and the amounts due to the participating class members under this agreement, within 14 business days after receiving the net aggregate settlement amount from defendants. In no event will defendants be required to pay more than the maximum settlement amount, with that amount paid only in the event that all class members participate in the settlement. c. If settlement payments to participating class members are not cashed within 90 days of the check date, the checks will be void. Any participating class member who does not cash their check will still be bound by all terms and conditions of this stipulation of settlement (including the releases contained in Section V) and will still be deemed a participating class member. In the event that the total claims of participating class members and other amounts required to be paid by defendants under the terms of this agreement are less than the 12 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 13 of 34 PageID #: 993 maximum settlement amount, defendants shall have no obligation to pay the difference to any person or entity. Any unclaimed monies remaining in the qualified settlement fund attributable to settlement checks that have not been cashed shall be returned to defendants in accordance with written instruction to the Settlement Administrator signed by authorized representatives of each defendant. d. Class members who do not return a request for exclusion form will be eligible for payment. e. Defendants will not oppose Class Counsel’s application to the Court for an award of a Class Counsel fees and expenses payment. At the fairness hearing, Class Counsel shall petition the Court for no more than 33.3% of the maximum settlement amount as an award of attorneys’ fees. Class Counsel shall also seek reimbursement of reasonable litigation costs and expenses from the maximum settlement amount. Defendants will not oppose such a fee and cost application. Plaintiffs, the settling class, and Class Counsel shall not seek payment of attorneys’ fees or reimbursement of costs or expenses except as set forth here. The award of attorneys’ fees and costs will be deducted from the maximum settlement amount and paid by the Settlement Administrator to Class Counsel within 28 business days of the effective date. The Settlement Administrator will issue an IRS Form 1099 to Class Counsel with respect to the attorneys’ fees and costs awarded to them. f. Plaintiffs will request, and defendants will not oppose, payment of an enhancement award to Plaintiff Delita Jacobs in an amount not to exceed $20,000.00, as reasonable additional compensation for the time and effort expended by her in connection with the initiation and maintenance of the litigation. The Class Representative payment will be deducted from the maximum settlement amount, and is in addition to any payment to which 13 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 14 of 34 PageID #: 994 Plaintiff Delita Jacobs is otherwise entitled as a participating class member. The Class Representative payment will be reported to the taxing authorities by means of an IRS Form 1099. g. For purposes of this agreement, the parties estimate that Settlement Administrator fees shall not exceed $30,000.00. The Settlement Administrator fees will be deducted from the maximum settlement amount. h. The net aggregate settlement fund shall be allocated and distributed to participating class members as follows: i. Each individual settlement payment will be calculated by summing the total amount each participating class member is entitled to from each of the below mentioned categories. The sums allocated to each category (“the net category allocation”), which currently total $700,000.00, will be reduced proportionally to the net aggregate settlement amount. 4 The categories are as follows: 1. Minimum Wage and Overtime: Each participating NY minimum wage/OT class member and PA minimum wage/OT class member will receive a pro rata share of $127,445.00, based on weeks worked within the class period, compared to the total weeks worked by all class members in this category. 2. NY Reserve: Each participating NY reserve class member who was hired prior to the end of the NY reserve class period will receive a pro rata share of $312,800.00, based on that class member’s gross pay within the NY reserve class period, compared 4 Thus the net category allocation can be determined as follows: (gross category allocation / $700,000) x Net aggregate settlement amount (which remains subject to final calculation). 14 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 15 of 34 PageID #: 995 to the total gross pay of the NY reserve class during the NY reserve class period. 3. PA Reserve: Each participating PA reserve class member who was hired prior to the end of the PA reserve class period will receive a pro rata share of $65,700.00, based on the that class member’s gross pay within the PA reserve class period, compared to the total gross pay of the PA reserve class during the PA reserve class period. 4. NY Deduction: Each participating NY deduction class member who worked within the NY class period will receive a pro rata share of $132,000.00, based on weeks worked within the NY class period, compared to total weeks worked by all class members in this category. 5. PA Deduction: Each participating PA deduction class member who worked within the PA class period will receive a pro rata share of $62,055.00, based on weeks worked within the PA class period, compared to total weeks worked by all class members in this category. ii. Irrespective of the formula set forth above, no class member shall receive less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00). In the event that a participating class member’s share, after the combination of the class member’s settlement amounts from all applicable categories, is less than $25.00, he will receive additional compensation to bring his share up 15 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 16 of 34 PageID #: 996 to $25.00 and all other participating class members’ benefit amounts will be reduced on a pro rata basis to account for the minimum threshold amount. iii. Each participating class member’s individual settlement payment will be attributed as 50% back wages and 50% interest. From each participating class member’s individual settlement, deductions for the participating class member’s share of federal, state and local income tax withholding and the participating class member’s share of the FICA tax on the wage portion of the benefit amount will be made. The Settlement Administrator will be responsible for issuing an IRS W-2 form to each participating class member for the wage portion of their benefit amount payable under this agreement and an IRS 1099 Form for the non-wage portion as may be necessary. iv. Any portion of the individual settlement payment treated as back wages shall be reported to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the payee under the payee’s name and social security number on an IRS Form W-2. v. Any portion of the individual settlement payment treated as interest shall be made without withholding and shall be reported to the IRS and the payee, to the extent required by law, under the payee’s name and social security number on an IRS Form 1099. vi. Payments of Class Counsel’s fees and costs shall be made without withholding and reported to the IRS and the payee under the 16 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 17 of 34 PageID #: 997 payee’s name and taxpayer identification number, which each such payee shall provide for this purpose, on an IRS Form 1099. vii. Any Class Representative payment shall be made without withholding and reported to the IRS and the payee under the payee’s name and social security number on an IRS Form 1099. IV. NOTICE AND CLAIMS PROCESS 43. The parties have agreed to the appointment of the Settlement Administrator to administer this settlement and independently review and verify documentation associated with any submitted claims or requests to be excluded and to pay the claims to the participating class members. The Settlement Administrator has been or shall be provided with a class list that includes each class member’s name, address, social security number, dates of employment, and work location. Defendants and the Settlement Administrator shall exchange such information as is necessary for the Settlement Administrator to perform its duties, including making proper tax withholdings and complying with tax reporting obligations. Defendants will provide such information sufficiently in advance to allow the Settlement Administrator to send out settlement checks on schedule and provide appropriate tax reporting. 44. Any disputes concerning administration of the settlement (including those concerning the number of compensable workweeks that a participating class member worked, or gross pay that a participating class member earned) shall be resolved by the Settlement Administrator subject to a reasonable dispute resolution procedure. 45. Within 21 calendar days of the Court entering the order granting preliminary approval, defendants shall provide (to the extent such information has not already been provided) to the Settlement Administrator the information necessary, in electronic form, to calculate the 17 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 18 of 34 PageID #: 998 settlement payment for all class members, which shall include the names, addresses, social security numbers, dates of employment, and work locations of all class members (“the class list”). Defendants agree to provide this information in Excel format, which is acceptable to the Settlement Administrator. A class list with only employee identification numbers or, if no employee identification numbers are available, the last four digits of each class member’s social security number, will be provided to Class Counsel and used solely in connection with overseeing this settlement. Class Counsel shall destroy the class list provided to it either upon or before the effective date of the settlement or upon receiving notice that defendants have revoked this agreement pursuant to paragraphs 60 and 61, below. Class Counsel shall not use the class list for any purpose other than overseeing this settlement. Class Counsel shall not initiate contact, or attempt to initiate contact, with any individual on the class list to encourage, solicit, or convince any class member to participate; provided, however nothing in this agreement shall prohibit Class Counsel from responding to unsolicited inquiries from class members. 46. The Settlement Administrator shall update the class members’ addresses through the National Change of Address Database (“NCOA”) or similar methods to ensure the most complete and accurate mailing reasonably possible, based on updated address information reasonably available and send, by first class mail, a notice of pendency of class action, proposed settlement and hearing date for Court approval (the “class notice”) to each member of the NY class and PA class in the forms here attached as Exhibits “B” and “C”, or as otherwise approved by the Court. The Claims Administrator will use the address information provided by defendants or a more current address from the NCOA or similar methods to ensure that the mailing is sent to the most accurate address reasonably available. 18 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 19 of 34 PageID #: 999 47. The Settlement Administrator will issue checks to the class members entitled to payment. All checks issued to the class members shall contain, on the back of the check, the following limited endorsement: CONSENT TO JOIN AND FINAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS: I understand that I have up to 90 days from the date of this settlement check to sign and cash this settlement check. I understand that I have consented to join in the case entitled Jacobs et al. v. Major Energy LLC/Respond Power LLC, et al., Civil Action No 1:12-cv-04842 (FB) (SMG), now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and agree to be bound by the settlement agreement negotiated by Class Counsel in that case. I agree that this payment represents payment in full for any and all federal Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, and any other state or local labor law, wage and hour and/or overtime or regular time claims I may or might have against Major Energy Services LLC/Respond Power LLC, Major Energy Electric Services LLC, Direct Sales Solutions LLC, and any and all related persons and entities. I irrevocably and unconditionally waive, release, extinguish, acquit, and forever discharge any claim I may or might have for unpaid wages or regular or overtime pay, or any other claim for violations of the federal or state wage and hour laws against Major Energy Services LLC/Respond Power LLC, Major Energy Electric Services LLC, Direct Sales Solutions LLC, and any and all related persons and entities. 48. Any envelopes from the mailings set forth above that are returned with forwarding addresses will be utilized by the Settlement Administrator to locate class members. The Settlement Administrator will take appropriate steps (which may include skip tracing) to ensure that the class notices are sent to all class members. It will be conclusively presumed that if an envelope has not been returned within thirty (30) days of the mailing, the class member received the class notice. 19 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 20 of 34 PageID #: 1000 49. Any class member may request exclusion from the class by “opting out.” The NY class notice and the PA class notice will provide that any class members who wish to exclude themselves (“opt out”) from the settlement must mail to the Settlement Administrator, not later than 45 days after the date that the Settlement Administrator first mails the class notice, a signed request to be excluded from the settlement (“request for exclusion”) in the form attached here as Exhibit “D” and approved by the Court. A request for exclusion must be completed in full, signed, postmarked and sent to the Settlement Administrator within 45 days from its initial mailing by the Settlement Administrator, as specified in the class notice, or it will not be honored. A class member who does not complete and mail a timely request for exclusion in the manner and by the deadline specified above will, if the Court approves the settlement, be bound by all terms and conditions of the settlement, including the release set forth herein, and be deemed a participating class member. An eligible class member who timely submits a request for exclusion will not participate in or be bound by this settlement or the judgment in any respect. Class members who submit a request for exclusion will not be permitted to file objections to the settlement or appear at the final approval hearing to voice any objections to the settlement. 50. The class notice will also provide that class members who wish to object to the settlement must file with the Court and serve on counsel for the parties, not later than 45 days after the date that the Settlement Administrator first mails the class notice, a written statement objecting to the settlement and setting forth the grounds for the objection. Any written objections shall state each specific objection and any legal support for each objection. The objection must also state the class member’s full name, address, and the dates of his or her employment with defendants. The statement also will indicate whether the class member intends 20 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 21 of 34 PageID #: 1001 to appear and object to the settlement at the final approval hearing; the failure to so indicate will constitute a waiver of the right to appear at the hearing. A class member who does not file and serve an objection in the manner and by the deadline specified above will be deemed to have waived all objections and will be foreclosed from making any objections to the settlement, whether by appeal or otherwise. All written objections shall be filed with the Court, with copies sent to the following: To Class Counsel: Andrew B. Stoll Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP 475 Atlantic Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11217 To Defendants’ Counsel: Avery S. Mehlman Jonathan L. Adler Herrick Feinstein, LLP 2 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 Kathleen McLeod Caminiti Fisher & Phillips, LLP 430 Mountain Ave., Suite 303 Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Brent Cossrow Fisher & Phillips 150 North Radnor Chester Road , Suite C300 Radnor, PA 19087 51. The Settlement Administrator will certify in writing the following to Class Counsel and defendants’ counsel within seven days after the deadline to submit a request for exclusion form: 21 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 22 of 34 PageID #: 1002 a. the names of each class member who timely requested to be excluded from the settlement; and b. the names of each class member who did not timely submit a request for exclusion. 52. Class Counsel and defendants’ counsel shall thereafter be entitled to file and serve a response to any such objection[s] no later than five days before the hearing for final approval of the settlement. 53. If the Court rejects a class member’s objection, the class member will still be bound by the terms of this agreement. Class members who submit requests for exclusion shall not have standing to object to the settlement. 54. Neither the parties nor their respective counsel will solicit or otherwise encourage any class member, directly or indirectly, to request exclusion from the settlement, object to the settlement, or appeal. V. RELEASE OF CLAIMS BY THE CLASS 55. Upon the entry of an order granting final approval by the Court of this agreement, except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this agreement, the settling class and each settling class member who has been identified on the class list submitted to the Settlement Administrator, who does not exclude him or herself, and without the need to manually sign a release document, shall in exchange for the consideration recited in this agreement, on behalf of himself or herself and on behalf of his or her current, former, and future heirs, executors, administrators, attorneys, representatives, agents, and assigns, fully release and discharge defendants and their past, present and future partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, servants, registered representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, 22 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 23 of 34 PageID #: 1003 affiliates, parents, fiduciaries, trustees, assigns, attorneys, and agents (collectively the “releasees”) from all claims, causes of action, damages, liabilities, debts, penalties, obligations, and demands, whether known or unknown, which were or could have been asserted in the litigation, including, without limitation, all claims related to (a) defendants’ alleged failure to pay field representatives and team leaders all compensation due, including wages, regular or overtime compensation; (b) unlawful deductions; (c) reserve withholding, and/or (d) any other claims arising under the FLSA, NYLL, PMWA, PWPCL, or and any other state or local labor law, and including any and all claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, interest, and statutory penalties. 56. In addition to the release as set forth in paragraph 55 above, with the exception of paragraph 57 below, Named Plaintiff Delita Jacobs hereby settles with, compromises, releases, remits, acquits, discharges and reaches accord and satisfaction upon any and all claims, demands, causes of action, remedies, obligations, damages, and liabilities which she had or now has, whether known or unknown, against defendants and their past, present and future partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, servants, registered representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, parents, fiduciaries, trustees, assigns, attorneys, and agents, in addition to those claims already being released by her as part of the class action stipulation and agreement. This release specifically includes, but is not limited to, any claims for wages, back pay, front pay, bonuses, commissions, liquidated damages, penalties or punitive damages arising out of her employment by defendants or the separation of her employment, as well as any and all claims she may have had, or claims to have as a member or representative of any class, including, but not limited to claims under the FLSA, NYLL, PMWA, and PWPCL, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the 23 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 24 of 34 PageID #: 1004 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the Family and Medical Leave Act, New York State and City Human Rights Laws, Federal and New York State Prevailing Wage Laws, the Immigration Reform and Control Act, and any other similar federal, state or local antidiscrimination or employment laws. 57. Irrespective of any other terms or releases specified in this agreement, Named Plaintiff Delita Jacobs, by signing this agreement and the terms sheet associated with this agreement, and/or otherwise participating as a settling class member, does not release those claims asserted by her against defendants in the matter captioned Delita Jacobs v. Major Energy, et al., Index No. 19518/2012, filed in New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, Civil Term. VI. ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF THE PARTIES 58. Promptly upon execution of this stipulation of settlement, the parties shall apply to the Court for the entry of a preliminary order accomplishing the following: a. Preliminarily approving this settlement as to form and content; b. Preliminarily certifying the class for purposes of settlement; c. Approving as to form and content the proposed NY and PA class notices; d. Directing the mailing of the class notices by first class mail to the class e. Scheduling a hearing to determine whether this settlement should be members; and finally approved as fair, reasonable and adequate as to the members of the class, and approving attorneys’ fees and costs. 59. At or immediately after final approval by the Court of the settlement provided for in this agreement, the parties will submit a proposed final order: 24 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 25 of 34 PageID #: 1005 a. Approving the settlement, adjudging the terms to be fair, reasonable and adequate, and directing consummation of its terms and provisions; b. Approving the Class Counsel fees and costs payment and the Class Representative payment, in the manner set forth in this agreement; and c. Dismissing this action on the merits and with prejudice and permanently barring all members of the settling class from prosecuting against the releasees any individual or class claims released by the members of the settling class, except as set forth in Paragraph 57 above, through the date of preliminary approval, upon satisfaction of all payments and obligations hereunder. VII. VOIDING THE AGREEMENT 60. If a combined 40% or more of the eligible class members submit valid requests for exclusion, defendants shall have the option, in their sole discretion, of cancelling the settlement within 15 business days after their receipt of the report referenced in Paragraph 51, above. 61. A failure of the Court to approve any material condition of this agreement, that effects a fundamental change of the parties’ settlement, shall render the entire agreement voidable and unenforceable as to all parties herein at the option of any party. A fundamental change to the settlement includes, but is not limited to, a decision by the Court to strike any of the claims listed in Section V from the settlement or its release or to modify or alter the terms of payment of the settlement funds, with the exception of attorneys’ fees or service payments. Also, if the Court denies final approval of the settlement, then this settlement shall become null and void. If the settlement is voided through any of these mechanisms, the parties will have no further obligations under the settlement, including any obligation by defendants to pay the 25 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 26 of 34 PageID #: 1006 maximum settlement amount or the net aggregate settlement amount, or any amounts that otherwise would have been owed under this settlement. Each party may exercise this option to void the settlement by giving notice, in writing, to the other party and to the Court at any time prior to the effective date of the settlement. VIII. MEDIA CONTACT AND CONFIDENTIALITY 62. This agreement shall be filed with the Court and, except as otherwise here provided, up until this agreement is filed and approved, in order to avoid unnecessary confusion and/or the dissemination of inaccurate information, plaintiffs, defendants, Class Representative and Class Counsel shall keep strictly confidential the terms of this agreement, shall not disclose, make known, discuss or relay orally, or in writing, electronically or otherwise, the existence or terms of this agreement, any information concerning this agreement, any of the discussions leading up to this agreement, the facts and allegations underlying the claims in the Complaint, and/or defendants’ defenses to such claims. The parties recognize and acknowledge that this agreement was carefully negotiated, and plaintiffs and Class Counsel agree to limit disclosure of the settlement terms to this agreement itself and the pleadings on the Court docket in order to avoid unnecessary confusion and/or the dissemination of inaccurate information. 63. Any communication about the settlement to class members prior to the Court- approved mailing will be limited to a statement that a settlement has been reached and the details will be communicated in a forthcoming Court-approved notice. Neither the parties nor their counsel shall issue any press releases or media releases, utilize any social media, or have any communications with the press or media, regarding the settlement at any time. 64. The parties agree and Class Counsel agrees that there will be no advertising, promotional efforts or materials regarding the litigation or the settlement. Class Counsel agrees 26 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 27 of 34 PageID #: 1007 that they will not directly or indirectly issue any press release, hold any press conference, make any posting on any website, instant messaging site, blog, or social networking site, initiate or respond to any contact with any members of the news media, including, but not limited to, any radio or television stations, newspapers, or magazines regarding the litigation, the settlement between the parties, this agreement, or the negotiations of this agreement. If plaintiffs, defendants, participating class members or their counsel are asked about the details of the settlement, they may state only that “the matter has been resolved” and refer to the pleadings on file with the Court. IX. PARTIES’ AUTHORITY AND AGREEMENT OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE 65. The parties and their respective signatories represent and warrant that they have the capacity and full authority to enter into this agreement and to bind the parties to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. 66. The Class Representative agrees to sign this agreement and by signing this agreement is bound by the terms herein stated, and further agrees not to request to be excluded as a class member and agrees not to object to or appeal any of the terms of this agreement. Noncompliance by the Class Representative with this paragraph shall be void and of no force or effect. Any such request for exclusion or objection shall therefore be void and of no force or effect. X. MUTUAL FULL COOPERATION 67. The parties agree to fully cooperate with each other to accomplish the terms of this agreement, including execution of such documents and such other action as may reasonably be necessary to implement the terms of this agreement. The parties to this agreement shall use their best efforts, including all efforts contemplated by this agreement and any other efforts that 27 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 28 of 34 PageID #: 1008 may become necessary by order of the Court, or otherwise, to effectuate this agreement and the terms set forth here. As soon as practicable after execution of this agreement, Class Counsel shall, with the assistance and cooperation of defendants and defendants’ counsel, take all reasonable and necessary steps to secure the Court’s final approval of this agreement. 68. The outcome of any proceeding related to Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and costs shall not terminate this agreement, extinguish any party’s obligations under this agreement, or otherwise affect the Court’s ruling on the motion for judgment and final approval. XI. NO PRIOR ASSIGNMENTS 69. The parties represent, covenant, and warrant that they have not directly or indirectly, assigned, transferred, encumbered, or purported to assign, transfer, or encumber to any person or entity any portion of any liability, claim, demand, action, cause of action or rights herein released and discharged. XII. NO ADMISSION 70. Nothing contained in this agreement, nor the consummation of this agreement, is to be construed or deemed an admission of liability, culpability, negligence, or wrongdoing on the part of defendants. Each of the parties has entered into this agreement with the intention to avoid further disputes and litigation with the attendant inconvenience and expenses. This agreement is a settlement document and shall be inadmissible in evidence in any proceeding except in an action or proceeding to approve, interpret, or enforce this agreement. 71. For settlement purposes only, the parties will stipulate that a class may be certified, as described in this settlement. The parties agree that certification for settlement purposes under the lenient standard applied to settlements is in no way an admission that class 28 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 29 of 34 PageID #: 1009 certification is proper under the more stringent standard applied for litigation purposes, and that evidence of this limited stipulation for settlement purposes only will not be deemed admissible in this or any other proceeding. XIII. NOTICES 72. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all notices, demands or other communications given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given as of the third business day after mailing by first class United States mail, return receipt requested, addressed: To Class Counsel: Andrew B. Stoll Stoll, Glickman & Bellina, LLP 475 Atlantic Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11217 To Defendants’ Counsel: Avery S. Mehlman Jonathan L. Adler Herrick Feinstein, LLP 2 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 Kathleen McLeod Caminiti Fisher & Phillips, LLP 430 Mountain Ave., Suite 303 Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Brent Cossrow Fisher & Phillips 150 North Radnor Chester Road, Suite C300 Radnor, PA 19087 XIV. CONSTRUCTION 29 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 30 of 34 PageID #: 1010 73. The parties agree that the terms and conditions of this agreement are the result of lengthy, intensive arms-length negotiations between the parties and their counsel. The parties have jointly participated in the drafting and approval of this agreement, which shall not be construed in favor of or against any party by reason of the extent to which any party or his, her or its counsel participated in the drafting of this agreement. XV. CAPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS 74. Section and paragraph titles or captions contained in this agreement are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference, and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope of this agreement or any of its provisions. Each term of this agreement is contractual and not merely a recital. XVI. MODIFICATION 75. This agreement may not be changed, altered, or modified, except in writing and signed by the parties, and approved by the Court. This agreement may not be discharged except by performance in accordance with its terms or by a writing signed by all of the parties. XVII. MERGER AND INTEGRATION 76. This stipulation of settlement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the settlement and transaction contemplated here, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, whether oral or written and whether by a party or such party’s legal counsel, are merged here. No rights here may be waived except in writing. XVIII. BINDING ON ASSIGNS 77. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, trustees, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 30 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 31 of 34 PageID #: 1011 XIX. CLASS COUNSEL SIGNATORIES 78. It is agreed that because the members of the class are so numerous, it is impossible or impractical to have each member of the class execute this agreement. The NY and PA Class notices will advise all class members of the binding nature of the release and such shall have the same force and effect as if this agreement were executed by each member of the class. XX. CONTINUING JURISDICTION 79. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the interpretation and implementation of this agreement as well as any and all matters arising out of, or related to, the interpretation or implementation of this agreement and of the settlement it contemplates. XXI. COUNTERPARTS 80. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, and when each party has signed and delivered at least one such counterpart, each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and, when taken together with other signed counterparts, shall constitute one agreement, which shall be binding upon and effective as to all parties. 81. Any party may execute this agreement by causing its counsel to sign on the designated signature block below and transmitting that signature page via facsimile or email to counsel for the other party. Any signature made and transmitted by facsimile or email for the purpose of executing this agreement shall be deemed an original signature for purposes of this agreement and shall be binding upon the party whose counsel transmits the signature page by facsimile or email. XXII. INDEMNIFICATION 82. In signing this agreement, Class Counsel Andrew B. Stoll represents that he has full authority to represent the Class Representative and named plaintiffs, and that Stoll, 31 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 32 of 34 PageID #: 1012 Glickman & Bellina, LLP was retained by, and has represented plaintiffs since August 13, 2012. Class Counsel agrees to indemnify defendants in the unlikely event of any claims for attorneys’ fees made by Christopher Q. Davis or any attorneys currently employed by him. XXIII. CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE 81. Upon signing of this agreement, the parties and their counsel agree to sign and submit to the Court a form consenting to a United States magistrate’s authority to conduct all proceedings relating to settlement and administration of the settlement of this matter. In the event that this agreement is not approved, is voided or the settlement does not become effective, defendants reserve the right to revoke their consent. DATED: October ___, 2014 Andrew B. Stoll Attorney for Delita Jacobs, and Proposed Class Counsel DATED: October ___, 2014 ____________________________________ Kathleen McLeod Caminiti, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Fisher & Phillips LLP 430 Mountain Avenue, Suite 303 Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 Attorney for Direct Sales Solutions Defendants DATED: October ___, 2014 Avery S. Mehlman, Esq. Jonathan L. Adler, Esq. Herrick, Feinstein LLP 2 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016 Attorneys for Major Energy Defendants 32 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 33 of 34 PageID #: 1013 DATED: October ___, 2014 _______________________________________ Delita Jacobs, Class Representative MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES LLC/RESPOND POWER LLC DATED: October ___, 2014 Name: Title: MAJOR ENERGY ELECTRIC SERVICES LLC DATED: October ___, 2014 Name: Title: DIRECT SALES SOLUTIONS LLC DATED: October___, 2014 Name: Title: DATED: October ___, 2014 SAUL HOROWITZ DATED: October ___, 2014 ASHER FRIED DATED: October ___, 2014 MARK WIEDERMAN 33 Case 1:12-cv-04842-SMG Document 77-6 Filed 04/03/15 Page 34 of 34 PageID #: 1014 DATED: October ___, 2014 SHAI FISHMAN 34